Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

‘Yoda’ for scientists: the outsider ecologist whose ideas from the 80s just might fix our future

News Feed
Thursday, April 10, 2025

John Todd remembers the moment he knew he was really on to something: “There was no question that it was at the Harwich dump in 1986,” he recalls. This was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, close to where Todd still lives. Hidden away from the picturesque beaches was the town landfill, including lagoons of toxic waste from septic tanks, which was being left to seep into the groundwater below. So Todd, then a 45-year-old biologist, decided to design a solution. What he was “on to”, he came to realise, was not just a natural way of removing pollution from water, it was a holistic approach to environmental restoration that was way ahead of its time, and possibly still is.Todd’s solution to the Harwich pollution problem was both beautifully simple and unfathomably complex. Next to the lagoons, he assembled a line of 15 clear-sided fiberglass tanks, each about the height of a person, and filled them with water containing all the different life forms he could find from local ponds, marshes and streams – plants, bugs, bacteria, fungi, general gunk. The water could be pumped from one tank to the next, and the living matter inside them soon organised itself into a series of different ecosystems. Todd found that he could put in polluted water from the lagoons at one end of the line of tanks and by the time it came out the other end, 10 days later, it was clean enough to drink.“To see that water, and to see all the organisms in the tanks, including fishes, looking and being so healthy, I was just amazed,” he says.Todd didn’t know exactly what was going on in those tanks – he would later discover that various microorganisms were finding uses for the toxins and heavy metals – but he didn’t need to, he says. “All I really knew going into it was all the kingdoms of life had to be in there. Nobody knew which ones could cope with what we had, but there’s probably no problem they haven’t solved in one way or another over the last three or four billion years.” Todd calls it “biological intelligence”.“The thing that separates myself and my colleagues is that we really do celebrate the living world for what it’s beginning to show us it can do,” he says.There’s just so many positive directions that are possible and economically feasibleTodd christened his invention the “eco-machine”, and spent the next four decades understanding and refining it, applying it to everything from treating wastewater to growing food to repairing damaged ecosystems. Now aged 85, he is still at work, inventing new solutions to a set of environmental problems that has only deepened.Todd’s latest proposal is his most ambitious yet, something he calls “the Fleet”. The idea is very simple, he says: a fleet of sailing vessels, each containing one of his eco-machines. These could be deployed to clean up coastal environmental disasters on site, wherever they are needed. Each sailing eco-machine, Todd says, is “an incubator of beneficial organisms into the environment surrounding it”. Each vessel would take polluted sea water and not only clean it but add helpful organisms and nutrients to it, such as diatoms, which he calls the “baby milk” of the marine food chain.It sounds romantic, challenging, far-fetched even, but between his knowledge of ecological design and naval architecture, Todd seems to have figured it all out: the design of the sailing vessels (inspired by 19th-century Thames barges); how to keep the tanks full of liquid stable on board; energy and lighting; how much water these relatively small vessels could treat. Powered by wind and sun, the entire operation would be fossil fuel-free, he says, “and the fact that they’re going to be so beautiful, they’re going to be the sort of technology neighbourhoods are going to want to have in their back yards”.Maybe I should just slow down and let them catch up before I go galloping off with sailing eco-machines. But I can’t, I’m not young enoughTodd estimates a fleet of 30 such vessels could clean up maritime pollution for about a quarter of the cost of conventional processes. He would love to get two 40ft prototype vessels built and put them to work on nearby Waquoit Bay, which would cost about $20m (£15.5m), he says. Like many coastal areas, Cape Cod’s inshore waters are dying, largely as a result of pollution from domestic sewage. The sea-run brook trout, the shellfish and the eelgrass he saw in the 1960s are hardly to be found any more. Every summer, scores of Massachusetts beaches close after heavy rains because of sewage pollution.Todd knows how to fix it, and much more besides, he believes, but, as has been the case since the 1970s, his ideas are still too wide-ranging for the compartmentalised scientific world to fully understand, he says. Despite having won numerous awards and accolades, he has always been something of an outsider scientist. “Maybe I should just slow down, and let them catch up before I go galloping off with sailing eco-machines,” he says. “But I can’t, I’m not young enough.”Born in Ontario, Canada, Todd has always loved the water and boats. His father designed and built yachts as a hobby, and he has done the same. He studied agriculture and marine biology, but by the time he came to Cape Cod in 1969 and took a post at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, he was beginning to chafe against the strictures and compartmentalisation of academia. He was also becoming increasingly worried about the environment.In 1969, Todd co-founded the New Alchemy Institute with his wife, Nancy, and a colleague, Bill McClarney – not quite a hippy commune, an alternative research institute (associates included visionary architect Richard Buckminster Fuller, economist EF Schumacher and Lynn Margulis, co-creator of the Gaia hypothesis). “I decided I wasn’t a doomwatch ecologist,” Todd says. “Doomwatch can be left to other people, I was more interested in solutions.”The 13-acre (five-hectare) New Alchemy site is a few minutes’ drive from where he and Nancy still live. Its mission was to explore joined-up, sustainable ways of living: energy, food, shelter, waste. They planted organic crops, farmed fish and built wind turbines and experimental architecture – all underpinned by a belief that the more systems they had working together, the stronger the whole would be, just like the organisms in one of his eco-machines.That first eco-machine, in Harwich, ought to have gained Todd national attention; instead it earned him a lawsuit from the state regulators. Apparently nobody was permitted to treat waste without a civil engineering degree. “I appeared on the front page of the Boston Globe, described with a word I’d never heard before, ‘scofflaw’,” he says, chuckling. “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency heard about my fight and sent one of his scientists up to review the data and what I was doing. He went back and he said, ‘He’s legitimate.’” The EPA subsequently honoured him with an award (indeed, an EPA study in 2002 found Todd’s technology to be “typically cost competitive with more conventional wastewater treatment systems”).After the New Alchemy Institute wound down, Todd founded his own ecological consultancy, Ocean Arks International. It has designed and built more than 100 eco-machine systems to treat problems of pollution, wastewater and food production around the world, from the US to China, Australia, Brazil and Scotland. He has drawn up proposals for islands owned by Richard Branson, Marlon Brando and Leonardo DiCaprio (only Branson actually implemented them).Todd’s eco-machines are cheaper and more effective than industrial alternatives, he says, and are even capable of treating chemicals that have been impossible to break down using conventional methods, such as grades of crude oil and mining waste. They are also far more sustainable – powered almost entirely by sunlight.All of which begs the question: why aren’t they more widely used? One reason is prevailing attitudes, Todd suggests. “Civil engineering schools tend to eschew innovation and invention. Hardware is tinkered with and new components are added at a pretty slow pace. A 100-year-old waste water treatment plant looks pretty similar to a contemporary one.”At the same time, for all his scientific skills, Todd is the first to admit he has never been much of a businessman. His career is strewn with startups and partnerships that fell by the wayside for various reasons. However, many of his ideas have seeped into the mainstream and some of his ideas have been developed in a more commerical way, including by his son, Jonathan.It is not just Todd who can vouch for their efficacy. Three years ago, under Todd’s guidance, the Dutch environmental restoration company the Weather Makers built their own eco-machine in Den Bosch, in the Netherlands, with 12 water tanks housed under a 50ft-diameter geodesic dome. They were seeking to process local water polluted by intensive farming into fertile, nutrient-rich water, and to desalinate marine sediments to use in their ecosystem regeneration projects in places such as the Sinai desert.Just as Todd did in Harwich, the Weather Makers’ co-founder Ties van der Hoeven found the results were “amazing”. “Everything he said was just spot on, and certain things really overtook our expectations,” says van der Hoeven. “Everything is growing like crazy.” Tomato plants growing inside the dome with the treated water are 20-30% bigger than ones grown with groundwater, he says.Like many others, he did not really understand Todd’s approach until he put it into practice. “Hopefully now, with this planetary craziness we’re entering into, we’re starting to recognise these kinds of holistic solutions better,” he says. He likens Todd to Yoda from the Star Wars movies – the keeper of an ecological wisdom born in the 1960s and 70s but forgotten, “a bit like the Renaissance being forgotten in the middle ages, and then now people are picking it up again”.As ever, Todd remains an optimist. “I feel we know how to fix the ocean, I feel we know how to fix the deserts, I feel we know how to fix the urban environment, and so we’ve just got to get the story moving,” he says. “There’s just so many positive directions that are possible and economically feasible. If we could get the larger public really excited about how nature can be made to clean up, then people would say, ‘we can do it. We’ve got a future.’”

John Todd’s eco-machine stunned experts by using natural organisms to remove toxic waste from a Cape Cod lagoon. Forty years on, he wants to build a fleet of them to clean up the oceansJohn Todd remembers the moment he knew he was really on to something: “There was no question that it was at the Harwich dump in 1986,” he recalls. This was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, close to where Todd still lives. Hidden away from the picturesque beaches was the town landfill, including lagoons of toxic waste from septic tanks, which was being left to seep into the groundwater below. So Todd, then a 45-year-old biologist, decided to design a solution. What he was “on to”, he came to realise, was not just a natural way of removing pollution from water, it was a holistic approach to environmental restoration that was way ahead of its time, and possibly still is.An early eco-machine purifying toxic waste on Cape Cod in 1986. Photograph: John Todd Continue reading...

John Todd remembers the moment he knew he was really on to something: “There was no question that it was at the Harwich dump in 1986,” he recalls. This was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, close to where Todd still lives. Hidden away from the picturesque beaches was the town landfill, including lagoons of toxic waste from septic tanks, which was being left to seep into the groundwater below. So Todd, then a 45-year-old biologist, decided to design a solution. What he was “on to”, he came to realise, was not just a natural way of removing pollution from water, it was a holistic approach to environmental restoration that was way ahead of its time, and possibly still is.

Todd’s solution to the Harwich pollution problem was both beautifully simple and unfathomably complex. Next to the lagoons, he assembled a line of 15 clear-sided fiberglass tanks, each about the height of a person, and filled them with water containing all the different life forms he could find from local ponds, marshes and streams – plants, bugs, bacteria, fungi, general gunk. The water could be pumped from one tank to the next, and the living matter inside them soon organised itself into a series of different ecosystems. Todd found that he could put in polluted water from the lagoons at one end of the line of tanks and by the time it came out the other end, 10 days later, it was clean enough to drink.

“To see that water, and to see all the organisms in the tanks, including fishes, looking and being so healthy, I was just amazed,” he says.

Todd didn’t know exactly what was going on in those tanks – he would later discover that various microorganisms were finding uses for the toxins and heavy metals – but he didn’t need to, he says. “All I really knew going into it was all the kingdoms of life had to be in there. Nobody knew which ones could cope with what we had, but there’s probably no problem they haven’t solved in one way or another over the last three or four billion years.” Todd calls it “biological intelligence”.

“The thing that separates myself and my colleagues is that we really do celebrate the living world for what it’s beginning to show us it can do,” he says.

Todd christened his invention the “eco-machine”, and spent the next four decades understanding and refining it, applying it to everything from treating wastewater to growing food to repairing damaged ecosystems. Now aged 85, he is still at work, inventing new solutions to a set of environmental problems that has only deepened.

Todd’s latest proposal is his most ambitious yet, something he calls “the Fleet”. The idea is very simple, he says: a fleet of sailing vessels, each containing one of his eco-machines. These could be deployed to clean up coastal environmental disasters on site, wherever they are needed. Each sailing eco-machine, Todd says, is “an incubator of beneficial organisms into the environment surrounding it”. Each vessel would take polluted sea water and not only clean it but add helpful organisms and nutrients to it, such as diatoms, which he calls the “baby milk” of the marine food chain.

It sounds romantic, challenging, far-fetched even, but between his knowledge of ecological design and naval architecture, Todd seems to have figured it all out: the design of the sailing vessels (inspired by 19th-century Thames barges); how to keep the tanks full of liquid stable on board; energy and lighting; how much water these relatively small vessels could treat. Powered by wind and sun, the entire operation would be fossil fuel-free, he says, “and the fact that they’re going to be so beautiful, they’re going to be the sort of technology neighbourhoods are going to want to have in their back yards”.

Todd estimates a fleet of 30 such vessels could clean up maritime pollution for about a quarter of the cost of conventional processes. He would love to get two 40ft prototype vessels built and put them to work on nearby Waquoit Bay, which would cost about $20m (£15.5m), he says. Like many coastal areas, Cape Cod’s inshore waters are dying, largely as a result of pollution from domestic sewage. The sea-run brook trout, the shellfish and the eelgrass he saw in the 1960s are hardly to be found any more. Every summer, scores of Massachusetts beaches close after heavy rains because of sewage pollution.

Todd knows how to fix it, and much more besides, he believes, but, as has been the case since the 1970s, his ideas are still too wide-ranging for the compartmentalised scientific world to fully understand, he says. Despite having won numerous awards and accolades, he has always been something of an outsider scientist. “Maybe I should just slow down, and let them catch up before I go galloping off with sailing eco-machines,” he says. “But I can’t, I’m not young enough.”


Born in Ontario, Canada, Todd has always loved the water and boats. His father designed and built yachts as a hobby, and he has done the same. He studied agriculture and marine biology, but by the time he came to Cape Cod in 1969 and took a post at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, he was beginning to chafe against the strictures and compartmentalisation of academia. He was also becoming increasingly worried about the environment.

In 1969, Todd co-founded the New Alchemy Institute with his wife, Nancy, and a colleague, Bill McClarney – not quite a hippy commune, an alternative research institute (associates included visionary architect Richard Buckminster Fuller, economist EF Schumacher and Lynn Margulis, co-creator of the Gaia hypothesis). “I decided I wasn’t a doomwatch ecologist,” Todd says. “Doomwatch can be left to other people, I was more interested in solutions.”

The 13-acre (five-hectare) New Alchemy site is a few minutes’ drive from where he and Nancy still live. Its mission was to explore joined-up, sustainable ways of living: energy, food, shelter, waste. They planted organic crops, farmed fish and built wind turbines and experimental architecture – all underpinned by a belief that the more systems they had working together, the stronger the whole would be, just like the organisms in one of his eco-machines.

That first eco-machine, in Harwich, ought to have gained Todd national attention; instead it earned him a lawsuit from the state regulators. Apparently nobody was permitted to treat waste without a civil engineering degree. “I appeared on the front page of the Boston Globe, described with a word I’d never heard before, ‘scofflaw’,” he says, chuckling. “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency heard about my fight and sent one of his scientists up to review the data and what I was doing. He went back and he said, ‘He’s legitimate.’” The EPA subsequently honoured him with an award (indeed, an EPA study in 2002 found Todd’s technology to be “typically cost competitive with more conventional wastewater treatment systems”).

After the New Alchemy Institute wound down, Todd founded his own ecological consultancy, Ocean Arks International. It has designed and built more than 100 eco-machine systems to treat problems of pollution, wastewater and food production around the world, from the US to China, Australia, Brazil and Scotland. He has drawn up proposals for islands owned by Richard Branson, Marlon Brando and Leonardo DiCaprio (only Branson actually implemented them).

Todd’s eco-machines are cheaper and more effective than industrial alternatives, he says, and are even capable of treating chemicals that have been impossible to break down using conventional methods, such as grades of crude oil and mining waste. They are also far more sustainable – powered almost entirely by sunlight.

All of which begs the question: why aren’t they more widely used? One reason is prevailing attitudes, Todd suggests. “Civil engineering schools tend to eschew innovation and invention. Hardware is tinkered with and new components are added at a pretty slow pace. A 100-year-old waste water treatment plant looks pretty similar to a contemporary one.”

At the same time, for all his scientific skills, Todd is the first to admit he has never been much of a businessman. His career is strewn with startups and partnerships that fell by the wayside for various reasons. However, many of his ideas have seeped into the mainstream and some of his ideas have been developed in a more commerical way, including by his son, Jonathan.

It is not just Todd who can vouch for their efficacy. Three years ago, under Todd’s guidance, the Dutch environmental restoration company the Weather Makers built their own eco-machine in Den Bosch, in the Netherlands, with 12 water tanks housed under a 50ft-diameter geodesic dome. They were seeking to process local water polluted by intensive farming into fertile, nutrient-rich water, and to desalinate marine sediments to use in their ecosystem regeneration projects in places such as the Sinai desert.

Just as Todd did in Harwich, the Weather Makers’ co-founder Ties van der Hoeven found the results were “amazing”. “Everything he said was just spot on, and certain things really overtook our expectations,” says van der Hoeven. “Everything is growing like crazy.” Tomato plants growing inside the dome with the treated water are 20-30% bigger than ones grown with groundwater, he says.

Like many others, he did not really understand Todd’s approach until he put it into practice. “Hopefully now, with this planetary craziness we’re entering into, we’re starting to recognise these kinds of holistic solutions better,” he says. He likens Todd to Yoda from the Star Wars movies – the keeper of an ecological wisdom born in the 1960s and 70s but forgotten, “a bit like the Renaissance being forgotten in the middle ages, and then now people are picking it up again”.

As ever, Todd remains an optimist. “I feel we know how to fix the ocean, I feel we know how to fix the deserts, I feel we know how to fix the urban environment, and so we’ve just got to get the story moving,” he says. “There’s just so many positive directions that are possible and economically feasible. If we could get the larger public really excited about how nature can be made to clean up, then people would say, ‘we can do it. We’ve got a future.’”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

EPA urged to classify abortion drugs as pollutants

It follows 40 other anti-abortion groups and lawmakers previously calling for the EPA to assess the water pollution levels of the drug.

(NewsNation) — Anti-abortion group Students for Life of America is urging the Environmental Protection Agency to add abortion drug mifepristone to its list of water contaminants. It follows 40 other anti-abortion groups and lawmakers previously calling for the EPA to assess the water pollution levels of the abortion drug. “The EPA has the regulatory authority and humane responsibility to determine the extent of abortion water pollution, caused by the reckless and negligent policies pushed by past administrations through the [Food and Drug Administration],” Kristan Hawkins, president of SFLA, said in a release. “Take the word ‘abortion’ out of it and ask, should chemically tainted blood and placenta tissue, along with human remains, be flushed by the tons into America’s waterways? And since the federal government set that up, shouldn’t we know what’s in our water?” she added. In 2025, lawmakers from seven states introduced bills, none of which passed, to either order environmental studies on the effects of mifepristone in water or to enact environmental regulations for the drug. EPA’s Office of Water leaders met with Politico in November, with its press secretary Brigit Hirsch telling the outlet it “takes the issue of pharmaceuticals in our water systems seriously and employs a rigorous, science-based approach to protect human health and the environment.” “As always, EPA encourages all stakeholders invested in clean and safe drinking water to review the proposals and submit comments,” Hirsch added. Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump’s EPA' in 2025: A Fossil Fuel-Friendly Approach to Deregulation

The Trump administration has reshaped the Environmental Protection Agency, reversing pollution limits and promoting fossil fuels

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration has transformed the Environmental Protection Agency in its first year, cutting federal limits on air and water pollution and promoting fossil fuels, a metamorphosis that clashes with the agency’s historic mission to protect human health and the environment.The administration says its actions will “unleash” the American economy, but environmentalists say the agency’s abrupt change in focus threatens to unravel years of progress on climate-friendly initiatives that could be hard or impossible to reverse.“It just constantly wants to pat the fossil fuel business on the back and turn back the clock to a pre-Richard Nixon era” when the agency didn’t exist, said historian Douglas Brinkley.Zeldin has argued the EPA can protect the environment and grow the economy at the same time. He announced “five pillars” to guide EPA’s work; four were economic goals, including energy dominance — Trump’s shorthand for more fossil fuels — and boosting the auto industry.Zeldin, a former New York congressman who had a record as a moderate Republican on some environmental issues, said his views on climate change have evolved. Many federal and state climate goals are unattainable in the near future — and come at huge cost, he said.“We should not be causing … extreme economic pain for an individual or a family” because of policies aimed at “saving the planet,” he told reporters at EPA headquarters in early December.But scientists and experts say the EPA's new direction comes at a cost to public health, and would lead to far more pollutants in the environment, including mercury, lead and especially tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs. They also note higher emissions of greenhouse gases will worsen atmospheric warming that is driving more frequent, costly and deadly extreme weather.Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican who led the EPA for several years under President George W. Bush, said watching Zeldin attack laws protecting air and water has been “just depressing.” “It’s tragic for our country. I worry about my grandchildren, of which I have seven. I worry about what their future is going to be if they don’t have clean air, if they don’t have clean water to drink,” she said.The EPA was launched under Nixon in 1970 with pollution disrupting American life, some cities suffocating in smog and some rivers turned into wastelands by industrial chemicals. Congress passed laws then that remain foundational for protecting water, air and endangered species.The agency's aggressiveness has always seesawed depending on who occupies the White House. Former President Joe Biden's administration boosted renewable energy and electric vehicles, tightened motor-vehicle emissions and proposed greenhouse gas limits on coal-fired power plants and oil and gas wells. Industry groups called rules overly burdensome and said the power plant rule would force many aging plants to shut down. In response, many businesses shifted resources to meet the more stringent rules that are now being undone.“While the Biden EPA repeatedly attempted to usurp the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law to impose its ‘Green New Scam,’ the Trump EPA is laser-focused on achieving results for the American people while operating within the limits of the laws passed by Congress,” EPA spokeswoman Brigit Hirsch said. Zeldin's list of targets is long Much of EPA’s new direction aligns with Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation road map that argued the agency should gut staffing, cut regulations and end what it called a war on coal on other fossil fuels.“A lot of the regulations that were put on during the Biden administration were more harmful and restrictive than in any other period. So that’s why deregulating them looks like EPA is making major changes,” said Diana Furchtgott-Roth, director of Heritage's Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment.But Chris Frey, an EPA official under Biden, said the regulations Zeldin has targeted “offered benefits of avoided premature deaths, of avoided chronic illness … bad things that would not happen because of these rules.”Matthew Tejada, a former EPA official under both Trump and Biden who now works at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said of the revamped EPA: “I think it would be hard for them to make it any clearer to polluters in this country that they can go on about their business and not worry about EPA getting in their way.”Zeldin also has shrunk EPA staffing by about 20% to levels last seen in the mid-1980s. Justin Chen, president of the EPA’s largest union, called staff cuts “devastating.” He cited the dismantling of research and development offices at labs across the country and the firing of employees who signed a letter of dissent opposing EPA cuts. Relaxed enforcement and cutting staff Many of Zeldin's changes aren't in effect yet. It takes time to propose new rules, get public input and finalize rollbacks. It's much faster to cut grants and ease up on enforcement, and Trump's EPA is doing both. The number of new civil environmental actions is roughly one-fifth what it was in the first eight months of the Biden administration, according to the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project. “You can effectively do a lot of deregulation if you just don’t do enforcement,” said Leif Fredrickson, visiting assistant professor of history at the University of Montana.Hirsch said the number of legal filings isn't the best way to judge enforcement because they require work outside of the EPA and can bog staff down with burdensome legal agreements. She said the EPA is “focused on efficiently resolving violations and achieving compliance as quickly as possible” and not making demands beyond what the law requires.EPA's cuts have been especially hard on climate change programs and environmental justice, the effort to address chronic pollution that typically is worse in minority and poor communities. Both were Biden priorities. Zeldin dismissed staff and canceled billions in grants for projects that fell under the “diversity, equity and inclusion” umbrella, a Trump administration target.He also spiked a $20 billion “green bank” set up under Biden’s landmark climate law to fund qualifying clean energy projects. Zeldin argued the fund was a scheme to funnel money to Democrat-aligned organizations with little oversight — allegations a federal judge rejected. Pat Parenteau, an environmental law expert and former director of the Environmental Law School at Vermont Law & Graduate School, said the EPA's shift under Trump left him with little optimism for what he called “the two most awful crises in the 21st century” — biodiversity loss and climate disruption.“I don’t see any hope for either one,” he said. “I really don’t. And I’ll be long gone, but I think the world is in just for absolute catastrophe.”The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environmentCopyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.