Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

SoCal regulators weigh weakened rules for emissions-free appliances

News Feed
Tuesday, April 8, 2025

In 2021, Gayatri Sehgal moved away from the fresh air of upstate New York and into the smog-choked city of Los Angeles. The pollution quickly made their asthma worse. On a given day, Sehgal might be short of breath or wheezing as their airways inflame. “I’ve felt valid anxieties about the air,” the 28-year-old said. Their symptoms are bad enough that they don’t know if they can continue living in the region. At a March 21 public meeting, Sehgal, a mental health worker focused on climate issues and an intern with the LA-area chapter of the Sierra Club, urged Southern California regulators not to delay in adopting clean air rules that would support the state’s plan to unleash millions of electric heat pumps — and net a major health win for residents like Sehgal. Regulators are deciding just how much to heed appeals like these. The South Coast Air Quality Management District is weighing new rules to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides, or NOx, the smog-forming byproducts of combustion, by limiting the sale of home gas-fired furnaces and water heaters. About 10 million of these fossil-fueled appliances are currently installed throughout the region, home to more than 17 million residents across Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. Although an earlier draft of the rules would have effectively banned the sale of gas-fired units, the agency’s staff walked back the idea after vigorous opposition from industry, business organizations, city governments, and others. Now, the agency is proposing to allow manufacturers to gradually ratchet down the amount of gas equipment they sell so long as they pay nominal mitigation fees. Starting in 2027, manufacturers would be required to aim for a sales target of 30% for appliances that meet zero-NOx emissions standards, i.e., heat pumps and heat-pump water heaters. The fraction would increase to 90% by 2036, but the rules would never require sales of gas appliances to actually stop. Some advocates are still pushing for updates with stronger teeth, saying the proposed fees are likely too small to get manufacturers to comply. But over two years into a prolonged process that has only diluted the initial proposal, supporters are also urging the agency to get the rules done as soon as possible and lock in their considerable health and environmental benefits. The full board for the district is expected to vote on the rules on June 6. NOx emissions are a nationwide problem that many states are actively working to solve. But the challenge is especially urgent in Southern California, which has some of the worst air quality in the country, according to the American Lung Association, a supporter of stronger draft rules. “We fail to meet several federal air quality standards,” said Sarah Rees, deputy executive officer at the air district, the oldest in the nation. ​“We really need to take all actions that we can to reduce those emissions.” Most NOx is from transportation sources, which are regulated by state and federal agencies. But under the SCAQMD’s jurisdiction are the fossil fuel–burning appliances in residential and commercial buildings. These pollution sources are responsible for roughly 76,000 asthma attacks, 30,000 lost school days, and 130 premature deaths each year, according to the advocacy group Coalition for Clean Air and climate think tank RMI. The annual health costs total about $2 billion. The district first set NOx emission limits on residential space heaters with Rule 1111 and residential water heaters with Rule 1121 in 1978. Regulators have progressively strengthened them over time, first beginning to consider the shift to zero-emission equipment in 2016. Though the proposed updates to the rules don’t represent a wholesale shift to NOx-free units, they could still reduce NOx emissions by 6 tons per day by 2060. For comparison, the more ambitious rules, which included space heaters in commercial buildings, would have enabled the South Coast to eliminate 10 tons of NOx per day by 2054. Still, 6 tons per day is ​“a pretty big chunk,” Rees told Canary Media. ​“It’s about 10% of all of the stationary source emissions [from every factory, refinery, power plant, etc.] in our region.” The public health benefits would be enormous, according to the district’s socioeconomic impact analysis: more than $25 billion from 2027 to 2053, including about 2,500 lives saved. Zero-NOx emissions standards taking off Zero-NOx standards for new home appliances aren’t a new concept. San Francisco Bay Area regulators adopted such rules in 2023, and the California Air Resources Board is developing a similar proposal for the entire state. The trend is growing outside of California, too. Maryland is developing zero-emissions rules for heating homes and businesses, and in 2023, eight more states — Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Washington — committed to exploring such standards. The South Coast also has a recent history of health- and climate-aligned rulemaking. In 2023, regulators adopted a first-of-its-kind rule to electrify large commercial bakeries and kitchens. In 2024, they passed another landmark rule to electrify small industrial boilers and large water heaters. However, this time, critics got the district to refrain from requiring new space and water heaters be electric.

In 2021, Gayatri Sehgal moved away from the fresh air of upstate New York and into the smog-choked city of Los Angeles. The pollution quickly made their asthma worse. On a given day, Sehgal might be short of breath or wheezing as their airways inflame. “I’ve felt valid anxieties about the air,” the 28-year-old said.…

In 2021, Gayatri Sehgal moved away from the fresh air of upstate New York and into the smog-choked city of Los Angeles. The pollution quickly made their asthma worse. On a given day, Sehgal might be short of breath or wheezing as their airways inflame.

I’ve felt valid anxieties about the air,” the 28-year-old said. Their symptoms are bad enough that they don’t know if they can continue living in the region.

At a March 21 public meeting, Sehgal, a mental health worker focused on climate issues and an intern with the LA-area chapter of the Sierra Club, urged Southern California regulators not to delay in adopting clean air rules that would support the state’s plan to unleash millions of electric heat pumps — and net a major health win for residents like Sehgal.

Regulators are deciding just how much to heed appeals like these. The South Coast Air Quality Management District is weighing new rules to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides, or NOx, the smog-forming byproducts of combustion, by limiting the sale of home gas-fired furnaces and water heaters. About 10 million of these fossil-fueled appliances are currently installed throughout the region, home to more than 17 million residents across Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties.

Although an earlier draft of the rules would have effectively banned the sale of gas-fired units, the agency’s staff walked back the idea after vigorous opposition from industry, business organizations, city governments, and others.

Now, the agency is proposing to allow manufacturers to gradually ratchet down the amount of gas equipment they sell so long as they pay nominal mitigation fees. Starting in 2027, manufacturers would be required to aim for a sales target of 30% for appliances that meet zero-NOx emissions standards, i.e., heat pumps and heat-pump water heaters. The fraction would increase to 90% by 2036, but the rules would never require sales of gas appliances to actually stop.

Some advocates are still pushing for updates with stronger teeth, saying the proposed fees are likely too small to get manufacturers to comply. But over two years into a prolonged process that has only diluted the initial proposal, supporters are also urging the agency to get the rules done as soon as possible and lock in their considerable health and environmental benefits. The full board for the district is expected to vote on the rules on June 6.

NOx emissions are a nationwide problem that many states are actively working to solve. But the challenge is especially urgent in Southern California, which has some of the worst air quality in the country, according to the American Lung Association, a supporter of stronger draft rules.

We fail to meet several federal air quality standards,” said Sarah Rees, deputy executive officer at the air district, the oldest in the nation. We really need to take all actions that we can to reduce those emissions.”

Most NOx is from transportation sources, which are regulated by state and federal agencies. But under the SCAQMD’s jurisdiction are the fossil fuel–burning appliances in residential and commercial buildings. These pollution sources are responsible for roughly 76,000 asthma attacks, 30,000 lost school days, and 130 premature deaths each year, according to the advocacy group Coalition for Clean Air and climate think tank RMI. The annual health costs total about $2 billion.

The district first set NOx emission limits on residential space heaters with Rule 1111 and residential water heaters with Rule 1121 in 1978. Regulators have progressively strengthened them over time, first beginning to consider the shift to zero-emission equipment in 2016.

Though the proposed updates to the rules don’t represent a wholesale shift to NOx-free units, they could still reduce NOx emissions by 6 tons per day by 2060. For comparison, the more ambitious rules, which included space heaters in commercial buildings, would have enabled the South Coast to eliminate 10 tons of NOx per day by 2054.

Still, 6 tons per day is a pretty big chunk,” Rees told Canary Media. It’s about 10% of all of the stationary source emissions [from every factory, refinery, power plant, etc.] in our region.”

The public health benefits would be enormous, according to the district’s socioeconomic impact analysis: more than $25 billion from 2027 to 2053, including about 2,500 lives saved.


Zero-NOx emissions standards taking off

Zero-NOx standards for new home appliances aren’t a new concept. San Francisco Bay Area regulators adopted such rules in 2023, and the California Air Resources Board is developing a similar proposal for the entire state.

The trend is growing outside of California, too. Maryland is developing zero-emissions rules for heating homes and businesses, and in 2023, eight more states — Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Washington — committed to exploring such standards.

The South Coast also has a recent history of health- and climate-aligned rulemaking. In 2023, regulators adopted a first-of-its-kind rule to electrify large commercial bakeries and kitchens. In 2024, they passed another landmark rule to electrify small industrial boilers and large water heaters.

However, this time, critics got the district to refrain from requiring new space and water heaters be electric.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

The U.S. is committed to cleaning up Tijuana River pollution. Will California follow through?

San Diego leaders are calling on California to take stronger action to address the ongoing environmental crisis caused by sewage and industrial pollution flowing from the Tijuana River.

In summary San Diego leaders are calling on California to take stronger action to address the ongoing environmental crisis caused by sewage and industrial pollution flowing from the Tijuana River. As Tijuana River sewage has contaminated neighborhoods in southern San Diego County, the federal government has pledged two-thirds of a billion to clean it up.  Now local lawmakers are calling on California to step up the fight against cross-border pollution, and one introduced a bill this week to revisit air quality standards for noxious gas from the river. State Sen. Catherine Blakespear held a joint hearing of the Senate Environmental Quality Committee and the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee in San Diego Thursday to explore how the state can help solve the problem. “California has long been a national leader in environmental stewardship and policy making,” Blakespear said at the hearing. “But what is happening in the Tijuana River Valley is an international environmental disaster that undermines everything that California stands for.” The hearing at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, convened scientists and civic leaders to discuss how failed infrastructure, industrial waste and decades of neglect created the environmental disaster, and what it will take to fix it. “Due to its international nature, we know the federal government must take the lead,” Blakespear said. “Still, there is much that the state and local governments can do.” After decades of stalemate, action on Tijuana River pollution is speeding up. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Monday announced a new agreement with Mexico to plan for wastewater infrastructure to accommodate future population growth in Tijuana. On Wednesday State Sen. Steve Padilla introduced a bill to update state standards for hydrogen sulfide, a noxious gas with a rotten egg smell that’s produced by sewage in the river. Residents in the area complain of headaches, nausea and other ailments when hydrogen sulfide reaches high concentrations. The bill would require the California Air Resources Board to review the half-century-old standard and tighten it if needed. State Lawmakers also aim to improve conditions for lifeguards and other workers exposed to pollution, and hold American companies accountable for their role in contamination of the river. County officials will conduct an extensive health study to measure effects of Tijuana River pollution, and are making plans to remove a pollution hot spot in Imperial Beach. Ongoing, chronic pollution Sewage spills in south San Diego County became common in the early 2000s, sickening swimmers and surfers at local beaches. Then the aging wastewater plants failed, sending hundreds of millions of gallons of raw sewage into the ocean. Last year Scripps researchers found that the river is harming nearby communities by releasing airborne chemicals including hydrogen sulfide gas, which smells like rotten eggs. “The sewage flowing into San Diego County’s Coastline is poisoning our air and water, harming public health, closing beaches, and killing marine life,” Blakespear said.  San Diego officials have successfully lobbied for federal investment to upgrade aging wastewater treatment plants. They also introduced faster water quality testing and surveyed residents to understand health issues.  Paula Stigler Granados, a professor of public health at San Diego State University, said studies of people living near the Tijuana River found “more scary stuff,”  with 45% experiencing health problems, 63% saying pollution disrupted their work or school and 94% of respondents reporting sewage smells at home.  “Children are waking up sick in the middle of the night,” she said. “This is an ongoing, chronic exposure, not a one-time event.” A section of the Tijuana River next to Saturn Boulevard in San Diego on Nov. 21, 2025. Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters Water samples revealed industrial chemicals, methamphetamine, fentanyl, restricted pesticides, pharmaceuticals and odor-causing sulfur compounds, she said. “This is absolutely a public health emergency,” Stigler Granados said. “I do think it is the biggest environmental crisis we have in the country right now.” That sense of urgency isn’t universal. Last year Gov. Gavin Newsom declined requests by San Diego officials to declare a state of emergency over the border pollution problem, saying it “would have meant nothing.” Over the last two years State Sen. Steve Padilla has introduced legislation to fund improvements to wastewater treatment, limit landfill construction in the Tijuana River Valley and require California companies to report waste discharges that affect water quality in the state, but those bills failed. He said the problem is overlooked in this border area, with its low-income and working class population. “This is one of the most unique and acute environmental crises in all of North America,” Padilla said. “It is underappreciated simply because of where it is occurring.”  Tijuana River solutions This year the U.S. repaired the failing South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant and expanded its capacity from 25 million to 35 million gallons of wastewater per day. In April, Mexico repaired its Punta Bandera plant near the border, reducing sewage flows into the ocean. But the Imperial Beach shoreline has remained closed for three years, and residents still complain of headaches, nausea, eye irritation and respiratory ailments from airborne pollution. That problem is worst at a point known as the Saturn Blvd. hot spot in Imperial Beach, where flood control culverts churn sewage-tainted water into foam, spraying contaminants into the air. “When the water is polluted you can close the beach,” said Kim Prather, an atmospheric chemist at Scripps, who identified the airborne toxins. “But you can’t tell people not to breathe.” Community members feel forgotten by state leaders as they face chronic air pollution and years of closed beaches because of contaminated wastewater from the Tijuana River, said Serge Dedina, executive director of the environmental organization WildCoast and former Imperial Beach mayor. “What they say is ‘how come California doesn’t care about us?’” Dedina said. As federal authorities plan expansions to the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant that will boost its capacity to 50 million gallons per day, local and state leaders have their own action plan. A top priority for Aguirre is removing culverts at the Saturn Blvd. hot spot that cause airborne pollution. “That’s low hanging fruit that we don’t need to depend on the federal government to fix,” Aguirre said. She hopes to get funding for that project from Proposition 4, the state environmental bond that voters passed earlier this year. It dedicates $50 million to cleaning up degraded waterways, including the Tijuana River and New River, which flows into the Salton Sea.  The county is also planning a health study that would include physiological measurements to determine the health effects of Tijuana River pollution. “What we’re working on is how are we going to take real, hard medical data and follow a cohort of people who live in this environment, so we can understand what is happening in their bodies,” Aguirre said. “What is happening to children and seniors? What is in their bloodstreams?” San Diego County has distributed about 10,000 home air purifiers to households near the Tijuana River, but Aguirre wants to provide devices to all 40,000 homes in the affected area. Dedina said his organization is removing waste tires that are exported to Mexico and wash back into the Tijuana River Valley. “My lesson here is we need to stop the sediment, the tires, the trash, the toxic waste, the sewage,” he said. In addition to his bill updating hydrogen sulfide standards, Padilla said he’s exploring legislation to regulate pollution created by California companies operating through maquiladoras in Mexico. He wants to work with Mexico “to put some pressure on them to basically clamp down on American companies that are licensed to do business here in California. Blakespear said she wants to protect lifeguards and other public workers exposed to pollution. Whether the solution is creating environmental standards for international businesses or funding costly infrastructure, lawmakers acknowledge that the binational nature of the problem makes it tough to solve. “The complexity around it being an international issue and being a federal issue has added to the difficulties about who should act,” Blakespear said.

Air Pollution Linked To Autoimmune Diseases Like Lupus, Arthritis, Experts Say

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterWEDNESDAY, Dec. 17, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution might play a role in people’s risk for developing...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterWEDNESDAY, Dec. 17, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution might play a role in people’s risk for developing autoimmune diseases like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, a new study says.People exposed to particle air pollution had higher levels of anti-nuclear antibodies, a characteristic marker of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, researchers recently reported in the journal Rheumatology.“These results point us in a new direction for understanding how air pollution might trigger immune system changes that are associated with autoimmune disease,” senior researcher Dr. Sasha Bernatsky, a professor of medicine at McGill University in Canada, said in a news release.For the study, researchers collected blood samples from more than 3,500 people living in Canada’s Ontario region, looking at their levels of anti-nuclear antibodies.Anti-nuclear antibodies are produced by the immune system as part of an autoimmune disease. These antibodies mistakenly target the body’s own cells and tissues.The team compared those blood test results to people’s average exposure to particle pollution, based on air pollution tracking data for their home address.People with the highest levels of exposure to air pollution were 46% to 54% more likely to have high levels of anti-nuclear antibodies, the study found.Fine particle pollution involves particles that are 2.5 microns wide or smaller, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. By comparison, a human hair is 50 to 70 microns wide.“These fine particles in air pollution are small enough to reach the bloodstream, potentially affecting the whole body,” Bernatsky said.She stressed that such pollution is not just a problem for big cities.“Air pollution is often seen as an urban problem caused by traffic, but rural and suburban areas experience poor air quality too,” Bernatsky said, pointing to wildfires that choke the sky with smoke.The results underscore why standards to reduce air pollution are important, she concluded.“Even though air quality is overall better in Canada than in many other countries, research suggests there is no safe level, which is why Canadian policymakers need research like ours,” Bernatsky said.SOURCES: McGill University, news release, Dec. 15, 2025; Rheumatology, Oct. 22, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.