Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Tight-Knit Microbes Live Together to Make a Vital Nutrient

News Feed
Wednesday, July 17, 2024

microbiologyTight-Knit Microbes Live Together to Make a Vital NutrientBy Dan SamorodnitskyJuly 17, 2024At sea, biologists discovered microbial partners that together produce nitrogen, a nutrient essential for life. The pair are in the process of merging into a single organism.Across the world’s oceans, a pair of symbiotic microbes — bacteria that live inside the phytoplankton known as diatoms — do the essential work of making nitrogen available for life. Remarkably, the bacteria are related to those that “fix” most nitrogen on land. Samuel Velasco/Quanta Magazine IntroductionNitrogen is fundamental to all life on Earth. Organisms use it to make amino acids and nucleic acids — the building blocks of proteins and DNA — among other vital molecules. Luckily, four-fifths of the atmosphere is nitrogen. Unluckily, in gaseous form it is inert and biologically unavailable: Every nitrogen atom is locked to another with a triple bond, which takes an extraordinary amount of energy to break. Without intervention, cells on land or sea cannot access this atmospheric source. “We breathe it in, and we breathe it out, but we can’t do anything with it,” said Bernhard Tschitschko, a microbiologist at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology. “In life on Earth, nitrogen is one of the elements that controls growth.” How, then, do organisms access this indispensable element? They rely on a select few bacteria with a special talent: the ability to convert nitrogen gas (N2) into ammonia (NH3), a process known as fixation, which makes the element available to life. All bacterial species that can break the triple bond of nitrogen gas do it using the same protein: nitrogenase. Every time a molecule of N2 is naturally converted into NH3, anywhere on Earth, it’s because of nitrogenase. The protein’s importance is reflected in how ancient it is: Nitrogenase emerged about 3.2 billion years ago in what researchers have called “one of the most consequential biogeochemical innovations over life’s history.” For many decades, scientists were aware of only one genus, the filament-shaped cyanobacteria Trichodesmium, that seemed to be responsible for essentially all nitrogen fixed in the ocean. Then, in the 1990s and 2000s, new and inexpensive technologies let researchers scoop up a bucket of seawater and sequence the DNA of all critters living there. To their surprise, the scientists began discovering nitrogenase genes in the ocean that could not have come from Trichodesmium or any other cyanobacterium. Another organism, or more likely many, many organisms, were fixing nitrogen too. “There are probably hundreds of different non-cyanobacterial nitrogenase genes in the ocean metagenome,” said Jonathan Zehr, an environmental microbiologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz. But researchers couldn’t pin down the organisms that harbored these alien nitrogenases. They shrugged and gave the non-Trichodesmium bacteria the umbrella name “Gamma A” until future researchers could identify them. The microbiologist Bernhard Tschitschko was part of a team of researchers searching for the ocean’s missing nitrogen producers. They discovered a pair of microbes that work together to create the vital nutrient. Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology Introduction“We didn’t know anything about these organisms, who they are or whether they even fix nitrogen,” Tschitschko said. “All that was known about them was the nitrogenase sequence — nothing else.” In a recent paper in Nature, Tschitschko and colleagues reported their discovery of two of these Gamma A organisms — closely related bacteria that live throughout the world’s oceans and supply the food web with nitrogen where Trichodesmium doesn’t. The bacteria don’t work alone: They are lodged firmly inside diatoms, an abundant microscopic phytoplankton, with which they trade nitrogen for housing and energy. The symbiotic relationship — a mutually beneficial collaboration between two independent organisms — is so tight that the bacterium may be on its way to becoming a permanent part of the diatom’s body as a new cellular organelle, according to a DNA analysis. The partners’ lives at sea may feel distant from ours, but we have something in common. Most nitrogen on land is fixed by rhizobia bacteria, which live symbiotically in nodules on the roots of legume plants. The Gamma A gene for nitrogenase is related to that found in rhizobia, suggesting an ancient genetic relationship between the two symbiotic partnerships that enable life on land and at sea. Marine Detectives Tschitschko had been working in his new lab at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology for only a few months when he set off on an expedition to discover Gamma A. He knew it wouldn’t be easy. In any given bucket of water, there might be millions or billions of microbial cells, and only a hundred might fix nitrogen. Fishing with a bucket was almost exactly what Tschitschko and his team did: They dropped a CTD rosette — an array of large bottles, open but sealable at both ends — into the ocean to capture water at various depths. Later, in tanks hanging over the side of their ships, they mixed each sample with a lightly radioactive isotope of nitrogen. Any cells that had become radioactive within 24 hours must be able to fix nitrogen and incorporate it into their own proteins and DNA. The researchers sampled microbial life in the western tropical North Atlantic using a CTD rosette — essentially a high-tech bucket — which samples water while taking measurements at various ocean depths. Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbioloby IntroductionIn the radioactive bacteria, Tschitschko and his colleagues detected the Gamma A version of the nitrogenase gene. They were on its trail. However, the gene was located in an exotic genomic environment. When they sequenced the DNA of the Gamma A bacterium, most of its genome was typical of a globally distributed class of bacteria called Alphaproteobacteria. Its nitrogenase gene, however, was taxonomically related to the land-based rhizobia. If Gamma A’s genome is a chess set, its nitrogenase gene is a checkers piece thrown in the box: It has to have come from somewhere else. This was odd enough, but the researchers still had not laid eyes on the organism in question, only its genome. Using genetic techniques, they tracked the rhizobia DNA to a marine diatom — one of the ubiquitous, photosynthetic microscopic algae of the sea — of the genus Haslea. Inside each diatom were four to eight bacterial cells. The cells turned out to be two bacterial species, which the researchers named Tectiglobus diatomicola and Tectiglobus profundi. Haslea diatoms photosynthesize to create energy; then they hand over some of this energy to Tectiglobus, which supplies the diatom with nitrogen. This mirrors the relationship between rhizobia and legumes on land, in which bacteria offer nitrogen to the plant in exchange for carbohydrates. Somehow, this nitrogenase gene found its way into two bacterial groups — and both went on to form symbiotic relationships, with very different host organisms, crucial for providing nitrogen to food webs. To unpack these twisted histories, the researchers reconstructed evolutionary trees for the rhizobia and Tectiglobus bacteria. The results suggested that both groups acquired the ancient nitrogenase gene from other bacteria through horizontal gene transfer at different points in their evolutionary histories. The authors also speculated that Tectiglobus evolved its symbiotic relationship independently and earlier than its more widely known cousin onshore. Tectiglobus is doing important biochemical work in the ocean. The researchers estimated that Tectiglobus is fixing nitrogen at slightly less than half the rate of Trichodesmium, the cyanobacteria previously thought to dominate oceanic nitrogen fixation. And the Tectiglobus-diatom partners are found in oceans throughout the world. The relationship appears to represent a significant chunk of nitrogen fixation on Earth. The Symbiotic Spectrum It makes sense that a diatom would want to carry an in-house nitrogen source: The ocean is a desert. Nutrients are scarce, and most microbes are in a perpetual state of near-starvation. A photosynthesizing diatom with its own unlimited source of energy, but with a need for nitrogen, offered Tectiglobus a safe and beneficial arrangement. “This is the way this one isolated, lonely little diatom can meet its own needs,” said Angelicque White, an oceanographer at the University of Hawaiʻi who wasn’t involved in the work. “These unusual associations break down our simplified description of how ecosystems work. They’re far from land. They’re far from the sources of nutrients. And so these organisms have to adapt in some way.” But what is the arrangement exactly? It has a whiff of an enduring symbiotic relationship, but it’s also possible that Tschitschko caught the bacteria in the middle of a transition to full-fledged organelle, in which case they would cease to be an independent organism. This is the same scenario that produced mitochondria and chloroplasts: Both organelles were formerly free-living bacteria that became symbionts of larger cells and eventually moved in permanently. The two Tectiglobus species, like mitochondria and chloroplasts, have a rather small genome, suggesting that they have been jettisoning genes they no longer need because the diatom host provides for them. When Tschitschko observed the host and symbiont dividing to reproduce, their divisions occurred together. Both of these qualities — a diminished genome and paired reproduction — point to a long-lasting and stable symbiosis. Whether Tectiglobus is definitely on its way to losing even more of its genome and becoming an organelle requires more research. “Undoubtedly there’s a spectrum of symbioses, from loose symbioses to an organelle, and these organisms can be placed along that spectrum,” said Zehr, who was not involved in the new research. In 2024, his lab reported a nitrogen-providing cyanobacterium that had become an organelle within an algal cell. Clearly, this is a recurring theme in the world of nitrogen fixation. After all, if you had the chance to manufacture your own vital nutrient by taking on a pet, how could you resist?

At sea, biologists discovered microbial partners that together produce nitrogen, a nutrient essential for life. The pair are in the process of merging into a single organism. The post Tight-Knit Microbes Live Together to Make a Vital Nutrient first appeared on Quanta Magazine

Tight-Knit Microbes Live Together to Make a Vital Nutrient

July 17, 2024

At sea, biologists discovered microbial partners that together produce nitrogen, a nutrient essential for life. The pair are in the process of merging into a single organism.
An illustration shows green gears, representing the nitrogen-fixing bacteria, living inside a diatom. Nitrogen gas enters the diatom from the left; ammonia exits on the right.

Across the world’s oceans, a pair of symbiotic microbes — bacteria that live inside the phytoplankton known as diatoms — do the essential work of making nitrogen available for life. Remarkably, the bacteria are related to those that “fix” most nitrogen on land.

Samuel Velasco/Quanta Magazine

Introduction

Nitrogen is fundamental to all life on Earth. Organisms use it to make amino acids and nucleic acids — the building blocks of proteins and DNA — among other vital molecules. Luckily, four-fifths of the atmosphere is nitrogen. Unluckily, in gaseous form it is inert and biologically unavailable: Every nitrogen atom is locked to another with a triple bond, which takes an extraordinary amount of energy to break. Without intervention, cells on land or sea cannot access this atmospheric source.

“We breathe it in, and we breathe it out, but we can’t do anything with it,” said Bernhard Tschitschko, a microbiologist at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology. “In life on Earth, nitrogen is one of the elements that controls growth.”

How, then, do organisms access this indispensable element? They rely on a select few bacteria with a special talent: the ability to convert nitrogen gas (N2) into ammonia (NH3), a process known as fixation, which makes the element available to life. All bacterial species that can break the triple bond of nitrogen gas do it using the same protein: nitrogenase. Every time a molecule of N2 is naturally converted into NH3, anywhere on Earth, it’s because of nitrogenase. The protein’s importance is reflected in how ancient it is: Nitrogenase emerged about 3.2 billion years ago in what researchers have called “one of the most consequential biogeochemical innovations over life’s history.”

For many decades, scientists were aware of only one genus, the filament-shaped cyanobacteria Trichodesmium, that seemed to be responsible for essentially all nitrogen fixed in the ocean. Then, in the 1990s and 2000s, new and inexpensive technologies let researchers scoop up a bucket of seawater and sequence the DNA of all critters living there. To their surprise, the scientists began discovering nitrogenase genes in the ocean that could not have come from Trichodesmium or any other cyanobacterium. Another organism, or more likely many, many organisms, were fixing nitrogen too.

“There are probably hundreds of different non-cyanobacterial nitrogenase genes in the ocean metagenome,” said Jonathan Zehr, an environmental microbiologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz. But researchers couldn’t pin down the organisms that harbored these alien nitrogenases. They shrugged and gave the non-Trichodesmium bacteria the umbrella name “Gamma A” until future researchers could identify them.

Portrait of Bernhard Tschitschko.

The microbiologist Bernhard Tschitschko was part of a team of researchers searching for the ocean’s missing nitrogen producers. They discovered a pair of microbes that work together to create the vital nutrient.

Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology

Introduction

“We didn’t know anything about these organisms, who they are or whether they even fix nitrogen,” Tschitschko said. “All that was known about them was the nitrogenase sequence — nothing else.”

In a recent paper in Nature, Tschitschko and colleagues reported their discovery of two of these Gamma A organisms — closely related bacteria that live throughout the world’s oceans and supply the food web with nitrogen where Trichodesmium doesn’t. The bacteria don’t work alone: They are lodged firmly inside diatoms, an abundant microscopic phytoplankton, with which they trade nitrogen for housing and energy. The symbiotic relationship — a mutually beneficial collaboration between two independent organisms — is so tight that the bacterium may be on its way to becoming a permanent part of the diatom’s body as a new cellular organelle, according to a DNA analysis.

The partners’ lives at sea may feel distant from ours, but we have something in common. Most nitrogen on land is fixed by rhizobia bacteria, which live symbiotically in nodules on the roots of legume plants. The Gamma A gene for nitrogenase is related to that found in rhizobia, suggesting an ancient genetic relationship between the two symbiotic partnerships that enable life on land and at sea.

Marine Detectives

Tschitschko had been working in his new lab at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology for only a few months when he set off on an expedition to discover Gamma A. He knew it wouldn’t be easy. In any given bucket of water, there might be millions or billions of microbial cells, and only a hundred might fix nitrogen.

Fishing with a bucket was almost exactly what Tschitschko and his team did: They dropped a CTD rosette — an array of large bottles, open but sealable at both ends — into the ocean to capture water at various depths. Later, in tanks hanging over the side of their ships, they mixed each sample with a lightly radioactive isotope of nitrogen. Any cells that had become radioactive within 24 hours must be able to fix nitrogen and incorporate it into their own proteins and DNA.

A CTD rosette hangs off the side of a ship. It consists of a bundle of individual bottles that can be individually sealed and unsealed.

The researchers sampled microbial life in the western tropical North Atlantic using a CTD rosette — essentially a high-tech bucket — which samples water while taking measurements at various ocean depths.

Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbioloby

Introduction

In the radioactive bacteria, Tschitschko and his colleagues detected the Gamma A version of the nitrogenase gene. They were on its trail. However, the gene was located in an exotic genomic environment. When they sequenced the DNA of the Gamma A bacterium, most of its genome was typical of a globally distributed class of bacteria called Alphaproteobacteria. Its nitrogenase gene, however, was taxonomically related to the land-based rhizobia.

If Gamma A’s genome is a chess set, its nitrogenase gene is a checkers piece thrown in the box: It has to have come from somewhere else.

This was odd enough, but the researchers still had not laid eyes on the organism in question, only its genome. Using genetic techniques, they tracked the rhizobia DNA to a marine diatom — one of the ubiquitous, photosynthetic microscopic algae of the sea — of the genus Haslea. Inside each diatom were four to eight bacterial cells. The cells turned out to be two bacterial species, which the researchers named Tectiglobus diatomicola and Tectiglobus profundi.

Haslea diatoms photosynthesize to create energy; then they hand over some of this energy to Tectiglobus, which supplies the diatom with nitrogen.

This mirrors the relationship between rhizobia and legumes on land, in which bacteria offer nitrogen to the plant in exchange for carbohydrates. Somehow, this nitrogenase gene found its way into two bacterial groups — and both went on to form symbiotic relationships, with very different host organisms, crucial for providing nitrogen to food webs.

To unpack these twisted histories, the researchers reconstructed evolutionary trees for the rhizobia and Tectiglobus bacteria. The results suggested that both groups acquired the ancient nitrogenase gene from other bacteria through horizontal gene transfer at different points in their evolutionary histories. The authors also speculated that Tectiglobus evolved its symbiotic relationship independently and earlier than its more widely known cousin onshore.

Tectiglobus is doing important biochemical work in the ocean. The researchers estimated that Tectiglobus is fixing nitrogen at slightly less than half the rate of Trichodesmium, the cyanobacteria previously thought to dominate oceanic nitrogen fixation. And the Tectiglobus-diatom partners are found in oceans throughout the world. The relationship appears to represent a significant chunk of nitrogen fixation on Earth.

The Symbiotic Spectrum

It makes sense that a diatom would want to carry an in-house nitrogen source: The ocean is a desert. Nutrients are scarce, and most microbes are in a perpetual state of near-starvation. A photosynthesizing diatom with its own unlimited source of energy, but with a need for nitrogen, offered Tectiglobus a safe and beneficial arrangement.

“This is the way this one isolated, lonely little diatom can meet its own needs,” said Angelicque White, an oceanographer at the University of Hawaiʻi who wasn’t involved in the work. “These unusual associations break down our simplified description of how ecosystems work. They’re far from land. They’re far from the sources of nutrients. And so these organisms have to adapt in some way.”

But what is the arrangement exactly? It has a whiff of an enduring symbiotic relationship, but it’s also possible that Tschitschko caught the bacteria in the middle of a transition to full-fledged organelle, in which case they would cease to be an independent organism.

This is the same scenario that produced mitochondria and chloroplasts: Both organelles were formerly free-living bacteria that became symbionts of larger cells and eventually moved in permanently. The two Tectiglobus species, like mitochondria and chloroplasts, have a rather small genome, suggesting that they have been jettisoning genes they no longer need because the diatom host provides for them. When Tschitschko observed the host and symbiont dividing to reproduce, their divisions occurred together.

Both of these qualities — a diminished genome and paired reproduction — point to a long-lasting and stable symbiosis. Whether Tectiglobus is definitely on its way to losing even more of its genome and becoming an organelle requires more research.

“Undoubtedly there’s a spectrum of symbioses, from loose symbioses to an organelle, and these organisms can be placed along that spectrum,” said Zehr, who was not involved in the new research. In 2024, his lab reported a nitrogen-providing cyanobacterium that had become an organelle within an algal cell. Clearly, this is a recurring theme in the world of nitrogen fixation. After all, if you had the chance to manufacture your own vital nutrient by taking on a pet, how could you resist?

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

California governor under pressure over bill to ban cookware made with Pfas

Gavin Newsom, who has vetoed environmental bills before, feeling push from industry and celebrity chefs on next stepsGavin Newsom, the California governor, is facing intense pressure from industry, and even some celebrity chefs, as he weighs whether or not to sign a bill that bans the sale of cookware made with Pfas or “forever chemicals”.The legislation, approved by the California legislature on 12 September, comes as Newsom contemplates a run for the Democratic presidential nomination, heightening the scrutiny of his decision. Continue reading...

Gavin Newsom, the California governor, is facing intense pressure from industry, and even some celebrity chefs, as he weighs whether or not to sign a bill that bans the sale of cookware made with Pfas or “forever chemicals”.The legislation, approved by the California legislature on 12 September, comes as Newsom contemplates a run for the Democratic presidential nomination, heightening the scrutiny of his decision.The industry pressure is part of a broader attack that aims to derail similar bans on Pfas in cookware in other states, public health advocates say. Newsom has a history of vetoing some environmental bills around toxic chemicals, including a ban on Pfas in household cleaners and artificial turf that were made amid similar industry pressure. But advocates say they have worked with the administration to address concerns.“Industry is putting so much pressure on Newsom, and they’re doing it in the press, scaring the public and high profile people are writing to him saying the sky will fall,” said Andria Ventura, legislative director for Clean Water Action, which has lobbied for the bills. “We’re not sure where he’ll land on this.”Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. He has until 13 October to veto the bill.Pfas are a class of about 16,000 chemicals most frequently used to make products water-, stain- and grease-resistant. The compounds have been linked to cancer, birth defects, decreased immunity, high cholesterol, kidney disease and a range of other serious health problems. They are dubbed “forever chemicals” because they do not naturally break down in the environment.The Cookware Sustainability Alliance, a trade group founded by two of the world’s largest cookware manufacturers, Groupe SEB and Meyer, is leading the charge against the ban. Steve Burns, a lobbyist from the group, said he is particularly concerned about restaurants that use Pfas throughout the kitchen.“Some of the top chefs in the nation rely on nonstick,” he said. “They need this in their restaurants.”Burns claimed butter and oil used in pans is more unhealthy than Ptfe exposure and said the cookware industry is unfairly maligned because it did not create the chemicals.“We’re two steps removed yet we’re the ones who are being held accountable,” Burns said.Chefs who have come out in opposition to the bill include Thomas Keller, David Chang and Rachael Ray – each has had cookware lines that could take a financial hit from the ban. That has drawn criticism from actor and anti-Pfas activist Mark Ruffalo, who supports the ban.The state’s legislature is the seventh to pass a ban on the sale of Pfas in cookware, and is part of a package that would prohibit the chemicals’ use in six product categories. State legislatures across the US have proposed hundreds of limits on Pfas’s use in consumer goods in recent years, which is pressuring companies to move away from the often dangerous chemicals in non-essential uses.“These are avoidable uses of Pfas that we can eliminate now,” said Avi Kar, senior director of the toxics program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, which is lobbying in support of the bill. “Pfas is such a large problem and we need to do everything we can to reduce exposures. This is a clear cut case, and there are already alternatives, so it’s not going to cause hardship.”Advocates say they worked with industry in other product categories but only cookware makers were hostile toward legislation. The industry previously sued in federal court in an attempt to overturn a similar ban in Minnesota, but the suit was dismissed.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Detox Your KitchenA seven-week expert course to help you avoid chemicals in your food and groceries.Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionSimilar tactics and claims are being deployed in California. Industry has said, without providing firm evidence, that the bans caused cookware shortages on store shelves. Maine was among the first states to ban Pfas in cookware and the industry has claimed brides in the state are upset because they can’t get Teflon pans on their registries, advocates say.Pfas compounds like Ptfe, also called Teflon, are most commonly used in pans and industry has claimed the chemical is safe and should not be classified as a Pfas. New Mexico exempted Ptfe from its cookware ban, but most governments classify it as a Pfas and regulate it. While science suggests Ptfe poses less of a health threat in isolation than other more dangerous Pfas, some peer-reviewed research highlights risks throughout its life cycle.Highly toxic Pfas are used to manufacture Ptfe, and the former can end up in the environment or leftover on a pan. When Ptfe cookware is scratched or chipped, it can shed micro- or nanoplastics into food. Research has linked Ptfe in combination with other microplastics to decreased sperm quality, among other health issues, and Ptfe fumes emitted from a pan can cause flu-like symptoms.Ventura noted the California water and sewer utility trade group endorses the ban because utilities are left with the cost of trying to remove PFAS pollution from drinking water.Industry has also run ads in California claiming the state is in a cost-of-living crisis, and the ban would force families to spend more than $300 buying new pots and pans. In one ad that ran on Instagram, a woman standing in a kitchen states that she can’t afford to buy new pans.But Ventura noted the ban only covers selling new cookware with Pfas and wouldn’t prohibit owning the products or buying them out of state. Though industry claims alternatives are more expensive, most companies also make stainless steel, cast iron or nonstick ceramic products, and many are the same price.“All you have to do is walk into a Marshalls or Macy’s and you can see they’re the same price, and the companies are making the alternatives,” Ventura said. “Nobody is going to go into your house or the kitchen of your restaurant and take away [the Teflon pans].”

Industrial Chemical Linked To Parkinson's Disease

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Oct. 2, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Long-term exposure to a chemical used in metal degreasing and dry...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Oct. 2, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Long-term exposure to a chemical used in metal degreasing and dry cleaning might increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease, a new study says.Seniors living in places with the highest airborne levels of trichloroethylene showed a 10% higher risk for Parkinson’s than those in areas with the lowest levels, researchers report in the journal Neurology.Further, risk of Parkinson’s increased fourfold for people living one to five miles downwind of an Oregon factory that used the chemical, researchers found.“Long-term exposure to trichloroethylene in outdoor air was associated with a small but measurable increase in Parkinson’s risk,” said lead researcher Brittany Krzyzanowski, an assistant professor at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix.“These findings add to a growing body of evidence that environmental exposures may contribute to Parkinson’s disease,” she said in a news release.Trichloroethylene (TCE) is known to cause kidney cancer, and studies have linked the chemical to blood cancers and liver cancer, according to the National Cancer Institute.It’s a persistent environmental pollutant in air, water and soil across the United States, researchers noted. A 2000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA) report estimated that up to 30% of the nation’s drinking water supplies were contaminated with TCE. In 2024, the EPA issued a ban on the chemical for all consumer and commercial uses that was set to start in 2025. However, the ban was stayed pending a legal challenge, and the chemical remains in use.For the new study, researchers used Medicare data to identify seniors older than 67 newly diagnosed with Parkinson’s between 2016 and 2018, and compared each participant to five other seniors who didn’t have the disease.Parkinson’s occurs when brain cells that produce the neurotransmitter dopamine either die or become impaired. When that happens, people start to have movement problems that include shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination, according to Cleveland Clinic.All told, the study included nearly 222,000 people with Parkinson’s and more than 1.1 million people without the disease, researchers said.Using ZIP codes and EPA data, researchers mapped everyone’s exposure to outdoor TCE concentrations two years prior to their diagnosis.Researchers concluded that people exposed to the highest levels of TCE appeared to have a greater risk of Parkinson’s, after controlling for other risk factors for the disorder.“While the increased risk was modest, the sheer number of people exposed to TCE in the environment means the potential public health impact could be substantial,” Krzyzanowski said.The team also identified several geographic “hot spots” where outdoor TCE levels were highest, particularly in the Rust Belt region, as well as three facilities that operated as the nation’s top TCE-emitting facilities in 2002.Results showed that Parkinson’s risk was higher close to two of the three facilities. At one of those sites, Parkinson’s risk clearly rose the closer people lived to the facility. People living one to five miles downwind from a lithium battery plant in Lebanon, Oregon, had a more than four times greater risk of Parkinson’s than those living up to 10 miles away.“This underscores the need for stronger regulations and more monitoring of industrial pollutants,” Krzyzanowski said.The researchers noted that their study could not draw a direct cause-and-effect link between TCE and Parkinson’s. Their results only show an association.However, previous reports have also linked TCE to Parkinson’s, researchers said.For example, TCE contamination of the drinking water at Camp Lejeune, a Marine Corps base in Jacksonville, N.C., has been linked with a 70% higher risk of Parkinson’s among service members stationed there.SOURCES: American Academy of Neurology, news release, Oct. 1, 2025; Neurology, Oct. 1, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Why Is This Remote and Rugged River in Alaska Turning Orange?

New research suggests the Salmon River is full of toxic metals that are likely harming fish and other aquatic creatures

Why Is This Remote and Rugged River in Alaska Turning Orange? New research suggests the Salmon River is full of toxic metals that are likely harming fish and other aquatic creatures Sarah Kuta - Daily Correspondent October 1, 2025 4:56 p.m. New research suggests that the Salmon River in northwest Alaska is full of toxic metals. Ray Koleser Alaska’s Salmon River was once so clean that author John McPhee described it as the “clearest, purest water I have ever seen flowing over rocks.” Now, however, the remote waterway is a muddy, orangish-yellow mess. It’s brimming with toxic metals, at concentrations that are likely harmful to aquatic life. The culprit? Thawing permafrost resulting from climate change, according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences last month. “It’s a sobering study,” says Diane McKnight, a geochemist at the University of Colorado Boulder who was not involved with the research, to Chemical & Engineering News’ Fionna Samuels. The Salmon River winds 70 miles through Kobuk Valley National Park in northwest Alaska, flowing from Mount Angayukaqsraq to the Kobuk River. The federal government designated it a National Wild and Scenic River in 1980, noting its large salmon runs and its “water of exceptional clarity.” However, around 2019, the once-crystal-clear waters of the Salmon River and its tributaries turned orange and murky. Patrick Sullivan, an ecologist at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and Roman Dial, a now-retired biologist at Alaska Pacific University, first noticed the unusual hue during an unrelated research trip in the region. Fun Fact Alaska archaeology Alaska is home to the oldest known evidence of salmon fishing in the Americas—11,500-year-old fish bones. The Salmon River had become what’s known as a “rusting river,” a phenomenon caused by the presence of high amounts of iron and other metals. Sullivan, Dial and their colleagues returned to the waterway to take samples in 2022 and 2023. Based on their analyses, they suspect it has fallen victim to sulfide mineral weathering, also known as acid-rock drainage, which can occur when permafrost thaws. Found primarily in the Arctic and some high-elevation regions, permafrost is the name given to soil, sand, sediment and rock that remains at or below freezing temperatures for at least two years. The bedrock beneath some permafrost contains sulfide minerals, which are typically inaccessible to groundwater. However, when permafrost thaws, those minerals become exposed to water and oxygen for the first time in hundreds or even thousands of years. As the minerals dissolve, they produce acids, which in turn cause metals to leach out of rocks. In this way, acid-rock drainage is a form of natural pollution that can occur far from humans—even though it’s caused by human activity. “There are few places left on Earth as untouched as these rivers,” says co-author Tim Lyons, a geochemist at the University of California Riverside, to BBC Wildlife Magazine’s Daniel Graham. “But even here, far from cities and highways, the fingerprint of global warming is unmistakable. No place is spared.” The team’s analyses show the Salmon River is chock-full of metals—including aluminum, cadmium, copper, iron, nickel, and zinc—at concentrations above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s safe limits for aquatic life. “If there were a mine that were operating in the headwaters of the Salmon, they would be facing regulatory intervention at this point,” Sullivan tells Chemical & Engineering News. Pollution from mines is typically limited to a single source and can be managed with treatment systems. Acid-rock drainage caused by permafrost thaw, on the other hand, is occurring at various sites and is nearly impossible to mitigate, the researchers say. “The only hope for solving this problem…is the recovery of the permafrost, which of course would involve pretty massive emissions reductions at this point,” Sullivan tells Chemical & Engineering News. And the ripple effects of permafrost thaw are not limited to the Salmon River. The process can occur in any waterway located near permafrost covering sulfide-rich bedrock, and scientists are using satellite imagery to look for other rivers and streams that might be affected. The high levels of toxic metals in the Salmon River might help explain a recent drop in the number of chum salmon returning to spawn, the researchers say. But, they add, they need to conduct more research to confirm that hunch. Even if the pollution is not to blame for the depressed salmon runs, it’s likely still affecting the local food chain. “It would be very hard, for instance, for a bear to fish for a salmon just because of the turbidity,” Sullivan tells the Alaska Beacon’s Yereth Rosen. “Raptors would have a really hard time catching a fish if they were fishing there.” The water is simply too cloudy, he says, citing his own failed attempts to fish the river. The metals also seem to be harming aquatic insects, such as stoneflies and mayflies, a source of food for many fish, per Science’s Warren Cornwall. In parts of the Salmon River with high levels of aluminum and iron, for instance, the scientists found very few insect larvae. “We have no idea when that process might reach its conclusion and how many new acid seeps might develop,” Sullivan tells the Alaska Beacon. Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Bills Target Crucitas Gold Mining Mess in Costa Rica

Crucitas ranks among Costa Rica’s most severe environmental setbacks. Illegal gold mining has ravaged the area for years, bringing crime, community unrest, water pollution, and deaths among those risking their lives in unauthorized operations. The once-rich natural zone now shows clear signs of decline, with forests cleared and rivers tainted by chemicals. Recent events highlight […] The post Bills Target Crucitas Gold Mining Mess in Costa Rica appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Crucitas ranks among Costa Rica’s most severe environmental setbacks. Illegal gold mining has ravaged the area for years, bringing crime, community unrest, water pollution, and deaths among those risking their lives in unauthorized operations. The once-rich natural zone now shows clear signs of decline, with forests cleared and rivers tainted by chemicals. Recent events highlight the ongoing trouble. Just this month, authorities detained five Nicaraguans for illegal mining, and earlier, two young brothers from Nicaragua died when a tunnel collapsed on them. Rescue teams recovered their bodies after hours of work, a grim reminder of the dangers. These incidents add to a long list of fatalities, as people cross borders chasing gold amid poverty. Lawmakers in the Legislative Assembly are pushing several bills to tackle this mess. The government’s plan stands out—it would permit gold exploration and extraction in Crucitas to curb the chaos from illegal activities. The Alajuela Commission gave it a green light on September 11 with an 8-1 vote, sending it to the full assembly for debate. It awaits scheduling, and motions could still alter it. Supporters argue that regulated mining would bring order, generate jobs, and fund cleanup, but critics question the fit with Costa Rica’s eco-friendly reputation. Open-pit methods, which the bill would allow under strict rules, carry heavy costs. They strip away land, wipe out habitats, and reduce plant and animal diversity. Air gets dusty, water sources shift or get contaminated, and noise drives away wildlife. Communities nearby face health risks from pollutants, as seen already in Crucitas where mercury and cyanide have seeped into streams. Despite bans since 2010, illegal digs persist, often tied to organized groups, making the site a hotspot for violence and smuggling. Another bill, backed by the Frente Amplio party and the Civic Environmental Parliament, takes a different path. It proposes a Sustainable Development Hub for the Huetar Norte region, focusing on recovery without mining. At its core is the Crucitas International Environmental Geopark, covering wooded hills between Fortuna and Botija. A natural and historical museum would join it, highlighting the area’s past and ecology. This approach draws from UNESCO geoparks, with 13 already in Latin America, including one in Nicaragua. Costa Rica’s planning ministry has approved a similar site in Rio Cuarto. The idea is to protect resources while allowing research and low-key recreation. No gold digging permitted—that aligns with the country’s green identity. The hub would put the National System of Conservation Areas in charge of oversight. Locals could run small-scale businesses with support from the Development Bank and rural agencies. Educational programs through the National Learning Institute and universities would train people, creating opportunities on the ground. Tax breaks aim to attract private projects that fit the goals, like eco-tourism or studies. A key part involves cleaning up the damage. Remediation targets the toxins left behind, aiming to restore soil and water. Some still push for mining as the fix, claiming it would stop illegals and boost the economy, but that ignores the added harm to an already battered spot. The debate boils down to priorities: quick cash from gold versus long-term protection. Costa Rica has built its image on sustainability, drawing tourists to parks and beaches. Reopening to mining could shift that, while the hub option builds on strengths in conservation. As bills move forward, locals watch closely, hoping for a solution that heals rather than harms. The post Bills Target Crucitas Gold Mining Mess in Costa Rica appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Extraordinary pictures show what a common antibiotic does to E. coli

A commonly used class of antibiotics seems to kill bacteria like E. coli by breaking down their tough armour

The top image shows an untreated E.coli bacterium; the bottom shows a bacterium after 90 minutes of being exposed to the antibiotic polymyxin BCarolina Borrelli, Edward Douglas et al./Nature Microbiology The way antibiotics called polymyxins pierce the armour of bacteria has been revealed in stunning detail by high-resolution microscopy, which could help us develop new treatments for drug-resistant infections. Polymyxins are commonly used as a last-resort treatment against some so-called gram-negative bacteria, which can cause infections such as pneumonia, meningitis and typhoid fever. “The top three World Health Organization priority pathogens are all gram-negative bacteria, and this is largely a reflection of their complex cell envelope,” says Andrew Edwards at Imperial College London. Around their inner cell, these bacteria have an outer surface layer containing molecules called lipopolysaccharides, which act like armour. We knew polymyxins target this outer layer, but how exactly they disrupt it and then kill bacteria wasn’t understood; neither was why the drugs don’t always work. Now, Edwards and his colleagues have used biochemical experiments and atomic force microscopy – in which a needle just a few nanometres wide creates an image of a cell by sensing its shape – to reveal that one of the two types of polymyxin used therapeutically, called polymyxin B, causes strange bulges to break out on the surface of the gram-negative bacterium E. coli. Minutes after the protrusions appear, the bacterium begins to quickly shed its lipopolysaccharides, which the researchers detected in the solution it was in. The researchers say the antibiotic’s presence triggers the bacterium to try to put more and more “bricks” of lipopolysaccharide in its defensive wall. But as it adds bricks, it is also shedding some, temporarily leaving gaps in its defences that allow the antibiotic to enter and kill it. “The antibiotics are a bit like a crowbar that helps these bricks come out of the wall,” says Edwards. “The outer membrane doesn’t disintegrate; it doesn’t fall off. But there are clearly gaps where the antibiotic can then get to the second membrane.” He and his colleagues also uncovered why the antibiotic doesn’t always work: it only affected bacteria that were active and growing. When bacteria were dormant, a state they can enter to survive environmental stress such as nutrient deprivation, the polymyxin B was ineffective, because it wasn’t producing its armour. Images of E. coli exposed to polymyxin B, showing changes to the outer layer of its membrane, from left to right: untreated; bacterium after 15 minutes of antibiotic exposure; after 30 minutes; after 60 minutes; after 90 minutesCarolina Borrelli, Edward Douglas et al. / Nature Microbiology However, the researchers found that providing sugar to the E. coli cells woke them from this dormant state and, within 15 minutes, armour production resumed and the cells were killed. The same is expected to apply to the other polymyxin antibiotic used therapeutically, polymyxin E. Edwards says it might be possible to target dormant bacteria by giving people sugars, but there are dangers to waking these pathogens from their dormant state. “You don’t necessarily want bacteria at an infection site to start multiplying rapidly because that has its own downsides,” he says. Instead, he adds, it might be possible to combine different drugs to bypass the hibernation state without waking the bacteria up.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.