Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Can the Noise in Sports Arenas Be Turned Into Electricity?

News Feed
Monday, August 5, 2024

fstop123/Getty Images Gyeongyun Lily Min spent the last seven months in a makeshift laboratory she set up in her parent’s garage as she tried to convert vibrations produced by sound waves in sports arenas into electrical energy. Her days were a long repetition of refining the concept, conducting experiments and analyzing the results. The 17-year-old rising senior at Alfred M. Barbe High School in Lake Charles, Louisiana, was initially inspired by Disney’s Monsters, Inc. In the 2001 film, energy is generated from children’s screams. Sans the cruelty, Gyeongyun thought, the concept could help meet the global demand for sustainable energy. “This imaginative concept sparked my curiosity about the potential of converting sound into usable energy,” explains Gyeongyun. “I began to wonder if, in reality, we could harness the abundant noise in environments like sports arenas and use it to generate electricity.” Merging her curiosity with her passion for science and innovation, the young student set out to study the concept on her own. “This idea,” says Gyeongyun, “led me to explore the feasibility of acoustic energy harvesting as a sustainable and innovative energy solution that could contribute to meeting global energy demands and reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.” With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. Society for Science Today, with over 60 percent of global electricity generated by fossil fuels, the world continues to be heavily dependent on non-renewable energy sources. Coal is the largest contributor to the industry at roughly 36 percent, followed by natural gas with a share of around 23 percent. According to a recent report by the World Nuclear Association, which promotes the global nuclear energy industry, over 40 percent of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per year are due to the burning of fossil fuels for electricity generation. The power sector is the largest source of planet-warming CO2 worldwide. About a year and a half ago, Gyeongyun watched her mother garden and make her own compost. She observed the heat generated by the compost and wondered how this thermal energy could be harnessed and converted into usable energy. “This led me to explore the principles of heat transfer and energy conversion through experiments with composting coffee grounds,” says Gyeongyun. A few months later, the student researcher found herself again intrigued by innovative new ways to harvest energy, this time from environments like sports arenas rich in noise levels, with the help of the piezoelectric effect. Certain materials in the environment produce large amounts of mechanical energy as vibrations or shocks. This energy is largely wasted. However, with the piezoelectric effect, it is possible to convert this kinetic energy into electric energy. Piezoelectricity, in simple terms, is the production of an electric charge in response to natural or artificially applied pressure. One of the best-known examples of electricity generated through the piezoelectric effect was found in the Shibuya train station in Tokyo. From 2008 to 2009, a piezoelectric mat measuring about 14 square inches was installed outside the station. The inch-thick mat generated electricity every time a person stepped on it. With some 2.4 million people passing through the station daily, the mat produced between 0.1 and 0.3 watts of electricity in each second it was stepped on. “I chose a sports arena as the suitable location for my project because it represents a unique environment where noise levels are consistently high due to the cheering crowds, announcements and music,” Gyeongyun says. According to the American Academy of Audiology, the noise levels at a sporting event can reach 110 decibels. “Additionally, sports arenas are large, public spaces where implementing sustainable energy solutions could have a significant positive impact, making them an ideal candidate for exploring innovative energy harvesting techniques,” she adds. To accurately simulate the sound environment of a sports arena, the young innovator built an approximately 22-inch by 12-inch model of a basketball stadium with the official NBA court ratio, crafted primarily from lightweight materials such as foam board and plastic to simulate the structural aspects of a real sports arena. She then found the best locations within it for piezoelectric generators by studying sound pressure in relation to the speaker’s position. For sound, Gyeongyun played audio recordings of typical crowd noise in a sports arena, including cheering and general ambient sounds at average sound pressure levels of 70 and 100 decibels, representing normal and peak noise levels observed during a live event. She designed three different types of energy harvester models—known as Cassegrain, Gregorian and front feed—that help focus sound onto the piezoelectric generators, thus improving their efficiency in capturing energy. Regeneron ISEF 2024 - Gyeongyun Lily Min The voltage produced by Gyeongyun’s energy-harvesting models demonstrated a significantly higher voltage output than standalone piezoelectric devices. “While a regular piezoelectric device might produce minimal voltage under similar conditions,” explains the student, “the harvester models in the experiment produced up to several tens of millivolts, depending on the configuration and sound pressure level.” She adds, “This enhancement suggests that the design of the models, which focuses sound energy toward the piezoelectric materials, plays a crucial role in increasing efficiency.” With limited resources, Gyeongyun faced some obstacles. For one, she struggled with relatively low-quality piezoelectric material she purchased from Amazon. “[They were] not as sensitive as needed for optimal energy harvesting,” she says. “This limitation significantly impacted the efficiency and accuracy of my experiment.” Nevertheless, she adapted her experimental setup and re-evaluated expectations regarding the voltage output. The experiment revealed that the piezoelectric devices in the model generated relatively small amounts of electricity, with the voltage output varying depending on the sound pressure level and the location of the energy harvesters. “For instance, the Cassegrain model produced an average of 44.90 millivolts at 100 decibels, while the front feed model yielded around 38.60 millivolts at 70 decibels,” Gyeongyun explains. While that output is relatively low, scaling this to an actual sports arena suggests that there is potential for improvement with more sensitive materials and better design. “The success of the experiment was evaluated based on the comparative voltage output between different models and setups, indicating that strategic deployment can enhance energy harvesting efficiency,” she says. “If I had access to better materials, I believe I could significantly enhance the effectiveness and reliability of my energy harvesting research.” Her project demonstrates the possibility of generating electric energy with piezoelectric devices from environments with considerably high noise levels. When implemented on a large scale, the technology has the potential to reduce global reliance on fossil fuels, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and helping mitigate climate change. “In urban areas with heavy traffic, the constant noise from vehicles could be harnessed to generate electricity, contributing to the energy needs of city infrastructure,” Gyeongyun says. “Manufacturing plants, which often have continuous machinery noise, could integrate piezoelectric devices to capture and convert these sound vibrations into electrical energy, thereby reducing their overall energy consumption and improving sustainability.” Public transportation systems, such as subway stations and train terminals, which experience high levels of ambient noise from trains and passengers, could utilize this technology to power some of their operations, as well. With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. The top award was granted to a student who built a better organic electrochemical transistor to be used in implantable bioelectronics that can help detect and treat serious illnesses like diabetes, epilepsy and organ failure. The second-place prize was won by another student scientist who improved the speed and efficiency of software that is used in several fields, including machine learning, transportation and financial systems. Maya Ajmera, president and CEO of Society for Science, which runs the Regeneron competition, calls Gyeongyun’s research “innovative.” “Gyeongyun at the age of 17, thinking about this project, I found it very inspirational,” she says. Daniel Inman, a mechanical engineer at the University of Michigan and co-author of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting, considers it a feasible technology. “There have been a number of studies on floor vibrations as a source of harvested energy, and this may be viable.” However, the expert points out several important factors that can affect how well Gyeongyun’s technology works. These include the type of material the stadium is made from, the amount of vibrational energy generated from the crowd walking or stomping, and how these vibrations are measured. “The big challenge is that a reasonable amount of piezo material only has the ability to harvest microwatts of energy,” says Inman. “There are many issues and factors in determining how much energy can be harvested in a given situation. This makes it impossible to make predictions about a given situation unless one knows all the factors, such as the density of the available ambient energy and its properties such as frequency, amplitude, etc. Bringing these systems to scale would require hundreds of such elements.” Gyeongyun remains hopeful for the future of the technology. “Although this technology is not yet realistically applicable due to the current limitations in the sensitivity and efficiency of piezoelectric materials, further research and development could significantly improve its feasibility,” she says. “By advancing the quality of piezoelectric devices and optimizing their deployment, we can unlock a new avenue for sustainable energy production, contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable future.” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Seventeen-year-old Gyeongyun Lily Min is hopeful it can someday, after testing the concept on a scale model of an NBA stadium

fans in a basketball stadium
fstop123/Getty Images

Gyeongyun Lily Min spent the last seven months in a makeshift laboratory she set up in her parent’s garage as she tried to convert vibrations produced by sound waves in sports arenas into electrical energy. Her days were a long repetition of refining the concept, conducting experiments and analyzing the results.

The 17-year-old rising senior at Alfred M. Barbe High School in Lake Charles, Louisiana, was initially inspired by Disney’s Monsters, Inc. In the 2001 film, energy is generated from children’s screams. Sans the cruelty, Gyeongyun thought, the concept could help meet the global demand for sustainable energy.

“This imaginative concept sparked my curiosity about the potential of converting sound into usable energy,” explains Gyeongyun. “I began to wonder if, in reality, we could harness the abundant noise in environments like sports arenas and use it to generate electricity.”

Merging her curiosity with her passion for science and innovation, the young student set out to study the concept on her own. “This idea,” says Gyeongyun, “led me to explore the feasibility of acoustic energy harvesting as a sustainable and innovative energy solution that could contribute to meeting global energy demands and reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.”

Can the Noise in Sports Arenas Be Turned Into Electricity?
With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. Society for Science

Today, with over 60 percent of global electricity generated by fossil fuels, the world continues to be heavily dependent on non-renewable energy sources. Coal is the largest contributor to the industry at roughly 36 percent, followed by natural gas with a share of around 23 percent. According to a recent report by the World Nuclear Association, which promotes the global nuclear energy industry, over 40 percent of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per year are due to the burning of fossil fuels for electricity generation. The power sector is the largest source of planet-warming CO2 worldwide.

About a year and a half ago, Gyeongyun watched her mother garden and make her own compost. She observed the heat generated by the compost and wondered how this thermal energy could be harnessed and converted into usable energy. “This led me to explore the principles of heat transfer and energy conversion through experiments with composting coffee grounds,” says Gyeongyun.

A few months later, the student researcher found herself again intrigued by innovative new ways to harvest energy, this time from environments like sports arenas rich in noise levels, with the help of the piezoelectric effect.

Certain materials in the environment produce large amounts of mechanical energy as vibrations or shocks. This energy is largely wasted. However, with the piezoelectric effect, it is possible to convert this kinetic energy into electric energy. Piezoelectricity, in simple terms, is the production of an electric charge in response to natural or artificially applied pressure.

One of the best-known examples of electricity generated through the piezoelectric effect was found in the Shibuya train station in Tokyo. From 2008 to 2009, a piezoelectric mat measuring about 14 square inches was installed outside the station. The inch-thick mat generated electricity every time a person stepped on it. With some 2.4 million people passing through the station daily, the mat produced between 0.1 and 0.3 watts of electricity in each second it was stepped on.

“I chose a sports arena as the suitable location for my project because it represents a unique environment where noise levels are consistently high due to the cheering crowds, announcements and music,” Gyeongyun says. According to the American Academy of Audiology, the noise levels at a sporting event can reach 110 decibels. “Additionally, sports arenas are large, public spaces where implementing sustainable energy solutions could have a significant positive impact, making them an ideal candidate for exploring innovative energy harvesting techniques,” she adds.

To accurately simulate the sound environment of a sports arena, the young innovator built an approximately 22-inch by 12-inch model of a basketball stadium with the official NBA court ratio, crafted primarily from lightweight materials such as foam board and plastic to simulate the structural aspects of a real sports arena. She then found the best locations within it for piezoelectric generators by studying sound pressure in relation to the speaker’s position. For sound, Gyeongyun played audio recordings of typical crowd noise in a sports arena, including cheering and general ambient sounds at average sound pressure levels of 70 and 100 decibels, representing normal and peak noise levels observed during a live event. She designed three different types of energy harvester models—known as Cassegrain, Gregorian and front feed—that help focus sound onto the piezoelectric generators, thus improving their efficiency in capturing energy.

Regeneron ISEF 2024 - Gyeongyun Lily Min

The voltage produced by Gyeongyun’s energy-harvesting models demonstrated a significantly higher voltage output than standalone piezoelectric devices. “While a regular piezoelectric device might produce minimal voltage under similar conditions,” explains the student, “the harvester models in the experiment produced up to several tens of millivolts, depending on the configuration and sound pressure level.” She adds, “This enhancement suggests that the design of the models, which focuses sound energy toward the piezoelectric materials, plays a crucial role in increasing efficiency.”

With limited resources, Gyeongyun faced some obstacles. For one, she struggled with relatively low-quality piezoelectric material she purchased from Amazon. “[They were] not as sensitive as needed for optimal energy harvesting,” she says. “This limitation significantly impacted the efficiency and accuracy of my experiment.” Nevertheless, she adapted her experimental setup and re-evaluated expectations regarding the voltage output.

The experiment revealed that the piezoelectric devices in the model generated relatively small amounts of electricity, with the voltage output varying depending on the sound pressure level and the location of the energy harvesters. “For instance, the Cassegrain model produced an average of 44.90 millivolts at 100 decibels, while the front feed model yielded around 38.60 millivolts at 70 decibels,” Gyeongyun explains. While that output is relatively low, scaling this to an actual sports arena suggests that there is potential for improvement with more sensitive materials and better design.

“The success of the experiment was evaluated based on the comparative voltage output between different models and setups, indicating that strategic deployment can enhance energy harvesting efficiency,” she says. “If I had access to better materials, I believe I could significantly enhance the effectiveness and reliability of my energy harvesting research.”

Her project demonstrates the possibility of generating electric energy with piezoelectric devices from environments with considerably high noise levels. When implemented on a large scale, the technology has the potential to reduce global reliance on fossil fuels, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and helping mitigate climate change.

“In urban areas with heavy traffic, the constant noise from vehicles could be harnessed to generate electricity, contributing to the energy needs of city infrastructure,” Gyeongyun says. “Manufacturing plants, which often have continuous machinery noise, could integrate piezoelectric devices to capture and convert these sound vibrations into electrical energy, thereby reducing their overall energy consumption and improving sustainability.”

Public transportation systems, such as subway stations and train terminals, which experience high levels of ambient noise from trains and passengers, could utilize this technology to power some of their operations, as well.

With her environmental sustainability technology, Gyeongyun secured a spot as a finalist in this year’s Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest global science competition for high school students. The top award was granted to a student who built a better organic electrochemical transistor to be used in implantable bioelectronics that can help detect and treat serious illnesses like diabetes, epilepsy and organ failure. The second-place prize was won by another student scientist who improved the speed and efficiency of software that is used in several fields, including machine learning, transportation and financial systems.

Maya Ajmera, president and CEO of Society for Science, which runs the Regeneron competition, calls Gyeongyun’s research “innovative.” “Gyeongyun at the age of 17, thinking about this project, I found it very inspirational,” she says.

Daniel Inman, a mechanical engineer at the University of Michigan and co-author of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting, considers it a feasible technology. “There have been a number of studies on floor vibrations as a source of harvested energy, and this may be viable.” However, the expert points out several important factors that can affect how well Gyeongyun’s technology works. These include the type of material the stadium is made from, the amount of vibrational energy generated from the crowd walking or stomping, and how these vibrations are measured.

“The big challenge is that a reasonable amount of piezo material only has the ability to harvest microwatts of energy,” says Inman. “There are many issues and factors in determining how much energy can be harvested in a given situation. This makes it impossible to make predictions about a given situation unless one knows all the factors, such as the density of the available ambient energy and its properties such as frequency, amplitude, etc. Bringing these systems to scale would require hundreds of such elements.”

Gyeongyun remains hopeful for the future of the technology.

“Although this technology is not yet realistically applicable due to the current limitations in the sensitivity and efficiency of piezoelectric materials, further research and development could significantly improve its feasibility,” she says. “By advancing the quality of piezoelectric devices and optimizing their deployment, we can unlock a new avenue for sustainable energy production, contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable future.”

Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Medical Imaging Contributing To Water Pollution, Experts Say

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Dec. 11, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Contrast chemicals injected into people for medical imaging scans...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Dec. 11, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Contrast chemicals injected into people for medical imaging scans are likely contributing to water pollution, a new study says.Medicare patients alone received 13.5 billion milliliters of contrast media between 2011 and 2024, and those chemicals wound up in waterways after people excreted them, researchers recently reported in JAMA Network Open.“Contrast agents are necessary for effective imaging, but they don’t disappear after use,” said lead researcher Dr. Florence Doo, an assistant professor at the University of Maryland Medical Intelligent Imaging Center in Baltimore.“Iodine and gadolinium are non-renewable resources that can enter wastewater and accumulate in rivers, oceans and even drinking water,” Doo said in a news release.People undergoing X-ray or CT scans are sometimes given iodine or barium-sulfate compounds that cause certain tissues, blood vessels or organs to light up, allowing radiologists a better look at potential health problems.For MRI scans, radiologists use gadolinium, a substance that alters the magnetic properties of water molecules in the human body.These are critical for diagnosing disease, but they are also persistent pollutants, researchers said in background notes. They aren’t biodegradable, and conventional wastewater treatment doesn’t fully remove them.For the new study, researchers analyzed 169 million contrast-enhanced imaging procedures that Medicare covered over 13 years.Iodine-based contrast agents accounted for more than 95% of the total volume, or nearly 12.9 billion milliliters. Of those, agents used in CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis alone contributed 4.4 billion milliliters.Gadolinium agents were less frequently used, but still contributed nearly 600 million milliliters, researchers said. Brain MRIs were the most common scan using these contrast materials.Overall, just a handful of procedures accounted for 80% of all contrast use, researchers concluded.“Our study shows that a small number of imaging procedures drive the majority of contrast use. Focusing on those highest-use imaging types make meaningful changes tractable and could significantly reduce health care’s environmental footprint,” researcher Elizabeth Rula, executive director of the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute in Reston, Va., said in a news release.Doctors can help by making sure their imaging orders are necessary, while radiologists can lower the doses of contrast agents by basing them on a patient’s weight, researchers said.Biodegradable contrast media are under development, researchers noted. Another solution could involve AI, which might be able to accurately analyze medical imaging scans even if less contrast media is used.“We can’t ignore the environmental consequences of medical imaging,” Doo said. “Stewardship of contrast agents is a measurable and impactful way to align patient care with planetary health and should be an important part of broader health care sustainability efforts.”SOURCES: Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, news release, Dec. 4, 2025; JAMA Network Open, Dec. 5, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Cars to AI: How new tech drives demand for specialized materials

Generative artificial intelligence has become widely accepted as a tool that increases productivity. Yet the technology is far from mature. Large language models advance rapidly from one generation to the next, and experts can only speculate how AI will affect the workforce and people’s daily lives. As a materials scientist, I am interested in how materials and the technologies that derive from them affect society. AI is one example of a technology driving global change—particularly through its demand for materials and rare minerals. But before AI evolved to its current level, two other technologies exemplified the process created by the demand for specialized materials: cars and smartphones. Often, the mass adoption of a new invention changes human behavior, which leads to new technologies and infrastructures reliant upon the invention. In turn, these new technologies and infrastructures require new or improved materials—and these often contain critical minerals: those minerals that are both essential to the technology and strain the supply chain. The unequal distribution of these minerals gives leverage to the nations that produce them. The resulting power shifts strain geopolitical relations and drive the search for new mineral sources. New technology nurtures the mining industry. The car and the development of suburbs At the beginning of the 20th century, only 5 out of 1,000 people owned a car, with annual production around a few thousand. Workers commuted on foot or by tram. Within a 2-mile radius, many people had all they needed: from groceries to hardware, from school to church, and from shoemakers to doctors. Then, in 1913, Henry Ford transformed the industry by inventing the assembly line. Now, a middle class family could afford a car: Mass production cut the price of the Model T from US$850 in 1908 to $360 in 1916. While the Great Depression dampened the broad adoption of the car, sales began to increase again after the end of World War II. With cars came more mobility, and many people moved farther away from work. In the 1940s and 1950s, a powerful highway lobby that included oil, automobile, and construction interests promoted federal highway and transportation policies, which increased automobile dependence. These policies helped change the landscape: Houses were spaced farther apart, and located farther away from the urban centers where many people worked. By the 1960s, two-thirds of American workers commuted by car, and the average commute had increased to 10 miles. Public policy and investment favored suburbs, which meant less investment in city centers. The resulting decay made living in downtown areas of many cities undesirable and triggered urban renewal projects. Long commutes added to pollution and expenses, which created a demand for lighter, more fuel-efficient cars. But building these required better materials. In 1970, the entire frame and body of a car was made from one steel type, but by 2017, 10 different, highly specialized steels constituted a vehicle’s lightweight form. Each steel contains different chemical elements, such as molybdenum and vanadium, which are mined only in a few countries. While the car supply chain was mostly domestic until the 1970s, the car industry today relies heavily on imports. This dependence has created tension with international trade partners, as reflected by higher tariffs on steel. The cellphone and American life The cellphone presents another example of a technology creating a demand for minerals and affecting foreign policy. In 1983, Motorola released the DynaTAC, the first commercial cellular phone. It was heavy, expensive, and its battery lasted for only half an hour, so few people had one. Then in 1996, Motorola introduced the flip phone, which was cheaper, lighter, and more convenient to use. The flip phone initiated the mass adoption of cellphones. However, it was still just a phone: Unlike today’s smartphones, all it did was send and receive calls and texts. In 2007, Apple redefined communication with the iPhone, inventing the touchscreen and integrating an internet navigator. The phone became a digital hub for navigating, finding information, and building an online social identity. Before smartphones, mobile phones supplemented daily life. Now, they structure it. In 2000, fewer than half of American adults owned a cellphone, and nearly all who did used it only sporadically. In 2024, 98% of Americans over the age of 18 reported owning a cellphone, and over 90% owned a smartphone. Without the smartphone, most people cannot fulfill their daily tasks. Many individuals now experience nomophobia: They feel anxious without a cellphone. Around three-quarters of all stable elements are represented in the components of each smartphone. These elements are necessary for highly specialized materials that enable touchscreens, displays, batteries, speakers, microphones, and cameras. Many of these elements are essential for at least one function and have an unreliable supply chain, which makes them critical. Critical materials and AI Critical materials give leverage to countries that have a monopoly in mining and processing them. For example, China has gained increased power through its monopoly on rare earth elements. In April 2025, in response to U.S. tariffs, China stopped exporting rare earth magnets, which are used in cellphones. The geopolitical tensions that resulted demonstrate the power embodied in the control over critical minerals. The mass adoption of AI technology will likely change human behavior and bring forth new technologies, industries, and infrastructure on which the U.S. economy will depend. All of these technologies will require more optimized and specialized materials and create new material dependencies. By exacerbating material dependencies, AI could affect geopolitical relations and reorganize global power. America has rich deposits of many important minerals, but extraction of these minerals comes with challenges. Factors including slow and costly permitting, public opposition, environmental concerns, high investment costs, and an inadequate workforce all can prevent mining companies from accessing these resources. The mass adoption of AI is already adding pressure to overcome these factors and to increase responsible domestic mining. While the path from innovation to material dependence spanned a century for cars and a couple of decades for cellphones, the rapid advancement of large language models suggests that the scale will be measured in years for AI. The heat is already on. Peter Müllner is a distinguished professor in materials science and engineering at Boise State University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Generative artificial intelligence has become widely accepted as a tool that increases productivity. Yet the technology is far from mature. Large language models advance rapidly from one generation to the next, and experts can only speculate how AI will affect the workforce and people’s daily lives. As a materials scientist, I am interested in how materials and the technologies that derive from them affect society. AI is one example of a technology driving global change—particularly through its demand for materials and rare minerals. But before AI evolved to its current level, two other technologies exemplified the process created by the demand for specialized materials: cars and smartphones. Often, the mass adoption of a new invention changes human behavior, which leads to new technologies and infrastructures reliant upon the invention. In turn, these new technologies and infrastructures require new or improved materials—and these often contain critical minerals: those minerals that are both essential to the technology and strain the supply chain. The unequal distribution of these minerals gives leverage to the nations that produce them. The resulting power shifts strain geopolitical relations and drive the search for new mineral sources. New technology nurtures the mining industry. The car and the development of suburbs At the beginning of the 20th century, only 5 out of 1,000 people owned a car, with annual production around a few thousand. Workers commuted on foot or by tram. Within a 2-mile radius, many people had all they needed: from groceries to hardware, from school to church, and from shoemakers to doctors. Then, in 1913, Henry Ford transformed the industry by inventing the assembly line. Now, a middle class family could afford a car: Mass production cut the price of the Model T from US$850 in 1908 to $360 in 1916. While the Great Depression dampened the broad adoption of the car, sales began to increase again after the end of World War II. With cars came more mobility, and many people moved farther away from work. In the 1940s and 1950s, a powerful highway lobby that included oil, automobile, and construction interests promoted federal highway and transportation policies, which increased automobile dependence. These policies helped change the landscape: Houses were spaced farther apart, and located farther away from the urban centers where many people worked. By the 1960s, two-thirds of American workers commuted by car, and the average commute had increased to 10 miles. Public policy and investment favored suburbs, which meant less investment in city centers. The resulting decay made living in downtown areas of many cities undesirable and triggered urban renewal projects. Long commutes added to pollution and expenses, which created a demand for lighter, more fuel-efficient cars. But building these required better materials. In 1970, the entire frame and body of a car was made from one steel type, but by 2017, 10 different, highly specialized steels constituted a vehicle’s lightweight form. Each steel contains different chemical elements, such as molybdenum and vanadium, which are mined only in a few countries. While the car supply chain was mostly domestic until the 1970s, the car industry today relies heavily on imports. This dependence has created tension with international trade partners, as reflected by higher tariffs on steel. The cellphone and American life The cellphone presents another example of a technology creating a demand for minerals and affecting foreign policy. In 1983, Motorola released the DynaTAC, the first commercial cellular phone. It was heavy, expensive, and its battery lasted for only half an hour, so few people had one. Then in 1996, Motorola introduced the flip phone, which was cheaper, lighter, and more convenient to use. The flip phone initiated the mass adoption of cellphones. However, it was still just a phone: Unlike today’s smartphones, all it did was send and receive calls and texts. In 2007, Apple redefined communication with the iPhone, inventing the touchscreen and integrating an internet navigator. The phone became a digital hub for navigating, finding information, and building an online social identity. Before smartphones, mobile phones supplemented daily life. Now, they structure it. In 2000, fewer than half of American adults owned a cellphone, and nearly all who did used it only sporadically. In 2024, 98% of Americans over the age of 18 reported owning a cellphone, and over 90% owned a smartphone. Without the smartphone, most people cannot fulfill their daily tasks. Many individuals now experience nomophobia: They feel anxious without a cellphone. Around three-quarters of all stable elements are represented in the components of each smartphone. These elements are necessary for highly specialized materials that enable touchscreens, displays, batteries, speakers, microphones, and cameras. Many of these elements are essential for at least one function and have an unreliable supply chain, which makes them critical. Critical materials and AI Critical materials give leverage to countries that have a monopoly in mining and processing them. For example, China has gained increased power through its monopoly on rare earth elements. In April 2025, in response to U.S. tariffs, China stopped exporting rare earth magnets, which are used in cellphones. The geopolitical tensions that resulted demonstrate the power embodied in the control over critical minerals. The mass adoption of AI technology will likely change human behavior and bring forth new technologies, industries, and infrastructure on which the U.S. economy will depend. All of these technologies will require more optimized and specialized materials and create new material dependencies. By exacerbating material dependencies, AI could affect geopolitical relations and reorganize global power. America has rich deposits of many important minerals, but extraction of these minerals comes with challenges. Factors including slow and costly permitting, public opposition, environmental concerns, high investment costs, and an inadequate workforce all can prevent mining companies from accessing these resources. The mass adoption of AI is already adding pressure to overcome these factors and to increase responsible domestic mining. While the path from innovation to material dependence spanned a century for cars and a couple of decades for cellphones, the rapid advancement of large language models suggests that the scale will be measured in years for AI. The heat is already on. Peter Müllner is a distinguished professor in materials science and engineering at Boise State University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Synthetic chemicals in food system creating health burden of $2.2tn a year, report finds

Scientists issue urgent warning about chemicals, found to cause cancer and infertility as well as harming environmentScientists have issued an urgent warning that some of the synthetic chemicals that help underpin the current food system are driving increased rates of cancer, neurodevelopmental conditions and infertility, while degrading the foundations of global agriculture.The health burden from phthalates, bisphenols, pesticides and Pfas “forever chemicals” amounts to up to $2.2tn a year – roughly as much as the profits of the world’s 100 largest publicly listed companies, according to the report published on Wednesday. Continue reading...

Scientists have issued an urgent warning that some of the synthetic chemicals that help underpin the current food system are driving increased rates of cancer, neurodevelopmental conditions and infertility, while degrading the foundations of global agriculture.The health burden from phthalates, bisphenols, pesticides and Pfas “forever chemicals” amounts to up to $2.2tn a year – roughly as much as the profits of the world’s 100 largest publicly listed companies, according to the report published on Wednesday.Most ecosystem damage remains unpriced, they say, but even a narrow accounting of ecological impacts, taking into account agricultural losses and meeting water safety standards for Pfas and pesticides, implies a further cost of $640bn. There are also potential consequences for human demographics, with the report concluding that if exposure to endocrine disruptors such as bisphenols and phthalates persists at current rates, there could be between 200 million and 700 million fewer births between 2025 and 2100.The report is the work of dozens of scientists from organisations including the Institute of Preventive Health, the Center for Environmental Health, Chemsec, and various universities in the US and UK, including the University of Sussex and Duke University. It was led by a core team from Systemiq, a company that invests in enterprises aimed at fulfilling the UN sustainable development goals and the Paris agreement on climate change.The authors said they had focused on the four chemical types examined because “they are among the most prevalent and best studied worldwide, with robust evidence of harm to human and ecological health”.One of the team, Philip Landrigan, a paediatrician and professor of global public health at Boston College, called the report a “wake-up call”. He said: “The world really has to wake up and do something about chemical pollution. I would argue that the problem of chemical pollution is every bit as serious as the problem with climate change.”Human and ecosystem exposure to synthetic chemicals has surged since the end of the second world war, with chemical production increasing by more than 200 times since the 1950s and more than 350,000 synthetic chemicals currently on the global market.Three years ago, researchers from the Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC) concluded that chemical pollution had crossed a “planetary boundary”, the point at which human-made changes to the Earth push it outside the stable environment of the past 10,000 years, the period in which modern human civilisation has developed.Unlike with pharmaceuticals, there are few safeguards to test for the safety of industrial chemicals before they are put into use, and little monitoring of their effects once they are. Some have been found to be disastrously toxic to humans, animals and ecosystems, leaving governments to pick up the bill.This report assesses the impact of four families of synthetic chemicals endemic in global food production. Phthalates and bisphenols are commonly used as plastic additives, employed in food packaging and disposable gloves used in food preparation.Pesticides underpin industrial agriculture, with large-scale monoculture farms spraying thousands of gallons on crops to eliminate weeds and insects, and many crops treated after harvest to maintain freshness.Pfas are used in food contact materials such as greaseproof paper, popcorn tubs and ice-cream cartons, but have also accumulated in the environment to such an extent they enter food via air, soil and water contamination.All have been linked to harms including endocrine (hormone system) disruption, cancers, birth defects, intellectual impairment and obesity.Landrigan said that during his long career in paediatric public health he had seen a shift in the conditions affecting children. “The amount of disease and death caused by infectious diseases like measles, like scarlet fever, like pertussis, has come way down,” he said. “By contrast, there’s been this incredible increase in rates of non-communicable diseases. And of course, there’s no single factor there … but the evidence is very clear that increasing exposure to hundreds, maybe even thousands of manufactured chemicals is a very important cause of disease in kids.”Landrigan said he was most concerned about “the chemicals that damage children’s developing brains and thus make them less intelligent, less creative, just less able to give back to society across the whole of their lifetimes”.“And the second class of chemicals that I worry really worried about are the endocrine-disrupting chemicals,” he added. “Bisphenol would be the classic example, that get into people’s bodies at every age, damage the liver, change cholesterol metabolism, and result in increased serum cholesterol, increased obesity, increased diabetes, and those internally to increase rates of heart disease and stroke.”Asked whether the report could have looked beyond the groups of chemicals studied, Landridge said: “I would argue that they’re only the tip of the iceberg. They’re among the very small number of chemicals, maybe 20 or 30 chemicals where we really have solid toxicologic information.“What scares the hell out of me is the thousands of chemicals to which we’re all exposed every day about which we know nothing. And until one of them causes something obvious, like children to be born with missing limbs, we’re going to go on mindlessly exposing ourselves.”

More than 520 chemicals found in English soil, including long-banned medical substances

Fertilising arable land with human waste leaves array of toxins that could re-enter food chain, study findsMore than 520 chemicals have been found in English soils, including pharmaceutical products and toxins that were banned decades ago, because of the practice of spreading human waste to fertilise arable land.Research by scientists at the University of Leeds, published as a preprint in the Journal of Hazardous Materials, found a worrying array of chemicals in English soils. Close to half (46.4%) of the pharmaceutical substances detected had not been reported in previous global monitoring campaigns. Continue reading...

More than 520 chemicals have been found in English soils, including pharmaceutical products and toxins that were banned decades ago, because of the practice of spreading human waste to fertilise arable land.Research by scientists at the University of Leeds, published as a preprint in the Journal of Hazardous Materials, found a worrying array of chemicals in English soils. Close to half (46.4%) of the pharmaceutical substances detected had not been reported in previous global monitoring campaigns.The anticonvulsants lamotrigine and carbamazepine were among the human-use medicines reported for the first time in English soils.A category of chemicals of particular concern to scientists are emerging contaminants, which are pharmaceuticals and other chemicals which have not been widely studied for their impacts on the environment or human health when they re-enter the food chain.Water companies treat human faeces and remove some of the contaminants from wastewater at their treatment centres. The resulting product is treated biosolids, the organic matter from the human waste, and this is often disposed of by being spread on fields as fertiliser.However, it appears that despite decontamination, hundreds of chemicals are leaching into the soil and in some cases staying there for many years. Several chemicals banned or withdrawn from use decades ago were found to persist in agricultural soils.One of the researchers, Laura Carter, a professor of environmental chemistry at the University of Leeds, said: “Some of the chemicals were banned for use decades ago and their presence suggests that they are really persistent … so soils are a long-term sink of these pollutants.”It is possible these chemicals will enter the food chain and be ingested by humans who eat food grown in these fields, she said. It could also harm farm productivity if the chemicals inhibit plant growth or negatively affect soil health.“Some of the work which we did before this monitoring campaign was focused on the uptake and accumulation into crops and looking at effects on soil health and plant health,” she said. “What we need to understand is the subsequent pathway moving from the crops to consumption. Some of these contaminants can [affect] the soil health, and inhibit the nutrients taken up into crops.”To conduct the research, Carter and her team asked farmers to send soil samples to their lab, and also visited some farms themselves. They took a variety of measures to detect what she calls a “chemical fingerprint” of the soil, using methods including mass spectrometry.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe EU is working to remove these emerging contaminants from wastewater across the continent by passing legislation requiring countries to implement “quaternary treatment”, which is an advanced pollution removal method that can get rid of micropollutants such as these chemicals. The UK has no plans to do this, and for now is sticking with the less precise tertiary treatment systems.“Wastewater treatment processes can remove some contaminants,” Carter said. “We found that the processes are not as efficient as they need to be to remove them.“These chemicals aren’t regulated for so there isn’t a drive to develop or to focus on technologies that can remove them. More advanced treatment like the EU’s planned quaternary treatment will typically remove more.”Soil pollution is understudied compared with wastewater and river research, despite soil being so important for human and environmental health, and the fact contaminants can persist for decades.“This is because of a combination of factors. There are analytical challenges, the chemicals are often at trace levels so you need to develop methods to extract them; the soil and the biosolids and the more agricultural focus means you have the complexity of the environmental metrics to contend with when you are trying to monitor them. And there is a lack of awareness about the pathways in which they enter the environment,” Carter said.The contaminants can be removed, she said: “You can do processes such as actively planting crops so they take up the contaminants and that is a way of removing contaminants from the soil. But then you’d be left with trying to dispose of that contaminated plant.”She was most surprised to find the banned chemicals, because this showed the long-term persistence of contaminants in soil. “They have been prohibited for use for quite some years so we were surprised by their persistence in the soils,” Carter said.“We were also able to detect some anti-cancer drugs which was surprising because there isn’t very much research in this space so we haven’t seen those detected before.”It is not the fault of farmers for spreading this, she said, as it is what they have been told to do in order to be sustainable.“We need to regulate for them properly and we need education to make sure that everybody knows what is being applied and what the potential risks are that are associated with that,” Carter said.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.