Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

California wants to harness more than half its land to combat climate change by 2045. Here's how

News Feed
Monday, April 22, 2024

California has unveiled an ambitious plan to help combat the worsening climate crisis with one of its invaluable assets: its land. Over the next 20 years, the state will work to transform more than half of its 100 million acres into multi-benefit landscapes that can absorb more carbon than they release, officials announced Monday. The so-called nature-based solutions will span natural and working lands such as forests, farms, grasslands, chaparral, deserts and other types of ecosystems and urban environments. Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. The first-of-its-kind plan — part of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s California Climate Commitment geared toward helping the state reach carbon neutrality by 2045 — includes 81 targets that will help harness the power of millions of acres across the Golden State. “We’re setting aggressive and ambitious new targets to use California’s lands to fight the climate crisis,” Newsom said in a statement. “This scale of action is unprecedented, and yet another example of California punching above its weight. From restoring and conserving lands to greening our urban spaces and treating more acres to prevent wildfires, we’re protecting nature and allowing it to work for our communities.”Among the 2045 targets announced Monday are 33.5 million acres that will be managed to reduce wildfire risk, mostly through fuel reduction activities and beneficial fire practices. Those practices include cultural and prescribed burns, which are intentional fires designed to sear through overgrown vegetation and other material that can act as fuel for flames. U.S. Forest Service firefighters in the Angeles National Forest burn piles of forest debris below Mt. Baldy in November 2023. Controlled burns are part of the service’s forest management practices. (Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times) To get there, the state seeks to conduct 1.5 million acres of wildfire risk reduction activity per year by 2030; 2 million acres per year by 2038, and 2.5 million acres per year by 2045, most of which will be applied to forests, shrublands, chaparral and grasslands, which together comprise about 67% of the state.(By comparison, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection completed about 105,000 acres of fuel treatment, including 36,000 acres of prescribed burns during the 2023 fiscal year, according to agency data. The U.S. Forest Service completed about 312,000 acres of combined treatment and burns).The plan also calls for 11.9 million acres of forestland to be managed for biodiversity protection, carbon storage and water supply protection by 2045, and 2.7 million acres of shrublands and chaparral to be managed for carbon storage, resilience and habitat connectivity, among other efforts.“We’ve had a really strong environmental conservation movement in California, and we’re clearly strong on climate action, but we haven’t integrated nature into our climate agenda,” said Wade Crowfoot, California’s natural resources secretary. “And so this is really the next tangible step to do that.”Crowfoot noted that nature-based solutions are gaining attention not only in the state, but also on the international stage, with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change validating their critical importance in ongoing efforts to stabilize the climate. “This is all about improving the health and the resilience of our lands, whether that’s forests and deserts and farms and coastal areas,” Crowfoot said. “Healthy, resilient lands ... do a better job absorbing and storing carbon, and avoid emissions.” But the move was also prompted by the results of California’s 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, which analyzed for the first time the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced and absorbed by the state’s lands. The analysis found that California’s lands currently emit more than they absorb — principally in the form of wildfires, which spew carbon dioxide and other harmful emissions. In fact, a recent study found that California wildfires in 2020 — the state’s worst fire season on record — released about 127 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, or almost twice the tonnage of greenhouse gases as the total amount of CO2 reductions made since 2003. “This shift from carbon sink to carbon emitter is largely due to historic land use decisions, including disconnection from beneficial land management practices utilized by California Native American tribes, and the accelerating impacts of climate change,” the governor’s office said. “Modeling suggests that aggressive near-term efforts to increase climate action on California’s lands will put this sector on the path to course correction.” Beaches are included in the state’s plan to use nature to mitigate climate change. (Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times) The plan also comes on the heels of Earth’s hottest year on record, which has seen scientists and public officials alike sounding alarms about rapid global changes made worse by fossil fuel emissions. What’s more, the planet is teetering on the brink of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming over pre-industrial levels — an international benchmark for avoiding the worst effects of climate change — and is already beginning to see worsening wildfires, stronger storms, more severe droughts and accelerating species loss, among other effects. Smog hangs in the air as the sun sets after a hot day in Los Angeles last fall. (Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times) Reducing carbon emissions is key to preventing such outcomes from getting worse, experts say. The current level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is hovering around 425 parts per million — well beyond safe limits. “The science is very clear: Shifting our lands from a source to a sink requires aggressive near-term action, and the longer we wait, the harder it will become,” said Lauren Sanchez, Newsom’s climate advisor. Other items outlined in the plan include managing 3.4 million acres of croplands for healthy soils, drought resilience and below-ground biodiversity, as well as conservation. This includes about 152,000 acres per year by 2030; 206,000 acres per year by 2038, and 209,500 acres per year by 2045. Much of this work will include practices that sequester carbon and provide multiple benefits on working lands, such as increased water holding capacity and improved nutrient cycling, said Karen Ross, secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture. A tractor plows a field in the Cuyama Valley in Central California. (Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times) Indeed, agricultural emissions in the United States account for about 10% of the country’s emissions, according to the latest greenhouse gas emission inventory from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The California Air Resources Board estimates that in California, agriculture is the source of 8% of total inventoried greenhouse gas emissions. “I know that with the continued investment, cooperation and partnerships that we’re building, we can continue to be a leader in the nation of putting these practices on the soil, and being [a] carbon sink,” Ross said. The governor plans to plant thousands of trees in urban areas. (Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times) But it’s not just agricultural land that will play a part in the state’s land-use transformation. The program also calls for 4.2 million trees to be planted across California, which will help remove carbon, combat heat and increase access to nature. Studies have shown that areas without trees can simmer several degrees hotter than their leafier counterparts, with poor neighborhoods often bearing the brunt of extreme temperatures. Trees and vegetation also contribute to more permeable soil that creates more opportunities for water to seep into the ground and replenish groundwater aquifers that have been sapped by agriculture, drought and overuse. In fact, many of the projects — which will span more than 40 state agencies, tribal partners and stakeholder groups — will have multiple benefits, said Liane Randolph, chair of the California Air Resources Board. For example, healthier forests can mean healthier soils and water tables, as well as reduced wildfire risks and improved air quality.The solutions were developed “not just to support carbon storage and help achieve carbon neutrality by 2045, but also for the much larger public health and environmental benefits that come with restored and sustained ecosystem health,” Randolph said. She added that the phased rollout of the targets means that many Californians will begin to see benefits long before the 2045 deadline. The governor’s plan also includes 1.6 million acres of grasslands managed to restore native grasslands and protect biodiversity; and 1.5 million acres of sparsely vegetated lands — such as deserts and beaches — managed to protect fragile ecosystems. More than 230,000 acres of wetlands and seagrasses will be managed to protect water supply, deliver carbon benefits and buffer communities from flooding.The cumulative targets amount to nearly 60 million acres across California by 2045, although it’s possible some projects will overlap, officials said. There is currently no specific price tag attached to the work. The state only recently saw several of its key climate programs placed on the chopping block as Newsom seeks to close a massive budget deficit. The work will “require significant investment and levels of action collectively,” acknowledged Amanda Hansen, deputy secretary for climate change with the Natural Resources Agency. However, she noted that according to the Scoping Plan, the cost for delivering on the targets is significantly less than the estimated costs for addressing emissions in fossil fuel sectors.The targets are intended to help guide state policy and investment, Hansen said, and will work in conjunction with the Scoping Plan and with Assembly Bill 1757, a 2022 bill that required the state agencies to collaborate on setting targets for carbon sequestration and nature-based solutions. The Newsom administration has invested $9.6 billion in nature-based solutions since 2020.Officials described the plan as “among the most comprehensive in the world” and said they believe it can act as a model for other states and regions.“These climate targets are a big deal for California, for the nation, and for the world,” Sanchez said.

State officials unveiled 81 targets to transform millions of acres in the Golden State into landscapes that can absorb more carbon than they release by 2045.

California has unveiled an ambitious plan to help combat the worsening climate crisis with one of its invaluable assets: its land.

Over the next 20 years, the state will work to transform more than half of its 100 million acres into multi-benefit landscapes that can absorb more carbon than they release, officials announced Monday. The so-called nature-based solutions will span natural and working lands such as forests, farms, grasslands, chaparral, deserts and other types of ecosystems and urban environments.

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

The first-of-its-kind plan — part of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s California Climate Commitment geared toward helping the state reach carbon neutrality by 2045 — includes 81 targets that will help harness the power of millions of acres across the Golden State.

“We’re setting aggressive and ambitious new targets to use California’s lands to fight the climate crisis,” Newsom said in a statement. “This scale of action is unprecedented, and yet another example of California punching above its weight. From restoring and conserving lands to greening our urban spaces and treating more acres to prevent wildfires, we’re protecting nature and allowing it to work for our communities.”

Among the 2045 targets announced Monday are 33.5 million acres that will be managed to reduce wildfire risk, mostly through fuel reduction activities and beneficial fire practices. Those practices include cultural and prescribed burns, which are intentional fires designed to sear through overgrown vegetation and other material that can act as fuel for flames.

U.S. Forest Service firefighters in the Angeles National Forest burn piles of forest debris below Mt. Baldy.

U.S. Forest Service firefighters in the Angeles National Forest burn piles of forest debris below Mt. Baldy in November 2023. Controlled burns are part of the service’s forest management practices.

(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

To get there, the state seeks to conduct 1.5 million acres of wildfire risk reduction activity per year by 2030; 2 million acres per year by 2038, and 2.5 million acres per year by 2045, most of which will be applied to forests, shrublands, chaparral and grasslands, which together comprise about 67% of the state.

(By comparison, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection completed about 105,000 acres of fuel treatment, including 36,000 acres of prescribed burns during the 2023 fiscal year, according to agency data. The U.S. Forest Service completed about 312,000 acres of combined treatment and burns).

The plan also calls for 11.9 million acres of forestland to be managed for biodiversity protection, carbon storage and water supply protection by 2045, and 2.7 million acres of shrublands and chaparral to be managed for carbon storage, resilience and habitat connectivity, among other efforts.

“We’ve had a really strong environmental conservation movement in California, and we’re clearly strong on climate action, but we haven’t integrated nature into our climate agenda,” said Wade Crowfoot, California’s natural resources secretary. “And so this is really the next tangible step to do that.”

Crowfoot noted that nature-based solutions are gaining attention not only in the state, but also on the international stage, with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change validating their critical importance in ongoing efforts to stabilize the climate.

“This is all about improving the health and the resilience of our lands, whether that’s forests and deserts and farms and coastal areas,” Crowfoot said. “Healthy, resilient lands ... do a better job absorbing and storing carbon, and avoid emissions.”

But the move was also prompted by the results of California’s 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, which analyzed for the first time the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced and absorbed by the state’s lands. The analysis found that California’s lands currently emit more than they absorb — principally in the form of wildfires, which spew carbon dioxide and other harmful emissions.

In fact, a recent study found that California wildfires in 2020 — the state’s worst fire season on record — released about 127 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, or almost twice the tonnage of greenhouse gases as the total amount of CO2 reductions made since 2003.

“This shift from carbon sink to carbon emitter is largely due to historic land use decisions, including disconnection from beneficial land management practices utilized by California Native American tribes, and the accelerating impacts of climate change,” the governor’s office said. “Modeling suggests that aggressive near-term efforts to increase climate action on California’s lands will put this sector on the path to course correction.”

Beachgoers take in the cooling mist of the ocean as the sun sets on Huntington Beach.

Beaches are included in the state’s plan to use nature to mitigate climate change.

(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

The plan also comes on the heels of Earth’s hottest year on record, which has seen scientists and public officials alike sounding alarms about rapid global changes made worse by fossil fuel emissions.

What’s more, the planet is teetering on the brink of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming over pre-industrial levels — an international benchmark for avoiding the worst effects of climate change — and is already beginning to see worsening wildfires, stronger storms, more severe droughts and accelerating species loss, among other effects.

A smoggy sky, with the downtown Los Angeles skyline and a freeway packed with cars

Smog hangs in the air as the sun sets after a hot day in Los Angeles last fall.

(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

Reducing carbon emissions is key to preventing such outcomes from getting worse, experts say. The current level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is hovering around 425 parts per million — well beyond safe limits.

“The science is very clear: Shifting our lands from a source to a sink requires aggressive near-term action, and the longer we wait, the harder it will become,” said Lauren Sanchez, Newsom’s climate advisor.

Other items outlined in the plan include managing 3.4 million acres of croplands for healthy soils, drought resilience and below-ground biodiversity, as well as conservation. This includes about 152,000 acres per year by 2030; 206,000 acres per year by 2038, and 209,500 acres per year by 2045.

Much of this work will include practices that sequester carbon and provide multiple benefits on working lands, such as increased water holding capacity and improved nutrient cycling, said Karen Ross, secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

A tractor plows a field in the Cuyama Valley in October.

A tractor plows a field in the Cuyama Valley in Central California.

(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

Indeed, agricultural emissions in the United States account for about 10% of the country’s emissions, according to the latest greenhouse gas emission inventory from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The California Air Resources Board estimates that in California, agriculture is the source of 8% of total inventoried greenhouse gas emissions.

“I know that with the continued investment, cooperation and partnerships that we’re building, we can continue to be a leader in the nation of putting these practices on the soil, and being [a] carbon sink,” Ross said.

A man loads up a truck with trees to be planted

The governor plans to plant thousands of trees in urban areas.

(Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times)

But it’s not just agricultural land that will play a part in the state’s land-use transformation. The program also calls for 4.2 million trees to be planted across California, which will help remove carbon, combat heat and increase access to nature. Studies have shown that areas without trees can simmer several degrees hotter than their leafier counterparts, with poor neighborhoods often bearing the brunt of extreme temperatures.

Trees and vegetation also contribute to more permeable soil that creates more opportunities for water to seep into the ground and replenish groundwater aquifers that have been sapped by agriculture, drought and overuse.

In fact, many of the projects — which will span more than 40 state agencies, tribal partners and stakeholder groups — will have multiple benefits, said Liane Randolph, chair of the California Air Resources Board. For example, healthier forests can mean healthier soils and water tables, as well as reduced wildfire risks and improved air quality.

The solutions were developed “not just to support carbon storage and help achieve carbon neutrality by 2045, but also for the much larger public health and environmental benefits that come with restored and sustained ecosystem health,” Randolph said. She added that the phased rollout of the targets means that many Californians will begin to see benefits long before the 2045 deadline.

The governor’s plan also includes 1.6 million acres of grasslands managed to restore native grasslands and protect biodiversity; and 1.5 million acres of sparsely vegetated lands — such as deserts and beaches — managed to protect fragile ecosystems. More than 230,000 acres of wetlands and seagrasses will be managed to protect water supply, deliver carbon benefits and buffer communities from flooding.

The cumulative targets amount to nearly 60 million acres across California by 2045, although it’s possible some projects will overlap, officials said.

There is currently no specific price tag attached to the work. The state only recently saw several of its key climate programs placed on the chopping block as Newsom seeks to close a massive budget deficit.

The work will “require significant investment and levels of action collectively,” acknowledged Amanda Hansen, deputy secretary for climate change with the Natural Resources Agency. However, she noted that according to the Scoping Plan, the cost for delivering on the targets is significantly less than the estimated costs for addressing emissions in fossil fuel sectors.

The targets are intended to help guide state policy and investment, Hansen said, and will work in conjunction with the Scoping Plan and with Assembly Bill 1757, a 2022 bill that required the state agencies to collaborate on setting targets for carbon sequestration and nature-based solutions. The Newsom administration has invested $9.6 billion in nature-based solutions since 2020.

Officials described the plan as “among the most comprehensive in the world” and said they believe it can act as a model for other states and regions.

“These climate targets are a big deal for California, for the nation, and for the world,” Sanchez said.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

The Olympics Need to Change as the Climate Changes

Organizers must reduce the event’s carbon footprint.

The organizers of the Paris Olympic Games have outdone their predecessors in trying to make the Games the most sustainable in the decades since climate change became a concern. But with an estimated 11 million tourists converging on the City of Light for the Olympics, including 1.5 million from abroad, the Games can only be so green.On the plus side, organizers have been serious in their efforts to reduce carbon emissions. They measured the expected carbon footprint of the Games, reduced emissions through energy efficiencies, limited new construction by using existing facilities, added bike lanes, minimized the use of fuel-powered generators and sourced sustainably produced goods for medals and podiums and much of the event materials.Perhaps most important, they’ve talked about their sustainability work at every turn, drawing attention to unsexy details and raising public awareness of environmental issues such as air pollution and extreme heat in France and beyond.Still, international travel is a big contributor to the overall carbon impact of the Games. Organizers of the Rio Olympics in 2016 predicted that slightly more than half of the carbon emissions would come from spectators. Of that amount, 80 percent was expected to be generated by international fans traveling to and from the Games. Organizers saw a low potential to reduce those emissions and said they would need to compensate elsewhere in the preparation and running of the events.What else is to be done? If the world is serious about reducing carbon emissions, the Olympics, like so much else, will have to change even more. Jules Boykoff, who has written extensively about the Olympic Games, rightly argues in Scientific American that “the Games need to reduce their size, limit the number of tourists who travel from afar, thoroughly greenify their capacious supply chains and open up their eco-books for bona fide accountability.”The sustainability efforts in Paris have not all been smooth sailing. The Seine is scheduled to host marathon swimming and the swim portion of the triathlon. But despite spending 1.4 billion euros trying to clean the river, French authorities have achieved inconsistent results: Water tests in June still showed high levels of E. coli. Those numbers improved and crept into the range of safe to swim in late June and early this month. Anne Hidalgo, the mayor of Paris, recently took a swim in the river after canceling an earlier planned plunge because of those high bacteria levels. Her swim was promising, but one heavy rainfall could draw more pollutants into the river and undo much of the progress she celebrated.Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.

Canada’s 2023 Wildfire Season: An Unprecedented Environmental Catastrophe

A study has found that contaminated mining sites increase the risks associated with fires. The 2023 wildfire season in Canada was the most destructive ever...

The 2023 wildfire season in Canada, the most destructive on record, released significant amounts of arsenic, particularly from mining-impacted areas around Yellowknife, posing increased environmental and health risks.A study has found that contaminated mining sites increase the risks associated with fires.The 2023 wildfire season in Canada was the most destructive ever recorded, and a new study suggests the impact was unprecedented. The research found that four wildfires in mine-impacted areas around Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, potentially contributed up to half of the global annual arsenic emissions from wildfires.The work, led by researchers at the University of Waterloo and Nipissing University, is the first to calculate the amount of arsenic that was stored in areas at high risk of wildfires around Yellowknife. Looking at data from the past five decades, the team estimates the 2023 wildfires potentially released between 69 and 183 tonnes of arsenic.Arsenic, a potent toxin, that the World Health Organization associates with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, various cancers, and infant mortality, can be transformed by wildfire and released into the environment from the soils that normally sequester it. The Growing Risk of WildfiresGiven that the frequency and severity of wildfires are expected to increase because of climate change, the researchers caution that in any regions in the world where annual wildfires intersect with past or present mining and smelting operations, future fires could present a major risk for releasing stored toxins back into the environment.“Yellowknife has a decades-long history of mining, which has led to an accumulation of arsenic in the surrounding landscape. However, Yellowknife is not unique in this regard, Canada has many industrially contaminated sites that are vulnerable to wildfire,” said Dr. Owen Sutton, a postdoctoral fellow in the Faculty of Environment at Waterloo.The amount of arsenic released by wildfires depends on a multitude of factors, such as fire temperature, depth of the burn, and soil type, and the combination of these variables.“While our research has raised the alarm on this issue, we will be the first to argue there is an urgent need for collaborative investigation by wildfire scientists, chemists, environmental scientists, and policy experts,” said Dr. Colin McCarter, professor in the Department of Geography at Nipissing University and Canada Research Chair in Climate and Environmental Change. “By integrating diverse fire management techniques, including Indigenous fire stewardship, we can hopefully mitigate these emerging risks to human and environmental health.”The researchers found that arsenic emissions from wetlands were the most concerning because of their tendency to store contaminants compared to forests. Moving forward, they will continue quantifying the amount of toxins being stored by northern peatlands and study the potential release of other metals from those landscapes.Reference: “Globally-significant arsenic release by wildfires in a mining-impacted boreal landscape” by O F Sutton, C P R McCarter and J M Waddington, 20 May 2024, Environmental Research Letters.DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad461a

As a Toxic Haze Blurs the Rockies, Residents Worry About Plans for More Drilling

During Colorado’s ‘ozone season,’ children and adults alike stay indoors. Drilling wells near the suburbs could make it worse. The post As a Toxic Haze Blurs the Rockies, Residents Worry About Plans for More Drilling appeared first on .

For more than half the days since May 31, a toxic haze has blurred the towering Rocky Mountains along the eastern Front Range, prompting Colorado health officials to warn residents to reduce time outdoors to avoid damage to their lungs.   The smog forced older adults to forgo walks, asthma sufferers to reach for inhalers and parents to keep toddlers inside. It also heightened concerns about what it might mean for 3 million people here if state regulators approve oil and gas proposals that call for scores of new wells. Emissions from energy industry operations and traffic are the main drivers of the nine-county metropolitan Denver region’s failure to meet federal air quality standards for the last two decades.   “I am completely dumbfounded!” Aldo Plascencia, an Aurora resident who lives near where hundreds of new wells would be drilled, wrote on a community Facebook page on July 11.   “When dropping my kids at school this morning, parents were being notified that all outdoor field trips were being canceled today due to high ozone activity,” he added. “Why would anyone in their right mind consider permitting fracking so close to schools and houses — this will make matters worse.”   A decision on a 156-well Lowry Ranch proposal is imminent — state regulators have scheduled a hearing for July 30. Drilling would occur along the southeastern edge of greater Denver, under homes, a reservoir that holds the region’s drinking water and adjacent to one of the nation’s most polluted Superfund sites.    The 50-square-mile site is also near air monitors that recorded some of the region’s worst air pollution levels from 2019 to 2022. In the first 10 years of operation alone, the Lowry Ranch project would emit hundreds of tons of smog-forming compounds per year, as well as tens of thousands of tons of climate warming gases, according to Geosyntec, a consultant hired by Crestone Peak Resources, the operator proposing the plan. The wells could be in operation for 25 years.     In the month after this year’s annual “ozone season” began May 31, Colorado health officials issued more air quality alerts than in any similar period since 2016.     Cities along the eastern flank of the Rockies already rank among the worst in the nation for lung-damaging ozone pollution, according to the American Lung Association’s 2023 “State of the Air” report. Denver was ranked sixth worst, with  every county in the area receiving a failing grade. Pollution is so bad some days that a monitor at Rocky Mountain National Park registers levels that violate Environmental Protection Agency standards.   Greater Denver’s topography, which traps pollutants, contributes to the intractable problem, as does human-caused climate change. Global warming made June’s record hot conditions — the second warmest since 1872 — “more likely,” according to Climate Central, an organization that uses data and science to link weather-related events to global warming.   Colorado’s most densely populated area overlaps with some of the nation’s most profitable oil and gas fields — amplifying the health risk. The state tied with Alaska as the country’s fourth-largest oil producer and ranked as its eighth-biggest gas producer.   Vehicles and oil and gas operations emit nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, which react when heated by the region’s plentiful sunlight to create ground-level ozone. In the month after this year’s annual “ozone season” began May 31, health officials issued more air quality alerts than in any similar period since 2016.   “We are having a difficult year,” Mike Silverstein, executive director of the Regional Air Quality Council, said at an online planning forum on July 18. The council advises state regulators on strategies to curb pollutants.   “We are exceeding the ozone standards at most of our monitoring stations,” he added, and “we are midway through ozone season.”   According to estimates used by the council, by 2026, emissions from oil and gas operations will comprise about 36% of the 253 tons per day of volatile organic compounds released in the region’s atmosphere. The second highest emitting category will be vehicles at 11%.   The industry is expected to account for 47% of the 144.5 tons of nitrogen oxide emitted per day in 2026 — more than three-and-a-half times as much as power plants and other large permitted facilities that pollute combined, according to the models used. It’s not possible, however, to draw a straight line from these percentages to the proportion of the region’s ozone pollution created by oil and gas extraction, David Sabados, the air quality council’s communications director, said in an email.   Because of where oil and gas “operations are located, as well as specifics of the types of volatile organic compounds that come out of drilling,” he wrote, “it’s estimated that cars are nearly as responsible for ozone creation as oil and gas.”     A total of 56 oil and gas wells are planned within one mile of the Aurora Reservoir, a major source of drinking water.     Regardless of what causes them, the emissions can be deadly. Air pollution from fossil fuel production in the U.S. in 2016 resulted in 7,500 excess deaths, 410,000 asthma incidents and 2,200 new cases of childhood asthma, with $77 billion in total health impacts, scientists found in a 2023 study published in Environmental Research: Health.   States with high oil and gas related emissions but lower population, such as Colorado and New Mexico, “have the highest impacts per million people,” scientists found.   “If you take any region that has a lot of people and put an air pollution source in it, all evidence points toward you would expect health impacts,” Jonathan Buonocore, the study’s lead author and an assistant environmental health professor at Boston University, told Capital & Main.   Crestone Peak Resources, the company proposing the 156-well project near suburban Aurora, said in documents filed with the Energy & Carbon Management Commission that it planned to mitigate emissions by electrifying drill rigs, among other strategies, so its operations would create “no adverse health risks to nearby communities, including sensitive individuals.”   To date, areas to the south and east of the Denver metropolitan area have seen little oil and gas development, compared to the state’s largest fossil fuel field north of the city. That could be about to dramatically change. A Capital & Main/FracTracker Alliance investigation found that the Lowry Ranch project, and a nearby 20-well plan proposed by GMT Exploration Company, LLC, could, if approved, result in about 229 wells being drilled near Aurora, the state’s third largest city.   A total of 56 wells are planned within one mile of the Aurora Reservoir, a major source of drinking water, the investigation found. About 125,000 people live within five miles of the proposed projects, the analysis showed.   These projects represent an expansion of fossil fuel production from Weld and Broomfield counties, to the north, looping around Denver’s eastern edge, where drilling will take place just yards from dense suburbs, an interactive map created using existing well locations, pending and approved permits and drilling proposals kept by the Energy & Carbon Management Commission found.  

Reforestation Initiative Tackles Climate Change in Guanacaste

To celebrate the 200th anniversary of the annexation of Nicoya County, Coopenae, the Environmental Bank Foundation (FUNBAM), and the Volunteer Fire Brigade (AAAS Tamarindo) have joined forces to initiate the Bicentennial Forests Project. In the first stage, 1,000 endemic trees will be planted in San Francisco Park, part of the Baula Marine Reserve, at the […] The post Reforestation Initiative Tackles Climate Change in Guanacaste appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

To celebrate the 200th anniversary of the annexation of Nicoya County, Coopenae, the Environmental Bank Foundation (FUNBAM), and the Volunteer Fire Brigade (AAAS Tamarindo) have joined forces to initiate the Bicentennial Forests Project. In the first stage, 1,000 endemic trees will be planted in San Francisco Park, part of the Baula Marine Reserve, at the Liceo de la Comunidad 27 de Abril high school, and in the El Trapiche sector. This initiative aims to reforest these areas and mitigate the risks associated with climate change. The project will enhance the water recharge areas of Guanacaste, which have been affected by forest fires, and provide training and education to young people in socially vulnerable situations. This will promote the development of soft skills, equipping them with tools to improve their quality of life. This year, there have been 141 forest fires, 90 of which have occurred in Guanacaste, affecting a total of 28,000 hectares. Coopenae’s Bicentennial Forests will also create green jobs for female heads of households in the area. They will be responsible for the care and maintenance of the trees, primarily Jícaros, for five years until the trees reach the recommended height and adapt to the environment. The forest will be enriched with native species, and the planting will be alternated with tree varieties that have forest viability and several species that directly benefit the aquifers. “We have generated the Bicentennial Forests here in the areas of Tamarindo, El Trapiche, and 27 de Abril. These projects enrich the secondary forest, and we are planting native trees such as Jícaro, laurel, Guanacaste, guacalillo, and beach almond to bring freshness to the locality. This initiative has an environmental background and a social focus,” said Victor Sequeira, coordinator of FUNBAM’s Footprint of the Future Program. In addition to the immediate benefits of reforestation and job creation, the Coopenae Bicentennial Forest is designed with a long-term focus. The inclusion of native species and forest viability ensures not only the recovery of local biodiversity but also the sustainability of the ecosystem over time. This holistic approach seeks to restore the natural balance and strengthen the region’s water resources. The post Reforestation Initiative Tackles Climate Change in Guanacaste appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Asphalt burns, delirium, body bags: extreme heat overwhelms ERs across US

More than 120,000 heat-related ER visits were tracked in 2023, as people struggle in record-breaking temperaturesIn his 40 years in the emergency room, David Sklar can think of three moments in his career when he was terrified.“One of them was when the Aids epidemic hit, the second was Covid, and now there’s this,” the Phoenix physician said, referring to his city’s unrelenting heat. Last month was the city’s hottest June on record, with temperatures averaging 97F (36C), and scientists say Phoenix is on track to experience its hottest summer on record this year. Continue reading...

In his 40 years in the emergency room, David Sklar can think of three moments in his career when he was terrified.“One of them was when the AIDS epidemic hit, the second was Covid, and now there’s this,” the Phoenix physician said, referring to his city’s unrelenting heat. Last month was the city’s hottest June on record, with temperatures averaging 97F (36C), and scientists say Phoenix is on track to experience its hottest summer on record this year.“All three of these situations are sort of disasters, where we became overwhelmed by something that had really serious effects on a large part of our population.”In recent months. he and his colleagues have seen waves of patients coming into the ER with heat stroke, dehydration and even asphalt burns.He described seeing several patients in a single shift with heat stroke. “Typically people aren’t talking at all, they’re just breathing and gasping and are in very bad shape,” he said of the most severe cases.As the climate crisis intensifies and shatters heat records, emergency rooms across the country are filling up with heat-sick patients. Officials recorded nearly 120,000 heat-related emergency room visits in 2023 alone, a “substantial” increase from previous years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.At least 27 people in Maricopa county, where Sklar works, have died from heat so far this year, with hundreds of other deaths under investigation. But these figures are likely underestimates, as heat-related deaths are often undercounted, especially among outdoor workers.“That’s the very tip of the iceberg,” said Sklar. “We really need to start thinking about heatwaves as a disaster.”Extreme heat is not recognized by the federal government as a disaster. Earlier this month, 14 attorneys general led by Arizona’s Kris Mayes, petitioned the Federal Emergency Management Agency to declare wildfire smoke and extreme heat as major disasters.“We’re used to calling hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes disasters where there can be a lot of casualties, but they get done with pretty quickly in most cases,” Sklar said. “[Heat] is a slow rolling disaster that goes on for weeks and months, and the people who are being affected are just really, really sick.”Firefighters attend to a man having trouble breathing during a heatwave in Phoenix, Arizona, on 20 July 2023. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty ImagesHeat is the deadliest weather disaster, killing more people each year than hurricanes, floods and earthquakes combined. Last month was the hottest June on record and record-breaking heat has continued to blanket much of the US in recent weeks.Health workers say that heat is straining emergency rooms that are already understaffed, overcrowded, and still grappling with the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic.“We’re brimming in our emergency departments to begin with,” said Ellen Sano, a physician at Columbia University Medical Center. “So every time you add the environmental effects of heat or viral infection, we struggle with capacity.”Earlier this month, millions of people in Texas lost power during a deadly heatwave after Hurricane Beryl made landfall. Outages in some areas lasted over a week, with local hospitals reporting an uptick in heat-related illnesses. Officials set up a medical shelter at a local arena to hold patients who were ready to be discharged from the hospital but whose homes still lacked electricity.“There are so many patients that we have to transfer because all these hospitals are so full,” said Owais Durrani, a Houston emergency room physician. “At the hospital, when, I park I see a row of ambulances around the corner. When you walk in, [you’re] seeing rows and rows of patients in hallways and every bed is full. That’s terrifying to come to work into.”Durrani said that heat at night, combined with power outages, contributed to people getting sick. “You may have had a day where you exerted yourself, you go home and you drink some fluids, you have air conditioning and you can recover,” he said. “But there is no recovery when you have no power.”skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionSince 1970, summers have warmed by an average of 2.5F, with overnight temperatures increasing by 3F across the US, according to Climate Central.Children, the elderly, pregnant people, outdoor workers and those with chronic medical conditions including diabetes and high blood pressure are the most vulnerable to heat stress – an excessive buildup of heat at a level that is more than the body can release. Unhoused people are another high-risk group, due in large to lack of air conditioning, prolonged exposure and often unaddressed health issues, many of which heat exacerbates.“They’re sleeping and living on the asphalt, and overnight temperatures don’t get as cool,” said Durrani, who says he’s seen patients come in with asphalt burns.Some medication for chronic conditions can put people at an increased risk of heat stroke. Amphetamines, commonly used to treat ADHD, can raise a person’s body temperature, and some antidepressants, antihistamines and beta blockers can impair the person’s ability to cool down.“People who are taking certain medications for psychiatric illnesses, those medications can interfere with your sweating mechanism,” said Gredia Huerta-Montañez, a pediatrician and environmental health researcher at Northeastern University. “If you leave your medications in the car during extreme heat days, those medications can suffer changes and be less effective.”Sklar, the Phoenix physician, said that other underlying conditions – including untreated mental illnesses – also place patients at high-risk. “Not being on medication for people who have schizophrenia can be a problem because they sometimes make decisions that are not in their best interest,” said Sklar. “So they may just walk and walk outside to a point where they collapse.”Treatment for heat illness varies on the state of the admitted patient, but if a person is sick enough to be hospitalized, healthcare workers typically apply ice packs to the neck and groin – places with a lot of blood flow and also areas where bodies tend to sweat according to Sklar. Cool intravenous fluids can bring down the body temperature and treat dehydration at the same time.Patients are sometimes so overheated they’re delirious or losing consciousness, Sklar said. That often indicates heat stroke, where core body temperatures may reach above 104F. In such cases, speed is imperative as internal organs can start to fail.In those cases, physicians sometimes place patients in body bags filled with ice.“Turns out that those are actually relatively effective for this, because they hold the water well, and they’re the right size for a human body,” said Sklar. First responders, including fire departments, use similar methods. “Because they’re unconscious, they’re not really feeling the pain of the cold,” he added. “The key is to cool them quickly.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.