Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Exercising to lose weight? Here's why the results may backfire

News Feed
Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Obesity afflicts many people, with a study published earlier this year in the medical journal The Lancet showing that more than 1 billion people — or roughly one out of eight people alive today — struggles with the condition. Along with the social stigma associated with being “fat,” obesity comes with a heightened risk for a wide range of health issues including heart attacks, diabetes, strokes, fatty liver diseases, metabolic disorders, sleep apnea and various types of cancer. Conventional wisdom dictates that, for these people to lose weight, they need to eat better and exercise more. Yet a recent study in the journal Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise found that at least part of this equation doesn't help as much as conventional wisdom would suggest. In fact, this research found people who vigorously exercise usually experience a drop in body temperature and non-exercise physical activity (NEPA). As a result, they wind up gaining weight. “Exercise has many beneficial effects on the body and mind, but weight loss is often less effective than expected,” study co-author Dr. Takashi Matsui, who teaches at the University of Tsukuba’s Institute of Health and Sport Sciences, told Salon. “This is assumed to be due to a decrease in post-exercise physical activity and heat production, which may be maintained or reduced by total daily energy expenditure. However, it was not known under what conditions and through what physiological mechanisms the post-exercise decrease in physical activity occurs.” In their new study, Matsui and his team examined the effects of post-exercise physical activity to determine whether exercise leads to weight loss. Importantly, they were able to control for factors like genetics and environmental and social factors. “The results revealed for the first time that a single bout of not-so-moderate, strenuous exercise leads to a decrease in physical activity and body temperature, which in turn leads to an increase in body weight,” Matsui said. “We also learned for the first time that part of the mechanism is a disruption of the circadian rhythm of corticosterone, the stress hormone that produces our well-rounded lives.” "Exercise has many beneficial effects on the body and mind, but weight loss is often less effective than expected" Unfortunately for those who try to lose weight, Matsui observed that they often strenuously work out in a desire "reap the benefits of exercise" and "lose weight through exercise." Because of these misleading cultural drives, “sudden intense exercise may have the opposite effect of people's desire to benefit from exercise and to exercise and lose weight. Additionally, although different from this study, strenuous exercise is also known to carry risks of injury and weakening of the immune system.” Dr. Nicole Avena, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Mount Sinai Medical School and visiting professor of health psychology at Princeton University, was not involved in the study. Speaking with Salon, Avena praised the researcher’s conclusions, although she emphasized that exercise is still healthy and should therefore be encouraged. “Intentional exercise is great for our cardiovascular, muscular and hormonal health overall,” Avena said. “Currently, the recommendation stands at 30 minutes of moderate physical activity per day to see benefits like these. With regular exercise you can expect less mood swings, more energy and better sleep — which may not be known to some!” This does not mean that Avena does not see downsides to exercising, at least when it is done excessively. Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes. “Overexercising can be problematic — and cause health issues including malnutrition, fatigue and injury,” Avena said. “Sticking with moderate intensity should not cause any of the unwanted side effects when paired with proper nutrition.” Matsui also presented a balanced view of exercise. He described its "many beneficial effects on the body and mind,” urging readers to instead do it in moderation so that they do not burn out. “The ‘tiredness’ and ‘hopelessness’ that accompany these phenomena may prevent us from doing the really important"moderate exercise habitually,” Matsui said. “This can be understood as a defensive reaction as animals.” If a human in the wild was attacked and had to fight to escape with their life, he or she would then respond like most other animals — hunkering down and resting so they can recover. "It is easy to imagine that these behaviors and physiological responses helped preserve the individual and the species, i.e., the baton of life,” Matsui said. “However, this response can be counterproductive in modern society. What we have learned in this study is that it is not caused solely by a psychological’"tiredness,’ but is accompanied by a disturbance in a distinct physiological response: the circadian rhythm of the stress response.” As a result, Matsui suggests that people struggling with obesity focus not on losing weight, but on developing a regimen of regular moderate amounts of exercise. “Make exercise a habit by performing moderate exercise that you want to continue the next day,” Matsui said. “What is really important, of course, is consistency.” For her part, Avena hopes that studies like this one will get people to start thinking of exercise not in terms of beating obesity, which often isn’t possible, but rather simply so they can lead happier and healthier lives. “I think it's important to emphasize the health benefits of exercise outside of weight,” Avena said. “Exercise is good for our mental, physical and emotional wellbeing!”

Although exercise has benefits other than weight loss, recent research suggests it may instead cause weight gain

Obesity afflicts many people, with a study published earlier this year in the medical journal The Lancet showing that more than 1 billion people — or roughly one out of eight people alive today — struggles with the condition. Along with the social stigma associated with being “fat,” obesity comes with a heightened risk for a wide range of health issues including heart attacks, diabetes, strokes, fatty liver diseases, metabolic disorders, sleep apnea and various types of cancer.

Conventional wisdom dictates that, for these people to lose weight, they need to eat better and exercise more. Yet a recent study in the journal Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise found that at least part of this equation doesn't help as much as conventional wisdom would suggest. In fact, this research found people who vigorously exercise usually experience a drop in body temperature and non-exercise physical activity (NEPA). As a result, they wind up gaining weight.

“Exercise has many beneficial effects on the body and mind, but weight loss is often less effective than expected,” study co-author Dr. Takashi Matsui, who teaches at the University of Tsukuba’s Institute of Health and Sport Sciences, told Salon. “This is assumed to be due to a decrease in post-exercise physical activity and heat production, which may be maintained or reduced by total daily energy expenditure. However, it was not known under what conditions and through what physiological mechanisms the post-exercise decrease in physical activity occurs.”

In their new study, Matsui and his team examined the effects of post-exercise physical activity to determine whether exercise leads to weight loss. Importantly, they were able to control for factors like genetics and environmental and social factors.

“The results revealed for the first time that a single bout of not-so-moderate, strenuous exercise leads to a decrease in physical activity and body temperature, which in turn leads to an increase in body weight,” Matsui said. “We also learned for the first time that part of the mechanism is a disruption of the circadian rhythm of corticosterone, the stress hormone that produces our well-rounded lives.”

"Exercise has many beneficial effects on the body and mind, but weight loss is often less effective than expected"

Unfortunately for those who try to lose weight, Matsui observed that they often strenuously work out in a desire "reap the benefits of exercise" and "lose weight through exercise." Because of these misleading cultural drives, “sudden intense exercise may have the opposite effect of people's desire to benefit from exercise and to exercise and lose weight. Additionally, although different from this study, strenuous exercise is also known to carry risks of injury and weakening of the immune system.”

Dr. Nicole Avena, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Mount Sinai Medical School and visiting professor of health psychology at Princeton University, was not involved in the study. Speaking with Salon, Avena praised the researcher’s conclusions, although she emphasized that exercise is still healthy and should therefore be encouraged.

“Intentional exercise is great for our cardiovascular, muscular and hormonal health overall,” Avena said. “Currently, the recommendation stands at 30 minutes of moderate physical activity per day to see benefits like these. With regular exercise you can expect less mood swings, more energy and better sleep — which may not be known to some!”

This does not mean that Avena does not see downsides to exercising, at least when it is done excessively.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“Overexercising can be problematic — and cause health issues including malnutrition, fatigue and injury,” Avena said. “Sticking with moderate intensity should not cause any of the unwanted side effects when paired with proper nutrition.”

Matsui also presented a balanced view of exercise. He described its "many beneficial effects on the body and mind,” urging readers to instead do it in moderation so that they do not burn out.

“The ‘tiredness’ and ‘hopelessness’ that accompany these phenomena may prevent us from doing the really important"moderate exercise habitually,” Matsui said. “This can be understood as a defensive reaction as animals.”

If a human in the wild was attacked and had to fight to escape with their life, he or she would then respond like most other animals — hunkering down and resting so they can recover.

"It is easy to imagine that these behaviors and physiological responses helped preserve the individual and the species, i.e., the baton of life,” Matsui said. “However, this response can be counterproductive in modern society. What we have learned in this study is that it is not caused solely by a psychological’"tiredness,’ but is accompanied by a disturbance in a distinct physiological response: the circadian rhythm of the stress response.”

As a result, Matsui suggests that people struggling with obesity focus not on losing weight, but on developing a regimen of regular moderate amounts of exercise.

“Make exercise a habit by performing moderate exercise that you want to continue the next day,” Matsui said. “What is really important, of course, is consistency.”

For her part, Avena hopes that studies like this one will get people to start thinking of exercise not in terms of beating obesity, which often isn’t possible, but rather simply so they can lead happier and healthier lives.

“I think it's important to emphasize the health benefits of exercise outside of weight,” Avena said. “Exercise is good for our mental, physical and emotional wellbeing!”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Scientists Find Brain Circuit That Locks Alcohol Users in Addiction Cycle

Researchers at Scripps Research have shown in an animal model that the brain learns to pursue alcohol as a way to find relief, rather than only for its rewarding effects. What drives a person to keep drinking alcohol despite the harm it causes to their health, relationships, and overall well-being? New research from Scripps Research [...]

Scientists have pinpointed a hidden brain circuit that may explain why withdrawal drives people back to alcohol. Credit: ShutterstockResearchers at Scripps Research have shown in an animal model that the brain learns to pursue alcohol as a way to find relief, rather than only for its rewarding effects. What drives a person to keep drinking alcohol despite the harm it causes to their health, relationships, and overall well-being? New research from Scripps Research points to a possible answer: a small midline brain region helps shape how animals learn to drink in order to relieve the stress and discomfort of withdrawal. In a study recently published in Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science, the Scripps Research team examined brain activity in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) in rats. They discovered that when rats linked environmental cues with alcohol’s ability to ease withdrawal symptoms, activity in this brain region increased, reinforcing relapse behaviors. By uncovering this pathway, the study highlights one of addiction’s most persistent aspects—using alcohol not for enjoyment but to avoid suffering—and may pave the way for new therapies for substance use disorders (SUDs) and related conditions such as anxiety. “What makes addiction so hard to break is that people aren’t simply chasing a high,” says Friedbert Weiss, professor of neuroscience at Scripps Research and senior author of the study. “They’re also trying to get rid of powerful negative states, like the stress and anxiety of withdrawal. This work shows us which brain systems are responsible for locking in that kind of learning, and why it can make relapse so persistent.” “This brain region just lit up in every rat that had gone through withdrawal-related learning,” says co-senior author Hermina Nedelescu of Scripps Research. “It shows us which circuits are recruited when the brain links alcohol with relief from stress—and that could be a game-changer in how we think about relapse.” From behavior to brain maps About 14.5 million people in the United States are estimated to have alcohol use disorder, a condition that includes a spectrum of harmful drinking behaviors. Similar to other forms of substance addiction, it is marked by recurring cycles of withdrawal, abstinence, and relapse. In 2022, researchers Weiss and Nedelescu investigated these processes in rats to better understand how learning shapes addiction in the brain. At the outset, the animals linked alcohol with pleasurable effects and were motivated to drink more. But as they went through repeated periods of withdrawal and relapse, the drive to drink became much stronger. Once the rats learned that alcohol could relieve the distress of withdrawal—an example of negative reinforcement, or the easing of a “negative hedonic state”—they pursued alcohol more intensely and continued seeking it even in challenging conditions. “When rats learn to associate environmental stimuli or contexts with the experience of relief, they end up with an incredibly powerful urge to seek alcohol in the presence of that stimuli –even if conditions are introduced that require great effort to engage in alcohol seeking,” says Weiss. “That is, these rats seek alcohol even if that behavior is punished.” In this study, the researchers set out to identify the specific networks of brain cells that drive the learning process in which environmental cues become linked to the relief of a negative hedonic state. Using advanced whole-brain imaging in rats, they analyzed cellular activity to determine which regions became more responsive to alcohol-associated cues. Four groups of rats were compared: one group that had experienced withdrawal and learned that alcohol reduced a negative hedonic state, and three separate control groups that had not developed this association. Although multiple brain regions showed heightened activity in the withdrawal-experienced group, one region in particular stood out: the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT), a structure already recognized for its involvement in stress and anxiety. “In retrospect, this makes a lot of sense,” says Nedelescu. “The unpleasant effects of alcohol withdrawal are strongly associated with stress, and alcohol is providing relief from the agony of that stressful state.” The researchers hypothesize that this negative hedonic state, and the activation of the PVT in the brain as a response, is critical for how the brain learns and perpetuates addiction. A better understanding of addiction The implications of the new study extend well beyond alcohol, the researchers say. Environmental stimuli conditioned to negative reinforcement—the drive to act in order to escape pain or stress—is a universal feature of the brain, and can drive human behavior beyond substance use disorders such as anxiety disorders, fear-conditioning and traumatic avoidance learning. “This work has potential applications not only for alcohol addiction, but also other disorders where people get trapped in harmful cycles,” says Nedelescu. Future research will zoom in even further. Nedelescu and colleagues at Scripps Research want to expand the study to females and to study neurochemicals released in the PVT when subjects encounter environments associated with the experience of this relief from a negative hedonic state. If they can pinpoint molecules that are involved, it could open new avenues for drug development by targeting those molecules. For now, the new study underscores a key shift in how basic scientists think about addiction. “As psychologists, we’ve long known that addiction isn’t just about chasing pleasure—it’s about escaping those negative hedonic states,” says Weiss. “This study shows us where in the brain that learning takes root, which is a step forward.” Reference: “Recruitment of Neuronal Populations in the Paraventricular Thalamus of Alcohol-Seeking Rats With Withdrawal-Related Learning Experience” by Hermina Nedelescu, Elias Meamari, Nami Rajaei, Alexus Grey, Ryan Bullard, Nathan O’Connor, Nobuyoshi Suto and Friedbert Weiss, 5 August 2025, Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science.DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100578 This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award T32AA007456, K01 DA054449, R01 AA027555, and R01 AA023183). Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.

This Invasive Vampire Fish Is Helping Researchers Understand the Human Nervous System in Jaw-Dropping Ways

The sea lamprey looks like it’s from another planet, but this ancient creature has a surprising amount in common with humans

This Invasive Vampire Fish Is Helping Researchers Understand the Human Nervous System in Jaw-Dropping Ways The sea lamprey looks like it’s from another planet, but this ancient creature has a surprising amount in common with humans A sea lamprey shows off its nightmarish mouth. NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory via Wikimedia Commons under CC By-SA 2.0 Key takeaways: Sea lampreys and research Sea lampreys have large neurons and synapses, making them ideal for neuroscience research. Scientists study the creatures to learn more about how we might recover from spinal cord injuries. With a suction-cup mouth and over 100 teeth, the sea lamprey has earned the nickname "vampire fish" and comparisons to sea monsters. Sea lampreys are one of the world’s most ancient fish species, killing prey by latching their suction-cup mouth onto a fish's skin and rasping away the fish's flesh with a rough tongue to feed on blood and bodily fluids. Sea lampreys sound like something from a horror movie, but the creatures have been crucial to almost two centuries of neuroscience research. Neuroscientists study sea lamprey spinal cells, which the animals can regenerate if their spinal cord is damaged, as a model to understand the human nervous system, spinal cord injuries and neurological disease. The evolution of human brains and nervous systems is also closely tied to these alien-like creatures. Neurologists and zoologists began studying lampreys in the 1830s, examining their nerve cells to understand how the spinal cord works. Lamprey research took off after 1959, when biologists first described lampreys’ ability to regenerate spinal cord neurons and eventually swim after spinal damage. Sea lampreys are ideal for neuroscientists to work with because the animals have large nerve cells and synapses, making observation easier than in other species. “The synapses are so big that you can see them, and you can record from them and access them very easily,” says Jennifer Morgan, neuroscientist at the University of Chicago’s Marine Biological Laboratory. The creatures also have a similar molecular and genetic toolkit to humans, she says, which can make it simpler to translate research from lampreys to humans and find tools that work in both species. Lampreys thrive in different types of water, all over the globe. “[Lampreys] have been found on every continent except for Antarctica,” says Morgan, whose lab uses sea lampreys for research. “So, they’re very hearty animals and super easy to maintain.” The sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) filter feeds as a larva but becomes parasitic once it reaches adulthood, latching onto fish and feeding on their blood. They can feed on trout, salmon and other large, commercially important fish, and one sea lamprey can destroy up to 40 pounds of fish per year. Much of the supply of sea lampreys for research comes from the Great Lakes, where lampreys wreak havoc on the fishing industry. Although the species is native to the Atlantic Ocean, improvements in the late 1800s and early 1900s to canals connecting Lake Ontario and Lake Erie to the ocean enabled lampreys to bypass Niagara Falls, which had previously been a natural barrier. From there, lampreys invaded the lakes, where they have no natural predators. By the 1960s, lampreys had devastated trout fisheries in the region and a control program began to weed them out using pesticides. Sea lampreys’ invasion of the Great Lakes has actually boosted their use in research. Over the last century, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission has directed considerable amounts of research funding toward lampreys, to study their life cycle and how to eradicate them. This put more lampreys in labs, resulting in studies on other aspects of their anatomy and evolution. Collectors catch wild lampreys in the Great Lakes, says Morgan, and send them to the lab in coolers. “Great Lakes fisheries harvested these lampreys, and they wanted scientists to understand them more,” says Robb Krumlauf, developmental biologist and scientific director emeritus at the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, who also researches lampreys sent from the Great Lakes. “They had a natural supply that they could give to those who are interested in the research.” Although lampreys look like they’re from another planet, they have more in common with us than it might seem. Lampreys branched off from other vertebrates about 500 million years ago, so they have some of the oldest traits in the lineage: they’re at the base of the vertebrate branch of the evolutionary tree. Because of this, studying lampreys’ genomes can clarify important evolutionary steps in the lineage—like when vertebrates developed jaws, or arms and legs. Sea lampreys survived multiple mass extinction events, including the asteroid 66 million years ago that wiped out roughly 80 percent of life on Earth. “It’s a chance to have a glimpse of the past. It’s sort of like a living fossil,” says Krumlauf. Krumlauf studies how sea lamprey evolution and human evolution are related through how our faces and heads develop. The brain region that shapes facial and cranial features is similar across vertebrates, from lampreys to chickens to mice to zebrafish, even though all these animals’ heads look quite different. “There’s a common toolkit,” says Krumlauf. “If you have building materials, and they’re all the same, you can build a garden shed or you can build a mansion––what’s different is the way the blueprint is put together.” Studying lampreys shows how these blueprints evolved in the earliest vertebrates, says Krumlauf. His research links facial and head development in the animals to the development of craniofacial abnormalities in humans. The evolutionary history of lampreys and other vertebrates also helps scientists like Yi-Rong Peng, ophthalmologist and neurobiologist at UCLA, illuminate the evolution of vision. Peng’s research has found lamprey retinal cells are similar to those of other vertebrates, such as mice, chickens and zebrafish. Such a finding suggests retinal vision, like humans have, evolved early in the vertebrate lineage. Studying the overlaps between animal retinas gives a window into how vertebrates saw the world 500 million years ago. And understanding how the retina first formed in humans can help Peng’s research team study retinal cell degeneration that leads to blindness. Morgan’s lab studies how sea lampreys regenerate spinal cords, and its work could lead to advances that help humans recover from spinal damage. When researchers cut a sea lamprey’s spinal cord, it becomes paralyzed but can regenerate nerve connections. The process does not have to be perfect to work, adds Purdue University science historian Kathryn Maxson Jones. Lampreys’ original neuron connections don’t reform in the same way, but cells grow in flexible ways to compensate for damage––biology can take different routes to achieve the goal of a spinal cord that works again. And the large size of lampreys’ cells and synapses enable the research team to closely examine the whole process. A microscopic view of a sea lamprey’s reconnected spinal cord shows how it healed after being cut. Daniel Cojanu, Under Current Productions Sea lampreys are also crucial to Morgan’s research on Parkinson’s disease. A specific protein’s accumulation in the brain is linked to the progression of the disease, so injecting that protein into lamprey synapses allows the researchers to observe how it affects the nervous system. This gives insight into how the disease progresses in the human nervous system and how exactly neurons can recover. Scientists observe how damaged lamprey neurons regenerate and how many synaptic connections are restored, guiding how to target treatment in human brains. Morgan’s research team hopes to move from understanding nervous system damage in lampreys and humans to how to fix it. When you cut your finger and the area becomes numb, that’s because of damage to the nerve endings in the finger, which is part of your peripheral nervous system, explains Morgan. But you do eventually get feeling back, because humans can regenerate cells in the peripheral nervous system––just not in our central nervous system. But lampreys can. “When lampreys regenerate the spinal cord and recover function, they are using a lot of the same changes in gene expression that occur during regeneration of the peripheral nervous system in mammals,” says Morgan. “Why we can’t do that in our spinal cord is a big question. But I think learning from the adaptations of these animals, that can do these really neat feats of nature like regeneration, will tell you something about the recipe that needs to happen, the conditions that need to be met,” adds Morgan. And the parallels between lampreys’ brain features and ours make crucial research possible when studying human brains isn’t an option. “It often points us in the direction of things we would’ve never looked at in humans,” says Krumlauf. Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Will Portland weaken its policy to phase out diesel, replace it with biofuels?

Portland’s Renewable Fuels Standards Advisory Committee is poised to recommend delaying the phase-out -- but the decision on how to move ahead will be made by city leaders.

Portland leaders may soon weigh whether to roll back parts of the city’s signature climate policy on replacing diesel with renewable fuels, a first-in-the-nation standard critical to reducing emissions and harmful particulate matter pollution. The policy, adopted by the City Council in 2022 and aimed at medium and heavy trucks, phases out the sale of petroleum diesel by 2030, gradually replacing it with diesel blended with renewable fuels at increasingly higher increments.Council members had hailed the diesel phase-out as a tool to reduce pollution in low-income neighborhoods often located near freeways with high concentrations of diesel emissions. As part of the policy, a 15% blend requirement began in 2024, a 50% blend will be required by 2026 and a 99% blend by 2030. Medium and heavy trucks affected by the policy include delivery trucks, school and transit buses, dump trucks, tractor trailers and cement mixers. But Portland’s Renewable Fuels Standards Advisory Committee is poised to recommend weakening the phase-out. The committee was established in July 2023 to advise the city Bureau of Planning and Sustainability director on technical and economic issues related to the renewable fuel supply as well as meeting the policy’s fuel requirements. A draft memo, made public in advance of the committee’s meeting this week, shows the committee is planning to ask the city to reduce the 2026 biofuel percentage requirement from 50% to 20% and delay implementation until 2028 or 2030. The memo was obtained by the Braided River Campaign, a Portland nonprofit that advocates for a green working waterfront, and shared with The Oregonian/OregonLive. The proposed rollback essentially would allow trucks to continue to emit black carbon or “soot” at a higher level and for longer than under the original plan.The draft also recommends pausing for at least two years strict restrictions on the type of feedstock used to make renewable fuels – a standard that three years ago was hailed as the most innovative, emission-reducing part of Portland’s diesel phase-out. The pause would allow retailers to fall back on using biofuels made from feedstocks such as soybean, canola and palm oils which have been linked to much higher carbon emissions, displacing food production and causing deforestation. The draft memo, addressed to Planning and Sustainability’s Director Eric Engstrom, says the changes would respond to unfavorable biodiesel and renewable diesel market conditions in Oregon and Portland, including the scarcity of low-carbon intensity feedstocks such as used cooking oil and animal tallow.It’s unclear who will decide on the future of the diesel phase-out. While Engstrom has sole discretion to make changes to the program’s rules, the City Council holds the authority to amend city code. Engstrom did not immediately comment on whether the recommended changes would require rule or code changes. Portland officials have said they are fully committed to electrification of trucks but that transition will take many years. Moving from diesel to biofuels is an interim step, they said, allowing for faster emission and particulate matter reductions. The committee’ draft recommendation comes as Portland leaders are debating the future of the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub, a 6-mile stretch on the northwest bank of the Willamette River where most of Oregon’s fuel supply is stored. Zenith Energy, which operates a terminal at the hub that has drawn environmental opposition, has promised the city to convert from fossil fuel loading and storage to renewable fuels. Other companies at the hub are also eyeing renewable fuels as a new income stream. Earlier this week, the city unveiled four alternatives for the hub, one of which allows for unlimited renewable fuel expansion. Environmental advocates said the committee’s recommendations are unacceptable and would gut the renewable fuel policy’s environmental credibility.“This is a complete walk-back of a promise made to Portlanders,” said Marnie Glickman, Braided River Campaign’s executive director. “The city sold this policy on the promise of a rapid decline in carbon pollution. Now, before the strongest rules even take effect, the industry-dominated advisory board is asking for a hall pass to continue using the cheapest, dirtiest biofuels.” The committee is set to refine the memo at its meeting on Thursday and may vote on the recommendation. It must submit the final recommendation to Engstrom by mid-October. Biofuel cost is one of the major reasons the committee cites for the recommended changes. “If the RFS (renewable fuel standard) is left unchanged, the cost of the diesel fuel in Portland could get significantly higher in the City of Portland compared to the rest of the state of Oregon due to the combined higher requirement of renewable content and lower carbon intensity,” the memo said. The draft memo also says Portland’s program has trouble competing with other regional markets such as California for scarce low-carbon intensity biofuels. It also mentions Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill excluding feedstocks supplied from countries outside North America from tax incentives – which is likely to further reduce the supply of low-carbon feedstocks. Glickman said she’s also concerned about the committee’s potential conflict of interest when making recommendations to the sustainability director – a fact the draft memo acknowledges. Six of the seven members of the advisory committee are representatives of fuel producers and suppliers – including bpAmerica, Phillips 66 and the Western States Petroleum Association. The committee’s only non-industry member – Andrew Dyke, a senior economist at ECOnorthwest – declined to comment on the draft memo. In 2006, Portland became the first city in the U.S. to adopt a renewable fuel standard, which required the city’s fuel retailers to sell a minimum blend of 5% biodiesel. The city updated the policy in 2022 to a full diesel phase-out. The current policy far exceeds the federal and state renewable fuel standards.If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Salmon farmer accused of blocking UK investigations into alleged animal rights breaches

Faroese firm Bakkafrost wants to ban campaigner Don Staniford from going within 15 metres of its fish farmsOne of Europe’s largest salmon farmers has been accused of attacking the civil rights of environmental campaigners by asking for sweeping restrictions on their freedom to investigate alleged animal rights breaches.The Faroese company Bakkafrost, which produces about 20% of the UK’s farmed salmon, has asked a judge to consider banning the campaigner Don Staniford from going within 15 metres of any of its fish farms, boats and barges. Continue reading...

One of Europe’s largest salmon farmers has been accused of attacking the civil rights of environmental campaigners by asking for sweeping restrictions on their freedom to investigate alleged animal rights breaches.The Faroese company Bakkafrost, which produces about 20% of the UK’s farmed salmon, has asked a judge to consider banning the campaigner Don Staniford from going within 15 metres of any of its fish farms, boats and barges.The company is seeking an interdict, or injunction, that would extend to anyone acting with Staniford, or guided by him, from approaching, entering or boarding any of Bakkafrost’s more than 200 salmon farms, ships, factories, docks, hatcheries and offices – including its head office in Edinburgh.Don Staniford has documented conditions in Scottish salmon farms. Civil rights groups argue that Bakkafrost’s legal action amounts to an attempt to shut down legitimate investigations in the public interest, using a tactic known as a strategic lawsuits against public participation, or Slapp.Staniford, one of the UK’s most prominent fish farm campaigners, has already been ordered to stay away from fish farms and land bases in Scotland owned by the Norwegian multinational Mowi and by Scottish Sea Farms.Staniford, who is based in north-west England and known to his supporters as the “kayak vigilante”, boards salmon farms to look for any evidence of disease or parasite infestations on fish, or any evidence of illegal chemical discharges, at times with documentary film-makers and journalists.All three firms say they uphold the highest legal and welfare standards on their farms.Bakkafrost’s legal action, being heard at Dunoon sheriff court near Glasgow, is trying to establish an even broader restriction than its competitors by asking for the 15-metre exclusion zone around all its assets. Breaching that interdict would be a contempt of court, exposing campaigners to the risk of imprisonment.Mowi tried and failed to impose a similar exclusion area against Staniford but that restriction was thrown out on appeal. Staniford said Mowi is pursuing him for £123,000 in court costs and legal costs – a bill he is unable to pay.Nik Williams, a policy officer with the Index on Censorship and a co-chair of the UK Anti-Slapp coalition, said sweeping bans of this kind, particularly if the interdict appeared to include anyone associated with Staniford, had a chilling effect on public debate.He said: “Anywhere there are legal constraints like this, people will step back scrutinising these incredibly influential industries”, adding it was “quite concerning” that Bakkafrost was seeking a 15-metre exclusion area despite knowing that Mowi’s application to do so had failed.Bakkafrost wants its “extended interdict” to include Staniford “by himself or by his agents, employees, or servants, or by anyone acting on his behalf or under his instructions, or procurement”.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionIn the first day of the hearing, Staniford’s lawyer, Nicole Hogg, told the sheriff, Laura Mundell, the judge presiding over the case, that Bakkafrost wanted sweeping restrictions on him without specifying why they were needed.She said it had failed to produce evidence that it owned or leased the land-based properties it wanted to protect, or why an exclusion zone was necessary at sea. “It is not sufficiently precise,” she told Mundell.Ruairidh Leishman, acting for Bakkafrost, said the 15-metre zone was useful because it set a precise boundary for the court, but it was asking for it to be imposed only if the judge believed it necessary.He said the case it had against Staniford would be disclosed at a later hearing, but this was not an attack on his freedom of expression.Even though Staniford had voluntarily agreed not to enter its properties in December 2024 while its application was being heard, he had continued to make highly critical comments about Bakkafrost. “This a case about property rights and not freedom of expression,” Leishman told the court.The case is due to continue at a later date.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.