Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

How Heat Index, Dew Point and Wet-Bulb Temperature Describe Summer Weather

News Feed
Thursday, August 1, 2024

The summer sun is rising in the sky as you’re getting ready for the day. You check the forecast to see how hot it will be: The high is 94 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius). The heat index is 102 degrees F (39 degrees C). The relative humidity is going to be 50 percent in the afternoon. There’s a heat advisory in your area, and the “heat risk” is orange. Clearly, it’s going to be a warm, muggy day. But what exactly does this jumble of numbers and terms actually mean for what you’ll experience outside and what precautions you should take?“It can be confusing, having multiple parameters or indicators of heat and heat stress,” says Kimberly G. McMahon, public weather services program manager at the National Weather Service (NWS) and co-lead at the National Integrated Heat Health Information System.Scientific American is here to help unpack the various measures and tools used to communicate heat and its associated risk to help you prepare for the day.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.TemperatureWhen you’re talking about a heat event, the baseline measurement is air temperature.The NWS has a series of stations that measure the temperature of the air a few feet off the ground. Of course, temperature can vary widely over even a small area, so the reported figure for, say, New York City may not be the same across the entire metropolitan area. The verdant expanse of Central Park is generally a few degrees Fahrenheit cooler in the summer than a neighborhood with plenty of paved surfaces and little green space.And our experience of temperature varies depending on whether we’re in the shade or the sun: standing in direct sunlight can feel 10 to 15 degrees F (six to eight degrees C) hotter to the body than the measured air temperature.High temperatures can place a lot of stress on one’s body, especially for young children, older people, those with certain health conditions or on certain medications and those who don’t have ready access to air-conditioning. “No one is immune from the effects of heat, but there are some who are more susceptible,” McMahon says. “It’s a really personalized hazard.”When the human body overheats, it can become dehydrated, which causes the blood to thicken and the heart to work harder to pump. Heat exposure can lead to heat exhaustion, which can feature nausea, dizziness and muscle cramps. Exposure can also lead to heat stroke and even death.And though we’re all familiar with how the temperature feels according to whatever scale we use (Fahrenheit in the U.S.; Celsius nearly everywhere else), this figure isn’t always the only factor in summer heat. There’s another measure that plays a big role in how we experience heat, especially when it’s extreme.HumidityMost of us are broadly familiar with humidity—the amount of water vapor in the air—and how it can make a hot day much less pleasant and sweatier. But though we know a humid day feels worse, not everyone makes the connection “that an 85-degree-F [29-degree-C] day that is very humid is worse on your body than an 85-degree day that is dry,” says Casey Ivanovich, a Ph.D. student who studies extreme heat at Columbia University.Humid heat can be more of a health risk because the more moisture there is in the air, the less the body can naturally cool itself off through the evaporation of sweat. So humidity is a key component to consider when thinking about your experience with the day’s weather.Relative humidityForecasts typically communicate this experience through relative humidity, which expresses the amount of water vapor in the air relative to what the air could hold at a given temperature. That means relative humidity is, as its name suggests, relative to the temperature, which can make it difficult to gauge how muggy conditions will feel. An 80-degree-F (27-degree-C) day with 50 percent humidity feels a lot more humid than a 30-degree-F (minus-one-degree-C) day with 100 percent humidity, for example.Relative humidity can also change during the day: the humidity can be, say, 90 percent in the morning and 50 percent in the afternoon, when the temperature is higher, and yet conditions won’t feel any less humid later in the day.Dew pointFor this reason, a lot of meteorologists and weather enthusiasts prefer to use another measure, the dew point. The dew point is the temperature the air would have to be cooled to for the water vapor in the atmosphere to start condensing out, meaning the air would reach 100 percent relative humidity. The nice thing about the dew point is that it doesn’t change with the temperature, though it can change during the day if a moisture-laden air mass moves in or out of the area.But you don’t have to remember that definition to use the dew point to gauge how humid it is outside: using a rough guideline, a dew point below 55 degrees F (13 degrees C) is dry and pleasant; between 55 and 65 degrees F (18 degrees C), it’s starting to get sticky; and above 65 degrees F, it can start to feel like you’re swimming through the air. Once you get into the 70s F (low to mid-20s C), it’s oppressive.But how comfortable you are at a given dew point depends on how acclimated you are to humidity. For much of the western U.S., the air is generally pretty dry, and dew points are low, so even those middle dew points can feel uncomfortable. Along the Gulf Coast, humidity is the norm, and dew points are routinely in the 60s F or higher. “Everybody has their own threshold,” says Jared Rennie, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research meteorologist. (For his part, Rennie jokingly uses “the Jared is miserable index,” where anything above a dew point of 55 degrees F is miserable. “It is backed by zero science,” he says.)Not everyone has that level of interest in the weather or that much time on their hands to dive into dew point, so there are some other tools that can be used to get a sense of what it’s going to feel like outside.Heat indexOne tool the NWS has used for a few decades is called the heat index, which indicates how hot it feels. More technically, the index brings temperature and humidity together to give a sense of how hot the weather will feel to the body.The heat index is calculated with a complex equation that factors in relative humidity and air temperature. So, for example, if it’s 84 degrees F (29 degrees C) and 75 percent relative humidity, it will feel like 92 degrees F (33 degrees C). But that equation makes various assumptions about a person’s age, height and weight, and it also assumes they are at rest in the shade. For people who are older, engaging in strenuous activity or located in direct sunlight, the heat index will be higher. Conversely, if there’s a breeze, they can feel cooler.But “with any heat tool, there are strength and limitations,” McMahon says. The heat index isn’t very useful in the western U.S., where humid heat is less prevalent, and the equation was never tested for very extreme heat and humidity. The NWS has attempted to adjust for those extremes, which are occurring more often as the climate warms. A 2022 study in Environmental Research Letters, however, suggests that the agency’s method of adjustment is underestimating the heat index in those extremes and suggests an alternate approach.Even with these limitations, though, McMahon says the heat index is a useful way to quickly get across to the public that it will feel hotter than the actual temperature.New MeasuresThe NWS and other experts are working on different, more actionable ways to better convey to people the health risk that comes with heat. Doing so is crucial because heat waves are now more frequent, more intense and longer-lasting.Wet-bulb globe temperatureOne such measure is pretty wonky, and its name is a mouthful: the wet-bulb globe temperature. It accounts for not only the air temperature and humidity but also sun exposure and wind speed. The U.S. military developed the measure in the 1950s “to address the high amounts of heat illness they were seeing in their training camps,” McMahon says. School districts and sports teams are starting to use it more to decide whether to hold summer practices. In Florida the Zachary Martin Act (named after an athlete who died from heat illness) was passed in 2020 to require high-school sports teams to use the wet-bulb globe temperature to determine if it is safe to hold practice.The measurement tends to only be used by institutions with people trained in how to interpret it because it can yield numbers that are lower than the actual temperature. “A dangerous value is 90 degrees” F (32 degrees C), Rennie says. In those conditions, “you cannot be outside.”StickinessIvanovich and her colleagues at Columbia University are developing a measure they call “stickiness.” It effectively indicates whether a given extreme heat event is more a factor of temperature or humidity. The distinction is important because “the different types of actions that people need to take might be different” depending on which factor is weighted more heavily, she says.She and her colleagues envision local weather and climate experts using the stickiness index to determine whether heat events in an area are consistently more temperature- or humidity-driven or if they are highly variable. In the latter case, local authorities should explicitly warn people if a given event will be very humid so they can take the appropriate precautions to stay more hydrated and cool off. “It’s encouraging that we’re seeing more and more people try to wrap humidity into extreme heat communication,” Ivanovich says. “The more aware [we are], the better.”Heat watches, warnings and advisoriesTo help people know when they’re most at risk and what to do, the NWS puts out various hot weather alerts. Until recently, these came in the form of heat watches, warnings and advisories that were tied to certain temperature thresholds. Those thresholds “are very specific to where you are,” Rennie says, because what feels like extreme heat to people in Seattle is different than what feels oppressive to people in Atlanta.As with other weather watches, a heat watch is issued when the heat index is expected to be above a certain threshold, generally in the next 24 to 72 hours, but the timing and the question of whether the extreme heat will materialize are still uncertain. Sometimes heat watches can be issued even further in advance if forecasters are fairly confident the event will happen.Warnings and advisories are generally issued about 12 to 24 hours in advance, though they can also be issued earlier when confidence in the forecast is high. Warnings have a higher temperature threshold than advisories.Though these alerts can be helpful in grabbing the public’s attention, they don’t always work well where major changes in topography create very different microclimates in a forecast area.Rennie gives the example of Asheville, N.C., where he lives: the NWS office for that area has a 105-degree-F (41-degree-C) threshold to trigger a heat advisory, but the relatively milder climate up in the mountains, where Asheville is located, means that at lower temperatures, it feels much hotter to people there at than to those down in the Piedmont plateau to the east.Heat riskTo help get around the limitations of existing tools, the NWS has developed an interactive map-based tool called HeatRisk. It’s “the first heat alert system across the CONUS [continental U.S.],” says Mike Staudenmaier, chief of the Science and Technology Infusion Division at NWS Western Region Headquarters.The system uses a color-coded ranking of green, yellow, orange, red and magenta to denote increasing risk. Those rankings are based on the maximum and minimum temperatures for a given day in a given area by how unusual they are compared with the historical climate for that place at that time of year. So, as with watches and warnings, HeatRisk is sensitive to what people are locally acclimated to. A 90-degree-F event in New York City in April is different than one in July “because people have had time to adjust to the warmer temperatures” later in the summer, McMahon says. Similarly, a heat event that might be rated orange (moderate risk) or red along the Gulf Coast may be rated a magenta (excessive risk) farther north, where the same conditions are less common.The NWS HeatRisk map for July 31, 2024.The HeatRisk map also uses Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality data that link temperatures to upticks in heat-related deaths. And it factors in expected duration of the heat because that heat’s effects stack up when there’s no time for the body to recover and cool down.The map can also be more tailored to very localized changes in climate. For example, it can show green levels on the coast of California and quickly move up to orange or red moving inland. As an example, Rennie notes a recent heat wave where his house was in the orange category, his work was in yellow and his son’s camp was in red.HeatRisk does not factor in humidity, but it does consider overnight low temperatures, which track well with dew point, Staudenmaier says. For example, if the dew point in Atlanta is 73 degrees F (23 degrees C), the temperature will be equal to or above 73 degrees F. Through those means, the tool can account for humid heat events.The risk levels also account for the people who are more susceptible to heat and need to take precautions at lower risk levels than others who are less susceptible. Some risk communication experts would like to see the wording around those risks change to better convey when people need to be aware because terms such as “minor” can inadvertently convey that there is little risk.McMahon says that the tool is considered “experimental.” The NWS, which rolled the measure out to the whole continental U.S. for the first time this year, will be considering feedback and tweaking it to make sure it’s as useful as possible. The NWS is also still working on extending the tool to Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories, she says. The difficulty there is the relative dearth of historical data.Though the HeatRisk tool isn’t perfect, “it’s a start,” Rennie says. McMahon adds that the only way we can minimize heat illness and death is through just such “a whole-of-country approach” that gives people ample warning. “We really emphasize using it to help people plan and prepare.”

When heat hits, we talk about the heat index, the dew point and heat risk. But what do all these measures mean?

The summer sun is rising in the sky as you’re getting ready for the day. You check the forecast to see how hot it will be: The high is 94 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius). The heat index is 102 degrees F (39 degrees C). The relative humidity is going to be 50 percent in the afternoon. There’s a heat advisory in your area, and the “heat risk” is orange. Clearly, it’s going to be a warm, muggy day. But what exactly does this jumble of numbers and terms actually mean for what you’ll experience outside and what precautions you should take?

“It can be confusing, having multiple parameters or indicators of heat and heat stress,” says Kimberly G. McMahon, public weather services program manager at the National Weather Service (NWS) and co-lead at the National Integrated Heat Health Information System.

Scientific American is here to help unpack the various measures and tools used to communicate heat and its associated risk to help you prepare for the day.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Temperature

When you’re talking about a heat event, the baseline measurement is air temperature.

The NWS has a series of stations that measure the temperature of the air a few feet off the ground. Of course, temperature can vary widely over even a small area, so the reported figure for, say, New York City may not be the same across the entire metropolitan area. The verdant expanse of Central Park is generally a few degrees Fahrenheit cooler in the summer than a neighborhood with plenty of paved surfaces and little green space.

And our experience of temperature varies depending on whether we’re in the shade or the sun: standing in direct sunlight can feel 10 to 15 degrees F (six to eight degrees C) hotter to the body than the measured air temperature.

On the left side, a matrix shows which inputs (air temperature, relative humidity, solar irradiance, wind, pressure) are used to calculate various metrics of heat (dew point, wet-bulb globe temperature, heat index). On the right side, a visual explainer of different heat alerts using hot sauce as an analogy.

High temperatures can place a lot of stress on one’s body, especially for young children, older people, those with certain health conditions or on certain medications and those who don’t have ready access to air-conditioning. “No one is immune from the effects of heat, but there are some who are more susceptible,” McMahon says. “It’s a really personalized hazard.”

When the human body overheats, it can become dehydrated, which causes the blood to thicken and the heart to work harder to pump. Heat exposure can lead to heat exhaustion, which can feature nausea, dizziness and muscle cramps. Exposure can also lead to heat stroke and even death.

And though we’re all familiar with how the temperature feels according to whatever scale we use (Fahrenheit in the U.S.; Celsius nearly everywhere else), this figure isn’t always the only factor in summer heat. There’s another measure that plays a big role in how we experience heat, especially when it’s extreme.

Humidity

Most of us are broadly familiar with humidity—the amount of water vapor in the air—and how it can make a hot day much less pleasant and sweatier. But though we know a humid day feels worse, not everyone makes the connection “that an 85-degree-F [29-degree-C] day that is very humid is worse on your body than an 85-degree day that is dry,” says Casey Ivanovich, a Ph.D. student who studies extreme heat at Columbia University.

Humid heat can be more of a health risk because the more moisture there is in the air, the less the body can naturally cool itself off through the evaporation of sweat. So humidity is a key component to consider when thinking about your experience with the day’s weather.

Relative humidity

Forecasts typically communicate this experience through relative humidity, which expresses the amount of water vapor in the air relative to what the air could hold at a given temperature. That means relative humidity is, as its name suggests, relative to the temperature, which can make it difficult to gauge how muggy conditions will feel. An 80-degree-F (27-degree-C) day with 50 percent humidity feels a lot more humid than a 30-degree-F (minus-one-degree-C) day with 100 percent humidity, for example.

Relative humidity can also change during the day: the humidity can be, say, 90 percent in the morning and 50 percent in the afternoon, when the temperature is higher, and yet conditions won’t feel any less humid later in the day.

Dew point

For this reason, a lot of meteorologists and weather enthusiasts prefer to use another measure, the dew point. The dew point is the temperature the air would have to be cooled to for the water vapor in the atmosphere to start condensing out, meaning the air would reach 100 percent relative humidity. The nice thing about the dew point is that it doesn’t change with the temperature, though it can change during the day if a moisture-laden air mass moves in or out of the area.

But you don’t have to remember that definition to use the dew point to gauge how humid it is outside: using a rough guideline, a dew point below 55 degrees F (13 degrees C) is dry and pleasant; between 55 and 65 degrees F (18 degrees C), it’s starting to get sticky; and above 65 degrees F, it can start to feel like you’re swimming through the air. Once you get into the 70s F (low to mid-20s C), it’s oppressive.

A stylistic line chart shows the physical interpretation for the value ranges of dew point: Arid (less than 45 degrees Fahrenheit), Comfortable (45 to 60 degrees F), Sticky (60 to 75 degrees F) and Oppressive (more than 75 degrees F).

But how comfortable you are at a given dew point depends on how acclimated you are to humidity. For much of the western U.S., the air is generally pretty dry, and dew points are low, so even those middle dew points can feel uncomfortable. Along the Gulf Coast, humidity is the norm, and dew points are routinely in the 60s F or higher. “Everybody has their own threshold,” says Jared Rennie, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research meteorologist. (For his part, Rennie jokingly uses “the Jared is miserable index,” where anything above a dew point of 55 degrees F is miserable. “It is backed by zero science,” he says.)

Not everyone has that level of interest in the weather or that much time on their hands to dive into dew point, so there are some other tools that can be used to get a sense of what it’s going to feel like outside.

Heat index

One tool the NWS has used for a few decades is called the heat index, which indicates how hot it feels. More technically, the index brings temperature and humidity together to give a sense of how hot the weather will feel to the body.

The heat index is calculated with a complex equation that factors in relative humidity and air temperature. So, for example, if it’s 84 degrees F (29 degrees C) and 75 percent relative humidity, it will feel like 92 degrees F (33 degrees C). But that equation makes various assumptions about a person’s age, height and weight, and it also assumes they are at rest in the shade. For people who are older, engaging in strenuous activity or located in direct sunlight, the heat index will be higher. Conversely, if there’s a breeze, they can feel cooler.

A matrix graph with air temperature in degrees on the x axis and relative humidity in percent on the y axis. Cells in the matrix contain the heat index values for the combinations of temperature and humidity and are colored by the level of danger: Okay (less than 80 degrees Fahrenheit), Caution (80 to 90 degrees F), Extreme Caution (90 to 103 degrees F), Danger (103 to 124 degrees F) and Extreme Danger (more than 125 degrees F).

But “with any heat tool, there are strength and limitations,” McMahon says. The heat index isn’t very useful in the western U.S., where humid heat is less prevalent, and the equation was never tested for very extreme heat and humidity. The NWS has attempted to adjust for those extremes, which are occurring more often as the climate warms. A 2022 study in Environmental Research Letters, however, suggests that the agency’s method of adjustment is underestimating the heat index in those extremes and suggests an alternate approach.

Even with these limitations, though, McMahon says the heat index is a useful way to quickly get across to the public that it will feel hotter than the actual temperature.

New Measures

The NWS and other experts are working on different, more actionable ways to better convey to people the health risk that comes with heat. Doing so is crucial because heat waves are now more frequent, more intense and longer-lasting.

Wet-bulb globe temperature

One such measure is pretty wonky, and its name is a mouthful: the wet-bulb globe temperature. It accounts for not only the air temperature and humidity but also sun exposure and wind speed. The U.S. military developed the measure in the 1950s “to address the high amounts of heat illness they were seeing in their training camps,” McMahon says. School districts and sports teams are starting to use it more to decide whether to hold summer practices. In Florida the Zachary Martin Act (named after an athlete who died from heat illness) was passed in 2020 to require high-school sports teams to use the wet-bulb globe temperature to determine if it is safe to hold practice.

The measurement tends to only be used by institutions with people trained in how to interpret it because it can yield numbers that are lower than the actual temperature. “A dangerous value is 90 degrees” F (32 degrees C), Rennie says. In those conditions, “you cannot be outside.”

Stickiness

Ivanovich and her colleagues at Columbia University are developing a measure they call “stickiness.” It effectively indicates whether a given extreme heat event is more a factor of temperature or humidity. The distinction is important because “the different types of actions that people need to take might be different” depending on which factor is weighted more heavily, she says.

She and her colleagues envision local weather and climate experts using the stickiness index to determine whether heat events in an area are consistently more temperature- or humidity-driven or if they are highly variable. In the latter case, local authorities should explicitly warn people if a given event will be very humid so they can take the appropriate precautions to stay more hydrated and cool off. “It’s encouraging that we’re seeing more and more people try to wrap humidity into extreme heat communication,” Ivanovich says. “The more aware [we are], the better.”

Heat watches, warnings and advisories

To help people know when they’re most at risk and what to do, the NWS puts out various hot weather alerts. Until recently, these came in the form of heat watches, warnings and advisories that were tied to certain temperature thresholds. Those thresholds “are very specific to where you are,” Rennie says, because what feels like extreme heat to people in Seattle is different than what feels oppressive to people in Atlanta.

As with other weather watches, a heat watch is issued when the heat index is expected to be above a certain threshold, generally in the next 24 to 72 hours, but the timing and the question of whether the extreme heat will materialize are still uncertain. Sometimes heat watches can be issued even further in advance if forecasters are fairly confident the event will happen.

Warnings and advisories are generally issued about 12 to 24 hours in advance, though they can also be issued earlier when confidence in the forecast is high. Warnings have a higher temperature threshold than advisories.

Though these alerts can be helpful in grabbing the public’s attention, they don’t always work well where major changes in topography create very different microclimates in a forecast area.

Rennie gives the example of Asheville, N.C., where he lives: the NWS office for that area has a 105-degree-F (41-degree-C) threshold to trigger a heat advisory, but the relatively milder climate up in the mountains, where Asheville is located, means that at lower temperatures, it feels much hotter to people there at than to those down in the Piedmont plateau to the east.

Heat risk

To help get around the limitations of existing tools, the NWS has developed an interactive map-based tool called HeatRisk. It’s “the first heat alert system across the CONUS [continental U.S.],” says Mike Staudenmaier, chief of the Science and Technology Infusion Division at NWS Western Region Headquarters.

The system uses a color-coded ranking of green, yellow, orange, red and magenta to denote increasing risk. Those rankings are based on the maximum and minimum temperatures for a given day in a given area by how unusual they are compared with the historical climate for that place at that time of year. So, as with watches and warnings, HeatRisk is sensitive to what people are locally acclimated to. A 90-degree-F event in New York City in April is different than one in July “because people have had time to adjust to the warmer temperatures” later in the summer, McMahon says. Similarly, a heat event that might be rated orange (moderate risk) or red along the Gulf Coast may be rated a magenta (excessive risk) farther north, where the same conditions are less common.

The NWS HeatRisk is an experimental color-numeric-based index that provides a forecast risk of heat-related impacts to occur over a 24-hour period. The map for July 31, 2024 shows minor heat risk in much of the western United States represented by yellow, moderate heat risk in most of the midwestern and eastern United States represented by orange, and major heat risk in large pockets of the southern United States represented by red

The NWS HeatRisk map for July 31, 2024.

The HeatRisk map also uses Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality data that link temperatures to upticks in heat-related deaths. And it factors in expected duration of the heat because that heat’s effects stack up when there’s no time for the body to recover and cool down.

The map can also be more tailored to very localized changes in climate. For example, it can show green levels on the coast of California and quickly move up to orange or red moving inland. As an example, Rennie notes a recent heat wave where his house was in the orange category, his work was in yellow and his son’s camp was in red.

HeatRisk does not factor in humidity, but it does consider overnight low temperatures, which track well with dew point, Staudenmaier says. For example, if the dew point in Atlanta is 73 degrees F (23 degrees C), the temperature will be equal to or above 73 degrees F. Through those means, the tool can account for humid heat events.

The risk levels also account for the people who are more susceptible to heat and need to take precautions at lower risk levels than others who are less susceptible. Some risk communication experts would like to see the wording around those risks change to better convey when people need to be aware because terms such as “minor” can inadvertently convey that there is little risk.

McMahon says that the tool is considered “experimental.” The NWS, which rolled the measure out to the whole continental U.S. for the first time this year, will be considering feedback and tweaking it to make sure it’s as useful as possible. The NWS is also still working on extending the tool to Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories, she says. The difficulty there is the relative dearth of historical data.

Though the HeatRisk tool isn’t perfect, “it’s a start,” Rennie says. McMahon adds that the only way we can minimize heat illness and death is through just such “a whole-of-country approach” that gives people ample warning. “We really emphasize using it to help people plan and prepare.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Fire Disrupts UN Climate Talks Just as Negotiators Reach Critical Final Days

Fire has disrupted United Nations climate talks, forcing evacuations of several buildings with just two scheduled days left and negotiators yet to announce any major agreements

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — Fire disrupted United Nations climate talks in Brazil on Thursday, forcing evacuations of several buildings with just two scheduled days left and negotiators yet to announce any major agreements. Officials said no one was hurt.The fire was reported in an area of pavilions where sideline events are held during the annual talks, known this year as COP30. Organizers soon announced that the fire was under control, but fire officials ordered the entire site evacuated for safety checks and it wasn't clear when conference business would resume.Viliami Vainga Tone, with the Tonga delegation, had just come out of a high-level ministerial meeting when dozens of people came thundering past him shouting about the fire. He was among people pushed out of the venue by Brazilian and United Nations security forces.Tone called time the most precious resource at COP and said he was disappointed it's even shorter due to the fire.“We have to keep up our optimism. There is always tomorrow, if not the remainder of today. But at least we have a full day tomorrow,” Tone told The Associated Press.A few hours before the fire, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres urged countries to compromise and “show willingness and flexibility to deliver results,” even if they fall short of the strongest measures some nations want.“We are down to the wire and the world is watching Belem,” Guterres said, asking negotiators to engage in good faith in the last two scheduled days of talks, which already missed a self-imposed deadline Wednesday for progress on a few key issues. The conference, with this year's edition known as COP30, frequently runs longer than its scheduled two weeks.“Communities on the front lines are watching, too — counting flooded homes, failed harvests, lost livelihoods — and asking, ‘how much more must we suffer?’” Guterres said. "They’ve heard enough excuses and demand results.” On contentious issues involving more detailed plans to phase out fossil fuels and financial aid to poorer countries, Guterres said he was “perfectly convinced” that compromise was possible and dismissed the idea that not adopting the strongest measures would be a failure.Guterres was more forceful in what he wanted rich countries to do for poor countries, especially those in need of tens of billions of dollars to adapt to the floods, droughts, storms and heat waves triggered by worsening climate change. He continued calls to triple adaptation finance from $40 billion a year to $120 billion a year.“No delegation will leave Belem with everything it wants, but every delegation has a duty to reach a balanced deal,” Guterres said.“Every country, especially the big emitters, must do more,” Guterres said.Delivering overall financial aid — with an agreed goal of $300 billion a year — is one of four interconnected issues that were initially excluded from the official agenda. The other three are: whether countries should be told to toughen their new climate plans; dealing with trade barriers over climate and improving reporting on transparency and climate progress.More than 80 countries have pushed for a detailed “road map” on how to transition away from fossil fuels, like coal, oil and natural gas, which are the chief cause of warming. That was a general but vague agreement two years ago at the COP in Dubai. Guterres kept referring to it as already being agreed to in Dubai, but did not commit to a detailed plan, which Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva pushed for earlier in a speech.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.This story was produced as part of the 2025 Climate Change Media Partnership, a journalism fellowship organized by Internews’ Earth Journalism Network and the Stanley Center for Peace and Security.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

Engineered microbes could tackle climate change – if we ensure it’s done safely

Engineering microbes to soak up more carbon, boost crop yields and restore former farmland is appealing. But synthetic biology fixes must be done thoughtfully

Yuji Sakai/GettyAs the climate crisis accelerates, there’s a desperate need to rapidly reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, both by slashing emissions and by pulling carbon out of the air. Synthetic biology has emerged as a particularly promising approach. Despite the name, synthetic biology isn’t about creating new life from scratch. Rather, it uses engineering principles to build new biological components for existing microorganisms such as bacteria, microbes and fungi to make them better at specific tasks. By one recent estimate, synthetic biology could cut more carbon than emitted by all passenger cars ever made – up to 30 billion tonnes – through methods such as boosting crop yields, restoring agricultural land, cutting livestock methane emissions, reducing the need for fertiliser, producing biofuels and engineering microbes to store more carbon. According to some synthetic biologists, this could be a game-changer. But will it prove to be? Technological efforts to “solve” the climate problem often verge on the improbably utopian. There’s a risk in seeing synthetic biology as a silver bullet for environmental problems. A more realistic approach suggests synthetic biology isn’t a magic fix, but does have real potential worth exploring further. Engineering microorganisms is a controversial practice. To make the most of these technologies, researchers will have to ensure it’s done safely and ethically, as my research points out. What potential does synthetic biology have? Earth’s oceans, forests, soils and other natural processes soak up over half of all carbon emitted by burning fossil fuels. Synthetic biology could make these natural sinks even more effective. Some researchers are exploring ways to modify natural enzymes to rapidly convert carbon dioxide gas into carbon in rocks. Perhaps the best known example is the use of precision fermentation to cut methane emissions from livestock. Because methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, these emissions account for roughly 12% of total warming potential from greenhouse emissions. Bioengineered yeasts could absorb up to 98% of these emissions. After being eaten by cattle or other ruminants these yeasts block production of methane before it can be belched out. Synthetic biology could even drastically reduce how much farmland the world needs by producing food more efficiently. Engineered soil microbes can boost crop yields at least by 10–20%, meaning more food from less land. Precision fermentation can be used to produce clean meat and clean milk with much lower emissions than traditional farming. Engineered microbes have the potential to boost crop yields considerably. Collab Media/Unsplash, CC BY-NC-ND If farms produce more on less land, excess farmland can be returned to nature. Wetlands, forests and native grasslands can store much more carbon than farmland, helping tackle climate change. Synthetic biology can be used to modify microbe and algae species to increase their natural ability to store carbon in wetlands and oceans. This approach is known as natural geoengineering. Engineered crops and soil microbes can also lock away much more carbon in the roots of crops or by increasing soil storage capacity. They can also reduce methane emissions from organic matter and tackle pollutants such as fertiliser runoff and heavy metals. Sounds great – what’s the problem? As researchers have pointed out, using this approach will require a rollout at massive scale. At present, much work has been done at smaller scale. These engineered organisms need to be able to go from Petri dishes to industrial bioreactors and then safely into the environment. To scale, these approaches have to be economically viable, well regulated and socially acceptable. That’s easier said than done. First, engineering organisms comes with the serious risk of unintended consequences. If these customised microbes release their stored carbon all at once during a drought or bushfire, it could worsen climate change. It would be very difficult to control these organisms if a problem emerges after their release, such as if an engineered microbe began outcompeting its rivals or if synthetic genes spread beyond the target species and do unintended damage to other species and ecosystems. It will be essential to tackle these issues head on with robust risk management and forward planning. Second, synthetic biology approaches will likely become products. To make these organisms cheaply and gain market share, biotech companies will have an incentive to focus on immediate profits. This could lead companies to downplay actual risks to protect their profit margins. Regulation will be essential here. Third, some worthwhile approaches may not appeal to companies seeking a return on investment. Instead, governments or public institutions may have to develop them to benefit plants, animals and natural habitats, given human existence rests on healthy ecosystems. Which way forward? These issues shouldn’t stop researchers from testing out these technologies. But these risks must be taken into account, as not all risks are equal. Unchecked climate change would be much worse, as it could lead to societal collapse, large-scale climate migration and mass species extinction. Large scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is now essential. In the face of catastrophic risks, it can be ethically justifiable to take the smaller risk of unintended consequences from these organisms. But it’s far less justifiable if these same risks are accepted to secure financial returns for private investors. As time passes and the climate crisis intensifies, these technologies will look more and more appealing. Synthetic biology won’t be the silver bullet many imagine it to be, and it’s unlikely it will be the gold mine many hope for. But the technology has undeniable promise. Used thoughtfully and ethically, it could help us make a healthier planet for all living species. Daniele Fulvi receives funding from the ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, and his current project investigates the ethical dimensions of synthetic biology for climate mitigation. He also received a small grant from the Advanced Engineering Biology Future Science Platform at CSIRO. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Australian Government or the Australian Research Council.

Exclusive-Europe Plans Service to Gauge Climate Change Role in Extreme Weather

By Alison Withers and Kate AbnettCOPENHAGEN (Reuters) -The EU is launching a service to measure the role climate change is playing in extreme...

By Alison Withers and Kate AbnettCOPENHAGEN (Reuters) -The EU is launching a service to measure the role climate change is playing in extreme weather events like heatwaves and extreme rain, and experts say this could help governments set climate policy, improve financial risk assessments and provide evidence for use in lawsuits.Scientists with the EU's Copernicus Climate Change Service told Reuters the service can help governments in weighing the physical risks posed by worsening weather and setting policy in response. "It's the demand of understanding when an extreme event happens, how is this related to climate change?" said the new service's technical lead, Freja Vamborg.The European Commission did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.The service will perform attribution science, which involves running computer simulations of how weather systems might have behaved if people had never started pumping greenhouse gases into the air and then comparing those results with what is happening today.Funded for about 2.5 million euros over three years, Copernicus will publish results by the end of next year and offer two assessments a month - each within a week of an extreme weather event.For the first time, "there will be an attribution office operating constantly," said Carlo Buontempo, director of Copernicus Climate Change Service. "Climate policy is unfortunately again a very polarized topic," said Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London who helped to pioneer the scientific approach but is not involved in the new EU service. She welcomed the service's plans to partner with national weather services of EU members along with the UK Met and the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre."From that point of view, it also helps if the governments do it themselves and just see themselves really the evidence from their own weather services," Otto said. Some independent climate scientists and lawyers cheered the EU move. "We want to have the most information available," said senior attorney Erika Lennon at the non-profit Center for International Environmental Law."The more information we have about attribution science, the easier it will be for the most impacted to be able to successfully bring claims to courts."By calculating probabilities of climate change impacting weather patterns, the approach also helps insurance companies and others in the financial sector.In a way, "they're already using it" with in-house teams calculating probabilities for floods or storms, said environmental scientist Johan Rockstroem with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research."Financial institutions understand risk and risk has to be quantified, and this is one way of quantifying," Rockstroem said.In litigation, attribution science is also being used already in calculating how much a country's or company's emissions may have contributed to climate-fuelled disasters.The International Court of Justice said in July that attribution science is legally viable for linking emissions with climate extremes - but it has yet to fully be tested in court. A German court in May dismissed a Peruvian farmer's lawsuit against German utility RWE for emissions-driven warming causing Andean glaciers to thaw. The case had used attribution science in calculating the damage claim, but the court said the claim amount was too low to take the case forward.So "the court never got to discussing attribution science in detail and going into whether the climate models are good enough, and all of these complex and thorny questions," said Noah Walker-Crawford, a climate litigation researcher at the London School of Economics. (Reporting by Ali Withers in Copenhagen and Kate Abnett in Belem, Brazil; Writing by Katy Daigle; Editing by David Gregorio)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

Billionaire hedge fund founder Tom Steyer is running for governor

Billionaire hedge fund founder, climate change warrior and major Democratic donor Tom Steyer is running for governor. Fossil fuel and migrant detention facility investments will likely draw attacks from his fellow Democrats.

Billionaire hedge fund founder Tom Steyer announced Wednesday that he is running for governor of California, arguing that he is not beholden to special interests and can take on corporations that are making life unaffordable in the state.“The richest people in America think that they earned everything themselves. Bulls—, man. That’s so ridiculous,” Steyer said in an online video announcing his campaign. “We have a broken government. It’s been bought by corporations and my question is: Who do you think is going to change that? Sacramento politicians are afraid to change up this system. I’m not. They’re going to hate this. Bring it on.” Protesters hold placards and banners during a rally against Whitehaven Coal in Sydney in 2014. Dozens of protesters and activists gathered downtown to protest against the controversial massive Maules Creek coal mine project in northern New South Wales. (Saeed Khan / AFP/Getty Images) Steyer, 68, founded Farallon Capital Management, one of the nation’s largest hedge funds, and left it in 2012 after 26 years. Since his departure, he has become a global environmental activist and a major donor to Democratic candidates and causes. But the hedge firm’s investments — notably a giant coal mine in Australia that cleared 3,700 acres of koala habitat and a company that runs migrant detention centers on the U.S.-Mexico border for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — will make him susceptible to political attack by his gubernatorial rivals. Steyer has expressed regret for his involvement in such projects, saying it was why he left Farallon and started focusing his energy on fighting climate change. Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer addresses a crowd during a presidential primary election-night party in Columbia, S.C. (Sean Rayford / Getty Images) Steyer previously flirted with running for governor and the U.S. Senate but decided against it, instead opting to run for president in 2020. He dropped out after spending nearly $342 million on his campaign, which gained little traction before he ended his run after the South Carolina primary.Next year’s gubernatorial race is in flux, after former Vice President Kamala Harris and Sen. Alex Padilla decided not to run and Proposition 50, the successful Democratic effort to redraw congressional districts, consumed all of the political oxygen during an off-year election.Most voters are undecided about who they would like to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom, who cannot run for reelection because of term limits, according to a poll released this month by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies and co-sponsored by The Times. Steyer had the support of 1% of voters in the survey. In recent years, Steyer has been a longtime benefactor of progressive causes, most recently spending $12 million to support the redistricting ballot measure. But when he was the focus of one of the ads, rumors spiraled that he was considering a run for governor.In prior California ballot initiatives, Steyer successfully supported efforts to close a corporate tax loophole and to raise tobacco taxes, and fought oil-industry-backed efforts to roll back environmental law.His campaign platform is to build 1 million homes in four years, lower energy costs by ending monopolies, make preschool and community college free and ban corporate contributions to political action committees in California elections.Steyer’s brother Jim, the leader of Common Sense Media, and former Biden administration U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy are aiming to put an initiative on next year’s ballot to protect children from social media, specifically the chatbots that have been accused of prompting young people to kill themselves. Newsom recently vetoed a bill aimed at addressing this artificial intelligence issue.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.