Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Is your tampon trying to kill you? Here are 7 women and POC-owned options

News Feed
Thursday, July 18, 2024

A study published in Environment International journal this month revealed toxic metals in numerous top-selling tampon brands.Several toxic materials, including lead, cadmium and arsenic, were found in all 30 tampons tested, a range made up of 14 tampon brands and 18 product lines available in the U.S., UK and Europe. This is the first time these products have been tested for metals and metalloids, according to the report.The metals researchers looked for are considered harmful. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), lead exposure is especially dangerous to children and women of reproductive age, which overtime is linked to damage of the kidneys and nervous system. The inorganic compounds found in arsenic, found in building products and contaminated water, have been linked to cancer, while organic arsenic, which can be found in some foods, is considered less toxic, according to the American Cancer Society.Researchers say that name brand, store brand, organic and nonorganic all contained metals, which Kristen Upson, assistant professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Michigan State University, and co-author of the study said could be an issue.“While the concentrations of some metals were low, we have to remember that there are no safe levels of exposure to toxic metals, including lead,” Upson told MSU Today. “Going into this research, I was curious to see if there would be a tampon product that was consistently lower in metal content. However, we found metal concentrations across the board in all the tampons we tested.”According to the study, lead concentrations were higher in non-organic tampons, but arsenic levels were higher in organic options. In one unnamed tampon, researchers found all 16 metals tested.Some are jumping in to say that recent articles are misleading.“There are so many click-bait, fear-filled headlines about lead and other metals in tampons. Remember, scaring women about vaginal health is highly profitable,” OB-GYN and author of “Blood: the Science, Medicine and Mythology of Menstruation.” Dr. Jennifer Gunter said in a July 11 Twitter thread.Gunter goes on to explain in a thread that plants, like cotton used in tampons, can absorb metals from soil but do not pose a threat.“So we don’t know if the arsenic, lead, and cadmium in tampons can even get into the vagina, never mind be absorbed,” she wrote.The study also states that further research is needed to determine if these metals can be absorbed through the vagina.“Lead isn’t safe in any concentration, but it’s really important we don’t panic,” author of the report and University of California, Berkeley environmental epidemiologist Jenni Shearston told Chemical & Engineering News this week. “I can’t say that someone should or shouldn’t use a tampon based on our results. We don’t yet know if those metals come out of the tampon and if they do, we don’t know whether they can get into the bloodstream. Our team is continuing to study this.”Though more research is needed to determine if tampons are putting women’s health at risk, many women are voicing their concerns online. While researchers did not release the name of the brands included in the study, the report states they selected products marked as “top sellers on a major online retailer.” According to Statistica, Tampax, U by Kotex, and Playtex are some of the top selling tampon brands in the U.S.Though it is unclear which exact brands or products were tested, Reckon looked into the parent companies of some of the top selling tampon brands including Tampax, U by Kotex, and Playtex, finding that the CEOs of each are… men. Each year, U.S. consumers spend over $2 billion on period products, with the average menstruator using around 17,000 tampons or pads over their lifetime, according to Healthline. This being a billion dollar industry underscores the need for more research in women’s health.For those looking for options outside of the mainstream market, Reckon gathered together a list of women and POC-owned period brands, many of which offer clean, sustainable, or chemical free alternatives.Founder: Cherie HoegerSaalt carries a wide range of reusable period products from menstrual discs and cups to period underwear in different cuts – thongs, bikinis, boyshorts, and more. According to Saalt’s website, co-founder and CEO Cherie Hoeger says she created the brand after a conversation with her aunt in Venezuela, who said pads and tampons had not been available in stores there for years.She learned more about the broader impact of period poverty, an issue affecting an estimated 500 million women worldwide, and decided to create reusable products she would use herself, focusing on clean, ethical, and sustainable materials to “keep toxins out of our ecosystems and out of our bodies.”Founder: Crystal EtienneAs more and more period underwear enter the market, Ruby Love takes the idea of period wear to the next level, offering sleepwear, loungewear, bodysuits and athletics all designed to absorb and lock in blood so it doesn’t disrupt your day. Owner Crystal Etienne also created period swimwear, dropping the need to pack tampons in your beach bag this summer.This is a size-inclusive option for all body types, Ruby Love carries an array of sizes with some products ranging from XXS to 8XL.Founders: Greta Meyer and Amanda CalabreseGreta Meyer, a star lacrosse player at Stanford University, and Amanda Calabrese, 6x champion in lifesaving, took their needs as athletes and reinvented the traditional tampon. Sequel Spirals add spiral ridges that make the flow path longer, to better absorb blood and prevent leakage.According to Sequel, this is the first engineering redesign of the modern tampon in 80 years.Founder: Toun OmeziNiima founder Toun Omezi created the brand after her experience having endometrial polyp removed, growths in the inner lining of the uterus, and wanting a cleaner period product to use.“While researching, I discovered the harmful chemicals used to produce conventional non-organic sanitary pads that I had been using for years,” Omezi told Essence in 2021. “I knew that I could not go back to using the conventional non-organic pads anymore now knowing what the adverse effects were, and I did not want other women to unknowingly do the same.”According to their website, Niima pads free of latex, chlorine, and pesticides, are made with 100% certified organic cotton and are biodegradable, decomposing within 12 months.Founder: Sherrie EvansMany women use liners to absorb daily discharge, manage light period flow, or for bladder leaks, but recently gynecologists like Dr. Fatima Daoud have jumped on Tik Tok to share that wearing panty liners everyday can be irritating to vulvar skin.Sherpax offers cloth pantyliners and pads made from breathable, moisture-wicking fabric that are reusable and can be thrown in the washing machine with the rest of your laundry. The cloth liners have wings which snap around your underwear to remain in place.Evans regularly shares details about her products, and even teaches followers how to create their own pads at home on her Tik Tok.Founder: Ruby RautUK-based Wuka was founded by Ruby Raut, who grew up in Nepal, using fabric scraps as reusable menstrual products.“My mum gave me one of her old saris to use as my first period product and that is what I did for nearly 20 years,” Raut told the Drum in Aug. 2023.She broke through the menstrual product market selling period underwear before it was common, filling the gap for sustainable menstruation in 2017. Today Wuka offers an array of specialty options, including cooling underwear for those experiencing hot flashes and stretch underwear to accommodate weight gain and changing bodies.Founders: Cindy Belardo and Drew JarvisMenstrual cups are becoming more popular, especially for those looking for a more environmentally-friendly or cost efficient period management option, but the insertion/removal process or fear of leakage prevents some people from trying them.Sunny solves that problem by adding an applicator to their cup, allowing users to have the familiarity of a tampon with the benefits of a menstrual cup that holds two to five times the amount of blood and can be worn for up to 12 hours. Both the cup and applicator can be reused for up to one year.

Toxic metals found in top tampon brands, study reveals, raising concerns as these billion dollar companies are led by men.

A study published in Environment International journal this month revealed toxic metals in numerous top-selling tampon brands.

Several toxic materials, including lead, cadmium and arsenic, were found in all 30 tampons tested, a range made up of 14 tampon brands and 18 product lines available in the U.S., UK and Europe. This is the first time these products have been tested for metals and metalloids, according to the report.

The metals researchers looked for are considered harmful. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), lead exposure is especially dangerous to children and women of reproductive age, which overtime is linked to damage of the kidneys and nervous system. The inorganic compounds found in arsenic, found in building products and contaminated water, have been linked to cancer, while organic arsenic, which can be found in some foods, is considered less toxic, according to the American Cancer Society.

Researchers say that name brand, store brand, organic and nonorganic all contained metals, which Kristen Upson, assistant professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Michigan State University, and co-author of the study said could be an issue.

“While the concentrations of some metals were low, we have to remember that there are no safe levels of exposure to toxic metals, including lead,” Upson told MSU Today. “Going into this research, I was curious to see if there would be a tampon product that was consistently lower in metal content. However, we found metal concentrations across the board in all the tampons we tested.”

According to the study, lead concentrations were higher in non-organic tampons, but arsenic levels were higher in organic options. In one unnamed tampon, researchers found all 16 metals tested.

Some are jumping in to say that recent articles are misleading.

“There are so many click-bait, fear-filled headlines about lead and other metals in tampons. Remember, scaring women about vaginal health is highly profitable,” OB-GYN and author of “Blood: the Science, Medicine and Mythology of Menstruation.” Dr. Jennifer Gunter said in a July 11 Twitter thread.

Gunter goes on to explain in a thread that plants, like cotton used in tampons, can absorb metals from soil but do not pose a threat.

“So we don’t know if the arsenic, lead, and cadmium in tampons can even get into the vagina, never mind be absorbed,” she wrote.

The study also states that further research is needed to determine if these metals can be absorbed through the vagina.

“Lead isn’t safe in any concentration, but it’s really important we don’t panic,” author of the report and University of California, Berkeley environmental epidemiologist Jenni Shearston told Chemical & Engineering News this week. “I can’t say that someone should or shouldn’t use a tampon based on our results. We don’t yet know if those metals come out of the tampon and if they do, we don’t know whether they can get into the bloodstream. Our team is continuing to study this.”

Though more research is needed to determine if tampons are putting women’s health at risk, many women are voicing their concerns online. While researchers did not release the name of the brands included in the study, the report states they selected products marked as “top sellers on a major online retailer.” According to Statistica, Tampax, U by Kotex, and Playtex are some of the top selling tampon brands in the U.S.

Though it is unclear which exact brands or products were tested, Reckon looked into the parent companies of some of the top selling tampon brands including Tampax, U by Kotex, and Playtex, finding that the CEOs of each are… men. Each year, U.S. consumers spend over $2 billion on period products, with the average menstruator using around 17,000 tampons or pads over their lifetime, according to Healthline. This being a billion dollar industry underscores the need for more research in women’s health.

For those looking for options outside of the mainstream market, Reckon gathered together a list of women and POC-owned period brands, many of which offer clean, sustainable, or chemical free alternatives.

Founder: Cherie Hoeger

Saalt carries a wide range of reusable period products from menstrual discs and cups to period underwear in different cuts – thongs, bikinis, boyshorts, and more. According to Saalt’s website, co-founder and CEO Cherie Hoeger says she created the brand after a conversation with her aunt in Venezuela, who said pads and tampons had not been available in stores there for years.

She learned more about the broader impact of period poverty, an issue affecting an estimated 500 million women worldwide, and decided to create reusable products she would use herself, focusing on clean, ethical, and sustainable materials to “keep toxins out of our ecosystems and out of our bodies.”

Founder: Crystal Etienne

As more and more period underwear enter the market, Ruby Love takes the idea of period wear to the next level, offering sleepwear, loungewear, bodysuits and athletics all designed to absorb and lock in blood so it doesn’t disrupt your day. Owner Crystal Etienne also created period swimwear, dropping the need to pack tampons in your beach bag this summer.

This is a size-inclusive option for all body types, Ruby Love carries an array of sizes with some products ranging from XXS to 8XL.

Founders: Greta Meyer and Amanda Calabrese

Greta Meyer, a star lacrosse player at Stanford University, and Amanda Calabrese, 6x champion in lifesaving, took their needs as athletes and reinvented the traditional tampon. Sequel Spirals add spiral ridges that make the flow path longer, to better absorb blood and prevent leakage.

According to Sequel, this is the first engineering redesign of the modern tampon in 80 years.

Founder: Toun Omezi

Niima founder Toun Omezi created the brand after her experience having endometrial polyp removed, growths in the inner lining of the uterus, and wanting a cleaner period product to use.

“While researching, I discovered the harmful chemicals used to produce conventional non-organic sanitary pads that I had been using for years,” Omezi told Essence in 2021. “I knew that I could not go back to using the conventional non-organic pads anymore now knowing what the adverse effects were, and I did not want other women to unknowingly do the same.”

According to their website, Niima pads free of latex, chlorine, and pesticides, are made with 100% certified organic cotton and are biodegradable, decomposing within 12 months.

Founder: Sherrie Evans

Many women use liners to absorb daily discharge, manage light period flow, or for bladder leaks, but recently gynecologists like Dr. Fatima Daoud have jumped on Tik Tok to share that wearing panty liners everyday can be irritating to vulvar skin.

Sherpax offers cloth pantyliners and pads made from breathable, moisture-wicking fabric that are reusable and can be thrown in the washing machine with the rest of your laundry. The cloth liners have wings which snap around your underwear to remain in place.

Evans regularly shares details about her products, and even teaches followers how to create their own pads at home on her Tik Tok.

Founder: Ruby Raut

UK-based Wuka was founded by Ruby Raut, who grew up in Nepal, using fabric scraps as reusable menstrual products.

“My mum gave me one of her old saris to use as my first period product and that is what I did for nearly 20 years,” Raut told the Drum in Aug. 2023.

She broke through the menstrual product market selling period underwear before it was common, filling the gap for sustainable menstruation in 2017. Today Wuka offers an array of specialty options, including cooling underwear for those experiencing hot flashes and stretch underwear to accommodate weight gain and changing bodies.

Founders: Cindy Belardo and Drew Jarvis

Menstrual cups are becoming more popular, especially for those looking for a more environmentally-friendly or cost efficient period management option, but the insertion/removal process or fear of leakage prevents some people from trying them.

Sunny solves that problem by adding an applicator to their cup, allowing users to have the familiarity of a tampon with the benefits of a menstrual cup that holds two to five times the amount of blood and can be worn for up to 12 hours. Both the cup and applicator can be reused for up to one year.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Forever Chemicals' Might Triple Teens' Risk Of Fatty Liver Disease

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk of developing fatty liver disease, a new study says.Each doubling in blood levels of the PFAS chemical perfluorooctanoic acid is linked to 2.7 times the odds of fatty liver disease among teenagers, according to findings published in the January issue of the journal Environmental Research.Fatty liver disease — also known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) — occurs when fat builds up in the organ, leading to inflammation, scarring and increased risk of cancer.About 10% of all children, and up to 40% of children with obesity, have fatty liver disease, researchers said in background notes.“MASLD can progress silently for years before causing serious health problems,” said senior researcher Dr. Lida Chatzi, a professor of population and public health sciences and pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of USC in Los Angeles.“When liver fat starts accumulating in adolescence, it may set the stage for a lifetime of metabolic and liver health challenges,” Chatzi added in a news release. “If we reduce PFAS exposure early, we may help prevent liver disease later. That’s a powerful public health opportunity.”Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are called “forever chemicals” because they combine carbon and fluorine molecules, one of the strongest chemical bonds possible. This makes PFAS removal and breakdown very difficult.PFAS compounds have been used in consumer products since the 1940s, including fire extinguishing foam, nonstick cookware, food wrappers, stain-resistant furniture and waterproof clothing.More than 99% of Americans have measurable PFAS in their blood, and at least one PFAS chemical is present in roughly half of U.S. drinking water supplies, researchers said.“Adolescents are particularly more vulnerable to the health effects of PFAS as it is a critical period of development and growth,” lead researcher Shiwen “Sherlock” Li, an assistant professor of public health sciences at the University of Hawaii, said in a news release.“In addition to liver disease, PFAS exposure has been associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, including several types of cancer,” Li said.For the new study, researchers examined data on 284 Southern California adolescents and young adults gathered as part of two prior USC studies.All of the participants already had a high risk of metabolic disease because their parents had type 2 diabetes or were overweight, researchers said.Their PFAS levels were measured through blood tests, and liver fat was assessed using MRI scans.Higher blood levels of two common PFAS — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) — were linked to an increased risk of fatty liver disease.Results showed a young person’s risk was even higher if they smoked or carried a genetic variant known to influence liver fat.“These findings suggest that PFAS exposures, genetics and lifestyle factors work together to influence who has greater risk of developing MASLD as a function of your life stage,” researcher Max Aung, assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine, said in a news release.“Understanding gene and environment interactions can help advance precision environmental health for MASLD,” he added.The study also showed that fatty liver disease became more common as teens grew older, adding to evidence that younger people might be more vulnerable to PFAS exposure, Chatzi said.“PFAS exposures not only disrupt liver biology but also translate into real liver disease risk in youth,” Chatzi said. “Adolescence seems to be a critical window of susceptibility, suggesting PFAS exposure may matter most when the liver is still developing.”The Environmental Working Group has more on PFAS.SOURCES: Keck School of Medicine of USC, news release, Jan. 6, 2026; Environmental Research, Jan. 1, 2026Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

China Announces Another New Trade Measure Against Japan as Tensions Rise

China has escalated its trade tensions with Japan by launching an investigation into imported dichlorosilane, a chemical gas used in making semiconductors

BEIJING (AP) — China escalated its trade tensions with Japan on Wednesday by launching an investigation into imported dichlorosilane, a chemical gas used in making semiconductors, a day after it imposed curbs on the export of so-called dual-use goods that could be used by Japan’s military.The Chinese Commerce Ministry said in a statement that it had launched the investigation following an application from the domestic industry showing the price of dichlorosilane imported from Japan had decreased 31% between 2022 and 2024.“The dumping of imported products from Japan has damaged the production and operation of our domestic industry,” the ministry said.The measure comes a day after Beijing banned exports to Japan of dual-use goods that can have military applications.Beijing has been showing mounting displeasure with Tokyo after new Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested late last year that her nation's military could intervene if China were to take action against Taiwan — an island democracy that Beijing considers its own territory.Tensions were stoked again on Tuesday when Japanese lawmaker Hei Seki, who last year was sanctioned by China for “spreading fallacies” about Taiwan and other disputed territories, visited Taiwan and called it an independent country. Also known as Yo Kitano, he has been banned from entering China. He told reporters that his arrival in Taiwan demonstrated the two are “different countries.”“I came to Taiwan … to prove this point, and to tell the world that Taiwan is an independent country,” Hei Seki said, according to Taiwan’s Central News Agency.“The nasty words of a petty villain like him are not worth commenting on,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning retorted when asked about his comment. Fears of a rare earths curb Masaaki Kanai, head of Asia Oceanian Affairs at Japan's Foreign Ministry, urged China to scrap the trade curbs, saying a measure exclusively targeting Japan that deviates from international practice is unacceptable. Japan, however, has yet to announce any retaliatory measures.As the two countries feuded, speculation rose that China might target rare earths exports to Japan, in a move similar to the rounds of critical minerals export restrictions it has imposed as part of its trade war with the United States.China controls most of the global production of heavy rare earths, used for making powerful, heat-resistance magnets used in industries such as defense and electric vehicles.While the Commerce Ministry did not mention any new rare earths curbs, the official newspaper China Daily, seen as a government mouthpiece, quoted anonymous sources saying Beijing was considering tightening exports of certain rare earths to Japan. That report could not be independently confirmed. Improved South Korean ties contrast with Japan row As Beijing spars with Tokyo, it has made a point of courting a different East Asian power — South Korea.On Wednesday, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung wrapped up a four-day trip to China – his first since taking office in June. Lee and Chinese President Xi Jinping oversaw the signing of cooperation agreements in areas such as technology, trade, transportation and environmental protection.As if to illustrate a contrast with the China-Japan trade frictions, Lee joined two business events at which major South Korean and Chinese companies pledged to collaborate.The two sides signed 24 export contracts worth a combined $44 million, according to South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources. During Lee’s visit, Chinese media also reported that South Korea overtook Japan as the leading destination for outbound flights from China’s mainland over the New Year’s holiday.China has been discouraging travel to Japan, saying Japanese leaders’ comments on Taiwan have created “significant risks to the personal safety and lives of Chinese citizens in Japan.”Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill

Democrats and the Make America Healthy Again movement pushed back on the rider in a funding bill led by BayerIn a setback for the pesticide industry, Democrats have succeeded in removing a rider from a congressional appropriations bill that would have helped protect pesticide makers from being sued and could have hindered state efforts to warn about pesticide risks.Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine and ranking member of the House appropriations interior, environment, and related agencies subcommittee, said Monday that the controversial measure pushed by the agrochemical giant Bayer and industry allies has been stripped from the 2026 funding bill. Continue reading...

In a setback for the pesticide industry, Democrats have succeeded in removing a rider from a congressional appropriations bill that would have helped protect pesticide makers from being sued and could have hindered state efforts to warn about pesticide risks.Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine and ranking member of the House appropriations interior, environment, and related agencies subcommittee, said Monday that the controversial measure pushed by the agrochemical giant Bayer and industry allies has been stripped from the 2026 funding bill.The move is final, as Senate Republican leaders have agreed not to revisit the issue, Pingree said.“I just drew a line in the sand and said this cannot stay in the bill,” Pingree told the Guardian. “There has been intensive lobbying by Bayer. This has been quite a hard fight.”The now-deleted language was part of a larger legislative effort that critics say is aimed at limiting litigation against pesticide industry leader Bayer, which sells the widely used Roundup herbicides.An industry alliance set up by Bayer has been pushing for both state and federal laws that would make it harder for consumers to sue over pesticide risks to human health and has successfully lobbied for the passing of such laws in Georgia and North Dakota so far.The specific proposed language added to the appropriations bill blocked federal funds from being used to “issue or adopt any guidance or any policy, take any regulatory action, or approve any labeling or change to such labeling” inconsistent with the conclusion of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human health assessment.Critics said the language would have impeded states and local governments from warning about risks of pesticides even in the face of new scientific findings about health harms if such warnings were not consistent with outdated EPA assessments. The EPA itself would not be able to update warnings without finalizing a new assessment, the critics said.And because of the limits on warnings, critics of the rider said, consumers would have found it difficult, if not impossible, to sue pesticide makers for failing to warn them of health risks if the EPA assessments do not support such warnings.“This provision would have handed pesticide manufacturers exactly what they’ve been lobbying for: federal preemption that stops state and local governments from restricting the use of harmful, cancer-causing chemicals, adding health warnings, or holding companies accountable in court when people are harmed,” Pingree said in a statement. “It would have meant that only the federal government gets a say – even though we know federal reviews can take years, and are often subject to intense industry pressure.”Pingree tried but failed to overturn the language in a July appropriations committee hearing.Bayer, the key backer of the legislative efforts, has been struggling for years to put an end to thousands of lawsuits filed by people who allege they developed cancer from their use of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weed killers sold by Bayer. The company inherited the litigation when it bought Monsanto in 2018 and has paid out billions of dollars in settlements and jury verdicts but still faces several thousand ongoing lawsuits. Bayer maintains its glyphosate-based herbicides do not cause cancer and are safe when used as directed.When asked for comment on Monday, Bayer said that no company should have “blanket immunity” and it disputed that the appropriations bill language would have prevented anyone from suing pesticide manufacturers. The company said it supports state and federal legislation “because the future of American farming depends on reliable science-based regulation of important crop protection products – determined safe for use by the EPA”.The company additionally states on its website that without “legislative certainty”, lawsuits over its glyphosate-based Roundup and other weed killers can impact its research and product development and other “important investments”.Pingree said her efforts were aided by members of the Make America Healthy Again (Maha) movement who have spent the last few months meeting with congressional members and their staffers on this issue. She said her team reached out to Maha leadership in the last few days to pressure Republican lawmakers.“This is the first time that we’ve had a fairly significant advocacy group working on the Republican side,” she said.Last week, Zen Honeycutt, a Maha leader and founder of the group Moms Across America, posted a “call to action”, urging members to demand elected officials “Stop the Pesticide Immunity Shield”.“A lot of people helped make this happen,” Honeycutt said. “Many health advocates have been fervently expressing their requests to keep chemical companies accountable for safety … We are delighted that our elected officials listened to so many Americans who spoke up and are restoring trust in the American political system.”Pingree said the issue is not dead. Bayer has “made this a high priority”, and she expects to see continued efforts to get industry friendly language inserted into legislation, including into the new Farm Bill.“I don’t think this is over,” she said.This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group

Forever Chemicals' Common in Cosmetics, but FDA Says Safety Data Are Scant

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Jan. 3, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Federal regulators have released a mandated report regarding the...

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Jan. 3, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Federal regulators have released a mandated report regarding the presence of "forever chemicals" in makeup and skincare products. Forever chemicals — known as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS — are manmade chemicals that don't break down and have built up in people’s bodies and the environment. They are sometimes added to beauty products intentionally, and sometimes they are contaminants. While the findings confirm that PFAS are widely used in the beauty industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted it lacks enough scientific evidence to determine if they are truly safe for consumers.The new report reveals that 51 forever chemicals — are used in 1,744 cosmetic formulations. These synthetic chemicals are favored by manufacturers because they make products waterproof, increase their durability and improve texture.FDA scientists focused their review on the 25 most frequently used PFAS, which account for roughly 96% of these chemicals found in beauty products. The results were largely unclear. While five were deemed to have low safety concerns, one was flagged for potential health risks, and safety of the rest could not be confirmed.FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary expressed concern over the difficulty in accessing private research. “Our scientists found that toxicological data for most PFAS are incomplete or unavailable, leaving significant uncertainty about consumer safety,” Makary said in a news release, adding that “this lack of reliable data demands further research.”Despite growing concerns about their potential toxicity, no federal laws specifically ban their use in cosmetics.The FDA report focuses on chemicals that are added to products on purpose, rather than those that might show up as accidental contaminants. Moving forward, FDA plans to work closely with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to update and strengthen recommendations on PFAS across the retail and food supply chain, Makary said. The agency has vowed to devote more resources to monitoring these chemicals and will take enforcement action if specific products are proven to be dangerous.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration provides updates and consumer guidance on the use of PFAS in cosmetics.SOURCE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, news release, Dec. 29, 2025Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.