Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Oregon’s underwater forests are vanishing. Can they be saved?

News Feed
Tuesday, July 23, 2024

On a chilly May morning at a sandy beach 15 miles southwest of Coos Bay, marine ecologist Sara Hamilton poured hot water from a thermos into her thick wetsuit, neoprene dive boots and gloves. Snorkeling mask and fins in hand, she made her way toward the jutting headland of Cape Arago State Park, across slippery rocks draped in seaweed, mussels and barnacles and crevices teeming with green sea anemones.Hamilton eased herself into the ocean, a frigid 49 degrees that day, followed by several colleagues who braced themselves on surf-drenched rocks. But the waves crashed too high, sending the team into shallower waters before they floated and dove down.A lush, towering kelp forest had sprung up under the waves in this cove in each of the past three summers, providing refuge to juvenile rockfish and salmon, shrimp, whales and countless other creatures. But it was unclear if it would regrow this year or become the latest casualty of an upended marine ecosystem that could herald the future impact of global warming on Oregon’s coast.For millennia, underwater forests of seaweed or large brown algae stretched from the seafloor to the ocean’s surface, forming canopies, much like trees, and providing food, shelter and hunting grounds to countless animals. Bull kelp, the predominant species found along the southern third of Oregon shores, is one of the world’s fastest growers – rising at a rate of up to 10 inches per day and reaching heights of up to about 100 feet, establishing itself as the sequoia of the seas. Kelp has helped protect the coastline from storms and supported local fisheries, tribal fishing and cultural practices.But over the past decade, according to new data, Oregon lost more than two-thirds of that kelp canopy.Kelp’s troubles on the West Coast started in 2013 when a mysterious illness began to decimate sunflower sea stars, the sole predators of purple sea urchins in Oregon. In turn, the purple urchins — small, spiky orbs that are native to the coast but previously dwelled in the crevices of tide pools, passively feeding on pieces of drifting kelp — had a bonanza population spurt.Purple urchins cover the sea floor at Cape Arago State Park on May 24, 2024. The urchins, whose population growth was exacerbated by a marine heat wave, have eaten most of Oregon’s kelp forests.  Gosia Wozniacka / The OregonianWarmer water didn’t cause the stars’ disease, but scientists say the starfish died faster because of it. They have concluded that the Blob, an extreme heat wave in the Pacific Ocean that in 2014 raised temperatures between 4 and 10 degrees above average and lasted for more than 700 days, exacerbated both the star die-off and the urchin explosion. Without sunflower sea stars – considered the largest and fastest of the starfish species, able to grow up to 24 arms and easily outrun prey – hordes of purples took over underwater forests. They overgrazed the kelp, forming “urchin barrens,” lifeless zones covered with hungry purple urchins and not much else.The problem was not unique to the Pacific Ocean; purple urchins overran kelp forests across the globe, from Tasmania to Norway. On the West Coast, a collapse was first identified in northern California in 2019 when a study chronicled the abrupt decline of kelp there by more than 90% in 2014. Similar warning signs emerged in southern Oregon: the wads of snake-like tangles that had once washed up on beaches were becoming scarce and the dense floating mats of kelp along the shores had nearly vanished – and with them, the fish and animals that had once lived and hunted there.Despite the red flags, action to probe the extent of kelp’s loss and to stave it off has been slow. Oregon’s craggy, exposed shoreline and murky waters meant few divers had been taking stock of underwater conditions. And because the state doesn’t allow commercial harvesting of kelp, wildlife officials had neither the mandate nor the funding to regularly survey or monitor the situation.In the void, a nonprofit launched in 2019 in the small coastal town of Port Orford, about 60 miles north of the California border, bringing together local fishermen, researchers, tribal members, university students, recreational and commercial divers. The Oregon Kelp Alliance had a singular focus: to sound the alarm and take immediate action to protect Oregon’s underwater jungles.Tom Calvanese, the founder and director of the Oregon Kelp Alliance, helps lower a boat into the ocean at the Port Orford port in southern Oregon. Calvanese has been at the forefront of kelp restoration efforts in Oregon.  Gosia Wozniacka / The OregonianPreviously, “the ocean felt alive, smelled alive and looked alive. The kelp was doing its job as a foundation species, supporting this vibrant ecosystem. The water was clearer. There were a lot of fish, marine mammals, birds and whales, right there, all around you,” said the group’s founder, Tom Calvanese, a fisheries scientist and former commercial urchin diver.“Fast forward to now,” he added, “the ocean without kelp doesn’t feel vibrant anymore, it doesn’t have much activity, much life.”Over the past five years, the Kelp Alliance has gained momentum, expanding up and down the coast. It’s secured more than $4 million in federal, state and private funding to conduct, in partnership with the state, a coast-wide survey of kelp and launch several scientific research and restoration projects aimed at saving kelp habitat, controlling purple urchins and bringing back sunflower sea stars. Later this summer, the group will publish a kelp status report and a comprehensive restoration plan that aims to rehabilitate Oregon’s underwater forests, although similar efforts in California so far have yielded only modest success.The soon-to-be-released report, shared early with The Oregonian/OregonLive, quantifies for the first time the amount of damage the state’s kelp forests sustained between 2010 and 2022.In all, more than two-thirds of Oregon’s kelp canopy disappeared from the southern shores. That’s nearly 900 acres, or the equivalent of 680 football fields.Floating kelp canopy observed in ODFW aerial surveys in 2010 and 2022 at three major kelp-bearing regions on the Oregon coast. Orford Reef (top, off Cape Blanco) historically held the largest kelp bed in the state by far, and has seen the most dramatic kelp decline. Meanwhile, Redfish Rocks (middle, near Port Orford) and Rogue Reef (bottom, off Gold Beach) both saw localized kelp losses that were largely balanced by a shifting kelp distribution.Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeThe repercussions of those massive losses are just starting to emerge. The state’s commercial red sea urchin harvest is down by half from a decade ago. The recreational red abalone fishery permanently closed in December. And recreational nearshore fishing has dwindled on the southern coast.Researchers with the Kelp Alliance have estimated, based on a global assessment of kelp ecosystem values, that the 900 acres of lost kelp canopy is costing Oregon $23 million to $53 million every year. This includes the value of shrinking local fisheries as well as the ocean’s lessened ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Underwater kelp forests are key to combating climate change – they can sequester up to 20 times more carbon per acre than land forests.How rising temperatures will impact kelp moving forward is unclear, although it typically does better in cooler waters that provide more nutrients. The state’s coastal surface waters warmed an average of half a degree per decade from the mid-20th century to the 2000s, according to the most recent state-funded analysis published in 2010. But the alliance’s report concludes that, unlike in other parts of the world, long-term ocean warming is likely not a cause of kelp’s decline in Oregon even as short-term heat waves played a significant role.While kelp is susceptible to heat – it experiences decreased growth and reproductive success when temperatures regularly reach 61 degrees and can die or fail to reproduce when the water warms past about 64 degrees – those thresholds have been rarely reached along Oregon’s southern shores. In fact, researchers noted that surface water temperatures at two locations, off Port Orford and at Charleston, near Coos Bay, have declined very slightly over the past 30 years.Complicating matters, a few areas, including Cape Arago State Park near Coos Bay, saw gains in kelp cover for reasons researchers don’t yet understand.Hamilton, the marine ecologist, has monitored kelp at Cape Arago for the past three years with a drone and by diving or snorkeling there about a dozen times. Every year, the underwater forest has regrown, making it one of Oregon’s bright spot outliers, with a 25% increase in canopy cover.She’s cautiously optimistic that, despite an abundance of purple urchins already on scene, it will come back this summer.Snorkeling through cloudy water at the cove this spring, the research team spotted signs of hope, anchored to the seabed.Hamilton broke the surface and yelled: “Baby kelp!”But she remains worried about the future.“There’s a theory known as tipping points. If you push a system closer and closer to a point where all of a sudden the urchins take over, they can quickly switch the kelp forest to an urchin barren,” Hamilton said after the snorkeling excursion. “We have these sites that still seem relatively healthy. We don’t know if they’re close to tipping. We don’t know if they can sustain those populations of urchins long-term. It fuels our sense of urgency and anxiety.”FEELING KELP’S LOSSThe disappearance of kelp – amid the rise and dominance of purple urchins – is being felt all along Oregon’s southern shores.This spring in Port Orford, Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance founder, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steered a small boat out of the tiny port toward a rocky headland known as The Heads. They circled just below at Nellies Cove, a sheltered bay.Tom Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance director, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steer a boat on May 25, 2024, out of Port Orford in southern Oregon toward Nellies Cove. The picturesque cove has become a wasteland of purple urchins.  Gosia Wozniacka / The OregonianThe cove is ground zero for Oregon’s kelp restoration efforts. It’s where Calvanese, Lacey and others first began to notice signs of dramatic change.The two men, both transplants from the East Coast, recalled paddling or kayaking together just past the breakwater with their fishing poles to where a dense mat of kelp encircled the shores. Lacey, the head of a local tour company, would bring groups of recreational fishing enthusiasts. They would park their kayaks right on the edge of the kelp forest and fish over it.“We never got skunked here. We always caught fish, always,” Calvanese said.Then, about six years ago, the kelp canopy disappeared – and with it, the fish at Nellies Cove.“It got so bad, we stopped doing kayak fishing tours,” Lacey said. “We used to pull in about $10,000 every summer. Now that’s totally gone. We just gave up on it. I didn’t want to take people’s money and not catch any fish.”Calvanese, who manages Oregon State University’s field station at Port Orford, also began fielding calls from commercial urchin divers alarmed by kelp declines on nearby reefs. They took him by surprise. He had worked for an urchin diving crew while finishing his graduate degree and had seen first-hand the thick forests stretching for hundreds of acres under the waves.He realized the stakes were high. Port Orford, population 1,149, is dependent on fishing. With kelp forests dwindling, both the commercial nearshore fishery – rockfish, cabezon and greenling – and the red urchin fishery could be threatened, not to mention recreational fishing and tourism.Calvanese wanted to see the underwater changes for himself, so he dove in Nellies Cove. What he found shocked him and brought tears to his eyes, he said. The entire sea bottom was covered in purple urchins actively foraging for food. Where a thriving kelp forest had once grown, bountiful with juvenile and adult fish, he now couldn’t spot a single kelp.The fish, too, were mostly gone.A few hundred yards from that spot in Nellies Cove, commercial urchin diver Tom Butterbaugh anchored his boat, the F/V Good News, surveying the area this spring for red urchins to harvest.Urchin diving in Oregon is a dangerous job, and Butterbaugh has been searching for them under water for 24 years. Unlike the small and skinny purple urchins that have no commercial value, red urchins are harvested throughout the world for their roe — also called uni — which is considered a delicacy, especially in Japan.The business was once lucrative. Now, it’s less so. Most of the red urchins in Oregon are either gone or their roe isn’t well developed because they have to compete for food with the masses of purple urchins.Butterbaugh remembers good kelp years and bad kelp years, but it’s never been as bad as it is now, he said.He estimates he has lost over 90% of red urchin picking territory in recent years, most of it at nearby Orford Reef – the hardest-hit area for kelp decline – where he had typically harvested for six months annually.“The feeling of loss, the frustration, the helplessness when we can’t get the urchins is constantly there,” he said. “‘Where are we going to go? We already went there.’ Our [harvest] counts are getting lower and lower. Maybe this will be the year that the kelp comes back. We thought it was going to come back last year. And look at Depoe Bay, the kelp is amazing, but the urchins are skinny anyway.”The only reason he’s still in business is because the domestic market for red urchins has grown. A decade ago, he picked urchins for 50 to 80 cents per pound. Now, depending on the season and whether there’s competition from divers in Mexico or Chile, the price is up at $2 to $4.“It’s been thin ice for urchin divers,” Butterbaugh said. “The only thing keeping us afloat are the higher prices. If we lost market value, we’d go out of business.”From left, black rockfish, red urchins, sunflower sea star and red abalone.  Photos courtesy Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Reserves ProgramConcern is also growing over the future of the commercial groundfish industry in Port Orford. Kelp forests act as nurseries for juvenile rockfish and other groundfish – providing shelter, food and a place to grow – so the drastic decline of kelp beds is bound to have an impact, said Port of Port Orford Commission president Aaron Ashdown. Although local fishermen have yet to see changes in fish availability, he said, that’s likely because rockfish are some of the longest-living fish.“We might not see the negative effects of this kelp die-off until a decade or two goes by because of how long it takes for these fish to grow up,” Ashdown said. “But by then, we could see the collapse of certain species.”For the Coquille Indian Tribe, too, the decline of underwater forests has been wrenching, spelling the disappearance of tribal foods and practices, said Shelley Estes, an enrolled member of the tribe, which has inhabited Oregon’s southwestern coast for thousands of years.“Our elders said the kelp was our ‘canoe superhighway,’” said Estes, who is on the tribe’s resiliency climate task force. “Our people ran canoes up and down the coastline. That’s where we felt safe. Kelp protected us. It absorbed the shocks of the waves coming onto the shore.”One of the early victims of the disappearing kelp is red abalone, a large ocean snail that grazes on kelp and is a traditional source of nourishment and spiritual protection for the tribe. Abalone shells are also used in smudging – cleansing rituals that use burning herbs to clear out negative energies – and to make tribal regalia.Without kelp, the abalone, whose populations were already in decline prior to kelp’s collapse, have starved. The tribe can no longer harvest them and must purchase their shells on Amazon.“As a tribal member, I’m alarmed,” Estes said.PATH TO RESTORATIONRestoring kelp along Oregon’s southern shoreline may require an assortment of strategies, including, crucially, removing most of the purple urchin – somehow.A healthy bull kelp forest swayed underwater in August 2021 at Redfish Rocks, one of Oregon’s five marine reserves just south of Port Orford. The tree-like algae float up to the surface buoyed by air-filled bladders, their fronds or blades forming a thick canopy.  Brandon Cole / Special to The OregonianThe Kelp Alliance initially focused on hand removing and composting purple urchins or smashing them with hammers on the seabed – under a permit from the state – at sites including Nellies Cove, Macklyn Cove in Brookings and Haystack Rock in Pacific City. But those efforts, as in California, have had limited impact thus far, due in part to limited funding that paid for only short-term removal actions.One challenge is that purple urchins can persist in a hungry zombie state for well over a year, easily outlasting the annual cycle of bull kelp and lying in wait to devour baby algae before it has a chance to regrow. As a result, scientists say, it’s extremely difficult to flip barrens back into kelp ecosystems – it requires continually removing most if not all urchins in an area. Short of that, studies and surveys have shown that urchin removal can be effective when it happens at larger, semi-discrete sites or focuses on barrens surrounded by healthy kelp.Restoring kelp forests coast-wide by removing urchins by hand is clearly not feasible.Case in point: At Orford Reef – where Butterbaugh traditionally dove for red urchins – state biologists in 2019 documented 350 million purple urchins sitting on the seabed, a 10,000% increase over a five year period. The reef, once the state’s largest underwater kelp forest, spanning about 1,655 acres or just under half the size of the city of Astoria, saw a 95% decline in kelp, the largest in Oregon, according to the new data.“We realized we could not smash our way out of this crisis,” said Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance’s founder.The group is now launching a new $2.5 million restoration initiative that ties targeted urchin removal with kelp revegetation. Divers in Oregon will remove urchins at six sites along the coast and then “seed” kelp via spore bags and other cultivation methods. The sites include not only urchin barrens such as Nellies Cove but also areas that have abundant kelp canopy yet are overrun with urchins, such as Cape Arago.Separately, the group is mounting a kelp mariculture project in the waters around Port Orford. It will grow bull kelp on vertical mooring lines off the ocean bottom and out of reach of hungry urchins. The kelp will be used to make animal feed or fertilizer – a boost to the local economy – and spores will be saved for the kelp revegetation at restoration sites. The group is also working with local seaweed farms to collect purple urchins to fatten them up in land-based tanks with the hope to make them commercially viable.Ultimately, said Calvanese, restoration can stave off the complete disappearance of kelp along the West Coast by protecting a network of small sites that can maintain kelp’s genetic diversity and eventually repopulate urchin barrens.“If we can restore and maintain these oases where we continue to produce kelp spores then we have a chance to regrow from there,” he said. “We can also protect the remaining kelp we still have and not just watch it shrivel up.”MORE: Does kelp restoration work?But to make kelp’s comeback viable at scale, Calvanese and others are betting big on returning the sunflower sea stars – purple urchins’ only predator in the state – to the ocean.Scott Groth, a marine scientist with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, holds a sunflower sea star off the Oregon coast near Port Orford. The photo was taken before a mysterious wasting disease wiped out the population of the sea stars in Oregon beginning in 2013.  Scott Groth / Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeMarine ecologists Aaron Galloway and Sarah Gravem, with the University of Oregon and Oregon State University, have been able to show that the sunflower sea stars could potentially regulate purple sea urchin populations and, as a result, restore and maintain healthy kelp forests.Their study published last year indicates that sunflower sea stars don’t discriminate between fully grown healthy urchins and starved, nutritionally poor urchins similar to those that dwell in urchin barrens. In fact, during experiments the sea stars ate more skinny, hungry urchins than healthy ones, likely because it takes a shorter amount of time to digest them, Galloway said.Modeling also showed that, at the densities of sea stars before the wasting disease, there were enough stars to stop urchins from turning kelp forests into barrens.With those results in mind, the scientists, who are both members of the Kelp Alliance, are working toward a captive breeding program in Oregon, with the end-goal being reintroduction to the wild. That reality is now a step closer as Oregon has seen an increase in the sightings of sunflower sea stars, meaning researchers can start collecting them for local experiments and breeding. Earlier this year, Galloway secured approval for a permit to collect 20 in Oregon waters to launch the endeavors. He’s working closely with a lab in Washington that was the first to successfully breed the animals.Eventually, Galloway said, he hopes to breed and release thousands of sunflower sea stars into Oregon waters and see how they behave in urchin barrens. It’s unclear whether this will work, he admits. Though several research centers and aquariums around the U.S. are now racing to breed the stars, which the federal government last year proposed to list as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, no one has attempted such a release thus far.“It’s a dream for us,” he said. “If we put a bunch of them at a reef or declining kelp forest, will it cause a recovery? Will the stars eat the urchins or will they just leave and go somewhere else?”In September 2023, a drone captured a thick bull kelp canopy growing just off of Cape Foulweather’s Otter Crest State Scenic Viewpoint. The cape, just south of Depoe Bay, was one of the few areas on Oregon’s coast that saw an increase in kelp last year.  Sara Hamilton / Oregon Kelp Alliance.Because that’s a long-term endeavor, Gravem said, the state needs to urgently step up to regularly monitor, manage and restore kelp forests, similar to how it manages land-based forests, grasslands and estuaries.“For a long time, we’ve been hesitant to intervene in the ocean. It’s so big and we thought that it would rebound if we just left it alone,” Gravem said. “But it’s becoming increasingly clear that it’s not rebounding on its own. If anything, it’s getting worse because of climate change. So we need to … start helping it along.”— Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.

As marine heat waves wreak havoc on Oregon’s ocean ecosystems, the collapse of kelp forests could prove catastrophic to marine life, fisheries and tribes.

On a chilly May morning at a sandy beach 15 miles southwest of Coos Bay, marine ecologist Sara Hamilton poured hot water from a thermos into her thick wetsuit, neoprene dive boots and gloves. Snorkeling mask and fins in hand, she made her way toward the jutting headland of Cape Arago State Park, across slippery rocks draped in seaweed, mussels and barnacles and crevices teeming with green sea anemones.

Hamilton eased herself into the ocean, a frigid 49 degrees that day, followed by several colleagues who braced themselves on surf-drenched rocks. But the waves crashed too high, sending the team into shallower waters before they floated and dove down.

A lush, towering kelp forest had sprung up under the waves in this cove in each of the past three summers, providing refuge to juvenile rockfish and salmon, shrimp, whales and countless other creatures. But it was unclear if it would regrow this year or become the latest casualty of an upended marine ecosystem that could herald the future impact of global warming on Oregon’s coast.

For millennia, underwater forests of seaweed or large brown algae stretched from the seafloor to the ocean’s surface, forming canopies, much like trees, and providing food, shelter and hunting grounds to countless animals. Bull kelp, the predominant species found along the southern third of Oregon shores, is one of the world’s fastest growers – rising at a rate of up to 10 inches per day and reaching heights of up to about 100 feet, establishing itself as the sequoia of the seas. Kelp has helped protect the coastline from storms and supported local fisheries, tribal fishing and cultural practices.

But over the past decade, according to new data, Oregon lost more than two-thirds of that kelp canopy.

Kelp’s troubles on the West Coast started in 2013 when a mysterious illness began to decimate sunflower sea stars, the sole predators of purple sea urchins in Oregon. In turn, the purple urchins — small, spiky orbs that are native to the coast but previously dwelled in the crevices of tide pools, passively feeding on pieces of drifting kelp — had a bonanza population spurt.

Purple urchins cover the sea floor at Cape Arago State Park on May 24, 2024. The urchins, whose population growth was exacerbated by a marine heat wave, have eaten most of Oregon’s kelp forests.  Gosia Wozniacka / The Oregonian

Warmer water didn’t cause the stars’ disease, but scientists say the starfish died faster because of it. They have concluded that the Blob, an extreme heat wave in the Pacific Ocean that in 2014 raised temperatures between 4 and 10 degrees above average and lasted for more than 700 days, exacerbated both the star die-off and the urchin explosion. Without sunflower sea stars – considered the largest and fastest of the starfish species, able to grow up to 24 arms and easily outrun prey – hordes of purples took over underwater forests. They overgrazed the kelp, forming “urchin barrens,” lifeless zones covered with hungry purple urchins and not much else.

The problem was not unique to the Pacific Ocean; purple urchins overran kelp forests across the globe, from Tasmania to Norway. On the West Coast, a collapse was first identified in northern California in 2019 when a study chronicled the abrupt decline of kelp there by more than 90% in 2014. Similar warning signs emerged in southern Oregon: the wads of snake-like tangles that had once washed up on beaches were becoming scarce and the dense floating mats of kelp along the shores had nearly vanished – and with them, the fish and animals that had once lived and hunted there.

Despite the red flags, action to probe the extent of kelp’s loss and to stave it off has been slow. Oregon’s craggy, exposed shoreline and murky waters meant few divers had been taking stock of underwater conditions. And because the state doesn’t allow commercial harvesting of kelp, wildlife officials had neither the mandate nor the funding to regularly survey or monitor the situation.

In the void, a nonprofit launched in 2019 in the small coastal town of Port Orford, about 60 miles north of the California border, bringing together local fishermen, researchers, tribal members, university students, recreational and commercial divers. The Oregon Kelp Alliance had a singular focus: to sound the alarm and take immediate action to protect Oregon’s underwater jungles.

Tom Calvanese, the founder and director of the Oregon Kelp Alliance, helps lower a boat into the ocean at the Port Orford port in southern Oregon. Calvanese has been at the forefront of kelp restoration efforts in Oregon.  Gosia Wozniacka / The Oregonian

Previously, “the ocean felt alive, smelled alive and looked alive. The kelp was doing its job as a foundation species, supporting this vibrant ecosystem. The water was clearer. There were a lot of fish, marine mammals, birds and whales, right there, all around you,” said the group’s founder, Tom Calvanese, a fisheries scientist and former commercial urchin diver.

“Fast forward to now,” he added, “the ocean without kelp doesn’t feel vibrant anymore, it doesn’t have much activity, much life.”

Over the past five years, the Kelp Alliance has gained momentum, expanding up and down the coast. It’s secured more than $4 million in federal, state and private funding to conduct, in partnership with the state, a coast-wide survey of kelp and launch several scientific research and restoration projects aimed at saving kelp habitat, controlling purple urchins and bringing back sunflower sea stars. Later this summer, the group will publish a kelp status report and a comprehensive restoration plan that aims to rehabilitate Oregon’s underwater forests, although similar efforts in California so far have yielded only modest success.

The soon-to-be-released report, shared early with The Oregonian/OregonLive, quantifies for the first time the amount of damage the state’s kelp forests sustained between 2010 and 2022.

In all, more than two-thirds of Oregon’s kelp canopy disappeared from the southern shores. That’s nearly 900 acres, or the equivalent of 680 football fields.

Kelp canopy map

Floating kelp canopy observed in ODFW aerial surveys in 2010 and 2022 at three major kelp-bearing regions on the Oregon coast. Orford Reef (top, off Cape Blanco) historically held the largest kelp bed in the state by far, and has seen the most dramatic kelp decline. Meanwhile, Redfish Rocks (middle, near Port Orford) and Rogue Reef (bottom, off Gold Beach) both saw localized kelp losses that were largely balanced by a shifting kelp distribution.Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

The repercussions of those massive losses are just starting to emerge. The state’s commercial red sea urchin harvest is down by half from a decade ago. The recreational red abalone fishery permanently closed in December. And recreational nearshore fishing has dwindled on the southern coast.

Researchers with the Kelp Alliance have estimated, based on a global assessment of kelp ecosystem values, that the 900 acres of lost kelp canopy is costing Oregon $23 million to $53 million every year. This includes the value of shrinking local fisheries as well as the ocean’s lessened ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Underwater kelp forests are key to combating climate change – they can sequester up to 20 times more carbon per acre than land forests.

How rising temperatures will impact kelp moving forward is unclear, although it typically does better in cooler waters that provide more nutrients. The state’s coastal surface waters warmed an average of half a degree per decade from the mid-20th century to the 2000s, according to the most recent state-funded analysis published in 2010. But the alliance’s report concludes that, unlike in other parts of the world, long-term ocean warming is likely not a cause of kelp’s decline in Oregon even as short-term heat waves played a significant role.

While kelp is susceptible to heat – it experiences decreased growth and reproductive success when temperatures regularly reach 61 degrees and can die or fail to reproduce when the water warms past about 64 degrees – those thresholds have been rarely reached along Oregon’s southern shores. In fact, researchers noted that surface water temperatures at two locations, off Port Orford and at Charleston, near Coos Bay, have declined very slightly over the past 30 years.

Complicating matters, a few areas, including Cape Arago State Park near Coos Bay, saw gains in kelp cover for reasons researchers don’t yet understand.

Hamilton, the marine ecologist, has monitored kelp at Cape Arago for the past three years with a drone and by diving or snorkeling there about a dozen times. Every year, the underwater forest has regrown, making it one of Oregon’s bright spot outliers, with a 25% increase in canopy cover.

She’s cautiously optimistic that, despite an abundance of purple urchins already on scene, it will come back this summer.

Snorkeling through cloudy water at the cove this spring, the research team spotted signs of hope, anchored to the seabed.

Hamilton broke the surface and yelled: “Baby kelp!”

But she remains worried about the future.

“There’s a theory known as tipping points. If you push a system closer and closer to a point where all of a sudden the urchins take over, they can quickly switch the kelp forest to an urchin barren,” Hamilton said after the snorkeling excursion. “We have these sites that still seem relatively healthy. We don’t know if they’re close to tipping. We don’t know if they can sustain those populations of urchins long-term. It fuels our sense of urgency and anxiety.”

FEELING KELP’S LOSS

The disappearance of kelp – amid the rise and dominance of purple urchins – is being felt all along Oregon’s southern shores.

This spring in Port Orford, Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance founder, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steered a small boat out of the tiny port toward a rocky headland known as The Heads. They circled just below at Nellies Cove, a sheltered bay.

Tom Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance director, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steer a boat on May 25, 2024, out of Port Orford in southern Oregon toward Nellies Cove. The picturesque cove has become a wasteland of purple urchins.  Gosia Wozniacka / The Oregonian

The cove is ground zero for Oregon’s kelp restoration efforts. It’s where Calvanese, Lacey and others first began to notice signs of dramatic change.

The two men, both transplants from the East Coast, recalled paddling or kayaking together just past the breakwater with their fishing poles to where a dense mat of kelp encircled the shores. Lacey, the head of a local tour company, would bring groups of recreational fishing enthusiasts. They would park their kayaks right on the edge of the kelp forest and fish over it.

“We never got skunked here. We always caught fish, always,” Calvanese said.

Then, about six years ago, the kelp canopy disappeared – and with it, the fish at Nellies Cove.

“It got so bad, we stopped doing kayak fishing tours,” Lacey said. “We used to pull in about $10,000 every summer. Now that’s totally gone. We just gave up on it. I didn’t want to take people’s money and not catch any fish.”

Calvanese, who manages Oregon State University’s field station at Port Orford, also began fielding calls from commercial urchin divers alarmed by kelp declines on nearby reefs. They took him by surprise. He had worked for an urchin diving crew while finishing his graduate degree and had seen first-hand the thick forests stretching for hundreds of acres under the waves.

He realized the stakes were high. Port Orford, population 1,149, is dependent on fishing. With kelp forests dwindling, both the commercial nearshore fishery – rockfish, cabezon and greenling – and the red urchin fishery could be threatened, not to mention recreational fishing and tourism.

Calvanese wanted to see the underwater changes for himself, so he dove in Nellies Cove. What he found shocked him and brought tears to his eyes, he said. The entire sea bottom was covered in purple urchins actively foraging for food. Where a thriving kelp forest had once grown, bountiful with juvenile and adult fish, he now couldn’t spot a single kelp.

The fish, too, were mostly gone.

A few hundred yards from that spot in Nellies Cove, commercial urchin diver Tom Butterbaugh anchored his boat, the F/V Good News, surveying the area this spring for red urchins to harvest.

Urchin diving in Oregon is a dangerous job, and Butterbaugh has been searching for them under water for 24 years. Unlike the small and skinny purple urchins that have no commercial value, red urchins are harvested throughout the world for their roe — also called uni — which is considered a delicacy, especially in Japan.

The business was once lucrative. Now, it’s less so. Most of the red urchins in Oregon are either gone or their roe isn’t well developed because they have to compete for food with the masses of purple urchins.

Butterbaugh remembers good kelp years and bad kelp years, but it’s never been as bad as it is now, he said.

He estimates he has lost over 90% of red urchin picking territory in recent years, most of it at nearby Orford Reef – the hardest-hit area for kelp decline – where he had typically harvested for six months annually.

“The feeling of loss, the frustration, the helplessness when we can’t get the urchins is constantly there,” he said. “‘Where are we going to go? We already went there.’ Our [harvest] counts are getting lower and lower. Maybe this will be the year that the kelp comes back. We thought it was going to come back last year. And look at Depoe Bay, the kelp is amazing, but the urchins are skinny anyway.”

The only reason he’s still in business is because the domestic market for red urchins has grown. A decade ago, he picked urchins for 50 to 80 cents per pound. Now, depending on the season and whether there’s competition from divers in Mexico or Chile, the price is up at $2 to $4.

“It’s been thin ice for urchin divers,” Butterbaugh said. “The only thing keeping us afloat are the higher prices. If we lost market value, we’d go out of business.”

From left, black rockfish, red urchins, sunflower sea star and red abalone.  Photos courtesy Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Reserves Program

Concern is also growing over the future of the commercial groundfish industry in Port Orford. Kelp forests act as nurseries for juvenile rockfish and other groundfish – providing shelter, food and a place to grow – so the drastic decline of kelp beds is bound to have an impact, said Port of Port Orford Commission president Aaron Ashdown. Although local fishermen have yet to see changes in fish availability, he said, that’s likely because rockfish are some of the longest-living fish.

“We might not see the negative effects of this kelp die-off until a decade or two goes by because of how long it takes for these fish to grow up,” Ashdown said. “But by then, we could see the collapse of certain species.”

For the Coquille Indian Tribe, too, the decline of underwater forests has been wrenching, spelling the disappearance of tribal foods and practices, said Shelley Estes, an enrolled member of the tribe, which has inhabited Oregon’s southwestern coast for thousands of years.

“Our elders said the kelp was our ‘canoe superhighway,’” said Estes, who is on the tribe’s resiliency climate task force. “Our people ran canoes up and down the coastline. That’s where we felt safe. Kelp protected us. It absorbed the shocks of the waves coming onto the shore.”

One of the early victims of the disappearing kelp is red abalone, a large ocean snail that grazes on kelp and is a traditional source of nourishment and spiritual protection for the tribe. Abalone shells are also used in smudging – cleansing rituals that use burning herbs to clear out negative energies – and to make tribal regalia.

Without kelp, the abalone, whose populations were already in decline prior to kelp’s collapse, have starved. The tribe can no longer harvest them and must purchase their shells on Amazon.

“As a tribal member, I’m alarmed,” Estes said.

PATH TO RESTORATION

Restoring kelp along Oregon’s southern shoreline may require an assortment of strategies, including, crucially, removing most of the purple urchin – somehow.

A healthy bull kelp forest swayed underwater in August 2021 at Redfish Rocks, one of Oregon’s five marine reserves just south of Port Orford. The tree-like algae float up to the surface buoyed by air-filled bladders, their fronds or blades forming a thick canopy.  Brandon Cole / Special to The Oregonian

The Kelp Alliance initially focused on hand removing and composting purple urchins or smashing them with hammers on the seabed – under a permit from the state – at sites including Nellies Cove, Macklyn Cove in Brookings and Haystack Rock in Pacific City. But those efforts, as in California, have had limited impact thus far, due in part to limited funding that paid for only short-term removal actions.

One challenge is that purple urchins can persist in a hungry zombie state for well over a year, easily outlasting the annual cycle of bull kelp and lying in wait to devour baby algae before it has a chance to regrow. As a result, scientists say, it’s extremely difficult to flip barrens back into kelp ecosystems – it requires continually removing most if not all urchins in an area. Short of that, studies and surveys have shown that urchin removal can be effective when it happens at larger, semi-discrete sites or focuses on barrens surrounded by healthy kelp.

Restoring kelp forests coast-wide by removing urchins by hand is clearly not feasible.

Case in point: At Orford Reef – where Butterbaugh traditionally dove for red urchins – state biologists in 2019 documented 350 million purple urchins sitting on the seabed, a 10,000% increase over a five year period. The reef, once the state’s largest underwater kelp forest, spanning about 1,655 acres or just under half the size of the city of Astoria, saw a 95% decline in kelp, the largest in Oregon, according to the new data.

“We realized we could not smash our way out of this crisis,” said Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance’s founder.

The group is now launching a new $2.5 million restoration initiative that ties targeted urchin removal with kelp revegetation. Divers in Oregon will remove urchins at six sites along the coast and then “seed” kelp via spore bags and other cultivation methods. The sites include not only urchin barrens such as Nellies Cove but also areas that have abundant kelp canopy yet are overrun with urchins, such as Cape Arago.

Separately, the group is mounting a kelp mariculture project in the waters around Port Orford. It will grow bull kelp on vertical mooring lines off the ocean bottom and out of reach of hungry urchins. The kelp will be used to make animal feed or fertilizer – a boost to the local economy – and spores will be saved for the kelp revegetation at restoration sites. The group is also working with local seaweed farms to collect purple urchins to fatten them up in land-based tanks with the hope to make them commercially viable.

Ultimately, said Calvanese, restoration can stave off the complete disappearance of kelp along the West Coast by protecting a network of small sites that can maintain kelp’s genetic diversity and eventually repopulate urchin barrens.

“If we can restore and maintain these oases where we continue to produce kelp spores then we have a chance to regrow from there,” he said. “We can also protect the remaining kelp we still have and not just watch it shrivel up.”

MORE: Does kelp restoration work?

But to make kelp’s comeback viable at scale, Calvanese and others are betting big on returning the sunflower sea stars – purple urchins’ only predator in the state – to the ocean.

Scott Groth, a marine scientist with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, holds a sunflower sea star off the Oregon coast near Port Orford. The photo was taken before a mysterious wasting disease wiped out the population of the sea stars in Oregon beginning in 2013.  Scott Groth / Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Marine ecologists Aaron Galloway and Sarah Gravem, with the University of Oregon and Oregon State University, have been able to show that the sunflower sea stars could potentially regulate purple sea urchin populations and, as a result, restore and maintain healthy kelp forests.

Their study published last year indicates that sunflower sea stars don’t discriminate between fully grown healthy urchins and starved, nutritionally poor urchins similar to those that dwell in urchin barrens. In fact, during experiments the sea stars ate more skinny, hungry urchins than healthy ones, likely because it takes a shorter amount of time to digest them, Galloway said.

Modeling also showed that, at the densities of sea stars before the wasting disease, there were enough stars to stop urchins from turning kelp forests into barrens.

With those results in mind, the scientists, who are both members of the Kelp Alliance, are working toward a captive breeding program in Oregon, with the end-goal being reintroduction to the wild. That reality is now a step closer as Oregon has seen an increase in the sightings of sunflower sea stars, meaning researchers can start collecting them for local experiments and breeding. Earlier this year, Galloway secured approval for a permit to collect 20 in Oregon waters to launch the endeavors. He’s working closely with a lab in Washington that was the first to successfully breed the animals.

Eventually, Galloway said, he hopes to breed and release thousands of sunflower sea stars into Oregon waters and see how they behave in urchin barrens. It’s unclear whether this will work, he admits. Though several research centers and aquariums around the U.S. are now racing to breed the stars, which the federal government last year proposed to list as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, no one has attempted such a release thus far.

“It’s a dream for us,” he said. “If we put a bunch of them at a reef or declining kelp forest, will it cause a recovery? Will the stars eat the urchins or will they just leave and go somewhere else?”

In September 2023, a drone captured a thick bull kelp canopy growing just off of Cape Foulweather’s Otter Crest State Scenic Viewpoint. The cape, just south of Depoe Bay, was one of the few areas on Oregon’s coast that saw an increase in kelp last year.  Sara Hamilton / Oregon Kelp Alliance.

Because that’s a long-term endeavor, Gravem said, the state needs to urgently step up to regularly monitor, manage and restore kelp forests, similar to how it manages land-based forests, grasslands and estuaries.

“For a long time, we’ve been hesitant to intervene in the ocean. It’s so big and we thought that it would rebound if we just left it alone,” Gravem said. “But it’s becoming increasingly clear that it’s not rebounding on its own. If anything, it’s getting worse because of climate change. So we need to … start helping it along.”

— Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Violence, death and stolen land: people need to know the true cost of an avocado | Claudia Ignacio Álvarez

Behind the west’s huge appetite for the fruit lies the dark reality of environmental destruction and Indigenous exploitation in MexicoI grew up in San Andrés Tziróndaro, a Purépecha community on the shores of Lake Pátzcuaro in the Mexican state of Michoacán. My childhood was shaped by water, forests and music. The lake fed us. The forest protected us. In the afternoons, people gathered in the local square while bands passed through playing pirekua, our traditional music.That way of life is now under threat as our land is extracted for profit. Continue reading...

I grew up in San Andrés Tziróndaro, a Purépecha community on the shores of Lake Pátzcuaro in the Mexican state of Michoacán. My childhood was shaped by water, forests and music. The lake fed us. The forest protected us. In the afternoons, people gathered in the local square while bands passed through playing pirekua, our traditional music.That way of life is now under threat as our land is extracted for profit.Michoacán is one of Mexico’s leading export states for agricultural products. Avocados and berries are promoted internationally as symbols of healthy, sustainable consumption. Yet behind this lies a reality of land dispossession, environmental destruction and violence.Most avocados and berries from Michoacán are exported to the US, though some also reach European markets, including the UK.In San Andrés Tziróndaro, agribusiness companies rent land that is legally communal. This land is meant to guarantee food for our people, not profits for export. Pipes have been installed to extract water from Lake Pátzcuaro and divert it to plantations. During last year’s severe drought, the lake nearly dried up. Fish disappeared. A fishing community was suddenly unable to eat its own traditional food.If governments are serious about human rights and environmental protection, they must move beyond rhetoricIn the forests, avocado orchards consume enormous amounts of water and eliminate other forms of life. Forest fires, often deliberately set, clear land that is then quickly converted into plantations.We have done everything we can to protect our land, but sadly this has led to threats, killings and disappearances.Communities such as mine find ourselves caught between corporate interests, organised criminal actors and a state that repeatedly fails to protect us.This pattern is not limited to agribusiness. In Michoacán’s coastal region, Indigenous Nahua communities have faced similar threats while opposing mining and steel-related projects imposed without consultation. In San Juan Huitzontla, the defence of communal territory brought defenders into direct confrontation with extractive interests linked to the steel industry. It was in this context that Eustacio Alcalá Díaz was murdered, and environmental defender José Gabriel Pelayo was forcibly disappeared. Both cases remain unresolved, emblematic of the dangers faced by those who challenge powerful economic interests.A protest in Puebla in November. For us, defending the land is not an abstract environmental cause: it is about memory, survival and dignity. Photograph: Alejandro Munoz/AlamyI have not been immune to this violence.I have had to physically intervene when authorities have attacked community members, often traditional leaders.One incident remains etched in my memory. Outside a government building in Michoacán, I noticed a police officer loitering near people organising a peaceful demonstration. When I asked him to identify himself, he stepped directly in front of me, using his height and strength to block me. I activated the emergency button provided by the authorities while he made mocking gestures. I stepped back and began writing my report, trying to hide that my hands were shaking.The context has grown even more tense after the killing of Carlos Manzo, the mayor of Uruapan, who had launched a public confrontation with organised crime. His assassination in November took place during a public event in the central square of a city that is economically crucial as the capital of the world’s main avocado-exporting region. It has been reported that at least three mayors have been murdered this year. These killings create widespread fear and reveal how violence is used politically in Michoacán.According to Global Witness, at least 36 defenders were attacked in Mexico between 2023 and 2024, most of them Indigenous. Few of these cases have seen meaningful progress in investigations. Carrying out sustained human rights work now means accepting serious personal risk.In practice, protection does not come from the state but from strengthening community networks, international accompaniment and collective self-protection strategies.Red handprints symbolising violence surround a picture of murdered mayor Carlos Manzo. Photograph: Alejandro Munoz/AlamyThe emotional toll of this violence is collective. Many defenders, including myself, now live in forced displacement. We return to our communities only briefly, always alert. Violence is not only physical; it is psychological. The perpetrators are trying to fragment us; exhaust our resistance and corrode our hope.Responsibility does not lie with Mexico alone. The US, the main destination for Michoacán’s avocados and berries, plays a central role in sustaining this model. European and British markets are also implicated through imports, corporate finance and trade relationships that prioritise profit while ignoring conditions locally.If governments are serious about human rights and environmental protection, they must move beyond rhetoric. Importing countries should require binding human rights and environmental due diligence across agricultural and extractive supply chains. Indigenous peoples must be consulted, communal land and water rights respected, and defenders protected.For us, defending the land is not an abstract environmental cause. It is about memory, survival and dignity. If the international community continues to enjoy the benefits of extraction while ignoring its costs, violence in places such as Michoacán will not end. It will simply remain out of sight.

Costa Rica Mandates Mangrove Restoration at RIU Guanacaste Hotel

Costa Rica’s Environmental Administrative Tribunal has issued a directive for the RIU Guanacaste hotel complex to repair mangrove and forest areas harmed during its construction in Playa Matapalo, Guanacaste. This decision wraps up a dispute that has dragged on for over 15 years, holding the developers accountable for altering sensitive coastal ecosystems. The tribunal’s ruling, […] The post Costa Rica Mandates Mangrove Restoration at RIU Guanacaste Hotel appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Costa Rica’s Environmental Administrative Tribunal has issued a directive for the RIU Guanacaste hotel complex to repair mangrove and forest areas harmed during its construction in Playa Matapalo, Guanacaste. This decision wraps up a dispute that has dragged on for over 15 years, holding the developers accountable for altering sensitive coastal ecosystems. The tribunal’s ruling, numbered 1403-2025, pins responsibility on SE Costa Rica Hotelera de Guanacaste S.A., the property owner, and Yitzak Investments S.A., which handled the site’s groundwork. Inspectors found clear evidence of mangrove loss and other harms in the public maritime zone along Matapalo beach in Carrillo. Back in 2007, the area featured intact mangroves and tree cover in the public zone. By 2009, changes were stark: two wooded sections totaling 6,994 square meters and 5,960 square meters were impacted, an 8,233-square-meter mangrove patch was wiped out through filling and material dumping, and an unnamed stream’s path was shifted, damaging its protected buffer. The court linked these issues directly to debris from the RIU project’s building phase. Mangroves shield coasts from erosion, nurture marine life, and store carbon effectively. Local groups have pointed out that such losses weaken the bay’s health to favor one major tourism venture. To fix this, the tribunal requires the companies to revert the site to its prior state. They must submit a detailed technical plan within 30 business days, outlining fill removal and mangrove revival, backed by expert input and a timeline. The National System of Conservation Areas must approve it, with full work done in three years and yearly updates sent to the tribunal. Separately, the ruling calls for a plan to clear structures from the stream’s bed and restore its flow and buffer. No financial penalty applies here, as the court deemed it unfit for this scenario. RIU Hotels & Resorts responded to inquiries from us in the media, noting the ruling’s arrival but emphasizing its non-final status. The chain plans to pursue all legal options to contest it, claiming the project held all required permits and expecting a thorough review to clarify events. Given that tribunal outcomes can lead to further agency steps or court appeals, this matter may linger in the system even as restoration deadlines approach. The case traces to 2009, when residents and advocates reported filling, tree removal, and water changes. Organizations like Confraternidad Guanacasteca pushed through delays, with Constitutional Court interventions urging timely resolution. Critics say holdups let the development solidify, complicating fixes. Now, the verdict sets a benchmark for similar coastal clashes, though enforcement remains key. This outcome signals broader lessons for coastal growth in Costa Rica. It stresses that mangroves and public zones cannot be sacrificed for projects promising employment and revenue. Firms face not only halts to harm but active ecosystem repairs under supervision. It also exposes institutional slowdowns, where community persistence proved essential. For those in Guanacaste’s tourism scene, the decision underscores hidden stories of land and resource conflicts behind beachfront appeal. Over the coming years, focus shifts to on-site progress: clearing fills, fixing water flows, replanting, and official checks to ensure real change. After prolonged advocacy and interim steps, the court has confirmed what was noted long ago: the Matapalo mangrove suffered, and recovery is due. The post Costa Rica Mandates Mangrove Restoration at RIU Guanacaste Hotel appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

How a former Forest Service employee changed the future of housing in California

One April night eight years ago, two tech leaders sat down with a former Forest Service employee at Terroir, a natural wine bar in San Francisco. Then they started sketching out a plan that would eventually reshape California’s housing policy. Landmark housing reforms that passed in the state in 2025, one that allows more housing to be built near transit stops, and another curbing the use of environmental law to block new housing—and which many believed would never succeed—can be traced back to that night, five bottles of wine, and crucial backing from Silicon Valley executives. An unlikely new leader Brian Hanlon, the Forest Service employee, was an unlikely leader for a new housing movement. Hanlon moved to the Bay Area in 2010 after dropping out of a Ph.D. program, and got a job managing grant paperwork for USFS. He wasn’t planning to work on housing; he considered becoming a winemaker. But he soon saw the impact of California’s housing policy directly. When he first arrived in the area, apartments were still relatively affordable. Within a year, he saw demand spike: every open house he visited had 20 to 30 people competing for the same apartment. Over the next couple of years, as rents in the city continued to rise, Hanlon got involved with rental advocacy groups, but quickly saw the limitations. He felt advocates weren’t engaging with what he saw as a basic problem: restrictive policy made it too difficult to build housing, and the shortage of housing—not just landlords trying to extract higher rents from renters—was what was driving up prices. “Even then, I was like, ‘It’s not landlord greed.’ There aren’t enough homes. Landlords are just as greedy in Houston, Texas, or wherever else,” he says. “I kind of got excommunicated from that movement because I believed in more housing.” A friend introduced him to Sonia Trauss, a math teacher who had started advocating for new housing development at planning meetings—a YIMBY (“yes in my backyard”) counterpart to the resistance to new construction that was common in San Francisco, which is commonly characterized as NIMBY (“not in my backyard”). This resistance came largely from two separate, but sometimes aligned, groups: first, homeowners who believe new constructions of apartments around their homes will lower the resale value, obstruct their views, and otherwise affect “the neighborhood character”; and second, advocates for low-income tenants who believe that the new construction pushed by the YIMBY movement in gentrifying working-class neighborhoods will accelerate the damaging process of pricing out long-time residents. The first group is more powerful politically at the state level, but at the start of Hanlon and Trauss’s advocacy in San Francisco, many of the fights were with the second, leading to vitriolic conflict in the city (and online). Trauss faced intense criticism for comparing tenant advocates to Trump voters during a speech at hearing. And in one incident, Hanlon was at a public film screening about the eviction crisis, talking with a resident who was fighting a plan to demolish his apartment building, when an activist forced him out of the event, screaming “Get the fuck out!” As the conflicts continued in San Francisco, Hanlon decided he needed to do more than tackle one planning meeting—and one building—at a time. After he and Trauss secured some funding, they founded a nonprofit, California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund, and filed a lawsuit against a Bay Area suburb for not building enough housing. They lost the suit, and Hanlon realized that they needed to change direction. “I was like, alright, well, we’re going to fail as a nonprofit if we don’t change the law,” he says. Rewriting the law With help from a likeminded developer he’d met, Hanlon brought together a group of land-use attorneys, planners, and other developers and explained why the lawsuit had failed and how he wanted the law to change so cities would have to allow more construction. Hanlon copied the existing law into Microsoft Word, rewrote it based on feedback from the group, and then gave it to a lawyer to draft a real version of a potential bill. Then he started heading to Sacramento, meeting with anyone who’d talk. A lawyer from the Building Industry Association told him that he was wasting his time. “I’m like, alright, thanks for your feedback,” he says. “And then I just kept going.” At the time, he had little money and few connections. At a housing conference, he entered a contest to meet the new chair of the state’s Department of Housing Development—the competition involved guessing the number of Monopoly houses in a giant jar. “I remembered a little bit of middle school geometry or something, and I just looked at the jar and did the right math and guessed the right number of houses,” he says. He won a lunch with Ben Metcalf, the new chair, and peppered him with questions about housing reform in the state. Meanwhile, he was starting to make more connections in the tech industry. Trauss had already gotten some support from tech CEOs like Yelp’s Jeremy Stoppleman, who saw that the housing shortage could hurt their industry since it was so hard for employees to find a place to live. Like others, he’d read a viral article in TechCrunch from Kim-Mai Cutler explaining how housing policy restricted development. “That story really helped put everything in perspective—like, oh, this is actually by design,” Stoppleman says. “[It was] many years of decisions to specifically constrain housing production, density, and growth. That created a real point of frustration as a person leading a business with thousands of employees here in the Bay Area.” Hanlon met Zack Rosen, CEO of the WebOps platform Pantheon, on Twitter. “I got in a fight with him on the internet,” Rosen says. “I got into one of those things where it was back and forth, back and forth, and by the third time, I’m like, man, I don’t know what I’m talking about.” He suggested to Hanlon that they meet up for coffee, and they became friends. Rosen, too, wanted to invest in a solution to the housing crisis. “The tech industry didn’t create these terrible housing policies, they predate us,” Rosen says. “However, the success of our industry and these terrible housing policies are a train wreck. The net effect of that train wreck is immiseration for the state of California—you know, teachers teaching [while] homeless in San Francisco. I mean, it’s insane. So for me, it was like, look, the tech industry has a special responsibility to help solve it.” A few weeks later, Hanlon ran into Rosen in Sacramento, along with Nat Friedman—the former CEO of Github, now head of Meta’s Superintelligence Labs, who had come to Sacramento to talk about housing with an assemblymember. They started walking through the capital building, and knocked on the door of the governor’s office, where they managed to wrangle a meeting with staffers on the fly. Policymakers wanted to act, but the issue was complex, and they needed help understanding what laws could truly help. On the drive back home, Rosen started thinking about partnering with Hanlon. Making a bet on a new startup nonprofit They stayed in touch, and nearly a year later, Rosen, Friedman, and Hanlon met at the wine bar to talk about the potential for a new nonprofit. They talked for hours, closing out the bar. Hanlon pitched them on the vision of a new housing advocacy organization for the state that would work on new policy, build coalitions and a grassroots movement, and massively scale up homebuilding. At the time, Hanlon was still working on a shoestring budget, helping shepherd a housing bill called SB 167—based on what he’d drafted earlier—through the committee process. “Imagine all that we could do if I had a real team and a real budget?” he said. They didn’t know exactly how the new organization would work. “We ended up with more questions than answers,” says Rosen. “But we had a direction. We had a strategy.” They were sold on the idea. “It was reminiscent to me of the beginnings of a great startup,” he says. “It just felt like hey, here’s this obvious idea. No one’s doing it. Is it possible to do? Absolutely. Is it incredibly difficult to do? Absolutely. Let’s go do it.” Within a couple of months, they had raised hundreds of thousands for the project. Hanlon resigned from his previous nonprofit with Trauss. Rosen joined the new organization, California YIMBY, as a cofounder. It’s something that probably only would have happened in San Francisco. “I don’t think I ever would have raised this sort of philanthropic capital just given my profile—I’m some guy who was working for the Forest Service and moved to the Mission because I was really into wine, fixed gear bikes, and shows,” Hanlon says. “That doesn’t sound like someone I’d want to make a big bet on to try to rebuild the built environment of the world’s fourth largest economy.” But his vision resonated with them, and with friends of Friedman’s who gave to the new nonprofit. “Brian’s a mile a minute—very fast on his feet, very thoughtful, had clearly done tons of research, knew his stuff,” says Stoppleman. “It was a really unique strategy that he was laying out. For me, it’s exciting to meet people at that stage when they’re just getting going. Obviously brilliant, lots of energy, a lot of passion, probably some naivete. There is a parallel, 100%, to the startup world.” The tech leaders who put in money also were willing to try something new. “I don’t mean to just make a paean to enlightened tech leaders, but I will say, San Francisco’s entrepreneurial tech leaders don’t treat the status quo or entrenched power as immutable reality,” says Hanlon. “They treat it as problems to be solved and building a new future. And that’s rare and uncommon….I think there’s this real sense that we’re not on this Earth for very long, it’s good and right to work quickly to solve your problems. And also, that failure isn’t the worst thing. The worst thing is not trying, or trying and not being ambitious.” Sweeping changes in policy After the nonprofit was founded in 2017—as a 501(c)(4) organization, so it’s allowed to lobby full time—it led advocacy for SB 167, a bill that made it harder for cities to fail to comply with state laws designed to force cities to approve more housing. The organization also fought for new laws that make it easier to build ADUs and “missing middle” housing like duplexes. But the biggest victories, after earlier failed attempts, came this year. First, the state passed a set of laws that reform CEQA, the California’s environmental law, which has sometimes been used as a method to stop development. Some housing now has a faster review process under the law. When the nonprofit first began working on CEQA reform, they were told that it was impossible. This fall, the state also passed SB 79, a law that legalizes large apartment buildings near major transit stops throughout the state—even when local laws restrict density or height. That can help significantly shrink the state’s housing shortage. In L.A., alone, by one estimate, it will eventually zone for 1.46 million new housing units. Along with CEQA reform, it was something they’d first talked about at the wine bar. “That was really was got Nat and Zack excited that night,” Hanlon says. Earlier attempts to pass the law, including a bill introduced in 2018, helped change the conversation about housing. Academics had long argued for more housing near transit, but this type of policy was new. “That’s the first bill, to my knowledge, that had actually been commensurate with the scale of the problem to actually solve it,” Hanlon says. It died quickly in committee, but got people talking in other cities. In New York City, the planning office held a meeting to discuss it. Other advocacy groups in other states started considered new changes to state policy. The latest version of the bill barely passed. It’s likely the only bill in the history of the state, Hanlon says, to become law after “rolling” the first two policy committee chairs, meaning it passed over their objections. The bill had to make it through nine votes, and then the governor’s vote. At each step, it barely made it. “This was incredibly, incredibly hard fought.” Still, he says, despite fierce opposition to the bill, including citizen protests and formal opposition from dozens of city councils, the debate was less heated than it had been in the past. Previous bills had faced widespread, statewide activism in large town halls and protests—many of which were organized by Livable California, a group of homeowners founded by a former oil executive that fights zoning changes and regulations that would make it easier to build apartemts—along with a deluge of op-eds and even a study with false data that argued that Los Angeles could meet its housing needs with vacant apartments. Now, the ideas behind the YIMBY have now become more mainstream. Policymakers have largely accepted the idea that the housing shortage is a supply problem, and that policy has held back development. “YIMBY benefits from being correct,” says Rosen. “It’s real. It’s substantive. It’s right. It also benefits from taking what should be an obscure issue like zoning, and turning it into something that’s real and personal for people—housing. And that was clear from the beginning.” When the YIMBY movement started to take off, “what wasn’t clear was how you would translate that movement that was getting attention into change of government that would enable a boom in housing,” he says. “There’s a huge leap between those things. We’ve got a long list of modern-day political movements that capture attention and don’t deliver the outcome. it’s not that any of the work of translating attention in a movement into outcomes is like rocket science. But it’s tremendously difficult work. And it’s very deliberate kind of work, very strategic work. It’s very stage sequenced. To me, it feels like kind of like scaling a company.” The work isn’t done. The next big battle, Hanlon says, is the steep fees that local governments impose on new developments, which can make building infeasible even when other barriers are taken away. But 2025 has “absolutely been a breakthrough year,” says Rosen. “We have a lot left to do. But I don’t know that there’s going to be a political lift that heavy.”

One April night eight years ago, two tech leaders sat down with a former Forest Service employee at Terroir, a natural wine bar in San Francisco. Then they started sketching out a plan that would eventually reshape California’s housing policy. Landmark housing reforms that passed in the state in 2025, one that allows more housing to be built near transit stops, and another curbing the use of environmental law to block new housing—and which many believed would never succeed—can be traced back to that night, five bottles of wine, and crucial backing from Silicon Valley executives. An unlikely new leader Brian Hanlon, the Forest Service employee, was an unlikely leader for a new housing movement. Hanlon moved to the Bay Area in 2010 after dropping out of a Ph.D. program, and got a job managing grant paperwork for USFS. He wasn’t planning to work on housing; he considered becoming a winemaker. But he soon saw the impact of California’s housing policy directly. When he first arrived in the area, apartments were still relatively affordable. Within a year, he saw demand spike: every open house he visited had 20 to 30 people competing for the same apartment. Over the next couple of years, as rents in the city continued to rise, Hanlon got involved with rental advocacy groups, but quickly saw the limitations. He felt advocates weren’t engaging with what he saw as a basic problem: restrictive policy made it too difficult to build housing, and the shortage of housing—not just landlords trying to extract higher rents from renters—was what was driving up prices. “Even then, I was like, ‘It’s not landlord greed.’ There aren’t enough homes. Landlords are just as greedy in Houston, Texas, or wherever else,” he says. “I kind of got excommunicated from that movement because I believed in more housing.” A friend introduced him to Sonia Trauss, a math teacher who had started advocating for new housing development at planning meetings—a YIMBY (“yes in my backyard”) counterpart to the resistance to new construction that was common in San Francisco, which is commonly characterized as NIMBY (“not in my backyard”). This resistance came largely from two separate, but sometimes aligned, groups: first, homeowners who believe new constructions of apartments around their homes will lower the resale value, obstruct their views, and otherwise affect “the neighborhood character”; and second, advocates for low-income tenants who believe that the new construction pushed by the YIMBY movement in gentrifying working-class neighborhoods will accelerate the damaging process of pricing out long-time residents. The first group is more powerful politically at the state level, but at the start of Hanlon and Trauss’s advocacy in San Francisco, many of the fights were with the second, leading to vitriolic conflict in the city (and online). Trauss faced intense criticism for comparing tenant advocates to Trump voters during a speech at hearing. And in one incident, Hanlon was at a public film screening about the eviction crisis, talking with a resident who was fighting a plan to demolish his apartment building, when an activist forced him out of the event, screaming “Get the fuck out!” As the conflicts continued in San Francisco, Hanlon decided he needed to do more than tackle one planning meeting—and one building—at a time. After he and Trauss secured some funding, they founded a nonprofit, California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund, and filed a lawsuit against a Bay Area suburb for not building enough housing. They lost the suit, and Hanlon realized that they needed to change direction. “I was like, alright, well, we’re going to fail as a nonprofit if we don’t change the law,” he says. Rewriting the law With help from a likeminded developer he’d met, Hanlon brought together a group of land-use attorneys, planners, and other developers and explained why the lawsuit had failed and how he wanted the law to change so cities would have to allow more construction. Hanlon copied the existing law into Microsoft Word, rewrote it based on feedback from the group, and then gave it to a lawyer to draft a real version of a potential bill. Then he started heading to Sacramento, meeting with anyone who’d talk. A lawyer from the Building Industry Association told him that he was wasting his time. “I’m like, alright, thanks for your feedback,” he says. “And then I just kept going.” At the time, he had little money and few connections. At a housing conference, he entered a contest to meet the new chair of the state’s Department of Housing Development—the competition involved guessing the number of Monopoly houses in a giant jar. “I remembered a little bit of middle school geometry or something, and I just looked at the jar and did the right math and guessed the right number of houses,” he says. He won a lunch with Ben Metcalf, the new chair, and peppered him with questions about housing reform in the state. Meanwhile, he was starting to make more connections in the tech industry. Trauss had already gotten some support from tech CEOs like Yelp’s Jeremy Stoppleman, who saw that the housing shortage could hurt their industry since it was so hard for employees to find a place to live. Like others, he’d read a viral article in TechCrunch from Kim-Mai Cutler explaining how housing policy restricted development. “That story really helped put everything in perspective—like, oh, this is actually by design,” Stoppleman says. “[It was] many years of decisions to specifically constrain housing production, density, and growth. That created a real point of frustration as a person leading a business with thousands of employees here in the Bay Area.” Hanlon met Zack Rosen, CEO of the WebOps platform Pantheon, on Twitter. “I got in a fight with him on the internet,” Rosen says. “I got into one of those things where it was back and forth, back and forth, and by the third time, I’m like, man, I don’t know what I’m talking about.” He suggested to Hanlon that they meet up for coffee, and they became friends. Rosen, too, wanted to invest in a solution to the housing crisis. “The tech industry didn’t create these terrible housing policies, they predate us,” Rosen says. “However, the success of our industry and these terrible housing policies are a train wreck. The net effect of that train wreck is immiseration for the state of California—you know, teachers teaching [while] homeless in San Francisco. I mean, it’s insane. So for me, it was like, look, the tech industry has a special responsibility to help solve it.” A few weeks later, Hanlon ran into Rosen in Sacramento, along with Nat Friedman—the former CEO of Github, now head of Meta’s Superintelligence Labs, who had come to Sacramento to talk about housing with an assemblymember. They started walking through the capital building, and knocked on the door of the governor’s office, where they managed to wrangle a meeting with staffers on the fly. Policymakers wanted to act, but the issue was complex, and they needed help understanding what laws could truly help. On the drive back home, Rosen started thinking about partnering with Hanlon. Making a bet on a new startup nonprofit They stayed in touch, and nearly a year later, Rosen, Friedman, and Hanlon met at the wine bar to talk about the potential for a new nonprofit. They talked for hours, closing out the bar. Hanlon pitched them on the vision of a new housing advocacy organization for the state that would work on new policy, build coalitions and a grassroots movement, and massively scale up homebuilding. At the time, Hanlon was still working on a shoestring budget, helping shepherd a housing bill called SB 167—based on what he’d drafted earlier—through the committee process. “Imagine all that we could do if I had a real team and a real budget?” he said. They didn’t know exactly how the new organization would work. “We ended up with more questions than answers,” says Rosen. “But we had a direction. We had a strategy.” They were sold on the idea. “It was reminiscent to me of the beginnings of a great startup,” he says. “It just felt like hey, here’s this obvious idea. No one’s doing it. Is it possible to do? Absolutely. Is it incredibly difficult to do? Absolutely. Let’s go do it.” Within a couple of months, they had raised hundreds of thousands for the project. Hanlon resigned from his previous nonprofit with Trauss. Rosen joined the new organization, California YIMBY, as a cofounder. It’s something that probably only would have happened in San Francisco. “I don’t think I ever would have raised this sort of philanthropic capital just given my profile—I’m some guy who was working for the Forest Service and moved to the Mission because I was really into wine, fixed gear bikes, and shows,” Hanlon says. “That doesn’t sound like someone I’d want to make a big bet on to try to rebuild the built environment of the world’s fourth largest economy.” But his vision resonated with them, and with friends of Friedman’s who gave to the new nonprofit. “Brian’s a mile a minute—very fast on his feet, very thoughtful, had clearly done tons of research, knew his stuff,” says Stoppleman. “It was a really unique strategy that he was laying out. For me, it’s exciting to meet people at that stage when they’re just getting going. Obviously brilliant, lots of energy, a lot of passion, probably some naivete. There is a parallel, 100%, to the startup world.” The tech leaders who put in money also were willing to try something new. “I don’t mean to just make a paean to enlightened tech leaders, but I will say, San Francisco’s entrepreneurial tech leaders don’t treat the status quo or entrenched power as immutable reality,” says Hanlon. “They treat it as problems to be solved and building a new future. And that’s rare and uncommon….I think there’s this real sense that we’re not on this Earth for very long, it’s good and right to work quickly to solve your problems. And also, that failure isn’t the worst thing. The worst thing is not trying, or trying and not being ambitious.” Sweeping changes in policy After the nonprofit was founded in 2017—as a 501(c)(4) organization, so it’s allowed to lobby full time—it led advocacy for SB 167, a bill that made it harder for cities to fail to comply with state laws designed to force cities to approve more housing. The organization also fought for new laws that make it easier to build ADUs and “missing middle” housing like duplexes. But the biggest victories, after earlier failed attempts, came this year. First, the state passed a set of laws that reform CEQA, the California’s environmental law, which has sometimes been used as a method to stop development. Some housing now has a faster review process under the law. When the nonprofit first began working on CEQA reform, they were told that it was impossible. This fall, the state also passed SB 79, a law that legalizes large apartment buildings near major transit stops throughout the state—even when local laws restrict density or height. That can help significantly shrink the state’s housing shortage. In L.A., alone, by one estimate, it will eventually zone for 1.46 million new housing units. Along with CEQA reform, it was something they’d first talked about at the wine bar. “That was really was got Nat and Zack excited that night,” Hanlon says. Earlier attempts to pass the law, including a bill introduced in 2018, helped change the conversation about housing. Academics had long argued for more housing near transit, but this type of policy was new. “That’s the first bill, to my knowledge, that had actually been commensurate with the scale of the problem to actually solve it,” Hanlon says. It died quickly in committee, but got people talking in other cities. In New York City, the planning office held a meeting to discuss it. Other advocacy groups in other states started considered new changes to state policy. The latest version of the bill barely passed. It’s likely the only bill in the history of the state, Hanlon says, to become law after “rolling” the first two policy committee chairs, meaning it passed over their objections. The bill had to make it through nine votes, and then the governor’s vote. At each step, it barely made it. “This was incredibly, incredibly hard fought.” Still, he says, despite fierce opposition to the bill, including citizen protests and formal opposition from dozens of city councils, the debate was less heated than it had been in the past. Previous bills had faced widespread, statewide activism in large town halls and protests—many of which were organized by Livable California, a group of homeowners founded by a former oil executive that fights zoning changes and regulations that would make it easier to build apartemts—along with a deluge of op-eds and even a study with false data that argued that Los Angeles could meet its housing needs with vacant apartments. Now, the ideas behind the YIMBY have now become more mainstream. Policymakers have largely accepted the idea that the housing shortage is a supply problem, and that policy has held back development. “YIMBY benefits from being correct,” says Rosen. “It’s real. It’s substantive. It’s right. It also benefits from taking what should be an obscure issue like zoning, and turning it into something that’s real and personal for people—housing. And that was clear from the beginning.” When the YIMBY movement started to take off, “what wasn’t clear was how you would translate that movement that was getting attention into change of government that would enable a boom in housing,” he says. “There’s a huge leap between those things. We’ve got a long list of modern-day political movements that capture attention and don’t deliver the outcome. it’s not that any of the work of translating attention in a movement into outcomes is like rocket science. But it’s tremendously difficult work. And it’s very deliberate kind of work, very strategic work. It’s very stage sequenced. To me, it feels like kind of like scaling a company.” The work isn’t done. The next big battle, Hanlon says, is the steep fees that local governments impose on new developments, which can make building infeasible even when other barriers are taken away. But 2025 has “absolutely been a breakthrough year,” says Rosen. “We have a lot left to do. But I don’t know that there’s going to be a political lift that heavy.”

You think you’ve seen a big tree? Why we can no longer recognize a real forest

Environmental educator Ross Reid, also known as Nerdy About Nature, explains why we don't understand the scale of true old-growth forests.

Stand in awe before a towering Douglas fir in an Oregon forest, and you might believe you’re experiencing the majesty of old growth. But according to environmental educator Ross Reid, what most of us consider impressive forest landscapes are merely shadows of what once existed. In an archived episode of the Peak Northwest podcast, Reid, who is known for his presence on social media as “Nerdy About Nature,” explains why our perception of forests has been fundamentally altered by what we’ve lost.“It’s this concept known as shifting baseline syndrome where we’re limited in what we think is normal based on our experiences,” Reid said on the podcast. “The people who are living in this part of the world a hundred years ago had a radically different perception of the forest around them versus the one we have now.”Generative AI was used to summarize a recent episode of the Peak Northwest podcast. This story was reviewed and edited by The Oregonian/OregonLive.This psychological phenomenon, where each generation accepts a more diminished version of nature as “normal,” has profound implications for conservation efforts, Reid said. If we can’t recognize what we’ve lost, how can we work to protect or restore it?Bushwhacking through the rain forest of the Devil's Staircase Wilderness, one of Oregon's last true old-growth forests, in the Coast Range.Jamie Hale/The OregonianReid offered tangible examples of the differences between second-growth and old-growth forests that go beyond just tree size. “Pit mound topography is a concept in an old growth forest where you have bigger, older trees falling over naturally ... and you end up with a really undulating bit of terrain,” Reid said. “A lot of the forests we have in the Pacific Northwest, especially the second growth ones, you walk around, it’s fairly easy to walk off trail because it’s all kind of flat.”Throughout the episode, Reid explained how old-growth forests create unique habitats that are impossible to replicate in younger stands. For instance, bears in British Columbia rely on hollowed-out cavities in old Western red cedar trees for denning — structures that take centuries to form.A towering western redcedar tree is the highlight of the Rockaway Beach Old Growth Cedar Preserve on the north Oregon coast.Jamie Hale/The OregonianThe conversation reveals how industrial forestry has not just changed how forests look, but fundamentally altered their ecological function. Second-growth forests managed for timber production lack the structural complexity, genetic diversity, and ecological relationships that develop in forests allowed to mature naturally over centuries, Reid said.For anyone who loves hiking through Pacific Northwest forests, the interview offers a new lens through which to view familiar landscapes. Reid challenges listeners to look beyond their initial impressions of big trees and green canopies to recognize the subtler signs of ecological complexity that distinguish truly ancient forests from their younger counterparts.Listen to the full episode here: Subscribe to The Oregonian/OregonLive’s travel and outdoors podcast Peak Northwest on Apple, Spotify, YouTube or anywhere else you listen to podcasts. Hosts Jamie Hale and Chiara Profenna take you to some of the greatest destinations in Oregon and the Pacific Northwest. Check out more Peak Northwest episodes below.

‘I can’t think of a place more pristine’: 133,000 hectares of Chilean Patagonia preserved after local fundraising

Exclusive: Ancient forests and turquoise rivers of the Cochamó Valley protected from logging, damming and developmentA wild valley in Chilean Patagonia has been preserved for future generations and protected from logging, damming and unbridled development after a remarkable fundraising effort by local groups, the Guardian can reveal.The 133,000 hectares (328,000 acres) of pristine wilderness in the Cochamó Valley was bought for $78m (£58m) after a grassroots campaign led by the NGO Puelo Patagonia, and the title to the wildlands was officially handed over to the Chilean nonprofit Fundación Conserva Puchegüín on 9 December. Continue reading...

A wild valley in Chilean Patagonia has been preserved for future generations and protected from logging, damming and unbridled development after a remarkable fundraising effort by local groups, the Guardian can reveal.The 133,000 hectares (328,000 acres) of pristine wilderness in the Cochamó Valley was bought for $78m (£58m) after a grassroots campaign led by the NGO Puelo Patagonia, and the title to the wildlands was officially handed over to the Chilean nonprofit Fundación Conserva Puchegüín on 9 December.The now-protected ecosystem is 383 times the size of Manhattan’s Central Park, or 800 times as big as London’s Regent’s Park.The lush, forested Cochamó Valley is home to waterfalls, emerald green rivers, hummingbirds and condors. The ancient forests hold groves of alerce trees that sprouted about 1,000BC, four centuries before the rise of the Roman empire.The newly acquired lands hold 11% of the remaining alerce forests on Earth. Logged for their solid, water-resistant trunk, alerce wood was fashioned into ship masts and telephone poles.The thick reddish bark on the alerce tree allows it to survive forest fires, droughts and 11ft of annual rainfall. Photograph: Marcelo SalazarSparsely populated by a few remote homestead camps and rustic campgrounds, the Cochamó Valley is surrounded by 3,200ft (970 metre) granite cliffs that in 1997 lured climbers seeking the first ascent of rock faces on Cerro Trinidad.In 2012, rancher families and lone cowboys living in the valley joined forces with tour operators, NGOs, climbers, backpackers and explorers in vociferous opposition to a $400m hydroelectric plan that included 150-metre transmission towers, access roads and complete disruption of the rural way of life along the Manso River. The communities then worked together to stop a high-end vacation home development and plans to pave roads through the valley.“Our goal was to transform threats into opportunities,” said José Claro, the president of Puelo Patagonia.Claro described how one large-scale project after another was stymied by Puelo Patagonia and the local community working together.The conservation campaigns highlighted Cochamó’s importance as a biological corridor that could connect to the surrounding 1.6m hectares of protected lands in Chile and Argentina. A coalition of local and foreign NGOs known as Conserva Puchegüín then began recruiting donors to fund long-term conservation strategies.The valley receives over 3 metres of rain a year, making industrial agriculture virtually impossible. Cattle grazing is difficult as the mountain slopes are nearly vertical.Except for a few cave drawings attributed to native peoples from present-day Argentina who migrated along riverbanks, this corner of northern Patagonia reveals few signs of longstanding human habitation.These never-logged forests and free-flowing turquoise rivers are a field biologist’s paradise. The area teems with ferns the size of beach umbrellas. The undergrowth of native bamboo makes bushwhacking through this temperate rainforest nearly impossible, even with a machete.The dense underbrush prevents many larger mammals from migrating through the valley. Local species of deer known as pudu have adapted so they are rarely taller than 40cm.Chilean cowboys often lead pack horses into Cochamó Valley with saddles and sacks filled with food and supplies. Photograph: Valentina Thenoux“You think about those trees being cut down or the valley flooded. It’s just terrifying,” said Alex Taylor, the chief executive of Cox Enterprises, who was first introduced to Cochamó in early 2025 by fellow fly fisher Yvon Chouinard, the founder of the clothing company Patagonia.Taylor returned to Atlanta with an idea for the James M Cox Foundation to support the protection of the valley. The other trustees agreed and approved a $20m donation.“It’s almost like the spiritual centre of the universe from a forest biodiversity standpoint,” said Taylor. “I can’t think of a place more pristine.”Hikers and climbers who manage to reach the peaks inside Cochamó Valley are treated to a panoramic view of the many unclimbed peaks inside the future park. Photograph: Valentina ThenouxThe successful fundraising campaign to buy the land is the beginning of what is likely to be a decades-long project to conserve the homesteader way of life and the valley’s rich biodiversity.“How do we ensure that traditional living and practices that have been going on for the better part of a century or more don’t get disrupted?” said Alex Perry, the Latin America general manager for Patagonia, which has been funding local conservation groups in the Cochamó Valley for more than a decade and in 2024 donated $4m through the company’s non-profit owner, Holdfast Collective.“How do we make it so that this model is something that can be replicated and scaled and is attractive to the next generation?”While the 133,000 hectares may eventually be donated to the Chilean national park system, recently passed environmental legislation in Chile created a system that secures permanent protection of designated areas even when the land remains in private ownership.As the valley’s popularity surges among hikers, climbers and horseback riders, a limit of 15,000 visitors a year has been set. Reservations are now required and a master plan of hiking trails, base camps and horse stables is being developed with direct participation from the local communities.“The beauty of the Pucheguín project is that it’s coming with an endowment,” said Anne Deane, the president of the Freyja Foundation which helped fund land purchases in the valley and recruited additional funders including the Wyss Foundation. “Cochamó is only going to get more and more popular, so it’s very important that there is an operating budget to support it.”Using camera traps and through collaboration with residents, a survey of the area’s wildlife has begun. A small herd of Chile’s national symbol, the now-endangered huemul deer, was recently discovered.A pair of endangered huemul deer grazing in Cochamó Valley. Photograph: Benjamin ValenzuelaThere are no roads through the valley and electricity is generated house by house through solar or wind. The homes are often rough cabins set on riverbanks, allowing small motorboats to navigate up and down the Puelo River. Pack horses still haul in most food and supplies.The Cochamó conservation project was inspired by the landmark conservation efforts of Kris and Doug Tompkins, who abandoned successful leadership roles at the Patagonia and Esprit clothing companies respectively, moved to a remote cabin in Patagonia and dedicated 25 years and $300m to creating national parks in Chile and Argentina.By buying massive swathes of land and then negotiating with the Chilean government to expand its existing parks, the Tompkins conservation group – now known as Rewilding Chile – helped protect more than 5.7m hectares of wildlands.The path to becoming a park may be different in Cochamó. The measly budget allocated for national parks in Chile – highlighted by the recent deaths of five hikers in Torres del Paine national park – has convinced many conservation advocates to look at creating private parks that combine conservation with low impact commercial operations such as family farms or a solar-powered craft brewery.The plans for Cochamó are to place at least 80% in protected national park level status, while the remaining 20% will be zoned for multiple use, allowing locals to earn a living off tourism and traditional activities such as family farms and their small ranches.There are no roads through the valley and electricity is generated house by house through solar or wind. Photograph: Rodrigo MannsOn a recent hike through Cochamó, the connection between conservation and community was evident.A Chilean cowboy hauling a horse piled high with fruits, vegetables and canned food stopped to share news. His horse was pregnant. Rex, a neighbour’s dog, needed medicine. The remote bridge washed away by the floods was nearly rebuilt.Stopping to chat in the cool fern forest, the cowboy spoke with excitement about the German tourists he would that evening be guiding down the mountain, on a path that his father helped build and that his children might one day continue to use and preserve.

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.