Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

News Feed
Wednesday, December 18, 2024

It’s been five years since the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program launched, and at a recent retreat gathering the leadership team reflected on what we’ve learned and what environmental issues we’re watching closely as we near 2025.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify. Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change programTranscript Brian BienkowskiHello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host, Brian Bienkowski, editor at Agents of Change and senior editor at Environmental Health News. This podcast is designed to bring you the voices, stories and ideas of environmental justice leaders, and we're going to do that today too, but I'm actually joining you from outside at a picnic table near an old brick chimney fireplace at a tree-filled retreat center outside of Philadelphia. The Agents of Change team, along with different groups of fellows, have gathered here the past few years, and it's become familiar to me, the creaky floors in my room, the wood chipped pathways full of busy squirrels and the towering Eastern White Pines that remind me of my home in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. I've spent today hearing about policy intervention plans from our current group of fellows, how to make sure villagers near the chobei National Park in Africa are treated equitably as ecO-lodges and sport hunting grow, how to simultaneously tackle gentrification and the proliferation of micro plastics, how to bring down energy costs in the Atlanta neighborhoods that need it most. It's heavy work, but we've spent just as much time laughing, connecting, hugging and sharing meals and too much coffee for someone who works from home, these trips are re energizing and only reinforce the need for human connection. It's amazing what happens when you put smart, motivated people in a room together. I wanted to take this opportunity to hear from the Agents of Change team reflecting on what we've learned and what we're looking forward to. I also wanted to take this opportunity to say that this will be my last podcast. After 13 years as a reporter and editor at Environmental Health News and nearly five years as the editor of Agents of Change, I am signing off, folks. I am filled with gratitude for my time here, I was able to work on so many projects that I truly believed in, and work with so many dedicated, kind people. It's a bittersweet departure. While I'm sad to leave my colleagues, I will be joining American Forests in their tree equity program, getting back to my roots of environmental interest in trees and forest, the reason I got into this in the first place. I'm excited to have an acute focus on forest protection and to advocate for green space and tree access. Many of the podcast conversations and essays that I worked on here at Agents of Change touched on this inequity in green space access, and I'm thrilled to take what I've learned from these fellows and put it to work in the real world. Over the past five years, I've learned a lot, but this program has reaffirmed for me the power and beauty of storytelling. While the podcast will be taking a break after this episode, the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program continues and its storytelling will continue as well. I'm excited to see how the program grows and evolves with this gift of in person, time with friends, new and old, I sat down with my fellow leaders of the Agents of Change team. I wanted to know five years into the program, what other people have learned from training, mentoring and working with dozens of early career environmental justice scholars. Enjoy. Veena Singla Hi, it's Veena Singla here. I'm on the leadership team of Agents of Change, and something I learn every year is how much the fellows have to teach me, even though I'm here to provide them guidance in science communication and policy translation, I'm constantly learning from them about their work and how they are infusing equity and engaging with communities in really unique and different ways. So I appreciate how much we teach and learn from each other, and something that I'm really excited to continue researching and advocacy on in the next year is this idea of so called chemical recycling of plastics, which is being really pushed for by the plastics industry as a supposed solution to plastics pollution crisis, and in reality, is just a very polluting technology that does very little to recycle plastic or or solve the crisis. So I'm wanting to provide a lot more data and information to communities and decision makers about so called chemical recycling and advocate for better and real solutions like reducing plastic production.Maria Paula Rubiano Hi, this is Maria Paula Rubiano. I am an assistant editor here at Agents of Change and Environmental Health News. And you know, since. Since I started, I think two years ago, what has surprised me the most by working with the fellows is just the nuance and the diversity of questions that researchers are asking themselves in the environmental justice and environmental health space. You know, I had been a reporter for six or seven years before coming to EHN and Agents of Change and just learning how young researchers are asking sort of questions that I had never asked myself as a journalist and I didn't see reflected in the kinds of of journalism stories that I worked on is really exciting, and it's exciting to be putting those ideas out there. And what I think it's going to be exciting for next year is just, I don't know, I feel like there's this momentum building in public opinion and also in research and policy decisions towards regulating plastics and plastic pollution. You know, I know there's a lot of opposition from industry, but I feel like, you know, just regular people are more aware of how complicated solving the plastic issue is. It's not about just recycling. That's just like not cutting it and not going to be enough. And I feel like more and more people are realizing that, and so keep building and contributing to these conversations on the petrochemical industry and regulating plastics. It's very exciting for me as an editor and journalist.Max Aung Hey there. This is Max Aung. I'm the assistant director and part of the leadership team program. And, you know, something really cool that I've been learning recently, especially with this cohort, is that while all the fellows have such a deep connection to the focus areas that they're working on, we've learned about all of the different perspectives that they bring to the table through their communication and partnerships with local organizations as well as policy makers. So it's been really interesting to learn about how all of those different perspectives have played such a critical role in the way they think about applying their research to inform policy. And for me, going forward, something I'm really excited about, you know, continuing to do advocacy and research on in terms of environmental justice is on access to clean water and sustainable water systems across the US. And you know, that's something that I've been doing research on, particularly with exposure assessment to environmental chemical pollution. So I'm really hopeful that we can continue this work and ensure healthy access to clean water.Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne Hi everyone. This is Yoshi. I'm also on the senior leadership team with Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one of the great things that I've learned over the years is just how even with one topic or range of topics in environmental justice, so many people can just come at it from different angles, and there's always just so many different subcategories, the definition and the ways that the fellows have been able to integrate both the science, but also their community partnerships and now them working on the policy analysis to actually enact change has been a really wonderful experience to see both them grow, but also the program in its new directions. I think, personally, for one issue in the area of environmental justice, that I'm looking forward to working in the next year is actually a project with Ami and Rise Saint James out in Louisiana. So we're working with community partner out there to do some extensive research and community-based research on exposures to petrochemical industries in the St James Parish. So I think that's one of the projects that we're that we're very excited about to continue growing, but also make some headway in the fight towards petrochemicals.Lariah Edwards Hi, this is Lariah Edwards. I'm also on the senior leadership team for Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one thing that I have learned during my time in this program is how how important is to think critically about new environmental health and justice solutions. The fellows have really shown me that, you know, a new solution may be great, but thinking about who's actually being protected and who's being forgotten, the fellows show me, year after year, how passionate and determined they are to make sure community does not get left behind or forgotten when these new solutions roll out. And I absolutely love that, and I learn so much every single time. And an issue that I hope to follow in the new year, I hope to continue to generate science around relaxers and the chemicals of concern that are in them, in the hopes that that work can reinvigorate and kind of re-excite FDA to think about regulating some of these chemicals and relaxers and other hair products that predominantly impact women of color. So I hope to keep pushing policy-relevant science in the upcoming year about these chemicals and personal care products.Samar Ahmad I'm Samar Ahmad and I'm program manager for the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. Something that I've been surprised from my time with the Agents of Change program are the profound connections that develop throughout this fellowship, despite meeting only once or twice a year, our fellows have made lasting friendships and really meaningful bonds, which have led to collaborations, both within and beyond the environmental justice space and as a program manager and the person who plans and leads the in person retreats, this is incredibly rewarding to see. An environmental issue that I'm excited is being discussed is extreme heat. I think that this is an issue that scientists in the field have been talking about for a long time, but maybe has not been taken seriously by mainstream media, and the fact that is now getting coverage and press in big news outlets and journals, I think is really important, especially in terms of making policy changes that will eventually help to reduce the temperature of our Earth.Emily Weaver Hi, my name is Emily Weaver, and I'm a program associate with Agents of Change. Something that surprised me about the Agents of Change fellowship is the sheer amount of connection that happens at the retreats. Just everyone I've talked to, and all the fellows that I meet, I feel like I can find something in common, even if we come from different disciplines, different backgrounds, different parts of the world, which I think is a super cool form of connection as we all have this, like, shared interest in environmental justice and an environmental issue. I'm excited to follow our environmental determinants of cancer and environmental health exposures. I'm working on a project right now through Columbia in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and that's something that I'm excited for. Just it's like getting a lot of attention. I read an article in The New York Times earlier today just talking about personal care product use and how that could possibly be linked to rising cancer rates in people under 40. But I'm just generally happy this is like being talked about more and excited to do more research in this area.Dr. Ami Zota Hello. I'm Dr Ami Zota, and I'm the founder and director of the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. One thing I've learned is in a surprising, or pleasantly surprising way, from this program is truly the power of the collective, both in terms of the collective power of bringing all of these truly creative, brilliant and inspiring young scholars from marginalized backgrounds together and just that collective force. I've also learned a lot from our growing leadership team for the program, their heart and creativity. Creativity and hard work really continues to make the program impactful, new, exciting and worth watching. Something I'm looking forward to in the environmental, health and justice space, really, lots of things to look forward to. I'm looking forward to seeing sort of how media, advocacy, policy and research combined forces to on the petrochemicals and plastics front, there's a lot of exciting work happening, really at the intersections of these different sectors. I'm also excited to keep advancing the quest for Beauty justice, with some new and exciting projects that are under wraps. So stay tuned.

It’s been five years since the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program launched, and at a recent retreat gathering the leadership team reflected on what we’ve learned and what environmental issues we’re watching closely as we near 2025.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify. Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change programTranscript Brian BienkowskiHello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host, Brian Bienkowski, editor at Agents of Change and senior editor at Environmental Health News. This podcast is designed to bring you the voices, stories and ideas of environmental justice leaders, and we're going to do that today too, but I'm actually joining you from outside at a picnic table near an old brick chimney fireplace at a tree-filled retreat center outside of Philadelphia. The Agents of Change team, along with different groups of fellows, have gathered here the past few years, and it's become familiar to me, the creaky floors in my room, the wood chipped pathways full of busy squirrels and the towering Eastern White Pines that remind me of my home in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. I've spent today hearing about policy intervention plans from our current group of fellows, how to make sure villagers near the chobei National Park in Africa are treated equitably as ecO-lodges and sport hunting grow, how to simultaneously tackle gentrification and the proliferation of micro plastics, how to bring down energy costs in the Atlanta neighborhoods that need it most. It's heavy work, but we've spent just as much time laughing, connecting, hugging and sharing meals and too much coffee for someone who works from home, these trips are re energizing and only reinforce the need for human connection. It's amazing what happens when you put smart, motivated people in a room together. I wanted to take this opportunity to hear from the Agents of Change team reflecting on what we've learned and what we're looking forward to. I also wanted to take this opportunity to say that this will be my last podcast. After 13 years as a reporter and editor at Environmental Health News and nearly five years as the editor of Agents of Change, I am signing off, folks. I am filled with gratitude for my time here, I was able to work on so many projects that I truly believed in, and work with so many dedicated, kind people. It's a bittersweet departure. While I'm sad to leave my colleagues, I will be joining American Forests in their tree equity program, getting back to my roots of environmental interest in trees and forest, the reason I got into this in the first place. I'm excited to have an acute focus on forest protection and to advocate for green space and tree access. Many of the podcast conversations and essays that I worked on here at Agents of Change touched on this inequity in green space access, and I'm thrilled to take what I've learned from these fellows and put it to work in the real world. Over the past five years, I've learned a lot, but this program has reaffirmed for me the power and beauty of storytelling. While the podcast will be taking a break after this episode, the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program continues and its storytelling will continue as well. I'm excited to see how the program grows and evolves with this gift of in person, time with friends, new and old, I sat down with my fellow leaders of the Agents of Change team. I wanted to know five years into the program, what other people have learned from training, mentoring and working with dozens of early career environmental justice scholars. Enjoy. Veena Singla Hi, it's Veena Singla here. I'm on the leadership team of Agents of Change, and something I learn every year is how much the fellows have to teach me, even though I'm here to provide them guidance in science communication and policy translation, I'm constantly learning from them about their work and how they are infusing equity and engaging with communities in really unique and different ways. So I appreciate how much we teach and learn from each other, and something that I'm really excited to continue researching and advocacy on in the next year is this idea of so called chemical recycling of plastics, which is being really pushed for by the plastics industry as a supposed solution to plastics pollution crisis, and in reality, is just a very polluting technology that does very little to recycle plastic or or solve the crisis. So I'm wanting to provide a lot more data and information to communities and decision makers about so called chemical recycling and advocate for better and real solutions like reducing plastic production.Maria Paula Rubiano Hi, this is Maria Paula Rubiano. I am an assistant editor here at Agents of Change and Environmental Health News. And you know, since. Since I started, I think two years ago, what has surprised me the most by working with the fellows is just the nuance and the diversity of questions that researchers are asking themselves in the environmental justice and environmental health space. You know, I had been a reporter for six or seven years before coming to EHN and Agents of Change and just learning how young researchers are asking sort of questions that I had never asked myself as a journalist and I didn't see reflected in the kinds of of journalism stories that I worked on is really exciting, and it's exciting to be putting those ideas out there. And what I think it's going to be exciting for next year is just, I don't know, I feel like there's this momentum building in public opinion and also in research and policy decisions towards regulating plastics and plastic pollution. You know, I know there's a lot of opposition from industry, but I feel like, you know, just regular people are more aware of how complicated solving the plastic issue is. It's not about just recycling. That's just like not cutting it and not going to be enough. And I feel like more and more people are realizing that, and so keep building and contributing to these conversations on the petrochemical industry and regulating plastics. It's very exciting for me as an editor and journalist.Max Aung Hey there. This is Max Aung. I'm the assistant director and part of the leadership team program. And, you know, something really cool that I've been learning recently, especially with this cohort, is that while all the fellows have such a deep connection to the focus areas that they're working on, we've learned about all of the different perspectives that they bring to the table through their communication and partnerships with local organizations as well as policy makers. So it's been really interesting to learn about how all of those different perspectives have played such a critical role in the way they think about applying their research to inform policy. And for me, going forward, something I'm really excited about, you know, continuing to do advocacy and research on in terms of environmental justice is on access to clean water and sustainable water systems across the US. And you know, that's something that I've been doing research on, particularly with exposure assessment to environmental chemical pollution. So I'm really hopeful that we can continue this work and ensure healthy access to clean water.Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne Hi everyone. This is Yoshi. I'm also on the senior leadership team with Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one of the great things that I've learned over the years is just how even with one topic or range of topics in environmental justice, so many people can just come at it from different angles, and there's always just so many different subcategories, the definition and the ways that the fellows have been able to integrate both the science, but also their community partnerships and now them working on the policy analysis to actually enact change has been a really wonderful experience to see both them grow, but also the program in its new directions. I think, personally, for one issue in the area of environmental justice, that I'm looking forward to working in the next year is actually a project with Ami and Rise Saint James out in Louisiana. So we're working with community partner out there to do some extensive research and community-based research on exposures to petrochemical industries in the St James Parish. So I think that's one of the projects that we're that we're very excited about to continue growing, but also make some headway in the fight towards petrochemicals.Lariah Edwards Hi, this is Lariah Edwards. I'm also on the senior leadership team for Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one thing that I have learned during my time in this program is how how important is to think critically about new environmental health and justice solutions. The fellows have really shown me that, you know, a new solution may be great, but thinking about who's actually being protected and who's being forgotten, the fellows show me, year after year, how passionate and determined they are to make sure community does not get left behind or forgotten when these new solutions roll out. And I absolutely love that, and I learn so much every single time. And an issue that I hope to follow in the new year, I hope to continue to generate science around relaxers and the chemicals of concern that are in them, in the hopes that that work can reinvigorate and kind of re-excite FDA to think about regulating some of these chemicals and relaxers and other hair products that predominantly impact women of color. So I hope to keep pushing policy-relevant science in the upcoming year about these chemicals and personal care products.Samar Ahmad I'm Samar Ahmad and I'm program manager for the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. Something that I've been surprised from my time with the Agents of Change program are the profound connections that develop throughout this fellowship, despite meeting only once or twice a year, our fellows have made lasting friendships and really meaningful bonds, which have led to collaborations, both within and beyond the environmental justice space and as a program manager and the person who plans and leads the in person retreats, this is incredibly rewarding to see. An environmental issue that I'm excited is being discussed is extreme heat. I think that this is an issue that scientists in the field have been talking about for a long time, but maybe has not been taken seriously by mainstream media, and the fact that is now getting coverage and press in big news outlets and journals, I think is really important, especially in terms of making policy changes that will eventually help to reduce the temperature of our Earth.Emily Weaver Hi, my name is Emily Weaver, and I'm a program associate with Agents of Change. Something that surprised me about the Agents of Change fellowship is the sheer amount of connection that happens at the retreats. Just everyone I've talked to, and all the fellows that I meet, I feel like I can find something in common, even if we come from different disciplines, different backgrounds, different parts of the world, which I think is a super cool form of connection as we all have this, like, shared interest in environmental justice and an environmental issue. I'm excited to follow our environmental determinants of cancer and environmental health exposures. I'm working on a project right now through Columbia in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and that's something that I'm excited for. Just it's like getting a lot of attention. I read an article in The New York Times earlier today just talking about personal care product use and how that could possibly be linked to rising cancer rates in people under 40. But I'm just generally happy this is like being talked about more and excited to do more research in this area.Dr. Ami Zota Hello. I'm Dr Ami Zota, and I'm the founder and director of the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. One thing I've learned is in a surprising, or pleasantly surprising way, from this program is truly the power of the collective, both in terms of the collective power of bringing all of these truly creative, brilliant and inspiring young scholars from marginalized backgrounds together and just that collective force. I've also learned a lot from our growing leadership team for the program, their heart and creativity. Creativity and hard work really continues to make the program impactful, new, exciting and worth watching. Something I'm looking forward to in the environmental, health and justice space, really, lots of things to look forward to. I'm looking forward to seeing sort of how media, advocacy, policy and research combined forces to on the petrochemicals and plastics front, there's a lot of exciting work happening, really at the intersections of these different sectors. I'm also excited to keep advancing the quest for Beauty justice, with some new and exciting projects that are under wraps. So stay tuned.



It’s been five years since the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program launched, and at a recent retreat gathering the leadership team reflected on what we’ve learned and what environmental issues we’re watching closely as we near 2025.


The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

Transcript 


Brian Bienkowski

Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host, Brian Bienkowski, editor at Agents of Change and senior editor at Environmental Health News. This podcast is designed to bring you the voices, stories and ideas of environmental justice leaders, and we're going to do that today too, but I'm actually joining you from outside at a picnic table near an old brick chimney fireplace at a tree-filled retreat center outside of Philadelphia. The Agents of Change team, along with different groups of fellows, have gathered here the past few years, and it's become familiar to me, the creaky floors in my room, the wood chipped pathways full of busy squirrels and the towering Eastern White Pines that remind me of my home in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. I've spent today hearing about policy intervention plans from our current group of fellows, how to make sure villagers near the chobei National Park in Africa are treated equitably as ecO-lodges and sport hunting grow, how to simultaneously tackle gentrification and the proliferation of micro plastics, how to bring down energy costs in the Atlanta neighborhoods that need it most. It's heavy work, but we've spent just as much time laughing, connecting, hugging and sharing meals and too much coffee for someone who works from home, these trips are re energizing and only reinforce the need for human connection. It's amazing what happens when you put smart, motivated people in a room together. I wanted to take this opportunity to hear from the Agents of Change team reflecting on what we've learned and what we're looking forward to. I also wanted to take this opportunity to say that this will be my last podcast. After 13 years as a reporter and editor at Environmental Health News and nearly five years as the editor of Agents of Change, I am signing off, folks. I am filled with gratitude for my time here, I was able to work on so many projects that I truly believed in, and work with so many dedicated, kind people. It's a bittersweet departure. While I'm sad to leave my colleagues, I will be joining American Forests in their tree equity program, getting back to my roots of environmental interest in trees and forest, the reason I got into this in the first place. I'm excited to have an acute focus on forest protection and to advocate for green space and tree access. Many of the podcast conversations and essays that I worked on here at Agents of Change touched on this inequity in green space access, and I'm thrilled to take what I've learned from these fellows and put it to work in the real world. Over the past five years, I've learned a lot, but this program has reaffirmed for me the power and beauty of storytelling. While the podcast will be taking a break after this episode, the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program continues and its storytelling will continue as well. I'm excited to see how the program grows and evolves with this gift of in person, time with friends, new and old, I sat down with my fellow leaders of the Agents of Change team. I wanted to know five years into the program, what other people have learned from training, mentoring and working with dozens of early career environmental justice scholars. Enjoy.

Veena Singla

Hi, it's Veena Singla here. I'm on the leadership team of Agents of Change, and something I learn every year is how much the fellows have to teach me, even though I'm here to provide them guidance in science communication and policy translation, I'm constantly learning from them about their work and how they are infusing equity and engaging with communities in really unique and different ways. So I appreciate how much we teach and learn from each other, and something that I'm really excited to continue researching and advocacy on in the next year is this idea of so called chemical recycling of plastics, which is being really pushed for by the plastics industry as a supposed solution to plastics pollution crisis, and in reality, is just a very polluting technology that does very little to recycle plastic or or solve the crisis. So I'm wanting to provide a lot more data and information to communities and decision makers about so called chemical recycling and advocate for better and real solutions like reducing plastic production.

Maria Paula Rubiano

Hi, this is Maria Paula Rubiano. I am an assistant editor here at Agents of Change and Environmental Health News. And you know, since. Since I started, I think two years ago, what has surprised me the most by working with the fellows is just the nuance and the diversity of questions that researchers are asking themselves in the environmental justice and environmental health space. You know, I had been a reporter for six or seven years before coming to EHN and Agents of Change and just learning how young researchers are asking sort of questions that I had never asked myself as a journalist and I didn't see reflected in the kinds of of journalism stories that I worked on is really exciting, and it's exciting to be putting those ideas out there. And what I think it's going to be exciting for next year is just, I don't know, I feel like there's this momentum building in public opinion and also in research and policy decisions towards regulating plastics and plastic pollution. You know, I know there's a lot of opposition from industry, but I feel like, you know, just regular people are more aware of how complicated solving the plastic issue is. It's not about just recycling. That's just like not cutting it and not going to be enough. And I feel like more and more people are realizing that, and so keep building and contributing to these conversations on the petrochemical industry and regulating plastics. It's very exciting for me as an editor and journalist.

Max Aung

Hey there. This is Max Aung. I'm the assistant director and part of the leadership team program. And, you know, something really cool that I've been learning recently, especially with this cohort, is that while all the fellows have such a deep connection to the focus areas that they're working on, we've learned about all of the different perspectives that they bring to the table through their communication and partnerships with local organizations as well as policy makers. So it's been really interesting to learn about how all of those different perspectives have played such a critical role in the way they think about applying their research to inform policy. And for me, going forward, something I'm really excited about, you know, continuing to do advocacy and research on in terms of environmental justice is on access to clean water and sustainable water systems across the US. And you know, that's something that I've been doing research on, particularly with exposure assessment to environmental chemical pollution. So I'm really hopeful that we can continue this work and ensure healthy access to clean water.

Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne

Hi everyone. This is Yoshi. I'm also on the senior leadership team with Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one of the great things that I've learned over the years is just how even with one topic or range of topics in environmental justice, so many people can just come at it from different angles, and there's always just so many different subcategories, the definition and the ways that the fellows have been able to integrate both the science, but also their community partnerships and now them working on the policy analysis to actually enact change has been a really wonderful experience to see both them grow, but also the program in its new directions. I think, personally, for one issue in the area of environmental justice, that I'm looking forward to working in the next year is actually a project with Ami and Rise Saint James out in Louisiana. So we're working with community partner out there to do some extensive research and community-based research on exposures to petrochemical industries in the St James Parish. So I think that's one of the projects that we're that we're very excited about to continue growing, but also make some headway in the fight towards petrochemicals.

Lariah Edwards

Hi, this is Lariah Edwards. I'm also on the senior leadership team for Agents of Change in environmental justice. I think one thing that I have learned during my time in this program is how how important is to think critically about new environmental health and justice solutions. The fellows have really shown me that, you know, a new solution may be great, but thinking about who's actually being protected and who's being forgotten, the fellows show me, year after year, how passionate and determined they are to make sure community does not get left behind or forgotten when these new solutions roll out. And I absolutely love that, and I learn so much every single time. And an issue that I hope to follow in the new year, I hope to continue to generate science around relaxers and the chemicals of concern that are in them, in the hopes that that work can reinvigorate and kind of re-excite FDA to think about regulating some of these chemicals and relaxers and other hair products that predominantly impact women of color. So I hope to keep pushing policy-relevant science in the upcoming year about these chemicals and personal care products.

Samar Ahmad

I'm Samar Ahmad and I'm program manager for the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. Something that I've been surprised from my time with the Agents of Change program are the profound connections that develop throughout this fellowship, despite meeting only once or twice a year, our fellows have made lasting friendships and really meaningful bonds, which have led to collaborations, both within and beyond the environmental justice space and as a program manager and the person who plans and leads the in person retreats, this is incredibly rewarding to see. An environmental issue that I'm excited is being discussed is extreme heat. I think that this is an issue that scientists in the field have been talking about for a long time, but maybe has not been taken seriously by mainstream media, and the fact that is now getting coverage and press in big news outlets and journals, I think is really important, especially in terms of making policy changes that will eventually help to reduce the temperature of our Earth.

Emily Weaver

Hi, my name is Emily Weaver, and I'm a program associate with Agents of Change. Something that surprised me about the Agents of Change fellowship is the sheer amount of connection that happens at the retreats. Just everyone I've talked to, and all the fellows that I meet, I feel like I can find something in common, even if we come from different disciplines, different backgrounds, different parts of the world, which I think is a super cool form of connection as we all have this, like, shared interest in environmental justice and an environmental issue. I'm excited to follow our environmental determinants of cancer and environmental health exposures. I'm working on a project right now through Columbia in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and that's something that I'm excited for. Just it's like getting a lot of attention. I read an article in The New York Times earlier today just talking about personal care product use and how that could possibly be linked to rising cancer rates in people under 40. But I'm just generally happy this is like being talked about more and excited to do more research in this area.

Dr. Ami Zota

Hello. I'm Dr Ami Zota, and I'm the founder and director of the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program. One thing I've learned is in a surprising, or pleasantly surprising way, from this program is truly the power of the collective, both in terms of the collective power of bringing all of these truly creative, brilliant and inspiring young scholars from marginalized backgrounds together and just that collective force. I've also learned a lot from our growing leadership team for the program, their heart and creativity. Creativity and hard work really continues to make the program impactful, new, exciting and worth watching. Something I'm looking forward to in the environmental, health and justice space, really, lots of things to look forward to. I'm looking forward to seeing sort of how media, advocacy, policy and research combined forces to on the petrochemicals and plastics front, there's a lot of exciting work happening, really at the intersections of these different sectors. I'm also excited to keep advancing the quest for Beauty justice, with some new and exciting projects that are under wraps. So stay tuned.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Lead water pipes are a primary contributor to lead exposure in children, study says

A recent study published in Environmental Science and Technology found a strong association between the presence of lead service lines (LSLs) and children’s elevated blood lead levels in Cincinnati, OH and Grand Rapids, MI. In short:While many factors can contribute to lead exposure, the prevalence of lead pipes was a stronger predictor of elevated lead levels than standard risk predictors used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD).For both cities, the prevalence of lead pipes was linked to the percentage of housing built before the 1950s, highlighting that lead pipes are more commonly found in older homes.Key quote:“These findings suggest that replacing LSLs is an effective public health strategy to eliminate this important source of [lead] exposure.”Why this matters:Lead is an incredibly toxic chemical that’s been linked to cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, damage to the reproductive and nervous systems, and more. While significant progress has been made in reducing the average blood lead levels in the U.S. over time, hotspots of elevated exposure still remain. Communities that suffer from higher lead levels are often faced with multiple potential sources of exposure, which is commonly paired with significant economic and social inequality in comparison to areas with lower exposures. Because the results of this study point to lead service lines as key contributors to lead exposures, the authors emphasize that federal programs that fund the replacement of these pipes are an effective and meaningful strategy for protecting public health.Related EHN coverage:Federal housing programs linked to lower levels of lead exposureUS lead pipe replacements stoke concerns about plastic and environmental injusticeMore resources:LISTEN: Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcastSabah Usmani on making cities healthy and justNsilo Berry on making buildings healthierDiana Hernández on housing and healthTornero-Velez, Rogelio et al. for Environmental Science and Technology vol. 59, 43. Oct. 21, 2025

A recent study published in Environmental Science and Technology found a strong association between the presence of lead service lines (LSLs) and children’s elevated blood lead levels in Cincinnati, OH and Grand Rapids, MI. In short:While many factors can contribute to lead exposure, the prevalence of lead pipes was a stronger predictor of elevated lead levels than standard risk predictors used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD).For both cities, the prevalence of lead pipes was linked to the percentage of housing built before the 1950s, highlighting that lead pipes are more commonly found in older homes.Key quote:“These findings suggest that replacing LSLs is an effective public health strategy to eliminate this important source of [lead] exposure.”Why this matters:Lead is an incredibly toxic chemical that’s been linked to cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, damage to the reproductive and nervous systems, and more. While significant progress has been made in reducing the average blood lead levels in the U.S. over time, hotspots of elevated exposure still remain. Communities that suffer from higher lead levels are often faced with multiple potential sources of exposure, which is commonly paired with significant economic and social inequality in comparison to areas with lower exposures. Because the results of this study point to lead service lines as key contributors to lead exposures, the authors emphasize that federal programs that fund the replacement of these pipes are an effective and meaningful strategy for protecting public health.Related EHN coverage:Federal housing programs linked to lower levels of lead exposureUS lead pipe replacements stoke concerns about plastic and environmental injusticeMore resources:LISTEN: Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcastSabah Usmani on making cities healthy and justNsilo Berry on making buildings healthierDiana Hernández on housing and healthTornero-Velez, Rogelio et al. for Environmental Science and Technology vol. 59, 43. Oct. 21, 2025

How a Texas shrimper stalled Exxon’s $10bn plastics plant | Shilpi Chhotray

Diane Wilson recognized Exxon’s playbook – and showed how local people can take on even the most entrenched industriesWhen ExxonMobil announced it would “slow the pace of development” on a $10bn plastics plant along the Texas Gulf coast, the company blamed market conditions. But it wasn’t just the market applying pressure; it was a 77-year-old shrimper named Diane Wilson who refused to stay silent. Her fight exposes big oil’s latest survival plan: ramping up oil and gas production to create plastic.I first met Wilson back in 2019 while tracking her historic lawsuit against Formosa Plastics, the Taiwanese petrochemical giant accused of dumping toxic plastic waste throughout coastal Texas. Billions of tiny plastic pellets were contaminating waterways, shorelines, and even the soil itself.Shilpi Chhotray is the co-founder and president of Counterstream Media and Host of A People’s Climate for the Nation Continue reading...

When ExxonMobil announced it would “slow the pace of development” on a $10bn plastics plant along the Texas Gulf coast, the company blamed market conditions. But it wasn’t just the market applying pressure; it was a 77-year-old shrimper named Diane Wilson who refused to stay silent. Her fight exposes big oil’s latest survival plan: ramping up oil and gas production to create plastic.I first met Wilson back in 2019 while tracking her historic lawsuit against Formosa Plastics, the Taiwanese petrochemical giant accused of dumping toxic plastic waste throughout coastal Texas. Billions of tiny plastic pellets were contaminating waterways, shorelines, and even the soil itself.When I spoke with her again a few months ago for A People’s Climate, a podcast from the Nation and Counterstream Media, she was still doing what she’s always done: holding power to account in the place she loves most. I’ve spent years covering the plastic industry’s impact on frontline communities, and Exxon’s delay isn’t a business decision to dismiss. It’s a strategic signal that the fossil-to-plastic pivot is facing growing, community-led resistance.When Exxon arrived in Calhoun county late last year, Wilson recognized the playbook: a rubber-stamp process rushed through a school-board meeting – a requirement under Texas law for the tax abatement Exxon sought. She sued that same board in May, arguing it had violated Texas open-meeting laws in what she has called “a deliberate attempt to avoid public opposition”. A district judge agreed, striking down the board’s approval of the tax abatement in late September. Less than two weeks later, Exxon announced it would pause plans for the new facility, indicating “market conditions”. The timing was hard to ignore. In a region dominated by fossil-fuel interests, that kind of outcome is unheard of.While Exxon hasn’t reached a final investment decision, this delayed matters. It shows how even the most entrenched industries can be made to pause when local people demand transparency.As gasoline demand declines, Exxon, Shell, and Dow are betting billions on petrochemicals, the feedstocks that become plastics. Industry projections show these products could drive nearly half of future oil-demand growth by 2050. Plastics are marketed as modern and indispensable, yet they come from one of the planet’s most carbon-intensive and polluting supply chains. According to Exxon’s December 2024 tax abatement application, the company’s proposed plastics plant in Calhoun county would produce 3 million tons of polyethylene pellets per year. These are the raw materials for plastic products that are used in everything from grocery bags to vinyl flooring.Exxon already runs one of the world’s largest chemical hubs, in Baytown, Texas. According to Inside Climate News, the facility would be its next link in a fossil-fuel chain stretching from gas wells in west Texas to manufacturing zones in Asia. While industry executives tout diversification, on the ground, it looks and smells like doubling down on pollution.Calhoun county’s history reads like a case study in corporate impunity. For decades, the oil and gas industry has promised jobs but delivered health risks, poisoned groundwater, and dead fisheries. Wilson grew up in Seadrift, the last authentic fishing village on the Texas Gulf coast. “The heart and soul of the community was the bay, the fish house, the boats,” she told me on A People’s Climate. “I’ve been on a boat since I was eight years old … It’s my life and my identity.”Her battle with Formosa began decades ago, after she discovered her tiny county ranked first in the nation for toxic dumping. An introvert by nature, she was thrust into activism overnight when local officials tried to silence her for asking questions. She’s since been arrested more than 50 times, led hunger strikes, and even scaled the White House fence – what she calls “soul power in action”. Wilson’s work helped prove what regulators had long denied: plastic pellets were flooding coastal ecosystems by the billions.Her historic $50m Clean Water Act settlement against Formosa Plastics was only possible after documenting years of illegal discharges into Lavaca Bay. It was the largest citizen-led environmental settlement in US history, and she didn’t take a cent. The money has gone towards local restoration: a fisheries co-op, oyster farms, and the community-science network known as Nurdle Patrol. (Formosa did not admit liability.)That case made her a target of local politics, but it also gave her something invaluable: the ability to turn frustration into organizing power. Her latest lawsuit against the school board wasn’t simply about procedure, but questions who gets to decide the future. Is it the people who live there or the corporations that profit from polluting it?Across the Gulf south, communities are demanding accountability. In St James Parish, Sharon Lavigne has also spent years fighting Formosa’s $9.4bn complex in what’s known as Louisiana’s Cancer Alley. In Port Arthur and Corpus Christi, organizers are fighting new gas export terminals. These aren’t isolated nimby fights; they’re part of a regional reckoning with a century of extraction. As record heat and hurricanes grow deadlier, Exxon still defends oil and petrochemical projects as “accelerating a just transition”, a phrase that borders on self-parody.Wilson’s small-town lawsuit shouldn’t matter in Exxon’s $500bn universe – but it does. It reminds us that grassroots power still works, even in refinery country. “Eventually I lost my husband, the house, the boat,” she told me due to her activism. “But you can lose it all and gain your soul.” When a community like Seadrift demands transparency, it widens the space for others to question why their towns should subsidize pollution in the name of development.With Cop30 in Belém under way, world leaders are once again pledging to phase out fossil fuels, while the same corporations responsible for the crisis expand drilling, petrochemical production, and greenwashing efforts behind the scenes. Recent reporting by Nina Lakhani revealed that more than 5,000 fossil-fuel lobbyists have gained access to UN climate talks over the past four years – underscoring how those driving oil and gas expansion are also shaping global climate policy.For Exxon, Calhoun county may be a temporary delay. But it must be permanent, and not simply relocated elsewhere. The world cannot afford another generation of plastic built on the same extractive logic that created the climate crisis in the first place. Exxon’s pause is a chance for regulators, investors, and communities to recognize that the oil-to-plastic pivot has catastrophic consequences. As Wilson told me: “We have drawn a line in the sand against plastic polluters, and that line now runs through Calhoun county.” Her story is a reminder that even the largest corporations can be stopped when ordinary people refuse to back down.

Factbox-Highlights of US Framework Trade Deals With Argentina, Ecuador, El Salvador and Guatemala

By Andrea Shalal and Natalia SiniawskiWASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States on Thursday announced framework agreements with Argentina, Ecuador,...

By Andrea Shalal and Natalia SiniawskiWASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States on Thursday announced framework agreements with Argentina, Ecuador, El Salvador and Guatemala that will see Washington drop tariffs on imports of some foods and other goods, while those countries will open their markets to more U.S. agricultural and industrial goods.Details will be released in coming weeks after the framework deals are finalized.Following are highlights of the four deals, according to fact sheets and joint statements released by the White House and the countries involved on Thursday:Argentina will provide preferential market access for U.S. goods, including certain medicines, chemicals, machinery, information technology products, medical devices, motor vehicles, and a wide range of agricultural products.Under the deal, Argentina will allow access for U.S. poultry and poultry products, within one year, and simplify red tape for U.S. exporters of beef, beef products, pork, and pork products. Argentina also has agreed not to restrict market access for certain U.S. meats and cheeses.Argentina agreed to step up enforcement against counterfeit and pirated goods; use U.S. or international standards for imports of goods made in the United States, including automobiles; and refrain from imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions or digital services taxes.Argentina agreed to treat U.S. firms fairly in its critical minerals sector, and to adopt a ban on importation of goods produced by forced or compulsory labor.In exchange, the U.S. will remove tariffs on "certain unavailable natural resources and non-patented articles for use in pharmaceutical applications."The countries also committed to improved, reciprocal, bilateral market access conditions for trade in beef.Total two-way trade in goods and services between the United States and Ecuador amounted to approximately $90.4 billion in 2024.Ecuador agreed to remove or lower a range of tariffs on products including tree nuts, fresh fruit, pulses, wheat, wine, and distilled spirits, as well as machinery, health products, chemicals, motor vehicles, and to establish tariff-rate quotas on a number of other agricultural goods.It also agreed to reduce non-tariff barriers for U.S. agricultural goods, including through changes to its licensing systems for food and agricultural products.Ecuador will also accept vehicles and automotive parts built to U.S. motor vehicle safety and emissions standards, as well as U.S. medical devices marketed in the United States, and U.S. pharmaceutical products marketed in the United States.It also agreed to prevent barriers to services and digital trade with the U.S.; refrain from imposing digital service taxes; strengthen enforcement of its labor laws and ban importation of goods produced by forced or compulsory labor.The two countries agreed to strengthen their economic and national security cooperation by taking complementary actions to address non-market policies and cooperating on investment security and export controls, a reference that could refer to China and its non-market policies.In exchange, the U.S. will remove its tariffs on certain qualifying exports from Ecuador that cannot be grown, mined or naturally produced in the United States in sufficient quantities, including coffee and bananas.El Salvador will provide preferential market access for U.S. goods, including pharmaceutical products, medical devices, remanufactured goods and motor vehicles.The country will streamline regulatory approvals, accept U.S. auto standards, simplify certificate of free sale requirements, allow electronic certificates, remove apostille requirements and expedite product registration.El Salvador has committed to prevent barriers to U.S. agricultural products, recognize U.S. regulatory oversight, continue accepting agreed U.S. certificates and not restrict access of meats and cheeses including parmesan, gruyere, mozzarella, feta, asiago, salami, and prosciutto.The country will advance international intellectual property treaties and ensure transparency and fairness on geographical indications.El Salvador will prevent barriers to services and digital trade and support a permanent moratorium on customs duties for electronic transmissions.It has reinforced its commitment to labor rights, environmental protection, and sustainable resource management, including tackling illegal logging, mining, wildlife trafficking and industrial distortions.In return, the United States will remove reciprocal tariffs on certain Salvadoran exports and extend preferences to qualifying CAFTA‑DR textiles. The countries will also strengthen economic and national security cooperation, enhancing supply chain resilience, innovation, and collaboration on duty evasion, procurement, investment security and export controls.Two-way trade in goods and services between the United States and Guatemala totaled almost $18.7 billion in 2024.Under the deal, Guatemala will streamline regulatory approvals, accept U.S. auto standards, simplify certificate of free sale requirements, allow electronic certificates, remove apostille requirements and expedite product registration.The country has committed to prevent barriers to U.S. agricultural products, recognize U.S. regulatory oversight, maintain science- and risk-based frameworks and continue accepting agreed U.S. certificates. Access will not be restricted on common meats and cheeses.Guatemala will strengthen intellectual property protection, implement international treaties, resolve longstanding U.S. Special 301 issues, and ensure transparency on geographical indications.It will facilitate digital trade, refrain from discriminatory digital services taxes, support free cross-border data flows and back a permanent WTO moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions.The country has reinforced commitments to labor rights, environmental protection, and sustainable resource management, including prohibiting goods from forced labor, combating illegal logging, mining, and wildlife trafficking, enforcing forest and fisheries measures and addressing industrial and state-owned enterprise distortions.In response, the United States will remove reciprocal tariffs on certain Guatemalan exports, including products that cannot be grown or produced in sufficient quantities in the United States and qualifying textiles and apparel.(Reporting by Andrea Shalal and Natalia Siniawski; Editing by Lincoln Feast.)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

Jesse Marquez, tireless defender of L.A. port communities, dies at 74

One of the Los Angeles region's most important environmental justice advocates has died.

When Jesse Marquez walked into the Los Angeles harbor commission hearing room in 2013, he didn’t bring a consultant or a slideshow. He brought death certificates.Each sheet of paper, he told the commissioners, bore the name of a Wilmington resident killed by respiratory illness. Wedged between two of the country’s busiest ports, the neighborhood is dotted with oil refineries, chemical plants, railyards and freeways. It’s one of several portside communities known by some as a “diesel death zone,” where residents are more likely to die from cancer than just about anywhere else in the L.A. Basin. For decades, Marquez refused to let anyone forget it.He knocked on doors, installed air monitors, counted oil wells, built coalitions, staged demonstrations, fought legal battles and affected policy. He dove deep into impenetrable environmental impact documents.“Before Jesse, there was no playbook.” Earthjustice attorney Adrian Martinez said in an interview. “What was remarkable from the beginning is that Jesse wasn’t afraid to write stuff down, to demand things, to spend lots of time scouring for evidence.”Marquez, founder of the Coalition for a Safe Environment, or CFASE, died surrounded by family in his Orange County home Nov. 3. His death was due to complications after he was struck by a vehicle while in a crosswalk in January. He was 74.“He was one of a kind,” Martinez said. “He had a fierce independence and really believed in speaking up for himself and his community. He played an instrumental role in centering Wilmington in the fight for environmental justice.”In 2001, when the port planned to ramp up operations and expand a major terminal operated by Trapac Inc. further north into Wilmington, Marquez and neighborhood organizers pushed back, winning a $200-million green-space buffer between residences and port operations.When oil refineries evaded pollution caps through what organizers called a “gaping loophole” in Environmental Protection Agency policy, Marquez and others sued, overturning the policy and successfully curtailing pollution spikes at California plants.And when cargo ships idled at California ports burning diesel fuel, Marquez and his allies pressed the state to adopt the nation’s first rule requiring vessels to turn off their engines and plug into the electric grid while docked.Born Oct. 22, 1951, Marquez was raised in Wilmington, and lived most of his life there. As a child, he had a view of Fletcher Oil Co.’s towering smokestacks from his frontyard.Years later, black pearls of petroleum rained down on Wilmington the day the oil refinery exploded.Then 17, Marquez hit the floor when he heard the blast. Frantic, he helped his parents hoist his six younger siblings over a backyard fence as fireballs of ignited crude descended around their home, just across the street. His grandmother was the last over, suffering third-degree burns along the entire left side of her body.“From that moment on, he’s always had Wilmington in his mind,” his 44-year-old son, Alex Marquez, said in an interview.The memory shaped the battles he fought decades later. In college at UCLA, he crossed paths with young members of the Brown Berets, Movimiento Estudiantil Chicanx de Aztlán, and the Black Panther Party, later volunteering in demonstrations led by Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta.“He started off within that movement,” Alex Marquez said. “It was his reason to bring a lot of different communities into his work.”After a career in aerospace, he began organizing in earnest in the 1990s, aligning with groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council and Coalition for Clean Air to oppose port expansion projects.When his sons were old enough, he brought them along to photograph and count oil wells, later folding them into his other projects.He described his father as a man of contrasts.“When it was time to work, he was the most serious, stern, no patience,” Alex Marquez said. “But the minute the job was done, he completely transformed. He was your best friend who brought a roast turkey and a six-pack of beers. He partied and relaxed better than anyone I’ve ever met.”Marquez’s home was always filled with dogs — he jokingly called his lawyers his “legal beagles,” Martinez recalled. He loved reggae music, dancing and was an amateur archaeologist. He kept a collection of colonial maps tracing the migration of the Aztec people, part of what his son called “his love for Native American and Aztec culture.”He founded CFASE with a group of Wilmington residents. After learning about the port’s expansion plans, he hosted an ad hoc meeting at his home. There, residents shared their experiences with industrial pollution in Wilmington.They talked about the refinery explosions in 1969, 1984, 1986, 1991, 1992, 1995, 1996 and 2001.“Then someone says, ‘Well, I have two kids and they have asthma,’” Jesse Marquez recalled in a media interview in January. “And then someone else says, ‘All three of my kids have asthma — My mom has asthma — I have asthma.’”The group would play a central role in developing the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach’s landmark Clean Air Action Plan and Clean Truck Program, which replaced more than 16,000 diesel rigs with cleaner models.It pushed for zero-emission truck demonstrations, solar power installations, and won millions of dollars for communities for public health and air-quality projects.The coalition helped negotiate a $60-million settlement in the seminal China Shipping terminal case — securing local health grants, truck retrofit funds and the first Port Community Advisory Committee in the U.S. — and later helped establish the Harbor Community Benefit Foundation, which funds air filtration, land use, and job-training initiatives across Wilmington and San Pedro.Marquez’s group also fought off proposals for liquefied natural gas terminals, oil tank farms and hydrogen power plants.Since 2005, diesel emissions at the Port of Los Angeles have plummeted by 90%.Now Alex Marquez finds himself suddenly in charge of the nonprofit his father built.He’s been learning to manage the group’s finances, fix its monitoring equipment and reconnect with its network of allies.“It’s literally been a crash course in how to run a nonprofit,” he said. “But we’re keeping it alive.”In Wilmington, residents point to visible symbols of Marquez’s work: the waterfront park, the electrified port terminals and the health surveys that documented decades of illness.“He left us too early, but a movement that was just budding when he started decades ago has now blossomed into national and even international networks,” Martinez wrote in a tribute to Marquez.Marquez is survived by his sons Alex Marquez, Danilo Marquez, Radu Iliescu and, the many who knew him say, the environmental justice movement writ large.

James Watson, Co-Discoverer of DNA's Double Helix, Dead at 97

(Reuters) -James D. Watson, the brilliant but controversial American biologist whose 1953 discovery of the structure of DNA, the molecule of...

(Reuters) -James D. Watson, the brilliant but controversial American biologist whose 1953 discovery of the structure of DNA, the molecule of heredity, ushered in the age of genetics and provided the foundation for the biotechnology revolution of the late 20th century, has died at the age of 97.His death was confirmed by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, where he worked for many years. The New York Times reported that Watson died this week at a hospice on Long Island.In his later years, Watson's reputation was tarnished by comments on genetics and race that led him to be ostracized by the scientific establishment.Even as a younger man, he was known as much for his writing and for his enfant-terrible persona - including his willingness to use another scientist's data to advance his own career - as for his science.His 1968 memoir, "The Double Helix," was a racy, take-no-prisoners account of how he and British physicist Francis Crick were first to determine the three-dimensional shape of DNA. The achievement won the duo a share of the 1962 Nobel Prize in medicine and eventually would lead to genetic engineering, gene therapy and other DNA-based medicine and technology.Crick complained that the book "grossly invaded my privacy" and another colleague, Maurice Wilkins, objected to what he called a "distorted and unfavorable image of scientists" as ambitious schemers willing to deceive colleagues and competitors in order to make a discovery.In addition, Watson and Crick, who did their research at Cambridge University in England, were widely criticized for using raw data collected by X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin to construct their model of DNA - as two intertwined staircases - without fully acknowledging her contribution. As Watson put it in "Double Helix," scientific research feels "the contradictory pulls of ambition and the sense of fair play."In 2007, Watson again caused widespread anger when he told the Times of London that he believed testing indicated the intelligence of Africans was "not really ... the same as ours."Accused of promoting long-discredited racist theories, he was shortly afterwards forced to retire from his post as chancellor of New York's Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL). Although he later apologized, he made similar comments in a 2019 documentary, calling different racial attainment on IQ tests - attributed by most scientists to environmental factors - "genetic."James Dewey Watson was born in Chicago on April 6, 1928, and graduated from the University of Chicago in 1947 with a zoology degree. He received his doctorate from Indiana University, where he focused on genetics. In 1951, he joined Cambridge's Cavendish Lab, where he met Crick and began the quest for the structural chemistry of DNA.Just waiting to be found, the double helix opened the doors to the genetics revolution. In the structure Crick and Watson proposed, the steps of the winding staircase were made of pairs of chemicals called nucleotides or bases. As they noted at the end of their 1953 paper, "It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material."That sentence, often called the greatest understatement in the history of biology, meant that the base-and-helix structure provided the mechanism by which genetic information can be precisely copied from one generation to the next. That understanding led to the discovery of genetic engineering and numerous other DNA techniques.Watson and Crick went their separate ways after their DNA research. Watson was only 25 years old then and while he never made another scientific discovery approaching the significance of the double helix, he remained a scientific force."He had to figure out what to do with his life after achieving what he did at such a young age," biologist Mark Ptashne, who met Watson in the 1960s and remained a friend, told Reuters in a 2012 interview. "He figured out how to do things that played to his strength."That strength was playing "the tough Irishman," as Ptashne put it, to become one of the leaders of the U.S. leap to the forefront of molecular biology. Watson joined the biology department at Harvard University in 1956."The existing biology department felt that molecular biology was just a flash in the pan," Harvard biochemist Guido Guidotti related. But when Watson arrived, Guidotti said he immediately told everyone in the biology department – scientists whose research focused on whole organisms and populations, not cells and molecules – "that they were wasting their time and should retire."That earned Watson the decades-long enmity of some of those traditional biologists, but he also attracted young scientists and graduate students who went on to forge the genetics revolution.In 1968 Watson took his institution-building drive to CSHL on Long Island, splitting his time between CSHL and Harvard for eight years. The lab at the time was "just a mosquito-infested backwater," said Ptashne. As director, "Jim turned it into a vibrant, world-class institution."In 1990, Watson was named to lead the Human Genome Project, whose goal was to determine the order of the 3 billion chemical units that constitute humans' full complement of DNA. When the National Institutes of Health, which funded the project, decided to seek patents on some DNA sequences, Watson attacked the NIH director and resigned, arguing that genome knowledge should remain in the public domain.In 2007 he became the second person in the world to have his full genome sequenced. He made the sequence publicly available, arguing that concerns about "genetic privacy" were overwrought but made an exception by saying he did not want to know if he had a gene associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. Watson did have a gene associated with novelty-seeking.His proudest accomplishment, Watson told an interviewer for Discover magazine in 2003, was not discovering the double helix - which "was going to be found in the next year or two" anyway - but his books."My heroes were never scientists," he said. "They were Graham Greene and Christopher Isherwood - you know, good writers."Watson cherished the bad-boy image he presented to the world in "Double Helix," friends said, and he emphasized it in his 2007 book, "Avoid Boring People."Married with two sons, he often disparaged women in public statements and boasted of chasing what he called "popsies." But he personally encouraged many female scientists, including biologist Nancy Hopkins of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology."I certainly couldn't have had a career in science without his support, I believe," said Hopkins, long outspoken about anti-woman bias in science. "Jim was hugely supportive of me and other women. It's an odd thing to understand."(Editing by Bill Trott and Rosalba O'Brien)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.