Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

How an Aboriginal woman fought a coal company and won

News Feed
Monday, June 3, 2024

In 2019, Australia was on the cusp of approving a new coal mine on traditional Wirdi land in Queensland that would have extracted approximately 40 million tons of coal each year for 35 years. The Waratah coal mine would have destroyed a nature refuge and emitted 1.58 billion tons of carbon dioxide.  But that didn’t happen, thanks to the advocacy of Murrawah Maroochy Johnson, a 29-year-old Wirdi woman of the Birri Gubba Nation, who led a lawsuit against the coal company in 2021, and won.  The case was groundbreaking in many ways, but perhaps most strikingly, Johnson’s work helped set a new legal precedent that pushed members of the court to travel to where First Nations people lived in order hear their testimonies and perspectives, instead of expecting Indigenous people to travel long distances to settler courts. The lawsuit was also the first to successfully use Queensland’s new human rights law to challenge coal mining, arguing that greenhouse gas emissions from the Waratah coal mine would harm Indigenous peoples and their cultural traditions. Because of the litigation, the mine’s permit was denied in 2022, and its appeal failed last year. Because of her work, Johnson is now among several of this year’s winners of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize honoring global grassroots environmental activism. The last few years have been transformative for Johnson, who is the mother of a toddler and expecting her second baby in a few weeks. Grist spoke with her to learn about what motivates her, how she views the climate crisis, and what other young Indigenous activists can learn from her work.  This interview has been edited for length and clarity. Q. You have been working on behalf of your people since you were 19 years old. What drives you to do this work?  A. It’s definitely not a choice. First contact here was just 235 years ago. At that point, terra nullius was declared, which said that the land belonged to nobody, which essentially means that the first interaction with colonizing invading powers was one of dehumanization. They saw us here, but to say that the land belonged to no one really says that we are subhuman. They deemed us of a status where we couldn’t own our own land even though they saw us here inhabiting our own lands, living and thriving. And so there’s a long legacy of resistance in first contact frontier wars but also through advocacy over the generations. I’m just a young person who gets to inherit that great legacy. I was raised by very strong parents. My father, my grandfather, my great-grandparents, were all resistance fighters. There’s a lot of responsibility that comes with inheriting that legacy and feeling like you need to do your part. But also, I feel like it’s not a choice because at the end of the day, what’s real is our people, our law, our custom — no matter the colonial apparatus attempts to disappear us, dilute us, absorb us into homogenous Australian mainstream and complete the assimilation process. To me, that’s continued injustice that our people face. And every First Nations person, I feel, every Indigenous person, has an obligation to resist that as well. Because at the end of the day, we First Nations people here in Australia, we are the oldest continuous living culture on the planet, and what comes with that is the fact that we have the oldest living creation stories, we have the oldest living law and custom. That in and of itself is so significant that we can’t just allow it to be washed away. I think that there has to be a continued active effort, by my generation and all future generations, to maintain our ways. For us, colonial, Western, white contact is just such a small blip in time for how long our people have been here and how long we’ve maintained our ways and law and custom and culture. We have to collectively acknowledge that we have a duty of care and responsibility to maintain the way of our people. I’m really proud of being able to inherit that and also having a responsibility to protect and maintain it. Q. Can you tell me about your perspective on climate change?  A. It’s always called human-induced climate change, but I think that that term doesn’t allow for colonial powers to be held accountable, or big polluters. I think it’s actually more accurate to say that it’s colonial-induced climate change, because it’s actually the process of colonization violently extracting and exploiting the resources of Indigenous nations, peoples’ land, especially in the Global South, that’s resulted in the crisis of climate change that we face today.  I see climate change not just as a crisis, but also an opportunity. In one sense, if what remains of our cultural knowledge is so intimately dependent on our land, and having access to our lands and waters, then climate change is a huge threat. For example, in the Torres Strait and throughout the Pacific, what do you actually do when your country, your homelands, your territory disappears because of the impacts of climate change? What does that mean for our identity that actually derives from being the people of that unique country and that unique place? Climate change could really signal finality of our diverse and distinct and unique cultural identities as Indigenous and First Nations people in the sense that land may become so changed or so disappeared that our people are no longer able to resonate or recognize or identify with it anymore or learn from it anymore. So that’s really scary.  But I think the other side is an opportunity because climate change creates a sense of urgency. It’s that sense of urgency that is going to be pushing our peoples to work collectively as Indigenous and First Nations people around the world, to highlight the importance of the shift required to address climate change, but also to recenter our traditional systems of caring for country and sustainability and living in harmony with the land as a solution to climate change — really combat this normalization of colonial history and the global system and power systems as unquestionable.  Q. That reminds me of how, on the video announcing your Goldman Prize, you mentioned that “there’s a lot to be learned from our ways of being.” Can you expand on that idea?  A. We’re at this moment where we can really take the best of our traditional ways of being and really use that to influence the decisions that we make about our future. What real climate justice is, to me, is really drawing on the greatest strengths that we have in terms of our traditional law and custom, using that as a guidance system in terms of the decisions we make about what the future looks like. If you’re going to shift the entire global economy and global structure of how business is done, then you want to be talking to the experts. So you want to be talking to First Nations people and knowledge holders. I think climate change will ultimately lead those who are committed to the current system to be forced to be exposed to the reality that a lot of First Nations people have been living with for a long time: that this current global system doesn’t work for us. In the context of capitalism, it’s designed to work against us and facilitate outcomes for very few.  Climate change is here because of the current global systems, and that means that, eventually, the system will become obsolete. It already is when it comes to the survival of humanity. I think that ultimately people will come to see that the system doesn’t work for them. It’s never been designed to work for the masses.  So, I really see a huge shift towards leadership from First Nations people. Indigenous or non-Indigenous, people — this is my hope here in Australia — start to act in accordance with traditional principles of caring for country law and custom and really reestablishing old ways, governing ways, of these lands. I think that’s the only way to really address climate change. And maybe I’ve got a huge imagination, but I see it as part of my responsibility to work as hard as I can towards that goal of creating that reality, one in which a modern society essentially adheres to First Nations law and custom in a modern context. Q. You’ve talked a lot about the importance of drawing from traditional knowledge. When I think about what it means to be Indigenous, I think about both the knowledge we have and also the challenge in bringing that forward because of how colonialism has eroded our ties to both culture and land. What would you say to Indigenous people who care about land and culture, but are feeling disconnected from both? How do they find their way back?  A. This is one that I actually really struggle with sometimes because in the Australian context here, we had the Stolen Generation, when Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their parents and indoctrinated. So you have whole generations that have been dispossessed of their cultural inheritance, of their families, and also their peoples have been dispossessed of future generations as well. The colonial process was a finely tuned machine by the time it came through the South Pacific and Australia. In one sense, we’re fortunate that it was only just over 230 years ago first contact happened, but at the same time, this colonial apparatus was so finely tuned that they didn’t need as long to do as much damage as they’ve been able to do.   Being in a settler colony, we’re dealing with mass incarceration, mass suicide rates, and the disappearing of our people. It feels like it’s hard to catch up. We can’t take a break or catch our breath because we’re dealing with the very real, frontier issues of losing our people. But at the same time, what’s required for healing and to actually rebuild our cultural strength is time. And actually being able to take the time to be on country, to sit with country, to learn, and to reconnect.  It’s this really delicate tug of war that all First Peoples who have been subject to colonialism have to face, and we have to sort of grapple with on a daily basis, what do we put our energy into? Am I fighting forced child removals and assimilation on the daily? Am I fighting the education system? Am I doing land and country work and going through the legal system? Or am I just sort of operating as an individual, sovereign person, under our own law and custom and that’s how I resist and maintain my strength? It’s so vast in terms of how we have to split ourselves up in a way to deal with the issues at hand, which essentially is the disappearance of our people, but also our way of life and custom.  At the end of the day, for me, I just have to take heed from my ancestors and my own people that we’ve seen the end of the world before. My great grandparents and their generation saw the end of their world already, and they’ve been fighting. They were in the physical frontier on the front line, and survived that, and saw everything that they knew to be ripped away from them. So I have to just acknowledge that I’m very lucky to be born in the generation I’m born in, with so much more opportunity. But at the same time, there is that huge gap in familiarity with culture and our ways.  Q. Before your successful litigation against the Warratah mine, you fought against the Carmichael mine, filing lawsuit after lawsuit. But the mine still opened in 2021 and is now in operation. How do you handle such setbacks, and the grief of climate trauma and colonialism? What would you say to other Indigenous activists who are dealing with similar challenges?  A. Being a young person, going through that, it’s really hard. You’re up against the actual powers that be of the colonial apparatus: the state government, the federal government, the mining lobby itself, and this idea that our traditional lands should be destroyed for extraction and exploitation for the benefit of everybody else. For the benefit of the state in terms of royalties, and for the benefit of the rest of settler Australia, where we, the people and our lands, are the collateral damage. And so for a long time I was very heartbroken, very depressed. For a long time I didn’t know what my next steps were.  But the reality is that I feel very much so guarded by my ancestors and all our people. I had time to mourn and get back on my feet before the opportunity to join the Youth Verdict case against the Waratah coal mine came along.  All I can say is we kept going. We’re fighting for our people, every single day. And something that I was always reminded of along the way was that even though it might not be the silver bullet that makes significant change, it’s still important that we create our own legacy of resistance and that we do our best every day to maintain what we hold dear. We’ve got to do the work because we’ve got to do the work. It stands on its own and it’s our obligation as traditional custodians every day to do the work of maintaining and protecting country. We put on the record that we don’t consent, this isn’t free prior and informed consent as we are entitled under the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. And every step of the way, just maintaining that resistance, even if it’s just telling our story and challenging the prevailing, dominant, colonial narrative, I think is important to do every single day.  So in terms of advice, I think it’s to keep going. Take a break when you need to. And have a cry, because I cried for like eight years straight, but I think just knowing what some of my own people have been through and the horrors that they had to deal with, it’s the responsibility that we inherit to maintain the fight and continue on as best we can.  We might not be able to solve everything in one or two generations. But again, we’re the oldest living culture on the face of the earth. So, in that respect, we’ve been here the longest and, as long as my generation and our future generations maintain our own identities, cultural identities and resistance as best as we can, we’ll be here long into the future as well.  This story was originally published by Grist with the headline How an Aboriginal woman fought a coal company and won on Jun 3, 2024.

Goldman Prize Winner Murrawah Maroochy Johnson talks climate justice and inheriting a legacy of Indigenous resistance.

In 2019, Australia was on the cusp of approving a new coal mine on traditional Wirdi land in Queensland that would have extracted approximately 40 million tons of coal each year for 35 years. The Waratah coal mine would have destroyed a nature refuge and emitted 1.58 billion tons of carbon dioxide. 

But that didn’t happen, thanks to the advocacy of Murrawah Maroochy Johnson, a 29-year-old Wirdi woman of the Birri Gubba Nation, who led a lawsuit against the coal company in 2021, and won. 

The case was groundbreaking in many ways, but perhaps most strikingly, Johnson’s work helped set a new legal precedent that pushed members of the court to travel to where First Nations people lived in order hear their testimonies and perspectives, instead of expecting Indigenous people to travel long distances to settler courts. The lawsuit was also the first to successfully use Queensland’s new human rights law to challenge coal mining, arguing that greenhouse gas emissions from the Waratah coal mine would harm Indigenous peoples and their cultural traditions. Because of the litigation, the mine’s permit was denied in 2022, and its appeal failed last year.

Because of her work, Johnson is now among several of this year’s winners of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize honoring global grassroots environmental activism.

The last few years have been transformative for Johnson, who is the mother of a toddler and expecting her second baby in a few weeks. Grist spoke with her to learn about what motivates her, how she views the climate crisis, and what other young Indigenous activists can learn from her work. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Q. You have been working on behalf of your people since you were 19 years old. What drives you to do this work? 

A. It’s definitely not a choice. First contact here was just 235 years ago. At that point, terra nullius was declared, which said that the land belonged to nobody, which essentially means that the first interaction with colonizing invading powers was one of dehumanization. They saw us here, but to say that the land belonged to no one really says that we are subhuman. They deemed us of a status where we couldn’t own our own land even though they saw us here inhabiting our own lands, living and thriving. And so there’s a long legacy of resistance in first contact frontier wars but also through advocacy over the generations. I’m just a young person who gets to inherit that great legacy.

I was raised by very strong parents. My father, my grandfather, my great-grandparents, were all resistance fighters. There’s a lot of responsibility that comes with inheriting that legacy and feeling like you need to do your part. But also, I feel like it’s not a choice because at the end of the day, what’s real is our people, our law, our custom — no matter the colonial apparatus attempts to disappear us, dilute us, absorb us into homogenous Australian mainstream and complete the assimilation process. To me, that’s continued injustice that our people face. And every First Nations person, I feel, every Indigenous person, has an obligation to resist that as well. Because at the end of the day, we First Nations people here in Australia, we are the oldest continuous living culture on the planet, and what comes with that is the fact that we have the oldest living creation stories, we have the oldest living law and custom. That in and of itself is so significant that we can’t just allow it to be washed away. I think that there has to be a continued active effort, by my generation and all future generations, to maintain our ways.

For us, colonial, Western, white contact is just such a small blip in time for how long our people have been here and how long we’ve maintained our ways and law and custom and culture. We have to collectively acknowledge that we have a duty of care and responsibility to maintain the way of our people. I’m really proud of being able to inherit that and also having a responsibility to protect and maintain it.

Q. Can you tell me about your perspective on climate change? 

A. It’s always called human-induced climate change, but I think that that term doesn’t allow for colonial powers to be held accountable, or big polluters. I think it’s actually more accurate to say that it’s colonial-induced climate change, because it’s actually the process of colonization violently extracting and exploiting the resources of Indigenous nations, peoples’ land, especially in the Global South, that’s resulted in the crisis of climate change that we face today. 

I see climate change not just as a crisis, but also an opportunity. In one sense, if what remains of our cultural knowledge is so intimately dependent on our land, and having access to our lands and waters, then climate change is a huge threat. For example, in the Torres Strait and throughout the Pacific, what do you actually do when your country, your homelands, your territory disappears because of the impacts of climate change? What does that mean for our identity that actually derives from being the people of that unique country and that unique place? Climate change could really signal finality of our diverse and distinct and unique cultural identities as Indigenous and First Nations people in the sense that land may become so changed or so disappeared that our people are no longer able to resonate or recognize or identify with it anymore or learn from it anymore. So that’s really scary. 

But I think the other side is an opportunity because climate change creates a sense of urgency. It’s that sense of urgency that is going to be pushing our peoples to work collectively as Indigenous and First Nations people around the world, to highlight the importance of the shift required to address climate change, but also to recenter our traditional systems of caring for country and sustainability and living in harmony with the land as a solution to climate change — really combat this normalization of colonial history and the global system and power systems as unquestionable. 

Q. That reminds me of how, on the video announcing your Goldman Prize, you mentioned that “there’s a lot to be learned from our ways of being.” Can you expand on that idea? 

A. We’re at this moment where we can really take the best of our traditional ways of being and really use that to influence the decisions that we make about our future. What real climate justice is, to me, is really drawing on the greatest strengths that we have in terms of our traditional law and custom, using that as a guidance system in terms of the decisions we make about what the future looks like.

If you’re going to shift the entire global economy and global structure of how business is done, then you want to be talking to the experts. So you want to be talking to First Nations people and knowledge holders. I think climate change will ultimately lead those who are committed to the current system to be forced to be exposed to the reality that a lot of First Nations people have been living with for a long time: that this current global system doesn’t work for us. In the context of capitalism, it’s designed to work against us and facilitate outcomes for very few. 

Climate change is here because of the current global systems, and that means that, eventually, the system will become obsolete. It already is when it comes to the survival of humanity. I think that ultimately people will come to see that the system doesn’t work for them. It’s never been designed to work for the masses. 

So, I really see a huge shift towards leadership from First Nations people. Indigenous or non-Indigenous, people — this is my hope here in Australia — start to act in accordance with traditional principles of caring for country law and custom and really reestablishing old ways, governing ways, of these lands. I think that’s the only way to really address climate change. And maybe I’ve got a huge imagination, but I see it as part of my responsibility to work as hard as I can towards that goal of creating that reality, one in which a modern society essentially adheres to First Nations law and custom in a modern context.

Q. You’ve talked a lot about the importance of drawing from traditional knowledge. When I think about what it means to be Indigenous, I think about both the knowledge we have and also the challenge in bringing that forward because of how colonialism has eroded our ties to both culture and land. What would you say to Indigenous people who care about land and culture, but are feeling disconnected from both? How do they find their way back? 

A. This is one that I actually really struggle with sometimes because in the Australian context here, we had the Stolen Generation, when Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their parents and indoctrinated. So you have whole generations that have been dispossessed of their cultural inheritance, of their families, and also their peoples have been dispossessed of future generations as well. The colonial process was a finely tuned machine by the time it came through the South Pacific and Australia. In one sense, we’re fortunate that it was only just over 230 years ago first contact happened, but at the same time, this colonial apparatus was so finely tuned that they didn’t need as long to do as much damage as they’ve been able to do.  

Being in a settler colony, we’re dealing with mass incarceration, mass suicide rates, and the disappearing of our people. It feels like it’s hard to catch up. We can’t take a break or catch our breath because we’re dealing with the very real, frontier issues of losing our people. But at the same time, what’s required for healing and to actually rebuild our cultural strength is time. And actually being able to take the time to be on country, to sit with country, to learn, and to reconnect. 

It’s this really delicate tug of war that all First Peoples who have been subject to colonialism have to face, and we have to sort of grapple with on a daily basis, what do we put our energy into? Am I fighting forced child removals and assimilation on the daily? Am I fighting the education system? Am I doing land and country work and going through the legal system? Or am I just sort of operating as an individual, sovereign person, under our own law and custom and that’s how I resist and maintain my strength? It’s so vast in terms of how we have to split ourselves up in a way to deal with the issues at hand, which essentially is the disappearance of our people, but also our way of life and custom. 

At the end of the day, for me, I just have to take heed from my ancestors and my own people that we’ve seen the end of the world before. My great grandparents and their generation saw the end of their world already, and they’ve been fighting. They were in the physical frontier on the front line, and survived that, and saw everything that they knew to be ripped away from them. So I have to just acknowledge that I’m very lucky to be born in the generation I’m born in, with so much more opportunity. But at the same time, there is that huge gap in familiarity with culture and our ways. 

Q. Before your successful litigation against the Warratah mine, you fought against the Carmichael mine, filing lawsuit after lawsuit. But the mine still opened in 2021 and is now in operation. How do you handle such setbacks, and the grief of climate trauma and colonialism? What would you say to other Indigenous activists who are dealing with similar challenges? 

A. Being a young person, going through that, it’s really hard. You’re up against the actual powers that be of the colonial apparatus: the state government, the federal government, the mining lobby itself, and this idea that our traditional lands should be destroyed for extraction and exploitation for the benefit of everybody else. For the benefit of the state in terms of royalties, and for the benefit of the rest of settler Australia, where we, the people and our lands, are the collateral damage. And so for a long time I was very heartbroken, very depressed. For a long time I didn’t know what my next steps were. 

But the reality is that I feel very much so guarded by my ancestors and all our people. I had time to mourn and get back on my feet before the opportunity to join the Youth Verdict case against the Waratah coal mine came along. 

All I can say is we kept going. We’re fighting for our people, every single day. And something that I was always reminded of along the way was that even though it might not be the silver bullet that makes significant change, it’s still important that we create our own legacy of resistance and that we do our best every day to maintain what we hold dear.

We’ve got to do the work because we’ve got to do the work. It stands on its own and it’s our obligation as traditional custodians every day to do the work of maintaining and protecting country. We put on the record that we don’t consent, this isn’t free prior and informed consent as we are entitled under the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. And every step of the way, just maintaining that resistance, even if it’s just telling our story and challenging the prevailing, dominant, colonial narrative, I think is important to do every single day. 

So in terms of advice, I think it’s to keep going. Take a break when you need to. And have a cry, because I cried for like eight years straight, but I think just knowing what some of my own people have been through and the horrors that they had to deal with, it’s the responsibility that we inherit to maintain the fight and continue on as best we can. 

We might not be able to solve everything in one or two generations. But again, we’re the oldest living culture on the face of the earth. So, in that respect, we’ve been here the longest and, as long as my generation and our future generations maintain our own identities, cultural identities and resistance as best as we can, we’ll be here long into the future as well. 

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline How an Aboriginal woman fought a coal company and won on Jun 3, 2024.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

How Sewage Can Be Used to Heat and Cool Buildings

Wastewater flushed down the drain can be used to heat and cool homes and buildings in a sustainable way and climate experts say it's an untapped source of energy due to its stable temperature of approximately 70°F

DENVER (AP) — When a massive event center was being developed in Denver, planners had to contend with two existing 6-foot (1.8 meters) wide sewer pipes that emptied into the river, creating an unsightly dilemma. Developers wanted to bury them. The utility said the wastewater needed to vent heat before entering the river.There, a problem became a solution.Thermal energy from the sewage now powers a system that heats and cools classrooms, an equestrian center and veterinary hospital at the National Western Center complex.It's a recent example of how wastewater flushed down the drain can heat and cool buildings in a sustainable way. Climate experts say sewage is a largely untapped source of energy due to its stable temperature of approximately 70 F (21 C). Wastewater heat recovery systems have already been installed in California, Washington, Colorado, New York and Canada. Pipes that transport sewage are already built, making it a low-cost and widely available resource that reduces the need for polluting energy sources.There's no odor since the thermal energy transfer systems keep the wastewater separate from other components.“Wastewater is the last frontier of sustainable energy,” said Aaron Miller, the eastern regional manager for SHARC Energy, adding: “Even in this current environment where environmental stuff doesn’t really sell, there’s a financial benefit that we can sell to business owners.”While the technology works in a variety of locations, the Denver complex was uniquely positioned because it’s close to major sewer lines in a low-lying industrial zone. The vast majority of the center's heating and cooling comes from wastewater heat recovery. During extremely hot or cold weather, cooling towers and boilers are used to fill in the gaps.“Every city on the planet has a place just like this,” said Brad Buchanan, the center's CEO. “This is actually a value, a benefit that the bottoms have that the rest of the city doesn’t have.” How heat from sewage can warm buildings Extracting the thermal energy starts with the water from toilets, showers and sinks traveling down usual sewage lines before flowing into a tank that is part of the heat recovery system. Heavy solids are separated and the remaining fluid flows through a heat exchanger, a sealed device with stacks of metal plates that can take heat from one source and put it into another.Thermal energy from the wastewater is transferred to a clean water loop without the liquids coming into contact. The clean water carrying the thermal energy is then sent into a heat pump that can heat or cool rooms, depending on the weather. It can also heat potable water. Once the thermal energy has been extracted, the wastewater flows back into the sewer system and eventually to a water treatment plant.The heat from the sewage replaces the need for energy from other sources to heat and cool buildings, such as electricity from the grid. Electricity is only needed to run the heat exchanger and pumps that move the water, far more energy efficient than boilers and chillers used in traditional HVAC systems. Where wastewater heating is being used Miller said the systems work best in buildings with centralized hot water production, such as apartments, commercial laundromats, car washes and factories. In residential settings, Miller said the technology is best suited for buildings with 50 or more apartment units. The technology works in various climates around the country. Some buildings supplement with traditional HVAC components.The technology utilizes existing city pipes, which reduces the need for construction compared to some types of renewable energy, said Ania Camargo Cortes, a thermal energy networks expert and board member of the nonprofit HEET (Home Energy Efficiency Team).“If you can use wastewater, it’s going to be an enormous savings ... its billions of kilowatts available to us to use,” said Camargo Cortes.According to 2005 data from the U.S. Department of Energy, the equivalent of 350 billion kilowatt-hours' worth of hot water is flushed down drains each year.In Vancouver, Canada, a wastewater heat recovery system helps supply heat and hot water to 47 buildings served by the False Creek Neighbourhood Energy Utility. In 2025, 60% of the energy the utility generated came from sewage heat recovery, said Mark Schwark, director of water and utilities management at the City of Vancouver. The future of wastewater heat recovery Aaron Brown, associate professor of systems engineering at Colorado State University, said he believes use of the wastewater heat recovery systems will grow because it is an efficient, low-carbon system that is relatively easy to install.Unlike solar or wind power that can vary by weather or time of day, thermal energy from sewage can be available whenever it's needed, Brown said.“I think that to decarbonize, we have to think of some innovative solutions. And this is one that is not that complicated as far as the engineering technology, but it’s very effective,” said Brown.Epic Cleantec, which makes water reuse systems for office and apartment buildings, is expanding into heat recovery after previously focusing on treating water for toilets and irrigation. The company recently installed a wastewater heat recovery system in a high-rise building in San Francisco.Aaron Tartakovsky, co-founder and CEO of Epic Cleantec, said people have been conditioned to think that wastewater is dirty and should always be discarded, but his company recently launched two beers in collaboration with a brewer made from recycled shower and laundry water to illustrate novel ways to reuse it.“I think wastewater recovery is going to be a continuously growing thing because it’s something that we’re not taking advantage of,” said Tartakovsky.Peterson reported from Denver and O’Malley from Philadelphia.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Warm Weather and Low Snowpack Bedevil Western Ski Resorts

Lack of snow is causing problems for ski resorts and other businesses in the Western U.S. that rely on wintry conditions

EDWARDS, Colo. (AP) — Ski resorts are struggling to open runs, walk-through ice palaces can’t be built, and the owner of a horse stable hopes that her customers will be satisfied with riding wagons instead of sleighs under majestic Rocky Mountain peaks. It’s just been too warm in the West with not enough snow.Meanwhile, the Midwest and Northeast have been blanketed by record snow this December, a payday for skiers who usually covet conditions out West.In the Western mountains where snow is crucial for ski tourism — not to mention water for millions of acres (hectares) of crops and the daily needs of tens of millions of people — much less snow than usual has piled up.“Mother Nature has been dealing a really hard deck,” said Kevin Cooper, president of the Kirkwood Ski Education Foundation, a ski racing organization at Lake Tahoe on the California-Nevada line.Only a small percentage of lifts were open and snow depths were well below average at Lake Tahoe resorts, just one example of warm weather causing well-below-average snowpack in almost all of the West.In Utah, warmth has indefinitely postponed this winter’s Midway Ice Castles, an attraction 45 minutes east of Salt Lake City that requires cold temperatures to freeze water into building-size, palatial features. Temperatures in the area that will host part of the 2034 Winter Olympics have averaged 7-10 degrees (3-5 degrees Celsius) above normal in recent weeks, according to the National Weather Service.Near Vail, Colorado, Bearcat Stables owner Nicole Godley hopes wagons will be a good-enough substitute for sleighs for rides through mountain scenery.“It’s the same experience, the same ride, the same horses,” Godley said. “It’s more about, you know, just these giant horses and the Western rustic feel.”In the Northwest, torrential rain has washed out roads and bridges and flooded homes. Heavy mountain snow finally arrived late this week in Washington state but flood-damaged roads that might not be fixed for months now block access to some ski resorts.In Oregon, the Upper Deschutes Basin has had the slowest start to snow accumulation in records dating to 1981. Oregon, Idaho and western Colorado had their warmest Novembers on record, with temperatures ranging from 6-8.5 degrees (2-4 degrees Celsius) warmer than average, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Continued warmth could bring yet another year of drought and wildfires to the West. Most of the region except large parts of Colorado and Oregon has seen decent precipitation but as rain instead of snow, pointed out NOAA drought information coordinator Jason Gerlich.That not only doesn’t help skiers but farmers, ranchers and people from Denver to Los Angeles who rely on snowpack water for their daily existence. Rain runs off all at once at times when it's not necessarily needed.“That snowpack is one of our largest reservoirs for water supply across the West,” Gerlich said.Climate scientists agree that limiting global warming is critical to staving off the snow-to-rain trend.In the northeastern U.S., meanwhile, below-normal temperatures have meant snow instead of rain. Parts of Vermont have almost triple and Ohio double the snowfall they had this time last year.Vermont’s Killington Resort and Pico Mountain, had about 100 trails open for “by far the best conditions I have ever seen for this time of year,” said Josh Reed, resort spokesman who has lived in Killington for a decade.New Hampshire ski areas opening early include Cannon Mountain, with over 50 inches (127 centimeters) to date. In northern Vermont, Elena Veatch, 31, already has cross-country skied more this fall than she has over the past two years.“I don’t take a good New England winter for granted with our warming climate,” Veatch said.Out West, it's still far too early to rule out hope for snow. A single big storm can “turn things around rather quickly,” pointed out Gerlich, the NOAA coordinator.Lake Tahoe's snow forecast over Thanksgiving week didn't pan out but Cooper with the ski racing group is eyeing possibly several feet (1-2 meters) in the long-term forecast.“That would be so cool!” Cooper said.Janie Har in San Francisco and Gene Johnson in Seattle contributed. Gruver reported from Fort Collins, Colorado. ___The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environmentCopyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

New York realizes it cannot afford its green promises

Up for reelection, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) distance herself from climate catastrophists.

New York’s crusade against gas stoves is being placed on the back burner: Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) recently delayed the implementation of a 2023 ban on running gas in new buildings before it took effect in January.That hasn’t been Hochul’s only climate backtrack. In November, she agreed to a Trump-backed gas pipeline, marking the Empire State’s first pipeline in at least a decade — and the first since they passed their hallmark climate law in 2019 requiring the state to cut carbon emissions 40 percent by 2030. Hochul also signed an agreement granting permits to a gas-powered crypto mining facility, on the condition the plant nearly halves its pollution by 2030.When asked in October about the mandate for no gas in new buildings, the governor said she’s “going to look at this with a very realistic approach and do what I can, because my number one focus is affordability.” Hochul’s U-turn is an admission that the anti-energy agenda pushed by far-left environmental groups was always unaffordable.Climate activists accuse Hochul of being a traitor, but maybe the governor has finally realized that there’s rarely any upside to pursuing unrealistic decarbonization plans. At the very least, it looks like she’s paying attention to voters during a reelection cycle. Polling shows 61 percent of New Yorkers — including 54 percent of Democrats — “somewhat” or “strongly” agree that keeping energy affordable in the state is more important right now than reducing greenhouse gas emissions.The state’s residential electricity prices have risen 36 percent since New York passed its decarbonization legislation in 2019, according to a Progressive Policy Institute study. That’s almost three times faster than the rest of the country. Still, nearly half of New York’s electricity is supplied by fossil fuels. That study concludes that New York’s energy strategy is driving up costs, constraining reliable supply and jeopardizing the political viability of the state’s climate agenda. Other blue states face similar pain.It’s no coincidence that most of the states with the highest prices also have the most ambitious decarbonization mandates. Even though the federal government can dish out all kinds of subsidies for renewable energy, the states largely get to regulate how they generate and sell their electricity.Florida has chosen to base its energy generation on reliability and affordability, instead of ideology. Despite intense energy demands driven by a subtropical climate, Florida’s electricity prices are two percent lower than the national average. The state gets about 75 percent of its energy from natural gas.Symbolic climate gestures please activists, but they become a political liability when the bills come due.

The race to protect New York’s subway from extreme rainfall

As the planet warms, subway systems around the world have struggled to cope with floods far beyond what they were originally designed to handle.

(The Washington Post)The race to protect New York’s subway from extreme rainfallSubway systems around the world struggle to cope with floodingEvery day, thousands of people walk up these two yellow steps, never knowing they are treading on a key tool in the New York subway’s fight against a rising climate threat.Torrential rainstorms fueled by the warmer atmosphere are increasingly striking the city — creating floods that gush into tunnels and submerge tracks.At least 200 of the city’s 472 stations have flooded in the past two decades, according to data from the Metropolitan Transit Authority.December 19, 2025 at 5:00 a.m. EST7 minutes agoAs the planet warms, subway systems in places such as London and Tokyo have struggled to cope with floods far beyond what they were originally designed to handle. Stormwater regularly seeps into the subterranean networks, cutting off the transit lines that are their cities’ lifeblood. At least 14 passengers were killed in the Chinese city of Zhengzhou four years ago when floodwaters filled their train tunnel.Few places are more susceptible than New York. The city’s sprawling, century-old subway system was built close to the surface and contains more than 40,000 openings through which water can reach the tracks below.A map that shows where floods have been reported in the New York City Subway according to MTA data. The map shows stations that have two or more reported impacts in dark purple and stations that have one reported impact in lighter purple. Stormwater impacts can include such effects as pooled water on platforms and flooded tracks and tunnels. Staten Island Railway not shown.Its vulnerabilities underground are exacerbated by surging moisture in the skies above, a Washington Post analysis shows. The strongest plumes of water vapor the region sees each year — which provide fuel for the most severe storms — are intensifying almost twice as much as the global average. Very heavy rainfall events (producing at least 1.4 inches of rain in a day) have increased about 60 percent since the subway was first built.Yet public transit is also crucial for the fight against rising temperatures, officials say, because it means riders aren’t using cars or trucks that spew planet-warming pollution.This is what it will take to protect the New York subway — and its nearly 1.2 billion annual riders — in an era of escalating floods.Passengers navigate a train platform at Grand Central in New York on Dec. 11.An aging systemLong before the subway was built, before the city even existed, water defined New York. Manhattan was dotted by ponds and crisscrossed by creeks and streams. Wetlands fringed the Brooklyn and Queens borders, expanses of swaying cordgrass and reeds absorbing the rise and fall of tides.As the city grew, the original landscape was obscured by buildings and pavement. By the time subway construction began in the early 1900s, few remembered or cared where water once flowed.Today, that oversight is proving costly, said ecologist Eric Sanderson, vice president for urban conservation at the New York Botanical Garden. When he and his colleague analyzed reports of modern-day inundation from 311 calls and official flood maps, they found that the most susceptible parts of the city are often the sites of former waterways.An image made in 1893 of 116th Street near Lenox Avenue. (Brown Brothers/The New York Public Library)The 116th stop on the 2 and 3 lines, which run along Lenox Avenue in Central Harlem, illustrates the leaky system’s many vulnerabilities.The station sits at a low point in Manhattan’s topography along the path of a former creek. Flood maps from the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) show how stormwater collects at this spot — generating what the agency calls “deep and contiguous flooding” during periods of intense rain.A historic map of the area around the 116th St. station in Harlem. This map uses data from the Welikia Project to re-create what the region looked like in the early 17th century. The topography and coastline differ greatly from that of modern-day New York City. Tidal marshes and streams are annotated, and, when overlaid with modern Manhattan, a strong correlation with flood-prone areas of the subway system can be seen.This map of the same area as the before imagery shows what parts of the city's infrastructure are prone to flooding. When paired with the 17th-century re-creation, a strong connection to the flood-prone stations can be seen.“It’s not like you can erase the ecological factors that led to there being ... a creek there,” said Sanderson, who has spent more than a decade studying the city’s pre-Colonial landscape. “And climate change is supercharging those factors.”Like most of the original subway, the 116th Street station was built using the “cut and cover” technique, in which workers dug a trench, constructed the tunnel, then rebuilt the street on top.This graphic is an illustration of the intersection of 116th Street and Lenox Avenue, including a cross-section of the subway station below the street level. It shows how the intersection is at risk of flooding, including the station's entrances and vents. The illustration also shows how water drains off the platform, through the tracks, into a pump room located off the platform and into the city's sewer system. According to the DEP, this intersection can become submerged even during a “limited flood” scenario, when rainfall rates are 1.77 inches per hour.Water running off the sidewalk can drain into the station’s four entrances and several sidewalk grates, which are the station’s primary method of ventilation.116th Street station, Manhattan, Sept. 1, 2021Pans underneath the vents collect rainwater, but they can overflow in a deluge, spilling torrents onto the platform below.As water runs off the platform into the track bed, it mixes with floodwaters flowing from elsewhere in the tunnel. If water on the tracks rises as high as the electrified third rail — which supplies power to the trains — it becomes unsafe for subways to run.To avoid that scenario, a drain beneath the tracks carries water to a nearby sump pit. But the drain can become clogged with trash.When the sump pit fills, it activates pumps that push the water into the city’s sewer system. Two of the pumps at 116th Street are more than 100 years old and can handle only a fraction of the rainfall the city now experiences.After decades of budget crises and deferred maintenance, much of the subway system is outdated and in disrepair, the MTA acknowledges.But when it comes to storms, aging pumps are its “Achilles’ heel,” said Eric Wilson, the agency’s senior vice president for climate and land use planning. Of more than 250 pump rooms in the system, 11 percent are in poor or marginal condition, according to a 2023 assessment.At 116th Street, the struggling pneumatic pumps emit a shuddering screech every time they turn on.“You’re looking at a relic, basically,” said Juan Urena, a superintendent in the Department of Subway’s hydraulics division. “It’s time to upgrade.”MTA workers look into the sump pit at the 116th Street station on Oct. 17. The decision to put the subway underground stems from the “Great White Hurricane” of 1888, which killed about 200 people in New York and stranded roughly 15,000 people on the elevated trains that were then the city’s primary transit system. Freezing passengers fled one snowbound train by climbing down a ladder — but only after they paid the ladder’s owner 25 cents each.The catastrophe left residents aghast that their modern metropolis could be brought to its knees by the weather. Within three years, the state had authorized construction of a subterranean transit system.Water has posed a problem from the beginning. Groundwater seeps through tunnel walls, requiring the MTA to pump at least 10 million gallons out of the system every day. When it rains, New York’s tall buildings and paved surfaces prevent water from seeping into soils, causing it to run off into subway tunnels instead.Yet climate change has made the challenge worse, officials said. Plumes of warm, waterlogged air frequently stream out of the tropics and make landfall in the city, dropping large amounts of rain faster than the landscape and infrastructure can absorb it.Most parts of New York’s combined sewer system, which funnels both stormwater and sewage, are designed to handle up to 1.75 inches of rain in an hour. When many of the system’s components were installed more than 50 years ago, that intensity of rain could be expected roughly twice a decade. But a rain gauge at Central Park has recorded rainfall exceeding that threshold five times in the past five years.This is a line chart of annual maximum rainfall at the Central Park gauge. It shows inches per hour since a little before the 1950s. The combined sewer system was designed to take in 1.75 inches per hour at its upper limits. The line chart shows how, in the past few decades, that has been more often exceeded by rainfall averages.“The sewers were designed for a climate we no longer live in,” said Rohit Aggarwala, the city’s chief climate officer and DEP commissioner.When a strong moisture plume swept into the city on July 14, unleashing 2.07 inches of rain in one hour, the sewer system was quickly overwhelmed. Untreated stormwater backed up into streets and homes. Water rained through subway grates, streamed down station stairwells and seeped through cracks in the walls.The overtaxed sewers couldn’t take in additional water from the MTA’s pumps and instead became a source of flooding. At the 28th Street station, water burst through a manhole cover on a train platform, creating a geyser that drenched passengers waiting for the uptown 1 train. (The city welded the cover shut soon after.)“It’s an incredible challenge for any city to have to face,” said Bernice Rosenzweig, an environmental scientist at Sarah Lawrence College and a lead author of the New York City Panel on Climate Change. “The bad decisions were made generations ago, and now it’s figuring out how to deal with that in a fully built-out and operating city.”A manhole cover at the spot where massive flooding took place at the 28th Street station.The worst-case scenarioRosenzweig still remembers stories that emerged from the Zhengzhou subway flooding.Amid the heaviest downpour ever observed in China, water from a collapsed drainage ditch surged into a subway tunnel during rush hour. Survivors spoke of standing on seats and lifting children above the steadily rising water. People began to vomit and faint from lack of oxygen as they exhausted their dwindling pocket of air.The situation in China, which stemmed from a combination of extreme weather, infrastructure failures and human missteps, is not completely analogous to what might happen in New York, Rosenzweig noted.“But it was an important event for city managers and emergency managers to show that it’s not just the nightmare scenario of someone who studies natural hazards for a living,” she said. “It’s something that can happen and has happened, and it’s not unrealistic to plan for those worst-case scenarios.”When the remnants of Hurricane Ida lashed the New York region just over one month later, it underscored Rosenzweig’s worries. At its peak, the storm dropped a record-breaking 3.46 inches in a single hour — about twice the intensity of rainfall the city’s stormwater systems are designed to handle.The MTA’s Juan Urena looks over an antiquated pump room at the 116th Street station on Oct. 17.NEW YORK, NY, US, October 17- MTA workers look over an antiquated pump room at the 116th St. Station in New York, on Friday, October 17, 2025. Increasing rainfall has caused flooding in New York subways, a problem the city has scrambled to address. Photographer: Victor J. Blue for The Washington PostNo injuries or deaths were recorded in the subways during Ida. Yet all but one of New York’s 36 subway lines were shut down, according to an after-action report, and roughly 1,250 passengers had to be evacuated from the system. Damage to MTA infrastructure totaled $128 million.The full economic toll of transit disruptions is probably even greater, research suggests.“It is the absolutely vital organ of the region,” said Jamie Torres-Springer, president of MTA construction and development.The subway is also important for fighting climate change, he noted: By keeping cars off the street, the MTA estimates that it avoids about 22 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year.Yet floods make it harder for New Yorkers to get where they need to go. Subway service was disrupted due to flooding at least 75 times between January 2020 and September 2025, according to a Post analysis of MTA alerts.There’s no simple way to stop heavy rains from spilling into the system, Torres-Springer said.Though the MTA dedicated nearly $3 billion in state and federal funds to implement coastal resiliency measures after Hurricane Sandy ravaged the system in 2012, those protections don’t shield against inland flooding, he noted. The tunnel doors and grate covers developed after Sandy must also be deployed with hours or days of advance notice — precluding their use during sudden cloudbursts, like the July 14 storm.Outdated pipes in the pump room at the 116th Street station.Stemming the tideInstead of racing to respond to an approaching deluge, the MTA has adopted a sprawling set of interventions that can protect the subway system day in and day out. In a five-year capital plan passed this spring, the agency committed an unprecedented $700 million to new stormwater defenses.Much of that funding will go toward upgrading at least a dozen pump rooms, including the one at 116th Street. New pumps are made of stainless steel and can handle much more water per minute than their older counterparts, Urena said.But many solutions are lower-tech — what Torres-Springer calls “tactical” interventions that can be implemented one by one, gradually plugging the system’s thousands of leaks.By adding one or two steps to station entrances — as the agency is doing at 116th Street — the MTA aims to protect places that used to get drenched with every storm.New raised grates, sometimes topped by bicycle racks or benches, can prevent puddles on the surface from falling onto passengers below.At a few stations, including 116th Street, the agency has sealed vents with temporary covers until more permanent improvements can be installed.In some places, stopping floods is as simple as keeping debris out of the drains that siphon water on the tracks into station pump rooms. Since 2017, the MTA has maintained a catalogue of nearly 10,000 drain boxes scattered across the subway system. The agency has said it aims to clean at least a quarter of them every year.As of this month, the MTA has installed or set aside funds for flood defenses at 110 of the 200 flood-prone stations, according to a Post analysis of agency data. But 22 stations that have flooded more than once are not on its list of targets. Several of these stations, most of which are in Brooklyn, were among those inundated during the July 14 storm.A 2023 report from New York’s state comptroller also faulted the MTA for failing to complete several flood-proofing projects and for inconsistently following extreme-weather protocols.In a statement, MTA spokesperson Mitch Schwartz said that vulnerable stations not targeted in the capital plan might still receive flood defenses as part of other upgrade work.“We have never moved faster to keep this system safe from extreme weather,” he said.But the MTA can’t hold back surging floodwaters on its own, Torres-Springer said. The fate of the subway is inextricably linked to that of another massive, aging underground system: the sewer.The DEP recently adopted a requirement that all new stormwater infrastructure be capable of withstanding 2.15 inches of rainfall in an hour. The agency has directed about $10 billion to drainage network improvements, expanded sewer mains and underground tanks capable of storing excess water during storms.With a limited budget and more than 7,400 miles of sewer pipes to maintain, Aggarwala said, the DEP’s priority is preventing water from getting into people’s homes, where it can destroy possessions and threaten lives. Subway disruptions due to flooding, he added, are more temporary.As the skies above New York grow ever warmer and wetter, keeping water out of the subway will also involve restoring it to the surface where it originally flowed.Ecologist Eric Sanderson.Guided in part by Sanderson’s research on New York’s original ecology, city agencies are trying to uncover hidden creeks and wetlands — creating “bluebelts” that can absorb excess rainfall during severe storms. By alleviating pressure on the sewer system and giving runoff an alternate place to go, officials say that these projects can curb flooding in neighborhoods and subway stations alike.The initiative is a long-overdue reversal of the impulse that led New York to pave over waterways and bury the transit system in centuries past, Sanderson said.“A city that works with its nature,” he said, “is going to be a city that lasts longer for its people.”About this storyTop videos by Wynter Gray/Storyful; @nuevayorkypunto/Spectee; Paullee Wheatley-Rutner/Storyful; Ayeraye Akosua Hargett/Storyful; and @anjalitsui.Design and development by Talia Trackim. Additional code by Frank Hulley-Jones. Editing by Simon Ducroquet, Roger Hodge, Betty Chavarria, Dominique Hildebrand, Juliet Eilperin and John Farrell. Copy editing by Rachael Bolek.MethodologyTo examine trends in heavy rainfall in New York City, The Post analyzed 130 years of rain gauge data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Environmental Information weather station in Central Park. To define what counts as a heavy rainfall day, The Post used the period from 1895 to 1924 to find the threshold for a 95th percentile precipitation event. Days with at least 0.5 millimeters of precipitation were included. Using a simple linear regression, The Post measured the change in frequency of the 95th percentile rain events at the station from 1895 to 2024.The analysis showed a significant positive trend in 95th percentile rain events, with the number of days each year with heavy rainfall increasing by nearly three days, a roughly 60 percent increase.Carolien Mossel, a PhD candidate in the CUNY Graduate Center’s earth and environmental science department, provided guidance on the data and analysis of hourly precipitation amounts for Central Park from May 1948 to August 2025.​​To investigate global changes in extreme precipitation, The Post measured the amount of water vapor flowing through Earth’s atmosphere, a metric called integrated vapor transport (IVT). The analysis also identified days and locations where heavy rainfall coincided with high IVT. See more about The Post’s methodology for the IVT analysis here.To map how present-day New York City would have looked in the early 17th century, The Post used data from Eric Sanderson’s “Before New York: An Atlas and Gazetteer” (Abrams, 2026), courtesy of the New York Botanical Garden.

CalPERS’ $60 billion investment in ‘climate solutions’ lacks environmental standards, transparency

CalPERS won't say what climate companies it invests in. The pension also holds positions in fossil fuel, airlines, plastics manufacturing and technology.

Guest Commentary written by Allie Lindstrom Allie Lindstrom is a senior strategist for the Sierra Club’s sustainable finance campaign Jakob Evans Jakob Evans is a senior policy strategist with Sierra Club California In November the California Public Employees Retirement System announced it invested $60 billion in “climate solutions,” toward a goal of $100 billion by 2030. While the announcement highlighted several deals, the pension’s overall strategy remains shrouded in secrecy. As the largest public pension in the U.S., what CalPERS does has major impact. Yet it does not disclose a complete list of its climate-focused investments, nor the criteria it used to select them.  When asked how CalPERS defines climate investments, its staff points to a “taxonomy of mitigation, transition and adaptation” — meaning investments that reduce carbon emissions, support cleaner technologies for polluting businesses and help communities adapt to climate impacts. This taxonomy captures the right themes but is a woefully sparse definition for a pension that prides itself on climate leadership.  Climate finance around the world faces credibility challenges. Research has found climate dollars going to everything from airports to ice cream shops.  CalPERS can and should do better. The Sierra Club and the California Common Good coalition have asked CalPERS to be more transparent and adopt science-based principles to guide its climate investment strategy.  That became more important after research revealed CalPERS’ climate plan included $3.56 billion invested in fossil fuel companies, as well as in airlines, plastics manufacturers and tech companies. A sign at California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) headquarters in Sacramento. Photo by Max Whittaker, REUTERS CalPERS’ climate plan aims to not only reduce carbon emissions through its portfolio, but to reduce the risk that climate change poses to the pension fund.  Risk reduction should be front of mind, as studies show pension funds are particularly vulnerable to the wide-ranging economic impact of climate change and could face declines in investment return of up to 50% by 2040. That would be a massive shock to all pensions working to deliver safe, secure retirements for beneficiaries. What remains unclear is how CalPERS’ investments in polluting companies actually address climate risk.  CalPERS has defended its fossil fuel outlay by emphasizing the investments are “small,” and “a green asset is a green asset.” That doesn’t cut it. The investments lack what is called “additionality” — they’re not new investments, and they don’t unlock resources for decarbonization.  Simply put, holding investments in fossil fuel companies does not protect workers’ savings from the systemic risk of climate change. A climate plan that counts anything with a whiff of “green” as a climate investment does not represent a commitment to allocating capital where it’s needed to scale clean energy solutions and stabilize markets. Every dollar invested in polluting companies — that isn’t being leveraged to drive change — is a dollar that could have been invested in reducing emissions and protecting communities.  Fossil fuel investments do not belong in CalPERS’ climate solutions portfolio.  By keeping its criteria for climate solution investments vague, CalPERS may think it is preserving flexibility to develop a cutting-edge strategy. But it is missing the opportunity to show how public money can be invested to proactively protect workers’ livelihoods, retirement savings and communities.  CalPERS’ climate plan counts progress in billions of dollars, but it doesn’t measure the things that matter most, such as the amount of emissions reduced, communities served and clean energy deployed.  System-level risks require system-level solutions. For a fund of CalPERS’ size and influence, that means using its leverage to mitigate the risks of climate change that threaten the economy and beneficiaries’ pensions.  CalPERS can start by adopting science-based principles that set clear exclusions on what does — and does not — constitute climate investments, and by clearly defining strategies for mitigation, adaptation and transition.  CalPERS should be applauded for identifying that climate change poses a clear risk to its beneficiaries’ savings and the entire economy. Many pensions have yet to follow suit.  But it has yet to articulate a bold enough vision to effectively mitigate those risks. 

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.