Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justice

News Feed
Wednesday, May 22, 2024

Liliana Sierra Castillo joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss the concept of blue justice and how the expansion of aquaculture impacts small-scale fishery communities.Sierra Castillo, a current Agents of Change fellow and Ph.D. candidate at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara, also talks about how she became passionate about oceans, how we can rethink marine protected areas to center communities, and how meaningful it is for her to do research in her native Honduras.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Sierra Castillo and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justiceTranscriptBrian BienkowskiThank you so much for taking time to meet with me today. I'm really excited to have you on your work when I was doing a little research for this. It's different than other fellows we've had. And I'm really excited to talk about what you're doing. But as you may know, I'd like to start way at the beginning. So I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about your childhood and where an interest in the environment came into your life?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, of course. So I'm originally from Honduras. And it's funny because even when I was a child, my parents don't really live near the oceans. They live in the capital. But even when I was like, I remember specifically, I was like in second grade, and we did an essay. And it just fascinated me to know, when my professor was giving feedback that we know more about the moon, that about the ocean. And I think that just stuck in my head forever. And then at that moment, I decided I wanted to be a marine biologist, even though I didn't know what that meant. And then I guess I had the privilege that my parents were capable of taking us to like the beach around the country and exploring. I just, it's always fascinating, like how vast and amazing the ocean is. Because that's how it all started.Brian Bienkowski That's awesome. I grew up in the in Michigan, in the Great Lakes region, so not oceans, but really large lakes where you can't you know, you can't see the end of them. They're massive. And I just remember my whole life, no matter how many times I visited them, it always kind of blew me away or gave me this feeling of inspiration every time I see them. And it still does it to this day. And I don't know, do oceans. Do oceans do that for you? Do you still get kind of a sense of awe even though you've been working with them for so long?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, definitely. I feel these day like every time I walk past an ocean, as you're saying, like, I am just in awe how big it is and how much it is that we don't know. And I guess now, in the past 10 years or so that I've I've started working more on the human dimensions parts of oceans. It's more of like, wow, we have so much of these, like space and water and things but like, so much people are being affected by your kind of like that more critical analysis. I think that is also like it's more of an inspiration in that way as well.Brian Bienkowski For sure. And maybe maybe there's some overlap in this question. Since we've been talking about your your love of oceans, but you started your university studies at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in marine biology. So what was it specifically about oceans? Was it you know, fisheries? Was it how humans interact with them? Was it about their vastness or you know, all of the above.Liliana Sierra Castillo So, it's funny because as many marine biology programs, my undergrad was very much like ecology focus. And then my last quarter I took a the only fishery class. But at that moment, I still thought in my mind that I wanted to be a dolphin trainer. That was like my life goal. And then I was very lucky to have we have in that program for you to graduate, you have to do a professional internship. And so I got the super cool experience of working with the World Wildlife Fund in a bay area called Cortés*, which on the northern coast. And for six months, I was just working with fishery communities. And I was like, Okay, this is what I want to do, like, you know, those things are cool, but it's not like, and I discovered, like, you know, I really love the intersections of like, I get to be in the ocean and be in that moment, I used to be covered a lot in fish blog. So I was like, clean to the fisherman. And I love talking with people and like learning what they were doing. And I also found that I love, like, figuring out how to like, give back the results, right? that I'm learning from analysis back to the communities and all that like connection of cycles and turn it into, like management tools. And so yeah, I guess like it was, the university gave me the basic tools, and then this experience of the internship that kind of changed everything.Brian Bienkowski Well, these coastal communities, it's not just a, it's not just this natural wonder, like we were talking about, but it's so intertwined with culture and economics. And, you know, we're gonna get into a lot of that today with a lot of the work that you're doing. So it goes much further beyond as well, that's really pretty. It's so you know, intertwined with these coastal communities. So, before we get to your research, I want to know, a moment or event that has helped shape your identity up to this point.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I still, so I think for me, it happened again, in this internship. So this was like 10 years ago. And again, I had since from that moment, before that moment training on like, sadly, a lot of like, environmental classes are very much like, you know, we need pristine nature, we need everything to be protected, and all that, right. So I came up with that mentality. And I remember the first day, on the field with these fishery communities, I was with this fisherman who sadly has passed. Now he passed away, which is very sad. But I still remember he told me, you know, like, so what's the point of like, you guys, tell us like, we cannot fish in this area, my organization. And that moment, my NGO was internship with, they were trying to build a protected area, marine protected area, and like, we moved the fisherman, and he was like, "What's the point of view protecting these resources if we don't even have anything to eat? Like, what are we going to eat?" And so that, for me, was like, it was a moment that I it's I know, it sounds dumb. But in that moment, I was like, I cannot believe, that for all my undergrad, I was so like, naive, right? Like, in this little bubble of like, privilege that I didn't understand anything until that moment. And I will say, Yeah, you are 100%. Right. And I think that change everything until right now, 10 years after what I've gotten all the way since.Brian Bienkowski I don't think that sounds dumb at all. In fact, where I live in the northern Great Lakes region, a lot of people are focused on forest wilderness, you know, wild areas. And there's also indigenous communities up here who use those spaces to hunt and gather. So the idea of just blocking them off to protect them is is not in line with what how they've used these areas. So I totally, I totally understand what you're talking about. And I grew up the same way, like, oh, yeah, protect it. You know, that's great, preserve it and protect it. That's the way to go. And I think, hopefully, we're starting to realize that that's not always the most just way to do things. So a lot of your research now centers around the growth of aquaculture globally and the impacts it has on small scale fishery communities. So first, can you kind of orient those of us who are not too familiar with this trend? And what does aquaculture entail? Where are we seeing the most expansion of it?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I think for that question, because I know a lot of people, it's funny, because like, to this day, for example, a lot like my mom doesn't really know what I do. Right? So fisheries, and that's where I it's my big specialization, right? It's everything that's been caught wildly in any body of water, I do marine fisheries, but it can be lakes, as you're saying in Michigan, rivers, whatever. Aquaculture is basically I tried to think of it as like a farm or agriculture on water. So it's, there's some sort of human control component over it. It's literally you have a seed, or a baby or seed of an oyster, for example, and then you help it grow. Like you control it in an environment until it grows and then you harvest it. So it's a big difference from fisheries, right. The other comparison I tried to think about it is like hunters versus gatherers, right? Like hunting is the fishing and gatherer races like agriculture kind of wise. Um, so I'm gonna say in the past, so my expertise is fisheries, but going to aquaculture in the past, I'm going to say maybe since the 80s, there's been a big boom to kind of like grow aquaculture with this kind of idea that seafood is declining, the fisheries production, so As we all know, it's declaiming for a lot of lot of factors. So the idea that aquaculture is gonna, like provide, like all the seafood we need. And so it has had its ups and downs, I think around the 90s. It's when the shrimp aquaculture started around the world, especially in Latin America, coming from, again, like a lot of funding from like not, Latin America. And that was a very bad situation, because as you know, aquaculture for shrimp, they destroyed a lot of mangroves. So it was a whole thing, right? So then aquaculture kind of started to decline. And I think back, I think, would have saved maybe the, like, 15 years ago or so there's like this new kind of push to aquaculture through the blue economy, right? All these these cores narratives. And now it's kind of like thinking that aquaculture besides giving, like that seafood, the seafood supply, that fisheries might not be giving. Now, it's kind of like, okay, now, it's also can do ecosystem services. Now, it can help people, now it can provide all these other benefits, which in some instances it does. But what we're seeing in is where my study comes in is like when these when it's being implemented at a local scale in communities is specifically in underdeveloped countries. It's not getting all those benefits, that it's promising. And in reality, it's creating a lot of injustices. So that's where I come like, trying to understand why and how can we do it better to really have the benefits that you should have.Brian Bienkowski So what are some of the opportunities that this expanded aquaculture brings? And conversely, what are some of the problems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so some of the opportunities, you know, like, I've seen some examples where it actually provides employment to people, right. And a lot of again, I work in small scale coastal communities, so very different from industrial fisheries or aquaculture areas. So a lot of these communities, they're very marginalized, they're very vulnerable to shocks and a lot of things happening around them. So I've seen some instances where like, if doing that, like correctly, aquaculture can provide them with employment, like they can work, they can provide them with food security, they can provide, if done correctly, like benefits of the ecosystem, we know that some of these species might contribute to ecosystemic benefits. But the thing is, like conversely, when he's not being done correctly, it can also impact for example, a lot of these implementation of aquaculture right now is kind of like, okay, you have to stop fishing. And now you're going to do aquaculture. And as you mentioned a while ago, for these people fishing has a lot of cultural traditional aspects, right? It's not like they go fishing because money, they go fishing, because it's who they are. And so that impacts a lot, right? Like, that's already like very bad, kind of like being like, "Okay, you're gonna stop doing these things that you have done for four generations ago until right now, you're gonna stop doing it, even though you want to just because I want you to stop doing it." Now. So the way sometimes is being done is kind of like, not just like stop fishing, and it's going to impact relations, as I said, but also like, think about it, if you have such a vulnerable system, you want them to have multiple economic activity activities, where livelihoods, if you remove fishing, and then use of aquaculture when there's a shock to the market or to the food system or whatever, then what are these people going to rely on? Right? Like, what are we doing here. And then the other, that third thing that I've seen a lot, is that aquaculture tends to be very tends to be more of like, it can be more like division of classes, like people can like accumulate more as an aquaculture, like, for example, if you and me both have aquaculture operations, and I have the capacity to buy more land, to lobby more, to get more products, more seed everything I have maybe got a I studied to understand what's happening, I understand all these things. I'm gonna grow more, right, versus you're gonna stay tiny, tiny. And then that creates a problem, right? Like what's happened with the tiny, tiny, they're gonna be eliminated for the system. And I think the the worst that's happening is that people keep thinking that aquaculture, as I said, in the beginning is gonna solve all the problems that seafood and fisheries are facing. And it's not, it's not a bullet solution, bullet-proof solution. And so it's not any nice like, once in these communities, they are doing aquaculture because whatever someone told them, the people that are supposed to be managing the fisheries kind of forget that that system exists. And so the fisheries are doing very bad. They're not doing at all good. And then aquaculture is kind of there, but it's not really doing anything and it's kind of like creates a whole mess.Brian Bienkowski Yeah, that makes sense. And you mentioned just fishing being a traditional activity for many of these communities. Can you just talk about get a probe that little further, how this transition has overlooked kind of local context, local cultures and history and expand on why that's a problem?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so um, I can give you an example, actually from one of the communities I work with. So I have done all my fieldwork, most of it in in Baja California, so in Mexico, and I started in Honduras last year. But Baja California, so that's an interesting example, because there's been pushed to do aquaculture of different species from back on from 2011. You know, for many reasons, it hasn't worked, some has worked, some doesn't. But in 2020, when I started working with them, with this one community, there, the there was a local NGO pushing to the oyster aquaculture, right, so sounds all good, right? Like, yeah, that's gonna be always the aquaculture, the community is gonna be happy, you know that. But when you go and talk with the community, like I did that for three years, you notice, and they told me that to me many times, you know, like, I'm not happy. I miss fishing, I wish I could have a boat to go fish all the time I won. I missed the traditions, I miss the freedom associated with fishing. And so as a consequence, like if you think about it, their will they're not, they're not happy, there will be nice, not good, right? Like if you think about what they miss from fishing, and also because they're doing something they don't want to like aquaculture. It's kind of like that this is the aquaculture project was not being successful, right? Like it didn't really work because like the people didn't believing in through time, because fishers as I said, they still wanted to be diving and fishing and all these things. There was an increase on quote unquote, illegal fishing in which I don't like that term. But that's what it's called, you know, when you don't follow the management rules, they continue fishing goes, does what they want it to do. And so in the any creative like, besides all that I'm telling you, it creates a very sad like social situation, right? Like when you have a community that's divided, lot of social tension, tension between the community and the NGO. We've seen is going to affect everything, right? Like it's going to affect what if a project comes again, or like funding for fish, it's like a whole whole sea social situation being created. Because of not considering something as simple as being to go ask them like, Hey, guys, if you want to do aquaculture, if they say yes, how much time do you want to invest? What species you want to do? You know, do you still want to go fishing? Why don't we do it all together? Like think simple solution says that.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned working in California, Mexico, and now expanding your research to Honduras. Was that was it meaningful to you to expand your research into your your home?Liliana Sierra Castillo It was super meaningful. Actually, I was very excited. I've always, I always strive to do all like every research, I do kind of like the think about how to be applicable to Honduras. And actually was super cool. Last summer, I went back to the field areas where I started back 10 years ago. And it was so sweet, like people still remembered me. And I still remember them. And I was like, Yeah, that was super. It was like a very impactful moment. And it's it's very interesting. Because like Honduras. They've done aquaculture in the past, but this area is starting. There's like a super cool organization that's trying to like maybe do aquaculture, but they don't want to do it, like half just randomly they want to understand like, the social dimensions that are happening before transforming the system. So it's been very interesting to understand the system as it is a fishery system, what's going on? How can we maybe do aquaculture what is needed? And it's just cool to go talk with people and hear them.Brian Bienkowski Maybe I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to aquaculture, but I feel like I've seen headlines on I mean, are there pollution concerns? Is that something that you know anything about because I know sometimes when you have such a concentrated amount of fish and fish feeding, there can be pollution concerns? Is that? Is that an issue?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so definitely aquaculture besides everything I'm telling which I'm talking more the social things, it also has like some, like as you're saying, I guess this is more of like an ecological consequence, right? So I feel like the pollution it's more well I think it's more when it's like an industrial scale size right where you have maybe someone and you're putting like antibiotics or whatever and like the feed right like when you feed them that food leaves the area and stuff. But also like at a smaller scale. Like for example in Honduras, what happens a lot. You have the tilapia farms, and even though they're small, there's two big I guess, kind of pollution consequences. One is again, the feed that you give them right the feed makes the water around and like contaminated it gets you to revise. And second, a lot of these aquaculture operations use non-native species. Tilapia is non native. And so it scapes, because in aquaculture is always going to escape. Then you have the problem of like, okay, what is the, how is this non-native species going to, like impact the ecosystem. But in the, it's super interesting, because in Baja in Mexico and other parts of the world, they're pushing to use oyster aquaculture, because in theory, oyster has a lot of benefits, right? cleans the water, it a lot of ecosystemic services, I think it also sometimes is being used at like, what there's erosion and you use, like, oysters to, like, provide more structure to there. But there's also a lot of unknowns of oysters, right? Like, we don't know what impacts are being made by oysters in the ecosystem. For example, in Baja, the oysters that are being used are not in them are non native. So we don't even know how they're affecting the native organisms from the ecosystem. And all these other questions, but in oysters, you don't feed them. So at least you don't have to worry about that.Brian Bienkowski Before this call, I was at my local, not today. But recently I was at my grocery store and realize that I lived 20 minutes from Lake Superior, a massive fishery, the biggest freshwater lake on the planet. And almost all of the fish they sell there is farm raised from Chile and other places around the world, which is just indicative of our super broken food system. I think. So you mentioned you mentioned the places you're working in, in, you know, Mexico, Honduras, and California. And I'm wondering, what are some of the ways that you and others are working to kind of better incorporate small scale fisheries and their well being into these kinds of changes in systems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I think that there's a lot of good people trying to, as you're saying, like to give to voices to small-scale fishing communities and put them as at the center of all these policies or, or I don't even know, like, yeah, I guess their policies. So I think parallel to the blue economy, and blue growth, maybe I'm gonna say even, like, newer, I'm gonna say maybe, I don't know, like four or five years ago, eight years ago, is to start a what's called the Blue justice, right? Which is kind of these critical, how can we critically analyze and think about how we can put small scale fisheries or humans or human rights in the center, especially of these, these two big development discourses, right. And so there's a lot of people coming from all different perspectives, because the blue, this is a thing, the blue economy, if you think about it, the blue economy was a term proposed by an economist, I think 10 Or maybe 12 years ago, where basically is trying to get economic benefits from the ocean, right? That can mean a lot of things that can mean fisheries, aquaculture, offshore energy, so many things, it's like massive the amount of things you can get from the ocean. So I know a lot of great people that are trying to think about ways okay, like, for example, how can we make protected areas or I don't like the word permanent protected areas, but how can we manage the ocean in a way that the humans are there, we cannot eliminate the humans, right? I know a lot of people like doing similar work to what I do. But in other words, like parts of the world, like putting people at the center of labor, they want to because you're not if they want, how can we make it work? I know a lot of people being working with offshore energy and understanding like, how is this gonna impact communities, right communities? How can we bring them back to the table to think what you're saying? Obviously, there's like a big, I think that's been a big one for a lot of time, like trying to understand industrial fishing versus small scale fishing, right? Like, how can we provide more protection for small scale fisheries? Like how can we help them? And so I think it's so it's a very broad question, but I think it just inspires me to know that a lot of people are doing a lot of super amazing important work. It's hard work, but I think it's gonna get its get going in places.Brian Bienkowski And if you do you have examples or projects that you've seen that you feel like successfully and very intentionally incorporated local communities and their perspectives into aquaculture decisions?Liliana Sierra Castillo I know there's some like smaller-scale aquaculture operations from indigenous communities in I think it's in Seattle, and in Alaska, where communities are basically saying you know, we want to do aquaculture and they're like, in charge of the they are deciding everything. I think that one that example is pretty cool to read about that And I'm not sure about in Latin America, honestly. There must be some examples. But I don't know them from the top of my head right now. Sure, sure.Brian Bienkowski And you mentioned, you know, you've talked about these marine protected areas. And off the top, we spoke about why those can be seemingly very good, but perhaps problematic in some spots. I was wondering if you could talk about your work in advocacy in this area?Liliana Sierra Castillo In marine protected areas?Brian Bienkowski Yeah, just what you're what you're thinking, what you're what you're seeing what you're trying to do, in making that process more community centered and culturally inclusive.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I guess, um, as I mentioned, like, in 20, oh, my God, I don't even know, like, 10 years ago, when I was starting. And there was a big push for this big area, right, and getting these fishing communities out. I remember, I had a good conversation with my boss at that time, and we decided, you know, like, like, we cannot just eliminate these people, you know, like, that's going to be very counterproductive in the end, right? it's going to probably increase poaching and all these things. And also, it's not good. Like, it's super bad. So So we created it was kind of like, okay, let's think with them. Let's include them like that. See, like, inside of these marine area, how, what, what areas can we leave for them to fit, like, let's include them for everything. And so we developed this kind of cool kind of governance platform where we had like academia and government and NGOs and fishers are working together. And that was super cool. And I think that area is still going on back there. But recently, I'm in the marine protected area world –because I as I mentioned many times, I don't really like the word and the term– there's this cool project that I've been very honored to be part of is being carried by one of my friends, her name is Tasha Quintana. And she's trying to understand temporary closure. So temporary closure is a tool that has been used with people that manage their resources, which is basically as simple as like, you can be a person who's like exploiting a fishery, and you're gonna be like, Oh, I exploited this area, I'm gonna let us rest for a month or two, and then switch gears, right? So it's this is this is happening, and has been happening in all the world. So we're trying to understand, Okay, does it work? How does it work? How can we make it better maybe. And I'm trying to do like the equity and justice component of this, like trying to understand critically understand using critical environmental justice frameworks to see how this might be a more equitable solution versus the permanent and protected areas. So that's what we're trying to do with that space.Brian Bienkowski I'm curious with all this time spent in and around oceans and working in listening to fishing communities, do you fish?Liliana Sierra Castillo I fished more before then now I loved to go fishing. I was very bad at it. We really, really enjoyed like, you know, being with the hook and line and, or like the little nets or seeing when we're in the rivers and lakes. And I used to go out with fishermen and just see what they were like catching I used to go I think I went one year ago in Mexico with my fisher friends and was pretty fun. We went spear-diving. It's not allowed, but we still we did it was pretty fun. You know, it was night. And it was cool. Because like you couldn't see anything in the water on unless they had the flashlights. And when you like came out of the water. It was just like stars everywhere. So yeah, I do love fishing. I haven't done it California though, because I've heard it's like complicated to get a license and so on. But I do love fishing.Brian Bienkowski Cool. Very cool. And just one last question. Before we get to some of the final fun questions. What are you optimistic about when it comes to the work that you're doing and the research that you're conducting?Liliana Sierra Castillo You know, I'm optimistic and it's hard. I feel like this type of work, you have a lot of downs, some ups, um, it's as I mentioned, it's work that has to be done. But it's hard. Because it's kind of like if you think about it is kind of like trying to understand the cause root of things, really. Like, why are things the way they are? And sometimes that's uncomfortable to a lot of people, a lot of people are not going to be happy with the things that you say. But I'm hopeful. As I mentioned, I think that a lot of people are starting to think understand this is important. And I'm optimistic that more and more people we're going to start to know each other and kind of create these network of people that think alike and we need to continue to put communities in the center of all these decisions and continue to fight you know, it's kind of like a little revolution going on which I think it's very inspiring. But more than a revolution, I'm optimistic because I think that people also like, for example, all the people supporting the blue economy and all these, like bigger ideas are going to start understanding, you know, through all these other people of the blue justice team, they really need each other, like, how can you like, you know, it's kind of like, I'm optimistic that that can happen at some moment. But I think my most optimism is to that communities are slowly being put again, where they should be the center of everything. And that there's a lot of people that we're not alone, you know, like, it's a lot of times you feel alone. And there's a lot of people around the world trying to –which is crazy, right?– like, put them back in the center of all these things. But that's what it's happening. And I think it's pretty inspiring too.Brian Bienkowski There's so many parallels to other aspects of society. And when you think about one movement is like, how can we extract and make money? And the other movement is like, how can we make sure that the people who are most impacted by this have a say in this, and I think you can look at the energy sector you can look at, I mean, it's just so indicative of kind of where we find ourselves at this crossroads in trying to push for energy, justice, climate justice, environmental justice, kind of broadly. So I really appreciate you kind of introducing our readers to this idea of Blue justice, it's been really fascinating. And now I have three rapid fire fun questions where you could just answer with one word, or a phrase, my most treasured possession isLiliana Sierra Castillo my dog.Brian Bienkowski me too, by the way. One thing I'm looking forward to this month isLiliana Sierra Castillo in May, um I don't know, spending time with my friends.Brian Bienkowski That works. That's fun. And one unique tradition my family has isLiliana Sierra Castillo okay, so every time – this is a longer phrase, but it's just we're Latinos. Talk a lot. But every time it's your birthday, when we were back home, they used to wake you up, like at 4am. Even though you didn't want that and they would pretend that you were a baby and like give you like a like, it was like a lotion bottle. But it was supposed to be like a liquid our babies dreads call, like what they drink from them. The little bottles, milk bottles. Yeah, we were supposed to do that. And then after we will move out, I think they continue trying to do it, like calling us but now it's harder, right? Because like we're in so many different time zones. That he's kind of like has to vote okay, just told me when I can call you.Brian Bienkowski The call doesn't work quite as well, when you're, you know, paid to silence.Liliana Sierra Castillo Exactly. And my phone is always silent. So I think they tried it for a couple of years. And then I was like, I'm, I'm literally sleeping. Can't. But yeah, I do miss the pretending to be a baby thing.Brian Bienkowski That I've never, you know, that is new to me. I really, I really liked that. Well, Liliana, this has been so much fun. Again, thank you so much for your time. And it's just so exciting to have you in this program with your, you know, with your expertise and the research that you're doing. And one last question I've asked everybody is what is the last book that you read for fun? I'm readingLiliana Sierra Castillo it's I haven't finished reading it but I am in the middle of reading "Critical environmental justice and race." Which is funny because I haven't like in my side table like I read it every night while my boyfriend reads... I don't even know what you know, other things or friends are reading other things do. But for I guess before that I'm trying to think what was a good book? I don't remember right now I think that's been in a while kind of reading for me.Brian Bienkowski Well, you know what, for our audience, that probably is fun. So I think I think that one that you're reading right now works. Liliana, thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to following your career and working with you in this program.Liliana Sierra Castillo Thank you very much for everything, all the questions.

Liliana Sierra Castillo joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss the concept of blue justice and how the expansion of aquaculture impacts small-scale fishery communities.Sierra Castillo, a current Agents of Change fellow and Ph.D. candidate at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara, also talks about how she became passionate about oceans, how we can rethink marine protected areas to center communities, and how meaningful it is for her to do research in her native Honduras.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Sierra Castillo and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justiceTranscriptBrian BienkowskiThank you so much for taking time to meet with me today. I'm really excited to have you on your work when I was doing a little research for this. It's different than other fellows we've had. And I'm really excited to talk about what you're doing. But as you may know, I'd like to start way at the beginning. So I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about your childhood and where an interest in the environment came into your life?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, of course. So I'm originally from Honduras. And it's funny because even when I was a child, my parents don't really live near the oceans. They live in the capital. But even when I was like, I remember specifically, I was like in second grade, and we did an essay. And it just fascinated me to know, when my professor was giving feedback that we know more about the moon, that about the ocean. And I think that just stuck in my head forever. And then at that moment, I decided I wanted to be a marine biologist, even though I didn't know what that meant. And then I guess I had the privilege that my parents were capable of taking us to like the beach around the country and exploring. I just, it's always fascinating, like how vast and amazing the ocean is. Because that's how it all started.Brian Bienkowski That's awesome. I grew up in the in Michigan, in the Great Lakes region, so not oceans, but really large lakes where you can't you know, you can't see the end of them. They're massive. And I just remember my whole life, no matter how many times I visited them, it always kind of blew me away or gave me this feeling of inspiration every time I see them. And it still does it to this day. And I don't know, do oceans. Do oceans do that for you? Do you still get kind of a sense of awe even though you've been working with them for so long?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, definitely. I feel these day like every time I walk past an ocean, as you're saying, like, I am just in awe how big it is and how much it is that we don't know. And I guess now, in the past 10 years or so that I've I've started working more on the human dimensions parts of oceans. It's more of like, wow, we have so much of these, like space and water and things but like, so much people are being affected by your kind of like that more critical analysis. I think that is also like it's more of an inspiration in that way as well.Brian Bienkowski For sure. And maybe maybe there's some overlap in this question. Since we've been talking about your your love of oceans, but you started your university studies at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in marine biology. So what was it specifically about oceans? Was it you know, fisheries? Was it how humans interact with them? Was it about their vastness or you know, all of the above.Liliana Sierra Castillo So, it's funny because as many marine biology programs, my undergrad was very much like ecology focus. And then my last quarter I took a the only fishery class. But at that moment, I still thought in my mind that I wanted to be a dolphin trainer. That was like my life goal. And then I was very lucky to have we have in that program for you to graduate, you have to do a professional internship. And so I got the super cool experience of working with the World Wildlife Fund in a bay area called Cortés*, which on the northern coast. And for six months, I was just working with fishery communities. And I was like, Okay, this is what I want to do, like, you know, those things are cool, but it's not like, and I discovered, like, you know, I really love the intersections of like, I get to be in the ocean and be in that moment, I used to be covered a lot in fish blog. So I was like, clean to the fisherman. And I love talking with people and like learning what they were doing. And I also found that I love, like, figuring out how to like, give back the results, right? that I'm learning from analysis back to the communities and all that like connection of cycles and turn it into, like management tools. And so yeah, I guess like it was, the university gave me the basic tools, and then this experience of the internship that kind of changed everything.Brian Bienkowski Well, these coastal communities, it's not just a, it's not just this natural wonder, like we were talking about, but it's so intertwined with culture and economics. And, you know, we're gonna get into a lot of that today with a lot of the work that you're doing. So it goes much further beyond as well, that's really pretty. It's so you know, intertwined with these coastal communities. So, before we get to your research, I want to know, a moment or event that has helped shape your identity up to this point.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I still, so I think for me, it happened again, in this internship. So this was like 10 years ago. And again, I had since from that moment, before that moment training on like, sadly, a lot of like, environmental classes are very much like, you know, we need pristine nature, we need everything to be protected, and all that, right. So I came up with that mentality. And I remember the first day, on the field with these fishery communities, I was with this fisherman who sadly has passed. Now he passed away, which is very sad. But I still remember he told me, you know, like, so what's the point of like, you guys, tell us like, we cannot fish in this area, my organization. And that moment, my NGO was internship with, they were trying to build a protected area, marine protected area, and like, we moved the fisherman, and he was like, "What's the point of view protecting these resources if we don't even have anything to eat? Like, what are we going to eat?" And so that, for me, was like, it was a moment that I it's I know, it sounds dumb. But in that moment, I was like, I cannot believe, that for all my undergrad, I was so like, naive, right? Like, in this little bubble of like, privilege that I didn't understand anything until that moment. And I will say, Yeah, you are 100%. Right. And I think that change everything until right now, 10 years after what I've gotten all the way since.Brian Bienkowski I don't think that sounds dumb at all. In fact, where I live in the northern Great Lakes region, a lot of people are focused on forest wilderness, you know, wild areas. And there's also indigenous communities up here who use those spaces to hunt and gather. So the idea of just blocking them off to protect them is is not in line with what how they've used these areas. So I totally, I totally understand what you're talking about. And I grew up the same way, like, oh, yeah, protect it. You know, that's great, preserve it and protect it. That's the way to go. And I think, hopefully, we're starting to realize that that's not always the most just way to do things. So a lot of your research now centers around the growth of aquaculture globally and the impacts it has on small scale fishery communities. So first, can you kind of orient those of us who are not too familiar with this trend? And what does aquaculture entail? Where are we seeing the most expansion of it?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I think for that question, because I know a lot of people, it's funny, because like, to this day, for example, a lot like my mom doesn't really know what I do. Right? So fisheries, and that's where I it's my big specialization, right? It's everything that's been caught wildly in any body of water, I do marine fisheries, but it can be lakes, as you're saying in Michigan, rivers, whatever. Aquaculture is basically I tried to think of it as like a farm or agriculture on water. So it's, there's some sort of human control component over it. It's literally you have a seed, or a baby or seed of an oyster, for example, and then you help it grow. Like you control it in an environment until it grows and then you harvest it. So it's a big difference from fisheries, right. The other comparison I tried to think about it is like hunters versus gatherers, right? Like hunting is the fishing and gatherer races like agriculture kind of wise. Um, so I'm gonna say in the past, so my expertise is fisheries, but going to aquaculture in the past, I'm going to say maybe since the 80s, there's been a big boom to kind of like grow aquaculture with this kind of idea that seafood is declining, the fisheries production, so As we all know, it's declaiming for a lot of lot of factors. So the idea that aquaculture is gonna, like provide, like all the seafood we need. And so it has had its ups and downs, I think around the 90s. It's when the shrimp aquaculture started around the world, especially in Latin America, coming from, again, like a lot of funding from like not, Latin America. And that was a very bad situation, because as you know, aquaculture for shrimp, they destroyed a lot of mangroves. So it was a whole thing, right? So then aquaculture kind of started to decline. And I think back, I think, would have saved maybe the, like, 15 years ago or so there's like this new kind of push to aquaculture through the blue economy, right? All these these cores narratives. And now it's kind of like thinking that aquaculture besides giving, like that seafood, the seafood supply, that fisheries might not be giving. Now, it's kind of like, okay, now, it's also can do ecosystem services. Now, it can help people, now it can provide all these other benefits, which in some instances it does. But what we're seeing in is where my study comes in is like when these when it's being implemented at a local scale in communities is specifically in underdeveloped countries. It's not getting all those benefits, that it's promising. And in reality, it's creating a lot of injustices. So that's where I come like, trying to understand why and how can we do it better to really have the benefits that you should have.Brian Bienkowski So what are some of the opportunities that this expanded aquaculture brings? And conversely, what are some of the problems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so some of the opportunities, you know, like, I've seen some examples where it actually provides employment to people, right. And a lot of again, I work in small scale coastal communities, so very different from industrial fisheries or aquaculture areas. So a lot of these communities, they're very marginalized, they're very vulnerable to shocks and a lot of things happening around them. So I've seen some instances where like, if doing that, like correctly, aquaculture can provide them with employment, like they can work, they can provide them with food security, they can provide, if done correctly, like benefits of the ecosystem, we know that some of these species might contribute to ecosystemic benefits. But the thing is, like conversely, when he's not being done correctly, it can also impact for example, a lot of these implementation of aquaculture right now is kind of like, okay, you have to stop fishing. And now you're going to do aquaculture. And as you mentioned a while ago, for these people fishing has a lot of cultural traditional aspects, right? It's not like they go fishing because money, they go fishing, because it's who they are. And so that impacts a lot, right? Like, that's already like very bad, kind of like being like, "Okay, you're gonna stop doing these things that you have done for four generations ago until right now, you're gonna stop doing it, even though you want to just because I want you to stop doing it." Now. So the way sometimes is being done is kind of like, not just like stop fishing, and it's going to impact relations, as I said, but also like, think about it, if you have such a vulnerable system, you want them to have multiple economic activity activities, where livelihoods, if you remove fishing, and then use of aquaculture when there's a shock to the market or to the food system or whatever, then what are these people going to rely on? Right? Like, what are we doing here. And then the other, that third thing that I've seen a lot, is that aquaculture tends to be very tends to be more of like, it can be more like division of classes, like people can like accumulate more as an aquaculture, like, for example, if you and me both have aquaculture operations, and I have the capacity to buy more land, to lobby more, to get more products, more seed everything I have maybe got a I studied to understand what's happening, I understand all these things. I'm gonna grow more, right, versus you're gonna stay tiny, tiny. And then that creates a problem, right? Like what's happened with the tiny, tiny, they're gonna be eliminated for the system. And I think the the worst that's happening is that people keep thinking that aquaculture, as I said, in the beginning is gonna solve all the problems that seafood and fisheries are facing. And it's not, it's not a bullet solution, bullet-proof solution. And so it's not any nice like, once in these communities, they are doing aquaculture because whatever someone told them, the people that are supposed to be managing the fisheries kind of forget that that system exists. And so the fisheries are doing very bad. They're not doing at all good. And then aquaculture is kind of there, but it's not really doing anything and it's kind of like creates a whole mess.Brian Bienkowski Yeah, that makes sense. And you mentioned just fishing being a traditional activity for many of these communities. Can you just talk about get a probe that little further, how this transition has overlooked kind of local context, local cultures and history and expand on why that's a problem?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so um, I can give you an example, actually from one of the communities I work with. So I have done all my fieldwork, most of it in in Baja California, so in Mexico, and I started in Honduras last year. But Baja California, so that's an interesting example, because there's been pushed to do aquaculture of different species from back on from 2011. You know, for many reasons, it hasn't worked, some has worked, some doesn't. But in 2020, when I started working with them, with this one community, there, the there was a local NGO pushing to the oyster aquaculture, right, so sounds all good, right? Like, yeah, that's gonna be always the aquaculture, the community is gonna be happy, you know that. But when you go and talk with the community, like I did that for three years, you notice, and they told me that to me many times, you know, like, I'm not happy. I miss fishing, I wish I could have a boat to go fish all the time I won. I missed the traditions, I miss the freedom associated with fishing. And so as a consequence, like if you think about it, their will they're not, they're not happy, there will be nice, not good, right? Like if you think about what they miss from fishing, and also because they're doing something they don't want to like aquaculture. It's kind of like that this is the aquaculture project was not being successful, right? Like it didn't really work because like the people didn't believing in through time, because fishers as I said, they still wanted to be diving and fishing and all these things. There was an increase on quote unquote, illegal fishing in which I don't like that term. But that's what it's called, you know, when you don't follow the management rules, they continue fishing goes, does what they want it to do. And so in the any creative like, besides all that I'm telling you, it creates a very sad like social situation, right? Like when you have a community that's divided, lot of social tension, tension between the community and the NGO. We've seen is going to affect everything, right? Like it's going to affect what if a project comes again, or like funding for fish, it's like a whole whole sea social situation being created. Because of not considering something as simple as being to go ask them like, Hey, guys, if you want to do aquaculture, if they say yes, how much time do you want to invest? What species you want to do? You know, do you still want to go fishing? Why don't we do it all together? Like think simple solution says that.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned working in California, Mexico, and now expanding your research to Honduras. Was that was it meaningful to you to expand your research into your your home?Liliana Sierra Castillo It was super meaningful. Actually, I was very excited. I've always, I always strive to do all like every research, I do kind of like the think about how to be applicable to Honduras. And actually was super cool. Last summer, I went back to the field areas where I started back 10 years ago. And it was so sweet, like people still remembered me. And I still remember them. And I was like, Yeah, that was super. It was like a very impactful moment. And it's it's very interesting. Because like Honduras. They've done aquaculture in the past, but this area is starting. There's like a super cool organization that's trying to like maybe do aquaculture, but they don't want to do it, like half just randomly they want to understand like, the social dimensions that are happening before transforming the system. So it's been very interesting to understand the system as it is a fishery system, what's going on? How can we maybe do aquaculture what is needed? And it's just cool to go talk with people and hear them.Brian Bienkowski Maybe I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to aquaculture, but I feel like I've seen headlines on I mean, are there pollution concerns? Is that something that you know anything about because I know sometimes when you have such a concentrated amount of fish and fish feeding, there can be pollution concerns? Is that? Is that an issue?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so definitely aquaculture besides everything I'm telling which I'm talking more the social things, it also has like some, like as you're saying, I guess this is more of like an ecological consequence, right? So I feel like the pollution it's more well I think it's more when it's like an industrial scale size right where you have maybe someone and you're putting like antibiotics or whatever and like the feed right like when you feed them that food leaves the area and stuff. But also like at a smaller scale. Like for example in Honduras, what happens a lot. You have the tilapia farms, and even though they're small, there's two big I guess, kind of pollution consequences. One is again, the feed that you give them right the feed makes the water around and like contaminated it gets you to revise. And second, a lot of these aquaculture operations use non-native species. Tilapia is non native. And so it scapes, because in aquaculture is always going to escape. Then you have the problem of like, okay, what is the, how is this non-native species going to, like impact the ecosystem. But in the, it's super interesting, because in Baja in Mexico and other parts of the world, they're pushing to use oyster aquaculture, because in theory, oyster has a lot of benefits, right? cleans the water, it a lot of ecosystemic services, I think it also sometimes is being used at like, what there's erosion and you use, like, oysters to, like, provide more structure to there. But there's also a lot of unknowns of oysters, right? Like, we don't know what impacts are being made by oysters in the ecosystem. For example, in Baja, the oysters that are being used are not in them are non native. So we don't even know how they're affecting the native organisms from the ecosystem. And all these other questions, but in oysters, you don't feed them. So at least you don't have to worry about that.Brian Bienkowski Before this call, I was at my local, not today. But recently I was at my grocery store and realize that I lived 20 minutes from Lake Superior, a massive fishery, the biggest freshwater lake on the planet. And almost all of the fish they sell there is farm raised from Chile and other places around the world, which is just indicative of our super broken food system. I think. So you mentioned you mentioned the places you're working in, in, you know, Mexico, Honduras, and California. And I'm wondering, what are some of the ways that you and others are working to kind of better incorporate small scale fisheries and their well being into these kinds of changes in systems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I think that there's a lot of good people trying to, as you're saying, like to give to voices to small-scale fishing communities and put them as at the center of all these policies or, or I don't even know, like, yeah, I guess their policies. So I think parallel to the blue economy, and blue growth, maybe I'm gonna say even, like, newer, I'm gonna say maybe, I don't know, like four or five years ago, eight years ago, is to start a what's called the Blue justice, right? Which is kind of these critical, how can we critically analyze and think about how we can put small scale fisheries or humans or human rights in the center, especially of these, these two big development discourses, right. And so there's a lot of people coming from all different perspectives, because the blue, this is a thing, the blue economy, if you think about it, the blue economy was a term proposed by an economist, I think 10 Or maybe 12 years ago, where basically is trying to get economic benefits from the ocean, right? That can mean a lot of things that can mean fisheries, aquaculture, offshore energy, so many things, it's like massive the amount of things you can get from the ocean. So I know a lot of great people that are trying to think about ways okay, like, for example, how can we make protected areas or I don't like the word permanent protected areas, but how can we manage the ocean in a way that the humans are there, we cannot eliminate the humans, right? I know a lot of people like doing similar work to what I do. But in other words, like parts of the world, like putting people at the center of labor, they want to because you're not if they want, how can we make it work? I know a lot of people being working with offshore energy and understanding like, how is this gonna impact communities, right communities? How can we bring them back to the table to think what you're saying? Obviously, there's like a big, I think that's been a big one for a lot of time, like trying to understand industrial fishing versus small scale fishing, right? Like, how can we provide more protection for small scale fisheries? Like how can we help them? And so I think it's so it's a very broad question, but I think it just inspires me to know that a lot of people are doing a lot of super amazing important work. It's hard work, but I think it's gonna get its get going in places.Brian Bienkowski And if you do you have examples or projects that you've seen that you feel like successfully and very intentionally incorporated local communities and their perspectives into aquaculture decisions?Liliana Sierra Castillo I know there's some like smaller-scale aquaculture operations from indigenous communities in I think it's in Seattle, and in Alaska, where communities are basically saying you know, we want to do aquaculture and they're like, in charge of the they are deciding everything. I think that one that example is pretty cool to read about that And I'm not sure about in Latin America, honestly. There must be some examples. But I don't know them from the top of my head right now. Sure, sure.Brian Bienkowski And you mentioned, you know, you've talked about these marine protected areas. And off the top, we spoke about why those can be seemingly very good, but perhaps problematic in some spots. I was wondering if you could talk about your work in advocacy in this area?Liliana Sierra Castillo In marine protected areas?Brian Bienkowski Yeah, just what you're what you're thinking, what you're what you're seeing what you're trying to do, in making that process more community centered and culturally inclusive.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I guess, um, as I mentioned, like, in 20, oh, my God, I don't even know, like, 10 years ago, when I was starting. And there was a big push for this big area, right, and getting these fishing communities out. I remember, I had a good conversation with my boss at that time, and we decided, you know, like, like, we cannot just eliminate these people, you know, like, that's going to be very counterproductive in the end, right? it's going to probably increase poaching and all these things. And also, it's not good. Like, it's super bad. So So we created it was kind of like, okay, let's think with them. Let's include them like that. See, like, inside of these marine area, how, what, what areas can we leave for them to fit, like, let's include them for everything. And so we developed this kind of cool kind of governance platform where we had like academia and government and NGOs and fishers are working together. And that was super cool. And I think that area is still going on back there. But recently, I'm in the marine protected area world –because I as I mentioned many times, I don't really like the word and the term– there's this cool project that I've been very honored to be part of is being carried by one of my friends, her name is Tasha Quintana. And she's trying to understand temporary closure. So temporary closure is a tool that has been used with people that manage their resources, which is basically as simple as like, you can be a person who's like exploiting a fishery, and you're gonna be like, Oh, I exploited this area, I'm gonna let us rest for a month or two, and then switch gears, right? So it's this is this is happening, and has been happening in all the world. So we're trying to understand, Okay, does it work? How does it work? How can we make it better maybe. And I'm trying to do like the equity and justice component of this, like trying to understand critically understand using critical environmental justice frameworks to see how this might be a more equitable solution versus the permanent and protected areas. So that's what we're trying to do with that space.Brian Bienkowski I'm curious with all this time spent in and around oceans and working in listening to fishing communities, do you fish?Liliana Sierra Castillo I fished more before then now I loved to go fishing. I was very bad at it. We really, really enjoyed like, you know, being with the hook and line and, or like the little nets or seeing when we're in the rivers and lakes. And I used to go out with fishermen and just see what they were like catching I used to go I think I went one year ago in Mexico with my fisher friends and was pretty fun. We went spear-diving. It's not allowed, but we still we did it was pretty fun. You know, it was night. And it was cool. Because like you couldn't see anything in the water on unless they had the flashlights. And when you like came out of the water. It was just like stars everywhere. So yeah, I do love fishing. I haven't done it California though, because I've heard it's like complicated to get a license and so on. But I do love fishing.Brian Bienkowski Cool. Very cool. And just one last question. Before we get to some of the final fun questions. What are you optimistic about when it comes to the work that you're doing and the research that you're conducting?Liliana Sierra Castillo You know, I'm optimistic and it's hard. I feel like this type of work, you have a lot of downs, some ups, um, it's as I mentioned, it's work that has to be done. But it's hard. Because it's kind of like if you think about it is kind of like trying to understand the cause root of things, really. Like, why are things the way they are? And sometimes that's uncomfortable to a lot of people, a lot of people are not going to be happy with the things that you say. But I'm hopeful. As I mentioned, I think that a lot of people are starting to think understand this is important. And I'm optimistic that more and more people we're going to start to know each other and kind of create these network of people that think alike and we need to continue to put communities in the center of all these decisions and continue to fight you know, it's kind of like a little revolution going on which I think it's very inspiring. But more than a revolution, I'm optimistic because I think that people also like, for example, all the people supporting the blue economy and all these, like bigger ideas are going to start understanding, you know, through all these other people of the blue justice team, they really need each other, like, how can you like, you know, it's kind of like, I'm optimistic that that can happen at some moment. But I think my most optimism is to that communities are slowly being put again, where they should be the center of everything. And that there's a lot of people that we're not alone, you know, like, it's a lot of times you feel alone. And there's a lot of people around the world trying to –which is crazy, right?– like, put them back in the center of all these things. But that's what it's happening. And I think it's pretty inspiring too.Brian Bienkowski There's so many parallels to other aspects of society. And when you think about one movement is like, how can we extract and make money? And the other movement is like, how can we make sure that the people who are most impacted by this have a say in this, and I think you can look at the energy sector you can look at, I mean, it's just so indicative of kind of where we find ourselves at this crossroads in trying to push for energy, justice, climate justice, environmental justice, kind of broadly. So I really appreciate you kind of introducing our readers to this idea of Blue justice, it's been really fascinating. And now I have three rapid fire fun questions where you could just answer with one word, or a phrase, my most treasured possession isLiliana Sierra Castillo my dog.Brian Bienkowski me too, by the way. One thing I'm looking forward to this month isLiliana Sierra Castillo in May, um I don't know, spending time with my friends.Brian Bienkowski That works. That's fun. And one unique tradition my family has isLiliana Sierra Castillo okay, so every time – this is a longer phrase, but it's just we're Latinos. Talk a lot. But every time it's your birthday, when we were back home, they used to wake you up, like at 4am. Even though you didn't want that and they would pretend that you were a baby and like give you like a like, it was like a lotion bottle. But it was supposed to be like a liquid our babies dreads call, like what they drink from them. The little bottles, milk bottles. Yeah, we were supposed to do that. And then after we will move out, I think they continue trying to do it, like calling us but now it's harder, right? Because like we're in so many different time zones. That he's kind of like has to vote okay, just told me when I can call you.Brian Bienkowski The call doesn't work quite as well, when you're, you know, paid to silence.Liliana Sierra Castillo Exactly. And my phone is always silent. So I think they tried it for a couple of years. And then I was like, I'm, I'm literally sleeping. Can't. But yeah, I do miss the pretending to be a baby thing.Brian Bienkowski That I've never, you know, that is new to me. I really, I really liked that. Well, Liliana, this has been so much fun. Again, thank you so much for your time. And it's just so exciting to have you in this program with your, you know, with your expertise and the research that you're doing. And one last question I've asked everybody is what is the last book that you read for fun? I'm readingLiliana Sierra Castillo it's I haven't finished reading it but I am in the middle of reading "Critical environmental justice and race." Which is funny because I haven't like in my side table like I read it every night while my boyfriend reads... I don't even know what you know, other things or friends are reading other things do. But for I guess before that I'm trying to think what was a good book? I don't remember right now I think that's been in a while kind of reading for me.Brian Bienkowski Well, you know what, for our audience, that probably is fun. So I think I think that one that you're reading right now works. Liliana, thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to following your career and working with you in this program.Liliana Sierra Castillo Thank you very much for everything, all the questions.



Liliana Sierra Castillo joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss the concept of blue justice and how the expansion of aquaculture impacts small-scale fishery communities.


Sierra Castillo, a current Agents of Change fellow and Ph.D. candidate at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara, also talks about how she became passionate about oceans, how we can rethink marine protected areas to center communities, and how meaningful it is for her to do research in her native Honduras.

The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion with Sierra Castillo and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justice

Transcript


Brian Bienkowski

Thank you so much for taking time to meet with me today. I'm really excited to have you on your work when I was doing a little research for this. It's different than other fellows we've had. And I'm really excited to talk about what you're doing. But as you may know, I'd like to start way at the beginning. So I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about your childhood and where an interest in the environment came into your life?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, of course. So I'm originally from Honduras. And it's funny because even when I was a child, my parents don't really live near the oceans. They live in the capital. But even when I was like, I remember specifically, I was like in second grade, and we did an essay. And it just fascinated me to know, when my professor was giving feedback that we know more about the moon, that about the ocean. And I think that just stuck in my head forever. And then at that moment, I decided I wanted to be a marine biologist, even though I didn't know what that meant. And then I guess I had the privilege that my parents were capable of taking us to like the beach around the country and exploring. I just, it's always fascinating, like how vast and amazing the ocean is. Because that's how it all started.

Brian Bienkowski

That's awesome. I grew up in the in Michigan, in the Great Lakes region, so not oceans, but really large lakes where you can't you know, you can't see the end of them. They're massive. And I just remember my whole life, no matter how many times I visited them, it always kind of blew me away or gave me this feeling of inspiration every time I see them. And it still does it to this day. And I don't know, do oceans. Do oceans do that for you? Do you still get kind of a sense of awe even though you've been working with them for so long?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, definitely. I feel these day like every time I walk past an ocean, as you're saying, like, I am just in awe how big it is and how much it is that we don't know. And I guess now, in the past 10 years or so that I've I've started working more on the human dimensions parts of oceans. It's more of like, wow, we have so much of these, like space and water and things but like, so much people are being affected by your kind of like that more critical analysis. I think that is also like it's more of an inspiration in that way as well.

Brian Bienkowski

For sure. And maybe maybe there's some overlap in this question. Since we've been talking about your your love of oceans, but you started your university studies at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in marine biology. So what was it specifically about oceans? Was it you know, fisheries? Was it how humans interact with them? Was it about their vastness or you know, all of the above.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

So, it's funny because as many marine biology programs, my undergrad was very much like ecology focus. And then my last quarter I took a the only fishery class. But at that moment, I still thought in my mind that I wanted to be a dolphin trainer. That was like my life goal. And then I was very lucky to have we have in that program for you to graduate, you have to do a professional internship. And so I got the super cool experience of working with the World Wildlife Fund in a bay area called Cortés*, which on the northern coast. And for six months, I was just working with fishery communities. And I was like, Okay, this is what I want to do, like, you know, those things are cool, but it's not like, and I discovered, like, you know, I really love the intersections of like, I get to be in the ocean and be in that moment, I used to be covered a lot in fish blog. So I was like, clean to the fisherman. And I love talking with people and like learning what they were doing. And I also found that I love, like, figuring out how to like, give back the results, right? that I'm learning from analysis back to the communities and all that like connection of cycles and turn it into, like management tools. And so yeah, I guess like it was, the university gave me the basic tools, and then this experience of the internship that kind of changed everything.

Brian Bienkowski

Well, these coastal communities, it's not just a, it's not just this natural wonder, like we were talking about, but it's so intertwined with culture and economics. And, you know, we're gonna get into a lot of that today with a lot of the work that you're doing. So it goes much further beyond as well, that's really pretty. It's so you know, intertwined with these coastal communities. So, before we get to your research, I want to know, a moment or event that has helped shape your identity up to this point.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, I still, so I think for me, it happened again, in this internship. So this was like 10 years ago. And again, I had since from that moment, before that moment training on like, sadly, a lot of like, environmental classes are very much like, you know, we need pristine nature, we need everything to be protected, and all that, right. So I came up with that mentality. And I remember the first day, on the field with these fishery communities, I was with this fisherman who sadly has passed. Now he passed away, which is very sad. But I still remember he told me, you know, like, so what's the point of like, you guys, tell us like, we cannot fish in this area, my organization. And that moment, my NGO was internship with, they were trying to build a protected area, marine protected area, and like, we moved the fisherman, and he was like, "What's the point of view protecting these resources if we don't even have anything to eat? Like, what are we going to eat?" And so that, for me, was like, it was a moment that I it's I know, it sounds dumb. But in that moment, I was like, I cannot believe, that for all my undergrad, I was so like, naive, right? Like, in this little bubble of like, privilege that I didn't understand anything until that moment. And I will say, Yeah, you are 100%. Right. And I think that change everything until right now, 10 years after what I've gotten all the way since.

Brian Bienkowski

I don't think that sounds dumb at all. In fact, where I live in the northern Great Lakes region, a lot of people are focused on forest wilderness, you know, wild areas. And there's also indigenous communities up here who use those spaces to hunt and gather. So the idea of just blocking them off to protect them is is not in line with what how they've used these areas. So I totally, I totally understand what you're talking about. And I grew up the same way, like, oh, yeah, protect it. You know, that's great, preserve it and protect it. That's the way to go. And I think, hopefully, we're starting to realize that that's not always the most just way to do things. So a lot of your research now centers around the growth of aquaculture globally and the impacts it has on small scale fishery communities. So first, can you kind of orient those of us who are not too familiar with this trend? And what does aquaculture entail? Where are we seeing the most expansion of it?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so I think for that question, because I know a lot of people, it's funny, because like, to this day, for example, a lot like my mom doesn't really know what I do. Right? So fisheries, and that's where I it's my big specialization, right? It's everything that's been caught wildly in any body of water, I do marine fisheries, but it can be lakes, as you're saying in Michigan, rivers, whatever. Aquaculture is basically I tried to think of it as like a farm or agriculture on water. So it's, there's some sort of human control component over it. It's literally you have a seed, or a baby or seed of an oyster, for example, and then you help it grow. Like you control it in an environment until it grows and then you harvest it. So it's a big difference from fisheries, right. The other comparison I tried to think about it is like hunters versus gatherers, right? Like hunting is the fishing and gatherer races like agriculture kind of wise. Um, so I'm gonna say in the past, so my expertise is fisheries, but going to aquaculture in the past, I'm going to say maybe since the 80s, there's been a big boom to kind of like grow aquaculture with this kind of idea that seafood is declining, the fisheries production, so As we all know, it's declaiming for a lot of lot of factors. So the idea that aquaculture is gonna, like provide, like all the seafood we need. And so it has had its ups and downs, I think around the 90s. It's when the shrimp aquaculture started around the world, especially in Latin America, coming from, again, like a lot of funding from like not, Latin America. And that was a very bad situation, because as you know, aquaculture for shrimp, they destroyed a lot of mangroves. So it was a whole thing, right? So then aquaculture kind of started to decline. And I think back, I think, would have saved maybe the, like, 15 years ago or so there's like this new kind of push to aquaculture through the blue economy, right? All these these cores narratives. And now it's kind of like thinking that aquaculture besides giving, like that seafood, the seafood supply, that fisheries might not be giving. Now, it's kind of like, okay, now, it's also can do ecosystem services. Now, it can help people, now it can provide all these other benefits, which in some instances it does. But what we're seeing in is where my study comes in is like when these when it's being implemented at a local scale in communities is specifically in underdeveloped countries. It's not getting all those benefits, that it's promising. And in reality, it's creating a lot of injustices. So that's where I come like, trying to understand why and how can we do it better to really have the benefits that you should have.

Brian Bienkowski

So what are some of the opportunities that this expanded aquaculture brings? And conversely, what are some of the problems?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so some of the opportunities, you know, like, I've seen some examples where it actually provides employment to people, right. And a lot of again, I work in small scale coastal communities, so very different from industrial fisheries or aquaculture areas. So a lot of these communities, they're very marginalized, they're very vulnerable to shocks and a lot of things happening around them. So I've seen some instances where like, if doing that, like correctly, aquaculture can provide them with employment, like they can work, they can provide them with food security, they can provide, if done correctly, like benefits of the ecosystem, we know that some of these species might contribute to ecosystemic benefits. But the thing is, like conversely, when he's not being done correctly, it can also impact for example, a lot of these implementation of aquaculture right now is kind of like, okay, you have to stop fishing. And now you're going to do aquaculture. And as you mentioned a while ago, for these people fishing has a lot of cultural traditional aspects, right? It's not like they go fishing because money, they go fishing, because it's who they are. And so that impacts a lot, right? Like, that's already like very bad, kind of like being like, "Okay, you're gonna stop doing these things that you have done for four generations ago until right now, you're gonna stop doing it, even though you want to just because I want you to stop doing it." Now. So the way sometimes is being done is kind of like, not just like stop fishing, and it's going to impact relations, as I said, but also like, think about it, if you have such a vulnerable system, you want them to have multiple economic activity activities, where livelihoods, if you remove fishing, and then use of aquaculture when there's a shock to the market or to the food system or whatever, then what are these people going to rely on? Right? Like, what are we doing here. And then the other, that third thing that I've seen a lot, is that aquaculture tends to be very tends to be more of like, it can be more like division of classes, like people can like accumulate more as an aquaculture, like, for example, if you and me both have aquaculture operations, and I have the capacity to buy more land, to lobby more, to get more products, more seed everything I have maybe got a I studied to understand what's happening, I understand all these things. I'm gonna grow more, right, versus you're gonna stay tiny, tiny. And then that creates a problem, right? Like what's happened with the tiny, tiny, they're gonna be eliminated for the system. And I think the the worst that's happening is that people keep thinking that aquaculture, as I said, in the beginning is gonna solve all the problems that seafood and fisheries are facing. And it's not, it's not a bullet solution, bullet-proof solution. And so it's not any nice like, once in these communities, they are doing aquaculture because whatever someone told them, the people that are supposed to be managing the fisheries kind of forget that that system exists. And so the fisheries are doing very bad. They're not doing at all good. And then aquaculture is kind of there, but it's not really doing anything and it's kind of like creates a whole mess.

Brian Bienkowski

Yeah, that makes sense. And you mentioned just fishing being a traditional activity for many of these communities. Can you just talk about get a probe that little further, how this transition has overlooked kind of local context, local cultures and history and expand on why that's a problem?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so um, I can give you an example, actually from one of the communities I work with. So I have done all my fieldwork, most of it in in Baja California, so in Mexico, and I started in Honduras last year. But Baja California, so that's an interesting example, because there's been pushed to do aquaculture of different species from back on from 2011. You know, for many reasons, it hasn't worked, some has worked, some doesn't. But in 2020, when I started working with them, with this one community, there, the there was a local NGO pushing to the oyster aquaculture, right, so sounds all good, right? Like, yeah, that's gonna be always the aquaculture, the community is gonna be happy, you know that. But when you go and talk with the community, like I did that for three years, you notice, and they told me that to me many times, you know, like, I'm not happy. I miss fishing, I wish I could have a boat to go fish all the time I won. I missed the traditions, I miss the freedom associated with fishing. And so as a consequence, like if you think about it, their will they're not, they're not happy, there will be nice, not good, right? Like if you think about what they miss from fishing, and also because they're doing something they don't want to like aquaculture. It's kind of like that this is the aquaculture project was not being successful, right? Like it didn't really work because like the people didn't believing in through time, because fishers as I said, they still wanted to be diving and fishing and all these things. There was an increase on quote unquote, illegal fishing in which I don't like that term. But that's what it's called, you know, when you don't follow the management rules, they continue fishing goes, does what they want it to do. And so in the any creative like, besides all that I'm telling you, it creates a very sad like social situation, right? Like when you have a community that's divided, lot of social tension, tension between the community and the NGO. We've seen is going to affect everything, right? Like it's going to affect what if a project comes again, or like funding for fish, it's like a whole whole sea social situation being created. Because of not considering something as simple as being to go ask them like, Hey, guys, if you want to do aquaculture, if they say yes, how much time do you want to invest? What species you want to do? You know, do you still want to go fishing? Why don't we do it all together? Like think simple solution says that.

Brian Bienkowski

So you mentioned working in California, Mexico, and now expanding your research to Honduras. Was that was it meaningful to you to expand your research into your your home?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

It was super meaningful. Actually, I was very excited. I've always, I always strive to do all like every research, I do kind of like the think about how to be applicable to Honduras. And actually was super cool. Last summer, I went back to the field areas where I started back 10 years ago. And it was so sweet, like people still remembered me. And I still remember them. And I was like, Yeah, that was super. It was like a very impactful moment. And it's it's very interesting. Because like Honduras. They've done aquaculture in the past, but this area is starting. There's like a super cool organization that's trying to like maybe do aquaculture, but they don't want to do it, like half just randomly they want to understand like, the social dimensions that are happening before transforming the system. So it's been very interesting to understand the system as it is a fishery system, what's going on? How can we maybe do aquaculture what is needed? And it's just cool to go talk with people and hear them.

Brian Bienkowski

Maybe I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to aquaculture, but I feel like I've seen headlines on I mean, are there pollution concerns? Is that something that you know anything about because I know sometimes when you have such a concentrated amount of fish and fish feeding, there can be pollution concerns? Is that? Is that an issue?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so definitely aquaculture besides everything I'm telling which I'm talking more the social things, it also has like some, like as you're saying, I guess this is more of like an ecological consequence, right? So I feel like the pollution it's more well I think it's more when it's like an industrial scale size right where you have maybe someone and you're putting like antibiotics or whatever and like the feed right like when you feed them that food leaves the area and stuff. But also like at a smaller scale. Like for example in Honduras, what happens a lot. You have the tilapia farms, and even though they're small, there's two big I guess, kind of pollution consequences. One is again, the feed that you give them right the feed makes the water around and like contaminated it gets you to revise. And second, a lot of these aquaculture operations use non-native species. Tilapia is non native. And so it scapes, because in aquaculture is always going to escape. Then you have the problem of like, okay, what is the, how is this non-native species going to, like impact the ecosystem. But in the, it's super interesting, because in Baja in Mexico and other parts of the world, they're pushing to use oyster aquaculture, because in theory, oyster has a lot of benefits, right? cleans the water, it a lot of ecosystemic services, I think it also sometimes is being used at like, what there's erosion and you use, like, oysters to, like, provide more structure to there. But there's also a lot of unknowns of oysters, right? Like, we don't know what impacts are being made by oysters in the ecosystem. For example, in Baja, the oysters that are being used are not in them are non native. So we don't even know how they're affecting the native organisms from the ecosystem. And all these other questions, but in oysters, you don't feed them. So at least you don't have to worry about that.

Brian Bienkowski

Before this call, I was at my local, not today. But recently I was at my grocery store and realize that I lived 20 minutes from Lake Superior, a massive fishery, the biggest freshwater lake on the planet. And almost all of the fish they sell there is farm raised from Chile and other places around the world, which is just indicative of our super broken food system. I think. So you mentioned you mentioned the places you're working in, in, you know, Mexico, Honduras, and California. And I'm wondering, what are some of the ways that you and others are working to kind of better incorporate small scale fisheries and their well being into these kinds of changes in systems?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, I think that there's a lot of good people trying to, as you're saying, like to give to voices to small-scale fishing communities and put them as at the center of all these policies or, or I don't even know, like, yeah, I guess their policies. So I think parallel to the blue economy, and blue growth, maybe I'm gonna say even, like, newer, I'm gonna say maybe, I don't know, like four or five years ago, eight years ago, is to start a what's called the Blue justice, right? Which is kind of these critical, how can we critically analyze and think about how we can put small scale fisheries or humans or human rights in the center, especially of these, these two big development discourses, right. And so there's a lot of people coming from all different perspectives, because the blue, this is a thing, the blue economy, if you think about it, the blue economy was a term proposed by an economist, I think 10 Or maybe 12 years ago, where basically is trying to get economic benefits from the ocean, right? That can mean a lot of things that can mean fisheries, aquaculture, offshore energy, so many things, it's like massive the amount of things you can get from the ocean. So I know a lot of great people that are trying to think about ways okay, like, for example, how can we make protected areas or I don't like the word permanent protected areas, but how can we manage the ocean in a way that the humans are there, we cannot eliminate the humans, right? I know a lot of people like doing similar work to what I do. But in other words, like parts of the world, like putting people at the center of labor, they want to because you're not if they want, how can we make it work? I know a lot of people being working with offshore energy and understanding like, how is this gonna impact communities, right communities? How can we bring them back to the table to think what you're saying? Obviously, there's like a big, I think that's been a big one for a lot of time, like trying to understand industrial fishing versus small scale fishing, right? Like, how can we provide more protection for small scale fisheries? Like how can we help them? And so I think it's so it's a very broad question, but I think it just inspires me to know that a lot of people are doing a lot of super amazing important work. It's hard work, but I think it's gonna get its get going in places.

Brian Bienkowski

And if you do you have examples or projects that you've seen that you feel like successfully and very intentionally incorporated local communities and their perspectives into aquaculture decisions?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

I know there's some like smaller-scale aquaculture operations from indigenous communities in I think it's in Seattle, and in Alaska, where communities are basically saying you know, we want to do aquaculture and they're like, in charge of the they are deciding everything. I think that one that example is pretty cool to read about that And I'm not sure about in Latin America, honestly. There must be some examples. But I don't know them from the top of my head right now. Sure, sure.

Brian Bienkowski

And you mentioned, you know, you've talked about these marine protected areas. And off the top, we spoke about why those can be seemingly very good, but perhaps problematic in some spots. I was wondering if you could talk about your work in advocacy in this area?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

In marine protected areas?

Brian Bienkowski

Yeah, just what you're what you're thinking, what you're what you're seeing what you're trying to do, in making that process more community centered and culturally inclusive.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so I guess, um, as I mentioned, like, in 20, oh, my God, I don't even know, like, 10 years ago, when I was starting. And there was a big push for this big area, right, and getting these fishing communities out. I remember, I had a good conversation with my boss at that time, and we decided, you know, like, like, we cannot just eliminate these people, you know, like, that's going to be very counterproductive in the end, right? it's going to probably increase poaching and all these things. And also, it's not good. Like, it's super bad. So So we created it was kind of like, okay, let's think with them. Let's include them like that. See, like, inside of these marine area, how, what, what areas can we leave for them to fit, like, let's include them for everything. And so we developed this kind of cool kind of governance platform where we had like academia and government and NGOs and fishers are working together. And that was super cool. And I think that area is still going on back there. But recently, I'm in the marine protected area world –because I as I mentioned many times, I don't really like the word and the term– there's this cool project that I've been very honored to be part of is being carried by one of my friends, her name is Tasha Quintana. And she's trying to understand temporary closure. So temporary closure is a tool that has been used with people that manage their resources, which is basically as simple as like, you can be a person who's like exploiting a fishery, and you're gonna be like, Oh, I exploited this area, I'm gonna let us rest for a month or two, and then switch gears, right? So it's this is this is happening, and has been happening in all the world. So we're trying to understand, Okay, does it work? How does it work? How can we make it better maybe. And I'm trying to do like the equity and justice component of this, like trying to understand critically understand using critical environmental justice frameworks to see how this might be a more equitable solution versus the permanent and protected areas. So that's what we're trying to do with that space.

Brian Bienkowski

I'm curious with all this time spent in and around oceans and working in listening to fishing communities, do you fish?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

I fished more before then now I loved to go fishing. I was very bad at it. We really, really enjoyed like, you know, being with the hook and line and, or like the little nets or seeing when we're in the rivers and lakes. And I used to go out with fishermen and just see what they were like catching I used to go I think I went one year ago in Mexico with my fisher friends and was pretty fun. We went spear-diving. It's not allowed, but we still we did it was pretty fun. You know, it was night. And it was cool. Because like you couldn't see anything in the water on unless they had the flashlights. And when you like came out of the water. It was just like stars everywhere. So yeah, I do love fishing. I haven't done it California though, because I've heard it's like complicated to get a license and so on. But I do love fishing.

Brian Bienkowski

Cool. Very cool. And just one last question. Before we get to some of the final fun questions. What are you optimistic about when it comes to the work that you're doing and the research that you're conducting?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

You know, I'm optimistic and it's hard. I feel like this type of work, you have a lot of downs, some ups, um, it's as I mentioned, it's work that has to be done. But it's hard. Because it's kind of like if you think about it is kind of like trying to understand the cause root of things, really. Like, why are things the way they are? And sometimes that's uncomfortable to a lot of people, a lot of people are not going to be happy with the things that you say. But I'm hopeful. As I mentioned, I think that a lot of people are starting to think understand this is important. And I'm optimistic that more and more people we're going to start to know each other and kind of create these network of people that think alike and we need to continue to put communities in the center of all these decisions and continue to fight you know, it's kind of like a little revolution going on which I think it's very inspiring. But more than a revolution, I'm optimistic because I think that people also like, for example, all the people supporting the blue economy and all these, like bigger ideas are going to start understanding, you know, through all these other people of the blue justice team, they really need each other, like, how can you like, you know, it's kind of like, I'm optimistic that that can happen at some moment. But I think my most optimism is to that communities are slowly being put again, where they should be the center of everything. And that there's a lot of people that we're not alone, you know, like, it's a lot of times you feel alone. And there's a lot of people around the world trying to –which is crazy, right?– like, put them back in the center of all these things. But that's what it's happening. And I think it's pretty inspiring too.

Brian Bienkowski

There's so many parallels to other aspects of society. And when you think about one movement is like, how can we extract and make money? And the other movement is like, how can we make sure that the people who are most impacted by this have a say in this, and I think you can look at the energy sector you can look at, I mean, it's just so indicative of kind of where we find ourselves at this crossroads in trying to push for energy, justice, climate justice, environmental justice, kind of broadly. So I really appreciate you kind of introducing our readers to this idea of Blue justice, it's been really fascinating. And now I have three rapid fire fun questions where you could just answer with one word, or a phrase, my most treasured possession is

Liliana Sierra Castillo

my dog.

Brian Bienkowski

me too, by the way. One thing I'm looking forward to this month is

Liliana Sierra Castillo

in May, um I don't know, spending time with my friends.

Brian Bienkowski

That works. That's fun. And one unique tradition my family has is

Liliana Sierra Castillo

okay, so every time – this is a longer phrase, but it's just we're Latinos. Talk a lot. But every time it's your birthday, when we were back home, they used to wake you up, like at 4am. Even though you didn't want that and they would pretend that you were a baby and like give you like a like, it was like a lotion bottle. But it was supposed to be like a liquid our babies dreads call, like what they drink from them. The little bottles, milk bottles. Yeah, we were supposed to do that. And then after we will move out, I think they continue trying to do it, like calling us but now it's harder, right? Because like we're in so many different time zones. That he's kind of like has to vote okay, just told me when I can call you.

Brian Bienkowski

The call doesn't work quite as well, when you're, you know, paid to silence.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Exactly. And my phone is always silent. So I think they tried it for a couple of years. And then I was like, I'm, I'm literally sleeping. Can't. But yeah, I do miss the pretending to be a baby thing.

Brian Bienkowski

That I've never, you know, that is new to me. I really, I really liked that. Well, Liliana, this has been so much fun. Again, thank you so much for your time. And it's just so exciting to have you in this program with your, you know, with your expertise and the research that you're doing. And one last question I've asked everybody is what is the last book that you read for fun? I'm reading

Liliana Sierra Castillo

it's I haven't finished reading it but I am in the middle of reading "Critical environmental justice and race." Which is funny because I haven't like in my side table like I read it every night while my boyfriend reads... I don't even know what you know, other things or friends are reading other things do. But for I guess before that I'm trying to think what was a good book? I don't remember right now I think that's been in a while kind of reading for me.

Brian Bienkowski

Well, you know what, for our audience, that probably is fun. So I think I think that one that you're reading right now works. Liliana, thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to following your career and working with you in this program.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Thank you very much for everything, all the questions.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Australia has just been handed a map for getting to net zero. Here’s how it will guide us

Emissions pathways act as a map of the future, showing us how to get from where we are to where we want to be.

AustralianCamera/ShutterstockAustralia’s push for net-zero emissions received a welcome boost on Thursday, with the release of an official report showing how Australia can seek to cut domestic emissions across each sector of the economy. The Climate Change Authority prepared the report, which provides vital scaffolding for Australia’s climate ambitions. Hopefully, it will inform the Australian government’s upcoming decarbonisation plans for each sector of the economy, and its updated goal for emissions reduction out to 2035. The pathways laid out by the authority show how emissions cuts can be made in sectors such as land use, resources, transport and energy. Importantly, the report shows what effective climate action looks like – and what Australia can achieve. The roadmap also shows how Australia can do its part to limit global warming to 1.5°C to avoid temperatures climbing dangerously higher. Climate scientists are clear: every fraction of a degree matters. Why are these pathways important? The authority groups Australia’s domestic emissions into six categories: electricity and energy, transport, industry and waste, agriculture and land, built environment, and resources. For each sector of Australia’s economy, getting emissions to net zero poses different challenges and opportunities. Preventing emissions from buildings requires, among other things, getting off gas and making them more efficient. Reducing emissions from transport means encouraging uptake of diverse solutions such as electric vehicles, trains and cycling. The report provides pathways that can guide the decarbonisation of each sector. It shows which technologies could be taken up and phased out, how to attract, enable and time investments, and how to align policy with practical implementation. The authority borrows from the approach of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, by showing a range of possible routes to net zero and comparing their work to others. We hope the Australian government continues this approach, to ensure decision-makers understand how different modelling approaches and scenarios combine to create a robust body of knowledge. The land sector has become a carbon sink in recent years. AzureJasper/Shutterstock Pathways show us the way We have spent more than a decade doing work similar to the report just released. Our own sectoral pathways are also designed to support governments, businesses and investors as they look for opportunities to reduce emissions. Decision-makers around the world are calling for such guidance. Why? Because pathways create a signal of how things can change. Laying out the problem, and different approaches to solving it, helps create a common understanding of the opportunities, risks and barriers to effective action. They make it possible for governments to set clear goals and ensure policies match what is needed and are backed by evidence. Rather than just setting out the overarching intention of, say, cutting emissions in half in a decade, pathways show how it can be done. Pathways let investors and companies identify and reduce risks and get ahead in a global economy aiming for net-zero emissions. And they lay out the technologies and processes needed to make the shift: ranging from mature, ready-to-deploy technologies such as renewable energy and storage, to maturing technologies such as green steelmaking. Mining of critical minerals will increase as fossil fuel extraction decreases under the resources sector plan. Pictured: Greenbushes lithium mine in Western Australia. David Steele/Shutterstock Pathways to keep 1.5°C alive Early next year, the Australian government is expected to release its new 2035 emissions target, taking us beyond the current target for 2030. Every signatory to the 2015 Paris Agreement has to publicly set a new target every five years. Other nations are doing the same. In the authority’s plan, Australia would hit net zero by 2040 under the more ambitious pathway aimed at meeting the 1.5°C goal, or 2050 under the 2°C scenario. These net zero dates are broadly consistent with our own analysis. But there are opportunities to move faster still. Boosted ambitions Transport is now Australia’s fastest-growing source of emissions. The authority’s transport pathway envisages passenger vehicles going electric and encouraging public transport and active transport, such as walking, cycling and micromobility such as e-scooters. It aligns with our research, which shows a diverse solutions approach is a better option to reduce transport emissions. This is especially important given recent delays in the shift to zero-emissions vehicles. However, the authority only takes a diverse approach to passenger transport. Our own work shows Australia can diversify its approach to freight transport. The authority focuses on moving trucks from diesel and petrol to battery electric and green hydrogen. But Climateworks’ analysis shows we can also reduce distance travelled through route optimisation and shift freight to rail, where possible. For the built environment – our houses, offices and infrastructure – the report rightly notes most technologies are now technically ready, commercially available, cheaper to run and healthier. They include energy-efficient electrical appliances, roof and wall insulation and window glazing. But there’s an opportunity to go further. The most cost-effective way to green your house depends on which state or territory you live in. Quick fixes – such as switching gas hot water for heat pumps – are included in the authority’s report. But as our recent modelling shows, homes in cooler climates benefit from more comprehensive improvements including double-glazing windows and adding insulation to walls and ceilings, alongside the quick fixes. Heat pump? Solar? Insulation? The most cost-effective way of cutting emissions from houses differs state by state. ThomsonD/Shutterstock What’s next? The pathways laid out by the Climate Change Authority in this report will not just be left on the shelf. They have very real use for business leaders and investors, as well as for policymakers. These pathways will guide Australia’s comprehensive national net-zero plan. They give us a starting point and show us how it can be done. Read more: Can we really reach net zero by 2050? A new report maps out Australia's path in more detail than ever before Climateworks Centre is a part of Monash University. It receives funding from a range of external sources including philanthropy, governments and businesses.Josh Solomonsz works for Climateworks Centre. Climateworks is a part of Monash University and receives funding from a range of external sources including philanthropy, governments and businesses. Josh is a volunteer committee of management member of the Port Phillip EcoCentre, a community environmental sustainability organisation.Matthew Benetti is affiliated with Think Forward, an intergenerational fairness think tank. I am a volunteer board member.

Factbox-Key Ministers in Ukraine's Cabinet Reshuffle

By Olena HarmashKYIV (Reuters) - Here are some of the key appointees in a Ukrainian cabinet reshuffle completed on Thursday and why their...

KYIV (Reuters) - Here are some of the key appointees in a Ukrainian cabinet reshuffle completed on Thursday and why their portfolios matter:FOREIGN MINISTER: ANDRII SYBIHA, 49Sybiha's appointment reflects the fact that President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has taken a leading role in foreign policy since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.Sybiha, a career diplomat without a prominent public profile, was named first deputy foreign minister in April 2024. Before that, he was one of several deputy heads of Zelenskiy's presidential office where he oversaw foreign policy and strategic partnerships. He was Ukraine's ambassador to Turkey from 2016 to 2021 and headed a directorate for consular services at the Foreign Ministry before that. DEPUTY PM FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND REGIONS: OLEKSIY KULEBA, 41This government portfolio is powerful as it confers some control over financial flows for wartime reconstruction. The durability and viability of infrastructure is also vital as Russia targets it to try to get an upper hand in the war.Kuleba served as a deputy head of Zelenskiy's office overseeing regional policies from January 2023. That job involved coordinating ties between regional authorities and the military to build fortifications and support the development of mobile anti-drone groups across Ukraine. In the first year after Russia's invasion, Kuleba served as the regional governor of the Kyiv region that surrounds the capital.   DEPUTY PM FOR EU INTEGRATION AND JUSTICE MINISTER: OLHA STEFANYSHYNA, 38 Stefanyshyna, a lawyer by education, served as the deputy prime minister in charge of Kyiv's accession to the European Union and NATO military alliance from June 2020. She retains that portfolio and gains the functions of the old justice ministry as head of a bigger ministry combining the two.     A key negotiator in Ukraine's efforts to join the EU, she spent most of her professional life working to integrate Ukraine with the West and get rid of its post-Soviet legacy. In the early years of her career, she worked at the justice ministry, laying the legal groundwork for closer EU-Ukraine cooperation.AGRICULTURE MINISTER: VITALIY KOVAL, 43Koval headed the State Property Fund, Ukraine's main privatisation agency from November 2023. Prior to that he was the governor of the Rivne region in western Ukraine. He also worked in the private sector, serving in various senior positions in banking, transport and agriculture.MINISTER FOR STRATEGIC INDUSTRIES: HERMAN SMETANIN, 32Smetanin is the youngest minister in the cabinet and his appointment is more evidence of a rapid rise through the ranks. An engineer by education, he was named head of Ukraine's largest state-owned defence consortium UkrOboronProm in June 2023. During that period, weapons and ammunition production increased. He also spearheaded a corporate governance reform to increase transparency at the state giant.At the start of the invasion, he worked in his native city of Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine, about 30 km from the Russian border, as the director of one of the Ukrainian tank factories.MINISTER FOR VETERANS: NATALIIA KALMYKOVA, 37 Kalmykova, a doctor by education, was a deputy defence minister from September 2023. Prior to that, she headed Ukraine's Veterans Fund and worked in Come Back Alive, one of the largest Ukrainian charity organisations. ENVIRONMENT MINISTER: SVITLANA HRYNCHUK, 38 Hrynchuk was a deputy energy minister from September 2023. She was also a deputy environment minister for several months in 2022. Prior to that, she was an adviser to the finance minister and headed a working group in the ministry of energy on environmental protection and climate change. MINISTER FOR CULTURE AND STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS: MYKOLA TOCHYTSKYI, 56Tochytskyi, a career diplomat, was a deputy head of Zelenskiy's office overseeing foreign policy from April 2024. He earlier served as Ukraine's ambassador in Belgium and Luxembourg and was also Ukraine's representative in the Council of Europe.David Arakhamia, head of Zelenskiy's parliamentary faction, has said Ukraine needs to step up its efforts to combat disinformation and that a person with foreign policy experience was needed for that.(Reporting by Olena Harmash; editing by Tom Balmforth and Philippa Fletcher)Copyright 2024 Thomson Reuters.Photos You Should See - July 2024

Could Liverwurst Take Down Boar’s Head?

Deaths from a listeria outbreak are haunting the mysterious deli-meat empire.

Founded in Brooklyn in 1905, Boar’s Head is the industry standard for the modern miracle-horror of processed deli meat, whereby a whole lot of chicken or turkey or pork is macerated into oblivion, injected with a flavor brine, and reconstituted into a shape that is not found in nature. Meat eaters mostly agree that it is a gross and delicious and easy way to make a sandwich — when the system works. But on July 26, Boar’s Head announced a recall of some 207,000 pounds of product due to potential exposure to Listeria monocytogenes at a plant in Virginia, after the Maryland Department of Health found that a sample of Boar’s Head liverwurst tested positive for the bacteria. Four days later, the recall was expanded to include some 7 million additional pounds from the tainted plant — from hot dogs to bacon to something called “hot butt cappy ham.” By late August, nine people had died and 57 were hospitalized, according to the Centers for Disease Control, which is investigating what is the largest listeriosis outbreak since 2011. The adage about meat no longer applies to the recalled products of the Boar’s Head Provision Co. After a summer of recalls and deaths from listeria, people really do want to know how their sausages and other processed meats are made. As food-safety lawyers prepare class-action lawsuits, the next few months for Boar’s Head will involve cleaning up its reputation beyond its closed plant in Virginia — and beyond just liverwurst. “I had a customer come in, he was about 75 years old,” said Paul DiSpirito of Lioni Italian Heroes in Bensonhurst. “He has been eating cold cuts every day of his life for 60 years. He told me he hasn’t eaten a cold cut in a month and a half. So my bill is down. We are selling less Boar’s Head.” DiSpirito claims he has skipped several lunch breaks due to the volume of calls about the meat. “I’m sitting here answering phone calls from all these customers asking about this vendor. It’s bad, because Boar’s Head is New York deli.” On August 26, records released by the United States Department of Agriculture food-safety inspectors showed that the Virginia plant linked to the outbreak had 69 violations for “noncompliance” over the past year. Mildew was found near the sinks for workers to wash their hands. A “black mold-like substance” was found in coolers. Puddles of water were sitting so long they had “green algal growth.” Puddles of blood were found in a cooler. In June, an inspector noted “small flying gnat like insects flying” around a room whose walls had “heavy meat buildup.” One food-safety attorney representing the family of an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor who died after eating tainted liverwurst told USA Today that it was the “worst set of inspection reports I have ever seen.” “We are deeply sorry,” the company wrote in a statement that underlined that only liverwurst from one plant in Virginia was affected. For years, Boar’s Head has been known as a ruthless competitor, suing similarly named businesses to protect its reputation and pulling its products from stores that dared to push their house brands over its own. The president of Dietz & Watson, a rival, once described the juggernaut as its “mortal enemies.” This was before an incident in Florida in which Boar’s Head trucks reportedly blocked parking spots and blew air horns while customers were attending a fundraiser for breast cancer where Dietz & Watson did taste tests against Boar’s Head meats. Boar’s Head now has a CEO from outside the family, but the descendants of founders Frank Brunckhorst and Bruno Bischoff still own the company. They are locked in a yearslong legal battle in federal court. After Brunckhorst’s daughter Barbara died in 2020, her will stipulated that the lion’s share of her stake in the company go to environmental charities and neuroscience research. Bischoff’s grandson claims that Brunckhorst’s shares are actually his. How much the company actually makes is anyone’s guess. Court records suggest annual revenue is north of $1 billion. Despite the current crisis, the company maintains its fans. A friend who grew up working at a family deli — his winter jacket is a Carhartt with the Boar’s Head branding — sent me a picture of a recent party in Philadelphia. In the photo, cold cuts sat under a custom poster of the Boar’s Head logo, in which the brand’s swine has bloodshot eyes and appears to be foaming at the mouth. “I’d rather get the toxin / than eat Dietz & Watson,” read the caption. For those slightly less obsessed with deli meat — but still concerned about the “toxin” — food-safety expert Amanda Lathrop recommends vigilance in food prep. “Listeria is ubiquitous, so it is found pretty much everywhere,” said Lathrop, a professor at California Polytechnic State University. “It is this incredible organism that’s really hearty, so it can tolerate really cold temperatures, it can tolerate really high salt contents. It can grow at refrigeration temperature.” Another incredible aspect of listeria? “It can infect the human body by transversing the stomach lining, and it kind of moves from cell to cell,” said Lathrop. “It just really can evade the human’s immune system as well as things like antibiotics.” For most people, listeriosis will just cause uncomfortable but short-term symptoms like diarrhea, vomiting, and headaches. “It’s really the elderly folks, people who are immunocompromised, and particularly pregnant women who have the most kind of devastating effects,” said Lathrop. Sign Up for the Intelligencer Newsletter Daily news about the politics, business, and technology shaping our world.

Rachel Kushner’s Surprising Swerve

She and her narrators have always relied on swagger—but not this time.

“Sometimes I am boggled by the gallery of souls I’ve known. By the lore. The wild history, unsung,” Rachel Kushner writes in The Hard Crowd, her 2021 essay collection. “People crowd in and talk to me in dreams. People who died or disappeared or whose connection to my own life makes no logical sense, but exists as strong as ever, in a past that seeps and stains instead of fades.” As a girl in San Francisco’s Sunset District, Kushner ran with a group whom she has described as “ratty delinquents”—kids who fought, who set fires, who got high too young and too often, who in some cases wound up incarcerated or addicted or dead. At 16, she headed to UC Berkeley for college, but returned to the city after graduating, working at bars and immersing herself in the motorcycle scene. Almost immersing herself, anyway. Even when she was a 14-year-old sampling strangers’ drugs at rock concerts, some piece of Kushner was an observer as well as a participant, a student of unsung histories.In her fiction, Kushner gravitates toward main characters who occupy that same split psychological place. All of her novels—her latest, Creation Lake, is her fourth—feature a young woman, usually a narrator, who shares her way of viewing the world. Kushner often loans her protagonists her own biker swagger, the hard layer of confidence that helps a woman survive in a very male environment. Preferring to write in the first person, she also gives her central characters her distinctive style: Kushner is alternately warm and caustic, funny and slippery, able to swing from high-literary registers to street slang and back in an instant. Her recurring theme has been the limits that even groups of outsiders impose on women, and yet her female characters, no matter how constrained they find themselves, are roving, curious thinkers, using their keen powers of observation to escape subjugation and victimhood—in their minds, if not in their circumstances.With every book, Kushner has grown more interested in the push-pull between material restriction and psychic freedom. She’s especially intrigued by the effect that gender roles have on her characters’ strategies for navigating that tension. In each of her novels, a woman tries to both resist and exploit conventional ideas about female behavior. One of the main characters in Telex From Cuba, her 2008 debut, is a burlesque dancer named Rachel K (her name is taken from a real historical figure, though of course Kushner is winking in the mirror), whose very literal performance of femininity attracts some of the most powerful men in prerevolutionary Cuba. Her evident goal is to use these men to her own ends, but she winds up getting conscripted into their service instead.Such failures of self-liberation continue through Kushner’s next novel, 2013’s The Flamethrowers, which was a breakout for her. Its protagonist, Reno, is a biker and an emerging artist who covets the independence and aura of influence that seem to come so easily to the men in both the art world and the 1970s Italian radical underground, of which she briefly becomes a part. Unlike Rachel K, Reno’s not a seductress. She’s not interested in seducing the reader, either. What Reno offers in place of charm is commentary so wryly smart and dispassionate that, especially in contrast with the male blowhards she repeatedly encounters, she seems powerful. But over the course of the novel, Kushner builds a skidding sense of perilousness, a feeling that no one, Reno included, is in charge or exempt from the mounting chaos. In the end, as Reno and the reader may have sensed all along, her detachment is just another performance, a cool-girl put-on not so different from Rachel K’s burlesque.[Read: Great sex in the time of war]The irony that the aloof-observer stance turns into yet another trap is not lost on either Kushner or her narrators. Romy, the protagonist of The Mars Room (2018), takes especially bleak stock of her plight, and for good reason. She’s serving two life sentences after killing a stalker who latched on to her at the Market Street strip club where she worked and began menacing her and her child in their private life. For Romy, her flat narration (counterposed with excerpts from the Unabomber’s diary and chapters voiced by a sex-obsessed crooked cop) is a way of walling herself off, creating the mental freedom to imagine escape. Whether flight is a real act of hope, though, remains deliberately ambiguous. It may be an attempt at suicide.Again and again, Kushner scrambles conventional ideas about gender, skewering male bravado while also subverting familiar ideas of femininity. Who and what counts as weak, she wants to know, and why? Stubborn stereotype portrays women as prey to emotion, unable to rein themselves in, yet in book after book, her protagonists’ relentless restraint has stood in stark contrast to the egotistical, violent impulsiveness of the men around them. In Creation Lake, Kushner complicates this dynamic. Her protagonist, Sadie Smith, is another dispassionate observer, but one who appears to have far more independence and agency than her predecessors. She’s a lone wolf, a private intelligence agent who has shucked off her home, her past, and even her name: “Sadie Smith” is an alias.At the novel’s start, she’s en route to the Guyenne, a rural region in southwestern France, where she’s been hired to spy on Pascal Balmy, the leader of Le Moulin, a group of environmental radicals intent on sabotaging Big Agriculture. She has no idea who’s paying her or what their larger agenda might be, and yet she’s convinced that she’s playing her assigned part to perfection. Indeed, she has such faith in her toughness, acuity, and ability to dupe men that she considers herself all but invincible. Her vigilant predecessors Romy and Reno were much warier and wiser than Sadie, who loves bragging that any innocence she displays is just a pose.[Read: A grim view of marriage—and an exhortation to leave it]Creation Lake is not a conventional spy novel, but, unlike Kushner’s shaggy earlier books, it often feels as tight as a thriller. Sadie’s “secret bosses” have sent her to the Guyenne not just to embed herself in Pascal’s group, but to undermine it. Gradually, readers understand that her assignment has a deadlier side—a realization that Sadie either suppresses or notices less quickly than she should, perhaps the most glaring giveaway that she’s not quite the clever spy she thinks. She’s sloppy, distractible, as drunk on her perception of her own power as any engine-revving “king of the road,” to use her derisive phrase for the swellheaded bikers among whom she first went undercover.Sadie is also more impressionable—and less happy—than she’s ready to admit, which generates psychological ferment beneath the surface espionage plot. Creation Lake gets some of its suspense from its action, but Kushner mainly builds tension inside her narrator’s head. Sadie spends much of the novel reading Pascal’s correspondence with Bruno Lacombe, an aging philosopher whose opposition to modern civilization inspired Le Moulin at its founding. Living in a cave now, he reveres the collaborative and artistic Neanderthals, “who huddled modestly and dreamed expansively.” Initially, she dismisses Bruno’s ideas as crackpot, but they come to preoccupy her. For years, she’s told herself that she was content to carry out small parts of big, murky plans, duly suppressing her curiosity. Bruno’s emails urge her to take a broader, more inquisitive view: of humanity, of history, of alternative ways she could live. But once Sadie starts asking questions, things inside her start falling apart.Not least, she starts questioning masculinity—or, rather, her ideas about it, which have dictated her espionage strategies and what she considers her success in the field. In the presence of others, Sadie the operative plays up her feminine sexual allure and compliance, but Sadie the narrator treats readers to a distinctly macho version of swagger. More than once, she notes that her breast augmentation is a calculated professional asset; she seems convinced that the same is true of her rootlessness and emotional disengagement. A hard drinker and frat-boy-style slob, she often seems to be trying to outman the men around her in her own mind, even as she must submit to them in reality.Perhaps Sadie’s most traditionally masculine quality is her terror of weakness. But over the course of Creation Lake, as Sadie’s mission within Le Moulin gets riskier, she sees that her constant projection of control is alienating her from her desires, hollowing out her vaunted autonomy, making her easy to manipulate. She’s shattered—doubly so, because falling apart emotionally shocks her. It’s a fate Kushner withheld from her previous, more guarded protagonists. By letting tough-guy Sadie break down, she writes a radical conversion that is also a bold authorial leap: Kushner lets herself ask, for the first time in her career, what happens to a woman unmoored by masculine and feminine categorizing.Putting Sadie under such intense pressure changes Creation Lake’s nature as a story. Once Sadie starts cracking, the novel doesn’t become digressive and loose like its predecessors, but it certainly stops feeling like a thriller. After many chapters that seemed to build to a dramatic act of sabotage, the story shifts register, heading into a very different, more emotional denouement. Relinquishing some swagger, Kushner opens up in her writing to new levels of feeling and possibilities for change.In the process, she shakes up gender stereotypes in new ways. Creation Lake asks what sources of strength might be found in the kind of vulnerability, physical and emotional, that is associated with femininity. Sadie has prided herself on her supremely instrumental view of sex; she’d never get hysterical, never get too attached or lose her reason over a man. Although the strategic romance she’s begun with Lucien, a friend of Pascal’s, physically disgusts her, she boasts about not letting that get in her way. Kushner leans into the irony here: The reader sees well before Sadie does that her employers are exploiting precisely this blind willingness to obey them at real emotional cost to herself.For all that she wants to treat her body as a professional resource, she can’t do it. Kushner’s exploration of sex as a catalyst for Sadie’s emotions breaking free is fascinating. Repelled by Lucien, she risks her job by beginning an affair with a partnered member of Le Moulin that starts out enjoyable but leaves her feeling abject; in its aftermath, Sadie begins nursing bigger doubts about her life. This drama could seem retrograde, but coming from Kushner, a restored connection between female body and mind feels less traditional than transformative.[Read: The book that teaches us to live with our fears]Sex isn’t Sadie’s only route to a softer self. She also follows a more intellectual path to which she is led by Bruno, the cave-dwelling philosopher. Although Bruno has retreated from contemporary society, his reflections are what get Sadie to reconsider her pride in her nomadic self-sufficiency. She has long bridled at the notion that women should do—and enjoy—domestic work, and is emphatic that she will never have a baby. But she’s swayed by Bruno’s devotion to the painted caves and their former inhabitants, and by her own images of Bruno as a father, after she learns that he has grown children. Indeed, she develops a sort of daughterly love for Bruno.By the end of the novel, his meditations bring out the feelings that she has most wanted to suppress: homesickness, nostalgia, loneliness. After reading an email in which Bruno describes his sense of being existentially lost, she says aloud, “I feel that way too.” The sound of her voice “let something into the room,” Sadie goes on, “some kind of feeling. The feeling was mine, even as I observed it, watched myself as if from above.” What Sadie sees is herself crying alone in bed, an image more suited to a teen movie than a Kushner novel. Yet this moment is no performance. In the grip of uncontrollable emotion, Sadie recognizes both her vulnerability and her desire to drastically change her life.For Kushner, too, lowering the barricades against the clichés of femininity has an effect at once jarring and liberating. Her earlier novels veer away from culminating clarity, their explosive yet enigmatic endings reminding readers that her characters are too trapped and disempowered to change in the ways they want to. In Creation Lake, Sadie’s transfigured consciousness is a kind of resolution that might be mistaken for a sentimental promise of sunniness ahead—except that Kushner gives her narrator a new, daunting challenge. At the novel’s close, Sadie has already started experimenting with a life in which she engages fully rather than contorting herself to perform roles that others expect. She’s now armed with an agenda of her own, one that promises to turn her into a woman who couldn’t care less about what anyone thinks woman means. Creation Lake’s radicals aren’t likely to upend society, but Sadie’s swerve suggests that Kushner is ready for big change.This article appears in the October 2024 print edition with the headline “Rachel Kushner's Surprising Swerve.”

Calling for further study, California lawmakers table ban on toxic herbicide paraquat

Assembly Bill 1963 originally sought to sunset the use of the powerful weedkiller. Instead, it orders state regulators to study the safety of the product.

California lawmakers have approved a bill that could help strengthen regulations around the use of paraquat, a powerful weedkiller associated with Parkinson’s disease and other serious health issues. Assembly Bill 1963 was introduced in January by Assemblymember Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), and originally sought to sunset the use of paraquat in California beginning in January 2026. However, the final legislation has been amended so that it now will require the California Department of Pesticide Regulation to complete a reevaluation of the herbicide by Jan. 1, 2029, and determine whether to retain, cancel or suspend its registration, or to create new restrictions. The bill passed the Senate 23 to 8 and now awaits a signature from Gov. Gavin Newsom. Paraquat is banned in more than 60 countries. Many environmental and advocacy groups had been hoping for an outright ban in California, but said the bill still marks a step forward by fast-tracking its safety review — a process that can sometimes take decades.“We are encouraged by the progress being made in California setting the example for other states to act when it comes to evaluating the safety and toxicity of chemicals with long term neurological and other health implications,” read a statement from Julia Pitcher, director of state government relations for the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. “We strongly urge the passage of this legislation and look forward to Governor Newsom signing it into law soon.” Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency describes paraquat as highly toxic — noting that “one sip can kill” — yet California remains one of the nation’s top users of the chemical. The state sprays millions of pounds annually on crops such as almonds, grapes and cotton. An Environmental Working Group report published earlier this year found that the state’s farmworkers and low-income Latino people, in particular, are disproportionately exposed to paraquat in their communities, with more than 5.3 million pounds sprayed in Kern County alone between 2017 and 2021. The bill faced opposition from a coalition of opponents including pesticide manufacturers, chemical industry trade associations and agriculture trade organizations. By the time it wound its way through the legislature, including the Senate Agriculture Committee, it had lost much of its teeth, said Bill Allayaud, California director of government affairs with EWG.“It’s still a good bill, because without this, DPR probably wouldn’t do anything,” he said. “Hopefully the governor will sign it and agree that this is at the top of the list for things we don’t want people exposed to, especially farmworkers.” Paraquat has been the subject of thousands of lawsuits from people seeking damages related to exposure to the product, including people who say it has given them Parkinson’s disease, a neurodegenerative disorder that affects movement. The bill’s legislative analysis notes that at least 10 epidemiological studies have linked paraquat exposure to Parkinson’s disease, including a 2019 meta-analysis of 13 studies that found exposure to the herbicide was associated with a 1.64-fold increase in the risk of the disease.Other studies have found no clear link, however, and the product’s manufacturers continue to reject any claims of a connection. In a statement, Friedman said AB 1963 will have “very real results.”“I’m happy with where the bill landed,” Friedman said. “We never thought we’d get a full ban through the Legislature. But we had to push as hard as we could.”She noted that the Legislature provided the Department of Pesticide Regulation with additional funding this year with a requirement that the agency do more reevaluations of toxic chemicals.“I have full confidence, that should AB 1963 get signed into law, that DPR will do a thorough reevaluation of paraquat, and either ban it outright, or place greater restrictions on its use,” Friedman said.Advocacy groups remain committed to seeing the chemical controlled. The EWG this week launched a campaign with the Michael J. Fox Foundation urging President Biden and the EPA to ban paraquat nationwide. The federal agency will have until Jan. 17 to make a decision.There is some reason for optimism: The EPA last month issued a rare emergency order to stop the use of another weedkiller, dachthal, that poses a significant risk to fetuses.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.