Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

This epic slice of Arizona feeds their souls but lacks a basic necessity: Water

News Feed
Sunday, April 7, 2024

DENNEHOTSO, Ariz. —  Gilarya Begaye looks out across the brush-blanketed pastures, red-dirt plains and flat-topped mesas that surround her home in the Navajo Nation.“Everywhere I’ve ever moved, it never felt like home,” says Begaye, 36. “My heart’s always been here.”But for all the ways that living on the reservation feeds the soul, one basic necessity has been sorely lacking for Begaye, her six children and other Navajos: Water. Leland Interpreter turns the valve at a community well next to the Dennehotso Chapter House in Northeast Arizona. (Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times) DigDeep’s Shanna Yazzie looks over water jugs while completing a survey at the home rural of Alfreda Manheimer in December. (Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times) The Navajos live in the same 1,400-mile-long Colorado River Basin that brings fresh water to millions in Southern California, yet about 30% of homes on the reservation were built without indoor plumbing.With the absence of pipes connecting homes in this isolated corner of the reservation to a water source, many Navajos must spend hours each week driving to a community center in the tribal settlement of Dennehotso to refill portable tanks.While California wrangles with other Western states over the Colorado River’s drought-stricken water supply, Navajo water rights advocates estimate that the 175,000 members who live on the reservation subsist on average on just 5 to 10 gallons a day per person. Compare that to the 76 to 100 gallons of water the Environmental Protection Agency says most Californians use daily.Some see hope in a proposed landmark agreement that would settle all outstanding water rights disputes between the Navajo, Hopi and San Juan Southern Paiute tribes and the state of Arizona. If the final terms of the agreement are approved by the tribal government, the Navajos will ask Congress for $5 billion in federal funding to expand the reservation’s water delivery infrastructure, says Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley. “In the past, we’ve tried to get all of the parties to the table to secure water rights, which since time immemorial we’ve had to fight for,” Curley says. The Navajos aren’t the only ones who’ve been left behind. Researchers from the University of Arizona and Kings College London reported in 2021 that nearly half a million American households nationwide did not have running water, with people of color and renters among the hardest hit. The failure to extend water service to all Indigenous Americans is especially galling given their traditional role as nature’s caretakers, says Heather Whiteman Runs Him, associate clinical professor and director of the Tribal Justice Clinic at the University of Arizona in Tucson. “We respect water in ways that many other Americans don’t,” says Whiteman Runs Him, a Crow tribal member from Montana. “The vast majority of Americans take water access for granted. You pay a water bill but don’t think about what you’re paying for.”With no running water at home, Begaye, a single mother, devised a system. Water barrels lie empty at Gilarya Begaye’s Navajo Nation home after a new water system was installed. (Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times) “I have some 55-gallon water barrels — also some 5-gallon water barrels,” she says. “The smaller ones, we’d usually take down to my mom’s house down the hill and refill them, because she has a 250-gallon water tank.”Begaye’s mother would drive to her daughter’s house in her flatbed truck to refill the larger barrels before making the trek into town to replenish her tank.Recently, Begaye and about 200 other homeowners near Northeast Arizona’s borders with New Mexico, Utah and Colorado received free water systems, including cisterns, pipes and kitchen sinks with functioning cold-water taps, through a Los Angeles-based nonprofit, the DigDeep Right to Water Project. In the previous years, tasks such as cooking, cleaning and bathing were complicated; they required the family — kids included — to venture out in the bracing chill of winter and scorching heat of summer to siphon water into jugs to bring indoors. Gilarya Begaye, and daughter Mia Etsitty, 6 months, carries a five gallon water jug she no longer needs inside her Navajo Nation home after indoor plumbing was installed. (Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times) In winter, Begaye was careful to leave the small jugs slightly open to prevent them from cracking in freezing temperatures. Summer brought another hazard — snakes that took shelter under the larger containers.Some homeowners near Begaye collect water from vessels meant for livestock — boiling and adding purification tablets to make it safe to use. The lack of sewer lines means outhouses are a common sight.The Navajos take this hardship in stride. Water may be scarce, and climate change may be ushering in more extreme droughts, but this landscape fortifies them.Dennehotso, where Begaye lives, lies an hour away from the red-rock formations of Monument Valley, which were shaped by eons of water and wind erosion but resemble artworks chiseled by a sculptor.According to their creation story, Navajos were born out of the same earth and stone.::The disparity in water access between Navajo tribal members and other Americans was dramatized in a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling. Brushing aside a host of treaties and legal precedents dating to the formation of the reservation on a fraction of Navajo ancestral territory in 1868, the court determined that the federal government is not obligated to help the tribe get more access to water from natural sources such as the Colorado River basin.“That disregard for the humanity and human rights of people who live in the Navajo Nation — it should be disturbing to every American that these conditions persist,” Whiteman Runs Him says.Whiteman Runs Him filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case on behalf of a coalition of Navajo supporters, arguing that water access is not just critical for public health and sanitation but that it is a universal human right. The Biden administration appeared to support this view when it announced on Tuesday that the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation would make $320 million available to federally recognized tribes in the western U.S. to help restore and revitalize their water infrastructure and expand access to clean drinking water.The U.S. government hasn’t always been benign presences in Indian country. They have a long track record of threatening the Navajos’ existence.Thousands of tribal members were removed from their lands during the “Long Walk” — a brutal, 400-mile journey to an internment camp in central New Mexico that was part of Kit Carson’s scorched-earth campaign of 1863. To make their homeland unlivable, he poisoned the tribe’s wells. Later, coal and uranium companies tainted the water with runoff and toxic spills.Homeowners in Dennehotso seem more keen to talk about their will to persevere than relive the indignities that have scarred their land and oppressed their people.Living here, Begaye says, makes her feel closer to her late grandmother, who used to herd sheep among windmills that dot the landscape. All around, horses and cows roam in pastures crisscrossed by nameless dirt roads. A single mother, Begaye purchased her small plot three years ago, partly with savings earned from weaving traditional Navajo rugs, sewing, carpentry jobs and baking. The home, which she converted from a storage shed, has a small kitchen with a propane stove. That opens to a living room and an area for beds in the back. Space is tight, but she appreciates that her children — ages 6 months to 16 — can play in the fields that stretch beneath the startlingly blue sky.As her baby, Mia, coos in her rocker, Begaye recounts her 4-year-old son Alex’s excitement when he turned on the tap for the first time. It was as if he had performed magic.“Just seeing the look on his face, it made me really happy,” she says. Alex Etsitty, 4, washes his hands inside his Navajo Nation home. His family recently got indoor plumbing for the first time. (Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times) On this day, Shanna Yazzie, DigDeep’s regional project manager, has come with a gift — a step ladder to allow the smaller children to use the sink.Alex steps up, turns on the tap and watches as water swirls down the drain. Begaye looks just as charmed.Begaye holds up a blue, 5-gallon jug. A vessel this size would provide two or three showers for her family. The average American uses the equivalent of three of these jugs for a single shower.::A 15-minute-drive along dirt and gravel roads leads to the home of one of Begaye’s uncles, where a DigDeep crew is at work. Sunlight drenches one of the organization’s water trucks. Printed on the side is a saying in the tribal language: Tó éí ííná át’é”Water is life. DigDeep employee Arvin Holiday fills a new cistern from a water tanker at Everett Blackwater’s Navajo Nation home. (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) It takes a few minutes before Everett Blackwater, 63, feels comfortable opening up to a non-Native stranger about how his own life has been shaped by the difficulty of accessing water.Dressed in a Carhartt hoodie and knit cap, he watches a backhoe operator dig a pit for a cistern, which will connect to the new sink that will be installed in the kitchen.Blackwater, his wife and his adult son — the only one of seven siblings who still lives at home — had been hauling water from Dennehotso each month, making the half-hour trek to fill a 225-gallon tank.Indoor plumbing was unheard of when Blackwater was growing up.He points toward an old windmill and says he and other family members resorted to collecting their drinking water from a livestock well each weekend. The pickup truck he uses today is a massive improvement. “Back then, when I was a kid,” he says, “it was a donkey.”Other residents share stories of resolve at the Navajo Chapter House, the community center in Dennehotso where they come to load up on water. Tribe members pay a sliding fee to siphon water, depending on the size of their barrels — less than $10 for most customers. Each week, 100 to 200 customers arrive to refill their water vessels, says Maricelyn Smith-Williams, the center’s manager.Public showers are available for residents who lack indoor plumbing — $3 per visit, with the elderly welcome to bathe for free. Five-gallon water jugs are also given to those who need them.Outside, Leland Interpreter, the grandson of a World War II Navajo Code Talker, fills a 425-gallon tank in his truck’s flatbed. He drives here every three or four days.Interpreter, 40, says most of the water goes to his livestock — three dozen cows, a dozen sheep and three horses.“They say that livestock is more important to us” than people, he says.Next to pull in is Irene Yazzie, 71. It took over an hour to drive from her home 10 miles away in the outback. Her late husband used to make these water runs.“Now it’s my job,” Yazzie, who’s no relation to Shanna, says. She comes to refill her 250-gallon tank about once a week — twice a week when her grandchildren visit. The wear-and-tear on the truck is the biggest downside, she says. And she must be careful to plan her trips to avoid the occasional rains that can wash out dirt roads.Speaking in both Navajo and English, Yazzie says no one has running water around where she lives. Clouds gather over a rural home on the Arizona side of the Navajo Reservation near Monument Valley. The Navajo believe their people emerged from this sweeping land of desert plains and red rocks. (Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times) Smith-Williams says this lack of indoor plumbing reflects a broader socioeconomic crisis. Poverty is widespread in Dennehotso and jobs are as lacking as indoor taps, she says. Families can’t afford to install plumbing on their own or replace deteriorated cisterns. Permits needed for any water pipe construction require navigating the tribe’s cumbersome bureaucracy.With so many obstacles, Smith-Williams says, it’s a challenge to build a better life while remaining on the reservation.Back at Begaye’s house, she says she is more focused than ever on the future. Her home loan is paid off and she’s about to get free internet service installed so her older children can do homework online. She plans to go back to school in the fall to learn a trade.Begaye stands by a loom where she’s weaving a rug that will depict the Navajo Tree of Life — a corn stalk with radiating leaves and sturdy roots. Water runs across the Navajo Reservation in Tuba City, Ariz. A severe drought in the arid Southwest has brought new urgency to the Navajo’s long fight to secure access to drinking water for all of their people. (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) The tree represents the Navajos’ emergence from the lower realms of the earth after a great flood. It also signifies something that inspires Begaye in her own life — her people’s unbreakable connection to this land.

More than a third of the Navajo Nation lacks running water. As the tribe nears a pact with Arizona over water rights, a California nonprofit looks to help.

DENNEHOTSO, Ariz. — 

Gilarya Begaye looks out across the brush-blanketed pastures, red-dirt plains and flat-topped mesas that surround her home in the Navajo Nation.

“Everywhere I’ve ever moved, it never felt like home,” says Begaye, 36. “My heart’s always been here.”

But for all the ways that living on the reservation feeds the soul, one basic necessity has been sorely lacking for Begaye, her six children and other Navajos: Water.

Leland Interpreter turns the valve at a well at the Dennehotso Chapter House.

Leland Interpreter turns the valve at a community well next to the Dennehotso Chapter House in Northeast Arizona.

(Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times)

Shanna Yazzie looks over water jugs while completing a survey at the home rural of Alfreda Manheime

DigDeep’s Shanna Yazzie looks over water jugs while completing a survey at the home rural of Alfreda Manheimer in December.

(Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times)

The Navajos live in the same 1,400-mile-long Colorado River Basin that brings fresh water to millions in Southern California, yet about 30% of homes on the reservation were built without indoor plumbing.

With the absence of pipes connecting homes in this isolated corner of the reservation to a water source, many Navajos must spend hours each week driving to a community center in the tribal settlement of Dennehotso to refill portable tanks.

While California wrangles with other Western states over the Colorado River’s drought-stricken water supply, Navajo water rights advocates estimate that the 175,000 members who live on the reservation subsist on average on just 5 to 10 gallons a day per person. Compare that to the 76 to 100 gallons of water the Environmental Protection Agency says most Californians use daily.

Some see hope in a proposed landmark agreement that would settle all outstanding water rights disputes between the Navajo, Hopi and San Juan Southern Paiute tribes and the state of Arizona. If the final terms of the agreement are approved by the tribal government, the Navajos will ask Congress for $5 billion in federal funding to expand the reservation’s water delivery infrastructure, says Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley.

“In the past, we’ve tried to get all of the parties to the table to secure water rights, which since time immemorial we’ve had to fight for,” Curley says.

The Navajos aren’t the only ones who’ve been left behind. Researchers from the University of Arizona and Kings College London reported in 2021 that nearly half a million American households nationwide did not have running water, with people of color and renters among the hardest hit.

The failure to extend water service to all Indigenous Americans is especially galling given their traditional role as nature’s caretakers, says Heather Whiteman Runs Him, associate clinical professor and director of the Tribal Justice Clinic at the University of Arizona in Tucson.

“We respect water in ways that many other Americans don’t,” says Whiteman Runs Him, a Crow tribal member from Montana. “The vast majority of Americans take water access for granted. You pay a water bill but don’t think about what you’re paying for.”

With no running water at home, Begaye, a single mother, devised a system.

Water barrels lie empty at Gilarya Begaye's Navajo Nation home after a new water system was installed

Water barrels lie empty at Gilarya Begaye’s Navajo Nation home after a new water system was installed.

(Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times)

“I have some 55-gallon water barrels — also some 5-gallon water barrels,” she says. “The smaller ones, we’d usually take down to my mom’s house down the hill and refill them, because she has a 250-gallon water tank.”

Begaye’s mother would drive to her daughter’s house in her flatbed truck to refill the larger barrels before making the trek into town to replenish her tank.

Recently, Begaye and about 200 other homeowners near Northeast Arizona’s borders with New Mexico, Utah and Colorado received free water systems, including cisterns, pipes and kitchen sinks with functioning cold-water taps, through a Los Angeles-based nonprofit, the DigDeep Right to Water Project.

In the previous years, tasks such as cooking, cleaning and bathing were complicated; they required the family — kids included — to venture out in the bracing chill of winter and scorching heat of summer to siphon water into jugs to bring indoors.

Gilarya Begaye carries a five gallon water jug she no longer needs inside her Navajo Nation home.

Gilarya Begaye, and daughter Mia Etsitty, 6 months, carries a five gallon water jug she no longer needs inside her Navajo Nation home after indoor plumbing was installed.

(Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times)

In winter, Begaye was careful to leave the small jugs slightly open to prevent them from cracking in freezing temperatures. Summer brought another hazard — snakes that took shelter under the larger containers.

Some homeowners near Begaye collect water from vessels meant for livestock — boiling and adding purification tablets to make it safe to use. The lack of sewer lines means outhouses are a common sight.

The Navajos take this hardship in stride. Water may be scarce, and climate change may be ushering in more extreme droughts, but this landscape fortifies them.

Dennehotso, where Begaye lives, lies an hour away from the red-rock formations of Monument Valley, which were shaped by eons of water and wind erosion but resemble artworks chiseled by a sculptor.

According to their creation story, Navajos were born out of the same earth and stone.

::

The disparity in water access between Navajo tribal members and other Americans was dramatized in a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

Brushing aside a host of treaties and legal precedents dating to the formation of the reservation on a fraction of Navajo ancestral territory in 1868, the court determined that the federal government is not obligated to help the tribe get more access to water from natural sources such as the Colorado River basin.

“That disregard for the humanity and human rights of people who live in the Navajo Nation — it should be disturbing to every American that these conditions persist,” Whiteman Runs Him says.

Whiteman Runs Him filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case on behalf of a coalition of Navajo supporters, arguing that water access is not just critical for public health and sanitation but that it is a universal human right. The Biden administration appeared to support this view when it announced on Tuesday that the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation would make $320 million available to federally recognized tribes in the western U.S. to help restore and revitalize their water infrastructure and expand access to clean drinking water.

The U.S. government hasn’t always been benign presences in Indian country. They have a long track record of threatening the Navajos’ existence.

Thousands of tribal members were removed from their lands during the “Long Walk” — a brutal, 400-mile journey to an internment camp in central New Mexico that was part of Kit Carson’s scorched-earth campaign of 1863. To make their homeland unlivable, he poisoned the tribe’s wells. Later, coal and uranium companies tainted the water with runoff and toxic spills.

Homeowners in Dennehotso seem more keen to talk about their will to persevere than relive the indignities that have scarred their land and oppressed their people.

Living here, Begaye says, makes her feel closer to her late grandmother, who used to herd sheep among windmills that dot the landscape. All around, horses and cows roam in pastures crisscrossed by nameless dirt roads.

A single mother, Begaye purchased her small plot three years ago, partly with savings earned from weaving traditional Navajo rugs, sewing, carpentry jobs and baking. The home, which she converted from a storage shed, has a small kitchen with a propane stove. That opens to a living room and an area for beds in the back.

Space is tight, but she appreciates that her children — ages 6 months to 16 — can play in the fields that stretch beneath the startlingly blue sky.

As her baby, Mia, coos in her rocker, Begaye recounts her 4-year-old son Alex’s excitement when he turned on the tap for the first time. It was as if he had performed magic.

“Just seeing the look on his face, it made me really happy,” she says.

Alex Etsitty, 4, washes his hands inside his Navajo Nation home.

Alex Etsitty, 4, washes his hands inside his Navajo Nation home. His family recently got indoor plumbing for the first time.

(Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times)

On this day, Shanna Yazzie, DigDeep’s regional project manager, has come with a gift — a step ladder to allow the smaller children to use the sink.

Alex steps up, turns on the tap and watches as water swirls down the drain. Begaye looks just as charmed.

Begaye holds up a blue, 5-gallon jug. A vessel this size would provide two or three showers for her family. The average American uses the equivalent of three of these jugs for a single shower.

::

A 15-minute-drive along dirt and gravel roads leads to the home of one of Begaye’s uncles, where a DigDeep crew is at work.

Sunlight drenches one of the organization’s water trucks.

Printed on the side is a saying in the tribal language: Tó éí ííná át’é”

Water is life.

DigDeep employee Arvin Holiday fills a new cistern from a water tanker.

DigDeep employee Arvin Holiday fills a new cistern from a water tanker at Everett Blackwater’s Navajo Nation home.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

It takes a few minutes before Everett Blackwater, 63, feels comfortable opening up to a non-Native stranger about how his own life has been shaped by the difficulty of accessing water.

Dressed in a Carhartt hoodie and knit cap, he watches a backhoe operator dig a pit for a cistern, which will connect to the new sink that will be installed in the kitchen.

Blackwater, his wife and his adult son — the only one of seven siblings who still lives at home — had been hauling water from Dennehotso each month, making the half-hour trek to fill a 225-gallon tank.

Indoor plumbing was unheard of when Blackwater was growing up.

He points toward an old windmill and says he and other family members resorted to collecting their drinking water from a livestock well each weekend.

The pickup truck he uses today is a massive improvement.

“Back then, when I was a kid,” he says, “it was a donkey.”

Other residents share stories of resolve at the Navajo Chapter House, the community center in Dennehotso where they come to load up on water.

Tribe members pay a sliding fee to siphon water, depending on the size of their barrels — less than $10 for most customers. Each week, 100 to 200 customers arrive to refill their water vessels, says Maricelyn Smith-Williams, the center’s manager.

Public showers are available for residents who lack indoor plumbing — $3 per visit, with the elderly welcome to bathe for free. Five-gallon water jugs are also given to those who need them.

Outside, Leland Interpreter, the grandson of a World War II Navajo Code Talker, fills a 425-gallon tank in his truck’s flatbed. He drives here every three or four days.

Interpreter, 40, says most of the water goes to his livestock — three dozen cows, a dozen sheep and three horses.

“They say that livestock is more important to us” than people, he says.

Next to pull in is Irene Yazzie, 71. It took over an hour to drive from her home 10 miles away in the outback. Her late husband used to make these water runs.

“Now it’s my job,” Yazzie, who’s no relation to Shanna, says. She comes to refill her 250-gallon tank about once a week — twice a week when her grandchildren visit.

The wear-and-tear on the truck is the biggest downside, she says. And she must be careful to plan her trips to avoid the occasional rains that can wash out dirt roads.

Speaking in both Navajo and English, Yazzie says no one has running water around where she lives.

Alfreda Manheimer's rural home.

Clouds gather over a rural home on the Arizona side of the Navajo Reservation near Monument Valley. The Navajo believe their people emerged from this sweeping land of desert plains and red rocks.

(Brian van der Burg / Los Angeles Times)

Smith-Williams says this lack of indoor plumbing reflects a broader socioeconomic crisis.

Poverty is widespread in Dennehotso and jobs are as lacking as indoor taps, she says. Families can’t afford to install plumbing on their own or replace deteriorated cisterns. Permits needed for any water pipe construction require navigating the tribe’s cumbersome bureaucracy.

With so many obstacles, Smith-Williams says, it’s a challenge to build a better life while remaining on the reservation.

Back at Begaye’s house, she says she is more focused than ever on the future.

Her home loan is paid off and she’s about to get free internet service installed so her older children can do homework online. She plans to go back to school in the fall to learn a trade.

Begaye stands by a loom where she’s weaving a rug that will depict the Navajo Tree of Life — a corn stalk with radiating leaves and sturdy roots.

Water flows on the arid Navajo Reservation.

Water runs across the Navajo Reservation in Tuba City, Ariz. A severe drought in the arid Southwest has brought new urgency to the Navajo’s long fight to secure access to drinking water for all of their people.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

The tree represents the Navajos’ emergence from the lower realms of the earth after a great flood.

It also signifies something that inspires Begaye in her own life — her people’s unbreakable connection to this land.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

As California cracks down on groundwater, what will happen to fallowed farmland?

California water regulators are cracking down on the overuse of groundwater by farmers. Enforcement could prompt them to idle thousands of acres of farmland and poses larger questions about what will happen to the affected fields.

In summary California water regulators are cracking down on the overuse of groundwater by farmers. Enforcement could prompt them to idle thousands of acres of farmland and poses larger questions about what will happen to the affected fields. A couple of weeks ago, the California Water Resources Control Board put five agricultural water agencies in Kings County on probation for failing to adequately manage underground water supplies in the Tulare Lake Basin that have been seriously depleted due to overpumping. It was the state’s first major enforcement action under the State Groundwater Management Act, passed a decade ago to protect the aquifers that farmers have used to supplement or replace water from reservoirs that’s curtailed during periods of drought. In some areas, so much groundwater has been pumped that the land above it has collapsed, a phenomenon known as subsidence. The board’s action on April 16 not only subjects the Kings County agencies to fees and tighter monitoring but sends a message to irrigators throughout the state that they must get serious about eliminating overdrafts after having a decade to adopt aquifer management plans. Curtailing groundwater use is not an isolated event, but rather a significant piece of the state’s declared intent to reduce the share of water devoted to agriculture – roughly three quarters of overall human use – as the state adjusts to the effects of climate change. As if to punctuate that goal, federal water managers have told San Joaquin Valley farmers that despite two wet winters they will receive less than half of their contracted allocations of water during this year’s growing season. In decades past, when surface water from reservoirs has fallen short of demand, farmers have drilled deep wells to tap aquifers. With the state water board cracking down on groundwater, it is inevitable, experts say, that some fields will have to be taken out of production. The Public Policy Institute of California, which closely monitors management of the state’s water supply, has estimated that at least 500,000 acres of farmland will be fallowed when the groundwater law is fully implemented. Whose lands will be affected, what happens to idled acreage and the financial impacts are issues hovering over groundwater reduction. One day after the water board’s crackdown on Kings County, a hint of those issues surfaced as the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee approved legislation that would make it easier for farmers whose access to groundwater is restricted to convert their fields into solar energy farms. Assembly Bill 2528, carried by Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula, a Fresno Democrat, would allow affected farmers to withdraw their land from Williamson Act conservation contracts and use it for solar power generation without paying the stiff cancellation fees now in current law. The six-decade-old Williamson Act gives farmers big reductions in their property taxes in return for making long-term commitments to keep land in agricultural production. Learn more about legislators mentioned in this story. Joaquin Arambula Democrat, State Assembly, District 31 (Fresno) Arambula told the committee that “many agricultural landowners are at risk of losing access to water that is essential for their ability to farm their land (and) this confluence of water sustainability needs and clean energy demand creates an opportunity for us to craft an approach that addresses multiple economic and environmental goals.” The bill is backed by the solar power industry and the Western Growers Association, which generally represents large farmers. However, the California Farm Bureau, with many relatively small farmers as members, is opposed, saying the bill could undermine the Williamson Act’s goal of conserving farmland. The split between the two farm groups implies that as groundwater is curtailed, there will be a scramble over the conversion of fallowed fields. Some farmers are already lining up deals with solar energy interests that would be even more lucrative if they can cancel their Williamson Act contracts without paying hefty cancellation fees, as much as 25% of the land’s value.

Fire for Watersheds

To bring more water to the landscape — and fight the growing risk of catastrophic wildfires — a Tribe in California helps to reshape fire management policy. The post Fire for Watersheds appeared first on The Revelator.

Originally published by BioGraphic. Fire is not coming easily to the pile of dried grass and brush. Four college students fuss with the smoldering heap while Ron Goode, a bear-like man with a graying braid, leans on his cane and inspects their work. Crouch down low, he tells them. Reach farther into the brush with the lighter. Tentative orange flames spring to life and a student in a tie-dyed t-shirt blows gently, imploring them not to die. It’s a clear November day in the western foothills of California’s Sierra Nevada near the town of Mariposa. The students, visiting from the University of California, Berkeley, are here to help revitalize a patch of live oaks that belongs to Goode’s wife’s family. Goode, the chairman of the North Fork Mono Tribe, is here to teach them how. Now in his early 70s, Goode and his Tribe have worked for decades to restore neglected meadows and woodlands on private property,  reservations belonging to other Tribes, and on their own ancestral homelands in the Sierra National Forest. And restoration, in these dry hills, calls for fire. Dressed in cotton shirts and pants, the students feeding the thread of smoke in the oak grove look more like landscapers than a fire crew. “We’re not firefighters. We’re burners, professional burners,” Goode explains. “And we’re using Native knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge, from centuries ago.” This approach, employed by Native peoples across the world, is known as cultural burning. Once the fire is rolling, the students use pruning shears to cut more naked stems of Ta-ka-te, or sourberry (Rhus trilobata), down to the ground and toss those onto the now crackling pile. The next morning, after the flames have devoured this fuel, Goode’s grandnephew Jesse Valdez will coach the students on how to mix the cooling ash into the soil with rakes, to fertilize the roots below. After piles are burned and extinguished, fire practitioners will rake the ash into the soil to fertilize the roots below. Photograph by Ashley Braun Cultural burning is a kind of gardening. This Indigenous stewardship tradition of clearing, landscaping, and burning mimics natural disturbances, which create a diverse mosaic of habitats and trigger beneficial growth patterns in certain plants. Goode, Valdez, and other practitioners use small, targeted fires to help reshape and rejuvenate landscapes, both for the overall ecological health of the land and for specific cultural purposes, from cultivating traditional foods to sustaining ceremonial practices. Fire, for instance, stimulates Mo-nop’, or deergrass (Muhlenbergia rigens), to explode with flowers. Nium people, as the Mono call themselves, use these flexible flower stalks to weave watertight baskets coiled and patterned like rattlesnakes. And towering Wi-yap’, or black oak (Quercus kelloggii) yield bushels of healthy acorns — once a staple in many Native Californian diets. Low-intensity fires discourage competing conifers, smoke out pests, and clear fuels that threaten to carry flames into the oaks’ more vulnerable crowns. Fire also improves fruit production in berry patches — another key food source for people and animals. Acorns were once a staple among many California Natives, accounting for up to 50 percent of Indigenous diets in the state. Photograph by Ashley Braun Before foreign colonizers arrived and suppressed the practice, Native Californians often lit low-intensity fires to realize benefits like these. Frequent, low-intensity fire also inoculated the landscape against the kind of destructive megafires that regularly scorch the West Coast today. In fact, fire was so endemic in pre-colonial times that the total area burned in California each year was far greater than that burned by modern megafires. But instead of leaving a blackened moonscape largely devoid of life, the low-intensity fires revitalized the land. Now, Indigenous peoples across the United States are reclaiming traditional fire stewardship practices, from California and Oregon to Minnesota and Texas. They are reviving their connections to their cultures and homelands, restoring ecosystems, boosting biodiversity, and reducing wildfire risk. In California, they’re even using fire — counterintuitively — to bring water back to the parched land. “Let’s go way back in time,” Goode says, beginning a Nium story. “Tobahp — Land — married Pia — Water — and they had a mischievous child named Kos. And Kos is Fire. Kos liked to run around out in the forest and leave a trail, and wherever Kos went, his father Pia would follow him and sprinkle water on his trail, and his mother Tobahp would come along and plant flowers and plants.” The ancient allegory describes wildfire in the Sierra, Goode explains: After flames pass over the land, “Water is everywhere, and the first thing that starts popping up are all the cultural plants and the flowers.” Learning to harness fire and its benefits over millennia allowed Native Californians like the Nium to create and maintain open, park-like landscapes. They wanted clear sightlines to watch for danger and protect their villages and families. And the grassy oak savannas and meadows that they tended with cultural burning were ideal for gathering food, medicines, and other supplies, as well as for travel and hunting. Meadows are good for more than just people, says Joanna Clines, a Sierra National Forest botanist who has worked with the North Fork Mono on restoration. These wetland ecosystems are often-spring-fed and boast “a huge explosion of diversity,” Clines explains, including dozens of species of sedges, rushes, and grasses,  which in turn provide cover and forage for deer, birds, frogs, snakes, and other fauna. Wildflowers like common camas hide delicious bulbs beneath the damp soil and produce blooms that attract native butterflies and bees. Comprising just 2% of the region today — historically they may have covered more than four times that — meadows “are the gems of the Sierra Nevada,” Clines says. But from the late 18th to the early 20th century, colonists violently removed Indigenous stewards from their meadows, and from the land. Fires were snuffed out or never lit. Indigenous people in the Sierra and beyond were killed in droves, forced to assimilate, and corralled onto reservations. Spanish missionaries were first to ban cultural burning, followed later by the U.S. government. After a devastating complex of wildfires burned 3 million acres in the Northern Rockies in 1911, Congress passed a law establishing a national forest policy of fire prevention and suppression. The Bureau of Indian Affairs later adopted it on reservations. The land and people are still recovering from their forced separation from fire. Fifty miles east of Mariposa, Goode surveys a meadow within the North Fork Mono’s homelands, where fragrant native mint and soaproot toast in the autumn sun, alongside a muddy spring. The meadow is part of the 1.3-million-acre Sierra National Forest. For a long time, the Tribe tended deergrass and other resources here, Goode says, but in the early 1980s, many began to feel that the national forest no longer welcomed them in this place. Without the Tribe’s ministrations, ponderosa pines marched in, along with aggressive European invaders like Scotch broom, shading out what had been the largest deergrass bed in their homelands. In 2003, Dave Martin, a friendly new Forest Service district ranger, invited the North Fork Mono back to this meadow. When the Tribe returned, they found it unrecognizable. But with initial help from an environmental nonprofit and local volunteers, the Tribe chopped brush and selectively logged to mimic what fire would have accomplished had it been allowed. They also performed three cultural burns between 2005 and 2010. Some pines were too large for them to cut or burn, but the utility company PG&E serendipitously felled them later as it cleared space around its powerlines to avoid sparking wildfires. Freed from thirsty conifers, the meager spring began gushing through the summer. Within a few years, Goode says, these five verdant acres were once again worthy of the label “meadow.” A stately black oak — a favorite tree among many California Tribes — drops acorns at its margin, and Goode points out the sprawling hummocks of returned bunchgrasses, their green glow fading to straw. “These are all the fresh deergrasses,” he says. “They go way up, all the way to the farthest telephone pole now.” The link between fire and water is well-recognized among fire-dependent Indigenous cultures worldwide, says Frank Kanawha Lake, a Forest Service fire ecologist who collaborates with Goode on research. Historical records suggest that Tribes throughout California, for example, have long known that burning brush makes springs run better and helps save water, according to research by Lake, who has family ties to the Karuk and Yurok. Even in swampy Florida, the Seminole Tribe has a long history of burning in marshes and other damp ecosystems to encourage cultural and medicinal plants that require a higher water table. The Maar-speaking Indigenous peoples of southeastern Australia, meanwhile, tell a story about a vengeful cockatoo who sets a grass fire that prompts a musk duck to shake its wings, filling lakes and swamps with water. Western science is just starting to catch up with this kind of Indigenous knowledge. Tucked beyond the iconic monolith Half Dome in Yosemite National Park, north of Goode’s restored meadow, Illilouette Creek rushes past streaked granite and patches of charred pines. For almost a hundred years, federal land managers suppressed every blaze in the creek’s fire-adapted basin. Then, in 1968, the National Park Service acknowledged fire’s ecological role with a new policy of “Natural Fire Management.” The policy allowed lightning-caused wildfires to burn in zones where they didn’t threaten human health or infrastructure and where natural fuel breaks contained their reach. By 1972, Yosemite had applied the approach to granite-flanked Illilouette Creek Basin. In the following four and a half decades, wildfire remade the landscape, though not in the way of the megafires that often grab headlines today. Instead, the blazes were more frequent, smaller, and burned with varying degrees of severity — likely aided at first by the cooler, wetter climate of the 1970s and ’80s. Using aerial photography, ecohydrologist Gabrielle Boisramé and a handful of collaborators discovered that Illilouette Basin’s forest cover shrank by a quarter, more closely approximating historical conditions.  New holes appeared in the canopy, filling in with shrublands and meadow-like fields, which have more than tripled in area since 1972. In 2019, Boisramé published a model-based study that suggested these changes have made the basin modestly but notably wetter. “In the more open areas — which are maintained open by fire — you get deeper snow, and it sticks around longer,” in part because more of it reaches the ground, says Boisramé, who’s now based at the nonprofit Desert Research Institute in Nevada. “That means that water from the snowmelt is getting added to the soil later into the dry season, which is better for vegetation, and can help maintain some of those wet meadows” — as well as boost streamflows and groundwater in a region often grappling with drought. Her previous modeling also shows that fire’s return brings as much as a 30% spike in soil moisture during the summer. The extra water stored and the smaller number of trees competing for it seem to have helped Illilouette’s trees weather the state’s worst drought in centuries, even as trees in the adjacent Sierra National Forest died in droves, Boisramé says. And the type of fire diversity now found in Illilouette is connected to better long-term carbon storage and greater biodiversity, with documented benefits for bees, understory plants, bats, and birds. Teasing out fire’s precise and myriad influences on hydrology is challenging, given the many variables involved for any particular place or circumstance. However, Boisramé’s studies are part of a small but growing body of work that suggests frequent fire has long-term hydrologic benefits for ecosystems adapted to such blazes. In the mid-20th century, pioneering fire researcher Harold Biswell found that the prescribed burns he conducted on cattle ranches in the Sierra Nevada foothills helped revive summer-parched springs. That aligns with research in the western U.S. showing that some watersheds — particularly those without substantial groundwater stores to feed waterways — see more water in streams after fire, likely thanks to fewer thirsty plants. Researchers in Australia, meanwhile, recently published a paper suggesting that European colonization of southeast Tasmania created the region’s dry scrublands and devastating megafires by suppressing Indigenous burning that had maintained waterlogged heathlands. Fire has less direct benefits, too. Inspired by the knowledge of Indigenous burners in the Karuk Tribe, have shown that wildfire smoke can block enough solar radiation to cool rivers and streams by nearly 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit. In some cases, that could offer localized relief to cold-water species like salmon during the changing climate’s hottest summer days. As more scientists and conservationists recognize the ways Indigenous people shaped ecosystem biodiversity and resilience with fire, there’s an opportunity to return reciprocity to management, says Lake — and to reconnect people and place. “What is our human responsibility, and what are our human services for that ecosystem?” he asks. “How do we prescribe the right amount of fire today, fire as medicine? Traditional knowledge can guide us.” There is little question that the land needs help. Of the more than 8,200 meadows that the Forest Service has documented in the Sierra Nevada, the agency has listed 95% as unhealthy, or worse, no longer functioning as meadow ecosystems. The North Fork Mono have taken on the task of reviving some of these places in addition to the deergrass meadow that Goode showed me. Working alongside the Forest Service, they’ve begun restoring at least five others in the Sierra National Forest since 2003. In 2018, and again last year, Goode signed five-year agreements with the Forest Service that he hopes will allow the Tribe to restore many more. Those agreements explicitly acknowledge their authority to carry out Indigenous fire management. But their traditional management practices have been challenging to implement. Goode and his team have so far assessed nine meadows for restoration — and eventually, for cultural burning. They and the Forest Service are working to cut down encroaching conifers and shrubs, clear dead and fallen trees and other vegetation, create piles for burning, remove noxious weeds, clear gullies, and build structures to stabilize eroding soil. All paving the way for vibrant meadows that will hold onto water. As some elements of those projects move forward, Goode’s team has so far hit a roadblock when it comes to lighting the actual fires. According to Goode, under the agreements, “it’s us putting fire on the ground, and them participating if they wish.” But the Forest Service won’t allow someone to set a fire unless they have a “red card” obtained through rigorous firefighter training. “The forest is in dire need of restoration, and cultural burning is certainly going to be a key component going forward,” says Dean Gould, Sierra National Forest supervisor. But the agency wants to operate as safely as possible, he adds. Fire practitioners must work in forests laced with buildings and infrastructure, under unprecedented climatic conditions and huge fuel loads. For his part, Gould blames the delay mostly on a lack of capacity. Several recent historic wildfires within the national forest have kept its staff from building a more robust prescribed fire program, which would coordinate cultural burns. The COVID pandemic added other delays, as did a slew of onerous new nation-wide recommendations for prescribed fire that the Forest Service issued in 2022 after losing control of two such burns in New Mexico. Tribes hoping to implement cultural burning on federal lands commonly face challenges like the ones the Nork Fork Mono has come up against. “[B]oth state and federal agencies lack an adequate understanding of Tribes and cultural fire practitioners, their expertise and authority, land tenure, and the requirements of cultural burns,” write the authors of a report put together for the Karuk Tribe. That, in turn, has led to “confusion, delay, and red-tape,” as well as interference with tribal sovereignty. “Either we do cultural burning the way it’s supposed to be done, or we’re not going to do it,” says Goode, whose team has more than a hundred small piles of brush prepped and waiting in two Sierra National Forest meadows — ready for them to light and tend the fires before snow falls. Indigenous fire stewardship also includes cultural rituals such as burning sage, which is sacred to many Native communities of California and Mexico. Photograph by Ashley Braun Traditional practitioners often see requirements like red cards as inconsistent with cultural burning, explains Jonathan Long, a Forest Service ecologist who has worked with several Tribes on the issue. Part of the problem is that cultural burning adopts precautions in fundamentally different ways than typical agency burns do. Their intentions and practices, for example, make for safer burns as a general rule. Practitioners tend to ignite only small patches of lower-intensity fire; they welcome both youth and elders to teach and learn; they manicure away risky fuels; and they tend burns closely enough to reduce impacts on cultural resources like deergrass, as well as other plants and wildlife. It’s akin to a city installing bike lanes and traffic-slowing measures so parents can transport kids safely to school by bike, instead of strapping them in car seats inside bulky SUVs. Either way, kids arrive in one piece, but the approaches are vastly different. There’s also not yet an official playbook for cultural burning within the Forest Service to help guide agency staff, which holds the process back. But Gould says he is part of a regional effort to draft such a policy and that his staff are thinking about how to apply that in the Sierra National Forest. “I think people are trying to work through, how do we craft the system in ways that will distinguish cultural burning from the wildfire suppression and large prescribed fire events where the risks are different?” says Long. Still, Long sees more opportunities for traditional fire practices opening up, especially in California, where in recent years the state has rolled out new policies that ease barriers to cultural burning on state and private lands. And at the federal level, in late 2022 the U.S. Forest Service announced 11 major agreements to jointly manage lands with Tribes, including one that allows the Karuk Tribe to conduct cultural burns in partnership with the Six Rivers National Forest in California. The White House followed that announcement with the first-ever national guidance on Indigenous knowledge for federal agencies. The document explicitly recognized the North Fork Mono Tribe for collaborating on research examining cultural burning and climate resilience. In December, Goode’s grandnephew Valdez trained the Tule River Indian Tribe and Sequoia National Forest staff during a cultural burn at that forest. Sierra National Forest staff also attended, hoping to use the event’s success as a springboard in their own forest, according to Gould. But Goode, now facing serious health issues, is losing patience with the plodding government agency overseeing his Tribe’s homelands, and is even considering legal options for enforcing his Tribe’s right to burn. “You’re not doing it fast enough, not just for the Tribe’s benefit, but for the land,” he says. As the light retreats after the first day of burning near Mariposa, Goode and Valdez, both of whom also work as tribal archaeologists, gather the students next to a wide meadow. Goode’s wife’s property, where they’ve been working, lies within the ancestral territory of the Miwok people,  and a few years ago, Goode, Valdez, and a large volunteer contingent worked with some Miwok to clear and burn this portion of the land. These burns represent an intergenerational transfer of knowledge and culture, a core part of the practice and key to its continuity. While the sky turns citrus, the group stands atop a massive slab of granite bedrock that emerges from the sea of amber grass like the back of a gray whale. It’s pockmarked with deep, perfectly round holes, some filled with rotting leaves and recent rainwater. Here, the pair explains, the Miwok women who lived in this place at least as far back as 8,000 years ago milled acorns with stone pestles, their daily rhythms grinding permanent impressions into the stone. “They need to be cleaned and cleared out,” Goode says of the mortars. “Right now these are all deteriorating.” Like the meadow here that needed burning, even features as immutable-seeming as these bedrock mortars need tending. They need the Indigenous stewards whose hands shaped them; and people today to remember how to sustain the land. After the archaeology lesson, everyone piles back into trucks to return for dinner: foil-wrapped potatoes, roasting in the embers of today’s fire. Previously in The Revelator: Wildfires Ignite Mental Health Concerns The post Fire for Watersheds appeared first on The Revelator.

California increases water allocation after wet winter, but fish protections limit pumping

California has increased water allocations to 40% of full allotments from the State Water Project. Officials say environmental regulations have limited pumping.

With runoff from this year’s snow and rain boosting the levels of California’s reservoirs, state water managers on Tuesday announced plans to increase deliveries of supplies from the State Water Project to 40% of full allotments, up from 30% last month.The increased allocation, which had been widely expected, means that suppliers serving 27 million Californians, as well as some farming areas, will have substantially more water available to use and store this year. But the Department of Water Resources also said officials have had to limit pumping from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta this year because of environmental protections for native fish.Although this year has brought average wet conditions, the agency said its ability to move water south through the system of aqueducts and reservoirs has been “impacted by the presence of threatened and endangered fish species” near the state’s pumping facilities in the south delta.“The presence of these fish species has triggered state and federal regulations that significantly reduce the pumping from the Delta into the California Aqueduct,” John Yarbrough, acting deputy director of the State Water Project, said in a notice outlining the increased allocation. Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. That has limited the state’s ability to move water south to San Luis Reservoir, which stands at 72% of capacity — a level that is 86% of average for this time of year.The reduced pumping is expected to continue into late spring, Yarbrough said. State officials then expect to increase pumping significantly this summer, once conditions allow for it under the pumping facilities’ permits.Environmental and fishing groups have criticized a recent rise in the estimated numbers of fish that have died at the pumping facilities in the delta, and have demanded that state and federal agencies take steps to limit the losses of threatened steelhead trout and endangered winter-run chinook salmon.The massive pumps that draw water into the State Water Project and the federally managed Central Valley Project are strong enough that they can reverse the flow in parts of the south delta.The losses of fish are estimated based on how many fish are collected at a state facility near the pumps and trucked to nearby areas of the delta, where they are released. The calculations attempt to account for fish that are caught by predators and those that are killed when they are sucked into pumps.State water managers said they are taking various steps to limit the losses of fish. They said pumping has been reduced this month to minimal levels in order to comply with spring flow requirements.The Department of Water Resources said the increased allocation was based on the latest snowpack and runoff data. The snowpack measures 99% of average for this time of year, and the amount of runoff is projected to be above average.The state’s reservoirs rose dramatically in 2023, which brought one of the wettest winters on record, and this year’s storms have again boosted reservoir levels.Lake Oroville, the state’s second largest reservoir, is now at 94% of capacity and is projected to completely fill next month.The water that is pumped from the delta and flows south into the California Aqueduct provides a significant portion of Southern California’s supplies.With the increased allocation, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California will be able to meet the region’s water demands this year and will have surplus water to put into storage, said Adel Hagekhalil, the MWD’s general manager.That will build on the record 3.4 million acre-feet of water that the district has banked in various reservoirs and underground storage areas. The MWD’s added supplies amount to about 200,000 acre-feet, enough to supply roughly 600,000 typical households for a year.“We will make every effort to store as much water as possible in every storage account available, for use during the next dry year,” Hagekhalil said.He urged Southern Californians to keep up their efforts to save water.“The more efficient we all are during these wet years, the more water we can keep in storage for use during the next inevitable drought to provide reliable water supplies,” he said.The final water allocation still could change in May or June as state water managers reassess conditions.The restrictions on pumping this year have coincided with the ongoing debate over the efforts of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration to advance the proposed Delta Conveyance Project, a 45-mile tunnel that would transport water beneath the delta.Karla Nemeth, director of the Department of Water Resources, said the limitations on pumping this year underscore “the challenges of moving water in wet periods with the current pumping infrastructure in the south Delta.”“We had both record low pumping for a wet year and high fish salvage at the pumps,” Nemeth said in a press release. “We need to be moving water when it’s wet so that we can ease conditions for people and fish when dry conditions return.”She said in a wet year like this, the proposed tunnel would allow the state to move more water during high flows “in a manner safer for fish.”Her department estimated that if the Delta tunnel had been in place this winter, the State Water Project would have been able to capture an additional 909,000 acre-feet of water, enough to supply roughly 3 million households for a year.The State Water Contractors, an association of 27 public agencies that purchase the water, reiterated its support for moving forward with the Delta Conveyance Project.“Water deliveries should be far higher in a good water year like we’ve had,” said Jennifer Pierre, the association’s general manager. “Today’s modest allocation highlights just how difficult it is to operate within current regulatory constraints and with infrastructure in need of modernization. Even in a good water year, moving water effectively and efficiently under the current regime is difficult.”Newsom has called the Delta Conveyance Project a central piece of his administration’s strategy for making the state’s water-delivery system more resilient to the effects of climate change.Opponents are trying to block the project in the courts. Environmental groups, fishing advocates, tribal leaders and local agencies have said the Delta Conveyance Project would harm the delta’s ecosystem and have also raised other concerns.In one of the latest court cases, four environmental groups and the Central Delta Water Agency are seeking to challenge the state’s reliance on decades-old water rights permits for the project. They’ve argued that the State Water Resources Control Board has wrongly given preferential treatment to the state, which is seeking to use water rights that were originally filed in 1955 and 1972.Lawyer Osha Meserve, who represents the Central Delta Water Agency, said the state water board is letting the Department of Water Resources “cut in line ahead of thousands of other water rights holders” — and ahead of flows that are necessary to keep the delta and its fish healthy.

Thames Water could raise bills to £627 a year to help fix leaks

Embattled water supplier promises to invest up to £3bn more over the next five yearsBusiness live – latest updatesThames Water could raise bills to as much as £627 a year to pay to fix its leaky network, after promising to invest up to £3bn more over the next five years.The embattled water supplier said on Monday that it had updated its spending plans for 2025 to 2030 after discussions with the industry regulator, Ofwat. Continue reading...

Thames Water could raise bills to as much as £627 a year to pay to fix its leaky network, after promising to invest up to £3bn more over the next five years.The embattled water supplier said on Monday that it had updated its spending plans for 2025 to 2030 after discussions with the industry regulator, Ofwat.In October it submitted its business plan, known as a PR24, to Ofwat, pledging to spend £18.7bn over the period, and raise bills by 40% to £610 excluding inflation.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe company has now said it will definitely spend a further £1.1bn – totalling £19.8bn – to address environmental concerns over sewage dumping in the sector.Thames said it could spend £1.9bn on top of this – totalling £21.7bn over the period – depending on the availability of labour in its supply chain, which it would agree on an annual basis with Ofwat. If this occurred, bills for Thames’s 16 million customers would reach £627 by 2030, a 44% increase, excluding inflation.Thames is under intense scrutiny amid fears over its financial stability and questions over whether its shareholders are willing to pay upfront for its investments, before they are recovered from consumers through bills.The government is preparing plans in case the debt-laden company collapses, including renationalisation. The Guardian revealed last week that Whitehall contingency plans for a renationalisation could include the bulk of its £15.6bn debt being added to the public purse, with some lenders to its core operating company potentially losing up to 40% of their money.Thames said on Monday it had been able to up its spending without increasing bills “due to a rebalancing of operating and capital expenditures”.The Thames Water chief executive, Chris Weston, said: “Our business plan focuses on our customers’ priorities. As part of the usual ongoing discussions relating to PR24, we’ve now updated it to deliver more projects that will benefit the environment.“We will continue to discuss this with our regulators and stakeholders.”Shareholders said last month they were not willing to put in a promised £500m while a standoff between Thames and Ofwat continued.The Guardian revealed last week that Thames was considering issuing more debt to help fund its plans, adding to its £15.6bn debt pile.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.