Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Keith Wilson: Portland mayor’s race

News Feed
Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Name: Keith WilsonNeighborhood: ConcordiaAre you a renter or homeowner: OwnerEducation: University of Portland/MBA, business administration and management; Oregon State University/B.S., business administration and marketing; Portland Community College/A.A., business administration and management; Roosevelt High School/graduateOccupation: President and CEO of TITAN Freight Systems; Founder of Nonprofit, Shelter PortlandAge: 60, turning 61 in October.Pronouns: He/Him/HisPortland is facing an historic election involving a new voting system and an unusually high number of candidates. Journalists at The Oregonian/OregonLive and Oregon Public Broadcasting share a goal of ensuring that Portland voters have the information they need to make informed choices, and we also know candidates’ time is valuable and limited.That’s why the two news organizations teamed up this cycle to solicit Portland mayoral candidates’ perspectives on the big issues in this election. Here’s what they had to say:For each of the following questions, we asked candidates to limit their answers to 150 words.Why are you the best candidate to serve as mayor at this time? Please point to specific accomplishments as part of your answer.Portlanders are dismayed by how our city became a national symbol for failed leadership. Our city has the lowest job growth, the highest downtown vacancy rate, and burdensome taxes on working families. Families and businesses have fled. We can’t keep electing the same failed city politicians and expect change.I’m a green business leader, an innovator, and an operations expert with a proven record of advancing bipartisan legislation and environmental transformation. My nonprofit Shelter Portland shows we can end unsheltered homelessness for a fraction of what the city already spends.I’m running because I no longer recognize the city I was born and raised in. It isn’t normal to have blocks choked with tents and open drug use or graffiti, boarded-up windows, and empty storefronts where we should have thriving neighborhoods. I can bring real change to Portland where our insider politicians have failed.What are one or two issues that you’d like to draw attention to or champion as mayor that are overlooked or receiving less attention than they deserve?The unsheltered homelessness and economic missteps at our doorstep have made it easy to deprioritize the climate crisis. Throwing more taxpayer money at Portland’s poorly managed PCEF fund won’t make a difference, but smart environmental policy will.Black carbon is a nasty greenhouse gas with up to 1,500 times the potency of carbon dioxide, and a major cause of health and environmental damage. I was the chief petitioner of HB 3590, which passed committee with unanimous, bipartisan support. Fully implemented, it would remove 35,000 tons of black carbon from the skies of Oregon annually.Between federal grants, state rebates and credits, and the plunging cost of high-capacity battery technology, there has never been a better time to convert Portland’s vehicle fleet to electric power. As one of the first freight carriers in the nation to go electric, I have the experience to do the same for our city.What specific examples do you have that demonstrate your competence to oversee a city with an $8.2 billion budget?I have decades of experience in team leadership, complex logistical and financial operations, process management and systems improvement. I hold a Master of Business Administration from the University of Portland with an emphasis in operations and technology, and a Lean Six Sigma black belt certification, the highest level.My leadership at TITAN Freight Systems has demonstrated exceptional management competence for large-scale operations. TITAN earned a B-Corp status for commitment to the environment and community, is a national safety leader and was named National Innovator of the Year two years running.As a citizen, I’ve dedicated my life to lifting up the voices of others. I’m vice chair of Word is Bond, an organization dedicated to mentoring Portland’s future leaders, and founder of Shelter Portland, which seeks to end unsheltered homelessness in our city. My experience is vast, and relevant, and will meet Portland’s moment of crisis.What are your biggest concerns, if any, about the new form of government? What role do you think the mayor should play in it?My biggest concern about the new form of government is that we miss our moment. The next mayor of Portland will have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to break through political gridlock and highly siloed bureaucratic inefficiency.This failure of our current city politicians has cost our city billions in lost wages, rent, and tourism dollars, forcing painful cuts to the city budget and public education. While we’ve seen some encouraging “green shoots” of economic development, the overall financial and social picture shows how badly our leadership has failed. Electing one of our failed city leaders into the mayor’s office will double down on the dysfunction of the status quo.The role of mayor will be both operational and inspirational. Portland has historically been a highly sought-after destination for residents and businesses alike. Bringing in a new generation of young Portlanders requires city leadership, families, and businesses to trust and believe in.How would you work to promote and boost Portland nationally as mayor and reinvigorate people’s sense of civic pride?Portlanders are not fair weather champions of the city we love. Our city, our culture, our natural environment, and our citizens are exceptional. Reinvigorating civic pride and inviting back families, jobs and businesses requires one thing: getting basic governance right.Families want to stay, but they need safe routes to school. Businesses want to grow, but they need a thriving downtown and neighborhoods. Tourists want to visit, but they need clean, bustling streets.The Portland renaissance we all want is within our reach. We can end unsheltered homelessness and open drug use. We can revitalize our communities and businesses. We can support our first responders and fix the overwhelmed systems that have cost lives. We can be a Portland that no longer leaves our most vulnerable to suffer. Best of all, we can do all this with the time, energy, people and taxpayer money we’ve already committed to our city.Mayor Ted Wheeler has already warned that next year’s budget will be a difficult one as costs rise and forecasts call for lower revenue. What would guide your decisions in developing a budget, what specific ideas would you explore to minimize service reductions and are there specific areas where you would look to make cuts?The latest municipal budget saw a citywide cut and the next budget promises more painful cuts. Portland’s tax base is melting away, due to entirely preventable, self-inflicted wounds. We’re losing families and businesses in droves. The consequences of this are felt everywhere, including a $30 million cut from our transportation budget despite passing a critical gas tax.Portland spends about $300 million annually on the aggregated costs of unsheltered homelessness. Peer cities have proven that for less than $25 million, we can end unsheltered homelessness altogether. Instead, we are shoveling money into the unaccountable, ineffective Joint Office of Homeless Services.If civic livability continues to deteriorate, we’ll continue to see a downward spiral and outwards migration of Portlanders, jobs, and businesses, tax revenue and service erosion until our failed city leadership is replaced by elected representatives willing to follow the proven solutions enacted by other cities.How can the city of Portland and Multnomah County improve their existing partnership to more effectively address the homelessness, addiction and behavioral health crises?Portland city government must no longer delegate or lay blame for our fundamental responsibilities. Until 2016, Portland was in charge of sheltering the unsheltered within the city. Costs increased substantially and efficacy sharply dropped once that responsibility was delegated to the Joint Office of Homeless Services, a Multnomah County-controlled department. The result was that costs exploded without adding any additional beds and now Portland/Multnomah County has the highest unsheltered rate in the nation, outside of California.We are in the midst of a declared homeless emergency. As mayor, I will reestablish clear lines of what each jurisdiction provides. We must listen and learn from those who have found successful solutions in their respective cities. We must lead, compassionately and cost-effectively, to shelter our unhoused population, end public camping and once again enforce our community safety laws on tents, RVs and public sanitation.If elected, you will oversee the police chief. What is your opinion of police bureau priorities and operations and what changes, if any, would you make? Would you push for the city to fund hundreds more police officers than the City Council has already authorized? If yes, where would you find the money?From 2005 to 2024, Portland’s population increased 31% while the number of Portland Police Bureau officers shrank by 23%. Due to the unsheltered homelessness crisis, our current leadership has allowed it to go unaddressed, approximately 50% of all arrests in Portland now involve our unsheltered.The consequences of this failed leadership have been severe. For years, Portland had no traffic division, compounding a nationwide spike in traffic deaths, and more recently dissolved the property crimes unit despite 96% of property crimes going unsolved. Response times have quadrupled, if there are any officers available at all.Portlanders must feel safe in their city and confident that calling 911 means help is on the way. This is not negotiable. As mayor, I’ll focus on freeing up first responder resources by dealing with the unsheltered homelessness crisis, and once more focus on law enforcement issues that matter to the safety of our families.For the five remaining questions, we asked candidates to answer in 50 words or fewer:Do you favor arresting and jailing people who camp on public property in Portland who have refused repeated offers of shelter, such as the option to sleep in a city-designated tiny home cluster?We cannot arrest our way out of our homelessness crisis, and I do not support jailing individuals for simply refusing shelter. We can, however, provide enough emergency nighttime shelters to legally enforce our existing laws on tent encampments, RVs, car camping and illegal dumping.Have the problems impacting downtown Portland received too much or too little attention among current city leaders? Are there other specific neighborhoods in the city that have not received enough attention?With a vacancy rate among the highest in the nation and a decimated commercial property market, Portland’s downtown has received far too little attention and action from city leaders. City leaders have also critically neglected North and East Portland neighborhoods.Do you support the decision to use millions from the Portland Clean Energy Fund to backfill budget holes in various city bureaus? Would you seek to continue, expand or halt that practice?City leadership has siphoned away millions from the Portland Clean Energy Fund without a clearly articulated goal or financial accountability. I strongly oppose diverting PCEF funds to any purpose other than originally intended by Portland voters. We must return this critical program to effective renewable energy projects and jobs.Do you support a potential change to the region’s homeless services tax that would direct some of the program’s unanticipated revenue to construct more affordable housing? Why or why not?Multnomah County’s poorly designed supportive housing services tax has contributed to the flight of high-skilled workers from Portland. The tax has not been adjusted for inflation, and the “unanticipated revenue” encourages irresponsible, unaccountable spending. I support adjusting the tax to fit a clear, measurable goal of ending unsheltered homelessness.Describe the qualities and experience you will seek in a city administrator. Describe the working relationship you plan to build with the top administrator and their half dozen deputies.I will hire a city administrator capable of breaking through political gridlock and bureaucratic inefficiency. My role will be to contribute operational expertise and inspirational vision as we serve Portland, setting the city on a path to a greener, brighter, more pragmatic and successful future.

Read the candidate’s responses to questions about homelessness, police accountability, Portland’s budget and taxes.

Name: Keith Wilson

Neighborhood: Concordia

Are you a renter or homeowner: Owner

Education: University of Portland/MBA, business administration and management; Oregon State University/B.S., business administration and marketing; Portland Community College/A.A., business administration and management; Roosevelt High School/graduate

Occupation: President and CEO of TITAN Freight Systems; Founder of Nonprofit, Shelter Portland

Age: 60, turning 61 in October.

Pronouns: He/Him/His

Portland is facing an historic election involving a new voting system and an unusually high number of candidates. Journalists at The Oregonian/OregonLive and Oregon Public Broadcasting share a goal of ensuring that Portland voters have the information they need to make informed choices, and we also know candidates’ time is valuable and limited.

That’s why the two news organizations teamed up this cycle to solicit Portland mayoral candidates’ perspectives on the big issues in this election. Here’s what they had to say:

For each of the following questions, we asked candidates to limit their answers to 150 words.

Why are you the best candidate to serve as mayor at this time? Please point to specific accomplishments as part of your answer.

Portlanders are dismayed by how our city became a national symbol for failed leadership. Our city has the lowest job growth, the highest downtown vacancy rate, and burdensome taxes on working families. Families and businesses have fled. We can’t keep electing the same failed city politicians and expect change.

I’m a green business leader, an innovator, and an operations expert with a proven record of advancing bipartisan legislation and environmental transformation. My nonprofit Shelter Portland shows we can end unsheltered homelessness for a fraction of what the city already spends.

I’m running because I no longer recognize the city I was born and raised in. It isn’t normal to have blocks choked with tents and open drug use or graffiti, boarded-up windows, and empty storefronts where we should have thriving neighborhoods. I can bring real change to Portland where our insider politicians have failed.

What are one or two issues that you’d like to draw attention to or champion as mayor that are overlooked or receiving less attention than they deserve?

The unsheltered homelessness and economic missteps at our doorstep have made it easy to deprioritize the climate crisis. Throwing more taxpayer money at Portland’s poorly managed PCEF fund won’t make a difference, but smart environmental policy will.

Black carbon is a nasty greenhouse gas with up to 1,500 times the potency of carbon dioxide, and a major cause of health and environmental damage. I was the chief petitioner of HB 3590, which passed committee with unanimous, bipartisan support. Fully implemented, it would remove 35,000 tons of black carbon from the skies of Oregon annually.

Between federal grants, state rebates and credits, and the plunging cost of high-capacity battery technology, there has never been a better time to convert Portland’s vehicle fleet to electric power. As one of the first freight carriers in the nation to go electric, I have the experience to do the same for our city.

What specific examples do you have that demonstrate your competence to oversee a city with an $8.2 billion budget?

I have decades of experience in team leadership, complex logistical and financial operations, process management and systems improvement. I hold a Master of Business Administration from the University of Portland with an emphasis in operations and technology, and a Lean Six Sigma black belt certification, the highest level.

My leadership at TITAN Freight Systems has demonstrated exceptional management competence for large-scale operations. TITAN earned a B-Corp status for commitment to the environment and community, is a national safety leader and was named National Innovator of the Year two years running.

As a citizen, I’ve dedicated my life to lifting up the voices of others. I’m vice chair of Word is Bond, an organization dedicated to mentoring Portland’s future leaders, and founder of Shelter Portland, which seeks to end unsheltered homelessness in our city. My experience is vast, and relevant, and will meet Portland’s moment of crisis.

What are your biggest concerns, if any, about the new form of government? What role do you think the mayor should play in it?

My biggest concern about the new form of government is that we miss our moment. The next mayor of Portland will have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to break through political gridlock and highly siloed bureaucratic inefficiency.

This failure of our current city politicians has cost our city billions in lost wages, rent, and tourism dollars, forcing painful cuts to the city budget and public education. While we’ve seen some encouraging “green shoots” of economic development, the overall financial and social picture shows how badly our leadership has failed. Electing one of our failed city leaders into the mayor’s office will double down on the dysfunction of the status quo.

The role of mayor will be both operational and inspirational. Portland has historically been a highly sought-after destination for residents and businesses alike. Bringing in a new generation of young Portlanders requires city leadership, families, and businesses to trust and believe in.

How would you work to promote and boost Portland nationally as mayor and reinvigorate people’s sense of civic pride?

Portlanders are not fair weather champions of the city we love. Our city, our culture, our natural environment, and our citizens are exceptional. Reinvigorating civic pride and inviting back families, jobs and businesses requires one thing: getting basic governance right.

Families want to stay, but they need safe routes to school. Businesses want to grow, but they need a thriving downtown and neighborhoods. Tourists want to visit, but they need clean, bustling streets.

The Portland renaissance we all want is within our reach. We can end unsheltered homelessness and open drug use. We can revitalize our communities and businesses. We can support our first responders and fix the overwhelmed systems that have cost lives. We can be a Portland that no longer leaves our most vulnerable to suffer. Best of all, we can do all this with the time, energy, people and taxpayer money we’ve already committed to our city.

Mayor Ted Wheeler has already warned that next year’s budget will be a difficult one as costs rise and forecasts call for lower revenue. What would guide your decisions in developing a budget, what specific ideas would you explore to minimize service reductions and are there specific areas where you would look to make cuts?

The latest municipal budget saw a citywide cut and the next budget promises more painful cuts. Portland’s tax base is melting away, due to entirely preventable, self-inflicted wounds. We’re losing families and businesses in droves. The consequences of this are felt everywhere, including a $30 million cut from our transportation budget despite passing a critical gas tax.

Portland spends about $300 million annually on the aggregated costs of unsheltered homelessness. Peer cities have proven that for less than $25 million, we can end unsheltered homelessness altogether. Instead, we are shoveling money into the unaccountable, ineffective Joint Office of Homeless Services.

If civic livability continues to deteriorate, we’ll continue to see a downward spiral and outwards migration of Portlanders, jobs, and businesses, tax revenue and service erosion until our failed city leadership is replaced by elected representatives willing to follow the proven solutions enacted by other cities.

How can the city of Portland and Multnomah County improve their existing partnership to more effectively address the homelessness, addiction and behavioral health crises?

Portland city government must no longer delegate or lay blame for our fundamental responsibilities. Until 2016, Portland was in charge of sheltering the unsheltered within the city. Costs increased substantially and efficacy sharply dropped once that responsibility was delegated to the Joint Office of Homeless Services, a Multnomah County-controlled department. The result was that costs exploded without adding any additional beds and now Portland/Multnomah County has the highest unsheltered rate in the nation, outside of California.

We are in the midst of a declared homeless emergency. As mayor, I will reestablish clear lines of what each jurisdiction provides. We must listen and learn from those who have found successful solutions in their respective cities. We must lead, compassionately and cost-effectively, to shelter our unhoused population, end public camping and once again enforce our community safety laws on tents, RVs and public sanitation.

If elected, you will oversee the police chief. What is your opinion of police bureau priorities and operations and what changes, if any, would you make? Would you push for the city to fund hundreds more police officers than the City Council has already authorized? If yes, where would you find the money?

From 2005 to 2024, Portland’s population increased 31% while the number of Portland Police Bureau officers shrank by 23%. Due to the unsheltered homelessness crisis, our current leadership has allowed it to go unaddressed, approximately 50% of all arrests in Portland now involve our unsheltered.

The consequences of this failed leadership have been severe. For years, Portland had no traffic division, compounding a nationwide spike in traffic deaths, and more recently dissolved the property crimes unit despite 96% of property crimes going unsolved. Response times have quadrupled, if there are any officers available at all.

Portlanders must feel safe in their city and confident that calling 911 means help is on the way. This is not negotiable. As mayor, I’ll focus on freeing up first responder resources by dealing with the unsheltered homelessness crisis, and once more focus on law enforcement issues that matter to the safety of our families.

For the five remaining questions, we asked candidates to answer in 50 words or fewer:

Do you favor arresting and jailing people who camp on public property in Portland who have refused repeated offers of shelter, such as the option to sleep in a city-designated tiny home cluster?

We cannot arrest our way out of our homelessness crisis, and I do not support jailing individuals for simply refusing shelter. We can, however, provide enough emergency nighttime shelters to legally enforce our existing laws on tent encampments, RVs, car camping and illegal dumping.

Have the problems impacting downtown Portland received too much or too little attention among current city leaders? Are there other specific neighborhoods in the city that have not received enough attention?

With a vacancy rate among the highest in the nation and a decimated commercial property market, Portland’s downtown has received far too little attention and action from city leaders. City leaders have also critically neglected North and East Portland neighborhoods.

Do you support the decision to use millions from the Portland Clean Energy Fund to backfill budget holes in various city bureaus? Would you seek to continue, expand or halt that practice?

City leadership has siphoned away millions from the Portland Clean Energy Fund without a clearly articulated goal or financial accountability. I strongly oppose diverting PCEF funds to any purpose other than originally intended by Portland voters. We must return this critical program to effective renewable energy projects and jobs.

Do you support a potential change to the region’s homeless services tax that would direct some of the program’s unanticipated revenue to construct more affordable housing? Why or why not?

Multnomah County’s poorly designed supportive housing services tax has contributed to the flight of high-skilled workers from Portland. The tax has not been adjusted for inflation, and the “unanticipated revenue” encourages irresponsible, unaccountable spending. I support adjusting the tax to fit a clear, measurable goal of ending unsheltered homelessness.

Describe the qualities and experience you will seek in a city administrator. Describe the working relationship you plan to build with the top administrator and their half dozen deputies.

I will hire a city administrator capable of breaking through political gridlock and bureaucratic inefficiency. My role will be to contribute operational expertise and inspirational vision as we serve Portland, setting the city on a path to a greener, brighter, more pragmatic and successful future.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

The conservative parties can change their leaders – but it won’t stop the NSW Coalition’s death spiral | Anne Davies

The Nationals have a new leader in Gurmesh Singh and Kellie Sloane could soon replace Liberal leader Mark Speakman. But the Coalition is fractured on net zeroThe NSW Nationals have a new leader, Gurmesh Singh, and the Liberals will almost certainly follow suit by early next week.It’s desperation politics. Changing leaders will likely do nothing to stop the apparent death spiral the conservative side of politics has inflicted upon itself – in Canberra and now the states. Continue reading...

The NSW Nationals have a new leader, Gurmesh Singh, and the Liberals will almost certainly follow suit by early next week.It’s desperation politics. Changing leaders will likely do nothing to stop the apparent death spiral the conservative side of politics has inflicted upon itself – in Canberra and now the states.If they needed evidence of what the electorate was thinking, it was shouting at them from internal YouGov research presented to the NSW Liberal party room on Tuesday. The party’s MPs and MLCs were considering whether to dump net zero as their federal counterparts did on the weekend.YouGov found only one-third of Australians would now seriously consider voting for the Coalition, the party room was told.It found 26% of Australians who are former Coalition voters won’t seriously consider the Coalition in the future. That’s approximately 5 million voters the Coalition needs to persuade to consider them again, the pollsters said.“Only one in five (21%) of former Coalition voters see the Coalition as being in touch with modern Australia. Only one in four (25%) see them as aligned with their values,” the YouGov report stated.One in two (52%) of former Coalition voters said they would only consider a party ready to govern if it had credible policies to address climate change and its impacts.Without a coherent position on the most pressing problem of our generation – how to slow climate change – voters, in particular younger cohorts, have fled in droves. They are unable to take seriously a political party that ignores the overwhelming scientific consensus and the economics of renewables.The federal Liberals have chosen to dump any semblance of a coherent plan.The NSW Liberals, however, voted on Tuesday to retain a net zero emissions by 2050 target. They are sticking with the bipartisan energy transition roadmap devised by the state Coalition when in government.But how does that work when their federal counterparts are talking up new coal-fired power stations and their junior state partner has abandoned the net zero target?Singh, the NSW National’s newly minted leader, hopes a compromise might be reached – though it takes a vivid imagination to see it working.As the first Indian-Australian to leader a major party, he’s a break from the white male graziers that the NSW National party usually chooses.Singh has a degree in industrial design, has worked in advertising and was previously a big wheel in the blueberry and macadamia industries. He formerly chaired Oz Group Co-op – the major marketing co-operative in the Coffs region.His family is still a major player in the Coffs Harbour blueberry industry, an industry that has divided the local community over rapid rapid expansion, use of pesticides, environmental standards and use of contract labour.Singh is acutely aware that on the north coast, his own and other seats face an existential political threat from the progressive side of politics, in the form of the Greens and teals, who have made action on climate change central to their platforms.The Greens already hold the state seat of Ballina, just north of Singh’s seat. In the 2025 federal election, teal candidate Caz Heize slashed the National’s margin in the seat of Cowper (which includes Coffs Harbour) to 0.14% on a two-party preferred basis.Singh is no Barnaby Joyce or Matt Canavan, dinosaurs of the National party whose mission includes returning Australia to a coal-fired past. But he is of the same party.Asked at his first press conference how he would reconcile the Nationals’ position with that of the Liberals in NSW, Singh highlighted the cost of power, the plight of pensioners in the regions who can’t afford hot showers, and suggested a better-managed rollout was required. He didn’t diss renewables per se.Meanwhile, the Liberals’ leadership drama is still to unfold, probably on Thursday, or possibly early next week.Moderate Kellie Sloane, a former journalist who has been an MP for less than three years, appears to be the frontrunner to replace Mark Speakman.However, Alister Heskens, from the right faction and the manager of opposition business, is also canvassing the numbers.The difficulty for Sloane will be her lack of history in the party and her inexperience in government. Heskens’ challenge is his low profile and convincing colleagues he offers an improvement on Speakman. He is likely to relish attacking Labor more than Speakman does.The NSW Liberals have, at least, heeded the YouGov polling on attitudes to climate change and have not been infected by the nonsense pedalled by Advance and other climate-denying figures on the right.The party issued a statement on Tuesday that it remained “committed to a target of net zero by 2050”.“It’s been our target since 2016. It’s a target to be achieved alongside a focus on energy reliability, affordability, and industrial competitiveness.”

Federal Cash for Lead Pipe Replacement Isn’t Making It to Illinois Communities

This story, a partnership between Grist, Inside Climate News, and Chicago-area public radio station WBEZ, is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Lead pipes are ubiquitous. At this point, no state has gotten rid of all of its toxic lead service lines, which pipe drinking water to homes and businesses. But some cities like Chicago, New York […]

This story, a partnership between Grist, Inside Climate News, and Chicago-area public radio station WBEZ, is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Lead pipes are ubiquitous. At this point, no state has gotten rid of all of its toxic lead service lines, which pipe drinking water to homes and businesses. But some cities like Chicago, New York City, and Detroit have more lead plumbing than others, and replacing it can cost tens of thousands of dollars. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Biden-era infrastructure law, promised $15 billion for lead pipe replacements across the country to be disbursed over five years.  But in a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency sent earlier this week, a group of Illinois congressional delegates allege that $3 billion appropriated for lead pipe replacements nationwide for the fiscal year that ended in September has not reached communities yet. They warn that the delay is a “dangerous politicization” that puts children and families at risk. “It feels like it’s targeting blue states or blue cities that might require more of this mitigation.” “Federal resources are not partisan tools—they are vital lifelines intended to serve all Americans,” the letter notes. “Using federal funds as leverage against communities based on political considerations represents a dangerous abuse of power that undermines public trust and puts lives at risk.”  The move comes as communities in Illinois, which is among the top five states with the most lead service lines, and across the country are grappling with the overwhelming cost of removing the hazardous metal piping from water systems. The Trump administration has already withheld congressionally appropriated funding for infrastructure and energy projects from Democrat-led states like New York, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, and Massachusetts. Now, lawmakers fear money for lead pipes is stuck in Washington too.  “I think that they’re playing games,” said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, one of the lawmakers who led the effort to send the letter. “It feels like it’s targeting blue states or blue cities that might require more of this mitigation than other parts of the country.”  Lead is toxic and dangerous to human health. Lead plumbing can flake and dissolve into drinking water, which can lead to brain damage, cardiovascular problems, and reproductive issues. The EPA advises that there is no safe level of lead exposure. A spokesperson for the federal agency said it is “actively working” on allotments for lead service line replacements. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for disbursing the federal funds to local governments, did not respond to a request for comment. The Chicago Department of Water Management said it received $14 million from the Illinois EPA for the 2025 financial year and was approved for $28 million for the next fiscal year.   “The estimated replacement cost for the Chicago region alone is $12 billion or more, and statewide, it could be $14 billion,” Krishnamoorthi said. “Whatever amounts would come to Chicago would not be enough to do the entire job, but the federal component is vital to get the ball rolling.” Chicago has more than 412,000 lead service lines, the most of any city in the country. So far, the city has replaced roughly 14,000 lead pipes at a cost of $400 million over the past five years. That’s due in part to the high cost of replacing lead pipes. In Chicago, a single lead pipe replacement can cost on average $35,000. Federal rules require that Chicago replace all its pipes by 2047, but city officials have cited concerns over the unfunded federal mandate.  “This is impacting people’s health,” said Chakena Sims, a senior policy advocate with Natural Resources Defense Council. “The federal government politicizing access to safe drinking water is an all-time low,” she added. “It’s encouraging to see our Illinois congressional leaders stand up for communities.”  

Best Leaders 2025: John Palfrey

From finding MacArthur ‘geniuses’ to funding transformative change

John Palfrey is used to thinking about the biggest issues confronting society and what we should all do about them. And in these turbulent times, Palfrey, the president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, has reaffirmed his and the foundation's commitment to supporting democracy, creativity, learning and diversity.“I have a relentlessly positive nature, and I do, for better and for worse, often see what is possible and then have the temerity to think we can go get it,” Palfrey said in an interview with U.S. News & World Report. “I think that form of optimism is very helpful, particularly on the darkest of days.”With $9.2 billion in assets, the MacArthur Foundation is one of the nation’s largest philanthropic organizations. In 2024 alone, the foundation paid out more than $350 million in grants. This year, the foundation announced it would increase its grants for 2025 and 2026 because of the federal government’s cuts to funding – which could be devastating for the arts, environmental protection, public safety and more.Meet America's Best LeadersU.S. News & World Report selected its 2025 Best Leaders in public service, business, healthcare and education.See the Top 25 of '25The foundation makes “Big Bets,” investing in initiatives intended to bring about transformative change. For example, in October, the foundation announced it would participate in Humanity AI, an initiative to help ensure that artificial intelligence is a positive tool for society, funding efforts to safeguard democracy from negative effects of the new technology and to protect artists and other creators from theft of their intellectual property.MacArthur also makes “enduring commitments” to invest in journalism that promotes inclusive news narratives and supports a healthy democracy, and it funds initiatives in Chicago, where it is headquartered, to support racial equity and a more inclusive community.It’s perhaps most famous for the MacArthur Fellowships – referred to as “genius grants” – which award 20 to 30 extraordinary creative people in various fields with $800,000 each over a five-year period.Palfrey, 53, likens the foundation to “sort of a nonprofit venture capital” fund.“We prize creativity and effectiveness. And so we are constantly looking for people and institutions and networks that are creative and have new ideas and different ways of approaching topics,” he says.As an educator and acclaimed legal scholar who previously worked at Harvard University and Phillips Academy, Andover, Palfrey has studied some of the most complex challenges facing a democratic society – such as education’s need to respect both free speech and diversity and the influence of technology on society. He understands the fraught nature of these issues and has written seven books, such as “Safe Spaces, Brave Spaces,” to address them head-on.But Palfrey did not anticipate the recent need to advocate for American democracy itself.“The First Amendment, our freedom of expression, the freedom of the press, the freedom to give, the freedom to invest,” he says. “These are 250-year-old American traditions that are unbroken.” And all of a sudden, he says, “they need advocates in a way that they haven’t before.”In addition to the foundation’s ongoing support of the independent press, Palfrey has spearheaded the creation of Press Forward, a new initiative supported by several foundations to rebuild local news.He’s also been touring the country to speak on the importance of democracy and the First Amendment as well as continuing that dialogue in essays and social media.Watching other institutions, such as universities, agree to substantial changes in policy in light of federal government demands, Palfrey thought of historian Timothy Snyder’s first rule for resisting tyranny: “Do not obey in advance.” So, in April 2025, Palfrey and colleagues at other foundations decided to “unite in advance,” issuing a statement that they must have the freedom to give to the causes they believe in. More than 700 foundations from across the ideological spectrum have since signed on.

‘They’re playing games’: Illinois lawmakers press Trump administration over stalled lead-pipe funding

Congress appropriated $15 billion to replace lead pipes across the country. Is the Trump administration withholding it?

Lead pipes are ubiquitous. At this point, no state has gotten rid of all of its toxic lead service lines, which pipe drinking water to homes and businesses. But some cities like Chicago, New York City, and Detroit, have more lead plumbing than others, and replacing it can cost tens of thousands of dollars. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Biden-era infrastructure law, promised $15 billion for lead pipe replacements across the country to be disbursed over five years.  But in a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency sent earlier this week, a group of Illinois congressional delegates allege that $3 billion appropriated for lead pipe replacements nationwide for the fiscal year that ended in September has not reached communities yet. They warn that the delay is a “dangerous politicization” that puts children and families at risk. “Federal resources are not partisan tools — they are vital lifelines intended to serve all Americans,” the letter notes. “Using federal funds as leverage against communities based on political considerations represents a dangerous abuse of power that undermines public trust and puts lives at risk.”  The move comes as communities in Illinois, which is among the top five states with the most lead service lines, and across the country are grappling with the overwhelming cost of removing the hazardous metal piping from water systems. The Trump administration has already withheld congressionally appropriated funding for infrastructure and energy projects from Democrat-led states like New York, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, and Massachusetts. Now, lawmakers fear money for lead pipes is stuck in Washington too.  “I think that they’re playing games,” said Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, one of the lawmakers who led the effort to send the letter. “It feels like it’s targeting blue states or blue cities that might require more of this mitigation than other parts of the country.”  Lead is toxic and dangerous to human health. Lead plumbing can flake and dissolve into drinking water, which can lead to brain damage, cardiovascular problems, and reproductive issues. The EPA advises that there is no safe level of lead exposure. A spokesperson for the federal agency said it is “actively working” on allotments for lead service line replacements. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for disbursing the federal funds to local governments, did not respond to a request for comment. The Chicago Department of Water Management said it received $14 million from the Illinois EPA for the 2025 financial year and was approved for $28 million for the next fiscal year.   “The estimated replacement cost for the Chicago region alone is $12 billion or more, and statewide, it could be $14 billion,” Krishnamoorthi said. “Whatever amounts would come to Chicago would not be enough to do the entire job, but the federal component is vital to get the ball rolling.” Chicago has more than 412,000 lead service lines, the most of any city in the country. So far, the city has replaced roughly 14,000 lead pipes at a cost of $400 million over the past five years. That’s due in part to the high cost of replacing lead pipes. In Chicago, a single lead pipe replacement can cost on average $35,000. Federal rules require that Chicago replace all its pipes by 2047, but city officials have cited concerns over the unfunded federal mandate.  “This is impacting people’s health,” said Chakena Sims, a senior policy advocate with Natural Resources Defense Council. “The federal government politicizing access to safe drinking water is an all-time low,” she added. “It’s encouraging to see our Illinois congressional leaders stand up for communities.”   This story was originally published by Grist with the headline ‘They’re playing games’: Illinois lawmakers press Trump administration over stalled lead-pipe funding on Nov 13, 2025.

How Can Detroit Repair Past Harms? Reparations Recommendations Are In

Detroit’s Reparations Task Force has submitted its long-anticipated report of recommendations to the City Council for programs to repair harms and compensate Black residents for historically unjust city policies

Detroit’s Reparations Task Force, the first of its kind for the city, submitted its long-anticipated report of recommendations to the City Council.The task force, created through a 2021 voter-approved ballot initiative, recommends programs to repair harms and compensate African American residents for historically unjust city policies. Key proposals include cash payments and housing grants for eligible Detroiters, expanding African-centered education, firing “high-risk” police officers and ending water shutoffs for delinquent bills.Details of the report were shared with BridgeDetroit after it was submitted to the City Council at the end of October. The full document is available online here.The task force recommended three criteria to determine who is eligible to receive compensation through reparations programs: 1. A descendant of an African enslaved in the U.S. or in the diaspora3. A current resident of Detroit who has been a Detroit resident for at least 20 yearsThe task force documented “historical atrocities” inflicted on African American residents since before Detroit’s founding. Recommended policies are the culmination of dozens of meetings and hundreds of hours of discussion.“We have been guided as a Task Force by our understanding that the wealth and imperialist power of the United States may be attributed directly to profits generated by the enslavement of our ancestors – through the slave trade, chattel slavery, peonage, and prison labor,” the report states. “In colonial America and the United States, extraction of Black labor and the violence with which this extraction was conducted, ensured the accumulation of wealth by whites, so that their heirs today continue to enjoy economic security and prosperity.” The final product tackles a broad range of issues and suggests a multitude of new investments. Some changes are within the city’s power, like creating grants, while others require changes in state law, like ending qualified immunity for police. It’s unclear how much reparations programs would cost. The task force recommends finding revenue by creating a downtown entertainment tax, an additional fee on casino revenue and a $5 million fund for neighborhood corridor development. It also suggests clawing back tax breaks from developers that fail to meet benchmarks and creating a new fee on city contracts. A reparations administrative office is recommended to ensure accountability and long-term success. It would be overseen by an independent board of appointed residents and charged with administering reparations payments, establishing programs, tracking outcomes and coordinating public feedback. The task force was charged with suggesting policies, not implementing them. The City Council will decide what to do with the recommendations. Project Manager Evan Daugherty said the task force hopes to hold public discussions on the report but can’t take action without the City Council extending the task force. Their business ended Oct. 31, he said, though the council could ask members to stay on longer to roll out the recommendations to residents. Mayor-elect Mary Sheffield introduced legislation that established the reparations effort. Chief of Staff Brian White said Tuesday that her team is still reviewing the report. Detroit’s task force builds on decades of local advocacy from figures like “Reparations Ray” Jenkins and U.S. Rep. John Conyers Jr., who pushed for federal reparations. The report acknowledges reparations were historically paid to other groups, including Japanese Americans who were interred during World War II, Holocaust victims and even former slave owners. The city’s 2021 ballot initiative established a task force to suggest housing and economic development programs that address historic discrimination. Unlike past efforts, the task force is focused on seeking municipal reparations to repair harms caused by the City of Detroit. “The devastating consequence of Detroit municipal policies over the last 50 years has been the handing over of City governance to corporate control,” the report states. “There has been intensive development of the downtown core — to the neglect of traditional neighborhoods, and the concession of the people’s valuable assets, such as the Water and Sewerage Department and Belle Isle, to suburban and State interests.” The task force laments that city policies “reflect the same racial and political biases that characterized policies of previous eras” despite most city leaders being African Americans. It argues city leaders stood by as thousands of residents lost their homes through illegal overassessment and have not held corporations accountable for delivering benefits negotiated in tax abatement agreements.“Our City leaders have surrendered their authority to the corporate establishment and entities like the Detroit Downtown Development Authority, leaving the welfare of neighborhood communities unattended and underfunded,” the report states. “Now Detroit consists of two cities, one thriving, the other neglected and plundered.” Here’s a summary of recommendations: A reparations office would distribute housing grants worth up to $40,000 in down payment assistance and up to $30,000 for home repairs. The task force recommended building at least 1,000 new housing units for African Americans that are affordable for someone making 50% of the area median income ($35,350). It called for creating rent control policies and renovating vacant properties into shelters for unhoused residents. The task force wants to end the transfer of city-owned land to the Detroit Land Bank Authority and establish a new redevelopment program that prioritizes residents. The task force also wants to stop delinquent water bills from becoming a lien on property and eliminate sewage fees. The report recommends refunding African American property owners who lost homes to tax foreclosure with money from auction sales. It recommends freezing property taxes for residents who were overassessed by the city. The task force recommends providing up to $100,000 in grants for businesses displaced by urban renewal projects. It suggests creating other grants for co-ops, start-ups, grocery stores and community-based businesses. It recommends building 10 new commercial strip malls that provide five years of rent-free space for African American–owned businesses. Commercial areas should be designated as tax increment financing zones, according to the task force, allowing tax revenues to be reinvested within the zone. City contracts should give more preference to African American-owned businesses, according to the report. Recommendations call for free post-secondary training for skilled trades careers and online financial literacy courses. The report also calls for giving city-owned land to local farmers to support community food networks. Policing and law enforcement The task force proposed recommendations to address ongoing issues with police misconduct. It includes paying restitution to people injured or killed by police, ending qualified immunity, and firing “high risk” officers identified by the Detroit Police Department and officers who shoot unarmed citizens. The task force recommends hiring more Black residents at DPD and in local courts to better reflect the city’s racial demographics. It calls for adding staff to process citizen complaints against police officers and create a permanent archive for police body camera footage. The report calls for dissolving a DPD command center that monitors school campuses across the city. It also seeks to dismantle the “One Detroit” violent crime initiative, a partnership between local law enforcement and federal agencies like the DEA, AFT and FBI. The task force argued the partnership “represses citizens in an overlay of multiple surveillance and policing operations,” while city leaders credit it for decreasing violent crime. Funding should be increased for community violence intervention, DPD’s mental health co-response unit and other restorative justice programs, according to the report. Unaffordable water bills have caused residents to live in unsanitary conditions and lose their homes, according to the report. The task force calls for a moratorium on residential water shutoffs and a new affordability program that doesn’t charge residents more than 3% of their household income. The task force calls for renegotiating a $50 million annual lease with the Great Lakes Water Authority and the terms of its service agreement to create a more equitable cost-sharing scheme. The report highlights how Detroit pays 83% of sewerage system costs, while suburban residents pay 17%.Decades of disinvestment, state-imposed emergency management and racially biased funding formulas left the Detroit Public Schools Community District unable to meet the needs of its predominantly African American student population, according to the task force. Reparations school grants are recommended to fund STEM fellowships, free high-speed internet for students and other academic, athletic and mental health programs. The task force also suggested finding new uses for shuttered school buildings. The report recommends lobbying the state Legislature for funding to reduce class sizes, upgrade school infrastructure, hire more African American teachers and introduce educators to African-centered education. The task force aims to rebuild the foundations of health, environment and food access in neighborhoods.The report sets a goal for creating 100 acres of community-controlled agricultural land by 2035. It recommends creating a food sovereignty fund to support Black-owned grocers, co-ops, kitchens and food markets. The task force suggests dedicating vacant city land as food distribution centers and offering funding to grocers that open in food deserts. The task force recommends creating “environmental reparations zones” in polluted census tracts to coordinate environmental monitoring and clean up. Detroit’s high rate of asthma hospitalization and toxic air quality poses a major threat to the wellbeing of residents, according to the report. The task force hopes to cut emergency room visits due to asthma in half within a decade. Possible solutions include in-home air filters, ongoing air quality monitoring and creating buffer zones between homes and industrial facilities. The task force recommends creating an Office of African American Cultural Programs to support the arts. This includes historic preservation projects, grants for galleries and studios, plus efforts to rename public sites in honor of significant African American leaders. This story was originally published by BridgeDetroit and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.