Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

‘Yoda’ for scientists: the outsider ecologist whose ideas from the 80s just might fix our future

News Feed
Thursday, April 10, 2025

John Todd remembers the moment he knew he was really on to something: “There was no question that it was at the Harwich dump in 1986,” he recalls. This was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, close to where Todd still lives. Hidden away from the picturesque beaches was the town landfill, including lagoons of toxic waste from septic tanks, which was being left to seep into the groundwater below. So Todd, then a 45-year-old biologist, decided to design a solution. What he was “on to”, he came to realise, was not just a natural way of removing pollution from water, it was a holistic approach to environmental restoration that was way ahead of its time, and possibly still is.Todd’s solution to the Harwich pollution problem was both beautifully simple and unfathomably complex. Next to the lagoons, he assembled a line of 15 clear-sided fiberglass tanks, each about the height of a person, and filled them with water containing all the different life forms he could find from local ponds, marshes and streams – plants, bugs, bacteria, fungi, general gunk. The water could be pumped from one tank to the next, and the living matter inside them soon organised itself into a series of different ecosystems. Todd found that he could put in polluted water from the lagoons at one end of the line of tanks and by the time it came out the other end, 10 days later, it was clean enough to drink.“To see that water, and to see all the organisms in the tanks, including fishes, looking and being so healthy, I was just amazed,” he says.Todd didn’t know exactly what was going on in those tanks – he would later discover that various microorganisms were finding uses for the toxins and heavy metals – but he didn’t need to, he says. “All I really knew going into it was all the kingdoms of life had to be in there. Nobody knew which ones could cope with what we had, but there’s probably no problem they haven’t solved in one way or another over the last three or four billion years.” Todd calls it “biological intelligence”.“The thing that separates myself and my colleagues is that we really do celebrate the living world for what it’s beginning to show us it can do,” he says.There’s just so many positive directions that are possible and economically feasibleTodd christened his invention the “eco-machine”, and spent the next four decades understanding and refining it, applying it to everything from treating wastewater to growing food to repairing damaged ecosystems. Now aged 85, he is still at work, inventing new solutions to a set of environmental problems that has only deepened.Todd’s latest proposal is his most ambitious yet, something he calls “the Fleet”. The idea is very simple, he says: a fleet of sailing vessels, each containing one of his eco-machines. These could be deployed to clean up coastal environmental disasters on site, wherever they are needed. Each sailing eco-machine, Todd says, is “an incubator of beneficial organisms into the environment surrounding it”. Each vessel would take polluted sea water and not only clean it but add helpful organisms and nutrients to it, such as diatoms, which he calls the “baby milk” of the marine food chain.It sounds romantic, challenging, far-fetched even, but between his knowledge of ecological design and naval architecture, Todd seems to have figured it all out: the design of the sailing vessels (inspired by 19th-century Thames barges); how to keep the tanks full of liquid stable on board; energy and lighting; how much water these relatively small vessels could treat. Powered by wind and sun, the entire operation would be fossil fuel-free, he says, “and the fact that they’re going to be so beautiful, they’re going to be the sort of technology neighbourhoods are going to want to have in their back yards”.Maybe I should just slow down and let them catch up before I go galloping off with sailing eco-machines. But I can’t, I’m not young enoughTodd estimates a fleet of 30 such vessels could clean up maritime pollution for about a quarter of the cost of conventional processes. He would love to get two 40ft prototype vessels built and put them to work on nearby Waquoit Bay, which would cost about $20m (£15.5m), he says. Like many coastal areas, Cape Cod’s inshore waters are dying, largely as a result of pollution from domestic sewage. The sea-run brook trout, the shellfish and the eelgrass he saw in the 1960s are hardly to be found any more. Every summer, scores of Massachusetts beaches close after heavy rains because of sewage pollution.Todd knows how to fix it, and much more besides, he believes, but, as has been the case since the 1970s, his ideas are still too wide-ranging for the compartmentalised scientific world to fully understand, he says. Despite having won numerous awards and accolades, he has always been something of an outsider scientist. “Maybe I should just slow down, and let them catch up before I go galloping off with sailing eco-machines,” he says. “But I can’t, I’m not young enough.”Born in Ontario, Canada, Todd has always loved the water and boats. His father designed and built yachts as a hobby, and he has done the same. He studied agriculture and marine biology, but by the time he came to Cape Cod in 1969 and took a post at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, he was beginning to chafe against the strictures and compartmentalisation of academia. He was also becoming increasingly worried about the environment.In 1969, Todd co-founded the New Alchemy Institute with his wife, Nancy, and a colleague, Bill McClarney – not quite a hippy commune, an alternative research institute (associates included visionary architect Richard Buckminster Fuller, economist EF Schumacher and Lynn Margulis, co-creator of the Gaia hypothesis). “I decided I wasn’t a doomwatch ecologist,” Todd says. “Doomwatch can be left to other people, I was more interested in solutions.”The 13-acre (five-hectare) New Alchemy site is a few minutes’ drive from where he and Nancy still live. Its mission was to explore joined-up, sustainable ways of living: energy, food, shelter, waste. They planted organic crops, farmed fish and built wind turbines and experimental architecture – all underpinned by a belief that the more systems they had working together, the stronger the whole would be, just like the organisms in one of his eco-machines.That first eco-machine, in Harwich, ought to have gained Todd national attention; instead it earned him a lawsuit from the state regulators. Apparently nobody was permitted to treat waste without a civil engineering degree. “I appeared on the front page of the Boston Globe, described with a word I’d never heard before, ‘scofflaw’,” he says, chuckling. “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency heard about my fight and sent one of his scientists up to review the data and what I was doing. He went back and he said, ‘He’s legitimate.’” The EPA subsequently honoured him with an award (indeed, an EPA study in 2002 found Todd’s technology to be “typically cost competitive with more conventional wastewater treatment systems”).After the New Alchemy Institute wound down, Todd founded his own ecological consultancy, Ocean Arks International. It has designed and built more than 100 eco-machine systems to treat problems of pollution, wastewater and food production around the world, from the US to China, Australia, Brazil and Scotland. He has drawn up proposals for islands owned by Richard Branson, Marlon Brando and Leonardo DiCaprio (only Branson actually implemented them).Todd’s eco-machines are cheaper and more effective than industrial alternatives, he says, and are even capable of treating chemicals that have been impossible to break down using conventional methods, such as grades of crude oil and mining waste. They are also far more sustainable – powered almost entirely by sunlight.All of which begs the question: why aren’t they more widely used? One reason is prevailing attitudes, Todd suggests. “Civil engineering schools tend to eschew innovation and invention. Hardware is tinkered with and new components are added at a pretty slow pace. A 100-year-old waste water treatment plant looks pretty similar to a contemporary one.”At the same time, for all his scientific skills, Todd is the first to admit he has never been much of a businessman. His career is strewn with startups and partnerships that fell by the wayside for various reasons. However, many of his ideas have seeped into the mainstream and some of his ideas have been developed in a more commerical way, including by his son, Jonathan.It is not just Todd who can vouch for their efficacy. Three years ago, under Todd’s guidance, the Dutch environmental restoration company the Weather Makers built their own eco-machine in Den Bosch, in the Netherlands, with 12 water tanks housed under a 50ft-diameter geodesic dome. They were seeking to process local water polluted by intensive farming into fertile, nutrient-rich water, and to desalinate marine sediments to use in their ecosystem regeneration projects in places such as the Sinai desert.Just as Todd did in Harwich, the Weather Makers’ co-founder Ties van der Hoeven found the results were “amazing”. “Everything he said was just spot on, and certain things really overtook our expectations,” says van der Hoeven. “Everything is growing like crazy.” Tomato plants growing inside the dome with the treated water are 20-30% bigger than ones grown with groundwater, he says.Like many others, he did not really understand Todd’s approach until he put it into practice. “Hopefully now, with this planetary craziness we’re entering into, we’re starting to recognise these kinds of holistic solutions better,” he says. He likens Todd to Yoda from the Star Wars movies – the keeper of an ecological wisdom born in the 1960s and 70s but forgotten, “a bit like the Renaissance being forgotten in the middle ages, and then now people are picking it up again”.As ever, Todd remains an optimist. “I feel we know how to fix the ocean, I feel we know how to fix the deserts, I feel we know how to fix the urban environment, and so we’ve just got to get the story moving,” he says. “There’s just so many positive directions that are possible and economically feasible. If we could get the larger public really excited about how nature can be made to clean up, then people would say, ‘we can do it. We’ve got a future.’”

John Todd’s eco-machine stunned experts by using natural organisms to remove toxic waste from a Cape Cod lagoon. Forty years on, he wants to build a fleet of them to clean up the oceansJohn Todd remembers the moment he knew he was really on to something: “There was no question that it was at the Harwich dump in 1986,” he recalls. This was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, close to where Todd still lives. Hidden away from the picturesque beaches was the town landfill, including lagoons of toxic waste from septic tanks, which was being left to seep into the groundwater below. So Todd, then a 45-year-old biologist, decided to design a solution. What he was “on to”, he came to realise, was not just a natural way of removing pollution from water, it was a holistic approach to environmental restoration that was way ahead of its time, and possibly still is.An early eco-machine purifying toxic waste on Cape Cod in 1986. Photograph: John Todd Continue reading...

John Todd remembers the moment he knew he was really on to something: “There was no question that it was at the Harwich dump in 1986,” he recalls. This was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, close to where Todd still lives. Hidden away from the picturesque beaches was the town landfill, including lagoons of toxic waste from septic tanks, which was being left to seep into the groundwater below. So Todd, then a 45-year-old biologist, decided to design a solution. What he was “on to”, he came to realise, was not just a natural way of removing pollution from water, it was a holistic approach to environmental restoration that was way ahead of its time, and possibly still is.

Todd’s solution to the Harwich pollution problem was both beautifully simple and unfathomably complex. Next to the lagoons, he assembled a line of 15 clear-sided fiberglass tanks, each about the height of a person, and filled them with water containing all the different life forms he could find from local ponds, marshes and streams – plants, bugs, bacteria, fungi, general gunk. The water could be pumped from one tank to the next, and the living matter inside them soon organised itself into a series of different ecosystems. Todd found that he could put in polluted water from the lagoons at one end of the line of tanks and by the time it came out the other end, 10 days later, it was clean enough to drink.

“To see that water, and to see all the organisms in the tanks, including fishes, looking and being so healthy, I was just amazed,” he says.

Todd didn’t know exactly what was going on in those tanks – he would later discover that various microorganisms were finding uses for the toxins and heavy metals – but he didn’t need to, he says. “All I really knew going into it was all the kingdoms of life had to be in there. Nobody knew which ones could cope with what we had, but there’s probably no problem they haven’t solved in one way or another over the last three or four billion years.” Todd calls it “biological intelligence”.

“The thing that separates myself and my colleagues is that we really do celebrate the living world for what it’s beginning to show us it can do,” he says.

Todd christened his invention the “eco-machine”, and spent the next four decades understanding and refining it, applying it to everything from treating wastewater to growing food to repairing damaged ecosystems. Now aged 85, he is still at work, inventing new solutions to a set of environmental problems that has only deepened.

Todd’s latest proposal is his most ambitious yet, something he calls “the Fleet”. The idea is very simple, he says: a fleet of sailing vessels, each containing one of his eco-machines. These could be deployed to clean up coastal environmental disasters on site, wherever they are needed. Each sailing eco-machine, Todd says, is “an incubator of beneficial organisms into the environment surrounding it”. Each vessel would take polluted sea water and not only clean it but add helpful organisms and nutrients to it, such as diatoms, which he calls the “baby milk” of the marine food chain.

It sounds romantic, challenging, far-fetched even, but between his knowledge of ecological design and naval architecture, Todd seems to have figured it all out: the design of the sailing vessels (inspired by 19th-century Thames barges); how to keep the tanks full of liquid stable on board; energy and lighting; how much water these relatively small vessels could treat. Powered by wind and sun, the entire operation would be fossil fuel-free, he says, “and the fact that they’re going to be so beautiful, they’re going to be the sort of technology neighbourhoods are going to want to have in their back yards”.

Todd estimates a fleet of 30 such vessels could clean up maritime pollution for about a quarter of the cost of conventional processes. He would love to get two 40ft prototype vessels built and put them to work on nearby Waquoit Bay, which would cost about $20m (£15.5m), he says. Like many coastal areas, Cape Cod’s inshore waters are dying, largely as a result of pollution from domestic sewage. The sea-run brook trout, the shellfish and the eelgrass he saw in the 1960s are hardly to be found any more. Every summer, scores of Massachusetts beaches close after heavy rains because of sewage pollution.

Todd knows how to fix it, and much more besides, he believes, but, as has been the case since the 1970s, his ideas are still too wide-ranging for the compartmentalised scientific world to fully understand, he says. Despite having won numerous awards and accolades, he has always been something of an outsider scientist. “Maybe I should just slow down, and let them catch up before I go galloping off with sailing eco-machines,” he says. “But I can’t, I’m not young enough.”


Born in Ontario, Canada, Todd has always loved the water and boats. His father designed and built yachts as a hobby, and he has done the same. He studied agriculture and marine biology, but by the time he came to Cape Cod in 1969 and took a post at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, he was beginning to chafe against the strictures and compartmentalisation of academia. He was also becoming increasingly worried about the environment.

In 1969, Todd co-founded the New Alchemy Institute with his wife, Nancy, and a colleague, Bill McClarney – not quite a hippy commune, an alternative research institute (associates included visionary architect Richard Buckminster Fuller, economist EF Schumacher and Lynn Margulis, co-creator of the Gaia hypothesis). “I decided I wasn’t a doomwatch ecologist,” Todd says. “Doomwatch can be left to other people, I was more interested in solutions.”

The 13-acre (five-hectare) New Alchemy site is a few minutes’ drive from where he and Nancy still live. Its mission was to explore joined-up, sustainable ways of living: energy, food, shelter, waste. They planted organic crops, farmed fish and built wind turbines and experimental architecture – all underpinned by a belief that the more systems they had working together, the stronger the whole would be, just like the organisms in one of his eco-machines.

That first eco-machine, in Harwich, ought to have gained Todd national attention; instead it earned him a lawsuit from the state regulators. Apparently nobody was permitted to treat waste without a civil engineering degree. “I appeared on the front page of the Boston Globe, described with a word I’d never heard before, ‘scofflaw’,” he says, chuckling. “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency heard about my fight and sent one of his scientists up to review the data and what I was doing. He went back and he said, ‘He’s legitimate.’” The EPA subsequently honoured him with an award (indeed, an EPA study in 2002 found Todd’s technology to be “typically cost competitive with more conventional wastewater treatment systems”).

After the New Alchemy Institute wound down, Todd founded his own ecological consultancy, Ocean Arks International. It has designed and built more than 100 eco-machine systems to treat problems of pollution, wastewater and food production around the world, from the US to China, Australia, Brazil and Scotland. He has drawn up proposals for islands owned by Richard Branson, Marlon Brando and Leonardo DiCaprio (only Branson actually implemented them).

Todd’s eco-machines are cheaper and more effective than industrial alternatives, he says, and are even capable of treating chemicals that have been impossible to break down using conventional methods, such as grades of crude oil and mining waste. They are also far more sustainable – powered almost entirely by sunlight.

All of which begs the question: why aren’t they more widely used? One reason is prevailing attitudes, Todd suggests. “Civil engineering schools tend to eschew innovation and invention. Hardware is tinkered with and new components are added at a pretty slow pace. A 100-year-old waste water treatment plant looks pretty similar to a contemporary one.”

At the same time, for all his scientific skills, Todd is the first to admit he has never been much of a businessman. His career is strewn with startups and partnerships that fell by the wayside for various reasons. However, many of his ideas have seeped into the mainstream and some of his ideas have been developed in a more commerical way, including by his son, Jonathan.

It is not just Todd who can vouch for their efficacy. Three years ago, under Todd’s guidance, the Dutch environmental restoration company the Weather Makers built their own eco-machine in Den Bosch, in the Netherlands, with 12 water tanks housed under a 50ft-diameter geodesic dome. They were seeking to process local water polluted by intensive farming into fertile, nutrient-rich water, and to desalinate marine sediments to use in their ecosystem regeneration projects in places such as the Sinai desert.

Just as Todd did in Harwich, the Weather Makers’ co-founder Ties van der Hoeven found the results were “amazing”. “Everything he said was just spot on, and certain things really overtook our expectations,” says van der Hoeven. “Everything is growing like crazy.” Tomato plants growing inside the dome with the treated water are 20-30% bigger than ones grown with groundwater, he says.

Like many others, he did not really understand Todd’s approach until he put it into practice. “Hopefully now, with this planetary craziness we’re entering into, we’re starting to recognise these kinds of holistic solutions better,” he says. He likens Todd to Yoda from the Star Wars movies – the keeper of an ecological wisdom born in the 1960s and 70s but forgotten, “a bit like the Renaissance being forgotten in the middle ages, and then now people are picking it up again”.

As ever, Todd remains an optimist. “I feel we know how to fix the ocean, I feel we know how to fix the deserts, I feel we know how to fix the urban environment, and so we’ve just got to get the story moving,” he says. “There’s just so many positive directions that are possible and economically feasible. If we could get the larger public really excited about how nature can be made to clean up, then people would say, ‘we can do it. We’ve got a future.’”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

The U.S. is committed to cleaning up Tijuana River pollution. Will California follow through?

San Diego leaders are calling on California to take stronger action to address the ongoing environmental crisis caused by sewage and industrial pollution flowing from the Tijuana River.

In summary San Diego leaders are calling on California to take stronger action to address the ongoing environmental crisis caused by sewage and industrial pollution flowing from the Tijuana River. As Tijuana River sewage has contaminated neighborhoods in southern San Diego County, the federal government has pledged two-thirds of a billion to clean it up.  Now local lawmakers are calling on California to step up the fight against cross-border pollution, and one introduced a bill this week to revisit air quality standards for noxious gas from the river. State Sen. Catherine Blakespear held a joint hearing of the Senate Environmental Quality Committee and the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee in San Diego Thursday to explore how the state can help solve the problem. “California has long been a national leader in environmental stewardship and policy making,” Blakespear said at the hearing. “But what is happening in the Tijuana River Valley is an international environmental disaster that undermines everything that California stands for.” The hearing at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, convened scientists and civic leaders to discuss how failed infrastructure, industrial waste and decades of neglect created the environmental disaster, and what it will take to fix it. “Due to its international nature, we know the federal government must take the lead,” Blakespear said. “Still, there is much that the state and local governments can do.” After decades of stalemate, action on Tijuana River pollution is speeding up. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Monday announced a new agreement with Mexico to plan for wastewater infrastructure to accommodate future population growth in Tijuana. On Wednesday State Sen. Steve Padilla introduced a bill to update state standards for hydrogen sulfide, a noxious gas with a rotten egg smell that’s produced by sewage in the river. Residents in the area complain of headaches, nausea and other ailments when hydrogen sulfide reaches high concentrations. The bill would require the California Air Resources Board to review the half-century-old standard and tighten it if needed. State Lawmakers also aim to improve conditions for lifeguards and other workers exposed to pollution, and hold American companies accountable for their role in contamination of the river. County officials will conduct an extensive health study to measure effects of Tijuana River pollution, and are making plans to remove a pollution hot spot in Imperial Beach. Ongoing, chronic pollution Sewage spills in south San Diego County became common in the early 2000s, sickening swimmers and surfers at local beaches. Then the aging wastewater plants failed, sending hundreds of millions of gallons of raw sewage into the ocean. Last year Scripps researchers found that the river is harming nearby communities by releasing airborne chemicals including hydrogen sulfide gas, which smells like rotten eggs. “The sewage flowing into San Diego County’s Coastline is poisoning our air and water, harming public health, closing beaches, and killing marine life,” Blakespear said.  San Diego officials have successfully lobbied for federal investment to upgrade aging wastewater treatment plants. They also introduced faster water quality testing and surveyed residents to understand health issues.  Paula Stigler Granados, a professor of public health at San Diego State University, said studies of people living near the Tijuana River found “more scary stuff,”  with 45% experiencing health problems, 63% saying pollution disrupted their work or school and 94% of respondents reporting sewage smells at home.  “Children are waking up sick in the middle of the night,” she said. “This is an ongoing, chronic exposure, not a one-time event.” A section of the Tijuana River next to Saturn Boulevard in San Diego on Nov. 21, 2025. Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters Water samples revealed industrial chemicals, methamphetamine, fentanyl, restricted pesticides, pharmaceuticals and odor-causing sulfur compounds, she said. “This is absolutely a public health emergency,” Stigler Granados said. “I do think it is the biggest environmental crisis we have in the country right now.” That sense of urgency isn’t universal. Last year Gov. Gavin Newsom declined requests by San Diego officials to declare a state of emergency over the border pollution problem, saying it “would have meant nothing.” Over the last two years State Sen. Steve Padilla has introduced legislation to fund improvements to wastewater treatment, limit landfill construction in the Tijuana River Valley and require California companies to report waste discharges that affect water quality in the state, but those bills failed. He said the problem is overlooked in this border area, with its low-income and working class population. “This is one of the most unique and acute environmental crises in all of North America,” Padilla said. “It is underappreciated simply because of where it is occurring.”  Tijuana River solutions This year the U.S. repaired the failing South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant and expanded its capacity from 25 million to 35 million gallons of wastewater per day. In April, Mexico repaired its Punta Bandera plant near the border, reducing sewage flows into the ocean. But the Imperial Beach shoreline has remained closed for three years, and residents still complain of headaches, nausea, eye irritation and respiratory ailments from airborne pollution. That problem is worst at a point known as the Saturn Blvd. hot spot in Imperial Beach, where flood control culverts churn sewage-tainted water into foam, spraying contaminants into the air. “When the water is polluted you can close the beach,” said Kim Prather, an atmospheric chemist at Scripps, who identified the airborne toxins. “But you can’t tell people not to breathe.” Community members feel forgotten by state leaders as they face chronic air pollution and years of closed beaches because of contaminated wastewater from the Tijuana River, said Serge Dedina, executive director of the environmental organization WildCoast and former Imperial Beach mayor. “What they say is ‘how come California doesn’t care about us?’” Dedina said. As federal authorities plan expansions to the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant that will boost its capacity to 50 million gallons per day, local and state leaders have their own action plan. A top priority for Aguirre is removing culverts at the Saturn Blvd. hot spot that cause airborne pollution. “That’s low hanging fruit that we don’t need to depend on the federal government to fix,” Aguirre said. She hopes to get funding for that project from Proposition 4, the state environmental bond that voters passed earlier this year. It dedicates $50 million to cleaning up degraded waterways, including the Tijuana River and New River, which flows into the Salton Sea.  The county is also planning a health study that would include physiological measurements to determine the health effects of Tijuana River pollution. “What we’re working on is how are we going to take real, hard medical data and follow a cohort of people who live in this environment, so we can understand what is happening in their bodies,” Aguirre said. “What is happening to children and seniors? What is in their bloodstreams?” San Diego County has distributed about 10,000 home air purifiers to households near the Tijuana River, but Aguirre wants to provide devices to all 40,000 homes in the affected area. Dedina said his organization is removing waste tires that are exported to Mexico and wash back into the Tijuana River Valley. “My lesson here is we need to stop the sediment, the tires, the trash, the toxic waste, the sewage,” he said. In addition to his bill updating hydrogen sulfide standards, Padilla said he’s exploring legislation to regulate pollution created by California companies operating through maquiladoras in Mexico. He wants to work with Mexico “to put some pressure on them to basically clamp down on American companies that are licensed to do business here in California. Blakespear said she wants to protect lifeguards and other public workers exposed to pollution. Whether the solution is creating environmental standards for international businesses or funding costly infrastructure, lawmakers acknowledge that the binational nature of the problem makes it tough to solve. “The complexity around it being an international issue and being a federal issue has added to the difficulties about who should act,” Blakespear said.

Air Pollution Linked To Autoimmune Diseases Like Lupus, Arthritis, Experts Say

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterWEDNESDAY, Dec. 17, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution might play a role in people’s risk for developing...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterWEDNESDAY, Dec. 17, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution might play a role in people’s risk for developing autoimmune diseases like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, a new study says.People exposed to particle air pollution had higher levels of anti-nuclear antibodies, a characteristic marker of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, researchers recently reported in the journal Rheumatology.“These results point us in a new direction for understanding how air pollution might trigger immune system changes that are associated with autoimmune disease,” senior researcher Dr. Sasha Bernatsky, a professor of medicine at McGill University in Canada, said in a news release.For the study, researchers collected blood samples from more than 3,500 people living in Canada’s Ontario region, looking at their levels of anti-nuclear antibodies.Anti-nuclear antibodies are produced by the immune system as part of an autoimmune disease. These antibodies mistakenly target the body’s own cells and tissues.The team compared those blood test results to people’s average exposure to particle pollution, based on air pollution tracking data for their home address.People with the highest levels of exposure to air pollution were 46% to 54% more likely to have high levels of anti-nuclear antibodies, the study found.Fine particle pollution involves particles that are 2.5 microns wide or smaller, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. By comparison, a human hair is 50 to 70 microns wide.“These fine particles in air pollution are small enough to reach the bloodstream, potentially affecting the whole body,” Bernatsky said.She stressed that such pollution is not just a problem for big cities.“Air pollution is often seen as an urban problem caused by traffic, but rural and suburban areas experience poor air quality too,” Bernatsky said, pointing to wildfires that choke the sky with smoke.The results underscore why standards to reduce air pollution are important, she concluded.“Even though air quality is overall better in Canada than in many other countries, research suggests there is no safe level, which is why Canadian policymakers need research like ours,” Bernatsky said.SOURCES: McGill University, news release, Dec. 15, 2025; Rheumatology, Oct. 22, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.