Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Forever chemicals' have been linked to many diseases. Are they connected to breast and gynecological cancers, too?

News Feed
Monday, April 15, 2024

This story is part of a series, “Fighting ‘Forever Chemicals’: Women face pervasive PFAS risks.” Loreen Hackett suffered two bouts of cancer before she turned 50. Cancerous cells were discovered in her cervix when she was in her 20s, leading her to undergo a hysterectomy when she was just 28. Less than two decades later, she was diagnosed again — this time with breast cancer. Hackett, a longtime activist, said she now believes both her cancers were connected to “forever chemicals” contamination in the drinking water in Hoosick Falls, N.Y., where she has lived for most of her life and where state agencies detected problematic levels of a certain type of the compounds, known as PFOA, in the community’s groundwater supplies and private wells in 2016. Scientists are researching the possibility of such a link between exposure to the substances, known as PFAS, and breast and gynecological cancers — though they have yet to find a definitive connection. PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals found in a range of consumer products such as Teflon pans, waterproof apparel, cosmetics and stain removers. They have become pervasive in the air, water and soil due to their use in manufacturing, and are estimated to be in the blood of about 97 percent of Americans.  Scientists have found evidence connecting numerous cancers — including testicular cancer — and other adverse health outcomes to PFAS exposure, and more findings on the issue are rapidly emerging. Establishing these links can be complicated, however. The search for connections “Most cancers take years to develop, and may have developmental origins that we do not clearly understand,” said Suzanne Fenton, who at the time was a group leader in the Mechanistic Toxicology Branch of the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health.   Further muddying the waters is the fact that breast and ovarian cancers include many unique subtypes, each of which could have inconsistent interactions with PFAS exposures, noted Fenton, who became the director of North Carolina State University's Center for Human Health and the Environment in October 2023..  Patients also may be exposed to a variety of chemicals in their environment, for different amounts of time — complicating the quest “to pinpoint the role of PFAS in particular types of cancers,” she added.   Experts agree, however, that exposure to the substances could have an effect on a person’s immune system, making them more vulnerable to illnesses across the board — including cancers.  Both animal and human studies have shown that several types of PFAS can impact immune function — leading the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to propose using those effects as drivers for their health advisories for certain PFAS compounds, according to Fenton. “The immune system is critically important in cancer development,” she said.  In fact, when the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer convened a working group a few years ago to define the key characteristics of carcinogens, one of the top traits included immunosuppression.  “Those immune effects noted above may play a role in a person’s general immune function or may have effects in the tissues in which the cancer develops,” Fenton said. “PFOA and other PFAS are carcinogens.” PFOA is a type of PFAS that has been heavily studied and that the EPA has classified as likely carcinogenic. The WHO working group emphasized the immunosuppressive capabilities of such carcinogens by citing evidence of increased immune system dysfunction, as well as decreased “immunosurveillance” — the process in which immune cells find and target foreign tissue. "Persistent immunosuppression presents a risk of cancer," the report stated. “Survival of these cells and their replication to form tumors is greatly facilitated by immune suppression.” Troubling breast development Ruthann Rudel, director of research at the nonprofit Silent Spring Institute, described a recent shift in thinking surrounding the causes of cancer — from looking only at direct DNA damage to the idea that immunosuppressants like PFAS can increase cancer risk. In addition, she stressed the importance of trying “to figure out why so many women are having trouble breastfeeding and why younger women getting breast cancer and puberty is starting so early — breast development in particular.” Though scientists have not yet proven a definitive link between PFAS and breast cancer, Rudel noted that they have identified many of these same effects in lab animals exposed to the substances and other endocrine-disrupting compounds. “There are all these problems in the human population, there are things that are changing and that we can observe,” continued Rudel, whose Massachusetts-based organization focuses on the link between environmental contaminants and women’s health. “That's concerning, and I think we need more attention on it and hopefully we're moving in that direction.” Fenton and her colleagues have long been studying the impacts of PFAS on mammary glands in animals. They published a paper on the subject, along with Erin P. Hines, a researcher in the EPA’s reproductive toxicology division, in the journal Reproductive Toxicology in 2009.  Birnbaum referred to this pioneering research, which she said described how “in-utero exposure screws up the developing mammary gland in mice.” “If they're exposed in utero, then they have real difficulty nursing their pups, because their mammary gland never fully developed,” Birnbaum said. Fenton confirmed that “mice developmentally exposed to PFOA demonstrate persistent abnormalities in breast growth in female offspring.” She stressed, however, that there have only been a few studies evaluating PFAS exposures and breast development in human girls.   “At this time, the answer is unknown,” she said.  Because longitudinal studies that track health impacts on a human from development through adulthood require so much time and money, Hines said scientists often look at animal toxicology studies to try to understand such endpoints. That said, if human samples are taken earlier in life, in big cohorts, follow-up can occur later in life, she explained. “But sometimes the animal studies will give you a clue as to what you might want to look for,” Hines added. Bolstering gynecological cancer cells Another medical mystery impacting the human population — particularly older women — is ovarian cancer, which can oftentimes be lethal. But identifying a link between ovarian cancer development and toxic exposures during a specific life stage remains challenging because it “is much more rare than other cancers and usually a late in life disease,” Fenton explained.  “So it is difficult to ascertain that information in human studies,” she said.    Scientists do know, however, that PFAS cause ovarian cancer cells to multiply, according to Fenton, who co-authored a May 2022 paper on the subject in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences. The authors found that some types of PFAS increase the proliferation of two ovarian cancer cell lines and disrupt the chemotherapy that aims to kill these cells.  The researchers then confirmed this data and extended their findings in a September 2022 article, which demonstrated how a type of light-based treatment could help patients overcome PFAS-induced resistance to chemotherapy.  Separate research, which Fenton also co-authored, found that the survival rate of certain endometrial cancer cells surged following exposure to specific kinds of PFAS. These cells also appeared to be less sensitive to chemotherapy, according to the study, published in Environmental Health in December.   As in other gynecologic cancers, resistance to chemotherapy plays a key role in the fatal nature of endometrial malignancies, the authors noted.  Advocating for further research on the subject, the scientists stressed that clearer insight into the connection between environmental exposures and chemotherapy could benefit patients who reside in PFAS-polluted communities.  “If these patient populations could be identified prior to the administration of treatment, treatment failure, which is directly correlated with decreased survival, could be prevented,” the authors added. A decades-long battle While a definitive connection may not yet have been made between PFAS exposure and either breast or ovarian cancer, many women — like Hackett — attribute the development of their cancers to these toxins, which have contaminated their community drinking water systems. Hackett underwent a hysterectomy at 28 years old after doctors found cancerous cells in her cervix. She had been suffering from polycystic ovarian syndrome, as well as a blood disease, for several years prior, but fought a long battle before doctors agreed to remove her uterus because she was so young.   Her bout with breast cancer came less than two decades later, when she was in her mid-40s, in 2009. Hackett decided against radiation because she felt her weakened immune system would not withstand such treatment.   “So I said, well, let's do this,” Hackett said. “Let's do the lumpectomy and remove the glands. And we'll see what happens in a few years.” While Hackett’s breast cancer has yet to resurface, she said she does now have lumps on her thyroid — which are thus far benign according to functional blood test results. Hackett admitted in a February followup email that she hasn’t had her thyroid itself scanned for quite some time, as her own health issues have “taken a back seat” to other family concerns, such as her 31-year-old daughter’s recent hysterectomy. She also noted the exhaustion — and resultant avoidance — that she associates with having to go to the doctor so often.  “If you’ve gone through cancer once and gone through the whole scary part of it, you really don’t want to go through it again,” Hackett said in the original interview, noting at the time that she goes so far as to avoid medications that contain PFAS. Boston University researchers last year identified 337 medicines that contain PFAS, also known as “organofluorine pharmaceuticals.” The scientists based their classification on the U.S. National Defense Authorization Act definition of PFAS, or any substance that contains “at least on fully fluorinated carbon” — a carbon atom on which all hydrogens are replaced by fluorines. Among the organofluorine pharmaceuticals are some of the nation’s top prescribed drugs, including the cholesterol-reducer atorvastatin, the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, the antifungal fluconazole, and the antidepressants fluoxetine, escitalopram, citalopram and paroxetine.  In addition to experiencing reproductive issues herself, Hackett said that her daughters have experienced similar such struggles. Like Hackett’s mother, one of her daughters is severely vitamin D deficient — a condition linked to PFOA exposure — and has had to take prescription supplements. Hackett is aware a definitive link has not been found between PFAS and breast cancer, but she said she “wouldn’t doubt” that her cancers were, in fact, related to the contamination in Hoosick Falls, regardless. More and more research has been probing a potential connection, she contended, and stressed that breast cancer does not run in her family and that her test for the BRCA gene, which is indicative of breast cancer risk, was negative.  A cancer incidence investigation released by the New York State Department of Health in May 2017 for the 1995-2014 date range did not identify any statistically significant elevations of cancer for any types of cancers associated with PFOA exposure, including breast, cervical, uterine or ovary cancer.  At the time, the Department of Health said that it would update and review the cancer data for any changes in the comparative cancer profile of residents in about three to five years.  Nevertheless, a community health questionnaire published in August 2018 by researchers at the University of Bennington in Vermont identified possible discrepancies with the Department of Health’s investigation.  While the Department of Health found 12 cases of kidney cancer, no cases of testicular cancer and did not review data on thyroid disease, the University of Bennington questionnaire identified 17 cases of kidney cancer, nine cases of testicular cancer and 135 incidences of thyroid disease.  The researchers stressed that these occurrences could even be an underestimation, as only about 10 percent of Hoosick Falls residents responded to their questionnaire.  The fight for legal recognition While scientists have linked a number of diseases to PFAS, many lawyers will only take on a personal injury case if a victim suffers from a much more limited set of ailments. In 2004, residents of Parkersburg, W.Va., secured a settlement in a groundbreaking class-action lawsuit spurred by their exposure to PFAS from a nearby plant. That case resulted in the 2012 “C8 Science Panel,” which established a definitive link between PFAS exposure and diagnosed high cholesterol, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease and pregnancy-induced hypertension.  Neither breast nor ovarian cancer made it to the list at the time, though more research has been conducted in the decade since the panel published its findings. Some attorneys will now represent victims of PFAS exposure who have other illnesses, such as pancreatic and prostate cancers, but many will still only take on a personal injury case if someone suffers from the relatively short list of diseases. As researchers continue to investigate the possible associations between PFAS and other health impacts, Hackett posed the question: “When do these array of illnesses that are popping up more and more and more get added to that list?” “How many studies does a lawyer need to bring to court?” she continued. “There’s no answer.” Hackett acknowledged that there are multiple causes of breast cancer. But she denounced what she characterized as industry’s ability to “fall back on the tobacco playbook.” “Someone can smoke and never get lung cancer,” she said. “Now, is smoking linked?”

This story is part of a series, “Fighting ‘Forever Chemicals’: Women face pervasive PFAS risks.” Loreen Hackett suffered two bouts of cancer before she turned 50. Cancerous cells were discovered in her cervix when she was in her 20s, leading her to undergo a hysterectomy when she was just 28. Less than two decades later,...

This story is part of a series, “Fighting ‘Forever Chemicals’: Women face pervasive PFAS risks.”

Loreen Hackett suffered two bouts of cancer before she turned 50. Cancerous cells were discovered in her cervix when she was in her 20s, leading her to undergo a hysterectomy when she was just 28. Less than two decades later, she was diagnosed again — this time with breast cancer.

Hackett, a longtime activist, said she now believes both her cancers were connected to “forever chemicals” contamination in the drinking water in Hoosick Falls, N.Y., where she has lived for most of her life and where state agencies detected problematic levels of a certain type of the compounds, known as PFOA, in the community’s groundwater supplies and private wells in 2016.

Scientists are researching the possibility of such a link between exposure to the substances, known as PFAS, and breast and gynecological cancers — though they have yet to find a definitive connection.

PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals found in a range of consumer products such as Teflon pans, waterproof apparel, cosmetics and stain removers. They have become pervasive in the air, water and soil due to their use in manufacturing, and are estimated to be in the blood of about 97 percent of Americans. 

Scientists have found evidence connecting numerous cancers — including testicular cancer — and other adverse health outcomes to PFAS exposure, and more findings on the issue are rapidly emerging. Establishing these links can be complicated, however.

The search for connections

“Most cancers take years to develop, and may have developmental origins that we do not clearly understand,” said Suzanne Fenton, who at the time was a group leader in the Mechanistic Toxicology Branch of the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health.  

Further muddying the waters is the fact that breast and ovarian cancers include many unique subtypes, each of which could have inconsistent interactions with PFAS exposures, noted Fenton, who became the director of North Carolina State University's Center for Human Health and the Environment in October 2023.. 

Patients also may be exposed to a variety of chemicals in their environment, for different amounts of time — complicating the quest “to pinpoint the role of PFAS in particular types of cancers,” she added.

  Experts agree, however, that exposure to the substances could have an effect on a person’s immune system, making them more vulnerable to illnesses across the board — including cancers. 

Both animal and human studies have shown that several types of PFAS can impact immune function — leading the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to propose using those effects as drivers for their health advisories for certain PFAS compounds, according to Fenton.

“The immune system is critically important in cancer development,” she said. 

In fact, when the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer convened a working group a few years ago to define the key characteristics of carcinogens, one of the top traits included immunosuppression. 

“Those immune effects noted above may play a role in a person’s general immune function or may have effects in the tissues in which the cancer develops,” Fenton said. “PFOA and other PFAS are carcinogens.”

PFOA is a type of PFAS that has been heavily studied and that the EPA has classified as likely carcinogenic.

The WHO working group emphasized the immunosuppressive capabilities of such carcinogens by citing evidence of increased immune system dysfunction, as well as decreased “immunosurveillance” — the process in which immune cells find and target foreign tissue.

"Persistent immunosuppression presents a risk of cancer," the report stated. “Survival of these cells and their replication to form tumors is greatly facilitated by immune suppression.”

Troubling breast development

Ruthann Rudel, director of research at the nonprofit Silent Spring Institute, described a recent shift in thinking surrounding the causes of cancer — from looking only at direct DNA damage to the idea that immunosuppressants like PFAS can increase cancer risk.

In addition, she stressed the importance of trying “to figure out why so many women are having trouble breastfeeding and why younger women getting breast cancer and puberty is starting so early — breast development in particular.”

Though scientists have not yet proven a definitive link between PFAS and breast cancer, Rudel noted that they have identified many of these same effects in lab animals exposed to the substances and other endocrine-disrupting compounds.

“There are all these problems in the human population, there are things that are changing and that we can observe,” continued Rudel, whose Massachusetts-based organization focuses on the link between environmental contaminants and women’s health. “That's concerning, and I think we need more attention on it and hopefully we're moving in that direction.”

Fenton and her colleagues have long been studying the impacts of PFAS on mammary glands in animals. They published a paper on the subject, along with Erin P. Hines, a researcher in the EPA’s reproductive toxicology division, in the journal Reproductive Toxicology in 2009. 

Birnbaum referred to this pioneering research, which she said described how “in-utero exposure screws up the developing mammary gland in mice.”

“If they're exposed in utero, then they have real difficulty nursing their pups, because their mammary gland never fully developed,” Birnbaum said.

Fenton confirmed that “mice developmentally exposed to PFOA demonstrate persistent abnormalities in breast growth in female offspring.” She stressed, however, that there have only been a few studies evaluating PFAS exposures and breast development in human girls.  

“At this time, the answer is unknown,” she said. 

Because longitudinal studies that track health impacts on a human from development through adulthood require so much time and money, Hines said scientists often look at animal toxicology studies to try to understand such endpoints. That said, if human samples are taken earlier in life, in big cohorts, follow-up can occur later in life, she explained.

“But sometimes the animal studies will give you a clue as to what you might want to look for,” Hines added.

Bolstering gynecological cancer cells

Another medical mystery impacting the human population — particularly older women — is ovarian cancer, which can oftentimes be lethal. But identifying a link between ovarian cancer development and toxic exposures during a specific life stage remains challenging because it “is much more rare than other cancers and usually a late in life disease,” Fenton explained. 

“So it is difficult to ascertain that information in human studies,” she said. 

  Scientists do know, however, that PFAS cause ovarian cancer cells to multiply, according to Fenton, who co-authored a May 2022 paper on the subject in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

The authors found that some types of PFAS increase the proliferation of two ovarian cancer cell lines and disrupt the chemotherapy that aims to kill these cells. 

The researchers then confirmed this data and extended their findings in a September 2022 article, which demonstrated how a type of light-based treatment could help patients overcome PFAS-induced resistance to chemotherapy. 

Separate research, which Fenton also co-authored, found that the survival rate of certain endometrial cancer cells surged following exposure to specific kinds of PFAS. These cells also appeared to be less sensitive to chemotherapy, according to the study, published in Environmental Health in December.

  As in other gynecologic cancers, resistance to chemotherapy plays a key role in the fatal nature of endometrial malignancies, the authors noted. 

Advocating for further research on the subject, the scientists stressed that clearer insight into the connection between environmental exposures and chemotherapy could benefit patients who reside in PFAS-polluted communities. 

“If these patient populations could be identified prior to the administration of treatment, treatment failure, which is directly correlated with decreased survival, could be prevented,” the authors added.

A decades-long battle

While a definitive connection may not yet have been made between PFAS exposure and either breast or ovarian cancer, many women — like Hackett — attribute the development of their cancers to these toxins, which have contaminated their community drinking water systems.

Hackett underwent a hysterectomy at 28 years old after doctors found cancerous cells in her cervix. She had been suffering from polycystic ovarian syndrome, as well as a blood disease, for several years prior, but fought a long battle before doctors agreed to remove her uterus because she was so young.

  Her bout with breast cancer came less than two decades later, when she was in her mid-40s, in 2009. Hackett decided against radiation because she felt her weakened immune system would not withstand such treatment.

  “So I said, well, let's do this,” Hackett said. “Let's do the lumpectomy and remove the glands. And we'll see what happens in a few years.”

While Hackett’s breast cancer has yet to resurface, she said she does now have lumps on her thyroid — which are thus far benign according to functional blood test results. Hackett admitted in a February followup email that she hasn’t had her thyroid itself scanned for quite some time, as her own health issues have “taken a back seat” to other family concerns, such as her 31-year-old daughter’s recent hysterectomy. She also noted the exhaustion — and resultant avoidance — that she associates with having to go to the doctor so often. 

“If you’ve gone through cancer once and gone through the whole scary part of it, you really don’t want to go through it again,” Hackett said in the original interview, noting at the time that she goes so far as to avoid medications that contain PFAS.

Boston University researchers last year identified 337 medicines that contain PFAS, also known as “organofluorine pharmaceuticals.” The scientists based their classification on the U.S. National Defense Authorization Act definition of PFAS, or any substance that contains “at least on fully fluorinated carbon” — a carbon atom on which all hydrogens are replaced by fluorines.

Among the organofluorine pharmaceuticals are some of the nation’s top prescribed drugs, including the cholesterol-reducer atorvastatin, the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, the antifungal fluconazole, and the antidepressants fluoxetine, escitalopram, citalopram and paroxetine. 

In addition to experiencing reproductive issues herself, Hackett said that her daughters have experienced similar such struggles. Like Hackett’s mother, one of her daughters is severely vitamin D deficient — a condition linked to PFOA exposure — and has had to take prescription supplements.

Hackett is aware a definitive link has not been found between PFAS and breast cancer, but she said she “wouldn’t doubt” that her cancers were, in fact, related to the contamination in Hoosick Falls, regardless. More and more research has been probing a potential connection, she contended, and stressed that breast cancer does not run in her family and that her test for the BRCA gene, which is indicative of breast cancer risk, was negative. 

A cancer incidence investigation released by the New York State Department of Health in May 2017 for the 1995-2014 date range did not identify any statistically significant elevations of cancer for any types of cancers associated with PFOA exposure, including breast, cervical, uterine or ovary cancer. 

At the time, the Department of Health said that it would update and review the cancer data for any changes in the comparative cancer profile of residents in about three to five years. 

Nevertheless, a community health questionnaire published in August 2018 by researchers at the University of Bennington in Vermont identified possible discrepancies with the Department of Health’s investigation. 

While the Department of Health found 12 cases of kidney cancer, no cases of testicular cancer and did not review data on thyroid disease, the University of Bennington questionnaire identified 17 cases of kidney cancer, nine cases of testicular cancer and 135 incidences of thyroid disease. 

The researchers stressed that these occurrences could even be an underestimation, as only about 10 percent of Hoosick Falls residents responded to their questionnaire. 

The fight for legal recognition

While scientists have linked a number of diseases to PFAS, many lawyers will only take on a personal injury case if a victim suffers from a much more limited set of ailments.

In 2004, residents of Parkersburg, W.Va., secured a settlement in a groundbreaking class-action lawsuit spurred by their exposure to PFAS from a nearby plant. That case resulted in the 2012 “C8 Science Panel,” which established a definitive link between PFAS exposure and diagnosed high cholesterol, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease and pregnancy-induced hypertension. 

Neither breast nor ovarian cancer made it to the list at the time, though more research has been conducted in the decade since the panel published its findings. Some attorneys will now represent victims of PFAS exposure who have other illnesses, such as pancreatic and prostate cancers, but many will still only take on a personal injury case if someone suffers from the relatively short list of diseases.

As researchers continue to investigate the possible associations between PFAS and other health impacts, Hackett posed the question: “When do these array of illnesses that are popping up more and more and more get added to that list?”

“How many studies does a lawyer need to bring to court?” she continued. “There’s no answer.”

Hackett acknowledged that there are multiple causes of breast cancer. But she denounced what she characterized as industry’s ability to “fall back on the tobacco playbook.”

“Someone can smoke and never get lung cancer,” she said. “Now, is smoking linked?”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

California regulators approve rules to curb methane leaks and prevent fires at landfills

California air regulators adopted new rules designed to reduce methane leaks and better respond to disastrous underground fires at landfills statewide.

In one of the most important state environmental decisions this year, California air regulators adopted new rules designed to reduce methane leaks and better respond to disastrous underground fires at landfills statewide. California Air Resources Board members voted 12-0 on Thursday to approve a batch of new regulations for the state’s nearly 200 large landfills, designed to minimize the release of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas produced by decomposing organic waste. Landfills are California’s second-largest source of methane emissions, following only the state’s large dairy cow and livestock herds.The new requirements will force landfill operators to install additional pollution controls; more comprehensively investigate methane leaks on parts of landfills that are inaccessible with on-the-ground monitoring using new technology like drones and satellites; and fix equipment breakdowns much faster. Landfill operators also will be required to repair leaks identified through California’s new satellite-detection program. The regulation is expected to prevent the release of 17,000 metric tons of methane annually — an amount capable of warming the atmosphere as much as 110,000 gas-fired cars driven for a year. It also will curtail other harmful landfill pollution, such as lung-aggravating sulfur and cancer-causing benzene. Landfill operators will be required to keep better track of high temperatures and take steps to minimize the fire risks that heat could create. There are underground fires burning in at least two landfills in Southern California — smoldering chemical reactions that are incinerating buried garbage, releasing toxic fumes and spewing liquid waste. Regulators found explosive levels of methane emanating from many other landfills across the state.During the three-hour Air Resources Board hearing preceding the vote, several Californians who live near Chiquita Canyon Landfill — one of the known sites where garbage is burning deep underground — implored the board to act to prevent disasters in other communities across the state.“If these rules were already updated, maybe my family wouldn’t be sick,” said Steven Howse, a 27-year resident of Val Verde. “My house wouldn’t be for sale. My close friend and neighbor would still live next door to me. And I wouldn’t be pleading with you right now. You have the power to change this.”Landfill operators, including companies and local governments, voiced their concern about the costs and labor needed to comply with the regulation. “We want to make sure that the rule is implementable for our communities, not unnecessarily burdensome,” said John Kennedy, a senior policy advocate for Rural County Representatives of California, a nonprofit organization representing 40 of the state’s 58 counties, many of which own and operate landfills. “While we support the overarching goals of the rule, we remain deeply concerned about specific measures including in the regulation.”Lauren Sanchez, who was appointed chair of the California Air Resources Board in October, recently attended the United Nations’ COP30 climate conference in Brazil with Gov. Gavin Newsom. What she learned at the summit, she said, made clear to her that California’s methane emissions have international consequences, and that the state has an imperative to reduce them. “The science is clear, acting now to reduce emissions of methane and other short-lived climate pollutants is the best way to immediately slow the pace of climate change,” Sanchez said.

Exoplanet atmospheres are a key to habitability

The habitable zone of a planet might be key to whether life can survive there. But so are exoplanet atmospheres, scientists say. The post Exoplanet atmospheres are a key to habitability first appeared on EarthSky.

Artist’s concept of exoplanet GJ 9827 d. It might be a steam world, with lots of water vapor in its atmosphere. Astronomers say exoplanet atmospheres are a key to whether or not life could survive on a planet. Image via NASA/ ESA/ Leah Hustak (STScI)/ Ralf Crawford (STScI)/ University of Montreal. Scientists focus on the habitable zone (where liquid water might exist) when they are gauging whether an exoplanet could be habitable. But exoplanet atmospheres are also key to whether a planet can maintain stable, life-supporting conditions. For life to persist on a planet, the environment must be stable. A planet’s surface, oceans and atmosphere can work together to regulate the system. By Morgan Underwood, Rice University EarthSky isn’t powered by billionaires. We’re powered by you.Support EarthSky’s 2025 Donation Campaign and help keep science accessible. Exoplanet atmospheres are a key to habitability When astronomers search for planets that could host liquid water on their surface, they start by looking at a star’s habitable zone. Water is a key ingredient for life, and on a planet too close to its star, water on its surface may boil. Too far, and it could freeze. This zone marks the region in-between. But being in this sweet spot doesn’t automatically mean a planet is hospitable to life. Other factors, like whether a planet is geologically active or has processes that regulate gases in its atmosphere, play a role. The habitable zone provides a useful guide to search for signs of life on exoplanets, or planets outside our solar system orbiting other stars. But what’s in these planets’ atmospheres holds the next clue about whether liquid water – and possibly life – exists beyond Earth. The greenhouse effect On Earth, the greenhouse effect, caused by gases like carbon dioxide and water vapor, keeps the planet warm enough for liquid water and life as we know it. Without an atmosphere, Earth’s surface temperature would average around 0 degrees Fahrenheit (-18 C), far below the freezing point of water. The boundaries of the habitable zone are defined by how much of a greenhouse effect is necessary to maintain the surface temperatures that allow for liquid water to persist. It’s a balance between sunlight and atmospheric warming. Many planetary scientists, including me, are seeking to understand if the processes responsible for regulating Earth’s climate are operating on other habitable-zone worlds. We use what we know about Earth’s geology and climate to predict how these processes might appear elsewhere. That is where my geoscience expertise comes in. Picturing the habitable zone of a solar system analog, with Venus- and Mars-like planets outside of the “just right” temperature zone. Image via NASA. Why the habitable zone? The habitable zone is a simple and powerful idea, and for good reason. It provides a starting point, directing astronomers to where they might expect to find planets with liquid water. But without needing to know every detail about the planet’s atmosphere or history. Its definition is partially informed by what scientists know about Earth’s rocky neighbors. Mars, which lies just outside the outer edge of the habitable zone, shows clear evidence of ancient rivers and lakes where liquid water once flowed. Similarly, Venus is currently too close to the sun to be within the habitable zone. Yet, some geochemical evidence and modeling studies suggest Venus may have had water in its past. Though how much and for how long remains uncertain. These examples show that while the habitable zone is not a perfect predictor of habitability, it provides a useful starting point. How to have a stable environment What the habitable zone doesn’t do is determine whether a planet can sustain habitable conditions over long periods of time. On Earth, a stable climate allowed life to emerge and persist. Liquid water could remain on the surface, giving slow chemical reactions enough time to build the molecules of life. This let early ecosystems develop resilience to change, which reinforced habitability. Life emerged on Earth, but continued to reshape the environments it evolved in, making them more conducive to life. This stability likely unfolded over hundreds of millions of years, as the planet’s surface, oceans and atmosphere worked together as part of a slow but powerful system to regulate Earth’s temperature. Recycling inorganic carbon A key part of this system is how Earth recycles inorganic carbon between the atmosphere, surface and oceans over the course of millions of years. Inorganic carbon refers to carbon bound in atmospheric gases, dissolved in seawater or locked in minerals, rather than biological material. This part of the carbon cycle acts like a natural thermostat. When volcanoes release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the carbon dioxide molecules trap heat and warm the planet. As temperatures rise, rain and weathering draw carbon out of the air and store it in rocks and oceans. If the planet cools, this process slows down. This allows carbon dioxide, a warming greenhouse gas, to build up in the atmosphere again. This part of the carbon cycle has helped Earth recover from past ice ages and avoid runaway warming. Even as the sun has gradually brightened, this cycle has contributed to keeping temperatures on Earth within a range where liquid water and life can persist for long spans of time. Similar cycles in exoplanet atmospheres? Now, scientists are asking whether similar geological processes might operate on other planets. And if so, how they might detect them. For example, if researchers could observe enough rocky planets in their stars’ habitable zones, they could look for a pattern connecting the amount of sunlight a planet receives and how much carbon dioxide is in its atmosphere. Finding such a pattern may hint that the same kind of carbon-cycling process could be operating elsewhere. The mix of gases in a planet’s atmosphere is shaped by what’s happening on or below its surface. One study shows that measuring atmospheric carbon dioxide in a number of rocky planets could reveal whether their surfaces are broken into a number of moving plates, like Earth’s, or if their crusts are more rigid. On Earth, these shifting plates drive volcanism and rock weathering, which are key to carbon cycling. Simulation of what space telescopes, like the Habitable Worlds Observatory, will capture when looking at distant solar systems. Image via STScI/ NASA GSFC. Keeping an eye on distant exoplanet atmospheres The next step will be toward gaining a population-level perspective of planets in their stars’ habitable zones. By analyzing atmospheric data from many rocky planets, researchers can look for trends that reveal the influence of underlying planetary processes, such as the carbon cycle. Scientists could then compare these patterns with a planet’s position in the habitable zone. Doing so would allow them to test whether the zone accurately predicts where habitable conditions are possible, or whether some planets maintain conditions suitable for liquid water beyond the zone’s edges. This kind of approach is especially important given the diversity of exoplanets. Many exoplanets fall into categories that don’t exist in our solar system. These include super Earths and mini Neptunes. Others orbit stars smaller and cooler than the sun. NASA’s Habitable Worlds Observatory The datasets needed to explore and understand this diversity are just on the horizon. NASA’s upcoming Habitable Worlds Observatory will be the first space telescope designed specifically to search for signs of habitability and life on planets orbiting other stars. It will directly image Earth-sized planets around sunlike stars to study their atmospheres in detail. Instruments on the observatory will analyze starlight passing through these atmospheres to detect gases like carbon dioxide, methane, water vapor and oxygen. As starlight filters through a planet’s atmosphere, different molecules absorb specific wavelengths of light, leaving behind a chemical fingerprint that reveals which gases are present. These compounds offer insight into the processes shaping these worlds. The Habitable Worlds Observatory is under active scientific and engineering development, with a potential launch targeted for the 2030s. Combined with today’s telescopes, which are increasingly capable of observing atmospheres of Earth-sized worlds, scientists may soon be able to determine whether the same planetary processes that regulate Earth’s climate are common throughout the galaxy, or uniquely our own. NASA’s planned Habitable Worlds Observatory will look for exoplanets that could potentially host life. Morgan Underwood, Ph.D. Candidate in Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Rice University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Bottom line: The habitable zone of a planet might be key to whether life can survive there. But so are exoplanet atmospheres, scientists say.The post Exoplanet atmospheres are a key to habitability first appeared on EarthSky.

Some California landfills are on fire and leaking methane. Newly proposed rules could make them safer

California is considering adopting new rules to better identify and more quickly to respond to dangerous methane leaks and underground fires at landfills statewide.

A vast canyon of buried garbage has been smoldering inside a landfill in the Santa Clarita Valley, inducing geysers of liquid waste onto the surface and noxious fumes into the air.In the Inland Empire, several fires have broken out on the surface of another landfill. In the San Fernando Valley, an elementary school has occasionally canceled recess due to toxic gases emanating from rain-soaked, rotting garbage from a nearby landfill. And, in the San Francisco Bay Area, burrowing rodents may be digging into entombed trash at a landfill-turned-park, unloosing explosive levels of methane.These are just a few of the treacherous episodes that have recently transpired at landfills in California, subjecting the state’s waste management industry to growing scrutiny by residents and regulators.Landfill emissions — produced by decaying food, paper and other organic waste — are a major source of planet-warming greenhouse gases and harmful air pollution statewide. But mismanagement, aging equipment and inadequate oversight have worsened this pollution in recent years, according to environmental regulators and policy experts.This week, the California Air Resources Board will vote on adopting a new slate of requirements to better identify and more quickly respond to methane leaks and disastrous underground fires at large landfills statewide.The proposal calls for using satellites, drones and other new technologies to more comprehensively investigate methane leaks. It also would require landfill operators to take corrective action within a few days of finding methane leaks or detecting elevated temperatures within their pollution control systems.In recent years, state regulators have pinpointed at least two landfills in Southern California experiencing “rare” underground landfill fires — largely uncontrollable disasters that have burned troves of buried garbage and released toxic fumes into the air. More recently, a new state satellite program has detected 17 methane plumes from nine landfills between July and October, potentially leaking the flammable gas into unwanted areas and contributing to climate change.Proponents of the proposed rule say the added oversight could help reduce California’s second-largest source of methane, a potent greenhouse gas that warms the atmosphere much more than carbon dioxide. It could also bring relief to hundreds of thousands of people who live nearby landfills and may be exposed to toxic pollutants like hydrogen sulfide or benzene.“Curbing methane emissions is a relatively quick and cost-effective way to reduce the greenhouse pollution that’s wreaking havoc with our climate,” said Bill Magavern, policy director at the Coalition for Clean Air. “But [we’ve] also been involved in updating and strengthening the rule because we’re seeing the community impacts of leaking landfills, particularly at places like Chiquita Canyon, where we have a landfill fire that is making people in the community sick.”Nearly 200 landfills statewide would be subject to the proposed requirements — 48 are privately owned and 140 are government-owned.Many landfill operators oppose the rule, saying the new requirements would saddle the industry with an untenable workload and millions of dollars each year in added costs. These costs could be passed on to residents, whose garbage fees have already risen significantly in recent years.Sacramento County officials, who operate the Kiefer Landfill, said the proposed protocols were not feasible. “As a public landfill, Kiefer cannot quickly adapt to regulatory shifts of this magnitude, and these increased costs would ultimately burden the community it serves,” Sacramento County officials wrote in a Nov. 10 letter to the state Air Resources Board.The vast majority of landfills are already required to monitor for leaks and operate a gas collection system — a network of wells that extend deep into the layers of buried waste to capture and destroy methane.A hot messChiquita Canyon Landfill in Castaic has become the poster child for the issues plaguing California’s waste management system.A blistering-hot chemical reaction began inside the landfill’s main canyon in May 2022, roasting garbage in a roughly 30-acre area.Starting in April 2023, residents of Castaic and nearby Val Verde began to take notice. They called in thousands of odor complaints to the South Coast Air Quality Management District, with many citing headaches, nausea, nosebleeds and difficulty breathing.Later that year, state regulators learned that the landfill’s temperatures had risen above 200 degrees, melting plastic pipes used to collect landfill gases. An air district inspector also witnessed geysers of liquid waste bursting onto the surface and white smoke venting from large cracks spreading across the reaction area.Air sampling found elevated levels of lung-aggravating sulfur pollutants and cancer-causing benzene. Air samples in 2023 detected benzene concentrations more than eight times higher than the state’s short-term health limit at Hasley Canyon Park, which abuts Live Oak Elementary School, alarming local parents.“I personally have transferred my children to different schools further away,” said Jennifer Elkins, a Val Verde resident whose children attended Live Oak. “I spend three hours a day driving my kids to and from school. The commute has been a sacrifice, but it’s also been well worth it, because I know my children are breathing cleaner air, and I have seen their health improve.”The landfill, owned by Texas-based Waste Connections, installed new heat-resistant equipment to extract liquid waste in an attempt to reduce broiling temperatures. It also installed a large covering over the affected area to suppress odors. It permanently closed and ceased accepting waste this year.Still, the reaction area has tripled in size and could consume the entire 160-acre canyon for many more years. During other underground landfill fires, elevated temperatures have persisted for more than a decade.The issue is, once these broiling temperatures start consuming landfill waste, there’s little that landfill operators can do to snuff them out.The fumes from Chiquita Canyon have pushed some longtime residents to consider moving. After more than 25 years in Val Verde, Abigail DeSesa is contemplating starting anew somewhere else.“This is our life’s investment — our forever home that we were building for retirement and on the verge of paying off,” DeSesa said. “And we may have to start over.”“I don’t know that I can outlast it,” DeSesa added.Chiquita Canyon is not alone.Earlier this year, the South Coast air district learned about another fiery chemical reaction brewing inside El Sobrante Landfill in Corona. In August, Waste Management, the landfill’s owner and operator, acknowledged there was a two-acre “area of concern” where landfill staff had observed temperatures climbing above 200 degrees. Riverside County inspectors also found several fires had ignited on the landfill’s surface in recent years, according to public records.Environmental advocates fear that many more landfills may be on the precipice of these largely unmanageable disasters.According to an analysis by California Communities Against Toxics, there are 18 landfills in California that have had prolonged heat signatures detected by NASA’s Fire Information for Resource Management System, an online tool using satellite instruments to detect fires and thermal anomalies.At least 11 of these landfills requested and received permission from either federal or local environmental regulators to continue operating with higher temperatures than currently allowed, according to public records obtained by the environmental organization.These regulatory exemptions are part of the problem, said Jane Williams, the group’s executive director.“We have 11 landfills across California that have been granted waivers by the government to basically ‘hot rod’ the landfill,” Williams said. “We would really like EPA and state agencies to stop granting landfill waivers. It’s a permission slip to speed in a school zone.”Under newly proposed revisions to state rules, operators must be more transparent in disclosing the temperatures in their gas collection systems. If operators detect elevated temperatures, they must take action to minimize the amount of oxygen in the landfill.While these rule changes might be coming too late to fix the issues near Chiquita Canyon, locals hope it will help others who live in the orbit of the nearly 200 other large landfills in California that could be subject to these rules.“While there’s still a fight here to try to address the concerns at Chiquita Canyon Landfill, we know that there’s an opportunity to really prevent this kind of disaster from happening anywhere else in our state,” said Assemblymember Pilar Schiavo.Dangerous leaksMeanwhile, many other landfills are releasing unsafe amounts of methane, an odorless gas produced by bacteria that break down organic waste.These emissions present two critical issues.First, methane is a powerful greenhouse gas — capable of warming the atmosphere 80 times more than the same amount of carbon dioxide over 20 years. Following California’s large dairy and livestock operations, landfills emit the second-most methane statewide.Second, methane is the primary constituent in natural gas. It can ignite or explode at certain concentrations, presenting a serious safety risk in the event of uncontrolled releases. Several times over the last few years, regulators have detected potentially explosive concentrations in the air and shallow soil near several landfills.Under current landfill regulations, operators are required to monitor for excessive methane leaks four times a year. Many operators hire contractors to walk across accessible portions of the landfill with a handheld leak-monitoring device, an approach that some environmental advocates say is unreliable.In addition, some areas of the landfill are not screened for methane leaks if operators consider them to be unsafe to walk across, due to, for example, steep hills or ongoing construction activities.“Landfills have to monitor surface emissions, but they do that in a very inefficient way, using outdated technology,” Magavern said.Starting this past summer, California has partnered with the nonprofit organization Carbon Mapper to use satellites to detect methane leaks, and already has found 17 coming from landfills. In one case, researchers saw a large methane plume appear to emanate from Newby Island Landfill in San José and drift into a nearby residential neighborhood.Although the state has notified these landfill operators, it currently cannot require them to repair leaks detected via satellite. That would change under the proposed amendments to the state’s landfill regulations. Operators would also have to use state-approved technology to routinely scan portions of their landfills they deem inaccessible.The proposed amendments seek to prevent the most common causes of methane emissions. A series of surveys of landfill operators found 43% of leaks in recent years were caused by one or more of a facility’s gas collection wells being offline at the time.The new rules would require that such wells can only be offline for up to five days at a time for repairs. Operators would also be required to install gas collection systems within six months of when garbage is first placed in a new part of a landfill — rather than the 18-month time frame currently allowed.In addition, landfills would be forced to take actions to fix a leak within three days of detection, rather than 10 days. In theory, that should help reduce the risk of leaks from things like cracks in landfill covers (typically a layer of soil or plastic covering) and damaged components of gas collection systems — two other major sources of leaks that landfill operators have reported.The amended landfill rules could collectively cost private companies and local governments $12 million annually.Some say that’s well worth the cost.A contingent of residents who live near Chiquita Canyon Landfill are flying to Sacramento to attend the state Air Resources Board meeting. They are expected to testify on how the fire and landfill emissions have unraveled the fabric of the semi-rural community.Elkins, the Val Verde resident, appreciated the area’s natural beauty — picturesque hillsides, wildlife and opportunities for stargazing without bright city lights. However, now her family hardly spends any time outdoors due to the noxious odors.Some of her neighbors have moved away, but Elkins and many other longtime locals cannot, no matter how they fear for their health and safety. “The homes are not selling,” she said. “Other homes sit vacant, and community members are paying two mortgages just to get away. And for many of us, it would be financial suicide to move away and start over somewhere new.”

New Texas petrochemical facilities are mostly in low income areas, communities of color, study finds

Researchers evaluated the neighborhoods around 89 proposed or expanding petrochemical facilities across the state using a screening tool from the EPA.

Environment Researchers evaluated the neighborhoods around 89 proposed or expanding petrochemical facilities across the state using a screening tool from the EPA. David J. Phillip/APThis aerial photo shows the TPC petrochemical plant near downtown Houston, background, on Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2017. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)A recent report from Texas Southern University found that new and expanding petrochemical facilities in Texas are overwhelmingly located in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color. Researchers evaluated the neighborhoods around 89 proposed or expanding petrochemical facilities across the state using a screening tool from the Environmental Protection Agency. They looked at air pollution and proximity to other "hazardous facilities" in the areas. Data related to the race, education, income level and languages within the areas was also collected. Sign up for the Hello, Houston! daily newsletter to get local reports like this delivered directly to your inbox. "The communities that are on the fenceline are getting pollution and they also are getting poverty," said Robert Bullard, one of the study's authors. "And also, if you look at the infrastructures within those neighborhoods that have these facilities, they are of poor quality." The report found that 9 in 10 of the facilities are located in counties with "higher demographic vulnerability" – meaning they had more people of color, more low-income residents, or both, compared to the state and national averages. Over half of the new facilities were slated to be built in communities that have a higher proportion of people of color than the national average. Meanwhile, 30% of the facilities were slated to be built in areas with a poverty rate higher than the national average. "Segregation and racial redlining actually segregated pollution, and it segregated people," Bullard said. The analysis also found that the proposed facilities were being built in areas that are already struggling with air pollution. About 1 in 5 of the proposed facilities are located within the top 10% of areas nationwide with the highest amount of particulate matter pollution, and 46% of the new facilities are slated to be built within the top 10% of communities across the country with the highest amount of air toxins. The facilities were concentrated in 9% of Texas counties, with nearly half of them located in Harris County or Jefferson County.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.