Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Chemical Fire at Atlanta-Area Plant Sparks Local Movement Against BioLab

News Feed
Tuesday, December 10, 2024

In late September, a massive billow of smoke from a chemical fire spread over metro Atlanta, lingering for weeks and prompting national news coverage. The smoke has cleared, but the anger has not dissipated in Conyers, the city of 20,000 where the fire occurred, and in surrounding areas. (Conyers lies 24 miles east of downtown Atlanta.) Smoke from the blaze left some residents with breathing difficulties, headaches, dizziness and skin rashes in the days that followed, along with a deepening worry about their community’s safety.   The fire was pool-chemical company BioLab’s fourth in the last two decades, a track record that has created what one observer described as “generational rage” among residents. Some are now turning to activism for the first time, joined by Atlanta-area, mostly Black-led community groups. The population of Conyers is nearly two-thirds Black, causing some in the community to argue that the repeated industrial accidents at the BioLab facility are an example of environmental racism. The result: an unusually fast-growing grassroots movement led by residents fed up with a company that they say has jeopardized their health and the environment for decades. They also blame local, state and federal authorities for failing to inform the community about the accident’s cause and impact in a timely or transparent manner. Many residents want to see the BioLab facility, which is one of the largest employers in town, permanently shut down. Short of that, they seek to prevent future accidents. BioLab declined to comment, directing Capital & Main to its website, which asserted the company’s commitment to supporting affected residents. In October, BioLab opened a 24/7 call center and a community assistance center, and it has provided ongoing debris removal services. According to the website, the company’s remediation efforts are being conducted under the oversight of Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division (GEPD). (In response to a query about the community’s concerns, the GEPD referred Capital & Main to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.) The cause of the most recent fire was still under investigation as of Nov. 1, according to the company’s website. The response of the company and environmental regulators to the fire has been cold comfort to residents of Conyers and surrounding areas, who are demanding to know if their health is at risk. Locals have been confused about the accident’s reach and immediate and long-term impacts. Rockdale County, where BioLab is located, lifted shelter-in-place orders in mid-October after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reported that the accident site had been cleaned and levels of chlorine in the community’s air met federal standards. In the days following the fire, Nga Lee (Sally) Ng, professor at the Georgia Tech School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, reported high levels of chlorine and bromine in the air.  Debris was still being cleared from the site of the Sept. 29 BioLab fire in early December. Photo: Jesse Pratt López. Residents also expressed deep frustration over what they say was a disorganized evacuation process and the mixed messages from local authorities about when it was safe to return home. Neke Stroud, a longtime Conyers resident, attempted to follow Rockdale County’s Sept. 29 evacuation orders but got stuck in traffic for hours with her elderly father, ultimately returning home. Local business owner Larry Cox tried to return to his company after Rockdale County lifted its shelter-in-place order on Oct. 17, only to be turned back by police.  Galvanized by the incident, residents of the small city and surrounding counties have gathered more than 11,000 signatures supporting a shut down of BioLab, nearly two-thirds from the Conyers area; a Facebook group called Stand Against BioLab in Rockdale County, Ga has attracted 1,600 members; local farmers are organizing amongst themselves; and residents are connecting with people in other communities affected by industrial disasters, including East Palestine, Ohio, which was exposed to toxic fumes after last year’s Norfolk Southern train wreck. Independent research efforts have also been launched to assess everything from dioxin levels in soil to the fire’s impacts on the health and well-being of people and animals. “I’ve never been in a situation where pretty much everyone on the ground, in the community, was ready to go, as soon as the disaster happened,” said Paul Glaze, spokesperson for Georgia Conservation Voters Education Fund, about the grassroots response. The group is supporting some of the organizing efforts. Glaze said dozens of residents of Conyers and surrounding counties have contacted his organization, complaining of symptoms such as difficulty breathing, skin rashes, dizziness and headaches. Madelyne Reece is one of the locals whose concerns have moved her to act. Reece moved to Conyers in 2020; her home is about five miles from the BioLab facility. She went to the emergency room four days after the chemical fire began because she was having trouble breathing and feeling nauseous. Doctors prescribed steroids. Since then, she’s suffered from a persistent cough. Madelyne Reece at a Dec. 3 community forum in Conyers where residents met to discuss concerns about the recent BioLab fire. The event featured guests from East Palestine, Ohio, the site of a train derailment and chemical spill in early 2023. Photo: Jesse Pratt López. Reece launched the Facebook group advocating for the BioLab facility’s closure in early October as a “place where we could figure out what we need to do and get ourselves heard.” Reece, who works in human resources at an Atlanta golf club, also spoke at a mid-October rally in downtown Conyers. “This is absolutely a first for me,” she said of both efforts. Stroud is also new to activism. Her family has been living in Conyers for nearly a hundred years, but it wasn’t until BioLab sent plumes of smoke wafting over her neighborhood in September that she became the first among her relatives to help organize a protest rally. Stroud’s mother developed colon cancer after the company’s 2004 fire and died in 2014. Her family suspected the cancer was tied to the fire and explored suing BioLab, but Stroud believes that her parents accepted a payment from BioLab and therefore could not sue the company. The company’s website states that “residents and business owners that receive standard financial assistance from the Company will not be asked to release any claims they may have against BioLab or its affiliates arising from the fire.” The company did not respond to a question about whether such terms existed in the past.  The company’s website also notes that as of Nov. 9, a call center set up after the fire had handled more than 15,700 inquiries related to claims, reimbursement requests and other concerns. After the September accident, Stroud said, “I think I’ve had enough.” She began handing out flyers at a local Walmart inviting locals to the Oct. 19 protest rally aimed at shutting down the plant, which has been a presence in the area since 1973. Neke Stroud attends a Dec. 3 community forum in Conyers. Photo: Jesse Pratt López. “Organizing is new to me. But this is personal,” she told Capital & Main. She said the company’s history of environmental contamination has led to “a situation where money outweighs life.” Scott Smith, a Boston-based inventor and businessman, is leading one of the independent research efforts. He has worked with a volunteer team of scientists to test water, soil and debris for different chemicals following environmental disasters across the country since 2006, when his own company’s site was flooded with water contaminated by oil.  Smith has visited East Palestine; Flint, Michigan; and a host of other disaster sites in the last 18 years, around 60 all told. Since the BioLab fire, he’s traveled twice to Conyers, taking dozens of samples to be tested at a Massachusetts lab. He has yet to announce results. Community reaction has not been limited to Conyers residents, as the billows of smoke have traveled with the wind. Ina Braxton runs a small farm in Covington, about 15 miles southeast of Conyers. She was outside on the morning of Sept. 29 when the fire ignited. “Within 30 minutes of the fire,” she said, “my skin started to itch and break out in bumps.” She’s been having difficulty breathing ever since, and wound up deciding to burn her crops — cucumbers, tomatoes and peppers — because she “didn’t want to put produce in the market and have someone getting sick.” Braxton estimates she’s lost more than $35,000 in produce, soil and equipment. She contacted the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a local agricultural extension service for advice — as well as BioLab — but got no response. In the absence of accurate, timely information, she’s decided to organize fellow farmers. “If no one’s looking our way, we have no idea what the summer’s going to look like,” she said, referring to the potential of lingering contamination in soil and water. She and 15 other small-farm owners are seeking help testing for harmful chemicals.  Ina Braxton on her farm in Covington. Photo: Jesse Pratt López. Braxton also said she would like to organize small farms statewide, and gain access to information about industrial polluters, “so when you’re buying farmland, you know if they could cause issues.”  Like all other residents interviewed for this story, Reece wants to see BioLab shut down in her town — but added, “I don’t want to dump this on somebody else.” Instead, she’d like to see laws that address such disasters and “bigger financial penalties when companies are out of compliance.” Rockdale County, where Conyers is located, has sued the company, seeking compensation and to shut the BioLab facility down. County representatives did not respond to repeated queries. Reece said the lawsuit was “a step in the right direction,” adding, “The community taking to the streets moved the needle.”  Communities banding together after industrial accidents like the one at the BioLab facility is not a new phenomenon, said Tracy Perkins, Arizona State University professor and author of a book on environmental activism. These incidents “kick off heightened awareness of the risks people are living under … [and] pull people together quickly when they realize, ‘We all live here, we don’t want this noxious facility,’” she said.  At the same time, Perkins noted that shutting down a plant is “a big lift” for communities affected by pollution — especially when it employs many residents or supports the local tax base, as the BioLab facility does. Communities have found more success organizing to prevent polluters from setting up or expanding in the first place, she said. A banner advertises a local law firm’s services to residents affected by the BioLab fire. Photo: Jesse Pratt López. At a Facebook Live event in October, East Palestine residents recounted cautionary tales about unscrupulous attorneys and explained the intricacies of class-action lawsuits. Many Georgia residents are grappling with tough decisions in the wake of the BioLab fire, including how to find the right lawyer, and whether to file a reimbursement claim with the company or join a lawsuit against it.  Connecting with other communities should be even easier for the nascent Georgia activists in the coming months. In early December, Rockdale County joined the Chemically Impacted Communities Coalition, a group of 35 communities advocating for stronger safety regulations, improved emergency response protocols and increased accountability from corporations and government agencies. The group was founded earlier this year by East Palestine resident Jami Wallace. Meanwhile, Reece said, organizing against the company makes her feel like she has two jobs. The work is “stressful,” but also “gratifying,” she said. “It’s a beautiful thing our community is doing everything it can.” Copyright 2024 Capital & Main

Skin rashes, breathing difficulties and “generational rage” led residents to join a nationwide push against companies accused of endangering health and the environment. The post Chemical Fire at Atlanta-Area Plant Sparks Local Movement Against BioLab appeared first on .

In late September, a massive billow of smoke from a chemical fire spread over metro Atlanta, lingering for weeks and prompting national news coverage.

The smoke has cleared, but the anger has not dissipated in Conyers, the city of 20,000 where the fire occurred, and in surrounding areas. (Conyers lies 24 miles east of downtown Atlanta.) Smoke from the blaze left some residents with breathing difficulties, headaches, dizziness and skin rashes in the days that followed, along with a deepening worry about their community’s safety.
 



 
The fire was pool-chemical company BioLab’s fourth in the last two decades, a track record that has created what one observer described as “generational rage” among residents. Some are now turning to activism for the first time, joined by Atlanta-area, mostly Black-led community groups. The population of Conyers is nearly two-thirds Black, causing some in the community to argue that the repeated industrial accidents at the BioLab facility are an example of environmental racism.

The result: an unusually fast-growing grassroots movement led by residents fed up with a company that they say has jeopardized their health and the environment for decades. They also blame local, state and federal authorities for failing to inform the community about the accident’s cause and impact in a timely or transparent manner. Many residents want to see the BioLab facility, which is one of the largest employers in town, permanently shut down. Short of that, they seek to prevent future accidents.

BioLab declined to comment, directing Capital & Main to its website, which asserted the company’s commitment to supporting affected residents. In October, BioLab opened a 24/7 call center and a community assistance center, and it has provided ongoing debris removal services. According to the website, the company’s remediation efforts are being conducted under the oversight of Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division (GEPD). (In response to a query about the community’s concerns, the GEPD referred Capital & Main to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.) The cause of the most recent fire was still under investigation as of Nov. 1, according to the company’s website.

The response of the company and environmental regulators to the fire has been cold comfort to residents of Conyers and surrounding areas, who are demanding to know if their health is at risk. Locals have been confused about the accident’s reach and immediate and long-term impacts. Rockdale County, where BioLab is located, lifted shelter-in-place orders in mid-October after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reported that the accident site had been cleaned and levels of chlorine in the community’s air met federal standards. In the days following the fire, Nga Lee (Sally) Ng, professor at the Georgia Tech School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, reported high levels of chlorine and bromine in the air. 

Debris was still being cleared from the site of the Sept. 29 BioLab fire in early December. Photo: Jesse Pratt López.

Residents also expressed deep frustration over what they say was a disorganized evacuation process and the mixed messages from local authorities about when it was safe to return home. Neke Stroud, a longtime Conyers resident, attempted to follow Rockdale County’s Sept. 29 evacuation orders but got stuck in traffic for hours with her elderly father, ultimately returning home. Local business owner Larry Cox tried to return to his company after Rockdale County lifted its shelter-in-place order on Oct. 17, only to be turned back by police. 

Galvanized by the incident, residents of the small city and surrounding counties have gathered more than 11,000 signatures supporting a shut down of BioLab, nearly two-thirds from the Conyers area; a Facebook group called Stand Against BioLab in Rockdale County, Ga has attracted 1,600 members; local farmers are organizing amongst themselves; and residents are connecting with people in other communities affected by industrial disasters, including East Palestine, Ohio, which was exposed to toxic fumes after last year’s Norfolk Southern train wreck.

Independent research efforts have also been launched to assess everything from dioxin levels in soil to the fire’s impacts on the health and well-being of people and animals.

“I’ve never been in a situation where pretty much everyone on the ground, in the community, was ready to go, as soon as the disaster happened,” said Paul Glaze, spokesperson for Georgia Conservation Voters Education Fund, about the grassroots response. The group is supporting some of the organizing efforts. Glaze said dozens of residents of Conyers and surrounding counties have contacted his organization, complaining of symptoms such as difficulty breathing, skin rashes, dizziness and headaches.

Madelyne Reece is one of the locals whose concerns have moved her to act. Reece moved to Conyers in 2020; her home is about five miles from the BioLab facility. She went to the emergency room four days after the chemical fire began because she was having trouble breathing and feeling nauseous. Doctors prescribed steroids. Since then, she’s suffered from a persistent cough.

Madelyne Reece at a Dec. 3 community forum in Conyers where residents met to discuss concerns about the recent BioLab fire. The event featured guests from East Palestine, Ohio, the site of a train derailment and chemical spill in early 2023. Photo: Jesse Pratt López.

Reece launched the Facebook group advocating for the BioLab facility’s closure in early October as a “place where we could figure out what we need to do and get ourselves heard.” Reece, who works in human resources at an Atlanta golf club, also spoke at a mid-October rally in downtown Conyers. “This is absolutely a first for me,” she said of both efforts.

Stroud is also new to activism. Her family has been living in Conyers for nearly a hundred years, but it wasn’t until BioLab sent plumes of smoke wafting over her neighborhood in September that she became the first among her relatives to help organize a protest rally.

Stroud’s mother developed colon cancer after the company’s 2004 fire and died in 2014. Her family suspected the cancer was tied to the fire and explored suing BioLab, but Stroud believes that her parents accepted a payment from BioLab and therefore could not sue the company. The company’s website states that “residents and business owners that receive standard financial assistance from the Company will not be asked to release any claims they may have against BioLab or its affiliates arising from the fire.” The company did not respond to a question about whether such terms existed in the past. 

The company’s website also notes that as of Nov. 9, a call center set up after the fire had handled more than 15,700 inquiries related to claims, reimbursement requests and other concerns.

After the September accident, Stroud said, “I think I’ve had enough.” She began handing out flyers at a local Walmart inviting locals to the Oct. 19 protest rally aimed at shutting down the plant, which has been a presence in the area since 1973.

Neke Stroud attends a Dec. 3 community forum in Conyers. Photo: Jesse Pratt López.

“Organizing is new to me. But this is personal,” she told Capital & Main. She said the company’s history of environmental contamination has led to “a situation where money outweighs life.”

Scott Smith, a Boston-based inventor and businessman, is leading one of the independent research efforts. He has worked with a volunteer team of scientists to test water, soil and debris for different chemicals following environmental disasters across the country since 2006, when his own company’s site was flooded with water contaminated by oil. 

Smith has visited East Palestine; Flint, Michigan; and a host of other disaster sites in the last 18 years, around 60 all told. Since the BioLab fire, he’s traveled twice to Conyers, taking dozens of samples to be tested at a Massachusetts lab. He has yet to announce results.

Community reaction has not been limited to Conyers residents, as the billows of smoke have traveled with the wind. Ina Braxton runs a small farm in Covington, about 15 miles southeast of Conyers. She was outside on the morning of Sept. 29 when the fire ignited. “Within 30 minutes of the fire,” she said, “my skin started to itch and break out in bumps.” She’s been having difficulty breathing ever since, and wound up deciding to burn her crops — cucumbers, tomatoes and peppers — because she “didn’t want to put produce in the market and have someone getting sick.” Braxton estimates she’s lost more than $35,000 in produce, soil and equipment.

She contacted the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a local agricultural extension service for advice — as well as BioLab — but got no response. In the absence of accurate, timely information, she’s decided to organize fellow farmers. “If no one’s looking our way, we have no idea what the summer’s going to look like,” she said, referring to the potential of lingering contamination in soil and water. She and 15 other small-farm owners are seeking help testing for harmful chemicals. 

Ina Braxton on her farm in Covington. Photo: Jesse Pratt López.

Braxton also said she would like to organize small farms statewide, and gain access to information about industrial polluters, “so when you’re buying farmland, you know if they could cause issues.” 

Like all other residents interviewed for this story, Reece wants to see BioLab shut down in her town — but added, “I don’t want to dump this on somebody else.” Instead, she’d like to see laws that address such disasters and “bigger financial penalties when companies are out of compliance.”

Rockdale County, where Conyers is located, has sued the company, seeking compensation and to shut the BioLab facility down. County representatives did not respond to repeated queries. Reece said the lawsuit was “a step in the right direction,” adding, “The community taking to the streets moved the needle.” 

Communities banding together after industrial accidents like the one at the BioLab facility is not a new phenomenon, said Tracy Perkins, Arizona State University professor and author of a book on environmental activism. These incidents “kick off heightened awareness of the risks people are living under … [and] pull people together quickly when they realize, ‘We all live here, we don’t want this noxious facility,’” she said.

 At the same time, Perkins noted that shutting down a plant is “a big lift” for communities affected by pollution — especially when it employs many residents or supports the local tax base, as the BioLab facility does. Communities have found more success organizing to prevent polluters from setting up or expanding in the first place, she said.

A banner advertises a local law firm’s services to residents affected by the BioLab fire. Photo: Jesse Pratt López.

At a Facebook Live event in October, East Palestine residents recounted cautionary tales about unscrupulous attorneys and explained the intricacies of class-action lawsuits. Many Georgia residents are grappling with tough decisions in the wake of the BioLab fire, including how to find the right lawyer, and whether to file a reimbursement claim with the company or join a lawsuit against it. 

Connecting with other communities should be even easier for the nascent Georgia activists in the coming months. In early December, Rockdale County joined the Chemically Impacted Communities Coalition, a group of 35 communities advocating for stronger safety regulations, improved emergency response protocols and increased accountability from corporations and government agencies. The group was founded earlier this year by East Palestine resident Jami Wallace.

Meanwhile, Reece said, organizing against the company makes her feel like she has two jobs. The work is “stressful,” but also “gratifying,” she said. “It’s a beautiful thing our community is doing everything it can.”


Copyright 2024 Capital & Main

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

MIT community in 2025: A year in review

Top stories highlighted the Institute’s leading positions in world and national rankings; new collaboratives tackling manufacturing, generative AI, and quantum; how one professor influenced hundreds of thousands of students around the world; and more.

In 2025, MIT maintained its standard of community and research excellence amidst a shift in national priorities regarding the federal funding of higher education. Notably, QS ranked MIT No. 1 in the world for the 14th straight year, while U.S. News ranked MIT No. 2 in the nation for the 5th straight year.This year, President Sally Kornbluth also added to the Institute’s slate of community-wide strategic initiatives, with new collaborative efforts focused on manufacturing, generative artificial intelligence, and quantum science and engineering. In addition, MIT opened several new buildings and spaces, hosted a campuswide art festival, and continued its tradition of bringing the latest in science and technology to the local community and to the world. Here are some of the top stories from around MIT over the past 12 months.MIT collaborativesPresident Kornbluth announced three new Institute-wide collaborative efforts designed to foster and support alliances that will take on global problems. The Initiative for New Manufacturing (INM) will work toward bolstering industry and creating jobs by driving innovation across vital manufacturing sectors. The MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium (MGAIC), a group of industry leaders and MIT researchers, aims to harness the power of generative artificial intelligence for the good of society. And the MIT Quantum Initiative (QMIT) will leverage quantum breakthroughs to drive the future of scientific and technological progress.These missions join three announced last year — the Climate Project at MIT, the MIT Human Insight Collaborative (MITHIC), and the MIT Health and Life Sciences Collaborative (MIT HEALS).Sharing the wonders of science and technologyThis year saw the launch of MIT Learn, a dynamic AI-enabled website that hosts nearly 13,000 non-degree learning opportunities, making it easier for learners around the world to discover the courses and resources available on MIT’s various learning platforms.The Institute also hosted the Cambridge Science Carnival, a hands-on event managed by the MIT Museum that drew approximately 20,000 attendees and featured more than 140 activities, demonstrations, and installations tied to the topics of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM).CommencementAt Commencement, Hank Green urged MIT’s newest graduates to focus their work on the “everyday solvable problems of normal people,” even if it is not always the easiest or most obvious course of action. Green is a popular content creator and YouTuber whose work often focuses on science and STEAM issues, and who co-created the educational media company Complexly.President Kornbluth challenged graduates to be “ambassadors” for the open-minded inquiry and collaborative work that marks everyday life at MIT.Top accoladesIn January, the White House bestowed national medals of science and technology — the country’s highest awards for scientists and engineers — on four MIT professors and an additional alumnus. Moderna, with deep MIT roots, was also recognized.As in past years, MIT faculty, staff, and alumni were honored with election to the various national academies: the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the National Academy of Medicine, and the National Academy of Inventors.Faculty member Carlo Ratti served as curator of the Venice Biennale’s 19th International Architecture Exhibition.Members of MIT Video Productions won a New England Emmy Award for their short film on the art and science of hand-forged knives with master bladesmith Bob Kramer.And at MIT, Dimitris Bertsimas, vice provost for open learning and a professor of operations research, won this year’s Killian Award, the Institute’s highest faculty honor.New and refreshed spacesIn the heart of campus, the Edward and Joyce Linde Music Building became fully operational to start off the year. In celebration, the Institute hosted Artfinity, a vibrant multiweek exploration of art and ideas, with more than 80 free performing and visual arts events including a film festival, interactive augmented-reality art installations, a simulated lunar landing, and concerts by both student groups and internationally renowned musicians.Over the summer, the “Outfinite” — the open space connecting Hockfield Court with Massachusetts Avenue — was officially named the L. Rafael Reif Innovation Corridor in honor of President Emeritus L. Rafael Reif, MIT’s 17th president.And in October, the Undergraduate Advising Center’s bright new home opened in Building 11 along the Infinite Corridor, bringing a welcoming and functional destination for MIT undergraduate students within the Institute’s Main Group.Student honors and awardsMIT undergraduates earned an impressive number of prestigious awards in 2025. Exceptional students were honored with Rhodes, Gates Cambridge, and Schwarzman scholarships, among others.A number of MIT student-athletes also helped to secure their team’s first NCAA national championship in Institute history: Women’s track and field won both the indoor national championship and outdoor national championship, while women’s swimming and diving won their national title as well.Also for the fifth year in a row, MIT students earned all five top spots at the Putnam Mathematical Competition.Leadership transitionsSeveral senior administrative leaders took on new roles in 2025. Anantha Chandrakasan was named provost; Paula Hammond was named dean of the School of Engineering; Richard Locke was named dean of the MIT Sloan School of Management; Gaspare LoDuca was named vice president for information systems and technology and CIO; Evelyn Wang was named vice president for energy and climate; and David Darmofal was named vice chancellor for undergraduate and graduate education.Additional new leadership transitions include: Ana Bakshi was named executive director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship; Fikile Brushett was named director of the David H. Koch School of Chemical Engineering Practice; Laurent Demanet was named co-director of the Center for Computational Science and Engineering; Rohit Karnik was named director of the Abdul Latif Jameel Water and Food Systems Lab; Usha Lee McFarling was named director of the Knight Science Journalism Program; C. Cem Tasan was named director of the Materials Research Laboratory; and Jessika Trancik was named director of the Sociotechnical Systems Research Center.Remembering those we lostAmong MIT community members who died this year were David Baltimore, Juanita Battle, Harvey Kent Bowen, Stanley Fischer, Frederick Greene, Lee Grodzins, John Joannopoulos, Keith Johnson, Daniel Kleppner, Earle Lomon, Nuno Loureiro, Victor K. McElheny, David Schmittlein, Anthony Sinskey, Peter Temin, Barry Vercoe, Rainer Weiss, Alan Whitney, and Ioannis Yannas.In case you missed it…Additional top stories from around the Institute in 2025 include a description of the environmental and sustainability implications of generative AI tech and applications; the story of how an MIT professor introduced hundreds of thousands of students to neuroscience with his classic textbook; a look at how MIT entrepreneurs are using AI; a roundup of new books by MIT faculty and staff; and behind the scenes with MIT students who cracked a longstanding egg dilemma. 

Study Finds Cancer-Linked Chemicals in Some Firefighter Gear

By I. Edwards HealthDay ReporterFRIDAY, Dec. 19, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Some protective gear worn by firefighters may contain chemicals linked to...

FRIDAY, Dec. 19, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Some protective gear worn by firefighters may contain chemicals linked to serious health risks, according to a new study.The research — published Dec. 16 in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters — found that certain firefighter turnout gear contains brominated flame retardants, or chemicals added to materials to slow flames, but also tied to cancer and hormone problems.This is one of the first in-depth studies to closely examine whether these chemicals are present in firefighter gear and how much could be released during use.Firefighters wear turnout gear made of three layers: An outer shell that resists flames, a middle moisture barrier that blocks germs and an inner lining that helps control body heat. To meet safety rules set by the National Fire Protection Association, manufacturers treat these layers with chemicals to reduce fire risk.For years, firefighters have raised concerns about PFAS, a group of chemicals once commonly used in turnout gear to repel water and oil. PFAS exposure has been linked to cancer and other health problems.Although PFAS-treated gear has not been directly tied to illness in firefighters, many states have passed laws banning the purchase of PFAS-treated gear starting in 2027. As a result, manufacturers have begun phasing those chemicals out.That raised a new question: What chemicals are being used instead?"There was a rumor that one of the turnout gear manufacturers might be using brominated flame retardants in the non-PFAS treated textiles," study leader Heather Stapleton, a professor at Duke University’s Nicholas School of the Environment in Durham, N.C., said in a news release."Because some brominated flame retardants have known toxicity, I requested a sample of the gear in question to test," she added.Stapleton and her colleagues tested 12 sets of turnout gear, nine made between 2013 and 2020, and three made in 2024 that were marketed as PFAS-free.They tested each layer of the gear to see:PFAS showed up in all older gear, but 2024 gear had little to no extractable PFAS, supporting claims that newer gear avoids those chemicals.However, every single set of gear tested contained brominated flame retardants, and in many cases, levels were higher than PFAS.The highest levels of brominated flame retardants were found in gear labeled as non-PFAS, especially in the moisture barrier layer.This suggests that manufacturers may be intentionally adding brominated flame retardants to replace PFAS and still meet fire safety standards.One chemical, decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), appeared most often. While it hasn’t been studied much in the U.S., a 2019 study in China linked DBDPE exposure to thyroid problems in manufacturing workers."I was really surprised that the manufacturers used DBDPE in turnout gear," Stapleton said. "It has similar properties as a toxic chemical called decaBDE that has been largely phased out globally, raising questions about its safety."In older gear, the outer shell had the highest chemical levels, most likely from smoke and soot during fires."When building materials burn, they can release brominated flame retardants into the air that stick to gear and don't wash out very well," Stapleton explained.But the presence of these chemicals inside the gear shows that manufacturing choices, and not just fire exposure, play a role.Researchers said they don’t know just yet how much of these chemicals firefighters absorb or what the long-term health effects may be.But the findings matter because turnout gear is expensive and often used for many years."Fire departments must consider both the financial and personal safety costs of keeping or replacing gear," said study co-author R. Bryan Ormond, an associate professor at N.C. State University’s Wilson College of Textiles in Raleigh, N.C.Stapleton said some companies now offer gear made without PFAS or brominated flame retardants, and she urged departments to demand more transparency in the equipment they use."We know firefighters receive higher exposure to multiple chemicals from all the hazards they face during their duty, and they shouldn't have to worry about receiving additional chemical exposures from their gear," Stapleton said.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more on PFAS.SOURCE: Duke University, news release, Dec. 18, 2025 Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

New research affirms sustainable design principles can lead to safer chemical alternatives

A new commentary published in Nature Sustainability reflects on the results of a new study identifying a potentially less toxic bisphenol chemical as an example of the Safe and Sustainable by Design framework for creating a generation of safer chemical alternatives. In short: The Safe and Sustainable by Design framework, introduced by the European Commission in 2022, lays out principles for the redesign and assessment of industrial chemicals based on four considerations: hazard, worker’s exposure during production, exposure from use, and full life-cycle impacts. Using this framework, researchers identified a bisphenol chemical that does not have estrogenic properties, unlike toxic BPA. This new bisphenol also shows potential for high technical performance and is created from renewable materials. Key quote: “Importantly, this work signals a growing interest among chemists… to find safe substitutes for endocrine-disrupting commercial chemicals to enhance the welfare of the ecosphere and the sustainability of our civilization.” Why this matters: Existing bisphenol chemicals — including BPA and its common substitutes BPS and BPF — have well-established negative health consequences, particularly to metabolism and reproduction. While some countries have limited the use of BPA, the use of other estrogenic bisphenols has continued to increase, undermining regulations’ protective potential. This commentary emphasizes how critical it is that health and environmental impacts be prioritized as key considerations in the creation of new chemicals alongside economic potential and technical performance. Related EHN coverage: Op-ed: Building a safe and sustainable chemical enterpriseFDA’s current BPA safety standards are outdated, misguided and flawed, scientists sayMore resources: European Commission: Safe and Sustainable by Design frameworkTiered Protocol for Endocrine Disruption (TiPED), a tool used by the authors of this commentary to facilitate the early identification of potentially endocrine disrupting chemicals. Collins, Terrence et al. for Nature Sustainability. Dec. 4, 2025Margarita, Christiana et al. for Nature Sustainability. Dec. 4, 2025

A new commentary published in Nature Sustainability reflects on the results of a new study identifying a potentially less toxic bisphenol chemical as an example of the Safe and Sustainable by Design framework for creating a generation of safer chemical alternatives. In short: The Safe and Sustainable by Design framework, introduced by the European Commission in 2022, lays out principles for the redesign and assessment of industrial chemicals based on four considerations: hazard, worker’s exposure during production, exposure from use, and full life-cycle impacts. Using this framework, researchers identified a bisphenol chemical that does not have estrogenic properties, unlike toxic BPA. This new bisphenol also shows potential for high technical performance and is created from renewable materials. Key quote: “Importantly, this work signals a growing interest among chemists… to find safe substitutes for endocrine-disrupting commercial chemicals to enhance the welfare of the ecosphere and the sustainability of our civilization.” Why this matters: Existing bisphenol chemicals — including BPA and its common substitutes BPS and BPF — have well-established negative health consequences, particularly to metabolism and reproduction. While some countries have limited the use of BPA, the use of other estrogenic bisphenols has continued to increase, undermining regulations’ protective potential. This commentary emphasizes how critical it is that health and environmental impacts be prioritized as key considerations in the creation of new chemicals alongside economic potential and technical performance. Related EHN coverage: Op-ed: Building a safe and sustainable chemical enterpriseFDA’s current BPA safety standards are outdated, misguided and flawed, scientists sayMore resources: European Commission: Safe and Sustainable by Design frameworkTiered Protocol for Endocrine Disruption (TiPED), a tool used by the authors of this commentary to facilitate the early identification of potentially endocrine disrupting chemicals. Collins, Terrence et al. for Nature Sustainability. Dec. 4, 2025Margarita, Christiana et al. for Nature Sustainability. Dec. 4, 2025

Don’t talk – listen. Why communities affected by forever chemicals in water must be heard

When worried communities talk to authorities about forever chemicals, officials often seek to explain and clarify. But this isn’t what people actually want.

97s/Unsplash, CC BY-NC-NDUntil recently, Australia’s efforts to tackle “forever chemical” pollution focused on highly polluted firefighting and defence sites. But last year, elevated levels of some of these chemicals were detected in the untreated water supply for the Blue Mountains in New South Wales. Residents were understandably concerned. Community groups threatened to launch a class action, while residents sought to have their blood tested. NSW Water Minister Rose Jackson moved to reassure residents their “water is safe”, and a Sydney Morning Herald editorial said the state government was blind to the risks. Earlier this year, Australia banned three of these chemicals – PFOA, PFOS and PFHxS. PFOA is considered carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, while PFOS is considered possibly carcinogenic. But the environmental and health effects of forever chemical exposure remain a matter of debate, as the risk depends on concentration. In November, a Senate inquiry made dozens of recommendations to better regulate these chemicals. All too often, authorities respond to legitimate community concerns by pointing to the low level of risk. But as these chemicals build up in drinking water, wastewater and farming soils, this trust-the-experts approach isn’t going to work. Risks and concentration levels Forever chemicals are properly known as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). They’re used in products such as carpets, clothes, food packaging and paper, as well as firefighting foams, pesticides and stain repellents. They don’t break down easily, and steadily accumulate in soil, surface water and groundwater. Around 15,000 PFAS chemicals are now ubiquitous in the environment. In highly contaminated sites such as firefighter training facilities or defence bases, the risk is clearer and responses can target specific facilities and geographic locations. But the question of what to do becomes much harder when forever chemicals become widely distributed in drinking water and wastewater systems, generally at levels well below thresholds considered dangerous according to Australian standards. In response to the Blue Mountains issue, Water NSW stopped two dams from supplying water as a precautionary measure. Sydney Water installed a new PFAS water treatment system. Community backlash Australian authorities began responding to PFAS contamination a decade ago. Since then, policymakers have restricted the import and manufacture of certain forever chemicals, banned some uses of PFAS-containing firefighting foams, developed a national plan to manage PFAS chemicals, officially set the levels of PFAS a person could safely consume in a day and developed guidelines for drinking water. Even with such actions, authorities have been subject to sustained public criticism from community groups and the media over the speed, adequacy and level of protections compared to the more restrictive thresholds set by the United States and European Union. At Williamtown in NSW, authorities were aware of the issue for three years before revealing it. Community groups lost faith in official responses, turning to external experts before ultimately launching a class action against the Department of Defence. Some compensation flowed from this based on financial losses. But researchers have found compensation does little to actually address residents’ health and environment concerns. Independent reviews have recommended official responses to PFAS should be more transparent. But little has changed. The same distrust is emerging in the Blue Mountains, while state and federal inquiries have raised questions over how PFAS risks are communicated and falling public trust in government agencies. Better communication misses the point Community backlash against issues such as PFAS contamination can often be framed as non-experts misunderstanding the science. Authorities often think the answer is to communicate better and more clearly to fix the deficit. For instance, the national PFAS policy describes communication as essential: if people affected by PFAS contamination cannot understand what governments are saying, they are more likely to view the information with scepticism or as a deliberate attempt to disguise the facts. The risk here is that focusing on better official communication is still about speaking, rather than listening. The community can become a noisy stakeholder to be managed rather than an active collaborator. But people in these communities are legitimately worried. They want to speak and be heard as equal partners. Is there a better way? PFAS contamination isn’t just a technological or legal issue. It’s also a social issue – it affects communities. When facing a pollution problem, affected communities often organise themselves and advocate for better outcomes. Community groups often commission independent research or conduct citizen science, while collaborating with scientists and engineers. Officials and residents should collectively work through the options and costs associated, as well as discussing what level of risk different communities are willing to accept. Public forums aren’t enough, as these tend to put experts at the centre, answering questions. The launch of the first community-based PFAS working group under the new PFAS National Coordinating Body is a positive initial step. Collaborative efforts like this are not easy. Authorities and community leaders can view each other with suspicion, and the unequal power dynamics play a role. As NSW Information Commissioner Rosalind Croucher recently pointed out, making contamination data easily available to communities helps ensure management is “transparent, evidence-based, and accountable to the communities it affects”. Hard but not impossible Like forever chemicals themselves, the issue of PFAS pollution isn’t going away. Finding better ways of responding will be essential, as the issue can’t be solved by scientists, engineers and policymakers in a top-down approach. Communities who have to drink the water must be given the right to speak – and be heard. Read more: Living with PFAS 'forever chemicals' can be distressing. Not knowing if they're making you sick is just the start Matthew Kearnes receives funding from the Australian Research Council and Australian government under the National Environmental Science Program, through the Sustainable Communities and Waste HubCameron Holley receives funding from an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant, partnering with the NSW Natural Resources Access Regulator. He is a Deputy Director of the UNSW Institute for Climate Risk and Response and a board member of the National Environmental Law Association (NELA). Carley Bartlett receives funding from an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant, partnering with the NSW Natural Resources Access Regulator. Her PhD research was supported by an Australian government Research Training Program scholarship.Patrick Bonney receives funding from an Australian Research Council Discovery Project on the governance of emerging contaminants.Denis O'Carroll does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Tunisians Revive Protests in Gabes Over Pollution From State Chemical Plant

By Tarek AmaraTUNIS, Dec 17 (Reuters) - Around 2,500 ‌Tunisians ​marched through the coastal city ‌of Gabes on Wednesday, reviving protests over...

TUNIS, Dec 17 (Reuters) - Around 2,500 ‌Tunisians ​marched through the coastal city ‌of Gabes on Wednesday, reviving protests over pollution from a ​state-owned phosphate complex amid rising anger over perceived failures to protect public health.People chanted ‍mainly "Gabes wants to live", on ​the 15th anniversary of the start of the 2011 pro-democracy uprising that sparked ​the Arab ⁠Spring movement against autocracy.The protest added to the pressure on President Kais Saied’s government, which is grappling with a deep financial crisis and growing street unrest, protests by doctors, journalists, banks and public transport systems. The powerful UGTT union has called ‌for a nationwide strike next month, signalling great tension in the country. The ​recent ‌protests are widely seen ‍as one ⁠of the biggest challenges facing Saied since he began ruling by decree in 2021.Protesters chanted slogans such as "We want to live" and "People want to dismantle polluting units", as they marched toward Chatt Essalam, a coastal suburb north of the city where the Chemical Group’s industrial units are located."The chemical plant is a fully fledged crime... We refuse to ​pass on an environmental disaster to our children, and we are determined to stick to our demand,” said Safouan Kbibieh, a local environmental activist.Residents say toxic emissions from the phosphate complex have led to higher rates of respiratory illnesses, osteoporosis and cancer, while industrial waste continues to be discharged into the sea, damaging marine life and livelihoods.The protests in Gabes were reignited after hundreds of schoolchildren suffered breathing difficulties in recent months, allegedly caused by toxic fumes from a plant converting phosphates into phosphoric ​acid and fertilisers.In October, Saied described the situation in Gabes as an “environmental assassination”, blaming policy choices made by previous governments, and has called for urgent maintenance to prevent toxic leaks.The protesters reject the temporary measures and ​are demanding the permanent closure and relocation of the plant.(Reporting by Tarek Amara, editing by Ed Osmond)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.