Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Forever chemicals' have been linked to many diseases. Are they connected to breast and gynecological cancers, too?

News Feed
Monday, April 15, 2024

This story is part of a series, “Fighting ‘Forever Chemicals’: Women face pervasive PFAS risks.” Loreen Hackett suffered two bouts of cancer before she turned 50. Cancerous cells were discovered in her cervix when she was in her 20s, leading her to undergo a hysterectomy when she was just 28. Less than two decades later, she was diagnosed again — this time with breast cancer. Hackett, a longtime activist, said she now believes both her cancers were connected to “forever chemicals” contamination in the drinking water in Hoosick Falls, N.Y., where she has lived for most of her life and where state agencies detected problematic levels of a certain type of the compounds, known as PFOA, in the community’s groundwater supplies and private wells in 2016. Scientists are researching the possibility of such a link between exposure to the substances, known as PFAS, and breast and gynecological cancers — though they have yet to find a definitive connection. PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals found in a range of consumer products such as Teflon pans, waterproof apparel, cosmetics and stain removers. They have become pervasive in the air, water and soil due to their use in manufacturing, and are estimated to be in the blood of about 97 percent of Americans.  Scientists have found evidence connecting numerous cancers — including testicular cancer — and other adverse health outcomes to PFAS exposure, and more findings on the issue are rapidly emerging. Establishing these links can be complicated, however. The search for connections “Most cancers take years to develop, and may have developmental origins that we do not clearly understand,” said Suzanne Fenton, who at the time was a group leader in the Mechanistic Toxicology Branch of the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health.   Further muddying the waters is the fact that breast and ovarian cancers include many unique subtypes, each of which could have inconsistent interactions with PFAS exposures, noted Fenton, who became the director of North Carolina State University's Center for Human Health and the Environment in October 2023..  Patients also may be exposed to a variety of chemicals in their environment, for different amounts of time — complicating the quest “to pinpoint the role of PFAS in particular types of cancers,” she added.   Experts agree, however, that exposure to the substances could have an effect on a person’s immune system, making them more vulnerable to illnesses across the board — including cancers.  Both animal and human studies have shown that several types of PFAS can impact immune function — leading the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to propose using those effects as drivers for their health advisories for certain PFAS compounds, according to Fenton. “The immune system is critically important in cancer development,” she said.  In fact, when the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer convened a working group a few years ago to define the key characteristics of carcinogens, one of the top traits included immunosuppression.  “Those immune effects noted above may play a role in a person’s general immune function or may have effects in the tissues in which the cancer develops,” Fenton said. “PFOA and other PFAS are carcinogens.” PFOA is a type of PFAS that has been heavily studied and that the EPA has classified as likely carcinogenic. The WHO working group emphasized the immunosuppressive capabilities of such carcinogens by citing evidence of increased immune system dysfunction, as well as decreased “immunosurveillance” — the process in which immune cells find and target foreign tissue. "Persistent immunosuppression presents a risk of cancer," the report stated. “Survival of these cells and their replication to form tumors is greatly facilitated by immune suppression.” Troubling breast development Ruthann Rudel, director of research at the nonprofit Silent Spring Institute, described a recent shift in thinking surrounding the causes of cancer — from looking only at direct DNA damage to the idea that immunosuppressants like PFAS can increase cancer risk. In addition, she stressed the importance of trying “to figure out why so many women are having trouble breastfeeding and why younger women getting breast cancer and puberty is starting so early — breast development in particular.” Though scientists have not yet proven a definitive link between PFAS and breast cancer, Rudel noted that they have identified many of these same effects in lab animals exposed to the substances and other endocrine-disrupting compounds. “There are all these problems in the human population, there are things that are changing and that we can observe,” continued Rudel, whose Massachusetts-based organization focuses on the link between environmental contaminants and women’s health. “That's concerning, and I think we need more attention on it and hopefully we're moving in that direction.” Fenton and her colleagues have long been studying the impacts of PFAS on mammary glands in animals. They published a paper on the subject, along with Erin P. Hines, a researcher in the EPA’s reproductive toxicology division, in the journal Reproductive Toxicology in 2009.  Birnbaum referred to this pioneering research, which she said described how “in-utero exposure screws up the developing mammary gland in mice.” “If they're exposed in utero, then they have real difficulty nursing their pups, because their mammary gland never fully developed,” Birnbaum said. Fenton confirmed that “mice developmentally exposed to PFOA demonstrate persistent abnormalities in breast growth in female offspring.” She stressed, however, that there have only been a few studies evaluating PFAS exposures and breast development in human girls.   “At this time, the answer is unknown,” she said.  Because longitudinal studies that track health impacts on a human from development through adulthood require so much time and money, Hines said scientists often look at animal toxicology studies to try to understand such endpoints. That said, if human samples are taken earlier in life, in big cohorts, follow-up can occur later in life, she explained. “But sometimes the animal studies will give you a clue as to what you might want to look for,” Hines added. Bolstering gynecological cancer cells Another medical mystery impacting the human population — particularly older women — is ovarian cancer, which can oftentimes be lethal. But identifying a link between ovarian cancer development and toxic exposures during a specific life stage remains challenging because it “is much more rare than other cancers and usually a late in life disease,” Fenton explained.  “So it is difficult to ascertain that information in human studies,” she said.    Scientists do know, however, that PFAS cause ovarian cancer cells to multiply, according to Fenton, who co-authored a May 2022 paper on the subject in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences. The authors found that some types of PFAS increase the proliferation of two ovarian cancer cell lines and disrupt the chemotherapy that aims to kill these cells.  The researchers then confirmed this data and extended their findings in a September 2022 article, which demonstrated how a type of light-based treatment could help patients overcome PFAS-induced resistance to chemotherapy.  Separate research, which Fenton also co-authored, found that the survival rate of certain endometrial cancer cells surged following exposure to specific kinds of PFAS. These cells also appeared to be less sensitive to chemotherapy, according to the study, published in Environmental Health in December.   As in other gynecologic cancers, resistance to chemotherapy plays a key role in the fatal nature of endometrial malignancies, the authors noted.  Advocating for further research on the subject, the scientists stressed that clearer insight into the connection between environmental exposures and chemotherapy could benefit patients who reside in PFAS-polluted communities.  “If these patient populations could be identified prior to the administration of treatment, treatment failure, which is directly correlated with decreased survival, could be prevented,” the authors added. A decades-long battle While a definitive connection may not yet have been made between PFAS exposure and either breast or ovarian cancer, many women — like Hackett — attribute the development of their cancers to these toxins, which have contaminated their community drinking water systems. Hackett underwent a hysterectomy at 28 years old after doctors found cancerous cells in her cervix. She had been suffering from polycystic ovarian syndrome, as well as a blood disease, for several years prior, but fought a long battle before doctors agreed to remove her uterus because she was so young.   Her bout with breast cancer came less than two decades later, when she was in her mid-40s, in 2009. Hackett decided against radiation because she felt her weakened immune system would not withstand such treatment.   “So I said, well, let's do this,” Hackett said. “Let's do the lumpectomy and remove the glands. And we'll see what happens in a few years.” While Hackett’s breast cancer has yet to resurface, she said she does now have lumps on her thyroid — which are thus far benign according to functional blood test results. Hackett admitted in a February followup email that she hasn’t had her thyroid itself scanned for quite some time, as her own health issues have “taken a back seat” to other family concerns, such as her 31-year-old daughter’s recent hysterectomy. She also noted the exhaustion — and resultant avoidance — that she associates with having to go to the doctor so often.  “If you’ve gone through cancer once and gone through the whole scary part of it, you really don’t want to go through it again,” Hackett said in the original interview, noting at the time that she goes so far as to avoid medications that contain PFAS. Boston University researchers last year identified 337 medicines that contain PFAS, also known as “organofluorine pharmaceuticals.” The scientists based their classification on the U.S. National Defense Authorization Act definition of PFAS, or any substance that contains “at least on fully fluorinated carbon” — a carbon atom on which all hydrogens are replaced by fluorines. Among the organofluorine pharmaceuticals are some of the nation’s top prescribed drugs, including the cholesterol-reducer atorvastatin, the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, the antifungal fluconazole, and the antidepressants fluoxetine, escitalopram, citalopram and paroxetine.  In addition to experiencing reproductive issues herself, Hackett said that her daughters have experienced similar such struggles. Like Hackett’s mother, one of her daughters is severely vitamin D deficient — a condition linked to PFOA exposure — and has had to take prescription supplements. Hackett is aware a definitive link has not been found between PFAS and breast cancer, but she said she “wouldn’t doubt” that her cancers were, in fact, related to the contamination in Hoosick Falls, regardless. More and more research has been probing a potential connection, she contended, and stressed that breast cancer does not run in her family and that her test for the BRCA gene, which is indicative of breast cancer risk, was negative.  A cancer incidence investigation released by the New York State Department of Health in May 2017 for the 1995-2014 date range did not identify any statistically significant elevations of cancer for any types of cancers associated with PFOA exposure, including breast, cervical, uterine or ovary cancer.  At the time, the Department of Health said that it would update and review the cancer data for any changes in the comparative cancer profile of residents in about three to five years.  Nevertheless, a community health questionnaire published in August 2018 by researchers at the University of Bennington in Vermont identified possible discrepancies with the Department of Health’s investigation.  While the Department of Health found 12 cases of kidney cancer, no cases of testicular cancer and did not review data on thyroid disease, the University of Bennington questionnaire identified 17 cases of kidney cancer, nine cases of testicular cancer and 135 incidences of thyroid disease.  The researchers stressed that these occurrences could even be an underestimation, as only about 10 percent of Hoosick Falls residents responded to their questionnaire.  The fight for legal recognition While scientists have linked a number of diseases to PFAS, many lawyers will only take on a personal injury case if a victim suffers from a much more limited set of ailments. In 2004, residents of Parkersburg, W.Va., secured a settlement in a groundbreaking class-action lawsuit spurred by their exposure to PFAS from a nearby plant. That case resulted in the 2012 “C8 Science Panel,” which established a definitive link between PFAS exposure and diagnosed high cholesterol, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease and pregnancy-induced hypertension.  Neither breast nor ovarian cancer made it to the list at the time, though more research has been conducted in the decade since the panel published its findings. Some attorneys will now represent victims of PFAS exposure who have other illnesses, such as pancreatic and prostate cancers, but many will still only take on a personal injury case if someone suffers from the relatively short list of diseases. As researchers continue to investigate the possible associations between PFAS and other health impacts, Hackett posed the question: “When do these array of illnesses that are popping up more and more and more get added to that list?” “How many studies does a lawyer need to bring to court?” she continued. “There’s no answer.” Hackett acknowledged that there are multiple causes of breast cancer. But she denounced what she characterized as industry’s ability to “fall back on the tobacco playbook.” “Someone can smoke and never get lung cancer,” she said. “Now, is smoking linked?”

This story is part of a series, “Fighting ‘Forever Chemicals’: Women face pervasive PFAS risks.” Loreen Hackett suffered two bouts of cancer before she turned 50. Cancerous cells were discovered in her cervix when she was in her 20s, leading her to undergo a hysterectomy when she was just 28. Less than two decades later,...

This story is part of a series, “Fighting ‘Forever Chemicals’: Women face pervasive PFAS risks.”

Loreen Hackett suffered two bouts of cancer before she turned 50. Cancerous cells were discovered in her cervix when she was in her 20s, leading her to undergo a hysterectomy when she was just 28. Less than two decades later, she was diagnosed again — this time with breast cancer.

Hackett, a longtime activist, said she now believes both her cancers were connected to “forever chemicals” contamination in the drinking water in Hoosick Falls, N.Y., where she has lived for most of her life and where state agencies detected problematic levels of a certain type of the compounds, known as PFOA, in the community’s groundwater supplies and private wells in 2016.

Scientists are researching the possibility of such a link between exposure to the substances, known as PFAS, and breast and gynecological cancers — though they have yet to find a definitive connection.

PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals found in a range of consumer products such as Teflon pans, waterproof apparel, cosmetics and stain removers. They have become pervasive in the air, water and soil due to their use in manufacturing, and are estimated to be in the blood of about 97 percent of Americans. 

Scientists have found evidence connecting numerous cancers — including testicular cancer — and other adverse health outcomes to PFAS exposure, and more findings on the issue are rapidly emerging. Establishing these links can be complicated, however.

The search for connections

“Most cancers take years to develop, and may have developmental origins that we do not clearly understand,” said Suzanne Fenton, who at the time was a group leader in the Mechanistic Toxicology Branch of the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health.  

Further muddying the waters is the fact that breast and ovarian cancers include many unique subtypes, each of which could have inconsistent interactions with PFAS exposures, noted Fenton, who became the director of North Carolina State University's Center for Human Health and the Environment in October 2023.. 

Patients also may be exposed to a variety of chemicals in their environment, for different amounts of time — complicating the quest “to pinpoint the role of PFAS in particular types of cancers,” she added.

  Experts agree, however, that exposure to the substances could have an effect on a person’s immune system, making them more vulnerable to illnesses across the board — including cancers. 

Both animal and human studies have shown that several types of PFAS can impact immune function — leading the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to propose using those effects as drivers for their health advisories for certain PFAS compounds, according to Fenton.

“The immune system is critically important in cancer development,” she said. 

In fact, when the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer convened a working group a few years ago to define the key characteristics of carcinogens, one of the top traits included immunosuppression. 

“Those immune effects noted above may play a role in a person’s general immune function or may have effects in the tissues in which the cancer develops,” Fenton said. “PFOA and other PFAS are carcinogens.”

PFOA is a type of PFAS that has been heavily studied and that the EPA has classified as likely carcinogenic.

The WHO working group emphasized the immunosuppressive capabilities of such carcinogens by citing evidence of increased immune system dysfunction, as well as decreased “immunosurveillance” — the process in which immune cells find and target foreign tissue.

"Persistent immunosuppression presents a risk of cancer," the report stated. “Survival of these cells and their replication to form tumors is greatly facilitated by immune suppression.”

Troubling breast development

Ruthann Rudel, director of research at the nonprofit Silent Spring Institute, described a recent shift in thinking surrounding the causes of cancer — from looking only at direct DNA damage to the idea that immunosuppressants like PFAS can increase cancer risk.

In addition, she stressed the importance of trying “to figure out why so many women are having trouble breastfeeding and why younger women getting breast cancer and puberty is starting so early — breast development in particular.”

Though scientists have not yet proven a definitive link between PFAS and breast cancer, Rudel noted that they have identified many of these same effects in lab animals exposed to the substances and other endocrine-disrupting compounds.

“There are all these problems in the human population, there are things that are changing and that we can observe,” continued Rudel, whose Massachusetts-based organization focuses on the link between environmental contaminants and women’s health. “That's concerning, and I think we need more attention on it and hopefully we're moving in that direction.”

Fenton and her colleagues have long been studying the impacts of PFAS on mammary glands in animals. They published a paper on the subject, along with Erin P. Hines, a researcher in the EPA’s reproductive toxicology division, in the journal Reproductive Toxicology in 2009. 

Birnbaum referred to this pioneering research, which she said described how “in-utero exposure screws up the developing mammary gland in mice.”

“If they're exposed in utero, then they have real difficulty nursing their pups, because their mammary gland never fully developed,” Birnbaum said.

Fenton confirmed that “mice developmentally exposed to PFOA demonstrate persistent abnormalities in breast growth in female offspring.” She stressed, however, that there have only been a few studies evaluating PFAS exposures and breast development in human girls.  

“At this time, the answer is unknown,” she said. 

Because longitudinal studies that track health impacts on a human from development through adulthood require so much time and money, Hines said scientists often look at animal toxicology studies to try to understand such endpoints. That said, if human samples are taken earlier in life, in big cohorts, follow-up can occur later in life, she explained.

“But sometimes the animal studies will give you a clue as to what you might want to look for,” Hines added.

Bolstering gynecological cancer cells

Another medical mystery impacting the human population — particularly older women — is ovarian cancer, which can oftentimes be lethal. But identifying a link between ovarian cancer development and toxic exposures during a specific life stage remains challenging because it “is much more rare than other cancers and usually a late in life disease,” Fenton explained. 

“So it is difficult to ascertain that information in human studies,” she said. 

  Scientists do know, however, that PFAS cause ovarian cancer cells to multiply, according to Fenton, who co-authored a May 2022 paper on the subject in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

The authors found that some types of PFAS increase the proliferation of two ovarian cancer cell lines and disrupt the chemotherapy that aims to kill these cells. 

The researchers then confirmed this data and extended their findings in a September 2022 article, which demonstrated how a type of light-based treatment could help patients overcome PFAS-induced resistance to chemotherapy. 

Separate research, which Fenton also co-authored, found that the survival rate of certain endometrial cancer cells surged following exposure to specific kinds of PFAS. These cells also appeared to be less sensitive to chemotherapy, according to the study, published in Environmental Health in December.

  As in other gynecologic cancers, resistance to chemotherapy plays a key role in the fatal nature of endometrial malignancies, the authors noted. 

Advocating for further research on the subject, the scientists stressed that clearer insight into the connection between environmental exposures and chemotherapy could benefit patients who reside in PFAS-polluted communities. 

“If these patient populations could be identified prior to the administration of treatment, treatment failure, which is directly correlated with decreased survival, could be prevented,” the authors added.

A decades-long battle

While a definitive connection may not yet have been made between PFAS exposure and either breast or ovarian cancer, many women — like Hackett — attribute the development of their cancers to these toxins, which have contaminated their community drinking water systems.

Hackett underwent a hysterectomy at 28 years old after doctors found cancerous cells in her cervix. She had been suffering from polycystic ovarian syndrome, as well as a blood disease, for several years prior, but fought a long battle before doctors agreed to remove her uterus because she was so young.

  Her bout with breast cancer came less than two decades later, when she was in her mid-40s, in 2009. Hackett decided against radiation because she felt her weakened immune system would not withstand such treatment.

  “So I said, well, let's do this,” Hackett said. “Let's do the lumpectomy and remove the glands. And we'll see what happens in a few years.”

While Hackett’s breast cancer has yet to resurface, she said she does now have lumps on her thyroid — which are thus far benign according to functional blood test results. Hackett admitted in a February followup email that she hasn’t had her thyroid itself scanned for quite some time, as her own health issues have “taken a back seat” to other family concerns, such as her 31-year-old daughter’s recent hysterectomy. She also noted the exhaustion — and resultant avoidance — that she associates with having to go to the doctor so often. 

“If you’ve gone through cancer once and gone through the whole scary part of it, you really don’t want to go through it again,” Hackett said in the original interview, noting at the time that she goes so far as to avoid medications that contain PFAS.

Boston University researchers last year identified 337 medicines that contain PFAS, also known as “organofluorine pharmaceuticals.” The scientists based their classification on the U.S. National Defense Authorization Act definition of PFAS, or any substance that contains “at least on fully fluorinated carbon” — a carbon atom on which all hydrogens are replaced by fluorines.

Among the organofluorine pharmaceuticals are some of the nation’s top prescribed drugs, including the cholesterol-reducer atorvastatin, the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, the antifungal fluconazole, and the antidepressants fluoxetine, escitalopram, citalopram and paroxetine. 

In addition to experiencing reproductive issues herself, Hackett said that her daughters have experienced similar such struggles. Like Hackett’s mother, one of her daughters is severely vitamin D deficient — a condition linked to PFOA exposure — and has had to take prescription supplements.

Hackett is aware a definitive link has not been found between PFAS and breast cancer, but she said she “wouldn’t doubt” that her cancers were, in fact, related to the contamination in Hoosick Falls, regardless. More and more research has been probing a potential connection, she contended, and stressed that breast cancer does not run in her family and that her test for the BRCA gene, which is indicative of breast cancer risk, was negative. 

A cancer incidence investigation released by the New York State Department of Health in May 2017 for the 1995-2014 date range did not identify any statistically significant elevations of cancer for any types of cancers associated with PFOA exposure, including breast, cervical, uterine or ovary cancer. 

At the time, the Department of Health said that it would update and review the cancer data for any changes in the comparative cancer profile of residents in about three to five years. 

Nevertheless, a community health questionnaire published in August 2018 by researchers at the University of Bennington in Vermont identified possible discrepancies with the Department of Health’s investigation. 

While the Department of Health found 12 cases of kidney cancer, no cases of testicular cancer and did not review data on thyroid disease, the University of Bennington questionnaire identified 17 cases of kidney cancer, nine cases of testicular cancer and 135 incidences of thyroid disease. 

The researchers stressed that these occurrences could even be an underestimation, as only about 10 percent of Hoosick Falls residents responded to their questionnaire. 

The fight for legal recognition

While scientists have linked a number of diseases to PFAS, many lawyers will only take on a personal injury case if a victim suffers from a much more limited set of ailments.

In 2004, residents of Parkersburg, W.Va., secured a settlement in a groundbreaking class-action lawsuit spurred by their exposure to PFAS from a nearby plant. That case resulted in the 2012 “C8 Science Panel,” which established a definitive link between PFAS exposure and diagnosed high cholesterol, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease and pregnancy-induced hypertension. 

Neither breast nor ovarian cancer made it to the list at the time, though more research has been conducted in the decade since the panel published its findings. Some attorneys will now represent victims of PFAS exposure who have other illnesses, such as pancreatic and prostate cancers, but many will still only take on a personal injury case if someone suffers from the relatively short list of diseases.

As researchers continue to investigate the possible associations between PFAS and other health impacts, Hackett posed the question: “When do these array of illnesses that are popping up more and more and more get added to that list?”

“How many studies does a lawyer need to bring to court?” she continued. “There’s no answer.”

Hackett acknowledged that there are multiple causes of breast cancer. But she denounced what she characterized as industry’s ability to “fall back on the tobacco playbook.”

“Someone can smoke and never get lung cancer,” she said. “Now, is smoking linked?”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Forever Chemicals' Might Triple Teens' Risk Of Fatty Liver Disease

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk of developing fatty liver disease, a new study says.Each doubling in blood levels of the PFAS chemical perfluorooctanoic acid is linked to 2.7 times the odds of fatty liver disease among teenagers, according to findings published in the January issue of the journal Environmental Research.Fatty liver disease — also known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) — occurs when fat builds up in the organ, leading to inflammation, scarring and increased risk of cancer.About 10% of all children, and up to 40% of children with obesity, have fatty liver disease, researchers said in background notes.“MASLD can progress silently for years before causing serious health problems,” said senior researcher Dr. Lida Chatzi, a professor of population and public health sciences and pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of USC in Los Angeles.“When liver fat starts accumulating in adolescence, it may set the stage for a lifetime of metabolic and liver health challenges,” Chatzi added in a news release. “If we reduce PFAS exposure early, we may help prevent liver disease later. That’s a powerful public health opportunity.”Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are called “forever chemicals” because they combine carbon and fluorine molecules, one of the strongest chemical bonds possible. This makes PFAS removal and breakdown very difficult.PFAS compounds have been used in consumer products since the 1940s, including fire extinguishing foam, nonstick cookware, food wrappers, stain-resistant furniture and waterproof clothing.More than 99% of Americans have measurable PFAS in their blood, and at least one PFAS chemical is present in roughly half of U.S. drinking water supplies, researchers said.“Adolescents are particularly more vulnerable to the health effects of PFAS as it is a critical period of development and growth,” lead researcher Shiwen “Sherlock” Li, an assistant professor of public health sciences at the University of Hawaii, said in a news release.“In addition to liver disease, PFAS exposure has been associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, including several types of cancer,” Li said.For the new study, researchers examined data on 284 Southern California adolescents and young adults gathered as part of two prior USC studies.All of the participants already had a high risk of metabolic disease because their parents had type 2 diabetes or were overweight, researchers said.Their PFAS levels were measured through blood tests, and liver fat was assessed using MRI scans.Higher blood levels of two common PFAS — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) — were linked to an increased risk of fatty liver disease.Results showed a young person’s risk was even higher if they smoked or carried a genetic variant known to influence liver fat.“These findings suggest that PFAS exposures, genetics and lifestyle factors work together to influence who has greater risk of developing MASLD as a function of your life stage,” researcher Max Aung, assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine, said in a news release.“Understanding gene and environment interactions can help advance precision environmental health for MASLD,” he added.The study also showed that fatty liver disease became more common as teens grew older, adding to evidence that younger people might be more vulnerable to PFAS exposure, Chatzi said.“PFAS exposures not only disrupt liver biology but also translate into real liver disease risk in youth,” Chatzi said. “Adolescence seems to be a critical window of susceptibility, suggesting PFAS exposure may matter most when the liver is still developing.”The Environmental Working Group has more on PFAS.SOURCES: Keck School of Medicine of USC, news release, Jan. 6, 2026; Environmental Research, Jan. 1, 2026Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

China Announces Another New Trade Measure Against Japan as Tensions Rise

China has escalated its trade tensions with Japan by launching an investigation into imported dichlorosilane, a chemical gas used in making semiconductors

BEIJING (AP) — China escalated its trade tensions with Japan on Wednesday by launching an investigation into imported dichlorosilane, a chemical gas used in making semiconductors, a day after it imposed curbs on the export of so-called dual-use goods that could be used by Japan’s military.The Chinese Commerce Ministry said in a statement that it had launched the investigation following an application from the domestic industry showing the price of dichlorosilane imported from Japan had decreased 31% between 2022 and 2024.“The dumping of imported products from Japan has damaged the production and operation of our domestic industry,” the ministry said.The measure comes a day after Beijing banned exports to Japan of dual-use goods that can have military applications.Beijing has been showing mounting displeasure with Tokyo after new Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested late last year that her nation's military could intervene if China were to take action against Taiwan — an island democracy that Beijing considers its own territory.Tensions were stoked again on Tuesday when Japanese lawmaker Hei Seki, who last year was sanctioned by China for “spreading fallacies” about Taiwan and other disputed territories, visited Taiwan and called it an independent country. Also known as Yo Kitano, he has been banned from entering China. He told reporters that his arrival in Taiwan demonstrated the two are “different countries.”“I came to Taiwan … to prove this point, and to tell the world that Taiwan is an independent country,” Hei Seki said, according to Taiwan’s Central News Agency.“The nasty words of a petty villain like him are not worth commenting on,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning retorted when asked about his comment. Fears of a rare earths curb Masaaki Kanai, head of Asia Oceanian Affairs at Japan's Foreign Ministry, urged China to scrap the trade curbs, saying a measure exclusively targeting Japan that deviates from international practice is unacceptable. Japan, however, has yet to announce any retaliatory measures.As the two countries feuded, speculation rose that China might target rare earths exports to Japan, in a move similar to the rounds of critical minerals export restrictions it has imposed as part of its trade war with the United States.China controls most of the global production of heavy rare earths, used for making powerful, heat-resistance magnets used in industries such as defense and electric vehicles.While the Commerce Ministry did not mention any new rare earths curbs, the official newspaper China Daily, seen as a government mouthpiece, quoted anonymous sources saying Beijing was considering tightening exports of certain rare earths to Japan. That report could not be independently confirmed. Improved South Korean ties contrast with Japan row As Beijing spars with Tokyo, it has made a point of courting a different East Asian power — South Korea.On Wednesday, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung wrapped up a four-day trip to China – his first since taking office in June. Lee and Chinese President Xi Jinping oversaw the signing of cooperation agreements in areas such as technology, trade, transportation and environmental protection.As if to illustrate a contrast with the China-Japan trade frictions, Lee joined two business events at which major South Korean and Chinese companies pledged to collaborate.The two sides signed 24 export contracts worth a combined $44 million, according to South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources. During Lee’s visit, Chinese media also reported that South Korea overtook Japan as the leading destination for outbound flights from China’s mainland over the New Year’s holiday.China has been discouraging travel to Japan, saying Japanese leaders’ comments on Taiwan have created “significant risks to the personal safety and lives of Chinese citizens in Japan.”Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill

Democrats and the Make America Healthy Again movement pushed back on the rider in a funding bill led by BayerIn a setback for the pesticide industry, Democrats have succeeded in removing a rider from a congressional appropriations bill that would have helped protect pesticide makers from being sued and could have hindered state efforts to warn about pesticide risks.Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine and ranking member of the House appropriations interior, environment, and related agencies subcommittee, said Monday that the controversial measure pushed by the agrochemical giant Bayer and industry allies has been stripped from the 2026 funding bill. Continue reading...

In a setback for the pesticide industry, Democrats have succeeded in removing a rider from a congressional appropriations bill that would have helped protect pesticide makers from being sued and could have hindered state efforts to warn about pesticide risks.Chellie Pingree, a Democratic representative from Maine and ranking member of the House appropriations interior, environment, and related agencies subcommittee, said Monday that the controversial measure pushed by the agrochemical giant Bayer and industry allies has been stripped from the 2026 funding bill.The move is final, as Senate Republican leaders have agreed not to revisit the issue, Pingree said.“I just drew a line in the sand and said this cannot stay in the bill,” Pingree told the Guardian. “There has been intensive lobbying by Bayer. This has been quite a hard fight.”The now-deleted language was part of a larger legislative effort that critics say is aimed at limiting litigation against pesticide industry leader Bayer, which sells the widely used Roundup herbicides.An industry alliance set up by Bayer has been pushing for both state and federal laws that would make it harder for consumers to sue over pesticide risks to human health and has successfully lobbied for the passing of such laws in Georgia and North Dakota so far.The specific proposed language added to the appropriations bill blocked federal funds from being used to “issue or adopt any guidance or any policy, take any regulatory action, or approve any labeling or change to such labeling” inconsistent with the conclusion of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human health assessment.Critics said the language would have impeded states and local governments from warning about risks of pesticides even in the face of new scientific findings about health harms if such warnings were not consistent with outdated EPA assessments. The EPA itself would not be able to update warnings without finalizing a new assessment, the critics said.And because of the limits on warnings, critics of the rider said, consumers would have found it difficult, if not impossible, to sue pesticide makers for failing to warn them of health risks if the EPA assessments do not support such warnings.“This provision would have handed pesticide manufacturers exactly what they’ve been lobbying for: federal preemption that stops state and local governments from restricting the use of harmful, cancer-causing chemicals, adding health warnings, or holding companies accountable in court when people are harmed,” Pingree said in a statement. “It would have meant that only the federal government gets a say – even though we know federal reviews can take years, and are often subject to intense industry pressure.”Pingree tried but failed to overturn the language in a July appropriations committee hearing.Bayer, the key backer of the legislative efforts, has been struggling for years to put an end to thousands of lawsuits filed by people who allege they developed cancer from their use of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weed killers sold by Bayer. The company inherited the litigation when it bought Monsanto in 2018 and has paid out billions of dollars in settlements and jury verdicts but still faces several thousand ongoing lawsuits. Bayer maintains its glyphosate-based herbicides do not cause cancer and are safe when used as directed.When asked for comment on Monday, Bayer said that no company should have “blanket immunity” and it disputed that the appropriations bill language would have prevented anyone from suing pesticide manufacturers. The company said it supports state and federal legislation “because the future of American farming depends on reliable science-based regulation of important crop protection products – determined safe for use by the EPA”.The company additionally states on its website that without “legislative certainty”, lawsuits over its glyphosate-based Roundup and other weed killers can impact its research and product development and other “important investments”.Pingree said her efforts were aided by members of the Make America Healthy Again (Maha) movement who have spent the last few months meeting with congressional members and their staffers on this issue. She said her team reached out to Maha leadership in the last few days to pressure Republican lawmakers.“This is the first time that we’ve had a fairly significant advocacy group working on the Republican side,” she said.Last week, Zen Honeycutt, a Maha leader and founder of the group Moms Across America, posted a “call to action”, urging members to demand elected officials “Stop the Pesticide Immunity Shield”.“A lot of people helped make this happen,” Honeycutt said. “Many health advocates have been fervently expressing their requests to keep chemical companies accountable for safety … We are delighted that our elected officials listened to so many Americans who spoke up and are restoring trust in the American political system.”Pingree said the issue is not dead. Bayer has “made this a high priority”, and she expects to see continued efforts to get industry friendly language inserted into legislation, including into the new Farm Bill.“I don’t think this is over,” she said.This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group

Forever Chemicals' Common in Cosmetics, but FDA Says Safety Data Are Scant

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Jan. 3, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Federal regulators have released a mandated report regarding the...

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Jan. 3, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Federal regulators have released a mandated report regarding the presence of "forever chemicals" in makeup and skincare products. Forever chemicals — known as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS — are manmade chemicals that don't break down and have built up in people’s bodies and the environment. They are sometimes added to beauty products intentionally, and sometimes they are contaminants. While the findings confirm that PFAS are widely used in the beauty industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted it lacks enough scientific evidence to determine if they are truly safe for consumers.The new report reveals that 51 forever chemicals — are used in 1,744 cosmetic formulations. These synthetic chemicals are favored by manufacturers because they make products waterproof, increase their durability and improve texture.FDA scientists focused their review on the 25 most frequently used PFAS, which account for roughly 96% of these chemicals found in beauty products. The results were largely unclear. While five were deemed to have low safety concerns, one was flagged for potential health risks, and safety of the rest could not be confirmed.FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary expressed concern over the difficulty in accessing private research. “Our scientists found that toxicological data for most PFAS are incomplete or unavailable, leaving significant uncertainty about consumer safety,” Makary said in a news release, adding that “this lack of reliable data demands further research.”Despite growing concerns about their potential toxicity, no federal laws specifically ban their use in cosmetics.The FDA report focuses on chemicals that are added to products on purpose, rather than those that might show up as accidental contaminants. Moving forward, FDA plans to work closely with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to update and strengthen recommendations on PFAS across the retail and food supply chain, Makary said. The agency has vowed to devote more resources to monitoring these chemicals and will take enforcement action if specific products are proven to be dangerous.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration provides updates and consumer guidance on the use of PFAS in cosmetics.SOURCE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, news release, Dec. 29, 2025Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.