Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Extreme Temperatures Seem To Be Messing With Children’s Mental Health

News Feed
Thursday, June 13, 2024

This story was originally published by Inside Climate News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Researchers are now connecting the dots between the climate crisis and the havoc heat can wreak on developing minds.  Extreme heat and other climate calamities “impact our first and worst, our most vulnerable,” said Jennifer Runkle, an environmental epidemiologist at the North Carolina Institute for Climate Studies. She is the lead author of a recent study which found that during periods of intense drought and heat, children and young adults showing signs of mood disorders and suicide risks visited emergency rooms at alarming rates. The risk soared in the hardest-hit parts of the state, especially in lower-income areas and densely populated cities. Children are especially vulnerable to extreme heat and drought because they have a diminished ability to regulate their body temperature or otherwise cope with the heat. To understand how dangerous extreme weather could be for them, Runkle used data in North Carolina, a state routinely ravaged by dry spells in dozens of counties and droughts that can last months at a time. As in many other parts of the world, the state has gotten hotter and dryer in recent years. Runkle and her colleagues focused their study on dry periods from 2016 to 2019. They found that young people were visiting emergency departments at alarming rates whenever there was an extended heatwave, a drought or both.  “If you have a child that grows up with increased environmental stress…that is early life stress.” During heat waves in Charlotte, North Carolina, for example, psychiatric emergency visits by young people jumped 29 percent. And during a drought in the state’s western mountains and on the eastern coastline, emergency room visits more than quadrupled in those parts of the state.  Within that span, around 1,800 young emergency department admits were for mood disorder cases, including 1,300 for suicide attempts. The most at-risk children were from low-income families with a history of mental health issues. A higher proportion of emergency admissions were Black or girls younger than 12, according to Runkle’s study.  In a separate paper published in 2023, another team of scientists documented similar trends with pediatric patients in New York City. Dr. Perry Sheffield, lead author of the study and associate professor of environmental medicine, climate science and pediatrics at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, has been interested in how climate affects children for years.  Her group looked at 83,000 emergency department visits between 2005 and 2011 and tried to find a link between these admissions and spikes in temperature. Like Runkle, their study saw elevated cases of anxiety and bipolar disorders.  “People who are more vulnerable are those who already have mental health conditions,” Sheffield said.  Each team’s work is consistent with previous research linking rising temperatures to depression and suicidality, violence and hospitalizations in adults. Young people may be even more susceptible due to several factors working in tandem, according to Dr. Joshua Wortzel, a pediatric psychiatrist at Brown University who also studies temperatures and suicidality in kids.  He notes that thermoregulation, a person’s ability to maintain a stable body temperature despite external conditions, is often dysfunctional in children predisposed to mental illnesses. If children are also taking medications to treat those mental illnesses, heat exposure could be even more dangerous. Some antipsychotics reduce sweat production—a cooling process—while simultaneously altering the hypothalamus, which Wortzel calls “the main thermostat of the brain.”  Temperature and a therapeutic neurotransmitter called serotonin have a close relationship as well. When it’s suddenly too warm out, levels of serotonin can rise, according to Wortzel. With too much serotonin, other regions of the brain, including those that regulate temperature, lose their ability to function properly.  That can also make it harder for people of all ages, but especially for kids and teens, to control their emotions. Wortzel suggests that for developing brains,irregular levels of serotonin means children could be more prone to anger, irritation and exacerbated symptoms of mood disorders. The prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain that’s crucial in controlling behavior and executive function, also suffers from serotonin induced by hot weather. Sleep and physical activity play a huge role for kids too, said Dr. Martin Paulus, scientific director and president of the Laureate Institute for Brain Research at the University of Tulsa. Families who live in hot areas are prone to restlessness at night and chronic inflammation that over time can lead to foggy memories and depression.  What’s especially tricky with physical activity is that being active does prime the brain’s hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis to better regulate depression and aggression, and keep stress hormones from going awry. But most kids don’t—and shouldn’t—play outside when it’s excessively hot. By moving around less, Paulus is concerned about the various ways stress can slip into children’s lives and elevate their risk for mood swings. Both experts feel metabolic imbalances that affect energy levels and inflammation sparked by heat are additional areas of concern. Inflammation left unchecked, they believe, can affect levels of serotonin, dopamine and hormones. According to Wortzel and Paulus, when stress hormones are constantly in flux, it could lead to poor mental health now and in the future.  “If you have a child that grows up with increased environmental stress…that is early life stress,” Paulus said. Stress at such a young age is associated with greater risk for depression and post-traumatic stress, and both can have enormous physical and mental consequences that affect children long into adulthood.  The hottest parts of the US should brace themselves for a stressful future, Paulus suggests. “We know that high humidity and high heat in the South and Southeast will continue to increase. These areas are most likely to be disproportionately affected over the next few years.”  Parents and other adults in kids’ lives need to be on the lookout for changes such as mood swings and isolation from other children, Wortzel said, along with “statements about hopelessness, helplessness, worthlessness, thoughts of not wanting to be around anymore.” Whenever it’s hot out, adults should pay extra attention if children mention overexertion and dehydration. Cooling centers and cooling pillows that pull heat away from the body will be increasingly important in hot cities as temperature spikes become more normal. Clinicians, too, must be vigilant, and ready to urge psychotherapy for young people affected by heat. Wortzel acknowledges this is a problem that might not be easily or widely accepted. How the climate and environment affect mental health is still broadly debated, despite plenty of research. So doctors must be “fairly aggressive” in advocating for better public awareness of the problem, he said. Paulus agrees, and has encouraged clinician scientists to adopt monitoring systems that identify trends in childhood mental wellness and extreme weather.  That enhanced awareness could protect kids from the ramifications of a warming world. It starts with clinicians themselves, many of whom aren’t aware of the climate-mental health connection, experts said. “I think it’s important to start bringing extreme heat and other climate stressors to the clinical community as a risk factor,” Runkle said, “so that we can get better clinical [and] school guidance out there.”

This story was originally published by Inside Climate News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Researchers are now connecting the dots between the climate crisis and the havoc heat can wreak on developing minds.  Extreme heat and other climate calamities “impact our first and worst, our most vulnerable,” said Jennifer Runkle, an environmental epidemiologist at the […]

This story was originally published by Inside Climate News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Researchers are now connecting the dots between the climate crisis and the havoc heat can wreak on developing minds. 

Extreme heat and other climate calamities “impact our first and worst, our most vulnerable,” said Jennifer Runkle, an environmental epidemiologist at the North Carolina Institute for Climate Studies. She is the lead author of a recent study which found that during periods of intense drought and heat, children and young adults showing signs of mood disorders and suicide risks visited emergency rooms at alarming rates. The risk soared in the hardest-hit parts of the state, especially in lower-income areas and densely populated cities.

Children are especially vulnerable to extreme heat and drought because they have a diminished ability to regulate their body temperature or otherwise cope with the heat. To understand how dangerous extreme weather could be for them, Runkle used data in North Carolina, a state routinely ravaged by dry spells in dozens of counties and droughts that can last months at a time.

As in many other parts of the world, the state has gotten hotter and dryer in recent years. Runkle and her colleagues focused their study on dry periods from 2016 to 2019. They found that young people were visiting emergency departments at alarming rates whenever there was an extended heatwave, a drought or both. 

“If you have a child that grows up with increased environmental stress…that is early life stress.”

During heat waves in Charlotte, North Carolina, for example, psychiatric emergency visits by young people jumped 29 percent. And during a drought in the state’s western mountains and on the eastern coastline, emergency room visits more than quadrupled in those parts of the state. 

Within that span, around 1,800 young emergency department admits were for mood disorder cases, including 1,300 for suicide attempts. The most at-risk children were from low-income families with a history of mental health issues. A higher proportion of emergency admissions were Black or girls younger than 12, according to Runkle’s study. 

In a separate paper published in 2023, another team of scientists documented similar trends with pediatric patients in New York City. Dr. Perry Sheffield, lead author of the study and associate professor of environmental medicine, climate science and pediatrics at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, has been interested in how climate affects children for years. 

Her group looked at 83,000 emergency department visits between 2005 and 2011 and tried to find a link between these admissions and spikes in temperature. Like Runkle, their study saw elevated cases of anxiety and bipolar disorders. 

“People who are more vulnerable are those who already have mental health conditions,” Sheffield said. 

Each team’s work is consistent with previous research linking rising temperatures to depression and suicidalityviolence and hospitalizations in adults. Young people may be even more susceptible due to several factors working in tandem, according to Dr. Joshua Wortzel, a pediatric psychiatrist at Brown University who also studies temperatures and suicidality in kids. 

He notes that thermoregulation, a person’s ability to maintain a stable body temperature despite external conditions, is often dysfunctional in children predisposed to mental illnesses. If children are also taking medications to treat those mental illnesses, heat exposure could be even more dangerous. Some antipsychotics reduce sweat production—a cooling process—while simultaneously altering the hypothalamus, which Wortzel calls “the main thermostat of the brain.” 

Temperature and a therapeutic neurotransmitter called serotonin have a close relationship as well. When it’s suddenly too warm out, levels of serotonin can rise, according to Wortzel. With too much serotonin, other regions of the brain, including those that regulate temperature, lose their ability to function properly. 

That can also make it harder for people of all ages, but especially for kids and teens, to control their emotions. Wortzel suggests that for developing brains,irregular levels of serotonin means children could be more prone to anger, irritation and exacerbated symptoms of mood disorders. The prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain that’s crucial in controlling behavior and executive function, also suffers from serotonin induced by hot weather.

Sleep and physical activity play a huge role for kids too, said Dr. Martin Paulus, scientific director and president of the Laureate Institute for Brain Research at the University of Tulsa. Families who live in hot areas are prone to restlessness at night and chronic inflammation that over time can lead to foggy memories and depression. 

What’s especially tricky with physical activity is that being active does prime the brain’s hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis to better regulate depression and aggression, and keep stress hormones from going awry. But most kids don’t—and shouldn’t—play outside when it’s excessively hot. By moving around less, Paulus is concerned about the various ways stress can slip into children’s lives and elevate their risk for mood swings.

Both experts feel metabolic imbalances that affect energy levels and inflammation sparked by heat are additional areas of concern. Inflammation left unchecked, they believe, can affect levels of serotonin, dopamine and hormones. According to Wortzel and Paulus, when stress hormones are constantly in flux, it could lead to poor mental health now and in the future. 

“If you have a child that grows up with increased environmental stress…that is early life stress,” Paulus said. Stress at such a young age is associated with greater risk for depression and post-traumatic stress, and both can have enormous physical and mental consequences that affect children long into adulthood. 

The hottest parts of the US should brace themselves for a stressful future, Paulus suggests. “We know that high humidity and high heat in the South and Southeast will continue to increase. These areas are most likely to be disproportionately affected over the next few years.” 

Parents and other adults in kids’ lives need to be on the lookout for changes such as mood swings and isolation from other children, Wortzel said, along with “statements about hopelessness, helplessness, worthlessness, thoughts of not wanting to be around anymore.” Whenever it’s hot out, adults should pay extra attention if children mention overexertion and dehydration. Cooling centers and cooling pillows that pull heat away from the body will be increasingly important in hot cities as temperature spikes become more normal.

Clinicians, too, must be vigilant, and ready to urge psychotherapy for young people affected by heat. Wortzel acknowledges this is a problem that might not be easily or widely accepted. How the climate and environment affect mental health is still broadly debated, despite plenty of research. So doctors must be “fairly aggressive” in advocating for better public awareness of the problem, he said. Paulus agrees, and has encouraged clinician scientists to adopt monitoring systems that identify trends in childhood mental wellness and extreme weather. 

That enhanced awareness could protect kids from the ramifications of a warming world. It starts with clinicians themselves, many of whom aren’t aware of the climate-mental health connection, experts said. “I think it’s important to start bringing extreme heat and other climate stressors to the clinical community as a risk factor,” Runkle said, “so that we can get better clinical [and] school guidance out there.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Biodiversity offsets failed to protect habitat in NSW. Now federal Labor is about to make the same mistakes, critics warn

Offsets were meant to be a last resort for mitigating environmental damage from development projects, but rapidly became the defaultGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastThe federal government risks repeating grievous mistakes made in NSW with its proposals to change the way developers compensate for damage to the environment, scientists and legal experts have warned.As the Coalition tears itself apart again over climate, Labor’s plan to overhaul biodiversity offsets – and nature laws more broadly – has coasted under the radar with comparatively little scrutiny. Continue reading...

The federal government risks repeating grievous mistakes made in NSW with its proposals to change the way developers compensate for damage to the environment, scientists and legal experts have warned.As the Coalition tears itself apart again over climate, Labor’s plan to overhaul biodiversity offsets – and nature laws more broadly – has coasted under the radar with comparatively little scrutiny.Sign up: AU Breaking News emailThe plan includes a proposal to establish a “restoration contributions” fund that developers could pay into rather than doing their own work to find a suitable project to compensate for harm their projects cause.The legislation before parliament would also overturn a ban on offsets forming part of the federal nature market under a deal reached with the Greens two years ago.But Rachel Walmsley, deputy director of policy and law reform at the Environmental Defenders Office, said the proposals would replicate a flawed system at the national level despite “so much evidence of the problems” in NSW and other jurisdictions.Environmental offsets allow developers to compensate for the damage they cause by restoring habitat for the same species or ecosystem elsewhere.It is a system of balance sheet calculations – literally – where harm to habitat is approved on a promise to even the ledger with actions that deliver an equal or greater benefit.Offsets are meant to be a last resort after all efforts to avoid or mitigate damage to nature have been attempted.But as the former competition watchdog chief Graeme Samuel found in his 2020 review of national environmental laws, they have become the default policy by which most developments with significant impacts on endangered species are approved.Problems with the system include offsets that are never delivered or are insufficient, offsets on land that already had environmental protections and restoration activities (meaning there is little to no extra benefit derived from the offset), and integrity and conflict of interest concerns that have largely escaped the watch of corporate regulators.In NSW developers have the option of finding and securing an offset themselves or buying offsets on a market where “credits” for specific ecosystems and species are attached to properties where the landholder is undertaking conservation work.Developers can also pay into a fund managed by the state’s Biodiversity Conservation Trust, which then inherits the task of finding offsets that meet the developer’s obligations.In 2021, Guardian Australia exposed a litany of failures in this NSW scheme, triggering several investigations.An auditor general report found the government had no strategy for ensuring the offset market delivered the required environmental outcomes. The auditor and a separate parliamentary inquiry found the money developers were paying into the fund managed by the trust was outstripping the supply of available offsets or credits.In plain terms, development was occurring that harmed nature, money was accumulating in the fund because there were not enough offsets to compensate for that harm and species were being pushed closer to extinction.Subsequent reviews by the NSW Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal have made similar findings and the NSW government has now taken steps to limit the circumstances in which developers can pay into the fund.Dr Megan Evans, an expert on offsetting at the University of NSW, warned the federal legislation in its current form would replicate the problems seen at state level.“We know from experience … that pay-and-go offset schemes do not work because impacts to threatened biodiversity continue to be approved and then the state is liable for spending the money to buy offsets which are then too scarce, nonexistent – because there’s no habitat left – or expensive”.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Breaking News AustraliaGet the most important news as it breaksPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe Clean Energy Council on Friday told a Senate hearing examining the government’s bills it supported the establishment of a restoration contributions fund.The council’s policy and impact officer William Churchill said the proposed fund would give developers of renewable projects who might not be best placed to undertake on-ground restoration the “flexibility” to “discharge their offset obligations through a payment, while allowing contribution holders to deliver landscape scale restoration”.The federal government is also proposing to relax “like-for-like” rules for offsets delivered through the fund. Like-for-like rules require an environmental benefit to be delivered for the same species or ecosystem harmed by a development.Prof Brendan Wintle from the Biodiversity Council said last week the proposal was “absurd”.“You’re basically saying you can trade koalas with a land snail in Tasmania or a small plant in north Queensland,” Wintle said.Another element of the legislation would create a “top-up” provision to draw on taxpayer funds where contributions from developers fall short. Wintle’s colleague at the council, Prof Martine Maron, said this would leave taxpayers holding the bill for environmental destruction when the responsibility for that cost should fall to the developers that cause it.Some ecosystems and species were so endangered there were “serious limits to what we can actually offset”, Maron said.She said the use of offsets should be limited to cases where their environmental benefits were guaranteed and they would not simply facilitate further decline of species and ecosystems to a point that they cannot recover.“Turning offsets into an easy payment option flips the whole logic of environmental protection on its head,” she said.Guardian Australia sought comment from the environment minister Murray Watt.

Climate Protesters Swelter in Brazilian Sun Outside COP30 Summit

BELEM, Brazil (Reuters) -Thousands of climate protesters marched through the Brazilian city of Belem on Saturday in a noisy, diverse and peaceful...

BELEM, Brazil (Reuters) -Thousands of climate protesters marched through the Brazilian city of Belem on Saturday in a noisy, diverse and peaceful display to demand more action to protect the fate of the planet and vent their anger at governments and fossil fuel industries.A short distance away, negotiators reached the halfway point in the marathon COP30 climate summit which seeks to turn years of promises into action to halt rising global temperatures and deliver support to those most affected by a warmer planet.Out on the streets Indigenous people, young activists and civil society groups came together in sweltering temperatures, singing, playing musical instruments and waving banners."This is a place for us to march and draw up a roadmap for what needs to be done at this COP: a transition away from deforestation and the use of fossil fuels," Brazil's environment minister Marina Silva said, addressing the crowds.Indigenous protester, Cristiane Puyanawa, joined the march to call for greater land rights."Our land and our forest are not commodities. Respect nature and the peoples who live in the forest," she said.COP30 has already seen myriad protests, most notably an attempt to force entry to the venue by Indigenous people that resulted in clashes with security on Tuesday, and a separate peaceful sit-in that blocked the venue on Friday morning.On Saturday, designated as a day of protest in the two-week COP summit, there was a huge security presence around the venue, including military police in riot gear, even though the march route did not directly pass it.COP30 TALKS TO MOVE INTO POLITICAL PHASEInside the talks, negotiators who have spent the week trying to thrash out progress were reporting back on what they had achieved, before they hand over their work to ministers who will seek to overcome any remaining political obstacles."As negotiators approach week two, they need to remember that climate action isn’t about abstract numbers or distant targets. It’s about people," said Katharine Hayhoe, chief scientist at environmental non-profit The Nature Conservancy."Every choice we make today determines the future we will share tomorrow."The sprawling summit agenda covers a huge range of issues with the intention of building on progress made in previous years - an often inch-by-inch process that has over three decades delivered some, but not enough, progress to reduce global warming.But the shape of what will emerge from the summit remains unclear, with some of the most controversial issues being discussed outside the formal process - such as increasing climate finance, moving away from fossil fuels, and how to address a collective shortfall in emissions-cutting plans.The Brazilian COP30 presidency, which is steering those sideline discussions, must decide if it wants to attempt a high-stakes balancing act and come up with a political agreement on those issues that can be endorsed by all - known in COP parlance as a 'cover decision.'Asked about such a deal - as he has been most days since the summit began on November 10 - COP30 President Andre Correa do Lago told a press conference:"For a long time, I've been saying that we are not planning a cover decision, but I also said that if there is a movement from the countries to propose a cover decision, the presidency will obviously take it into consideration. So, let's see how things evolve."(Reporting by Sebastian Rocandio, Lisandra Paraguassu and William James; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Andrea Ricci)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

Climate Protesters Demand to Be Heard as They March on COP30 With Costumes and Drums

Demonstrators are marching in Belem, Brazil, at the halfway point of United Nations climate talks for what is typically their biggest day of protests during the event

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — Some wore black dresses to signify a funeral for fossil fuels. Hundreds wore red shirts, symbolizing the blood of colleagues fighting to protect the environment. And others chanted, waved huge flags or held up signs Saturday in what's traditionally the biggest day of protest at the halfway point of annual United Nations climate talks.Organizers with booming sound systems on trucks with raised platforms directed protesters from a wide range of environmental and social movements. Marisol Garcia, a Kichwa woman from Peru marching at the head of one group, said protesters are there to put pressure on world leaders to make “more humanized decisions.”The demonstrators planned to walk about 4 kilometers (about 2.5 miles) on a route that will take them near the main venue for the talks, known as COP30. Protesters earlier this week twice disrupted the talks by surrounding the venue, including an incident Tuesday where two security guards suffered minor injuries. Saturday's march was scheduled to stop short of the venue, where a full day of sessions was planned.Many of the protesters reveled in a freedom to demonstrate more openly than at recent climate talks held in more authoritarian countries, including Azerbaijan, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.Youth leader Ana Heloisa Alves, 27, said it was the biggest climate march she has been part of. “This is incredible,” she said. “You can’t ignore all these people.”Alves was at the march to fight for the Tapajos River, which the Brazilian government wants to develop commercially. “The river is for the people,” her group’s signs read. Pablo Neri, coordinator in the Brazilian state of Pará for the Movimento dos Trabajadores Rurais Sem Terra, an organization for rural workers, said organizers of the talks should involve more people to reflect a climate movement that is shifting toward popular participation.One demonstrator, Flavio Pinto of Pará state, took aim at the U.S. Wearing a brown suit and an oversized American flag top hat, he shifted his weight back and forth on stilts and fanned himself with fake hundred-dollar bills with Trump’s face on them. “Imperialism produces wars and environmental crises,” his sign read. Vitoria Balbina, a regional coordinator for the Interstate Movement of Coconut Breakers of Babaçu, marched with a group of mostly women wearing domed hats made with fronds of the Babaçu palm. They were calling for more access to the trees on private property that provide not only their livelihoods but also a deep cultural significance. She said marching is not only about fighting and resistance on a climate and environment front, but also about “a way of life.”The marchers formed a sea of red, white and green flags as they progressed up a hill. A crowd of onlookers gathered outside a corner supermarket to watch them approach, leaning over a railing and taking cellphone photos. “Beautiful,” said a man passing by, carrying grocery bags.The climate talks are scheduled to run through Friday. Analysts and some participants have said they don't expect any major new agreements to emerge from the talks, but are hoping for progress on some past promises, including money to help poor countries adapt to climate change.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

This Invasive Disease-Carrier Is Showing Up in Places It Really Shouldn’t Be

This story was originally published by Inside Climate News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. It can carry life-threatening diseases. It’s difficult to find and hard to kill. And it’s obsessed with human blood.  Aedes aegypti is a species of mosquito that people like Tim Moore, district manager of a mosquito control district […]

This story was originally published by Inside Climate News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. It can carry life-threatening diseases. It’s difficult to find and hard to kill. And it’s obsessed with human blood.  Aedes aegypti is a species of mosquito that people like Tim Moore, district manager of a mosquito control district on the Western Slope of Colorado, really don’t want to see. “Boy, they are locked into humans,” Moore said. “That’s their blood meal.”  This mosquito species is native to tropical and subtropical climates, but as climate change pushes up temperatures and warps precipitation patterns, Aedes aegypti—which can spread Zika, dengue, chikungunya and other potentially deadly viruses—is on the move.  It’s popping up all over the Mountain West, where conditions have historically been far too harsh for it to survive. In the last decade, towns in New Mexico and Utah have begun catching Aedes aegypti in their traps year after year, and just this summer, one was found for the first time in Idaho.  Now, an old residential neighborhood in Grand Junction, Colorado, has emerged as one of the latest frontiers for this troublesome mosquito. The city, with a population of about 70,000, is the largest in Colorado west of the Continental Divide. In 2019, the local mosquito control district spotted one wayward Aedes aegypti in a trap. It was odd, but the mosquitoes had already been found in Moab, Utah, about 100 miles to the southwest. Moore, the district manager, figured they’d caught a hitchhiker and that the harsh Colorado climate would quickly eliminate the species. “I concluded it was a one-off, and we don’t have to worry too much about this,” Moore said.  Tim Moore, district manager of Grand River Mosquito Control District, explains that managing a new invasive species of mosquito in Grand Junction has required the district to increase spending on new mosquito traps and staff.Isabella Escobedo/Inside Climate News But then, a few years later, it happened again. They found two more of the invasive mosquito species in traps in 2023. “Coincidence is not a word you use much in science,” said Hannah Livesay, biologist at the Grand River Mosquito Control District, which is based in Grand Junction.  The team bought different traps and adjusted their techniques to hunt for the mosquito. Scientific literature and mosquito researchers told them the effort was bound to be pointless. It was unlikely the mosquito would make it through the winter.  Then, the results started coming in. In 2024, the first year of the Aedes aegypti surveillance program, the district caught 796 adults and found 446 eggs.  These mosquitoes weren’t just surviving in Colorado—they were thriving. Mosquitoes are often called the most dangerous creatures on the planet for their ability to spread life-threatening diseases to humans. Of those, malaria, carried by female Anopheles mosquitoes, has long been one of the most devastating.  However, as climate change allows Aedes aegypti to move northward, survive at higher elevations and stay active for longer into the fall, the dengue virus is fast emerging as one of the most dangerous of the world’s diseases transmitted by mosquitoes and ticks, researchers say. Between 2000 and 2024, dengue cases reported to the World Health Organization increased more than twentyfold, as climate change, urbanization and global travel and trade pushed the mosquito vector for the disease into new areas. Climate change has also lengthened the season during which the insect can breed and thrive in areas where it’s endemic. About half the world’s population is now at risk of dengue, according to the WHO, and between 100 and 400 million infections occur each year.  The virus is often mild or asymptomatic, but for some people, it can become severe, so painful that it’s nicknamed “breakbone fever.” It can even be deadly. More than 2,500 dengue-related deaths have been reported globally in 2025, with outbreaks in Brazil, India, Australia and other countries. In the US, dengue is most common in Florida, where the Aedes aegypti mosquito has thrived for centuries in the subtropical and tropical climates.  In Colorado, state medical entomologist Chris Roundy said that while the mosquito is in Grand Junction, the state’s public health officials are not too worried about disease spread—yet. “The presence of those mosquitoes does not mean that dengue is going to be there,” Roundy said.  For the mosquitoes to spread disease, they need to feed on a human who is already sick: Someone who traveled to Florida, contracted dengue and then returned to Grand Junction while they’re still infected, for example.  In other words, the chances of an outbreak of dengue or another of the diseases Aedes aegypti carries in western Colorado remain pretty slim. Still, he said, “we are keeping a very close eye on [the mosquitoes] to see if they expand their area in Grand Junction, or if we start seeing them in other counties.” Containers, labeled by year, display the mosquitoes caught by the Grand River Mosquito Control District.Isabella Escobedo/Inside Climate News On a warm and sunny October morning in Grand Junction, David Garrett, team lead for the Grand River Mosquito Control District’s Aedes aegypti program, parked his white truck on what the team calls their “epicenter street” in the old residential neighborhood of Orchard Mesa, where Aedes aegypti found a foothold in Colorado.  It was collection day. Across the rest of Colorado, mosquito control operations aimed at preventing the spread of West Nile virus are winding down. Populations of the native Culex tarsalis mosquitoes, the primary vector for the virus, were declining rapidly in the autumn chill.  But in Grand Junction, Garrett is still in the field looking for the invasive mosquito species that seems to get active in the fall. The traps need to be close to humans—the food source—and an inviting place for the mosquitoes to lay eggs. Unlike the mosquitoes that are native to the Western Slope, which breed in standing water like ditches and ponds, Aedes aegypti mosquitos prefer to breed in containers like potted plant saucers, watering cans, and decorative yard fixtures. The traps for them look like unassuming black plastic buckets with an oddly shaped funnel attached to their tops. The district has snuck them into corners of front yards, between bushes and along fences throughout the neighborhood.  Garrett plucks out the sticky papers that have been inside the traps for the previous week, replaces them with clean sticky papers and adds a bit of fresh water. He’ll take the samples back to the lab to count how many Aedes aegypti they snagged. Various bugs collected from the Grand River Mosquito Control District’s trap, including an Aedes aegypti mosquito. Every trap is examined, and each invasive mosquito is counted.Isabella Escobedo/Inside Climate News But before doing that, he pauses to peel one of the sticky papers apart and counts four invasive mosquitoes stuck to it. Their jet black bodies with reflective white markings are easy to differentiate from the dusty brown of the native desert mosquitoes. As of mid-October, the district had caught 526 adult Aedes aegypti in 2025, all in the Orchard Mesa area. The mosquitoes don’t lay all their eggs in one basket. They skip from container to container, laying a few eggs in each. “You don’t find one and find them all,” said Livesay, the district’s biologist. “So, it’s really difficult to track them down.”  Back in the car, control district staff wound through the neighborhood. From the passenger seat, Livesay pointed with a frustrated sigh at an old tire lying in a yard. “Tires are one of the most common places you find them,” she said.  As the climate warms, “Aedes aegypti is performing at an extraordinarily high level.” The species’ preference for backyards and gardens makes it incredibly difficult to control, Livesay said. The district had to get permission from dozens of homeowners in the Orchard Mesa area to set up and maintain traps on private property, and only a handful of homeowners have allowed them to spray insecticides in their yards.  Public awareness of the mosquito’s presence, and the potential health risk it could pose, has been gradual; the district has passed out fliers and chatted with residents, but the campaign doesn’t appear to have quite taken root. On the day the team checked its traps, several residents said that they weren’t aware that an invasive mosquito was present in their neighborhood.  The new species is also expensive to control: It has cost the district about $15,000 this year in new traps, additional staff who must stay later into the season and different insecticides after learning that the mosquitoes had a resistance to the one they use for the native mosquitoes—permethrin. Given how costly it is to control them, further expansion of their range on the Western Slope is Moore’s biggest concern. Right now, Aedes aegypti occupies about 100 acres of the Orchard Mesa neighborhood. He doesn’t want it to gain any more ground. “If we can’t get rid of them, or at least confine them,” Moore says, “that’s a huge game-changer for us.”  While it’s virtually impossible to know how the mosquitoes got into Colorado, experts said, the pathway could’ve been as benign as a Grand Junction resident bringing home a potted plant from out of state. Robert Hancock, a mosquito researcher and biology professor at Metropolitan State University of Denver, said that, since the mosquito follows humans and is easily transported by the containers it breeds in, he’s not surprised when it pops up in Colorado and other high and cold locations. What does surprise him is when the mosquito can survive winters in those areas.  Hancock noted it’s recently been found to endure the winters in California, Oregon, and Utah—and now in Colorado.  “That’s the scary part, because it made it to the next summer in Grand Junction,” Hancock said, speaking in his Denver lab while feeding his own colony of Aedes aegypti, reared for research. (He allows the mosquitoes, which are completely free of disease, to feed on his own arm.)  Hannah Livesay, biologist at the Grand River Mosquito Control District, explains at her lab in Grand Junction how warmer winters likely make it easier for an invasive species of mosquito to survive in Colorado. Isabella Escobedo/Inside Climate News As the climate warms, Hancock said, “Aedes aegypti is performing at an extraordinarily high level.” More than half of pathogenic diseases can be aggravated by climate change, a 2022 article in the journal Nature Climate Change found. Livesay, the biologist, suspects the newcomer mosquitoes are wiggling their way into basements and greenhouses to weather the Colorado winter, which doesn’t have as many freezing nights as it used to.  Grand Junction had only 17 days of below-freezing temperatures in 2024, the fewest on record, according to data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Typically, the area gets more than two months’ worth of freezing weather. Winters there have, on average, warmed 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit since 1970.  “We need a cold winter for the mosquitoes to not make it through,” Livesay said. “Things are hovering just above freezing, and they’re able to last.”  This story was produced with support from the Center for Environmental Journalism at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Business Groups Ask Supreme Court to Pause California Climate Reporting Laws in Emergency Appeal

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is asking the Supreme Court to pause new California laws expected to require thousands of companies to report emissions and climate-risk information

The laws are the most sweeping of their kind in the nation, and a collection of business groups argued in an emergency appeal that they violate free-speech rights. The measures were signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2023, and reporting requirements are expected to start early next year. Lower courts have so far refused to block the laws, which the state says will increase transparency and encourage companies to assess how they can cut their emissions. The Chamber of Commerce asked the justices to put the laws on hold while lawsuits continue to play out. One requires businesses that make more than $1 billion a year and operate in California to annually report their direct and indirect carbon emissions, beginning in 2026 and 2027, respectively. That includes planet-warming pollution from burning fossil fuels directly, as well as releases from activities such as delivering products from warehouses to stores and employee business travel. The Chamber of Commerce estimates it will affect about 5,000 companies, though state air regulators say it will apply to roughly 2,600.The other law requires companies that make more than $500,000 a year to biennially disclose how climate change could hurt them financially. The state Air Resources Board estimates more than 4,100 companies will have to comply.“Without this Court’s immediate intervention, California’s unconstitutional efforts to slant public debate through compelled speech will take effect and inflict irreparable harm on thousands of companies across the country,” the companies argued.Companies that fail to publish could be subject to civil penalties. ExxonMobil also challenged the laws in a lawsuit filed last month. The state has argued that the laws don’t violate the First Amendment because commercial speech isn’t protected the same way under the Constitution. In 2023, Newsom called the emissions-disclosure law an important policy and of the state's “bold responses to the climate crisis, turning information transparency into climate action.” The environmental group Ceres has said the information will help people decide whether to support the businesses. The conservative-majority Supreme Court has cast a skeptical eye on some environmental regulations in recent years, including a landmark decision that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in 2022, and another that halted the agency’s air-pollution-fighting “good neighbor” rule.Austin reported from Sacramento. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.