Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Elijah Hutchinson on New York City’s push for climate justice

News Feed
Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Elijah Hutchinson joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss New York City’s first comprehensive study on environmental inequality and how communities can use it to advocate for themselves.Hutchinson, executive director at New York City’s Mayor's Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, also talks about how the mayor’s office is incorporating the feedback and needs of diverse communities across the city into its policymaking.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Hutchinson and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify. Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Elijah Hutchinson on New York City’s push for climate justiceTranscript Brian BienkowskiElijah, how are you doing today?Elijah Hutchinson Hi, I'm doing great. What a good Monday to start the week off.Brian Bienkowski Yes. Well, thank you so much for joining us. We're really excited to have you. So where are you today?Elijah Hutchinson I am in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, inside of the apartment building that I grew up in 40 years ago. I'm in a family-owned apartment building where my dad lives downstairs, and my mom lived with me for a little while, up until recently. So it's still kind of my, my, my, my home for a really long time, and kind of my, my community is all all around here. So calling in from Brooklyn.Brian Bienkowski wow, that is so cool. What a cool way to to grow up in the same community, but the same building. I am so far from home, not not too far. I grew up in the Detroit area, and now I'm in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, so... but every time I go home, I always wanted to leave there, and now I feel a really strong pull. So very cool for you to share that with your family. So that brings me to my first question before we get into a lot of the cool work that you're doing with the city is, how did you get into environmental work in the first place?Elijah Hutchinson It's a big part of that is growing up in this community and growing up in Greenpoint, where we sit on top of not just one Superfund site, but multiple Superfund sites from the legacies of pollution that have occurred from industrial and energy uses that have been happening along our waterfront for generations, and really polluting Newtown Creek. I live next to the Newtown Creek wastewater treatment plant, which is a state-of-the-art facility that got invested into in the late 90s and early 2000s and was really a game changer for the neighborhood in terms of improving quality of life. But Greenpoint was also a place where a lot of our trees were cut down in the 90s because of a beetle infestation that came through our ports, and we had to, you know, replant a lot of trees. Our local pool was closed when I grew up here with McCarran Park, and it's amazing to see that now 50 pools are open across the city for for swimming, which is really important during these heat times. But living in Greenpoint and experiencing the rapid change of the neighborhood –gentrification, the environmental costs and benefits and burdens that legacies of decisions and policymaking make– really made me shift from being a geneticist, which was what I thought I was going to be when I was in training and in college, I was a biological anthropology major, I was working in mice and fly labs, and I really shifted to the city planning and community development and environmental justice work.Brian Bienkowski Excellent, and we are going to get into that. And I want to start with the city's first comprehensive study on environmental inequality that was released just this past April, which put you and your work on my radar. So what prompted this report, and what were some of the key findings?Elijah Hutchinson The prompt for the report was actually some city council legislation that had passed in 2017. Those local laws they were called local law 60 and 64 required us to assess environmental equity issues and develop a plan around incorporating environmental justice into the fabric of city decision making. It was a really interesting charge that meant that for the first time, New York City was going to produce a landmark and historic report about documenting environmental burdens and benefits across a landscape of issues in New York City, and do so in a really comprehensive way, where we brought over 100 different data layers together to try to put all of those compounding effects on one place and in one map, and tell multiple stories and narratives, interviewing people in those communities to get those first person perspectives on what was going on and happening in their community. And so those investigations and all of that data analysis and the Constitution of the Environmental Justice Advisory Board really guided the research and practice and resulted in us putting out the first report this past, this past spring, which is really, really exciting. But what it also comes with, is a mapping tool that is a digital online tool that can be used for research or analysis, but really captures all of the findings of the report, and it includes a next phase of work, which we're just starting right now, to come up with new policies and programs that are going to address the issues we identified in the first phase of the report.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned some of the historical context right where you are there in Greenpoint, but kind of more broadly, can you talk about the decisions and policies in the past in the city related to housing, zoning and transit that left a lot of low income and communities of color more subject to the environmental ills.Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, for sure, one of the biggest factors that we see affecting communities is not one that's a stranger to these communities, but really redlining and the practice of racially discriminatory real estate practices that were embedded within how mortgages and financing were given to most disproportionately impacting Black and Hispanic communities across New York City. And what we're finding is that 67% of the total population that lives in historically redlined areas of New York City also live in what we defined for the first time as environmental justice communities that were based off of the state's disadvantaged community criteria. And once we kind of crunched the numbers and look at these overlaps, you can see that in areas of central Brooklyn and Upper Manhattan, in most of the Bronx, these areas, you really start to see the intersections between the decisions to redline and what it ends up actually meaning for these communities which show up in areas of like deficiencies in housing maintenance, higher levels of pollution and other factors that are that are really persistent because of these decisions of the past.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned pollution. I know the city obviously has a lot of traffic. I think we all know that, even those of us who don't live there, leaving a lot of people exposed to air pollutants. But what did the report find about air pollution exposure and what is driving up exposure in the city's environmental justice communities?Elijah Hutchinson The report itself examines exposure to polluted air across five issues and indicators. So breaks that down into outdoor air pollution, stationary sources of pollution, mobile sources of pollution, solid waste facilities and indoor air quality. And air quality can be influenced by many things, including geography and regional weather patterns and human activity, but climate change is another variable and factor for air quality because of things like the Canadian wildfires, for instance, which have burned thousands of miles away, yet we know from last summer, and we suspect even this summer, we're going to experience air quality impacts on those hotter days that are associated with lower air quality, which really bring up the vulnerability. But then on the exposure side, there's a lot of mobile sources of pollution as well, that comes from cars, trucks and other vehicles. And communities of color are disproportionately exposed to emissions from heavy duty diesel vehicles compared to communities that are mostly white due to location near to arterial highways commercial waste routes, delivery routes, parking facilities for heavy duty vehicles, but really, last-mile facilities have proliferated in the city due to the rapid growth of the e Commerce Industry, and about 68% of these last mile facilities, these are your Amazon distribution centers, for instance, are located in environmental justice communities, and that has an impact on the traffic and the pollution that we're seeing in those areas. We're also seeing the stationary sources of pollution, meaning facilities that emit pollutants from a fixed position, like a power plant or a or a wastewater recovery facility or manufacturing facility, are also disproportionately located in environmental justice neighborhoods. And so 13 of the city's 19 peaker plants that get fired up on days in which we are desperate for energy, those are the days in which we experience higher levels of those stationary sources pollution from being generated in environmental justice neighborhoods.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned climate change, which is kind of the it touches on all of these issues, pollution and of course, heat vulnerability and flooding. So what did the report find out about heat vulnerability and flooding issues? And as we talk, I should say it has been an incredibly hot summer where I'm at and I think the same is true there in the city, and what neighborhoods are most at risk, and what's driving this risk?Elijah Hutchinson You know, heat vulnerability and flood vulnerability are two areas where we can look at the data and we could look at the numbers, but it doesn't necessarily tell you about impact. And so while it's really important that we understand exposure, and we know that our environmental justice communities are certainly exposed to more, the impacts of this exposure are also disproportionately high because of the adverse health outcomes related to air pollution and the intersectionality of so many of these issues in environmental justice communities, where you end up seeing high percentage of asthma, you know, 21% of public housing residents having asthma, compared to 11.5% of the rest of the New York City residents. And so it was really important for us to come up with these indicators that take into account the data, but then also other socio economic, demographic, health-related metrics that help us understand and contextualize the issue better. And so for the first time, with the Environmental Justice Report, we released the flood vulnerability index, which has six different maps and data layers to look at different types of flooding that communities will experience, not just from the coast, but also inland flooding and rainstorms and the compounded effect of that with the demographic factors, not just today in the year 2024, which is already a really challenging year, but looks at what these impacts will be in 2050, in 2080, in 2100, and so for the first time, we have the flood vulnerability maps added to the heat vulnerability maps, which is a metric that we've had with the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for a few years now. Now we've added this flood vulnerability layer to people to help communicate those risks, so that people can kind of understand in a more simple way how climate is really affecting them from this really huge hazard, which is heat, which is only going to get worse over time, but also now this, this flooding, which you know, whether you're a property owner, you're a renter, you're realizing that you don't need to live in along the coast of New York City to be impacted by water.Brian Bienkowski What's something about the report that surprised you or that you think might surprise listeners?Elijah Hutchinson What's something that surprised me about the report was just how these issues all relate to one another, and sometimes there are stories or narratives we hear from or coming from within the communities that we work in, but it's really hard to characterize how All of these issues combined to create a feeling or an effect, and so it was really great to see that we didn't just stop at the data. We did tons of interviews and met with people and discussed our findings with people to try to understand how these issues show up in their community and what matters to them. Ad what matters to people are the same things that, you know, make it, make it hard for New Yorkers to live in in their communities, sometimes with just wanting to get to work on time, or wanting to find some shade or quiet place, or, you know, wanting to have some vegetation. And so it was good for us to be able to crunch the numbers and kind of validate what we've been already hearing and understanding from our communities. But it was also really good to give people that validation, and give them the tools itself, that that they need to to help advocate for their communities and ways that can be supported by by our office, which, which I thought was really exciting. On the data side, it's the flood vulnerability that people are experiencing, I think has been a real lesson learned for a lot of communities, because they may not necessarily understand their inland flood risk that happens when you have a rainstorm or you have water coming from below. It's a very different story than living in Coney Island or the Rockaways and kind of expecting water to be an issue. And so I think a lot of what's been surprising, too, is just being able to communicate and really tell that full story when we are speaking with people, to see how much people feel like they want this information, even though it's... even though it's not all good news. You know, it's not this is, this is very difficult to process in a lot of ways. The the data and the stats are hard to digest. But I think that it's, it's been really telling that people want the information, that they can can receive it, they can handle it. And they want to know, you know what's, what's the city doing, and what, what can we do to make it better? But it, I have also been struck by a couple of the other data points where we find that, you know, heat's a big issue, but almost 20 there are some neighborhoods where 25% or a quarter of their residents don't have access to air conditioning. And I don't know if people really grapple with that all the time or make assumptions about the cooling capacity of some of these of these neighborhoods, but there are lots of people that are going to be heat vulnerable if that kind of condition continues. And I grew up in New York without air conditioning, and it's just, you know, a lot harder to do that these days, and it's not necessarily safe. But then you also see that, you know, housing maintenance deficiencies and lead pain violations are another thing that come out of those historically redlined environmental justice areas, and nine out of the 10 neighborhoods with the highest incidence of three or more housing maintenance deficiencies are renter households in environmental justice neighborhoods. And so those are really powerful findings that can help motivate decision making and policy makers.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned the mapping tool for people to use and to see environmental hazards and risks near them in their neighborhood. So how do you see people using this tool, or, you know, to report and to advocate for themselves as you kind of develop some of the policy around these environmental justice issues?Elijah Hutchinson we've already seen people using the mapping tool and using the data that we've collected for their benefit in a few ways that have been really promising. One is the states and the federal government. Really, really, you know, the Biden administration is making historic investments in environmental justice communities, historic infrastructure investments. And so we need to be ready to take advantage of those investments, and really compete to take advantage of those investments with other jurisdictions. And so providing this data on an open-source platform for anyone to access means that if a community or an organization is applying for funding, they can beef up and make their application more competitive, using the mapping tool and stitch together narratives and stories using the data that's there to reinforce the grant application that they're applying for, hopefully driving resources into these communities. But we've also seen people use it as a legislative and policy advocacy tool. So whether they're meeting with their local elected, whether they're talking to their community board, whether they're pushing for a certain law to be passed. Using our EJ mapping tool to cull and pull up all of these different data layers to help support that story. And so that's really promising and really powerful, and I hope that people continue to really find new and creative ways to use the information that we're sharing.Brian Bienkowski So in light of this report, how is the Mayor's office embedding environmental justice into ongoing and future policies?Elijah Hutchinson Environmental Justice itself is for the first time in the title of the climate office of the mayor's office, and this is a new thing. Before we had separate sustainability offices, resilience offices, environmental remediation offices, and now we've all been brought under one umbrella and centered around environmental justice as a climate office, which is pretty powerful, because as a climate office, we already have our ambitious targets in place. We have that we're going for carbon neutrality by 2050 we have that we are striving for 100% renewables by by 2040 we're trying to half our transportation emissions by 2030. We have all these goals in place, but we you know, how we get there is really important, and we can't leave people behind if we're trying to achieve these really ambitious targets. And so it's really critical that we use environmental justice and work with our communities to make sure that we're doing the work in a way that makes sense for the everyday New Yorker who doesn't want to be left behind in this really critical and transformative transition that this entire city is about to and is experiencing, and so environmental justice itself, what we found from the first phase was that it needed to be... we needed improvements in several different areas, and it's not just having environmental justice be at the center of decision making, but it's also climate budgeting and changing our budgeting process so that as we're making agency spending decisions, we're considering it not just Our climate targets, but how it impacts our environmental justice communities, and that that evaluation is is happening. It's about permitting, and when permitting decisions are being made with the state to make sure that we're we're we're that environmental justice communities have a seat at the table as those decisions get made, and there are new permitting processes that are being developed and now for public comment right now on how to exactly do this. It's about prioritizing resources in environmental justice communities really coming out of Biden's Justice40 initiative and other funding prioritization targets that the state has, but it's about improved community engagement as well, which is something that we're really excited about doing in this next phase of our environmental justice plan. Is working with weact and other organizations who are the co chair for Environmental Justice Advisory Board to, you know, have a lot of conversations with people about what they would like to see in improvements and things we could do better.Brian Bienkowski So what are some of the challenges? I mean, I think of, I think of New York City, and I just think of the, you know, from where you are in Greenpoint, up to the Bronx to Harlem. I mean, it's just such a vast, large city, competing interest and just a big, dense population. What are some of the challenges in addressing climate change and other environmental health hazards given the size, and again, the competing interest and diversity within your city?Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, some of the challenges are that there's been so there's so many long-standing issues that these communities face, whether it's been public safety or affordable housing or transportation safety, you know, access to good schools, access to healthy food – New York City has a long advocacy platform that comes out of every one of these neighborhoods. And so now climate and environmental justice is, you know, in essence, a new thing. It's not a new thing, but it is a new priority, and it's a very, it can be a very expensive one to try to rebuild a waterfront, or to make our infrastructure more resilient, or to install solar panels in a lot of places. And so what we need to do is help people understand how climate and environmental justice are connected to the issues that they care deeply about, and help them see themselves as environmental justice advocates, because we really do need to broaden the tent and include more people in this movement as a whole, so that we can get more resources to tackle these issues, but but do so in a way that we're addressing the housing issues by addressing climate, and we're addressing the transportation issues by addressing climate, and we're addressing the waterfront or public safety issues by investing in our our built environment and our public spaces and beautifying our waterfront with trees and shade and new infrastructure. So my hope is that we can work with everyone to have a shared platform and a shared agenda, and what we would like to see and define some of these North Stars with with people, so that we can kind of collaborate and work together on the outcomes.Brian Bienkowski So a big theme among our fellows and in our program is kind of community engagement and doing so in an intentional and meaningful way, both in developing policy, you know, in the case of folks like you, but also, you know, doing research, gathering data, which it sounds like you guys took that same approach. So you mentioned WeAct. We've had folks on this podcast from WeAct. They are a fantastic organization. I'm always in awe of the work that they're doing. So I was wondering if you could speak to that and kind of more broadly, how the mayor's office is incorporating and engaging communities in decision and policy making again, given the city's diversity and size?Elijah Hutchinson yeah, there's, there's so many different inputs that we have to get people's perspectives included. One of the things we set up was the Environmental Justice Advisory Board, and so that is actually appointed by the city council and the mayor, but it's also, you know, not everybody can participate in the Environmental Justice Advisory Board. And so we have to have different kinds of meetings and forums to engage with people even further and go a level deeper. And so we have lots of different task forces and meetings with people to be transparent about the issues that we're grappling with and all of the trade offs and considerations so that we can kind of share in the concerns of of what we're seeing are the challenges that we face, and being really honest about the the the barriers and the challenges, while, while presenting the tools and opportunities to people so that we can say, here are, here's some things we can do that will put us in the right direction. And so I have found that the the as I've started here and taking a real focus on environmental justice, that people are really hungry for these conversations and have really celebrated that we're taking this kind of approach to climate and see this as a much more inclusive way to go about this transformation, and know that we don't have it all worked out. They know that nobody is exactly figured out. This is, this is the menu of and the ingredients, and this is exactly how you bake the cake, right? Like we know that there's a lot to figure out here. And so I think people are seeing that we're listening, but people are seeing also that we are making decisions and there is action. And so building that credibility, and building that momentum to make some decisions, to build credibility within that space, has been very, very effective to making sure that people want to work with us and see that there's real opportunity here to actually change the things that we've been upset about for a really long time. And now it's really about, how do we do this with limited funding, right? And how do we do this with, like, with long-term political cycles, and how do we do this with, with with our federal and state partners, where there's also changing politics? And how do we do this when it's we're just really complicated to deliver some of these engineering projects because of the just how technical they are and the amount of coordination that they need on the city side, but we get that these things are hard. We have a real good track record of delivering our our infrastructure priorities, and we're getting better and faster with delivering projects and making policy. So I'm feeling. Being optim somewhat optimistic about the future. I know that that can be feel really challenging at the moment, but I'm, I'm feeling like we are, we are making some steps in the right direction I hope that we we continue to do so.Brian Bienkowski So what would you say to somebody in the city who doesn't feel like they're being heard? You know, someone who feel is feeling the effects of climate change or pollution, and is feeling left out of this process, or just kind of not feeling hurt in general?Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, I hope that they come to you know, one of our one of our meetings or convenings, and talk to us. We have a couple of different processes, like climate strong communities is one program that we do where we set up meetings in with with community members, in partnership with other neighborhood-based organizations to start to get ideas for resilience projects, even before we have any funding or budget to support them. And then we work with those communities to take their project ideas, and apply to the public resources, state and federal resources, and really bring, you know, money and city capacity and decision making to some of their ideas. And that can be and I've seen this play out, and it could be really, really fulfilling, but I understand that it is also very frustrating. The state of the world is very frustrating at the moment. And you know, in some ways, I almost wish people were more frustrated with things, with where we are, and I want to be able to take that frustration and channel it into outcomes. And sometimes I look around the room, I'm like, How is everybody not more angry? But we are that we are where we are. So I actually, I welcome that people are frustrated and we I tour the neighborhoods with even Mayor Adams what he does his town halls and and we do get a lot of climate questions, and I'm so often surprised, though, that in every meeting we don't get climate questions. There's lots of questions about other things. But you know, whether it's like cannabis shops or or E-bikes, you know there's, there's lots of other pressing neighborhood issues, but I really want to see people speak about climate and every every public meeting that we go to, so that all of the policy makers are hearing it from us loud and clear.Brian Bienkowski And as you mentioned, there's been this kind of merging of advocacy in recent years that we've noticed too in the newsroom, which is the folks that are interested in labor rights, housing rights, are starting to see the intersection with climate and climate impacts. So I think hopefully you are going to see increasing frustration, increasing engagement, that will help the work that you all are doing. So you mentioned being optimistic. I was wondering if you could just expand on that. What are you, in general, What are you optimistic about?Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, I think the optimism that I feel is coming really from the new the new audience for climate and young people who are really making it a part of their future and how they want to contribute to the world. It's great to see just how different the state of play is from when I was starting my career in the city of New York. You know, you can 20 years ago, 10 years ago, even five years ago, prior to the pandemic, you know, you could be the only person in the room, sometimes lifting up the data and raising your voice about what's going on with with climate. And now I see that conversation, and that dialog has really shifted, and there's a groundswell of interest across many different topics, because there's a climate impact and a climate angle to literally everything that we do, and so it's fascinating to see how we're starting to understand these relationships, whether it's like AI or or our food systems, or, you know, decisions on where to where to locate renewable energy infrastructure, there's, there's all sorts of real estate and economic and legal and other perspectives that I that I see people getting really sophisticated about across sectors, and I think that that's what we're going to need, because we're going to this is an all hands on deck kind of transition that's going to affect every industry and every part of our lived experience in New York. Yeah.Brian Bienkowski Yeah, well, Elijah, thank you so much for filling us in on this report, the work you all are doing, it's really fascinating, and hopefully it's a blueprint for other cities who are looking to tackle climate change and pollution in an equitable way. And we will, of course, give readers and listeners links to all these resources so they can go poke around the mapping tool and have fun. And before we get you out of here, one question I like to ask everybody is, what is the last book that you read for fun?Elijah Hutchinson Well, I'll answer this honestly, but it's, it has a profanity in the title, and it was, it was the the subtle art of not giving a leap, and it's I, I have for I have to balance out all of my serious reading with just like fun let me, let me not, let me not worry too much kind of reading, because there's just, there's so much that you could worry about, but it can be really paralyzing. And so I love a good, you know, drugstore book read on happiness, or or or about just how to, how to, how to live your life with joy, because it's so critical to keep me, for me to maintain that side of things, so I could keep doing the work that I do. So I not, I don't necessarily recommend it, because I do want people to give a bleep, but something that I needed at the moment when I was on my last vacation and and was, was, was a good a book to read by the pool.Brian Bienkowski Excellent. You know, I've seen that book in bookstores, and I have been curious, and I you beat me to it. I was going to make the joke that you are spending your days trying to make people give a bleep, and spending your vacations reading about how to not but, you know, there is, there is lessons in there that we all need to decompress and know when to leave things be. But again, Elijah, thank you so much for your time. I'm really glad we got to connect on this. We will share the resources, and hopefully we can have you on again in the future.Elijah Hutchinson Sure, I certainly appreciate it. Thank you so much.

Elijah Hutchinson joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss New York City’s first comprehensive study on environmental inequality and how communities can use it to advocate for themselves.Hutchinson, executive director at New York City’s Mayor's Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, also talks about how the mayor’s office is incorporating the feedback and needs of diverse communities across the city into its policymaking.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Hutchinson and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify. Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Elijah Hutchinson on New York City’s push for climate justiceTranscript Brian BienkowskiElijah, how are you doing today?Elijah Hutchinson Hi, I'm doing great. What a good Monday to start the week off.Brian Bienkowski Yes. Well, thank you so much for joining us. We're really excited to have you. So where are you today?Elijah Hutchinson I am in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, inside of the apartment building that I grew up in 40 years ago. I'm in a family-owned apartment building where my dad lives downstairs, and my mom lived with me for a little while, up until recently. So it's still kind of my, my, my, my home for a really long time, and kind of my, my community is all all around here. So calling in from Brooklyn.Brian Bienkowski wow, that is so cool. What a cool way to to grow up in the same community, but the same building. I am so far from home, not not too far. I grew up in the Detroit area, and now I'm in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, so... but every time I go home, I always wanted to leave there, and now I feel a really strong pull. So very cool for you to share that with your family. So that brings me to my first question before we get into a lot of the cool work that you're doing with the city is, how did you get into environmental work in the first place?Elijah Hutchinson It's a big part of that is growing up in this community and growing up in Greenpoint, where we sit on top of not just one Superfund site, but multiple Superfund sites from the legacies of pollution that have occurred from industrial and energy uses that have been happening along our waterfront for generations, and really polluting Newtown Creek. I live next to the Newtown Creek wastewater treatment plant, which is a state-of-the-art facility that got invested into in the late 90s and early 2000s and was really a game changer for the neighborhood in terms of improving quality of life. But Greenpoint was also a place where a lot of our trees were cut down in the 90s because of a beetle infestation that came through our ports, and we had to, you know, replant a lot of trees. Our local pool was closed when I grew up here with McCarran Park, and it's amazing to see that now 50 pools are open across the city for for swimming, which is really important during these heat times. But living in Greenpoint and experiencing the rapid change of the neighborhood –gentrification, the environmental costs and benefits and burdens that legacies of decisions and policymaking make– really made me shift from being a geneticist, which was what I thought I was going to be when I was in training and in college, I was a biological anthropology major, I was working in mice and fly labs, and I really shifted to the city planning and community development and environmental justice work.Brian Bienkowski Excellent, and we are going to get into that. And I want to start with the city's first comprehensive study on environmental inequality that was released just this past April, which put you and your work on my radar. So what prompted this report, and what were some of the key findings?Elijah Hutchinson The prompt for the report was actually some city council legislation that had passed in 2017. Those local laws they were called local law 60 and 64 required us to assess environmental equity issues and develop a plan around incorporating environmental justice into the fabric of city decision making. It was a really interesting charge that meant that for the first time, New York City was going to produce a landmark and historic report about documenting environmental burdens and benefits across a landscape of issues in New York City, and do so in a really comprehensive way, where we brought over 100 different data layers together to try to put all of those compounding effects on one place and in one map, and tell multiple stories and narratives, interviewing people in those communities to get those first person perspectives on what was going on and happening in their community. And so those investigations and all of that data analysis and the Constitution of the Environmental Justice Advisory Board really guided the research and practice and resulted in us putting out the first report this past, this past spring, which is really, really exciting. But what it also comes with, is a mapping tool that is a digital online tool that can be used for research or analysis, but really captures all of the findings of the report, and it includes a next phase of work, which we're just starting right now, to come up with new policies and programs that are going to address the issues we identified in the first phase of the report.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned some of the historical context right where you are there in Greenpoint, but kind of more broadly, can you talk about the decisions and policies in the past in the city related to housing, zoning and transit that left a lot of low income and communities of color more subject to the environmental ills.Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, for sure, one of the biggest factors that we see affecting communities is not one that's a stranger to these communities, but really redlining and the practice of racially discriminatory real estate practices that were embedded within how mortgages and financing were given to most disproportionately impacting Black and Hispanic communities across New York City. And what we're finding is that 67% of the total population that lives in historically redlined areas of New York City also live in what we defined for the first time as environmental justice communities that were based off of the state's disadvantaged community criteria. And once we kind of crunched the numbers and look at these overlaps, you can see that in areas of central Brooklyn and Upper Manhattan, in most of the Bronx, these areas, you really start to see the intersections between the decisions to redline and what it ends up actually meaning for these communities which show up in areas of like deficiencies in housing maintenance, higher levels of pollution and other factors that are that are really persistent because of these decisions of the past.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned pollution. I know the city obviously has a lot of traffic. I think we all know that, even those of us who don't live there, leaving a lot of people exposed to air pollutants. But what did the report find about air pollution exposure and what is driving up exposure in the city's environmental justice communities?Elijah Hutchinson The report itself examines exposure to polluted air across five issues and indicators. So breaks that down into outdoor air pollution, stationary sources of pollution, mobile sources of pollution, solid waste facilities and indoor air quality. And air quality can be influenced by many things, including geography and regional weather patterns and human activity, but climate change is another variable and factor for air quality because of things like the Canadian wildfires, for instance, which have burned thousands of miles away, yet we know from last summer, and we suspect even this summer, we're going to experience air quality impacts on those hotter days that are associated with lower air quality, which really bring up the vulnerability. But then on the exposure side, there's a lot of mobile sources of pollution as well, that comes from cars, trucks and other vehicles. And communities of color are disproportionately exposed to emissions from heavy duty diesel vehicles compared to communities that are mostly white due to location near to arterial highways commercial waste routes, delivery routes, parking facilities for heavy duty vehicles, but really, last-mile facilities have proliferated in the city due to the rapid growth of the e Commerce Industry, and about 68% of these last mile facilities, these are your Amazon distribution centers, for instance, are located in environmental justice communities, and that has an impact on the traffic and the pollution that we're seeing in those areas. We're also seeing the stationary sources of pollution, meaning facilities that emit pollutants from a fixed position, like a power plant or a or a wastewater recovery facility or manufacturing facility, are also disproportionately located in environmental justice neighborhoods. And so 13 of the city's 19 peaker plants that get fired up on days in which we are desperate for energy, those are the days in which we experience higher levels of those stationary sources pollution from being generated in environmental justice neighborhoods.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned climate change, which is kind of the it touches on all of these issues, pollution and of course, heat vulnerability and flooding. So what did the report find out about heat vulnerability and flooding issues? And as we talk, I should say it has been an incredibly hot summer where I'm at and I think the same is true there in the city, and what neighborhoods are most at risk, and what's driving this risk?Elijah Hutchinson You know, heat vulnerability and flood vulnerability are two areas where we can look at the data and we could look at the numbers, but it doesn't necessarily tell you about impact. And so while it's really important that we understand exposure, and we know that our environmental justice communities are certainly exposed to more, the impacts of this exposure are also disproportionately high because of the adverse health outcomes related to air pollution and the intersectionality of so many of these issues in environmental justice communities, where you end up seeing high percentage of asthma, you know, 21% of public housing residents having asthma, compared to 11.5% of the rest of the New York City residents. And so it was really important for us to come up with these indicators that take into account the data, but then also other socio economic, demographic, health-related metrics that help us understand and contextualize the issue better. And so for the first time, with the Environmental Justice Report, we released the flood vulnerability index, which has six different maps and data layers to look at different types of flooding that communities will experience, not just from the coast, but also inland flooding and rainstorms and the compounded effect of that with the demographic factors, not just today in the year 2024, which is already a really challenging year, but looks at what these impacts will be in 2050, in 2080, in 2100, and so for the first time, we have the flood vulnerability maps added to the heat vulnerability maps, which is a metric that we've had with the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for a few years now. Now we've added this flood vulnerability layer to people to help communicate those risks, so that people can kind of understand in a more simple way how climate is really affecting them from this really huge hazard, which is heat, which is only going to get worse over time, but also now this, this flooding, which you know, whether you're a property owner, you're a renter, you're realizing that you don't need to live in along the coast of New York City to be impacted by water.Brian Bienkowski What's something about the report that surprised you or that you think might surprise listeners?Elijah Hutchinson What's something that surprised me about the report was just how these issues all relate to one another, and sometimes there are stories or narratives we hear from or coming from within the communities that we work in, but it's really hard to characterize how All of these issues combined to create a feeling or an effect, and so it was really great to see that we didn't just stop at the data. We did tons of interviews and met with people and discussed our findings with people to try to understand how these issues show up in their community and what matters to them. Ad what matters to people are the same things that, you know, make it, make it hard for New Yorkers to live in in their communities, sometimes with just wanting to get to work on time, or wanting to find some shade or quiet place, or, you know, wanting to have some vegetation. And so it was good for us to be able to crunch the numbers and kind of validate what we've been already hearing and understanding from our communities. But it was also really good to give people that validation, and give them the tools itself, that that they need to to help advocate for their communities and ways that can be supported by by our office, which, which I thought was really exciting. On the data side, it's the flood vulnerability that people are experiencing, I think has been a real lesson learned for a lot of communities, because they may not necessarily understand their inland flood risk that happens when you have a rainstorm or you have water coming from below. It's a very different story than living in Coney Island or the Rockaways and kind of expecting water to be an issue. And so I think a lot of what's been surprising, too, is just being able to communicate and really tell that full story when we are speaking with people, to see how much people feel like they want this information, even though it's... even though it's not all good news. You know, it's not this is, this is very difficult to process in a lot of ways. The the data and the stats are hard to digest. But I think that it's, it's been really telling that people want the information, that they can can receive it, they can handle it. And they want to know, you know what's, what's the city doing, and what, what can we do to make it better? But it, I have also been struck by a couple of the other data points where we find that, you know, heat's a big issue, but almost 20 there are some neighborhoods where 25% or a quarter of their residents don't have access to air conditioning. And I don't know if people really grapple with that all the time or make assumptions about the cooling capacity of some of these of these neighborhoods, but there are lots of people that are going to be heat vulnerable if that kind of condition continues. And I grew up in New York without air conditioning, and it's just, you know, a lot harder to do that these days, and it's not necessarily safe. But then you also see that, you know, housing maintenance deficiencies and lead pain violations are another thing that come out of those historically redlined environmental justice areas, and nine out of the 10 neighborhoods with the highest incidence of three or more housing maintenance deficiencies are renter households in environmental justice neighborhoods. And so those are really powerful findings that can help motivate decision making and policy makers.Brian Bienkowski So you mentioned the mapping tool for people to use and to see environmental hazards and risks near them in their neighborhood. So how do you see people using this tool, or, you know, to report and to advocate for themselves as you kind of develop some of the policy around these environmental justice issues?Elijah Hutchinson we've already seen people using the mapping tool and using the data that we've collected for their benefit in a few ways that have been really promising. One is the states and the federal government. Really, really, you know, the Biden administration is making historic investments in environmental justice communities, historic infrastructure investments. And so we need to be ready to take advantage of those investments, and really compete to take advantage of those investments with other jurisdictions. And so providing this data on an open-source platform for anyone to access means that if a community or an organization is applying for funding, they can beef up and make their application more competitive, using the mapping tool and stitch together narratives and stories using the data that's there to reinforce the grant application that they're applying for, hopefully driving resources into these communities. But we've also seen people use it as a legislative and policy advocacy tool. So whether they're meeting with their local elected, whether they're talking to their community board, whether they're pushing for a certain law to be passed. Using our EJ mapping tool to cull and pull up all of these different data layers to help support that story. And so that's really promising and really powerful, and I hope that people continue to really find new and creative ways to use the information that we're sharing.Brian Bienkowski So in light of this report, how is the Mayor's office embedding environmental justice into ongoing and future policies?Elijah Hutchinson Environmental Justice itself is for the first time in the title of the climate office of the mayor's office, and this is a new thing. Before we had separate sustainability offices, resilience offices, environmental remediation offices, and now we've all been brought under one umbrella and centered around environmental justice as a climate office, which is pretty powerful, because as a climate office, we already have our ambitious targets in place. We have that we're going for carbon neutrality by 2050 we have that we are striving for 100% renewables by by 2040 we're trying to half our transportation emissions by 2030. We have all these goals in place, but we you know, how we get there is really important, and we can't leave people behind if we're trying to achieve these really ambitious targets. And so it's really critical that we use environmental justice and work with our communities to make sure that we're doing the work in a way that makes sense for the everyday New Yorker who doesn't want to be left behind in this really critical and transformative transition that this entire city is about to and is experiencing, and so environmental justice itself, what we found from the first phase was that it needed to be... we needed improvements in several different areas, and it's not just having environmental justice be at the center of decision making, but it's also climate budgeting and changing our budgeting process so that as we're making agency spending decisions, we're considering it not just Our climate targets, but how it impacts our environmental justice communities, and that that evaluation is is happening. It's about permitting, and when permitting decisions are being made with the state to make sure that we're we're we're that environmental justice communities have a seat at the table as those decisions get made, and there are new permitting processes that are being developed and now for public comment right now on how to exactly do this. It's about prioritizing resources in environmental justice communities really coming out of Biden's Justice40 initiative and other funding prioritization targets that the state has, but it's about improved community engagement as well, which is something that we're really excited about doing in this next phase of our environmental justice plan. Is working with weact and other organizations who are the co chair for Environmental Justice Advisory Board to, you know, have a lot of conversations with people about what they would like to see in improvements and things we could do better.Brian Bienkowski So what are some of the challenges? I mean, I think of, I think of New York City, and I just think of the, you know, from where you are in Greenpoint, up to the Bronx to Harlem. I mean, it's just such a vast, large city, competing interest and just a big, dense population. What are some of the challenges in addressing climate change and other environmental health hazards given the size, and again, the competing interest and diversity within your city?Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, some of the challenges are that there's been so there's so many long-standing issues that these communities face, whether it's been public safety or affordable housing or transportation safety, you know, access to good schools, access to healthy food – New York City has a long advocacy platform that comes out of every one of these neighborhoods. And so now climate and environmental justice is, you know, in essence, a new thing. It's not a new thing, but it is a new priority, and it's a very, it can be a very expensive one to try to rebuild a waterfront, or to make our infrastructure more resilient, or to install solar panels in a lot of places. And so what we need to do is help people understand how climate and environmental justice are connected to the issues that they care deeply about, and help them see themselves as environmental justice advocates, because we really do need to broaden the tent and include more people in this movement as a whole, so that we can get more resources to tackle these issues, but but do so in a way that we're addressing the housing issues by addressing climate, and we're addressing the transportation issues by addressing climate, and we're addressing the waterfront or public safety issues by investing in our our built environment and our public spaces and beautifying our waterfront with trees and shade and new infrastructure. So my hope is that we can work with everyone to have a shared platform and a shared agenda, and what we would like to see and define some of these North Stars with with people, so that we can kind of collaborate and work together on the outcomes.Brian Bienkowski So a big theme among our fellows and in our program is kind of community engagement and doing so in an intentional and meaningful way, both in developing policy, you know, in the case of folks like you, but also, you know, doing research, gathering data, which it sounds like you guys took that same approach. So you mentioned WeAct. We've had folks on this podcast from WeAct. They are a fantastic organization. I'm always in awe of the work that they're doing. So I was wondering if you could speak to that and kind of more broadly, how the mayor's office is incorporating and engaging communities in decision and policy making again, given the city's diversity and size?Elijah Hutchinson yeah, there's, there's so many different inputs that we have to get people's perspectives included. One of the things we set up was the Environmental Justice Advisory Board, and so that is actually appointed by the city council and the mayor, but it's also, you know, not everybody can participate in the Environmental Justice Advisory Board. And so we have to have different kinds of meetings and forums to engage with people even further and go a level deeper. And so we have lots of different task forces and meetings with people to be transparent about the issues that we're grappling with and all of the trade offs and considerations so that we can kind of share in the concerns of of what we're seeing are the challenges that we face, and being really honest about the the the barriers and the challenges, while, while presenting the tools and opportunities to people so that we can say, here are, here's some things we can do that will put us in the right direction. And so I have found that the the as I've started here and taking a real focus on environmental justice, that people are really hungry for these conversations and have really celebrated that we're taking this kind of approach to climate and see this as a much more inclusive way to go about this transformation, and know that we don't have it all worked out. They know that nobody is exactly figured out. This is, this is the menu of and the ingredients, and this is exactly how you bake the cake, right? Like we know that there's a lot to figure out here. And so I think people are seeing that we're listening, but people are seeing also that we are making decisions and there is action. And so building that credibility, and building that momentum to make some decisions, to build credibility within that space, has been very, very effective to making sure that people want to work with us and see that there's real opportunity here to actually change the things that we've been upset about for a really long time. And now it's really about, how do we do this with limited funding, right? And how do we do this with, like, with long-term political cycles, and how do we do this with, with with our federal and state partners, where there's also changing politics? And how do we do this when it's we're just really complicated to deliver some of these engineering projects because of the just how technical they are and the amount of coordination that they need on the city side, but we get that these things are hard. We have a real good track record of delivering our our infrastructure priorities, and we're getting better and faster with delivering projects and making policy. So I'm feeling. Being optim somewhat optimistic about the future. I know that that can be feel really challenging at the moment, but I'm, I'm feeling like we are, we are making some steps in the right direction I hope that we we continue to do so.Brian Bienkowski So what would you say to somebody in the city who doesn't feel like they're being heard? You know, someone who feel is feeling the effects of climate change or pollution, and is feeling left out of this process, or just kind of not feeling hurt in general?Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, I hope that they come to you know, one of our one of our meetings or convenings, and talk to us. We have a couple of different processes, like climate strong communities is one program that we do where we set up meetings in with with community members, in partnership with other neighborhood-based organizations to start to get ideas for resilience projects, even before we have any funding or budget to support them. And then we work with those communities to take their project ideas, and apply to the public resources, state and federal resources, and really bring, you know, money and city capacity and decision making to some of their ideas. And that can be and I've seen this play out, and it could be really, really fulfilling, but I understand that it is also very frustrating. The state of the world is very frustrating at the moment. And you know, in some ways, I almost wish people were more frustrated with things, with where we are, and I want to be able to take that frustration and channel it into outcomes. And sometimes I look around the room, I'm like, How is everybody not more angry? But we are that we are where we are. So I actually, I welcome that people are frustrated and we I tour the neighborhoods with even Mayor Adams what he does his town halls and and we do get a lot of climate questions, and I'm so often surprised, though, that in every meeting we don't get climate questions. There's lots of questions about other things. But you know, whether it's like cannabis shops or or E-bikes, you know there's, there's lots of other pressing neighborhood issues, but I really want to see people speak about climate and every every public meeting that we go to, so that all of the policy makers are hearing it from us loud and clear.Brian Bienkowski And as you mentioned, there's been this kind of merging of advocacy in recent years that we've noticed too in the newsroom, which is the folks that are interested in labor rights, housing rights, are starting to see the intersection with climate and climate impacts. So I think hopefully you are going to see increasing frustration, increasing engagement, that will help the work that you all are doing. So you mentioned being optimistic. I was wondering if you could just expand on that. What are you, in general, What are you optimistic about?Elijah Hutchinson Yeah, I think the optimism that I feel is coming really from the new the new audience for climate and young people who are really making it a part of their future and how they want to contribute to the world. It's great to see just how different the state of play is from when I was starting my career in the city of New York. You know, you can 20 years ago, 10 years ago, even five years ago, prior to the pandemic, you know, you could be the only person in the room, sometimes lifting up the data and raising your voice about what's going on with with climate. And now I see that conversation, and that dialog has really shifted, and there's a groundswell of interest across many different topics, because there's a climate impact and a climate angle to literally everything that we do, and so it's fascinating to see how we're starting to understand these relationships, whether it's like AI or or our food systems, or, you know, decisions on where to where to locate renewable energy infrastructure, there's, there's all sorts of real estate and economic and legal and other perspectives that I that I see people getting really sophisticated about across sectors, and I think that that's what we're going to need, because we're going to this is an all hands on deck kind of transition that's going to affect every industry and every part of our lived experience in New York. Yeah.Brian Bienkowski Yeah, well, Elijah, thank you so much for filling us in on this report, the work you all are doing, it's really fascinating, and hopefully it's a blueprint for other cities who are looking to tackle climate change and pollution in an equitable way. And we will, of course, give readers and listeners links to all these resources so they can go poke around the mapping tool and have fun. And before we get you out of here, one question I like to ask everybody is, what is the last book that you read for fun?Elijah Hutchinson Well, I'll answer this honestly, but it's, it has a profanity in the title, and it was, it was the the subtle art of not giving a leap, and it's I, I have for I have to balance out all of my serious reading with just like fun let me, let me not, let me not worry too much kind of reading, because there's just, there's so much that you could worry about, but it can be really paralyzing. And so I love a good, you know, drugstore book read on happiness, or or or about just how to, how to, how to live your life with joy, because it's so critical to keep me, for me to maintain that side of things, so I could keep doing the work that I do. So I not, I don't necessarily recommend it, because I do want people to give a bleep, but something that I needed at the moment when I was on my last vacation and and was, was, was a good a book to read by the pool.Brian Bienkowski Excellent. You know, I've seen that book in bookstores, and I have been curious, and I you beat me to it. I was going to make the joke that you are spending your days trying to make people give a bleep, and spending your vacations reading about how to not but, you know, there is, there is lessons in there that we all need to decompress and know when to leave things be. But again, Elijah, thank you so much for your time. I'm really glad we got to connect on this. We will share the resources, and hopefully we can have you on again in the future.Elijah Hutchinson Sure, I certainly appreciate it. Thank you so much.



Elijah Hutchinson joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss New York City’s first comprehensive study on environmental inequality and how communities can use it to advocate for themselves.


Hutchinson, executive director at New York City’s Mayor's Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, also talks about how the mayor’s office is incorporating the feedback and needs of diverse communities across the city into its policymaking.

The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion with Hutchinson and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Elijah Hutchinson on New York City’s push for climate justice

Transcript 


Brian Bienkowski

Elijah, how are you doing today?

Elijah Hutchinson

Hi, I'm doing great. What a good Monday to start the week off.

Brian Bienkowski

Yes. Well, thank you so much for joining us. We're really excited to have you. So where are you today?

Elijah Hutchinson

I am in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, inside of the apartment building that I grew up in 40 years ago. I'm in a family-owned apartment building where my dad lives downstairs, and my mom lived with me for a little while, up until recently. So it's still kind of my, my, my, my home for a really long time, and kind of my, my community is all all around here. So calling in from Brooklyn.

Brian Bienkowski

wow, that is so cool. What a cool way to to grow up in the same community, but the same building. I am so far from home, not not too far. I grew up in the Detroit area, and now I'm in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, so... but every time I go home, I always wanted to leave there, and now I feel a really strong pull. So very cool for you to share that with your family. So that brings me to my first question before we get into a lot of the cool work that you're doing with the city is, how did you get into environmental work in the first place?

Elijah Hutchinson

It's a big part of that is growing up in this community and growing up in Greenpoint, where we sit on top of not just one Superfund site, but multiple Superfund sites from the legacies of pollution that have occurred from industrial and energy uses that have been happening along our waterfront for generations, and really polluting Newtown Creek. I live next to the Newtown Creek wastewater treatment plant, which is a state-of-the-art facility that got invested into in the late 90s and early 2000s and was really a game changer for the neighborhood in terms of improving quality of life. But Greenpoint was also a place where a lot of our trees were cut down in the 90s because of a beetle infestation that came through our ports, and we had to, you know, replant a lot of trees. Our local pool was closed when I grew up here with McCarran Park, and it's amazing to see that now 50 pools are open across the city for for swimming, which is really important during these heat times. But living in Greenpoint and experiencing the rapid change of the neighborhood –gentrification, the environmental costs and benefits and burdens that legacies of decisions and policymaking make– really made me shift from being a geneticist, which was what I thought I was going to be when I was in training and in college, I was a biological anthropology major, I was working in mice and fly labs, and I really shifted to the city planning and community development and environmental justice work.

Brian Bienkowski

Excellent, and we are going to get into that. And I want to start with the city's first comprehensive study on environmental inequality that was released just this past April, which put you and your work on my radar. So what prompted this report, and what were some of the key findings?

Elijah Hutchinson

The prompt for the report was actually some city council legislation that had passed in 2017. Those local laws they were called local law 60 and 64 required us to assess environmental equity issues and develop a plan around incorporating environmental justice into the fabric of city decision making. It was a really interesting charge that meant that for the first time, New York City was going to produce a landmark and historic report about documenting environmental burdens and benefits across a landscape of issues in New York City, and do so in a really comprehensive way, where we brought over 100 different data layers together to try to put all of those compounding effects on one place and in one map, and tell multiple stories and narratives, interviewing people in those communities to get those first person perspectives on what was going on and happening in their community. And so those investigations and all of that data analysis and the Constitution of the Environmental Justice Advisory Board really guided the research and practice and resulted in us putting out the first report this past, this past spring, which is really, really exciting. But what it also comes with, is a mapping tool that is a digital online tool that can be used for research or analysis, but really captures all of the findings of the report, and it includes a next phase of work, which we're just starting right now, to come up with new policies and programs that are going to address the issues we identified in the first phase of the report.

Brian Bienkowski

So you mentioned some of the historical context right where you are there in Greenpoint, but kind of more broadly, can you talk about the decisions and policies in the past in the city related to housing, zoning and transit that left a lot of low income and communities of color more subject to the environmental ills.

Elijah Hutchinson

Yeah, for sure, one of the biggest factors that we see affecting communities is not one that's a stranger to these communities, but really redlining and the practice of racially discriminatory real estate practices that were embedded within how mortgages and financing were given to most disproportionately impacting Black and Hispanic communities across New York City. And what we're finding is that 67% of the total population that lives in historically redlined areas of New York City also live in what we defined for the first time as environmental justice communities that were based off of the state's disadvantaged community criteria. And once we kind of crunched the numbers and look at these overlaps, you can see that in areas of central Brooklyn and Upper Manhattan, in most of the Bronx, these areas, you really start to see the intersections between the decisions to redline and what it ends up actually meaning for these communities which show up in areas of like deficiencies in housing maintenance, higher levels of pollution and other factors that are that are really persistent because of these decisions of the past.

Brian Bienkowski

So you mentioned pollution. I know the city obviously has a lot of traffic. I think we all know that, even those of us who don't live there, leaving a lot of people exposed to air pollutants. But what did the report find about air pollution exposure and what is driving up exposure in the city's environmental justice communities?

Elijah Hutchinson

The report itself examines exposure to polluted air across five issues and indicators. So breaks that down into outdoor air pollution, stationary sources of pollution, mobile sources of pollution, solid waste facilities and indoor air quality. And air quality can be influenced by many things, including geography and regional weather patterns and human activity, but climate change is another variable and factor for air quality because of things like the Canadian wildfires, for instance, which have burned thousands of miles away, yet we know from last summer, and we suspect even this summer, we're going to experience air quality impacts on those hotter days that are associated with lower air quality, which really bring up the vulnerability. But then on the exposure side, there's a lot of mobile sources of pollution as well, that comes from cars, trucks and other vehicles. And communities of color are disproportionately exposed to emissions from heavy duty diesel vehicles compared to communities that are mostly white due to location near to arterial highways commercial waste routes, delivery routes, parking facilities for heavy duty vehicles, but really, last-mile facilities have proliferated in the city due to the rapid growth of the e Commerce Industry, and about 68% of these last mile facilities, these are your Amazon distribution centers, for instance, are located in environmental justice communities, and that has an impact on the traffic and the pollution that we're seeing in those areas. We're also seeing the stationary sources of pollution, meaning facilities that emit pollutants from a fixed position, like a power plant or a or a wastewater recovery facility or manufacturing facility, are also disproportionately located in environmental justice neighborhoods. And so 13 of the city's 19 peaker plants that get fired up on days in which we are desperate for energy, those are the days in which we experience higher levels of those stationary sources pollution from being generated in environmental justice neighborhoods.

Brian Bienkowski

So you mentioned climate change, which is kind of the it touches on all of these issues, pollution and of course, heat vulnerability and flooding. So what did the report find out about heat vulnerability and flooding issues? And as we talk, I should say it has been an incredibly hot summer where I'm at and I think the same is true there in the city, and what neighborhoods are most at risk, and what's driving this risk?

Elijah Hutchinson

You know, heat vulnerability and flood vulnerability are two areas where we can look at the data and we could look at the numbers, but it doesn't necessarily tell you about impact. And so while it's really important that we understand exposure, and we know that our environmental justice communities are certainly exposed to more, the impacts of this exposure are also disproportionately high because of the adverse health outcomes related to air pollution and the intersectionality of so many of these issues in environmental justice communities, where you end up seeing high percentage of asthma, you know, 21% of public housing residents having asthma, compared to 11.5% of the rest of the New York City residents. And so it was really important for us to come up with these indicators that take into account the data, but then also other socio economic, demographic, health-related metrics that help us understand and contextualize the issue better. And so for the first time, with the Environmental Justice Report, we released the flood vulnerability index, which has six different maps and data layers to look at different types of flooding that communities will experience, not just from the coast, but also inland flooding and rainstorms and the compounded effect of that with the demographic factors, not just today in the year 2024, which is already a really challenging year, but looks at what these impacts will be in 2050, in 2080, in 2100, and so for the first time, we have the flood vulnerability maps added to the heat vulnerability maps, which is a metric that we've had with the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for a few years now. Now we've added this flood vulnerability layer to people to help communicate those risks, so that people can kind of understand in a more simple way how climate is really affecting them from this really huge hazard, which is heat, which is only going to get worse over time, but also now this, this flooding, which you know, whether you're a property owner, you're a renter, you're realizing that you don't need to live in along the coast of New York City to be impacted by water.

Brian Bienkowski

What's something about the report that surprised you or that you think might surprise listeners?

Elijah Hutchinson

What's something that surprised me about the report was just how these issues all relate to one another, and sometimes there are stories or narratives we hear from or coming from within the communities that we work in, but it's really hard to characterize how All of these issues combined to create a feeling or an effect, and so it was really great to see that we didn't just stop at the data. We did tons of interviews and met with people and discussed our findings with people to try to understand how these issues show up in their community and what matters to them. Ad what matters to people are the same things that, you know, make it, make it hard for New Yorkers to live in in their communities, sometimes with just wanting to get to work on time, or wanting to find some shade or quiet place, or, you know, wanting to have some vegetation. And so it was good for us to be able to crunch the numbers and kind of validate what we've been already hearing and understanding from our communities. But it was also really good to give people that validation, and give them the tools itself, that that they need to to help advocate for their communities and ways that can be supported by by our office, which, which I thought was really exciting. On the data side, it's the flood vulnerability that people are experiencing, I think has been a real lesson learned for a lot of communities, because they may not necessarily understand their inland flood risk that happens when you have a rainstorm or you have water coming from below. It's a very different story than living in Coney Island or the Rockaways and kind of expecting water to be an issue. And so I think a lot of what's been surprising, too, is just being able to communicate and really tell that full story when we are speaking with people, to see how much people feel like they want this information, even though it's... even though it's not all good news. You know, it's not this is, this is very difficult to process in a lot of ways. The the data and the stats are hard to digest. But I think that it's, it's been really telling that people want the information, that they can can receive it, they can handle it. And they want to know, you know what's, what's the city doing, and what, what can we do to make it better? But it, I have also been struck by a couple of the other data points where we find that, you know, heat's a big issue, but almost 20 there are some neighborhoods where 25% or a quarter of their residents don't have access to air conditioning. And I don't know if people really grapple with that all the time or make assumptions about the cooling capacity of some of these of these neighborhoods, but there are lots of people that are going to be heat vulnerable if that kind of condition continues. And I grew up in New York without air conditioning, and it's just, you know, a lot harder to do that these days, and it's not necessarily safe. But then you also see that, you know, housing maintenance deficiencies and lead pain violations are another thing that come out of those historically redlined environmental justice areas, and nine out of the 10 neighborhoods with the highest incidence of three or more housing maintenance deficiencies are renter households in environmental justice neighborhoods. And so those are really powerful findings that can help motivate decision making and policy makers.

Brian Bienkowski

So you mentioned the mapping tool for people to use and to see environmental hazards and risks near them in their neighborhood. So how do you see people using this tool, or, you know, to report and to advocate for themselves as you kind of develop some of the policy around these environmental justice issues?

Elijah Hutchinson

we've already seen people using the mapping tool and using the data that we've collected for their benefit in a few ways that have been really promising. One is the states and the federal government. Really, really, you know, the Biden administration is making historic investments in environmental justice communities, historic infrastructure investments. And so we need to be ready to take advantage of those investments, and really compete to take advantage of those investments with other jurisdictions. And so providing this data on an open-source platform for anyone to access means that if a community or an organization is applying for funding, they can beef up and make their application more competitive, using the mapping tool and stitch together narratives and stories using the data that's there to reinforce the grant application that they're applying for, hopefully driving resources into these communities. But we've also seen people use it as a legislative and policy advocacy tool. So whether they're meeting with their local elected, whether they're talking to their community board, whether they're pushing for a certain law to be passed. Using our EJ mapping tool to cull and pull up all of these different data layers to help support that story. And so that's really promising and really powerful, and I hope that people continue to really find new and creative ways to use the information that we're sharing.

Brian Bienkowski

So in light of this report, how is the Mayor's office embedding environmental justice into ongoing and future policies?

Elijah Hutchinson

Environmental Justice itself is for the first time in the title of the climate office of the mayor's office, and this is a new thing. Before we had separate sustainability offices, resilience offices, environmental remediation offices, and now we've all been brought under one umbrella and centered around environmental justice as a climate office, which is pretty powerful, because as a climate office, we already have our ambitious targets in place. We have that we're going for carbon neutrality by 2050 we have that we are striving for 100% renewables by by 2040 we're trying to half our transportation emissions by 2030. We have all these goals in place, but we you know, how we get there is really important, and we can't leave people behind if we're trying to achieve these really ambitious targets. And so it's really critical that we use environmental justice and work with our communities to make sure that we're doing the work in a way that makes sense for the everyday New Yorker who doesn't want to be left behind in this really critical and transformative transition that this entire city is about to and is experiencing, and so environmental justice itself, what we found from the first phase was that it needed to be... we needed improvements in several different areas, and it's not just having environmental justice be at the center of decision making, but it's also climate budgeting and changing our budgeting process so that as we're making agency spending decisions, we're considering it not just Our climate targets, but how it impacts our environmental justice communities, and that that evaluation is is happening. It's about permitting, and when permitting decisions are being made with the state to make sure that we're we're we're that environmental justice communities have a seat at the table as those decisions get made, and there are new permitting processes that are being developed and now for public comment right now on how to exactly do this. It's about prioritizing resources in environmental justice communities really coming out of Biden's Justice40 initiative and other funding prioritization targets that the state has, but it's about improved community engagement as well, which is something that we're really excited about doing in this next phase of our environmental justice plan. Is working with weact and other organizations who are the co chair for Environmental Justice Advisory Board to, you know, have a lot of conversations with people about what they would like to see in improvements and things we could do better.

Brian Bienkowski

So what are some of the challenges? I mean, I think of, I think of New York City, and I just think of the, you know, from where you are in Greenpoint, up to the Bronx to Harlem. I mean, it's just such a vast, large city, competing interest and just a big, dense population. What are some of the challenges in addressing climate change and other environmental health hazards given the size, and again, the competing interest and diversity within your city?

Elijah Hutchinson

Yeah, some of the challenges are that there's been so there's so many long-standing issues that these communities face, whether it's been public safety or affordable housing or transportation safety, you know, access to good schools, access to healthy food – New York City has a long advocacy platform that comes out of every one of these neighborhoods. And so now climate and environmental justice is, you know, in essence, a new thing. It's not a new thing, but it is a new priority, and it's a very, it can be a very expensive one to try to rebuild a waterfront, or to make our infrastructure more resilient, or to install solar panels in a lot of places. And so what we need to do is help people understand how climate and environmental justice are connected to the issues that they care deeply about, and help them see themselves as environmental justice advocates, because we really do need to broaden the tent and include more people in this movement as a whole, so that we can get more resources to tackle these issues, but but do so in a way that we're addressing the housing issues by addressing climate, and we're addressing the transportation issues by addressing climate, and we're addressing the waterfront or public safety issues by investing in our our built environment and our public spaces and beautifying our waterfront with trees and shade and new infrastructure. So my hope is that we can work with everyone to have a shared platform and a shared agenda, and what we would like to see and define some of these North Stars with with people, so that we can kind of collaborate and work together on the outcomes.

Brian Bienkowski

So a big theme among our fellows and in our program is kind of community engagement and doing so in an intentional and meaningful way, both in developing policy, you know, in the case of folks like you, but also, you know, doing research, gathering data, which it sounds like you guys took that same approach. So you mentioned WeAct. We've had folks on this podcast from WeAct. They are a fantastic organization. I'm always in awe of the work that they're doing. So I was wondering if you could speak to that and kind of more broadly, how the mayor's office is incorporating and engaging communities in decision and policy making again, given the city's diversity and size?

Elijah Hutchinson

yeah, there's, there's so many different inputs that we have to get people's perspectives included. One of the things we set up was the Environmental Justice Advisory Board, and so that is actually appointed by the city council and the mayor, but it's also, you know, not everybody can participate in the Environmental Justice Advisory Board. And so we have to have different kinds of meetings and forums to engage with people even further and go a level deeper. And so we have lots of different task forces and meetings with people to be transparent about the issues that we're grappling with and all of the trade offs and considerations so that we can kind of share in the concerns of of what we're seeing are the challenges that we face, and being really honest about the the the barriers and the challenges, while, while presenting the tools and opportunities to people so that we can say, here are, here's some things we can do that will put us in the right direction. And so I have found that the the as I've started here and taking a real focus on environmental justice, that people are really hungry for these conversations and have really celebrated that we're taking this kind of approach to climate and see this as a much more inclusive way to go about this transformation, and know that we don't have it all worked out. They know that nobody is exactly figured out. This is, this is the menu of and the ingredients, and this is exactly how you bake the cake, right? Like we know that there's a lot to figure out here. And so I think people are seeing that we're listening, but people are seeing also that we are making decisions and there is action. And so building that credibility, and building that momentum to make some decisions, to build credibility within that space, has been very, very effective to making sure that people want to work with us and see that there's real opportunity here to actually change the things that we've been upset about for a really long time. And now it's really about, how do we do this with limited funding, right? And how do we do this with, like, with long-term political cycles, and how do we do this with, with with our federal and state partners, where there's also changing politics? And how do we do this when it's we're just really complicated to deliver some of these engineering projects because of the just how technical they are and the amount of coordination that they need on the city side, but we get that these things are hard. We have a real good track record of delivering our our infrastructure priorities, and we're getting better and faster with delivering projects and making policy. So I'm feeling. Being optim somewhat optimistic about the future. I know that that can be feel really challenging at the moment, but I'm, I'm feeling like we are, we are making some steps in the right direction I hope that we we continue to do so.

Brian Bienkowski

So what would you say to somebody in the city who doesn't feel like they're being heard? You know, someone who feel is feeling the effects of climate change or pollution, and is feeling left out of this process, or just kind of not feeling hurt in general?

Elijah Hutchinson

Yeah, I hope that they come to you know, one of our one of our meetings or convenings, and talk to us. We have a couple of different processes, like climate strong communities is one program that we do where we set up meetings in with with community members, in partnership with other neighborhood-based organizations to start to get ideas for resilience projects, even before we have any funding or budget to support them. And then we work with those communities to take their project ideas, and apply to the public resources, state and federal resources, and really bring, you know, money and city capacity and decision making to some of their ideas. And that can be and I've seen this play out, and it could be really, really fulfilling, but I understand that it is also very frustrating. The state of the world is very frustrating at the moment. And you know, in some ways, I almost wish people were more frustrated with things, with where we are, and I want to be able to take that frustration and channel it into outcomes. And sometimes I look around the room, I'm like, How is everybody not more angry? But we are that we are where we are. So I actually, I welcome that people are frustrated and we I tour the neighborhoods with even Mayor Adams what he does his town halls and and we do get a lot of climate questions, and I'm so often surprised, though, that in every meeting we don't get climate questions. There's lots of questions about other things. But you know, whether it's like cannabis shops or or E-bikes, you know there's, there's lots of other pressing neighborhood issues, but I really want to see people speak about climate and every every public meeting that we go to, so that all of the policy makers are hearing it from us loud and clear.

Brian Bienkowski

And as you mentioned, there's been this kind of merging of advocacy in recent years that we've noticed too in the newsroom, which is the folks that are interested in labor rights, housing rights, are starting to see the intersection with climate and climate impacts. So I think hopefully you are going to see increasing frustration, increasing engagement, that will help the work that you all are doing. So you mentioned being optimistic. I was wondering if you could just expand on that. What are you, in general, What are you optimistic about?

Elijah Hutchinson

Yeah, I think the optimism that I feel is coming really from the new the new audience for climate and young people who are really making it a part of their future and how they want to contribute to the world. It's great to see just how different the state of play is from when I was starting my career in the city of New York. You know, you can 20 years ago, 10 years ago, even five years ago, prior to the pandemic, you know, you could be the only person in the room, sometimes lifting up the data and raising your voice about what's going on with with climate. And now I see that conversation, and that dialog has really shifted, and there's a groundswell of interest across many different topics, because there's a climate impact and a climate angle to literally everything that we do, and so it's fascinating to see how we're starting to understand these relationships, whether it's like AI or or our food systems, or, you know, decisions on where to where to locate renewable energy infrastructure, there's, there's all sorts of real estate and economic and legal and other perspectives that I that I see people getting really sophisticated about across sectors, and I think that that's what we're going to need, because we're going to this is an all hands on deck kind of transition that's going to affect every industry and every part of our lived experience in New York. Yeah.

Brian Bienkowski

Yeah, well, Elijah, thank you so much for filling us in on this report, the work you all are doing, it's really fascinating, and hopefully it's a blueprint for other cities who are looking to tackle climate change and pollution in an equitable way. And we will, of course, give readers and listeners links to all these resources so they can go poke around the mapping tool and have fun. And before we get you out of here, one question I like to ask everybody is, what is the last book that you read for fun?

Elijah Hutchinson

Well, I'll answer this honestly, but it's, it has a profanity in the title, and it was, it was the the subtle art of not giving a leap, and it's I, I have for I have to balance out all of my serious reading with just like fun let me, let me not, let me not worry too much kind of reading, because there's just, there's so much that you could worry about, but it can be really paralyzing. And so I love a good, you know, drugstore book read on happiness, or or or about just how to, how to, how to live your life with joy, because it's so critical to keep me, for me to maintain that side of things, so I could keep doing the work that I do. So I not, I don't necessarily recommend it, because I do want people to give a bleep, but something that I needed at the moment when I was on my last vacation and and was, was, was a good a book to read by the pool.

Brian Bienkowski

Excellent. You know, I've seen that book in bookstores, and I have been curious, and I you beat me to it. I was going to make the joke that you are spending your days trying to make people give a bleep, and spending your vacations reading about how to not but, you know, there is, there is lessons in there that we all need to decompress and know when to leave things be. But again, Elijah, thank you so much for your time. I'm really glad we got to connect on this. We will share the resources, and hopefully we can have you on again in the future.

Elijah Hutchinson

Sure, I certainly appreciate it. Thank you so much.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

UNESCO Designates 26 New Biosphere Reserves Amid Biodiversity Challenges and Climate Change

The U.N. cultural agency UNESCO has designated 26 new biosphere reserves

An Indonesian archipelago that's home to three-fourths of Earth's coral species, a stretch of Icelandic coast with 70% of the country's plant life and an area along Angola's Atlantic coast featuring savannahs, forests and estuaries are among 26 new UNESCO-designated biosphere reserves.The United Nations cultural agency says the reserves — 785 sites in 142 countries, designated since 1971 — are home to some of the planet’s richest and most fragile ecosystems. But biosphere reserves encompass more than strictly protected nature reserves; they're expanded to include areas where people live and work, and the designation requires that scientists, residents and government officials work together to balance conservation and research with local economic and cultural needs.“The concept of biosphere reserves is that biodiversity conservation is a pillar of socioeconomic development” and can contribute to the economy, said António Abreu, head of the program, adding that conflict and misunderstanding can result if local communities are left out of decision-making and planning. The new reserves, in 21 countries, were announced Saturday in Hangzhou, China, where the program adopted a 10-year strategic action plan that includes studying the effects of climate change, Abreu said. The new reserves include a 52,000-square-mile (135,000-square-kilometer) area in the Indonesian archipelago, Raja Ampat, home to over 75% of earth’s coral species as well as rainforests and rare endangered sea turtles. The economy depends on fishing, aquaculture, small-scale agriculture and tourism, UNESCO said.On Iceland's west coast, the Snæfellsnes Biosphere Reserve's landscape includes volcanic peaks, lava fields, wetlands, grasslands and the Snæfellsjökull glacier. The 1,460-square-kilometer (564 square-mile) reserve is an important sanctuary for seabirds, seals and over 70% of Iceland's plant life — including 330 species of wildflowers and ferns. Its population of more than 4,000 people relies on fishing, sheep farming and tourism.And in Angola, the new Quiçama Biosphere Reserve, along 206 kilometers (128 miles) of Atlantic coast is a “sanctuary for biodiversity” within its savannahs, forests, flood plains, estuaries and islands, according to UNESCO. It's home to elephants, manatees, sea turtles and more than 200 bird species. Residents' livelihoods include livestock herding, farming, fishing, honey production.Residents are important partners in protecting biodiversity within the reserves, and even have helped identify new species, said Abreu, the program's leader. Meanwhile, scientists also are helping to restore ecosystems to benefit the local economy, he said.For example, in the Philippines, the coral reefs around Pangatalan Island were severely damaged because local fishermen used dynamite to find depleted fish populations. Scientists helped design a structure to help coral reefs regrow and taught fishermen to raise fish through aquaculture so the reefs could recover.“They have food and they have also fish to sell in the markets,” said Abreu.In the African nation of São Tomé and Príncipe, a biosphere reserve on Príncipe Island led to restoration of mangroves, which help buffer against storm surges and provide important habitat, Abreu said.Ecotourism also has become an important industry, with biosphere trails and guided bird-watching tours. A new species of owl was identified there in recent years. This year, a biosphere reserve was added for the island of São Tomé, making the country the first entirely within a reserve. Climate and environmental concerns At least 60% of the UNESCO biosphere reserves have been affected by extreme weather tied to climate change, which is caused primarily by the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and gas, including extreme heat and drought and sea-level rise, Abreu said.The agency is using satellite imagery and computer modeling to monitor changes in coastal zones and other areas, and is digitizing its historical databases, Abreu said. The information will be used to help determine how best to preserve and manage the reserves.Some biosphere reserves also are under pressure from environmental degradation.In Nigeria, for example, habitat for a dwindling population of critically endangered African forest elephants is under threat as cocoa farmers expand into Omo Forest Reserve, a protected rainforest and one of Africa’s oldest and largest UNESCO Biosphere Reserves. The forest is also important to help combat climate change.The Trump administration in July announced that the U.S. would withdraw from UNESCO as of December 2026, just as it did during his first administration, saying U.S. involvement is not in the national interest. The U.S. has 47 biosphere reserves, most in federal protected areas.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Sept. 2025

On North Carolina’s Rivers and Streams, the Cleanup of Helene’s Fury Seems Never-Ending

It’s been only a year since Hurricane Helene hammered the southeast U.S. from Florida to the Carolinas

WOODFIN, N.C. (AP) — Bracing himself against the current in waist-deep water, Clancy Loorham wrestles a broken length of PVC pipe from the rocky bottom of the French Broad River and peers inside.“I got a catfish in the pipe,” the 27-year-old with wispy beard and mustache shouted to fellow cleanup workers floating nearby in rafts, canoes and kayaks piled with plastic pipe and other human-made detritus. “He’s right here. I’m looking him in the eyes!”It’s been just a year since floodwaters from the remnants of Hurricane Helene washed these pipes out of a nearby factory with such force that some pieces ended up in Douglas Lake, about 90 miles (145 kilometers) away in Tennessee. But they're already slick with algae and filled with river silt — and creatures.Helene killed more than 250 people and caused nearly $80 billion in damage from Florida to the Carolinas. In the North Carolina mountains, rains of up to 30 inches (76 centimeters) turned gentle streams into torrents that swept away trees, boulders, homes and vehicles, shattered century-old flood records, and in some places carved out new channels.In the haste to rescue people and restore their lives to some semblance of normalcy, some fear the recovery efforts compounded Helene’s impact on the ecosystem. Contractors hired to remove vehicles, shipping containers, shattered houses and other large debris from waterways sometimes damaged sensitive habitat.“They were using the river almost as a highway in some situations,” said Peter Raabe, Southeast regional director for the conservation group American Rivers.Conservationists found instances of contractors cutting down healthy trees and removing live root balls, said Jon Stamper, river cleanup coordinator for MountainTrue, the North Carolina-based nonprofit conducting the French Broad work.“Those trees kind of create fish habitats,” he said. “They slow the flow of water down. They’re an important part of a river system, and we’ve seen kind of a disregard for that.”The Army Corps of Engineers said in a statement that debris removal missions “are often challenging” due to the large volume storms can leave behind across a wide area. The Corps said it trains its contractors to minimize disturbances to waterways and to prevent harm to wildlife. North Carolina Emergency Management said debris removal after Helene took into account safety and the environment, and that projects reimbursed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency met that agency’s standards for minimizing impact. Battered first by the storm, and then by the cleanup Hannah Woodburn, who tracks the headwaters and tributaries of the New River as MountainTrue's Upper New Riverkeeper, said waters are much muddier since Helene, both from storm-related vegetation loss and from heavy machinery used during cleanup.She said it's been bad for the eastern hellbender, a “species of special concern” in North Carolina. It's one of only three giant salamanders found in the world, growing up to 2 feet (61 centimeters) long and weighing more than 3 pounds (1.4 kilograms).“After the storm, we had so many reports and pictures of dead hellbenders, some nearly a mile from the stream once the waters receded,” said Woodburn.Of even greater concern is the Appalachian elktoe, a federally endangered mussel found only in the mountains of North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. Helene hurt the Appalachian elktoe, but it also suffered from human-caused damage, said Mike Perkins, a state biologist.Perkins said some contractors coordinated with conservation teams ahead of river cleanups and took precautions. Others were not so careful. He described snorkeling in the cold waters of the Little River and “finding crushed individuals, some of them still barely alive, some with their insides hanging out.” On that river, workers moved 60 Appalachian elktoe to a refuge site upstream. On the South Toe River, home to one of the most important populations, biologists collected a dozen and took them to a hatchery to store in tanks until it's safe to return them to the wild.“It was shocking and unprecedented in my professional line of work in 15 years,” Perkins said of the incident. “There’s all of these processes in place to prevent this secondary tragedy from happening, and none of it happened.”Andrea Leslie, mountain habitat conservation coordinator with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, said she hopes the experience can inform future recovery efforts.“To a certain degree, you can’t do this perfectly,” she said. “They’re in emergency mode. They’re working to make sure that people are safe and that infrastructure is safe. And it’s a big, complicated process. And there are multiple places in my observation where we could shift things to be more careful." Humans along the river are still recovering, too Like the hellbender and the Appalachian elktoe, humans cling to the river, too.Vickie and Paul Revis’ home sat beside old U.S. 70 in a bend of the Swannanoa River. As Helene swept through, the Swannanoa took their home and scraped away a big chunk of their half-acre lot.With the land paid for and no flood insurance payment to move away, they decided to stay put.After a year in a donated camper, they'll soon move into their new house — a double-wide modular home, also donated by a local Christian charity. It sits atop a 6-foot mound that Paul Revis piled up near the front of the property, farther from the river. Using rock, fill dirt and broken concrete dumped on his property by friendly debris-removal contractors, Paul has reclaimed the frontage the Swannanoa took. His wife planted it with marigolds for beauty and a weeping willow for stability. And they've purchased flood insurance.“I hope I never see another one in my lifetime, and I’m hoping that if I do, it does hold up,” Vickie said. “I mean, that’s all we can (do). Mother Nature does whatever she wants to do, and you just have to roll with it.” Tons of debris pulled out, tons still to go Back on the French Broad, the tedious cleanup work continues. Many on the crew are rafting guides knocked out of work by the storm.MountainTrue got a $10 million, 18-month grant from the state for the painstaking work of pulling small debris from the rivers and streams. Since July, teams have removed more than 75 tons from about a dozen rivers across five watersheds.Red-tailed hawks and osprey circle high overhead as the flotilla glides past banks lined with willow, sourwood and sycamore, ablaze with goldenrod and jewelweed. That peacefulness belies its fury of a year ago that upended so many lives. “There are so many people who are living in western North Carolina right now that feel very afraid of our rivers,” said Liz McGuirl, a crew member who managed a hair salon before Helene put her out of work. “They feel hurt. They feel betrayed.”Downstream, as McGuirl hauled up a length of pipe, another catfish swam out.“We’re creating a habitat, but it’s just the wrong habitat,” crew leader Leslie Beninato said ruefully. “I’d like to give them a tree as a home, maybe, instead of a pipe.”The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environmentCopyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Sept. 2025

The Dismantling of the US Forest Service Is Imminent

This story was originally published by High Country News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. In the 1880s, giant cattle companies turned thousands of cattle out to graze on the “public domain”—i.e., the Western lands that had been stolen from Indigenous people and then opened up for white settlement. In remote southeastern […]

This story was originally published by High Country News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. In the 1880s, giant cattle companies turned thousands of cattle out to graze on the “public domain”—i.e., the Western lands that had been stolen from Indigenous people and then opened up for white settlement. In remote southeastern Utah, this coincided with a wave of settlement by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The region’s once-abundant grasslands and lush mountain slopes were soon reduced to denuded wastelands etched with deep flash-flood-prone gullies. Cattlemen fought, sometimes violently, over water and range. The local citizenry grew sick and tired of it, sometimes literally: At one point, sheep feces contaminated the water supply of the town of Monticello and led to a typhoid outbreak that killed 11 people. Yet there was little they could do, since there were few rules on the public domain and fewer folks with the power to enforce them. That changed in 1891, when Congress passed the Forest Reserve Act, which authorized the president to place some unregulated tracts under “judicious control,” thereby mildly restraining extractive activities in the name of conservation. In 1905, the Forest Service was created as a branch of the US Agriculture Department to oversee these reserves, and Gifford Pinchot was chosen to lead it. A year later, the citizens of southeastern Utah successfully petitioned the Theodore Roosevelt administration to establish forest reserves in the La Sal and Abajo Mountains. Since then, the Forest Service has gone through various metamorphoses, shifting from stewarding and conserving forests for the future to supplying the growing nation with lumber to managing forests for multiple uses and then to the ecosystem management era, which began in the 1990s. Throughout all these shifts, however, it has largely stayed true to Pinchot and his desire to conserve forests and their resources for future generations.  But now, the Trump administration is eager to begin a new era for the agency and its public lands, with a distinctively un-Pinchot-esque structure and a mission that maximizes resource production and extraction while dismantling the administrative state and its role as environmental protector. Over the last nine months, the administration has issued executive orders calling for expanded timber production and rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule, declared “emergency” situations that enable it to bypass regulations on nearly 60 percent of the public’s forests, and proposed slashing the agency’s operations budget by 34 percent. The most recent move, which is currently open to public comment, involves a proposal by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to radically overhaul the entire US Department of Agriculture. Its stated purposes are to ensure that the agency’s “workforce aligns with financial resources and priorities,” and to consolidate functions and eliminate redundancy. This will include moving at least 2,600 of the department’s 4,600 Washington, DC, employees to five hub locations, with only two in the West: Salt Lake City, Utah, and Fort Collins, Colorado. (The others will be in North Carolina, Missouri, and Indiana.) The goal, according to Rollins’ memorandum, is to “bring the USDA closer to its customers.” The plan is reminiscent of Trump’s first-term relocation of the Bureau of Land Management’s headquarters to Grand Junction, Colorado, in 2019. That relocation resulted in a de facto agency housecleaning; many senior staffers chose to resign or move to other agencies, and only a handful of workers ended up in the Colorado office, which shared a building with oil and gas companies. Using an emergency declaration, Trump’s timber production executive order would ease environmental protections so as to greatly expand logging in the national forests. Though Rollins’ proposal is aimed at decentralizing the department, it would effectively re-centralize the Forest Service by eliminating its nine regional offices, six of which are located in the West. Each regional forester oversees dozens of national forests within their region, providing budget oversight, guiding place-specific implementation of national policies, and facilitating coordination among the various forests. Rollins’ memo does not explain why the regional offices are being axed, or what will happen to the regional foresters’ positions and their functions, or how the change will affect the agency’s chain of command. When several US senators asked Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden for more specifics, he responded that “decisions pertaining to the agency’s structure and the location of specialized personnel will be made after” the public comment period ends on September 30. Curiously, the administration’s forest management strategy, published in May, relies on regional offices to “work with the Washington Office to develop tailored strategies to meet their specific timber goals.” Now it’s unclear that either the regional or Washington offices will remain in existence long enough to carry this out. The administration has been far more transparent about its desire to return the Forest Service to its timber plantation era, which ran from the 1950s through the ’80s. During that time, logging companies harvested 10 billion to 12 billion board-feet per year from federal forests, while for the last 25 years, the annual number has hovered below 3 billion board-feet. Now, Trump, via his Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production order, plans to crank up the annual cut to 4 billion board-feet by 2028. This will be accomplished—in classic Trumpian fashion—by declaring an “emergency” on national forest lands that will allow environmental protections and regulations, including the National Environmental Protection Act, Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act, to be eased or bypassed. In April, Rollins issued a memorandum doing just that, declaring that the threat of wildfires, insects and disease, invasive species, overgrown forests, the growing number of homes in the wildland-urban interface, and more than a century of rigorous fire suppression have contributed to what is now “a full-blown wildfire and forest health crisis.” Emergency determinations aren’t limited to Trump and friends; in 2023, the Biden administration identified almost 67 million acres of national forest lands as being under a high or very high fire risk, thus qualifying as an “emergency situation” under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Rollins, however, vastly expanded the “emergency situation” acreage to almost 113 million acres, or 59 percent of all Forest Service lands. This allows the agency to use streamlined environmental reviews and “expedited” tribal consultation time frames to “carry out authorized emergency actions,” ranging from commercial harvesting of damaged trees to removing “hazardous fuels” to reconstructing existing utility lines. Meanwhile, the administration has announced plans to consolidate all federal wildfire fighting duties under the Interior Department. This would completely zero out the Forest Service’s $2.4 billion wildland fire management budget, sowing even more confusion and chaos. The administration also plans to slash staff and budgets in other parts of the agency, further compromising its ability to carry out its mission. The so-called Department of Government Efficiency fired about 3,400 Forest Service employees, or more than 10 percent of the agency’s total workforce, earlier this year. And the administration has proposed cutting the agency’s operations budget, which includes salaries, by 34 percent in fiscal 2026, which will most likely necessitate further reductions in force. It would also cut the national forest system and capital improvement and maintenance budgets by 21 percent and 48 percent respectively. The goal, it seems, is to cripple the agency with both direct and indirect blows. The result, if the administration succeeds, will be a diminished Forest Service that would be unrecognizable to Gifford Pinchot.

Two climate scientists on how to use emotion in the climate crisis

From anger to hope, Kate Marvel and Tim Lenton explain how to tackle the tricky feelings aroused by climate change and harness them to take action

With emissions still rising, how do we feel hope for the future?Qilai Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images With dire environmental warnings and extreme weather events in the news almost every day, it can be tempting to simply avoid thinking about the climate crisis. But how do climate scientists, who must grapple with the harsh reality of our changing planet every day, cope? What can they teach us about processing the powerful emotions provoked by escalating climate change? And are there ways we can use these feelings to our advantage? New Scientist recently sat down with New York-based climate scientist Kate Marvel and Tim Lenton, a climate scientist at the University of Exeter, UK. Both have spent years modelling how our planet may react to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, and both have recently published books that distil their perspectives on how best to engage with, and tackle, the climate emergency. At first glance, these are two quite different books. Human Nature, by Marvel, is a series of essays exploring the science of climate change, each centred on a different emotional response to the crisis. By contrast, Lenton’s book, Positive Tipping Points, prioritises taking action over introspection. It makes a persuasive case that a radical, systemic shift to a cleaner world is possible with the right social, economic and technological interventions. At their heart, though, both books are about how to embrace our emotions around climate change so we can reframe our thinking and actions. In this conversation, Lenton and Marvel reveal why we should feel angry, fearful, proud and hopeful all at once about our future on Earth. Rowan Hooper: Kate, your book is about nine ways to feel about our changing planet. Can we start with anger? Kate Marvel: The anger chapter was one of the easiest ones to write. What I wanted to talk about was the history of how we discovered climate change was happening. The thing that makes me really angry is that the history of scientists finding stuff out is intertwined with the history of people lying about it. I tell this story of a research group. They’re trying to establish that most of the excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere comes from fossil fuels, and they design these really creative experiments to prove that. They have a large ship that’s going around, taking measurements of the ocean. And eventually they develop a climate model that has made extremely accurate projections in retrospect. You know who did all of that? It was Exxon. That does make me very angry. The fact that they knew. RH: Can anger be motivating? KM: I hope so. It can be really easy to go down a bad path where all you are is angry. Social media definitely incentivises this, where you’re fed more and more outrage, but it’s not productive outrage. RH: Your book also covers wonder, guilt, fear, grief, surprise, pride, hope and love. Can you talk us through how you processed these emotions? KM: What I wanted to do is embrace the fact there is no one way to feel about climate change. I was getting really frustrated when I was reading things that were designed to elicit a single emotion. Either, just be afraid, or just be angry, or just be hopeful. That didn’t feel very useful to me. I wanted to acknowledge that if you live on planet Earth, you have a conflict of interest. You care about what happens to this place. Because everybody that you know lives here. Tim Lenton studies “tipping points” in ecosystems that could affect the wider climateUniversity of Exeter RH: Tim, how do you find dealing with the emotions that come with studying climate change? Tim Lenton: I’ve been studying climate tipping points that could be really bad, really nasty. And arguably some of them are starting to unfold. I mean, we’re losing tropical coral reefs that up to half a billion people in the world depend on for their livelihoods. I’ve been staring this stuff down for nearly 20 years. So, I just found I had to use the mental toolkit I had of understanding complex systems to try to see if I could find plausible grounds for hope. Could we build a credible case that we could accelerate the change we need to get out of trouble? It took doing the research on the book to see that there was evidence that this is possible, and I wasn’t just going to delude myself with naive hope. RH: So it’s rational, usable hope? TL: It’s conditional optimism. I’m optimistic on the basis that some people are going to read the book, and some fraction of them will join me on the same journey. History teaches us that it only needs a fraction of people to change to ultimately tip everyone to change. Madeleine Cuff: Tim, much of your career has focused on this idea of tipping points. For those who are new to the concept, what are they? TL: Tipping points are those moments where a small change makes a big difference to the state or the fate of some system. For the bad ones in the climate, we know that there are large parts of the Earth system – major ice sheets, aspects of the ocean circulation, big bits of the biosphere – that have what we call alternative stable states. And they can be tipped from one state into another. We could potentially tip the Amazon rainforest into a different degraded forest or savannah state, for example. MC: What is a positive tipping point? TL: I’m drawing on over half a century of scholarship in different fields that shows you can have tipping points in social change. We’re all familiar with the idea of political revolutions popping up and protests popping up seemingly out of nowhere and exploding in size. But history also teaches us that sometimes you get abrupt and hard-to-reverse changes in technology. There are tipping points where one new technology will take over from an existing one. RH: The obvious climate example I’m thinking of is electric vehicles. And, of course, solar is so cheap now that it’s really taking off. How do we bring about positive tipping points? TL: We have to think about what actions can bring forward the positive tipping points, accepting that we need to be going more than five times faster than we are at decarbonising the economy. Luckily, each of us has agency to do something about this. At the most basic level, maybe we can be an adopter of new behaviour, such as eating less meat, or adopting a new technology like EVs or solar panels. We’ve probably also got a pension fund, and we should be asking hard questions about where that’s invested. The story of positive tipping points that have already happened starts with social activists or innovators. The people who have a passion to develop the core new technology, or activists who want to create change and see that possibility before everybody else. In her research, Kate Marvel tries to better model our planet’s changing climateRoy Rochlin/Getty Images MC: Kate, we’ve talked a little bit about the negative emotions that come with thinking about climate change. But what about the impact of positive emotions? What role can they play in inspiring positive action? KM: I started the book with the emotion wonder because, when you take a step back, just thinking about this planet that we live on and the fact that we understand it at all, that’s incredible. It’s a really useful tool for making connections and starting conversations. A lot of times, when I tell people I’m a climate scientist, they assume I’m immediately going to start scolding them. But if you start out with wonder, if you start out a conversation with: “Did you know the Earth’s water is probably older than the Earth itself?” people are going to say: “Oh wait, that’s amazing.” And they are going to be more likely to talk to you. Embracing a wide spectrum of emotions is useful as a communications strategy. There is support for feeling these emotions in the scientific and social scientific literature. There is a sense of pride we can feel in doing the hard work. There is deep satisfaction in making change. The social science literature also says that love is probably the most powerful motivating factor in climate action. People are motivated to act because they love their communities, their families, their children. We know how powerful that emotion is. I have a whole chapter on hope, even though I have a very complicated relationship to hope. I feel like when people always ask me: “Do you hope we can solve climate change?” that, for me, is like asking, do you hope you can clean your bathroom? That’s a silly question. You know what to do, just go clean your bathroom. As Tim says, we have so many of the solutions we need. We are on these trajectories already. We just need to push them over the precipice. We need to get past that social tipping point. RH: We have to face up to these emotions, don’t we? Maybe that’s one reason why we haven’t really got to grips with the problem – it’s too big for us to face. KM: Totally. I think about this stuff all day every day, and I still don’t really understand it. I can’t fit it into my head. This is a problem that is caused by basically every industrial human activity. And because CO2 and other greenhouse gases are well mixed in the atmosphere, it is affecting literally every aspect of life on this planet. Trying to boil that down to something very glib and manageable is just not possible. It is the work of a lifetime, or many lifetimes, to really come to terms with what this is and what this means, and what we do about it. Most Americans are concerned about climate change and want the US government to do something. But when you look at the polls, most Americans think other Americans do not think that. So that, I think, is why one of the most powerful things that an individual can do regarding climate change is to talk about it. Because when you talk about it, you realise, maybe I’m not so much of an individual after all. Maybe I’m not alone. RH: What do you want people to do after reading your books? KM: I would like people to think about how to tell climate stories that resonate with themselves, with their own community, with the people who will listen to them because of who they are and what they bring to the table. TL: I’m hoping the readers are feeling empowered to act, in what might have beforehand been feeling like a very scary, disempowering situation. I’d like them instead to feel a sense of agency. This is an edited version of an interview that originally took place on New Scientist‘s The World, the Universe and Us podcast What on earth can we do about climate change? See Matt Winning explain how to dispel the despair and take action on 18 October newscientist.com/nslmag

America's blame game over Canada's wildfire smoke misses the point, experts say

US officials have blamed Canada for not doing enough to stop its wildfire smoke from wafting south. Climate experts say it’s not so simple.

America's blame game over Canada's wildfire smoke misses the point, experts sayNadine YousifSenior Canada reporterGetty ImagesSmoke from Canada's wildfires have drifted south to the US several times this summer, clouding the sky with an orange haze. As deadly wildfires raged in the Canadian province of Manitoba this summer, Republican lawmakers in nearby US states penned letters asking that Canada be held accountable for the smoke drifting south."Our skies are being choked by wildfire smoke we didn't start and can't control," wrote Calvin Callahan, a Republican state representative from Wisconsin, in a letter dated early August.Callahan, along with lawmakers from Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota, filed a formal complaint with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urging an investigation into Canada's wildfire management.Manitoba premier Wab Kinew quickly condemned the move, accusing the lawmakers of throwing a "timber tantrum" and playing "political games".By August, the wildfires had scorched more than two million acres in Manitoba, forced thousands to evacuate, and killed two people – a married couple who authorities said were trapped by fast-moving flames around their family home. As September draws to a close, data shows that 2025 is on track to be Canada's second-worst wildfire season on record.A study published in the Nature journal in September has revealed that smoke from Canada's wildfires has also had far-reaching, fatal consequences. It estimates that the 2023 wildfires - the country's worst on record by area burned - caused more than 87,500 acute and premature deaths worldwide, including 4,100 acute, smoke-related deaths in the US and over 22,000 premature deaths in Europe.Wildfire smoke contains PM2.5 - a type of air pollution - that is known to trigger inflammation in the body. It can exacerbate conditions like asthma and heart disease, and, in some causes, can damage neural connections in the brain."These are big numbers," said Michael Brauer, a professor at the University of British Columbia who co-authored the study. He added the findings show wildfire smoke should be treated as a serious health issue, akin to breast cancer or prostate cancer.For some American lawmakers, the blame falls squarely on Canada. "Canada's failure to contain massive wildfires," Callahan wrote in August, "has harmed the health and quality of life of more than 20 million Americans in the Midwest."Their complaints raise the question: Could Canada be doing more to curb its wildfires – and by extension, their smoke?Climate and fire experts in both countries told the BBC that the answer is largely no. "Until we as a global society deal with human-cased climate change, we're going to have this problem," said Mike Flannigan, an emergency management and fire science expert at Thompson Rivers University in British Columbia.Gallo Images/Orbital Horizon/Copernicus Sentinel Data 2025Wildfire smoke can often travel hundreds of thousands of miles. A sattelite image here from August shows smoke from a fire in Newfoundland drifting over the Atlantic Ocean.Metrics show Canada's wildfires, a natural part of its vast boreal forest, have worsened in recent years. Fire season now starts earlier, ends later, and burns more land on average. The 2023 fires razed 15 million hectares (37 million acres) – an area larger than England – while the 2025 blazes have so far burned 8.7 million hectares (21.5 million acres).As of mid-September, there are still more than 500 fires burning, mostly in British Columbia and Manitoba, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre.Roughly half of Canada's wildfires are sparked by lightning, while the rest stem from human activity, data from the National Forestry Database shows. Experts warn that hotter temperatures are making the land drier and more prone to ignition.Wildfires are not only worsening in Canada. The US has recently seen some of its most damaging blazes, including the 2023 Hawaii wildfires that killed at least 102 people, and the Palisades fire in January, the most destructive in Los Angeles history.Both countries have struggled to keep pace, often sharing firefighting resources. Canadian water bombers were deployed in California this year, while more than 600 US firefighters travelled north to assist Canada, according to the US Forest Service.In Canada, strained resources – and worsening fires – have fuelled calls for a national firefighting service. Wildfire emergency response is currently handled separately by each of the provinces and territories."The system we have right now worked 40 years ago. Today? Not so much," argued Mr Flannigan.Others propose controlled burns, a practice used in Australia and by indigenous communities, as a solution, though these fires would still generate smoke. Some argue for better clearing of flammable material in forests and near towns, or investing in new technology that can help detect wildfires faster.Some of that work is already underway. In August, Canada pledged more than $47m for research projects to help communities better prepare for and mitigate wildfires.Getty ImagesMajor Canadian cities, like Vancouver, have also been dealing with wildfire smoke. Still, experts like Jen Beverly, a wildland fire professor at the University of Alberta, warn there is little Canada can do to prevent wildfires altogether."These are high intensity fire ecosystems" in Canada, she said, that are different from fires in Australia or the US. "We have very difficult fires to manage under extreme conditions, and we're seeing more of those because of climate change."With a warmer climate, Prof Beverly said attention should be paid to pollution. She noted that the US is the second-worst carbon emitter in the world behind China. "I mean, we should be blaming them for the problem," she argued.In recent months, the Trump administration has also rolled back environmental policies designed to reduce emissions, and has withdrawn the US from the Paris climate accords.Sheila Olmstead, an enviromental policy professor at Cornell University, noted that Canada and the US have a history of cooperation on pollution and climate, including an air quality agreement signed by the two in 1991 to address acid rain."It was a very clear framework for addressing the problem, and that's what seems to be missing here," Olmstead told the BBC. Both countries, she said, would benefit from working together on wildfires instead of trading blame.As for the EPA complaint, it is unclear what the agency could do to address the US lawmakers' concerns. In a statement to the BBC, the EPA said it is reviewing it "and will respond through appropriate channels".Prof Brauer said the data in his study shows that even though the fires are burning in Canada - often in remote areas - their impact can reach far beyond.The findings, he told the BBC, call for a re-framing of how the consequences of climate change are understood. "The effects of a warmer climate are localised, and there are winners and losers," Prof Brauer said. "But this is an illustration that some of these impacts are becoming global."He argued that the US lawmakers' complaints are an "unfortunate distraction," and that the focus should instead be on collaboration and learning how to "live with smoke"."This stuff isn't going away," Prof Brauer said, adding that there are ways to prevent future deaths if there is a will to adapt.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.