Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Bear Story Is As Disturbing As It Is Implausible

News Feed
Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Among the big political news stories of the week — Kamala Harris formally clinching the Democratic nomination; the selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate — was the bizarre tale of Robert F. Kennedy leaving a dead bear in New York City’s iconic Central Park, ending a decadelong local mystery.As soon as it became clear to Kennedy that he would no longer be able to keep his illegal stunt a secret, the independent presidential candidate and conspiracy theorist went into damage control. He concocted a story that was clearly aimed at making his decision to dump the bear’s carcass more palatable to the general public.But his explanation makes as little sense as the act itself.Gordon Batcheller, who retired as New York state’s chief wildlife biologist in 2015 but spoke to HuffPost in his personal capacity, has followed the Kennedy bear cub story closely. He described Kennedy’s actions as perplexing, unlawful and wildly disrespectful of a wild animal.“Looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind.”- Gordon Batcheller, former chief wildlife biologist of New York state“As a citizen, even as a biologist, looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind in terms of behavior of this individual,” Batcheller told HuffPost by phone on Tuesday. “The thought that somehow doing this prank would be amusing or something — just bizarre.” As for Kennedy’s account of what happened, Batcheller said “it sounds to me like a 4-year-old who was meddling with mom’s freshly cooked pies, got caught and started fabricating some excuse about his dog and cat and little sister and everything else.” “Bottom line, it’s wrong.” Earlier this week, The New Yorker was on the cusp of reporting as part of a lengthy profile that in October 2014, Kennedy callously and illegally dumped the carcass of a young black bear in Central Park and staged it to look like the animal had been struck and killed by a cyclist. On Sunday, a day before the magazine went to press, Kennedy posted a video to X, formerly Twitter, in which he confessed — to an often stunned-looking Roseanne Barr, of all people — that he was responsible for the decade-old mystery, chalking it up to little more than a harmless prank. In Kennedy’s telling, ditching the bear cub in the heart of Manhattan wasn’t always his intention. It was simply what he resorted to after a long, successful day of falconry — that is, hunting with trained birds of prey — a fancy dinner in New York City and the realization that he had an early flight to catch the next morning. In short, those commitments spoiled what he led his audience to believe were totally reasonable plans to salvage the carcass and keep the meat.The 60-year-old environmental lawyer, “avid outdoorsman” and “master falconer” explained to Barr that he was en route to New York’s Hudson Valley for a day of falconry when a woman driving in front of him “hit a bear and killed it — a young bear.” “So I pulled over and I picked up the bear and put him in the back of my van because I was going to skin the bear and it was in very good condition,” he said, fidgeting in his chair. “And I was gonna put the meat in my refrigerator — and you can do that in New York state, you can get a bear tag for a roadkill bear.” Before we get into the rest of Kennedy’s rambling account, it is worth noting that what Kennedy did is illegal in New York, regardless of whether he had a license, or tag, to hunt a black bear at the time, which remains unclear. “Let’s say you’re a hunter and you have a bear tag as part of your hunting license, you still can’t pick up a bear on the side of the road,” Batcheller said. “You just can’t.”Salvaging a roadkill animal falls under an entirely separate permitting process completely unrelated to hunting, Batcheller explained. The process requires individuals to first report the animal and then obtain a permit from either the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation or local law enforcement. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, or DEC, which led the 2014 investigation into the bear cub’s death, told HuffPost that under the state’s environmental law, possession of a bear without a license or permit and illegal disposal of a bear are both subject to fines of up to $250 for the first offense. However, the statute of limitations for such offenses is one year, meaning Kennedy can no longer be charged or prosecuted. DEC does not publicly release individuals’ sporting license information unless subpoenaed to do so or the individual authorizes their release. The agency also does not keep records of permits for salvaging roadkill animals, it said.Kennedy’s campaign did not respond to HuffPost’s requests for comment. Independent Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., pictured here during an event in Nashville, Tennessee in July, confessed in a bizarre video posted to social media that he was the one who dumped a dead black bear cub in New York City's Central Park in 2014.Jon Cherry via Getty ImagesKennedy had an opportunity to do something good, to shine light on the many benefits of salvaging roadkill wildlife, which include utilizing meat that would otherwise go to waste and protecting scavengers, including foxes and vultures, that could also be hit when trying to feast on a roadside carcass. Dozens of states allow for salvaging certain roadkill animals, although permits are usually required, and some states have programs that collect roadkill for local food banks.Batcheller noted that roadkill animals are also often of interest to conservation officials for biological data and scientific research. When it comes to processing wild game, be it a deer harvested with a rifle or a bear salvaged off the side of the road, time is of the essence. It is crucial to remove the animal’s internal organs, strip the hide and cool the meat as quickly as possible to keep it from spoiling. “Taking a bear, which I would suspect was not field dressed — so now it’s just a whole bear with all the internal organs — throwing it in a trunk, it’s just going to be a bacteria factory,” Batcheller said. “The meat would be kaput at that point.” By his own admission, Kennedy did nothing to safeguard the quality of the bear meat. Instead, he stashed the animal in his trunk for an entire day — something no informed person would do if planning to consume it — before ultimately deciding to stage the carcass to look like the cub had been hit by a bike in the middle of the most populated city in the country. “I didn’t want to leave the bear in the car, because that would have been bad,” he said in the video. “So then I thought, at that time — this was a little bit of the redneck in me — there had been a series of bicycle accidents in New York. They had just put in the bike lanes. A couple of people had gotten killed, and it was every day, and people had been badly injured.” “I wasn’t drinking of course, but people were drinking with me who thought this was a good idea,” Kennedy went on. “I had an old bike in my car that somebody asked me to get rid of, and I said, ‘Let’s go put the bear in Central Park and we’ll make it look like he got hit by a bike. It will be fun, funny for people.’ Everybody thought, ‘That’s a great idea!’ So we went and did that and we thought it would be amusing for whoever found it.”When the bear was discovered the next day, the story garnered national media attention. Police and conservation officials scrambled to figure out how the animal got there, with no success. Few found the incident amusing. New York Police and New York State Environmental Conservation officers investigate the site where a bear cub was found dead under bushes in New York's Central Park in October 2014. For 10 years, Kennedy kept quiet — until he got caught.“Luckily, the story died after a while. And it stayed dead for a decade,” he said in the video. “The New Yorker somehow found out about it and they’re going to do a big article on me … It’s going to be a bad story.” In the video, Barr and others are heard chuckling at Kennedy’s disturbing tale. One man outside the camera’s frame says, “I think it’s a great story.” Above the video, Kennedy wrote, “Looking forward to seeing how you spin this one, @NewYorker…”The story requires zero spin. Kennedy made a mockery of a well-established code of ethics among hunters, which include obeying all rules and regulations, not wasting game meat and treating wildlife with respect. While Kennedy wasn’t hunting for bear that day, and one might argue that ethical hunting principals don’t apply to recovering roadkill, he almost certainly knew better. His preferred method of hunting, falconry, is “the most highly regulated field sport in the U.S.,” according to the Michigan Hawking Club. Kennedy is a “licensed master falconer” and a former president of the New York State Falconry Association.“If he’s a licensed master falconer, he’s gone through one of the most rigorous wildlife regulatory processes that’s in existence,” Batcheller said. “Someone like Mr. Kennedy, a falconer, certainly knows there’s a wildlife agency out there that deals with wildlife.” The New Yorker profile included a graphic picture of Kennedy with the dead bear. It shows Kennedy sitting in the back of a van, with blood stains on his pants, his fingers shoved into the lifeless cub’s bloody mouth and what the New Yorker described as “a comical grimace across his face,” as if pretending the bear was biting him. “Maybe that’s where I got my brain worm,” Kennedy told The New Yorker, referring to a parasite that doctors apparently found in his brain. New York DEC directed HuffPost to a page on its website about how to properly dispose of and safely handle dead animals. Among other things, it advises people to “be careful of teeth, claws, bone splinters, or porcupine quills.”Along with educating hunters about how to properly care for and process wild game, Batcheller said wildlife officials in New York and around the country emphasize the importance of respecting the animals they harvest. The rules of fair chase, a set of ethical hunting principles developed by the nonprofit Boone and Crockett Club, calls on hunters to “behave in a way that will bring no dishonor to either the hunter, the hunted, or the environment.”So what should Kennedy have done? “Report it. Get the permit. Treat the animal with the utmost respect as a prized source of great game meat. Transport it with dignity. Do it right,” Batcheller said. “There’s a way to do it right.” “If he was sitting right here, I would say, ‘Mr. Kennedy, you demonstrated extremely poor judgment in what you think is amusing or appropriate,’” he added. “Extremely poor judgment. I would tell that to his face, without hesitating.”

As soon as it became clear to Kennedy that he would no longer be able to keep his illegal stunt a secret, he went into damage control.

Among the big political news stories of the week — Kamala Harris formally clinching the Democratic nomination; the selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate — was the bizarre tale of Robert F. Kennedy leaving a dead bear in New York City’s iconic Central Park, ending a decadelong local mystery.

As soon as it became clear to Kennedy that he would no longer be able to keep his illegal stunt a secret, the independent presidential candidate and conspiracy theorist went into damage control. He concocted a story that was clearly aimed at making his decision to dump the bear’s carcass more palatable to the general public.

But his explanation makes as little sense as the act itself.

Gordon Batcheller, who retired as New York state’s chief wildlife biologist in 2015 but spoke to HuffPost in his personal capacity, has followed the Kennedy bear cub story closely. He described Kennedy’s actions as perplexing, unlawful and wildly disrespectful of a wild animal.

“Looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind.”

- Gordon Batcheller, former chief wildlife biologist of New York state

“As a citizen, even as a biologist, looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind in terms of behavior of this individual,” Batcheller told HuffPost by phone on Tuesday. “The thought that somehow doing this prank would be amusing or something — just bizarre.”

As for Kennedy’s account of what happened, Batcheller said “it sounds to me like a 4-year-old who was meddling with mom’s freshly cooked pies, got caught and started fabricating some excuse about his dog and cat and little sister and everything else.”

“Bottom line, it’s wrong.”

Earlier this week, The New Yorker was on the cusp of reporting as part of a lengthy profile that in October 2014, Kennedy callously and illegally dumped the carcass of a young black bear in Central Park and staged it to look like the animal had been struck and killed by a cyclist.

On Sunday, a day before the magazine went to press, Kennedy posted a video to X, formerly Twitter, in which he confessed — to an often stunned-looking Roseanne Barr, of all people — that he was responsible for the decade-old mystery, chalking it up to little more than a harmless prank.

In Kennedy’s telling, ditching the bear cub in the heart of Manhattan wasn’t always his intention. It was simply what he resorted to after a long, successful day of falconry — that is, hunting with trained birds of prey — a fancy dinner in New York City and the realization that he had an early flight to catch the next morning. In short, those commitments spoiled what he led his audience to believe were totally reasonable plans to salvage the carcass and keep the meat.

The 60-year-old environmental lawyer, “avid outdoorsman” and “master falconer” explained to Barr that he was en route to New York’s Hudson Valley for a day of falconry when a woman driving in front of him “hit a bear and killed it — a young bear.”

“So I pulled over and I picked up the bear and put him in the back of my van because I was going to skin the bear and it was in very good condition,” he said, fidgeting in his chair. “And I was gonna put the meat in my refrigerator — and you can do that in New York state, you can get a bear tag for a roadkill bear.”

Before we get into the rest of Kennedy’s rambling account, it is worth noting that what Kennedy did is illegal in New York, regardless of whether he had a license, or tag, to hunt a black bear at the time, which remains unclear.

“Let’s say you’re a hunter and you have a bear tag as part of your hunting license, you still can’t pick up a bear on the side of the road,” Batcheller said. “You just can’t.”

Salvaging a roadkill animal falls under an entirely separate permitting process completely unrelated to hunting, Batcheller explained. The process requires individuals to first report the animal and then obtain a permit from either the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation or local law enforcement.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, or DEC, which led the 2014 investigation into the bear cub’s death, told HuffPost that under the state’s environmental law, possession of a bear without a license or permit and illegal disposal of a bear are both subject to fines of up to $250 for the first offense. However, the statute of limitations for such offenses is one year, meaning Kennedy can no longer be charged or prosecuted.

DEC does not publicly release individuals’ sporting license information unless subpoenaed to do so or the individual authorizes their release. The agency also does not keep records of permits for salvaging roadkill animals, it said.

Kennedy’s campaign did not respond to HuffPost’s requests for comment.

Independent Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., pictured here during an event in Nashville, Tennessee in July, confessed in a bizarre video posted to social media that he was the one who dumped a dead black bear cub in New York City's Central Park in 2014.

Jon Cherry via Getty Images

Kennedy had an opportunity to do something good, to shine light on the many benefits of salvaging roadkill wildlife, which include utilizing meat that would otherwise go to waste and protecting scavengers, including foxes and vultures, that could also be hit when trying to feast on a roadside carcass. Dozens of states allow for salvaging certain roadkill animals, although permits are usually required, and some states have programs that collect roadkill for local food banks.

Batcheller noted that roadkill animals are also often of interest to conservation officials for biological data and scientific research.

When it comes to processing wild game, be it a deer harvested with a rifle or a bear salvaged off the side of the road, time is of the essence. It is crucial to remove the animal’s internal organs, strip the hide and cool the meat as quickly as possible to keep it from spoiling.

“Taking a bear, which I would suspect was not field dressed — so now it’s just a whole bear with all the internal organs — throwing it in a trunk, it’s just going to be a bacteria factory,” Batcheller said. “The meat would be kaput at that point.”

By his own admission, Kennedy did nothing to safeguard the quality of the bear meat. Instead, he stashed the animal in his trunk for an entire day — something no informed person would do if planning to consume it — before ultimately deciding to stage the carcass to look like the cub had been hit by a bike in the middle of the most populated city in the country.

“I didn’t want to leave the bear in the car, because that would have been bad,” he said in the video. “So then I thought, at that time — this was a little bit of the redneck in me — there had been a series of bicycle accidents in New York. They had just put in the bike lanes. A couple of people had gotten killed, and it was every day, and people had been badly injured.”

“I wasn’t drinking of course, but people were drinking with me who thought this was a good idea,” Kennedy went on. “I had an old bike in my car that somebody asked me to get rid of, and I said, ‘Let’s go put the bear in Central Park and we’ll make it look like he got hit by a bike. It will be fun, funny for people.’ Everybody thought, ‘That’s a great idea!’ So we went and did that and we thought it would be amusing for whoever found it.”

When the bear was discovered the next day, the story garnered national media attention. Police and conservation officials scrambled to figure out how the animal got there, with no success. Few found the incident amusing.

New York Police and New York State Environmental Conservation officers investigate the site where a bear cub was found dead under bushes in New York's Central Park in October 2014.

For 10 years, Kennedy kept quiet — until he got caught.

“Luckily, the story died after a while. And it stayed dead for a decade,” he said in the video. “The New Yorker somehow found out about it and they’re going to do a big article on me … It’s going to be a bad story.”

In the video, Barr and others are heard chuckling at Kennedy’s disturbing tale. One man outside the camera’s frame says, “I think it’s a great story.”

Above the video, Kennedy wrote, “Looking forward to seeing how you spin this one, @NewYorker…”

The story requires zero spin. Kennedy made a mockery of a well-established code of ethics among hunters, which include obeying all rules and regulations, not wasting game meat and treating wildlife with respect.

While Kennedy wasn’t hunting for bear that day, and one might argue that ethical hunting principals don’t apply to recovering roadkill, he almost certainly knew better. His preferred method of hunting, falconry, is “the most highly regulated field sport in the U.S.,” according to the Michigan Hawking Club. Kennedy is a “licensed master falconer” and a former president of the New York State Falconry Association.

“If he’s a licensed master falconer, he’s gone through one of the most rigorous wildlife regulatory processes that’s in existence,” Batcheller said. “Someone like Mr. Kennedy, a falconer, certainly knows there’s a wildlife agency out there that deals with wildlife.”

The New Yorker profile included a graphic picture of Kennedy with the dead bear. It shows Kennedy sitting in the back of a van, with blood stains on his pants, his fingers shoved into the lifeless cub’s bloody mouth and what the New Yorker described as “a comical grimace across his face,” as if pretending the bear was biting him.

“Maybe that’s where I got my brain worm,” Kennedy told The New Yorker, referring to a parasite that doctors apparently found in his brain.

New York DEC directed HuffPost to a page on its website about how to properly dispose of and safely handle dead animals. Among other things, it advises people to “be careful of teeth, claws, bone splinters, or porcupine quills.”

Along with educating hunters about how to properly care for and process wild game, Batcheller said wildlife officials in New York and around the country emphasize the importance of respecting the animals they harvest. The rules of fair chase, a set of ethical hunting principles developed by the nonprofit Boone and Crockett Club, calls on hunters to “behave in a way that will bring no dishonor to either the hunter, the hunted, or the environment.”

So what should Kennedy have done? “Report it. Get the permit. Treat the animal with the utmost respect as a prized source of great game meat. Transport it with dignity. Do it right,” Batcheller said. “There’s a way to do it right.”

“If he was sitting right here, I would say, ‘Mr. Kennedy, you demonstrated extremely poor judgment in what you think is amusing or appropriate,’” he added. “Extremely poor judgment. I would tell that to his face, without hesitating.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Contributor: 'Save the whales' worked for decades, but now gray whales are starving

The once-booming population that passed California twice a year has cratered because of retreating sea ice. A new kind of intervention is needed.

Recently, while sailing with friends on San Francisco Bay, I enjoyed the sight of harbor porpoises, cormorants, pelicans, seals and sea lions — and then the spouting plume and glistening back of a gray whale that gave me pause. Too many have been seen inside the bay recently.California’s gray whales have been considered an environmental success story since the passage of the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act and 1986’s global ban on commercial whaling. They’re also a major tourist attraction during their annual 12,000-mile round-trip migration between the Arctic and their breeding lagoons in Baja California. In late winter and early spring — when they head back north and are closest to the shoreline, with the moms protecting the calves — they can be viewed not only from whale-watching boats but also from promontories along the California coast including Point Loma in San Diego, Point Lobos in Monterey and Bodega Head and Shelter Cove in Northern California.In 1972, there were some 10,000 gray whales in the population on the eastern side of the Pacific. Generations of whaling all but eliminated the western population — leaving only about 150 alive today off of East Asia and Russia. Over the four decades following passage of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the eastern whale numbers grew steadily to 27,000 by 2016, a hopeful story of protection leading to restoration. Then, unexpectedly over the last nine years, the eastern gray whale population has crashed, plummeting by more than half to 12,950, according to a recent report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the lowest numbers since the 1970s.Today’s changing ocean and Arctic ice conditions linked to fossil-fuel-fired climate change are putting this species again at risk of extinction.While there has been some historical variation in their population, gray whales — magnificent animals that can grow up to 50 feet long and weigh as much as 80,000 pounds — are now regularly starving to death as their main food sources disappear. This includes tiny shrimp-like amphipods in the whales’ summer feeding grounds in the Arctic. It’s there that the baleen filter feeders spend the summer gorging on tiny crustaceans from the muddy bottom of the Bering, Chuckchi and Beaufort seas, creating shallow pits or potholes in the process. But, with retreating sea ice, there is less under-ice algae to feed the amphipods that in turn feed the whales. Malnourished and starving whales are also producing fewer offspring.As a result of more whales washing up dead, NOAA declared an “unusual mortality event” in California in 2019. Between 2019 and 2025, at least 1,235 gray whales were stranded dead along the West Coast. That’s eight times greater than any previous 10-year average.While there seemed to be some recovery in 2024, 2025 brought back the high casualty rates. The hungry whales now come into crowded estuaries like San Francisco Bay to feed, making them vulnerable to ship traffic. Nine in the bay were killed by ship strikes last year while another 12 appear to have died of starvation.Michael Stocker, executive director of the acoustics group Ocean Conservation Research, has been leading whale-viewing trips to the gray whales’ breeding ground at San Ignacio Lagoon in Baja California since 2006. “When we started going, there would be 400 adult whales in the lagoon, including 100 moms and their babies,” he told me. “This year we saw about 100 adult whales, only five of which were in momma-baby pairs.” Where once the predators would not have dared to hunt, he said that more recently, “orcas came into the lagoon and ate a couple of the babies because there were not enough adult whales to fend them off.”Southern California’s Gray Whale Census & Behavior Project reported record-low calf counts last year.The loss of Arctic sea ice and refusal of the world’s nations recently gathered at the COP30 Climate Summit in Brazil to meet previous commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions suggest that the prospects for gray whales and other wildlife in our warming seas, including key food species for humans such as salmon, cod and herring, look grim.California shut down the nation’s last whaling station in 1971. And yet now whales that were once hunted for their oil are falling victim to the effects of the petroleum or “rock oil” that replaced their melted blubber as a source of light and lubrication. That’s because the burning of oil, coal and gas are now overheating our blue planet. While humans have gone from hunting to admiring whales as sentient beings in recent decades, our own intelligence comes into question when we fail to meet commitments to a clean carbon-free energy future. That could be the gray whales’ last best hope, if there is any.David Helvarg is the executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean policy group, and co-host of “Rising Tide: The Ocean Podcast.” He is the author of the forthcoming “Forest of the Sea: The Remarkable Life and Imperiled Future of Kelp.”

Pills that communicate from the stomach could improve medication adherence

MIT engineers designed capsules with biodegradable radio frequency antennas that can reveal when the pill has been swallowed.

In an advance that could help ensure people are taking their medication on schedule, MIT engineers have designed a pill that can report when it has been swallowed.The new reporting system, which can be incorporated into existing pill capsules, contains a biodegradable radio frequency antenna. After it sends out the signal that the pill has been consumed, most components break down in the stomach while a tiny RF chip passes out of the body through the digestive tract.This type of system could be useful for monitoring transplant patients who need to take immunosuppressive drugs, or people with infections such as HIV or TB, who need treatment for an extended period of time, the researchers say.“The goal is to make sure that this helps people receive the therapy they need to help maximize their health,” says Giovanni Traverso, an associate professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, a gastroenterologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and an associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.Traverso is the senior author of the new study, which appears today in Nature Communications. Mehmet Girayhan Say, an MIT research scientist, and Sean You, a former MIT postdoc, are the lead authors of the paper.A pill that communicatesPatients’ failure to take their medicine as prescribed is a major challenge that contributes to hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths and billions of dollars in health care costs annually.To make it easier for people to take their medication, Traverso’s lab has worked on delivery capsules that can remain in the digestive tract for days or weeks, releasing doses at predetermined times. However, this approach may not be compatible with all drugs.“We’ve developed systems that can stay in the body for a long time, and we know that those systems can improve adherence, but we also recognize that for certain medications, we can’t change the pill,” Traverso says. “The question becomes: What else can we do to help the person and help their health care providers ensure that they’re receiving the medication?”In their new study, the researchers focused on a strategy that would allow doctors to more closely monitor whether patients are taking their medication. Using radio frequency — a type of signal that can be easily detected from outside the body and is safe for humans — they designed a capsule that can communicate after the patient has swallowed it.There have been previous efforts to develop RF-based signaling devices for medication capsules, but those were all made from components that don’t break down easily in the body and would need to travel through the digestive system.To minimize the potential risk of any blockage of the GI tract, the MIT team decided to create an RF-based system that would be bioresorbable, meaning that it can be broken down and absorbed by the body. The antenna that sends out the RF signal is made from zinc, and it is embedded into a cellulose particle.“We chose these materials recognizing their very favorable safety profiles and also environmental compatibility,” Traverso says.The zinc-cellulose antenna is rolled up and placed inside a capsule along with the drug to be delivered. The outer layer of the capsule is made from gelatin coated with a layer of cellulose and either molybdenum or tungsten, which blocks any RF signal from being emitted.Once the capsule is swallowed, the coating breaks down, releasing the drug along with the RF antenna. The antenna can then pick up an RF signal sent from an external receiver and, working with a small RF chip, sends back a signal to confirm that the capsule was swallowed. This communication happens within 10 minutes of the pill being swallowed.The RF chip, which is about 400 by 400 micrometers, is an off-the-shelf chip that is not biodegradable and would need to be excreted through the digestive tract. All of the other components would break down in the stomach within a week.“The components are designed to break down over days using materials with well-established safety profiles, such as zinc and cellulose, which are already widely used in medicine,” Say says. “Our goal is to avoid long-term accumulation while enabling reliable confirmation that a pill was taken, and longer-term safety will continue to be evaluated as the technology moves toward clinical use.”Promoting adherenceTests in an animal model showed that the RF signal was successfully transmitted from inside the stomach and could be read by an external receiver at a distance up to 2 feet away. If developed for use in humans, the researchers envision designing a wearable device that could receive the signal and then transmit it to the patient’s health care team.The researchers now plan to do further preclinical studies and hope to soon test the system in humans. One patient population that could benefit greatly from this type of monitoring is people who have recently had organ transplants and need to take immunosuppressant drugs to make sure their body doesn’t reject the new organ.“We want to prioritize medications that, when non-adherence is present, could have a really detrimental effect for the individual,” Traverso says.Other populations that could benefit include people who have recently had a stent inserted and need to take medication to help prevent blockage of the stent, people with chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, and people with neuropsychiatric disorders whose conditions may impair their ability to take their medication.The research was funded by Novo Nordisk, MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Division of Gastroenterology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the U.S. Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), which notes that the views and conclusions contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the United States Government.

Costa Rica Rescues Orphaned Manatee Calf in Tortuguero

A young female manatee washed up alone on a beach in Tortuguero National Park early on January 5, sparking a coordinated effort by local authorities to save the animal. The calf, identified as a Caribbean manatee, appeared separated from its mother, with no immediate signs of her in the area. Park rangers received the first […] The post Costa Rica Rescues Orphaned Manatee Calf in Tortuguero appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

A young female manatee washed up alone on a beach in Tortuguero National Park early on January 5, sparking a coordinated effort by local authorities to save the animal. The calf, identified as a Caribbean manatee, appeared separated from its mother, with no immediate signs of her in the area. Park rangers received the first alert around 8 a.m. from visitors who spotted the stranded calf. Staff from the National System of Conservation Areas (SINAC) quickly arrived on site. They secured the animal to prevent further harm and began searching nearby waters and canals for the mother. Despite hours of monitoring, officials found no evidence of her presence. “The calf showed no visible injuries but needed prompt attention due to its age and vulnerability,” said a SINAC official involved in the operation. Without a parent nearby, the young manatee faced risks from dehydration and predators in the open beach environment. As the day progressed, the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE) joined the response. They decided to relocate the calf for specialized care. In a first for such rescues in the region, teams arranged an aerial transport to move the animal safely to a rehabilitation facility. This step aimed to give the manatee the best chance at survival while experts assess its health. Once at the center, the calf received immediate feeding and medical checks. During one session, it dozed off mid-meal, a sign that it felt secure in the hands of caretakers. Biologists now monitor the animal closely, hoping to release it back into the wild if conditions allow. Manatees, known locally as manatíes, inhabit the coastal waters and rivers of Costa Rica’s Caribbean side. They often face threats from boat strikes, habitat loss, and pollution. Tortuguero, with its network of canals and protected areas, serves as a key habitat for the species. Recent laws have strengthened protections, naming the manatee a national marine symbol to raise awareness. This incident highlights the ongoing challenges for wildlife in the area. Local communities and tourists play a key role in reporting sightings, which can lead to timely interventions. Authorities encourage anyone spotting distressed animals to contact SINAC without delay. The rescue team expressed gratitude to those who reported the stranding. Their quick action likely saved the calf’s life. As investigations continue, officials will determine if environmental factors contributed to the separation. For now, the young manatee rests under professional care, a small win for conservation efforts in Limón. The post Costa Rica Rescues Orphaned Manatee Calf in Tortuguero appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

New Records Reveal the Mess RFK Jr. Left When He Dumped a Dead Bear in Central Park

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he left a bear cub's corpse in Central Park in 2014 to "be fun." Records newly obtained by WIRED show what he left New York civil servants to clean up.

This story contains graphic imagery.On August 4, 2024, when now-US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was still a presidential candidate, he posted a video on X in which he admitted to dumping a dead bear cub near an old bicycle in Central Park 10 years prior, in a mystifying attempt to make the young bear’s premature death look like a cyclist’s hit and run.WIRED's Guide to How the Universe WorksYour weekly roundup of the best stories on health care, the climate crisis, new scientific discoveries, and more. At the time, Kennedy said he was trying to get ahead of a story The New Yorker was about to publish that mentioned the incident. But in coming clean, Kennedy solved a decade-old New York City mystery: How and why had a young black bear—a wild animal native to the state, but not to modern-era Manhattan—been found dead under a bush near West 69th Street in Central Park?WIRED has obtained documents that shed new light on the incident from the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation via a public records request. The documents—which include previously unseen photos of the bear cub—resurface questions about the bizarre choices Kennedy says he made, which left city employees dealing with the aftermath and lamenting the cub’s short life and grim fate.A representative for Kennedy did not respond for comment. The New York Police Department (NYPD) and the Parks Department referred WIRED to the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). NYDEC spokesperson Jeff Wernick tells WIRED that its investigation into the death of the bear cub was closed in late 2014 “due to a lack of sufficient evidence” to determine if state law was violated. They added that New York’s environmental conservation law forbids “illegal possession of a bear without a tag or permit and illegal disposal of a bear,” and that “the statute of limitations for these offenses is one year.”The first of a number of emails between local officials coordinating the handling of the baby bear’s remains was sent at 10:16 a.m. on October 6, 2014. Bonnie McGuire, then-deputy director at Urban Park Rangers (UPR), told two colleagues that UPR sergeant Eric Handy had recently called her about a “dead black bear” found in Central Park.“NYPD told him they will treat it like a crime scene so he can’t get too close,” McGuire wrote. “I’ve asked him to take pictures and send them over and to keep us posted.”“Poor little guy!” McGuire wrote in a separate email later that morning.According to emails obtained by WIRED, Handy updated several colleagues throughout the day, noting that the NYDEC had arrived on scene, and that the agency was planning to coordinate with the NYPD to transfer the body to the Bronx Zoo, where it would be inspected by the NYPD’s animal cruelty unit and the ASPCA. (This didn’t end up happening, as the NYDEC took the bear to a state lab near Albany.)Imagery of the bear has been public before—local news footage from October 2014 appears to show it from a distance. However, the documents WIRED obtained show previously unpublished images that investigators took of the bear on the scene, which Handy sent as attachments in emails to McGuire. The bear is seen laying on its side in an unnatural position. Its head protrudes from under a bush and rests next to a small patch of grass. Bits of flesh are visible through the bear’s black fur, which was covered in a few brown leaves.Courtesy of NYC Parks

U.S. Military Ends Practice of Shooting Live Animals to Train Medics to Treat Battlefield Wounds

The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act bans the use of live animals in live fire training exercises and prohibits "painful" research on domestic cats and dogs

U.S. Military Ends Practice of Shooting Live Animals to Train Medics to Treat Battlefield Wounds The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act bans the use of live animals in live fire training exercises and prohibits “painful” research on domestic cats and dogs Sarah Kuta - Daily Correspondent January 5, 2026 12:00 p.m. The U.S. military will no longer shoot live goats and pigs to help combat medics learn to treat battlefield injuries. Pexels The United States military is no longer shooting live animals as part of its trauma training exercises for combat medics. The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which was enacted on December 18, bans the use of live animals—including dogs, cats, nonhuman primates and marine mammals—in any live fire trauma training conducted by the Department of Defense. It directs military leaders to instead use advanced simulators, mannequins, cadavers or actors. According to the Associated Press’ Ben Finley, the bill ends the military’s practice of shooting live goats and pigs to help combat medics learn to treat battlefield injuries. However, the military is allowed to continue other practices involving animals, including stabbing, burning and testing weapons on them. In those scenarios, the animals are supposed to be anesthetized, per the AP. “With today’s advanced simulation technology, we can prepare our medics for the battlefield while reducing harm to animals,” says Florida Representative Vern Buchanan, who advocated for the change, in a statement shared with the AP. He described the military’s practices as “outdated and inhumane” and called the move a “major step forward in reducing unnecessary suffering.” Quick fact: What is the National Defense Authorization Act? The National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, is a law passed each year that authorizes the Department of Defense’s appropriated funds, greenlights the Department of Energy’s nuclear weapons programs and sets defense policies and restrictions, among other activities, for the upcoming fiscal year. Organizations have opposed the military’s use of live animals in trauma training, too, including the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. PETA, a nonprofit animal advocacy group, described the legislation as a “major victory for animals” that will “save countless animals from heinous cruelty” in a statement. The legislation also prohibits “painful research” on domestic cats and dogs, though exceptions can be made under certain circumstances, such as interests of national security. “Painful” research includes any training, experiments or tests that fall into specific pain categories outlined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. For example, military cats and dogs can no longer be exposed to extreme environmental conditions or noxious stimuli they cannot escape, nor can they be forced to exercise to the point of distress or exhaustion. The bill comes amid a broader push to end the use of live animals in federal tests, studies and training, reports Linda F. Hersey for Stars and Stripes. After temporarily suspending live tissue training with animals in 2017, the U.S. Coast Guard made the ban permanent in 2018. In 2024, U.S. lawmakers directed the Department of Veterans Affairs to end its experiments on cats, dogs and primates. And in May 2025, the U.S. Navy announced it would no longer conduct research testing on cats and dogs. As the Washington Post’s Ernesto Londoño reported in 2013, the U.S. military has used animals for medical training since at least the Vietnam War. However, the practice largely went unnoticed until 1983, when the U.S. Army planned to anesthetize dogs, hang them from nylon mesh slings and shoot them at an indoor firing range in Maryland. When activists and lawmakers learned of the proposal, they decried the practice and convinced then-Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger to ban the shooting of dogs. However, in 1984, the AP reported the U.S. military would continue shooting live goats and pigs for wound treatment training, with a military medical study group arguing “there is no substitute for the live animals as a study object for hands-on training.” In the modern era, it’s not clear how often and to what extent the military uses animals, per the AP. And despite the Department of Defense’s past efforts to minimize the use of animals for trauma training, a 2022 report from the Government Accountability Office, the watchdog agency charged with providing fact-based, nonpartisan information to Congress, determined that the agency was “unable to fully demonstrate the extent to which it has made progress.” The Defense Health Agency, the U.S. government entity responsible for the military’s medical training, says in a statement shared with the AP that it “remains committed to replacement of animal models without compromising the quality of medical training,” including the use of “realistic training scenarios to ensure medical providers are well-prepared to care for the combat-wounded.” Animal activists say technology has come a long way in recent decades so, beyond the animal welfare concerns, the military simply no longer needs to use live animals for training. Instead, military medics can simulate treating battlefield injuries using “cut suits,” or realistic suits with skin, blood and organs that are worn by a live person to mimic traumatic injuries. However, not everyone agrees. Michael Bailey, an Army combat medic who served two tours in Iraq, told the Washington Post in 2013 that his training with a sedated goat was invaluable. “You don’t get that [sense of urgency] from a mannequin,” he told the publication. “You don’t get that feeling of this mannequin is going to die. When you’re talking about keeping someone alive when physics and the enemy have done their best to do the opposite, it’s the kind of training that you want to have in your back pocket.” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.