Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico

News Feed
Wednesday, July 17, 2024

Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss why she switched careers from physician to environmental health researcher, and how she’s using this new training to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico. Talayero Schettino, a current Agents of Change fellow and a DrPH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at The George Washington University, also talks about the challenges of immigrating to the U.S. and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Talayero Schettino and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice In MexicoTranscriptMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 00:00I don't I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries.Brian Bienkowski 00:11Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host Brian Bienkowski, editor of Agents of Change, and senior editor at Environmental Health News. Folks, we are so grateful for your support. We've been at this a few years now and we would love to continue to grow. Please share this podcast with your family and friends, colleagues, and subscribe to us on Spotify or iTunes and please leave us a review. Today's guest is Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino, a current fellow and a doctorate pH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the George Washington University. Maria talks about switching careers from a physician to an environmental health researcher, using her research to advocate for environmental justice in her native Mexico and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health. Enjoy. All right, I am now joined by Dr. Maria,Jose Talayero Schettino. Maria, how are you doing today?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:14I'm doing great. Thanks for having me here. Brian, how are you?Brian Bienkowski 01:18I am doing wonderful. And I'm really excited to hear about all the work that you're doing. But I want to start at the very beginning. Tell me about growing up in Mexico City.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:29Oh, yeah, I honestly have very good memories about growing up in Mexico City. But I'm not sure how familiar you are with Mexican culture or if you've ever traveled there, butBrian Bienkowski 01:41almost zeroMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:42Mexicans really highly, highly value things like hospitality, generosity, respect for elders, solidarity. And it might sound really funny, but we highly value social connections and gatherings. I mean, it's weird to say that we really value parties, but we do. And that's why our food and culture is so important. So I feel like growing up in Mexico City was just like that: full of culture, tradition, family gatherings. And I feel like I'm very lucky to be able to call myself Mexican.Brian Bienkowski 02:12Is there a certain food or or holiday or gathering? Are there certain ones that kind of stick out in your mind as being particularly poignant?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 02:22I mean, yes, I think so. Particularly, Independence Day. I have very good memories about going to watch the fireworks. Independence Days in September. Most people in America think it's Cinco de Mayo. But that's not it. It's in September. But other holidays that really stick up for me are the other mortos which is in November, and also Posadas, which are held during like, December. So Christmas is very important to us too.Brian Bienkowski 02:54And the only thing I really know about Mexico City, and pardon my American ignorance, is it's it's a massive city, right? I mean, were you in kind of a dense urban area?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:04I mean, yeah, it's a huge, huge city. And I feel like there's a lot of people living around Mexico City, I did feel like I lived with my family in one of like, more suburban area, not closer to like, the historical center or anything. But we travel a lot by car. I mean, we have a huge air pollution problem because of that. But I feel like yeah, it's a huge city, and everyone's all around it in. I mean, it's very, very well connected when it comes to streets, we have a lot of traffic, but that's how people go around Mexico City by staying in traffic for really long periods of time.Brian Bienkowski 03:48So how and when did you become interested in health and the environment?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:53I mean, this is a great question. And every time I get it, I wish I had that story, "like when I was younger, I used to tell my parents that I wanted to be a doctor since I was a little girl." Unfortunately, that was not me. I wanted to be a singer. I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to be a painter. So that was not me. So I think I ended up in like healthcare and the environment because I really loved science. And don't get me wrong, I really hated physics and math. So because they hated it, I feel like that drew me into chemistry and biology. And I I think I ended up in medical school because of that, because my love for science and honestly, I never knew I was gonna end up doing research and doing a lot of statistics. Even after I ran away from math.Brian Bienkowski 04:42The only class I ever got to see in growing up was chemistry that that that for some reason that subject gave me such fits. And I don't know if it was my teacher, or what but it really bothered me.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 04:54I mean, yeah, it's a really, really hard, hard subject! and I I feel you I feel like I just don't know, I don't know what it was. But chemistry and biology always caught my eye.Brian Bienkowski 05:05eye. And the weird thing is now I, you know, I've spent most of my career writing about chemicals in the environment. So it's, it's strange, I hope I'm not just writing a bunch of incorrect things.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:17I guess I guess you've made peace with it. And now you love it.Brian Bienkowski 05:21That's right. So before we get into your your career has been fascinating because you, you started off in healthcare as a physician, and I want to talk about your journey. But first, what is a moment or event that has helped shape your identity?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:35Wow, that's a really hard question. I think there are a couple of things that I want to mention that really shaped my identity as I was growing up. And I feel like the first one was really practicing medicine in public hospitals, that really showed me that life is not fair. And that made me want to work on that. And I think the other thing I want to mention that really shaped my identity is immigrating to the United States, even though I emigrated when I was, I think, 26 years old. Even though I'm like a short four-hour flight away from home, I think immigrating made me realize about all the things that I took for granted, and now I really highly value.Brian Bienkowski 06:16Luckily, we're going to talk about both of those things. Because I think that's, it's a really important part of your journey. And starting with this idea of you became a physician in practice in rural communities around Mexico City. So can you tell me about this work, what you learned from this time with patients and why ultimately, you decided to switch careers?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 06:34Of course. So I guess, practicing medicine in rural communities, and even public hospitals, or public health care centers in Mexico, it really does feel like an art. Because you need to learn how to treat disease differently. Sometimes the medicines that you learn on a book that were the best for a specific disease are not available. So you have to work around it. And the same comes for like diagnostic diagnostic tools, you don't have fancy equipment, or even sometimes you don't even have basic equipment to make a diagnosis. So you have to really focus on talking to the patient. And that's the only thing that you often have, and you have to learn how to practice medicine with that, which is the only thing that you have. And I think when it comes to the change that I made from like, a very clinical-practice-based career into like an research and an environmental one is that one of the things that frustrated me that most while I was practicing medicine is that there were and there are still a lot of things that we do not have answers for in patients. When they come to get a diagnosis, they sometimes ask you were themselves like why something happened. And most of the time, we really have to say that we don't know why. I think there's even a medical term for this, which is that something it's adiabatic, which means that we have absolutely no idea what costed and I really hated it. I hated not being able to have answers for my patients. And I mean, I still don't have all the answers. But I think as I moved forward into an environmental health career, I realized that this field of environmental health had a lot of those answers. And that through my medical education, I barely heard of those. So I think that's what made me shift.Brian Bienkowski 08:18So we're going to talk more about your your research and that switch. And, you know, maybe some ideas you have for the medical field to bridge some of these gaps. But I have to ask, did your did family and friends question your decision? I mean, being a physician is a is a career that I think most of us know. I mean, we all know that career. It's familiar to us. It's a pillar in most communities. And I think researcher is a little more esoteric to a lot of folks. So I'm wondering if your family was like, What are you doing?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 08:48Oh, my gosh, yeah, I every single person that went through medical school with me or even my family, or even friends, or even now that I meet people, when I tell them that I went through medical school and that I became a physician. Now I do environmental health, every single person has questioned that. And I feel like sometimes, when like for the Mexican perspective, a lot of people questioned this because they don't really know much about the field, and how important it is. But I don't know like having all these people question your life decision makes it like just harder to move forward and harder to realize if you're in the right path. And I think that was really hard when I first made the decision to switch. But now looking back, I don't think I would do anything differently.Brian Bienkowski 09:38And to keep on this theme of challenges. I want to reflect a bit on your move to the US. You mentioned how important Mexico City and family and gathering was to your, to your upbringing and identity. And I don't know that most folks understand the toll of immigrating even under positive circumstances like yourself. So can you talk about this experience and what people should know about the personal channel changes and sacrifices for immigrants?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:02Yeah, honestly, thanks for asking this questions. I think that sometimes the challenges for like immigrating in good, some good circumstances, like I did is invisible to others. But from my experience, I really want to say that immigrating in good circumstances to the US is extremely challenging. There are so many rules and steps that you need to take that often really don't even make sense and can really make your life harder. But I do have to say that I'm really fortunate to be here. And I'm really grateful to the US for the all the all the opportunities that I've had. But moving away from family is so hard. Like you move to a country where you don't have this support system, the culture is extremely different. And you need to talk and communicate using a different language. I don't know if you've watched Modern Family. I really like that show. But there's this episode.Brian Bienkowski 10:54Modern Family? Yeah, gosh, yes. I'm a yes. I'm rewatching it right now. Yes.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:59I love it. I love it. But there's this episode, where Sofia Vergara says, "do you know how smart I am in Spanish?" And it's so funny. But it's so relatable. Like, there's so many things that I want to say, but I just cannot find the words.Brian Bienkowski 11:13Well, thank you so much for sharing that. And I want to talk now about the work that you're doing as you've made the switch to research. So you're examining environmental exposures, and birth defects in Mexico. That's one of the things you're working on. So I wanted to talk about talk, you know, if you can explore this link between these exposures and birth defects, why it's concerning, and who is most impacted?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 11:34Of course, yeah. So through my dissertation, I'm on the final stages of my doctoral program, hopefully graduating this August. But through my dissertation, I've been studying birth defects and their relationship that they have with the polluting industry in the country, in Mexico. It has been challenging to do something like this with public databases that the Mexican government has, but I found really interesting things. For example, I've seen that the reporting for genital birth defects in Mexico in the last couple of years has been steadily increasing. I mean, this could be due to so many things –like people know now how to recognize them better or many other things. But when you compare that to other countries, this seems to be happening, too. And it's making us think about the impact endocrine disrupting chemicals are having in communities around industrial areas. I think it is very concerning to see the impact that pollution has in your health even before you were born. Like I don't think people realize that we used to think in a medical field that that placenta was like this major barrier where nothing could go through it. But we've realized that that's not the case. And I really think that we don't have strict enough regulations for most chemicals. But overall, like if you asked me like, What was the most concerning thing that you saw is the lack of data that Mexico has for both health effects and polluting chemicals. I'm always amazed that countries like the US, for example, like researchers in the US say that they are so far behind, but they don't really realize if they're far behind where developing countries are.Brian Bienkowski 13:11You mentioned a term their endocrine disrupting chemicals, which I think a lot of Environmental Health News readership is aware of. But for our listening audience, can you explain what those chemicals are? And kind of the plausible ways that they could possibly be behind some of these birth defects?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 13:26Of course, yeah, sorry, I forgot to explain that! But yeah, endocrine disrupting chemicals are generally what we say are chemicals that are capable of interfering with the way your hormones work. And your hormones are very important since the beginning of life, because hormones are also chemicals, but they mediate a lot of processes in your body. So if there's a chemical there's interrupting those pathways, then you can see problems with your development or the endocrine system diseases, for example, reproductive issues, or diabetes, or thyroid problems. So mostly, those are the things that we're concerned when we get exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are almost in everything. But one of the major things that we know, gets us exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, are plastics.Brian Bienkowski 14:21Soyou mentioned gaps in the research. And you noticed this pretty early on that there were some gaps in environmental health and environmental justice data in Mexico. And I know you're just one researcher, but can you talk about this dearth of research and how you're trying to tackle this?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 14:35So I feel like environmental justice has been overlooked for centuries in both the community scale and the global scale. I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries. For example, I remember a few years ago, there was this Super Bowl held in Arizona or one of the border, one of the border states, but I think it was Arizona. And they said that they weren't going to have have a zero-waste Super Bowl because all the plastic generated was going to be recycled. But that plastic was shipped to Mexico, to northern Mexico, where plastic recycling plans are polluting the water and air of Mexican communities. So is one of the of the issues that we see in the global health realm. Like, this is not something that only happens in Mexico, but it happens everywhere. But with things like in the country level, when I first started the process to find something I wanted to do for my dissertation, I remember talking to my chair, about wanting to do something on environmental justice. So I started doing research on what was out there. And unfortunately, I wasn't able to find much. And I think this is related to what I was talking about, that we don't have a lot of data. And there's also something going on in Mexico and you know, other Latin American countries like Colombia, where it's very dangerous to be in environmentalist in those countries. Mexico is one of the deadliest country to be an environmentalist. So advocating for these things can get really challenging.Brian Bienkowski 16:03So can you talk about your efforts, in particular to advance environmental health policy in Mexico, including on lead and criminal behavior? And can you talk a little bit about your involvement with Mundo Químico, boy, I'm probably butchering these words. I'm really smart English, I swear. And what have you learned? And have you had any victories along the way in your in your efforts to advance environmental health policy down there?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 16:28Yeah, so let me talk a little bit about what Mundo Químico is, which translates to chemical world because we live in a chemical world. So this Mundo Químico is like a collaborative of scientists and other professionals in Mexico that got together and are really trying to push programs and policies related to environmental health in the country. Honestly, I feel like I'm very lucky to be part of it. I am the youngest member. And I ended up being there because as I was finishing up my master's program, I always felt like I owed something to my country, and I needed to do something in Mexico. So I did some research and who was working on environmental health in the country. And I found this very big and famous scientist, his name is Dr. Carlos Santos Burdoa. He's US-based. He was at the George Washington University, when I first heard of that of him. So I email him. Honestly, I didn't expect a reply, because like, senior scientists are really busy. But I did get a reply. And I was really surprised. But he told me that he was building this collaborative called Mundo Químico, and he asked me if I wanted to join him. So of course, I said, Yes. So what we've been trying to do, as I was saying, is to push environmental health agenda into the policies and to do some programs to reduce environmental health exposures. And we started with lead exposure, because Mexico has a really big problem with lead. I think we've done different things that I don't think I have enough time to talk about during our podcast. But what I have learned, and I think I have learned a lot of things, but one of the most important ones, is that it is so hard to communicate to the public and with policymakers. And I really did not expect that when I started my career in environmental health. And I think that's how I ended up studying lead exposure and criminal behavior. Because often when you want policymakers to listen to what you have to say, you have to talk to them in their terms, and talk to them in topics that that you feel that they will prioritize. So we know crime is a big thing in Mexico. So what we did is where we viewed all the available evidence to see how lead exposure was related to criminal behavior, we found that there's a link. But we still need research on this. And we need research to understand what the relationship means in the Mexican context. But yeah, I feel like that's how it started because we need to learn to communicate with policymakers. And I really don't want to stop talking about this question without mentioning some of the wins that we had, because I feel like in environmental health, we will always hear a lot about our fatals and not our wins. So we have had some wins, we have been able to produce some programs on lead exposure. And one of them is we were able to partner with WONART, which is an Arts Fund that the government of Mexico has and through their through them, we've been able to push this program to train pottery workers to produce lathe, Clay ceramics, which are a major traditional thing in Mexico and they usually have led in it. But we're pushing this program to produce lead-free clay ceramics and to certify that they're lead free. And even though we still have a lot of work to do on that issue, the start of the program to me is just a great win.Brian Bienkowski 19:54You mentioned two things there that I have a follow up on and you started to get to it a little bit at the end is is you meantioned that lead exposure is a big issue in Mexico. And I'm wondering if you can just kind of give a brief overview of the ceramics and potentially other sources of lead in the environment there. And then second, if you can kind of walk us through why there's this possible link to crime, what does lead do to people that could make them more susceptible to committing crime?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 20:20Of course, yeah. So I'll start with at glaced clay ceramics. So in Mexico, we use traditional pottery for cooking, storing, or even serving food. And one of this traditional pottery is called glaced clay ceramics and the glaze that the ceramics have, it has lead in it. And because it's not produced in ovens, that can reach high enough temperatures, in like close ovens, because it's a very artisanal process, the lead stays there, and it leeches into food. And he usually leeches when you like cook, or store food that's very acidic. And Mexican cuisine is really acidic. So it leaves us a lot of lead. And we have a major problem of lead exposure. Because of that, that's actually the main source of lead exposure in the country, because most of the people in Mexico use it. Like if you go down there, you'll see it in restaurants, you'll see your honestly see it everywhere. And the latest numbers show that children from one to four ages in Mexico, 17% of all children from one to four years of age in Mexico have lead poisoning. So it's a really public health issue, we don't have data to see if older kids have lead, we don't have data on adults. But it's a really big concern, because lead is very toxic, like the WHO says that there is no safe level of exposure to lead because of how toxic it is. And he causes a variety of things. It can increase cardiovascular disease, it can damage the kidneys. But one of the ones, one of the things that we have studied the most is how it damages the nervous system and the brain. And this goes back to the question that you asked about criminal behavior. So we've seen that lead damages the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is in charge of, of behavior, and, yeah, to put it in, like, easier terms, yeah, it's in charge of behavior and how you react to things. So when it damages the neurons there, it can cause antisocial behavior, and it can cause aggressiveness, and it can cause violent behaviors. So that's how we've seen it has associated with criminal behavior. So in addition to that communication work directly with policymakers and residents, I know you're also active on social media. And I'm wondering how you've leveraged those platforms to try to get the word out on some of these environmental ills. Oh, my gosh, being on social media is so hard. I don't know if you've tried it. But seriously, it takes a lot of effort to create content on social media. But yeah, so I ended up in social media, because going back to this environmental justice issues, Spanish speaking countries, and communities really don't have as much information as English speakers do. And that's something I really noticed while I was scrolling down on every social media platform, so I saw hundreds of videos on how to reduce environmental exposures, but almost none, were in Spanish. So I decided to venture into social media. And honestly, I don't have that many followers, my platform is growing. But one of the things that I've noticed is that many health professionals are starting to follow me because they're interested. And they want to learn more, because some of their patients are asking about these topics. So I feel like it's a great way to do outreach and communication, things when you're in the environmental health field.Brian Bienkowski 24:06I have not tried it. Of course, I had I had social media accounts. It's been more than a decade. I think since I've had one, I don't even have LinkedIn anymore. I am really happy that people like you are on them, because I think it is a counterbalance to the reason that I got off, which is a lot of kind of miss information and hatred. But it is really heartening for me to see folks like yourself and scientists in general and health professionals are able to take their message directly to people as opposed to kind of being mediated through, you know, newspapers or whatever happened back in the day. So I think that's a good thing. And we have noticed though, as a newsroom, a lack of Spanish language environmental content and information and we are trying to trying to combat that with some eh en español coverage. So We have noticed the same thing as you. And there is a real language justice issue in the United States when it comes to environmental information. So I hope people will follow you. We will add a link in this podcast article so people can follow you if you want. Having spent some time now in the environmental health research field, and we were talking earlier about how you started as a physician, how do you think the medical field could better incorporate environmental health information for patients and prepare those physicians?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 25:28I mean, I honestly wish health care workers have better training in environmental health. From my experience, which is going through medical school in Mexico, I really can't speak for other countries. I barely heard about environmental exposures as causes of disease, when I was in medical school, maybe I heard about asbestos or silicosis or occupational exposures, but non an environmental exposures like a social determinants of health, which they are. So I'm currently working actually on a project with some peers on how there is a huge gap in medical and other other healthcare professions school curriculum when it comes to environmental health in Latin America. And it is a sad reality that we barely see courses on environmental health in these curriculums. But I can tell you that I like I can see myself advocating about this for a really long time. And I think we need to get to a point where every single doctor, every single dentist, every single nutritionist, every single nurse knows that this exists, and that we need to know about it and talk to our patients about it.Brian Bienkowski 26:41This is purely anecdotal. But I do feel like I'm seeing more on the climate side of things where physicians are being more active and perhaps more trained in climate change and extreme heat, but less so on –surprisingly– less so on things like chemical exposure, and the things that you've been talking about endocrine disrupting chemicals. So hopefully, hopefully, that changes because I think that would be a real public health win. So, Maria, this has been so much fun hearing about you and your work. And I have to ask you, before we get to some of the fun questions, I have a couple more questions. And one is do you plan on going back to Mexico? Would you want to work there? Or do you think you'll stay in the United States? What do you want to do with this environmental health research training?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:25Oh, my gosh, you're putting me on the spot.Brian Bienkowski 27:28I mean, you can have a no comment.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:30I know my family's gonna want me to give an answer that maybe it's not the one that they like. But I do feel that the work that I'm doing for Mexico in the United States, is far like, I feel like I have way more opportunities to do something for my country from the United States, than the ones that I see that are my country. And it's a really sad reality, because I would give the world to just go back to my family and my nephews. But if I really want to see a change, I really feel like I have to stay in the United States for at least a couple of years. To improve, like my research techniques to get a better sense of what's out there and what I can do for Mexico. I mean, in the future. I don't know how long from from now, I do see myself going back to Mexico at some point. But right now, I don't think it is an option. And it is a sad reality, not only for me, but for other immigrants that are doing science in the United States, because our countries lack opportunities.Brian Bienkowski 28:39And Maria, before we get to the fun stuff, what are you optimistic about?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 28:44Oh, that's a really important question! I feel like we don't hear about optimism sometimes in the environmental field, like there are so it's filled with bad news sometimes. But I feel like I'm optimistic about hearing more people are learning about environmental exposure. So how they can affect their health, because honestly, sometimes social movements can move policies faster. So we really need that. I'm optimistic about how younger generations are thinking more about the environment now. And they're joining this fight. There are so many things I'm optimistic about. And I'm glad you brought this up. Because again, I don't think that this field is full of good news. So we need to, to have these victories and these things that we're optimistic about really present in our day to day because he can get overwhelming at times.Brian Bienkowski 29:37I think the hard thing in my profession and maybe this is true in science in science communication as well, is whenever we try to talk about good news, it often feels like we're perhaps greenwashing or perhaps we're overlooking, you know, renewable energy is a great example. You know, solar energy and wind energy are less polluting, however now we have to go get those chemicals to make those panels in the ground and community. You know, so there's always there's other problems and we don't want to overlook those. But I totally agree with you that we need to be better as a, as a country in general about celebrating environmental wins, so people just don't get so down about it.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 30:17Yeah, cuz I mean, when I talk to people about toxic exposures, I usually get the same reaction, like, everything's toxic, I'm gonna die from something. So I might as well just stop thinking about this. And I don't think that's a great approach. So, I mean, that should go back to our communication efforts, like, what are we saying, what are we doing? And how can we make this better? So our message gets out there, and it's not as overwhelming as it is currently.Brian Bienkowski 30:43100% totally agree with you. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time. I'm just so I'm so happy to have met you and have you in this program. I'm just really excited about the work you're doing. So before I get you out of here, I have a few rapid fire questions where you can just answer with a one word or a phrase, if I have a whole day off, I am likely.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:05Oh my gosh, I'm probably hitting the craft store to find a new craft to doBrian Bienkowski 31:09What what type of crafting do you like do?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:12anything, like anything like it, maybe it's knitting, maybe it's stitching, maybe it's painting, whatever, like, whatever is new, I'm doing it.Brian Bienkowski 31:22So my wife and I, we live in the Upper Peninsula. And so we have very long winters. And I find myself this time of year. And I hesitate to even say this pining for winter, because it is such a great time to be quiet. And I play I'm playing music and my wife does be beadwork and stuff like that. Or we do some paintings together. And it's all crafty, and it's cozy and quiet. And then in the summer, I find that I really miss those. I really missed those times. So I need to find a way to do more crafty things, when it's nice outside. Yeah,Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:54I can relate to that. 100% I feel like it's a great therapy to do craftBrian Bienkowski 31:58100%. Well, I just had a guest on who was the guest, I'm forgetting now. But I had a guest on we were talking crafts not too long ago, I'll have to dig that out. Because I think it's for folks like yourself who are really busy doing this kind of work. It's good to have that other side of your creative brain get used every now and then. So the best gift I've ever received isMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:22I'm gonna see my family.Brian Bienkowski 32:24And if I could immediately gain one talent or ability it would beMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:31I know, to be able to get grants for research without being rejected.Brian Bienkowski 32:37Not flight or invisibility, just just grants! this one good for research. keeping it simple. I like that. And you do not have to. You can talk more than one word or a phrase here. What is the last book you read for fun?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:53Oh, this is a good one. So lately because I've been working on my dissertation. I feel like I've been reading a lot of science stuff. But I feel like the last book that I read it was, I feel it was last year. And it's a book by a Mexican Indigenous woman, well, Ilfrosina Cruz who is now a representative in the Mexican government. And it's a great book. I'm not gonna spoil it for everyone. But she talks about her life as an Indigenous girl and how she wanted something different. And she wanted to create opportunities. And she moved on to be a representative and changing the laws in Mexico. So it's a really inspiring book, and I highly recommend it, it is called "Los Sueños de la niña de la montaña," which translates to "The Dreams from the girl up the mountain. I don't know if it's available in English yet, but I know it's in Spanish and I really highly recommended.Brian Bienkowski 33:46Excellent. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for being part of this program, and we'll have you back soon.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 33:51Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was a great talk.Brian Bienkowski 33:59That's all for this week. folks. I hope you enjoyed my conversation with Maria. If you enjoyed this podcast, visit agentsofchangeinej.org. And while you're there, click the donate button to support us or sign up for our free monthly newsletter. You can also find us on X, Instagram and follow us on Spotify or iTunes and never miss an episode give us a rating. This agency chain podcast was recorded written produced and edited by me with outreaching scheduling and support from the rest of the team Dr. Ami Zota Dr. Yoshiro Cornelis Van Horn Dr. Veena singlet, Dr. Max on Dr. Laura Edwards, summer Ahmad and Maria Paula Rubiano. Our music is now sung by Paddington Bear. Thanks for joining us. We hope to keep these important conversations on diversity in science and health. Go. Have a great week folks.

Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss why she switched careers from physician to environmental health researcher, and how she’s using this new training to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico. Talayero Schettino, a current Agents of Change fellow and a DrPH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at The George Washington University, also talks about the challenges of immigrating to the U.S. and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Talayero Schettino and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice In MexicoTranscriptMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 00:00I don't I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries.Brian Bienkowski 00:11Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host Brian Bienkowski, editor of Agents of Change, and senior editor at Environmental Health News. Folks, we are so grateful for your support. We've been at this a few years now and we would love to continue to grow. Please share this podcast with your family and friends, colleagues, and subscribe to us on Spotify or iTunes and please leave us a review. Today's guest is Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino, a current fellow and a doctorate pH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the George Washington University. Maria talks about switching careers from a physician to an environmental health researcher, using her research to advocate for environmental justice in her native Mexico and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health. Enjoy. All right, I am now joined by Dr. Maria,Jose Talayero Schettino. Maria, how are you doing today?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:14I'm doing great. Thanks for having me here. Brian, how are you?Brian Bienkowski 01:18I am doing wonderful. And I'm really excited to hear about all the work that you're doing. But I want to start at the very beginning. Tell me about growing up in Mexico City.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:29Oh, yeah, I honestly have very good memories about growing up in Mexico City. But I'm not sure how familiar you are with Mexican culture or if you've ever traveled there, butBrian Bienkowski 01:41almost zeroMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:42Mexicans really highly, highly value things like hospitality, generosity, respect for elders, solidarity. And it might sound really funny, but we highly value social connections and gatherings. I mean, it's weird to say that we really value parties, but we do. And that's why our food and culture is so important. So I feel like growing up in Mexico City was just like that: full of culture, tradition, family gatherings. And I feel like I'm very lucky to be able to call myself Mexican.Brian Bienkowski 02:12Is there a certain food or or holiday or gathering? Are there certain ones that kind of stick out in your mind as being particularly poignant?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 02:22I mean, yes, I think so. Particularly, Independence Day. I have very good memories about going to watch the fireworks. Independence Days in September. Most people in America think it's Cinco de Mayo. But that's not it. It's in September. But other holidays that really stick up for me are the other mortos which is in November, and also Posadas, which are held during like, December. So Christmas is very important to us too.Brian Bienkowski 02:54And the only thing I really know about Mexico City, and pardon my American ignorance, is it's it's a massive city, right? I mean, were you in kind of a dense urban area?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:04I mean, yeah, it's a huge, huge city. And I feel like there's a lot of people living around Mexico City, I did feel like I lived with my family in one of like, more suburban area, not closer to like, the historical center or anything. But we travel a lot by car. I mean, we have a huge air pollution problem because of that. But I feel like yeah, it's a huge city, and everyone's all around it in. I mean, it's very, very well connected when it comes to streets, we have a lot of traffic, but that's how people go around Mexico City by staying in traffic for really long periods of time.Brian Bienkowski 03:48So how and when did you become interested in health and the environment?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:53I mean, this is a great question. And every time I get it, I wish I had that story, "like when I was younger, I used to tell my parents that I wanted to be a doctor since I was a little girl." Unfortunately, that was not me. I wanted to be a singer. I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to be a painter. So that was not me. So I think I ended up in like healthcare and the environment because I really loved science. And don't get me wrong, I really hated physics and math. So because they hated it, I feel like that drew me into chemistry and biology. And I I think I ended up in medical school because of that, because my love for science and honestly, I never knew I was gonna end up doing research and doing a lot of statistics. Even after I ran away from math.Brian Bienkowski 04:42The only class I ever got to see in growing up was chemistry that that that for some reason that subject gave me such fits. And I don't know if it was my teacher, or what but it really bothered me.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 04:54I mean, yeah, it's a really, really hard, hard subject! and I I feel you I feel like I just don't know, I don't know what it was. But chemistry and biology always caught my eye.Brian Bienkowski 05:05eye. And the weird thing is now I, you know, I've spent most of my career writing about chemicals in the environment. So it's, it's strange, I hope I'm not just writing a bunch of incorrect things.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:17I guess I guess you've made peace with it. And now you love it.Brian Bienkowski 05:21That's right. So before we get into your your career has been fascinating because you, you started off in healthcare as a physician, and I want to talk about your journey. But first, what is a moment or event that has helped shape your identity?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:35Wow, that's a really hard question. I think there are a couple of things that I want to mention that really shaped my identity as I was growing up. And I feel like the first one was really practicing medicine in public hospitals, that really showed me that life is not fair. And that made me want to work on that. And I think the other thing I want to mention that really shaped my identity is immigrating to the United States, even though I emigrated when I was, I think, 26 years old. Even though I'm like a short four-hour flight away from home, I think immigrating made me realize about all the things that I took for granted, and now I really highly value.Brian Bienkowski 06:16Luckily, we're going to talk about both of those things. Because I think that's, it's a really important part of your journey. And starting with this idea of you became a physician in practice in rural communities around Mexico City. So can you tell me about this work, what you learned from this time with patients and why ultimately, you decided to switch careers?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 06:34Of course. So I guess, practicing medicine in rural communities, and even public hospitals, or public health care centers in Mexico, it really does feel like an art. Because you need to learn how to treat disease differently. Sometimes the medicines that you learn on a book that were the best for a specific disease are not available. So you have to work around it. And the same comes for like diagnostic diagnostic tools, you don't have fancy equipment, or even sometimes you don't even have basic equipment to make a diagnosis. So you have to really focus on talking to the patient. And that's the only thing that you often have, and you have to learn how to practice medicine with that, which is the only thing that you have. And I think when it comes to the change that I made from like, a very clinical-practice-based career into like an research and an environmental one is that one of the things that frustrated me that most while I was practicing medicine is that there were and there are still a lot of things that we do not have answers for in patients. When they come to get a diagnosis, they sometimes ask you were themselves like why something happened. And most of the time, we really have to say that we don't know why. I think there's even a medical term for this, which is that something it's adiabatic, which means that we have absolutely no idea what costed and I really hated it. I hated not being able to have answers for my patients. And I mean, I still don't have all the answers. But I think as I moved forward into an environmental health career, I realized that this field of environmental health had a lot of those answers. And that through my medical education, I barely heard of those. So I think that's what made me shift.Brian Bienkowski 08:18So we're going to talk more about your your research and that switch. And, you know, maybe some ideas you have for the medical field to bridge some of these gaps. But I have to ask, did your did family and friends question your decision? I mean, being a physician is a is a career that I think most of us know. I mean, we all know that career. It's familiar to us. It's a pillar in most communities. And I think researcher is a little more esoteric to a lot of folks. So I'm wondering if your family was like, What are you doing?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 08:48Oh, my gosh, yeah, I every single person that went through medical school with me or even my family, or even friends, or even now that I meet people, when I tell them that I went through medical school and that I became a physician. Now I do environmental health, every single person has questioned that. And I feel like sometimes, when like for the Mexican perspective, a lot of people questioned this because they don't really know much about the field, and how important it is. But I don't know like having all these people question your life decision makes it like just harder to move forward and harder to realize if you're in the right path. And I think that was really hard when I first made the decision to switch. But now looking back, I don't think I would do anything differently.Brian Bienkowski 09:38And to keep on this theme of challenges. I want to reflect a bit on your move to the US. You mentioned how important Mexico City and family and gathering was to your, to your upbringing and identity. And I don't know that most folks understand the toll of immigrating even under positive circumstances like yourself. So can you talk about this experience and what people should know about the personal channel changes and sacrifices for immigrants?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:02Yeah, honestly, thanks for asking this questions. I think that sometimes the challenges for like immigrating in good, some good circumstances, like I did is invisible to others. But from my experience, I really want to say that immigrating in good circumstances to the US is extremely challenging. There are so many rules and steps that you need to take that often really don't even make sense and can really make your life harder. But I do have to say that I'm really fortunate to be here. And I'm really grateful to the US for the all the all the opportunities that I've had. But moving away from family is so hard. Like you move to a country where you don't have this support system, the culture is extremely different. And you need to talk and communicate using a different language. I don't know if you've watched Modern Family. I really like that show. But there's this episode.Brian Bienkowski 10:54Modern Family? Yeah, gosh, yes. I'm a yes. I'm rewatching it right now. Yes.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:59I love it. I love it. But there's this episode, where Sofia Vergara says, "do you know how smart I am in Spanish?" And it's so funny. But it's so relatable. Like, there's so many things that I want to say, but I just cannot find the words.Brian Bienkowski 11:13Well, thank you so much for sharing that. And I want to talk now about the work that you're doing as you've made the switch to research. So you're examining environmental exposures, and birth defects in Mexico. That's one of the things you're working on. So I wanted to talk about talk, you know, if you can explore this link between these exposures and birth defects, why it's concerning, and who is most impacted?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 11:34Of course, yeah. So through my dissertation, I'm on the final stages of my doctoral program, hopefully graduating this August. But through my dissertation, I've been studying birth defects and their relationship that they have with the polluting industry in the country, in Mexico. It has been challenging to do something like this with public databases that the Mexican government has, but I found really interesting things. For example, I've seen that the reporting for genital birth defects in Mexico in the last couple of years has been steadily increasing. I mean, this could be due to so many things –like people know now how to recognize them better or many other things. But when you compare that to other countries, this seems to be happening, too. And it's making us think about the impact endocrine disrupting chemicals are having in communities around industrial areas. I think it is very concerning to see the impact that pollution has in your health even before you were born. Like I don't think people realize that we used to think in a medical field that that placenta was like this major barrier where nothing could go through it. But we've realized that that's not the case. And I really think that we don't have strict enough regulations for most chemicals. But overall, like if you asked me like, What was the most concerning thing that you saw is the lack of data that Mexico has for both health effects and polluting chemicals. I'm always amazed that countries like the US, for example, like researchers in the US say that they are so far behind, but they don't really realize if they're far behind where developing countries are.Brian Bienkowski 13:11You mentioned a term their endocrine disrupting chemicals, which I think a lot of Environmental Health News readership is aware of. But for our listening audience, can you explain what those chemicals are? And kind of the plausible ways that they could possibly be behind some of these birth defects?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 13:26Of course, yeah, sorry, I forgot to explain that! But yeah, endocrine disrupting chemicals are generally what we say are chemicals that are capable of interfering with the way your hormones work. And your hormones are very important since the beginning of life, because hormones are also chemicals, but they mediate a lot of processes in your body. So if there's a chemical there's interrupting those pathways, then you can see problems with your development or the endocrine system diseases, for example, reproductive issues, or diabetes, or thyroid problems. So mostly, those are the things that we're concerned when we get exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are almost in everything. But one of the major things that we know, gets us exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, are plastics.Brian Bienkowski 14:21Soyou mentioned gaps in the research. And you noticed this pretty early on that there were some gaps in environmental health and environmental justice data in Mexico. And I know you're just one researcher, but can you talk about this dearth of research and how you're trying to tackle this?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 14:35So I feel like environmental justice has been overlooked for centuries in both the community scale and the global scale. I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries. For example, I remember a few years ago, there was this Super Bowl held in Arizona or one of the border, one of the border states, but I think it was Arizona. And they said that they weren't going to have have a zero-waste Super Bowl because all the plastic generated was going to be recycled. But that plastic was shipped to Mexico, to northern Mexico, where plastic recycling plans are polluting the water and air of Mexican communities. So is one of the of the issues that we see in the global health realm. Like, this is not something that only happens in Mexico, but it happens everywhere. But with things like in the country level, when I first started the process to find something I wanted to do for my dissertation, I remember talking to my chair, about wanting to do something on environmental justice. So I started doing research on what was out there. And unfortunately, I wasn't able to find much. And I think this is related to what I was talking about, that we don't have a lot of data. And there's also something going on in Mexico and you know, other Latin American countries like Colombia, where it's very dangerous to be in environmentalist in those countries. Mexico is one of the deadliest country to be an environmentalist. So advocating for these things can get really challenging.Brian Bienkowski 16:03So can you talk about your efforts, in particular to advance environmental health policy in Mexico, including on lead and criminal behavior? And can you talk a little bit about your involvement with Mundo Químico, boy, I'm probably butchering these words. I'm really smart English, I swear. And what have you learned? And have you had any victories along the way in your in your efforts to advance environmental health policy down there?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 16:28Yeah, so let me talk a little bit about what Mundo Químico is, which translates to chemical world because we live in a chemical world. So this Mundo Químico is like a collaborative of scientists and other professionals in Mexico that got together and are really trying to push programs and policies related to environmental health in the country. Honestly, I feel like I'm very lucky to be part of it. I am the youngest member. And I ended up being there because as I was finishing up my master's program, I always felt like I owed something to my country, and I needed to do something in Mexico. So I did some research and who was working on environmental health in the country. And I found this very big and famous scientist, his name is Dr. Carlos Santos Burdoa. He's US-based. He was at the George Washington University, when I first heard of that of him. So I email him. Honestly, I didn't expect a reply, because like, senior scientists are really busy. But I did get a reply. And I was really surprised. But he told me that he was building this collaborative called Mundo Químico, and he asked me if I wanted to join him. So of course, I said, Yes. So what we've been trying to do, as I was saying, is to push environmental health agenda into the policies and to do some programs to reduce environmental health exposures. And we started with lead exposure, because Mexico has a really big problem with lead. I think we've done different things that I don't think I have enough time to talk about during our podcast. But what I have learned, and I think I have learned a lot of things, but one of the most important ones, is that it is so hard to communicate to the public and with policymakers. And I really did not expect that when I started my career in environmental health. And I think that's how I ended up studying lead exposure and criminal behavior. Because often when you want policymakers to listen to what you have to say, you have to talk to them in their terms, and talk to them in topics that that you feel that they will prioritize. So we know crime is a big thing in Mexico. So what we did is where we viewed all the available evidence to see how lead exposure was related to criminal behavior, we found that there's a link. But we still need research on this. And we need research to understand what the relationship means in the Mexican context. But yeah, I feel like that's how it started because we need to learn to communicate with policymakers. And I really don't want to stop talking about this question without mentioning some of the wins that we had, because I feel like in environmental health, we will always hear a lot about our fatals and not our wins. So we have had some wins, we have been able to produce some programs on lead exposure. And one of them is we were able to partner with WONART, which is an Arts Fund that the government of Mexico has and through their through them, we've been able to push this program to train pottery workers to produce lathe, Clay ceramics, which are a major traditional thing in Mexico and they usually have led in it. But we're pushing this program to produce lead-free clay ceramics and to certify that they're lead free. And even though we still have a lot of work to do on that issue, the start of the program to me is just a great win.Brian Bienkowski 19:54You mentioned two things there that I have a follow up on and you started to get to it a little bit at the end is is you meantioned that lead exposure is a big issue in Mexico. And I'm wondering if you can just kind of give a brief overview of the ceramics and potentially other sources of lead in the environment there. And then second, if you can kind of walk us through why there's this possible link to crime, what does lead do to people that could make them more susceptible to committing crime?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 20:20Of course, yeah. So I'll start with at glaced clay ceramics. So in Mexico, we use traditional pottery for cooking, storing, or even serving food. And one of this traditional pottery is called glaced clay ceramics and the glaze that the ceramics have, it has lead in it. And because it's not produced in ovens, that can reach high enough temperatures, in like close ovens, because it's a very artisanal process, the lead stays there, and it leeches into food. And he usually leeches when you like cook, or store food that's very acidic. And Mexican cuisine is really acidic. So it leaves us a lot of lead. And we have a major problem of lead exposure. Because of that, that's actually the main source of lead exposure in the country, because most of the people in Mexico use it. Like if you go down there, you'll see it in restaurants, you'll see your honestly see it everywhere. And the latest numbers show that children from one to four ages in Mexico, 17% of all children from one to four years of age in Mexico have lead poisoning. So it's a really public health issue, we don't have data to see if older kids have lead, we don't have data on adults. But it's a really big concern, because lead is very toxic, like the WHO says that there is no safe level of exposure to lead because of how toxic it is. And he causes a variety of things. It can increase cardiovascular disease, it can damage the kidneys. But one of the ones, one of the things that we have studied the most is how it damages the nervous system and the brain. And this goes back to the question that you asked about criminal behavior. So we've seen that lead damages the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is in charge of, of behavior, and, yeah, to put it in, like, easier terms, yeah, it's in charge of behavior and how you react to things. So when it damages the neurons there, it can cause antisocial behavior, and it can cause aggressiveness, and it can cause violent behaviors. So that's how we've seen it has associated with criminal behavior. So in addition to that communication work directly with policymakers and residents, I know you're also active on social media. And I'm wondering how you've leveraged those platforms to try to get the word out on some of these environmental ills. Oh, my gosh, being on social media is so hard. I don't know if you've tried it. But seriously, it takes a lot of effort to create content on social media. But yeah, so I ended up in social media, because going back to this environmental justice issues, Spanish speaking countries, and communities really don't have as much information as English speakers do. And that's something I really noticed while I was scrolling down on every social media platform, so I saw hundreds of videos on how to reduce environmental exposures, but almost none, were in Spanish. So I decided to venture into social media. And honestly, I don't have that many followers, my platform is growing. But one of the things that I've noticed is that many health professionals are starting to follow me because they're interested. And they want to learn more, because some of their patients are asking about these topics. So I feel like it's a great way to do outreach and communication, things when you're in the environmental health field.Brian Bienkowski 24:06I have not tried it. Of course, I had I had social media accounts. It's been more than a decade. I think since I've had one, I don't even have LinkedIn anymore. I am really happy that people like you are on them, because I think it is a counterbalance to the reason that I got off, which is a lot of kind of miss information and hatred. But it is really heartening for me to see folks like yourself and scientists in general and health professionals are able to take their message directly to people as opposed to kind of being mediated through, you know, newspapers or whatever happened back in the day. So I think that's a good thing. And we have noticed though, as a newsroom, a lack of Spanish language environmental content and information and we are trying to trying to combat that with some eh en español coverage. So We have noticed the same thing as you. And there is a real language justice issue in the United States when it comes to environmental information. So I hope people will follow you. We will add a link in this podcast article so people can follow you if you want. Having spent some time now in the environmental health research field, and we were talking earlier about how you started as a physician, how do you think the medical field could better incorporate environmental health information for patients and prepare those physicians?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 25:28I mean, I honestly wish health care workers have better training in environmental health. From my experience, which is going through medical school in Mexico, I really can't speak for other countries. I barely heard about environmental exposures as causes of disease, when I was in medical school, maybe I heard about asbestos or silicosis or occupational exposures, but non an environmental exposures like a social determinants of health, which they are. So I'm currently working actually on a project with some peers on how there is a huge gap in medical and other other healthcare professions school curriculum when it comes to environmental health in Latin America. And it is a sad reality that we barely see courses on environmental health in these curriculums. But I can tell you that I like I can see myself advocating about this for a really long time. And I think we need to get to a point where every single doctor, every single dentist, every single nutritionist, every single nurse knows that this exists, and that we need to know about it and talk to our patients about it.Brian Bienkowski 26:41This is purely anecdotal. But I do feel like I'm seeing more on the climate side of things where physicians are being more active and perhaps more trained in climate change and extreme heat, but less so on –surprisingly– less so on things like chemical exposure, and the things that you've been talking about endocrine disrupting chemicals. So hopefully, hopefully, that changes because I think that would be a real public health win. So, Maria, this has been so much fun hearing about you and your work. And I have to ask you, before we get to some of the fun questions, I have a couple more questions. And one is do you plan on going back to Mexico? Would you want to work there? Or do you think you'll stay in the United States? What do you want to do with this environmental health research training?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:25Oh, my gosh, you're putting me on the spot.Brian Bienkowski 27:28I mean, you can have a no comment.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:30I know my family's gonna want me to give an answer that maybe it's not the one that they like. But I do feel that the work that I'm doing for Mexico in the United States, is far like, I feel like I have way more opportunities to do something for my country from the United States, than the ones that I see that are my country. And it's a really sad reality, because I would give the world to just go back to my family and my nephews. But if I really want to see a change, I really feel like I have to stay in the United States for at least a couple of years. To improve, like my research techniques to get a better sense of what's out there and what I can do for Mexico. I mean, in the future. I don't know how long from from now, I do see myself going back to Mexico at some point. But right now, I don't think it is an option. And it is a sad reality, not only for me, but for other immigrants that are doing science in the United States, because our countries lack opportunities.Brian Bienkowski 28:39And Maria, before we get to the fun stuff, what are you optimistic about?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 28:44Oh, that's a really important question! I feel like we don't hear about optimism sometimes in the environmental field, like there are so it's filled with bad news sometimes. But I feel like I'm optimistic about hearing more people are learning about environmental exposure. So how they can affect their health, because honestly, sometimes social movements can move policies faster. So we really need that. I'm optimistic about how younger generations are thinking more about the environment now. And they're joining this fight. There are so many things I'm optimistic about. And I'm glad you brought this up. Because again, I don't think that this field is full of good news. So we need to, to have these victories and these things that we're optimistic about really present in our day to day because he can get overwhelming at times.Brian Bienkowski 29:37I think the hard thing in my profession and maybe this is true in science in science communication as well, is whenever we try to talk about good news, it often feels like we're perhaps greenwashing or perhaps we're overlooking, you know, renewable energy is a great example. You know, solar energy and wind energy are less polluting, however now we have to go get those chemicals to make those panels in the ground and community. You know, so there's always there's other problems and we don't want to overlook those. But I totally agree with you that we need to be better as a, as a country in general about celebrating environmental wins, so people just don't get so down about it.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 30:17Yeah, cuz I mean, when I talk to people about toxic exposures, I usually get the same reaction, like, everything's toxic, I'm gonna die from something. So I might as well just stop thinking about this. And I don't think that's a great approach. So, I mean, that should go back to our communication efforts, like, what are we saying, what are we doing? And how can we make this better? So our message gets out there, and it's not as overwhelming as it is currently.Brian Bienkowski 30:43100% totally agree with you. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time. I'm just so I'm so happy to have met you and have you in this program. I'm just really excited about the work you're doing. So before I get you out of here, I have a few rapid fire questions where you can just answer with a one word or a phrase, if I have a whole day off, I am likely.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:05Oh my gosh, I'm probably hitting the craft store to find a new craft to doBrian Bienkowski 31:09What what type of crafting do you like do?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:12anything, like anything like it, maybe it's knitting, maybe it's stitching, maybe it's painting, whatever, like, whatever is new, I'm doing it.Brian Bienkowski 31:22So my wife and I, we live in the Upper Peninsula. And so we have very long winters. And I find myself this time of year. And I hesitate to even say this pining for winter, because it is such a great time to be quiet. And I play I'm playing music and my wife does be beadwork and stuff like that. Or we do some paintings together. And it's all crafty, and it's cozy and quiet. And then in the summer, I find that I really miss those. I really missed those times. So I need to find a way to do more crafty things, when it's nice outside. Yeah,Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:54I can relate to that. 100% I feel like it's a great therapy to do craftBrian Bienkowski 31:58100%. Well, I just had a guest on who was the guest, I'm forgetting now. But I had a guest on we were talking crafts not too long ago, I'll have to dig that out. Because I think it's for folks like yourself who are really busy doing this kind of work. It's good to have that other side of your creative brain get used every now and then. So the best gift I've ever received isMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:22I'm gonna see my family.Brian Bienkowski 32:24And if I could immediately gain one talent or ability it would beMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:31I know, to be able to get grants for research without being rejected.Brian Bienkowski 32:37Not flight or invisibility, just just grants! this one good for research. keeping it simple. I like that. And you do not have to. You can talk more than one word or a phrase here. What is the last book you read for fun?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:53Oh, this is a good one. So lately because I've been working on my dissertation. I feel like I've been reading a lot of science stuff. But I feel like the last book that I read it was, I feel it was last year. And it's a book by a Mexican Indigenous woman, well, Ilfrosina Cruz who is now a representative in the Mexican government. And it's a great book. I'm not gonna spoil it for everyone. But she talks about her life as an Indigenous girl and how she wanted something different. And she wanted to create opportunities. And she moved on to be a representative and changing the laws in Mexico. So it's a really inspiring book, and I highly recommend it, it is called "Los Sueños de la niña de la montaña," which translates to "The Dreams from the girl up the mountain. I don't know if it's available in English yet, but I know it's in Spanish and I really highly recommended.Brian Bienkowski 33:46Excellent. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for being part of this program, and we'll have you back soon.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 33:51Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was a great talk.Brian Bienkowski 33:59That's all for this week. folks. I hope you enjoyed my conversation with Maria. If you enjoyed this podcast, visit agentsofchangeinej.org. And while you're there, click the donate button to support us or sign up for our free monthly newsletter. You can also find us on X, Instagram and follow us on Spotify or iTunes and never miss an episode give us a rating. This agency chain podcast was recorded written produced and edited by me with outreaching scheduling and support from the rest of the team Dr. Ami Zota Dr. Yoshiro Cornelis Van Horn Dr. Veena singlet, Dr. Max on Dr. Laura Edwards, summer Ahmad and Maria Paula Rubiano. Our music is now sung by Paddington Bear. Thanks for joining us. We hope to keep these important conversations on diversity in science and health. Go. Have a great week folks.



Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss why she switched careers from physician to environmental health researcher, and how she’s using this new training to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico.


Talayero Schettino, a current Agents of Change fellow and a DrPH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at The George Washington University, also talks about the challenges of immigrating to the U.S. and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health.

The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion with Talayero Schettino and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice In Mexico

Transcript


Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 00:00

I don't I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries.

Brian Bienkowski 00:11

Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host Brian Bienkowski, editor of Agents of Change, and senior editor at Environmental Health News. Folks, we are so grateful for your support. We've been at this a few years now and we would love to continue to grow. Please share this podcast with your family and friends, colleagues, and subscribe to us on Spotify or iTunes and please leave us a review. Today's guest is Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino, a current fellow and a doctorate pH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the George Washington University. Maria talks about switching careers from a physician to an environmental health researcher, using her research to advocate for environmental justice in her native Mexico and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health. Enjoy. All right, I am now joined by Dr. Maria,Jose Talayero Schettino. Maria, how are you doing today?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:14

I'm doing great. Thanks for having me here. Brian, how are you?

Brian Bienkowski 01:18

I am doing wonderful. And I'm really excited to hear about all the work that you're doing. But I want to start at the very beginning. Tell me about growing up in Mexico City.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:29

Oh, yeah, I honestly have very good memories about growing up in Mexico City. But I'm not sure how familiar you are with Mexican culture or if you've ever traveled there, but

Brian Bienkowski 01:41

almost zero

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:42

Mexicans really highly, highly value things like hospitality, generosity, respect for elders, solidarity. And it might sound really funny, but we highly value social connections and gatherings. I mean, it's weird to say that we really value parties, but we do. And that's why our food and culture is so important. So I feel like growing up in Mexico City was just like that: full of culture, tradition, family gatherings. And I feel like I'm very lucky to be able to call myself Mexican.

Brian Bienkowski 02:12

Is there a certain food or or holiday or gathering? Are there certain ones that kind of stick out in your mind as being particularly poignant?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 02:22

I mean, yes, I think so. Particularly, Independence Day. I have very good memories about going to watch the fireworks. Independence Days in September. Most people in America think it's Cinco de Mayo. But that's not it. It's in September. But other holidays that really stick up for me are the other mortos which is in November, and also Posadas, which are held during like, December. So Christmas is very important to us too.

Brian Bienkowski 02:54

And the only thing I really know about Mexico City, and pardon my American ignorance, is it's it's a massive city, right? I mean, were you in kind of a dense urban area?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:04

I mean, yeah, it's a huge, huge city. And I feel like there's a lot of people living around Mexico City, I did feel like I lived with my family in one of like, more suburban area, not closer to like, the historical center or anything. But we travel a lot by car. I mean, we have a huge air pollution problem because of that. But I feel like yeah, it's a huge city, and everyone's all around it in. I mean, it's very, very well connected when it comes to streets, we have a lot of traffic, but that's how people go around Mexico City by staying in traffic for really long periods of time.

Brian Bienkowski 03:48

So how and when did you become interested in health and the environment?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:53

I mean, this is a great question. And every time I get it, I wish I had that story, "like when I was younger, I used to tell my parents that I wanted to be a doctor since I was a little girl." Unfortunately, that was not me. I wanted to be a singer. I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to be a painter. So that was not me. So I think I ended up in like healthcare and the environment because I really loved science. And don't get me wrong, I really hated physics and math. So because they hated it, I feel like that drew me into chemistry and biology. And I I think I ended up in medical school because of that, because my love for science and honestly, I never knew I was gonna end up doing research and doing a lot of statistics. Even after I ran away from math.

Brian Bienkowski 04:42

The only class I ever got to see in growing up was chemistry that that that for some reason that subject gave me such fits. And I don't know if it was my teacher, or what but it really bothered me.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 04:54

I mean, yeah, it's a really, really hard, hard subject! and I I feel you I feel like I just don't know, I don't know what it was. But chemistry and biology always caught my eye.

Brian Bienkowski 05:05

eye. And the weird thing is now I, you know, I've spent most of my career writing about chemicals in the environment. So it's, it's strange, I hope I'm not just writing a bunch of incorrect things.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:17

I guess I guess you've made peace with it. And now you love it.

Brian Bienkowski 05:21

That's right. So before we get into your your career has been fascinating because you, you started off in healthcare as a physician, and I want to talk about your journey. But first, what is a moment or event that has helped shape your identity?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:35

Wow, that's a really hard question. I think there are a couple of things that I want to mention that really shaped my identity as I was growing up. And I feel like the first one was really practicing medicine in public hospitals, that really showed me that life is not fair. And that made me want to work on that. And I think the other thing I want to mention that really shaped my identity is immigrating to the United States, even though I emigrated when I was, I think, 26 years old. Even though I'm like a short four-hour flight away from home, I think immigrating made me realize about all the things that I took for granted, and now I really highly value.

Brian Bienkowski 06:16

Luckily, we're going to talk about both of those things. Because I think that's, it's a really important part of your journey. And starting with this idea of you became a physician in practice in rural communities around Mexico City. So can you tell me about this work, what you learned from this time with patients and why ultimately, you decided to switch careers?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 06:34

Of course. So I guess, practicing medicine in rural communities, and even public hospitals, or public health care centers in Mexico, it really does feel like an art. Because you need to learn how to treat disease differently. Sometimes the medicines that you learn on a book that were the best for a specific disease are not available. So you have to work around it. And the same comes for like diagnostic diagnostic tools, you don't have fancy equipment, or even sometimes you don't even have basic equipment to make a diagnosis. So you have to really focus on talking to the patient. And that's the only thing that you often have, and you have to learn how to practice medicine with that, which is the only thing that you have. And I think when it comes to the change that I made from like, a very clinical-practice-based career into like an research and an environmental one is that one of the things that frustrated me that most while I was practicing medicine is that there were and there are still a lot of things that we do not have answers for in patients. When they come to get a diagnosis, they sometimes ask you were themselves like why something happened. And most of the time, we really have to say that we don't know why. I think there's even a medical term for this, which is that something it's adiabatic, which means that we have absolutely no idea what costed and I really hated it. I hated not being able to have answers for my patients. And I mean, I still don't have all the answers. But I think as I moved forward into an environmental health career, I realized that this field of environmental health had a lot of those answers. And that through my medical education, I barely heard of those. So I think that's what made me shift.

Brian Bienkowski 08:18

So we're going to talk more about your your research and that switch. And, you know, maybe some ideas you have for the medical field to bridge some of these gaps. But I have to ask, did your did family and friends question your decision? I mean, being a physician is a is a career that I think most of us know. I mean, we all know that career. It's familiar to us. It's a pillar in most communities. And I think researcher is a little more esoteric to a lot of folks. So I'm wondering if your family was like, What are you doing?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 08:48

Oh, my gosh, yeah, I every single person that went through medical school with me or even my family, or even friends, or even now that I meet people, when I tell them that I went through medical school and that I became a physician. Now I do environmental health, every single person has questioned that. And I feel like sometimes, when like for the Mexican perspective, a lot of people questioned this because they don't really know much about the field, and how important it is. But I don't know like having all these people question your life decision makes it like just harder to move forward and harder to realize if you're in the right path. And I think that was really hard when I first made the decision to switch. But now looking back, I don't think I would do anything differently.

Brian Bienkowski 09:38

And to keep on this theme of challenges. I want to reflect a bit on your move to the US. You mentioned how important Mexico City and family and gathering was to your, to your upbringing and identity. And I don't know that most folks understand the toll of immigrating even under positive circumstances like yourself. So can you talk about this experience and what people should know about the personal channel changes and sacrifices for immigrants?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:02

Yeah, honestly, thanks for asking this questions. I think that sometimes the challenges for like immigrating in good, some good circumstances, like I did is invisible to others. But from my experience, I really want to say that immigrating in good circumstances to the US is extremely challenging. There are so many rules and steps that you need to take that often really don't even make sense and can really make your life harder. But I do have to say that I'm really fortunate to be here. And I'm really grateful to the US for the all the all the opportunities that I've had. But moving away from family is so hard. Like you move to a country where you don't have this support system, the culture is extremely different. And you need to talk and communicate using a different language. I don't know if you've watched Modern Family. I really like that show. But there's this episode.

Brian Bienkowski 10:54

Modern Family? Yeah, gosh, yes. I'm a yes. I'm rewatching it right now. Yes.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:59

I love it. I love it. But there's this episode, where Sofia Vergara says, "do you know how smart I am in Spanish?" And it's so funny. But it's so relatable. Like, there's so many things that I want to say, but I just cannot find the words.

Brian Bienkowski 11:13

Well, thank you so much for sharing that. And I want to talk now about the work that you're doing as you've made the switch to research. So you're examining environmental exposures, and birth defects in Mexico. That's one of the things you're working on. So I wanted to talk about talk, you know, if you can explore this link between these exposures and birth defects, why it's concerning, and who is most impacted?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 11:34

Of course, yeah. So through my dissertation, I'm on the final stages of my doctoral program, hopefully graduating this August. But through my dissertation, I've been studying birth defects and their relationship that they have with the polluting industry in the country, in Mexico. It has been challenging to do something like this with public databases that the Mexican government has, but I found really interesting things. For example, I've seen that the reporting for genital birth defects in Mexico in the last couple of years has been steadily increasing. I mean, this could be due to so many things –like people know now how to recognize them better or many other things. But when you compare that to other countries, this seems to be happening, too. And it's making us think about the impact endocrine disrupting chemicals are having in communities around industrial areas. I think it is very concerning to see the impact that pollution has in your health even before you were born. Like I don't think people realize that we used to think in a medical field that that placenta was like this major barrier where nothing could go through it. But we've realized that that's not the case. And I really think that we don't have strict enough regulations for most chemicals. But overall, like if you asked me like, What was the most concerning thing that you saw is the lack of data that Mexico has for both health effects and polluting chemicals. I'm always amazed that countries like the US, for example, like researchers in the US say that they are so far behind, but they don't really realize if they're far behind where developing countries are.

Brian Bienkowski 13:11

You mentioned a term their endocrine disrupting chemicals, which I think a lot of Environmental Health News readership is aware of. But for our listening audience, can you explain what those chemicals are? And kind of the plausible ways that they could possibly be behind some of these birth defects?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 13:26

Of course, yeah, sorry, I forgot to explain that! But yeah, endocrine disrupting chemicals are generally what we say are chemicals that are capable of interfering with the way your hormones work. And your hormones are very important since the beginning of life, because hormones are also chemicals, but they mediate a lot of processes in your body. So if there's a chemical there's interrupting those pathways, then you can see problems with your development or the endocrine system diseases, for example, reproductive issues, or diabetes, or thyroid problems. So mostly, those are the things that we're concerned when we get exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are almost in everything. But one of the major things that we know, gets us exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, are plastics.

Brian Bienkowski 14:21

Soyou mentioned gaps in the research. And you noticed this pretty early on that there were some gaps in environmental health and environmental justice data in Mexico. And I know you're just one researcher, but can you talk about this dearth of research and how you're trying to tackle this?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 14:35

So I feel like environmental justice has been overlooked for centuries in both the community scale and the global scale. I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries. For example, I remember a few years ago, there was this Super Bowl held in Arizona or one of the border, one of the border states, but I think it was Arizona. And they said that they weren't going to have have a zero-waste Super Bowl because all the plastic generated was going to be recycled. But that plastic was shipped to Mexico, to northern Mexico, where plastic recycling plans are polluting the water and air of Mexican communities. So is one of the of the issues that we see in the global health realm. Like, this is not something that only happens in Mexico, but it happens everywhere. But with things like in the country level, when I first started the process to find something I wanted to do for my dissertation, I remember talking to my chair, about wanting to do something on environmental justice. So I started doing research on what was out there. And unfortunately, I wasn't able to find much. And I think this is related to what I was talking about, that we don't have a lot of data. And there's also something going on in Mexico and you know, other Latin American countries like Colombia, where it's very dangerous to be in environmentalist in those countries. Mexico is one of the deadliest country to be an environmentalist. So advocating for these things can get really challenging.

Brian Bienkowski 16:03

So can you talk about your efforts, in particular to advance environmental health policy in Mexico, including on lead and criminal behavior? And can you talk a little bit about your involvement with Mundo Químico, boy, I'm probably butchering these words. I'm really smart English, I swear. And what have you learned? And have you had any victories along the way in your in your efforts to advance environmental health policy down there?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 16:28

Yeah, so let me talk a little bit about what Mundo Químico is, which translates to chemical world because we live in a chemical world. So this Mundo Químico is like a collaborative of scientists and other professionals in Mexico that got together and are really trying to push programs and policies related to environmental health in the country. Honestly, I feel like I'm very lucky to be part of it. I am the youngest member. And I ended up being there because as I was finishing up my master's program, I always felt like I owed something to my country, and I needed to do something in Mexico. So I did some research and who was working on environmental health in the country. And I found this very big and famous scientist, his name is Dr. Carlos Santos Burdoa. He's US-based. He was at the George Washington University, when I first heard of that of him. So I email him. Honestly, I didn't expect a reply, because like, senior scientists are really busy. But I did get a reply. And I was really surprised. But he told me that he was building this collaborative called Mundo Químico, and he asked me if I wanted to join him. So of course, I said, Yes. So what we've been trying to do, as I was saying, is to push environmental health agenda into the policies and to do some programs to reduce environmental health exposures. And we started with lead exposure, because Mexico has a really big problem with lead. I think we've done different things that I don't think I have enough time to talk about during our podcast. But what I have learned, and I think I have learned a lot of things, but one of the most important ones, is that it is so hard to communicate to the public and with policymakers. And I really did not expect that when I started my career in environmental health. And I think that's how I ended up studying lead exposure and criminal behavior. Because often when you want policymakers to listen to what you have to say, you have to talk to them in their terms, and talk to them in topics that that you feel that they will prioritize. So we know crime is a big thing in Mexico. So what we did is where we viewed all the available evidence to see how lead exposure was related to criminal behavior, we found that there's a link. But we still need research on this. And we need research to understand what the relationship means in the Mexican context. But yeah, I feel like that's how it started because we need to learn to communicate with policymakers. And I really don't want to stop talking about this question without mentioning some of the wins that we had, because I feel like in environmental health, we will always hear a lot about our fatals and not our wins. So we have had some wins, we have been able to produce some programs on lead exposure. And one of them is we were able to partner with WONART, which is an Arts Fund that the government of Mexico has and through their through them, we've been able to push this program to train pottery workers to produce lathe, Clay ceramics, which are a major traditional thing in Mexico and they usually have led in it. But we're pushing this program to produce lead-free clay ceramics and to certify that they're lead free. And even though we still have a lot of work to do on that issue, the start of the program to me is just a great win.

Brian Bienkowski 19:54

You mentioned two things there that I have a follow up on and you started to get to it a little bit at the end is is you meantioned that lead exposure is a big issue in Mexico. And I'm wondering if you can just kind of give a brief overview of the ceramics and potentially other sources of lead in the environment there. And then second, if you can kind of walk us through why there's this possible link to crime, what does lead do to people that could make them more susceptible to committing crime?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 20:20

Of course, yeah. So I'll start with at glaced clay ceramics. So in Mexico, we use traditional pottery for cooking, storing, or even serving food. And one of this traditional pottery is called glaced clay ceramics and the glaze that the ceramics have, it has lead in it. And because it's not produced in ovens, that can reach high enough temperatures, in like close ovens, because it's a very artisanal process, the lead stays there, and it leeches into food. And he usually leeches when you like cook, or store food that's very acidic. And Mexican cuisine is really acidic. So it leaves us a lot of lead. And we have a major problem of lead exposure. Because of that, that's actually the main source of lead exposure in the country, because most of the people in Mexico use it. Like if you go down there, you'll see it in restaurants, you'll see your honestly see it everywhere. And the latest numbers show that children from one to four ages in Mexico, 17% of all children from one to four years of age in Mexico have lead poisoning. So it's a really public health issue, we don't have data to see if older kids have lead, we don't have data on adults. But it's a really big concern, because lead is very toxic, like the WHO says that there is no safe level of exposure to lead because of how toxic it is. And he causes a variety of things. It can increase cardiovascular disease, it can damage the kidneys. But one of the ones, one of the things that we have studied the most is how it damages the nervous system and the brain. And this goes back to the question that you asked about criminal behavior. So we've seen that lead damages the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is in charge of, of behavior, and, yeah, to put it in, like, easier terms, yeah, it's in charge of behavior and how you react to things. So when it damages the neurons there, it can cause antisocial behavior, and it can cause aggressiveness, and it can cause violent behaviors. So that's how we've seen it has associated with criminal behavior. So in addition to that communication work directly with policymakers and residents, I know you're also active on social media. And I'm wondering how you've leveraged those platforms to try to get the word out on some of these environmental ills. Oh, my gosh, being on social media is so hard. I don't know if you've tried it. But seriously, it takes a lot of effort to create content on social media. But yeah, so I ended up in social media, because going back to this environmental justice issues, Spanish speaking countries, and communities really don't have as much information as English speakers do. And that's something I really noticed while I was scrolling down on every social media platform, so I saw hundreds of videos on how to reduce environmental exposures, but almost none, were in Spanish. So I decided to venture into social media. And honestly, I don't have that many followers, my platform is growing. But one of the things that I've noticed is that many health professionals are starting to follow me because they're interested. And they want to learn more, because some of their patients are asking about these topics. So I feel like it's a great way to do outreach and communication, things when you're in the environmental health field.

Brian Bienkowski 24:06

I have not tried it. Of course, I had I had social media accounts. It's been more than a decade. I think since I've had one, I don't even have LinkedIn anymore. I am really happy that people like you are on them, because I think it is a counterbalance to the reason that I got off, which is a lot of kind of miss information and hatred. But it is really heartening for me to see folks like yourself and scientists in general and health professionals are able to take their message directly to people as opposed to kind of being mediated through, you know, newspapers or whatever happened back in the day. So I think that's a good thing. And we have noticed though, as a newsroom, a lack of Spanish language environmental content and information and we are trying to trying to combat that with some eh en español coverage. So We have noticed the same thing as you. And there is a real language justice issue in the United States when it comes to environmental information. So I hope people will follow you. We will add a link in this podcast article so people can follow you if you want. Having spent some time now in the environmental health research field, and we were talking earlier about how you started as a physician, how do you think the medical field could better incorporate environmental health information for patients and prepare those physicians?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 25:28

I mean, I honestly wish health care workers have better training in environmental health. From my experience, which is going through medical school in Mexico, I really can't speak for other countries. I barely heard about environmental exposures as causes of disease, when I was in medical school, maybe I heard about asbestos or silicosis or occupational exposures, but non an environmental exposures like a social determinants of health, which they are. So I'm currently working actually on a project with some peers on how there is a huge gap in medical and other other healthcare professions school curriculum when it comes to environmental health in Latin America. And it is a sad reality that we barely see courses on environmental health in these curriculums. But I can tell you that I like I can see myself advocating about this for a really long time. And I think we need to get to a point where every single doctor, every single dentist, every single nutritionist, every single nurse knows that this exists, and that we need to know about it and talk to our patients about it.

Brian Bienkowski 26:41

This is purely anecdotal. But I do feel like I'm seeing more on the climate side of things where physicians are being more active and perhaps more trained in climate change and extreme heat, but less so on –surprisingly– less so on things like chemical exposure, and the things that you've been talking about endocrine disrupting chemicals. So hopefully, hopefully, that changes because I think that would be a real public health win. So, Maria, this has been so much fun hearing about you and your work. And I have to ask you, before we get to some of the fun questions, I have a couple more questions. And one is do you plan on going back to Mexico? Would you want to work there? Or do you think you'll stay in the United States? What do you want to do with this environmental health research training?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:25

Oh, my gosh, you're putting me on the spot.

Brian Bienkowski 27:28

I mean, you can have a no comment.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:30

I know my family's gonna want me to give an answer that maybe it's not the one that they like. But I do feel that the work that I'm doing for Mexico in the United States, is far like, I feel like I have way more opportunities to do something for my country from the United States, than the ones that I see that are my country. And it's a really sad reality, because I would give the world to just go back to my family and my nephews. But if I really want to see a change, I really feel like I have to stay in the United States for at least a couple of years. To improve, like my research techniques to get a better sense of what's out there and what I can do for Mexico. I mean, in the future. I don't know how long from from now, I do see myself going back to Mexico at some point. But right now, I don't think it is an option. And it is a sad reality, not only for me, but for other immigrants that are doing science in the United States, because our countries lack opportunities.

Brian Bienkowski 28:39

And Maria, before we get to the fun stuff, what are you optimistic about?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 28:44

Oh, that's a really important question! I feel like we don't hear about optimism sometimes in the environmental field, like there are so it's filled with bad news sometimes. But I feel like I'm optimistic about hearing more people are learning about environmental exposure. So how they can affect their health, because honestly, sometimes social movements can move policies faster. So we really need that. I'm optimistic about how younger generations are thinking more about the environment now. And they're joining this fight. There are so many things I'm optimistic about. And I'm glad you brought this up. Because again, I don't think that this field is full of good news. So we need to, to have these victories and these things that we're optimistic about really present in our day to day because he can get overwhelming at times.

Brian Bienkowski 29:37

I think the hard thing in my profession and maybe this is true in science in science communication as well, is whenever we try to talk about good news, it often feels like we're perhaps greenwashing or perhaps we're overlooking, you know, renewable energy is a great example. You know, solar energy and wind energy are less polluting, however now we have to go get those chemicals to make those panels in the ground and community. You know, so there's always there's other problems and we don't want to overlook those. But I totally agree with you that we need to be better as a, as a country in general about celebrating environmental wins, so people just don't get so down about it.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 30:17

Yeah, cuz I mean, when I talk to people about toxic exposures, I usually get the same reaction, like, everything's toxic, I'm gonna die from something. So I might as well just stop thinking about this. And I don't think that's a great approach. So, I mean, that should go back to our communication efforts, like, what are we saying, what are we doing? And how can we make this better? So our message gets out there, and it's not as overwhelming as it is currently.

Brian Bienkowski 30:43

100% totally agree with you. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time. I'm just so I'm so happy to have met you and have you in this program. I'm just really excited about the work you're doing. So before I get you out of here, I have a few rapid fire questions where you can just answer with a one word or a phrase, if I have a whole day off, I am likely.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:05

Oh my gosh, I'm probably hitting the craft store to find a new craft to do

Brian Bienkowski 31:09

What what type of crafting do you like do?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:12

anything, like anything like it, maybe it's knitting, maybe it's stitching, maybe it's painting, whatever, like, whatever is new, I'm doing it.

Brian Bienkowski 31:22

So my wife and I, we live in the Upper Peninsula. And so we have very long winters. And I find myself this time of year. And I hesitate to even say this pining for winter, because it is such a great time to be quiet. And I play I'm playing music and my wife does be beadwork and stuff like that. Or we do some paintings together. And it's all crafty, and it's cozy and quiet. And then in the summer, I find that I really miss those. I really missed those times. So I need to find a way to do more crafty things, when it's nice outside. Yeah,

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:54

I can relate to that. 100% I feel like it's a great therapy to do craft

Brian Bienkowski 31:58

100%. Well, I just had a guest on who was the guest, I'm forgetting now. But I had a guest on we were talking crafts not too long ago, I'll have to dig that out. Because I think it's for folks like yourself who are really busy doing this kind of work. It's good to have that other side of your creative brain get used every now and then. So the best gift I've ever received is

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:22

I'm gonna see my family.

Brian Bienkowski 32:24

And if I could immediately gain one talent or ability it would be

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:31

I know, to be able to get grants for research without being rejected.

Brian Bienkowski 32:37

Not flight or invisibility, just just grants! this one good for research. keeping it simple. I like that. And you do not have to. You can talk more than one word or a phrase here. What is the last book you read for fun?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:53

Oh, this is a good one. So lately because I've been working on my dissertation. I feel like I've been reading a lot of science stuff. But I feel like the last book that I read it was, I feel it was last year. And it's a book by a Mexican Indigenous woman, well, Ilfrosina Cruz who is now a representative in the Mexican government. And it's a great book. I'm not gonna spoil it for everyone. But she talks about her life as an Indigenous girl and how she wanted something different. And she wanted to create opportunities. And she moved on to be a representative and changing the laws in Mexico. So it's a really inspiring book, and I highly recommend it, it is called "Los Sueños de la niña de la montaña," which translates to "The Dreams from the girl up the mountain. I don't know if it's available in English yet, but I know it's in Spanish and I really highly recommended.

Brian Bienkowski 33:46

Excellent. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for being part of this program, and we'll have you back soon.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 33:51

Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was a great talk.

Brian Bienkowski 33:59

That's all for this week. folks. I hope you enjoyed my conversation with Maria. If you enjoyed this podcast, visit agentsofchangeinej.org. And while you're there, click the donate button to support us or sign up for our free monthly newsletter. You can also find us on X, Instagram and follow us on Spotify or iTunes and never miss an episode give us a rating. This agency chain podcast was recorded written produced and edited by me with outreaching scheduling and support from the rest of the team Dr. Ami Zota Dr. Yoshiro Cornelis Van Horn Dr. Veena singlet, Dr. Max on Dr. Laura Edwards, summer Ahmad and Maria Paula Rubiano. Our music is now sung by Paddington Bear. Thanks for joining us. We hope to keep these important conversations on diversity in science and health. Go. Have a great week folks.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

The Trump Team Wants to Boost Birth Rates While Poisoning Children

“I want a baby boom,” Trump has said. His administration is indeed exploring a range of approaches to boost the birth rate, including baby bonuses and classes on natural fertility. Yet his focus is entirely on the production of babies. When it comes to keeping these babies alive, this administration is leaving parents on their own, facing some horrifying and unprecedented challenges. It’s common for right-wing American governments, whether at the state or federal level, to be only half-heartedly natalist: restricting abortion, birth control, and sex education, while also failing to embrace any policy that makes it easier to raise a family, like universal childcare, robust public education, school lunch, cash supports for parents, or paid family leave. But the Trump-Vance government has taken this paradox to a new level, with natalist rhetoric far surpassing that of other recent administrations, while real live children are treated with more depraved, life-threatening indifference than in any American government in at least a century. Due to brutal cuts at the Food and Drug Administration, where 20,000 employees have been fired, the administration has suspended one of its quality-control programs for milk, Reuters reported this week. Milk is iconically associated with child health, and this is not a mere storybook whimsy: Most pediatricians regard it as critical for young children’s developing brains and bones. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends two cups a day for babies between 1 and 2 years old. While some experts—and of course the administration—are downplaying the change, emphasizing that milk will still be regulated, a bird flu epidemic hardly seems like the right time to be cutting corners. A government so focused on making more babies shouldn’t be so indifferent to risks to our nation’s toddlers.This reckless approach to child safety is not limited to food. Also this week, The New York Times reported that the Environmental Protection Agency was canceling tens of millions of dollars in grants for research on environmental hazards to children in rural America. These hazards include pesticides, wildfire smoke, and forever chemicals, and the grants supported research toward solutions to such problems. Many focused on improving child health in red states like Oklahoma. Children are much more vulnerable than adults to the health problems that can stem from exposure to toxins. That makes Trump’s policies, for all his baby-friendly chatter, seem pathologically misopedic; he is reversing bans on so-called “forever chemicals” and repealing limits set by the Biden administration on lead exposure, all of which will have devastating effects on children’s mental and physical development.And of course there’s RFK Jr.’s crazy campaign against vaccines. This week, the health secretary said he was considering removing the Covid-19 vaccine from the list of vaccines the government recommends for children, even though to win Senate confirmation, he had agreed not to alter the childhood vaccine schedule. Even worse, RFK Jr. has used his office to promote disinformation about extensively debunked links between vaccines and autism, while praising unproven “treatments” for measles as an outbreak that has afflicted more than 600 people and killed at least three continues to spread. Trump’s public health cuts are meanwhile imperiling a program that gives free vaccines to children. So far, I haven’t even mentioned children outside the United States. Trump has not only continued Biden’s policy of mass infanticide in Gaza—at least 100 children there have been killed or injured every week by Israeli forces since the dissolution of the ceasefire in March—he has vastly surpassed that shameful record by dismantling USAID. (The Supreme Court demanded that the government restore some of the funding to the already-contracted programs, but it’s unclear what the results of that ruling will be.) Children across the globe will starve to death due to this policy. The cuts to nutrition funding alone, researchers estimate, will kill some 369,000 children who could otherwise have lived. That’s not even counting all the other children’s lives imperiled by USAID funding cuts to vaccines, health services, and maternal care, or the children who will go unprotected now that Trump has cut 69 programs dedicated to tracking child labor, forced labor, and human trafficking.Natalist or exterminationist? Pro-child or rabidly infanticidal? It’s tempting to dismiss such extreme contradictions within the Trump administration as merely chaotic and incoherent. But the situation is worse than that. Trying to boost births while actively making the world less safe for children is creepy—but not in a new way. The contradiction is baked into the eugenicist tradition that Vance and Trump openly embrace. Vance said at an anti-abortion rally in January that he wanted “more babies in the United States of America.” Vance also said he wanted “more beautiful young men and women” to have children. Notice he doesn’t just say “more babies”: the qualifiers are significant. Vance was implying that he wanted the right people to have babies: American, white, able-bodied, “beautiful” people with robust genetics. Children dying because of USAID cuts aren’t part of this vision, presumably, because those children are not American or white. As for infected milk, environmental toxins, or measles—here too, it’s hard not to hear social Darwinist overtones: In a far-right eugenicist worldview, children killed by those things likely aren’t fit for survival. In a more chaotic and dangerous environment, this extremely outdated logic goes, natural selection will ensure that the strongest survive. It’s also worth noting that this way of thinking originates in—and many of these Trump administration policies aim to return us to—an earlier era, when people of all ages, but especially children, were simply poisoned by industrial pollution, unvaccinated for diseases, and unprotected from industrial accidents. In such an unsafe world for children, people had many more of them; the world was such a dangerous place to raise kids that families expected to lose a few. That all-too-recent period is the unspoken context for natalist and eugenicist visions. That’s the world Trump and Vance seem to be nostalgic for, one in which women were constantly pregnant and in labor, and children were constantly dying horrible deaths. Doesn’t that sound pleasant for everyone?

“I want a baby boom,” Trump has said. His administration is indeed exploring a range of approaches to boost the birth rate, including baby bonuses and classes on natural fertility. Yet his focus is entirely on the production of babies. When it comes to keeping these babies alive, this administration is leaving parents on their own, facing some horrifying and unprecedented challenges. It’s common for right-wing American governments, whether at the state or federal level, to be only half-heartedly natalist: restricting abortion, birth control, and sex education, while also failing to embrace any policy that makes it easier to raise a family, like universal childcare, robust public education, school lunch, cash supports for parents, or paid family leave. But the Trump-Vance government has taken this paradox to a new level, with natalist rhetoric far surpassing that of other recent administrations, while real live children are treated with more depraved, life-threatening indifference than in any American government in at least a century. Due to brutal cuts at the Food and Drug Administration, where 20,000 employees have been fired, the administration has suspended one of its quality-control programs for milk, Reuters reported this week. Milk is iconically associated with child health, and this is not a mere storybook whimsy: Most pediatricians regard it as critical for young children’s developing brains and bones. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends two cups a day for babies between 1 and 2 years old. While some experts—and of course the administration—are downplaying the change, emphasizing that milk will still be regulated, a bird flu epidemic hardly seems like the right time to be cutting corners. A government so focused on making more babies shouldn’t be so indifferent to risks to our nation’s toddlers.This reckless approach to child safety is not limited to food. Also this week, The New York Times reported that the Environmental Protection Agency was canceling tens of millions of dollars in grants for research on environmental hazards to children in rural America. These hazards include pesticides, wildfire smoke, and forever chemicals, and the grants supported research toward solutions to such problems. Many focused on improving child health in red states like Oklahoma. Children are much more vulnerable than adults to the health problems that can stem from exposure to toxins. That makes Trump’s policies, for all his baby-friendly chatter, seem pathologically misopedic; he is reversing bans on so-called “forever chemicals” and repealing limits set by the Biden administration on lead exposure, all of which will have devastating effects on children’s mental and physical development.And of course there’s RFK Jr.’s crazy campaign against vaccines. This week, the health secretary said he was considering removing the Covid-19 vaccine from the list of vaccines the government recommends for children, even though to win Senate confirmation, he had agreed not to alter the childhood vaccine schedule. Even worse, RFK Jr. has used his office to promote disinformation about extensively debunked links between vaccines and autism, while praising unproven “treatments” for measles as an outbreak that has afflicted more than 600 people and killed at least three continues to spread. Trump’s public health cuts are meanwhile imperiling a program that gives free vaccines to children. So far, I haven’t even mentioned children outside the United States. Trump has not only continued Biden’s policy of mass infanticide in Gaza—at least 100 children there have been killed or injured every week by Israeli forces since the dissolution of the ceasefire in March—he has vastly surpassed that shameful record by dismantling USAID. (The Supreme Court demanded that the government restore some of the funding to the already-contracted programs, but it’s unclear what the results of that ruling will be.) Children across the globe will starve to death due to this policy. The cuts to nutrition funding alone, researchers estimate, will kill some 369,000 children who could otherwise have lived. That’s not even counting all the other children’s lives imperiled by USAID funding cuts to vaccines, health services, and maternal care, or the children who will go unprotected now that Trump has cut 69 programs dedicated to tracking child labor, forced labor, and human trafficking.Natalist or exterminationist? Pro-child or rabidly infanticidal? It’s tempting to dismiss such extreme contradictions within the Trump administration as merely chaotic and incoherent. But the situation is worse than that. Trying to boost births while actively making the world less safe for children is creepy—but not in a new way. The contradiction is baked into the eugenicist tradition that Vance and Trump openly embrace. Vance said at an anti-abortion rally in January that he wanted “more babies in the United States of America.” Vance also said he wanted “more beautiful young men and women” to have children. Notice he doesn’t just say “more babies”: the qualifiers are significant. Vance was implying that he wanted the right people to have babies: American, white, able-bodied, “beautiful” people with robust genetics. Children dying because of USAID cuts aren’t part of this vision, presumably, because those children are not American or white. As for infected milk, environmental toxins, or measles—here too, it’s hard not to hear social Darwinist overtones: In a far-right eugenicist worldview, children killed by those things likely aren’t fit for survival. In a more chaotic and dangerous environment, this extremely outdated logic goes, natural selection will ensure that the strongest survive. It’s also worth noting that this way of thinking originates in—and many of these Trump administration policies aim to return us to—an earlier era, when people of all ages, but especially children, were simply poisoned by industrial pollution, unvaccinated for diseases, and unprotected from industrial accidents. In such an unsafe world for children, people had many more of them; the world was such a dangerous place to raise kids that families expected to lose a few. That all-too-recent period is the unspoken context for natalist and eugenicist visions. That’s the world Trump and Vance seem to be nostalgic for, one in which women were constantly pregnant and in labor, and children were constantly dying horrible deaths. Doesn’t that sound pleasant for everyone?

The greater Pittsburgh region is among the 25 worst metro areas in the country for air quality: Report

PITTSBURGH — The greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area is among the 25 regions in the country with the worst air pollution, according to a new report from the American Lung Association.The nonprofit public health organization’s annual “State of the Air” report uses a report card-style grading system to compare air quality in regions across the U.S. This year’s report found that 46% of Americans — 156.1 million people — are living in places that get failing grades for unhealthy levels of ozone or particulate pollution. Overall, air pollution measured by the report was worse than in previous years, with more Americans living in places with unhealthy air than in the previous 10 years the report has been published.The 13-county region spanning Pittsburgh and southwestern Pennsylvania; Weirton, West Virginia; and Steubenville, Ohio received “fail” grades for both daily and annual average particulate matter exposure for the years 2021–2023.The region ranked 16th worst for 24-hour particle pollution out of 225 metropolitan areas and 12th worst for annual particle pollution out of 208 metropolitan areas. Particulate matter pollution, which comes from things like industrial emissions, vehicle exhaust, wildfires, and wood burning, causes higher rates of asthma, decreased lung function in children, and increased hospital admissions and premature death due to heart attacks and respiratory illness. Long-term exposure to particulate matter pollution also raises the risk of lung cancer, and research suggests that in the Pittsburgh region, air pollution linked to particulate matter and other harmful substances contributes significantly to cancer rates. According to the report, the Pittsburgh metro area is home to around 50,022 children with pediatric asthma, 227,806 adults with asthma, 173,588 people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), 250,600 people with cardiovascular disease, 1,468 people with lung cancer, and around 25,746 pregnant people, all of whom are especially vulnerable to the harmful impacts of particulate matter pollution exposure."The findings help community members understand the ongoing risks to the health of people in our region," said Matt Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project and the Breathe Collaborative, a coalition of more than 30 groups in southwestern Pennsylvania that advocate for cleaner air. "These findings emphasize the need to transition away from fossil fuels — in industry, transportation and residential uses — if we are to improve our health and address climate change." Allegheny County has received a failing grade for particulate matter pollution from the American Lung Association every year since the "State of the Air" report was first issued in 2004. The region is home to numerous polluting industries, with an estimated 80% of toxic air pollutants in Allegheny County (which encompasses Pittsburgh) coming from ten industrial sites, according to an analysis by the nonprofit environmental advocacy group PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center. The Ohio River near Pittsburgh Credit: Kristina Marusic for EHN In the 2024 State of the Air report, which looked at 2020-2022, Pittsburgh was for the first time ever not among the 25 cities most polluted by particulate matte, and showed some improvements in air quality, some of which may have resulted from pollution reductions spurred by the COVID-19 shut-down in 2020.The region earned a grade D for ozone smog this year, but its ranking improved from last year — it went from the 50th worst metro area for ozone smog in 2024’s report to the 90th worst in this year’s. Ozone pollution also comes from sources like vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions, and occurs when certain chemicals mix with sunlight. Exposure to ozone pollution is linked to respiratory issues, worsened asthma symptoms, and long-term lung damage.Each year the State of the Air Report makes recommendations for improving air quality. This year those recommendations include defending funding for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), because sweeping staff cuts and reduction of federal funding under the Trump administration are impairing the agency’s ability to enforce clean air regulations. For example, the report notes that EPA recently lowered annual limits for fine particulate matter pollution from 12 micrograms per cubic meter to 9 micrograms per cubic meter, and that states, including Pennsylvania, have submitted their recommendations for which areas should be cleaned up. Next, the agency must review those recommendations and add its own analyses to make final decisions by February 6, 2026 about which areas need additional pollution controls. If it fails to do so due to lack of funding or staffing, the report suggests, air quality might suffer.“The bottom line is this,” the report states. “EPA staff, working in communities across the country, are doing crucial work to keep your air clean. Staff cuts are already impacting people’s health across the country. Further cuts mean more dirty air.”

PITTSBURGH — The greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area is among the 25 regions in the country with the worst air pollution, according to a new report from the American Lung Association.The nonprofit public health organization’s annual “State of the Air” report uses a report card-style grading system to compare air quality in regions across the U.S. This year’s report found that 46% of Americans — 156.1 million people — are living in places that get failing grades for unhealthy levels of ozone or particulate pollution. Overall, air pollution measured by the report was worse than in previous years, with more Americans living in places with unhealthy air than in the previous 10 years the report has been published.The 13-county region spanning Pittsburgh and southwestern Pennsylvania; Weirton, West Virginia; and Steubenville, Ohio received “fail” grades for both daily and annual average particulate matter exposure for the years 2021–2023.The region ranked 16th worst for 24-hour particle pollution out of 225 metropolitan areas and 12th worst for annual particle pollution out of 208 metropolitan areas. Particulate matter pollution, which comes from things like industrial emissions, vehicle exhaust, wildfires, and wood burning, causes higher rates of asthma, decreased lung function in children, and increased hospital admissions and premature death due to heart attacks and respiratory illness. Long-term exposure to particulate matter pollution also raises the risk of lung cancer, and research suggests that in the Pittsburgh region, air pollution linked to particulate matter and other harmful substances contributes significantly to cancer rates. According to the report, the Pittsburgh metro area is home to around 50,022 children with pediatric asthma, 227,806 adults with asthma, 173,588 people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), 250,600 people with cardiovascular disease, 1,468 people with lung cancer, and around 25,746 pregnant people, all of whom are especially vulnerable to the harmful impacts of particulate matter pollution exposure."The findings help community members understand the ongoing risks to the health of people in our region," said Matt Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project and the Breathe Collaborative, a coalition of more than 30 groups in southwestern Pennsylvania that advocate for cleaner air. "These findings emphasize the need to transition away from fossil fuels — in industry, transportation and residential uses — if we are to improve our health and address climate change." Allegheny County has received a failing grade for particulate matter pollution from the American Lung Association every year since the "State of the Air" report was first issued in 2004. The region is home to numerous polluting industries, with an estimated 80% of toxic air pollutants in Allegheny County (which encompasses Pittsburgh) coming from ten industrial sites, according to an analysis by the nonprofit environmental advocacy group PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center. The Ohio River near Pittsburgh Credit: Kristina Marusic for EHN In the 2024 State of the Air report, which looked at 2020-2022, Pittsburgh was for the first time ever not among the 25 cities most polluted by particulate matte, and showed some improvements in air quality, some of which may have resulted from pollution reductions spurred by the COVID-19 shut-down in 2020.The region earned a grade D for ozone smog this year, but its ranking improved from last year — it went from the 50th worst metro area for ozone smog in 2024’s report to the 90th worst in this year’s. Ozone pollution also comes from sources like vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions, and occurs when certain chemicals mix with sunlight. Exposure to ozone pollution is linked to respiratory issues, worsened asthma symptoms, and long-term lung damage.Each year the State of the Air Report makes recommendations for improving air quality. This year those recommendations include defending funding for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), because sweeping staff cuts and reduction of federal funding under the Trump administration are impairing the agency’s ability to enforce clean air regulations. For example, the report notes that EPA recently lowered annual limits for fine particulate matter pollution from 12 micrograms per cubic meter to 9 micrograms per cubic meter, and that states, including Pennsylvania, have submitted their recommendations for which areas should be cleaned up. Next, the agency must review those recommendations and add its own analyses to make final decisions by February 6, 2026 about which areas need additional pollution controls. If it fails to do so due to lack of funding or staffing, the report suggests, air quality might suffer.“The bottom line is this,” the report states. “EPA staff, working in communities across the country, are doing crucial work to keep your air clean. Staff cuts are already impacting people’s health across the country. Further cuts mean more dirty air.”

New, 'Living' Building Material Made From Fungi and Bacteria Could Pave the Way to Self-Healing Structures

Researchers are developing the biomaterial as a more environmentally friendly alternative to concrete, but any wide-scale use is still far away

New, ‘Living’ Building Material Made From Fungi and Bacteria Could Pave the Way to Self-Healing Structures Researchers are developing the biomaterial as a more environmentally friendly alternative to concrete, but any wide-scale use is still far away Microscopic images of the bacteria and mycelium scaffolds. The circles indicate the likely presence of S. pasteurii bacteria. Viles, Ethan et al., Cell Reports Physical Science 2025 Concrete is a crucial construction material. Unfortunately, however, producing it requires large amounts of energy—often powered by fossil fuels—and includes chemical reactions that release carbon dioxide. This intensive process is responsible for up to 8 percent of humanity’s carbon dioxide emissions. As such, finding more sustainable building materials is vital to lessening our global carbon footprint. And to help achieve this goal, scientists are studying methods that might replace concrete with biologically derived materials, or biomaterials for short. Now, researchers have developed a building material made of mycelium—the tubular, branching filaments found in most fungi—and bacteria cells. As detailed in a study published last week in the journal Cell Reports Physical Science, the living bacteria survived in the structure for an extended amount of time, laying the groundwork for more environmentally friendly and self-healing construction material down the line. The researchers grew mycelium from the fungus Neurospora crassa, commonly known as red bread mold, into a dense, scaffold-like structure. Then, they added Sporosarcina pasteurii bacteria. “We like these organisms for several reasons,” Chelsea Heveran, a co-author of the study and an expert in engineered living materials at Montana State University, tells the Debrief’s Ryan Whalen. “First, they do not pose very much threat to human health. S. pasteurii is a common soil microorganism and has been used for years in biomineralization research, including in field-scale commercial applications. N. crassa is a model organism in fungal research.” They also liked that both organisms are capable of biomineralization—the process that forms bones and coral by creating hardened calcium carbonate. To set off biomineralization, the team placed the scaffold in a growing medium with urea and calcium. The bacteria formed calcium carbonate quickly and effectively, making the material stronger. Importantly, the bacteria S. pasteurii was alive, or viable, for at least a month. Live organisms in building material could offer unique properties—such as the ability to self-repair or self-clean—but only as long as they’re alive. This study didn’t test those traits specifically, according to a statement, but the longer lifetime of this material “lays the groundwork for these functionalities.” “We are excited about our results,” Heveran tells New Scientist’s James Woodford. “When viability is sufficiently high, we could start really imparting lasting biological characteristics to the material that we care about, such as self-healing, sensing or environmental remediation.” This month-long lifespan marks a significant improvement over previous structures. In fact, a major challenge in the development of living biomaterials is their short viability—other similar materials made with living organisms have remained viable for just days or weeks. Plus, they don’t usually form the complex internal structures necessary in construction projects, according to the statement. In the new study, however, “we learned that fungal scaffolds are quite useful for controlling the internal architecture of the material,” Heveran explains in the statement. “We created internal geometries that looked like cortical bone, but moving forward, we could potentially construct other geometries, too.” Ultimately, the researchers developed a tough structure that could provide the basis for future sustainable building alternatives. As reported by New Atlas’ Abhimanyu Ghoshal, however, scientists still have other challenges to tackle on the path to replacing concrete—for instance, scaling the material’s production, making it usable for different types of construction projects and overcoming the higher costs associated with living biomaterials. These materials, so far, “do not have high enough strength to replace concrete in all applications,” Heveran says in the statement. “But we and others are working to improve their properties so they can see greater usage.” To that end, Aysu Kuru, a building engineer at the University of Sydney in Australia who did not participate in the study, tells New Scientist that “proposing mycelium as a scaffolding medium for living materials is a simple but powerful strategy.” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

New electronic “skin” could enable lightweight night-vision glasses

MIT engineers developed ultrathin electronic films that sense heat and other signals, and could reduce the bulk of conventional goggles and scopes.

MIT engineers have developed a technique to grow and peel ultrathin “skins” of electronic material. The method could pave the way for new classes of electronic devices, such as ultrathin wearable sensors, flexible transistors and computing elements, and highly sensitive and compact imaging devices. As a demonstration, the team fabricated a thin membrane of pyroelectric material — a class of heat-sensing material that produces an electric current in response to changes in temperature. The thinner the pyroelectric material, the better it is at sensing subtle thermal variations.With their new method, the team fabricated the thinnest pyroelectric membrane yet, measuring 10 nanometers thick, and demonstrated that the film is highly sensitive to heat and radiation across the far-infrared spectrum.The newly developed film could enable lighter, more portable, and highly accurate far-infrared (IR) sensing devices, with potential applications for night-vision eyewear and autonomous driving in foggy conditions. Current state-of-the-art far-IR sensors require bulky cooling elements. In contrast, the new pyroelectric thin film requires no cooling and is sensitive to much smaller changes in temperature. The researchers are exploring ways to incorporate the film into lighter, higher-precision night-vision glasses.“This film considerably reduces weight and cost, making it lightweight, portable, and easier to integrate,” Xinyuan Zhang, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE). “For example, it could be directly worn on glasses.”The heat-sensing film could also have applications in environmental and biological sensing, as well as imaging of astrophysical phenomena that emit far-infrared radiation.What’s more, the new lift-off technique is generalizable beyond pyroelectric materials. The researchers plan to apply the method to make other ultrathin, high-performance semiconducting films.Their results are reported today in a paper appearing in the journal Nature. The study’s MIT co-authors are first author Xinyuan Zhang, Sangho Lee, Min-Kyu Song, Haihui Lan, Jun Min Suh, Jung-El Ryu, Yanjie Shao, Xudong Zheng, Ne Myo Han, and Jeehwan Kim, associate professor of mechanical engineering and of materials science and engineering, along with researchers at the University Wisconsin at Madison led by Professor Chang-Beom Eom and authors from multiple other institutions.Chemical peelKim’s group at MIT is finding new ways to make smaller, thinner, and more flexible electronics. They envision that such ultrathin computing “skins” can be incorporated into everything from smart contact lenses and wearable sensing fabrics to stretchy solar cells and bendable displays. To realize such devices, Kim and his colleagues have been experimenting with methods to grow, peel, and stack semiconducting elements, to fabricate ultrathin, multifunctional electronic thin-film membranes.One method that Kim has pioneered is “remote epitaxy” — a technique where semiconducting materials are grown on a single-crystalline substrate, with an ultrathin layer of graphene in between. The substrate’s crystal structure serves as a scaffold along which the new material can grow. The graphene acts as a nonstick layer, similar to Teflon, making it easy for researchers to peel off the new film and transfer it onto flexible and stacked electronic devices. After peeling off the new film, the underlying substrate can be reused to make additional thin films.Kim has applied remote epitaxy to fabricate thin films with various characteristics. In trying different combinations of semiconducting elements, the researchers happened to notice that a certain pyroelectric material, called PMN-PT, did not require an intermediate layer assist in order to separate from its substrate. Just by growing PMN-PT directly on a single-crystalline substrate, the researchers could then remove the grown film, with no rips or tears to its delicate lattice.“It worked surprisingly well,” Zhang says. “We found the peeled film is atomically smooth.”Lattice lift-offIn their new study, the MIT and UW Madison researchers took a closer look at the process and discovered that the key to the material’s easy-peel property was lead. As part of its chemical structure, the team, along with colleagues at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, discovered that the pyroelectric film contains an orderly arrangement of lead atoms that have a large “electron affinity,” meaning that lead attracts electrons and prevents the charge carriers from traveling and connecting to another materials such as an underlying substrate. The lead acts as tiny nonstick units, allowing the material as a whole to peel away, perfectly intact.The team ran with the realization and fabricated multiple ultrathin films of PMN-PT, each about 10 nanometers thin. They peeled off pyroelectric films and transfered them onto a small chip to form an array of 100 ultrathin heat-sensing pixels, each about 60 square microns (about .006 square centimeters). They exposed the films to ever-slighter changes in temperature and found the pixels were highly sensitive to small changes across the far-infrared spectrum.The sensitivity of the pyroelectric array is comparable to that of state-of-the-art night-vision devices. These devices are currently based on photodetector materials, in which a change in temperature induces the material’s electrons to jump in energy and briefly cross an energy “band gap,” before settling back into their ground state. This electron jump serves as an electrical signal of the temperature change. However, this signal can be affected by noise in the environment, and to prevent such effects, photodetectors have to also include cooling devices that bring the instruments down to liquid nitrogen temperatures.Current night-vision goggles and scopes are heavy and bulky. With the group’s new pyroelectric-based approach, NVDs could have the same sensitivity without the cooling weight.The researchers also found that the films were sensitive beyond the range of current night-vision devices and could respond to wavelengths across the entire infrared spectrum. This suggests that the films could be incorporated into small, lightweight, and portable devices for various applications that require different infrared regions. For instance, when integrated into autonomous vehicle platforms, the films could enable cars to “see” pedestrians and vehicles in complete darkness or in foggy and rainy conditions. The film could also be used in gas sensors for real-time and on-site environmental monitoring, helping detect pollutants. In electronics, they could monitor heat changes in semiconductor chips to catch early signs of malfunctioning elements.The team says the new lift-off method can be generalized to materials that may not themselves contain lead. In those cases, the researchers suspect that they can infuse Teflon-like lead atoms into the underlying substrate to induce a similar peel-off effect. For now, the team is actively working toward incorporating the pyroelectric films into a functional night-vision system.“We envision that our ultrathin films could be made into high-performance night-vision goggles, considering its broad-spectrum infrared sensitivity at room-temperature, which allows for a lightweight design without a cooling system,” Zhang says. “To turn this into a night-vision system, a functional device array should be integrated with readout circuitry. Furthermore, testing in varied environmental conditions is essential for practical applications.”This work was supported by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

President of Eugene wood treatment plant gets 90-day prison term for lying to DEQ inspectors

"There has to be some accountability," U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane said.

A federal judge Tuesday sentenced the president of Eugene’s J.H. Baxter & Co. wood treatment plant to 90 days in prison for lying about the company’s illegal handling of hazardous waste at the site.U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane called Georgia Baxter-Krause, 62, an “absent president” who took little responsibility for what occurred.“The fact that you lied when confronted suggests you knew the practice was not ‘above board,’” McShane said. “There has to be some accountability.”He also ordered Baxter-Krause and the company to pay $1.5 million in criminal fines. The plant is now a potential cleanup site under the federal Superfund program.J.H. Baxter & Co. Inc. pleaded guilty to illegally treating hazardous waste and Baxter-Krause pleaded guilty to two counts of making false statements in violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act governing hazardous waste management.The company so far has paid $850,000 of its $1 million share of the fine, and Baxter-Krause has paid $250,000 of her $500,000 share, their attorney David Angeli said.Much of the debate at the sentencing focused on whether Baxter-Krause should go to prison for lying to investigators.According to court documents, J.H. Baxter used hazardous chemicals to treat and preserve wood. Water from the process was considered hazardous waste. The company operated a legal wastewater treatment unit, but for years when there was “too much water on site,” the company essentially would “boil” off the wastewater, allowing discharge into the air through open vents, according to court records.Photograph sent to Georgia Baxter-Krause on July 8, 2019, depicting the inside of a J.H. Baxter container after weeks of boiling hazardous waste, according to federal prosecutors.U.S. Attorney's OfficeAngeli argued that the violations at the Eugene plant were “less egregious” than other criminal environmental damage cases and that “everyone” on the premises thought the hazardous waste handling was OK. He sought probation for Baxter-Krause.“Every person said she never directed or managed this activity,” Angeli said. “She was rarely even in Eugene.”But Assistant U.S. Attorney William McLaren said Baxter-Krause blatantly lied when inspectors from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality requested information about the company’s practice of boiling off the wastewater.Baxter-Krause provided false information when questioned about the extent of the illegal activity and failed to disclose that the company kept detailed logs that tracked it, according to prosecutors.The plant illegally boiled about 600,000 gallons of wastewater on 136 days from January to October 2019, McLaren said.The government didn’t seek the maximum fine for the environmental violations, which would have been $7 million for each day a violation was found, he said. A separate civil class-action suit is pending against the company filed by people living near the West Eugene plant. They allege gross negligence that allowed “carcinogenic and poisonous chemicals’’ to be regularly released into the air and groundwater. Baxter-Krause told an investigator that the company didn’t keep records on the boiling dates and claimed it occurred only occasionally during the rainy season, records said.“Those were not minimal or immaterial slip-ups,” McLaren said. What the company was doing was “known for years on end” and it was occurring every month, he said.“Despite alerts about equipment failure and the need for capital upgrades, the evidence reflects those warnings went unheeded by J.H. Baxter’s leadership for years,” McLaren said. “And by early 2019, this illegal boiling became the company’s sole method for treating their hazardous wastewater.”Baxter-Krause, who took over the company in 2001 after her father’s death, apologized to the community around the plant and to her friends and family. She now lives in Bend but had lived in California throughout her tenure as company president and visited the Eugene facility about three times a year, according to her lawyers.“I should have been honest,” she said. “To the West Eugene community who was impacted by my careless actions, I apologize. Not a day goes by that I don’t feel remorse. I am ashamed of what I have done. I feel I have truly let you down.”She acknowledged that as president, “the buck stops with me. I should have been more proactive in fully understanding the facility’s permits, the day-to-day operations and ensuring full compliance with environmental laws.”J.H. Baxter treated wood products at the plant from 1943 to 2022. Chemicals used to treat wood, such as creosote and pentachlorophenol, also known as “penta” or PCP, have contaminated the soil and groundwater and are an ongoing concern for surrounding neighborhoods, according to the government.The chemicals remain in tanks at the site and the environmental contamination has not been addressed, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.The company has spent more than $2 million since the plant’s closure to secure the facility and work on complying with environmental regulations, but it has been unable to sell the property because of the historical contamination, according to court records.The judge said it will be up to the Federal Bureau of Prisons where to send Baxter-Krause to serve the sentence. The defense said it would request that she be placed in a community corrections setting.Baxter-Krause was ordered to surrender on July 17. She wondered aloud in the courtroom after her sentencing how she would maintain the compliance reports.Her lawyers explained that the Environmental Protection Agency is on site daily working to fully shut the property down.The EPA is still working to determine how to handle and remove chemicals from the site. It collected soil, sediment, and water samples in May 2023 from both the facility and the surrounding areas. These samples will determine the environmental and potential public health impacts of chemicals that have migrated from the site and from air pollution from its operations.-- Maxine Bernstein covers federal court and criminal justice. Reach her at 503-221-8212, mbernstein@oregonian.com, follow her on X @maxoregonian, on Bluesky @maxbernstein.bsky.social or on LinkedIn.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.