Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

3 political newcomers vie to represent Portland’s west side in Oregon House

News Feed
Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Three political newcomers are vying to represent Portland’s west side in the Oregon House, a seat currently held by Rep. Maxine Dexter, who is running for Congress.Doctor Bryan Duty, environmental lawyer Peter Grabiel and health care clinic CEO Shannon Isadore will face off in the May 21 Democratic primary for House District 33, which includes downtown and much of Northwest Portland. Whoever wins the primary is expected to coast to victory in November, as registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans more than seven-to-one in the district.Each candidate has received an endorsement from a previous Oregon governor, but Duty has raised about $96,000, nearly double what his competitors have received combined. The state’s most powerful public employee unions have also weighed in on the race, splitting their endorsements between Duty and Isadore.Duty, a urology professor and surgeon at Oregon Health & Sciences University, said his top priorities in the Legislature would be boosting the capacity of Oregon hospitals, expanding behavioral health services and increasing health care workforce retention. He said his medical expertise would make him a strong choice for the Behavioral Health and Health Care Committee.Duty has received endorsements from former Gov. John Kitzhaber, Metro President Lynn Peterson, the Oregon League of Conservation Voters and several unions, including the Oregon chapters of the Service Employees International Union. He has raised more than $96,000, including $10,000 from former Nike CEO Mark Parker and his wife and $10,000 from the wife of former top Nike advisor and negotiator Howard Slusher, campaign finance records show. He has also donated $11,700 to his own campaign.“If elected, I will alleviate our health care system’s strain by increasing hospital capacity, enhancing medical training, retaining the best health professionals and addressing the shortfall in health service investments,” Duty wrote in response to an Oregonian/OregonLive questionnaire.Grabiel, a lawyer who has advocated for major international efforts to curb the effects of climate change, said his top priorities would be enacting environmental legislation and addressing Oregon’s public defender shortage. Grabiel spent several years negotiating climate policy for the United Nations as a senior lawyer for the African Union, according to his LinkedIn profile. He was part of a team that negotiated the 2016 Kigali Amendment, an international agreement to reduce the use of certain greenhouse gasses commonly used in air conditioners and refrigerators.If elected, Grabiel would be the first Latino to hold the District 33 seat, according to his campaign website. Grabiel has received endorsements from the Portland Metro Chamber, former Gov. Barbara Roberts and international climate expert Durwood Zaelke. He has raised about $34,000, including a $10,000 loan he made to his campaign, campaign finance records show.“I am the only candidate who has built a broad-based coalition to achieve a significant policy goal — which I did at the United Nations over a nine year period culminating in the adoption of a landmark international climate change law [in 2016],” Grabiel wrote. “I also know how to draft legislation that accomplishes a chosen policy goal, as I have done throughout my career as an environmental lawyer.”Environmental lawyer Peter Grabiel is vying to represent Portland's west side in the Oregon House. He said his top priorities in office would be enacting environmental legislation and addressing Oregon’s public defender shortage.Pete Grabiel campaignIsadore, a U.S. Marine veteran and founder of the Oregon Change Clinic, a culturally specific behavioral health clinic, said her focus in the Legislature would be creating affordable housing, supporting behavioral health initiatives and addressing Portland’s downtown office vacancies. If elected, Isadore would become the only Black woman serving in the Legislature with the departure of Rep. Janelle Bynum, D-Happy Valley, who is running for Congress.She is endorsed by former Gov. Kate Brown, five Democratic lawmakers from the Portland area and several unions, including the statewide teachers union and the Oregon chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Isadore has raised about $15,000, including a $5,000 contribution from the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association’s political action committee.“I know what it takes to provide culturally specific behavioral health and substance use disorder services to BIPOC people and veterans,” Isadore wrote. “Oregon taxpayers are investing $211 million in treatment and recovery. They deserve the expertise of a treatment provider with the financial background I have to ensure it’s well spent.”Housing, tolling, climate changeEach of the candidates said they would take steps to ensure that the $376 million housing and homelessness package approved by the Legislature earlier this year would be effectively carried out. However, they outlined different steps they would take to build on the package’s major initiatives.Isadore said she would ensure that the state’s housing and development-focused agencies have sufficient money and resources to help cities promote development and ensure that cities use their state dollars effectively. She also said “we need to streamline the siting of recovery housing to hold local jurisdictions accountable for building the entire continuum of housing.”Duty said he would prioritize making sure housing development dollars lead to new housing quickly. “If we do not see a substantial increase in affordable units,” he said, “we should revisit subsidies and incentives to further reduce the cost of development.”Grabiel said he would promote dense urban growth instead of sprawl and support legislation that reduces the amount of regulatory red tape that slows down housing development. He said he would also support the creation of large shelters to reduce unregulated camping in Portland.Lawmakers next year plan to take up a major transportation package to help maintain and build roads and necessary infrastructure. The three candidates said they wouldn’t support road tolling in their district to fund roads because it puts too high of a financial burden on working class and low-income individuals. Grabiel, however, did say he would support a toll on Vancouver residents who drive into Portland because they “pay far less taxes than Portlanders do to maintain our shared metropolis.”The three candidates also said they support the Department of Environmental Quality reestablishing the state’s Climate Protection Program, which would cap greenhouse gas emissions produced from burning fossil fuels. Last year, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that the program did not meet certain disclosure requirements and was legally invalid.Doctor Brian Duty, candidate to represent Oregon's District 33 in the House, speaks with campaign supporters. Duty said his top priorities in the Legislature would be boosting the capacity of Oregon hospitals, expanding behavioral health services and increasing health care workforce retention.Courtesy of Brian Duty campaignGrabiel said he supports the environmental agency’s efforts to revive the program and would work to ensure that the program couldn’t be easily overturned by a future governor.Additionally, Grabiel said lawmakers should explore a cap-and-trade system similar to those of California and Washington, which incentivize the use of clean energy by requiring major polluters to buy state-issued allowances on every ton of greenhouse gas they produce. In Oregon, Republican lawmakers have adamantly opposed and killed Democrat-backed bills that would create a cap-and-trade system by boycotting legislative floor sessions and denying Democrats a quorum to pass those bills, most recently in 2020.Isadore said she strongly supports the reintroduction of the state program and applauded the Legislature’s recent move to order the state treasury to drop all fossil fuel investments in its investment portfolio.Duty said the climate protection program is a win-win for all Oregonians because it creates jobs, reduces carbon emissions, lowers energy prices and encourages clean energy investment.He said lawmakers should take further environmental action, including “restoring long-term funding for the electric vehicle rebate program, continuing the fight against wildfires through prevention and reforestation and expanding solar and wind projects.”All three candidates said they would support an update to the State School Fund formula, which has not been revised in 30 years. They agreed that the state should provide more funding to schools but had different views on how much say the state should have on the spending by individual districts.Duty said the situation is complex and that he supports Gov. Tina Kotek’s call for a work group to explore school funding. “I think the state should take more accountability for funding failures,” Duty said. “The evidence suggests that mandates on districts have not often been successful and should be reviewed.”Grabiel said the state should have a say in certain classroom issues, such as class sizes or programs for students who exhibit disruptive behavior. That would mark a huge policy change in a state with a long history of local control that is carefully guarded by school boards, superintendents and teacher unions.“Schools that are not meeting educational standards should be subject to additional guardrails and given additional resources to meet the state’s and citizens’ expectations,” Grabiel said.Isadore said she would oppose more state-imposed guardrails on how school districts can use their funding.Duty said the state should take more accountability for funding failures in the state’s employee pension fund, and Isadore said the state should take over paying the pension fund’s highest costs, instead of leaving that to school districts.“I would lift the voices of education experts about what would be most effective and equitable,” Isadore said. “I believe we should not only look at how we’re doling out dollars but whether the pot itself is big enough.”— Carlos Fuentes covers state politics and government. Reach him at 503-221-5386 or cfuentes@oregonian.com.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Each candidate has received an endorsement from a previous Oregon governor.

Three political newcomers are vying to represent Portland’s west side in the Oregon House, a seat currently held by Rep. Maxine Dexter, who is running for Congress.

Doctor Bryan Duty, environmental lawyer Peter Grabiel and health care clinic CEO Shannon Isadore will face off in the May 21 Democratic primary for House District 33, which includes downtown and much of Northwest Portland. Whoever wins the primary is expected to coast to victory in November, as registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans more than seven-to-one in the district.

Each candidate has received an endorsement from a previous Oregon governor, but Duty has raised about $96,000, nearly double what his competitors have received combined. The state’s most powerful public employee unions have also weighed in on the race, splitting their endorsements between Duty and Isadore.

Duty, a urology professor and surgeon at Oregon Health & Sciences University, said his top priorities in the Legislature would be boosting the capacity of Oregon hospitals, expanding behavioral health services and increasing health care workforce retention. He said his medical expertise would make him a strong choice for the Behavioral Health and Health Care Committee.

Duty has received endorsements from former Gov. John Kitzhaber, Metro President Lynn Peterson, the Oregon League of Conservation Voters and several unions, including the Oregon chapters of the Service Employees International Union. He has raised more than $96,000, including $10,000 from former Nike CEO Mark Parker and his wife and $10,000 from the wife of former top Nike advisor and negotiator Howard Slusher, campaign finance records show. He has also donated $11,700 to his own campaign.

“If elected, I will alleviate our health care system’s strain by increasing hospital capacity, enhancing medical training, retaining the best health professionals and addressing the shortfall in health service investments,” Duty wrote in response to an Oregonian/OregonLive questionnaire.

Grabiel, a lawyer who has advocated for major international efforts to curb the effects of climate change, said his top priorities would be enacting environmental legislation and addressing Oregon’s public defender shortage. Grabiel spent several years negotiating climate policy for the United Nations as a senior lawyer for the African Union, according to his LinkedIn profile. He was part of a team that negotiated the 2016 Kigali Amendment, an international agreement to reduce the use of certain greenhouse gasses commonly used in air conditioners and refrigerators.

If elected, Grabiel would be the first Latino to hold the District 33 seat, according to his campaign website. Grabiel has received endorsements from the Portland Metro Chamber, former Gov. Barbara Roberts and international climate expert Durwood Zaelke. He has raised about $34,000, including a $10,000 loan he made to his campaign, campaign finance records show.

“I am the only candidate who has built a broad-based coalition to achieve a significant policy goal — which I did at the United Nations over a nine year period culminating in the adoption of a landmark international climate change law [in 2016],” Grabiel wrote. “I also know how to draft legislation that accomplishes a chosen policy goal, as I have done throughout my career as an environmental lawyer.”

Pete Grabiel

Environmental lawyer Peter Grabiel is vying to represent Portland's west side in the Oregon House. He said his top priorities in office would be enacting environmental legislation and addressing Oregon’s public defender shortage.Pete Grabiel campaign

Isadore, a U.S. Marine veteran and founder of the Oregon Change Clinic, a culturally specific behavioral health clinic, said her focus in the Legislature would be creating affordable housing, supporting behavioral health initiatives and addressing Portland’s downtown office vacancies. If elected, Isadore would become the only Black woman serving in the Legislature with the departure of Rep. Janelle Bynum, D-Happy Valley, who is running for Congress.

She is endorsed by former Gov. Kate Brown, five Democratic lawmakers from the Portland area and several unions, including the statewide teachers union and the Oregon chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Isadore has raised about $15,000, including a $5,000 contribution from the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association’s political action committee.

“I know what it takes to provide culturally specific behavioral health and substance use disorder services to BIPOC people and veterans,” Isadore wrote. “Oregon taxpayers are investing $211 million in treatment and recovery. They deserve the expertise of a treatment provider with the financial background I have to ensure it’s well spent.”

Housing, tolling, climate change

Each of the candidates said they would take steps to ensure that the $376 million housing and homelessness package approved by the Legislature earlier this year would be effectively carried out. However, they outlined different steps they would take to build on the package’s major initiatives.

Isadore said she would ensure that the state’s housing and development-focused agencies have sufficient money and resources to help cities promote development and ensure that cities use their state dollars effectively. She also said “we need to streamline the siting of recovery housing to hold local jurisdictions accountable for building the entire continuum of housing.”

Duty said he would prioritize making sure housing development dollars lead to new housing quickly. “If we do not see a substantial increase in affordable units,” he said, “we should revisit subsidies and incentives to further reduce the cost of development.”

Grabiel said he would promote dense urban growth instead of sprawl and support legislation that reduces the amount of regulatory red tape that slows down housing development. He said he would also support the creation of large shelters to reduce unregulated camping in Portland.

Lawmakers next year plan to take up a major transportation package to help maintain and build roads and necessary infrastructure. The three candidates said they wouldn’t support road tolling in their district to fund roads because it puts too high of a financial burden on working class and low-income individuals. Grabiel, however, did say he would support a toll on Vancouver residents who drive into Portland because they “pay far less taxes than Portlanders do to maintain our shared metropolis.”

The three candidates also said they support the Department of Environmental Quality reestablishing the state’s Climate Protection Program, which would cap greenhouse gas emissions produced from burning fossil fuels. Last year, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that the program did not meet certain disclosure requirements and was legally invalid.

Brian Duty campaigning

Doctor Brian Duty, candidate to represent Oregon's District 33 in the House, speaks with campaign supporters. Duty said his top priorities in the Legislature would be boosting the capacity of Oregon hospitals, expanding behavioral health services and increasing health care workforce retention.Courtesy of Brian Duty campaign

Grabiel said he supports the environmental agency’s efforts to revive the program and would work to ensure that the program couldn’t be easily overturned by a future governor.

Additionally, Grabiel said lawmakers should explore a cap-and-trade system similar to those of California and Washington, which incentivize the use of clean energy by requiring major polluters to buy state-issued allowances on every ton of greenhouse gas they produce. In Oregon, Republican lawmakers have adamantly opposed and killed Democrat-backed bills that would create a cap-and-trade system by boycotting legislative floor sessions and denying Democrats a quorum to pass those bills, most recently in 2020.

Isadore said she strongly supports the reintroduction of the state program and applauded the Legislature’s recent move to order the state treasury to drop all fossil fuel investments in its investment portfolio.

Duty said the climate protection program is a win-win for all Oregonians because it creates jobs, reduces carbon emissions, lowers energy prices and encourages clean energy investment.

He said lawmakers should take further environmental action, including “restoring long-term funding for the electric vehicle rebate program, continuing the fight against wildfires through prevention and reforestation and expanding solar and wind projects.”

All three candidates said they would support an update to the State School Fund formula, which has not been revised in 30 years. They agreed that the state should provide more funding to schools but had different views on how much say the state should have on the spending by individual districts.

Duty said the situation is complex and that he supports Gov. Tina Kotek’s call for a work group to explore school funding. “I think the state should take more accountability for funding failures,” Duty said. “The evidence suggests that mandates on districts have not often been successful and should be reviewed.”

Grabiel said the state should have a say in certain classroom issues, such as class sizes or programs for students who exhibit disruptive behavior. That would mark a huge policy change in a state with a long history of local control that is carefully guarded by school boards, superintendents and teacher unions.

“Schools that are not meeting educational standards should be subject to additional guardrails and given additional resources to meet the state’s and citizens’ expectations,” Grabiel said.

Isadore said she would oppose more state-imposed guardrails on how school districts can use their funding.

Duty said the state should take more accountability for funding failures in the state’s employee pension fund, and Isadore said the state should take over paying the pension fund’s highest costs, instead of leaving that to school districts.

“I would lift the voices of education experts about what would be most effective and equitable,” Isadore said. “I believe we should not only look at how we’re doling out dollars but whether the pot itself is big enough.”

Carlos Fuentes covers state politics and government. Reach him at 503-221-5386 or cfuentes@oregonian.com.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Fire Disrupts UN Climate Talks Just as Negotiators Reach Critical Final Days

Fire has disrupted United Nations climate talks, forcing evacuations of several buildings with just two scheduled days left and negotiators yet to announce any major agreements

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — Fire disrupted United Nations climate talks in Brazil on Thursday, forcing evacuations of several buildings with just two scheduled days left and negotiators yet to announce any major agreements. Officials said no one was hurt.The fire was reported in an area of pavilions where sideline events are held during the annual talks, known this year as COP30. Organizers soon announced that the fire was under control, but fire officials ordered the entire site evacuated for safety checks and it wasn't clear when conference business would resume.Viliami Vainga Tone, with the Tonga delegation, had just come out of a high-level ministerial meeting when dozens of people came thundering past him shouting about the fire. He was among people pushed out of the venue by Brazilian and United Nations security forces.Tone called time the most precious resource at COP and said he was disappointed it's even shorter due to the fire.“We have to keep up our optimism. There is always tomorrow, if not the remainder of today. But at least we have a full day tomorrow,” Tone told The Associated Press.A few hours before the fire, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres urged countries to compromise and “show willingness and flexibility to deliver results,” even if they fall short of the strongest measures some nations want.“We are down to the wire and the world is watching Belem,” Guterres said, asking negotiators to engage in good faith in the last two scheduled days of talks, which already missed a self-imposed deadline Wednesday for progress on a few key issues. The conference, with this year's edition known as COP30, frequently runs longer than its scheduled two weeks.“Communities on the front lines are watching, too — counting flooded homes, failed harvests, lost livelihoods — and asking, ‘how much more must we suffer?’” Guterres said. "They’ve heard enough excuses and demand results.” On contentious issues involving more detailed plans to phase out fossil fuels and financial aid to poorer countries, Guterres said he was “perfectly convinced” that compromise was possible and dismissed the idea that not adopting the strongest measures would be a failure.Guterres was more forceful in what he wanted rich countries to do for poor countries, especially those in need of tens of billions of dollars to adapt to the floods, droughts, storms and heat waves triggered by worsening climate change. He continued calls to triple adaptation finance from $40 billion a year to $120 billion a year.“No delegation will leave Belem with everything it wants, but every delegation has a duty to reach a balanced deal,” Guterres said.“Every country, especially the big emitters, must do more,” Guterres said.Delivering overall financial aid — with an agreed goal of $300 billion a year — is one of four interconnected issues that were initially excluded from the official agenda. The other three are: whether countries should be told to toughen their new climate plans; dealing with trade barriers over climate and improving reporting on transparency and climate progress.More than 80 countries have pushed for a detailed “road map” on how to transition away from fossil fuels, like coal, oil and natural gas, which are the chief cause of warming. That was a general but vague agreement two years ago at the COP in Dubai. Guterres kept referring to it as already being agreed to in Dubai, but did not commit to a detailed plan, which Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva pushed for earlier in a speech.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.This story was produced as part of the 2025 Climate Change Media Partnership, a journalism fellowship organized by Internews’ Earth Journalism Network and the Stanley Center for Peace and Security.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

Engineered microbes could tackle climate change – if we ensure it’s done safely

Engineering microbes to soak up more carbon, boost crop yields and restore former farmland is appealing. But synthetic biology fixes must be done thoughtfully

Yuji Sakai/GettyAs the climate crisis accelerates, there’s a desperate need to rapidly reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, both by slashing emissions and by pulling carbon out of the air. Synthetic biology has emerged as a particularly promising approach. Despite the name, synthetic biology isn’t about creating new life from scratch. Rather, it uses engineering principles to build new biological components for existing microorganisms such as bacteria, microbes and fungi to make them better at specific tasks. By one recent estimate, synthetic biology could cut more carbon than emitted by all passenger cars ever made – up to 30 billion tonnes – through methods such as boosting crop yields, restoring agricultural land, cutting livestock methane emissions, reducing the need for fertiliser, producing biofuels and engineering microbes to store more carbon. According to some synthetic biologists, this could be a game-changer. But will it prove to be? Technological efforts to “solve” the climate problem often verge on the improbably utopian. There’s a risk in seeing synthetic biology as a silver bullet for environmental problems. A more realistic approach suggests synthetic biology isn’t a magic fix, but does have real potential worth exploring further. Engineering microorganisms is a controversial practice. To make the most of these technologies, researchers will have to ensure it’s done safely and ethically, as my research points out. What potential does synthetic biology have? Earth’s oceans, forests, soils and other natural processes soak up over half of all carbon emitted by burning fossil fuels. Synthetic biology could make these natural sinks even more effective. Some researchers are exploring ways to modify natural enzymes to rapidly convert carbon dioxide gas into carbon in rocks. Perhaps the best known example is the use of precision fermentation to cut methane emissions from livestock. Because methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, these emissions account for roughly 12% of total warming potential from greenhouse emissions. Bioengineered yeasts could absorb up to 98% of these emissions. After being eaten by cattle or other ruminants these yeasts block production of methane before it can be belched out. Synthetic biology could even drastically reduce how much farmland the world needs by producing food more efficiently. Engineered soil microbes can boost crop yields at least by 10–20%, meaning more food from less land. Precision fermentation can be used to produce clean meat and clean milk with much lower emissions than traditional farming. Engineered microbes have the potential to boost crop yields considerably. Collab Media/Unsplash, CC BY-NC-ND If farms produce more on less land, excess farmland can be returned to nature. Wetlands, forests and native grasslands can store much more carbon than farmland, helping tackle climate change. Synthetic biology can be used to modify microbe and algae species to increase their natural ability to store carbon in wetlands and oceans. This approach is known as natural geoengineering. Engineered crops and soil microbes can also lock away much more carbon in the roots of crops or by increasing soil storage capacity. They can also reduce methane emissions from organic matter and tackle pollutants such as fertiliser runoff and heavy metals. Sounds great – what’s the problem? As researchers have pointed out, using this approach will require a rollout at massive scale. At present, much work has been done at smaller scale. These engineered organisms need to be able to go from Petri dishes to industrial bioreactors and then safely into the environment. To scale, these approaches have to be economically viable, well regulated and socially acceptable. That’s easier said than done. First, engineering organisms comes with the serious risk of unintended consequences. If these customised microbes release their stored carbon all at once during a drought or bushfire, it could worsen climate change. It would be very difficult to control these organisms if a problem emerges after their release, such as if an engineered microbe began outcompeting its rivals or if synthetic genes spread beyond the target species and do unintended damage to other species and ecosystems. It will be essential to tackle these issues head on with robust risk management and forward planning. Second, synthetic biology approaches will likely become products. To make these organisms cheaply and gain market share, biotech companies will have an incentive to focus on immediate profits. This could lead companies to downplay actual risks to protect their profit margins. Regulation will be essential here. Third, some worthwhile approaches may not appeal to companies seeking a return on investment. Instead, governments or public institutions may have to develop them to benefit plants, animals and natural habitats, given human existence rests on healthy ecosystems. Which way forward? These issues shouldn’t stop researchers from testing out these technologies. But these risks must be taken into account, as not all risks are equal. Unchecked climate change would be much worse, as it could lead to societal collapse, large-scale climate migration and mass species extinction. Large scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is now essential. In the face of catastrophic risks, it can be ethically justifiable to take the smaller risk of unintended consequences from these organisms. But it’s far less justifiable if these same risks are accepted to secure financial returns for private investors. As time passes and the climate crisis intensifies, these technologies will look more and more appealing. Synthetic biology won’t be the silver bullet many imagine it to be, and it’s unlikely it will be the gold mine many hope for. But the technology has undeniable promise. Used thoughtfully and ethically, it could help us make a healthier planet for all living species. Daniele Fulvi receives funding from the ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, and his current project investigates the ethical dimensions of synthetic biology for climate mitigation. He also received a small grant from the Advanced Engineering Biology Future Science Platform at CSIRO. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Australian Government or the Australian Research Council.

Exclusive-Europe Plans Service to Gauge Climate Change Role in Extreme Weather

By Alison Withers and Kate AbnettCOPENHAGEN (Reuters) -The EU is launching a service to measure the role climate change is playing in extreme...

By Alison Withers and Kate AbnettCOPENHAGEN (Reuters) -The EU is launching a service to measure the role climate change is playing in extreme weather events like heatwaves and extreme rain, and experts say this could help governments set climate policy, improve financial risk assessments and provide evidence for use in lawsuits.Scientists with the EU's Copernicus Climate Change Service told Reuters the service can help governments in weighing the physical risks posed by worsening weather and setting policy in response. "It's the demand of understanding when an extreme event happens, how is this related to climate change?" said the new service's technical lead, Freja Vamborg.The European Commission did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.The service will perform attribution science, which involves running computer simulations of how weather systems might have behaved if people had never started pumping greenhouse gases into the air and then comparing those results with what is happening today.Funded for about 2.5 million euros over three years, Copernicus will publish results by the end of next year and offer two assessments a month - each within a week of an extreme weather event.For the first time, "there will be an attribution office operating constantly," said Carlo Buontempo, director of Copernicus Climate Change Service. "Climate policy is unfortunately again a very polarized topic," said Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London who helped to pioneer the scientific approach but is not involved in the new EU service. She welcomed the service's plans to partner with national weather services of EU members along with the UK Met and the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre."From that point of view, it also helps if the governments do it themselves and just see themselves really the evidence from their own weather services," Otto said. Some independent climate scientists and lawyers cheered the EU move. "We want to have the most information available," said senior attorney Erika Lennon at the non-profit Center for International Environmental Law."The more information we have about attribution science, the easier it will be for the most impacted to be able to successfully bring claims to courts."By calculating probabilities of climate change impacting weather patterns, the approach also helps insurance companies and others in the financial sector.In a way, "they're already using it" with in-house teams calculating probabilities for floods or storms, said environmental scientist Johan Rockstroem with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research."Financial institutions understand risk and risk has to be quantified, and this is one way of quantifying," Rockstroem said.In litigation, attribution science is also being used already in calculating how much a country's or company's emissions may have contributed to climate-fuelled disasters.The International Court of Justice said in July that attribution science is legally viable for linking emissions with climate extremes - but it has yet to fully be tested in court. A German court in May dismissed a Peruvian farmer's lawsuit against German utility RWE for emissions-driven warming causing Andean glaciers to thaw. The case had used attribution science in calculating the damage claim, but the court said the claim amount was too low to take the case forward.So "the court never got to discussing attribution science in detail and going into whether the climate models are good enough, and all of these complex and thorny questions," said Noah Walker-Crawford, a climate litigation researcher at the London School of Economics. (Reporting by Ali Withers in Copenhagen and Kate Abnett in Belem, Brazil; Writing by Katy Daigle; Editing by David Gregorio)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

Billionaire hedge fund founder Tom Steyer is running for governor

Billionaire hedge fund founder, climate change warrior and major Democratic donor Tom Steyer is running for governor. Fossil fuel and migrant detention facility investments will likely draw attacks from his fellow Democrats.

Billionaire hedge fund founder Tom Steyer announced Wednesday that he is running for governor of California, arguing that he is not beholden to special interests and can take on corporations that are making life unaffordable in the state.“The richest people in America think that they earned everything themselves. Bulls—, man. That’s so ridiculous,” Steyer said in an online video announcing his campaign. “We have a broken government. It’s been bought by corporations and my question is: Who do you think is going to change that? Sacramento politicians are afraid to change up this system. I’m not. They’re going to hate this. Bring it on.” Protesters hold placards and banners during a rally against Whitehaven Coal in Sydney in 2014. Dozens of protesters and activists gathered downtown to protest against the controversial massive Maules Creek coal mine project in northern New South Wales. (Saeed Khan / AFP/Getty Images) Steyer, 68, founded Farallon Capital Management, one of the nation’s largest hedge funds, and left it in 2012 after 26 years. Since his departure, he has become a global environmental activist and a major donor to Democratic candidates and causes. But the hedge firm’s investments — notably a giant coal mine in Australia that cleared 3,700 acres of koala habitat and a company that runs migrant detention centers on the U.S.-Mexico border for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — will make him susceptible to political attack by his gubernatorial rivals. Steyer has expressed regret for his involvement in such projects, saying it was why he left Farallon and started focusing his energy on fighting climate change. Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer addresses a crowd during a presidential primary election-night party in Columbia, S.C. (Sean Rayford / Getty Images) Steyer previously flirted with running for governor and the U.S. Senate but decided against it, instead opting to run for president in 2020. He dropped out after spending nearly $342 million on his campaign, which gained little traction before he ended his run after the South Carolina primary.Next year’s gubernatorial race is in flux, after former Vice President Kamala Harris and Sen. Alex Padilla decided not to run and Proposition 50, the successful Democratic effort to redraw congressional districts, consumed all of the political oxygen during an off-year election.Most voters are undecided about who they would like to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom, who cannot run for reelection because of term limits, according to a poll released this month by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies and co-sponsored by The Times. Steyer had the support of 1% of voters in the survey. In recent years, Steyer has been a longtime benefactor of progressive causes, most recently spending $12 million to support the redistricting ballot measure. But when he was the focus of one of the ads, rumors spiraled that he was considering a run for governor.In prior California ballot initiatives, Steyer successfully supported efforts to close a corporate tax loophole and to raise tobacco taxes, and fought oil-industry-backed efforts to roll back environmental law.His campaign platform is to build 1 million homes in four years, lower energy costs by ending monopolies, make preschool and community college free and ban corporate contributions to political action committees in California elections.Steyer’s brother Jim, the leader of Common Sense Media, and former Biden administration U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy are aiming to put an initiative on next year’s ballot to protect children from social media, specifically the chatbots that have been accused of prompting young people to kill themselves. Newsom recently vetoed a bill aimed at addressing this artificial intelligence issue.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.