Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Bear Story Is As Disturbing As It Is Implausible

News Feed
Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Among the big political news stories of the week — Kamala Harris formally clinching the Democratic nomination; the selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate — was the bizarre tale of Robert F. Kennedy leaving a dead bear in New York City’s iconic Central Park, ending a decadelong local mystery.As soon as it became clear to Kennedy that he would no longer be able to keep his illegal stunt a secret, the independent presidential candidate and conspiracy theorist went into damage control. He concocted a story that was clearly aimed at making his decision to dump the bear’s carcass more palatable to the general public.But his explanation makes as little sense as the act itself.Gordon Batcheller, who retired as New York state’s chief wildlife biologist in 2015 but spoke to HuffPost in his personal capacity, has followed the Kennedy bear cub story closely. He described Kennedy’s actions as perplexing, unlawful and wildly disrespectful of a wild animal.“Looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind.”- Gordon Batcheller, former chief wildlife biologist of New York state“As a citizen, even as a biologist, looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind in terms of behavior of this individual,” Batcheller told HuffPost by phone on Tuesday. “The thought that somehow doing this prank would be amusing or something — just bizarre.” As for Kennedy’s account of what happened, Batcheller said “it sounds to me like a 4-year-old who was meddling with mom’s freshly cooked pies, got caught and started fabricating some excuse about his dog and cat and little sister and everything else.” “Bottom line, it’s wrong.” Earlier this week, The New Yorker was on the cusp of reporting as part of a lengthy profile that in October 2014, Kennedy callously and illegally dumped the carcass of a young black bear in Central Park and staged it to look like the animal had been struck and killed by a cyclist. On Sunday, a day before the magazine went to press, Kennedy posted a video to X, formerly Twitter, in which he confessed — to an often stunned-looking Roseanne Barr, of all people — that he was responsible for the decade-old mystery, chalking it up to little more than a harmless prank. In Kennedy’s telling, ditching the bear cub in the heart of Manhattan wasn’t always his intention. It was simply what he resorted to after a long, successful day of falconry — that is, hunting with trained birds of prey — a fancy dinner in New York City and the realization that he had an early flight to catch the next morning. In short, those commitments spoiled what he led his audience to believe were totally reasonable plans to salvage the carcass and keep the meat.The 60-year-old environmental lawyer, “avid outdoorsman” and “master falconer” explained to Barr that he was en route to New York’s Hudson Valley for a day of falconry when a woman driving in front of him “hit a bear and killed it — a young bear.” “So I pulled over and I picked up the bear and put him in the back of my van because I was going to skin the bear and it was in very good condition,” he said, fidgeting in his chair. “And I was gonna put the meat in my refrigerator — and you can do that in New York state, you can get a bear tag for a roadkill bear.” Before we get into the rest of Kennedy’s rambling account, it is worth noting that what Kennedy did is illegal in New York, regardless of whether he had a license, or tag, to hunt a black bear at the time, which remains unclear. “Let’s say you’re a hunter and you have a bear tag as part of your hunting license, you still can’t pick up a bear on the side of the road,” Batcheller said. “You just can’t.”Salvaging a roadkill animal falls under an entirely separate permitting process completely unrelated to hunting, Batcheller explained. The process requires individuals to first report the animal and then obtain a permit from either the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation or local law enforcement. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, or DEC, which led the 2014 investigation into the bear cub’s death, told HuffPost that under the state’s environmental law, possession of a bear without a license or permit and illegal disposal of a bear are both subject to fines of up to $250 for the first offense. However, the statute of limitations for such offenses is one year, meaning Kennedy can no longer be charged or prosecuted. DEC does not publicly release individuals’ sporting license information unless subpoenaed to do so or the individual authorizes their release. The agency also does not keep records of permits for salvaging roadkill animals, it said.Kennedy’s campaign did not respond to HuffPost’s requests for comment. Independent Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., pictured here during an event in Nashville, Tennessee in July, confessed in a bizarre video posted to social media that he was the one who dumped a dead black bear cub in New York City's Central Park in 2014.Jon Cherry via Getty ImagesKennedy had an opportunity to do something good, to shine light on the many benefits of salvaging roadkill wildlife, which include utilizing meat that would otherwise go to waste and protecting scavengers, including foxes and vultures, that could also be hit when trying to feast on a roadside carcass. Dozens of states allow for salvaging certain roadkill animals, although permits are usually required, and some states have programs that collect roadkill for local food banks.Batcheller noted that roadkill animals are also often of interest to conservation officials for biological data and scientific research. When it comes to processing wild game, be it a deer harvested with a rifle or a bear salvaged off the side of the road, time is of the essence. It is crucial to remove the animal’s internal organs, strip the hide and cool the meat as quickly as possible to keep it from spoiling. “Taking a bear, which I would suspect was not field dressed — so now it’s just a whole bear with all the internal organs — throwing it in a trunk, it’s just going to be a bacteria factory,” Batcheller said. “The meat would be kaput at that point.” By his own admission, Kennedy did nothing to safeguard the quality of the bear meat. Instead, he stashed the animal in his trunk for an entire day — something no informed person would do if planning to consume it — before ultimately deciding to stage the carcass to look like the cub had been hit by a bike in the middle of the most populated city in the country. “I didn’t want to leave the bear in the car, because that would have been bad,” he said in the video. “So then I thought, at that time — this was a little bit of the redneck in me — there had been a series of bicycle accidents in New York. They had just put in the bike lanes. A couple of people had gotten killed, and it was every day, and people had been badly injured.” “I wasn’t drinking of course, but people were drinking with me who thought this was a good idea,” Kennedy went on. “I had an old bike in my car that somebody asked me to get rid of, and I said, ‘Let’s go put the bear in Central Park and we’ll make it look like he got hit by a bike. It will be fun, funny for people.’ Everybody thought, ‘That’s a great idea!’ So we went and did that and we thought it would be amusing for whoever found it.”When the bear was discovered the next day, the story garnered national media attention. Police and conservation officials scrambled to figure out how the animal got there, with no success. Few found the incident amusing. New York Police and New York State Environmental Conservation officers investigate the site where a bear cub was found dead under bushes in New York's Central Park in October 2014. For 10 years, Kennedy kept quiet — until he got caught.“Luckily, the story died after a while. And it stayed dead for a decade,” he said in the video. “The New Yorker somehow found out about it and they’re going to do a big article on me … It’s going to be a bad story.” In the video, Barr and others are heard chuckling at Kennedy’s disturbing tale. One man outside the camera’s frame says, “I think it’s a great story.” Above the video, Kennedy wrote, “Looking forward to seeing how you spin this one, @NewYorker…”The story requires zero spin. Kennedy made a mockery of a well-established code of ethics among hunters, which include obeying all rules and regulations, not wasting game meat and treating wildlife with respect. While Kennedy wasn’t hunting for bear that day, and one might argue that ethical hunting principals don’t apply to recovering roadkill, he almost certainly knew better. His preferred method of hunting, falconry, is “the most highly regulated field sport in the U.S.,” according to the Michigan Hawking Club. Kennedy is a “licensed master falconer” and a former president of the New York State Falconry Association.“If he’s a licensed master falconer, he’s gone through one of the most rigorous wildlife regulatory processes that’s in existence,” Batcheller said. “Someone like Mr. Kennedy, a falconer, certainly knows there’s a wildlife agency out there that deals with wildlife.” The New Yorker profile included a graphic picture of Kennedy with the dead bear. It shows Kennedy sitting in the back of a van, with blood stains on his pants, his fingers shoved into the lifeless cub’s bloody mouth and what the New Yorker described as “a comical grimace across his face,” as if pretending the bear was biting him. “Maybe that’s where I got my brain worm,” Kennedy told The New Yorker, referring to a parasite that doctors apparently found in his brain. New York DEC directed HuffPost to a page on its website about how to properly dispose of and safely handle dead animals. Among other things, it advises people to “be careful of teeth, claws, bone splinters, or porcupine quills.”Along with educating hunters about how to properly care for and process wild game, Batcheller said wildlife officials in New York and around the country emphasize the importance of respecting the animals they harvest. The rules of fair chase, a set of ethical hunting principles developed by the nonprofit Boone and Crockett Club, calls on hunters to “behave in a way that will bring no dishonor to either the hunter, the hunted, or the environment.”So what should Kennedy have done? “Report it. Get the permit. Treat the animal with the utmost respect as a prized source of great game meat. Transport it with dignity. Do it right,” Batcheller said. “There’s a way to do it right.” “If he was sitting right here, I would say, ‘Mr. Kennedy, you demonstrated extremely poor judgment in what you think is amusing or appropriate,’” he added. “Extremely poor judgment. I would tell that to his face, without hesitating.”

As soon as it became clear to Kennedy that he would no longer be able to keep his illegal stunt a secret, he went into damage control.

Among the big political news stories of the week — Kamala Harris formally clinching the Democratic nomination; the selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate — was the bizarre tale of Robert F. Kennedy leaving a dead bear in New York City’s iconic Central Park, ending a decadelong local mystery.

As soon as it became clear to Kennedy that he would no longer be able to keep his illegal stunt a secret, the independent presidential candidate and conspiracy theorist went into damage control. He concocted a story that was clearly aimed at making his decision to dump the bear’s carcass more palatable to the general public.

But his explanation makes as little sense as the act itself.

Gordon Batcheller, who retired as New York state’s chief wildlife biologist in 2015 but spoke to HuffPost in his personal capacity, has followed the Kennedy bear cub story closely. He described Kennedy’s actions as perplexing, unlawful and wildly disrespectful of a wild animal.

“Looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind.”

- Gordon Batcheller, former chief wildlife biologist of New York state

“As a citizen, even as a biologist, looking at the whole scenario, the word ‘bizarre’ just leaps forward in my mind in terms of behavior of this individual,” Batcheller told HuffPost by phone on Tuesday. “The thought that somehow doing this prank would be amusing or something — just bizarre.”

As for Kennedy’s account of what happened, Batcheller said “it sounds to me like a 4-year-old who was meddling with mom’s freshly cooked pies, got caught and started fabricating some excuse about his dog and cat and little sister and everything else.”

“Bottom line, it’s wrong.”

Earlier this week, The New Yorker was on the cusp of reporting as part of a lengthy profile that in October 2014, Kennedy callously and illegally dumped the carcass of a young black bear in Central Park and staged it to look like the animal had been struck and killed by a cyclist.

On Sunday, a day before the magazine went to press, Kennedy posted a video to X, formerly Twitter, in which he confessed — to an often stunned-looking Roseanne Barr, of all people — that he was responsible for the decade-old mystery, chalking it up to little more than a harmless prank.

In Kennedy’s telling, ditching the bear cub in the heart of Manhattan wasn’t always his intention. It was simply what he resorted to after a long, successful day of falconry — that is, hunting with trained birds of prey — a fancy dinner in New York City and the realization that he had an early flight to catch the next morning. In short, those commitments spoiled what he led his audience to believe were totally reasonable plans to salvage the carcass and keep the meat.

The 60-year-old environmental lawyer, “avid outdoorsman” and “master falconer” explained to Barr that he was en route to New York’s Hudson Valley for a day of falconry when a woman driving in front of him “hit a bear and killed it — a young bear.”

“So I pulled over and I picked up the bear and put him in the back of my van because I was going to skin the bear and it was in very good condition,” he said, fidgeting in his chair. “And I was gonna put the meat in my refrigerator — and you can do that in New York state, you can get a bear tag for a roadkill bear.”

Before we get into the rest of Kennedy’s rambling account, it is worth noting that what Kennedy did is illegal in New York, regardless of whether he had a license, or tag, to hunt a black bear at the time, which remains unclear.

“Let’s say you’re a hunter and you have a bear tag as part of your hunting license, you still can’t pick up a bear on the side of the road,” Batcheller said. “You just can’t.”

Salvaging a roadkill animal falls under an entirely separate permitting process completely unrelated to hunting, Batcheller explained. The process requires individuals to first report the animal and then obtain a permit from either the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation or local law enforcement.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, or DEC, which led the 2014 investigation into the bear cub’s death, told HuffPost that under the state’s environmental law, possession of a bear without a license or permit and illegal disposal of a bear are both subject to fines of up to $250 for the first offense. However, the statute of limitations for such offenses is one year, meaning Kennedy can no longer be charged or prosecuted.

DEC does not publicly release individuals’ sporting license information unless subpoenaed to do so or the individual authorizes their release. The agency also does not keep records of permits for salvaging roadkill animals, it said.

Kennedy’s campaign did not respond to HuffPost’s requests for comment.

Independent Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., pictured here during an event in Nashville, Tennessee in July, confessed in a bizarre video posted to social media that he was the one who dumped a dead black bear cub in New York City's Central Park in 2014.

Jon Cherry via Getty Images

Kennedy had an opportunity to do something good, to shine light on the many benefits of salvaging roadkill wildlife, which include utilizing meat that would otherwise go to waste and protecting scavengers, including foxes and vultures, that could also be hit when trying to feast on a roadside carcass. Dozens of states allow for salvaging certain roadkill animals, although permits are usually required, and some states have programs that collect roadkill for local food banks.

Batcheller noted that roadkill animals are also often of interest to conservation officials for biological data and scientific research.

When it comes to processing wild game, be it a deer harvested with a rifle or a bear salvaged off the side of the road, time is of the essence. It is crucial to remove the animal’s internal organs, strip the hide and cool the meat as quickly as possible to keep it from spoiling.

“Taking a bear, which I would suspect was not field dressed — so now it’s just a whole bear with all the internal organs — throwing it in a trunk, it’s just going to be a bacteria factory,” Batcheller said. “The meat would be kaput at that point.”

By his own admission, Kennedy did nothing to safeguard the quality of the bear meat. Instead, he stashed the animal in his trunk for an entire day — something no informed person would do if planning to consume it — before ultimately deciding to stage the carcass to look like the cub had been hit by a bike in the middle of the most populated city in the country.

“I didn’t want to leave the bear in the car, because that would have been bad,” he said in the video. “So then I thought, at that time — this was a little bit of the redneck in me — there had been a series of bicycle accidents in New York. They had just put in the bike lanes. A couple of people had gotten killed, and it was every day, and people had been badly injured.”

“I wasn’t drinking of course, but people were drinking with me who thought this was a good idea,” Kennedy went on. “I had an old bike in my car that somebody asked me to get rid of, and I said, ‘Let’s go put the bear in Central Park and we’ll make it look like he got hit by a bike. It will be fun, funny for people.’ Everybody thought, ‘That’s a great idea!’ So we went and did that and we thought it would be amusing for whoever found it.”

When the bear was discovered the next day, the story garnered national media attention. Police and conservation officials scrambled to figure out how the animal got there, with no success. Few found the incident amusing.

New York Police and New York State Environmental Conservation officers investigate the site where a bear cub was found dead under bushes in New York's Central Park in October 2014.

For 10 years, Kennedy kept quiet — until he got caught.

“Luckily, the story died after a while. And it stayed dead for a decade,” he said in the video. “The New Yorker somehow found out about it and they’re going to do a big article on me … It’s going to be a bad story.”

In the video, Barr and others are heard chuckling at Kennedy’s disturbing tale. One man outside the camera’s frame says, “I think it’s a great story.”

Above the video, Kennedy wrote, “Looking forward to seeing how you spin this one, @NewYorker…”

The story requires zero spin. Kennedy made a mockery of a well-established code of ethics among hunters, which include obeying all rules and regulations, not wasting game meat and treating wildlife with respect.

While Kennedy wasn’t hunting for bear that day, and one might argue that ethical hunting principals don’t apply to recovering roadkill, he almost certainly knew better. His preferred method of hunting, falconry, is “the most highly regulated field sport in the U.S.,” according to the Michigan Hawking Club. Kennedy is a “licensed master falconer” and a former president of the New York State Falconry Association.

“If he’s a licensed master falconer, he’s gone through one of the most rigorous wildlife regulatory processes that’s in existence,” Batcheller said. “Someone like Mr. Kennedy, a falconer, certainly knows there’s a wildlife agency out there that deals with wildlife.”

The New Yorker profile included a graphic picture of Kennedy with the dead bear. It shows Kennedy sitting in the back of a van, with blood stains on his pants, his fingers shoved into the lifeless cub’s bloody mouth and what the New Yorker described as “a comical grimace across his face,” as if pretending the bear was biting him.

“Maybe that’s where I got my brain worm,” Kennedy told The New Yorker, referring to a parasite that doctors apparently found in his brain.

New York DEC directed HuffPost to a page on its website about how to properly dispose of and safely handle dead animals. Among other things, it advises people to “be careful of teeth, claws, bone splinters, or porcupine quills.”

Along with educating hunters about how to properly care for and process wild game, Batcheller said wildlife officials in New York and around the country emphasize the importance of respecting the animals they harvest. The rules of fair chase, a set of ethical hunting principles developed by the nonprofit Boone and Crockett Club, calls on hunters to “behave in a way that will bring no dishonor to either the hunter, the hunted, or the environment.”

So what should Kennedy have done? “Report it. Get the permit. Treat the animal with the utmost respect as a prized source of great game meat. Transport it with dignity. Do it right,” Batcheller said. “There’s a way to do it right.”

“If he was sitting right here, I would say, ‘Mr. Kennedy, you demonstrated extremely poor judgment in what you think is amusing or appropriate,’” he added. “Extremely poor judgment. I would tell that to his face, without hesitating.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Portland raccoon untying, moving and retying rope goes viral (video)

The raccoon, dubbed Knottingham by YouTube viewers, went viral for its unexpected knot tying skills.

Last July, my backyard trail camera in Southeast Portland’s Foster-Powell neighborhood captured a dexterous raccoon along a fenceline unraveling an old clothesline that tied up in its pathway and then securing it out of the way in above tree branches.The raccoon, which was later dubbed Knottingham by YouTube viewers, has received nearly 400,000 views on YouTube and been played more than 500,000 times on Facebook. It’s also found on several other social platforms.In addition, Knottingham, a regular nocturnal visitor to my backyard about 100 feet off Powell Boulevard, has received nearly 2,000 entertaining comments including:“A raccoon will drive your car if you aren’t careful with the keys.”“Every time you find a cord in your attic that has mysteriously tied itself into infinity knots that weren’t there when you put it away... you now know who’s to blame.”“And animals can’t do math? That’s 3D spatial reasoning.”“This explains my Christmas lights.”“I, for one, welcome our new procyonidae overlords.”“The raccoon is smarter than 90% of people in Portland. Raccoon for Mayor.”Mark Graves/The OregonianSome commenters were skeptical and believed the video was staged because of gaps in the footage. In reality, the video was genuine and the gaps were due to the camera only being able to record for 15 seconds, then resting for a bit and restarting once motion is detected.After seeing the video take off with interest, I decided to give the curious critter a challenge. I put the clothesline back in the raccoon’s path, added a larger rope attached to a small cedar board and a rubber dog ball hanging from a nearby branch. Within a day or two, Knottingham took interest and brought along some curious young kits to join. Knottingham and the kits continued to visit for weeks after seemingly enjoying the entangled puzzle of ropes and toys. In the last month, raccoon visits have been scarce. Interesting raccoon info:Population numbers are unknown, but they’re prevalent throughout the state anywhere there’s water. You’re unlikely to see them in the high desert or high mountainous regions. Often mistaken for large rodents, raccoons are actually the largest animal in the Procyonidae family which includes ringtails, cacomistles, coatis, kinkajous, olingos and olinguitos, most of which reside in Central America. They’re more similar to a small bear. In Germany Prochyonide is called Kleinbären which means “small bear”. They’re omnivorous and will eat everything from chickens to insects, fruits and nuts, frogs and just plain old garbage. In Oregon, their diet reflects where they live. For example, if they’re on the coast they’ll feed on shellfish, crabs, fish and other marine life. They love salmon during spawning season. They can swim for long periods while periodically holding their breath underwater to seek out food or escape predators.You might see them analyzing an object with their thumb-like paws. This is because they have four times the sensory cells of most animals, making them hyper-responsive to touch. They will feel something in order to identify it, especially in the dark. They’re even known to “wash” their food before eating it.The word “raccoon” comes from the Powhatan word “aroughcun,” which means “animal that scratches with its hands”. Yes, it’s true, raccoons can pick a simple lock. Studies have shown them unlocking complex mechanisms along with latches, jars, doors, coolers and garbage lids. Once learned, the clever problem solvers remember for years and the young learn from the old. In captivity, raccoons have been observed using tools to solve problems. The cliche fur mask they wear is designed to reduce glare and enhance night vision.You might’ve heard one before and had no clue what it was. They are highly vocal producing dozens of sounds including purring, growling and even a kind of “chittering” when they communicate.In Oregon, they reach just over 20 pounds and they’re lucky to live more than three years in the wild. In captivity, they can reach about 20 years old.Like cats, they always land on their feet.In the city, they’ll make homes in sewers, attics, culverts, chimneys and under decks. Elsewhere they can be found in small dens, tree cavities and abandoned burrows of other animals. You’re most likely to cross their path in late summer and fall as they prepare for winter by foraging for food. Oregon has been largely free of raccoon rabies. The state has strict regulations to prevent the spread of rabies, including a ban on relocating raccoons.During the fur trade era, which lasted till the 1840s, raccoons in Oregon and Southwest Washington were highly valued for their pelts. Though not as popular as beaver pelts, the demand for raccoon fur was one of the factors that attracted European exploration and settlement in the region.Indigenous tribes in Oregon and southwest Washington could practically trap raccoons blindfolded and were integral to the fur trade economy, supplying raccoon pelts and other furs to European traders. Check out the links in the sources below to learn a ton more about our fellow backyard critters. –Mark Graves, The Oregonian/OregonLivemgraves@oregonian.com503-860-3060@mark_w_gravesSources: Missouri Department of Conservation; The College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF); National Geographic for Kids; National Wildlife Federation (NWF); Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW); Iowa Department of Natural Resources; Nevada Department of Wildlife; Maryland Department of Natural Resources- Wildlife & Heritage Service; and Oregon Historical SocietyMore Oregon wildlife:

Rock Creek Park golf course overhaul gets final approval

The National Park Service’s plan to overhaul the public golf course in Rock Creek Park received final approval Thursday from the National Capital Planning Commission.

The National Park Service’s plan to overhaul the public golf course in Rock Creek Park received final approval Thursday from the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), despite opposition from environmental groups and D.C. residents.Eleven of the commission’s 12 members voted to approve the plan that would significantly revamp the more than 100-year-old course by turning what was once an 18-hole layout into one with a full-length, nine-hole course and a shorter par-3 nine-hole course. (One member abstained from voting.) The renovations would also include a new clubhouse, pro shop and indoor practice area, and would add a 50-bay lighted driving range to the facility just off 16th Street NW.During its monthly meeting, the commission reached its decision following hours of public testimony from opponents and supporters of the rehabilitation plan. More than 175 people signed up to speak during the meeting, which lasted until late Thursday evening.Before the vote was taken, Teri Goodmann, chair of the NCPC, acknowledged the many concerns and revisions made to the plan.“Not everybody got what they wanted,” Goodmann said. “But [debate] came out of a great love of this place.”She cited a recent tour of the course that spoke to the need for community support behind a new vision.“I was frankly appalled by the condition of the place with the invasives,” Goodmann said. “The neglect is there, clearly. But the dedication is there.”The renovation, proposed last year, is expected to take two years to complete. The National Park Service, which owns the course, announced in April that work on the project would start this fall.Funding is estimated to cost between $25 million and $35 million and would come from the National Links Trust, a local nonprofit group awarded a 50-year lease in 2020 to operate Rock Creek, East Potomac and Langston, the three public golf courses in Washington.The Rock Creek course has fallen into severe disrepair over the past few decades. Just 14 of its 18 holes are playable, and it is the least played of the District’s public courses. Supporters of the rehabilitation plan said it would make the course more enjoyable, open it up to a wider range of players and make it an example of what municipal golf can be.Rick Curtis called in to the meeting to support the planned changes to the course, saying that he and his wife walk and hike in Rock Creek Park daily, but he added that “making the golf course playable and accessible and viable is important, too.”Will Smith, co-founder of the National Links Trust, said in a statement to The Washington Post regarding the plan’s approval that “this would not have been possible without the support of our community, and we are forever indebted to them for their steadfast belief in our plan and organization.”“We look forward to building an affordable, accessible, equitable, and engaging future,” Smith said.Critics of the plan, which would remove more than 1,000 trees, said it would do significant environmental damage that would destroy animal and insect habitats that cannot be recovered. They also argued that the NCPC was ignoring climate change issues and the impact that tree removal would have on the environment and air quality in Washington.Leaders of environmental groups in the Washington region called the proposed changes a “cause for alarm” in an October letter to Brian Joyner, the National Park Service’s acting superintendent for Rock Creek Park.“We need to focus on mitigating the effects of climate change,” Barbara Zia, president of the League of Women Voters of the District of Columbia, said in her testimony to the commission on Thursday. “To be clear, we support the rehabilitation of the golf course, but we oppose the excesses of the current plan, especially the removal of more than 1,000 trees, including hundreds of large, healthy canopy trees.”While many of the plan’s critics said they recognized the course needed to be improved, several said they would prefer the course be closed altogether and the land allowed to be reforested.

Abrupt layoffs at Portland’s Bird Alliance signal upheaval in beloved programs, volunteers say

The group, formerly known as Portland Audubon, laid off the ambassador animal program coordinator and the rehab center manager. Director says layoffs were tied to the organization’s financial health.

Volunteers at the Bird Alliance of Oregon, the storied Portland conservation and education group, say recent leadership decisions have put essential and popular animal programs in jeopardy.Several volunteers told The Oregonian/OregonLive that sudden layoffs this summer at the organization, known until recently as Portland Audubon, have left an animal program beloved by children and funders alike at risk of closure and led to a brief shutdown of its wildlife rehabilitation center.The moves have placed increased strain on volunteers and remaining staff and led to a loss of trust in a group that usually enjoys widespread community support, they say.“We all are outraged and appalled by the ramifications of recent decisions. The Bird Alliance has tried to sweep everything under the carpet and move on, but a lot of us are worried. They haven’t given the public any warning,” said volunteer Valerie Dickie.At the end of June, at the height of bird breeding season when the wildlife care center is swamped with baby birds and other injured or orphaned animals, the Bird Alliance laid off two essential employees without notice.They were Stephanie Herman, the manager of the wildlife rehabilitation center, and Katie Newton, part-time coordinator of the Ambassador Animals program, which has taught generations of children about the importance of wildlife conservation.The layoffs came as the Bird Alliance is finalizing the purchase of a new property where it plans to build a larger, state-of-the-art wildlife rehabilitation hospital to replace the 37-year-old center that’s beyond repair, opening a new chapter for expansion.Stuart Wells, Bird Alliance executive director, said the layoffs occurred to prevent an operating budget deficit. The budget cycle dictated when staff would be let go, he said.While revenue has grown, the organization needs to maintain a reserve fund to ensure it can function in the event of a challenging, unpredictable situation such as the pandemic, he added.“Had we not done layoffs and other cost-cutting measures,” Wells said, “we would have depleted our reserves to a level which could put the larger organization at risk.”The Bird Alliance also laid off two other employees, a social media and marketing worker and a development manager.The layoffs weren’t linked to the Bird Alliance’s efforts to buy property in outer Northeast Portland, Wells said, because the capital campaign for a new rehabilitation center and the organization’s regular operating budget – which includes salaries -- are separate.The Bird Alliance currently employs about 45 people. It reported $8.35 million in revenue last year – the bulk of it coming from contributions and grants – and $5.9 million in expenses. Its latest tax return shows the nonprofit brought in $1 million more in revenue than the year before and held $16 million in net assets, roughly $3 million more than the previous year. Its assets included savings, investments, pledges and grants and its land and buildings. Some of those funds are restricted by donors to specific purposes such as perpetual endowments or capital campaigns and cannot be used for the operating budget.The group, more than 120 years old, has about 12,500 paid members and relies heavily on volunteers. Over 700 people donate their time during the year to assist with animal care, youth and adult education and habitat restoration at the group’s wildlife rehabilitation center and 172-acre wildlife sanctuary in Portland’s Forest Park and at two other sanctuaries on the central coast and in the foothills of Mount Hood.The ambassador animals live at the nonprofit’s Forest Park headquarters. Many of them have spent decades there; they cannot be released into the wild because they were raised in captivity or have an injury and won’t survive on their own.Current ambassadors include Julio, a great horned owl who has lived at the rehabilitation center for 20 years; Xena, an American kestrel, and Bybee, an endangered native western painted turtle. They are housed in shaded enclosures at the top of a popular sanctuary trail where tens of thousands of hikers pass by, including summer camps and other youth groups organized by the Bird Alliance.Newton oversaw the daily care of the animals, managed a public interpretive program, including sessions with camps and school field trips and oversaw volunteers working with the animals.Her layoff has shifted the work onto volunteers and left the program’s future up in the air.“Many of us remember visiting these animals as children. We are their home, friends and sanctuary. To not give the public a say in the relocation and cessation of the Ambassador program and its animals is a big mistake,” Dickie said.Newton couldn’t be immediately reached for comment. Several other volunteers echoed Dickie’s concerns but asked not to be named because they feared they would lose their volunteer positions.The ambassador program has been in transition in recent years. Two of the animal ambassadors – raven Aristophanes and turkey vulture Ruby – were relocated in 2022 after the pandemic to the Point Defiance Zoo in Tacoma. The Bird Alliance at the time said standards of care for the birds had evolved and it no longer had the staff capacity to care for such highly intelligent birds with complex social and training needs. The organization also said it was rebuilding the ambassador animal program post-COVID-19.Wells acknowledged that hundreds of thousands of people have met the ambassador animals and many have forged a special connection with them. But, he said, the leadership team is still figuring out whether the program will continue. He didn’t comment on why that’s the case.“At this stage we are assessing all options – including rehoming our three ambassadors – with our animal ambassadors’ well-being, and staff capacity to oversee and manage this program, given the highest consideration,” Wells said. “We will keep the public informed and will act with care and deliberation as we make this important decision.”Wells said the Bird Alliance would continue to invest in the wildlife care center. The center is one of the few places that cares for sick, injured and orphaned animals in northwest Oregon. Several other area rescues transport animals there for treatment. Last year, the center treated more than 3,100 injured or orphaned native birds and other native wildlife, including nearly 100 different bird species.A baby American Robin was sent via Uber to the Bird Alliance's wildlife care center. The center is one of the few places that cares for sick, injured and orphaned birds, mammals and reptiles in northwest Oregon. It treated more than 3,100 animals last year. Herman’s layoff came at the height of the busiest season, as the center triaged and fed several hundred birds and other animals, including baby hummingbirds, baby cowbirds, baby crows, baby jays, great horned owls, swallows, squirrels, ducklings, bats and a baby kestrel, volunteers said.Herman was the center’s sole holder of a permit from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and also fulfilled several requirements that made the program eligible for another permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, both of which allow the center to operate.Her abrupt layoff meant the Bird Alliance was out of compliance for several days and was forced to shutter its care center for 24 hours as another staffer scrambled to secure a new permit, volunteers said.Although staff and volunteers continued to feed and treat the animals during the closure, the center couldn’t accept new animals, leading to several dying, volunteers said.Herman told The Oregonian/OregonLive that despite constant reassurances from the leadership team and the organization’s board that they were working to improve conditions at the center, including by undertaking the land purchase to build a new facility, animal and staff well-being didn’t seem to be a top priority.“I experienced constant pressure to make the program less than it is and to continue to temporarily patch or ignore facilities issues that have been on the verge of catastrophic failure for decades,” she said. “Add to that frequent suggestions from board members and leadership that we should simply turn away people and animals or only take care of endangered species to save money, and a pattern of general promises of support followed by asking us what we needed, and then telling us we were asking for too much.”Wells said staffing at the center had doubled in the past few years. Currently, three full-time staff members, two part-time veterinarians, two seasonal workers and about 100 volunteers take care of the animals there.In a letter to the volunteers shared with The Oregonian/OregonLive, Wells acknowledged the permit snafu.“I want to express my sincerest apologies for the way that we rolled out layoffs during our organization’s incredibly difficult budget cycle,” he wrote. “I want to recognize how deeply the loss of Steph Herman and Katie Newton impacted the Wildlife Care Center community. I also acknowledge that removing their positions increased the workload for everyone else during the busiest time of year.”Wells promised to improve the transparency and timing of communications and said the Bird Alliance would work hard to regain trust and raise more money to ensure adequate staffing levels at the rehabilitation center.To that end, it has added a full-time grant writer and increased staffing to deepen relationships with existing donors and develop relationships with new donors, he told The Oregonian/OregonLive. In the meantime, it has increased the hours and terms for existing seasonal staff at the center.Regaining volunteers’ trust is key as the alliance plans to build a larger animal rehabilitation center to replace the existing one, which is too old and too small to handle the increasing onslaught of animal patients, the organization has said. Two years ago, the current center was further damaged during an ice storm and had to temporarily close for repairs.The Bird Alliance is in the process of purchasing a 12.5-acre site on Northeast 82nd Avenue across from McDaniel High School, the group’s spokesperson Ali Berman confirmed. The property, a former landfill and quarry owned by Mike Hashem, is one of the city’s largest undeveloped tracks and has sat vacant for years.Last week, the state filed a document as part of a court-approved consent order, the final step before the Bird Alliance can close on the property. The document specifies that the organization will be responsible for monitoring and remediating methane emissions at the site.Berman said methane levels at the property have been close to zero for at least a decade, but a monitoring system will be in place. The monitoring doesn’t pose a financial burden, she said.“Bird Alliance of Oregon has long advocated for restoring and redeveloping brownfields,” Berman said. “And now, we have an opportunity to put that in action while providing a valuable community asset and green space that will be accessible to the public.”— Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com

Even simple bacteria can anticipate the changing seasons

Cyanobacteria exposed to shorter days are better at surviving cold conditions, showing that even simple organisms can prepare for the arrival or summer and winter

A scanning electron micrograph of Synechococcus cyanobacteriaEYE OF SCIENCE/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY Despite being among the simplest forms of life on Earth, cyanobacteria are able to anticipate and prepare for the changing seasons based on the amount of light they are exposed to. It has been known for more than a century that complex organisms can utilise day length as a cue for future environmental conditions – days get shorter before it gets colder, for example. Phenomena like migration, flowering, hibernation and seasonal reproduction are all guided by such responses in plants and animals, known as photoperiodism, but it has never been seen in simple life forms such as bacteria until now. Luísa Jabbur, then at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, and her colleagues artificially exposed Synechococcus elongatus cyanobacteria to varying day lengths and found that those that experienced simulated short days went on to be two to three times better at surviving ice-cold temperatures, indicating they had prepared for winter-like conditions. By testing shorter and longer periods, the researchers determined that it takes four to six days for the response to develop. These organisms spawn a new generation in a matter of hours, meaning the cells must be passing along the day-length information to their descendants. However, the researchers don’t yet understand how this information is transmitted. Cyanobacteria, which capture energy from sunlight through photosynthesis, have existed for more than 2 billion years and are found almost everywhere on Earth. “The fact that an organism as old and as simple as a cyanobacterium can have photoperiodic responses suggests that this is a phenomenon that evolved much earlier than we might have imagined,” says Jabbur, who is now at the John Innes Centre in Norwich, UK. The team also looked at how patterns of gene expression changed in response to varying day length. Their results suggest that photoperiodism probably evolved by co-opting existing mechanisms to combat acute stresses such as bright light and extreme temperatures. These findings also have implications for the evolution of circadian rhythms, the biological clocks that regulate day-night cycles, says team member Carl Johnson at Vanderbilt University. “I think we have always assumed that daily clocks evolved before organisms could measure day/night length and thereby anticipate the changing seasons,” he says. “But the fact that photoperiodism evolved in such ancient and simple organisms, and our gene expression results implicate stress response pathways that probably evolved very early in life on Earth, suggest that photoperiodism might have evolved before circadian clocks,” says Johnson.

How a bat disease may have led to the death of more than 1,000 kids

Read more

Bats have a bad reputation, but they deserve better. The flying mammals are nature’s pest control, swooping over America’s farmland every night to feast on swarms of insects that would otherwise chew through crops.But many of the country’s bat populations are on the decline, wiped out by a devastating fungus that attacks the insect eaters in their sleep.Now, a new study suggests that decline in bats has come at a ghastly cost to human beings.An analysis published Thursday in the journal Science suggests farmers have increased their use of pesticides on crops in response to the population collapse of bats, potentially leading to the deaths of more than 1,000 human infants through intoxication from the chemicals. Past research has linked exposure to pesticides with negative health outcomes, including childhood asthma and death.The finding, though an indirect observation, is a potentially poignant demonstration of the benefits society derives from nature — and, in turn, of the deadly cost to humans when biodiversity is lost.Follow Climate & environment“This study estimates just a few of the consequences we suffer from the disappearance of bats, and they are just one of the species we’re losing,” said Bard College biology professor Felicia Keesing, who was not involved in the study. “These results should motivate everyone, not just farmers and parents, to clamor for the protection and restoration of biodiversity.”Around the world, nature — and by extension, people — are in trouble. Hundreds of thousands of plants and animals are at risk of vanishing forever due to habitat destruction, climate change and other human activities, an extinction crisis potentially on par with the asteroid that wiped out most dinosaurs. In response, nations have promised to protect roughly a third of land and oceans to maintain ecosystems essential to human society.Over the past few years, researchers have revealed many of the hidden ways healthy ecosystems help people thrive. A surge in wolves in Wisconsin resulted in fewer cars colliding with deer, for instance, while a decline in amphibians in Central America led to an uptick in malaria cases.An attack on batsFor bats, the trouble started about two decades ago, when biologists found a cave in Upstate New York littered with bat carcasses. Their noses were covered in white fuzz, as if each bat had done a line of cocaine. A fungus — one imported from Europe or Asia, perhaps on a hiker’s boot — was attacking the bats during their winter slumber.The deadly disease was dubbed white-nose syndrome. It quickly spread across the country, reaching 40 states. The fungus doesn’t infect humans, but that doesn’t mean it is leaving them unscathed. While the damage to bats themselves is clear — the pathogen has wiped out more than 90 percent of some species — the broader effect of the loss of the voracious insectivores on the entire ecosystem was unclear.To suss out that impact, Eyal Frank, an environmental economist at the University of Chicago, compared insecticide use and human infant mortality rates in U.S. counties where the fungus has been spotted to those where it has yet to be found.Frank found that between 2006 and 2017, farmers increased their use of pesticides by about 31 percent in counties where bats were dropping dead due to disease.Knowing that pest-killing compounds can spread through the air and water beyond farms and have negative health effects after they enter people’s bodies, he also analyzed infant mortality rates in each county and saw a nearly 8 percent spike in places where bats were hit by the disease. Frank tested to see if his results were somehow explained by other factors, including the opioid epidemic or unemployment, and saw no effects. “I kicked a lot of different tires.”“Bats are a fantastic example of a species that we like to keep a distance from, but are really impactful in terms of the role they play in ecosystems.,” Frank said.An ‘eye-popping’ effect on peopleFrederik Noack, an environmental economist at the University of British Columbia, found the findings credible and showed how technological solutions such as pesticides are often a poor substitute for the services that nature provides. The study estimated that white-nose syndrome cost farmers about $27 billion in total.But he added that study still leaves unanswered questions for further research, including how babies are exposed to insecticides, where insect-eating bats are concentrated across the country and why the study found no effect on other health outcomes such as birth weight.“Given the large effects, we should investigate the pathways through which pesticides affect birth outcomes. So far, it is unclear how people get exposed to pesticides,” said Noack, who co-wrote a policy analysis that accompanied Frank’s research.Keesing, the Bard College biologist, noted the study didn’t directly measure changes in bat or insect populations and said she would like to see more field research.“Without seeing the underlying data, I can’t evaluate the strength of the evidence supporting these linkages, but the impacts estimated here are eye-popping,” she said.Other scientists are now racing to figure out a way to stop the spread of the fungus, deploying ultraviolet lights on cave walls and administering vaccines to bats themselves to snuff out the disease.“It is not only the mega charismatic species that are warm and fuzzy and evoke a desire to hug and cuddle with them that provide value and benefit to us as people,” Frank said.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.