Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Southern California regulators impose pollution limits on the region's rail yards

News Feed
Saturday, August 3, 2024

Southern California air regulators have adopted a first-of-its-kind rule to curb smog-forming pollution from freight trains and cargo trucks that serve the region’s rail yards.The South Coast Air Quality Management District’s governing board voted 12-0 on Friday to require rail yard owners and operators, including BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad, to aggressively reduce lung-irritating nitrogen oxides emissions between 2027 and 2050. Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. The region’s rail yards produce nearly 22 tons of nitrogen oxide emissions a day, about 9% of all smog-forming pollution in the air basin.The new regulation — applicable to about 25 rail yards in Greater Los Angeles — would help curb regional rail yard pollution roughly 80% by 2036. Once implemented, the rule is expected to avert 300 premature deaths and 2,100 hospitalizations each year, according to the air district, improving air quality in communities that border rail yards, including Wilmington and San Bernardino.“While there is no single rule or regulation that can achieve federal air quality standards on its own, today’s adoption is a big step in the right direction,” said Vanessa Delgado, the air district’s governing board chair. “There are so many communities, parks and schools that are surrounded and affected by sources associated with rail yards that will directly benefit from today’s action. We will continue to reduce emissions where we are able because that is what our communities deserve.”Before the vote, dozens of community members and environmental advocates voiced their support of the rule, many wearing shirts that read, “My heart is in your hands,” alluding to the cardiovascular effects associated with breathing air pollution. Many hoped this regulation could mark a new beginning for communities near rail corridors.“This is about correcting a historical injustice,” said Samuel Brown-Vazquez, who spoke at Friday’s public hearing. “Where I live in Avocado Heights, our community was ravaged by the creation of the rail yard and the impacts they had.”The regulations intend to clean up some of the most stubborn sources of pollution within Southern California’s busy goods movement sector, most notably diesel-powered trains.Train emissions — about 70% of all rail yard pollution — have remained largely unchanged over the past decade, partly because the rail industry has not purchased new locomotives with cleaner engines, according to the air district.The air district new rule is expected to work in tandem with state Air Resources Board rules governing locomotives and trucks. But the new regulation is necessary because previous state rules for trucks have not been as effective at reducing pollution in Southern California compared with other parts of the state, according to the air district officials.The rail yard rule will ensure that Southern California’s rail yard emission reductions are on par with state rules.However, the new emission reduction rule can become effective only if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signs off on the region’s smog plan and approves the state regulations for locomotives and truck fleets.Curt Hagman, an air district governing board member and San Bernardino County supervisor, expressed concern about the feasibility of achieving these reductions, considering the necessary improvements to the power grid and electric infrastructure to accommodate cleaner rail yards.Wayne Nastri, the air district’s executive officer, said a recent historic $500-million EPA grant could help. He also noted there may be flexibility to waive penalties if rail yards encounter delays or difficulties.“There has been tremendous effort at the state level to make sure that we have the energy capacity to meet the growing needs,” Nastri said. “But the challenge that’s been identified more of lately is that last facility hookup, making sure that the facilities either have the substations, the circuits, the transformers and the time it takes to process that.” In Southern California, at least three agencies regulate air quality: the South Coast Air Quality Management District, which regulates facilities; the California Air Resources Board, which regulates in-state cars and trucks; and the EPA, which regulates trains, aircraft and ships.Because some of Southern California’s largest polluters are federally regulated, the local air district has attempted to work around its own limitations by requiring the facilities to offset pollution. The air district’s first rules of this kind, adopted in 2021, established requirements for large warehouses to mitigate the pollution from the truck traffic they attract.The rail yard rule is the second policy of its kind by the air district.Although the rule notably will not apply to rail yards at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the air district is drafting a similar proposal to reduce emissions at the ports complex, the largest fixed source of smog-forming pollution in the region.

The South Coast Air Quality Management District votes to require rail yard owners and operators, including BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad, to aggressively reduce lung-irritating nitrogen-oxide emissions through 2050.

Southern California air regulators have adopted a first-of-its-kind rule to curb smog-forming pollution from freight trains and cargo trucks that serve the region’s rail yards.

The South Coast Air Quality Management District’s governing board voted 12-0 on Friday to require rail yard owners and operators, including BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad, to aggressively reduce lung-irritating nitrogen oxides emissions between 2027 and 2050.

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

The region’s rail yards produce nearly 22 tons of nitrogen oxide emissions a day, about 9% of all smog-forming pollution in the air basin.

The new regulation — applicable to about 25 rail yards in Greater Los Angeles — would help curb regional rail yard pollution roughly 80% by 2036. Once implemented, the rule is expected to avert 300 premature deaths and 2,100 hospitalizations each year, according to the air district, improving air quality in communities that border rail yards, including Wilmington and San Bernardino.

“While there is no single rule or regulation that can achieve federal air quality standards on its own, today’s adoption is a big step in the right direction,” said Vanessa Delgado, the air district’s governing board chair. “There are so many communities, parks and schools that are surrounded and affected by sources associated with rail yards that will directly benefit from today’s action. We will continue to reduce emissions where we are able because that is what our communities deserve.”

Before the vote, dozens of community members and environmental advocates voiced their support of the rule, many wearing shirts that read, “My heart is in your hands,” alluding to the cardiovascular effects associated with breathing air pollution. Many hoped this regulation could mark a new beginning for communities near rail corridors.

“This is about correcting a historical injustice,” said Samuel Brown-Vazquez, who spoke at Friday’s public hearing. “Where I live in Avocado Heights, our community was ravaged by the creation of the rail yard and the impacts they had.”

The regulations intend to clean up some of the most stubborn sources of pollution within Southern California’s busy goods movement sector, most notably diesel-powered trains.

Train emissions — about 70% of all rail yard pollution — have remained largely unchanged over the past decade, partly because the rail industry has not purchased new locomotives with cleaner engines, according to the air district.

The air district new rule is expected to work in tandem with state Air Resources Board rules governing locomotives and trucks. But the new regulation is necessary because previous state rules for trucks have not been as effective at reducing pollution in Southern California compared with other parts of the state, according to the air district officials.

The rail yard rule will ensure that Southern California’s rail yard emission reductions are on par with state rules.

However, the new emission reduction rule can become effective only if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signs off on the region’s smog plan and approves the state regulations for locomotives and truck fleets.

Curt Hagman, an air district governing board member and San Bernardino County supervisor, expressed concern about the feasibility of achieving these reductions, considering the necessary improvements to the power grid and electric infrastructure to accommodate cleaner rail yards.

Wayne Nastri, the air district’s executive officer, said a recent historic $500-million EPA grant could help. He also noted there may be flexibility to waive penalties if rail yards encounter delays or difficulties.

“There has been tremendous effort at the state level to make sure that we have the energy capacity to meet the growing needs,” Nastri said. “But the challenge that’s been identified more of lately is that last facility hookup, making sure that the facilities either have the substations, the circuits, the transformers and the time it takes to process that.”

In Southern California, at least three agencies regulate air quality: the South Coast Air Quality Management District, which regulates facilities; the California Air Resources Board, which regulates in-state cars and trucks; and the EPA, which regulates trains, aircraft and ships.

Because some of Southern California’s largest polluters are federally regulated, the local air district has attempted to work around its own limitations by requiring the facilities to offset pollution. The air district’s first rules of this kind, adopted in 2021, established requirements for large warehouses to mitigate the pollution from the truck traffic they attract.

The rail yard rule is the second policy of its kind by the air district.

Although the rule notably will not apply to rail yards at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the air district is drafting a similar proposal to reduce emissions at the ports complex, the largest fixed source of smog-forming pollution in the region.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Lawsuit says PGE, Tillamook Creamery add to nitrate pollution in eastern Oregon

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of residents in Morrow and Umatilla counties, says nitrate pollution from a PGE power generation plant and from a Tillamook cheese production facility has seeped into groundwater, affecting thousands of residents in the area.

A new lawsuit claims Portland General Electric and the Tillamook County Creamery Association contribute significantly to the nitrate pollution that has plagued eastern Oregon for over three decades. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of residents in Morrow and Umatilla counties, says nitrate pollution has seeped into groundwater, affecting thousands of residents in the area known as the Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area who can’t use tap water from private wells at their homes.PGE operates a power generation plant at the Port of Morrow in Boardman and the Tillamook County Creamery Association, a farmer-owned cooperative known for the Tillamook Creamery at the coast, operates a cheese production plant in Boardman. The two plants send their wastewater to the port, which then sprays it through irrigation systems directly onto land in Morrow and Umatilla counties, according to the complaint filed Friday in the U.S. District Court in Oregon.PGE and Tillamook transfer their wastewater to the port despite knowing that the port doesn’t remove the nitrates before applying the water onto fields, the suit contends.PGE’s spokesperson Drew Hanson said the company would not provide comment on pending legal matters. Tillamook Creamery did not respond to a request for comment.The new complaint follows a 2024 lawsuit by several Boardman residents that accused the Port of Morrow, along with several farms and food processors of contaminating the basin’s groundwater. The others named are: Lamb Weston, Madison Ranches, Threemile Canyon Farms and Beef Northwest.A state analysis released earlier this year shows nitrate pollution has worsened significantly in eastern Oregon over the past decade. Much of the nitrate contamination in the region comes from farm fertilizer, animal manure and wastewater that are constantly and abundantly applied to farm fields by the owners of food processing facilities, confined animal feeding operations, irrigated farmland and animal feedlots, according to the analysis by the state and local nonprofits. Those polluters are also the main employers in eastern Oregon. Steve Berman, the attorney in the newest case, said PGE and the farmer cooperative were not included in the previous lawsuit because their impact wasn’t previously clear. “We keep drilling down into new records we are obtaining from the regulatory authorities and activists and analyzing how groundwater moves in the area. Our experts now tell us these two entities are contributing as well,” Berman said. According to the complaint, PGE’s power generation plant at the Port of Morrow, called Coyote Springs, generates an estimated 900 million gallons of nitrate-laced wastewater each year from a combination of cooling tower wastewater, wash water and the water discharged from boilers to remove built-up impurities.From 2019 to 2022, PGE’s wastewater had an average nitrate concentration of 38.9 milligrams per liter – almost four times higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s maximum contaminant level, the complaint claims. PGE’s plant is not producing nitrates, Berman said, but rather is using groundwater with pre-existing nitrates and then concentrating the chemicals through its industrial processes. PGE’s plant is not producing nitrates, Berman said, but rather is using groundwater with pre-existing nitrates and then concentrating the chemicals through its industrial processes. and then spread pre-existing nitrates from groundwater and don’t add their own but concentrate the nitrates through their industrial processes, such as xxx.Columbia River Processing, the Tillamook Creamery Association’s cheese production plant, generates an estimated 360 gallons of wastewater each year from a combination of cheese byproducts and tank wash water, according to the complaint. From 2019 to 2022, Tillamook’s wastewater had an average nitrate concentration of 24 milligrams per liter – more than twice the EPA’s maximum contaminant level, the complaint claims. In addition, the association also sources its milk from Threemile Canyon Farms, a “megadairy” in Boardman that houses 70,000 cows and was named in the previous nitrate lawsuit. The dairy constantly applies high-nitrogen waste from its operation to its farmland, the earlier suit says. The lawsuit seeks to force remediation or halt the practices. It also demands that the companies cover the costs of drilling deeper wells for private well users who currently face nitrate contamination – an estimated $40,000 cost per well – as well as the costs of connecting households to municipal water systems and compensation for higher water bills paid by residents due to nitrate treatment in public systems. People who can’t use their contaminated tap water now must rely on bottled water for cooking, bathing and other needs. While there are plans to extend municipal water service to some of those homes, many residents oppose the idea because they’ve invested heavily in their wells and fear paying steep water rates.Critics say state agencies have not done enough to crack down on the pollution, with much of the focus on voluntary measures that have failed to rein in the nitrate contamination.Research has linked high nitrate consumption over long periods to cancers, miscarriages, as well as thyroid issues. It is especially dangerous to infants who can quickly develop “blue baby syndrome,” a fatal illness.

Air Pollution Contributing To Clogged Arteries, Study Suggests

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterFRIDAY, Dec. 5, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution could be contributing to clogged arteries, a new study...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterFRIDAY, Dec. 5, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution could be contributing to clogged arteries, a new study says.People exposed long-term to common air pollutants have an increased risk of advanced heart disease caused by hardened arteries, researchers reported Thursday at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, in Chicago.Even air pollution levels near or below government standards were associated with early signs of heart disease, researchers found.“Even at low exposure levels, air pollution is associated with more plaque in the coronary arteries,” lead researcher Dr. Felipe Castillo Aravena, a cardiothoracic imaging fellow at the University of Toronto in Canada, said in a news release.Further, the more air pollution a person had been exposed to during their lifetime, the greater the odds that their arteries were clogged, results show.For the study, researchers tracked the heart health and air pollution exposure of more than 11,000 adults treated at three hospitals in Toronto.The team used chest CT scans to look at patients’ heart arteries and estimated their air pollution exposure using environmental data and the patients’ home postal codes.Results showed that for each 1 microgram per cubic meter increase in long-term exposure to particle air pollution, there was:An 11% increase in calcium build-up in the coronary arteries. A 13% greater odds of more arterial plaques. A 23% increased risk of heart disease caused by clogged arteries. Exposure to another form of air pollution, nitrogen dioxide, showed similar trends but with smaller effects, researchers said.There also were differences between men and women, researchers found.“In women, long-term exposure to fine particulate matter was linked to higher calcium scores and more severe narrowing of the arteries,” Castillo said. “In men, higher long-term exposure to fine particulate matter was associated with higher calcium scores and higher plaque burden.”This study couldn’t draw a direct cause and effect link, but only shows an association between air pollution and heart health, researchers noted.More research is needed to understand why air pollution might harm the heart and blood vessels, and to firm up a causal link between the two, Castillo said. “This is one of the largest studies to link long-term gaseous and particulate air pollution at contemporary exposure levels with multiple markers of coronary artery disease assessed by cardiac CT,” senior researcher Dr. Kate Hanneman, a cardiac radiologist and vice chair of research at the University of Toronto, said in a news release.“Heart disease is the number one cause of death globally,” Hanneman added. “The results of this study add to the growing body of evidence that air pollution is a modifiable cardiovascular risk factor and reinforce the need for further research to understand why these associations differ between men and women.”Findings presented at medical meetings should be considered preliminary until they’re published in a peer-reviewed journal.SOURCE: Radiological Society of North America, news release, Dec. 4, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.