Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Is your city the next ‘Cop City?’ How police are transforming neighborhoods and poisoning our planet

News Feed
Tuesday, June 4, 2024

As climate catastrophe worsens in the US, a disturbing policy trend ensues: expanding prisons and police projects that directly harm the environment and the very communities they claim to serve.Atlanta serves as a prime example, where plans for the controversial “Cop City” training facility involve destroying a crucial watershed – a pattern shadowing lawmakers from New York City to Texas and across the country.Atlanta’s proposed police training complex, dubbed “Cop City” by opponents, means clearing 381 acres of the Weelaunee Forest, a vital watershed for primarily Black neighborhoods. The decision, made in the wake of 2020′s Black Lives Matter protests, has left residents further prone to climate catastrophe.“Forests keep us safe because they soak up heavy rainfall, protecting us from floods,” said Mariah Parker, former Athens-Clarke County commissioner. “Cop city isn’t even built but the destruction of the forest and its replacement with impervious concrete is already putting people in danger.”In this aerial view, a structure sits on land owned by the city of Atlanta, Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in unincorporated DeKalb County. The Atlanta City Council has approved plans to lease the land to the Atlanta Police Foundation so it can build a state-of-the-art police and firefighter training center, a project that protesters derisively call “Cop City.” (AP Photo/Danny Karnik)APRecent extreme flooding, which Parker and other organizers link deforestation for Cop City, have cast a grim foreshadow. Like the rest of the country, Atlanta faces increasingly hotter years. The removal of the Weelaunee Forest further jeopardizes the Black residents already abandoned by the green energy movement due to redlining.As the deadly effects of climate change continue to sweep across the United States, millions of tax dollars are being poured into building new prisons and police facilities, leaving constituents, especially those of color, vulnerable to environmental catastrophe.A national trend: Prisons vs. the environmentThe pattern of pro-police agendas supersede environmental health and community safety, advocates say.This year, Texas Prison Community Advocates (TPCA) have filed a formal complaint that amends a 2023 lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The document alleges that temperatures inside cells can have reached as high as 149 degrees Fahrenheit, where prisoners are “cooking to death.” Professor Michele Deitch at the University of Texas Prison and Jail Innovation Lab, warns that such conditions will only worsen with climate change.Alongside noting antiquated piping in prisons, which often lead to water pollution, Deitch noted that several are built on flood plains, those prone to natural disasters.“Many prisons are built near toxic sites,” said Deitch. “It’s not unique to Texas, but they’re built near places where there’s chemical exposures and other kinds of toxins.”Toxic soils threaten New York City’s Chinatown, where the city has approved a 40-story mega jail, part of a borough-based jail to close the notorious Rikers’ Island. Of the five boroughs, Staten Island, majority white and Republican, will not receive a new jail. Soil samples revealed unsafe concentrations of chemicals like benzo anthracene and chrysene, which the CDC said are potentially linked to cancers.Matrix New World Engineering Land Surveying Report, July 2019, on behalf of the New York City Office of Management and Budget and New York City Department of Corrections, page 29New York City Office of Management and Budget[source: Matrix New World Engineering Land Surveying Report, July 2019, on behalf of the New York City Office of Management and Budget and New York City Department of Corrections, page 29]Chinatown advocates like Jan Lee, member of Neighbors United Below Canal, have alleged with documentation that Gramercy Group, the company contracted by the city, failed to adhere to environmental safety procedures and self-report these and worker injuries, as they are compelled to do so by city ordinance. This has caused buildings like the Chung Pak senior center to crack, threatening the lives of all the low-income elderly residents. Lee also predicts that many buildings will also lean towards destabilized areas.Lee and others have demanded that the city pay for an independent monitor of Gramercy Group as well as requested environmental reports without success. New York City’s mayor, former police officer Eric Adams, ran during election season on a platform to deny the building of the jail. After winning the race, he reneged on his promise. He has even nearly doubled the jail budget to $16B, but cut funding for and thus ended the thirty-year community composting program.“Every day that went by for the last five years, this project has increased by four million dollars,” said Lee.The cost of choosing policing over peoplePolice and prisons have resulted in not just a climate toll, but also a human cost.“[The Texas Department of Criminal Justice or TDCJ policy states] that incarcerated individuals can have water whenever they choose to have water and that is not the case,” said Amite Dominick, President of TPCA. “Just because it’s policy doesn’t mean it’s procedure.” In 2023, Texas prisons raised the price of bottled water by 50% from $4.80 to $7.20 per pack. Most incarcerated Texans earn zero dollars for their labor.Without access to air conditioning or water, Texas imprisoned people were described as literally cooking and have resorted to flooding toilets, laying in the unsanitary water or dunking their clothes in it in order to cool off. The impact on mental health is devastating.“One recent study found that days with unsafe heat index levels raised daily violent interactions by 20%,” said Deitch. “Suicide rates go up in the summer.”Atlanta climate advocates also experienced extreme treatment, including the city council’s dismissal of a petition that bolster approximately 116,000 signatures, racketeering and terror charges. Demands have been made for a formal inquiry into the death of Weelaunee Forest advocate Tortuguita, whose legal name is Manuel Paez Terán and who was killed by over 50 bullets after interacting with Georgia state patrol. Police were not wearing body cameras.Facilities like Cop City are now being planned, have been approved, or are already operating in all 50 states except for Wyoming, Vermont, and North Dakota. New York City’s mayor recently announced a cop city for the Queens borough to launch in 2030, and has projected that it will cost at least $225M.Police forces, many collaborating across state lines, have also been deployed against climate activists. Tarah Stangler, an autonomous street medic based in Madison, WI, was one of six hundred arrested during the 2021 Line 3 protests by the Northern Lights Task Force, a police coalition of over sixteen counties that received $750,000 from Canadian oil company Enbridge to secure the pipeline. The oil industry, one of the greatest contributors to the climate crisis, has fueled the prison system, and its predecessor enslavement, in some cases like Louisiana as far back as 1901. Chevron sent a prosecuting climate lawyer to jail after paying $18 billion in damages to Indigenous Ecuador Amazonians. The Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, with Canadian tax dollars, holds $5.9 million of stock with private prisons Geo Group and Core Civic and invested $186 million in ExxonMobil. Stangler witnessed brutality, experienced pepper spray, even was battered by low-flying helicopters.“[Police] are protecting property over people and focusing on us stopping them rather than stopping the climate catastrophe,” said Stangler. “This is very clear what y’all are here for, and it’s not for us.”Indigenous-led solutions offer a path to decarceration and climate justiceStangler aligned with Indigenous leadership and political thought to solve the linked crises. Indigenous people are held in state and federal prisons at double the national rate and four times that of white people. The incarceration rate between 2000 and 2019 increased by 89%. Across all demographics, 62% returned to prison between 2016-2019.Alaskan Native leader Talia Eames, Recovery Manager at The Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, proposed in 2020 recovery facilities built to resemble traditional multi-generational and multi-family long houses for recently released people to assist in their re-entry into the community. Indigenous legal collectives like the Tribal Defense Office of the Salish and Kootenai Tribes collaborated with the Bronx Defender to adapt their holistic defense as a legal practice.“Providing supportive housing and resources is actually a move for public safety,” Eames to the Juneau Empire in July 2020. “It’s the only way to impact recidivism.”Alongside Native and preventative solutions, Lee in New York City’s Chinatown has called for adaptive reuse instead of the mega jail.“It’s a much more green answer because we are not literally taking two enormous steel-reinforced gigantic jails and putting them into landfills,” said Lee. Although the procedure will most likely save the city billions of dollars and reduce its impact on the climate, the city rejected Lee’s idea.Both Lee and Dominick call for independent monitors in their respective situations. Dominick went even further, believing that the true resolution should come in stages, including setting a legal standard for water, AC units, ensuring that incarcerated people become a protected class, federal standards, until ultimately reducing the number of prisons.“We have too many prisons,” said Dominick. “We need to look at alternatives.”A joint report from the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs and Ella Baker Center for Human Rights corroborated Dominick’s assessment, especially the prisons most susceptible to climate change. It notes that people in prisons, especially the elderly and/or with disability, are most susceptible to the climate crisis because of a failure in policy to protect them or create emergency plans during fires, flooding, or other climate emergencies. The revenue saved, in California State’s context $106,000 per year per person, could then be used to fund climate solutions.Activists now face the greatest challenge: convincing elected officials to fund climate solutions and not the climate crisis like prisons and cop cities. Whether through the democratic process or direct democracy, disconnecting money between prisons and environmental catastrophe seems the paramount solution.Winona LaDuke, a Native American climate protector who was also arrested at the Line 3 protests, provides in her book Recovering The Sacred a solution already happening in some Native communities: a shift away from the oil industry and into democratizing the sacred power of wind energy as a means of reclaiming economic power. Such defunding of the oil industry might also catalyze the decline of investment in prisons.“The power of transformation is growing stronger these days,” she writes in the book. “Native American communities are creating momentum for change [...] providing solutions that all of us will need in order to survive the next millennium.”Rohan Zhou-Lee (They/Siya/祂(Tā)/Elle) is a queer/nonbinary Black Asian dancer, writer, and organizer. A 2023 Open City Fellow at the Asian American Writers’ Workshop, they have written for Newsweek, Prism Reports, NextShark, and more. Siya is also the founder of the award-winning Blasian March, a Black-Asian-Blasian grassroots solidarity organization, and for their work has been featured on CNN, NBC Chicago, USA Today, WNYC, and more. Zhou-Lee has spoken on organizing, human rights, and other subjects at New York University, The University of Tokyo, the 2022 Unite and Enough Festivals in Zürich, Switzerland, Harvard University, and more. www.diaryofafirebird.com

Facilities like Cop City are now being planned, have been approved, or are already operating in all 50 states except for Wyoming, Vermont, and North Dakota.

As climate catastrophe worsens in the US, a disturbing policy trend ensues: expanding prisons and police projects that directly harm the environment and the very communities they claim to serve.

Atlanta serves as a prime example, where plans for the controversial “Cop City” training facility involve destroying a crucial watershed – a pattern shadowing lawmakers from New York City to Texas and across the country.

Atlanta’s proposed police training complex, dubbed “Cop City” by opponents, means clearing 381 acres of the Weelaunee Forest, a vital watershed for primarily Black neighborhoods. The decision, made in the wake of 2020′s Black Lives Matter protests, has left residents further prone to climate catastrophe.

“Forests keep us safe because they soak up heavy rainfall, protecting us from floods,” said Mariah Parker, former Athens-Clarke County commissioner. “Cop city isn’t even built but the destruction of the forest and its replacement with impervious concrete is already putting people in danger.”

Trooper Shot Atlanta Activist Death

In this aerial view, a structure sits on land owned by the city of Atlanta, Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in unincorporated DeKalb County. The Atlanta City Council has approved plans to lease the land to the Atlanta Police Foundation so it can build a state-of-the-art police and firefighter training center, a project that protesters derisively call “Cop City.” (AP Photo/Danny Karnik)AP

Recent extreme flooding, which Parker and other organizers link deforestation for Cop City, have cast a grim foreshadow. Like the rest of the country, Atlanta faces increasingly hotter years. The removal of the Weelaunee Forest further jeopardizes the Black residents already abandoned by the green energy movement due to redlining.

As the deadly effects of climate change continue to sweep across the United States, millions of tax dollars are being poured into building new prisons and police facilities, leaving constituents, especially those of color, vulnerable to environmental catastrophe.

A national trend: Prisons vs. the environment

The pattern of pro-police agendas supersede environmental health and community safety, advocates say.

This year, Texas Prison Community Advocates (TPCA) have filed a formal complaint that amends a 2023 lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The document alleges that temperatures inside cells can have reached as high as 149 degrees Fahrenheit, where prisoners are “cooking to death.” Professor Michele Deitch at the University of Texas Prison and Jail Innovation Lab, warns that such conditions will only worsen with climate change.

Alongside noting antiquated piping in prisons, which often lead to water pollution, Deitch noted that several are built on flood plains, those prone to natural disasters.

“Many prisons are built near toxic sites,” said Deitch. “It’s not unique to Texas, but they’re built near places where there’s chemical exposures and other kinds of toxins.”

Toxic soils threaten New York City’s Chinatown, where the city has approved a 40-story mega jail, part of a borough-based jail to close the notorious Rikers’ Island. Of the five boroughs, Staten Island, majority white and Republican, will not receive a new jail. Soil samples revealed unsafe concentrations of chemicals like benzo anthracene and chrysene, which the CDC said are potentially linked to cancers.

Cop City vs everyone

Matrix New World Engineering Land Surveying Report, July 2019, on behalf of the New York City Office of Management and Budget and New York City Department of Corrections, page 29New York City Office of Management and Budget

[source: Matrix New World Engineering Land Surveying Report, July 2019, on behalf of the New York City Office of Management and Budget and New York City Department of Corrections, page 29]

Chinatown advocates like Jan Lee, member of Neighbors United Below Canal, have alleged with documentation that Gramercy Group, the company contracted by the city, failed to adhere to environmental safety procedures and self-report these and worker injuries, as they are compelled to do so by city ordinance. This has caused buildings like the Chung Pak senior center to crack, threatening the lives of all the low-income elderly residents. Lee also predicts that many buildings will also lean towards destabilized areas.

Lee and others have demanded that the city pay for an independent monitor of Gramercy Group as well as requested environmental reports without success. New York City’s mayor, former police officer Eric Adams, ran during election season on a platform to deny the building of the jail. After winning the race, he reneged on his promise. He has even nearly doubled the jail budget to $16B, but cut funding for and thus ended the thirty-year community composting program.

“Every day that went by for the last five years, this project has increased by four million dollars,” said Lee.

The cost of choosing policing over people

Police and prisons have resulted in not just a climate toll, but also a human cost.

“[The Texas Department of Criminal Justice or TDCJ policy states] that incarcerated individuals can have water whenever they choose to have water and that is not the case,” said Amite Dominick, President of TPCA. “Just because it’s policy doesn’t mean it’s procedure.” In 2023, Texas prisons raised the price of bottled water by 50% from $4.80 to $7.20 per pack. Most incarcerated Texans earn zero dollars for their labor.

Without access to air conditioning or water, Texas imprisoned people were described as literally cooking and have resorted to flooding toilets, laying in the unsanitary water or dunking their clothes in it in order to cool off. The impact on mental health is devastating.

One recent study found that days with unsafe heat index levels raised daily violent interactions by 20%,” said Deitch. “Suicide rates go up in the summer.”

Atlanta climate advocates also experienced extreme treatment, including the city council’s dismissal of a petition that bolster approximately 116,000 signatures, racketeering and terror charges. Demands have been made for a formal inquiry into the death of Weelaunee Forest advocate Tortuguita, whose legal name is Manuel Paez Terán and who was killed by over 50 bullets after interacting with Georgia state patrol. Police were not wearing body cameras.

Facilities like Cop City are now being planned, have been approved, or are already operating in all 50 states except for Wyoming, Vermont, and North Dakota. New York City’s mayor recently announced a cop city for the Queens borough to launch in 2030, and has projected that it will cost at least $225M.

Police forces, many collaborating across state lines, have also been deployed against climate activists. Tarah Stangler, an autonomous street medic based in Madison, WI, was one of six hundred arrested during the 2021 Line 3 protests by the Northern Lights Task Force, a police coalition of over sixteen counties that received $750,000 from Canadian oil company Enbridge to secure the pipeline. The oil industry, one of the greatest contributors to the climate crisis, has fueled the prison system, and its predecessor enslavement, in some cases like Louisiana as far back as 1901. Chevron sent a prosecuting climate lawyer to jail after paying $18 billion in damages to Indigenous Ecuador Amazonians. The Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, with Canadian tax dollars, holds $5.9 million of stock with private prisons Geo Group and Core Civic and invested $186 million in ExxonMobil. Stangler witnessed brutality, experienced pepper spray, even was battered by low-flying helicopters.

“[Police] are protecting property over people and focusing on us stopping them rather than stopping the climate catastrophe,” said Stangler. “This is very clear what y’all are here for, and it’s not for us.”

Indigenous-led solutions offer a path to decarceration and climate justice

Stangler aligned with Indigenous leadership and political thought to solve the linked crises. Indigenous people are held in state and federal prisons at double the national rate and four times that of white people. The incarceration rate between 2000 and 2019 increased by 89%. Across all demographics, 62% returned to prison between 2016-2019.

Alaskan Native leader Talia Eames, Recovery Manager at The Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, proposed in 2020 recovery facilities built to resemble traditional multi-generational and multi-family long houses for recently released people to assist in their re-entry into the community. Indigenous legal collectives like the Tribal Defense Office of the Salish and Kootenai Tribes collaborated with the Bronx Defender to adapt their holistic defense as a legal practice.

“Providing supportive housing and resources is actually a move for public safety,” Eames to the Juneau Empire in July 2020. “It’s the only way to impact recidivism.”

Alongside Native and preventative solutions, Lee in New York City’s Chinatown has called for adaptive reuse instead of the mega jail.

“It’s a much more green answer because we are not literally taking two enormous steel-reinforced gigantic jails and putting them into landfills,” said Lee. Although the procedure will most likely save the city billions of dollars and reduce its impact on the climate, the city rejected Lee’s idea.

Both Lee and Dominick call for independent monitors in their respective situations. Dominick went even further, believing that the true resolution should come in stages, including setting a legal standard for water, AC units, ensuring that incarcerated people become a protected class, federal standards, until ultimately reducing the number of prisons.

“We have too many prisons,” said Dominick. “We need to look at alternatives.”

A joint report from the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs and Ella Baker Center for Human Rights corroborated Dominick’s assessment, especially the prisons most susceptible to climate change. It notes that people in prisons, especially the elderly and/or with disability, are most susceptible to the climate crisis because of a failure in policy to protect them or create emergency plans during fires, flooding, or other climate emergencies. The revenue saved, in California State’s context $106,000 per year per person, could then be used to fund climate solutions.

Activists now face the greatest challenge: convincing elected officials to fund climate solutions and not the climate crisis like prisons and cop cities. Whether through the democratic process or direct democracy, disconnecting money between prisons and environmental catastrophe seems the paramount solution.

Winona LaDuke, a Native American climate protector who was also arrested at the Line 3 protests, provides in her book Recovering The Sacred a solution already happening in some Native communities: a shift away from the oil industry and into democratizing the sacred power of wind energy as a means of reclaiming economic power. Such defunding of the oil industry might also catalyze the decline of investment in prisons.

“The power of transformation is growing stronger these days,” she writes in the book. “Native American communities are creating momentum for change [...] providing solutions that all of us will need in order to survive the next millennium.”

Rohan Zhou-Lee (They/Siya/祂(Tā)/Elle) is a queer/nonbinary Black Asian dancer, writer, and organizer. A 2023 Open City Fellow at the Asian American Writers’ Workshop, they have written for Newsweek, Prism Reports, NextShark, and more. Siya is also the founder of the award-winning Blasian March, a Black-Asian-Blasian grassroots solidarity organization, and for their work has been featured on CNNNBC ChicagoUSA TodayWNYC, and more. Zhou-Lee has spoken on organizing, human rights, and other subjects at New York University, The University of Tokyo, the 2022 Unite and Enough Festivals in Zürich, Switzerland, Harvard University, and more. www.diaryofafirebird.com

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

A Flotilla Kicks off the People's Summit for Activists at UN Climate Talks

As United Nation climate talks get underway in Belem, a different kind of conference is kicking off: the People’s Summit, a gathering of activists, organizers, environmentalists and Indigenous groups from around the world

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — As United Nations climate talks rolled on Wednesday at the elaborate new venues built for the summit, many of the activists eager to shape the talks took to the water.Carried by scores of boats large and small, a vast group whooped and laughed, smiled and wept. Some splashed canoe paddles through the bay where a northern section of the Amazon rainforest meets the Atlantic Ocean. Others hugged old friends. They pressed their foreheads together or held hands or stood solemnly in moments of prayer and reflection.They were there to celebrate a community from around the world at a gathering of activists, organizers, environmentalists and Indigenous groups, outside the halls where world leaders are discussing climate change for the next two weeks. Their joy came after a brief but tense moment the night before when protesters broke through security barricades at the main conference venue, slightly injuring two security guards, according to the U.N.Many emphasized the importance of making the voice of the people heard after years of these talks being held in countries where civil society is not free to demonstrate.“The Amazon for us is the space of life,” said Jhajayra Machoa, an A'l Kofan First Nation of Ecuador member of A Wisdom Keepers Delegation, who helped paddle one of the canoes. “We carry the feeling and emotions of everything lived in this place, and what we want is to remember. Remember where we are from and where we’re going and what we want." Pressing world leaders to keep those who suffer most in mind The people who are attending the Conference of the Parties, or COP30, have a wide range of hopes for the outcome. This year is different than in past years, because leaders aren't expected to sign one big agreement at the end of it; instead, organizers and analysts have said it's about getting specifics to execute on past promises to act on climate change. “When we’re bridging what’s happening in the mind, when we talk about policy, we need to bridge to the heart, and touch our spirit when we do the work,” said Whaia, another member of A Wisdom Keepers Delegation, a Ngāti Kahungunu woman from New Zealand. “It takes both arms, both branches of the tree to really be strong, to be able to find our resilience in this space.” Activists welcome greater freedom to speak out The ability to express thoughts and feelings freely is a welcome respite for many arriving in Brazil after several years of these talks being held in countries where governments imposed limitations on free speech and demonstrations. The evolution that needs to happen for the world to take action is "not in the halls of the U.N. COP, but it’s in the streets and it is with our people,” said Jacob Johns, an Akimel O'Otham and Hopi member of A Wisdom Keepers Delegation who witnessed the security breach. Now is the time to come together, respect each other and reevaluate the systems that govern the planet, said Pooven Moodley of the Earthrise Collective, which brings together activists from different traditions. For him, the canoes seen in Wednesday's gathering are a metaphor for the situation the world is in with climate change.“The current canoe we’re in is falling apart, it’s leaking, people are being pushed over, and ultimately we’re heading for a massive waterfall. So the question is, what do we do, because we’re in that reality,” Moodley said. “We have to continue to defend the territories and the ecosystems that we can, but while we do that, we launch a new canoe.”The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

China made quiet border advances as ties warmed, Indian critics warn

Buffer zones meant to ease India-China tensions along their shared border have disproportionately restricted Indian forces from patrolling, former officials say.

NEW DELHI — In 2020, after Indian and Chinese soldiers brawled with stones and spiked rods in the thin Himalayan air along their countries’ contested border, nationalist fury gripped India.People smashed Chinese televisions and torched effigies of Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The Indian government banned dozens of Chinese apps and vowed it would not mend ties with its geopolitical rival until border issues were resolved.Five years later, India-China commerce has revived and direct flights between the countries have resumed. At a recent summit in Tianjin, China, Xi met his Indian counterpart, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and the leaders pledged to strengthen relations, with the Indian side touting “the maintenance of peace and tranquility along the border areas.”In New Delhi, however, and along the steep mountain passes that divide the countries, a chorus of critics contend that agreed-upon buffer zones meant to ease tensions have, in practice, disproportionately restricted Indian forces from patrolling in areas they once routinely accessed. With India’s quiet acquiescence, they allege, China has been able to effectively push the boundary lines in its favor.“Some of the buffer zones created are mostly in areas previously patrolled by us and on our side,” said a retired lieutenant general who has overseen these parts of the border. “We are supposed to try and get back our territory, but in the foreseeable future, it is a pipe dream,” he added, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic.Warnings about the shifting boundary lines — from former military officials and ambassadors, as well as sitting members of Parliament and border residents — have grown louder and more frequent. The claims are difficult to prove, since foreign journalists are denied access to the area. But the criticisms present a challenge to the Indian government, analysts said, as it mends ties with Beijing and seeks to rebalance its global relations amid an ongoing diplomatic feud with the United States.The Indian army referred questions from The Washington Post to the External Affairs Ministry, which did not respond to requests for comment. The Indian Defense Ministry, the Chinese Defense Ministry, and the Chinese Foreign Ministry did not respond to requests for comment. Chinese officials have urged India not to let the boundary question “define” the relationship.The Chinese strategy is “two steps forward, one step back,” said Jabin Jacob, an associate professor who teaches Chinese foreign policy at India’s Shiv Nadar University. “Then they still have one step in their possession.”A frozen boundaryIndia and China went to war over the border in 1962. More than half a century later, it remains undefined and bitterly disputed.The nuclear-armed neighbors still have drastically different interpretations of the de facto boundary — known as the Line of Actual Control, or LAC — and the soldiers deployed there have periodically come to blows.The most recent confrontation came in June 2020, in the border territory of Ladakh. At least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers were killed in the fighting, according to official counts. Tens of thousands of troops were rushed to forward positions, and, even after subsequent pullbacks, both sides have maintained a heightened military presence.Since the conflict, the two sides have struck a series of agreements to prevent flare-ups in the most contentious areas. The new protocols allowed some patrolling to resume, but also gave Chinese troops more favorable positions in several key spots, according to former officials, analysts and local leaders.“Around 450 square kilometers of land was converted into a buffer in my constituency alone,” Konchok Stanzin, an official in Chushul, one of the last villages on India’s eastern border, told The Post. “This land belonged to India but now our soldiers cannot set foot there.”As Indian forces have acceded to the new protocols, they have blocked pastoralists from grazing animals in areas where they once roamed freely. That has stirred anger in Ladakh, a restive Indian territory where locals have campaigned for greater political rights and environmental protections. Four people were killed in late September when police in the regional capital of Leh opened fire on people protesting for statehood, according to Human Rights Watch, and a political office belonging to Modi’s party was torched.In the aftermath, prominent environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk was arrested by Indian authorities under a national security law for allegedly inciting the violence, a claim he denies. Some of his supporters believe he was targeted, in part, for being outspoken about the loss of pasturelands and Chinese encroachment along the border.“It was not sitting well with government narratives that China is not taking our land,” said his wife, Gitanjali J. Angmo. “What Sonam has been fearing for a long time is that we can’t afford as a border state not to address the demands of the Ladakhis who have so far shown India love and passion.”Increasingly, the warnings from border communities are being echoed within the Indian establishment. A 2022 report by a senior police official in Ladakh said Indian forces no longer had a “presence” at 26 of 65 former patrolling points, highlighting what she called her country’s “play safe” strategy.“The Chinese absolutely have come in and established a position that is more advantageous to them than before,” said Ajai Shukla, a defense analyst and former military official, drawing on conversations with contacts on the ground. “The only question is, how much have we lost?”J.S. Bajwa, a former Indian lieutenant general, said “it is not just salami slicing,” referring to previous Chinese tactics that gradually changed the facts on the ground. “They actually took the whole belly of the pork,” he said.Strategic ‘opacity’The Indian government has been careful and sparing in its descriptions of the situation along the border.Last October, the government said it had reached an agreement with China to restore patrolling rights in two key areas, Depsang and Demchok, and that troops on both sides had pulled back slightly along all friction points. In December, however, Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar told Parliament that agreements in areas outside of Depsang and Demchok were “temporary and limited.”The MEA then said there had been a “resolution of the issues that emerged in 2020.” But when pressed by reporters and members of Parliament, Jaishankar and his colleagues have avoided stating categorically that patrolling rights have been restored at all friction points. Responding to similar border questions under the country’s right of information laws, the government has repeatedly called them “vague” and “speculative” and, therefore, not answerable.“The opacity is a way of dealing with the problem,” said Ashok Kanta, the Indian ambassador to China from 2014 to 2016. “If you don’t put it out in the public domain, then you don’t need to defend it publicly.”Some former military officials say Chinese troops have also lost access to previous patrolling points, while others reject the notion that India has surrendered any ground.“In all places, the Chinese have gone back to the original points they were at,” said Manoj Mukund Naravane, the army’s chief general during the 2020 conflict.A pragmatic truceIn late August, amid deteriorating U.S-India relations, Modi visited China for the first time since the clash in Ladakh. Videos of the countries’ two leaders engaging in a lighthearted exchange with Russian President Vladimir Putin rapidly went viral.India and China have since agreed to allow exchanges of scholars and journalists, cooperate on transboundary rivers, resume direct flights and reopen Indian access to a pilgrimage in Tibet. India has termed it a “gradual normalization of bilateral relations.”Rakesh Sharma, a former lieutenant general who served on the border from 2013 to 2015, said these are “logical” moves, mirroring China’s own increasingly relaxed posture. Some former officials argue that Jaishankar’s description of border measures as “temporary” signals India’s expectation that the issues will be addressed in future talks.“From the Indian side, the story is not over, but you have to live with Beijing next door, so you have to find some sort of an equilibrium,” said Manoj Kewalramani, a China studies fellow at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore.“The danger,” Jacob warned, “is that this becomes permanent out of sheer inertia until the next crisis.”For now, analysts said, India has more pressing problems, like steep U.S. tariffs and sluggish manufacturing growth — and it needs Chinese investment.“We essentially cannot do without China,” said Manoj Joshi, distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation.The hard reality, said Daniel Markey, a senior Stimson Center fellow focused on South Asia and China relations, is that “India does not have an easy, cheap, or effective solution to the broader threat posed by China militarily.”And it is that recognition, according to former Indian brigadier Deepak Sinha, driving the country’s current approach. “We remain intimidated and terrified of a conflict with China escalating,” he said. “It’s a fact of life.”Christian Shepherd in Singapore, Shams Irfan in Srinagar, Indian-administered Kashmir, and Supriya Kumar contributed to this report.

Jailed climate activist facing deportation from UK fights ‘crazy double punishment’

Marcus Decker is supported by climate experts, religious leaders and celebrities as he fights being first person in UK to be ‘deported for peaceful protest’A climate activist who is appealing against his deportation after serving one of the longest prison sentences in modern British history for peaceful protest has criticised his “crazy double punishment”.Marcus Decker was jailed for two years and seven months for a protest in which he climbed the Queen Elizabeth Bridge over the Dartford Crossing and unveiled a Just Stop Oil banner in October 2022. Continue reading...

A climate activist who is appealing against his deportation after serving one of the longest prison sentences in modern British history for peaceful protest has criticised his “crazy double punishment”.Marcus Decker was jailed for two years and seven months for a protest in which he climbed the Queen Elizabeth Bridge over the Dartford Crossing and unveiled a Just Stop Oil banner in October 2022.The 36-year-old German national, who was released from prison in February last year after serving 16 months, was sent a letter by the Home Office while in prison informing him of his automatic deportation. In his legal challenge, being heard at a tribunal in central London on Monday, Decker has the support of climate experts, religious leaders, celebrities and members of the public.“I would be the first person in this country to be deported for peaceful protest,” he said. “It’s such a crazy double punishment. I have my established life here with my partner, Holly, and the kids [he is stepfather to her two children], we’ve been living together for many years.“We’re in the middle of a multi[faceted] crisis. There’s an inequality crisis, the situation for immigrants has been getting so much worse since Labour has come in, and the climate crisis is getting worse by the day, which, of course, was the reason I took this action in the first place.“It sort of makes sense to be in this situation where I can communicate the values around care that made us take this action in the first place and that need to carry on in this society.”Decker, a teacher and musician, was released from prison in February 2024 after having served 16 months but still has an ankle tag, must report to the Home Office every other week and cannot leave the country. Because he began the appeal against deportation while in prison he served longer than his fellow protester, Morgan Trowland, despite Trowland having been given a longer three-year jail term.“I’m very sorry for those that were impacted by the harm that we caused directly on the day or on the two days,” said Decker. “The people that missed funerals or missed hospital appointments, who were stuck in traffic, that is real harm. But then at the same time whole countries are either on fire, or a third of Pakistan was underwater that year in 2022, London had for the first time experienced 40C heat. If you put it in the greater perspective, zoom out, then we have to keep trying different approaches to addressing these crises, to make change for the greater good.”Decker lauded the “incredible” support he has had in his fight against deportation, which has included a 10-page letter sent to the UK government by the UN special rapporteur on environmental defenders, Michel Forst, a letter signed by 22 Nobel prize laureates and support from 562 actors, musicians and other artists. Much of it is being presented in evidence at his appeal.Lord Hain, the former cabinet minister who was a leader of the anti-apartheid movement during the 1970s and 1980s, said: “It is difficult to see how the further step of deportation can be justified. That seems to me to cross a line and become unnecessarily punitive.”The former chief scientific adviser to the UK government, Sir David King, described the action by Decker and Trowland as a “reasonable and proportionate response in light of the escalating climate crisis”, while the actor Juliet Stevenson said Decker was a father figure to Holly Cullen-Davies’s children, and that his removal “would do them untold harm and cause unnecessary anguish and abandonment”.The former archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, said: “Deportation will reinforce the growing perception that environmental activism at the moment attracts excessively punitive sentencing and assimilates activists to terrorists.”The tribunal’s decision is expected at a later date. The Home Office has been approached for comment.

California’s pro-housing laws have failed to raise new home numbers

New housing starts were around 100,000 a year when Newsom took office in 2019; they still hover around that number today.

California YIMBY, an organization founded eight years ago to promote housing construction in response to an ever-increasing gap between demand and supply, held a victory party in San Francisco recently. “Welcome to the most victorious of California YIMBY’s victory parties,” Brian Hanlon, founder and CEO of the organization, told attendees. Its acronym (Yes In My Backyard) symbolizes its years-long battle with NIMBYs (Not in My Backyard), people and groups who have long thwarted housing projects by pressuring local governments that control land use. YIMBY’s party marked the passage of several pro-housing legislative measures this year, two of which have long been sought by housing advocates. Assembly Bill 130 exempts many urban housing projects from the California Environmental Quality Act, while Senate Bill 79 makes it easier to building high-density housing near transit stations in large cities. “2025 was a year,” Hanlon gleefully declared. The celebratory atmosphere was understandable because this year’s legislative actions capped a half-decade of ever-mounting state government activism on housing that followed Gov. Gavin Newsom’s 2017 campaign pledge to build 3.5 million new units of housing if elected. That goal was wildly unrealistic, as Newsom should have known, but he did push hard for legislation to remove barriers to housing development. His housing agency also ramped up pressure on local governments to remove arbitrary hurdles that YIMBY-influenced officials had erected and to meet quotas for identifying land that could be used for housing. However, the celebration omitted one salient factor: Pro-housing legislative and administrative actions have failed to markedly increase housing production. New housing starts were around 100,000 a year when Newsom took office in 2019, and they are about that number today, with the net increase even lower. As the Housing and Community Development Department admits in its statewide housing plan, “Not enough housing being built: During the last ten years, housing production averaged fewer than 80,000 new homes each year, and ongoing production continues to fall far below the projected need of 180,000 additional homes annually.” The Census Bureau calculates that since Newsom took office, new housing permits in California ranged from a high of 120,780 units in 2022 to a low of 101,546 last year. Newsom’s own budget agrees with the Census Bureau’s data for the same period and projects future construction through 2028 at 100,000 to 104,000 units a year. Those are the numbers. But how data on housing is collected and collated has been a somewhat murky process, and opponents of housing projects often challenge how they comport with quotas the state imposes on local communities. Fortunately, the Census Bureau has unveiled a new statistical tool that should go a long way toward having complete data that includes not only conventional single- and multi-family projects, but alternative forms of housing such as backyard granny flats, officially known as Accessory Dwelling Units; basements or garages that are transformed into apartments; single-family homes converted into duplexes or apartments; mobile homes or office buildings that become housing. The tool uses several sources of data but is heavily reliant on the Postal Service, which maintains a constantly updated roster of addresses that includes all housing types. More accurate data should make it easier to overcome conflicts and may even reveal that California’s pro-housing actions have had positive effects that current methodology misses. “The housing crisis has persisted in part because we haven’t been able to measure our progress accurately,” an article about the new tool published by the Niskanen Center, a think tank, concludes. “With the Census Bureau’s Address Count Listing File data, that excuse is gone. Now the question is whether policymakers will use this powerful new tool to finally build the housing America needs.”

Britain's Prince William Calls for Optimism on Environment at EarthShot Prize Event

RIO DE JANEIRO (Reuters) -Britain's Prince William expressed optimism on Wednesday about tackling global environmental challenges at a star-studded...

RIO DE JANEIRO (Reuters) -Britain's Prince William expressed optimism on Wednesday about tackling global environmental challenges at a star-studded event in Rio de Janeiro for the fifth edition of his EarthShot Prize.William's first visit to Latin America comes shortly before Brazil hosts the UN climate summit COP30 next week."I understand that some might feel discouraged in these uncertain times," William said during the ceremony for the award, founded in 2020 and inspired by a visit to Namibia."I understand that there is still so much to be done. But this is no time for complacency, and the optimism I felt in 2020 remains ardent today."Named in homage to John F. Kennedy's "moonshot" goal, the award was intended to foster significant environmental progress within a decade that has now reached its midpoint.The prize, which aims to find innovations to combat climate change, and tackle other green issues, awards five winners 1 million pounds ($1.3 million) each to drive their projects.Pop stars Kylie Minogue and Shawn Mendes, Brazilian musicians Gilberto Gil, Seu Jorge and Anitta, along with former Formula One world champion Sebastian Vettel, were among those who appeared or performed at the ceremony.British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and London Mayor Sadiq Khan also attended.William will attend the UN climate summit in place of his father, King Charles. On his trip, he announced initiatives for Indigenous communities and environmental activists, and visited landmarks in Rio.(Reporting by Andre Romani in Sao Paulo and Michael Holden in London; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.