Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Mystery surrounds sudden increase in steelhead trout deaths near California water pumps

News Feed
Friday, March 15, 2024

California environmental groups are urging a federal court to intervene amid a “dramatic increase” in the deaths of threatened steelhead trout at pumps operated by state and federal water managers. Since Dec. 1, more than 4,000 wild and hatchery-raised steelhead have been killed at pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, according to public data for the State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. The agencies are now at about 90% of their combined seasonal take limit, which refers to the amount of wild steelhead permitted to be killed between January and March under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. A coalition of environmental and fishing groups — including the Golden State Salmon Assn., the Bay Institute and Defenders of Wildlife — are involved in ongoing litigation that seeks to challenge current federal operating plans in the delta, an estuary at the heart of the state’s water supply. They say the protocols are largely based on outdated rules dating to the Trump administration and are asking the court to require several modifications to better protect fish, including setting targets for water temperatures and upstream storage in Shasta Lake. The cause of the recent uptick in fish deaths is unclear, but the sudden increase in steelhead at the pumps is unusual, according to Ashley Overhouse, a water policy advisor with Defenders of Wildlife. About 2,100 live steelhead have also been collected from fish screens at the pumps and released downstream, a process known as “salvage,” data show. Steelhead trout fingerlings swim in a raceway pond at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Feather River Hatchery in 2021. (Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images) “We would appreciate additional monitoring, genetic sampling and, frankly, transparency [around the] increase in fish kills like this across any of the threatened and endangered species that rely on a healthy Bay Delta estuary that are dying at the pumps,” Overhouse said. “Because this is not the first increase in a fish kill over the last four years, and I don’t think, unfortunately, it will be the last.” Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. The Central Valley Project — a massive network of dams, reservoirs and canals operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation — is a key source of water for agricultural users in the southern part of the state. The State Water Project, operated by the California Department of Water Resources, is a similar network that provides water to about 27 million residents. But because the federal and state agencies coordinate their operations and pump jointly, the “fish death … and salvage are attributed to both parties,” Overhouse said. Central Valley steelhead are federally listed as a threatened species. A type of rainbow trout, they are a distinct population that migrate from the American River and San Joaquin River, two major tributaries of the delta. Like salmon, they are born in fresh water, migrate to the ocean, and then return to rivers as adults to spawn.“These fish that are trying to make their way out to the ocean … then get sucked into the pumps,” said Scott Artis, executive director of the Golden State Salmon Assn. “And so we end up with less and less fish making it out to the oceans, and that’s less fish that return.”The deaths of steelhead are an indicator of how the pumping is harming various fish species, and chinook salmon are also among the species that have been killed in recent weeks, Artis said. Since Dec. 1, 1,274 threatened spring-run chinook salmon and 353 endangered winter-run chinook salmon have been killed in the pumps, including wild and hatchery-raised salmon, the latest data show.Salmon populations have declined in recent years, and last year regulators decided to shut down the fishing season for fall-run chinook along the coast. A decision about this year’s salmon fishing season has yet to be announced, but it’s expected to be heavily restricted or shut down again this year. But increasing steelhead deaths due to water pumps are symptomatic of the severe stresses fish populations are experiencing, and demand changes to how the state’s water systems are managed, Artis said. “This is a big overarching problem of how this whole system in California works with these pumps and with the water diversions,” he said. “We need to reduce the amount of water that’s being pumped, and that would actually help mitigate and reduce the impact to steelhead that are being sucked into these pumps.”The latest increase in fish deaths is not the first time environmental groups have clashed with water agencies over the delta — a delicate ecosystem that has in recent years been imperiled by heavy water withdrawals for agriculture and cities. Bureau of Reclamation officials said they are working with the Department of Water Resources to reduce pumping at the Harvey O. Banks pumping plant and the nearby Jones pumping plant in two main channels in the south delta — the Old and Middle rivers. The reductions are being made “due to a large number of Central Valley steelhead being observed and collected at the Skinner Delta Fish Protective and Tracy Fish Collection facilities upstream of the pumping plants,” the agency wrote in a statement. Officials with both agencies acknowledged that the fish can be vulnerable at pump screens during the wet and snowy months that coincide with their movement through the delta. But late winter and early spring are “also an important time for DWR to capture and move water into storage,” said Ted Craddock, deputy director with the State Water Project.He noted that the agency operates its pumps in accordance with state and federal permits, including rules that require reduced pumping when endangered fish move into the vicinity of the pumps. It reduced pumping in January when delta smelt and winter-run chinook salmon were observed in the area, and again in February when steelhead moved in. Despite the reduction, steelhead continued to be collected at the fish screens, Craddock said, including a small portion that were not wild but “poorly marked hatchery fish” that are not protected under the 2019 rules, formally known as the National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion. “DWR hypothesizes that many wild steelhead moved into the vicinity of the pumps prior to the large storms last week and are subsequently [resting] near the pumps,” he said. “Given current lower pumping levels and high flows as result of the storms last week, DWR does not believe the SWP is drawing additional steelhead near the pumps.”Even so, the agency on Monday again reduced its pumping from 2,400 cubic feet per second to 600 cubic feet per second, “which may help steelhead rearing near the SWP pumps to move quickly downstream en route to the ocean,” Craddock said. “In fact, since the initiation of the March 11 pumping reduction, DWR has not collected any steelhead at its fish screens.” He added that the agency plans to initiate a study on Friday to track the movements of steelhead and assess whether the pumping reduction is effective. The DWR is also making new investments in steelhead monitoring, including using new DNA technology to identify the origin of steelhead showing up at the fish screens. The San Joaquin River flows past Dos Rios Ranch Preserve near Modesto. (Loren Elliott / For The Times) Meanwhile, federal officials are also working with the Bureau of Reclamation to reexamine the 2019 biological opinions that govern the state and federal operations, including proposed thresholds for losses of salmon and steelhead at the delta pumping facilities.Under the proposal, weekly loss thresholds would “prompt action before disproportionate impacts on steelhead occur in a single week,” said Michael Milstein, a spokesperson for NOAA Fisheries. This would be a change from the current approach, which uses seasonal loss thresholds to trigger management actions.The Bureau of Reclamation is also proposing to develop a steelhead science plan, which would include a “juvenile production estimate” framework for the San Joaquin and Sacramento river basins, he said. That estimate “can then be used to develop loss criteria for steelhead that are scaled according to population size and trends instead of historic loss levels, which is what is currently used.”This sort of estimate is already used for management decisions regarding endangered winter-run chinook salmon, Milstein said, and is “recognized as a scientifically durable approach.”The evaluation of the biological opinion is expected to be completed by the end of this year, Milstein said. Until then, the water agencies are operating under interim plans that are supposed to be reviewed and approved by the court every year, with 2024’s update still pending. Artis, of the Golden State Salmon Assn., noted that the fish deaths have occurred at the pumps despite increased flows from recent storms. “Even with more water out there, there’s still a lot of water diversions that are happening,” he said. “If you can reduce the pumping, then you don’t have quite that pull, that suction through there, that can just basically grab those baby fish.”The steelhead deaths add more ammunition to the ongoing tug-of-war between environmentalists and the state water managers, who are also deadlocked over a proposed plan to build a $16-billion, 45-mile tunnel that would move more water out of the delta to regions to the south. State officials have touted the Delta Conveyance Project as a critical climate adaptation strategy and a key component of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s strategy for a hotter, drier California.Overhouse, of Defenders of Wildlife, said she believes it is possible for the state to achieve both goals — water capture and wildlife protection — at the same time. “It is not something that is easy — they are the most complex water projects, arguably, in the world,” she said of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project. But increasing storage along the upstream reservoirs would make it easier for the agencies to better utilize stormwater runoff, and to hold water for movement through the system later in the year.“While I recognize how important these operations are, it is still my belief that it can be achieved — both higher end-of-year storage as well as meeting those pumping needs,” Overhouse said. “And most importantly ... protecting the threatened and endangered species that rely on this estuary.” Newsletter Toward a more sustainable California Get Boiling Point, our newsletter exploring climate change, energy and the environment, and become part of the conversation — and the solution. You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

Environmentalists are calling for federal intervention after 4,000 threatened fish were killed by pumps operated by the State Water Project and the Central Valley Project.

California environmental groups are urging a federal court to intervene amid a “dramatic increase” in the deaths of threatened steelhead trout at pumps operated by state and federal water managers.

Since Dec. 1, more than 4,000 wild and hatchery-raised steelhead have been killed at pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, according to public data for the State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. The agencies are now at about 90% of their combined seasonal take limit, which refers to the amount of wild steelhead permitted to be killed between January and March under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

A coalition of environmental and fishing groups — including the Golden State Salmon Assn., the Bay Institute and Defenders of Wildlife — are involved in ongoing litigation that seeks to challenge current federal operating plans in the delta, an estuary at the heart of the state’s water supply. They say the protocols are largely based on outdated rules dating to the Trump administration and are asking the court to require several modifications to better protect fish, including setting targets for water temperatures and upstream storage in Shasta Lake.

The cause of the recent uptick in fish deaths is unclear, but the sudden increase in steelhead at the pumps is unusual, according to Ashley Overhouse, a water policy advisor with Defenders of Wildlife. About 2,100 live steelhead have also been collected from fish screens at the pumps and released downstream, a process known as “salvage,” data show.

Steelhead trout fingerlings swim in a raceway pond.

Steelhead trout fingerlings swim in a raceway pond at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Feather River Hatchery in 2021.

(Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

“We would appreciate additional monitoring, genetic sampling and, frankly, transparency [around the] increase in fish kills like this across any of the threatened and endangered species that rely on a healthy Bay Delta estuary that are dying at the pumps,” Overhouse said. “Because this is not the first increase in a fish kill over the last four years, and I don’t think, unfortunately, it will be the last.”

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

The Central Valley Project — a massive network of dams, reservoirs and canals operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation — is a key source of water for agricultural users in the southern part of the state. The State Water Project, operated by the California Department of Water Resources, is a similar network that provides water to about 27 million residents.

But because the federal and state agencies coordinate their operations and pump jointly, the “fish death … and salvage are attributed to both parties,” Overhouse said.

Central Valley steelhead are federally listed as a threatened species. A type of rainbow trout, they are a distinct population that migrate from the American River and San Joaquin River, two major tributaries of the delta. Like salmon, they are born in fresh water, migrate to the ocean, and then return to rivers as adults to spawn.

“These fish that are trying to make their way out to the ocean … then get sucked into the pumps,” said Scott Artis, executive director of the Golden State Salmon Assn. “And so we end up with less and less fish making it out to the oceans, and that’s less fish that return.”

The deaths of steelhead are an indicator of how the pumping is harming various fish species, and chinook salmon are also among the species that have been killed in recent weeks, Artis said. Since Dec. 1, 1,274 threatened spring-run chinook salmon and 353 endangered winter-run chinook salmon have been killed in the pumps, including wild and hatchery-raised salmon, the latest data show.

Salmon populations have declined in recent years, and last year regulators decided to shut down the fishing season for fall-run chinook along the coast. A decision about this year’s salmon fishing season has yet to be announced, but it’s expected to be heavily restricted or shut down again this year.

But increasing steelhead deaths due to water pumps are symptomatic of the severe stresses fish populations are experiencing, and demand changes to how the state’s water systems are managed, Artis said.

“This is a big overarching problem of how this whole system in California works with these pumps and with the water diversions,” he said. “We need to reduce the amount of water that’s being pumped, and that would actually help mitigate and reduce the impact to steelhead that are being sucked into these pumps.”

The latest increase in fish deaths is not the first time environmental groups have clashed with water agencies over the delta — a delicate ecosystem that has in recent years been imperiled by heavy water withdrawals for agriculture and cities.

Bureau of Reclamation officials said they are working with the Department of Water Resources to reduce pumping at the Harvey O. Banks pumping plant and the nearby Jones pumping plant in two main channels in the south delta — the Old and Middle rivers. The reductions are being made “due to a large number of Central Valley steelhead being observed and collected at the Skinner Delta Fish Protective and Tracy Fish Collection facilities upstream of the pumping plants,” the agency wrote in a statement.

Officials with both agencies acknowledged that the fish can be vulnerable at pump screens during the wet and snowy months that coincide with their movement through the delta. But late winter and early spring are “also an important time for DWR to capture and move water into storage,” said Ted Craddock, deputy director with the State Water Project.

He noted that the agency operates its pumps in accordance with state and federal permits, including rules that require reduced pumping when endangered fish move into the vicinity of the pumps. It reduced pumping in January when delta smelt and winter-run chinook salmon were observed in the area, and again in February when steelhead moved in.

Despite the reduction, steelhead continued to be collected at the fish screens, Craddock said, including a small portion that were not wild but “poorly marked hatchery fish” that are not protected under the 2019 rules, formally known as the National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion.

“DWR hypothesizes that many wild steelhead moved into the vicinity of the pumps prior to the large storms last week and are subsequently [resting] near the pumps,” he said. “Given current lower pumping levels and high flows as result of the storms last week, DWR does not believe the SWP is drawing additional steelhead near the pumps.”

Even so, the agency on Monday again reduced its pumping from 2,400 cubic feet per second to 600 cubic feet per second, “which may help steelhead rearing near the SWP pumps to move quickly downstream en route to the ocean,” Craddock said. “In fact, since the initiation of the March 11 pumping reduction, DWR has not collected any steelhead at its fish screens.”

He added that the agency plans to initiate a study on Friday to track the movements of steelhead and assess whether the pumping reduction is effective. The DWR is also making new investments in steelhead monitoring, including using new DNA technology to identify the origin of steelhead showing up at the fish screens.

Sunshine glints off the surface of a river.

The San Joaquin River flows past Dos Rios Ranch Preserve near Modesto.

(Loren Elliott / For The Times)

Meanwhile, federal officials are also working with the Bureau of Reclamation to reexamine the 2019 biological opinions that govern the state and federal operations, including proposed thresholds for losses of salmon and steelhead at the delta pumping facilities.

Under the proposal, weekly loss thresholds would “prompt action before disproportionate impacts on steelhead occur in a single week,” said Michael Milstein, a spokesperson for NOAA Fisheries. This would be a change from the current approach, which uses seasonal loss thresholds to trigger management actions.

The Bureau of Reclamation is also proposing to develop a steelhead science plan, which would include a “juvenile production estimate” framework for the San Joaquin and Sacramento river basins, he said. That estimate “can then be used to develop loss criteria for steelhead that are scaled according to population size and trends instead of historic loss levels, which is what is currently used.”

This sort of estimate is already used for management decisions regarding endangered winter-run chinook salmon, Milstein said, and is “recognized as a scientifically durable approach.”

The evaluation of the biological opinion is expected to be completed by the end of this year, Milstein said. Until then, the water agencies are operating under interim plans that are supposed to be reviewed and approved by the court every year, with 2024’s update still pending.

Artis, of the Golden State Salmon Assn., noted that the fish deaths have occurred at the pumps despite increased flows from recent storms.

“Even with more water out there, there’s still a lot of water diversions that are happening,” he said. “If you can reduce the pumping, then you don’t have quite that pull, that suction through there, that can just basically grab those baby fish.”

The steelhead deaths add more ammunition to the ongoing tug-of-war between environmentalists and the state water managers, who are also deadlocked over a proposed plan to build a $16-billion, 45-mile tunnel that would move more water out of the delta to regions to the south.

State officials have touted the Delta Conveyance Project as a critical climate adaptation strategy and a key component of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s strategy for a hotter, drier California.

Overhouse, of Defenders of Wildlife, said she believes it is possible for the state to achieve both goals — water capture and wildlife protection — at the same time.

“It is not something that is easy — they are the most complex water projects, arguably, in the world,” she said of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project. But increasing storage along the upstream reservoirs would make it easier for the agencies to better utilize stormwater runoff, and to hold water for movement through the system later in the year.

“While I recognize how important these operations are, it is still my belief that it can be achieved — both higher end-of-year storage as well as meeting those pumping needs,” Overhouse said. “And most importantly ... protecting the threatened and endangered species that rely on this estuary.”

Newsletter

Toward a more sustainable California

Get Boiling Point, our newsletter exploring climate change, energy and the environment, and become part of the conversation — and the solution.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

‘Mad fishing’: the super-size fleet of squid catchers plundering the high seas

Every year a Chinese-dominated flotilla big enough to be seen from space pillages the rich marine life on Mile 201, a largely ungoverned part of the South Atlantic off ArgentinaIn a monitoring room in Buenos Aires, a dozen members of the Argentinian coast guard watch giant industrial-fishing ships moving in real time across a set of screens. “Every year, for five or six months, the foreign fleet comes from across the Indian Ocean, from Asian countries, and from the North Atlantic,” says Cdr Mauricio López, of the monitoring department. “It’s creating a serious environmental problem.”Just beyond Argentina’s maritime frontier, hundreds of foreign vessels – known as the distant-water fishing fleet – are descending on Mile 201, a largely ungoverned strip of the high seas in the South Atlantic, to plunder its rich marine life. The fleet regularly becomes so big it can be seen from space, looking like a city floating on the sea. Continue reading...

In a monitoring room in Buenos Aires, a dozen members of the Argentinian coast guard watch giant industrial-fishing ships moving in real time across a set of screens. “Every year, for five or six months, the foreign fleet comes from across the Indian Ocean, from Asian countries, and from the North Atlantic,” says Cdr Mauricio López, of the monitoring department. “It’s creating a serious environmental problem.”Just beyond Argentina’s maritime frontier, hundreds of foreign vessels – known as the distant-water fishing fleet – are descending on Mile 201, a largely ungoverned strip of the high seas in the South Atlantic, to plunder its rich marine life. The fleet regularly becomes so big it can be seen from space, looking like a city floating on the sea.The distant-water fishing fleet, seen from space, off the coast of Argentina. Photograph: AlamyThe charity Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) has described it as one of the largest unregulated squid fisheries in the world, warning that the scale of activities could destabilise an entire ecosystem.“With so many ships constantly fishing without any form of oversight, the squid’s short, one-year life cycle simply is not being respected,” says Lt Magalí Bobinac, a marine biologist with the Argentinian coast guard.There are no internationally agreed catch limits in the region covering squid, and distant-water fleets take advantage of this regulatory vacuum.Steve Trent, founder of the EJF, describes the fishery as a “free for all” and says squid could eventually disappear from the area as a result of “this mad fishing effort”.The consequences extend far beyond squid. Whales, dolphins, seals, sea birds and commercially important fish species such as hake and tuna depend on the cephalopod. A collapse in the squid population could trigger a cascade of ecological disruption, with profound social and economic costs for coastal communities and key markets such as Spain, experts warn.“If this species is affected, the whole ecosystem is affected,” Bobinac says. “It is the food for other species. It has a huge impact on the ecosystem and biodiversity.”She says the “vulnerable marine ecosystems” beneath the fleet, such as deep-sea corals, are also at risk of physical damage and pollution.An Argentinian coast guard ship on patrol. ‘Outside our exclusive economic zone, we cannot do anything – we cannot board them, we cannot survey, nor inspect,’ says an officer. Photograph: EJFThree-quarters of squid jigging vessels (which jerk barbless lures up and down to imitate prey) that are operating on the high seas are from China, according to the EJF, with fleets from Taiwan and South Korea also accounting for a significant share.Activity on Mile 201 has surged over recent years, with total fishing hours increasing by 65% between 2019 and 2024 – a jump driven almost entirely by the Chinese fleet, which increased its activities by 85% in the same period, according to an investigation by the charity.The lack of oversight in Mile 201 has enabled something darker too. Interviews conducted by the EJF suggest widespread cruelty towards marine wildlife in the area. Crew reported the deliberate capture and killing of seals – sometimes in their hundreds – on more than 40% of Chinese squid vessels and a fifth of Taiwanese vessels.Other testimonies detailed the hunting of marine megafauna for body parts, including seal teeth. The EJF shared photos and videos with the Guardian of seals hanging on hooks and penguins trapped on decks.One of the huge squid-jigging ships. They also hunt seals, the EJF found. Photograph: EJFLt Luciana De Santis, a lawyer for the coast guard, says: “Outside our exclusive economic zone [EEZ], we cannot do anything – we cannot board them, we cannot survey, nor inspect.”An EEZ is a maritime area extending up to 200 nautical miles from a nation’s coast, with the rules that govern it set by that nation. The Argentinian coast guard says it has “total control” of this space, unlike the area just beyond this limit: Mile 201.But López says “a significant percentage of ships turn their identification systems off” when fishing in the area beyond this, otherwise known as “going dark” to evade detection.Crews working on the squid fleet are also extremely vulnerable. The EJF’s investigation uncovered serious human rights and labour abuses in Mile 201. Workers on the ships described physical violence, including hitting or strangulation, wage deductions, intimidation and debt bondage – a system that in effect traps them at sea. Many reported working excessive hours with little rest.Much of the squid caught under these conditions still enters major global markets in the European Union, UK and North America, the EJF warns – meaning consumers may be unknowingly buying seafood linked to animal cruelty, environmental destruction and human rights abuse.The charity is calling for a ban on imports linked to illegal or abusive fishing practices and a global transparency regime that makes it possible to see who is fishing where, when and how, by mandating an international charter to govern fishing beyond national waters.Cdr Mauricio López says many of the industrial fishing ships the Argentinian coastguard monitors turn off their tracking systems when they are in the area. Photograph: Harriet Barber“The Chinese distant-water fleet is the big beast in this,” says Trent. “Beijing must know this is happening, so why are they not acting? Without urgent action, we are heading for disaster.”The Chinese embassies in Britain and Argentina did not respond to requests for comment.

EPA Says It Will Propose Drinking Water Limit for Perchlorate, but Only Because Court Ordered It

The Environmental Protection Agency says it will propose a drinking water limit for perchlorate, a chemical in certain explosives

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday said it would propose a drinking water limit for perchlorate, a harmful chemical in rockets and other explosives, but also said doing so wouldn't significantly benefit public health and that it was acting only because a court ordered it.The agency said it will seek input on how strict the limit should be for perchlorate, which is particularly dangerous for infants, and require utilities to test. The agency’s move is the latest in a more than decade-long battle over whether to regulate perchlorate. The EPA said that the public benefit of the regulation did not justify its expected cost.“Due to infrequent perchlorate levels of health concern, the vast majority of the approximately 66,000 water systems that would be subject to the rule will incur substantial administrative and monitoring costs with limited or no corresponding public health benefits as a whole,” the agency wrote in its proposal.Perchlorate is used to make rockets, fireworks and other explosives, although it can also occur naturally. At some defense, aerospace and manufacturing sites, it seeped into nearby groundwater where it could spread, a problem that has been concentrated in the Southwest and along sections of the East Coast.Perchlorate is a concern because it affects the function of the thyroid, which can be particularly detrimental for the development of young children, lowering IQ scores and increasing rates of behavioral problems.Based on estimates that perchlorate could be in the drinking water of roughly 16 million people, the EPA determined in 2011 that it was a sufficient threat to public health that it needed to be regulated. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, this determination required the EPA to propose and then finalize regulations by strict deadlines, with a proposal due in two years.It didn’t happen. First, the agency updated the science to better estimate perchlorate’s risks, but that took time. By 2016, the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council sued to force action.During the first Trump administration, the EPA proposed a never-implemented standard that the NRDC said was less restrictive than any state limit and would lead to IQ point loss in children. It reversed itself in 2020, saying no standard was necessary because a new analysis had found the chemical was less dangerous and its appearance in drinking water less common than previously thought. That's still the agency's position. It said Monday that its data shows perchlorate is not widespread in drinking water.“We anticipate that fewer than one‑tenth of 1% of regulated water systems are likely to find perchlorate above the proposed limits,” the agency said. A limit will help the small number of places with a problem, but burden the vast majority with costs they don't need, officials said.The NRDC challenged that reversal and a federal appeals court said the EPA must propose a regulation for perchlorate, arguing that it still is a significant and widespread public health threat. The agency will solicit public comment on limits of 20, 40 and 80 parts per billion, as well as other elements of the proposal.“Members of the public deserve to know whether there’s rocket fuel in their tap water. We’re pleased to see that, however reluctantly, EPA is moving one step closer to providing the public with that information,” said Sarah Fort, a senior attorney with NRDC.EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has sought massive rollbacks of environmental rules and promoted oil and gas development. But on drinking water, the agency’s actions have been more moderate. The agency said it would keep the Biden administration's strict limits on two of the most common types of harmful “forever chemicals” in drinking water, while giving utilities more time to comply, and would scrap limits on other types of PFAS.The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environmentCopyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

New Navy Report Gauges Training Disruption of Hawaii's Marine Mammals

Over the next seven years, the U.S. Navy estimates its ships will injure or kill just two whales in collisions as it tests and trains in Hawaiian waters

Over the next seven years, the U.S. Navy estimates its ships will injure or kill just two whales in collisions as it tests and trains in Hawaiian waters, and it concluded those exercises won’t significantly harm local marine mammal populations, many of which are endangered.However, the Navy also estimates the readiness exercises, which include sonar testing and underwater explosions, will cause more than 3 million instances of disrupted behavior, hearing loss or injury to whale and dolphin species plus monk seals in Hawaii alone.That has local conservation groups worried that the Navy’s California-Training-and-Testing-EIS-OEIS/Final-EIS-OEIS/">detailed report on its latest multi-year training plan is downplaying the true impacts on vulnerable marine mammals that already face growing extinction threats in Pacific training areas off of Hawaii and California.“If whales are getting hammered by sonar and it’s during an important breeding or feeding season, it could ultimately affect their ability to have enough energy to feed their young or find food,” said Kylie Wager Cruz, a senior attorney with the environmental legal advocacy nonprofit Earthjustice. “There’s a major lack of consideration,” she added,” of how those types of behavioral impacts could ultimately have a greater impact beyond just vessel strikes.”The Navy, Cruz said, didn’t consider how its training exercises add to the harm caused by other factors, most notably collisions with major shipping vessels that kill dozens of endangered whales in the eastern Pacific each year. Environmental law requires the Navy to do that, she said, but “they’re only looking at their own take,” or harm.The Navy, in a statement earlier this month, said it “committed to the maximum level of mitigation measures” that it practically could to curb environmental damage while maintaining its military readiness in the years ahead. The plan also covers some Coast Guard operations.Federal fishery officials recently approved the plan, granting the Navy the necessary exemptions under the Marine Mammal Protection Act to proceed despite the harms. It’s at least the third time that the Navy has had to complete an environmental impact report and seek those exemptions to test and train off Hawaii and California.In a statement Monday, a U.S. Pacific Fleet spokesperson said the Navy and fishery officials did consider “reasonably foreseeable cumulative effects” — the Navy’s exercises plus unrelated harmful impacts — to the extent it was required to do so under federal environmental law.Fishery officials didn’t weigh those unrelated impacts, the statement said, in determining that the Navy’s activities would have a negligible impact on marine mammals and other animals.The report covers the impacts to some 39 marine mammal species, including eight that are endangered, plus a host of other birds, turtles and other species that inhabit those waters.The Navy says it will limit use of some of its most intense sonar equipment in designated “mitigation areas” around Hawaii island and Maui Nui to better protect humpback whales and other species from exposure. Specifically, it says it won’t use its more intense ship-mounted sonar in those areas during the whales’ Nov. 15 to April 15 breeding season, and it won’t use those systems there for more than 300 hours a year.However, outside of those mitigation zones the Navy report lists 11 additional areas that are biologically important to other marine mammals species, including spinner and bottle-nosed dolphins, false killer whales, short-finned pilot whales and dwarf sperm whales.Those biologically important areas encompass all the waters around the main Hawaiian islands, and based on the Navy’s report they won’t benefit from the same sonar limits. For the Hawaii bottle-nosed dolphins, the Navy estimates its acoustic and explosives exercises will disrupt that species’ feeding, breeding and other behaviors more than 310,000 times, plus muffle their hearing nearly 39,000 times and cause as many as three deaths. The report says the other species will see similar disruptions.In its statement Monday, U.S. Pacific Fleet said the Navy considered the extent to which marine mammals would be affected while still allowing crews to train effectively in setting those mitigation zones.Exactly how the Navy’s numbers compare to previous cycles are difficult to say, Wager Cruz and others said, because the ocean area and total years covered by each report have changed.Nonetheless, the instances in which its Pacific training might harm or kill a marine mammal appear to be climbing.In 2018, for instance, a press release from the nonprofit Center For Biological Diversity stated that the Navy’s Pacific training in Hawaii and Southern California would harm marine mammals an estimated 12.5 million times over a five-year period.This month, the center put out a similar release stating that the Navy’s training would harm marine mammals across Hawaii plus Northern and Southern California an estimated 35 million times over a seven-year period.“There’s large swaths of area that don’t get any mitigation,” Wager Cruz said. “I don’t think we’re asking for, like, everywhere is a prohibited area by any means, but I think that the military should take a harder look and see if they can do more.”The Navy should also consider slowing its vessels to 10 knots during training exercises to help avoid the collisions that often kill endangered whales off the California Coast, Cruz said. In its response, U.S. Pacific Fleet said the Navy “seriously considered” whether it could slow its ships down but concluded those suggestions were impracticable, largely due to the impacts on its mission.Hawaii-based Matson two years ago joined the other major companies who’ve pledged to slow their vessels to those speeds during whale season in the shipping lanes where dozens of endangered blue, fin and humpback whales are estimated to be killed each year.Those numbers have to be significantly reduced, researchers say, if the species are to make a comeback.“There are ways to minimize harm,” Center for Biological Diversity Hawaii and Pacific Islands Director Maxx Phillips added in a statement, “and protect our natural heritage and national security at the same time.”This story was originally published by Honolulu Civil Beat and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Hungary's 'Water Guardian' Farmers Fight Back Against Desertification

Southern Hungary landowner Oszkár Nagyapáti has been battling severe drought on his land

KISKUNMAJSA, Hungary (AP) — Oszkár Nagyapáti climbed to the bottom of a sandy pit on his land on the Great Hungarian Plain and dug into the soil with his hand, looking for a sign of groundwater that in recent years has been in accelerating retreat. “It’s much worse, and it’s getting worse year after year,” he said as cloudy liquid slowly seeped into the hole. ”Where did so much water go? It’s unbelievable.”Nagyapáti has watched with distress as the region in southern Hungary, once an important site for agriculture, has become increasingly parched and dry. Where a variety of crops and grasses once filled the fields, today there are wide cracks in the soil and growing sand dunes more reminiscent of the Sahara Desert than Central Europe. The region, known as the Homokhátság, has been described by some studies as semiarid — a distinction more common in parts of Africa, the American Southwest or Australian Outback — and is characterized by very little rain, dried-out wells and a water table plunging ever deeper underground. In a 2017 paper in European Countryside, a scientific journal, researchers cited “the combined effect of climatic changes, improper land use and inappropriate environmental management” as causes for the Homokhátság's aridification, a phenomenon the paper called unique in this part of the continent.Fields that in previous centuries would be regularly flooded by the Danube and Tisza Rivers have, through a combination of climate change-related droughts and poor water retention practices, become nearly unsuitable for crops and wildlife. Now a group of farmers and other volunteers, led by Nagyapáti, are trying to save the region and their lands from total desiccation using a resource for which Hungary is famous: thermal water. “I was thinking about what could be done, how could we bring the water back or somehow create water in the landscape," Nagyapáti told The Associated Press. "There was a point when I felt that enough is enough. We really have to put an end to this. And that's where we started our project to flood some areas to keep the water in the plain.”Along with the group of volunteer “water guardians,” Nagyapáti began negotiating with authorities and a local thermal spa last year, hoping to redirect the spa's overflow water — which would usually pour unused into a canal — onto their lands. The thermal water is drawn from very deep underground. Mimicking natural flooding According to the water guardians' plan, the water, cooled and purified, would be used to flood a 2½-hectare (6-acre) low-lying field — a way of mimicking the natural cycle of flooding that channelizing the rivers had ended.“When the flooding is complete and the water recedes, there will be 2½ hectares of water surface in this area," Nagyapáti said. "This will be quite a shocking sight in our dry region.”A 2024 study by Hungary’s Eötvös Loránd University showed that unusually dry layers of surface-level air in the region had prevented any arriving storm fronts from producing precipitation. Instead, the fronts would pass through without rain, and result in high winds that dried out the topsoil even further. Creation of a microclimate The water guardians hoped that by artificially flooding certain areas, they wouldn't only raise the groundwater level but also create a microclimate through surface evaporation that could increase humidity, reduce temperatures and dust and have a positive impact on nearby vegetation. Tamás Tóth, a meteorologist in Hungary, said that because of the potential impact such wetlands can have on the surrounding climate, water retention “is simply the key issue in the coming years and for generations to come, because climate change does not seem to stop.”"The atmosphere continues to warm up, and with it the distribution of precipitation, both seasonal and annual, has become very hectic, and is expected to become even more hectic in the future,” he said. Following another hot, dry summer this year, the water guardians blocked a series of sluices along a canal, and the repurposed water from the spa began slowly gathering in the low-lying field. After a couple of months, the field had nearly been filled. Standing beside the area in early December, Nagyapáti said that the shallow marsh that had formed "may seem very small to look at it, but it brings us immense happiness here in the desert.”He said the added water will have a “huge impact” within a roughly 4-kilometer (2½-mile) radius, "not only on the vegetation, but also on the water balance of the soil. We hope that the groundwater level will also rise.”Persistent droughts in the Great Hungarian Plain have threatened desertification, a process where vegetation recedes because of high heat and low rainfall. Weather-damaged crops have dealt significant blows to the country’s overall gross domestic product, prompting Prime Minister Viktor Orbán to announce this year the creation of a “drought task force” to deal with the problem.After the water guardians' first attempt to mitigate the growing problem in their area, they said they experienced noticeable improvements in the groundwater level, as well as an increase of flora and fauna near the flood site. The group, which has grown to more than 30 volunteers, would like to expand the project to include another flooded field, and hopes their efforts could inspire similar action by others to conserve the most precious resource. “This initiative can serve as an example for everyone, we need more and more efforts like this," Nagyapáti said. "We retained water from the spa, but retaining any kind of water, whether in a village or a town, is a tremendous opportunity for water replenishment.”The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.