Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Beaverton takes the lead in Oregon school districts’ drive to electrify school buses

News Feed
Monday, March 18, 2024

The movement to switch to electric school buses is accelerating around Oregon, and the Beaverton School District is leading the way.Already, the district — Oregon’s third largest with 39,000 students — has the largest electric school bus fleet in the state, with 28. Those no-emissions buses account for nearly 70% of the 42 electric school buses currently on the road for Oregon public schools.Now a $20 million grant from the federal government will allow Beaverton to purchase 50 more, all of which will be in service by May 2025.The new grant puts the district on track for its current plan to electrify a third of its fleet, or about 100 buses, by 2029.Concerns about a lack of available charging stations remain a limiting factor, however. “We don’t use the electric school buses for trips outside of our district boundaries due to range issues. This is the primary reason why we are limiting our fleet to 100 buses,” Beaverton transportation administrator Craig Beaver told The Oregonian/OregonLive.A possible reason that Beaverton has been able to move more quickly than surrounding districts: The district doesn’t contract out its bus service.Currently, of the eight Oregon districts that have electric school buses in service, only one has them through a private contractor. Gresham-Barlow contracts with First Student, which currently operates two electric buses for the district.Many other districts in Oregon contract with First Student, a private company that also received money from the federal grant: $16.5 million, enough to buy 46 low emission buses for eight districts the company serves in Oregon and Washington. The six Oregon districts are Gresham-Barlow, Portland, Willamina, Amity, Dayton and McMinnville. The two Washington districts are Seattle and Tacoma.Beaverton, the first school district in Oregon to get electric buses in 2021, has received funding from a variety of sources, including the EPA’s Clean Bus Program, Portland General Electric’s Electric School Bus Fund, Beaverton’s 2014 and 2022 school bonds, and state fleet replacement funds.“One of the fundamental reasons we began this journey is because our size enables us to take some calculated risks related to new technology which smaller districts cannot afford,” Beaver, the district transportation administrator, said.For the current school year, he said that Beaverton anticipates saving $350,000 as a result of using electric school buses.Officials with the school district say they are currently focusing their electrification efforts in two areas: Beaverton’s Title I elementary schools, which serve a concentration of students from low-income families, and special education students. Students who go to Title I schools are far more likely to have higher amounts of pollution in their neighborhoods than other students, according to online information from the Oregon Department of Energy.To date, 20 of the district’s 28 electric buses are used for special education students. District officials say the goal is to have 100% of their special education fleet powered by electricity or propane by 2029.As a result of lower emission buses, Beaver said, the district’s “most medically fragile students” will experience reduced and “eliminated diesel particulates and improved air quality.”An electric Beaverton special education school bus arrives back at Beaverton’s main bus yard to charge after a morning of dropping students off.Lucas Hellberg / The OregonianBoth bus drivers and students say they are very excited by the prospect of electric school buses.Sarah Arnold, a Beaverton bus driver, said that on her first day driving an electric school bus she noticed it was much quieter, making it a lot easier to make her announcements heard and communicate with students.“It was so much easier to drive. I wasn’t sure that the bus was on when I left this morning because it was so quiet,” said Arnold.“I could hear conservations in the back of the bus today,” she added. Natalie McWilliams, a senior at Sunset High School and the co-president of her school’s Climate Change Club, said she is excited about the district’s electric school buses because she believes they will help relieve the stigma that is sometimes associated with riding the bus.“I’ve heard that they’re quieter buses that don’t have the smell of diesel fuel,” said McWilliams. “As a kid, you don’t have a lot of choices about how you get to school, so seeing that the district really does care I think is really amazing.”Another Beaverton student said the switch to electric buses should help the district decrease its carbon footprint.“School buses often idle around a lot, especially when they pick up and drop off kids,” said Khevna Purushothaman, a sophomore at Westview High School and a member of her school’s Climate Change Club. “So, I think that electric buses would definitely help decrease carbon emissions for the district.”Chloe Gilmore, the policy lead for the Portland Youth Climate Strike and a senior at Lincoln High School in Portland, is also excited that electric school buses coming to Oregon will help reduce emissions.“I think that accessible and equitable transportation that reduces emissions will be one of the best ways that Oregon can meet our emissions reductions goals, especially because in our state, transportation makes up 30% to 40% of our total emissions,” Gilmore said. “Now that more young people care about sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions, this could be an incentive for more students to choose to ride the bus instead of driving.”Despite Gilmore’s hope, the Oregon Department of Education has not set a goal for districts to make the switch to electric transportation, according to spokesperson Peter Rudy.By contrast, in Washington, Gov. Jay Inslee is poised to sign a bill that earmarks $50 million for poorer school districts to begin purchasing electric buses and seeks to phase out the purchase of gas or diesel buses, as the prices drop for electric alternatives.Outsourcing school bus services to contractors doesn’t make it harder for school districts to electrify their bus fleets, according to districts that contract out service in the Portland metro area.A Portland Public Schools spokesperson said that district officials are open to increasing the number of electric buses, including working with private contractors to get grants to electrify their fleets.Greshman-Barlow said contractor First Student played a critical role in helping the district win grants to make the switch.“First Student has led the way in writing and pursuing the grants for the (electric) buses we have,” Greshman-Barlow spokesperson Athena Vadnais said.Jennifer Schiele, superintendent of the Lake Oswego School District with 6,900 students, said her district’s biggest obstacle to converting to an electric bus fleet is cost. Her district, which contracts with Student Transportation of America, recently announced plans to have four electric school buses in operation for the 2024-2025 school year through a grant from Portland General Electric’s Electric School Bus Fund.“An electric bus generally costs roughly three times more than a diesel or propane-powered bus,” Schiele said.While Beaverton has the most electric buses in the state so far, the relatively tiny Banks School District, about 25 miles west of Portland, could be the first in Oregon to go all electric for in-district daily routes. Banks Superintendent Brian Sica said its contractor, Mid Columbia Bus Company, is on track to help the 1,000-student district hit that milestone by fall 2024 after it secured a 2022 grant from the EPA.Outside the Portland metro area, rollout of electric school buses appears to be more difficult.The Prospect School District, with roughly 200 students, is located close to Crater Lake National Park. It originally planned to get three electric buses from a grant from the federal Environmental Protection Agency but is now forgoing the free federal money.Superintendent Daye Stone cited the short range of electric school buses, the inability to situate charging stations on land the district doesn’t own and student safety.“We have a ton of days where snow and cold weather dominate the landscape,” said Stone. “A dead battery on a rural mountain is a recipe for concern surrounding student safety. The hurdles were much too great to overcome at this point so we decided to pass on the grant and let another district use the money in a place that makes more sense.”A spokesperson for Bend-La Pine Schools — the fifth largest district in the state with 18,400 students — said they too are limited by location when it comes to electric buses. They currently have one electric bus, funded by a Pacific Power grant along with other funding from the state.“If we had grant support, because of the higher cost of electric buses, we would be open to future purchases. We would not be able to use electric buses for longer trips, such as over the Cascades, because of the distance limitations and the lack of charging stations where we travel,” said Bend-La Pine spokesperson Scott Maben.This story was written by Youth Voices contributor Lucas Hellberg, a senior at Lakeridge High School in Lake Oswego. Hellberg is an editor-in-chief for his school’s newspaper, The Newspacer, which received statewide recognition for its work last year. Hellberg, a Model UN award winner and cross country letter winner, is particularly interested in reporting on politics, education and emerging technology. In college, he plans to double major in computer science and journalism.

Oregon’s third largest district has the largest electric school bus fleet in the state, with 28.

The movement to switch to electric school buses is accelerating around Oregon, and the Beaverton School District is leading the way.

Already, the district — Oregon’s third largest with 39,000 students — has the largest electric school bus fleet in the state, with 28. Those no-emissions buses account for nearly 70% of the 42 electric school buses currently on the road for Oregon public schools.

Now a $20 million grant from the federal government will allow Beaverton to purchase 50 more, all of which will be in service by May 2025.

The new grant puts the district on track for its current plan to electrify a third of its fleet, or about 100 buses, by 2029.

Concerns about a lack of available charging stations remain a limiting factor, however. “We don’t use the electric school buses for trips outside of our district boundaries due to range issues. This is the primary reason why we are limiting our fleet to 100 buses,” Beaverton transportation administrator Craig Beaver told The Oregonian/OregonLive.

A possible reason that Beaverton has been able to move more quickly than surrounding districts: The district doesn’t contract out its bus service.

Currently, of the eight Oregon districts that have electric school buses in service, only one has them through a private contractor. Gresham-Barlow contracts with First Student, which currently operates two electric buses for the district.

Many other districts in Oregon contract with First Student, a private company that also received money from the federal grant: $16.5 million, enough to buy 46 low emission buses for eight districts the company serves in Oregon and Washington. The six Oregon districts are Gresham-Barlow, Portland, Willamina, Amity, Dayton and McMinnville. The two Washington districts are Seattle and Tacoma.

Beaverton, the first school district in Oregon to get electric buses in 2021, has received funding from a variety of sources, including the EPA’s Clean Bus Program, Portland General Electric’s Electric School Bus Fund, Beaverton’s 2014 and 2022 school bonds, and state fleet replacement funds.

“One of the fundamental reasons we began this journey is because our size enables us to take some calculated risks related to new technology which smaller districts cannot afford,” Beaver, the district transportation administrator, said.

For the current school year, he said that Beaverton anticipates saving $350,000 as a result of using electric school buses.

Officials with the school district say they are currently focusing their electrification efforts in two areas: Beaverton’s Title I elementary schools, which serve a concentration of students from low-income families, and special education students. Students who go to Title I schools are far more likely to have higher amounts of pollution in their neighborhoods than other students, according to online information from the Oregon Department of Energy.

To date, 20 of the district’s 28 electric buses are used for special education students. District officials say the goal is to have 100% of their special education fleet powered by electricity or propane by 2029.

As a result of lower emission buses, Beaver said, the district’s “most medically fragile students” will experience reduced and “eliminated diesel particulates and improved air quality.”

Large yellow school bus seen from the side. No passengers or drive appear to be aboard.

An electric Beaverton special education school bus arrives back at Beaverton’s main bus yard to charge after a morning of dropping students off.Lucas Hellberg / The Oregonian

Both bus drivers and students say they are very excited by the prospect of electric school buses.

Sarah Arnold, a Beaverton bus driver, said that on her first day driving an electric school bus she noticed it was much quieter, making it a lot easier to make her announcements heard and communicate with students.

“It was so much easier to drive. I wasn’t sure that the bus was on when I left this morning because it was so quiet,” said Arnold.

“I could hear conservations in the back of the bus today,” she added.

Natalie McWilliams, a senior at Sunset High School and the co-president of her school’s Climate Change Club, said she is excited about the district’s electric school buses because she believes they will help relieve the stigma that is sometimes associated with riding the bus.

“I’ve heard that they’re quieter buses that don’t have the smell of diesel fuel,” said McWilliams. “As a kid, you don’t have a lot of choices about how you get to school, so seeing that the district really does care I think is really amazing.”

Another Beaverton student said the switch to electric buses should help the district decrease its carbon footprint.

“School buses often idle around a lot, especially when they pick up and drop off kids,” said Khevna Purushothaman, a sophomore at Westview High School and a member of her school’s Climate Change Club. “So, I think that electric buses would definitely help decrease carbon emissions for the district.”

Chloe Gilmore, the policy lead for the Portland Youth Climate Strike and a senior at Lincoln High School in Portland, is also excited that electric school buses coming to Oregon will help reduce emissions.

“I think that accessible and equitable transportation that reduces emissions will be one of the best ways that Oregon can meet our emissions reductions goals, especially because in our state, transportation makes up 30% to 40% of our total emissions,” Gilmore said. “Now that more young people care about sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions, this could be an incentive for more students to choose to ride the bus instead of driving.”

Despite Gilmore’s hope, the Oregon Department of Education has not set a goal for districts to make the switch to electric transportation, according to spokesperson Peter Rudy.

By contrast, in Washington, Gov. Jay Inslee is poised to sign a bill that earmarks $50 million for poorer school districts to begin purchasing electric buses and seeks to phase out the purchase of gas or diesel buses, as the prices drop for electric alternatives.

Outsourcing school bus services to contractors doesn’t make it harder for school districts to electrify their bus fleets, according to districts that contract out service in the Portland metro area.

A Portland Public Schools spokesperson said that district officials are open to increasing the number of electric buses, including working with private contractors to get grants to electrify their fleets.

Greshman-Barlow said contractor First Student played a critical role in helping the district win grants to make the switch.

“First Student has led the way in writing and pursuing the grants for the (electric) buses we have,” Greshman-Barlow spokesperson Athena Vadnais said.

Jennifer Schiele, superintendent of the Lake Oswego School District with 6,900 students, said her district’s biggest obstacle to converting to an electric bus fleet is cost. Her district, which contracts with Student Transportation of America, recently announced plans to have four electric school buses in operation for the 2024-2025 school year through a grant from Portland General Electric’s Electric School Bus Fund.

“An electric bus generally costs roughly three times more than a diesel or propane-powered bus,” Schiele said.

While Beaverton has the most electric buses in the state so far, the relatively tiny Banks School District, about 25 miles west of Portland, could be the first in Oregon to go all electric for in-district daily routes. Banks Superintendent Brian Sica said its contractor, Mid Columbia Bus Company, is on track to help the 1,000-student district hit that milestone by fall 2024 after it secured a 2022 grant from the EPA.

Outside the Portland metro area, rollout of electric school buses appears to be more difficult.

The Prospect School District, with roughly 200 students, is located close to Crater Lake National Park. It originally planned to get three electric buses from a grant from the federal Environmental Protection Agency but is now forgoing the free federal money.

Superintendent Daye Stone cited the short range of electric school buses, the inability to situate charging stations on land the district doesn’t own and student safety.

“We have a ton of days where snow and cold weather dominate the landscape,” said Stone. “A dead battery on a rural mountain is a recipe for concern surrounding student safety. The hurdles were much too great to overcome at this point so we decided to pass on the grant and let another district use the money in a place that makes more sense.”

A spokesperson for Bend-La Pine Schools — the fifth largest district in the state with 18,400 students — said they too are limited by location when it comes to electric buses. They currently have one electric bus, funded by a Pacific Power grant along with other funding from the state.

“If we had grant support, because of the higher cost of electric buses, we would be open to future purchases. We would not be able to use electric buses for longer trips, such as over the Cascades, because of the distance limitations and the lack of charging stations where we travel,” said Bend-La Pine spokesperson Scott Maben.

This story was written by Youth Voices contributor Lucas Hellberg, a senior at Lakeridge High School in Lake Oswego. Hellberg is an editor-in-chief for his school’s newspaper, The Newspacer, which received statewide recognition for its work last year. Hellberg, a Model UN award winner and cross country letter winner, is particularly interested in reporting on politics, education and emerging technology. In college, he plans to double major in computer science and journalism.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Zeldin says he can 'absolutely' assure public EPA deregulation efforts won’t harm environment

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin said he can “absolutely” assure the public that the various deregulation efforts undergone by the agency will not harm the environment. Zeldin joined CBS News’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday, where he was asked if he could ensure the deregulation wouldn’t have an adverse impact. “Absolutely,” he replied....

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin said he can “absolutely” assure the public that the various deregulation efforts undergone by the agency will not harm the environment. Zeldin joined CBS News’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday, where he was asked if he could ensure the deregulation wouldn’t have an adverse impact. “Absolutely,” he replied. “We have to both protect the environment and grow the economy.” Zeldin argued that it’s what the American people are demanding out of the Trump administration. He criticized Biden-era regulations that were “targeting entire industries.” “When the American public went to vote last November, they were talking about economic concerns, about struggling to make ends meet. That includes the cost of being able to heat their home,” he said. “The choice of whether or not to be able to heat their home or fill up their fridge with groceries or afford prescription medication.” Zeldin’s remarks come about a month after the Trump administration unveiled a list of climate and pollution regulations they were looking to dismantle. Under the reversed regulations are some of the Biden administration’s most championed measures, including increasing electric vehicles and quickly closing coal mines. The Trump administration said it was considering rolling back regulations on the neurotoxic mercury from power plans and general air pollution limits for soot. It will also reconsider that climate change poses a threat to the public, laying regulatory groundwork for future climate action. The agency also indicated that it would be closing offices dedicated to fighting pollution in underserved and minority communities. Zeldin said last month that the deregulation efforts would make it easier for Americans to buy a car and heat their homes. Environmentalists have sounded the alarm over the administration’s plans, but Zeldin remained confident that the public and environment would not be negatively impacted. Zeldin noted that there will be a process for public comment and he encourages the public to “weigh in” when they have that opportunity. “I have a zero tolerance for any waste and abuse. It is my duty to ensure that I’m an exceptional steward of tax dollars,” Zeldin later said.

Tackling Climate Change Must Be Job Number One

This Earth Day, on April 22, you can exercise your power. The wellbeing of our planet and its people is at stake.

Amid the historic and sweeping cuts to federal agencies and programs being carried out by the Trump Administration, one truth has been overlooked: If we’re serious about cutting waste and protecting public funds, we must confront climate change head-on. 2024 was a disaster for the planet and its people. According to NASA, it was the warmest year since temperatures began being recorded in 1880. In the United States alone there were twenty-seven climate and weather events that resulted in at least a billion dollars in damages—second only to 2023, with twenty-eight such events.  These events—wildfires, floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes—are becoming the norm, and they’re financially devastating.  In January, tens of thousands of acres and more than 16,000 structures burned in southern California. Last month, more than 150 tornadoes tore across the central and southeastern United States, and, this month, historic floods submerged parts of the Midwest and South. In the parts of the United States at higher risk for climate-related extreme weather events, insurance claims are increasing in cost and frequency. Not surprisingly, these high-risk areas are also now seeing the highest increase in cancellations for failure to pay premiums and nonrenewals by the insurance companies. Without insurance, homeowners may not be able to rebuild when disaster strikes. And climate change isn’t the only escalating crisis. The world is also drowning in plastic. On September 5, 2024—Plastic Overshoot Day—the world exceeded its capacity to manage plastic waste. An estimated 220 million tons of plastic are projected to be produced this year alone, and 66 percent of people live in areas where plastic waste exceeds waste management capacity. Meanwhile, new research shows just how dangerous plastics are to human health. Microplastics have been found in human brains, and the World Wildlife Fund estimates that we may be ingesting up to five grams of plastic each week—the weight of a credit card. Plastics are now linked to cancer, endocrine disruption, impaired fertility, and cognitive development issues. Wildlife, too, is suffering from entanglement, starvation, and habitat loss. Here’s the hopeful part: We already have the tools and the power to change this. EARTHDAY.ORG, the network created by the original organizers of the first Earth Day in 1970, is still leading the charge with our campaign, “Our Power, Our Planet.” The goal is to help individuals, cities, and communities act on the environmental challenges of today. The economic upside of environmental action is massive. New solutions to our current environmental crisis rest in the hands of the people. This Earth Day, on April 22, you can exercise your power. Demonstrate to our leaders in government and business that we are still here, we are a witness to their actions, and we will hold them accountable to do right by our planet and its people.  As consumers, we can choose plastic-free products and demand a reduction and transition in the use of plastics from businesses, while at the same time pressuring government leaders to reduce plastic production globally to end the use of toxic ingredients and to improve waste management systems. We have the collective power not only to protect our planet but also to improve lives and livelihoods. The link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change is now scientifically indisputable. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, 90 percent of global electricity can and should come from renewable sources by 2050. The transition also promises cleaner air, up to thirty million new jobs, and stronger energy independence. Transitioning to clean energy, reducing plastic waste, and increasing resilience to extreme weather are among the most fiscally responsible actions governments can take. This Earth Day, we must recognize that efficiency isn’t just about cutting—it’s about investing in solutions that protect people and our infrastructure. True government efficiency means reducing risk in order to cut costs—not paying billions each year to clean up after preventable disasters. This column was produced for Progressive Perspectives, a project of The Progressive magazine, and distributed by Tribune News Service.

Australia opposition leader clarifies he believes in climate change after debate

Peter Dutton is facing outrage after comments he made on climate change during an election debate.

Australian opposition leader Peter Dutton has clarified he believes in climate change after facing backlash for comments made during an election debate on Wednesday night.Dutton and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese were asked about the increasing impact of climate change, to which Dutton replied he would "let scientists and others pass that judgment".He had previously said that flooding and natural disasters were "part of the history of our state of this country". The comments generated outrage from climate groups and mockery from Albanese."I believe in climate change, and that it is a reality" Dutton said while campaigning on Monday. During Wednesday's debate, Dutton responded to the moderator's question on whether flooding and natural disasters were getting worse by saying, "I don't know because I'm not a scientist". "I can't tell you whether the temperature has risen in Thargomindah because of climate change or the water levels are up," he added.Meanwhile Albanese, who had said Dutton's words showed "no acceptance of the science of climate change" continued mocking his opponent on Thursday, asking "does he believe in gravity?" Environmental organisations have reacted to Dutton's debate remarks with dismay.Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie told the Guardian "it's outrageous for a senior political leader to be so out of touch that they claim they "don't know" the risks Australians are facing."A report from the non-profit released earlier this month stated one in 23 properties across the country were found to be at high risk from climate change.Australian Conservation Foundation Chief Executive Kelly O'Shanassy called Dutton's words "a serious concern" in an interview with the Canberra Times, adding that "the next parliament is the last parliament that can get Australia's massive contribution to climate change under control."Albanese was also questioned on his climate policy during the debate, though for different reasons. The prime minister has championed renewable energy throughout his time in office, but has faced backlash for rising power bills.Asked when fees would fall, the prime minister did not directly reply. Instead, he stressed renewables were the "cheapest form of power".In March, Labor announced it would extend a relief system for the bills, providing a further automatic $150AUD ($95;£72) rebate to households and small businesses. The hour-long debate also saw the two party leaders pressed on other hot button issues for Australia including housing and foreign policy, in particular Australia's relationship to the US.

Ohio grid disparities leave some areas with older, outage-prone equipment

Ohio consumer and environmental advocates are calling on state regulators to address disparities within FirstEnergy’s grid after a recent report found disadvantaged communities are more likely to rely on older, more outage-prone equipment. Areas defined as disadvantaged under the Biden administration’s Climate and…

Ohio consumer and environmental advocates are calling on state regulators to address disparities within FirstEnergy’s grid after a recent report found disadvantaged communities are more likely to rely on older, more outage-prone equipment. Areas defined as disadvantaged under the Biden administration’s Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool were twice as likely to have low-voltage circuits compared to other parts of FirstEnergy’s Ohio territory, according to the study by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council. Equipment was also generally older and had less capacity for normal and overload situations. The results reflect historical patterns of underinvestment in disadvantaged communities, the report says, but the full scope of the problem — including across Ohio’s other utilities — is unclear due to the lack of information from utilities and regulators. “The public availability of any utility data is very, very limited in Ohio,” said report author Shay Banton, a regulatory program engineer and energy justice policy advocate for the Interstate Renewable Energy Council. The Ohio Environmental Council submitted the report as part of FirstEnergy’s pending rate case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and is asking regulators to address the topic in an evidentiary hearing set for May 5. The state of the local grid matters when it comes to the reliability of customers’ electric service, their ability to add distributed renewable energy resources like rooftop solar, and a community’s potential to attract business investments that could improve its economic conditions. Regulated electric utilities file reliability reports each spring that focus on two commonly used metrics. The system average interruption frequency index, or SAIFI, shows how many outages occurred per customer. The customer average interruption duration index, or CAIDI, measures the average length of time for restoring service to customers who lose power. The annual reports also list factors involved in outages, with breakouts for transmission-related service problems and major events. Major events such as severe weather are considered statistical outliers that don’t count for calculating whether utilities meet their company-specific standards for CAIDI and SAIFI. While weather accounted for the majority of time Ohioans went without power last year, equipment failures also triggered thousands of outages. For the ninth year in a row, at least one Ohio utility company failed to meet reliability standards, reports filed this month show. Both AEP Ohio and FirstEnergy’s Toledo Edison missed their marks for the average time before power is restored for customers who experience outages. The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio also collects data on the worst-performing circuits. Individual circuits serve anywhere from a few hundred to several thousand customers. However, the state doesn’t post these reports online or disclose the circuit’s exact locations, which could be used to show whether they are concentrated in disadvantaged communities. The SAIFI and CAIDI metrics used by state regulators did not show significant disparities between disadvantaged neighborhoods and other areas in FirstEnergy’s territory. But Banton said those reliability metrics rely on averages for large groups, which can obscure disparities. They said that utilities should also be required to publicly report the number of customers experiencing frequent service interruptions and the number of customers who faced long outages. Utilities in Ohio tend to be reactive in dealing with circuit problems, Banton said. Communities can face longer outages if utilities wait for equipment to fail before replacing it. Instead, Banton wants utilities’ capital investments to address current disparities and then prevent them from recurring in the future.

Proposed Rule Change on Endangered Species Triggers Alarm for Environmentalists

The Trump administration plans to rewrite part of the Endangered Species Act that prohibits harming the habitats of endangered and threatened species

The Trump administration plans to eliminate habitat protections for endangered and threatened species in a move environmentalists say would lead to the extinction of critically endangered species due to logging, mining, development and other activities.At issue is a longstanding definition of “harm” in the Endangered Species Act, which has included altering or destroying the places those species live. Habitat destruction is the biggest cause of extinction, said Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service said in a proposed rule issued Wednesday that habitat modification should not be considered harm because it's not the same as intentionally targeting a species, called “take.” Environmentalists argue that the definition of “take,” though, has always included actions that harm species, and the definition of “harm” has been upheld by the Supreme Court.The proposed rule “cuts the heart out of the Endangered Species Act,” said Greenwald. “If (you) say harm doesn’t mean significant habitat degradation or modification, then it really leaves endangered species out in the cold.”For example, he said spotted owls and Florida panthers both are protected because the current rule forbids habitat destruction. But if the new rule is adopted, someone who logs in a forest or builds a development would be unimpeded as long as they could say they didn't intend to harm an endangered species, he said.The proposed rule was expected to be published in the Federal Register on Thursday, kicking off a 30-day public comment period.A U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spokeswoman referred The Associated Press to the Department of Interior, which declined to comment.Environmental groups will challenge the rule in court if it is adopted, said Drew Caputo, an attorney at Earthjustice.He said the proposal “threatens a half-century of progress in protecting and restoring endangered species,” including bald eagles, gray wolves, Florida manatees and humpback whales. He said that's because the current rule “recognizes the common-sense concept that destroying a forest, beach, river, or wetland that a species relies on for survival constitutes harm to that species.”The question is whether the Trump administration is entitled to repeal a rule that was upheld specifically by the Supreme Court and therefore subject to precedent, said Patrick Parenteau, an emeritus professor at the Vermont Law and Graduate School who has handled endangered species cases.Because of the current definition of harm, “many, many millions of acres of land has been conserved” to help keep species alive, he said.The issue is of particular concern in Hawaii, which has more endangered species than any other state — 40% of the nation’s federally listed threatened and endangered species — even though it has less than 1% of the land area, according to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Birds are among the most vulnerable. Since humans arrived, 71 birds have gone extinct, according to the state Department of Land and Natural Resources. Thirty-one of the 42 remaining endemic birds are listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, the department said and ten of these haven’t been seen in decades.Associated Press reporter Audrey McAvoy in Hawaii contributed to this report.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Feb. 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.