Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Pollution Solution: Scientists Develop Living Plastics That Degrade in Compost or Erosion

News Feed
Saturday, August 31, 2024

Plastics are widely used but difficult to degrade, posing an ecological challenge. A team from SIAT developed degradable “living plastics” using synthetic biology and polymer engineering. They engineered Bacillus subtilis spores to produce Burkholderia cepacia lipase (BC-lipase), an enzyme that breaks down plastic. These spores were mixed with poly(caprolactone) (PCL) to create the plastics, maintaining the material’s physical properties. When the plastic surface is eroded, the spores release the enzyme, leading to a nearly complete breakdown of the plastic. Credit: Dai ZhuojunScientists developed engineered spores embedded in plastics that remain stable during use but degrade rapidly when exposed to specific environmental triggers. This innovative approach could significantly mitigate plastic pollution. The findings, led by Dr. Dai Zhuojun’s research group at the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), were recently published in Nature Chemical Biology. The study leverages the natural resilience of spores, which can endure extreme environmental conditions, by programming them to secrete plastic-degrading enzymes under specific circumstances. These spores are embedded into plastic matrices through standard plastic processing methods, such as high temperature, high pressure, or the use of organic solvents. In normal conditions, the spores remain dormant, ensuring the plastic’s stable performance. However, when exposed to specific triggers like surface erosion or composting, the spores activate and initiate the degradation process, leading to the plastic’s complete breakdown. Research Background The invention of plastics has improved our daily lives, but the massive production and improper disposal of plastic waste have made plastic pollution a major environmental issue. In 2016, Yoshida et al. discovered a bacterium, Ideonella sakaiensis, in poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET)-contaminated soil near a recycling facility in Japan. This bacterium can grow using PET as its main carbon source by producing two key enzymes: PETase and MHETase. Since then, numerous synthetic biology research has been focused on discovering, designing, and evolving the relevant plastic-degrading enzymes, but there has been little exploration of innovative methods for creating degradable plastics. Dormant Spores and Living Plastics Microorganisms have developed intrinsic mechanisms to defend against harsh conditions over billions of years. One classical example is the formation of spores that are resilient to dryness, high temperatures, and high pressure (similar conditions in plastics processing). Using synthetic biology, the research team engineered Bacillus subtilis with a genetic circuit to control the secretion of a plastic-degrading enzyme (lipase BC from Burkholderia cepacia). Under stress from heavy metal ions, Bacillus subtilis forms spores. The team mixed these engineered spores with poly (caprolactone) (PCL) plastic granules and produced spore-containing plastics through high-temperature extrusion or solvent dissolution. Tests showed that these “living plastics” had similar physical properties to regular PCL plastics. During daily use, the spores remain dormant, ensuring the plastic’s stable performance. Spore Release and Degradation Initiation The first key step in plastic degradation is to release the spores embedded in the living plastic for cell revival. Researchers have first demonstrated two methods of spore release. One method uses an enzyme (lipase CA) to erode the plastic surface. These released spores then germinated and expressed the lipase BC, which bound to the ends of PCL polymer chains and near-completely degraded the PCL molecules (final molecular weight <500 g/mol). The results showed that living plastic could degrade efficiently within 6-7 days, while ordinary PCL plastic subjected only to surface damage (lipase CA) still had a large amount of plastic debris after 21 days. Another method for spores release is composting. In the absence of any additional exogenous agents, living plastics in soil could completely degrade within 25-30 days, while traditional PCL plastic took about 55 days to degrade to a level that was invisible to the naked eye. Beyond PCL Plastics As mentioned earlier, PCL’s processing conditions are relatively ‘mild’ among plastics. To verify the system’s general applicability, the team continued to test other commercial plastic systems. They mixed spores carrying GFP expression plasmids with PBS (polybutylene succinate), PBAT (polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate), PLA (polylactic acid), PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoates), and even PET (poly (ethylene terephthalate)) and processed the mixture at temperatures as high as 300oC. By releasing the spores through physical grinding, they surprisingly found that the spores could still revive and expressed the GFP. These results have laid a solid foundation for extending the method with other types of plastics. To validate the potential for scaling up the system, the research team also conducted a small-scale industrial test on PCL system using a single-screw extruder. The generated living PCL still exhibited rapid and efficient degradation property (degrade within 7 days). In the absence of external factors, the living PCL maintained a stable shape, demonstrating its robustness during the service (stable in Sprite for two months). This study provides a novel method for fabricating green plastics that can function steadily when the spores are latent and decay when the spores are aroused and shed light on the development of materials for sustainability. Reference: “Degradable living plastics programmed by engineered spores” by Chenwang Tang, Lin Wang, Jing Sun, Guangda Chen, Junfeng Shen, Liang Wang, Ying Han, Jiren Luo, Zhiying Li, Pei Zhang, Simin Zeng, Dianpeng Qi, Jin Geng, Ji Liu and Zhuojun Dai, 21 August 2024, Nature Chemical Biology.DOI: 10.1038/s41589-024-01713-2

Scientists developed engineered spores embedded in plastics that remain stable during use but degrade rapidly when exposed to specific environmental triggers. This innovative approach could significantly mitigate plastic pollution. The findings, led by Dr. Dai Zhuojun’s research group at the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), were recently published in [...]

Living Plastics Degradation
Plastics are widely used but difficult to degrade, posing an ecological challenge. A team from SIAT developed degradable “living plastics” using synthetic biology and polymer engineering. They engineered Bacillus subtilis spores to produce Burkholderia cepacia lipase (BC-lipase), an enzyme that breaks down plastic. These spores were mixed with poly(caprolactone) (PCL) to create the plastics, maintaining the material’s physical properties. When the plastic surface is eroded, the spores release the enzyme, leading to a nearly complete breakdown of the plastic. Credit: Dai Zhuojun

Scientists developed engineered spores embedded in plastics that remain stable during use but degrade rapidly when exposed to specific environmental triggers. This innovative approach could significantly mitigate plastic pollution.

The findings, led by Dr. Dai Zhuojun’s research group at the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), were recently published in Nature Chemical Biology.

The study leverages the natural resilience of spores, which can endure extreme environmental conditions, by programming them to secrete plastic-degrading enzymes under specific circumstances. These spores are embedded into plastic matrices through standard plastic processing methods, such as high temperature, high pressure, or the use of organic solvents.

In normal conditions, the spores remain dormant, ensuring the plastic’s stable performance. However, when exposed to specific triggers like surface erosion or composting, the spores activate and initiate the degradation process, leading to the plastic’s complete breakdown.

Research Background

The invention of plastics has improved our daily lives, but the massive production and improper disposal of plastic waste have made plastic pollution a major environmental issue. In 2016, Yoshida et al. discovered a bacterium, Ideonella sakaiensis, in poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET)-contaminated soil near a recycling facility in Japan.

This bacterium can grow using PET as its main carbon source by producing two key enzymes: PETase and MHETase. Since then, numerous synthetic biology research has been focused on discovering, designing, and evolving the relevant plastic-degrading enzymes, but there has been little exploration of innovative methods for creating degradable plastics.

Dormant Spores and Living Plastics

Microorganisms have developed intrinsic mechanisms to defend against harsh conditions over billions of years. One classical example is the formation of spores that are resilient to dryness, high temperatures, and high pressure (similar conditions in plastics processing).

Using synthetic biology, the research team engineered Bacillus subtilis with a genetic circuit to control the secretion of a plastic-degrading enzyme (lipase BC from Burkholderia cepacia). Under stress from heavy metal ions, Bacillus subtilis forms spores. The team mixed these engineered spores with poly (caprolactone) (PCL) plastic granules and produced spore-containing plastics through high-temperature extrusion or solvent dissolution. Tests showed that these “living plastics” had similar physical properties to regular PCL plastics. During daily use, the spores remain dormant, ensuring the plastic’s stable performance.

Spore Release and Degradation Initiation

The first key step in plastic degradation is to release the spores embedded in the living plastic for cell revival. Researchers have first demonstrated two methods of spore release. One method uses an enzyme (lipase CA) to erode the plastic surface.

These released spores then germinated and expressed the lipase BC, which bound to the ends of PCL polymer chains and near-completely degraded the PCL molecules (final molecular weight <500 g/mol). The results showed that living plastic could degrade efficiently within 6-7 days, while ordinary PCL plastic subjected only to surface damage (lipase CA) still had a large amount of plastic debris after 21 days.

Another method for spores release is composting. In the absence of any additional exogenous agents, living plastics in soil could completely degrade within 25-30 days, while traditional PCL plastic took about 55 days to degrade to a level that was invisible to the naked eye.

Beyond PCL Plastics

As mentioned earlier, PCL’s processing conditions are relatively ‘mild’ among plastics. To verify the system’s general applicability, the team continued to test other commercial plastic systems. They mixed spores carrying GFP expression plasmids with PBS (polybutylene succinate), PBAT (polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate), PLA (polylactic acid), PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoates), and even PET (poly (ethylene terephthalate)) and processed the mixture at temperatures as high as 300oC.

By releasing the spores through physical grinding, they surprisingly found that the spores could still revive and expressed the GFP. These results have laid a solid foundation for extending the method with other types of plastics.

To validate the potential for scaling up the system, the research team also conducted a small-scale industrial test on PCL system using a single-screw extruder. The generated living PCL still exhibited rapid and efficient degradation property (degrade within 7 days). In the absence of external factors, the living PCL maintained a stable shape, demonstrating its robustness during the service (stable in Sprite for two months). This study provides a novel method for fabricating green plastics that can function steadily when the spores are latent and decay when the spores are aroused and shed light on the development of materials for sustainability.

Reference: “Degradable living plastics programmed by engineered spores” by Chenwang Tang, Lin Wang, Jing Sun, Guangda Chen, Junfeng Shen, Liang Wang, Ying Han, Jiren Luo, Zhiying Li, Pei Zhang, Simin Zeng, Dianpeng Qi, Jin Geng, Ji Liu and Zhuojun Dai, 21 August 2024, Nature Chemical Biology.
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-024-01713-2

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

EPA urged to classify abortion drugs as pollutants

It follows 40 other anti-abortion groups and lawmakers previously calling for the EPA to assess the water pollution levels of the drug.

(NewsNation) — Anti-abortion group Students for Life of America is urging the Environmental Protection Agency to add abortion drug mifepristone to its list of water contaminants. It follows 40 other anti-abortion groups and lawmakers previously calling for the EPA to assess the water pollution levels of the abortion drug. “The EPA has the regulatory authority and humane responsibility to determine the extent of abortion water pollution, caused by the reckless and negligent policies pushed by past administrations through the [Food and Drug Administration],” Kristan Hawkins, president of SFLA, said in a release. “Take the word ‘abortion’ out of it and ask, should chemically tainted blood and placenta tissue, along with human remains, be flushed by the tons into America’s waterways? And since the federal government set that up, shouldn’t we know what’s in our water?” she added. In 2025, lawmakers from seven states introduced bills, none of which passed, to either order environmental studies on the effects of mifepristone in water or to enact environmental regulations for the drug. EPA’s Office of Water leaders met with Politico in November, with its press secretary Brigit Hirsch telling the outlet it “takes the issue of pharmaceuticals in our water systems seriously and employs a rigorous, science-based approach to protect human health and the environment.” “As always, EPA encourages all stakeholders invested in clean and safe drinking water to review the proposals and submit comments,” Hirsch added. Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump’s EPA' in 2025: A Fossil Fuel-Friendly Approach to Deregulation

The Trump administration has reshaped the Environmental Protection Agency, reversing pollution limits and promoting fossil fuels

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration has transformed the Environmental Protection Agency in its first year, cutting federal limits on air and water pollution and promoting fossil fuels, a metamorphosis that clashes with the agency’s historic mission to protect human health and the environment.The administration says its actions will “unleash” the American economy, but environmentalists say the agency’s abrupt change in focus threatens to unravel years of progress on climate-friendly initiatives that could be hard or impossible to reverse.“It just constantly wants to pat the fossil fuel business on the back and turn back the clock to a pre-Richard Nixon era” when the agency didn’t exist, said historian Douglas Brinkley.Zeldin has argued the EPA can protect the environment and grow the economy at the same time. He announced “five pillars” to guide EPA’s work; four were economic goals, including energy dominance — Trump’s shorthand for more fossil fuels — and boosting the auto industry.Zeldin, a former New York congressman who had a record as a moderate Republican on some environmental issues, said his views on climate change have evolved. Many federal and state climate goals are unattainable in the near future — and come at huge cost, he said.“We should not be causing … extreme economic pain for an individual or a family” because of policies aimed at “saving the planet,” he told reporters at EPA headquarters in early December.But scientists and experts say the EPA's new direction comes at a cost to public health, and would lead to far more pollutants in the environment, including mercury, lead and especially tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs. They also note higher emissions of greenhouse gases will worsen atmospheric warming that is driving more frequent, costly and deadly extreme weather.Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican who led the EPA for several years under President George W. Bush, said watching Zeldin attack laws protecting air and water has been “just depressing.” “It’s tragic for our country. I worry about my grandchildren, of which I have seven. I worry about what their future is going to be if they don’t have clean air, if they don’t have clean water to drink,” she said.The EPA was launched under Nixon in 1970 with pollution disrupting American life, some cities suffocating in smog and some rivers turned into wastelands by industrial chemicals. Congress passed laws then that remain foundational for protecting water, air and endangered species.The agency's aggressiveness has always seesawed depending on who occupies the White House. Former President Joe Biden's administration boosted renewable energy and electric vehicles, tightened motor-vehicle emissions and proposed greenhouse gas limits on coal-fired power plants and oil and gas wells. Industry groups called rules overly burdensome and said the power plant rule would force many aging plants to shut down. In response, many businesses shifted resources to meet the more stringent rules that are now being undone.“While the Biden EPA repeatedly attempted to usurp the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law to impose its ‘Green New Scam,’ the Trump EPA is laser-focused on achieving results for the American people while operating within the limits of the laws passed by Congress,” EPA spokeswoman Brigit Hirsch said. Zeldin's list of targets is long Much of EPA’s new direction aligns with Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation road map that argued the agency should gut staffing, cut regulations and end what it called a war on coal on other fossil fuels.“A lot of the regulations that were put on during the Biden administration were more harmful and restrictive than in any other period. So that’s why deregulating them looks like EPA is making major changes,” said Diana Furchtgott-Roth, director of Heritage's Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment.But Chris Frey, an EPA official under Biden, said the regulations Zeldin has targeted “offered benefits of avoided premature deaths, of avoided chronic illness … bad things that would not happen because of these rules.”Matthew Tejada, a former EPA official under both Trump and Biden who now works at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said of the revamped EPA: “I think it would be hard for them to make it any clearer to polluters in this country that they can go on about their business and not worry about EPA getting in their way.”Zeldin also has shrunk EPA staffing by about 20% to levels last seen in the mid-1980s. Justin Chen, president of the EPA’s largest union, called staff cuts “devastating.” He cited the dismantling of research and development offices at labs across the country and the firing of employees who signed a letter of dissent opposing EPA cuts. Relaxed enforcement and cutting staff Many of Zeldin's changes aren't in effect yet. It takes time to propose new rules, get public input and finalize rollbacks. It's much faster to cut grants and ease up on enforcement, and Trump's EPA is doing both. The number of new civil environmental actions is roughly one-fifth what it was in the first eight months of the Biden administration, according to the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project. “You can effectively do a lot of deregulation if you just don’t do enforcement,” said Leif Fredrickson, visiting assistant professor of history at the University of Montana.Hirsch said the number of legal filings isn't the best way to judge enforcement because they require work outside of the EPA and can bog staff down with burdensome legal agreements. She said the EPA is “focused on efficiently resolving violations and achieving compliance as quickly as possible” and not making demands beyond what the law requires.EPA's cuts have been especially hard on climate change programs and environmental justice, the effort to address chronic pollution that typically is worse in minority and poor communities. Both were Biden priorities. Zeldin dismissed staff and canceled billions in grants for projects that fell under the “diversity, equity and inclusion” umbrella, a Trump administration target.He also spiked a $20 billion “green bank” set up under Biden’s landmark climate law to fund qualifying clean energy projects. Zeldin argued the fund was a scheme to funnel money to Democrat-aligned organizations with little oversight — allegations a federal judge rejected. Pat Parenteau, an environmental law expert and former director of the Environmental Law School at Vermont Law & Graduate School, said the EPA's shift under Trump left him with little optimism for what he called “the two most awful crises in the 21st century” — biodiversity loss and climate disruption.“I don’t see any hope for either one,” he said. “I really don’t. And I’ll be long gone, but I think the world is in just for absolute catastrophe.”The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environmentCopyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.