Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

These Alluring Images Capture the Threats of Air Pollution Around the World

News Feed
Tuesday, July 16, 2024

In November 2016 the “Great Smog of Delhi” engulfed India’s capital and marked the city’s worst air quality event in 17 years. Fine particulate matter air pollution, or tiny particles measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter—30 times thinner than a human hair—reached levels over 16 times the safe limit. The particles are small enough to be breathed deeply into lungs but not exhaled, so they can instead deposit and accumulate inside the body. Heavy smog was visible throughout the city, and hospital admissions of people with respiratory diseases spiked. Schools were closed, traffic was restricted, and construction and agricultural burning were halted. About a month later, a team of environmental scientists and an artist arrived in Delhi to collaborate on an air pollution monitoring project. At that time the city was still experiencing an extremely poor air quality event—experts said just walking around the city at that time was equivalent to smoking over two packs of cigarettes a day—yet the smog was no longer as visible. Although the city was still deep in an air quality event, it had disappeared from the news cycle, says artist Robin Price, who was in Delhi at the time. The collaboration​​ between Price and environmental scientist Francis Pope of the University of Birmingham in England aimed to make the invisible threat of air pollution visible. They used digital “light painting,” a photography technique that captures moving light sources as “brushstrokes,” to illustrate where air pollutants were most concentrated. The project focused on three places that face different air pollution challenges: India, Ethiopia and the United Kingdom. To create a light painting, Price set up a camera to capture a long-exposure photograph of an area, and then walked in front of the camera holding a low-cost air pollution sensor with LED lights. The sensor detected fine particulate matter air pollution, also known as PM2.5, and the LED lights flashed more where concentrations of PM2.5 were higher. The camera captured the light flashes as dots of light painting. The higher the PM2.5 concentration in an area, the more dots of light appear in the photograph. The project, called “Air of the Anthropocene,” has held photo exhibitions in Los Angeles; Belfast, Northern Ireland; and Birmingham, England, and has sparked global discussions about air pollution. POLLUTION PAINTING ON THE ROOF OF MEXICO CITY'S SEDEMA SUPERSITE MONITORING STATION Pope and Price chose the locations for the photographs to represent day-to-day life: in playgrounds, kitchens and city streets. Air quality tends to be measured on a broad regional level and based on monitors at tops of buildings, but data at the local and street level can be useful, too, says Patrick Kinney, an environmental health researcher at Boston University. Local data about where pollution is coming from can help people avoid exposure to it, or it can lead them to avoid being a source themselves, says Kinney. “Low-cost sensors, which have been a relatively recent technology that became available for air pollution use, have been particularly transformational,” says Pallavi Pant, head of global health at the nonprofit Health Effects Institute (HEI). Individuals can own these sensors, and so too can cities that can’t afford larger air pollution monitoring networks. The municipalities can use the data they gather to enact air pollution policies and monitor progress. And in regions where literacy might not be widespread, images like the photos from this project can convey air pollution data in a more accessible way, says Price. Light painting from a playground in less urban Palampur, India, shows much lower air pollution density compared with Delhi. Robin Price “I can sit here and talk about numbers and data every day, I will lose people very quickly,” says Pant. “Something more interactive, more visual, but still bringing data and science at its core, is a very useful and interesting approach.” The photos illustrate diverse air pollution issues among the three countries. In Wales, pollutant concentrations are high near the Port Talbot steelworks, which is the city’s main employer but also a major health hazard. Two playgrounds in India, one in urban Delhi and one in rural Palampur, show vastly different PM2.5 concentrations: The Delhi playground has about 12 times more PM2.5 pollution than the Palampur playground. Inside a kitchen with a wood stove in Ethiopia, PM2.5 concentrations are about 20 times greater than outside the home. Light painting shows air pollution near the steelworks in Port Talbot, Wales. The steelworks is the city’s main industry and source of particulate matter pollution. Robin Price Air pollution is one of the world’s leading threats to human health, with polluted air causing about seven million premature deaths worldwide every year. New research from the HEI finds air pollution-related health problems have become the second leading risk factor for death worldwide, ranking below high blood pressure but now ranking above tobacco and poor diet. Children under five years old are especially vulnerable to developing asthma and lung diseases due to poor air quality, according to the new HEI report. In 2021, air pollution exposure was linked to over 700,000 deaths of children under 5, the second-biggest risk factor for death worldwide for this age group after malnutrition. An estimated 500,000 of these deaths were linked to indoor air pollution from cooking with polluting fuels. PM2.5 is the air pollutant most responsible for health issues. The tiny particles come from natural and anthropogenic sources, but the primary source of harmful levels of PM2.5 pollution is burning fossil fuels and biomass: for transportation, industry and in homes. Air pollution is worse inside a wood-burning kitchen in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, than outside the home. Robin Price Over 90 percent of global air pollution deaths reported in the new HEI study are linked to PM2.5 air pollution. The particles are small enough to enter the lungs and bloodstream, increasing the risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. “[PM2.5] can be used as a very accurate predictor,” says Pant. “If you’re exposed to PM2.5, you’re going to experience health effects.” Most countries focus on fighting air pollution by reducing emissions at the source, through vehicle or industrial regulation, for example, and through transitioning away from more polluting technologies. In India and Latin America, a major cause of PM2.5 pollution has been burning agricultural residue for cooking. So policy makers are focusing on creating alternatives: promoting agricultural waste recycling programs, for example, or promoting cooking with less polluting fuels. Pant says we are seeing progress. Regions that face the highest levels of air pollution like Africa and Asia are now monitoring air quality more closely and implementing stricter air pollution policies. Since 2000, the air pollution-related death rate of children under 5 has dropped 53 percent, which the HEI report attributes mostly to improved access to clean fuel for cooking, improvements to health care and nutrition, and better awareness of the harmful effects of indoor air pollution. POLLUTION PAINTING PRESENTATION FOR MAKING ART AT THE END OF THE WORLD BOM ART & TECH SUMMIT Pope and Price are now trying to design their air pollution light-painting technique to be even more accessible, making the process open source to share with citizen scientists around the world who can create air quality light paintings themselves. Pope and Price are also working on an augmented reality approach to light painting using a phone app. “With the availability of local information and local data, there has been greater public conversation around air pollution,” says Pant. Pant also says understanding local-level air pollution is a powerful tool to change people’s attitudes, and to “create the environment where air pollution action and mitigation efforts are demanded, and well-received when they are implemented.” Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Researchers combined long-exposure photography with pollution sensor data to create representations of pollution in India, the United Kingdom and Ethiopia

In November 2016 the “Great Smog of Delhi” engulfed India’s capital and marked the city’s worst air quality event in 17 years. Fine particulate matter air pollution, or tiny particles measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter—30 times thinner than a human hair—reached levels over 16 times the safe limit. The particles are small enough to be breathed deeply into lungs but not exhaled, so they can instead deposit and accumulate inside the body. Heavy smog was visible throughout the city, and hospital admissions of people with respiratory diseases spiked. Schools were closed, traffic was restricted, and construction and agricultural burning were halted.

About a month later, a team of environmental scientists and an artist arrived in Delhi to collaborate on an air pollution monitoring project. At that time the city was still experiencing an extremely poor air quality event—experts said just walking around the city at that time was equivalent to smoking over two packs of cigarettes a day—yet the smog was no longer as visible. Although the city was still deep in an air quality event, it had disappeared from the news cycle, says artist Robin Price, who was in Delhi at the time.

The collaboration​​ between Price and environmental scientist Francis Pope of the University of Birmingham in England aimed to make the invisible threat of air pollution visible. They used digital “light painting,” a photography technique that captures moving light sources as “brushstrokes,” to illustrate where air pollutants were most concentrated. The project focused on three places that face different air pollution challenges: India, Ethiopia and the United Kingdom.

To create a light painting, Price set up a camera to capture a long-exposure photograph of an area, and then walked in front of the camera holding a low-cost air pollution sensor with LED lights. The sensor detected fine particulate matter air pollution, also known as PM2.5, and the LED lights flashed more where concentrations of PM2.5 were higher. The camera captured the light flashes as dots of light painting. The higher the PM2.5 concentration in an area, the more dots of light appear in the photograph. The project, called “Air of the Anthropocene,” has held photo exhibitions in Los Angeles; Belfast, Northern Ireland; and Birmingham, England, and has sparked global discussions about air pollution.

POLLUTION PAINTING ON THE ROOF OF MEXICO CITY'S SEDEMA SUPERSITE MONITORING STATION

Pope and Price chose the locations for the photographs to represent day-to-day life: in playgrounds, kitchens and city streets. Air quality tends to be measured on a broad regional level and based on monitors at tops of buildings, but data at the local and street level can be useful, too, says Patrick Kinney, an environmental health researcher at Boston University. Local data about where pollution is coming from can help people avoid exposure to it, or it can lead them to avoid being a source themselves, says Kinney.

“Low-cost sensors, which have been a relatively recent technology that became available for air pollution use, have been particularly transformational,” says Pallavi Pant, head of global health at the nonprofit Health Effects Institute (HEI). Individuals can own these sensors, and so too can cities that can’t afford larger air pollution monitoring networks. The municipalities can use the data they gather to enact air pollution policies and monitor progress.

And in regions where literacy might not be widespread, images like the photos from this project can convey air pollution data in a more accessible way, says Price.

Air Pollution Light Painting at Playground
Light painting from a playground in less urban Palampur, India, shows much lower air pollution density compared with Delhi. Robin Price

“I can sit here and talk about numbers and data every day, I will lose people very quickly,” says Pant. “Something more interactive, more visual, but still bringing data and science at its core, is a very useful and interesting approach.”

The photos illustrate diverse air pollution issues among the three countries. In Wales, pollutant concentrations are high near the Port Talbot steelworks, which is the city’s main employer but also a major health hazard. Two playgrounds in India, one in urban Delhi and one in rural Palampur, show vastly different PM2.5 concentrations: The Delhi playground has about 12 times more PM2.5 pollution than the Palampur playground. Inside a kitchen with a wood stove in Ethiopia, PM2.5 concentrations are about 20 times greater than outside the home.

Air Pollution Light Painting Near Steelworks
Light painting shows air pollution near the steelworks in Port Talbot, Wales. The steelworks is the city’s main industry and source of particulate matter pollution. Robin Price

Air pollution is one of the world’s leading threats to human health, with polluted air causing about seven million premature deaths worldwide every year. New research from the HEI finds air pollution-related health problems have become the second leading risk factor for death worldwide, ranking below high blood pressure but now ranking above tobacco and poor diet.

Children under five years old are especially vulnerable to developing asthma and lung diseases due to poor air quality, according to the new HEI report. In 2021, air pollution exposure was linked to over 700,000 deaths of children under 5, the second-biggest risk factor for death worldwide for this age group after malnutrition. An estimated 500,000 of these deaths were linked to indoor air pollution from cooking with polluting fuels.

PM2.5 is the air pollutant most responsible for health issues. The tiny particles come from natural and anthropogenic sources, but the primary source of harmful levels of PM2.5 pollution is burning fossil fuels and biomass: for transportation, industry and in homes.

Air Pollution Light Painting in Home
Air pollution is worse inside a wood-burning kitchen in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, than outside the home. Robin Price

Over 90 percent of global air pollution deaths reported in the new HEI study are linked to PM2.5 air pollution. The particles are small enough to enter the lungs and bloodstream, increasing the risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

“[PM2.5] can be used as a very accurate predictor,” says Pant. “If you’re exposed to PM2.5, you’re going to experience health effects.”

Most countries focus on fighting air pollution by reducing emissions at the source, through vehicle or industrial regulation, for example, and through transitioning away from more polluting technologies. In India and Latin America, a major cause of PM2.5 pollution has been burning agricultural residue for cooking. So policy makers are focusing on creating alternatives: promoting agricultural waste recycling programs, for example, or promoting cooking with less polluting fuels.

Pant says we are seeing progress. Regions that face the highest levels of air pollution like Africa and Asia are now monitoring air quality more closely and implementing stricter air pollution policies. Since 2000, the air pollution-related death rate of children under 5 has dropped 53 percent, which the HEI report attributes mostly to improved access to clean fuel for cooking, improvements to health care and nutrition, and better awareness of the harmful effects of indoor air pollution.

POLLUTION PAINTING PRESENTATION FOR MAKING ART AT THE END OF THE WORLD BOM ART & TECH SUMMIT

Pope and Price are now trying to design their air pollution light-painting technique to be even more accessible, making the process open source to share with citizen scientists around the world who can create air quality light paintings themselves. Pope and Price are also working on an augmented reality approach to light painting using a phone app.

“With the availability of local information and local data, there has been greater public conversation around air pollution,” says Pant.

Pant also says understanding local-level air pollution is a powerful tool to change people’s attitudes, and to “create the environment where air pollution action and mitigation efforts are demanded, and well-received when they are implemented.”

Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Environmental Agency Denies Petition to Designate Big Hole River as Impaired by Nutrient Pollution

Montana’s environmental regulator has denied a petition to designate the Big Hole River as impaired by nitrogen and phosphorus

Montana’s environmental regulator has denied a petition to designate the Big Hole River as impaired by nitrogen and phosphorus, throwing a wrench in environmentalists’ efforts to put the blue-ribbon fishery on a “pollution diet.”Upper Missouri Waterkeeper and the Big Hole River Foundation contend that excess nutrients are creating regular summertime algal blooms that can stretch for more than a mile, robbing fish and the macroinvertebrate bugs they eat of the oxygen they need to thrive. The groups argue in the petition they sent to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality last month that an impairment designation would direct the agency to identify and work to reduce the river’s pollution sources in an effort to rebalance the river’s aquatic ecosystem.On April 14, about a month after receiving the 32-page petition, DEQ wrote that it “cannot grant” the group’s petition. The agency’s letter doesn’t quibble with the groups’ findings, which were detailed in a five-year data collection effort. Instead, the agency suggested that legislation passed in 2021 has tied its hands. “As a result of Senate Bill 358, passed during the 2021 Legislative Session … DEQ is unable to base nutrient assessment upon the numeric nutrient criteria,” the letter, signed by DEQ Director Sonja Nowakowski, reads. In an April 23 conversation with Montana Free Press, Upper Missouri Waterkeeper Executive Director Guy Alsentzer criticized the agency’s decision, arguing that it did not use the best available science and applied “illogical and disingenuous” reasoning in its denial. “EPA already took action and struck down Senate Bill 358 from the 2021 session,” Alsentzer said, referencing federal regulators’ oversight of state laws and rules governing water quality. “Numeric criteria are applicable.”A spokesperson for the EPA confirmed Alsentzer’s assertion, writing in an April 24 email to MTFP that numeric nutrient standards for nitrogen and phosphorus the agency approved a decade ago “remain in effect for Clean Water Act purposes” and will remain so “unless or until the EPA approves the removal of the currently applicable numeric nutrient criteria and approves revised water quality standards.”A DEQ spokesperson did not directly answer MTFP’s questions about what water quality standards DEQ is using to assess Montana waterways and determine whether permittees are complying with state and federal regulations.The agency wrote in an email that no permitted pollution sources under its regulatory oversight are discharging into the Big Hole, suggesting that its enforcement role is limited. The agency also wrote that an impairment designation is not required to implement water quality improvement projects such as creating riparian buffers, improving forest roads, or creating shaded areas. “Watershed partners may begin actively working on nonpoint source pollution reduction projects at any time,” DEQ spokesperson Madison McGeffers wrote to MTFP. “There is nothing standing in the way of starting work on these types of projects to improve water quality. In fact, the Big Hole River Watershed Committee is actively implementing its Watershed Restoration Plan with funds and support from DEQ Nonpoint Source & Wetland Section’s 319 program.”Alsentzer countered that a science-based cleanup plan and greater accountability will benefit the Big Hole regardless of whether nutrients are flowing into the river from a pipe or entering via more diffuse and harder-to-regulate channels.“You can’t get to that if you don’t recognize that you’ve got a problem we need to solve,” he said, adding that an impairment designation “unlocks pass-through funding to the tune of millions of dollars.”Addressing manmade threats to the Big Hole should be a priority for DEQ, given local communities’ economic reliance on a healthy river, he added.“It’s just a real tragic state of affairs when you have a blue-ribbon trout fishery in a very rural county that’s essentially having its livelihood flushed down the drain because we can’t get our agencies to actually implement baseline river protections (and) use science-based standards,” Alsentzer said. “When people try to do the work for the agency and help them, they’re getting told to go pound sand. I think that’s wrong.”Two years ago, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks biologists recorded historically low numbers of brown trout along some stretches of the Big Hole. Anglers and conservationists floated a number of possible contributing factors, ranging from pathogens and drought conditions to angling pressure and unmitigated pollution. Save Wild Trout, a nonprofit formed in 2023 to understand which factors merit further investigation, described the 2023 southwestern Montana fishery “collapse” as a “canary in the coal mine moment.”In response to the 2023 population slump, Gov. Greg Gianforte announced the launch of a multiyear research effort on Jefferson Basin rivers that FWP is coordinating with Montana State University. Narrative Standards For ‘Undesirable Aquatic Life’ DEQ’s letter to Upper Missouri Waterkeeper and the Big Hole River Foundation leaves open the possibility of a future impairment designation based on narrative water quality standards. After mentioning the 2021 legislation, Nowakowski wrote that the agency reviewed the submitted data “along with other readily available data, in consideration of the state’s established narrative criteria.”The letter goes on to outline the additional material petitioners would need to submit for the agency to evaluate an impairment designation using narrative criteria, which establish that surface waters must be “free from substances” that “create conditions which produce undesirable aquatic life.”In an April 22 letter, Upper Missouri Waterkeeper and the Big Hole River Foundation addressed the petition denial in two parts. First, the groups argued that numeric nutrient standards apply. Second, they resubmitted material — photos, emails, a macroinvertebrate report, and “Aquatic Plant Visual Assessment Forms” — to support an impairment designation under the looser narrative standards. “We encourage DEQ to do the right thing, use all available science to determine the Big Hole River impaired for nutrients, and commit to working with petitioners and other (stakeholders) in addressing the pollution sources undermining this world-class waterway and harming the diverse uses it supports,” the letter says. Alsentzer noted that he has set up a meeting with the EPA to discuss DEQ’s treatment of the petition and its description of applicable water quality standards.The dispute over numeric nutrient standards comes shortly after the Legislature passed another bill seeking to repeal them. Any day now, Gianforte is expected to sign House Bill 664, which bears a striking similarity to 2021’s Senate Bill 358. HB 664 has garnered support from Nowakowski, who described it as a “time travel” bill that will return the state to “individual, site-by-site” regulations in lieu of more broadly applicable numeric standards. This story was originally published by Montana Free Press and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Feb. 2025

Supreme Court justices consider reviving industry bid to ax California clean car rule

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in a case that could revive a bid by fuel producers to ax California’s clean car standards. The court was not considering the legality of the standards themselves, which ​​require car companies to sell new vehicles in the state that produce less pollution — including by mandating...

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in a case that could revive a bid by fuel producers to ax California’s clean car standards. The court was not considering the legality of the standards themselves, which ​​require car companies to sell new vehicles in the state that produce less pollution — including by mandating a significant share of cars sold to be electric or hybrid.  Instead, the Supreme Court was considering whether the fuel industry had the authority to bring the lawsuit at all. A lower court determined that the producers, which include numerous biofuel companies and trade groups representing both them and the makers of gasoline, did not have standing to bring the case. Some of the justices were quiet, so it’s difficult to predict what the ultimate outcome of the case will be. However, others appeared critical of the federal government and California’s arguments that the fuel producers do not have the right to bring a suit. Justice Brett Kavanaugh in particular noted that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) itself did not initially try to have the case tossed on that basis.  “Isn't that a tell here? I mean, EPA, as you, of course, know, routinely raises standing objections when there's even — even a hint of a question about it,” Kavanaugh said.  The fuel producers argued that while it was technically the auto industry that was being regulated, the market was being “tilted” against them as well by California’s rule, which was also adopted by other states. The EPA and California have argued that the fuel producers are arguing on the basis of outdated facts and a market that has shifted since the rule was first approved by the EPA in 2013.  The EPA needs to grant approval to California to issue such rules. The approval was revoked by the Trump administration and later reinstated in the Biden administration.  If the justices revive the currently dismissed case, lower courts would then have to decide whether to uphold the California rule — though the underlying case could eventually make its way to the high court as well.  Meanwhile, California has since passed subsequent standards that go even further — banning the sale of gas-powered cars in the state by 2035. That rule was approved by the Biden administration — though Congress may try to repeal it.

EPA fires or reassigns hundreds of staffers

The Environmental Protection Agency plans to fire or reassign more than 450 staffers working on environmental justice issues, it said Tuesday.Why it matters: The large-scale changes could effectively end much of the EPA's work tackling pollution in historically disadvantaged communities.It's part of the Trump administration's effort to vastly shrink the federal workforce. EPA has around 15,000 employees.Driving the news: EPA notified roughly 280 employees that they will be fired in a "reduction in force." Another 175 who perform "statutory functions" will be reassigned.The employees come from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, the Office of Inclusive Excellence, and EPA regional offices."EPA is taking the next step to terminate the Biden-Harris Administration's Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Environmental Justice arms of the agency," a spokesperson said.Between the lines: The firings will likely see challenges from congressional Democrats and the employees themselves.EPA had previously put many environmental justice staffers on administrative leave.Administrator Lee Zeldin, during a Monday news conference, defended the agency's broader efforts to cut environmental justice grant programs, arguing the money is ill-spent."The problem is that, in the name of environmental justice, a dollar will get secured and not get spent on remediating that environmental issue," he said.

The Environmental Protection Agency plans to fire or reassign more than 450 staffers working on environmental justice issues, it said Tuesday.Why it matters: The large-scale changes could effectively end much of the EPA's work tackling pollution in historically disadvantaged communities.It's part of the Trump administration's effort to vastly shrink the federal workforce. EPA has around 15,000 employees.Driving the news: EPA notified roughly 280 employees that they will be fired in a "reduction in force." Another 175 who perform "statutory functions" will be reassigned.The employees come from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, the Office of Inclusive Excellence, and EPA regional offices."EPA is taking the next step to terminate the Biden-Harris Administration's Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Environmental Justice arms of the agency," a spokesperson said.Between the lines: The firings will likely see challenges from congressional Democrats and the employees themselves.EPA had previously put many environmental justice staffers on administrative leave.Administrator Lee Zeldin, during a Monday news conference, defended the agency's broader efforts to cut environmental justice grant programs, arguing the money is ill-spent."The problem is that, in the name of environmental justice, a dollar will get secured and not get spent on remediating that environmental issue," he said.

EPA firing 280 staffers who fought pollution in overburdened neighborhoods

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will fire 280 staffers who worked on tackling pollution in overburdened and underserved communities and will reassign another 175. These staffers worked in an area known as “environmental justice,” which helps communities that face a disproportionate amount of pollution exposure, especially minority or low-income communities.  The EPA has framed its...

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will fire 280 staffers who worked on tackling pollution in overburdened and underserved communities and will reassign another 175. These staffers worked in an area known as “environmental justice,” which helps communities that face a disproportionate amount of pollution exposure, especially minority or low-income communities.  The EPA has framed its efforts to cut these programs — including its previous closure of environmental justice offices — as part of a push to end diversity programming in the government. Supporters of the agency's environmental justice work have pointed out that Black communities face particularly high pollution levels and that the programs also help white Americans, especially if they are poor.  “EPA is taking the next step to terminate the Biden-Harris Administration’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Environmental Justice arms of the agency,” an EPA spokesperson said in a written statement.   “Today, EPA notified diversity, equity, and inclusion and environmental justice employees that EPA will be conducting a Reduction in Force,” the spokesperson said. “The agency also notified certain statutory and mission essential employees that they are being reassigned to other offices through the ‘transfer of function’ procedure also outlined in [the Office of Personnel Management’s] Handbook and federal regulations” The firings will be effective July 31, according to E&E News, which first reported that they were occurring. The news comes as the Trump administration has broadly sought to cut the federal workforce. The administration has previously indicated that it planned to cut 65 percent of the EPA’s overall budget. It’s not clear how much of this will be staff, though according to a plan reviewed by Democrat House staff, the EPA is considering the termination of as many as about 1,100 employees from its scientific research arm.  Meanwhile, as part of their reductions in force, other agencies including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Veterans Affairs have fired tens of thousands of staffers. The EPA is smaller than these agencies, with a total of more than 15,000 employees as of January.  Nearly 170 environmental justice staffers were previously placed on paid leave while the agency was “in the process of evaluating new structure and organization.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.