Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Scientists Devise New Plan to Study the Most Exciting Rock on Mars

News Feed
Tuesday, December 16, 2025

The most exciting rock known to science is a school-desk-sized chunk of mudstone currently stuck on Mars.Formed from fine, water-washed sediments on the floor of a long-lost lake—some 3.5 billion years ago, when Mars was a warmer, wetter world—the rock was found in 2024 by scientists using NASA’s Perseverance rover to explore what’s now known as Jezero Crater. Dubbed Cheyava Falls, the mudstone stood out to the researchers because its surface was spangled with strange speckles and ring-shaped blobs, which they referred to as poppy seeds and leopard spots. They also discovered that it was packed with organic matter—chemical compounds of carbon, the elemental cornerstone of biology as we know it.Organic-rich rocks right here on Earth sometimes contain similar features, which tend to be created by microbial life. And after painstaking follow-up studies with the rover, the Perseverance team announced earlier this year that ancient alien microbes might be the best explanation for the Martian rock’s spots and seeds as well.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.To know for sure whether Cheyava Falls is proof of past life on Mars—or instead just a weird quirk of lifeless organic chemistry—astrobiologists want to bring some of the rock back to Earth for closer study. But the NASA-led international program to do just that, known as Mars Sample Return (MSR), is in political limbo, beset by ballooning costs and flagging federal support. Even if MSR does go ahead as planned, Perseverance’s hard-won samples of Cheyava Falls and other Martian materials wouldn’t arrive before 2040.Not content to sit idle, a cadre of scientists organized by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is pursuing an audacious plan B. Rather than wait for pieces of Cheyava Falls to reach Earth, the researchers will try growing the rock’s most mysterious features for themselves in carefully curated or manufactured mudstones. By subjecting these simulacra—some of which will bear terrestrial microbes, while others will be slow baked and sterilized—to lab-based conditions mimicking what’s known of early Mars, the team hopes to learn how Cheyava Falls really got its spots.“Take your best guess as to what was in the mud. Take your best guess as to what the nature of the organic matter is. Stir them up together, let it all settle to the bottom, and watch what happens,” says Joel Hurowitz, a geoscientist at Stony Brook University and a member of the Perseverance science team, who is familiar with the work.This approach won’t be able to definitively prove or disprove the existence of past life on Mars. But by mapping out every conceivable way to make the seeds and spots in a lab, scientists can determine whether it’s likelier that the features evident in Cheyava Falls were made with microbes or without them.Cooking Up Poppy Seeds and Leopard SpotsThe universe owes a lot to the behavior of electrons. Whether we are talking about the explosive deaths of stars, the formation of planets, the weather or the critters that live under it, electrons often drive the chemistry that makes things happen.One particularly important type of chemical drama is known as an oxidation-reduction, or redox, reaction. Oxidation involves the loss of electrons, while reduction is the gain of electrons. Redox reactions happen everywhere, all the time, in all sorts of environments—and they are essential to the normal functioning of living things, allowing organisms to obtain energy, to maintain basic cellular operations and even to shield themselves from external dangers.Nobody expected to see fossilized creatures, or even necessarily preserved microbial corpses, on the surface of Mars. But finding trace evidence of biologically driven redox reactions was far more plausible, and the Cheyava Falls outcrop—and its wider environment—is a near-perfect place to look.“They record an ancient, habitable environment,” says Sanjeev Gupta, an Earth scientist at Imperial College London and a member of the Perseverance rover team. Within it, Perseverance picked up a bounty of organic material. It also saw tiny nodules and larger, halolike features: the poppy seeds and leopard spots, respectively. Both the poppy seeds and leopard spots are the graffiti left behind by the redoxlike shuttling about of electrons.Potentially microbe-made small dark “poppy seed” speckles and larger dark-rimmed “leopard spot” blobs dot the surface of “Cheyava Falls,” one of the most intriguing rocks ever found on Mars.The poppy seeds contain a reduced form of iron, Fe(II), found in a mineral named vivianite (seen as black specks). Fe(II) is produced when preexisting Fe(III) gains an electron. Fe(III), the oxidized version of this iron, was found within the original Cheyava Falls muds.The leopard spots also have Fe(II) in two different mineral forms: vivianite (which appears as dark rims) and greigite (which is within the spots’ interior). The spots also contain sulfides, a reduced form of preexisting sulfates that is also found in the Cheyava Falls muds; the sulfides are also part of the mineral greigite.The seeds and spots are essentially “a fossilized chemical reaction,” Gupta says. And any experiments on Earth hoping to re-create them will take one of two possible pathways: one that deploys microbes and one that doesn’t.First, let’s look at the nonbiological options. One way to turn Fe(III) and sulfates into Fe(II) and sulfides is to heat up the ingredients found in those muds and wait. “That’s a reaction that can happen without life. But it’s incredibly slow,” says Michael Tice, a geobiologist at Texas A&M College of Arts and Sciences and a member of the Perseverance science team. And by slow, he means potentially millions of years.A good analogy is sugar and oxygen. The two can react to unleash bountiful chemical energy—but sustained, strong heat is what really makes that happen. Sugar doesn’t much react with oxygen just sitting on your kitchen table. Similarly, you wouldn’t get the Cheyava Falls features unless you baked the original muds at high temperatures—150 degrees Celsius or more. Yet NASA’s Perseverance rover has uncovered no evidence of such cooking for Cheyava Falls, and it seems the seeds and spots were created shortly after the mud was deposited.Now let’s look at the microbial route. If that mudstone had instead formed from a lake bed on Earth, one would expect prevalent microbes to “consume” the organic matter and gain energy effectively from the reduction of Fe(III) and the sulfates. This would happen relatively fast because Earthly microbes deploy potent enzymes that ease the reaction’s energetic thresholds; no high-temperature cookery is required. And “it’s exactly where you’d expect microbes to be living,” Gupta says.Whisper it: based on current evidence, it seems likelier that microbes made these seeds and spots than geological activity. But the problem is that the two chemical pathways “start with the same reactants and end up with the same products,” says Morgan Cable, a research scientist at the Laboratory Studies group at JPL and a member of the Perseverance science team. “The reaction is essentially the same. That’s where it gets tricky.”Laboratory Alchemy Thanks to orbital reconnaissance from spacecraft and ground truthing from rovers, we already have a pretty good idea of what Jezero Crater was like in its halcyon days eons ago. By Martian standards, it was an aquatic wonderland, with water flowing through channels to form and feed a crater lake, piling up sprawling deltas of swept-in sediments, all under a warmer, thicker carbon-dioxide-rich sky. Remarkably, scientists can re-create parts of this past realm in their state-of-the-art laboratories.Test chambers can be kept at the right temperatures to simulate Martian conditions and can be filled with myriad mixtures of gases to reproduce atmospheric pressures and compositions that prevailed on the planet in its deep past. Synthetic mudstones custom-concocted in labs or purchased premade can incorporate various recipes informed by Perseverance’s measurements, with fluctuating amounts of oxygen, organic matter, acidity, salinity, and so on.Over time, as these simulacra unfold under different environmental conditions, watchful scientists can see what happens—and adjust accordingly to explore the truly vast landscape of possibilities. For better or worse, “the range of experiments to engage with is endless,” Hurowitz says.On Earth, life famously gets everywhere. Heat can ensure certain mudstones are sterilized, Cable says, similar to how water can be boiled to deactivate any microscopic bugs. But you can’t just flambé the mudstones, as that would also alter their Mars-like starting chemistry.This video montage shows high-resolution imagery from a selection of Perseverance’s CacheCam of rock cores inside the rover’s sample tubes before being sealed. The montage includes a view of “Sapphire Canyon,” a sample drilled from the Cheyava Falls rock.A gentler, tried-and-tested method of microorganismal murder is known as dry heat microbial reduction, or DHMR. “It’s how we sterilize spacecraft,” Cable says. Things wouldn’t get scorching hot with this method; instead mudstones would be gradually warmed in dry conditions for hundreds of hours. “That usually kills or deactivates most forms of life, including bacterial spores,” she says. To be safe, experimenters using this technique can continuously assay the supposedly sterile soil to make sure there aren’t any microbes left in them.For the deliberately biological experiments, the JPL team is spoiled for choice. Microbe-mediated reaction patterns resembling the poppy seeds and leopard spots can be found all over Earth, where they are often still associated with the diverse microbial ecosystems that made them. “You’d find them in mud, underwater,” Hurowitz says—in both the present and the distant past, from freshly deposited marine sediments off the shores of Taiwan to extremely old rocks in Scotland. Whatever the terrestrial source, the team simply needs to inoculate some of its Mars-like mudstones with microbes able to rapaciously gorge themselves on Fe(III) and sulfates and spark a population boom.“We’ll start there and see where these reactions take us,” Cable says. “We’re going to go down so many different rabbit holes.” Besides trying to summon the poppy seeds and leopard spots into existence in fresh rocks, the team also want to know how to prevent them from growing in the first place.Reducing Fe(III) produces more energy than reducing sulfates. But if microbes were involved, they switched from Fe(III) reduction (making the mineral vivianite) to sulfate reduction (making the mineral greigite). It’s not clear why, but it’s certainly strange—scientists would expect hungry bugs to prefer more energy-rich fare, so why would they leave Fe(III) “candy” untouched to munch on sulfate “broccoli” instead? These experiments could offer answers and put constraints on the types of microbes—and ancient chemical concoctions—that may have been present on Mars 3.5 billion years ago.The Perseverance scientists expect that their work will eventually produce poppy seeds and leopard spots both with and without life’s help. But the environmental conditions leading to both will likely be radically different. Then the researchers can return their focus to Perseverance—still scooting around Jezero—to try sniffing out other rocks nearby that are closer geochemical matches to any mudstones they’ve coaxed into sprouting the telltale speckles, whether with biology—or without.Ideally, the rover will encounter another exciting site—and uncover additional tantalizing hints of ancient Martian life. “You don’t just want one line of evidence. You want something completely independent of it pointing in the same direction,” Tice says.But Cheyava Falls on its own is already a thrill to the Perseverance science team. Finding it was the easy part. “Now the hard work begins,” Hurowitz says.

New laboratory studies could shed light on a rock containing potential signs of alien life that’s stranded on Mars

The most exciting rock known to science is a school-desk-sized chunk of mudstone currently stuck on Mars.

Formed from fine, water-washed sediments on the floor of a long-lost lake—some 3.5 billion years ago, when Mars was a warmer, wetter world—the rock was found in 2024 by scientists using NASA’s Perseverance rover to explore what’s now known as Jezero Crater. Dubbed Cheyava Falls, the mudstone stood out to the researchers because its surface was spangled with strange speckles and ring-shaped blobs, which they referred to as poppy seeds and leopard spots. They also discovered that it was packed with organic matter—chemical compounds of carbon, the elemental cornerstone of biology as we know it.

Organic-rich rocks right here on Earth sometimes contain similar features, which tend to be created by microbial life. And after painstaking follow-up studies with the rover, the Perseverance team announced earlier this year that ancient alien microbes might be the best explanation for the Martian rock’s spots and seeds as well.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To know for sure whether Cheyava Falls is proof of past life on Mars—or instead just a weird quirk of lifeless organic chemistry—astrobiologists want to bring some of the rock back to Earth for closer study. But the NASA-led international program to do just that, known as Mars Sample Return (MSR), is in political limbo, beset by ballooning costs and flagging federal support. Even if MSR does go ahead as planned, Perseverance’s hard-won samples of Cheyava Falls and other Martian materials wouldn’t arrive before 2040.

Not content to sit idle, a cadre of scientists organized by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is pursuing an audacious plan B. Rather than wait for pieces of Cheyava Falls to reach Earth, the researchers will try growing the rock’s most mysterious features for themselves in carefully curated or manufactured mudstones. By subjecting these simulacra—some of which will bear terrestrial microbes, while others will be slow baked and sterilized—to lab-based conditions mimicking what’s known of early Mars, the team hopes to learn how Cheyava Falls really got its spots.

“Take your best guess as to what was in the mud. Take your best guess as to what the nature of the organic matter is. Stir them up together, let it all settle to the bottom, and watch what happens,” says Joel Hurowitz, a geoscientist at Stony Brook University and a member of the Perseverance science team, who is familiar with the work.

This approach won’t be able to definitively prove or disprove the existence of past life on Mars. But by mapping out every conceivable way to make the seeds and spots in a lab, scientists can determine whether it’s likelier that the features evident in Cheyava Falls were made with microbes or without them.

Cooking Up Poppy Seeds and Leopard Spots

The universe owes a lot to the behavior of electrons. Whether we are talking about the explosive deaths of stars, the formation of planets, the weather or the critters that live under it, electrons often drive the chemistry that makes things happen.

One particularly important type of chemical drama is known as an oxidation-reduction, or redox, reaction. Oxidation involves the loss of electrons, while reduction is the gain of electrons. Redox reactions happen everywhere, all the time, in all sorts of environments—and they are essential to the normal functioning of living things, allowing organisms to obtain energy, to maintain basic cellular operations and even to shield themselves from external dangers.

Nobody expected to see fossilized creatures, or even necessarily preserved microbial corpses, on the surface of Mars. But finding trace evidence of biologically driven redox reactions was far more plausible, and the Cheyava Falls outcrop—and its wider environment—is a near-perfect place to look.

“They record an ancient, habitable environment,” says Sanjeev Gupta, an Earth scientist at Imperial College London and a member of the Perseverance rover team. Within it, Perseverance picked up a bounty of organic material. It also saw tiny nodules and larger, halolike features: the poppy seeds and leopard spots, respectively. Both the poppy seeds and leopard spots are the graffiti left behind by the redoxlike shuttling about of electrons.

The speckled, variegated surface of the "Cheyava Falls" rock, as seen by NASA's Perseverance Mars rover

Potentially microbe-made small dark “poppy seed” speckles and larger dark-rimmed “leopard spot” blobs dot the surface of “Cheyava Falls,” one of the most intriguing rocks ever found on Mars.

The poppy seeds contain a reduced form of iron, Fe(II), found in a mineral named vivianite (seen as black specks). Fe(II) is produced when preexisting Fe(III) gains an electron. Fe(III), the oxidized version of this iron, was found within the original Cheyava Falls muds.

The leopard spots also have Fe(II) in two different mineral forms: vivianite (which appears as dark rims) and greigite (which is within the spots’ interior). The spots also contain sulfides, a reduced form of preexisting sulfates that is also found in the Cheyava Falls muds; the sulfides are also part of the mineral greigite.

The seeds and spots are essentially “a fossilized chemical reaction,” Gupta says. And any experiments on Earth hoping to re-create them will take one of two possible pathways: one that deploys microbes and one that doesn’t.

First, let’s look at the nonbiological options. One way to turn Fe(III) and sulfates into Fe(II) and sulfides is to heat up the ingredients found in those muds and wait. “That’s a reaction that can happen without life. But it’s incredibly slow,” says Michael Tice, a geobiologist at Texas A&M College of Arts and Sciences and a member of the Perseverance science team. And by slow, he means potentially millions of years.

A good analogy is sugar and oxygen. The two can react to unleash bountiful chemical energy—but sustained, strong heat is what really makes that happen. Sugar doesn’t much react with oxygen just sitting on your kitchen table. Similarly, you wouldn’t get the Cheyava Falls features unless you baked the original muds at high temperatures—150 degrees Celsius or more. Yet NASA’s Perseverance rover has uncovered no evidence of such cooking for Cheyava Falls, and it seems the seeds and spots were created shortly after the mud was deposited.

Now let’s look at the microbial route. If that mudstone had instead formed from a lake bed on Earth, one would expect prevalent microbes to “consume” the organic matter and gain energy effectively from the reduction of Fe(III) and the sulfates. This would happen relatively fast because Earthly microbes deploy potent enzymes that ease the reaction’s energetic thresholds; no high-temperature cookery is required. And “it’s exactly where you’d expect microbes to be living,” Gupta says.

Whisper it: based on current evidence, it seems likelier that microbes made these seeds and spots than geological activity. But the problem is that the two chemical pathways “start with the same reactants and end up with the same products,” says Morgan Cable, a research scientist at the Laboratory Studies group at JPL and a member of the Perseverance science team. “The reaction is essentially the same. That’s where it gets tricky.”

Laboratory Alchemy

Thanks to orbital reconnaissance from spacecraft and ground truthing from rovers, we already have a pretty good idea of what Jezero Crater was like in its halcyon days eons ago. By Martian standards, it was an aquatic wonderland, with water flowing through channels to form and feed a crater lake, piling up sprawling deltas of swept-in sediments, all under a warmer, thicker carbon-dioxide-rich sky. Remarkably, scientists can re-create parts of this past realm in their state-of-the-art laboratories.

Test chambers can be kept at the right temperatures to simulate Martian conditions and can be filled with myriad mixtures of gases to reproduce atmospheric pressures and compositions that prevailed on the planet in its deep past. Synthetic mudstones custom-concocted in labs or purchased premade can incorporate various recipes informed by Perseverance’s measurements, with fluctuating amounts of oxygen, organic matter, acidity, salinity, and so on.

Over time, as these simulacra unfold under different environmental conditions, watchful scientists can see what happens—and adjust accordingly to explore the truly vast landscape of possibilities. For better or worse, “the range of experiments to engage with is endless,” Hurowitz says.

On Earth, life famously gets everywhere. Heat can ensure certain mudstones are sterilized, Cable says, similar to how water can be boiled to deactivate any microscopic bugs. But you can’t just flambé the mudstones, as that would also alter their Mars-like starting chemistry.

This video montage shows high-resolution imagery from a selection of Perseverance’s CacheCam of rock cores inside the rover’s sample tubes before being sealed. The montage includes a view of “Sapphire Canyon,” a sample drilled from the Cheyava Falls rock.

A gentler, tried-and-tested method of microorganismal murder is known as dry heat microbial reduction, or DHMR. “It’s how we sterilize spacecraft,” Cable says. Things wouldn’t get scorching hot with this method; instead mudstones would be gradually warmed in dry conditions for hundreds of hours. “That usually kills or deactivates most forms of life, including bacterial spores,” she says. To be safe, experimenters using this technique can continuously assay the supposedly sterile soil to make sure there aren’t any microbes left in them.

For the deliberately biological experiments, the JPL team is spoiled for choice. Microbe-mediated reaction patterns resembling the poppy seeds and leopard spots can be found all over Earth, where they are often still associated with the diverse microbial ecosystems that made them. “You’d find them in mud, underwater,” Hurowitz says—in both the present and the distant past, from freshly deposited marine sediments off the shores of Taiwan to extremely old rocks in Scotland. Whatever the terrestrial source, the team simply needs to inoculate some of its Mars-like mudstones with microbes able to rapaciously gorge themselves on Fe(III) and sulfates and spark a population boom.

“We’ll start there and see where these reactions take us,” Cable says. “We’re going to go down so many different rabbit holes.” Besides trying to summon the poppy seeds and leopard spots into existence in fresh rocks, the team also want to know how to prevent them from growing in the first place.

Reducing Fe(III) produces more energy than reducing sulfates. But if microbes were involved, they switched from Fe(III) reduction (making the mineral vivianite) to sulfate reduction (making the mineral greigite). It’s not clear why, but it’s certainly strange—scientists would expect hungry bugs to prefer more energy-rich fare, so why would they leave Fe(III) “candy” untouched to munch on sulfate “broccoli” instead? These experiments could offer answers and put constraints on the types of microbes—and ancient chemical concoctions—that may have been present on Mars 3.5 billion years ago.

The Perseverance scientists expect that their work will eventually produce poppy seeds and leopard spots both with and without life’s help. But the environmental conditions leading to both will likely be radically different. Then the researchers can return their focus to Perseverance—still scooting around Jezero—to try sniffing out other rocks nearby that are closer geochemical matches to any mudstones they’ve coaxed into sprouting the telltale speckles, whether with biology—or without.

Ideally, the rover will encounter another exciting site—and uncover additional tantalizing hints of ancient Martian life. “You don’t just want one line of evidence. You want something completely independent of it pointing in the same direction,” Tice says.

But Cheyava Falls on its own is already a thrill to the Perseverance science team. Finding it was the easy part. “Now the hard work begins,” Hurowitz says.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Forever Chemicals' Might Triple Teens' Risk Of Fatty Liver Disease

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk of developing fatty liver disease, a new study says.Each doubling in blood levels of the PFAS chemical perfluorooctanoic acid is linked to 2.7 times the odds of fatty liver disease among teenagers, according to findings published in the January issue of the journal Environmental Research.Fatty liver disease — also known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) — occurs when fat builds up in the organ, leading to inflammation, scarring and increased risk of cancer.About 10% of all children, and up to 40% of children with obesity, have fatty liver disease, researchers said in background notes.“MASLD can progress silently for years before causing serious health problems,” said senior researcher Dr. Lida Chatzi, a professor of population and public health sciences and pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of USC in Los Angeles.“When liver fat starts accumulating in adolescence, it may set the stage for a lifetime of metabolic and liver health challenges,” Chatzi added in a news release. “If we reduce PFAS exposure early, we may help prevent liver disease later. That’s a powerful public health opportunity.”Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are called “forever chemicals” because they combine carbon and fluorine molecules, one of the strongest chemical bonds possible. This makes PFAS removal and breakdown very difficult.PFAS compounds have been used in consumer products since the 1940s, including fire extinguishing foam, nonstick cookware, food wrappers, stain-resistant furniture and waterproof clothing.More than 99% of Americans have measurable PFAS in their blood, and at least one PFAS chemical is present in roughly half of U.S. drinking water supplies, researchers said.“Adolescents are particularly more vulnerable to the health effects of PFAS as it is a critical period of development and growth,” lead researcher Shiwen “Sherlock” Li, an assistant professor of public health sciences at the University of Hawaii, said in a news release.“In addition to liver disease, PFAS exposure has been associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, including several types of cancer,” Li said.For the new study, researchers examined data on 284 Southern California adolescents and young adults gathered as part of two prior USC studies.All of the participants already had a high risk of metabolic disease because their parents had type 2 diabetes or were overweight, researchers said.Their PFAS levels were measured through blood tests, and liver fat was assessed using MRI scans.Higher blood levels of two common PFAS — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) — were linked to an increased risk of fatty liver disease.Results showed a young person’s risk was even higher if they smoked or carried a genetic variant known to influence liver fat.“These findings suggest that PFAS exposures, genetics and lifestyle factors work together to influence who has greater risk of developing MASLD as a function of your life stage,” researcher Max Aung, assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine, said in a news release.“Understanding gene and environment interactions can help advance precision environmental health for MASLD,” he added.The study also showed that fatty liver disease became more common as teens grew older, adding to evidence that younger people might be more vulnerable to PFAS exposure, Chatzi said.“PFAS exposures not only disrupt liver biology but also translate into real liver disease risk in youth,” Chatzi said. “Adolescence seems to be a critical window of susceptibility, suggesting PFAS exposure may matter most when the liver is still developing.”The Environmental Working Group has more on PFAS.SOURCES: Keck School of Medicine of USC, news release, Jan. 6, 2026; Environmental Research, Jan. 1, 2026Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

China Announces Another New Trade Measure Against Japan as Tensions Rise

China has escalated its trade tensions with Japan by launching an investigation into imported dichlorosilane, a chemical gas used in making semiconductors

BEIJING (AP) — China escalated its trade tensions with Japan on Wednesday by launching an investigation into imported dichlorosilane, a chemical gas used in making semiconductors, a day after it imposed curbs on the export of so-called dual-use goods that could be used by Japan’s military.The Chinese Commerce Ministry said in a statement that it had launched the investigation following an application from the domestic industry showing the price of dichlorosilane imported from Japan had decreased 31% between 2022 and 2024.“The dumping of imported products from Japan has damaged the production and operation of our domestic industry,” the ministry said.The measure comes a day after Beijing banned exports to Japan of dual-use goods that can have military applications.Beijing has been showing mounting displeasure with Tokyo after new Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested late last year that her nation's military could intervene if China were to take action against Taiwan — an island democracy that Beijing considers its own territory.Tensions were stoked again on Tuesday when Japanese lawmaker Hei Seki, who last year was sanctioned by China for “spreading fallacies” about Taiwan and other disputed territories, visited Taiwan and called it an independent country. Also known as Yo Kitano, he has been banned from entering China. He told reporters that his arrival in Taiwan demonstrated the two are “different countries.”“I came to Taiwan … to prove this point, and to tell the world that Taiwan is an independent country,” Hei Seki said, according to Taiwan’s Central News Agency.“The nasty words of a petty villain like him are not worth commenting on,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning retorted when asked about his comment. Fears of a rare earths curb Masaaki Kanai, head of Asia Oceanian Affairs at Japan's Foreign Ministry, urged China to scrap the trade curbs, saying a measure exclusively targeting Japan that deviates from international practice is unacceptable. Japan, however, has yet to announce any retaliatory measures.As the two countries feuded, speculation rose that China might target rare earths exports to Japan, in a move similar to the rounds of critical minerals export restrictions it has imposed as part of its trade war with the United States.China controls most of the global production of heavy rare earths, used for making powerful, heat-resistance magnets used in industries such as defense and electric vehicles.While the Commerce Ministry did not mention any new rare earths curbs, the official newspaper China Daily, seen as a government mouthpiece, quoted anonymous sources saying Beijing was considering tightening exports of certain rare earths to Japan. That report could not be independently confirmed. Improved South Korean ties contrast with Japan row As Beijing spars with Tokyo, it has made a point of courting a different East Asian power — South Korea.On Wednesday, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung wrapped up a four-day trip to China – his first since taking office in June. Lee and Chinese President Xi Jinping oversaw the signing of cooperation agreements in areas such as technology, trade, transportation and environmental protection.As if to illustrate a contrast with the China-Japan trade frictions, Lee joined two business events at which major South Korean and Chinese companies pledged to collaborate.The two sides signed 24 export contracts worth a combined $44 million, according to South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources. During Lee’s visit, Chinese media also reported that South Korea overtook Japan as the leading destination for outbound flights from China’s mainland over the New Year’s holiday.China has been discouraging travel to Japan, saying Japanese leaders’ comments on Taiwan have created “significant risks to the personal safety and lives of Chinese citizens in Japan.”Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill

Democrats and the Make America Healthy Again movement pushed back on the rider in a funding bill led by BayerIn a setback for the pesticide industry, Democrats have succeeded in removing a rider from a congressional appropriations bill that would have helped protect pesticide makers from being sued and could have hindered state efforts to warn about pesticide risks.Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine and ranking member of the House appropriations interior, environment, and related agencies subcommittee, said Monday that the controversial measure pushed by the agrochemical giant Bayer and industry allies has been stripped from the 2026 funding bill. Continue reading...

In a setback for the pesticide industry, Democrats have succeeded in removing a rider from a congressional appropriations bill that would have helped protect pesticide makers from being sued and could have hindered state efforts to warn about pesticide risks.Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine and ranking member of the House appropriations interior, environment, and related agencies subcommittee, said Monday that the controversial measure pushed by the agrochemical giant Bayer and industry allies has been stripped from the 2026 funding bill.The move is final, as Senate Republican leaders have agreed not to revisit the issue, Pingree said.“I just drew a line in the sand and said this cannot stay in the bill,” Pingree told the Guardian. “There has been intensive lobbying by Bayer. This has been quite a hard fight.”The now-deleted language was part of a larger legislative effort that critics say is aimed at limiting litigation against pesticide industry leader Bayer, which sells the widely used Roundup herbicides.An industry alliance set up by Bayer has been pushing for both state and federal laws that would make it harder for consumers to sue over pesticide risks to human health and has successfully lobbied for the passing of such laws in Georgia and North Dakota so far.The specific proposed language added to the appropriations bill blocked federal funds from being used to “issue or adopt any guidance or any policy, take any regulatory action, or approve any labeling or change to such labeling” inconsistent with the conclusion of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human health assessment.Critics said the language would have impeded states and local governments from warning about risks of pesticides even in the face of new scientific findings about health harms if such warnings were not consistent with outdated EPA assessments. The EPA itself would not be able to update warnings without finalizing a new assessment, the critics said.And because of the limits on warnings, critics of the rider said, consumers would have found it difficult, if not impossible, to sue pesticide makers for failing to warn them of health risks if the EPA assessments do not support such warnings.“This provision would have handed pesticide manufacturers exactly what they’ve been lobbying for: federal preemption that stops state and local governments from restricting the use of harmful, cancer-causing chemicals, adding health warnings, or holding companies accountable in court when people are harmed,” Pingree said in a statement. “It would have meant that only the federal government gets a say – even though we know federal reviews can take years, and are often subject to intense industry pressure.”Pingree tried but failed to overturn the language in a July appropriations committee hearing.Bayer, the key backer of the legislative efforts, has been struggling for years to put an end to thousands of lawsuits filed by people who allege they developed cancer from their use of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weed killers sold by Bayer. The company inherited the litigation when it bought Monsanto in 2018 and has paid out billions of dollars in settlements and jury verdicts but still faces several thousand ongoing lawsuits. Bayer maintains its glyphosate-based herbicides do not cause cancer and are safe when used as directed.When asked for comment on Monday, Bayer said that no company should have “blanket immunity” and it disputed that the appropriations bill language would have prevented anyone from suing pesticide manufacturers. The company said it supports state and federal legislation “because the future of American farming depends on reliable science-based regulation of important crop protection products – determined safe for use by the EPA”.The company additionally states on its website that without “legislative certainty”, lawsuits over its glyphosate-based Roundup and other weed killers can impact its research and product development and other “important investments”.Pingree said her efforts were aided by members of the Make America Healthy Again (Maha) movement who have spent the last few months meeting with congressional members and their staffers on this issue. She said her team reached out to Maha leadership in the last few days to pressure Republican lawmakers.“This is the first time that we’ve had a fairly significant advocacy group working on the Republican side,” she said.Last week, Zen Honeycutt, a Maha leader and founder of the group Moms Across America, posted a “call to action”, urging members to demand elected officials “Stop the Pesticide Immunity Shield”.“A lot of people helped make this happen,” Honeycutt said. “Many health advocates have been fervently expressing their requests to keep chemical companies accountable for safety … We are delighted that our elected officials listened to so many Americans who spoke up and are restoring trust in the American political system.”Pingree said the issue is not dead. Bayer has “made this a high priority”, and she expects to see continued efforts to get industry friendly language inserted into legislation, including into the new Farm Bill.“I don’t think this is over,” she said.This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group

Forever Chemicals' Common in Cosmetics, but FDA Says Safety Data Are Scant

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Jan. 3, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Federal regulators have released a mandated report regarding the...

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Jan. 3, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Federal regulators have released a mandated report regarding the presence of "forever chemicals" in makeup and skincare products. Forever chemicals — known as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS — are manmade chemicals that don't break down and have built up in people’s bodies and the environment. They are sometimes added to beauty products intentionally, and sometimes they are contaminants. While the findings confirm that PFAS are widely used in the beauty industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted it lacks enough scientific evidence to determine if they are truly safe for consumers.The new report reveals that 51 forever chemicals — are used in 1,744 cosmetic formulations. These synthetic chemicals are favored by manufacturers because they make products waterproof, increase their durability and improve texture.FDA scientists focused their review on the 25 most frequently used PFAS, which account for roughly 96% of these chemicals found in beauty products. The results were largely unclear. While five were deemed to have low safety concerns, one was flagged for potential health risks, and safety of the rest could not be confirmed.FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary expressed concern over the difficulty in accessing private research. “Our scientists found that toxicological data for most PFAS are incomplete or unavailable, leaving significant uncertainty about consumer safety,” Makary said in a news release, adding that “this lack of reliable data demands further research.”Despite growing concerns about their potential toxicity, no federal laws specifically ban their use in cosmetics.The FDA report focuses on chemicals that are added to products on purpose, rather than those that might show up as accidental contaminants. Moving forward, FDA plans to work closely with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to update and strengthen recommendations on PFAS across the retail and food supply chain, Makary said. The agency has vowed to devote more resources to monitoring these chemicals and will take enforcement action if specific products are proven to be dangerous.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration provides updates and consumer guidance on the use of PFAS in cosmetics.SOURCE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, news release, Dec. 29, 2025Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.