Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

News Feed
Wednesday, December 18, 2024

It’s been five years since the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program launched, and at a recent retreat gathering the leadership team reflected on what we’ve learned and what environmental issues we’re watching closely as we near 2025.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify. Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change programTranscript Brian BienkowskiHello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host, Brian Bienkowski, editor at Agents of Change and senior editor at Environmental Health News. This podcast is designed to bring you the voices, stories and ideas of environmental justice leaders, and we're going to do that today too, but I'm actually joining you from outside at a picnic table near an old brick chimney fireplace at a tree-filled retreat center outside of Philadelphia. The Agents of Change team, along with different groups of fellows, have gathered here the past few years, and it's become familiar to me, the creaky floors in my room, the wood chipped pathways full of busy squirrels and the towering Eastern White Pines that remind me of my home in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. I've spent today hearing about policy intervention plans from our current group of fellows, how to make sure villagers near the chobei National Park in Africa are treated equitably as ecO-lodges and sport hunting grow, how to simultaneously tackle gentrification and the proliferation of micro plastics, how to bring down energy costs in the Atlanta neighborhoods that need it most. It's heavy work, but we've spent just as much time laughing, connecting, hugging and sharing meals and too much coffee for someone who works from home, these trips are re energizing and only reinforce the need for human connection. It's amazing what happens when you put smart, motivated people in a room together. I wanted to take this opportunity to hear from the Agents of Change team reflecting on what we've learned and what we're looking forward to. I also wanted to take this opportunity to say that this will be my last podcast. After 13 years as a reporter and editor at Environmental Health News and nearly five years as the editor of Agents of Change, I am signing off, folks. I am filled with gratitude for my time here, I was able to work on so many projects that I truly believed in, and work with so many dedicated, kind people. It's a bittersweet departure. While I'm sad to leave my colleagues, I will be joining American Forests in their tree equity program, getting back to my roots of environmental interest in trees and forest, the reason I got into this in the first place. I'm excited to have an acute focus on forest protection and to advocate for green space and tree access. Many of the podcast conversations and essays that I worked on here at Agents of Change touched on this inequity in green space access, and I'm thrilled to take what I've learned from these fellows and put it to work in the real world. Over the past five years, I've learned a lot, but this program has reaffirmed for me the power and beauty of storytelling. While the podcast will be taking a break after this episode, the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program continues and its storytelling will continue as well. I'm excited to see how the program grows and evolves with this gift of in person, time with friends, new and old, I sat down with my fellow leaders of the Agents of Change team. I wanted to know five years into the program, what other people have learned from training, mentoring and working with dozens of early career environmental justice scholars. Enjoy. Veena Singla Hi, it's Veena Singla here. I'm on the leadership team of Agents of Change, and something I learn every year is how much the fellows have to teach me, even though I'm here to provide them guidance in science communication and policy translation, I'm constantly learning from them about their work and how they are infusing equity and engaging with communities in really unique and different ways. So I appreciate how much we teach and learn from each other, and something that I'm really excited to continue researching and advocacy on in the next year is this idea of so called chemical recycling of plastics, which is being really pushed for by the plastics industry as a supposed solution to plastics pollution crisis, and in reality, is just a very polluting technology that does very little to recycle plastic or or solve the crisis. So I'm wanting to provide a lot more data and information to communities and decision makers about so called chemical recycling and advocate for better and real solutions like reducing plastic production.Maria Paula Rubiano Hi, this is Maria Paula Rubiano. I am an assistant editor here at Agents of Change and Environmental Health News. And you know, since. Since I started, I think two years ago, what has surprised me the most by working with the fellows is just the nuance and the diversity of questions that researchers are asking themselves in the environmental justice and environmental health space. You know, I had been a reporter for six or seven years before coming to EHN and Agents of Change and just learning how young researchers are asking sort of questions that I had never asked myself as a journalist and I didn't see reflected in the kinds of of journalism stories that I worked on is really exciting, and it's exciting to be putting those ideas out there. And what I think it's going to be exciting for next year is just, I don't know, I feel like there's this momentum building in public opinion and also in research and policy decisions towards regulating plastics and plastic pollution. You know, I know there's a lot of opposition from industry, but I feel like, you know, just regular people are more aware of how complicated solving the plastic issue is. It's not about just recycling. That's just like not cutting it and not going to be enough. And I feel like more and more people are realizing that, and so keep building and contributing to these conversations on the petrochemical industry and regulating plastics. It's very exciting for me as an editor and journalist.Max Aung Hey there. This is Max Aung. I'm the assistant director and part of the leadership team program. And, you know, something really cool that I've been learning recently, especially with this cohort, is that while all the fellows have such a deep connection to the focus areas that they're working on, we've learned about all of the different perspectives that they bring to the table through their communication and partnerships with local organizations as well as policy makers. So it's been really interesting to learn about how all of those different perspectives have played such a critical role in the way they think about applying their research to inform policy. And for me, going forward, something I'm really excited about, you know, continuing to do advocacy and research on in terms of environmental justice is on access to clean water and sustainable water systems across the US. And you know, that's something that I've been doing research on, particularly with exposure assessment to environmental chemical pollution. So I'm really hopeful that we can continue this work and ensure healthy access to clean water.Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne Hi everyone. This is Yoshi. I'm also on the senior leadership team with Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one of the great things that I've learned over the years is just how even with one topic or range of topics in environmental justice, so many people can just come at it from different angles, and there's always just so many different subcategories, the definition and the ways that the fellows have been able to integrate both the science, but also their community partnerships and now them working on the policy analysis to actually enact change has been a really wonderful experience to see both them grow, but also the program in its new directions. I think, personally, for one issue in the area of environmental justice, that I'm looking forward to working in the next year is actually a project with Ami and Rise Saint James out in Louisiana. So we're working with community partner out there to do some extensive research and community-based research on exposures to petrochemical industries in the St James Parish. So I think that's one of the projects that we're that we're very excited about to continue growing, but also make some headway in the fight towards petrochemicals.Lariah Edwards Hi, this is Lariah Edwards. I'm also on the senior leadership team for Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one thing that I have learned during my time in this program is how how important is to think critically about new environmental health and justice solutions. The fellows have really shown me that, you know, a new solution may be great, but thinking about who's actually being protected and who's being forgotten, the fellows show me, year after year, how passionate and determined they are to make sure community does not get left behind or forgotten when these new solutions roll out. And I absolutely love that, and I learn so much every single time. And an issue that I hope to follow in the new year, I hope to continue to generate science around relaxers and the chemicals of concern that are in them, in the hopes that that work can reinvigorate and kind of re-excite FDA to think about regulating some of these chemicals and relaxers and other hair products that predominantly impact women of color. So I hope to keep pushing policy-relevant science in the upcoming year about these chemicals and personal care products.Samar Ahmad I'm Samar Ahmad and I'm program manager for the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. Something that I've been surprised from my time with the Agents of Change program are the profound connections that develop throughout this fellowship, despite meeting only once or twice a year, our fellows have made lasting friendships and really meaningful bonds, which have led to collaborations, both within and beyond the environmental justice space and as a program manager and the person who plans and leads the in person retreats, this is incredibly rewarding to see. An environmental issue that I'm excited is being discussed is extreme heat. I think that this is an issue that scientists in the field have been talking about for a long time, but maybe has not been taken seriously by mainstream media, and the fact that is now getting coverage and press in big news outlets and journals, I think is really important, especially in terms of making policy changes that will eventually help to reduce the temperature of our Earth.Emily Weaver Hi, my name is Emily Weaver, and I'm a program associate with Agents of Change. Something that surprised me about the Agents of Change fellowship is the sheer amount of connection that happens at the retreats. Just everyone I've talked to, and all the fellows that I meet, I feel like I can find something in common, even if we come from different disciplines, different backgrounds, different parts of the world, which I think is a super cool form of connection as we all have this, like, shared interest in environmental justice and an environmental issue. I'm excited to follow our environmental determinants of cancer and environmental health exposures. I'm working on a project right now through Columbia in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and that's something that I'm excited for. Just it's like getting a lot of attention. I read an article in The New York Times earlier today just talking about personal care product use and how that could possibly be linked to rising cancer rates in people under 40. But I'm just generally happy this is like being talked about more and excited to do more research in this area.Dr. Ami Zota Hello. I'm Dr Ami Zota, and I'm the founder and director of the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. One thing I've learned is in a surprising, or pleasantly surprising way, from this program is truly the power of the collective, both in terms of the collective power of bringing all of these truly creative, brilliant and inspiring young scholars from marginalized backgrounds together and just that collective force. I've also learned a lot from our growing leadership team for the program, their heart and creativity. Creativity and hard work really continues to make the program impactful, new, exciting and worth watching. Something I'm looking forward to in the environmental, health and justice space, really, lots of things to look forward to. I'm looking forward to seeing sort of how media, advocacy, policy and research combined forces to on the petrochemicals and plastics front, there's a lot of exciting work happening, really at the intersections of these different sectors. I'm also excited to keep advancing the quest for Beauty justice, with some new and exciting projects that are under wraps. So stay tuned.

It’s been five years since the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program launched, and at a recent retreat gathering the leadership team reflected on what we’ve learned and what environmental issues we’re watching closely as we near 2025.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify. Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change programTranscript Brian BienkowskiHello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host, Brian Bienkowski, editor at Agents of Change and senior editor at Environmental Health News. This podcast is designed to bring you the voices, stories and ideas of environmental justice leaders, and we're going to do that today too, but I'm actually joining you from outside at a picnic table near an old brick chimney fireplace at a tree-filled retreat center outside of Philadelphia. The Agents of Change team, along with different groups of fellows, have gathered here the past few years, and it's become familiar to me, the creaky floors in my room, the wood chipped pathways full of busy squirrels and the towering Eastern White Pines that remind me of my home in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. I've spent today hearing about policy intervention plans from our current group of fellows, how to make sure villagers near the chobei National Park in Africa are treated equitably as ecO-lodges and sport hunting grow, how to simultaneously tackle gentrification and the proliferation of micro plastics, how to bring down energy costs in the Atlanta neighborhoods that need it most. It's heavy work, but we've spent just as much time laughing, connecting, hugging and sharing meals and too much coffee for someone who works from home, these trips are re energizing and only reinforce the need for human connection. It's amazing what happens when you put smart, motivated people in a room together. I wanted to take this opportunity to hear from the Agents of Change team reflecting on what we've learned and what we're looking forward to. I also wanted to take this opportunity to say that this will be my last podcast. After 13 years as a reporter and editor at Environmental Health News and nearly five years as the editor of Agents of Change, I am signing off, folks. I am filled with gratitude for my time here, I was able to work on so many projects that I truly believed in, and work with so many dedicated, kind people. It's a bittersweet departure. While I'm sad to leave my colleagues, I will be joining American Forests in their tree equity program, getting back to my roots of environmental interest in trees and forest, the reason I got into this in the first place. I'm excited to have an acute focus on forest protection and to advocate for green space and tree access. Many of the podcast conversations and essays that I worked on here at Agents of Change touched on this inequity in green space access, and I'm thrilled to take what I've learned from these fellows and put it to work in the real world. Over the past five years, I've learned a lot, but this program has reaffirmed for me the power and beauty of storytelling. While the podcast will be taking a break after this episode, the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program continues and its storytelling will continue as well. I'm excited to see how the program grows and evolves with this gift of in person, time with friends, new and old, I sat down with my fellow leaders of the Agents of Change team. I wanted to know five years into the program, what other people have learned from training, mentoring and working with dozens of early career environmental justice scholars. Enjoy. Veena Singla Hi, it's Veena Singla here. I'm on the leadership team of Agents of Change, and something I learn every year is how much the fellows have to teach me, even though I'm here to provide them guidance in science communication and policy translation, I'm constantly learning from them about their work and how they are infusing equity and engaging with communities in really unique and different ways. So I appreciate how much we teach and learn from each other, and something that I'm really excited to continue researching and advocacy on in the next year is this idea of so called chemical recycling of plastics, which is being really pushed for by the plastics industry as a supposed solution to plastics pollution crisis, and in reality, is just a very polluting technology that does very little to recycle plastic or or solve the crisis. So I'm wanting to provide a lot more data and information to communities and decision makers about so called chemical recycling and advocate for better and real solutions like reducing plastic production.Maria Paula Rubiano Hi, this is Maria Paula Rubiano. I am an assistant editor here at Agents of Change and Environmental Health News. And you know, since. Since I started, I think two years ago, what has surprised me the most by working with the fellows is just the nuance and the diversity of questions that researchers are asking themselves in the environmental justice and environmental health space. You know, I had been a reporter for six or seven years before coming to EHN and Agents of Change and just learning how young researchers are asking sort of questions that I had never asked myself as a journalist and I didn't see reflected in the kinds of of journalism stories that I worked on is really exciting, and it's exciting to be putting those ideas out there. And what I think it's going to be exciting for next year is just, I don't know, I feel like there's this momentum building in public opinion and also in research and policy decisions towards regulating plastics and plastic pollution. You know, I know there's a lot of opposition from industry, but I feel like, you know, just regular people are more aware of how complicated solving the plastic issue is. It's not about just recycling. That's just like not cutting it and not going to be enough. And I feel like more and more people are realizing that, and so keep building and contributing to these conversations on the petrochemical industry and regulating plastics. It's very exciting for me as an editor and journalist.Max Aung Hey there. This is Max Aung. I'm the assistant director and part of the leadership team program. And, you know, something really cool that I've been learning recently, especially with this cohort, is that while all the fellows have such a deep connection to the focus areas that they're working on, we've learned about all of the different perspectives that they bring to the table through their communication and partnerships with local organizations as well as policy makers. So it's been really interesting to learn about how all of those different perspectives have played such a critical role in the way they think about applying their research to inform policy. And for me, going forward, something I'm really excited about, you know, continuing to do advocacy and research on in terms of environmental justice is on access to clean water and sustainable water systems across the US. And you know, that's something that I've been doing research on, particularly with exposure assessment to environmental chemical pollution. So I'm really hopeful that we can continue this work and ensure healthy access to clean water.Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne Hi everyone. This is Yoshi. I'm also on the senior leadership team with Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one of the great things that I've learned over the years is just how even with one topic or range of topics in environmental justice, so many people can just come at it from different angles, and there's always just so many different subcategories, the definition and the ways that the fellows have been able to integrate both the science, but also their community partnerships and now them working on the policy analysis to actually enact change has been a really wonderful experience to see both them grow, but also the program in its new directions. I think, personally, for one issue in the area of environmental justice, that I'm looking forward to working in the next year is actually a project with Ami and Rise Saint James out in Louisiana. So we're working with community partner out there to do some extensive research and community-based research on exposures to petrochemical industries in the St James Parish. So I think that's one of the projects that we're that we're very excited about to continue growing, but also make some headway in the fight towards petrochemicals.Lariah Edwards Hi, this is Lariah Edwards. I'm also on the senior leadership team for Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one thing that I have learned during my time in this program is how how important is to think critically about new environmental health and justice solutions. The fellows have really shown me that, you know, a new solution may be great, but thinking about who's actually being protected and who's being forgotten, the fellows show me, year after year, how passionate and determined they are to make sure community does not get left behind or forgotten when these new solutions roll out. And I absolutely love that, and I learn so much every single time. And an issue that I hope to follow in the new year, I hope to continue to generate science around relaxers and the chemicals of concern that are in them, in the hopes that that work can reinvigorate and kind of re-excite FDA to think about regulating some of these chemicals and relaxers and other hair products that predominantly impact women of color. So I hope to keep pushing policy-relevant science in the upcoming year about these chemicals and personal care products.Samar Ahmad I'm Samar Ahmad and I'm program manager for the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. Something that I've been surprised from my time with the Agents of Change program are the profound connections that develop throughout this fellowship, despite meeting only once or twice a year, our fellows have made lasting friendships and really meaningful bonds, which have led to collaborations, both within and beyond the environmental justice space and as a program manager and the person who plans and leads the in person retreats, this is incredibly rewarding to see. An environmental issue that I'm excited is being discussed is extreme heat. I think that this is an issue that scientists in the field have been talking about for a long time, but maybe has not been taken seriously by mainstream media, and the fact that is now getting coverage and press in big news outlets and journals, I think is really important, especially in terms of making policy changes that will eventually help to reduce the temperature of our Earth.Emily Weaver Hi, my name is Emily Weaver, and I'm a program associate with Agents of Change. Something that surprised me about the Agents of Change fellowship is the sheer amount of connection that happens at the retreats. Just everyone I've talked to, and all the fellows that I meet, I feel like I can find something in common, even if we come from different disciplines, different backgrounds, different parts of the world, which I think is a super cool form of connection as we all have this, like, shared interest in environmental justice and an environmental issue. I'm excited to follow our environmental determinants of cancer and environmental health exposures. I'm working on a project right now through Columbia in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and that's something that I'm excited for. Just it's like getting a lot of attention. I read an article in The New York Times earlier today just talking about personal care product use and how that could possibly be linked to rising cancer rates in people under 40. But I'm just generally happy this is like being talked about more and excited to do more research in this area.Dr. Ami Zota Hello. I'm Dr Ami Zota, and I'm the founder and director of the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. One thing I've learned is in a surprising, or pleasantly surprising way, from this program is truly the power of the collective, both in terms of the collective power of bringing all of these truly creative, brilliant and inspiring young scholars from marginalized backgrounds together and just that collective force. I've also learned a lot from our growing leadership team for the program, their heart and creativity. Creativity and hard work really continues to make the program impactful, new, exciting and worth watching. Something I'm looking forward to in the environmental, health and justice space, really, lots of things to look forward to. I'm looking forward to seeing sort of how media, advocacy, policy and research combined forces to on the petrochemicals and plastics front, there's a lot of exciting work happening, really at the intersections of these different sectors. I'm also excited to keep advancing the quest for Beauty justice, with some new and exciting projects that are under wraps. So stay tuned.



It’s been five years since the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program launched, and at a recent retreat gathering the leadership team reflected on what we’ve learned and what environmental issues we’re watching closely as we near 2025.


The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

Transcript 


Brian Bienkowski

Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host, Brian Bienkowski, editor at Agents of Change and senior editor at Environmental Health News. This podcast is designed to bring you the voices, stories and ideas of environmental justice leaders, and we're going to do that today too, but I'm actually joining you from outside at a picnic table near an old brick chimney fireplace at a tree-filled retreat center outside of Philadelphia. The Agents of Change team, along with different groups of fellows, have gathered here the past few years, and it's become familiar to me, the creaky floors in my room, the wood chipped pathways full of busy squirrels and the towering Eastern White Pines that remind me of my home in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. I've spent today hearing about policy intervention plans from our current group of fellows, how to make sure villagers near the chobei National Park in Africa are treated equitably as ecO-lodges and sport hunting grow, how to simultaneously tackle gentrification and the proliferation of micro plastics, how to bring down energy costs in the Atlanta neighborhoods that need it most. It's heavy work, but we've spent just as much time laughing, connecting, hugging and sharing meals and too much coffee for someone who works from home, these trips are re energizing and only reinforce the need for human connection. It's amazing what happens when you put smart, motivated people in a room together. I wanted to take this opportunity to hear from the Agents of Change team reflecting on what we've learned and what we're looking forward to. I also wanted to take this opportunity to say that this will be my last podcast. After 13 years as a reporter and editor at Environmental Health News and nearly five years as the editor of Agents of Change, I am signing off, folks. I am filled with gratitude for my time here, I was able to work on so many projects that I truly believed in, and work with so many dedicated, kind people. It's a bittersweet departure. While I'm sad to leave my colleagues, I will be joining American Forests in their tree equity program, getting back to my roots of environmental interest in trees and forest, the reason I got into this in the first place. I'm excited to have an acute focus on forest protection and to advocate for green space and tree access. Many of the podcast conversations and essays that I worked on here at Agents of Change touched on this inequity in green space access, and I'm thrilled to take what I've learned from these fellows and put it to work in the real world. Over the past five years, I've learned a lot, but this program has reaffirmed for me the power and beauty of storytelling. While the podcast will be taking a break after this episode, the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program continues and its storytelling will continue as well. I'm excited to see how the program grows and evolves with this gift of in person, time with friends, new and old, I sat down with my fellow leaders of the Agents of Change team. I wanted to know five years into the program, what other people have learned from training, mentoring and working with dozens of early career environmental justice scholars. Enjoy.

Veena Singla

Hi, it's Veena Singla here. I'm on the leadership team of Agents of Change, and something I learn every year is how much the fellows have to teach me, even though I'm here to provide them guidance in science communication and policy translation, I'm constantly learning from them about their work and how they are infusing equity and engaging with communities in really unique and different ways. So I appreciate how much we teach and learn from each other, and something that I'm really excited to continue researching and advocacy on in the next year is this idea of so called chemical recycling of plastics, which is being really pushed for by the plastics industry as a supposed solution to plastics pollution crisis, and in reality, is just a very polluting technology that does very little to recycle plastic or or solve the crisis. So I'm wanting to provide a lot more data and information to communities and decision makers about so called chemical recycling and advocate for better and real solutions like reducing plastic production.

Maria Paula Rubiano

Hi, this is Maria Paula Rubiano. I am an assistant editor here at Agents of Change and Environmental Health News. And you know, since. Since I started, I think two years ago, what has surprised me the most by working with the fellows is just the nuance and the diversity of questions that researchers are asking themselves in the environmental justice and environmental health space. You know, I had been a reporter for six or seven years before coming to EHN and Agents of Change and just learning how young researchers are asking sort of questions that I had never asked myself as a journalist and I didn't see reflected in the kinds of of journalism stories that I worked on is really exciting, and it's exciting to be putting those ideas out there. And what I think it's going to be exciting for next year is just, I don't know, I feel like there's this momentum building in public opinion and also in research and policy decisions towards regulating plastics and plastic pollution. You know, I know there's a lot of opposition from industry, but I feel like, you know, just regular people are more aware of how complicated solving the plastic issue is. It's not about just recycling. That's just like not cutting it and not going to be enough. And I feel like more and more people are realizing that, and so keep building and contributing to these conversations on the petrochemical industry and regulating plastics. It's very exciting for me as an editor and journalist.

Max Aung

Hey there. This is Max Aung. I'm the assistant director and part of the leadership team program. And, you know, something really cool that I've been learning recently, especially with this cohort, is that while all the fellows have such a deep connection to the focus areas that they're working on, we've learned about all of the different perspectives that they bring to the table through their communication and partnerships with local organizations as well as policy makers. So it's been really interesting to learn about how all of those different perspectives have played such a critical role in the way they think about applying their research to inform policy. And for me, going forward, something I'm really excited about, you know, continuing to do advocacy and research on in terms of environmental justice is on access to clean water and sustainable water systems across the US. And you know, that's something that I've been doing research on, particularly with exposure assessment to environmental chemical pollution. So I'm really hopeful that we can continue this work and ensure healthy access to clean water.

Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne

Hi everyone. This is Yoshi. I'm also on the senior leadership team with Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one of the great things that I've learned over the years is just how even with one topic or range of topics in environmental justice, so many people can just come at it from different angles, and there's always just so many different subcategories, the definition and the ways that the fellows have been able to integrate both the science, but also their community partnerships and now them working on the policy analysis to actually enact change has been a really wonderful experience to see both them grow, but also the program in its new directions. I think, personally, for one issue in the area of environmental justice, that I'm looking forward to working in the next year is actually a project with Ami and Rise Saint James out in Louisiana. So we're working with community partner out there to do some extensive research and community-based research on exposures to petrochemical industries in the St James Parish. So I think that's one of the projects that we're that we're very excited about to continue growing, but also make some headway in the fight towards petrochemicals.

Lariah Edwards

Hi, this is Lariah Edwards. I'm also on the senior leadership team for Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one thing that I have learned during my time in this program is how how important is to think critically about new environmental health and justice solutions. The fellows have really shown me that, you know, a new solution may be great, but thinking about who's actually being protected and who's being forgotten, the fellows show me, year after year, how passionate and determined they are to make sure community does not get left behind or forgotten when these new solutions roll out. And I absolutely love that, and I learn so much every single time. And an issue that I hope to follow in the new year, I hope to continue to generate science around relaxers and the chemicals of concern that are in them, in the hopes that that work can reinvigorate and kind of re-excite FDA to think about regulating some of these chemicals and relaxers and other hair products that predominantly impact women of color. So I hope to keep pushing policy-relevant science in the upcoming year about these chemicals and personal care products.

Samar Ahmad

I'm Samar Ahmad and I'm program manager for the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. Something that I've been surprised from my time with the Agents of Change program are the profound connections that develop throughout this fellowship, despite meeting only once or twice a year, our fellows have made lasting friendships and really meaningful bonds, which have led to collaborations, both within and beyond the environmental justice space and as a program manager and the person who plans and leads the in person retreats, this is incredibly rewarding to see. An environmental issue that I'm excited is being discussed is extreme heat. I think that this is an issue that scientists in the field have been talking about for a long time, but maybe has not been taken seriously by mainstream media, and the fact that is now getting coverage and press in big news outlets and journals, I think is really important, especially in terms of making policy changes that will eventually help to reduce the temperature of our Earth.

Emily Weaver

Hi, my name is Emily Weaver, and I'm a program associate with Agents of Change. Something that surprised me about the Agents of Change fellowship is the sheer amount of connection that happens at the retreats. Just everyone I've talked to, and all the fellows that I meet, I feel like I can find something in common, even if we come from different disciplines, different backgrounds, different parts of the world, which I think is a super cool form of connection as we all have this, like, shared interest in environmental justice and an environmental issue. I'm excited to follow our environmental determinants of cancer and environmental health exposures. I'm working on a project right now through Columbia in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and that's something that I'm excited for. Just it's like getting a lot of attention. I read an article in The New York Times earlier today just talking about personal care product use and how that could possibly be linked to rising cancer rates in people under 40. But I'm just generally happy this is like being talked about more and excited to do more research in this area.

Dr. Ami Zota

Hello. I'm Dr Ami Zota, and I'm the founder and director of the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. One thing I've learned is in a surprising, or pleasantly surprising way, from this program is truly the power of the collective, both in terms of the collective power of bringing all of these truly creative, brilliant and inspiring young scholars from marginalized backgrounds together and just that collective force. I've also learned a lot from our growing leadership team for the program, their heart and creativity. Creativity and hard work really continues to make the program impactful, new, exciting and worth watching. Something I'm looking forward to in the environmental, health and justice space, really, lots of things to look forward to. I'm looking forward to seeing sort of how media, advocacy, policy and research combined forces to on the petrochemicals and plastics front, there's a lot of exciting work happening, really at the intersections of these different sectors. I'm also excited to keep advancing the quest for Beauty justice, with some new and exciting projects that are under wraps. So stay tuned.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Emergency Crews Respond to Ammonia Leak at Mississippi Fertilizer Plant

(Reuters) -Emergency teams responded on Wednesday to a chemical leak, possibly caused by an explosion, at a fertilizer plant in Central Mississippi...

(Reuters) -Emergency teams responded on Wednesday to a chemical leak, possibly caused by an explosion, at a fertilizer plant in Central Mississippi, according to Governor Tate Reeves and media reports. No injuries were immediately reported.A tall cloud of orange vapor could be seen rising over the facility in a photo from the scene of the plant posted online by television station WJTV, a CBS News affiliate in Jackson, Mississippi, the state capital.The governor identified the leaking chemical as anhydrous ammonia, a toxic substance that can cause irritation to the eyes and lungs.Fertilizer manufacturer CF Industries said in statement that "all employees and contractors on site at the time of the incident have been safely accounted for, with no injuries reported."It said it had notified government officials of an "incident" that occurred at its Yazoo City Complex at about 4:25 p.m. CT (2225 GMT).Reeves said in a statement posted on social media that state authorities were "actively responding to the anhydrous ammonia leak" at the plant, located about 50 miles (80.5 km) north of Jackson."Initial reports indicate the leak is due to an explosion. At this time, no deaths or injuries have been reported," the governor said.Personnel from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality were among various teams dispatched to the scene, WJTV reported.The governor said residents living along two nearby streets should be evacuated, while other residents in the vicinity were encouraged to shelter in place.(Reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Additional reporting by Costas Pita in Los Angeles and Angela Christy in Bengaluru; Editing by Himani Sarkar and Stephen Coates)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

EPA Proposes Approving Fifth ‘Forever Chemical’ Pesticide

November 5, 2025 – In line with its plan to continue pesticide approvals despite the government shutdown, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced this week that it will register a new weedkiller for use in corn, soybean, wheat, and canola fields. The herbicide, epyrifenacil, is the fifth pesticide set to be approved by the agency […] The post EPA Proposes Approving Fifth ‘Forever Chemical’ Pesticide appeared first on Civil Eats.

November 5, 2025 – In line with its plan to continue pesticide approvals despite the government shutdown, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced this week that it will register a new weedkiller for use in corn, soybean, wheat, and canola fields. The herbicide, epyrifenacil, is the fifth pesticide set to be approved by the agency within the last few months that fits into the group of chemicals called PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), based on a commonly used definition. And the agency is moving fast. The first pesticide was proposed for registration in April; that pesticide, called cyclobutrifluram, was finalized today. PFAS are linked to a wide range of health harms and are commonly called “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down easily and they accumulate in soil and water. In 2023, however, the EPA officially adopted a narrower definition. With the proposed approval of epyrifenacil, the agency for the first time has waded into the debate over which pesticides are PFAS and whether concerns voiced over other recent registrations of similar pesticides are warranted. In its announcement, the agency noted that epyrifenacil “contains a fluorinated carbon” and directed the public to a new website where it lays out its position on pesticides that contain fluorinated carbons. Whether those chemicals fit the definition of PFAS doesn’t matter, the agency argues, because under the law, the EPA evaluates the risks of each chemical individually. “Regardless of whether a chemical meets a specific structural definition or is part of a category or class of chemicals, the Agency utilizes a comprehensive assessment process under [the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act] to evaluate the potential risks of pesticide use,” it said. “This robust, chemical-specific process considers both hazard and exposure in determining whether the pesticide under review may pose risk to human health or the environment.” Epyrifenacil was developed by Japan-based Sumitomo Chemical, which owns Valent U.S.A. in the U.S. It’s one of a new class of herbicides designed to help farmers kill weeds that have developed resistance to popular chemicals like glyphosate. It’s also specifically designed for farmers to spray on cover crops and in no-till systems to prep fields for planting. The pesticide industry has lobbied in recent years to get the EPA to approve new chemicals to address what it calls an “innovation backlog.” Nathan Donley, environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement that an “office run by chemical lobbyists” is whitewashing what is already known about the risks of PFAS. “Not only did the pesticide industry get a proposed approval of its dangerous new product,” he said, “but it also got a shiny new government website parroting its misleading talking points.” (Link to this post.) The post EPA Proposes Approving Fifth ‘Forever Chemical’ Pesticide appeared first on Civil Eats.

Yeast on Mars could survive, unique new research shows

A new study from scientists in India shows that yeast could survive on Mars, tolerating both shockwaves from impacts and toxic perchlorate salts. The post Yeast on Mars could survive, unique new research shows first appeared on EarthSky.

View larger. | Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also known as baker’s yeast. Could yeast survive on Mars? A new study from scientists in India shows how yeast on Mars could, in fact, tolerate the red planet’s harsh conditions. Image via Mogana Das Murtey/ Patchamuthu Ramasamy/ Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0). Yeasts are single-celled microorganisms of the fungus kingdom. Could yeast survive on Mars? A new study from researchers in India shows that some of them would be able to. The yeast cells were exposed to high-intensity shockwaves and toxic perchlorate salts in lab tests. Many of them survived. Science matters. Wonder matters. You matter.Join our 2025 Donation Campaign today. Yeast on Mars When it comes to earthly organisms that could conceivably survive on Mars’ harsh surface, the options are seemingly few. But scientists in India found one that just might be able to: yeast. Researchers at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) said on October 24, 2025, that simple yeast cells could survive shockwaves from meteorite impacts and highly toxic perchlorate salts. The research team used simple baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for their experiments. Yeasts are tiny, single-celled microorganisms that are classified as part of the fungus kingdom. There are more than 1,500 species currently known. The researchers published their peer-reviewed findings in the journal PNAS Nexus on October 14, 2025. Shockwaves and salts To find out if yeast could actually survive the extreme conditions on Mars, the researchers exposed their yeast samples to two kinds of environmental factors. These were shock waves, mimicking meteorite impacts or marsquakes, and perchlorate salts, which are highly toxic and common on Mars. The shockwaves reached mach 5.6 in intensity. In addition, the researchers exposed the yeast cells to 100 mM sodium perchlorate. This was done both in isolation from the shockwaves and in combination with the shockwaves. These unique experiments had not been done before, explained lead author Riya Dhage, a project assistant at the Indian Institute of Science: One of the biggest hurdles was setting up the HISTA tube to expose live yeast cells to shock waves – something that has not been attempted before – and then recovering yeast with minimum contamination for downstream experiments. What makes this work unique is the integration of shock wave physics and chemical biology with molecular cell biology to probe how life might cope with such Mars-like stressors. Could life survive on Mars? Yeast offers a clue #EarthDotCom #EarthSnap #Earth — Earth.com (@earthdotcom.bsky.social) 2025-10-25T13:25:36Z Yeast on Mars survived in simulations Remarkably, many of the yeast cells did survive. Notably, this was the case whether they were tested with the shockwaves and perchlorates together or separately. The growth of the cells did slow down, but the stressful and toxic conditions didn’t kill them. Co-author Purusharth Rajyaguru said: We were surprised to observe yeast surviving the Mars-like stress conditions that we used in our experiments. We hope that this study will galvanize efforts to have yeast on board in future space explorations. So, how did they survive? The researchers said that ribonucleoprotein (RNP) condensates, produced by the cells, likely saved them. Those are tiny structures that have no membranes. They help protect and reorganize mRNA (messenger RNA) when the cells are under stress. mRNA is a type of single-stranded RNA (ribonucleic acid) involved in protein creation. In fact, the shockwaves triggered the creation of two types of RNPs, called stress granules and P-bodies. The perchlorates, meanwhile, caused the formation of just P-bodies. In some cases, however, the yeast cells weren’t able to form those structures. And consequently, those cells didn’t survive. View larger. | This image shows yeast cells with the protective RNP condensates in them (yellow dots). Image via Riya Dhage/ Indian Institute of Science. Lead author Riya Dhage and co-author Purusharth Rajyaguru at the Indian Institute of Science. Image via Swati Lamba/ Indian Institute of Science. Possible biosignatures The fact that many of the yeast cells did survive was surprising, and shows that similar kinds of cells could indeed survive on Mars in some instances. With that in mind, the protective RNP condensates might actually be good biosignatures – signs of life – when searching for evidence of extraterrestrial lifeforms. Dhage said: What makes this work unique is the integration of shock wave physics and chemical biology with molecular cell biology to probe how life might cope with such Mars-like stressors. Bottom line: A new study from scientists in India shows that yeast could survive on Mars, tolerating both shockwaves from impacts and toxic perchlorate salts. Source: Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) condensates modulate survival in response to Mars-like stress conditions Via Indian Institute of Science Read more: Life on Mars? Odd rings and spots tantalize scientists Read more: Prototaxites: Oldest giant organisms a lost kingdom of life?The post Yeast on Mars could survive, unique new research shows first appeared on EarthSky.

Why Lung Cancer Is Increasing among Nonsmoking Women Under Age 65

Thoracic surgeon Jonathan Villena explains why early screening for lung cancer is critical—even for those without symptoms.

Rachel Feltman: For Scientific American’s Science Quickly, I’m Rachel Feltman.Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer among women in the United States, surpassing the mortality numbers of breast and ovarian cancer combined. And surprisingly, younger women who have never smoked are increasingly being diagnosed with the disease.Here to explain what could be driving this trend—and why early screening can make all the difference—is Johnathan Villena, a thoracic surgeon at NewYork-Presbyterian and Weill Cornell.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Thank you so much for joining us.Johnathan Villena: Thank you for having me.Feltman: So our viewers and listeners might be surprised to hear that lung cancer [deaths] in women now tops breast cancer, ovarian cancer combined. Can you tell us more about what’s going on there?Villena: Yeah, definitely. So in general lung cancer is the number-one cancer [killing]people in the U.S., both men and women. If you look at the American Cancer Society, around 226 new—226,000 new cases of lung cancer are projected to be diagnosed in 2025. Of those about 50 percent are cancer-related deaths, meaning [roughly] 120,000 people die every year from lung cancer. Now, what’s—the good news is that the incidence has actually been decreasing in the last few years.Feltman: Mm.Villena: If you look at the American Cancer Society’s statistics, in the last 10 years [ of data, which goes through 2021], the, the incidence of lung cancer has decreased in men around 3 percent per year. And it’s about half of that in women, meaning it’s decreasing [roughly] 1.5 percent per year. So one of the reasons that they think that this might be happening is that there was an uptick in smoking in women around the ’60s and ’70s, and that’s why we’re seeing a slight, you know, decrease in the incidence in men but not so much in the women.What’s more interesting and very surprising is the fact that when you look at younger people, meaning less than 65 years old—especially younger never-smoking people—there’s actually an increase of women in that subgroup. They’re overrepresented, and that’s something very surprising.Feltman: Does the research offer us any clues about what’s going on in this demographic of younger women?Villena: Yeah, so there’s been a lot of research. So, you know, in general—and something that people don’t know is that about 20 percent of lung cancers actually occur in people that have never smoked in their entire lives.Feltman: Mm.Villena: This is something that we don’t really understand why this happens to this one in five people, but there are some risk factors associated with it. Number one is exposure to radon, which is a natural gas that sometimes people are exposed to for a prolonged time. Number two is secondhand smoking ...Feltman: Mm.Villena: So they don’t smoke directly, but they live in a household where they smoke. And number three are kind of other environmental factors, things such as working in a specific, you know, manufacturing plant that deals with specific chemicals. And then lastly, the one that has had, actually, had a lot of research into it are genetic factors. There’s definitely a preponderance of certain mutations in somebody’s genes that can cause lung cancer, and that is overrepresented in women.Feltman: Do women face any unique challenges in getting diagnosed or treated when it comes to lung cancer?Villena: So, yes. First of all, you know, how do we treat or catch lung cancer? So the newest and, and latest way of catching this disease is actually through lung cancer screening.That’s something that’s relatively new; it’s only happened in the last 10 years. And that’s in certain demographics, meaning that if someone is over 50 years old and they have smoked more than one pack per day for 20 years, they meet the criteria for lung cancer screening, which is basically a radiograph or a CAT scan of their lungs. That’s the way that we pick up lung cancer.That’s the—almost the exact same thing that people have for breast cancer, such as mammography, or colonoscopy. So that’s before any symptoms come in. That’s really just to try to capture it when it’s in very nascent stages, right?Feltman: Mm-hmm.Villena: Where it’s very small or not symptomatic. And that’s the way we diagnose a, a lot of lung cancer.Now, that being said, there’s a couple of things. So first of all, [roughly] 60 to 70 percent of people, like, in general get mammographies.Feltman: Mm-hmm.Villena: [About] 60 to 70 percent of people get colonoscopies. Only 6 percent of people actually get lung cancer screening. So it’s dismally low.Feltman: Yeah.Villena: The reason being that sometimes people don’t know about it; it’s relatively new. Sometimes even doctors don’t know about it. There’s also a little bit of guilt involved, where people, you know, they think they did it to themselves by smoking ...Feltman: Hmm.Villena: So they don’t wanna go do it. The second thing is that, as you could imagine, this is only for high-risk individuals or people that have a history of smoking, all right? So it misses these never-smoking one in five patients. So that’s one of the things that we’re actively working on.Feltman: Yeah, how else does the, you know, the stigma associated with lung cancer because of its association with smoking, how does that impact people’s ability to get diagnosed and treated?Villena: I think there’s a lot of hesitancy between patients. There’s, you know, a recent study that showed that people are more—have more tendency to downplay their smoking history, meaning that if they quit, let’s say 10 years ago, you tell your doctor that you never smoked.Feltman: Mm.Villena: And that’s something very common. Or if you smoked, you know, one pack a day, maybe you say you smoked half a pack a day because you feel that guilt. So then you don’t give your doctor or your caretaker the full picture. And sometimes that prevents you from getting these tests, right? So there’s definitely that attitude.There’s also a bit of a fatalistic attitude, sort of like, “I did it to myself. I’d rather not know. You know, this is something that—you know, I made that choice, and if I get cancer, that’s my choice.” Right? So that’s, that’s also another attitude that we’re constantly trying to change in patients. You know, the treatment, once you capture it, is all the same, but really it’s about getting screening and it’s about finding the lung cancer.Feltman: So with smoking no longer necessarily being the driving factor, at least in this younger demographic, what kinds of risk factors should we be talking about more?Villena: So I think, you know—so smoking is always number one.Feltman: Sure.Villena: In the never-smoking people it’s either radon, secondhand smoking or environmental factors, and then a little bit of genetics plays, plays a part.Radon is something that people can test for in their homes. It’s something that people should read up on. So that’s number one: if you have exposure to that, to get rid of that.If you are in, in an environment, let’s say you work with chemicals that you think, you know, are astringent or have caused—causes you to have coughs or, you know, affects you in any sort of way, to kind of try to talk to your employer to work in a more ventilated setting.Really important with genetic factors is understanding your family history.Feltman: Mm.Villena: If you have a mother, a grandmother, a grandfather who died of cancer or you have a lot of cancer in your family, sometimes understanding that and knowing that from your, you know, from your family perspective will actually clue a doctor in to doing further tests, to looking into that further, ’cause that sometimes is passed down and you can have the same genes.Feltman: Are there any big research questions that scientists need to answer about lung cancer, specifically in young women?Villena: So, you know, there’s so much to look at, all right? So if we think about just the genetic aspect of it, there’s one specific gene called the EGFR gene—or it’s a mutation that’s found in lung cancer that in, if you look at all people with lung cancer, it’s found in about 15 percent ...Feltman: Mm-hmm.Villena: Of the population with lung cancer. Now, if you look at never-smoking Asian women that get lung cancer, it’s about 60 percent of them ...Feltman: Mm.Villena: Have that mutation. So the important thing about that EGFR mutation is there’s a specific drug for that mutation, all right?So there’s definitely a lot of genetic kind of information that we’re still actively researching. But the important thing about this genetic information is that there’s drugs targeted specifically for those mutations. So the more we know, the more we understand, the better.Feltman: So for folks who are hearing this and are surprised and, and maybe concerned what is your advice for how they should proceed, how they should look into their risk factors?Villena: You know, I think one of the, the, the major aspects of health in general is understanding your own health.Feltman: Mm.Villena: I think that younger people tend to delay care, tend to not see their doctors, and because, one, they’re busy, right, at their very busy moment in their lives. But second is that, you know, you don’t wanna deal with it, and you think that you will not get cancer, that you will not get this disease because you’re young and you’ve never smoked and you’ve never done anything bad.Feltman: Mm.Villena: But, you know, you have to be very aware of your body, so what are the kind of top four symptoms? So number one, let’s say you have a cough, and that cough lasts for longer than two weeks, right?Feltman: Mm-hmm.Villena: A normal cold, things like that will go away after a couple of weeks. But if it’s there for a couple of months, and I’ve definitely seen patients that tell me in retrospect, you know, “I’ve had this cough for three months,” right, and it should have been checked up sooner. So understanding yourself, understanding your body, not, you know, waiting for things, not procrastinating, which is very hard to do, but you should definitely see your doctor ...Feltman: Yeah.Villena: Regularly.Second is, like I said before, understanding your family, right, and what your genetic makeup is, right? Knowing your family history, understanding if your parents, grandparents had cancer, etcetera, or other chronic diseases.Feltman: Mm-hmm.Villena: And that’s, that’s basically the, the major aspects of it. It’s really being in tune with yourself.Feltman: So once a patient is actually diagnosed, what does treatment look like?Villena: So treatment for lung cancer, actually, is heavily dependent on the stage. There’s everything from stage 1, in which it’s localized to one portion of a lung, to stage 4, where it actually has gone to other parts of the body.Now, stage 1 disease, you basically need a simple surgery, where that lung nodule, or that lung cancer, is surgically removed, and typically you don’t need any other treatments. So stage 1 is what we look for. Stage 1 is the reason that lung cancer screening works because stage 1 doesn’t really have any symptoms ...Feltman: Mm.Villena: So when you find it that early patients do very well.Stage 4, once it’s left the lung, you are no longer a surgical candidate, unless in, you know, sometimes very specific cases, but for the most part you’re no longer a surgical candidate. And there you need systemic treatments.Feltman: And how long does the treatment tend to take for a stage 1 patient, if it’s just a surgical procedure?Villena: So if it’s just a surgical procedure, look, I do these surgeries all the time: the patient comes in; we do the surgery; the patients usually go home the next day.Feltman: Wow.Villena: And then we follow the patient and get CAT scans every six months for a long time to make sure nothing comes back or nothing new comes. So it’s pretty straightforward, and we do this all the time. We do these surgeries robotically now. Patients recover incredibly well, and they’re out, you know, doing—living their lives in a couple of weeks. So it’s really something very, very, very efficient.Feltman: Yeah, so huge incentive to get checked early.Villena: Mm-hmm.Feltman: Are there any advances in treatment, you know, any new treatments that doctors are excited about?Villena: Yeah, so there’s two major steps forward that have changed lung cancer treatment. Number one is something called targeted therapy.Feltman: Mm-hmm.Villena: So that means that there’s a drug that targets a specific mutation. So just how I was speaking about earlier about the EGFR mutation in young, never-smoking Asian women, there is a drug that targets that mutation that has really shown amazing results at all stages now.And the second one is actually immunotherapy, which won the Nobel Prize, which is this idea that you can use your own body’s immune system to kill the cancer cell. So cancer is very smart—what it does is it evades your immune system; it pretends that it’s part of your own body. And what this drug does is that it basically reawakens your immune system to recognize that cancer again and kill it. And we’ve seen amazing results, even in the stage 4 patients, where they are potentially cured of cancer, which, which we’ve never seen before.Feltman: What motivated you to get into this specialty?Villena: You know, I do have a family history of this in an uncle that passed away from lung cancer ...Feltman: Mm.Villena: And he was a heavy smoker. And, you know, I saw how, basically, decimated his, he was—[his] life [was], basically. He was a very vibrant guy, he was very active, and in six months he was gone, right?And I think, you know, once I started getting into, you know, medical school and understanding things, one of the major things that I really got into was research. And I see that if my uncle had been treated 20 years ago, he potentially could have been saved ...Feltman: Mm.Villena: Because of these advances in research. And right now we are right at the cusp where we are learning all these new things, and we actually have the tools to change how patients are treated, you know? And this—every year there’s a new treatment, which prior to that, there was no new treatment; i t was basically just chemo, and that’s it, all right? So I think that that really motivated me—something that I can actually take part in and actually change the course for a lot of people.Feltman: Well, thank you so much for coming on to chat with us today. This has been great.Villena: Thank you.Feltman: That’s all for today’s episode. We’ll be back on Friday to unpack the shocking story of a missing meteorite.Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi and Jeff DelViscio. This episode was edited by Alex Sugiura and Kylie Murphy. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news.For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman. See you next time.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.