Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justice

News Feed
Wednesday, May 22, 2024

Liliana Sierra Castillo joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss the concept of blue justice and how the expansion of aquaculture impacts small-scale fishery communities.Sierra Castillo, a current Agents of Change fellow and Ph.D. candidate at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara, also talks about how she became passionate about oceans, how we can rethink marine protected areas to center communities, and how meaningful it is for her to do research in her native Honduras.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Sierra Castillo and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justiceTranscriptBrian BienkowskiThank you so much for taking time to meet with me today. I'm really excited to have you on your work when I was doing a little research for this. It's different than other fellows we've had. And I'm really excited to talk about what you're doing. But as you may know, I'd like to start way at the beginning. So I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about your childhood and where an interest in the environment came into your life?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, of course. So I'm originally from Honduras. And it's funny because even when I was a child, my parents don't really live near the oceans. They live in the capital. But even when I was like, I remember specifically, I was like in second grade, and we did an essay. And it just fascinated me to know, when my professor was giving feedback that we know more about the moon, that about the ocean. And I think that just stuck in my head forever. And then at that moment, I decided I wanted to be a marine biologist, even though I didn't know what that meant. And then I guess I had the privilege that my parents were capable of taking us to like the beach around the country and exploring. I just, it's always fascinating, like how vast and amazing the ocean is. Because that's how it all started.Brian Bienkowski That's awesome. I grew up in the in Michigan, in the Great Lakes region, so not oceans, but really large lakes where you can't you know, you can't see the end of them. They're massive. And I just remember my whole life, no matter how many times I visited them, it always kind of blew me away or gave me this feeling of inspiration every time I see them. And it still does it to this day. And I don't know, do oceans. Do oceans do that for you? Do you still get kind of a sense of awe even though you've been working with them for so long?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, definitely. I feel these day like every time I walk past an ocean, as you're saying, like, I am just in awe how big it is and how much it is that we don't know. And I guess now, in the past 10 years or so that I've I've started working more on the human dimensions parts of oceans. It's more of like, wow, we have so much of these, like space and water and things but like, so much people are being affected by your kind of like that more critical analysis. I think that is also like it's more of an inspiration in that way as well.Brian Bienkowski For sure. And maybe maybe there's some overlap in this question. Since we've been talking about your your love of oceans, but you started your university studies at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in marine biology. So what was it specifically about oceans? Was it you know, fisheries? Was it how humans interact with them? Was it about their vastness or you know, all of the above.Liliana Sierra Castillo So, it's funny because as many marine biology programs, my undergrad was very much like ecology focus. And then my last quarter I took a the only fishery class. But at that moment, I still thought in my mind that I wanted to be a dolphin trainer. That was like my life goal. And then I was very lucky to have we have in that program for you to graduate, you have to do a professional internship. And so I got the super cool experience of working with the World Wildlife Fund in a bay area called Cortés*, which on the northern coast. And for six months, I was just working with fishery communities. And I was like, Okay, this is what I want to do, like, you know, those things are cool, but it's not like, and I discovered, like, you know, I really love the intersections of like, I get to be in the ocean and be in that moment, I used to be covered a lot in fish blog. So I was like, clean to the fisherman. And I love talking with people and like learning what they were doing. And I also found that I love, like, figuring out how to like, give back the results, right? that I'm learning from analysis back to the communities and all that like connection of cycles and turn it into, like management tools. And so yeah, I guess like it was, the university gave me the basic tools, and then this experience of the internship that kind of changed everything.Brian Bienkowski Well, these coastal communities, it's not just a, it's not just this natural wonder, like we were talking about, but it's so intertwined with culture and economics. And, you know, we're gonna get into a lot of that today with a lot of the work that you're doing. So it goes much further beyond as well, that's really pretty. It's so you know, intertwined with these coastal communities. So, before we get to your research, I want to know, a moment or event that has helped shape your identity up to this point.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I still, so I think for me, it happened again, in this internship. So this was like 10 years ago. And again, I had since from that moment, before that moment training on like, sadly, a lot of like, environmental classes are very much like, you know, we need pristine nature, we need everything to be protected, and all that, right. So I came up with that mentality. And I remember the first day, on the field with these fishery communities, I was with this fisherman who sadly has passed. Now he passed away, which is very sad. But I still remember he told me, you know, like, so what's the point of like, you guys, tell us like, we cannot fish in this area, my organization. And that moment, my NGO was internship with, they were trying to build a protected area, marine protected area, and like, we moved the fisherman, and he was like, "What's the point of view protecting these resources if we don't even have anything to eat? Like, what are we going to eat?" And so that, for me, was like, it was a moment that I it's I know, it sounds dumb. But in that moment, I was like, I cannot believe, that for all my undergrad, I was so like, naive, right? Like, in this little bubble of like, privilege that I didn't understand anything until that moment. And I will say, Yeah, you are 100%. Right. And I think that change everything until right now, 10 years after what I've gotten all the way since.Brian Bienkowski I don't think that sounds dumb at all. In fact, where I live in the northern Great Lakes region, a lot of people are focused on forest wilderness, you know, wild areas. And there's also indigenous communities up here who use those spaces to hunt and gather. So the idea of just blocking them off to protect them is is not in line with what how they've used these areas. So I totally, I totally understand what you're talking about. And I grew up the same way, like, oh, yeah, protect it. You know, that's great, preserve it and protect it. That's the way to go. And I think, hopefully, we're starting to realize that that's not always the most just way to do things. So a lot of your research now centers around the growth of aquaculture globally and the impacts it has on small scale fishery communities. So first, can you kind of orient those of us who are not too familiar with this trend? And what does aquaculture entail? Where are we seeing the most expansion of it?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I think for that question, because I know a lot of people, it's funny, because like, to this day, for example, a lot like my mom doesn't really know what I do. Right? So fisheries, and that's where I it's my big specialization, right? It's everything that's been caught wildly in any body of water, I do marine fisheries, but it can be lakes, as you're saying in Michigan, rivers, whatever. Aquaculture is basically I tried to think of it as like a farm or agriculture on water. So it's, there's some sort of human control component over it. It's literally you have a seed, or a baby or seed of an oyster, for example, and then you help it grow. Like you control it in an environment until it grows and then you harvest it. So it's a big difference from fisheries, right. The other comparison I tried to think about it is like hunters versus gatherers, right? Like hunting is the fishing and gatherer races like agriculture kind of wise. Um, so I'm gonna say in the past, so my expertise is fisheries, but going to aquaculture in the past, I'm going to say maybe since the 80s, there's been a big boom to kind of like grow aquaculture with this kind of idea that seafood is declining, the fisheries production, so As we all know, it's declaiming for a lot of lot of factors. So the idea that aquaculture is gonna, like provide, like all the seafood we need. And so it has had its ups and downs, I think around the 90s. It's when the shrimp aquaculture started around the world, especially in Latin America, coming from, again, like a lot of funding from like not, Latin America. And that was a very bad situation, because as you know, aquaculture for shrimp, they destroyed a lot of mangroves. So it was a whole thing, right? So then aquaculture kind of started to decline. And I think back, I think, would have saved maybe the, like, 15 years ago or so there's like this new kind of push to aquaculture through the blue economy, right? All these these cores narratives. And now it's kind of like thinking that aquaculture besides giving, like that seafood, the seafood supply, that fisheries might not be giving. Now, it's kind of like, okay, now, it's also can do ecosystem services. Now, it can help people, now it can provide all these other benefits, which in some instances it does. But what we're seeing in is where my study comes in is like when these when it's being implemented at a local scale in communities is specifically in underdeveloped countries. It's not getting all those benefits, that it's promising. And in reality, it's creating a lot of injustices. So that's where I come like, trying to understand why and how can we do it better to really have the benefits that you should have.Brian Bienkowski So what are some of the opportunities that this expanded aquaculture brings? And conversely, what are some of the problems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so some of the opportunities, you know, like, I've seen some examples where it actually provides employment to people, right. And a lot of again, I work in small scale coastal communities, so very different from industrial fisheries or aquaculture areas. So a lot of these communities, they're very marginalized, they're very vulnerable to shocks and a lot of things happening around them. So I've seen some instances where like, if doing that, like correctly, aquaculture can provide them with employment, like they can work, they can provide them with food security, they can provide, if done correctly, like benefits of the ecosystem, we know that some of these species might contribute to ecosystemic benefits. But the thing is, like conversely, when he's not being done correctly, it can also impact for example, a lot of these implementation of aquaculture right now is kind of like, okay, you have to stop fishing. And now you're going to do aquaculture. And as you mentioned a while ago, for these people fishing has a lot of cultural traditional aspects, right? It's not like they go fishing because money, they go fishing, because it's who they are. And so that impacts a lot, right? Like, that's already like very bad, kind of like being like, "Okay, you're gonna stop doing these things that you have done for four generations ago until right now, you're gonna stop doing it, even though you want to just because I want you to stop doing it." Now. So the way sometimes is being done is kind of like, not just like stop fishing, and it's going to impact relations, as I said, but also like, think about it, if you have such a vulnerable system, you want them to have multiple economic activity activities, where livelihoods, if you remove fishing, and then use of aquaculture when there's a shock to the market or to the food system or whatever, then what are these people going to rely on? Right? Like, what are we doing here. And then the other, that third thing that I've seen a lot, is that aquaculture tends to be very tends to be more of like, it can be more like division of classes, like people can like accumulate more as an aquaculture, like, for example, if you and me both have aquaculture operations, and I have the capacity to buy more land, to lobby more, to get more products, more seed everything I have maybe got a I studied to understand what's happening, I understand all these things. I'm gonna grow more, right, versus you're gonna stay tiny, tiny. And then that creates a problem, right? Like what's happened with the tiny, tiny, they're gonna be eliminated for the system. And I think the the worst that's happening is that people keep thinking that aquaculture, as I said, in the beginning is gonna solve all the problems that seafood and fisheries are facing. And it's not, it's not a bullet solution, bullet-proof solution. And so it's not any nice like, once in these communities, they are doing aquaculture because whatever someone told them, the people that are supposed to be managing the fisheries kind of forget that that system exists. And so the fisheries are doing very bad. They're not doing at all good. And then aquaculture is kind of there, but it's not really doing anything and it's kind of like creates a whole mess.Brian Bienkowski Yeah, that makes sense. And you mentioned just fishing being a traditional activity for many of these communities. Can you just talk about get a probe that little further, how this transition has overlooked kind of local context, local cultures and history and expand on why that's a problem?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so um, I can give you an example, actually from one of the communities I work with. So I have done all my fieldwork, most of it in in Baja California, so in Mexico, and I started in Honduras last year. But Baja California, so that's an interesting example, because there's been pushed to do aquaculture of different species from back on from 2011. You know, for many reasons, it hasn't worked, some has worked, some doesn't. But in 2020, when I started working with them, with this one community, there, the there was a local NGO pushing to the oyster aquaculture, right, so sounds all good, right? Like, yeah, that's gonna be always the aquaculture, the community is gonna be happy, you know that. But when you go and talk with the community, like I did that for three years, you notice, and they told me that to me many times, you know, like, I'm not happy. I miss fishing, I wish I could have a boat to go fish all the time I won. I missed the traditions, I miss the freedom associated with fishing. And so as a consequence, like if you think about it, their will they're not, they're not happy, there will be nice, not good, right? Like if you think about what they miss from fishing, and also because they're doing something they don't want to like aquaculture. It's kind of like that this is the aquaculture project was not being successful, right? Like it didn't really work because like the people didn't believing in through time, because fishers as I said, they still wanted to be diving and fishing and all these things. There was an increase on quote unquote, illegal fishing in which I don't like that term. But that's what it's called, you know, when you don't follow the management rules, they continue fishing goes, does what they want it to do. And so in the any creative like, besides all that I'm telling you, it creates a very sad like social situation, right? Like when you have a community that's divided, lot of social tension, tension between the community and the NGO. We've seen is going to affect everything, right? Like it's going to affect what if a project comes again, or like funding for fish, it's like a whole whole sea social situation being created. Because of not considering something as simple as being to go ask them like, Hey, guys, if you want to do aquaculture, if they say yes, how much time do you want to invest? What species you want to do? You know, do you still want to go fishing? Why don't we do it all together? Like think simple solution says that.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned working in California, Mexico, and now expanding your research to Honduras. Was that was it meaningful to you to expand your research into your your home?Liliana Sierra Castillo It was super meaningful. Actually, I was very excited. I've always, I always strive to do all like every research, I do kind of like the think about how to be applicable to Honduras. And actually was super cool. Last summer, I went back to the field areas where I started back 10 years ago. And it was so sweet, like people still remembered me. And I still remember them. And I was like, Yeah, that was super. It was like a very impactful moment. And it's it's very interesting. Because like Honduras. They've done aquaculture in the past, but this area is starting. There's like a super cool organization that's trying to like maybe do aquaculture, but they don't want to do it, like half just randomly they want to understand like, the social dimensions that are happening before transforming the system. So it's been very interesting to understand the system as it is a fishery system, what's going on? How can we maybe do aquaculture what is needed? And it's just cool to go talk with people and hear them.Brian Bienkowski Maybe I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to aquaculture, but I feel like I've seen headlines on I mean, are there pollution concerns? Is that something that you know anything about because I know sometimes when you have such a concentrated amount of fish and fish feeding, there can be pollution concerns? Is that? Is that an issue?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so definitely aquaculture besides everything I'm telling which I'm talking more the social things, it also has like some, like as you're saying, I guess this is more of like an ecological consequence, right? So I feel like the pollution it's more well I think it's more when it's like an industrial scale size right where you have maybe someone and you're putting like antibiotics or whatever and like the feed right like when you feed them that food leaves the area and stuff. But also like at a smaller scale. Like for example in Honduras, what happens a lot. You have the tilapia farms, and even though they're small, there's two big I guess, kind of pollution consequences. One is again, the feed that you give them right the feed makes the water around and like contaminated it gets you to revise. And second, a lot of these aquaculture operations use non-native species. Tilapia is non native. And so it scapes, because in aquaculture is always going to escape. Then you have the problem of like, okay, what is the, how is this non-native species going to, like impact the ecosystem. But in the, it's super interesting, because in Baja in Mexico and other parts of the world, they're pushing to use oyster aquaculture, because in theory, oyster has a lot of benefits, right? cleans the water, it a lot of ecosystemic services, I think it also sometimes is being used at like, what there's erosion and you use, like, oysters to, like, provide more structure to there. But there's also a lot of unknowns of oysters, right? Like, we don't know what impacts are being made by oysters in the ecosystem. For example, in Baja, the oysters that are being used are not in them are non native. So we don't even know how they're affecting the native organisms from the ecosystem. And all these other questions, but in oysters, you don't feed them. So at least you don't have to worry about that.Brian Bienkowski Before this call, I was at my local, not today. But recently I was at my grocery store and realize that I lived 20 minutes from Lake Superior, a massive fishery, the biggest freshwater lake on the planet. And almost all of the fish they sell there is farm raised from Chile and other places around the world, which is just indicative of our super broken food system. I think. So you mentioned you mentioned the places you're working in, in, you know, Mexico, Honduras, and California. And I'm wondering, what are some of the ways that you and others are working to kind of better incorporate small scale fisheries and their well being into these kinds of changes in systems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I think that there's a lot of good people trying to, as you're saying, like to give to voices to small-scale fishing communities and put them as at the center of all these policies or, or I don't even know, like, yeah, I guess their policies. So I think parallel to the blue economy, and blue growth, maybe I'm gonna say even, like, newer, I'm gonna say maybe, I don't know, like four or five years ago, eight years ago, is to start a what's called the Blue justice, right? Which is kind of these critical, how can we critically analyze and think about how we can put small scale fisheries or humans or human rights in the center, especially of these, these two big development discourses, right. And so there's a lot of people coming from all different perspectives, because the blue, this is a thing, the blue economy, if you think about it, the blue economy was a term proposed by an economist, I think 10 Or maybe 12 years ago, where basically is trying to get economic benefits from the ocean, right? That can mean a lot of things that can mean fisheries, aquaculture, offshore energy, so many things, it's like massive the amount of things you can get from the ocean. So I know a lot of great people that are trying to think about ways okay, like, for example, how can we make protected areas or I don't like the word permanent protected areas, but how can we manage the ocean in a way that the humans are there, we cannot eliminate the humans, right? I know a lot of people like doing similar work to what I do. But in other words, like parts of the world, like putting people at the center of labor, they want to because you're not if they want, how can we make it work? I know a lot of people being working with offshore energy and understanding like, how is this gonna impact communities, right communities? How can we bring them back to the table to think what you're saying? Obviously, there's like a big, I think that's been a big one for a lot of time, like trying to understand industrial fishing versus small scale fishing, right? Like, how can we provide more protection for small scale fisheries? Like how can we help them? And so I think it's so it's a very broad question, but I think it just inspires me to know that a lot of people are doing a lot of super amazing important work. It's hard work, but I think it's gonna get its get going in places.Brian Bienkowski And if you do you have examples or projects that you've seen that you feel like successfully and very intentionally incorporated local communities and their perspectives into aquaculture decisions?Liliana Sierra Castillo I know there's some like smaller-scale aquaculture operations from indigenous communities in I think it's in Seattle, and in Alaska, where communities are basically saying you know, we want to do aquaculture and they're like, in charge of the they are deciding everything. I think that one that example is pretty cool to read about that And I'm not sure about in Latin America, honestly. There must be some examples. But I don't know them from the top of my head right now. Sure, sure.Brian Bienkowski And you mentioned, you know, you've talked about these marine protected areas. And off the top, we spoke about why those can be seemingly very good, but perhaps problematic in some spots. I was wondering if you could talk about your work in advocacy in this area?Liliana Sierra Castillo In marine protected areas?Brian Bienkowski Yeah, just what you're what you're thinking, what you're what you're seeing what you're trying to do, in making that process more community centered and culturally inclusive.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I guess, um, as I mentioned, like, in 20, oh, my God, I don't even know, like, 10 years ago, when I was starting. And there was a big push for this big area, right, and getting these fishing communities out. I remember, I had a good conversation with my boss at that time, and we decided, you know, like, like, we cannot just eliminate these people, you know, like, that's going to be very counterproductive in the end, right? it's going to probably increase poaching and all these things. And also, it's not good. Like, it's super bad. So So we created it was kind of like, okay, let's think with them. Let's include them like that. See, like, inside of these marine area, how, what, what areas can we leave for them to fit, like, let's include them for everything. And so we developed this kind of cool kind of governance platform where we had like academia and government and NGOs and fishers are working together. And that was super cool. And I think that area is still going on back there. But recently, I'm in the marine protected area world –because I as I mentioned many times, I don't really like the word and the term– there's this cool project that I've been very honored to be part of is being carried by one of my friends, her name is Tasha Quintana. And she's trying to understand temporary closure. So temporary closure is a tool that has been used with people that manage their resources, which is basically as simple as like, you can be a person who's like exploiting a fishery, and you're gonna be like, Oh, I exploited this area, I'm gonna let us rest for a month or two, and then switch gears, right? So it's this is this is happening, and has been happening in all the world. So we're trying to understand, Okay, does it work? How does it work? How can we make it better maybe. And I'm trying to do like the equity and justice component of this, like trying to understand critically understand using critical environmental justice frameworks to see how this might be a more equitable solution versus the permanent and protected areas. So that's what we're trying to do with that space.Brian Bienkowski I'm curious with all this time spent in and around oceans and working in listening to fishing communities, do you fish?Liliana Sierra Castillo I fished more before then now I loved to go fishing. I was very bad at it. We really, really enjoyed like, you know, being with the hook and line and, or like the little nets or seeing when we're in the rivers and lakes. And I used to go out with fishermen and just see what they were like catching I used to go I think I went one year ago in Mexico with my fisher friends and was pretty fun. We went spear-diving. It's not allowed, but we still we did it was pretty fun. You know, it was night. And it was cool. Because like you couldn't see anything in the water on unless they had the flashlights. And when you like came out of the water. It was just like stars everywhere. So yeah, I do love fishing. I haven't done it California though, because I've heard it's like complicated to get a license and so on. But I do love fishing.Brian Bienkowski Cool. Very cool. And just one last question. Before we get to some of the final fun questions. What are you optimistic about when it comes to the work that you're doing and the research that you're conducting?Liliana Sierra Castillo You know, I'm optimistic and it's hard. I feel like this type of work, you have a lot of downs, some ups, um, it's as I mentioned, it's work that has to be done. But it's hard. Because it's kind of like if you think about it is kind of like trying to understand the cause root of things, really. Like, why are things the way they are? And sometimes that's uncomfortable to a lot of people, a lot of people are not going to be happy with the things that you say. But I'm hopeful. As I mentioned, I think that a lot of people are starting to think understand this is important. And I'm optimistic that more and more people we're going to start to know each other and kind of create these network of people that think alike and we need to continue to put communities in the center of all these decisions and continue to fight you know, it's kind of like a little revolution going on which I think it's very inspiring. But more than a revolution, I'm optimistic because I think that people also like, for example, all the people supporting the blue economy and all these, like bigger ideas are going to start understanding, you know, through all these other people of the blue justice team, they really need each other, like, how can you like, you know, it's kind of like, I'm optimistic that that can happen at some moment. But I think my most optimism is to that communities are slowly being put again, where they should be the center of everything. And that there's a lot of people that we're not alone, you know, like, it's a lot of times you feel alone. And there's a lot of people around the world trying to –which is crazy, right?– like, put them back in the center of all these things. But that's what it's happening. And I think it's pretty inspiring too.Brian Bienkowski There's so many parallels to other aspects of society. And when you think about one movement is like, how can we extract and make money? And the other movement is like, how can we make sure that the people who are most impacted by this have a say in this, and I think you can look at the energy sector you can look at, I mean, it's just so indicative of kind of where we find ourselves at this crossroads in trying to push for energy, justice, climate justice, environmental justice, kind of broadly. So I really appreciate you kind of introducing our readers to this idea of Blue justice, it's been really fascinating. And now I have three rapid fire fun questions where you could just answer with one word, or a phrase, my most treasured possession isLiliana Sierra Castillo my dog.Brian Bienkowski me too, by the way. One thing I'm looking forward to this month isLiliana Sierra Castillo in May, um I don't know, spending time with my friends.Brian Bienkowski That works. That's fun. And one unique tradition my family has isLiliana Sierra Castillo okay, so every time – this is a longer phrase, but it's just we're Latinos. Talk a lot. But every time it's your birthday, when we were back home, they used to wake you up, like at 4am. Even though you didn't want that and they would pretend that you were a baby and like give you like a like, it was like a lotion bottle. But it was supposed to be like a liquid our babies dreads call, like what they drink from them. The little bottles, milk bottles. Yeah, we were supposed to do that. And then after we will move out, I think they continue trying to do it, like calling us but now it's harder, right? Because like we're in so many different time zones. That he's kind of like has to vote okay, just told me when I can call you.Brian Bienkowski The call doesn't work quite as well, when you're, you know, paid to silence.Liliana Sierra Castillo Exactly. And my phone is always silent. So I think they tried it for a couple of years. And then I was like, I'm, I'm literally sleeping. Can't. But yeah, I do miss the pretending to be a baby thing.Brian Bienkowski That I've never, you know, that is new to me. I really, I really liked that. Well, Liliana, this has been so much fun. Again, thank you so much for your time. And it's just so exciting to have you in this program with your, you know, with your expertise and the research that you're doing. And one last question I've asked everybody is what is the last book that you read for fun? I'm readingLiliana Sierra Castillo it's I haven't finished reading it but I am in the middle of reading "Critical environmental justice and race." Which is funny because I haven't like in my side table like I read it every night while my boyfriend reads... I don't even know what you know, other things or friends are reading other things do. But for I guess before that I'm trying to think what was a good book? I don't remember right now I think that's been in a while kind of reading for me.Brian Bienkowski Well, you know what, for our audience, that probably is fun. So I think I think that one that you're reading right now works. Liliana, thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to following your career and working with you in this program.Liliana Sierra Castillo Thank you very much for everything, all the questions.

Liliana Sierra Castillo joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss the concept of blue justice and how the expansion of aquaculture impacts small-scale fishery communities.Sierra Castillo, a current Agents of Change fellow and Ph.D. candidate at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara, also talks about how she became passionate about oceans, how we can rethink marine protected areas to center communities, and how meaningful it is for her to do research in her native Honduras.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Sierra Castillo and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justiceTranscriptBrian BienkowskiThank you so much for taking time to meet with me today. I'm really excited to have you on your work when I was doing a little research for this. It's different than other fellows we've had. And I'm really excited to talk about what you're doing. But as you may know, I'd like to start way at the beginning. So I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about your childhood and where an interest in the environment came into your life?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, of course. So I'm originally from Honduras. And it's funny because even when I was a child, my parents don't really live near the oceans. They live in the capital. But even when I was like, I remember specifically, I was like in second grade, and we did an essay. And it just fascinated me to know, when my professor was giving feedback that we know more about the moon, that about the ocean. And I think that just stuck in my head forever. And then at that moment, I decided I wanted to be a marine biologist, even though I didn't know what that meant. And then I guess I had the privilege that my parents were capable of taking us to like the beach around the country and exploring. I just, it's always fascinating, like how vast and amazing the ocean is. Because that's how it all started.Brian Bienkowski That's awesome. I grew up in the in Michigan, in the Great Lakes region, so not oceans, but really large lakes where you can't you know, you can't see the end of them. They're massive. And I just remember my whole life, no matter how many times I visited them, it always kind of blew me away or gave me this feeling of inspiration every time I see them. And it still does it to this day. And I don't know, do oceans. Do oceans do that for you? Do you still get kind of a sense of awe even though you've been working with them for so long?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, definitely. I feel these day like every time I walk past an ocean, as you're saying, like, I am just in awe how big it is and how much it is that we don't know. And I guess now, in the past 10 years or so that I've I've started working more on the human dimensions parts of oceans. It's more of like, wow, we have so much of these, like space and water and things but like, so much people are being affected by your kind of like that more critical analysis. I think that is also like it's more of an inspiration in that way as well.Brian Bienkowski For sure. And maybe maybe there's some overlap in this question. Since we've been talking about your your love of oceans, but you started your university studies at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in marine biology. So what was it specifically about oceans? Was it you know, fisheries? Was it how humans interact with them? Was it about their vastness or you know, all of the above.Liliana Sierra Castillo So, it's funny because as many marine biology programs, my undergrad was very much like ecology focus. And then my last quarter I took a the only fishery class. But at that moment, I still thought in my mind that I wanted to be a dolphin trainer. That was like my life goal. And then I was very lucky to have we have in that program for you to graduate, you have to do a professional internship. And so I got the super cool experience of working with the World Wildlife Fund in a bay area called Cortés*, which on the northern coast. And for six months, I was just working with fishery communities. And I was like, Okay, this is what I want to do, like, you know, those things are cool, but it's not like, and I discovered, like, you know, I really love the intersections of like, I get to be in the ocean and be in that moment, I used to be covered a lot in fish blog. So I was like, clean to the fisherman. And I love talking with people and like learning what they were doing. And I also found that I love, like, figuring out how to like, give back the results, right? that I'm learning from analysis back to the communities and all that like connection of cycles and turn it into, like management tools. And so yeah, I guess like it was, the university gave me the basic tools, and then this experience of the internship that kind of changed everything.Brian Bienkowski Well, these coastal communities, it's not just a, it's not just this natural wonder, like we were talking about, but it's so intertwined with culture and economics. And, you know, we're gonna get into a lot of that today with a lot of the work that you're doing. So it goes much further beyond as well, that's really pretty. It's so you know, intertwined with these coastal communities. So, before we get to your research, I want to know, a moment or event that has helped shape your identity up to this point.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I still, so I think for me, it happened again, in this internship. So this was like 10 years ago. And again, I had since from that moment, before that moment training on like, sadly, a lot of like, environmental classes are very much like, you know, we need pristine nature, we need everything to be protected, and all that, right. So I came up with that mentality. And I remember the first day, on the field with these fishery communities, I was with this fisherman who sadly has passed. Now he passed away, which is very sad. But I still remember he told me, you know, like, so what's the point of like, you guys, tell us like, we cannot fish in this area, my organization. And that moment, my NGO was internship with, they were trying to build a protected area, marine protected area, and like, we moved the fisherman, and he was like, "What's the point of view protecting these resources if we don't even have anything to eat? Like, what are we going to eat?" And so that, for me, was like, it was a moment that I it's I know, it sounds dumb. But in that moment, I was like, I cannot believe, that for all my undergrad, I was so like, naive, right? Like, in this little bubble of like, privilege that I didn't understand anything until that moment. And I will say, Yeah, you are 100%. Right. And I think that change everything until right now, 10 years after what I've gotten all the way since.Brian Bienkowski I don't think that sounds dumb at all. In fact, where I live in the northern Great Lakes region, a lot of people are focused on forest wilderness, you know, wild areas. And there's also indigenous communities up here who use those spaces to hunt and gather. So the idea of just blocking them off to protect them is is not in line with what how they've used these areas. So I totally, I totally understand what you're talking about. And I grew up the same way, like, oh, yeah, protect it. You know, that's great, preserve it and protect it. That's the way to go. And I think, hopefully, we're starting to realize that that's not always the most just way to do things. So a lot of your research now centers around the growth of aquaculture globally and the impacts it has on small scale fishery communities. So first, can you kind of orient those of us who are not too familiar with this trend? And what does aquaculture entail? Where are we seeing the most expansion of it?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I think for that question, because I know a lot of people, it's funny, because like, to this day, for example, a lot like my mom doesn't really know what I do. Right? So fisheries, and that's where I it's my big specialization, right? It's everything that's been caught wildly in any body of water, I do marine fisheries, but it can be lakes, as you're saying in Michigan, rivers, whatever. Aquaculture is basically I tried to think of it as like a farm or agriculture on water. So it's, there's some sort of human control component over it. It's literally you have a seed, or a baby or seed of an oyster, for example, and then you help it grow. Like you control it in an environment until it grows and then you harvest it. So it's a big difference from fisheries, right. The other comparison I tried to think about it is like hunters versus gatherers, right? Like hunting is the fishing and gatherer races like agriculture kind of wise. Um, so I'm gonna say in the past, so my expertise is fisheries, but going to aquaculture in the past, I'm going to say maybe since the 80s, there's been a big boom to kind of like grow aquaculture with this kind of idea that seafood is declining, the fisheries production, so As we all know, it's declaiming for a lot of lot of factors. So the idea that aquaculture is gonna, like provide, like all the seafood we need. And so it has had its ups and downs, I think around the 90s. It's when the shrimp aquaculture started around the world, especially in Latin America, coming from, again, like a lot of funding from like not, Latin America. And that was a very bad situation, because as you know, aquaculture for shrimp, they destroyed a lot of mangroves. So it was a whole thing, right? So then aquaculture kind of started to decline. And I think back, I think, would have saved maybe the, like, 15 years ago or so there's like this new kind of push to aquaculture through the blue economy, right? All these these cores narratives. And now it's kind of like thinking that aquaculture besides giving, like that seafood, the seafood supply, that fisheries might not be giving. Now, it's kind of like, okay, now, it's also can do ecosystem services. Now, it can help people, now it can provide all these other benefits, which in some instances it does. But what we're seeing in is where my study comes in is like when these when it's being implemented at a local scale in communities is specifically in underdeveloped countries. It's not getting all those benefits, that it's promising. And in reality, it's creating a lot of injustices. So that's where I come like, trying to understand why and how can we do it better to really have the benefits that you should have.Brian Bienkowski So what are some of the opportunities that this expanded aquaculture brings? And conversely, what are some of the problems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so some of the opportunities, you know, like, I've seen some examples where it actually provides employment to people, right. And a lot of again, I work in small scale coastal communities, so very different from industrial fisheries or aquaculture areas. So a lot of these communities, they're very marginalized, they're very vulnerable to shocks and a lot of things happening around them. So I've seen some instances where like, if doing that, like correctly, aquaculture can provide them with employment, like they can work, they can provide them with food security, they can provide, if done correctly, like benefits of the ecosystem, we know that some of these species might contribute to ecosystemic benefits. But the thing is, like conversely, when he's not being done correctly, it can also impact for example, a lot of these implementation of aquaculture right now is kind of like, okay, you have to stop fishing. And now you're going to do aquaculture. And as you mentioned a while ago, for these people fishing has a lot of cultural traditional aspects, right? It's not like they go fishing because money, they go fishing, because it's who they are. And so that impacts a lot, right? Like, that's already like very bad, kind of like being like, "Okay, you're gonna stop doing these things that you have done for four generations ago until right now, you're gonna stop doing it, even though you want to just because I want you to stop doing it." Now. So the way sometimes is being done is kind of like, not just like stop fishing, and it's going to impact relations, as I said, but also like, think about it, if you have such a vulnerable system, you want them to have multiple economic activity activities, where livelihoods, if you remove fishing, and then use of aquaculture when there's a shock to the market or to the food system or whatever, then what are these people going to rely on? Right? Like, what are we doing here. And then the other, that third thing that I've seen a lot, is that aquaculture tends to be very tends to be more of like, it can be more like division of classes, like people can like accumulate more as an aquaculture, like, for example, if you and me both have aquaculture operations, and I have the capacity to buy more land, to lobby more, to get more products, more seed everything I have maybe got a I studied to understand what's happening, I understand all these things. I'm gonna grow more, right, versus you're gonna stay tiny, tiny. And then that creates a problem, right? Like what's happened with the tiny, tiny, they're gonna be eliminated for the system. And I think the the worst that's happening is that people keep thinking that aquaculture, as I said, in the beginning is gonna solve all the problems that seafood and fisheries are facing. And it's not, it's not a bullet solution, bullet-proof solution. And so it's not any nice like, once in these communities, they are doing aquaculture because whatever someone told them, the people that are supposed to be managing the fisheries kind of forget that that system exists. And so the fisheries are doing very bad. They're not doing at all good. And then aquaculture is kind of there, but it's not really doing anything and it's kind of like creates a whole mess.Brian Bienkowski Yeah, that makes sense. And you mentioned just fishing being a traditional activity for many of these communities. Can you just talk about get a probe that little further, how this transition has overlooked kind of local context, local cultures and history and expand on why that's a problem?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so um, I can give you an example, actually from one of the communities I work with. So I have done all my fieldwork, most of it in in Baja California, so in Mexico, and I started in Honduras last year. But Baja California, so that's an interesting example, because there's been pushed to do aquaculture of different species from back on from 2011. You know, for many reasons, it hasn't worked, some has worked, some doesn't. But in 2020, when I started working with them, with this one community, there, the there was a local NGO pushing to the oyster aquaculture, right, so sounds all good, right? Like, yeah, that's gonna be always the aquaculture, the community is gonna be happy, you know that. But when you go and talk with the community, like I did that for three years, you notice, and they told me that to me many times, you know, like, I'm not happy. I miss fishing, I wish I could have a boat to go fish all the time I won. I missed the traditions, I miss the freedom associated with fishing. And so as a consequence, like if you think about it, their will they're not, they're not happy, there will be nice, not good, right? Like if you think about what they miss from fishing, and also because they're doing something they don't want to like aquaculture. It's kind of like that this is the aquaculture project was not being successful, right? Like it didn't really work because like the people didn't believing in through time, because fishers as I said, they still wanted to be diving and fishing and all these things. There was an increase on quote unquote, illegal fishing in which I don't like that term. But that's what it's called, you know, when you don't follow the management rules, they continue fishing goes, does what they want it to do. And so in the any creative like, besides all that I'm telling you, it creates a very sad like social situation, right? Like when you have a community that's divided, lot of social tension, tension between the community and the NGO. We've seen is going to affect everything, right? Like it's going to affect what if a project comes again, or like funding for fish, it's like a whole whole sea social situation being created. Because of not considering something as simple as being to go ask them like, Hey, guys, if you want to do aquaculture, if they say yes, how much time do you want to invest? What species you want to do? You know, do you still want to go fishing? Why don't we do it all together? Like think simple solution says that.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned working in California, Mexico, and now expanding your research to Honduras. Was that was it meaningful to you to expand your research into your your home?Liliana Sierra Castillo It was super meaningful. Actually, I was very excited. I've always, I always strive to do all like every research, I do kind of like the think about how to be applicable to Honduras. And actually was super cool. Last summer, I went back to the field areas where I started back 10 years ago. And it was so sweet, like people still remembered me. And I still remember them. And I was like, Yeah, that was super. It was like a very impactful moment. And it's it's very interesting. Because like Honduras. They've done aquaculture in the past, but this area is starting. There's like a super cool organization that's trying to like maybe do aquaculture, but they don't want to do it, like half just randomly they want to understand like, the social dimensions that are happening before transforming the system. So it's been very interesting to understand the system as it is a fishery system, what's going on? How can we maybe do aquaculture what is needed? And it's just cool to go talk with people and hear them.Brian Bienkowski Maybe I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to aquaculture, but I feel like I've seen headlines on I mean, are there pollution concerns? Is that something that you know anything about because I know sometimes when you have such a concentrated amount of fish and fish feeding, there can be pollution concerns? Is that? Is that an issue?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so definitely aquaculture besides everything I'm telling which I'm talking more the social things, it also has like some, like as you're saying, I guess this is more of like an ecological consequence, right? So I feel like the pollution it's more well I think it's more when it's like an industrial scale size right where you have maybe someone and you're putting like antibiotics or whatever and like the feed right like when you feed them that food leaves the area and stuff. But also like at a smaller scale. Like for example in Honduras, what happens a lot. You have the tilapia farms, and even though they're small, there's two big I guess, kind of pollution consequences. One is again, the feed that you give them right the feed makes the water around and like contaminated it gets you to revise. And second, a lot of these aquaculture operations use non-native species. Tilapia is non native. And so it scapes, because in aquaculture is always going to escape. Then you have the problem of like, okay, what is the, how is this non-native species going to, like impact the ecosystem. But in the, it's super interesting, because in Baja in Mexico and other parts of the world, they're pushing to use oyster aquaculture, because in theory, oyster has a lot of benefits, right? cleans the water, it a lot of ecosystemic services, I think it also sometimes is being used at like, what there's erosion and you use, like, oysters to, like, provide more structure to there. But there's also a lot of unknowns of oysters, right? Like, we don't know what impacts are being made by oysters in the ecosystem. For example, in Baja, the oysters that are being used are not in them are non native. So we don't even know how they're affecting the native organisms from the ecosystem. And all these other questions, but in oysters, you don't feed them. So at least you don't have to worry about that.Brian Bienkowski Before this call, I was at my local, not today. But recently I was at my grocery store and realize that I lived 20 minutes from Lake Superior, a massive fishery, the biggest freshwater lake on the planet. And almost all of the fish they sell there is farm raised from Chile and other places around the world, which is just indicative of our super broken food system. I think. So you mentioned you mentioned the places you're working in, in, you know, Mexico, Honduras, and California. And I'm wondering, what are some of the ways that you and others are working to kind of better incorporate small scale fisheries and their well being into these kinds of changes in systems?Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, I think that there's a lot of good people trying to, as you're saying, like to give to voices to small-scale fishing communities and put them as at the center of all these policies or, or I don't even know, like, yeah, I guess their policies. So I think parallel to the blue economy, and blue growth, maybe I'm gonna say even, like, newer, I'm gonna say maybe, I don't know, like four or five years ago, eight years ago, is to start a what's called the Blue justice, right? Which is kind of these critical, how can we critically analyze and think about how we can put small scale fisheries or humans or human rights in the center, especially of these, these two big development discourses, right. And so there's a lot of people coming from all different perspectives, because the blue, this is a thing, the blue economy, if you think about it, the blue economy was a term proposed by an economist, I think 10 Or maybe 12 years ago, where basically is trying to get economic benefits from the ocean, right? That can mean a lot of things that can mean fisheries, aquaculture, offshore energy, so many things, it's like massive the amount of things you can get from the ocean. So I know a lot of great people that are trying to think about ways okay, like, for example, how can we make protected areas or I don't like the word permanent protected areas, but how can we manage the ocean in a way that the humans are there, we cannot eliminate the humans, right? I know a lot of people like doing similar work to what I do. But in other words, like parts of the world, like putting people at the center of labor, they want to because you're not if they want, how can we make it work? I know a lot of people being working with offshore energy and understanding like, how is this gonna impact communities, right communities? How can we bring them back to the table to think what you're saying? Obviously, there's like a big, I think that's been a big one for a lot of time, like trying to understand industrial fishing versus small scale fishing, right? Like, how can we provide more protection for small scale fisheries? Like how can we help them? And so I think it's so it's a very broad question, but I think it just inspires me to know that a lot of people are doing a lot of super amazing important work. It's hard work, but I think it's gonna get its get going in places.Brian Bienkowski And if you do you have examples or projects that you've seen that you feel like successfully and very intentionally incorporated local communities and their perspectives into aquaculture decisions?Liliana Sierra Castillo I know there's some like smaller-scale aquaculture operations from indigenous communities in I think it's in Seattle, and in Alaska, where communities are basically saying you know, we want to do aquaculture and they're like, in charge of the they are deciding everything. I think that one that example is pretty cool to read about that And I'm not sure about in Latin America, honestly. There must be some examples. But I don't know them from the top of my head right now. Sure, sure.Brian Bienkowski And you mentioned, you know, you've talked about these marine protected areas. And off the top, we spoke about why those can be seemingly very good, but perhaps problematic in some spots. I was wondering if you could talk about your work in advocacy in this area?Liliana Sierra Castillo In marine protected areas?Brian Bienkowski Yeah, just what you're what you're thinking, what you're what you're seeing what you're trying to do, in making that process more community centered and culturally inclusive.Liliana Sierra Castillo Yeah, so I guess, um, as I mentioned, like, in 20, oh, my God, I don't even know, like, 10 years ago, when I was starting. And there was a big push for this big area, right, and getting these fishing communities out. I remember, I had a good conversation with my boss at that time, and we decided, you know, like, like, we cannot just eliminate these people, you know, like, that's going to be very counterproductive in the end, right? it's going to probably increase poaching and all these things. And also, it's not good. Like, it's super bad. So So we created it was kind of like, okay, let's think with them. Let's include them like that. See, like, inside of these marine area, how, what, what areas can we leave for them to fit, like, let's include them for everything. And so we developed this kind of cool kind of governance platform where we had like academia and government and NGOs and fishers are working together. And that was super cool. And I think that area is still going on back there. But recently, I'm in the marine protected area world –because I as I mentioned many times, I don't really like the word and the term– there's this cool project that I've been very honored to be part of is being carried by one of my friends, her name is Tasha Quintana. And she's trying to understand temporary closure. So temporary closure is a tool that has been used with people that manage their resources, which is basically as simple as like, you can be a person who's like exploiting a fishery, and you're gonna be like, Oh, I exploited this area, I'm gonna let us rest for a month or two, and then switch gears, right? So it's this is this is happening, and has been happening in all the world. So we're trying to understand, Okay, does it work? How does it work? How can we make it better maybe. And I'm trying to do like the equity and justice component of this, like trying to understand critically understand using critical environmental justice frameworks to see how this might be a more equitable solution versus the permanent and protected areas. So that's what we're trying to do with that space.Brian Bienkowski I'm curious with all this time spent in and around oceans and working in listening to fishing communities, do you fish?Liliana Sierra Castillo I fished more before then now I loved to go fishing. I was very bad at it. We really, really enjoyed like, you know, being with the hook and line and, or like the little nets or seeing when we're in the rivers and lakes. And I used to go out with fishermen and just see what they were like catching I used to go I think I went one year ago in Mexico with my fisher friends and was pretty fun. We went spear-diving. It's not allowed, but we still we did it was pretty fun. You know, it was night. And it was cool. Because like you couldn't see anything in the water on unless they had the flashlights. And when you like came out of the water. It was just like stars everywhere. So yeah, I do love fishing. I haven't done it California though, because I've heard it's like complicated to get a license and so on. But I do love fishing.Brian Bienkowski Cool. Very cool. And just one last question. Before we get to some of the final fun questions. What are you optimistic about when it comes to the work that you're doing and the research that you're conducting?Liliana Sierra Castillo You know, I'm optimistic and it's hard. I feel like this type of work, you have a lot of downs, some ups, um, it's as I mentioned, it's work that has to be done. But it's hard. Because it's kind of like if you think about it is kind of like trying to understand the cause root of things, really. Like, why are things the way they are? And sometimes that's uncomfortable to a lot of people, a lot of people are not going to be happy with the things that you say. But I'm hopeful. As I mentioned, I think that a lot of people are starting to think understand this is important. And I'm optimistic that more and more people we're going to start to know each other and kind of create these network of people that think alike and we need to continue to put communities in the center of all these decisions and continue to fight you know, it's kind of like a little revolution going on which I think it's very inspiring. But more than a revolution, I'm optimistic because I think that people also like, for example, all the people supporting the blue economy and all these, like bigger ideas are going to start understanding, you know, through all these other people of the blue justice team, they really need each other, like, how can you like, you know, it's kind of like, I'm optimistic that that can happen at some moment. But I think my most optimism is to that communities are slowly being put again, where they should be the center of everything. And that there's a lot of people that we're not alone, you know, like, it's a lot of times you feel alone. And there's a lot of people around the world trying to –which is crazy, right?– like, put them back in the center of all these things. But that's what it's happening. And I think it's pretty inspiring too.Brian Bienkowski There's so many parallels to other aspects of society. And when you think about one movement is like, how can we extract and make money? And the other movement is like, how can we make sure that the people who are most impacted by this have a say in this, and I think you can look at the energy sector you can look at, I mean, it's just so indicative of kind of where we find ourselves at this crossroads in trying to push for energy, justice, climate justice, environmental justice, kind of broadly. So I really appreciate you kind of introducing our readers to this idea of Blue justice, it's been really fascinating. And now I have three rapid fire fun questions where you could just answer with one word, or a phrase, my most treasured possession isLiliana Sierra Castillo my dog.Brian Bienkowski me too, by the way. One thing I'm looking forward to this month isLiliana Sierra Castillo in May, um I don't know, spending time with my friends.Brian Bienkowski That works. That's fun. And one unique tradition my family has isLiliana Sierra Castillo okay, so every time – this is a longer phrase, but it's just we're Latinos. Talk a lot. But every time it's your birthday, when we were back home, they used to wake you up, like at 4am. Even though you didn't want that and they would pretend that you were a baby and like give you like a like, it was like a lotion bottle. But it was supposed to be like a liquid our babies dreads call, like what they drink from them. The little bottles, milk bottles. Yeah, we were supposed to do that. And then after we will move out, I think they continue trying to do it, like calling us but now it's harder, right? Because like we're in so many different time zones. That he's kind of like has to vote okay, just told me when I can call you.Brian Bienkowski The call doesn't work quite as well, when you're, you know, paid to silence.Liliana Sierra Castillo Exactly. And my phone is always silent. So I think they tried it for a couple of years. And then I was like, I'm, I'm literally sleeping. Can't. But yeah, I do miss the pretending to be a baby thing.Brian Bienkowski That I've never, you know, that is new to me. I really, I really liked that. Well, Liliana, this has been so much fun. Again, thank you so much for your time. And it's just so exciting to have you in this program with your, you know, with your expertise and the research that you're doing. And one last question I've asked everybody is what is the last book that you read for fun? I'm readingLiliana Sierra Castillo it's I haven't finished reading it but I am in the middle of reading "Critical environmental justice and race." Which is funny because I haven't like in my side table like I read it every night while my boyfriend reads... I don't even know what you know, other things or friends are reading other things do. But for I guess before that I'm trying to think what was a good book? I don't remember right now I think that's been in a while kind of reading for me.Brian Bienkowski Well, you know what, for our audience, that probably is fun. So I think I think that one that you're reading right now works. Liliana, thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to following your career and working with you in this program.Liliana Sierra Castillo Thank you very much for everything, all the questions.



Liliana Sierra Castillo joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss the concept of blue justice and how the expansion of aquaculture impacts small-scale fishery communities.


Sierra Castillo, a current Agents of Change fellow and Ph.D. candidate at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara, also talks about how she became passionate about oceans, how we can rethink marine protected areas to center communities, and how meaningful it is for her to do research in her native Honduras.

The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion with Sierra Castillo and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Liliana Sierra Castillo on blue justice

Transcript


Brian Bienkowski

Thank you so much for taking time to meet with me today. I'm really excited to have you on your work when I was doing a little research for this. It's different than other fellows we've had. And I'm really excited to talk about what you're doing. But as you may know, I'd like to start way at the beginning. So I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about your childhood and where an interest in the environment came into your life?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, of course. So I'm originally from Honduras. And it's funny because even when I was a child, my parents don't really live near the oceans. They live in the capital. But even when I was like, I remember specifically, I was like in second grade, and we did an essay. And it just fascinated me to know, when my professor was giving feedback that we know more about the moon, that about the ocean. And I think that just stuck in my head forever. And then at that moment, I decided I wanted to be a marine biologist, even though I didn't know what that meant. And then I guess I had the privilege that my parents were capable of taking us to like the beach around the country and exploring. I just, it's always fascinating, like how vast and amazing the ocean is. Because that's how it all started.

Brian Bienkowski

That's awesome. I grew up in the in Michigan, in the Great Lakes region, so not oceans, but really large lakes where you can't you know, you can't see the end of them. They're massive. And I just remember my whole life, no matter how many times I visited them, it always kind of blew me away or gave me this feeling of inspiration every time I see them. And it still does it to this day. And I don't know, do oceans. Do oceans do that for you? Do you still get kind of a sense of awe even though you've been working with them for so long?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, definitely. I feel these day like every time I walk past an ocean, as you're saying, like, I am just in awe how big it is and how much it is that we don't know. And I guess now, in the past 10 years or so that I've I've started working more on the human dimensions parts of oceans. It's more of like, wow, we have so much of these, like space and water and things but like, so much people are being affected by your kind of like that more critical analysis. I think that is also like it's more of an inspiration in that way as well.

Brian Bienkowski

For sure. And maybe maybe there's some overlap in this question. Since we've been talking about your your love of oceans, but you started your university studies at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in marine biology. So what was it specifically about oceans? Was it you know, fisheries? Was it how humans interact with them? Was it about their vastness or you know, all of the above.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

So, it's funny because as many marine biology programs, my undergrad was very much like ecology focus. And then my last quarter I took a the only fishery class. But at that moment, I still thought in my mind that I wanted to be a dolphin trainer. That was like my life goal. And then I was very lucky to have we have in that program for you to graduate, you have to do a professional internship. And so I got the super cool experience of working with the World Wildlife Fund in a bay area called Cortés*, which on the northern coast. And for six months, I was just working with fishery communities. And I was like, Okay, this is what I want to do, like, you know, those things are cool, but it's not like, and I discovered, like, you know, I really love the intersections of like, I get to be in the ocean and be in that moment, I used to be covered a lot in fish blog. So I was like, clean to the fisherman. And I love talking with people and like learning what they were doing. And I also found that I love, like, figuring out how to like, give back the results, right? that I'm learning from analysis back to the communities and all that like connection of cycles and turn it into, like management tools. And so yeah, I guess like it was, the university gave me the basic tools, and then this experience of the internship that kind of changed everything.

Brian Bienkowski

Well, these coastal communities, it's not just a, it's not just this natural wonder, like we were talking about, but it's so intertwined with culture and economics. And, you know, we're gonna get into a lot of that today with a lot of the work that you're doing. So it goes much further beyond as well, that's really pretty. It's so you know, intertwined with these coastal communities. So, before we get to your research, I want to know, a moment or event that has helped shape your identity up to this point.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, I still, so I think for me, it happened again, in this internship. So this was like 10 years ago. And again, I had since from that moment, before that moment training on like, sadly, a lot of like, environmental classes are very much like, you know, we need pristine nature, we need everything to be protected, and all that, right. So I came up with that mentality. And I remember the first day, on the field with these fishery communities, I was with this fisherman who sadly has passed. Now he passed away, which is very sad. But I still remember he told me, you know, like, so what's the point of like, you guys, tell us like, we cannot fish in this area, my organization. And that moment, my NGO was internship with, they were trying to build a protected area, marine protected area, and like, we moved the fisherman, and he was like, "What's the point of view protecting these resources if we don't even have anything to eat? Like, what are we going to eat?" And so that, for me, was like, it was a moment that I it's I know, it sounds dumb. But in that moment, I was like, I cannot believe, that for all my undergrad, I was so like, naive, right? Like, in this little bubble of like, privilege that I didn't understand anything until that moment. And I will say, Yeah, you are 100%. Right. And I think that change everything until right now, 10 years after what I've gotten all the way since.

Brian Bienkowski

I don't think that sounds dumb at all. In fact, where I live in the northern Great Lakes region, a lot of people are focused on forest wilderness, you know, wild areas. And there's also indigenous communities up here who use those spaces to hunt and gather. So the idea of just blocking them off to protect them is is not in line with what how they've used these areas. So I totally, I totally understand what you're talking about. And I grew up the same way, like, oh, yeah, protect it. You know, that's great, preserve it and protect it. That's the way to go. And I think, hopefully, we're starting to realize that that's not always the most just way to do things. So a lot of your research now centers around the growth of aquaculture globally and the impacts it has on small scale fishery communities. So first, can you kind of orient those of us who are not too familiar with this trend? And what does aquaculture entail? Where are we seeing the most expansion of it?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so I think for that question, because I know a lot of people, it's funny, because like, to this day, for example, a lot like my mom doesn't really know what I do. Right? So fisheries, and that's where I it's my big specialization, right? It's everything that's been caught wildly in any body of water, I do marine fisheries, but it can be lakes, as you're saying in Michigan, rivers, whatever. Aquaculture is basically I tried to think of it as like a farm or agriculture on water. So it's, there's some sort of human control component over it. It's literally you have a seed, or a baby or seed of an oyster, for example, and then you help it grow. Like you control it in an environment until it grows and then you harvest it. So it's a big difference from fisheries, right. The other comparison I tried to think about it is like hunters versus gatherers, right? Like hunting is the fishing and gatherer races like agriculture kind of wise. Um, so I'm gonna say in the past, so my expertise is fisheries, but going to aquaculture in the past, I'm going to say maybe since the 80s, there's been a big boom to kind of like grow aquaculture with this kind of idea that seafood is declining, the fisheries production, so As we all know, it's declaiming for a lot of lot of factors. So the idea that aquaculture is gonna, like provide, like all the seafood we need. And so it has had its ups and downs, I think around the 90s. It's when the shrimp aquaculture started around the world, especially in Latin America, coming from, again, like a lot of funding from like not, Latin America. And that was a very bad situation, because as you know, aquaculture for shrimp, they destroyed a lot of mangroves. So it was a whole thing, right? So then aquaculture kind of started to decline. And I think back, I think, would have saved maybe the, like, 15 years ago or so there's like this new kind of push to aquaculture through the blue economy, right? All these these cores narratives. And now it's kind of like thinking that aquaculture besides giving, like that seafood, the seafood supply, that fisheries might not be giving. Now, it's kind of like, okay, now, it's also can do ecosystem services. Now, it can help people, now it can provide all these other benefits, which in some instances it does. But what we're seeing in is where my study comes in is like when these when it's being implemented at a local scale in communities is specifically in underdeveloped countries. It's not getting all those benefits, that it's promising. And in reality, it's creating a lot of injustices. So that's where I come like, trying to understand why and how can we do it better to really have the benefits that you should have.

Brian Bienkowski

So what are some of the opportunities that this expanded aquaculture brings? And conversely, what are some of the problems?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so some of the opportunities, you know, like, I've seen some examples where it actually provides employment to people, right. And a lot of again, I work in small scale coastal communities, so very different from industrial fisheries or aquaculture areas. So a lot of these communities, they're very marginalized, they're very vulnerable to shocks and a lot of things happening around them. So I've seen some instances where like, if doing that, like correctly, aquaculture can provide them with employment, like they can work, they can provide them with food security, they can provide, if done correctly, like benefits of the ecosystem, we know that some of these species might contribute to ecosystemic benefits. But the thing is, like conversely, when he's not being done correctly, it can also impact for example, a lot of these implementation of aquaculture right now is kind of like, okay, you have to stop fishing. And now you're going to do aquaculture. And as you mentioned a while ago, for these people fishing has a lot of cultural traditional aspects, right? It's not like they go fishing because money, they go fishing, because it's who they are. And so that impacts a lot, right? Like, that's already like very bad, kind of like being like, "Okay, you're gonna stop doing these things that you have done for four generations ago until right now, you're gonna stop doing it, even though you want to just because I want you to stop doing it." Now. So the way sometimes is being done is kind of like, not just like stop fishing, and it's going to impact relations, as I said, but also like, think about it, if you have such a vulnerable system, you want them to have multiple economic activity activities, where livelihoods, if you remove fishing, and then use of aquaculture when there's a shock to the market or to the food system or whatever, then what are these people going to rely on? Right? Like, what are we doing here. And then the other, that third thing that I've seen a lot, is that aquaculture tends to be very tends to be more of like, it can be more like division of classes, like people can like accumulate more as an aquaculture, like, for example, if you and me both have aquaculture operations, and I have the capacity to buy more land, to lobby more, to get more products, more seed everything I have maybe got a I studied to understand what's happening, I understand all these things. I'm gonna grow more, right, versus you're gonna stay tiny, tiny. And then that creates a problem, right? Like what's happened with the tiny, tiny, they're gonna be eliminated for the system. And I think the the worst that's happening is that people keep thinking that aquaculture, as I said, in the beginning is gonna solve all the problems that seafood and fisheries are facing. And it's not, it's not a bullet solution, bullet-proof solution. And so it's not any nice like, once in these communities, they are doing aquaculture because whatever someone told them, the people that are supposed to be managing the fisheries kind of forget that that system exists. And so the fisheries are doing very bad. They're not doing at all good. And then aquaculture is kind of there, but it's not really doing anything and it's kind of like creates a whole mess.

Brian Bienkowski

Yeah, that makes sense. And you mentioned just fishing being a traditional activity for many of these communities. Can you just talk about get a probe that little further, how this transition has overlooked kind of local context, local cultures and history and expand on why that's a problem?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so um, I can give you an example, actually from one of the communities I work with. So I have done all my fieldwork, most of it in in Baja California, so in Mexico, and I started in Honduras last year. But Baja California, so that's an interesting example, because there's been pushed to do aquaculture of different species from back on from 2011. You know, for many reasons, it hasn't worked, some has worked, some doesn't. But in 2020, when I started working with them, with this one community, there, the there was a local NGO pushing to the oyster aquaculture, right, so sounds all good, right? Like, yeah, that's gonna be always the aquaculture, the community is gonna be happy, you know that. But when you go and talk with the community, like I did that for three years, you notice, and they told me that to me many times, you know, like, I'm not happy. I miss fishing, I wish I could have a boat to go fish all the time I won. I missed the traditions, I miss the freedom associated with fishing. And so as a consequence, like if you think about it, their will they're not, they're not happy, there will be nice, not good, right? Like if you think about what they miss from fishing, and also because they're doing something they don't want to like aquaculture. It's kind of like that this is the aquaculture project was not being successful, right? Like it didn't really work because like the people didn't believing in through time, because fishers as I said, they still wanted to be diving and fishing and all these things. There was an increase on quote unquote, illegal fishing in which I don't like that term. But that's what it's called, you know, when you don't follow the management rules, they continue fishing goes, does what they want it to do. And so in the any creative like, besides all that I'm telling you, it creates a very sad like social situation, right? Like when you have a community that's divided, lot of social tension, tension between the community and the NGO. We've seen is going to affect everything, right? Like it's going to affect what if a project comes again, or like funding for fish, it's like a whole whole sea social situation being created. Because of not considering something as simple as being to go ask them like, Hey, guys, if you want to do aquaculture, if they say yes, how much time do you want to invest? What species you want to do? You know, do you still want to go fishing? Why don't we do it all together? Like think simple solution says that.

Brian Bienkowski

So you mentioned working in California, Mexico, and now expanding your research to Honduras. Was that was it meaningful to you to expand your research into your your home?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

It was super meaningful. Actually, I was very excited. I've always, I always strive to do all like every research, I do kind of like the think about how to be applicable to Honduras. And actually was super cool. Last summer, I went back to the field areas where I started back 10 years ago. And it was so sweet, like people still remembered me. And I still remember them. And I was like, Yeah, that was super. It was like a very impactful moment. And it's it's very interesting. Because like Honduras. They've done aquaculture in the past, but this area is starting. There's like a super cool organization that's trying to like maybe do aquaculture, but they don't want to do it, like half just randomly they want to understand like, the social dimensions that are happening before transforming the system. So it's been very interesting to understand the system as it is a fishery system, what's going on? How can we maybe do aquaculture what is needed? And it's just cool to go talk with people and hear them.

Brian Bienkowski

Maybe I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to aquaculture, but I feel like I've seen headlines on I mean, are there pollution concerns? Is that something that you know anything about because I know sometimes when you have such a concentrated amount of fish and fish feeding, there can be pollution concerns? Is that? Is that an issue?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so definitely aquaculture besides everything I'm telling which I'm talking more the social things, it also has like some, like as you're saying, I guess this is more of like an ecological consequence, right? So I feel like the pollution it's more well I think it's more when it's like an industrial scale size right where you have maybe someone and you're putting like antibiotics or whatever and like the feed right like when you feed them that food leaves the area and stuff. But also like at a smaller scale. Like for example in Honduras, what happens a lot. You have the tilapia farms, and even though they're small, there's two big I guess, kind of pollution consequences. One is again, the feed that you give them right the feed makes the water around and like contaminated it gets you to revise. And second, a lot of these aquaculture operations use non-native species. Tilapia is non native. And so it scapes, because in aquaculture is always going to escape. Then you have the problem of like, okay, what is the, how is this non-native species going to, like impact the ecosystem. But in the, it's super interesting, because in Baja in Mexico and other parts of the world, they're pushing to use oyster aquaculture, because in theory, oyster has a lot of benefits, right? cleans the water, it a lot of ecosystemic services, I think it also sometimes is being used at like, what there's erosion and you use, like, oysters to, like, provide more structure to there. But there's also a lot of unknowns of oysters, right? Like, we don't know what impacts are being made by oysters in the ecosystem. For example, in Baja, the oysters that are being used are not in them are non native. So we don't even know how they're affecting the native organisms from the ecosystem. And all these other questions, but in oysters, you don't feed them. So at least you don't have to worry about that.

Brian Bienkowski

Before this call, I was at my local, not today. But recently I was at my grocery store and realize that I lived 20 minutes from Lake Superior, a massive fishery, the biggest freshwater lake on the planet. And almost all of the fish they sell there is farm raised from Chile and other places around the world, which is just indicative of our super broken food system. I think. So you mentioned you mentioned the places you're working in, in, you know, Mexico, Honduras, and California. And I'm wondering, what are some of the ways that you and others are working to kind of better incorporate small scale fisheries and their well being into these kinds of changes in systems?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, I think that there's a lot of good people trying to, as you're saying, like to give to voices to small-scale fishing communities and put them as at the center of all these policies or, or I don't even know, like, yeah, I guess their policies. So I think parallel to the blue economy, and blue growth, maybe I'm gonna say even, like, newer, I'm gonna say maybe, I don't know, like four or five years ago, eight years ago, is to start a what's called the Blue justice, right? Which is kind of these critical, how can we critically analyze and think about how we can put small scale fisheries or humans or human rights in the center, especially of these, these two big development discourses, right. And so there's a lot of people coming from all different perspectives, because the blue, this is a thing, the blue economy, if you think about it, the blue economy was a term proposed by an economist, I think 10 Or maybe 12 years ago, where basically is trying to get economic benefits from the ocean, right? That can mean a lot of things that can mean fisheries, aquaculture, offshore energy, so many things, it's like massive the amount of things you can get from the ocean. So I know a lot of great people that are trying to think about ways okay, like, for example, how can we make protected areas or I don't like the word permanent protected areas, but how can we manage the ocean in a way that the humans are there, we cannot eliminate the humans, right? I know a lot of people like doing similar work to what I do. But in other words, like parts of the world, like putting people at the center of labor, they want to because you're not if they want, how can we make it work? I know a lot of people being working with offshore energy and understanding like, how is this gonna impact communities, right communities? How can we bring them back to the table to think what you're saying? Obviously, there's like a big, I think that's been a big one for a lot of time, like trying to understand industrial fishing versus small scale fishing, right? Like, how can we provide more protection for small scale fisheries? Like how can we help them? And so I think it's so it's a very broad question, but I think it just inspires me to know that a lot of people are doing a lot of super amazing important work. It's hard work, but I think it's gonna get its get going in places.

Brian Bienkowski

And if you do you have examples or projects that you've seen that you feel like successfully and very intentionally incorporated local communities and their perspectives into aquaculture decisions?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

I know there's some like smaller-scale aquaculture operations from indigenous communities in I think it's in Seattle, and in Alaska, where communities are basically saying you know, we want to do aquaculture and they're like, in charge of the they are deciding everything. I think that one that example is pretty cool to read about that And I'm not sure about in Latin America, honestly. There must be some examples. But I don't know them from the top of my head right now. Sure, sure.

Brian Bienkowski

And you mentioned, you know, you've talked about these marine protected areas. And off the top, we spoke about why those can be seemingly very good, but perhaps problematic in some spots. I was wondering if you could talk about your work in advocacy in this area?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

In marine protected areas?

Brian Bienkowski

Yeah, just what you're what you're thinking, what you're what you're seeing what you're trying to do, in making that process more community centered and culturally inclusive.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Yeah, so I guess, um, as I mentioned, like, in 20, oh, my God, I don't even know, like, 10 years ago, when I was starting. And there was a big push for this big area, right, and getting these fishing communities out. I remember, I had a good conversation with my boss at that time, and we decided, you know, like, like, we cannot just eliminate these people, you know, like, that's going to be very counterproductive in the end, right? it's going to probably increase poaching and all these things. And also, it's not good. Like, it's super bad. So So we created it was kind of like, okay, let's think with them. Let's include them like that. See, like, inside of these marine area, how, what, what areas can we leave for them to fit, like, let's include them for everything. And so we developed this kind of cool kind of governance platform where we had like academia and government and NGOs and fishers are working together. And that was super cool. And I think that area is still going on back there. But recently, I'm in the marine protected area world –because I as I mentioned many times, I don't really like the word and the term– there's this cool project that I've been very honored to be part of is being carried by one of my friends, her name is Tasha Quintana. And she's trying to understand temporary closure. So temporary closure is a tool that has been used with people that manage their resources, which is basically as simple as like, you can be a person who's like exploiting a fishery, and you're gonna be like, Oh, I exploited this area, I'm gonna let us rest for a month or two, and then switch gears, right? So it's this is this is happening, and has been happening in all the world. So we're trying to understand, Okay, does it work? How does it work? How can we make it better maybe. And I'm trying to do like the equity and justice component of this, like trying to understand critically understand using critical environmental justice frameworks to see how this might be a more equitable solution versus the permanent and protected areas. So that's what we're trying to do with that space.

Brian Bienkowski

I'm curious with all this time spent in and around oceans and working in listening to fishing communities, do you fish?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

I fished more before then now I loved to go fishing. I was very bad at it. We really, really enjoyed like, you know, being with the hook and line and, or like the little nets or seeing when we're in the rivers and lakes. And I used to go out with fishermen and just see what they were like catching I used to go I think I went one year ago in Mexico with my fisher friends and was pretty fun. We went spear-diving. It's not allowed, but we still we did it was pretty fun. You know, it was night. And it was cool. Because like you couldn't see anything in the water on unless they had the flashlights. And when you like came out of the water. It was just like stars everywhere. So yeah, I do love fishing. I haven't done it California though, because I've heard it's like complicated to get a license and so on. But I do love fishing.

Brian Bienkowski

Cool. Very cool. And just one last question. Before we get to some of the final fun questions. What are you optimistic about when it comes to the work that you're doing and the research that you're conducting?

Liliana Sierra Castillo

You know, I'm optimistic and it's hard. I feel like this type of work, you have a lot of downs, some ups, um, it's as I mentioned, it's work that has to be done. But it's hard. Because it's kind of like if you think about it is kind of like trying to understand the cause root of things, really. Like, why are things the way they are? And sometimes that's uncomfortable to a lot of people, a lot of people are not going to be happy with the things that you say. But I'm hopeful. As I mentioned, I think that a lot of people are starting to think understand this is important. And I'm optimistic that more and more people we're going to start to know each other and kind of create these network of people that think alike and we need to continue to put communities in the center of all these decisions and continue to fight you know, it's kind of like a little revolution going on which I think it's very inspiring. But more than a revolution, I'm optimistic because I think that people also like, for example, all the people supporting the blue economy and all these, like bigger ideas are going to start understanding, you know, through all these other people of the blue justice team, they really need each other, like, how can you like, you know, it's kind of like, I'm optimistic that that can happen at some moment. But I think my most optimism is to that communities are slowly being put again, where they should be the center of everything. And that there's a lot of people that we're not alone, you know, like, it's a lot of times you feel alone. And there's a lot of people around the world trying to –which is crazy, right?– like, put them back in the center of all these things. But that's what it's happening. And I think it's pretty inspiring too.

Brian Bienkowski

There's so many parallels to other aspects of society. And when you think about one movement is like, how can we extract and make money? And the other movement is like, how can we make sure that the people who are most impacted by this have a say in this, and I think you can look at the energy sector you can look at, I mean, it's just so indicative of kind of where we find ourselves at this crossroads in trying to push for energy, justice, climate justice, environmental justice, kind of broadly. So I really appreciate you kind of introducing our readers to this idea of Blue justice, it's been really fascinating. And now I have three rapid fire fun questions where you could just answer with one word, or a phrase, my most treasured possession is

Liliana Sierra Castillo

my dog.

Brian Bienkowski

me too, by the way. One thing I'm looking forward to this month is

Liliana Sierra Castillo

in May, um I don't know, spending time with my friends.

Brian Bienkowski

That works. That's fun. And one unique tradition my family has is

Liliana Sierra Castillo

okay, so every time – this is a longer phrase, but it's just we're Latinos. Talk a lot. But every time it's your birthday, when we were back home, they used to wake you up, like at 4am. Even though you didn't want that and they would pretend that you were a baby and like give you like a like, it was like a lotion bottle. But it was supposed to be like a liquid our babies dreads call, like what they drink from them. The little bottles, milk bottles. Yeah, we were supposed to do that. And then after we will move out, I think they continue trying to do it, like calling us but now it's harder, right? Because like we're in so many different time zones. That he's kind of like has to vote okay, just told me when I can call you.

Brian Bienkowski

The call doesn't work quite as well, when you're, you know, paid to silence.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Exactly. And my phone is always silent. So I think they tried it for a couple of years. And then I was like, I'm, I'm literally sleeping. Can't. But yeah, I do miss the pretending to be a baby thing.

Brian Bienkowski

That I've never, you know, that is new to me. I really, I really liked that. Well, Liliana, this has been so much fun. Again, thank you so much for your time. And it's just so exciting to have you in this program with your, you know, with your expertise and the research that you're doing. And one last question I've asked everybody is what is the last book that you read for fun? I'm reading

Liliana Sierra Castillo

it's I haven't finished reading it but I am in the middle of reading "Critical environmental justice and race." Which is funny because I haven't like in my side table like I read it every night while my boyfriend reads... I don't even know what you know, other things or friends are reading other things do. But for I guess before that I'm trying to think what was a good book? I don't remember right now I think that's been in a while kind of reading for me.

Brian Bienkowski

Well, you know what, for our audience, that probably is fun. So I think I think that one that you're reading right now works. Liliana, thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to following your career and working with you in this program.

Liliana Sierra Castillo

Thank you very much for everything, all the questions.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Ocean Acidification Threshold Pushes Earth Past Another Planetary Boundary

Earth has breached a critical boundary for ocean acidification, with potentially grim effects for ocean ecosystems and human livelihoods

Our planet is sick, and its life-threatening symptoms are getting worse, a new report warns.Earth has been pushed past multiple physical and chemical boundaries crucial for keeping the world a livable place. Beyond already exceeded thresholds set by scientists for rising temperatures, biodiversity loss and chemical pollution, we have now also breached the boundary on ocean acidification. The milestone comes with grim ramifications for marine ecosystems and human livelihoods.“More than three-quarters of the Earth’s support systems are not in the safe zone,” Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) in Germany, said in a statement announcing the 2025 evaluation of the planetary boundaries. “Humanity is pushing beyond the limits of a safe operating space, increasing the risk of destabilizing the planet.”On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Humans and many other species evolved to thrive in the climate of the Holocene, a period that began around 10,000 years ago. But as societies industrialized and began widely burning fossil fuels in the 19th century, greenhouse gases built up in the atmosphere, trapping heat and transforming Earth and its climate in many ways besides raising global temperatures.Beginning in 2009, PIK flagged and prioritized research on nine geophysical limits that make up a sort of planetary life-support system; staying within these limits, they argue, is the best hope for maintaining the clement climatic conditions we and most of Earth’s other denizens have adapted to. In 2023 researchers published a study that quantified those boundaries and established where we are in relation to them. At the time, six of the boundaries had been surpassed, with many well into what the scientists called a “zone of increasing risk.”“It’s like blood pressure,” said the 2023 study’s lead author Katherine Richardson, an earth systems scientist at the University of Copenhagen, in an interview with Scientific American at the time. “If your blood pressure is over 120 over 80, it’s not a guarantee that you’re going to have a heart attack, but it does raise the risk, and therefore we do what we can to bring it down.”Among the nine boundaries is of course climate change, which is measured in part by the amount of world-warming carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere. Carbon dioxide concentrations reached a record global high of 422.7 parts per million (ppm) last year, compared with 280 ppm prior to the industrial revolution and the 350 ppm that many scientists consider a “safe” limit (which was surpassed in 1987). The burning of fossil fuels is the indisputable culprit.Fossil fuels are also behind the new boundary breaching—the ocean absorbs some of the atmosphere’s excess carbon dioxide, causing waters to become more acidic. Since the industrial revolution, the ocean’s surface pH has dropped by 0.1; this may seem minuscule, but because the pH scale is logarithmic, it reflects roughly a 30 percent increase in acidity.Ocean acidification can have profound impacts on marine ecosystems by depleting seawater of certain carbon compounds that corals and other shell building animals need to construct their protective homes. At low enough pH levels, corals and shells can even begin to dissolve. These effects could destabilize entire ecosystems and devastate many commercially valuable species, such as oysters. A 2020 report by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that ocean acidification would cost the country’s economy billions of dollars.“The movement we’re seeing is absolutely headed in the wrong direction. The ocean is becoming more acidic, oxygen levels are dropping, and marine heatwaves are increasing. This is ramping up pressure on a system vital to stabilize conditions on planet Earth,” Levke Caesar, co-lead of PIK’s Planetary Boundaries Science Lab, said in the new evaluation’s press statement.The not-so-short list of other boundaries we’ve blown past is sobering. Excess phosphorus and nitrogen from the widespread use of fertilizers flows into rivers and seas to spark toxic algal blooms. Artificial chemicals, such as plastics, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and “forever chemical” perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) disruptively accumulate in food chains. Agriculture and other changes in land use strip away forests and diminish available fresh water. And as all these problems grow, more and more of Earth’s biodiversity is disappearing.According to the new report, just two of the nine limits remain intact: ozone depletion and aerosols in the atmosphere. Only the former shows clear progress away from the planetary boundary, as a result of the success of the Montreal Protocol, the international agreement through which countries are phasing out chemicals that erode Earth’s protective ozone layer. Aerosol emissions have declined globally—partly from efforts to reduce pollution from global shipping—but absent any unified policy framework for reductions, levels could easily surge back.The overall prognosis for the planet’s health is poor, given that a number of countries, including the U.S. in particular, are moving away from meaningful action to tackle environmental problems.“We are witnessing widespread decline in the health of our planet. But this is not an inevitable outcome. The drop in aerosol pollution and healing of the ozone layer, shows that it is possible to turn the direction of global development. Even if the diagnosis is dire, the window of cure is still open,” Rockström said in the press statement. “Failure is not inevitable; failure is a choice. A choice that must and can be avoided.”It’s Time to Stand Up for ScienceIf you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Meat is a leading emissions source – but few outlets report on it, analysis finds

Sentient Media reveals less than 4% of climate news stories mention animal agriculture as source of carbon emissionsFood and agriculture contribute one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions – second only to the burning of fossil fuels. And yet the vast majority of media coverage of the climate crisis overlooks this critical sector, according to a new data analysis from Sentient Media.The findings suggest that only about a quarter of climate articles in 11 major US outlets, including the Guardian, mention food and agriculture as a cause. And of the 940 articles analyzed, only 36 – or 3.8% – mentioned animal agriculture or meat production, by far the largest source of food-related emissions. Continue reading...

Food and agriculture contribute one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions – second only to the burning of fossil fuels. And yet the vast majority of media coverage of the climate crisis overlooks this critical sector, according to a new data analysis from Sentient Media.The findings suggest that only about a quarter of climate articles in 11 major US outlets, including the Guardian, mention food and agriculture as a cause. And of the 940 articles analyzed, only 36 – or 3.8% – mentioned animal agriculture or meat production, by far the largest source of food-related emissions.The data reveals a media environment that obscures a key driver of the climate crisis. Meat production alone is responsible for nearly 60% of the food sector’s climate emissions and yet its impact is sorely underestimated: a 2023 Washington Post/University of Maryland poll found 74% of US respondents believe eating less meat has little to no effect on the climate crisis.Sentient Media analyzed the most recent online articles about climate change from 11 major U.S. outlets – the Guardian, Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, CNN, Los Angeles Times, New York Post, New York Times, Reuters, Star Tribune, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. Opinion pieces, syndicated stories, and articles that mention climate change only in passing were excluded.The final group of 940 stories was collected using artificial intelligence and then reviewed individually for accuracy. Of all the causes surveyed in the report, including mining, manufacturing, and energy production (55.9%); fossil fuels (47.9%); and transportation (34%), livestock and meat consumption were by far discussed the least.Sentient Media’s editor-in-chief, Jenny Splitter, who helped oversee the report, said she had long noticed the omission as a reporter covering the intersection of climate and food. “We thought one way to start the conversation with other journalists and newsrooms was to put some numbers to the question,” she said.Mark Hertsgaard, the executive director and co-founder of Covering Climate Now, a non-profit that helps newsrooms strengthen their climate reporting, said daily news outlets struggle to emphasize the deeper root causes of climate change – often focusing on incremental updates over the larger why.“It’s not necessarily nefarious,” he said. “But as the climate crisis has accelerated, it is increasingly indefensible for news coverage of climate change not to make it clear that this crisis is driven by very specific human activities – primarily burning fossil fuels. And in second place is food, agriculture, forestry.”Hertsgaard, who has reported on the climate crisis since 1990, said food and agriculture had long been a “gross oversight” in climate circles. The United Nations climate change summit had no dedicated agriculture focus until 2015, reflecting its neglected status in the world of policymakers, thinktanks, and NGOs – which contributed into the media’s illiteracy on the topic, Hertsgaard said.Dhanush Dinesh, the founder of the food-systems focused thinktank Clim-Eat, said climate organizations sometimes shy away from the topic due to food’s fraught cultural status, which may have helped to keep it from the media spotlight.When you eat a burger, you’re not just eating a cow ... You’re eating the Amazon. You’re eating the earth.Michael Grunwald, journalist“Nobody wants to put themselves out there and tell people what to eat – it’s just too sensitive,” he said. “Even within the [climate advocacy] space, we see it’s quite polarizing.”That tension isn’t always so organic. When a 2019 report published by the Lancet showed how reduced-meat diets could feed the world without causing environmental breakdown, an industry-backed coalition helped to fund some of the backlash against it. Beef industry groups take an active approach to messaging, including staffing a 24/7 “command center” in Denver that scans social media for negative stories and deploys counter-messaging.Journalist Michael Grunwald said that the food conversation today is lagging about twenty years behind the energy and fossil fuels conversation. He spent years covering climate issues for outlets including Time, Politico and the Washington Post before he started to see the links between the food on our plates and changes in the atmosphere.“I didn’t know squat,” he said. “Here’s this important part of the climate equation that I was spectacularly ignorant about. And I realized others probably were, too.”skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionGrunwald’s new book, We Are Eating the Earth, unpacks how dietary choices shape the planet’s surface, playing a massive role in its ultimate fate. That is in part because ruminant livestock – particularly cattle – are a major source of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, that warms the planet 80 times faster than carbon dioxide.But feeding billions of farm animals also takes up a lot of space. Half of the earth’s habitable land is already devoted to agriculture, and most of that – about 80% – is grazing pasture and cropland for animal feed, making meat consumption a major driver of deforestation globally. Today, we clear a soccer field’s worth of tropical forest every six seconds, a loss dramatically worsened by humanity’s growing hunger for meat.“When you eat a burger, you’re not just eating a cow,” Grunwald said. “You’re eating macaws and jaguars and the rest of the cast of Rio. You’re eating the Amazon. You’re eating the earth.”And yet this toll tends to be broadly misunderstood, when it is not ignored altogether. Only about 15% of stories analyzed Sentient Media mention land-use changes in connection with the climate crisis.Princeton senior researcher Timothy Searchinger has spent decades making the case that we cannot solve the climate issue without rethinking how we use land.“Every tree, after you take out the water, is about 50% carbon. So forests store vast quantities of carbon,” he said. “If we continue to clear forests, we have the capability to dramatically increase climate change.”That conversion of forest into agricultural land takes an unthinkable toll, responsible globally for as much carbon emissions each year as the entire United States. Meanwhile, the global population is expected to grow from 8 billion to 10 billion by 2050. So fixing the climate crisis will mean growing more food with fewer emissions on the same amount of land – or, ideally, even less land.“There’s kind of no way to solve the land use problems in the world unless there is moderation of diets – meat consumption, particularly beef – in the developed world,” Searchinger said.If ruminant meat consumption in wealthy countries such as the US declined to about 1.5 burgers per person per week – about half what it is now, still well over the national average for most countries – that alone would nearly eliminate the need for additional deforestation due to agricultural expansion, even in a world with 10 billion people, according to an analysis by the World Resources Institute.Though she acknowledges the 3.8% figure is low, Jessica Fanzo, a professor of climate at Columbia University, said she didn’t blame media as much as the challenge of translating scientific consensus into real action – a structural gridlock that’s made progress, and therefore storytelling, more difficult.“Governments are reluctant to push hard on dietary change, livestock emissions, or fertilizer dependence because they trigger cultural sensitivities and risk political backlash,” she said, by email. She also said it is difficult to take action on the vast, decentralized agricultural sector. Climate advocate and author Bill McKibben agreed, pointing out in emailed comments that 20 fossil fuel companies are responsible for much of the world’s emissions, whereas food comes down to the actions of millions of farmers.Meanwhile, US agriculture policy is mostly geared toward ramping up commodity grain and animal-feed production through subsidies – an approach that prioritizes cheap calories over reducing carbon emissions. And available demand-side solutions, such as meat taxes or meatless Mondays at public schools, risk touching a cultural third rail.But in this divided environment, media can play a crucial role, said David McBey, a University of Aberdeen behavioral scientist focused on diet-climate links.“Information campaigns don’t change behavior,” he said. “But they do lay an important bedrock. If you want behavior to change, it’s important that people know why it should change.”

How AI can help detect pests early and reduce pesticide use in cotton fields

Precision agriculture uses tools and technologies such as GPS and sensors to monitor, measure, and respond to changes within a farm field in real time. This includes using artificial intelligence technologies for tasks such as helping farmers apply pesticides only where and when they are needed. However, precision agriculture has not been widely implemented in many rural areas of the United States. We study smart communities, environmental health sciences, and health policy and community health, and we participated in a research project on AI and pesticide use in a rural Georgia agricultural community. Our team, led by Georgia Southern University and the City of Millen, with support from University of Georgia Cooperative Extension, local high schools and agriculture technology company FarmSense, is piloting AI-powered sensors to help cotton farmers optimize pesticide use. Georgia is one of the top cotton-producing states in the U.S., with cotton contributing nearly US$1 billion to the state’s economy in 2024. But only 13% of Georgia farmers use precision agriculture practices. Public-private-academic partnership Innovation drives economic growth, but access to it often stops at major city limits. Smaller and rural communities are frequently left out, lacking the funding, partnerships and technical resources that fuel progress elsewhere. At the same time, 75% of generative AI’s projected economic impact is concentrated in customer operations, marketing, software engineering and research and development, according to a 2023 McKinsey report. In contrast, applications of AI that improve infrastructure, food systems, safety and health remain underexplored. Yet smaller and rural communities are rich in potential—home to anchor institutions like small businesses, civic groups and schools that are deeply invested in their communities. And that potential could be tapped to develop AI applications that fall outside of traditional corporate domains. The Partnership for Innovation, a coalition of people and organizations from academia, government and industry, helps bridge that gap. Since its launch almost five years ago, the Partnership for Innovation has supported 220 projects across Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, Texas and Alabama, partnering with more than 300 communities on challenges from energy poverty to river safety. One Partnership for Innovation program provides seed funding and technical support for community research teams. This support enables local problem-solving that strengthens both research scholarship and community outcomes. The program has recently focused on the role of civic artificial intelligence – AI that supports communities and local governments. Our project on cotton field pesticide use is part of this program. Cotton pests and pesticides Our project in Jenkins County, Georgia, is testing that potential. Jenkins County, with a population of around 8,700, is among the top 25 cotton-growing counties in the state. In 2024, approximately 1.1 million acres of land in Georgia were planted with cotton, and based on the 2022 agricultural county profiles census, Jenkins County ranked 173rd out of the 765 counties producing cotton in the United States. The state benefits from fertile soils, a subtropical-to-temperate climate, and abundant natural resources, all of which support a thriving agricultural industry. But these same conditions also foster pests and diseases. Farmers in Jenkins County, like many farmers, face numerous insect infestations, including stink bugs, cotton bollworms, corn earworms, tarnished plant bugs and aphids. Farmers make heavy use of pesticides. Without precise data on the bugs, farmers end up using more pesticides than they likely need, risking residents’ health and adding costs. While there are some existing tools for integrated pest management, such as the Georgia Cotton Insect Advisor app, they are not widely adopted and are limited to certain bugs. Other methods, such as traditional manual scouting and using sticky traps, are labor-intensive and time-consuming, particularly in the hot summer climate. Our research team set out to combine AI-based early pest detection methods with existing integrated pest management practices and the insect advisor app. The goal was to significantly improve pest detection, decrease pesticide exposure levels and reduce insecticide use on cotton farms in Jenkins County. The work compares different insect monitoring methods and assesses pesticide levels in both the fields and nearby semi-urban areas. We selected eight large cotton fields operated by local farmers in Millen, four active and four control sites, to collect environmental samples before farmers began planting cotton and applying pesticides. The team was aided by a new AI-based insect monitoring system called the FlightSensor by FarmSense. The system uses a machine learning algorithm that was trained to recognize the unique wingbeats of each pest insect species. The specialized trap is equipped with infrared optical sensors that project an invisible infrared light beam – called a light curtain – across the entrance of a triangular tunnel. A sensor monitors the light curtain and uses the machine learning algorithm to identify each pest species as insects fly into the trap. FlightSensor provides information on the prevalence of targeted insects, giving farmers an alternative to traditional manual insect scouting. The information enables the farmers to adjust their pesticide-spraying frequency to match the need. What we’ve learned Here are three things we have learned so far: 1. Predictive pest control potential – AI tools can help farmers pinpoint exactly where pest outbreaks are likely—before they happen. That means they can treat only the areas that need it, saving time, labor and pesticide costs. It’s a shift from blanket spraying to precision farming – and it’s a skill farmers can use season after season. 2. Stronger decision-making for farmers – The preliminary results indicate that the proposed sensors can effectively monitor insect populations specific to cotton farms. Even after the sensors are gone, farmers who used them get better at spotting pests. That’s because the AI dashboards and mobile apps help them see how pest populations grow over time and respond to different field conditions. Researchers also have the ability to access this data remotely through satellite-based monitoring platforms on their computers, further enhancing the collaboration and learning. 3. Building local agtech talent – Training students and farmers on AI pest detection is doing more than protecting cotton crops. It’s building digital literacy, opening doors to agtech careers and preparing communities for future innovation. The same tools could help local governments manage mosquitoes and ticks and open up more agtech innovations. Blueprint for rural innovation By using AI to detect pests early and reduce pesticide use, the project aims to lower harmful residues in local soil and air while supporting more sustainable farming. This pilot project could be a blueprint for how rural communities use AI generally to boost agriculture, reduce public health risks, and build local expertise. Just as important, this work encourages more civic AI applications – grounded in real community needs – that others can adopt and adapt elsewhere. AI and innovation do not need to be urban or corporate to have a significant effect, nor do you need advanced technology degrees to be innovative. With the right partnerships, small towns, too, can harness innovations for economic and community growth. Debra Lam is a founding director of the Partnership for Inclusive Innovation and the Enterprise Innovation Institute at Georgia Institute of Technology. Atin Adhikari is a professor of biostatistics, epidemiology & environmental health sciences at Georgia Southern University. James E. Thomas is a senior lecturer in health policy & community health at Georgia Southern University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Precision agriculture uses tools and technologies such as GPS and sensors to monitor, measure, and respond to changes within a farm field in real time. This includes using artificial intelligence technologies for tasks such as helping farmers apply pesticides only where and when they are needed. However, precision agriculture has not been widely implemented in many rural areas of the United States. We study smart communities, environmental health sciences, and health policy and community health, and we participated in a research project on AI and pesticide use in a rural Georgia agricultural community. Our team, led by Georgia Southern University and the City of Millen, with support from University of Georgia Cooperative Extension, local high schools and agriculture technology company FarmSense, is piloting AI-powered sensors to help cotton farmers optimize pesticide use. Georgia is one of the top cotton-producing states in the U.S., with cotton contributing nearly US$1 billion to the state’s economy in 2024. But only 13% of Georgia farmers use precision agriculture practices. Public-private-academic partnership Innovation drives economic growth, but access to it often stops at major city limits. Smaller and rural communities are frequently left out, lacking the funding, partnerships and technical resources that fuel progress elsewhere. At the same time, 75% of generative AI’s projected economic impact is concentrated in customer operations, marketing, software engineering and research and development, according to a 2023 McKinsey report. In contrast, applications of AI that improve infrastructure, food systems, safety and health remain underexplored. Yet smaller and rural communities are rich in potential—home to anchor institutions like small businesses, civic groups and schools that are deeply invested in their communities. And that potential could be tapped to develop AI applications that fall outside of traditional corporate domains. The Partnership for Innovation, a coalition of people and organizations from academia, government and industry, helps bridge that gap. Since its launch almost five years ago, the Partnership for Innovation has supported 220 projects across Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, Texas and Alabama, partnering with more than 300 communities on challenges from energy poverty to river safety. One Partnership for Innovation program provides seed funding and technical support for community research teams. This support enables local problem-solving that strengthens both research scholarship and community outcomes. The program has recently focused on the role of civic artificial intelligence – AI that supports communities and local governments. Our project on cotton field pesticide use is part of this program. Cotton pests and pesticides Our project in Jenkins County, Georgia, is testing that potential. Jenkins County, with a population of around 8,700, is among the top 25 cotton-growing counties in the state. In 2024, approximately 1.1 million acres of land in Georgia were planted with cotton, and based on the 2022 agricultural county profiles census, Jenkins County ranked 173rd out of the 765 counties producing cotton in the United States. The state benefits from fertile soils, a subtropical-to-temperate climate, and abundant natural resources, all of which support a thriving agricultural industry. But these same conditions also foster pests and diseases. Farmers in Jenkins County, like many farmers, face numerous insect infestations, including stink bugs, cotton bollworms, corn earworms, tarnished plant bugs and aphids. Farmers make heavy use of pesticides. Without precise data on the bugs, farmers end up using more pesticides than they likely need, risking residents’ health and adding costs. While there are some existing tools for integrated pest management, such as the Georgia Cotton Insect Advisor app, they are not widely adopted and are limited to certain bugs. Other methods, such as traditional manual scouting and using sticky traps, are labor-intensive and time-consuming, particularly in the hot summer climate. Our research team set out to combine AI-based early pest detection methods with existing integrated pest management practices and the insect advisor app. The goal was to significantly improve pest detection, decrease pesticide exposure levels and reduce insecticide use on cotton farms in Jenkins County. The work compares different insect monitoring methods and assesses pesticide levels in both the fields and nearby semi-urban areas. We selected eight large cotton fields operated by local farmers in Millen, four active and four control sites, to collect environmental samples before farmers began planting cotton and applying pesticides. The team was aided by a new AI-based insect monitoring system called the FlightSensor by FarmSense. The system uses a machine learning algorithm that was trained to recognize the unique wingbeats of each pest insect species. The specialized trap is equipped with infrared optical sensors that project an invisible infrared light beam – called a light curtain – across the entrance of a triangular tunnel. A sensor monitors the light curtain and uses the machine learning algorithm to identify each pest species as insects fly into the trap. FlightSensor provides information on the prevalence of targeted insects, giving farmers an alternative to traditional manual insect scouting. The information enables the farmers to adjust their pesticide-spraying frequency to match the need. What we’ve learned Here are three things we have learned so far: 1. Predictive pest control potential – AI tools can help farmers pinpoint exactly where pest outbreaks are likely—before they happen. That means they can treat only the areas that need it, saving time, labor and pesticide costs. It’s a shift from blanket spraying to precision farming – and it’s a skill farmers can use season after season. 2. Stronger decision-making for farmers – The preliminary results indicate that the proposed sensors can effectively monitor insect populations specific to cotton farms. Even after the sensors are gone, farmers who used them get better at spotting pests. That’s because the AI dashboards and mobile apps help them see how pest populations grow over time and respond to different field conditions. Researchers also have the ability to access this data remotely through satellite-based monitoring platforms on their computers, further enhancing the collaboration and learning. 3. Building local agtech talent – Training students and farmers on AI pest detection is doing more than protecting cotton crops. It’s building digital literacy, opening doors to agtech careers and preparing communities for future innovation. The same tools could help local governments manage mosquitoes and ticks and open up more agtech innovations. Blueprint for rural innovation By using AI to detect pests early and reduce pesticide use, the project aims to lower harmful residues in local soil and air while supporting more sustainable farming. This pilot project could be a blueprint for how rural communities use AI generally to boost agriculture, reduce public health risks, and build local expertise. Just as important, this work encourages more civic AI applications – grounded in real community needs – that others can adopt and adapt elsewhere. AI and innovation do not need to be urban or corporate to have a significant effect, nor do you need advanced technology degrees to be innovative. With the right partnerships, small towns, too, can harness innovations for economic and community growth. Debra Lam is a founding director of the Partnership for Inclusive Innovation and the Enterprise Innovation Institute at Georgia Institute of Technology. Atin Adhikari is a professor of biostatistics, epidemiology & environmental health sciences at Georgia Southern University. James E. Thomas is a senior lecturer in health policy & community health at Georgia Southern University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

These rural Californians want to secede. Newsom’s maps would pair them with Bay Area liberals

California Democrats’ redistricting plan would split the state’s traditional Republican stronghold into a sprawling coastal district with Bay Area liberals. North State conservatives say it would silence rural voices.

In summary California Democrats’ redistricting plan would split the state’s traditional Republican stronghold into a sprawling coastal district with Bay Area liberals. North State conservatives say it would silence rural voices. Over several rivers and through even more woods, flags advocating secession from California flutter above hills dotted with cattle, which outnumber people at least sixfold. This ranching region with a libertarian streak might have more in common with Texas than the San Francisco Bay Area.  But it’s not Texas. Five hours northeast of Sacramento on an easy day, Modoc County and its roughly 8,500 residents are still — begrudgingly — in California.  And California is dominated by Democrats, who are embroiled in a tit-for-tat redistricting war with the Lone Star State that will likely force conservative Modoc County residents to share a representative in Congress with parts of the Bay Area.  Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is proposing to split up the solidly Republican 1st Congressional District covering 10 rural, inland counties in the North State as part of his plan to create five more Democratic seats to offset a GOP-led effort to gain five red seats in Texas.  That would mean Republican Doug LaMalfa, the Richvale rice farmer who represents the district, would likely lose his seat.  Modoc County and two neighboring red counties would be shifted into a redrawn district that stretches 200 miles west to the Pacific Coast and then south, through redwoods and weed farms, to include some of the state’s wealthiest communities, current Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman’s home in San Rafael and the northern end of the Golden Gate Bridge, all in uber-liberal Marin County.  “It’s like a smack in the face,” said local rancher Amie Martinez. “How could you put Marin County with Modoc County? It’s just a different perspective.” Amie Martinez at the Brass Rail Bar & Grill in Alturas on Sept. 3, 2025. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters The proposal would even likely force Modoc residents to share a district with the governor, who moved back to Marin County last year and splits his time between there and Sacramento. Modoc County voted 78% in favor of recalling him, and voters asked about redistricting there view it as a publicity stunt for Newsom’s presidential ambitions. The ballot measure known as Proposition 50, on voters’ ballots Nov. 4, has sparked outrage in the North State. Yet for a region known for its rebellious spirit, residents are also resigned: they know they’re collateral damage in a partisan numbers game. The map would dilute conservative voting power in one of the state’s traditional Republican strongholds. It would cut short the career growth of politicians from the state’s minority party and make room for the growing cadre of Democrats rising up from state and county seats, jockeying for bigger platforms. But locals say they’re most concerned it’s a death-knell for rural representation. They worry their agricultural interests and their views on water, wildlife and forest management would be overshadowed in a district that includes Bay Area communities that have long championed environmental protection. “They’ve taken every rural district and made it an urban district,” said Nadine Bailey, a former staffer for a Republican state senator who now advocates for agricultural water users and the rural North State. “It just feels like an assault on rural California.” Though Modoc County supervisors have declared their opposition to Prop. 50, there’s little else locals can do. Registered Republicans are outnumbered by Democrats statewide nearly two-to-one. Rural residents represent an even smaller share of the state’s electorate.  “It’ll be very hard to fight back,” said Tim Babcock, owner of a general store in Lassen County, a similar and neighboring community that’s proposed to be drawn into a different liberal-leaning congressional district. “Unless we split the state. And that’s never going to happen.” An isolated county Far-flung but tight-knit, the high desert of Modoc County has been an agricultural community for generations.  In the west, cattle graze through a series of meadows and valleys into the hills of the Warner Mountains. Hundreds of them are sold weekly at an auction yard Martinez’s family runs on the outskirts of Alturas. The 3,000-person county seat consists of a cluster of government buildings, a high school and empty storefronts. In the east, migratory birds soar over vegetable farms on the drained Tule Lake bed that the U.S. granted to World War II veteran homesteaders by picking names out of a pickle jar. Not far away sit the remains of an internment camp where the government imprisoned nearly 19,000 Japanese Americans.  The sheer remoteness and harsh natural beauty are a point of pride and a source of difficulty. Residents live with the regular threat of wildfires. A fifth of the county’s residents live below the poverty line. There’s no WalMart and no maternity ward, and there are few jobs outside of agriculture. Like other forested counties, local schools are facing a fiscal cliff after Congress failed to renew a source of federal funding reserved for areas with declining timber revenues. Cattle graze on farmland in Modoc County on Sept. 4, 2025. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters First: Businesses in downtown Alturas, on Sept. 4, 2025. Alturas, in Modoc County, is one of the communities that would be affected by the current redistricting efforts led by state Democrats. Last: Historical structures at the Tule Lake Relocation Center in Newell on Sept. 4, 2025. The Tule Lake Relocation Center was a concentration camp established during World War II by the U.S. government for the incarceration of Japanese Americans. Photos by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters It’s so sparsely populated that local Republican Assemblymember Heather Hadwick, who lives in Modoc County, represents 10 neighboring counties besides her own. She puts in hundreds of miles on the road holding town halls between Sacramento and home, and struggles to imagine a congressmember reaching her county, with winding roads and the Klamath Mountains between Modoc and the coast. “It’s just not good governance,” she said. Modoc County went for Trump by over 70% last fall. Its sheriff, Tex Dowdy, proudly refuses to fly the California flag over his station out of grievance with the state’s liberal governance. In 2013, Modoc made headlines for declaring its intent to secede from California and form the “State of Jefferson” with neighboring counties in the North State and southwest Oregon. County Supervisor Geri Byrne said she knew it was a longshot — but thought, “when’s the last time The New York Times called someone in Modoc County?” Byrne, who is also chair of the Rural County Representatives of California and of the upcoming National Sheepdog Finals, said the secession resolution was about sending a message. “It wasn’t conservative-liberal,” she said. “It was the urban-rural divide, and that’s what this whole Prop. 50 is about.” Even a Democratic resident running a produce pickup center in Alturas observed that her neighbors are “not that Trumpy.” Instead, there’s a pervasive general distrust of politics on any side of the aisle. In particular, residents who live by swaths of national forests bemoan how successive federal administrations of both parties have flip-flopped on how to manage public lands, which they say have worsened the risk of wildfire and prioritized conservation over their livelihoods. Flourishing wolves are a problem At the moment, all anyone can talk about is the wolves.  The apex predator returned to California more than a decade ago, a celebrated conservation success story after they were hunted to near-extinction in the western U.S. Now they’re flourishing in the North State — and feeding on cattle, throwing ranching communities on edge. Federally, they’re still listed as an endangered species under the landmark conservation law signed by President Richard Nixon.  Under California rules, ranchers can only use nonlethal methods to deter the wolves, like electrifying fencing or hiring ranch hands to guard their herds at night.  First: Signs related to wolves hang on a trailer in Lassen County, near Nubieber, on Sept. 3, 2025. The gray wolf population has grown in Northern California, causing tension between local residents and animal protection advocates. Last: Teri Brown, owner of Modoc Farm Supply, at her store in Alturas, on Sept. 4, 2025. Alturas, in Modoc County, is one of the communities that would be affected by the current redistricting efforts led by Democrats. Photos by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters “That whole issue is softened by the organizations that mean well for the animals, but this is our absolute existence here,” said Teri Brown, owner of a local feed store, who said she’s had cows go missing that she suspects were killed by wolves.  It’s one of the rural issues Brown, a registered Republican, said voters closer to the Bay Area wouldn’t understand. She said she doesn’t support gerrymandering anywhere — in Texas or California.  In town to visit his bookkeeper, rancher Ray Anklin scrolled through his phone to show videos of wolves trotting through his property and grisly photos of calf kills. He said last year, wildlife killed 19 of his cattle — a loss of over $3,000 per head. He’s set up a booth at a nearby fair, hoping to get public support for delisting wolves as an endangered species, and wants any representative in Congress to take the issue seriously. As California’s battlegrounds increasingly take shape in exurban and suburban districts, rural North State conservatives at times feel almost as out of touch with their fellow Republicans as they do with Democrats.  Few Republicans in the state and nation understand “public lands districts,” said Modoc County Supervisor Shane Starr, a Republican who used to work in LaMalfa’s office. “Doug’s the closest thing we’ve got.” Modoc County Supervisor Shane Starr at the Hotel Niles in Alturas on Sept. 4, 2025. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters “This whole thing with DEI and ‘woke culture’ and stuff,” he said, referring to the diversity and inclusion efforts under attack from the right, “it’s like, yeah, we had a kid who goes to the high school who dyed his hair a certain color. Cool, we don’t care. All of these things going on at the national stage are not based in our reality whatsoever.” At a cattlemen’s dinner in Alturas one recent evening, Martinez said she once ran into LaMalfa at a local barbecue fundraiser for firefighters and approached him about a proposal to designate parts of northwestern Nevada as protected federal wilderness. Her 700-person town of Cedarville in east Modoc County is 10 minutes from the state line. Martinez worried about rules that prohibit driving motorized vehicles in wilderness, which she said would discourage the hunters who pass through during deer season and book lodging in town. Even though the proposal was in Nevada, LaMalfa sent staff, including Starr, to meetings to raise objections on behalf of the small town, she said.  “I know we won’t get that kind of representation from Marin County,” she said. Reached by phone, Huffman defended his qualifications to represent the region.  Adding Siskiyou, Shasta and Modoc counties would mean many more hours of travel to meet constituents, but Huffman pointed out his district is already huge, covering 350 miles of the North Coast. And it includes many conservative-leaning, forested areas in Trinity and Del Norte counties. A former attorney for the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, he’s the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, where LaMalfa also sits. Emma Harris holds a belt buckle she was awarded as a prize for winning a branding competition, at the Brass Rail Bar & Grill on Sept. 3, 2025. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters First: A mural depicts a cowboy riding Red Rock the famous bucking bull in Alturas, on Sept. 4, 2025. Last: Ranchers chat during a cattlemen’s meeting at the Brass Rail Bar & Grill in Alturas on Sept. 3, 2025. Photos by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters Huffman said he would run for re-election in the district if voters approve its redrawing, and “would work my tail off to give them great representation.” As for the wolves, he doesn’t support delisting their endangered status and said he only supports nonlethal methods of managing the population.  “There are plenty of win-win solutions,” he said of conflict between ranchers and environmentalists. “I’m not an absolutist. I’m a problem solver.” For Democrats, ‘I don’t think there’s any option’ On the other side of the aisle, North State Democrats are gearing up to support Prop. 50, even as parts of it make them uneasy.  Nancy Richardson, an office manager at the free weekly paper in Modoc County (coverage of high school sports remains steady, along with a police blotter announcing a woman’s booking for eavesdropping), said she doesn’t like that it will cost the state as much as $280 million to run the statewide election on redistricting.  But she thinks it has to be done.  “I don’t like that Texas is causing this problem,” she said. In Siskiyou County’s liberal enclave of Mt. Shasta, Greg Dinger said he supports the redistricting plan because he wants to fight back against the Trump administration’s targeting of immigrants, erosion of democratic norms and a federal budget that is estimated to cut $28 billion from health care in California over the next 10 years.  The effects are expected to be particularly acute in struggling rural hospitals, which disproportionately rely on Medicare and Medicaid funding. LaMalfa voted for the budget bill. Dinger, who owns a web development company, said normally he would only support bipartisan redistricting. But he was swayed by the fact that Trump had called for Republicans to draw more GOP seats in Texas.  “Under the circumstances, I don’t think there’s any option,” he said. “There’s the phrase that came from Michelle Obama, ‘When they go low, we go high.’ Well, that doesn’t work anymore.” In an interview, LaMalfa said the impacts to rural hospitals were exaggerated. He blamed impending Medicaid cuts instead on California’s health care system being billions of dollars over budget this year, in part because of rising pharmaceutical costs and higher-than-expected enrollment of undocumented immigrants who recently became eligible. (California doesn’t use federal dollars to pay for undocumented immigrants’ coverage.) “Basically what it boils down to is they want illegal immigrants to be getting these benefits,” he said in response to criticism of the spending bill. “Are the other 49 states supposed to pay for that?” LaMalfa has criticized Prop. 50 and said no state should engage in partisan redistricting in the middle of the decade. But he stopped short of endorsing his Republican colleague Rep. Kevin Kiley’s bill in Congress to ban it nationwide, saying states should still retain their rights to run their own elections systems.  The proposed new maps would make Kiley’s Republican-leaning district blue. They would turn LaMalfa’s 1st District into a dramatically more liberal one that stretches into Santa Rosa.  But LaMalfa said he’s leaning toward running for re-election even if the maps pass, though he’s focused for now on campaigning against the proposition.  “I intend to give it my all no matter what the district is,” he said.  He would likely face Audrey Denney, a Chico State professor and two-time prior Democratic challenger who has already said she’d run again if the maps pass. Outgoing state Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire, a Healdsburg Democrat who was instrumental in coming up with the proposed new maps, is also reportedly interested in the seat; McGuire’s office did not respond to a request for comment. In her renovated Queen Anne cottage in downtown Chico, Denney buzzed with excitement describing how the proposition has galvanized rural Democrats.  She emphasized her own family’s roots as ranchers in the Central Coast region, and said she has bipartisan relationships across the North State. Audrey Denney at her home in Chico on Sept. 3, 2025. Denney is considering running as a Democratic candidate for U.S. Congress in Calfornia’s 1st District if voters approve the new congressional maps. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters “I have credibility in those spaces, growing up in rural America and spending my career advocating for rural America and real, actual, practical solutions for people,” she said.  Denney’s former campaign staffer Rylee Pedotti, a Democrat in Modoc County, shares her optimism — to an extent. A communications professional whose family also owns a ranch, she said she’s not worried Huffman couldn’t represent Modoc.  “More often than not we actually do experience some of the same issues,” Pedotti said: water and irrigation concerns, the loss of home insurance, the rising costs of health care. Yet she’s deeply conflicted about the proposal: on the one hand cheering Democrats for being “finally ready to play hardball as the Republicans have done so well for decades in consolidating power;” on the other fearful of the escalating partisan rancor and the disenfranchisement of her neighbors. She’s considering sitting out the election. “We’ll still be heard,” she said, if the new maps pass. “But I understand the concerns of folks who are on the other side of the aisle. It feels like their voice is being taken away.”

‘A slap in the face’: our expert panel on Australia’s 2035 emissions target

Six experts respond to Labor’s plans for agriculture, resources, the built environment, industry, transport and energy. What did it get right and what more needs to be done?Sign up for climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s free Clear Air newsletter hereThe 62-70% emissions target is a slap in the face to the people growing Australia’s food. It is nothing short of betrayal to farmers around the country and the generations who come after us. The climate chaos described in Australia’s first Climate Risk Assessment is not inevitable, but with a weak target like this it pushes us towards a future no one wants or deserves. Continue reading...

Agriculture and land: farmers are on the frontline of climate changeThe 62-70% emissions target is a slap in the face to the people growing Australia’s food. It is nothing short of betrayal to farmers around the country and the generations who come after us. The climate chaos described in Australia’s first Climate Risk Assessment is not inevitable, but with a weak target like this it pushes us towards a future no one wants or deserves.The climate crisis is already devastating Australian agriculture. Farmers are facing hotter summers, longer droughts, devastating floods and increasingly unpredictable seasons. These shocks are not just hitting the farm gate; they’re flowing through to supermarket shelves, pushing food prices higher for every Australian family.The Climate Risk Assessment lays out the risks in stark detail: heat stress in livestock slashing productivity and animal welfare; horticulture yields dropping as fruit literally burns on the tree; cropping regions in Western Australia and south-east Australia facing declining rainfall; irrigation systems struggling under dwindling water supplies. Biosecurity threats are set to rise, and dangerous heat is already cutting into agricultural jobs and output. Farmers see the realities of climate change playing out in real time.Australian government announces 2035 emissions reduction target – videoFarmers and rural communities are on the frontlines of climate change, and that’s why we need every sector playing its part, especially the heavy polluting energy sector. Every new coalmine and gas project adds pollution that heats our atmosphere, and these emissions make it harder for farmers to keep producing the food we all rely on. A weak emissions target suggests that the government has more interest in protecting profits from coal and gas corporations and exports than in the safety of Australians.A stronger target means more jobs and investment in rural Australia, it means fewer disasters and a more productive food system. Farmers are already leading with renewable energy, soil carbon projects, and regenerative practices. They’re showing what a low-pollution future can look like. To keep Australians safe from worsening climate harm and unlock opportunities in rural communities, the government needs to strengthen its policies and deal with the polluting fossil fuel industry. We need to move quickly, sensibly, and together. Australia can cut pollution, safeguard our farmers, stabilise food prices, and seize the enormous opportunities of a clean economy. That’s a future worth fighting for. Dr Anika Molesworth, a farmer and agricultural environmental scientist, is a founding director of Farmers for Climate ActionResources: if we are to reduce emissions we must measure them effectivelyThe resources sector plan focuses on decarbonising existing emissions through electrification, using low carbon fuels, and reducing fugitive emissions. While it outlines the technical mechanisms to do this, the policies to actually make this happen are limited. They often rely on government outlays and direction rather than the market incentives that would come with pricing carbon.For example, it is cheaper to use diesel in mining site equipment and vehicles, and this diesel does not pay excise because diesel excise is seen as a road user charge and the resources sector use is off-road. Those seeking to use clean rather than diesel fuel are at a competitive disadvantage without a mechanism to charge for the damage to the environment caused by diesel.There are widespread concerns with the current approach to the measurement of fugitive emissions. We often rely on outdated benchmarks rather than actual measurement at site verified by satellite technology. If we are to reduce our emissions we need to measure them effectively.The resources sector currently often relies on land use offsets to meet its emission reduction obligations under the safeguard mechanism. We need to take further steps to ensure their integrity, yet the sector plan does not seem to focus on this. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletterOf further concern is the heavy reliance on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, which are unlikely to occur as this technology is high-cost and unproven in many applications. The examples given of where it is successful are where it is used to extract more gas from an existing reservoir.Finally, the plan doesn’t appear to connect with the other sector plans and the Treasury modelling which show large declines in coal-fired electricity generation beyond 2030, which is an important way we can reduce emissions. Rod Sims is the chair of the Superpower Institute and enterprise professor at the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, faculty of business and economics, University of Melbourne. He is also an expert adviser to the Treasury’s competition taskforce and to the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority on digital issues. From 2011 to 2022 he was chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionBuilt environment: we must improve energy-intensive homesThursday’s built environment sector plan identifies the need to retrofit our existing homes to electrify them, improve their thermal performance and add more efficient appliances. Such a “renovation wave” would have the double benefit of reducing emissions and saving households thousands of dollars from their energy bills every year.The energy performance of our 11m homes can be measured on the Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS). This spans from “zero stars” for the worst possible performance to 10 stars for a super “eco-home”. In 2022, the minimum performance required for a new home increased from six stars to seven stars, which should reduce heating and cooling energy needs in a new house by 11-27%. However, while new homes have improved, our existing homes remain leaky, uninsulated and energy-intensive. Over half of all existing Australian homes have a NatHERS rating below two stars, meaning there’s an urgent need for improvement – for our health and the environment.We also need to reduce the emissions from the materials we use to build, and the construction process itself. This is called “embodied carbon” and is responsible for about 10% of all Australian greenhouse gas emissions. Embodied carbon is rarely measured and entirely unregulated in Australia – except recently in New South Wales. What’s more, the emissions from many of the building materials we commonly use, such as cement, steel, glass and plasterboard, don’t come from electricity, but from chemical and heat-related manufacturing processes, making them difficult to decarbonise. The sector plan calls for the use of lower carbon materials – but other strategies such as building smaller homes, and adaptively reusing existing buildings will also be necessary. In 2024 building ministers agreed on a voluntary pathway for commercial buildings to report their embodied carbon. However, if we have any hope of reducing built environment emissions by 70% by 2035, regulating and capping embodied carbon emissions (like France, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands have already done) will be a much-needed next step. Philip Oldfield is the head of UNSW’s school of the built environment and a researcher in sustainable and low-carbon architectureIndustry: big progress is possible – with smart supportIndustry will need to contribute to the 2035 targets, but “industry” is a complex, diverse category and one size won’t fit all. There are big cross-cutting challenges like process heat and heavy vehicles – both eventually solvable with a mix of electrification and renewable fuels, though neither replacing major capital equipment nor paying higher fuel costs is easy. But a lot of challenges are very specific to industry subsectors: dealing with eroding carbon anodes in aluminium smelting, how to cleanly reduce iron ore for steel, shifting the mix of inputs and storing or using the carbon output in cement-making, and many more. Technical solutions are visible but often not yet tangible.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Clear Air AustraliaAdam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisisPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe challenge for industry is more than technical, it’s how to make the necessary investments while staying competitive. Policy will have to help in many ways beyond the useful but limited funds announced today. The safeguard mechanism gives a growing carbon value signal, and it will get deeper and likely broader. But business will need a level playing field, so they don’t lose ground just because they face a carbon constraint while their competitors ride free. “Border carbon adjustment” is being rolled out in Europe to ensure equal treatment in critical sectors like cement, and Australia should develop its own approach while respecting our trade commitments.While the safeguard covers most industrial emissions, most individual facilities are too small to be part of it and will never be a good fit. They’ll need different kinds of help to transition: for example, policies more like the “white certificate” schemes to credit energy efficiency and fuel switching that New South Wales and Victoria operate today.Some of industry’s diverse transitions will stretch well beyond 2035. But big progress is possible – with smart support and a focus on building competitiveness. Innes Willox is chief executive of the Australian Industry GroupTransport: we have technological solutions but not the policies to get us thereThe transport sector plan released on Thursday doesn’t have a target for emissions reduction for the sector. That’s a shame – it’s difficult to design policy well without understanding what we’re aiming at.Transport emissions have grown by 14m tonnes or 18% since 2005. The biggest increases have been in aviation (up 68% since 2005) and light commercial vehicles (up 62% since 2005).This happened because we are flying more often, and increasingly buying personal cars that count as “light commercial” – think big 4WD utes.The CSIRO’s work for the Climate Change Authority estimates that transport emissions could be reduced by 20% by 2035, with most of this coming from road transport.Three policies act on transport emissions at the moment: the fringe benefits tax exemption for electric cars, the safeguard mechanism, and the new vehicle efficiency standard.But between these three policies, only 11% of transport emissions are subject to a constraint.The holes in policy are for heavy vehicles – we need incentives for truck owners to switch to cleaner sources, but also more attention on the logistics of providing them with alternative fuel sources. We need charging infrastructure for electric trucks, both at depots and along highways; and we need upgrades to electricity infrastructure to support that. There’s almost no supply chain at the moment for alternative fuels such as biodiesel, and there is no incentive to use alternative fuels. Meanwhile, fuel tax credits provide a disincentive to switch and there’s uncertainty over road user charging. The government announced a $1bn package for low-emissions fuels on Wednesday but we’re yet to see the detailed policy design.Bottom line: the destination is clear, the technological solutions are clear, but it’s a long journey, and we don’t have the right policies yet to get us there. Alison Reeve is the energy and climate change program director at the Grattan InstituteElectricity and energy: there is no excuse for a lack of ambitionDramatically expanding the share of renewables in our electricity system is fundamental to achieving our emission targets. If we can’t decarbonise electricity then we’ll struggle to also reduce emissions from transport and heating of buildings and manufacturing processes, which both hinge on a switch to electric power.Unfortunately, the Albanese government is encountering significant difficulty delivering on its target to grow renewable energy to 82% of power supply by 2030. We’re doing reasonably OK on rooftop solar, extremely well in expanding battery capacity, but falling abysmally short on wind and solar farms due to inadequate transmission links. Yet while we might fall short on targets for 2030, this is no excuse for a lack of ambition on 2035 targets. It is extremely hard to transform the electricity sector within five years because it takes at least five years to plan and build new transmission lines. A 10-year timeframe, however, dramatically expands the scope for change. In addition, rooftop solar drives change by steadily accumulating in small increments, rooftop by rooftop. Over the space of 10 years that can add up to a very large amount of power.But there is also no time to waste. To speed things up the Albanese government must expand its policy suite to options that don’t rely on new transmission lines. This means instituting new policy measures to help households and businesses become more energy efficient and install more rooftop solar. In particular, it has to find a way to push (not just encourage) landlords to upgrade rental properties.We still need to push on with the rollout of wind and solar farms as well. For a small proportion of the population this will mean their rural view will be obscured by transmission lines and wind turbines. That’s unfortunate, but what’s the alternative?

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.