Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Accept Deny

GoGreenNation news

Who says Arlington needs more people?

News Feed
Saturday, July 13, 2024

Regarding the July 8 front-page article “Homeowners sue over zoning changes”:The article about Arlington County’s “missing middle” litigation clearly outlines two critical issues in the case. Did the county analyze whether its sweeping Expanded Housing Options (EHO) ordinance was the best way to create more reasonably priced housing units? And did it analyze how building more multifamily dwellings would affect Arlington’s infrastructure? In my view, these impacts have the potential to be devastating.The Post is technically correct that multifamily units must be “almost” identical in design standards. But this focus on aesthetics misses an important point: These EHO projects are allowed to build on a larger percentage of a lot than the single-family houses they replace. For many years before this policy was proposed, civic associations, environmental groups and others in Arlington had been pressing the county to revisit its existing, overly generous, lot-coverage limits for single-family homes. Recognizing this concern, the County Board assured Arlingtonians in 2022 that lot coverage for these new developments would be at parity with those generous existing limits for single-family homes. Yet the county ultimately allowed developers of EHO projects to build on an additional 5 percent of the lots where the projects are sited, an exception available only to those few single-family homes that include detached rear garages.As the county’s interim EHO report confirms, those EHO developers not waiting for the outcome of the litigation have already taken full advantage of this extra 5 percent allowance in their designs. Their projects would destroy mature trees, exacerbating heat islands and other climate effects; pose more stormwater management challenges, which are already considerable given the increased frequency and severity of flash floods; result in the teardowns of smaller and less expensive homes; cast shade that makes it harder for surrounding homes to generate solar power; and disrupt the reasonable expectations of quiet enjoyment by neighbors identified in the article.The county board refused to consider proposals to defer Expanded Housing Options until it had finally addressed this lot-coverage problem. But it has only now directed staff to begin a study of how to address these concerns. How promptly the county proceeds will be critical, as developers continue to tear down so many of Arlington’s smaller homes week by week and the county allows even more generous lot coverage for EHOs to go forward.William R. Richardson Jr., ArlingtonThe writer is president of the Donaldson Run Civic Association.As I read the June 8 front-page article about Arlington residents feuding with their government, I looked for but couldn’t find the reason why the Arlington government feels obliged to cram more people into the city.Is there a law that stipulates Arlington city officials, whether elected or employed, must enable more housing? And without citizen approval? If so, then when is Arlington “full”? Surely, Arlington government officials realize that, just as they allow a defined number of people to occupy a space, be it a school room, cafe or stadium, there’s a limit to how many human beings, along with their cars and possessions, can fit into the boundaries constituting Arlington.Who’s in charge in Arlington anyway, the public or their public servants?I found the June 8 article about a lawsuit against Arlington’s Expanded Housing Options program hilarious. It seems that comfortable, liberal NIMBYs are so conflicted by their desire to support affordable housing as long as it’s built somewhere else, they need to turn their narrow private interests into broad public interests. It never fails: They will bring up concerns about schools, streets, sewers, children, gentrification, greedy developers, whether the housing will be affordable, and if all else fails, process and procedure. Come clean, “missing middle” opponents; you simply want to protect your slice of heaven. It’s okay, we all do! But at least be honest about it.Jeffrey Denny, WashingtonThe July 1 Metro article “New laws set to take effect” neglected a significant new law in Virginia: House Bill 1395, “Historic Preservation; filing of a historic district designation,” which I proposed with John Reeder, and which was diligently championed by Del. Patrick Hope in the face of four years of relentless opposition from Arlington County.This new law is necessary and important, as it will prevent the debacle that occurred in Arlington in 2021 with the destruction of the historic Febrey-Lothrop-Rouse estate on Wilson Boulevard. This unique antebellum mansion, numerous historic outbuildings and 9½ acres of open land were all approved for demolition by Arlington County, prior to the completion of an in-progress review for Local Historic District designation for the entire site, which was also in the county’s hands.The new law requires full completion of the entire Local Historic District review and approval process prior to the issuance of any demolition permit by the government entity involved. It is possible that adherence to this new law might soon be tested in Arlington, with the current pending Local Historical District review for the former Nelly Custis school site in South Arlington, which is at serious risk of being demolished.Preservation advocates such as myself will be watching closely, here and around the whole state of Virginia, for proper compliance with this historic new legislation.I was amused by the dark humor in the July 2 Metro article “Fairfax County schools to change grading policy.” Once you cut the educational jargon away, the change is just another illustration of how “what goes around comes around” in education.Fairfax school leaders have solemnly announced they are changing their grading system from a “traditional” method that takes into account “student behavior, participation, and study habits” to new models that “prioritize” student performance on projects, tests, homework and quizzes.In the 1940s and ’50s when I was passing through public schools, the traditional method of grading was based on student performance on tests, homework, quizzes, and projects. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? In fact, other than students back then having to demonstrate mastery in a more rigorous way than those under Fairfax’s new model, there is no difference.In the decades after the 1950s, educational “reformers” successfully converted grading into the present system based on student behavior, which at its worst made preserving a student’s self-esteem its goal rather than assuring they learned anything. Now, this present system is being replaced by the 1950s system posing as a new model.I will not be around to see it, but I would be willing to bet that, 20 years from now, after the model based on mastery of subject matter has become the “traditional” grading system again, it will be challenged by educational “reformers” wishing to replace it with a new grading model based on student behavior, participation and study habits.Roger Burkhart, GaithersburgRegarding the June 27 Metro article, “Va., Md. bicker over blue crab dredging”:Imagine it. Friends and family gathered around a table, picking blue crabs, rehashing the age-old argument about J.O. seasoning vs. Old Bay and teaching the youngest of the crowd how to extract the prized lump meat. This summer, this scene is likely to play out thousands of times across Virginia and Maryland, where the iconic blue crab is as much a part of the cultural fabric as it is the economy.Now, imagine a scenario in which the blue crab fishery, the watermen who fish them and crab-picking gatherings are a thing of the past. Because of last month’s decision by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, that tragedy could be our future.The VMRC recently voted to overturn a 15-year closure of Virginia’s blue crab winter dredge fishery, which operated historically from December through March. The ban went into effect in 2008 because of severe declines in blue crab numbers, linked to the overharvesting of female crabs — the key to population sustainability. The winter dredge fishery, because of where and when it operates, takes predominantly adult female crabs before they spawn in the spring. Estimates indicated that when the dredge fishery was operating, it harvested 34 percent of all adult female crabs in the bay each year, and along with them, the millions of juvenile crabs they would have produced if they had been left to spawn.Today, the outlook for the bay’s blue crab population is once again worrisome, with scientists racing to understand the latest challenges limiting crab reproduction and the impact of new threats such as blue catfish. A new stock assessment, which will produce a statistical model that estimates crab abundance and sustainable harvest rates, is currently underway. Yet the VMRC chose now to open the possibility of additional harvest, against the best available science, the advice of its own staff scientists and the conservation efforts of its neighboring jurisdictions.Crab lovers in both states are rightfully upset by this decision. The VMRC’s verdict is concerning, premature and not based on science. There is still time to convince the commission to walk back this unwise decision and not reopen the fishery this December. That’s exactly what we urge them to do.Emmett Hanger,Mount Solon Va.The writers are, respectively, former director of the Chesapeake Bay Commission, president emeritus at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and a former Republican senator in the Virginia General Assembly.

Read more

Regarding the July 8 front-page article “Homeowners sue over zoning changes”:

The article about Arlington County’s “missing middle” litigation clearly outlines two critical issues in the case. Did the county analyze whether its sweeping Expanded Housing Options (EHO) ordinance was the best way to create more reasonably priced housing units? And did it analyze how building more multifamily dwellings would affect Arlington’s infrastructure? In my view, these impacts have the potential to be devastating.

The Post is technically correct that multifamily units must be “almost” identical in design standards. But this focus on aesthetics misses an important point: These EHO projects are allowed to build on a larger percentage of a lot than the single-family houses they replace. For many years before this policy was proposed, civic associations, environmental groups and others in Arlington had been pressing the county to revisit its existing, overly generous, lot-coverage limits for single-family homes. Recognizing this concern, the County Board assured Arlingtonians in 2022 that lot coverage for these new developments would be at parity with those generous existing limits for single-family homes. Yet the county ultimately allowed developers of EHO projects to build on an additional 5 percent of the lots where the projects are sited, an exception available only to those few single-family homes that include detached rear garages.

As the county’s interim EHO report confirms, those EHO developers not waiting for the outcome of the litigation have already taken full advantage of this extra 5 percent allowance in their designs. Their projects would destroy mature trees, exacerbating heat islands and other climate effects; pose more stormwater management challenges, which are already considerable given the increased frequency and severity of flash floods; result in the teardowns of smaller and less expensive homes; cast shade that makes it harder for surrounding homes to generate solar power; and disrupt the reasonable expectations of quiet enjoyment by neighbors identified in the article.

The county board refused to consider proposals to defer Expanded Housing Options until it had finally addressed this lot-coverage problem. But it has only now directed staff to begin a study of how to address these concerns. How promptly the county proceeds will be critical, as developers continue to tear down so many of Arlington’s smaller homes week by week and the county allows even more generous lot coverage for EHOs to go forward.

William R. Richardson Jr., Arlington

The writer is president of the Donaldson Run Civic Association.

As I read the June 8 front-page article about Arlington residents feuding with their government, I looked for but couldn’t find the reason why the Arlington government feels obliged to cram more people into the city.

Is there a law that stipulates Arlington city officials, whether elected or employed, must enable more housing? And without citizen approval? If so, then when is Arlington “full”? Surely, Arlington government officials realize that, just as they allow a defined number of people to occupy a space, be it a school room, cafe or stadium, there’s a limit to how many human beings, along with their cars and possessions, can fit into the boundaries constituting Arlington.

Who’s in charge in Arlington anyway, the public or their public servants?

I found the June 8 article about a lawsuit against Arlington’s Expanded Housing Options program hilarious. It seems that comfortable, liberal NIMBYs are so conflicted by their desire to support affordable housing as long as it’s built somewhere else, they need to turn their narrow private interests into broad public interests. It never fails: They will bring up concerns about schools, streets, sewers, children, gentrification, greedy developers, whether the housing will be affordable, and if all else fails, process and procedure. Come clean, “missing middle” opponents; you simply want to protect your slice of heaven. It’s okay, we all do! But at least be honest about it.

Jeffrey Denny, Washington

The July 1 Metro article “New laws set to take effect” neglected a significant new law in Virginia: House Bill 1395, “Historic Preservation; filing of a historic district designation,” which I proposed with John Reeder, and which was diligently championed by Del. Patrick Hope in the face of four years of relentless opposition from Arlington County.

This new law is necessary and important, as it will prevent the debacle that occurred in Arlington in 2021 with the destruction of the historic Febrey-Lothrop-Rouse estate on Wilson Boulevard. This unique antebellum mansion, numerous historic outbuildings and 9½ acres of open land were all approved for demolition by Arlington County, prior to the completion of an in-progress review for Local Historic District designation for the entire site, which was also in the county’s hands.

The new law requires full completion of the entire Local Historic District review and approval process prior to the issuance of any demolition permit by the government entity involved. It is possible that adherence to this new law might soon be tested in Arlington, with the current pending Local Historical District review for the former Nelly Custis school site in South Arlington, which is at serious risk of being demolished.

Preservation advocates such as myself will be watching closely, here and around the whole state of Virginia, for proper compliance with this historic new legislation.

I was amused by the dark humor in the July 2 Metro article “Fairfax County schools to change grading policy.” Once you cut the educational jargon away, the change is just another illustration of how “what goes around comes around” in education.

Fairfax school leaders have solemnly announced they are changing their grading system from a “traditional” method that takes into account “student behavior, participation, and study habits” to new models that “prioritize” student performance on projects, tests, homework and quizzes.

In the 1940s and ’50s when I was passing through public schools, the traditional method of grading was based on student performance on tests, homework, quizzes, and projects. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? In fact, other than students back then having to demonstrate mastery in a more rigorous way than those under Fairfax’s new model, there is no difference.

In the decades after the 1950s, educational “reformers” successfully converted grading into the present system based on student behavior, which at its worst made preserving a student’s self-esteem its goal rather than assuring they learned anything. Now, this present system is being replaced by the 1950s system posing as a new model.

I will not be around to see it, but I would be willing to bet that, 20 years from now, after the model based on mastery of subject matter has become the “traditional” grading system again, it will be challenged by educational “reformers” wishing to replace it with a new grading model based on student behavior, participation and study habits.

Roger Burkhart, Gaithersburg

Regarding the June 27 Metro article, “Va., Md. bicker over blue crab dredging”:

Imagine it. Friends and family gathered around a table, picking blue crabs, rehashing the age-old argument about J.O. seasoning vs. Old Bay and teaching the youngest of the crowd how to extract the prized lump meat. This summer, this scene is likely to play out thousands of times across Virginia and Maryland, where the iconic blue crab is as much a part of the cultural fabric as it is the economy.

Now, imagine a scenario in which the blue crab fishery, the watermen who fish them and crab-picking gatherings are a thing of the past. Because of last month’s decision by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, that tragedy could be our future.

The VMRC recently voted to overturn a 15-year closure of Virginia’s blue crab winter dredge fishery, which operated historically from December through March. The ban went into effect in 2008 because of severe declines in blue crab numbers, linked to the overharvesting of female crabs — the key to population sustainability. The winter dredge fishery, because of where and when it operates, takes predominantly adult female crabs before they spawn in the spring. Estimates indicated that when the dredge fishery was operating, it harvested 34 percent of all adult female crabs in the bay each year, and along with them, the millions of juvenile crabs they would have produced if they had been left to spawn.

Today, the outlook for the bay’s blue crab population is once again worrisome, with scientists racing to understand the latest challenges limiting crab reproduction and the impact of new threats such as blue catfish. A new stock assessment, which will produce a statistical model that estimates crab abundance and sustainable harvest rates, is currently underway. Yet the VMRC chose now to open the possibility of additional harvest, against the best available science, the advice of its own staff scientists and the conservation efforts of its neighboring jurisdictions.

Crab lovers in both states are rightfully upset by this decision. The VMRC’s verdict is concerning, premature and not based on science. There is still time to convince the commission to walk back this unwise decision and not reopen the fishery this December. That’s exactly what we urge them to do.

Emmett Hanger,Mount Solon Va.

The writers are, respectively, former director of the Chesapeake Bay Commission, president emeritus at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and a former Republican senator in the Virginia General Assembly.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Related News

This Climate Concern Is Way Out There

This story was originally published by Yale e360 and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. On a mid-November evening, at precisely 7:12 p.m., a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on the Florida coast. It appeared to be a perfect launch. At an altitude of about 40 […]

This story was originally published by Yale e360 and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. On a mid-November evening, at precisely 7:12 p.m., a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on the Florida coast. It appeared to be a perfect launch. At an altitude of about 40 miles, the rocket’s first stage separated and fell back to Earth, eventually alighting in a gentle, controlled landing on a SpaceX ship idling in the Atlantic Ocean. The mission’s focus then returned to the rocket’s payload: 29 Starlink communication satellites that were to be deployed in low-Earth orbit, about 340 miles above the planet’s surface. With this new fleet of machines, Starlink was expanding its existing mega-constellation so that it numbered over 9,000 satellites, all circling Earth at about 17,000 miles per hour.  Launches like this have become commonplace. As of late November, SpaceX had sent up 152 Falcon 9 missions in 2025—an annual record for the company. And while SpaceX is the undisputed leader in rocket launches, the space economy now ranges beyond American endeavors to involve orbital missions—military, scientific, and corporate—originating from Europe, China, Russia, India, Israel, Japan, and South Korea. This year the global total of orbital launches will near 300 for the first time, and there seems little doubt it will continue to climb.     “We are now in this regime where we are doing something new to the atmosphere that hasn’t been done before.” Starlink has sought permission from the Federal Communications Commission to expand its swarm, which at this point comprises the vast majority of Earth’s active satellites, so that it might within a few years have as many as 42,000 units in orbit. Blue Origin, the rocket company led by Jeff Bezos, is in the early stages of helping to deploy a satellite network for Amazon, a constellation of about 3,000 units known as Amazon Leo. European companies, such as France’s Eutelsat, plan to expand space-based networks, too. “We’re now at 12,000 active satellites, and it was 1,200 a decade ago, so it’s just incredible,” Jonathan MacDowell, a scientist at Harvard and the Smithsonian who has been tracking space launches for several decades, told me recently. MacDowell notes that based on applications to communications agencies, as well as on corporate projections, the satellite business will continue to grow at an extraordinary rate. By 2040, it’s conceivable that more than 100,000 active satellites would be circling Earth. But counting the number of launches and satellites has so far proven easier than measuring their impacts. For the past decade, astronomers have been calling attention to whether so much activity high above might compromise their opportunities to study distant objects in the night sky. At the same time, other scientists have concentrated on the physical dangers. Several studies project a growing likelihood of collisions and space debris—debris that could rain down on Earth or, in rare cases, on cruising airplanes. More recently, however, scientists have become alarmed by two other potential problems: the emissions from rocket fuels, and the emissions from satellites and rocket stages that mostly ablate (that is, burn up) on reentry. “Both of these processes are producing pollutants that are being injected into just about every layer of the atmosphere,” explains Eloise Marais, an atmospheric scientist at University College London, who compiles emissions data on launches and reentries.  As Marais told me, it’s crucial to understand that Starlink’s satellites, as well as those of other commercial ventures, don’t stay up indefinitely. With a lifetime usefulness of about five years, they are regularly deorbited and replaced by others. The new satellite business thus has a cyclical quality: launch, deploy, deorbit, destroy. And then repeat.  The cycle suggests we are using Earth’s mesosphere and stratosphere—the layers above the surface-hugging troposphere—as an incinerator dump for space machinery. Or as Jonathan MacDowell puts it: “We are now in this regime where we are doing something new to the atmosphere that hasn’t been done before.” MacDowell and some of his colleagues seem to agree that we don’t yet understand how—or how much—the reentries and launches will alter the air. As a result, we’re unsure what the impacts may be to Earth’s weather, climate, and (ultimately) its inhabitants.  To consider low-Earth orbit within an emerging environmental framework, it helps to see it as an interrelated system of cause and effect. As with any system, trying to address one problematic issue might lead to another. A long-held idea, for instance, has been to “design for demise,” in the argot of aerospace engineers, which means constructing a satellite with the intention it should not survive the heat of reentry. “But there’s an unforeseen consequence of your solution unless you have a grasp of how things are connected,” according to Hugh Lewis, a professor of astronautics at the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. In reducing “the population of debris” with incineration, Lewis told me—and thus, with rare exceptions, saving us from encounters with falling chunks of satellites or rocket stages—we seem to have chosen “probably the most harmful solution you could get from a perspective of the atmosphere.”  We don’t understand the material composition of everything that’s burning up. Yet scientists have traced a variety of elements that are vaporizing in the mesosphere during the deorbits of satellites and derelict rocket stages; and they’ve concluded these vaporized materials—as a recent study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences put it—“condense into aerosol particles that descend into the stratosphere.” The PNAS study, done by high altitude air sampling and not by modeling, showed that these tiny particles contained aluminum, silicon, copper, lead, lithium, and more exotic elements like niobium. “Emission plumes from the first few minutes of a mission, which disperse into the stratosphere, may…have a significant effect on the ozone layer.” The large presence of aluminum, signaling the formulation of aluminum oxide nanoparticles, may be especially worrisome, since it can harm Earth’s protective ozone layers and may undo our progress in halting damage done by chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs. A recent academic study in the journal Geophysical Research Letters concluded that the ablation of a single 550-pound satellite (a new Starlink unit is larger, at about 1,800 pounds) can generate around 70 pounds of aluminum oxide nanoparticles. This floating metallic pollution may stay aloft for decades.  The PNAS study and others, moreover, suggest the human footprint on the upper atmosphere will expand, especially as the total mass of machinery being incinerated ratchets up. Several scientists I spoke with noted that they have revised their previous belief that the effects of ablating satellites would not exceed those of meteorites that naturally burn up in the atmosphere and leave metallic traces in the stratosphere. “You might have more mass from the meteoroids,” Aaron Boley, an astronomer at the University of British Columbia, said, but “these satellites can still have a huge effect because they’re so vastly different [in composition].”  Last year, a group of researchers affiliated with NASA formulated a course of research that could be followed to fill large “knowledge gaps” relating to these atmospheric effects. The team proposed a program of modeling that would be complemented by data gleaned from in situ measurements. While some of this information could be gathered through high-altitude airplane flights, sampling the highest-ranging air might require “sounding” rockets doing tests with suborbital flights. Such work is viewed as challenging and not inexpensive—but also necessary. “Unless you have the data from the field, you cannot trust your simulations too much,” Columbia University’s Kostas Tsigaridis, one of the scientists on the NASA team, told me.  Tsigaridis explains that lingering uncertainty about NASA’s future expenditures on science has slowed US momentum for such research. One bright spot, however, has been overseas, where ESA, the European Space Agency, held an international workshop in September to address some of the knowledge gaps, particularly those relating to satellite ablations. The ESA meeting resulted in a commitment to begin field measurement campaigns over the next 24 months, Adam Mitchell, an engineer with the agency, said. The effort suggests a sense of urgency, in Europe, at least, that the space industry’s growth is outpacing our ability to grasp its implications. A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket takes off. SpaceX now has more than 9,000 Starlink satellites orbiting the Earth.SpaceX The atmospheric pollution problem is not only about what’s raining down from above, however; it also relates to what happens as rockets go up. According to the calculations of Marais’ UCL team, the quantity of heat-trapping gases like CO2 produced during liftoffs are still tiny in comparison to, say, those of commercial airliners. On the other hand, it seems increasingly clear that rocket emission plumes from the first few minutes of a mission, which disperse into the stratosphere, may, like reentries, have a significant effect on the ozone layer.  The most common rocket fuel right now is a highly refined kerosene known as RP-1, which is used by vehicles such as SpaceX’s Falcon 9. When RP-1 is burned in conjunction with liquid oxygen, the process releases black carbon particulates into the stratosphere. A recent study led by Christopher Maloney of the University of Colorado used computer models to assess how the black carbon absorbs solar radiation and whether it can warm the upper atmosphere significantly. Based on space industry growth projections a few decades into the future, these researchers concluded that the warming effect of black carbon would raise temperatures in the stratosphere by as much as 1.5 degrees C, leading to significant ozone reductions in the Northern Hemisphere. When satellite companies talk about sustainability, “what they mean is, we want to sustain this rate of growth.”  It may be the case that a different propellant could alleviate potential problems. But a fix isn’t as straightforward as it seems. Solid fuels, for instance, which are often used in rocket boosters to provide additional thrust, emit chlorine—another ozone-destroying element. Meanwhile, the propellant of the future looks to be formulations of liquefied natural gas (LNG), often referred to as liquid methane. Liquid methane will be used to power SpaceX’s massive Starship, a new vehicle that’s intended to be used for satellite deployments, moon missions, and, possibly someday, treks to Mars.  The amount of black carbon emissions from burning LNG may be 75 percent less than from RP-1. “But the issue is that the Starship rocket is so much bigger,” UCL’s Marais says. “There’s so much more mass that’s being launched.” Thus, while liquid methane might burn cleaner, using immense quantities of it—and using it for more frequent launches—could undermine its advantages. Recently, executives at SpaceX’s Texas factory have said they would like to build a new Starship every day, readying the company for a near-constant cycle of launches. One worry amongst scientists is that if new research suggests that space pollution is leading to serious impacts, it may eventually resemble an airborne variation of plastics in the ocean. A more optimistic view is that these are the early days of the space business, and there is still time for solutions. Some of the recent work at ESA, for instance, focuses on changing the “design for demise” paradigm for satellites to what some scientists are calling “design to survive.” Already, several firms are testing satellites that can get through an reentry without burning up; a company called Atmos, for instance, is working on an inflatable “atmospheric decelerator” that serves as a heat shield and parachute to bring cargo to Earth. Satellites might be built from safer materials, such as one tested in 2024 by Japan’s space agency, JAXA, made mostly from wood.  More ambitious plans are being discussed: Former NASA engineer Moriba Jah has outlined a design for an orbital “circular economy” that calls for “the development and operation of reusable and recyclable satellites, spacecraft, and space infrastructure.” In Jah’s vision, machines used in the space economy should be built in a modular way, so that parts can be disassembled, conserved, and reused. Anything of negligible worth would be disposed of responsibly. Most scientists I spoke with believe that a deeper recognition of environmental responsibilities could rattle the developing structure of the space business. “Regulations often translate into additional costs,” says UCL’s Marais, “and that’s an issue, especially when you’re privatizing space.” A shift to building satellites that can survive reentry, for instance, could change the economics of an industry that, as astronomer Aaron Boley notes, has been created to resemble the disposable nature of the consumer electronics business. Boley also warns that technical solutions are likely only one aspect of avoiding dangers and will not address all the complexities of overseeing low-Earth orbit as a shared and delicate system. It seems possible to Boley that in addition to new fuels, satellite designs, and reentry schemes, we may need to look toward quotas that require international management agreements. He acknowledges that this may seem “pie in the sky”; while there are treaties for outer space, as well as United Nations guidelines, they don’t address such governance issues. Moreover, the emphasis in most countries is on accelerating the space economy, not limiting it. And yet, Boley argues that without collective-action policy responses we may end up with orbital shells so crowded that they exceed a safe carrying capacity.  That wouldn’t be good for the environment or society—but it wouldn’t be good for the space business, either. Such concerns may be why those in the industry increasingly discuss a set of principles, supported by NASA, that are often grouped around the idea of “space sustainability.” University of Edinburgh astronomer Andrew Lawrence told me that the phrase can be used in a way that makes it unclear what we’re sustaining: “If you look at the mission statements that companies make, what they mean is, we want to sustain this rate of growth.”  But he doesn’t think we can. As one of the more eloquent academics arguing for space environmentalism, Lawrence perceives an element of unreality in the belief that in accelerating space activity we can “magically not screw everything up.” He thinks a goal in space for zero emissions, or zero impact, would be more sensible. And with recent private-sector startups suggesting that we should use space to build big data centers or increase sunlight on surface areas of Earth, he worries we are not entering an era of sustainability but a period of crisis. Lawrence considers debates around orbital satellites a high-altitude variation on climate change and threats to biodiversity—an instance, again, of trying to seek a balance between capitalism and conservation, between growth and restraint. “Of course, it affects me and other professional astronomers and amateur astronomers particularly badly,” he concedes. “But it’s really that it just wakes you up and you think, ‘Oh, God, it’s another thing. I thought, you know—I thought we were safe.’” After a pause, he adds, “But no, we’re not.”

Climate
Business
Cosmos

In Antarctica, Photos Show a Remote Area Teeming With Life Amid Growing Risks From Climate Change

Antarctica, one of the most remote places on Earth, teems with life

ANTARCTICA (AP) — The Southern Ocean is one of the most remote places on Earth, but that doesn't mean it is tranquil. Tumultuous waves that can swallow vessels ensure that the Antarctic Peninsula has a constant drone of ocean. While it can be loud, the view is serene — at first glance, it is only deep blue water and blinding white ice.Several hundred meters (yards) off the coast emerges a small boat with a couple dozen tourists in bright red jackets. They are holding binoculars, hoping for a glimpse of the orcas, seals and penguins that call this tundra home.They are in the Lemaire Channel, nicknamed the “Kodak Gap,” referring to the film and camera company, because of its picture-perfect cliffs and ice formations. This narrow strip of navigable water gives anybody who gets this far south a chance to see what is at stake as climate change, caused mainly by the burning of oil, gas and coal, leads to a steady rise in global average temperatures. The Antarctic Peninsula stands out as one of the fastest warming places in the world. The ocean that surrounds it is also a major repository for carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that contributes to warming. It captures and stores roughly 40% of the CO2 emitted by humans, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. On a recent day, Gentoo penguins, who sport slender, orange beaks and white spots above their eyes, appeared to be putting on a show. They took breaks from their dives into the icy water to nest on exposed rock. As the planet warms, they are migrating farther south. They prefer to colonize rock and fish in open water, allowing them to grow in population.The Adelie penguins, however, don't have the same prognosis. The plump figures with short flippers and wide bright eyes are not able to adapt in the same way. By 2100, 60% of Adelie penguin colonies around Antarctica could threatened by warming, according to one study. They rely on ice to rest and escape predators. If the water gets too warm, it will kill off their food sources. From 2002 to 2020, roughly 149 billion metric tons of Antarctic ice melted per year, according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. For tourists, Antarctica is still a giant, glacial expanse that is home to only select species that can tolerate such harsh conditions. For example, in the Drake Passage, a dangerous strip of tumultuous ocean, tourists stand in wonder while watching orca whales swim in the narrow strip of water and Pintado petrels soar above. The majestic views in Antarctica, however, will likely be starkly different in the decades ahead. The growing Gentoo penguin colonies, the shrinking pieces of floating ice and the increasing instances of exposed rock in the Antarctic Peninsula all underscore a changing landscape. Associated Press writer Caleigh Wells contributed to this report from Cleveland. The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Climate
CO2
Water

How Sewage Can Be Used to Heat and Cool Buildings

Wastewater flushed down the drain can be used to heat and cool homes and buildings in a sustainable way and climate experts say it's an untapped source of energy due to its stable temperature of approximately 70°F

DENVER (AP) — When a massive event center was being developed in Denver, planners had to contend with two existing 6-foot (1.8 meters) wide sewer pipes that emptied into the river, creating an unsightly dilemma. Developers wanted to bury them. The utility said the wastewater needed to vent heat before entering the river.There, a problem became a solution.Thermal energy from the sewage now powers a system that heats and cools classrooms, an equestrian center and veterinary hospital at the National Western Center complex.It's a recent example of how wastewater flushed down the drain can heat and cool buildings in a sustainable way. Climate experts say sewage is a largely untapped source of energy due to its stable temperature of approximately 70 F (21 C). Wastewater heat recovery systems have already been installed in California, Washington, Colorado, New York and Canada. Pipes that transport sewage are already built, making it a low-cost and widely available resource that reduces the need for polluting energy sources.There's no odor since the thermal energy transfer systems keep the wastewater separate from other components.“Wastewater is the last frontier of sustainable energy,” said Aaron Miller, the eastern regional manager for SHARC Energy, adding: “Even in this current environment where environmental stuff doesn’t really sell, there’s a financial benefit that we can sell to business owners.”While the technology works in a variety of locations, the Denver complex was uniquely positioned because it’s close to major sewer lines in a low-lying industrial zone. The vast majority of the center's heating and cooling comes from wastewater heat recovery. During extremely hot or cold weather, cooling towers and boilers are used to fill in the gaps.“Every city on the planet has a place just like this,” said Brad Buchanan, the center's CEO. “This is actually a value, a benefit that the bottoms have that the rest of the city doesn’t have.” How heat from sewage can warm buildings Extracting the thermal energy starts with the water from toilets, showers and sinks traveling down usual sewage lines before flowing into a tank that is part of the heat recovery system. Heavy solids are separated and the remaining fluid flows through a heat exchanger, a sealed device with stacks of metal plates that can take heat from one source and put it into another.Thermal energy from the wastewater is transferred to a clean water loop without the liquids coming into contact. The clean water carrying the thermal energy is then sent into a heat pump that can heat or cool rooms, depending on the weather. It can also heat potable water. Once the thermal energy has been extracted, the wastewater flows back into the sewer system and eventually to a water treatment plant.The heat from the sewage replaces the need for energy from other sources to heat and cool buildings, such as electricity from the grid. Electricity is only needed to run the heat exchanger and pumps that move the water, far more energy efficient than boilers and chillers used in traditional HVAC systems. Where wastewater heating is being used Miller said the systems work best in buildings with centralized hot water production, such as apartments, commercial laundromats, car washes and factories. In residential settings, Miller said the technology is best suited for buildings with 50 or more apartment units. The technology works in various climates around the country. Some buildings supplement with traditional HVAC components.The technology utilizes existing city pipes, which reduces the need for construction compared to some types of renewable energy, said Ania Camargo Cortes, a thermal energy networks expert and board member of the nonprofit HEET (Home Energy Efficiency Team).“If you can use wastewater, it’s going to be an enormous savings ... its billions of kilowatts available to us to use,” said Camargo Cortes.According to 2005 data from the U.S. Department of Energy, the equivalent of 350 billion kilowatt-hours' worth of hot water is flushed down drains each year.In Vancouver, Canada, a wastewater heat recovery system helps supply heat and hot water to 47 buildings served by the False Creek Neighbourhood Energy Utility. In 2025, 60% of the energy the utility generated came from sewage heat recovery, said Mark Schwark, director of water and utilities management at the City of Vancouver. The future of wastewater heat recovery Aaron Brown, associate professor of systems engineering at Colorado State University, said he believes use of the wastewater heat recovery systems will grow because it is an efficient, low-carbon system that is relatively easy to install.Unlike solar or wind power that can vary by weather or time of day, thermal energy from sewage can be available whenever it's needed, Brown said.“I think that to decarbonize, we have to think of some innovative solutions. And this is one that is not that complicated as far as the engineering technology, but it’s very effective,” said Brown.Epic Cleantec, which makes water reuse systems for office and apartment buildings, is expanding into heat recovery after previously focusing on treating water for toilets and irrigation. The company recently installed a wastewater heat recovery system in a high-rise building in San Francisco.Aaron Tartakovsky, co-founder and CEO of Epic Cleantec, said people have been conditioned to think that wastewater is dirty and should always be discarded, but his company recently launched two beers in collaboration with a brewer made from recycled shower and laundry water to illustrate novel ways to reuse it.“I think wastewater recovery is going to be a continuously growing thing because it’s something that we’re not taking advantage of,” said Tartakovsky.Peterson reported from Denver and O’Malley from Philadelphia.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Climate
Energy
Sustainable

Warm Weather and Low Snowpack Bedevil Western Ski Resorts

Lack of snow is causing problems for ski resorts and other businesses in the Western U.S. that rely on wintry conditions

EDWARDS, Colo. (AP) — Ski resorts are struggling to open runs, walk-through ice palaces can’t be built, and the owner of a horse stable hopes that her customers will be satisfied with riding wagons instead of sleighs under majestic Rocky Mountain peaks. It’s just been too warm in the West with not enough snow.Meanwhile, the Midwest and Northeast have been blanketed by record snow this December, a payday for skiers who usually covet conditions out West.In the Western mountains where snow is crucial for ski tourism — not to mention water for millions of acres (hectares) of crops and the daily needs of tens of millions of people — much less snow than usual has piled up.“Mother Nature has been dealing a really hard deck,” said Kevin Cooper, president of the Kirkwood Ski Education Foundation, a ski racing organization at Lake Tahoe on the California-Nevada line.Only a small percentage of lifts were open and snow depths were well below average at Lake Tahoe resorts, just one example of warm weather causing well-below-average snowpack in almost all of the West.In Utah, warmth has indefinitely postponed this winter’s Midway Ice Castles, an attraction 45 minutes east of Salt Lake City that requires cold temperatures to freeze water into building-size, palatial features. Temperatures in the area that will host part of the 2034 Winter Olympics have averaged 7-10 degrees (3-5 degrees Celsius) above normal in recent weeks, according to the National Weather Service.Near Vail, Colorado, Bearcat Stables owner Nicole Godley hopes wagons will be a good-enough substitute for sleighs for rides through mountain scenery.“It’s the same experience, the same ride, the same horses,” Godley said. “It’s more about, you know, just these giant horses and the Western rustic feel.”In the Northwest, torrential rain has washed out roads and bridges and flooded homes. Heavy mountain snow finally arrived late this week in Washington state but flood-damaged roads that might not be fixed for months now block access to some ski resorts.In Oregon, the Upper Deschutes Basin has had the slowest start to snow accumulation in records dating to 1981. Oregon, Idaho and western Colorado had their warmest Novembers on record, with temperatures ranging from 6-8.5 degrees (2-4 degrees Celsius) warmer than average, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Continued warmth could bring yet another year of drought and wildfires to the West. Most of the region except large parts of Colorado and Oregon has seen decent precipitation but as rain instead of snow, pointed out NOAA drought information coordinator Jason Gerlich.That not only doesn’t help skiers but farmers, ranchers and people from Denver to Los Angeles who rely on snowpack water for their daily existence. Rain runs off all at once at times when it's not necessarily needed.“That snowpack is one of our largest reservoirs for water supply across the West,” Gerlich said.Climate scientists agree that limiting global warming is critical to staving off the snow-to-rain trend.In the northeastern U.S., meanwhile, below-normal temperatures have meant snow instead of rain. Parts of Vermont have almost triple and Ohio double the snowfall they had this time last year.Vermont’s Killington Resort and Pico Mountain, had about 100 trails open for “by far the best conditions I have ever seen for this time of year,” said Josh Reed, resort spokesman who has lived in Killington for a decade.New Hampshire ski areas opening early include Cannon Mountain, with over 50 inches (127 centimeters) to date. In northern Vermont, Elena Veatch, 31, already has cross-country skied more this fall than she has over the past two years.“I don’t take a good New England winter for granted with our warming climate,” Veatch said.Out West, it's still far too early to rule out hope for snow. A single big storm can “turn things around rather quickly,” pointed out Gerlich, the NOAA coordinator.Lake Tahoe's snow forecast over Thanksgiving week didn't pan out but Cooper with the ski racing group is eyeing possibly several feet (1-2 meters) in the long-term forecast.“That would be so cool!” Cooper said.Janie Har in San Francisco and Gene Johnson in Seattle contributed. Gruver reported from Fort Collins, Colorado. ___The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environmentCopyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Climate
Education
Mountains

New York realizes it cannot afford its green promises

Up for reelection, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) distance herself from climate catastrophists.

New York’s crusade against gas stoves is being placed on the back burner: Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) recently delayed the implementation of a 2023 ban on running gas in new buildings before it took effect in January.That hasn’t been Hochul’s only climate backtrack. In November, she agreed to a Trump-backed gas pipeline, marking the Empire State’s first pipeline in at least a decade — and the first since they passed their hallmark climate law in 2019 requiring the state to cut carbon emissions 40 percent by 2030. Hochul also signed an agreement granting permits to a gas-powered crypto mining facility, on the condition the plant nearly halves its pollution by 2030.When asked in October about the mandate for no gas in new buildings, the governor said she’s “going to look at this with a very realistic approach and do what I can, because my number one focus is affordability.” Hochul’s U-turn is an admission that the anti-energy agenda pushed by far-left environmental groups was always unaffordable.Climate activists accuse Hochul of being a traitor, but maybe the governor has finally realized that there’s rarely any upside to pursuing unrealistic decarbonization plans. At the very least, it looks like she’s paying attention to voters during a reelection cycle. Polling shows 61 percent of New Yorkers — including 54 percent of Democrats — “somewhat” or “strongly” agree that keeping energy affordable in the state is more important right now than reducing greenhouse gas emissions.The state’s residential electricity prices have risen 36 percent since New York passed its decarbonization legislation in 2019, according to a Progressive Policy Institute study. That’s almost three times faster than the rest of the country. Still, nearly half of New York’s electricity is supplied by fossil fuels. That study concludes that New York’s energy strategy is driving up costs, constraining reliable supply and jeopardizing the political viability of the state’s climate agenda. Other blue states face similar pain.It’s no coincidence that most of the states with the highest prices also have the most ambitious decarbonization mandates. Even though the federal government can dish out all kinds of subsidies for renewable energy, the states largely get to regulate how they generate and sell their electricity.Florida has chosen to base its energy generation on reliability and affordability, instead of ideology. Despite intense energy demands driven by a subtropical climate, Florida’s electricity prices are two percent lower than the national average. The state gets about 75 percent of its energy from natural gas.Symbolic climate gestures please activists, but they become a political liability when the bills come due.

Climate
Activism
Government

Suggested Viewing

Can't Stop Change: Queer Climate Stories from the Florida Frontlines

As Florida's violent legislation dominates headlines, LGBTQ2S+ communities are also on the frontlines of accelerating climate change. “Can’t Stop Change: Queer Climate Stories from the Florida Frontlines” weaves interviews with 15 LGBTQ2S+ artists, organizers, and educators across Florida (and the new Florida diaspora) into an intersectional climate justice narrative.

Social Justice
Activism
Climate

THE SPRAYER

In the land occupied with the sprayers army, no one has the right to grow any kind of plants either in public or private. So many of the people and soldiers do not even know how a plant grows or looks like, until one day one of the soldiers finds a seed buried deep down in the dust and his curiosity is just the beginning of something extraordinary, something big, something revolutionary.

Plants
CO2
Animation

Living with Landslides

This film documents the devastating costs of landslides to both private property owners and taxpayers, and offers solutions. Climate change means landslides will only get worse.

Land Use
Education
Climate

Heimat - Requiem For The World As We Know It

Four theater-makers from Belgium travel to the melting glaciers on Greenland. Their goal: to play a new composed requiem and say goodbye to the world as we know it.

Music
Culture
Climate

Silent Skies - The First Electric Plane Flyover

Silent Skies follows the groundbreaking journey of three Pennsylvania college students who orchestrated and piloted the first ever fully electric airplane stadium flyover. Stunning fans with a whisper-quiet show, this event signaled the dawn of America's transition to electric aviation. The students completed a record breaking trip flying the airplane from its base in Hartford, CT to the stadium in Easton, PA, recharging at enroute airports directly from a fleet of electric F-150 trucks. The air travel industry faces an unprecedented challenge: decarbonization. Historically, new aviation technologies are met with consumer skepticism. Demonstrating electric aircraft today, ahead of widespread adoption, is key for building consumer trust, political support, and sustained investment. The flyover was witnessed by 10,000+ attendees, thousands more on ESPN+ and created a precedent for the FAA to approve manned electric aircraft demonstrations over populated areas. Textron eAviation and Ford amplified the event through their social media channels and the film premiered at San Francisco Climate Week.

Technology
Transportation
Climate

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.