Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Thames Water data reveals raw sewage discharges in rivers rose 50% in 2024

News Feed
Tuesday, March 18, 2025

A record 50% more raw sewage was discharged into rivers in England by Thames Water last year compared with the previous 12 months, data seen by the Guardian reveals.Thames, the largest of the privatised water companies, which is teetering on the verge of collapse with debts of £19bn, was responsible for almost 300,000 hours of raw sewage pouring into waterways in 2024 from its ageing sewage works, according to the data. This compares with 196,414 hours of raw effluent dumped in 2023.The data, obtained by the analyst Peter Hammond in answer to an environmental information request to the company, comes after Thames Water won approval from the court of appeal for a £3bn emergency debt bailout to avoid collapse.Environmental campaigners and a small group of Thames’s creditors unsuccessfully challenged the bailout loan on the grounds it was not in the public interest and would continue a “Thames Water debt doom loop”. They argued temporary nationalisation under a special administration regime would be a better option.The raw sewage discharge data from event duration monitors on Thames Water combined sewer overflows, pumping stations and treatment works reveals the scale of the investment challenge ahead to fix its crumbling infrastructure.To pay for the investment Thames Water is seeking to raise household bills by 59% over the next five years in an appeal to the Competiton and Markets Authority, far higher than the 35% that the regulator, Ofwat, has approved.Thames Water’s sewage treatment works were responsible for almost 90% of the 298,081 hours of raw sewage it released into rivers in 2024, the data shows. The works are already subject to a criminal Environment Agency (EA) investigation into illegal sewage dumping and a parallel inquiry by Ofwat, which has ordered the water company to move at pace to put things right.Thames has admitted it has left its sewage treatment works to crumble for decades as a result of underinvestment. Its own business documents say it has “sweated these assets” by failing to invest in their upkeep, and as a result its infrastructure poses a risk to public safety, water supply and to the environment.The data also shows that raw sewage was discharged from its network of combined sewer overflows, which are supposed to be used only in exceptional circumstances, and from sewage pumping stations. According to the spill data: The Amersham balancing tanks in Buckinghamshire, which are supposed to safely store excess sewage after heavy rain, discharged 4,842 hours of raw sewage in 2024. Amersham was the scene of the longest unbroken individual discharge, when the equivalent of 154 days of raw sewage spilled into the River Misbourne, a chalk stream, last year. Marlborough sewage treatment works dumped raw sewage for 2,786 hours. At the Chesham sewage treatment works there were 2,681 hours of sewage discharges. Steve Reed, the environment secretary, has promised to clean up rivers and has set a target for water companies to achieve an average of 10 spills per sewage overflow by 2050. There was an average of 45.2 spills per overflow in 2024, according to the latest Thames data.Ash Smith, of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution, who monitors raw sewage pollution into the River Windrush, said: “Thames Water has become reliant on dumping sewage and paying dividends and bonuses while the billpayer funds everything.“The regulator’s inactivity and inertia plays a vital role in allowing this and to call it a scandal is an understatement.”skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe analysis suggests discharges are taking place in breach of the permit rules for the treatment works and could be illegal. For example, according to Hammond’s analysis, Marlborough sewage treatment discharged raw sewage for 26 days into the River Kennet, a chalk stream that is a site of special scientific interest. The spills were illegal, Hammond believes, because they took place on dry days in breach of the legal permit to operate.Thames Water said the data had to be verified by the EA and could be subject to change. “In 2024 we experienced one of the wettest years on record. Storm discharges are closely correlated with rainfall and groundwater conditions, and we therefore experienced an increase in the frequency and duration of storm discharge events during 2024,” the water company said.“We know how much people enjoy and appreciate rivers, which is why over the next five years we will deliver a record amount of investment to address our ageing infrastructure. This is an enormous undertaking; we are responsible for the oldest and most complex infrastructure of any company in the sector.”It added: “While all storm discharges are unacceptable, the sewage system was historically designed to prevent sewage backing up into people’s homes. Transparency is at the heart of what we do, and we were the first water company to publish a real time data map on our website, before it became legal requirement to do so.”Hammond, a professor of computational biology at University College London, now retired, is an expert on water company raw sewage discharges. His evidence to MPs on the environmental audit committee in 2021 showed the scale of illegal raw sewage discharges by water companies was 10 times greater than the EA estimated, prompting the biggest criminal investigation by the agency into illegal spills and the parallel Ofwat investigation. Both investigations are ongoing.

Exclusive: Almost 300,000 hours of raw effluent poured into waterways, figures show, up from 196,000 in 2023A record 50% more raw sewage was discharged into rivers in England by Thames Water last year compared with the previous 12 months, data seen by the Guardian reveals.Thames, the largest of the privatised water companies, which is teetering on the verge of collapse with debts of £19bn, was responsible for almost 300,000 hours of raw sewage pouring into waterways in 2024 from its ageing sewage works, according to the data. This compares with 196,414 hours of raw effluent dumped in 2023.The Amersham balancing tanks in Buckinghamshire, which are supposed to safely store excess sewage after heavy rain, discharged 4,842 hours of raw sewage in 2024.Amersham was the scene of the longest unbroken individual discharge, when the equivalent of 154 days of raw sewage spilled into the River Misbourne, a chalk stream, last year.Marlborough sewage treatment works dumped raw sewage for 2,786 hours.At the Chesham sewage treatment works there were 2,681 hours of sewage discharges. Continue reading...

A record 50% more raw sewage was discharged into rivers in England by Thames Water last year compared with the previous 12 months, data seen by the Guardian reveals.

Thames, the largest of the privatised water companies, which is teetering on the verge of collapse with debts of £19bn, was responsible for almost 300,000 hours of raw sewage pouring into waterways in 2024 from its ageing sewage works, according to the data. This compares with 196,414 hours of raw effluent dumped in 2023.

The data, obtained by the analyst Peter Hammond in answer to an environmental information request to the company, comes after Thames Water won approval from the court of appeal for a £3bn emergency debt bailout to avoid collapse.

Environmental campaigners and a small group of Thames’s creditors unsuccessfully challenged the bailout loan on the grounds it was not in the public interest and would continue a “Thames Water debt doom loop”. They argued temporary nationalisation under a special administration regime would be a better option.

The raw sewage discharge data from event duration monitors on Thames Water combined sewer overflows, pumping stations and treatment works reveals the scale of the investment challenge ahead to fix its crumbling infrastructure.

To pay for the investment Thames Water is seeking to raise household bills by 59% over the next five years in an appeal to the Competiton and Markets Authority, far higher than the 35% that the regulator, Ofwat, has approved.

Thames Water’s sewage treatment works were responsible for almost 90% of the 298,081 hours of raw sewage it released into rivers in 2024, the data shows. The works are already subject to a criminal Environment Agency (EA) investigation into illegal sewage dumping and a parallel inquiry by Ofwat, which has ordered the water company to move at pace to put things right.

Thames has admitted it has left its sewage treatment works to crumble for decades as a result of underinvestment. Its own business documents say it has “sweated these assets” by failing to invest in their upkeep, and as a result its infrastructure poses a risk to public safety, water supply and to the environment.

The data also shows that raw sewage was discharged from its network of combined sewer overflows, which are supposed to be used only in exceptional circumstances, and from sewage pumping stations. According to the spill data:

  • The Amersham balancing tanks in Buckinghamshire, which are supposed to safely store excess sewage after heavy rain, discharged 4,842 hours of raw sewage in 2024.

  • Amersham was the scene of the longest unbroken individual discharge, when the equivalent of 154 days of raw sewage spilled into the River Misbourne, a chalk stream, last year.

  • Marlborough sewage treatment works dumped raw sewage for 2,786 hours.

  • At the Chesham sewage treatment works there were 2,681 hours of sewage discharges.

Steve Reed, the environment secretary, has promised to clean up rivers and has set a target for water companies to achieve an average of 10 spills per sewage overflow by 2050. There was an average of 45.2 spills per overflow in 2024, according to the latest Thames data.

Ash Smith, of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution, who monitors raw sewage pollution into the River Windrush, said: “Thames Water has become reliant on dumping sewage and paying dividends and bonuses while the billpayer funds everything.

“The regulator’s inactivity and inertia plays a vital role in allowing this and to call it a scandal is an understatement.”

skip past newsletter promotion

after newsletter promotion

The analysis suggests discharges are taking place in breach of the permit rules for the treatment works and could be illegal. For example, according to Hammond’s analysis, Marlborough sewage treatment discharged raw sewage for 26 days into the River Kennet, a chalk stream that is a site of special scientific interest. The spills were illegal, Hammond believes, because they took place on dry days in breach of the legal permit to operate.

Thames Water said the data had to be verified by the EA and could be subject to change. “In 2024 we experienced one of the wettest years on record. Storm discharges are closely correlated with rainfall and groundwater conditions, and we therefore experienced an increase in the frequency and duration of storm discharge events during 2024,” the water company said.

“We know how much people enjoy and appreciate rivers, which is why over the next five years we will deliver a record amount of investment to address our ageing infrastructure. This is an enormous undertaking; we are responsible for the oldest and most complex infrastructure of any company in the sector.”

It added: “While all storm discharges are unacceptable, the sewage system was historically designed to prevent sewage backing up into people’s homes. Transparency is at the heart of what we do, and we were the first water company to publish a real time data map on our website, before it became legal requirement to do so.”

Hammond, a professor of computational biology at University College London, now retired, is an expert on water company raw sewage discharges. His evidence to MPs on the environmental audit committee in 2021 showed the scale of illegal raw sewage discharges by water companies was 10 times greater than the EA estimated, prompting the biggest criminal investigation by the agency into illegal spills and the parallel Ofwat investigation. Both investigations are ongoing.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Underwater Forests Return to Life off the Coast of California, and That Might be Good News for the Entire Planet

Wondrous kelp beds harbor a complex ecosystem that’s teeming with life, cleaning the water and the atmosphere, and bringing new hope for the future

Underwater Forests Return to Life off the Coast of California, and That Might be Good News for the Entire Planet Wondrous kelp beds harbor a complex ecosystem that’s teeming with life, cleaning the water and the atmosphere, and bringing new hope for the future The Palos Verdes Kelp Forest Restoration Project near Los Angeles forms an ecosystem that is home to many creatures. Sage Ono Every year, on a late summer night, Eva Pagaling joins a group of fellow Chumash paddlers who climb into a tomol, a handcrafted wood-plank canoe, for an eight-to-ten-hour voyage from the California mainland. They head for the largest of the Channel Islands, an archipelago sometimes called the Galápagos of North America due to its stunning biodiversity. The island appears on maps as Santa Cruz; the Chumash call it Limuw. Pagaling, who is now 35, has been taking part in the annual journey since she was 10. As the youngest daughter of a master canoe builder, she grew up hearing oral histories and learning songs about her Indigenous group, among the first people to inhabit the California coast at least 13,000 years ago, but she emphasized that this annual tradition is more than ceremonial. “This isn’t a replica of a tomol,” she said. “We aren’t just descendants of the Chumash; this isn’t just a re-enactment of our journey. This is who we are and what we are doing right now.”  But one thing that has changed over the generations is the condition of the channel waters. For millennia, the Chumash and other Indigenous people sustained themselves in part by spear hunting in kelp forests teeming with fish. “We still catch halibut, tuna and rockfish,” said Pagaling, who is a Chumash tribal marine consultant as well as a trained rescue diver. “But these marine ecosystems are not as healthy as when our ancestors were eating the fish.” Pagaling is the board president of the nonprofit Ocean Origins, and she collaborates with marine scientists to restore one of the planet’s most precious resources: the kelp forests that once grew thick and wide in tidal corridors up and down the Pacific Coast.  Eva Pagaling, board president of the nonprofit Ocean Origins. Pagaling belongs to the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians. The Chumash have spent many thousands of years living on California’s central coast and outer Channel Islands, paddling in a canoe called a tomol. Sage Ono Kelp forests keep ocean waters clean and oxygenated while hosting a wide variety of fish and sea life. These green and amber stalks of aquatic vegetation, which grow up to 175 feet from the seafloor to the surface, not only combat pollution but also mitigate climate change. Kelp forests absorb carbon dioxide from both the air and water that would otherwise linger for centuries. They can absorb 20 times more CO2 compared with same-size terrestrial forests.  In the 1830s, Charles Darwin was amazed by the kelp ecosystems he found flourishing in the Pacific waters around the Galápagos. “I can only compare these great aquatic forests ... with the terrestrial ones in the intertropical regions,” he wrote in his journal. “Yet, if in any country a forest was destroyed, I do not believe nearly so many species of animals would perish as would here, from the destruction of the kelp.” Kelp is an umbrella term for 30 types of algae that grow along nearly a third of the world’s coastlines—in Maine and Long Island, in the United Kingdom and Norway, in Tasmania and southern Africa, in Argentina and Japan. With a global coverage of more than two million square miles, kelp takes up roughly the same space as the Amazon rainforest. But few places in recorded history have had more abundant kelp forests than the 840 miles along California’s coastline.  Over the past few hundred years, that changed. First came the 18th-century fur traders, who trapped the sea otters of Monterey Bay, natural predators of the purple urchins that feast on kelp stalks, stems and blades. By the early 20th century, otter populations were hunted to near extinction. Kelp beds were consumed until they turned into desolate underwater areas known as urchin barrens. Fish populations disappeared with the kelp.  Fun Fact: What is kelp, anyway? Kelp isn’t a plant. It’s a very large type of algae that can grow to be 150 feet tall. Gas-filled compartments allow kelp blades to float upright. Tangled extensions keep them anchored to the seafloor. Co-founders of Ocean Origins include, from right, project scientist Jesse Altemus, director of science Selena Smith and cultural adviser Josh Cocker (who is Eva Pagaling’s husband). Sage Ono Then came the rise of the automobile. In 1921, California created the world’s first tidelands oil and gas leasing program, attracting energy producers that drilled hundreds of offshore oil wells across the Santa Barbara Channel. Oil platforms rose up from the sea. Oil leaks became common, along with the bubbling up of ocean floor tars. On January 28, 1969, one of the Union Oil Company’s main offshore platforms had a blowout, the largest in U.S. history at the time. As many as 4.2 million gallons of crude oil poured into the sea, killing thousands of seabirds, seals and sea lions, and also destroying the kelp forests.  The drilling didn’t stop, but mass protests and the burgeoning environmental movement pushed the federal government to set aside certain tidal waters as nature reserves. In 1980, the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary began protecting endangered species and sensitive habitats in nearly 1,500 square miles of ocean waters around the five northern Channel Islands. Yet the channel waters by Santa Barbara’s mainland remained open to drilling and industrial uses.  In recent years, the most destructive culprit has been climate change. From 2013 to 2016, the entire Pacific coast was hit with unprecedented El Niño events, when differentials in global winds and air temperatures set off superstorms. In 2015 alone, 16 tropical cyclones roiled the central Pacific hurricane basin, with rising water temperatures whacking kelp ecosystems out of balance. Nick Bond, climatologist for the state of Washington, called this marine heat wave “The Blob,” after the 1958 B-movie. Some kelp beds lingered in remnants, while others disappeared almost entirely, replaced by piles of purple urchins.  “It’s like seeing a forest that’s been clear-cut,” said marine conservationist Norah Eddy, the associate director of oceans programs for the Nature Conservancy in California. “It’s that shocking.” In 2015, the Northern Chumash Tribal Council submitted a nomination to the federal government for its own marine protected area. In November 2024, it became official. The Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary now begins at the tip of the Channel Islands and stretches north over 116 miles of shore, more than 13 percent of California’s coastline. More than 4,500 square miles of tidal waters are now protected from offshore oil drilling, pollution, industrial development, overfishing and habitat destruction. I wanted to see a healthy kelp forest for myself. On a chilly December morning, right after sunrise, I arrived at Ventura Harbor to board a dive boat for an all-day excursion with a couple dozen other kelp forest explorers. My scuba skills were rusty, so I opted to snorkel, renting gear and a wet suit.  Charles Darwin Public Domain / Wikipedia On board was Selena Smith, a marine biologist who co-founded Ocean Origins along with Pagaling and two others. Smith also served as director of education at the Reef Check Foundation, a global organization that documents both coral reefs and kelp forests. On the choppy, two-hour outbound boat ride, Smith told me about how advanced ecological modeling, genetic studies of kelp and underwater mapping are being deployed for restoration projects. By learning how and why the algae thrive under certain conditions, Ocean Origins aims to restore kelp in many locations. Its team members regularly find plastic and other trash stuck in the blades. “Mylar balloons are horrible,” Smith said. “They are definitely harmful to the marine environment and its occupants.” The boat dropped anchor in a spot so close to the ancient volcanic rock of Limuw that we could almost peer into the sea caves that line its shores. The surface of the water was teeming with kelp, so it looked like we had come to the right place. I took a ladder down to a small platform and let myself fall backward into the sea. The 55-degree water was perfect for kelp growth, and magnificent visibility offered pristine views of the underwater forest. I swam toward the stalks until I found myself inside amber cathedrals of giant kelp, a robust species native to Southern California. A group of whiskered sea lions came out to greet us. With bodies twice as long as otters’, and leathery skin rather than fur, the lions police these places, feasting on fish to maintain their weight. For males, that can be upwards of 700 pounds.  The kelp reefs were a riot of color—populated with emerald, navy and ginger fish; spindly lobsters with bright yellow eyes; golden sea stars; anemones with magenta tentacles that gave a turquoise glow; and kelp shaped like olive feather boas and butterscotch bulbs. More than a thousand documented species of plants and animals can be found here. Drawing many gazes from the divers were the nudibranchs—sea slugs that appeared in vibrant blue and orange. This ecosystem was thriving for one main reason: It had been cleaned up and then left alone. “Areas that are protected from fishing tend to have higher amounts of kelp, creating a better environment and generating more diversity,” Smith said. “This past year has been an especially good one.” Over the decades, there have been several notable stories of successful kelp revival. In the waters near Monterey, scientists and enthusiasts boat out weekly to dive into and monitor the aquatic forests. Ever since 1984, the Monterey Bay Aquarium has been helping protect the local waters from pollution and industrial development. The Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, established in 1992, expanded the effort, and now some 3,000 sea otters thrive between Half Moon Bay near San Francisco and Point Conception near Santa Barbara. The kelp’s ebbs and flows depend mostly on water temperature.  Off the coast of Palos Verdes, a famed surfing spot 30 miles south of Los Angeles, marine biologist Tom Ford, CEO of the Bay Foundation, operates one of the world’s most impressive kelp restoration projects. After moving to the area in 1998, Ford went out scuba diving and encountered a kelp forest. “That was it,” he said. “I was hooked.” For his master’s degree at the University of California, Los Angeles, Ford studied the trajectories of loss and recovery of kelp all over the world, and the many creatures that depended on it. “If it’s gone,” he said, “they’re essentially homeless.”  Urchin remains pile up in the water near Palos Verdes after the spiny creatures—relatives of sea stars and sand dollars—ran out of kelp to eat.  Sage Ono By 2013, Ford was ready to start work with a group of student volunteers, but he had barely gotten going when the coast was hit by The Blob. “We stopped restoration work,” he said. What they found were ailing purple echinoderms as far as the eye could see. They had consumed all the kelp, and now they were starving. “Their spines covered entire ocean floors like marble tile,” Ford told me. He and his team dove into the water and smashed urchins to death with hammers, which released nutrients that would nourish other marine creatures. It’s taken a decade of relentless work to clean out enough urchins and replenish the area. “We restarted this ecological machine so it could restore its own health,” Ford said. By 2024, a 70-acre forest, the size of about 53 football fields, became the biggest kelp restoration success story in the United States.  A year later, when I rode on the dive boat with Ford and his crew, the restoration area had grown to 80 acres, or around 60 football fields. We swam in the aftermath of a summer heat wave, with the water’s surface at a toasty 72 degrees. The heat was causing some of the kelp blades to disintegrate, clouding the waters. But Ford showed me how the same ocean bottom that once looked pale and dead was now covered in kelp stalks and green, red and brown algae. Healthy urchins were present in small numbers. Ford’s studies show that having fewer than three urchins per ten square feet keeps the ecosystem in balance. Yet he acknowledged that clearing out urchins by hand takes too long. He told me he’s looking forward to new tools and techniques that could make restoration easier and more productive. When it comes to the economy and the planet, cultivating kelp is a worthwhile venture. Perhaps the most promising business model is an outfit called Ocean Rainforest, which had success growing sugar kelp in the Faroe Islands of the North Atlantic Ocean and chose the Santa Barbara Channel as its next locale. Its 86-acre giant kelp farm, created from scratch four miles offshore, grows kelp on ropes that are attached to buoys. The buoys have GPS devices on them, and the team does biweekly monitoring, taking measurements of water temperature, nutrients and salinity. “The entire farm is engineered as one unit,” Douglas Bush, the director of California operations for Ocean Rainforest, said.  Base Map: Copyright © Free Vector Maps.com On a visit to his land-based facility in Goleta, California, Bush showed me giant metal vats that process the kelp into a liquid biostimulant for agriculture. By spraying this natural compound on soil, farmers hope to reduce the need for artificial fertilizers that give off nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas that traps 300 times as much heat per pound as CO2. The kelp-based product may boost yields and reduce the water needed for cash crops ranging from almonds and avocados to strawberries and grapes. (“Those are benefits attributed to seaweed biostimulants in general,” Bush noted carefully. “Our hope is to evaluate those claims in trials using our product.”)  Because California farms produce nearly half of America’s vegetables and three-quarters of its fruit and nuts, improving local agricultural techniques is no small achievement. “The reason we’re here is to be part of the solution, to improve regional food systems, to be a creative tool in the toolkit for regenerative agriculture,” Bush said. By cultivating kelp, he hopes to help meet the growing demand for seaweed products without putting strain on existing wild kelp forests. Brian von Herzen, a planetary scientist who is the founder and executive director of the Climate Foundation—a nonprofit founded in California—believes that using kelp as a biostimulant for agriculture is a gigantic financial opportunity. “Furthermore, the seaweed forests play key roles in natural climate repair, which is essential at this late stage in our climate journey,” he said. Von Herzen and his team invented growing lattices with electric motors that lower seaweeds each night to absorb nutrients, and raise them up to the surface each morning to catch full sunlight and absorb carbon dioxide in the top few feet of the sea. This enables growth in areas that don’t have enough natural upwelling, due to warming waters. The foundation has a kelp farm in Philippines waters, where it sells a kelp-based fertilizer called BIGgrow. Terry Herzik usually earns his living fishing for urchins, a culinary delicacy. Here, he smashes them instead to help restore Palos Verdes’ kelp forests. Sage Ono In 2023, von Herzen’s group began hosting marine permaculture workshops in California to raise awareness. The group now collaborates with Ocean Origins, as well as with scientists at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Removing CO2 from the air is expensive with methods like direct-air capture machines, driven by giant fans. Each ton of carbon can cost as much as $1,000 to capture.  Von Herzen estimates that kelp can remove CO2 at a cost of just $20 to $85 per ton, without requiring any machinery. A single acre of kelp forest can take in 16 tons, von Herzen said, “but our arrays can do more than double that, 35 tons of CO2 per acre per year,” or about the annual emissions of six gasoline cars.  Existing global seaweed forests can capture nearly 200 million tons of CO2 a year while also giving a $500 billion boost in ecosystem services to industries including fishing. Expanding them is an excellent investment, said von Herzen, both financially and environmentally. And using biostimulants can boost the climate benefit even more, both by reducing nitrous oxide emissions and by cutting the CO2 emissions that come both from making artificial fertilizers and from shipping them to farmers. California is already outpacing the rest of the country in reducing fossil fuel emissions. Kelp would help the state meet its target of reaching net-zero emissions by 2045, at least five years sooner than the Paris Agreement’s goal of 2050. Seaweeds currently grow across nearly 1 percent of the world’s temperate coastal ocean waters. Getting back to pre-industrial levels of about 2 percent would be revolutionary. Von Herzen is focusing on specific species, which grow three times faster than other kelp. He said they could remove enough carbon to equal all emissions from global aviation—all flights using jet fuels everywhere in the world. What’s more, studies show that kelp forests give off biogenic aerosols—tiny airborne particles that come from living things—that help clouds form. Coastal cloud cover reflects sunlight back into space. In its absence, the seas and soils are hotter, which also heats the air. There is more evaporation, and there are longer periods without rain. The ground becomes drier, making coastal woodlands more susceptible to wildfire. “We can keep California cooler and keep it from burning,” von Herzen said. “This can be done not in the distant future, but within the next ten years.” That’s because kelp can expand its coverage by 18 inches per day. Some giant kelp grow at a daily rate of two feet. To take in the full glory of kelp, I flew to a set of seaside towns near Eureka, roughly 100 miles south of the Oregon border, that were playing host to the California Seaweed Festival, a two- or three-day event that pops up each year in different parts of the state. The festival, now in its sixth year, was co-founded by biologist Janet Kübler, who spelled out the challenges and opportunities for kelp in a 2021 paper in the Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. “It’s not just a conference,” Kübler told me. “It’s a celebration of seaweed, not just as a food or a carbon sink, but all of its possibilities.” This article is a selection from the December 2025 issue of Smithsonian magazine At the Palos Verdes Kelp Forest Restoration Project, a school of bright blue blacksmith fish swims through healthy green blades of giant kelp and red algae. Sage Ono Inside the festival’s main venue at Eureka’s Wharfinger Building, a diverse set of scientists, including Indigenous leaders, was ready to point to their wall posters and chat about their research. Leaders of the Sunflower Star Lab were on hand to talk about recovery from The Blob, which brought about sea star wasting syndrome, all but killing off this keystone species, another natural predator of purple urchins. The stars, which stood in small tanks on display here, grow up to 39 inches wide. When they are released near a kelp forest, a slow-motion chase scene ensues. Urchins sense danger from chemicals released by the stars and try to escape. But the stars are speedier. Finally, a star will clutch and consume an urchin. Outside, a bluegrass band called the Compost Mountain Boys played as attendees toured the farmer’s market. A stand operated by Sunken Seaweed, a startup that skyrocketed out of San Diego, drew much of the attention. The table was staffed by its co-founder Torre Polizzi, who sold me a $12 jar of Califurikake, a local twist on Japanese-style seasoning made from seaweed. The festival underscored the versatility of this underappreciated climate solution. I was familiar with kelp-based protein smoothies for humans, but I learned how sprinkling seaweed on cattle feed can help cows digest their food, reducing their methane emissions between 40 and 80 percent. Kelp can also serve as an ingredient in biodegradable biopolymers, which are used in place of petroleum-based plastics. In 2020, a nonprofit called the Lonely Whale Foundation announced a $1.2 million Plastic Innovation Prize in partnership with Tom Ford Beauty (a company founded by fashion designer Tom Ford, not by marine biologist Tom Ford who runs the Bay Foundation). The top award, announced in 2023, went to a California company called Sway, which makes a seaweed-based alternative to thin-film plastic packaging.  At the docks, I boarded a boat for a Humboldt Bay harbor cruise. Out on the sparkling water, we spotted pelicans gliding in for a lunch of fish. The boat passed an aquatic farm established in 2020 that had produced more than 3,000 pounds of bull kelp that year. On the cruise, a Los Angeles company called Blue Robotics was showing images captured by a remotely operated vehicle that can help tend kelp several hundred feet underwater. At night, a party billed as the Seaweed Speakeasy featured local beers made with kelp instead of malt, served along with seaweedy hors d’oeuvres. I found a station serving mac and kelp and cheese that went down easy with the beer. Jasmine Iniguez, an aquaculturalist at College of the Redwoods in Northern California, pulls a line of seaweed out of the water as she helps haul up the kelp harvest. Sage Ono The festival culminated at the marine lab of Cal Poly Humboldt. Pulling on latex gloves, I stood beside a lab table set with fresh ribbons of kelp and learned how to assess its reproductive health by isolating the tissue that holds its spores. With a razor, I scraped a slimy layer off a blade, splashed it with iodine and set the substance under a microscope. The batch held spores with excellent motility (the ability to move well on their own). Each spore grows into a microscopic organism, either male or female. The males will release sperm into the water, and the females will release chemicals that help the sperm find their eggs.  I left the festival feeling satisfied and, dare I say, optimistic, yet with some big unresolved questions. Where was this kelp work heading? How big could the movement really get? What kinds of signs would urge people to take such solutions seriously? The last of these questions took on even more urgency for me in January, after winds up to 100 miles an hour hit Los Angeles, where I live. The gusts stoked flames on parched lands, creating Southern California’s most devastating winter fire in decades. The result: death, devastation and more than $75 billion in damages.  Three California spiny lobsters at the Palos Verdes Kelp Forest Restoration Project. The lobsters prey on sea urchins, which helps kelp to thrive. Sage Ono The average person may know the Earth is warmer now than at any time in the past 100,000 years, or that each year now sets a global temperature record. But what happens underwater is so rarely seen. Most people have no idea that seaweeds have been around for a billion years, or that algae and aquatic plants provide the planet with about half of its oxygen, the other half coming from terrestrial plants. Most people don’t know that ocean water has already absorbed about a third of humanity’s excess carbon emissions, and that the resulting carbonic acid disrupts the ocean’s chemistry, leaving less calcium for the hard shell casings of shellfish—or that cultivating kelp serves as a giant pushback against this process. Most people don’t know that seaweeds can be used to make natural, low-cost alternatives to plastics and fertilizers. At Ocean Rainforest, solid kelp is ground into a slurry and then transformed into a biostimulant that can reduce farmers’ reliance on synthetic fertilizers. The strawberry plant shown above is in a container that was made partly from kelp. Sage Ono The Chumash people know all of this. I met Pagaling at Goleta Beach, near Santa Barbara, to chat on a bench by the playground, where her 4-year-old was having a wonderful time. Pagaling pointed to seaweed that had washed ashore on the sand and described how the Chumash had been gathering the stuff from beaches for centuries. She uses it as a fertilizer for her family’s garden of corn, squash, beans, carrots and zucchini. “You can watch the plants really take off,” she said. Seaweed-based products line shelves at North Coast Co-op in Eureka. The company’s founders are helping to rebuild kelp forests. Sage Ono As we gazed out at the ocean, she lamented the loss. “That’s where our food was provided, our staple areas, our swimming and fishing,” she said. Then came the pollution, the overfishing, the poor land and water management practices. Oil platforms are still visible to anyone driving north from Los Angeles along Highway 101. After a century of drilling, Californians have now spent more than a decade taking steps toward decommissioning the rigs. Still, as intrusive as the rigs once were, ecosystems have adapted around them. As with shipwrecks, the rigs are now habitats for arrays of marine life. That’s how resilient nature can be. Even many staunch environmentalists agree that the underwater structures should remain after they’re no longer in use.  A healthy habitat at Palos Verdes. Instead of roots, kelp has a tangle of extensions called a holdfast that keeps it anchored it to the seafloor. Sage Ono Pagaling spoke of the celebrations on the Chumash reservation when the federal government approved the Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary and the outlook for leading restoration of nature along the coast. “There are so many kelp forest opportunities now,” she said. “It will take collaboration between Indigenous and non-Indigenous groups.” Yet she acknowledged that there have been few collaborations like this before. “Lots of communities say they are for restoration, but there is often disagreement over how.” When the tomol crew reaches Limuw, a crowd of people from the Chumash community and beyond will welcome those who paddled all through the night. Next year, Pagaling says, the gathering won’t only be about honoring the past. It will also celebrate the possibility of a better future.  Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Data centers are the desert’s thirsty new neighbor

In arid New Mexico, a massive data center campus promises jobs, but residents fear it will drain their most precious resource: water

Words by Annie Rosenthal | Edited by Kate SchimelSunland Park, New Mexico, is not a notably online community. Retirees have settled in mobile homes around the small border town, just over the state line from El Paso. Some don’t own computers — they make their way to the air-conditioned public library when they need to look something up.Soon, though, the local economy could center around the internet: County officials have approved up to $165 billion in industrial revenue bonds to help developers build a sprawling data center campus just down the road.“Project Jupiter” is the latest in a tidal wave of data center projects popping up across the country. Once built, the giant buildings full of computer hardware work 24/7 to power artificial intelligence and web searches for tech companies. Developers BorderPlex Digital Assets and STACK Infrastructure have been the public faces of Project Jupiter — but last week, after local officials voted to support the effort, tech giants OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank revealed that they’ll be the clients for the campus. In a press release, they announced that the project is part of their Stargate initiative, which includes plans to invest $500 billion in new AI infrastructure in the next few years. The agreement approved by Doña Ana County commissioners on September 19 will allow developers to avoid paying property taxes on Project Jupiter for 30 years. In exchange, the companies are pledging $360 million in payments to the county over that period — plus more than $50 million for local infrastructure improvements. They say they’ll hire 2,500 people to build the campus, starting later this year, and then 750 for permanent roles, all prioritizing locals.That’s a big deal for Doña Ana County. Here, where the Rio Grande peels away from the Mexican border, a quarter of the population lives below the poverty line. Sunland Park’s most prominent business is a racetrack and casino complex that looks out on a long string of strip malls leading into the desert below Mount Cristo Rey. To the west, the small town of Santa Teresa — the proposed home for Project Jupiter — has worked for decades to court development around its port of entry to rural Chihuahua.But in a few short weeks, the deal has generated intense controversy. Like the residents of dozens of other U.S. communities facing the arrival of a data center, many in Doña Ana County are wary. A large data center could use millions of gallons of drinking water a day to keep its equipment cool, and the industry already accounts for more than 4% of total U.S. electricity consumption in a given year.Project Jupiter’s developers have promised to build their own microgrid and said they’ll use a small fraction of that water, but residents are urging caution.Residents of Sunland Park, New Mexico, gathered in August at the local library to discuss the effects that a proposed $165 billion data center might have on their community. Photo by Alberto Silva Fernandez/Puente News Collaborative & High Country NewsPalabraIn late August, about 15 people from Sunland Park and organizers from the nonprofit Empowerment Congress of Doña Ana County met at the library to discuss the proposal. “I don’t understand much of the technology,” said attendee Alma Márquez, in Spanish. “But we have a lot of basic needs here in Sunland Park.”The city started as a group of colonias — unplanned settlements that emerged along the border in the 1980s and ’90s when developers sold off plots for low prices, often without ensuring that residents would have basic services. Decades later, people here and in Santa Teresa are still struggling to access clean water.“This thing that’s coming consumes a lot of power, a lot of water,” Márquez said. “What’s going to happen with us, with that water we need (to be) clean?” Looking around the room, she asked, “And why here?”Santa Teresa has long harbored dreams of becoming a hub for cross-border industry. BorderPlex Digital says its location on the edge of two states and two countries makes it a particularly attractive place to invest. “We firmly believe that the next wave of frontier tech belongs on the American frontier,” the company’s CEO said in a press release.But the county’s colonia residents aren’t convinced. Even as their leaders give developers the green light, they’re joining a growing number of communities around the country that see data centers as a threat, not a boon.‘I don’t want a PowerPoint presentation that just says, ‘Don’t worry, we’re not going to use that much water.’ And I think the community deserves to know.’The proposed site for Project Jupiter is a flat stretch of scrub along the highway just north of the port of entry. Its closest neighbors include a set of industrial parks built to complement the maquiladoras across the border, and a new solar plant where thousands of panels point skyward.As data centers proliferate, many are landing in rural or exurban areas like this, where open space abounds. And local leaders are often eager to welcome them. When Gov. Michelle Luján Grisham first announced a partnership with BorderPlex Digital in February, she called it an opportunity to “position New Mexico as a leader in digital infrastructure.” In the same press release, Davin López, president of the Mesilla Valley Economic Development Alliance, wrote that Project Jupiter is “precisely the type of development we’ve been working to attract — one that leverages innovation to strengthen our position as a key player in global trade.”In the earliest phases of the AI boom, such developments were often quietly approved, with limited public input or outcry. But that’s changing. Data Center Watch, an industry research firm, has counted $64 billion of data center projects that have been delayed or paused in just two years amid local opposition.Construction near a housing development in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, not far from the proposed site for “Project Jupiter.” Photo by Alberto Silva Fernandez/Puente News Collaborative & High Country NewsPalabraProtests started in Virginia, currently the data center capital of the world. But as the industry moves west, it’s facing increasing backlash in states from Texas to Oregon to California. In Cascade Locks, Oregon, voters recalled two local officials for supporting a $100 million data center. In Mesa, Arizona, the city government just passed new regulations restricting data center construction. The California legislature is currently considering multiple bills focused on data center energy use.As the research group Data Center Watch notes, opposition cuts across party lines, with frustrated neighbors criticizing everything from tax breaks and rising utility costs to noise pollution and decreasing property values. In the arid Borderlands, water use tops the list of concerns. This summer, when Amazon attempted to quietly push through a massive data center near Tucson, hundreds of people showed up to city council meetings, bearing pamphlets that said, “Protect our water future.”In Doña Ana County, the opposition has been led by colonia residents focused on an already too-dry present. In early 2024, after residents reported slimy water coming from their taps, a state investigation found dozens of violations by the Camino Real Regional Utility Authority (CRRUA) — including evidence that the utility had been bypassing arsenic treatment for over a year, selling contaminated water to more than 19,000 customers. The county has since announced plans to end its relationship with CRRUA, and the state has sued the utility over a decade of mismanagement. But residents cite continued issues with their water: yellow discoloration, sediment in the stream, and taps that barely drip despite escalating bills.Paulina Reyna speaks at a gathering of Doña Ana County residents in Sunland Park. Photo by Alberto Silva Fernandez/Puente News Collaborative & High Country NewsPalabraAt the library in Sunland Park, Joe Anthony Martínez, 76, pointed to scars on his neck, where a surgeon removed skin cancer that he believes was caused by the water. Unwilling to trust the tap, he and his wife have spent years paying for filtered water. Now, as the county and city work towards establishing a new utility system, they worry that even if the water improves, it will go to the data center.“We don’t want any of that,” Martínez said in Spanish. “What we want is quality water.”As concerns about data centers’ resource use gain traction, the industry is working quickly to demonstrate its environmental consciousness. BorderPlex Digital says Project Jupiter will minimize water use by employing a cooling system that recycles water, rather than the more traditional system that evaporates it. A company spokesperson said in an email that their partner firm, STACK, currently operates data centers in Oregon using the same technology. “The closed-loop cooling system requires only a one-time fill-up and will therefore limit ongoing water use to domestic needs of employees (similar to an office building with 750 employees),” he wrote. According to documents detailing the agreement between developers and the county, “ongoing operations” for the campus will rely on treated drinking water provided by the county and CRRUA, the utility that county officials plan to replace. In a public meeting, developers said that the initial fill would require about 10 million gallons of water, and that the system would use 7.2 million gallons annually. Daily water use for the campus will average around 20,000 gallons a day, capped at 60,000. Daisy Maldonado, director of the civic engagement group Empowerment Congress, remains skeptical. “I want scientific reports about how a closed-loop system works and what is the level of water evaporation and recharge needed every year,” she said. “I don’t want a PowerPoint presentation that just says, ‘Don’t worry, we’re not going to use that much water.’ And I think the community deserves to know.”Empowerment Congress director Daisy Maldonado says she is concerned that the massive infrastructure complex will cause more issues with the local water supply. Photo by Alberto Silva Fernandez/Puente News Collaborative & High Country NewsPalabraWhile the state of New Mexico announced the BorderPlex Digital partnership in February, many in Doña Ana County didn’t learn about Project Jupiter until details of the plan were unveiled in late August, just weeks before commissioners planned a final vote on the bond proposal.At a county meeting on August 26, commissioners tried to assuage residents’ concerns. “One of the things that we insist on as part of this discussion is that … this data center is not going to have a negative impact on the water situation down in Santa Teresa and in Sunland Park,” County Commissioner Shannon Reynolds said, according to El Paso Matters. “If it does, then I promise you, we will be on top of it.”Over the following weeks, however, local tensions around the project rose. Early last month, Reynolds posted on Facebook the names of dozens of people who submitted public comments in opposition to the project.In a press release, the New Mexico Environmental Law Center called the post “An act of intimidation intended to deter participation and silence community members exercising their right to participate in public and government processes.” Reynolds did not respond to a request for comment, but said on Facebook that he was naming the residents to thank them publicly.Leading up to the scheduled vote, developers launched a website outlining their pitch and hosted a series of community meetings around the county. Dozens of people showed up to ask questions — and as the public hearing neared, residents on both sides of the issue pushed for more time to get answers. On September 16, the city of Sunland Park joined calls to delay the vote, saying its leaders hadn’t had a chance to fully assess the proposal.But developers reportedly said postponing the decision would mean losing the development altogether. On September 19, after hours of heated debate in public comment and multiple requests from one commissioner to delay, county commissioners went ahead with the vote, approving the bond proposal 4-1.To Daisy Maldonado, the decision wasn’t a surprise — but it did feel like a betrayal. She said she had hoped the county would ask more questions about the kinds of development it seeks. Driving down McNutt Road, the main thoroughfare through Sunland Park, she pointed out more than a dozen cannabis dispensaries. A total of 43 have filled vacant storefronts and warehouses in the city since New Mexico legalized the drug in 2021, catering to customers from across the state line.“You know how many grocery stores are in the city of Sunland Park, in Santa Teresa?” she asked. “It might be one. For a community of almost 20,000 people.”She sighed.“So how is New Mexico taking care of its residents? They’re failing the people in Sunland Park, in Santa Teresa, because all they can see is the dollar signs.”—Annie Rosenthal is the Virginia Spencer Davis fellow at High Country News, where she covers migration, rural communities, and life in the borderlands. She was previously the border reporter at Marfa Public Radio, and her work has appeared in or on NPR, Marketplace, Politico Magazine, and the Washington Post, among other publications. She’s based in Marfa, Texas. @AnnieRosenthal8Alberto Silva Fernandez is a bilingual photojournalist based in El Paso, Texas. He has worked at the student newspaper The Prospector as the Photo Editor and as Editor in Chief, and was a photojournalism intern with the El Paso Times from April 2023 to December 2023. His coverage of events includes the Aug. 3rd, 2019, Walmart mass shooting, and high school and collegiate sports. His goal is to capture moments of his community through photography, and to continue the efforts of honest and passionate journalism. @albert.sf08Kate Schimel is the news and investigations editor at High Country News. She lives in Bozeman, Montana. @kateschimelIf you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

At least 15 English sewage plants use plastic beads spilled at Camber Sands

Exclusive: Experts urge water companies to update plants to avoid another catastrophe, as analysis reveals scale of useAt least 15 sewage plants on England’s south coast use the same contaminated plastic beads that were spilled in an environmental disaster in Camber Sands, Guardian analysis can reveal.Environmental experts have urged water companies to update these old treatment plants to avoid another catastrophic spill, which can lead to plastic beads being permanently embedded in the environment and killing marine wildlife. Continue reading...

At least 15 sewage plants on England’s south coast use the same contaminated plastic beads that were spilled in an environmental disaster in Camber Sands, Guardian analysis can reveal.Environmental experts have urged water companies to update these old treatment plants to avoid another catastrophic spill, which can lead to plastic beads being permanently embedded in the environment and killing marine wildlife.The sewage works in these areas, which include some of England’s most treasured beaches, use billions of floating plastic beads in tanks to purify water. Experts say this is a risky method of treating sewage because of the risk that the beads could spill into the sea if one of the mesh screens holding them fails.The government and regulators keep no record of which water companies use these beads, where the treatment works using them are located, or how many are in use, a government spokesperson confirmed, adding that it was a “matter for water companies”. This analysis reveals the scale of the problem for the first time.Campaigners have called for water companies to phase out the beads. Rob Abrams of Surfers Against Sewage said: “Once released, bio-beads behave like any other microplastic: they can be ingested by fish, seabirds and shellfish, enter the food chain, carry harmful pollutants on their surface, and pose risks to human health. And the risk is even greater as so many of these systems sit on the coast. Storms, sea levels rising, and increasingly extreme weather only heighten the chance of failures. Yet instead of investing in safe, modern infrastructure, water companies have siphoned money out to shareholders while letting environmental protections crumble.”The beads are used to create layers of biofilm, bacteria that purify water. Billions at a time are held in tanks, and all that separates them from the environment is a mesh screen. Most of the sewage works using these beads were built about 30 years ago.Beverley Coombes, of the plastic pollution nonprofit Strandliners, said: “A loss from a coastal plant is much more of a pollution risk. The discharge goes directly out to sea, where the bio-beads can be carried along the coast for many miles or even across the Channel. I think existing treatment centres should be exploring alternatives to bio-beads. Anything that can stop billions of these potentially toxic bio-beads from entering our rivers and seas has to be a step in the right direction.”The vast majority of the sewage works using beads are in small towns on England’s south and south-west coastlines, in Sussex, Cornwall, Devon and Dorset. Coastal areas affected include Exmouth, Porthleven, Lyme Regis and Peacehaven.The Guardian scrutinised water treatment centre applications and reports to build a picture of where they are used, as well as drawing on data from the Cornish Plastic Pollution Coalition, which has been tracking the issue in Cornwall.Camber Sands in East Sussex faced a spill of an estimated 650m of these beads this month. They have found their way along the coastline, contaminating beaches including Hastings and Dungeness, and buried themselves into the shingle and salt marshes around the area. They were spilled due to a failure of the screen on their tank. Southern Water has apologised and committed to paying for cleanup operations.These beads contain a high number of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which have been linked to cancer. They often contain toxins including lead, antimony and bromine. Once in the sea, they attract algae, making them smell like food to sea creatures, which then ingest them and can be poisoned.England’s coastal communities are some of its most deprived, and they have failed to gain investment over past decades, as tourism habits have changed and people fly abroad instead of visiting the coast.Helena Dollimore, the MP for Hastings and Rye, said: “Southern Water revealed at my public meeting last week that the use of plastic beads is outdated, and modern treatment works don’t use them. So why is our coastline being put at risk? Southern Water must urgently explain how they will ensure an incident like this never happens again. These beads are contaminating some of our most precious habitats, from the salt marsh at Rye Harbour to the sand dunes at Camber. Our area, and especially our wildlife, will be dealing with these beads for many months to come.”John Penicud, the managing director for wastewater at Southern Water, said: “In our new plant construction since the early 2000s we don’t use beads any more. We use something called membrane technology.” This uses fixed membranes rather than billions of floating plastic beads, so poses less of an environmental risk.Penicud blamed the government’s focus on sewage pollution for not retrofitting his sites: “Where we have put forward cases for how we can retrofit some of these sites instead, our focus from government has been to continue to improve the environment by reducing discharges, improving the quality of the sewage that we treat every day.” He added that retrofitting these sites was “always under review”.Cornish plastics campaigners have battled over this issue for years. Volunteers and beachcombers are still finding beads from a major 2010 spill from the Newham sewage treatment works near Truro. In 2017, vandals slashed some sacks holding beads at a treatment centre, causing a spill on to Tregantle Beach, Whitsand Bay.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe Cornish Plastic Pollution Coalition says it frequently finds beads from more low-level spills along the coast, where they have been handled incorrectly.South West Water, which owns the sewage treatment plants on that stretch of the coast, was initially planning to phase out beads. Instead, it has replaced the smaller beads with newer, larger ones, which should be less likely to escape.Claire Wallerstein, from the Cornish Plastic Pollution Coalition, said: “We are very concerned that South West Water is using new beads to extend the use of these old wastewater plants beyond the end of their planned 30-year lifespan – we fear this is a recipe for potential disaster.“A breach in the containment mesh was what caused the devastating Cornish spill back in 2010 and now, 15 years on, the infrastructure of these plants is surely at even greater risk of rupture.”A South West Water spokesperson said: “Only eight of our 655 wastewater treatment works use bio-beads, which are all fitted with two levels of robust containment measures and are inspected to ensure beads are kept within the treatment works. Decommissioning these plants is very costly as it requires the whole treatment process to be completely replaced. We are aiming to remove the bio-bead process at our remaining sites when they are required to be upgraded in the future.”Wessex Water has been contacted for comment.Where the beads are usedCoastal Gorran Haven (South West Water) Combe Martin (South West Water) Porthleven (South West Water) Slapton (South West Water) Exmouth (South West Water) Lyme Regis (South West Water) Plympton (South West Water) Eastbourne (Southern Water) Peacehaven (Southern Water) Sandown (Southern Water) Broomfield Bank (Southern Water) Beckley (Southern Water) Kingston Seymour (Wessex Water) Inland

Trump proposes to narrow where Clean Water Act applies

The Trump administration is proposing to narrow which bodies of water qualify for Clean Water Act protections. The administration proposed a new definition Monday for what counts as a “water of the United States” and is therefore subject to federal pollution regulations under the Clean Water Act. The issue is a controversial one, with developers,...

The Trump administration is proposing to narrow which bodies of water qualify for Clean Water Act protections.  The administration on Monday proposed a new definition for what counts as a “water of the United States” and is therefore subject to federal pollution regulations under the Clean Water Act. The issue is a controversial one, with developers, farmers and others calling for including fewer bodies of water to make it easier for them to operate. Environmental activists, however, argue that more bodies of water deserve protection in order to prevent pollution that can flow to important waters. “There will be less that will be regulated by the federal government,” Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin told reporters. Waters of the U.S. require permits for pollution, as well as activities such as filling and dredging. Those that are not so classified may not require permits.  In general, large, permanent bodies of water such as oceans and lakes are considered waters of the U.S., but wetlands and streams have been more contentious. DEVELOPING… Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.