Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

America’s most endangered rivers of 2024

News Feed
Wednesday, April 17, 2024

The United States has a nostalgic and almost mystical connection with its rivers.These vital waterways, many of which are central to the cultural traditions and day-to-day lives of Native American peoples, have also inspired centuries of American folklore, literature, and cinema—from the mighty Mississippi to the Hudson and Potomac rivers.But rather than dreamy, wistful tales of adventure and triumph from long ago, the modern reality of rivers tells a stark tale of pollution and its dire consequences for people, animals, and the environment.A new report detailing the general state of the nation’s rivers and a detailed account of its ten most endangered rivers says they are in crisis.“All water is connected. We cannot allow pollution anywhere without risk to the rivers we rely on for our drinking water,” said Tom Kiernan, President and CEO of American Rivers, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit environmental advocacy organization focused on protecting and promoting the health of the nation’s rivers. “Our leaders must hold polluters accountable and strengthen the Clean Water Act to safeguard our health and communities.”Around 44% of waterways are too polluted for swimming or fishing, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.The country’s 3.5 million miles of rivers supply water to thousands of farms and millions of people. They support a vast number of jobs nationwide and are home to countless animal and plant species. While the days of seeing rivers ablaze due to severe pollution may be behind us, new and equally daunting challenges have emerged, making safeguarding and rejuvenating these lifelines more complex and urgent than ever.Today, the country’s 250,000 rivers face the threat of human-made climate change, fueling more extreme weather, like floods and droughts. Harmful infrastructure projects and rapidly expanding cities have increased the demand on rivers and greatly strained wildlife and the environment.One of the central elements that has improved these threats by preventing environmental protection is lobbyists from a range of industries, including agriculture, energy, chemicals, mining, construction, and transportation.Even the Supreme Court has added to the plight of U.S. rivers, deciding in 2023 that wetlands and ephemeral streams are not part of the 50-year-old Clean Water Act. Wetlands naturally remove pollutants and runoff while also preventing erosion and flooding. Ephemeral streams only have flowing water during floods or heavy rain, transferring pollution to larger bodies of water.Here are the ten most endangered rivers of 2024, which includes a whole state.1. New Mexico’s riversNew MexicoAt risk: clean water, wildlife, habitat, recreation, agriculture, cultural resources.Large parts of New Mexico are often in some level of drought, making its rivers a crucial part of life. They provide clean drinking water, irrigation, fish and wildlife habitat, and rich cultural resources. But American Rivers claims that the 2023 SCOTUS decision harms New Mexico the most out of all the states. Losing the protections could allow more pollution and habitat damage, leading to damage to downstream rivers such as the Rio Grande, Gila, San Juan, and Pecos.2. Big Sunflower and Yazoo RiversMississippiAt risk: Wetlands, birds, fish, and wildlife, local communities.These two rivers are home to wetlands and habitats that support hundreds of species of birds, fish, and other wildlife. They are located in the heart of a major bird migration route known as the Mississippi Flyway. Home to one of the last intact bottomland hardwood forests in the nation, the area is threatened by a project known as the Yazoo Backwater Pumps. The project would damage 200,000 acres of waterfowl habitat and, according to American Rivers, reinforce historical environmental and racial injustices for predominantly Black, poor communities. The Yazoo Pumps proposal was vetoed by EPA under President George W Bush in 2008 due to its environmental impact. It was revived in 2021.3. Duck RiverTennesseeAt risk: Clean water, fish and wildlife habitat.The Duck River in Tennessee holds the distinction of being North America’s most biodiverse river. It is one of the world’s three primary centers of fish and mussel diversity, providing habitat for endangered species. However, rapid development from expanding local communities poses a significant threat to its health. The river supports local needs for drinking water, agriculture, and industrial manufacturing, but escalating demands are surpassing the river’s sustainable capacity. This overuse jeopardizes the future availability of the Duck River’s resources for both people and its diverse aquatic life.4. Santa Cruz RiverArizona and Sonora (Mexico)At risk: community and cultural connection, fish and wildlife.The Santa Cruz River, the tribal home to one of the first communities established in North America, is coming back to life after intensive groundwater withdrawals dried it up in the 1940s. Decades later, partially treated wastewater discharge created harmful conditions for native ecosystems and humans. However, climate change and water scarcity now threaten its path to recovery, while environmental rollbacks to clean water protections at the federal level could add new challenges to the watershed’s long-term health.5. Little Pee Dee RiverSouth Carolina and North CarolinaAt risk: clean water, wetlands, wildlife habitat.The river, primarily situated in South Carolina’s upper coastal plain, is one of the Southeast’s most unique blackwater rivers. Along its 118-mile course, forestry wetlands provide a critical habitat for endangered fish and wildlife species. Until recently, the river remained primarily untouched by development, but that could be about to change as the threat of highway development and poor resource management threaten it and the communities that depend on it.6. Farmington RiverConnecticut and MassachusettsAt risk: clean drinking water, fish and wildlife.The Farmington River supports a diverse range of fish and wildlife and is a vital source of clean drinking water for the region, as well as boating and other recreation opportunities. However, the outdated Rainbow Dam is damaging the river, blocking fish migration and spurring outbreaks of toxic algae blooms that harm people, pets, and wildlife.7. Trinity RiverCaliforniaAt risk: tribal fishing and water rights, clean drinking water, fish and wildlife.The Trinity River’s main threats come from excessive water diversions, new water demands, and the effects of drought and climate change. It’s the largest tributary of the Klamath River and a vital habitat for salmon, steelhead and green sturgeon. Known as Hun’ to the Hoopa Tribe, which has lived on its banks for thousands of years, it’s now at the center of a dispute over tribal rights. The Hoopa Valley and Yurok Tribes have been stewarding and defending the river for generations and fighting for environmental justice for the people and the waters.8. Kobuk RiverAlaskaAt risk: Iñupiaq subsistence traditions and economy, clean water, fish and wildlife.The Kobuk River, free-flowing and situated north of the Arctic Circle in Alaska, winds through the northern edge of the boreal forest beside the colossal Brooks Mountain Range. This river has no road connections or industrial development and provides a unique view of an ancient and rare North American landscape. It runs through the homelands of the Indigenous Iñupiat, who rely on the river’s rich fish and wildlife populations to survive and use it for spiritual and cultural purposes. However, a new road development supporting mining activities seriously threatens the river and tribe.9. Tijuana River/Rio TijuanaCalifornia and Baja California (Mexico)At risk: clean water and public health.The Tijuana River Watershed is home to millions of people on both sides of the U.S./Mexico border and the ancestral and current homeland of the Kumeyaay People. The river was once a favorite spot for families, swimmers, and surfers but is now heavily polluted. It limits coastal access where it meets the Pacific Ocean, hurts ecosystems, forces beach closures, and causes widespread illnesses.Years of mismanagement and poor wastewater infrastructure have led to long-running violations of the Clean Water Act.10. Blackwater RiverWest VirginiaAt risk: Clean water, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation and tourism economy.West Virginia’s Blackwater River is a beloved recreational destination for wildlife and nature enthusiasts, including boaters, cyclists, hikers, hunters, and anglers. However, Blackwater is at risk from a state-proposed four-lane “Corridor H” highway that would divide local communities, destroy delicate habitats, and pollute key tributaries.

A new national report says America's rivers are in crisis.

The United States has a nostalgic and almost mystical connection with its rivers.

These vital waterways, many of which are central to the cultural traditions and day-to-day lives of Native American peoples, have also inspired centuries of American folklore, literature, and cinema—from the mighty Mississippi to the Hudson and Potomac rivers.

But rather than dreamy, wistful tales of adventure and triumph from long ago, the modern reality of rivers tells a stark tale of pollution and its dire consequences for people, animals, and the environment.

A new report detailing the general state of the nation’s rivers and a detailed account of its ten most endangered rivers says they are in crisis.

“All water is connected. We cannot allow pollution anywhere without risk to the rivers we rely on for our drinking water,” said Tom Kiernan, President and CEO of American Rivers, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit environmental advocacy organization focused on protecting and promoting the health of the nation’s rivers. “Our leaders must hold polluters accountable and strengthen the Clean Water Act to safeguard our health and communities.”

Around 44% of waterways are too polluted for swimming or fishing, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The country’s 3.5 million miles of rivers supply water to thousands of farms and millions of people. They support a vast number of jobs nationwide and are home to countless animal and plant species. While the days of seeing rivers ablaze due to severe pollution may be behind us, new and equally daunting challenges have emerged, making safeguarding and rejuvenating these lifelines more complex and urgent than ever.

Today, the country’s 250,000 rivers face the threat of human-made climate change, fueling more extreme weather, like floods and droughts. Harmful infrastructure projects and rapidly expanding cities have increased the demand on rivers and greatly strained wildlife and the environment.

One of the central elements that has improved these threats by preventing environmental protection is lobbyists from a range of industries, including agriculture, energy, chemicals, mining, construction, and transportation.

Even the Supreme Court has added to the plight of U.S. rivers, deciding in 2023 that wetlands and ephemeral streams are not part of the 50-year-old Clean Water Act. Wetlands naturally remove pollutants and runoff while also preventing erosion and flooding. Ephemeral streams only have flowing water during floods or heavy rain, transferring pollution to larger bodies of water.

Here are the ten most endangered rivers of 2024, which includes a whole state.

1. New Mexico’s rivers

New Mexico

At risk: clean water, wildlife, habitat, recreation, agriculture, cultural resources.

Large parts of New Mexico are often in some level of drought, making its rivers a crucial part of life. They provide clean drinking water, irrigation, fish and wildlife habitat, and rich cultural resources. But American Rivers claims that the 2023 SCOTUS decision harms New Mexico the most out of all the states. Losing the protections could allow more pollution and habitat damage, leading to damage to downstream rivers such as the Rio Grande, Gila, San Juan, and Pecos.

2. Big Sunflower and Yazoo Rivers

Mississippi

At risk: Wetlands, birds, fish, and wildlife, local communities.

These two rivers are home to wetlands and habitats that support hundreds of species of birds, fish, and other wildlife. They are located in the heart of a major bird migration route known as the Mississippi Flyway. Home to one of the last intact bottomland hardwood forests in the nation, the area is threatened by a project known as the Yazoo Backwater Pumps. The project would damage 200,000 acres of waterfowl habitat and, according to American Rivers, reinforce historical environmental and racial injustices for predominantly Black, poor communities. The Yazoo Pumps proposal was vetoed by EPA under President George W Bush in 2008 due to its environmental impact. It was revived in 2021.

3. Duck River

Tennessee

At risk: Clean water, fish and wildlife habitat.

The Duck River in Tennessee holds the distinction of being North America’s most biodiverse river. It is one of the world’s three primary centers of fish and mussel diversity, providing habitat for endangered species. However, rapid development from expanding local communities poses a significant threat to its health. The river supports local needs for drinking water, agriculture, and industrial manufacturing, but escalating demands are surpassing the river’s sustainable capacity. This overuse jeopardizes the future availability of the Duck River’s resources for both people and its diverse aquatic life.

4. Santa Cruz River

Arizona and Sonora (Mexico)

At risk: community and cultural connection, fish and wildlife.

The Santa Cruz River, the tribal home to one of the first communities established in North America, is coming back to life after intensive groundwater withdrawals dried it up in the 1940s. Decades later, partially treated wastewater discharge created harmful conditions for native ecosystems and humans. However, climate change and water scarcity now threaten its path to recovery, while environmental rollbacks to clean water protections at the federal level could add new challenges to the watershed’s long-term health.5. Little Pee Dee RiverSouth Carolina and North CarolinaAt risk: clean water, wetlands, wildlife habitat.The river, primarily situated in South Carolina’s upper coastal plain, is one of the Southeast’s most unique blackwater rivers. Along its 118-mile course, forestry wetlands provide a critical habitat for endangered fish and wildlife species. Until recently, the river remained primarily untouched by development, but that could be about to change as the threat of highway development and poor resource management threaten it and the communities that depend on it.

6. Farmington River

Connecticut and Massachusetts

At risk: clean drinking water, fish and wildlife.

The Farmington River supports a diverse range of fish and wildlife and is a vital source of clean drinking water for the region, as well as boating and other recreation opportunities. However, the outdated Rainbow Dam is damaging the river, blocking fish migration and spurring outbreaks of toxic algae blooms that harm people, pets, and wildlife.

7. Trinity River

California

At risk: tribal fishing and water rights, clean drinking water, fish and wildlife.

The Trinity River’s main threats come from excessive water diversions, new water demands, and the effects of drought and climate change. It’s the largest tributary of the Klamath River and a vital habitat for salmon, steelhead and green sturgeon. Known as Hun’ to the Hoopa Tribe, which has lived on its banks for thousands of years, it’s now at the center of a dispute over tribal rights. The Hoopa Valley and Yurok Tribes have been stewarding and defending the river for generations and fighting for environmental justice for the people and the waters.

8. Kobuk River

Alaska

At risk: Iñupiaq subsistence traditions and economy, clean water, fish and wildlife.

The Kobuk River, free-flowing and situated north of the Arctic Circle in Alaska, winds through the northern edge of the boreal forest beside the colossal Brooks Mountain Range. This river has no road connections or industrial development and provides a unique view of an ancient and rare North American landscape. It runs through the homelands of the Indigenous Iñupiat, who rely on the river’s rich fish and wildlife populations to survive and use it for spiritual and cultural purposes. However, a new road development supporting mining activities seriously threatens the river and tribe.

9. Tijuana River/Rio Tijuana

California and Baja California (Mexico)

At risk: clean water and public health.

The Tijuana River Watershed is home to millions of people on both sides of the U.S./Mexico border and the ancestral and current homeland of the Kumeyaay People. The river was once a favorite spot for families, swimmers, and surfers but is now heavily polluted. It limits coastal access where it meets the Pacific Ocean, hurts ecosystems, forces beach closures, and causes widespread illnesses.

Years of mismanagement and poor wastewater infrastructure have led to long-running violations of the Clean Water Act.

10. Blackwater River

West Virginia

At risk: Clean water, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation and tourism economy.

West Virginia’s Blackwater River is a beloved recreational destination for wildlife and nature enthusiasts, including boaters, cyclists, hikers, hunters, and anglers. However, Blackwater is at risk from a state-proposed four-lane “Corridor H” highway that would divide local communities, destroy delicate habitats, and pollute key tributaries.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

This Majority-Black City Has a Water Crisis That Privatization Won’t Fix

This story was originally published by Grist and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. In the summer of 2022, heavy rainfall damaged a water treatment plant in the city of Jackson, Mississippi, precipitating a high-profile public health crisis. The Republican Governor Tate Reeves declared a state of emergency, as thousands of residents were told to boil […]

This story was originally published by Grist and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. In the summer of 2022, heavy rainfall damaged a water treatment plant in the city of Jackson, Mississippi, precipitating a high-profile public health crisis. The Republican Governor Tate Reeves declared a state of emergency, as thousands of residents were told to boil their water before drinking it. For some, the pressure in their taps was so low that they couldn’t flush their toilets and were forced to rely on bottled water for weeks.  Many of the city’s 150,000 residents were wary that their local government could get clean water running through their pipes again. State officials had a history of undermining efforts to repair Jackson’s beleaguered infrastructure, and the city council, for its part, didn’t have the money to make the fixes on its own. So when the federal government stepped in that fall, allocating funding and appointing an engineer to manage the city’s water system, there was reason to believe change may finally be near.  But as the months wore on, hope turned to frustration. The federally appointed engineer, Ted Henifin, began taking steps to run the city’s water system through a private company, despite Mayor Chokwe Lumumba’s objections. Advocates’ repeated requests for data and other information about Jackson’s drinking water went unanswered, according to a local activist, Makani Themba, and despite Henifin’s assurances before a federal judge that the water was safe to drink, brown liquid still poured out of some taps. Faced with these conditions, a group of advocates sent the Environmental Protection Agency a letter last July asking to be involved in the overhaul of the city’s water system.  “The state has funneled funds to majority-white areas in Mississippi despite their less acute needs.” “Jackson residents have weathered many storms, literally and figuratively, over the last several years,” they wrote in the letter. “We have a right and responsibility to be fully engaged in the redevelopment of our water and sewer system.” The letter was followed by an emergency petition to the EPA containing similar requests for transparency and involvement.  Earlier this month, a federal judge granted the advocates their request, making two community organizations, the Mississippi Poor People’s Campaign and the People’s Advocacy Group, parties to an EPA lawsuit against the city of Jackson for violating the Safe Drinking Water Act. A seat at the table of the legal proceedings, the advocates hope, will allow the city’s residents to have a say in rebuilding their infrastructure and also ward off privatization. The saga in Jackson reflects a wider problem affecting public utilities across the country, with cash-strapped local governments turning to corporations to make badly needed repairs to water treatment plants, distribution pipes, and storage systems, a course that often limits transparency and boxes locals out of the decision-making.  “This isn’t a uniquely Jackson problem,” said Brooke Floyd, co-director of the Jackson People’s Assembly at the People’s Advocacy Institute. “We need ways for all these cities that need infrastructure repairs to get clean water to their communities.” The roots of Jackson’s water crisis lie in decades of disinvestment and neglect. Like many other midsize cities around the country, such as Pittsburgh and St. Louis, Jackson declined after white, middle-class residents relocated to the suburbs, taking tax dollars away from infrastructure in increasing need of repair. Between 1980 and 2020, Jackson’s population dropped by around 25 percent. Today, the city is more than 80 percent Black, up from 50 percent in the 1980s. A quarter of Jackson’s residents live below the poverty line, with most households earning less than $40,000 a year, compared with $49,000 for the state overall. Over the decades, antagonism between the Republican state government and the Democratic and Black-led local government created additional obstacles to updating Jackson’s water and sewage infrastructure. A Title VI civil rights complaint that the NAACP filed with the EPA in September 2022 accused Governor Reeves and the state legislature of “systematically depriving Jackson the funds that it needs to operate and maintain its water facilities in a safe and reliable manner.” The biggest problem, the NAACP argued, was that the state had rejected the city’s proposal for a 1 percent sales tax to pay for infrastructure updates and by directing funds from the EPA’s Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund away from the capital city.  “What we’ve learned from all over the country is that privatization doesn’t work for the community. We want what works.” “Despite Jackson’s status as the most populous city in Mississippi, state agencies awarded federal funds” from the EPA program three times in the past 25 years, the complaint read. “Meanwhile, the state has funneled funds to majority-white areas in Mississippi despite their less acute needs.” In the absence of adequate resources from the state and local government, Jacksonians have learned to fend for themselves, Floyd told Grist. At the height of the water crisis in 2022, federal dollars helped fund the distribution of bottled water to thousands of residents, but when the money dried up, people organized to secure drinking water for households still reckoning with smelly, off-color fluid running from their taps. When Henifin began posting boil-water notices on a smartphone app that some found hard to use, one resident set up a separate community text service. Floyd said that for some residents, these problems are still ongoing today.  “There’s this sense of, we have to provide for each other because no one is coming,” Floyd said. “We know that the state is not going to help us.” Henifin has told a federal judge that he’s made a number of moves to improve Jackson’s water quality. The private company that he set up, JXN Water, has hired contractors to update the main water plant’s corrosion control and conducted testing for lead and bacteria like E. coli. But residents and advocates point out that while the water coming out of the system might be clean, the city hosts more than 150 miles of decrepit pipes that can leach toxic chemicals into the water supply. Advocates want the city to replace them and conduct testing in neighborhoods instead of just near the treatment facility, changes that the city has federal money to make. In December 2022, the federal government allocated $600 million to Jackson for repairs to its water system. But the worry is that this money will be spent on other things. Henifin is the one who handles the federal funds. By court order, he has the authority to enter into contracts, make payments, and change the rates and fees charged to consumers.  Themba, the local activist, said that Henifin has not responded to residents’ demands for additional testing and access to monitoring data that already exists. Because JXN Water is a private company, it’s not subject to public disclosure laws requiring this information to be shared with the public. (Henifin did not respond to Grist’s requests for comment.)  Themba points to Pittsburgh as an example of a place where residents fought privatization of their water system and secured a more democratic public utility. In 2012, faced with a lack of state and federal funding, the city turned over its water system to Veolia, an international waste- and water-management giant based in France. Over the following years, the publicly traded company elected for cost-cutting measures that caused lead to enter the water supply of tens of thousands of residents. A local campaign ensued, and advocates eventually won a commitment from the city government to return the water system to city control and give the  public a voice in the system’s management. “What we’ve learned from all over the country is that privatization doesn’t work for the community,” Themba said. “We want what works.” The court order that designated Henifin as Jackson’s water manager in 2022 does not outline what will happen once his four-year contract expires in 2026. Last month, the Mississippi Senate passed a bill that would put Jackson’s water in the hands of the state after Henifin steps down, a move that the manager recently said he supports and that Jackson’s mayor strongly opposes. That bill soon failed in the House without a vote. Now that they are part of the lawsuit, advocates hope they’ll have a chance to influence the outcome, before it’s too late.  “Jackson residents have felt left out of the equation for so long,” Floyd said. “If we lose this, that’s a big deal.”

A decade later, Flint’s water crisis continues

The past 10 years revealed how government failures at every level could effectively kill a city, turning it into a "ghost town."

This story was originally published by Capital B. At the edge of Saginaw Street, a hand-painted sign is etched into a deserted storefront. “Please help, God. Clean-up Flint.” Behind it, the block tells the story of a city 10 years removed from the start of one of the nation’s largest environmental crises.  Empty lot. Charred two-story home. Empty lot. Abandoned house with the message “All Copper GONE,” across boarded-up windows.  John Ishmael Taylor, 44, was born in this ZIP code, 48503, and he’s seen firsthand the neglect of the place he loves, one he hopes will be reborn for his young children.  “The water crisis, no more jobs, the violence,” Taylor said, has left Flint like a “ghost town — a ghost town with a whole bunch of people still here.”  Over the past decade, Flint’s water crisis has revealed how government failures at every level could effectively kill a city while opening the country’s eyes to how an environmental crisis could wreak havoc on all facets of life, make people sick, destroy a public school system, and kill jobs.  Four years after Flint residents reached the largest civil settlement agreement in Michigan history, Taylor and tens of thousands of other victims still haven’t received a penny from the $626.25 million pot. The only money doled out has gone to lawyers involved in the case, not those who’ve been haunted by the crisis’s true impacts. Still, even when residents ultimately receive the funding, most expressed doubts that the payouts will have any true benefits for their life. As Claire McClinton, a retired auto worker, explained, Flint’s water crisis, and America’s, has long-lasting impacts that won’t be solved by merely replacing lead water service lines. Adam Mahoney / Capital B In many ways, Taylor’s life shows the violent and widespread nature of America’s water crisis. After being born in Flint, he’d spent his preteen years living outside Jackson, Mississippi, where brown water has flowed through Black homes for decades.  Taylor, a single father, moved back to Flint permanently in January 2014. Within a year, lead levels in the drinking water of three of every four homes in his ZIP code were well above federal standards. His youngest son, Jalen, was born 52 days before the start of the water crisis, which is recognized as April 25, 2014, the day the city infamously switched its water source from Lake Huron to the Flint River.  The rashes started immediately for baby Jalen, speckling the inside of his legs with coarse, red blotches. Within a few years, he was diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a form of autism spectrum disorder; both ailments are associated with lead poisoning.  Taylor says he has battled with anxiety in the aftermath as 20 percent of the city’s residents and hundreds of businesses packed up and left. Flint’s unemployment rate is now 1.5 times higher than the national average as 70 percent of children grow up in poverty.  He wonders what that means for his children.  “I always wonder how they’re gonna do because this is a long-term effect — we’re talking about lead poisoning. This is going to be with them for most of their life. It’s depressing,” he said, and he’s felt no restitution. He believes it has led to a citywide mental health crisis. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1 out of 5 Flint residents reported having poor mental health, which is nearly 40 percent higher than the U.S. average.  Nayyirah Shariff holds a document from the Michigan Department of Environment that shows her home’s lead level in water as three to four times the federal limits. Adam Mahoney / Capital B Angela Welch, who has lived in Flint for four decades, understands the health implications intimately.  She recently tested for lead levels in her blood at 6.5 micrograms per deciliter. Anything above 5 micrograms is considered extremely dangerous for your health.  Since the start of the crisis, Welch has developed chronic skin and cardiac issues, had multiple surgeries, and lost part of her leg to amputation. Her brother Mac showed Capital B the scars along his body from water-induced rashes. Welch questions what repair looks like for her family. “We gotta be dead to get our money? They want us dead to receive anything from the crisis.”  The federal Environmental Protection Agency and officials with Flint’s mayor’s and city attorney’s offices did not respond to multiple requests from Capital B for comment. Residents argue that even though they’ve brought the country’s water woes to the forefront, they’re in a worse position today despite hundreds of millions of dollars of investment — and they want you to know that your city can be next.  Read Next A water crisis in Mississippi turns into a fight against privatization Lylla Younes “We’re seeing it happen to Jackson,” said Nayyirah Shariff, a community activist, whose water is still testing for lead at levels three times higher than federal limits.  “It’s like they have the same playbook to decimate a city.” What Flint tells us about the nation’s water crises  Flint opened the nation’s eyes to a brewing water affordability and infrastructure crisis, ultimately leading to billions of dollars invested in cleaning the country’s drinking water, improving water plants and roads, and building climate resilience.  There are roughly 9 million lead pipes in service across the U.S., and they’re everywhere, from the oldest cities across Massachusetts to Florida, which leads the country in lead pipes but where infrastructure and the average home is among the nation’s youngest. In November, the Biden administration outlined a plan to replace all 9 million within the next decade, making 50 percent of the $30 billion price tag available from the federal government.   Flint residents are fighting to hang on amid the city’s water crisis. The unemployment rate is now 1.5 times higher than the national average, while 70 percent of children grow up in poverty. Adam Mahoney / Capital B Yet Flint residents and experts told Capital B that the main flaws of the federal government’s plan have been realized in the city over the past decade: It is complicated, time-consuming, and costly to identify and replace water lines. Not to mention, as Shariff explained, replacing lead water lines is not the “magical silver bullet” to eradicate the issue. The lead service line in her home was replaced in 2017, yet her water is still filled with more lead than federal limits allow.  As officials have claimed that the use of water filters and replacement of lead water lines has solved the crisis, including an infamous declaration by former President Barack Obama in 2016, some residents in Flint have felt confused about the true safety of their water.  When approached by Capital B in April, James Johnson explained how a state-conducted test for lead in his drinking water in 2023 returned a clean bill of health. However, public records show Johnson’s property’s lead results were actually 19 parts per billion. The federal limit is 15. “I don’t know what to think [about the water,]” Johnson said after Capital B explained the results. “We just use filters. We have been since ’14, but they said it’s all clean.” Flint officials did not respond to Capital B’s request for data related to the status of its water line identification and replacement work. This month, a federal judge found the city in contempt of court for missing deadlines for lead water line replacement and related work in the aftermath of the water crisis. In addition, as the nation focuses on drinking water, lead lines have created another crisis that rarely gets attention: how lead contamination has torn through kitchens and bathrooms. Flint residents told Capital B that since the crisis began, they’ve had corroded toilets fall through floors, and their shower heads turn black from buildup every few months.  “Dirty water doesn’t just impact service lives,” explained Claire McClinton, a Flint resident and former autoworker. “It’s very naive to think that was the only thing that was impacted, and people do not have the money or support to fix these things.”  All the while, Flint has had amongst the most expensive water bills in the country. A 2016 analysis revealed that the average household was paying more than $850 annually for water services, making it the most expensive average bill in the country. Today, the average bill is $1,200 annually. McClinton is afraid that as the country chugs on with its focus on drinking water, Black communities will be harmed by efforts to cut costs, or worse, boxed out of their access to publicly run water systems. More than 20 percent of Americans now rely on private companies for drinking water, a substantial increase compared to 2019, according to the National Association of Water Companies. On average, private water utilities charge families 59 percent more on their water bills than public utilities.  “We don’t want corporations to benefit from all this spending — we should want to keep our water public,” McClinton said.  Still, public water systems have their challenges supporting Black communities as well. Failing public water systems are 40 percent more likely to serve people of color, and they take longer than systems in white communities to come back into compliance. Funding to reach these communities remains faulty despite the Biden administration’s goal of spending 40 percent of funds on “disadvantaged communities.”  A Capital B analysis found that 27 percent of drinking water funds from the bipartisan infrastructure law went to “disadvantaged communities” in 2022, and the two states that received the most funds characterized for “disadvantaged communities” were Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, where less than 10 percent of residents are Black.  McClinton said it’s bittersweet to watch Flint purportedly influence the nation for the better while things remain “broken” for Black communities.   “The system has failed us. We did all the things you’re supposed to do; we participated in water studies, and our water is still dirty, and our health is still bad,” she said. “There’s this thing where they say every generation lives better than the next generation, but all of that is turned upside down right now, and the water crisis is just a manifestation of it.”  ‘The start of the second civil war’ In a stream of whiteness, Confederate flags, and Make America Great Again signs, the 60 miles between Detroit and Flint tell the story of Black life in Michigan, Welch said. “Because we are a majority here and have conquered [Flint and Detroit], they want to get back at us,” she said.  From left: Hatcher Welch, Angela Welch, and Mac Welch all expressed disgust over the continued handling of Flint’s water, arguing that there is little that could be done to repair harm. Adam Mahoney / Capital B Over the past decade, as Detroit’s financial crisis peaked and Flint’s water crisis began, far-right white-led groups have surged and a white-led militia plotted to abduct the state’s governor. “It feels like the start of the second civil war,” Welch said, all while Flint is “left behind.”   It’s seeing this shift intensify that has led some residents to see deeper racial undertones in not only Flint’s battle over water affordability and rights, but also the nation’s. “The power structure is coalescing over water,” McClinton said.  Flint’s issues began primarily because of a plan that was concocted to save the city money during its water-delivery process. Similar situations are happening outside of Chicago in a majority Black and Latino town, and in Baltimore.  Read Next California communities are fighting the last battery recycling plant in the West — and its toxic legacy Molly Peterson Not to mention the glaring similarities between Jackson and Flint, both majority-Black cities where local Black leadership was overridden by white leaders at the federal and state levels. In Jackson, after an EPA lawsuit against the city allowed the federal government to take control of the water, residents are still fighting to be included in the process.  The attack on Black life has also widened the racial gap within the city, Shariff said.  In a commemorative event headlined by a public health researcher from Michigan State University and attended by roughly 50 people the week before the 10-year-anniversary, just five attendees were Black. It’s events like these, Shariff says, that highlight the disconnect between local leaders, academic researchers, and those directly impacted by the crisis. “All this money these places are spending feels like for nothing,” she said. “People marching in the streets weren’t asking for book talks or community health assessments. We asked for reparations and resources for Black self-determination.” The crisis is a chronic illness For some residents, like Taylor, there is still hope that the settlement checks will hit their bank accounts and improve their lives. Children affected by the water crisis are expected to receive 80 percent of the record settlement. Community activist Nayyirah Shariff said the attack on Black life in Flint has widened the racial gap in the city. Adam Mahoney / Capital B As Flint schools have crumbled in the aftermath of the crises, in addition to experiencing an 8 percent increase in the number of students with special needs, especially among school-age boys, Taylor hopes to use the money to better their educational opportunities and put them through college. However, for others, including Welch and Shariff, the expected payout of $2,000 to $3,000 for adults feels like a slap in the face. There is also a lot of confusion around the settlement process, with two residents telling Capital B they thought the money was already gone, which stopped them from attempting to be a part of the process.  In a lot of ways, although harder to find, opportunities have reached the city in recent years, including through a guaranteed income program for every pregnant person and infant in the city. The new program “prescribes” a one-time $1,500 payment after 20 weeks of pregnancy, and $500 a month during the infant’s first year.  Yet, it still remains challenging to remain confident in change.  “With all the experiences we’ve had over the 10 years, our hopes have been dashed,” explained McClinton, who every April 25 helps to organize a day of commemoration for Flint residents.  As Capital B has reported, the water issues afflicting Black communities are violent in many ways, and it trickles down into increasing situations of despair around housing, mental and physical health, and communal violence. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic widened the racial death gap in Flint, Black residents’ death rate climbed at a rate that was more than twice the city’s death rate between 2014 and 2019, according to Capital B’s analysis of state data. Capital B Several Flint residents explained how the mental health strain caused by the water crisis created a cycle of “disunity” and the inability to trust not just the government or the water flowing out of their pipes, but also the people around them.  “Everyone is just on edge,” Taylor said, “and that has everything to do with the water.”  In the city’s Black areas, it’s hard to find a block without an abandoned home or grassy field full of trash and plastic water bottles. Taylor said it’s depressing to drive through your neighborhood to see your former schools empty, graffitied, and boarded up, or parks closed and desolate. As job opportunities have become harder to find, so has housing. Nearly all of the dozen residents Capital B spoke to for this story said they experienced housing insecurity at times over the past decade.  Capital B Due to a lack of affordable housing options, the average stay at the city’s housing shelter has increased from less than two months to over five. The public housing waitlist has ballooned to two years, even as some public housing buildings still have high levels of lead in the water, including the Richert Manor homes where Welch lived for many years at the height of the water situation.  In the meantime, as race, namely being Black in America, stands as the biggest risk factor for lead poisoning, more so than even poverty or poor housing, Flint residents say their home serves as a warning to other Black communities.  Nationwide, Black children have the highest blood lead levels. As such, even as billions are pumped into fixing the issues, the next generation of Black Americans will remain altered by the impacts of lead poisoning.  As Shariff said: “The water crisis is like having a chronic illness — I mean, it gave me a chronic illness — but it is basically like you’re dealing with it, and it never goes away.” This story was originally published by Grist with the headline A decade later, Flint’s water crisis continues on Apr 28, 2024.

A water crisis in Mississippi turns into a fight against privatization

Thanks to a federal judge, residents of Jackson will have a say in how the city resolves its yearslong water crisis.

In the summer of 2022, heavy rainfall damaged a water treatment plant in the city of Jackson, Mississippi, precipitating a high-profile public health crisis. The Republican Governor Tate Reeves declared a state of emergency, as thousands of residents were told to boil their water before drinking it. For some, the pressure in their taps was so low that they couldn’t flush their toilets and were forced to rely on bottled water for weeks.  Many of the city’s 150,000 residents were wary that their local government could get clean water running through their pipes again. State officials had a history of undermining efforts to repair Jackson’s beleaguered infrastructure, and the city council, for its part, didn’t have the money to make the fixes on its own. So when the federal government stepped in that fall, allocating funding and appointing an engineer to manage the city’s water system, there was reason to believe change may finally be near.  But as the months wore on, hope turned to frustration. The federally appointed engineer, Ted Henifin, began taking steps to run the city’s water system through a private company, despite Mayor Chokwe Lumumba’s objections. Advocates’ repeated requests for data and other information about Jackson’s drinking water went unanswered, according to a local activist, Makani Themba, and despite Henifin’s assurances before a federal judge that the water was safe to drink, brown liquid still poured out of some taps. Faced with these conditions, a group of advocates sent the Environmental Protection Agency a letter last July asking to be involved in the overhaul of the city’s water system.  “Jackson residents have weathered many storms, literally and figuratively, over the last several years,” they wrote in the letter. “We have a right and responsibility to be fully engaged in the redevelopment of our water and sewer system.” The letter was followed by an emergency petition to the EPA containing similar requests for transparency and involvement.  Earlier this month, a federal judge granted the advocates their request, making two community organizations, the Mississippi Poor People’s Campaign and the People’s Advocacy Group, parties to an EPA lawsuit against the city of Jackson for violating the Safe Drinking Water Act. A seat at the table of the legal proceedings, the advocates hope, will allow the city’s residents to have a say in rebuilding their infrastructure and also ward off privatization. The saga in Jackson reflects a wider problem affecting public utilities across the country, with cash-strapped local governments turning to corporations to make badly needed repairs to water treatment plants, distribution pipes, and storage systems, a course that often limits transparency and boxes locals out of the decision-making.  “This isn’t a uniquely Jackson problem,” said Brooke Floyd, co-director of the Jackson People’s Assembly at the People’s Advocacy Institute. “We need ways for all these cities that need infrastructure repairs to get clean water to their communities.” The roots of Jackson’s water crisis lie in decades of disinvestment and neglect. Like many other mid-sized cities around the country, such as Pittsburgh and St. Louis, Jackson declined after white, middle-class residents relocated to the suburbs, taking tax dollars away from infrastructure in increasing need of repair. Between 1980 and 2020, Jackson’s population dropped by around 25 percent. Today, the city is more than 80 percent Black, up from 50 percent in the 1980s. A quarter of Jackson’s residents live below the poverty line, with most households earning less than $40,000 a year, compared with $49,000 for the state overall. Over the decades, antagonism between the Republican state government and the Democratic and Black-led local government created additional obstacles to updating Jackson’s water and sewage infrastructure. A Title VI civil rights complaint that the NAACP filed with the EPA in September 2022 accused Governor Reeves and the state legislature of “systematically depriving Jackson the funds that it needs to operate and maintain its water facilities in a safe and reliable manner.” The biggest problem, the NAACP argued, was that the state had rejected the city’s proposal for a one percent sales tax to pay for infrastructure updates and by directing funds from the EPA’s Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund away from the capital city.  “Despite Jackson’s status as the most populous city in Mississippi, State agencies awarded federal funds” from the EPA program three times in the past 25 years, the complaint read. “Meanwhile, the State has funneled funds to majority-white areas in Mississippi despite their less acute needs.” In the absence of adequate resources from the state and local government, Jacksonians have learned to fend for themselves, Floyd told Grist. At the height of the water crisis in 2022, federal dollars helped fund the distribution of bottled water to thousands of residents, but when the money dried up, people organized to secure drinking water for households still reckoning with smelly, off-color fluid running from their taps. When Henifin began posting boil-water notices on a smartphone application that some found hard to use, one resident set up a separate community text service. Floyd said that for some residents, these problems are still ongoing today.  “There’s this sense of, we have to provide for each other because no one is coming,” Floyd said. “We know that the state is not going to help us.” Henifin has told a federal judge that he’s made a number of moves to improve Jackson’s water quality. The private company that he set up, JXN Water, has hired contractors to update the main water plant’s corrosion control and conducted testing for lead and bacteria like E. Coli. But residents and advocates point out that while the water coming out of the system might be clean, the city hosts more than 150 miles of decrepit pipes that can leach toxic chemicals into the water supply. Advocates want the city to replace them and conduct testing in neighborhoods instead of just near the treatment facility, changes that the city has federal money to make. In December 2022, the federal government allocated $600 million to Jackson for repairs to its water system. But the worry is that this money will be spent on other things. Henifin is the one who handles the federal funds. By court order, he has the authority to enter into contracts, make payments, and change the rates and fees charged to consumers.  Themba, the local activist, said that Henifin has not responded to residents’ demands for additional testing and access to monitoring data that already exists. Because JXN Water is a private company, it’s not subject to public disclosure laws requiring this information to be shared with the public. (Henifin did not respond to Grist’s requests for comment.)  Themba points to Pittsburgh as an example of a place where residents fought privatization of their water system and secured a more democratic public utility. In 2012, faced with a lack of state and federal funding, the city turned over its water system to Veolia, an international waste and water management giant based in France. Over the following years, the publicly traded company  elected for cost-cutting measures that caused lead to enter the water supply of tens of thousands of residents. A local campaign ensued, and advocates eventually won a commitment from the city government to return the water system to city controlCK? and give the  public a voice in the system’s management. “What we’ve learned from all over the country is that privatization doesn’t work for the community,” Themba said. “We want what works.” The court order that designated Henifin as Jackson’s water manager in 2022 does not outline what will happen once his four-year contract expires in 2026. Last month, the Mississippi Senate passed a bill that would put Jackson’s water in the hands of the state after Henifin steps down, a move that the manager recently said he supports and that Jackson’s city mayor strongly opposes. That bill soon failed in the House without a vote. Now that they are part of the lawsuit, advocates hope they’ll have a chance to influence the outcome, before it’s too late.  “Jackson residents have felt left out of the equation for so long,” Floyd said. “If we lose this, that’s a big deal.” This story was originally published by Grist with the headline A water crisis in Mississippi turns into a fight against privatization on Apr 26, 2024.

Flint residents grapple with water crisis a decade later: ‘If we had the energy left, we’d cry’

Years after the emergency, the Michigan city is yet to replace all lead pipes and affected families are still awaiting justiceEarlier this month, Brittany Thomas received a call that her 11-year-old daughter Janiyah had experienced a seizure at school.“She’d been seizure-free for about two years now,” said Thomas, a resident of Flint, Michigan. “And they just came back.” Continue reading...

Earlier this month, Brittany Thomas received a call that her 11-year-old daughter Janiyah had experienced a seizure at school.“She’d been seizure-free for about two years now,” said Thomas, a resident of Flint, Michigan. “And they just came back.”The call took Thomas back to April 2014, when, to save money, the City of Flint switched to a water source that exposed more than 100,000 residents – including up to 12,000 children – to elevated levels of lead and bacteria. Thomas’s family drank bottled water at the time, but they cooked with and bathed in the tap water.Soon after the switch, Thomas and her two children developed rashes on their skin. Then the children began experiencing frequent seizures that sent them in and out of the hospital. Blood tests revealed they had lead poisoning.“I didn’t know how to feel,” she said. “I’ve been depressed, I’ve been frustrated, stressed out – can’t catch a break.”Studies later showed that after officials changed Flint’s water supply from Lake Huron to the Flint River, the percentage of children with elevated levels of lead levels in their blood doubled – and in some parts of the city, tripled. The switch also exposed residents to the bacteria that causes Legionnaires’ disease, leading to as many as 115 deaths.Despite an outcry from the predominantly African American community, officials at every level of government were slow to respond. It was nearly two years before Barack Obama, then president, declared a state of emergency in Flint. The Michigan Civil Rights Commission, a state-established body, concluded that the poor governmental response to the Flint crisis was a “result of systemic racism”.Now, a decade after the crisis began, kids are still sick, the city is not done replacing lead pipes and families like Thomas’ are still awaiting justice.“The people of Flint will never trust that water again,” said Pastor Alfred Harris of Concerned Pastors for Social Action. Harris was part of a group of pastors who organized protests and water-filter giveaways, met with lawmakers to urge them to stop sourcing water from the Flint River and sued, along with other groups, the city and state in 2016.“Flint was a poor community and majority people of color,” Harris said. “If it had been in another community – a majority white or more affluent community – I think actions would have been taken much sooner.”There is no safe level of lead exposure. The neurotoxin harms nearly all of the body’s functions, is linked to premature births and miscarriages and has been shown to cause learning and behavior problems, among other ailments, in children.A delivery man hauls bottled water outside of the St Mark Baptist church in Flint, Michigan, on 23 February 2016. Photograph: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty ImagesIn 2020, the state of Michigan agreed to a $600m settlement with Flint residents. Eighty percent of that sum would go to children who, like Thomas’ kids, were under 18 when they were exposed to Flint River water, and a district court is now reviewing residents’ claims.Settlement funds can’t come soon enough for claimants like Thomas, who said she lost her job as a result of needing to respond to her kids’ health problems. “They haven’t told us anything,” she said. “They keep giving us different dates … but nobody hasn’t seen nothing.”‘It’s like an open sore’A Flint resident for most of her life, Eileen Hayes moved into her townhome in 1996. When lead contaminated her water, she started losing her hair.“Losing hair on the top of your head changes not only how you can wear your hair, but it changes your self-esteem, how you see yourself, and of course that impacts how you carry yourself,” she said.Hayes continues to buy her own bottled water, years after the state stopped supplying it. “It would have to be a massive change that would make me stop using bottled water,” she said.In 2017, as part of a settlement with Flint residents, officials agreed to replace thousands of lead pipes in the city within three years.Hayes, like many residents, received conflicting information about whether her service lines were checked. “I can’t put the issue behind me until we fix the pipes,” Hayes wrote in a 2023 declaration. “The unfinished program is like an open sore to me.”skip past newsletter promotionOur US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionLast month, a judge held the city in contempt of court for failing to comply with the settlement. “It is apparent that the City has failed to abide by the Court’s orders in several respects,” the order read. “And that it has no good reason for its failures.”Workers prepare to replace a lead water service line at the site of the first Flint home with high lead levels on 4 March 2016. Photograph: Bill Pugliano/Getty ImagesA spokesperson for the City of Flint said lead service line replacement is ongoing. “We have completed outreach to more than 31,000 addresses and there are still 1,900 addresses where we have not been able to get consent from residents to do the work,” the spokesperson wrote in an email. The spokesperson said the city completed work at Hayes’ home in 2021. ‘If we had the energy left, we’d cry’Like Hayes and Thomas, Melissa Mays also pays for bottled water out of pocket. She worries about exposure to microplastics from bottled water, but doesn’t trust the tap.In 2014, even as some areas of the city had brown tap water, her water was clear. So she and her family continued drinking it. When the city set a boil water advisory for bacteria, she boiled the water. “Nobody told us that was making it a ton worse – concentrating the metals,” she explained.Her family consumed contaminated tap water for nine months. Now, her three sons have a long list of medical issues and learning challenges. Like Thomas, she too is waiting on settlement funds to help pay for her kids’ healthcare, school tutors and therapy.Mays said the community is still reeling from the “moral injury” of the crisis – state officials knew of the risks long before telling the public. “We are traumatised from being lied to by the same people that continue to tell us everything’s fine and it’s just in our head,” Mays said.A spokesperson for the Michigan department of environment, Great Lakes and energy (EGLE) wrote, “EGLE has worked hard to make sure Flint residents have the facts and data they need to trust their water again.” The department said it had “wholly revamped its approach to public drinking water”, with new offices added to oversee water. The official also noted that Flint’s drinking water has met federal standards since July 2016.The City of Flint said in a statement that it has made major upgrades to water quality monitoring and water infrastructure, including a new backup water source “to ensure residents have access to water in an emergency and will never again be forced to turn to the Flint River as a water source”. While the city’s water is in compliance with federal lead standards of less than 15 ppb, the city spokesperson said they recognize that “no amount of lead in water is safe”.We are traumatised from being lied to by the same people that continue to tell us everything’s fine and it’s just in our headThe Environmental Protection Agency oversees and tracks compliance with public water systems in Michigan, including Flint. A spokesperson from the agency wrote in an email: “Every community deserves clean water to drink, and the Biden-Harris Administration is working to ensure no family has to worry whether their water is safe when they turn on the tap. That’s why EPA efforts to ensure safe, reliable drinking water for Flint residents are ongoing.” The spokesperson added that the EPA is leveraging $15bn in funding from the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to identify and replace lead service lines across the country.Four officials from the local, state and federal governments resigned in the wake of the crisis, including one official from the EPA. Nine leaders in Michigan, including former governor Rick Snyder, were charged with felonies and misdemeanors, but the charges were dropped.Like many residents, Mays was shocked. “Nobody went to jail. How does that happen in America?” she asked. “If we had the energy left, we’d cry.”

Nature destruction will cause bigger economic slump in UK than 2008 crisis, experts warn

Green Finance Institute report said further pollution could cut 12% off GDP by 2030sThe destruction of nature over the rest of the decade could trigger a bigger economic slump in Britain than those caused by the 2008 global financial crisis and the Covid pandemic, experts have warned.Sounding the alarm over the rising financial cost from pollution, damage to water systems, soil erosion, and threats from disease, the report by the Green Finance Institute warned that further breakdown in the UK’s natural environment could lead to a 12% loss of gross domestic product (GDP) by the 2030s. Continue reading...

The destruction of nature over the rest of the decade could trigger a bigger economic slump in Britain than those caused by the 2008 global financial crisis and the Covid pandemic, experts have warned.Sounding the alarm over the rising financial cost from pollution, damage to water systems, soil erosion, and threats from disease, the report by the Green Finance Institute warned that further breakdown in the UK’s natural environment could lead to a 12% loss of gross domestic product (GDP) by the 2030s.In a report that received input from experts across academia and government, the authors argued that “gradual, year-to year environmental degradation is as detrimental or more so than climate change”.The continued loss of natural habitats in urban and rural areas would compare unfavourably with the financial crisis of 2008, which took about 5% off the value of UK GDP, while the Covid pandemic cost the UK 11% of its GDP in 2020.The academics used three scenarios to construct the report: domestic risks from continued UK environment breakdown; international risks – including destruction to nature in countries which are key UK trading partners; and a health scenario, focusing on the dangers of a fresh global pandemic.All three took into account current trends in environmental breakdown – including water and air pollution, soil health erosion and biodiversity loss – resulting in a hit to GDP worth up to 3%, or about £70bn by the late 2020s.The report then added “acute risks” on top of these trends – including floods, droughts and wildfires – which would result in a 6% loss to GDP in the domestic and international scenarios, and a 12% hit in a health scenario, reflecting the extreme dangers to the UK economy from a renewed pandemic.Ministers are expected to take an interest in the report amid concern over the potential dangers to the economy from nature breakdown. Environment minister Richard Benyon said the report showed that nature “underpins the health of our economy and it is under threat from a global nature crisis”.The former Conservative MP, whose family controls a 5,600-hectare (14,000-acre) estate in west Berkshire, southern England, said the responsibility to conserve nature “lies with all sectors and sections of society, and green finance has a crucial role to play”.He said: “The findings in this report will help people and institutions across the corporate and finance sectors understand that it is in their own interests to go further and faster for the planet to protect it for future generations.”Shadow environment secretary, Steve Reed, blamed the government for the UK becoming “one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world”.Saying that the UK needed “to reverse the tide of destruction”, Reed committed Labour to cleaner air and water “and growing nature-rich habitats for wildlife to thrive”.The Green Finance Institute describes itself as the UK and Europe’s “principal forum for innovation in green finance” bringing together banks, academics, philanthropists and government bodies to develop climate-friendly policies and financial products.The report warned that unless action is taken, UK banks will need to reduce their exposure to the worst hit industries or find themselves increasing the risk of losses from bad loans. About 50% of the extra cost will come from the loss of nature overseas that the UK relies on to provide food, natural resources and trade.Partly funded by the government with input from the Treasury and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the authors also relied on advice and information from the Bank of England, Oxford and Reading universities, the UN’s environment programme, and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.The report said: “The impacts of biodiversity loss and environmental degradation will not be felt alone but will compound with climate risks. Both are happening at once and there are strong feedback effects between the loss of natural capital and climate change.”The study follows a Treasury-backed review in 2021 by the Cambridge economist Sir Partha Dasgupta, who found that the world was being put at “extreme risk” by the failure of economics to take account of the rapid depletion of the natural world.Last year, the government agency Natural England launched its Nature Returns programme to coordinate efforts across government and the private sector to explore how the UK can best use land in England “to address climate change whilst producing food and promoting thriving nature”.The agency said it wanted “to mobilise the billions in private investment that government estimates we need to meet our national net zero commitments”.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.