Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Can the Noise in Sports Arenas Be Turned Into Electricity?

News Feed
Monday, August 5, 2024

fstop123/Getty Images Gyeongyun Lily Min spent the last seven months in a makeshift laboratory she set up in her parent’s garage as she tried to convert vibrations produced by sound waves in sports arenas into electrical energy. Her days were a long repetition of refining the concept, conducting experiments and analyzing the results. The 17-year-old rising senior at Alfred M. Barbe High School in Lake Charles, Louisiana, was initially inspired by Disney’s Monsters, Inc. In the 2001 film, energy is generated from children’s screams. Sans the cruelty, Gyeongyun thought, the concept could help meet the global demand for sustainable energy. “This imaginative concept sparked my curiosity about the potential of converting sound into usable energy,” explains Gyeongyun. “I began to wonder if, in reality, we could harness the abundant noise in environments like sports arenas and use it to generate electricity.” Merging her curiosity with her passion for science and innovation, the young student set out to study the concept on her own. “This idea,” says Gyeongyun, “led me to explore the feasibility of acoustic energy harvesting as a sustainable and innovative energy solution that could contribute to meeting global energy demands and reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.” With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. Society for Science Today, with over 60 percent of global electricity generated by fossil fuels, the world continues to be heavily dependent on non-renewable energy sources. Coal is the largest contributor to the industry at roughly 36 percent, followed by natural gas with a share of around 23 percent. According to a recent report by the World Nuclear Association, which promotes the global nuclear energy industry, over 40 percent of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per year are due to the burning of fossil fuels for electricity generation. The power sector is the largest source of planet-warming CO2 worldwide. About a year and a half ago, Gyeongyun watched her mother garden and make her own compost. She observed the heat generated by the compost and wondered how this thermal energy could be harnessed and converted into usable energy. “This led me to explore the principles of heat transfer and energy conversion through experiments with composting coffee grounds,” says Gyeongyun. A few months later, the student researcher found herself again intrigued by innovative new ways to harvest energy, this time from environments like sports arenas rich in noise levels, with the help of the piezoelectric effect. Certain materials in the environment produce large amounts of mechanical energy as vibrations or shocks. This energy is largely wasted. However, with the piezoelectric effect, it is possible to convert this kinetic energy into electric energy. Piezoelectricity, in simple terms, is the production of an electric charge in response to natural or artificially applied pressure. One of the best-known examples of electricity generated through the piezoelectric effect was found in the Shibuya train station in Tokyo. From 2008 to 2009, a piezoelectric mat measuring about 14 square inches was installed outside the station. The inch-thick mat generated electricity every time a person stepped on it. With some 2.4 million people passing through the station daily, the mat produced between 0.1 and 0.3 watts of electricity in each second it was stepped on. “I chose a sports arena as the suitable location for my project because it represents a unique environment where noise levels are consistently high due to the cheering crowds, announcements and music,” Gyeongyun says. According to the American Academy of Audiology, the noise levels at a sporting event can reach 110 decibels. “Additionally, sports arenas are large, public spaces where implementing sustainable energy solutions could have a significant positive impact, making them an ideal candidate for exploring innovative energy harvesting techniques,” she adds. To accurately simulate the sound environment of a sports arena, the young innovator built an approximately 22-inch by 12-inch model of a basketball stadium with the official NBA court ratio, crafted primarily from lightweight materials such as foam board and plastic to simulate the structural aspects of a real sports arena. She then found the best locations within it for piezoelectric generators by studying sound pressure in relation to the speaker’s position. For sound, Gyeongyun played audio recordings of typical crowd noise in a sports arena, including cheering and general ambient sounds at average sound pressure levels of 70 and 100 decibels, representing normal and peak noise levels observed during a live event. She designed three different types of energy harvester models—known as Cassegrain, Gregorian and front feed—that help focus sound onto the piezoelectric generators, thus improving their efficiency in capturing energy. Regeneron ISEF 2024 - Gyeongyun Lily Min The voltage produced by Gyeongyun’s energy-harvesting models demonstrated a significantly higher voltage output than standalone piezoelectric devices. “While a regular piezoelectric device might produce minimal voltage under similar conditions,” explains the student, “the harvester models in the experiment produced up to several tens of millivolts, depending on the configuration and sound pressure level.” She adds, “This enhancement suggests that the design of the models, which focuses sound energy toward the piezoelectric materials, plays a crucial role in increasing efficiency.” With limited resources, Gyeongyun faced some obstacles. For one, she struggled with relatively low-quality piezoelectric material she purchased from Amazon. “[They were] not as sensitive as needed for optimal energy harvesting,” she says. “This limitation significantly impacted the efficiency and accuracy of my experiment.” Nevertheless, she adapted her experimental setup and re-evaluated expectations regarding the voltage output. The experiment revealed that the piezoelectric devices in the model generated relatively small amounts of electricity, with the voltage output varying depending on the sound pressure level and the location of the energy harvesters. “For instance, the Cassegrain model produced an average of 44.90 millivolts at 100 decibels, while the front feed model yielded around 38.60 millivolts at 70 decibels,” Gyeongyun explains. While that output is relatively low, scaling this to an actual sports arena suggests that there is potential for improvement with more sensitive materials and better design. “The success of the experiment was evaluated based on the comparative voltage output between different models and setups, indicating that strategic deployment can enhance energy harvesting efficiency,” she says. “If I had access to better materials, I believe I could significantly enhance the effectiveness and reliability of my energy harvesting research.” Her project demonstrates the possibility of generating electric energy with piezoelectric devices from environments with considerably high noise levels. When implemented on a large scale, the technology has the potential to reduce global reliance on fossil fuels, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and helping mitigate climate change. “In urban areas with heavy traffic, the constant noise from vehicles could be harnessed to generate electricity, contributing to the energy needs of city infrastructure,” Gyeongyun says. “Manufacturing plants, which often have continuous machinery noise, could integrate piezoelectric devices to capture and convert these sound vibrations into electrical energy, thereby reducing their overall energy consumption and improving sustainability.” Public transportation systems, such as subway stations and train terminals, which experience high levels of ambient noise from trains and passengers, could utilize this technology to power some of their operations, as well. With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. The top award was granted to a student who built a better organic electrochemical transistor to be used in implantable bioelectronics that can help detect and treat serious illnesses like diabetes, epilepsy and organ failure. The second-place prize was won by another student scientist who improved the speed and efficiency of software that is used in several fields, including machine learning, transportation and financial systems. Maya Ajmera, president and CEO of Society for Science, which runs the Regeneron competition, calls Gyeongyun’s research “innovative.” “Gyeongyun at the age of 17, thinking about this project, I found it very inspirational,” she says. Daniel Inman, a mechanical engineer at the University of Michigan and co-author of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting, considers it a feasible technology. “There have been a number of studies on floor vibrations as a source of harvested energy, and this may be viable.” However, the expert points out several important factors that can affect how well Gyeongyun’s technology works. These include the type of material the stadium is made from, the amount of vibrational energy generated from the crowd walking or stomping, and how these vibrations are measured. “The big challenge is that a reasonable amount of piezo material only has the ability to harvest microwatts of energy,” says Inman. “There are many issues and factors in determining how much energy can be harvested in a given situation. This makes it impossible to make predictions about a given situation unless one knows all the factors, such as the density of the available ambient energy and its properties such as frequency, amplitude, etc. Bringing these systems to scale would require hundreds of such elements.” Gyeongyun remains hopeful for the future of the technology. “Although this technology is not yet realistically applicable due to the current limitations in the sensitivity and efficiency of piezoelectric materials, further research and development could significantly improve its feasibility,” she says. “By advancing the quality of piezoelectric devices and optimizing their deployment, we can unlock a new avenue for sustainable energy production, contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable future.” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Seventeen-year-old Gyeongyun Lily Min is hopeful it can someday, after testing the concept on a scale model of an NBA stadium

fans in a basketball stadium
fstop123/Getty Images

Gyeongyun Lily Min spent the last seven months in a makeshift laboratory she set up in her parent’s garage as she tried to convert vibrations produced by sound waves in sports arenas into electrical energy. Her days were a long repetition of refining the concept, conducting experiments and analyzing the results.

The 17-year-old rising senior at Alfred M. Barbe High School in Lake Charles, Louisiana, was initially inspired by Disney’s Monsters, Inc. In the 2001 film, energy is generated from children’s screams. Sans the cruelty, Gyeongyun thought, the concept could help meet the global demand for sustainable energy.

“This imaginative concept sparked my curiosity about the potential of converting sound into usable energy,” explains Gyeongyun. “I began to wonder if, in reality, we could harness the abundant noise in environments like sports arenas and use it to generate electricity.”

Merging her curiosity with her passion for science and innovation, the young student set out to study the concept on her own. “This idea,” says Gyeongyun, “led me to explore the feasibility of acoustic energy harvesting as a sustainable and innovative energy solution that could contribute to meeting global energy demands and reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.”

Can the Noise in Sports Arenas Be Turned Into Electricity?
With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. Society for Science

Today, with over 60 percent of global electricity generated by fossil fuels, the world continues to be heavily dependent on non-renewable energy sources. Coal is the largest contributor to the industry at roughly 36 percent, followed by natural gas with a share of around 23 percent. According to a recent report by the World Nuclear Association, which promotes the global nuclear energy industry, over 40 percent of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per year are due to the burning of fossil fuels for electricity generation. The power sector is the largest source of planet-warming CO2 worldwide.

About a year and a half ago, Gyeongyun watched her mother garden and make her own compost. She observed the heat generated by the compost and wondered how this thermal energy could be harnessed and converted into usable energy. “This led me to explore the principles of heat transfer and energy conversion through experiments with composting coffee grounds,” says Gyeongyun.

A few months later, the student researcher found herself again intrigued by innovative new ways to harvest energy, this time from environments like sports arenas rich in noise levels, with the help of the piezoelectric effect.

Certain materials in the environment produce large amounts of mechanical energy as vibrations or shocks. This energy is largely wasted. However, with the piezoelectric effect, it is possible to convert this kinetic energy into electric energy. Piezoelectricity, in simple terms, is the production of an electric charge in response to natural or artificially applied pressure.

One of the best-known examples of electricity generated through the piezoelectric effect was found in the Shibuya train station in Tokyo. From 2008 to 2009, a piezoelectric mat measuring about 14 square inches was installed outside the station. The inch-thick mat generated electricity every time a person stepped on it. With some 2.4 million people passing through the station daily, the mat produced between 0.1 and 0.3 watts of electricity in each second it was stepped on.

“I chose a sports arena as the suitable location for my project because it represents a unique environment where noise levels are consistently high due to the cheering crowds, announcements and music,” Gyeongyun says. According to the American Academy of Audiology, the noise levels at a sporting event can reach 110 decibels. “Additionally, sports arenas are large, public spaces where implementing sustainable energy solutions could have a significant positive impact, making them an ideal candidate for exploring innovative energy harvesting techniques,” she adds.

To accurately simulate the sound environment of a sports arena, the young innovator built an approximately 22-inch by 12-inch model of a basketball stadium with the official NBA court ratio, crafted primarily from lightweight materials such as foam board and plastic to simulate the structural aspects of a real sports arena. She then found the best locations within it for piezoelectric generators by studying sound pressure in relation to the speaker’s position. For sound, Gyeongyun played audio recordings of typical crowd noise in a sports arena, including cheering and general ambient sounds at average sound pressure levels of 70 and 100 decibels, representing normal and peak noise levels observed during a live event. She designed three different types of energy harvester models—known as Cassegrain, Gregorian and front feed—that help focus sound onto the piezoelectric generators, thus improving their efficiency in capturing energy.

Regeneron ISEF 2024 - Gyeongyun Lily Min

The voltage produced by Gyeongyun’s energy-harvesting models demonstrated a significantly higher voltage output than standalone piezoelectric devices. “While a regular piezoelectric device might produce minimal voltage under similar conditions,” explains the student, “the harvester models in the experiment produced up to several tens of millivolts, depending on the configuration and sound pressure level.” She adds, “This enhancement suggests that the design of the models, which focuses sound energy toward the piezoelectric materials, plays a crucial role in increasing efficiency.”

With limited resources, Gyeongyun faced some obstacles. For one, she struggled with relatively low-quality piezoelectric material she purchased from Amazon. “[They were] not as sensitive as needed for optimal energy harvesting,” she says. “This limitation significantly impacted the efficiency and accuracy of my experiment.” Nevertheless, she adapted her experimental setup and re-evaluated expectations regarding the voltage output.

The experiment revealed that the piezoelectric devices in the model generated relatively small amounts of electricity, with the voltage output varying depending on the sound pressure level and the location of the energy harvesters. “For instance, the Cassegrain model produced an average of 44.90 millivolts at 100 decibels, while the front feed model yielded around 38.60 millivolts at 70 decibels,” Gyeongyun explains. While that output is relatively low, scaling this to an actual sports arena suggests that there is potential for improvement with more sensitive materials and better design.

“The success of the experiment was evaluated based on the comparative voltage output between different models and setups, indicating that strategic deployment can enhance energy harvesting efficiency,” she says. “If I had access to better materials, I believe I could significantly enhance the effectiveness and reliability of my energy harvesting research.”

Her project demonstrates the possibility of generating electric energy with piezoelectric devices from environments with considerably high noise levels. When implemented on a large scale, the technology has the potential to reduce global reliance on fossil fuels, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and helping mitigate climate change.

“In urban areas with heavy traffic, the constant noise from vehicles could be harnessed to generate electricity, contributing to the energy needs of city infrastructure,” Gyeongyun says. “Manufacturing plants, which often have continuous machinery noise, could integrate piezoelectric devices to capture and convert these sound vibrations into electrical energy, thereby reducing their overall energy consumption and improving sustainability.”

Public transportation systems, such as subway stations and train terminals, which experience high levels of ambient noise from trains and passengers, could utilize this technology to power some of their operations, as well.

With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. The top award was granted to a student who built a better organic electrochemical transistor to be used in implantable bioelectronics that can help detect and treat serious illnesses like diabetes, epilepsy and organ failure. The second-place prize was won by another student scientist who improved the speed and efficiency of software that is used in several fields, including machine learning, transportation and financial systems.

Maya Ajmera, president and CEO of Society for Science, which runs the Regeneron competition, calls Gyeongyun’s research “innovative.” “Gyeongyun at the age of 17, thinking about this project, I found it very inspirational,” she says.

Daniel Inman, a mechanical engineer at the University of Michigan and co-author of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting, considers it a feasible technology. “There have been a number of studies on floor vibrations as a source of harvested energy, and this may be viable.” However, the expert points out several important factors that can affect how well Gyeongyun’s technology works. These include the type of material the stadium is made from, the amount of vibrational energy generated from the crowd walking or stomping, and how these vibrations are measured.

“The big challenge is that a reasonable amount of piezo material only has the ability to harvest microwatts of energy,” says Inman. “There are many issues and factors in determining how much energy can be harvested in a given situation. This makes it impossible to make predictions about a given situation unless one knows all the factors, such as the density of the available ambient energy and its properties such as frequency, amplitude, etc. Bringing these systems to scale would require hundreds of such elements.”

Gyeongyun remains hopeful for the future of the technology.

“Although this technology is not yet realistically applicable due to the current limitations in the sensitivity and efficiency of piezoelectric materials, further research and development could significantly improve its feasibility,” she says. “By advancing the quality of piezoelectric devices and optimizing their deployment, we can unlock a new avenue for sustainable energy production, contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable future.”

Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Researchers Solve Decades-Old Color Mystery in Iconic Jackson Pollock Painting

Scientists have identified the origins of the blue color in one of Jackson Pollock’s paintings with a little help from chemistry

NEW YORK (AP) — Scientists have identified the origins of the blue color in one of Jackson Pollock's paintings with a little help from chemistry, confirming for the first time that the abstract expressionist used a vibrant, synthetic pigment known as manganese blue. “Number 1A, 1948,” showcases Pollock's classic style: paint has been dripped and splattered across the canvas, creating a vivid, multicolored work. Pollock even gave the piece a personal touch, adding his handprints near the top. The painting, currently on display at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, is almost 9 feet (2.7 meters) wide. Scientists had previously characterized the reds and yellows splattered across the canvas, but the source of the rich turquoise blue proved elusive.In a new study, researchers took scrapings of the blue paint and used lasers to scatter light and measure how the paint's molecules vibrated. That gave them a unique chemical fingerprint for the color, which they pinpointed as manganese blue. The analysis, published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the first confirmed evidence of Pollock using this specific blue.“It’s really interesting to understand where some striking color comes from on a molecular level,” said study co-author Edward Solomon with Stanford University.The pigment manganese blue was once used by artists, as well as to color the cement for swimming pools. It was phased out by the 1990s because of environmental concerns.Previous research had suggested that the turquoise from the painting could indeed be this color, but the new study confirms it using samples from the canvas, said Rutgers University’s Gene Hall, who has studied Pollock’s paintings and was not involved with the discovery.“I’m pretty convinced that it could be manganese blue,” Hall said.The researchers also went one step further, inspecting the pigment’s chemical structure to understand how it produces such a vibrant shade.Scientists study the chemical makeup of art supplies to conserve old paintings and catch counterfeits. They can take more specific samples from Pollock's paintings since he often poured directly onto the canvas instead of mixing paints on a palette beforehand. To solve this artistic mystery, researchers explored the paint using various scientific tools — similarly to how Pollock would alternate his own methods, dripping paint using a stick or using it straight from the can.While the artist’s work may seem chaotic, Pollock rejected that interpretation. He saw his work as methodical, said study co-author Abed Haddad, an assistant conservation scientist at the Museum of Modern Art.“I actually see a lot of similarities between the way that we worked and the way that Jackson Pollock worked on the painting," Haddad said.The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Sept. 2025

California Votes To Ban PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Cookware, Other Items

By I. Edwards HealthDay ReporterMONDAY, Sept. 15, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Every time you reach for a nonstick pan, you could be using chemicals...

MONDAY, Sept. 15, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Every time you reach for a nonstick pan, you could be using chemicals that are now on the chopping block in the state of California.Lawmakers have approved a bill to phase out PFAS — also called “forever chemicals” — in cookware, cleaning products, dental floss, ski wax, food packaging and certain children’s items.The proposal, Senate Bill 682, passed in a 41-19 vote and quickly cleared the state Senate. It now heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has until Oct. 12 to sign it into law, CBS News reported.PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) have been widely used for decades, because they resist heat and water stains. But the chemicals build up in the body and environment and have been linked to cancers, liver and kidney damage and reproductive problems."Exposure to PFAS poses a significant threat to the environment and public health," the bill says.If signed, the law will roll out in stages: cookware must comply by 2030; cleaning products by 2031; and all other covered items by 2028.The plan has drawn sharp debate. Some chefs, including Rachael Ray, Thomas Keller and David Chang, argue that banning nonstick cookware made with PTFE (a type of PFAS better known as Teflon) could make cooking harder and more expensive for families, CBS News reported. “PTFEs, when manufactured and used responsibly, are proven to be safe and effective,” Ray, who sells a line of cookware bearing her name, wrote in a letter to lawmakers.But environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, say nonstick pans can release PFAS particles when scratched or overheated. Actor Mark Ruffalo also urged support for the bill. "Independent science shows that the PFAS in cookware can wind up in our food," he wrote on X.State Sen. Ben Allen proposed the legislation.“PFAS pose a level of serious risks that require us to take a measured approach to reduce their proliferation and unnecessary use,” he said.California has already banned PFAS in items like carpets, firefighting foam and cosmetics. If signed into law, SB 682 would make California one of the first states to phase out PFAS in cookware.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more on PFAS.SOURCES: CBS News, Sept. 13, 2025; California Legislative Information, Sept. 9, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

The Trump Team Wants to Boost Birth Rates While Poisoning Children

“I want a baby boom,” Trump has said. His administration is indeed exploring a range of approaches to boost the birth rate, including baby bonuses and classes on natural fertility. Yet his focus is entirely on the production of babies. When it comes to keeping these babies alive, this administration is leaving parents on their own, facing some horrifying and unprecedented challenges. It’s common for right-wing American governments, whether at the state or federal level, to be only half-heartedly natalist: restricting abortion, birth control, and sex education, while also failing to embrace any policy that makes it easier to raise a family, like universal childcare, robust public education, school lunch, cash supports for parents, or paid family leave. But the Trump-Vance government has taken this paradox to a new level, with natalist rhetoric far surpassing that of other recent administrations, while real live children are treated with more depraved, life-threatening indifference than in any American government in at least a century. Due to brutal cuts at the Food and Drug Administration, where 20,000 employees have been fired, the administration has suspended one of its quality-control programs for milk, Reuters reported this week. Milk is iconically associated with child health, and this is not a mere storybook whimsy: Most pediatricians regard it as critical for young children’s developing brains and bones. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends two cups a day for babies between 1 and 2 years old. While some experts—and of course the administration—are downplaying the change, emphasizing that milk will still be regulated, a bird flu epidemic hardly seems like the right time to be cutting corners. A government so focused on making more babies shouldn’t be so indifferent to risks to our nation’s toddlers.This reckless approach to child safety is not limited to food. Also this week, The New York Times reported that the Environmental Protection Agency was canceling tens of millions of dollars in grants for research on environmental hazards to children in rural America. These hazards include pesticides, wildfire smoke, and forever chemicals, and the grants supported research toward solutions to such problems. Many focused on improving child health in red states like Oklahoma. Children are much more vulnerable than adults to the health problems that can stem from exposure to toxins. That makes Trump’s policies, for all his baby-friendly chatter, seem pathologically misopedic; he is reversing bans on so-called “forever chemicals” and repealing limits set by the Biden administration on lead exposure, all of which will have devastating effects on children’s mental and physical development.And of course there’s RFK Jr.’s crazy campaign against vaccines. This week, the health secretary said he was considering removing the Covid-19 vaccine from the list of vaccines the government recommends for children, even though to win Senate confirmation, he had agreed not to alter the childhood vaccine schedule. Even worse, RFK Jr. has used his office to promote disinformation about extensively debunked links between vaccines and autism, while praising unproven “treatments” for measles as an outbreak that has afflicted more than 600 people and killed at least three continues to spread. Trump’s public health cuts are meanwhile imperiling a program that gives free vaccines to children. So far, I haven’t even mentioned children outside the United States. Trump has not only continued Biden’s policy of mass infanticide in Gaza—at least 100 children there have been killed or injured every week by Israeli forces since the dissolution of the ceasefire in March—he has vastly surpassed that shameful record by dismantling USAID. (The Supreme Court demanded that the government restore some of the funding to the already-contracted programs, but it’s unclear what the results of that ruling will be.) Children across the globe will starve to death due to this policy. The cuts to nutrition funding alone, researchers estimate, will kill some 369,000 children who could otherwise have lived. That’s not even counting all the other children’s lives imperiled by USAID funding cuts to vaccines, health services, and maternal care, or the children who will go unprotected now that Trump has cut 69 programs dedicated to tracking child labor, forced labor, and human trafficking.Natalist or exterminationist? Pro-child or rabidly infanticidal? It’s tempting to dismiss such extreme contradictions within the Trump administration as merely chaotic and incoherent. But the situation is worse than that. Trying to boost births while actively making the world less safe for children is creepy—but not in a new way. The contradiction is baked into the eugenicist tradition that Vance and Trump openly embrace. Vance said at an anti-abortion rally in January that he wanted “more babies in the United States of America.” Vance also said he wanted “more beautiful young men and women” to have children. Notice he doesn’t just say “more babies”: the qualifiers are significant. Vance was implying that he wanted the right people to have babies: American, white, able-bodied, “beautiful” people with robust genetics. Children dying because of USAID cuts aren’t part of this vision, presumably, because those children are not American or white. As for infected milk, environmental toxins, or measles—here too, it’s hard not to hear social Darwinist overtones: In a far-right eugenicist worldview, children killed by those things likely aren’t fit for survival. In a more chaotic and dangerous environment, this extremely outdated logic goes, natural selection will ensure that the strongest survive. It’s also worth noting that this way of thinking originates in—and many of these Trump administration policies aim to return us to—an earlier era, when people of all ages, but especially children, were simply poisoned by industrial pollution, unvaccinated for diseases, and unprotected from industrial accidents. In such an unsafe world for children, people had many more of them; the world was such a dangerous place to raise kids that families expected to lose a few. That all-too-recent period is the unspoken context for natalist and eugenicist visions. That’s the world Trump and Vance seem to be nostalgic for, one in which women were constantly pregnant and in labor, and children were constantly dying horrible deaths. Doesn’t that sound pleasant for everyone?

“I want a baby boom,” Trump has said. His administration is indeed exploring a range of approaches to boost the birth rate, including baby bonuses and classes on natural fertility. Yet his focus is entirely on the production of babies. When it comes to keeping these babies alive, this administration is leaving parents on their own, facing some horrifying and unprecedented challenges. It’s common for right-wing American governments, whether at the state or federal level, to be only half-heartedly natalist: restricting abortion, birth control, and sex education, while also failing to embrace any policy that makes it easier to raise a family, like universal childcare, robust public education, school lunch, cash supports for parents, or paid family leave. But the Trump-Vance government has taken this paradox to a new level, with natalist rhetoric far surpassing that of other recent administrations, while real live children are treated with more depraved, life-threatening indifference than in any American government in at least a century. Due to brutal cuts at the Food and Drug Administration, where 20,000 employees have been fired, the administration has suspended one of its quality-control programs for milk, Reuters reported this week. Milk is iconically associated with child health, and this is not a mere storybook whimsy: Most pediatricians regard it as critical for young children’s developing brains and bones. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends two cups a day for babies between 1 and 2 years old. While some experts—and of course the administration—are downplaying the change, emphasizing that milk will still be regulated, a bird flu epidemic hardly seems like the right time to be cutting corners. A government so focused on making more babies shouldn’t be so indifferent to risks to our nation’s toddlers.This reckless approach to child safety is not limited to food. Also this week, The New York Times reported that the Environmental Protection Agency was canceling tens of millions of dollars in grants for research on environmental hazards to children in rural America. These hazards include pesticides, wildfire smoke, and forever chemicals, and the grants supported research toward solutions to such problems. Many focused on improving child health in red states like Oklahoma. Children are much more vulnerable than adults to the health problems that can stem from exposure to toxins. That makes Trump’s policies, for all his baby-friendly chatter, seem pathologically misopedic; he is reversing bans on so-called “forever chemicals” and repealing limits set by the Biden administration on lead exposure, all of which will have devastating effects on children’s mental and physical development.And of course there’s RFK Jr.’s crazy campaign against vaccines. This week, the health secretary said he was considering removing the Covid-19 vaccine from the list of vaccines the government recommends for children, even though to win Senate confirmation, he had agreed not to alter the childhood vaccine schedule. Even worse, RFK Jr. has used his office to promote disinformation about extensively debunked links between vaccines and autism, while praising unproven “treatments” for measles as an outbreak that has afflicted more than 600 people and killed at least three continues to spread. Trump’s public health cuts are meanwhile imperiling a program that gives free vaccines to children. So far, I haven’t even mentioned children outside the United States. Trump has not only continued Biden’s policy of mass infanticide in Gaza—at least 100 children there have been killed or injured every week by Israeli forces since the dissolution of the ceasefire in March—he has vastly surpassed that shameful record by dismantling USAID. (The Supreme Court demanded that the government restore some of the funding to the already-contracted programs, but it’s unclear what the results of that ruling will be.) Children across the globe will starve to death due to this policy. The cuts to nutrition funding alone, researchers estimate, will kill some 369,000 children who could otherwise have lived. That’s not even counting all the other children’s lives imperiled by USAID funding cuts to vaccines, health services, and maternal care, or the children who will go unprotected now that Trump has cut 69 programs dedicated to tracking child labor, forced labor, and human trafficking.Natalist or exterminationist? Pro-child or rabidly infanticidal? It’s tempting to dismiss such extreme contradictions within the Trump administration as merely chaotic and incoherent. But the situation is worse than that. Trying to boost births while actively making the world less safe for children is creepy—but not in a new way. The contradiction is baked into the eugenicist tradition that Vance and Trump openly embrace. Vance said at an anti-abortion rally in January that he wanted “more babies in the United States of America.” Vance also said he wanted “more beautiful young men and women” to have children. Notice he doesn’t just say “more babies”: the qualifiers are significant. Vance was implying that he wanted the right people to have babies: American, white, able-bodied, “beautiful” people with robust genetics. Children dying because of USAID cuts aren’t part of this vision, presumably, because those children are not American or white. As for infected milk, environmental toxins, or measles—here too, it’s hard not to hear social Darwinist overtones: In a far-right eugenicist worldview, children killed by those things likely aren’t fit for survival. In a more chaotic and dangerous environment, this extremely outdated logic goes, natural selection will ensure that the strongest survive. It’s also worth noting that this way of thinking originates in—and many of these Trump administration policies aim to return us to—an earlier era, when people of all ages, but especially children, were simply poisoned by industrial pollution, unvaccinated for diseases, and unprotected from industrial accidents. In such an unsafe world for children, people had many more of them; the world was such a dangerous place to raise kids that families expected to lose a few. That all-too-recent period is the unspoken context for natalist and eugenicist visions. That’s the world Trump and Vance seem to be nostalgic for, one in which women were constantly pregnant and in labor, and children were constantly dying horrible deaths. Doesn’t that sound pleasant for everyone?

The greater Pittsburgh region is among the 25 worst metro areas in the country for air quality: Report

PITTSBURGH — The greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area is among the 25 regions in the country with the worst air pollution, according to a new report from the American Lung Association.The nonprofit public health organization’s annual “State of the Air” report uses a report card-style grading system to compare air quality in regions across the U.S. This year’s report found that 46% of Americans — 156.1 million people — are living in places that get failing grades for unhealthy levels of ozone or particulate pollution. Overall, air pollution measured by the report was worse than in previous years, with more Americans living in places with unhealthy air than in the previous 10 years the report has been published.The 13-county region spanning Pittsburgh and southwestern Pennsylvania; Weirton, West Virginia; and Steubenville, Ohio received “fail” grades for both daily and annual average particulate matter exposure for the years 2021–2023.The region ranked 16th worst for 24-hour particle pollution out of 225 metropolitan areas and 12th worst for annual particle pollution out of 208 metropolitan areas. Particulate matter pollution, which comes from things like industrial emissions, vehicle exhaust, wildfires, and wood burning, causes higher rates of asthma, decreased lung function in children, and increased hospital admissions and premature death due to heart attacks and respiratory illness. Long-term exposure to particulate matter pollution also raises the risk of lung cancer, and research suggests that in the Pittsburgh region, air pollution linked to particulate matter and other harmful substances contributes significantly to cancer rates. According to the report, the Pittsburgh metro area is home to around 50,022 children with pediatric asthma, 227,806 adults with asthma, 173,588 people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), 250,600 people with cardiovascular disease, 1,468 people with lung cancer, and around 25,746 pregnant people, all of whom are especially vulnerable to the harmful impacts of particulate matter pollution exposure."The findings help community members understand the ongoing risks to the health of people in our region," said Matt Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project and the Breathe Collaborative, a coalition of more than 30 groups in southwestern Pennsylvania that advocate for cleaner air. "These findings emphasize the need to transition away from fossil fuels — in industry, transportation and residential uses — if we are to improve our health and address climate change." Allegheny County has received a failing grade for particulate matter pollution from the American Lung Association every year since the "State of the Air" report was first issued in 2004. The region is home to numerous polluting industries, with an estimated 80% of toxic air pollutants in Allegheny County (which encompasses Pittsburgh) coming from ten industrial sites, according to an analysis by the nonprofit environmental advocacy group PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center. The Ohio River near Pittsburgh Credit: Kristina Marusic for EHN In the 2024 State of the Air report, which looked at 2020-2022, Pittsburgh was for the first time ever not among the 25 cities most polluted by particulate matte, and showed some improvements in air quality, some of which may have resulted from pollution reductions spurred by the COVID-19 shut-down in 2020.The region earned a grade D for ozone smog this year, but its ranking improved from last year — it went from the 50th worst metro area for ozone smog in 2024’s report to the 90th worst in this year’s. Ozone pollution also comes from sources like vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions, and occurs when certain chemicals mix with sunlight. Exposure to ozone pollution is linked to respiratory issues, worsened asthma symptoms, and long-term lung damage.Each year the State of the Air Report makes recommendations for improving air quality. This year those recommendations include defending funding for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), because sweeping staff cuts and reduction of federal funding under the Trump administration are impairing the agency’s ability to enforce clean air regulations. For example, the report notes that EPA recently lowered annual limits for fine particulate matter pollution from 12 micrograms per cubic meter to 9 micrograms per cubic meter, and that states, including Pennsylvania, have submitted their recommendations for which areas should be cleaned up. Next, the agency must review those recommendations and add its own analyses to make final decisions by February 6, 2026 about which areas need additional pollution controls. If it fails to do so due to lack of funding or staffing, the report suggests, air quality might suffer.“The bottom line is this,” the report states. “EPA staff, working in communities across the country, are doing crucial work to keep your air clean. Staff cuts are already impacting people’s health across the country. Further cuts mean more dirty air.”

PITTSBURGH — The greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area is among the 25 regions in the country with the worst air pollution, according to a new report from the American Lung Association.The nonprofit public health organization’s annual “State of the Air” report uses a report card-style grading system to compare air quality in regions across the U.S. This year’s report found that 46% of Americans — 156.1 million people — are living in places that get failing grades for unhealthy levels of ozone or particulate pollution. Overall, air pollution measured by the report was worse than in previous years, with more Americans living in places with unhealthy air than in the previous 10 years the report has been published.The 13-county region spanning Pittsburgh and southwestern Pennsylvania; Weirton, West Virginia; and Steubenville, Ohio received “fail” grades for both daily and annual average particulate matter exposure for the years 2021–2023.The region ranked 16th worst for 24-hour particle pollution out of 225 metropolitan areas and 12th worst for annual particle pollution out of 208 metropolitan areas. Particulate matter pollution, which comes from things like industrial emissions, vehicle exhaust, wildfires, and wood burning, causes higher rates of asthma, decreased lung function in children, and increased hospital admissions and premature death due to heart attacks and respiratory illness. Long-term exposure to particulate matter pollution also raises the risk of lung cancer, and research suggests that in the Pittsburgh region, air pollution linked to particulate matter and other harmful substances contributes significantly to cancer rates. According to the report, the Pittsburgh metro area is home to around 50,022 children with pediatric asthma, 227,806 adults with asthma, 173,588 people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), 250,600 people with cardiovascular disease, 1,468 people with lung cancer, and around 25,746 pregnant people, all of whom are especially vulnerable to the harmful impacts of particulate matter pollution exposure."The findings help community members understand the ongoing risks to the health of people in our region," said Matt Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project and the Breathe Collaborative, a coalition of more than 30 groups in southwestern Pennsylvania that advocate for cleaner air. "These findings emphasize the need to transition away from fossil fuels — in industry, transportation and residential uses — if we are to improve our health and address climate change." Allegheny County has received a failing grade for particulate matter pollution from the American Lung Association every year since the "State of the Air" report was first issued in 2004. The region is home to numerous polluting industries, with an estimated 80% of toxic air pollutants in Allegheny County (which encompasses Pittsburgh) coming from ten industrial sites, according to an analysis by the nonprofit environmental advocacy group PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center. The Ohio River near Pittsburgh Credit: Kristina Marusic for EHN In the 2024 State of the Air report, which looked at 2020-2022, Pittsburgh was for the first time ever not among the 25 cities most polluted by particulate matte, and showed some improvements in air quality, some of which may have resulted from pollution reductions spurred by the COVID-19 shut-down in 2020.The region earned a grade D for ozone smog this year, but its ranking improved from last year — it went from the 50th worst metro area for ozone smog in 2024’s report to the 90th worst in this year’s. Ozone pollution also comes from sources like vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions, and occurs when certain chemicals mix with sunlight. Exposure to ozone pollution is linked to respiratory issues, worsened asthma symptoms, and long-term lung damage.Each year the State of the Air Report makes recommendations for improving air quality. This year those recommendations include defending funding for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), because sweeping staff cuts and reduction of federal funding under the Trump administration are impairing the agency’s ability to enforce clean air regulations. For example, the report notes that EPA recently lowered annual limits for fine particulate matter pollution from 12 micrograms per cubic meter to 9 micrograms per cubic meter, and that states, including Pennsylvania, have submitted their recommendations for which areas should be cleaned up. Next, the agency must review those recommendations and add its own analyses to make final decisions by February 6, 2026 about which areas need additional pollution controls. If it fails to do so due to lack of funding or staffing, the report suggests, air quality might suffer.“The bottom line is this,” the report states. “EPA staff, working in communities across the country, are doing crucial work to keep your air clean. Staff cuts are already impacting people’s health across the country. Further cuts mean more dirty air.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.