Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

300,000ha Queensland cattle station acquired for conservation following $21m donation

News Feed
Tuesday, April 16, 2024

A Queensland outback cattle station the size of Yosemite national park which includes key habitat for the elusive night parrot has been acquired for conservation following an anonymous donation of $21m.Vergemont station, 110km west of Longreach, was acquired in a joint purchase by the Queensland government and the Nature Conservancy, which brokered the deal. The group said it is likely the single largest philanthropic contribution to land protection in Australia.The 352,000ha property had been for sale since 2016. It is located at the headwaters of one of the Lake Eyre Basin and will join existing national parks to create a conservation corridor of roughly 1.4 million hectares.According to the Nature Conservancy’s senior advisor for global protection, Dr James Fitzsimons, the property contains 34 different ecosystems and ranks higher than 90% of existing national parks in the state for habitat representation.Fitzsimons said the purchase was critical to protect key habitat for threatened species, including the endangered night parrot and vulnerable yellow-footed rock-wallaby.“This is a really important way of showing philanthropic and government interest of meeting our national ambition of protecting 30% of the country by 2030,” he said.“A key part of growing Australia’s [nature] reserve system is a focus of comprehensiveness and representatives, ensuring we are conserving samples of each type of ecosystem.”There will be a two-year transition process to allow the current landowner to remove cattle from the property. Once it is converted to a national park, Queensland’s network of protected areas will surpass 15 million hectares – an area more than twice the size of Tasmania.The state government has also committed to engaging with the Maiawali traditional owners to undertake cultural heritage assessments on the property.The Nature Conservancy’s interim managing director, Lara Gallagher, said the $21m donation “highlights the power of leveraged gifts, enabling philanthropists and governments alike to achieve outcomes far beyond what is possible alone”.Last year the Nature Conservancy and other environmental groups recommended the federal government establish a $5bn land acquisition fund to permanently protect high-value conservation land.“We really do hope this inspires other philanthropists to join with government… to protect more really important properties like this around the country,” Fitzsimons said.The 2022 state of the environment report found climate change, habitat loss, invasive species, pollution and mining had caused significant and ongoing deterioration of the environment and the Albanese government has since committed to protecting 30% of land by 2030 in a bid to halt species extinctions and environmental degradation.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to The Rural NetworkSubscribe to Calla Wahlquist's fortnightly update on Australian rural and regional affairsPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionAn additional 60 million hectares, an area three times the size of Victoria, will need to be protected by 2030 to reach the goal.The Queensland environment minister, Leanne Linard, said the government will contribute to the Vergemont purchase out of a $262.5m state fund dedicated to expanding and managing protected areas.Two neighbouring stations, Tonkoro station (138,200ha) and Melrose station (73,048ha), were purchased by the state government earlier this year to add to existing protected areas, chiefly the Diamantina, Goneaway and Bladensburg national parks.Linard said the new national park at Vergemont would bring visitors and employment opportunities for locally-based contractors and park rangers.About 40,000ha of the 350,000ha property will remain as opal mining leases, with an additional 10,000ha slated as a “buffer” area.“We will work to ensure an ecologically sustainable co-existence between the existing opal mining operations and conservation of the important natural and cultural values on the property,” Linard said.“We will allow small-scale opal mining interests to continue their operations on suitable areas.”

State government and the Nature Conservancy jointly purchase Vergemont station, which contains habitat for endangered night parrotsSign up for the Rural Network email newsletterJoin the Rural Network group on Facebook to be part of the communityA Queensland outback cattle station the size of Yosemite national park which includes key habitat for the elusive night parrot has been acquired for conservation following an anonymous donation of $21m.Vergemont station, 110km west of Longreach, was acquired in a joint purchase by the Queensland government and the Nature Conservancy, which brokered the deal. The group said it is likely the single largest philanthropic contribution to land protection in Australia.Sign up to receive Guardian Australia’s fortnightly Rural Network email newsletterSign up for the Rural Network email newsletterJoin the Rural Network group on Facebook to be part of the community Continue reading...

A Queensland outback cattle station the size of Yosemite national park which includes key habitat for the elusive night parrot has been acquired for conservation following an anonymous donation of $21m.

Vergemont station, 110km west of Longreach, was acquired in a joint purchase by the Queensland government and the Nature Conservancy, which brokered the deal. The group said it is likely the single largest philanthropic contribution to land protection in Australia.

The 352,000ha property had been for sale since 2016. It is located at the headwaters of one of the Lake Eyre Basin and will join existing national parks to create a conservation corridor of roughly 1.4 million hectares.

According to the Nature Conservancy’s senior advisor for global protection, Dr James Fitzsimons, the property contains 34 different ecosystems and ranks higher than 90% of existing national parks in the state for habitat representation.

Fitzsimons said the purchase was critical to protect key habitat for threatened species, including the endangered night parrot and vulnerable yellow-footed rock-wallaby.

“This is a really important way of showing philanthropic and government interest of meeting our national ambition of protecting 30% of the country by 2030,” he said.

“A key part of growing Australia’s [nature] reserve system is a focus of comprehensiveness and representatives, ensuring we are conserving samples of each type of ecosystem.”

There will be a two-year transition process to allow the current landowner to remove cattle from the property. Once it is converted to a national park, Queensland’s network of protected areas will surpass 15 million hectares – an area more than twice the size of Tasmania.

The state government has also committed to engaging with the Maiawali traditional owners to undertake cultural heritage assessments on the property.

The Nature Conservancy’s interim managing director, Lara Gallagher, said the $21m donation “highlights the power of leveraged gifts, enabling philanthropists and governments alike to achieve outcomes far beyond what is possible alone”.

Last year the Nature Conservancy and other environmental groups recommended the federal government establish a $5bn land acquisition fund to permanently protect high-value conservation land.

“We really do hope this inspires other philanthropists to join with government… to protect more really important properties like this around the country,” Fitzsimons said.

The 2022 state of the environment report found climate change, habitat loss, invasive species, pollution and mining had caused significant and ongoing deterioration of the environment and the Albanese government has since committed to protecting 30% of land by 2030 in a bid to halt species extinctions and environmental degradation.

skip past newsletter promotion

after newsletter promotion

An additional 60 million hectares, an area three times the size of Victoria, will need to be protected by 2030 to reach the goal.

The Queensland environment minister, Leanne Linard, said the government will contribute to the Vergemont purchase out of a $262.5m state fund dedicated to expanding and managing protected areas.

Two neighbouring stations, Tonkoro station (138,200ha) and Melrose station (73,048ha), were purchased by the state government earlier this year to add to existing protected areas, chiefly the Diamantina, Goneaway and Bladensburg national parks.

Linard said the new national park at Vergemont would bring visitors and employment opportunities for locally-based contractors and park rangers.

About 40,000ha of the 350,000ha property will remain as opal mining leases, with an additional 10,000ha slated as a “buffer” area.

“We will work to ensure an ecologically sustainable co-existence between the existing opal mining operations and conservation of the important natural and cultural values on the property,” Linard said.

“We will allow small-scale opal mining interests to continue their operations on suitable areas.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

The Ocean Is Becoming Too Loud for Oysters

Research from the University of Adelaide reveals that human-generated noise is hindering baby oysters’ ability to use natural sounds to find habitats, affecting marine conservation...

Human noise pollution interferes with baby oysters’ natural acoustic cues, hindering their settlement. While acoustic technology can aid oyster recruitment in quieter areas, it is less effective in noisy environments. Researchers are optimistic about its use in less trafficked areas. Credit: Dominic McAfeeResearch from the University of Adelaide reveals that human-generated noise is hindering baby oysters’ ability to use natural sounds to find habitats, affecting marine conservation efforts. Although acoustic technology helps in quieter areas, its effectiveness is reduced in noisy urban settings.New research from the University of Adelaide indicates that baby oysters, which depend on natural acoustic cues to find suitable environments for settling, are being disrupted by noise pollution from human activities.“The ocean’s natural sound is gradually hushing due to habitat loss, leading to a quieter natural environment increasingly drowned out by the crescendo of man-made noise pollution,” explained lead author Dr Brittany Williams, from the University’s Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories. “Numerous marine larvae rely on natural sounds to navigate and select their dwellings, so this interference poses a problem for conservationists aiming to attract oysters to restored reefs using natural sounds.“Noises from shipping, machinery, and construction, for example, are pervasive and pose serious environmental change that affects both terrestrial and marine animals.”According to the research, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, marine organisms appear particularly vulnerable to the intensification of anthropogenic noise because they use sound for a range of activities, including to sense their surroundings, navigate, communicate, avoid predators, and find mates and food.Challenges and Limitations of Acoustic Technology“Our previous work demonstrated that novel acoustic technology can bolster oyster recruitment in habitat restoration projects, but this new research indicates potential limitations of this speaker technology,” said the University of Adelaide’s Dr Dominic McAfee, who was part of the research team.In environments where there is a lot of human noise pollution, the speakers did not increase larval recruitment.“This suggests that noise pollution might cloak the intrinsic sounds of the ocean, potentially exerting profound ramifications on marine ecosystem vitality and resilience,” said co-author Professor Sean Connell, from the University of Adelaide and the Environment Institute.While acoustic enrichment may be less effective along noisy metropolitan coastlines and urbanized waterways, the researchers are still optimistic about the application of the technique in less trafficked areas.“Where there is little anthropogenic noise, acoustic enrichment appears to enhance the process of recruitment which is key to restoration success,” said Dr Williams.Reference: “Anthropogenic noise disrupts acoustic cues for recruitment” by Brittany R. Williams, Dominic McAfee and Sean D. Connell, 1 July 2024, Proceedings B.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0741

Small modular reactors have promise. But we found they’re unlikely to help Australia hit net zero by 2050

Small modular reactors promise to make nuclear power cheaper and safer. But our new report shows they’re still a long way off.

Golden Sikorka/ShutterstockAustralia’s clean energy transition is already underway, driven by solar, wind, batteries and new transmission lines. But what about nuclear? Opposition leader Peter Dutton last month committed to building nuclear reactors on the site of retired coal plants – triggering intense debate over whether this older low-carbon power source is viable in Australia due to cost and long timeframes. Dutton proposed building a mix of traditional large nuclear plants alongside small modular reactors (SMRs). Over the last decade, there’s been growing interest in SMRs. These reactor designs are meant to tackle known problems with traditional large reactor designs, namely cost, perceived safety and lengthy build times. Are SMRs ready? Experts from the the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering have done a deep dive on the state of the technology and market considerations in a new report, summing up the state of the technology. What’s the answer? SMRs are not ready for deployment yet. The earliest they could be built in Australia would be in the 2040s. That’s too late to help with the push to net zero by 2050. As our report notes, the “least risky option” would be to buy them after the technology has been commercialised and successfully operated overseas. But once the technology is proven, they could be used for specific circumstances, such as powering energy-intensive manufacturing and refining. A mock-up of the Rolls Royce SMR design. Rolls Royce, CC BY What is a small modular reactor? Small modular reactors are a range of new nuclear reactors currently being designed. SMRs involve standardised components produced in factories and assembled on-site. As the name suggests, they are smaller than traditional large nuclear reactors, which have to be custom built. They are also, in theory, cheaper and safer. Traditional nuclear plants can generate between 1 and 8 gigawatts of power. By contrast, each SMR would generate 50-300 megawatts. Between three to 20 SMRs would be needed to provide the amount of power produced by a traditional nuclear power station. Many designs incorporate in-built passive cooling in case of power failure to avoid the risk of meltdown. They could be daisy-chained – or connected up – with multiple reactors cores inside a single power plant. They are currently at the design stage in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and South Korea, with no models yet operating in OECD countries. Publicly available information about SMRs being developed elsewhere is limited. What’s behind this interest? Key factors include: very low carbon emissions ability to support intermittent power sources such as renewables potential for easier and faster construction than conventional nuclear ability to provide heat as a key input to industrial processes. At present, we know of 14 different designs at a comparatively advanced stage of development globally. That means the designs are undergoing detailed simulations, evaluation of components and creation of small-scale replicas for testing and evaluation. None have yet been licensed for construction in any OECD countries. How would SMRs stack up against other power sources? Given the fact SMRs are still a while away from prime time, we estimate the earliest Australia could have one built would be during the 2040s. At this time, Australia’s grid is projected to have 6 gigawatts of renewables added every year, along with a large amount of dispatchable energy in the form of battery storage, and a small amount of new gas generation. Given renewables and battery technologies get cheaper every year, expensive new sources of power may well struggle to break in. Because SMRs are still at the design stage, we have no operating data to assess the cost of their electricity. Even so, CSIRO’s latest GenCost study illustrates the scale of the challenge. In 2030, the agency forecasts the cost of power from solar and wind, firmed by storage to firm capacity, to be A$89-125 per megawatt hour. By contrast, GenCost estimates large-scale nuclear would cost $141-233 a megawatt hour – and $230-382 for SMRs. SMRs could conceivably contribute to the energy grid in the future, providing some steady power to energy-intensive industries. As the technology matures and proves itself in testing, these reactors may represent a lower-cost, shorter build-time, smaller terrestrial footprint alternative to traditional, large-scale nuclear power plants. But they won’t replace our need for a major expansion of renewable energy, and not in the next 20 years. A market for SMRs? This new report on SMRs in Australia makes clear that a mature SMR market will not emerge in time for Australia to meet its international commitment of reaching net zero emissions by 2050. The barriers to adoption in Australia are substantial. Significantly, there are bans on nuclear power federally and in many states. These would need to be overturned before any work could commence. A regulator would need to be created to oversee all aspects of the delivery, safety, workforce needs and environmental impact of any SMR installation. We’d need to train an appropriately skilled workforce. Most importantly, nuclear energy (large or small) is a divisive issue. Australia would need to secure the social licence to operate nuclear. It would also be financially and technically risky for Australia to pursue SMRs before a mature global market for the technology emerges. Proponents expect SMRs will gradually drop in price as the technology matures, expertise develops and economies of scale take root. This will take time – there’s no shortcut. First, developers would have to progress designs and acquire licenses, funding and sites for construction. In Australia, this would require building a nuclear energy regulator and selecting locations with community support. Second, developers would build a full-scale working prototype. SMR developers worldwide have indicated this is around ten years away. Third, developers would have to convert the knowledge gained from full-scale prototypes into an accepted commercial package. This could take three to five years after prototyping. Finally, developers would become vendors and compete for contracts to build SMRs, creating a global market. We expect the first commercial releases of SMRs between the late 2030s and mid 2040s. There are many questions still to be answered for SMRs to be seriously considered as part of the power mix of the future: cost, construction time, waste disposal, water use, integration with the grid, First Nations sovereignty, skills and workforce and more. But companies around the world are making progress. The next ten years will bring a much stronger evidence base on whether SMRs could be useful in powering Australia in the future. Ian Lowe received funding from the National Energy Research, Development and Demonstration Council in 1983 for a project on Australia's energy needs to 2030. He was president of the Australian Conservation Foundation from 2004 to 2014.As CEO of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, Kylie Walker receives funding from the federal Department of Industry, Science and Resources, and the Department of Education.

Albert the Alligator’s Owner Sues New York State Agency in Effort to Be Reunited

An upstate New York man whose 750-pound alligator was seized is suing the state Department of Environmental Conservation.

Buffalo, N.Y. — An upstate New York man whose 750-pound alligator was seized is suing the state Department of Environmental Conservation in an effort to get him back, saying the agency was wrong not to renew a license for the pet he looked after for more than 30 years. [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] Conservation officers entered Tony Cavallaro’s home in the Buffalo suburb of Hamburg in March, sedated the 11-foot alligator named Albert, taped his mouth shut and drove off with him, saying Cavallaro’s license to keep the reptile expired in 2021 and hadn’t been renewed. In his lawsuit filed with the state Supreme Court, Cavallaro says the agency’s denial of his license wasn’t “factually based,” his attorney, Peter Kooshoian, said Tuesday. “We’re hoping that he will get his license to have the animal reinstated, and from there we’d like to either negotiate or litigate to have the animal brought back to Mr. Cavallaro because we feel that he should have had a valid license at the time, as he’d had for the last 30 years,” Kooshoian said. The DEC does not comment on pending litigation, a spokesman said via email when asked for a response to the claims. It previously said Albert’s enclosure didn’t sufficiently ensure that he would not come into contact with people, and that the alligator was afflicted by “blindness in both eyes and spinal complications” — conditions Cavallaro disputes. Officers’ seizure of the alligator, caught on video, and Cavallaro’s videos and photos of him petting and kissing Albert in the custom indoor pool he built led to an outpouring of support for the duo. “Bring Albert Home” signs still dot some neighborhood lawns and more than 4,500 followers keep up with Cavallaro’s efforts on Facebook. “I’m hoping we get this thing resolved. That’s all I can do,” Cavallaro said of the decision to sue. “It’s overwhelming me. … It’s ruined my whole year, destroyed it.” Cavallaro bought the American alligator at an Ohio reptile show in 1990 when Albert was two months old. He considers him an emotional support animal and “gentle giant.” The license became an issue following a change in regulations for possessing dangerous animals adopted by the DEC in 2020. After Cavallaro’s license expired in 2021, the agency said he failed to bring the holding area into compliance with the updated standards to ensure the alligator did not pose a danger to the public. Cavallaro said the DEC failed to follow its own licensing requirements governing people who already owned a wild animal when the new regulations took effect. Albert was taken to Gator Country, a Beaumont, Texas, rescue facility where visitors can interact with the alligators and other reptiles. “You can interact with them in all different ways. It’s like a kick right in my teeth,” Cavallaro said.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.