Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

‘Haul no!’: tribes protest uranium mine trucking ore through Navajo Nation

News Feed
Tuesday, August 6, 2024

A coalition of hundreds of environmental activists, Navajo and Havasupai tribal members are protesting the transportation of uranium ore through the Navajo Nation, as a newly opened mine near the Grand Canyon resurfaces a painful legacy of nuclear development.Located just seven miles south of the famous national park, the controversial Pinyon Plain mine is one of the first uranium mines to open in years as the United States works to boost its nuclear arsenal and energy supply.Protests were rapidly organized over the weekend after news broke that Energy Fuels, the company that owns and operates the mine, had begun transporting dozens of tons of uranium across the Navajo Nation without alerting the nation’s leadership, a move that the tribe views as an illegal violation of laws that prohibit uranium shipping on its land.Protesters gathered at several events along the 350-mile long fuel shipping route that trucks will take as they transport ore from Pinyon Plain for processing at White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah. On Friday, about 50 people marched in Cameron, Arizona, alongside the Navajo Nation’s president Buu Nygren and First Lady Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren.On Saturday in Flagstaff, Arizona, protesters gathered outside city hall, holding aloft signs that read “Haul No!” and “Respect Tribal Sovereignty”. And on Sunday, more than 100 people – including members of the Havasupai tribe who live in the Grand Canyon – marched in Grand Canyon Junction, Arizona.The renewal of uranium mining and shipping across the region has touched a nerve because of its troubled health and environmental legacy on the Navajo Nation, where more than 500 abandoned uranium mines remain. The US government extracted 30m tons of uranium ore on Navajo Nation land from 1944 to 1986, beginning as part of the Manhattan Project. Many Navajo men labored in the mines, where the health risks of doing so were not well communicated.Pinyon Plain mine (formerly called Canyon mine), nine miles from the South Rim of Grand Canyon, seen from above. Photograph: Bruce Gordon/Bruce Gordon / ecoflightToday, families continue to link health issues – particularly high rates of kidney disease, cancer and reproductive disorders – to the mines. In 1979, the nation was home to the largest radioactive spill on US soil – larger than the accident at Three Mile Island – when a dam burst at the Church Rock uranium mill, flooding the Puerco River with 94m gallons of radioactive waste.“The Havasupai have been fighting the Pinyon Plain mine since the 80s, for decades,” said Leona Morgan, co-founder of Haul No!, a Navajo/Diné-led group focused on ending uranium extraction. “As Diné people, we’re dealing with all the past mining still.”Shipping ore through these tribal lands “risks the waters of the Grand Canyon and puts at risk the people along the haul route”, said Sandy Bahr, director of the Sierra Club’s Grand Canyon Chapter and one of the organizer’s of Sunday’s march.The transport of uranium ore across Navajo Nation comes as the US is reinvesting in nuclear energy and building up its nuclear arsenal. At Cop28, the US endorsed an agreement to triple nuclear energy production to combat climate change, boosting the demand for uranium.Mark Chalmers, the president and CEO of Energy Fuels, argued that opposition to the mine is “rooted in outdated fears from the legacy of uranium mining from the 1940s through 1960s, which is not representative of the strict regulations and high environmental and safety standards of today’s industry”.“With this transport, we can work together to combat climate change, while meeting the growing demand for clean energy and reducing reliance on Russia for uranium and critical minerals,” Chalmers said in a statement to the Guardian.The reopening of Pinyon Plain has been steeped in controversy. Last August, Joe Biden signed a proclamation establishing a national monument around the Grand Canyon and banning future uranium mining there as well – but Pinyon Plain mine was exempted and began operating in January.More actions have been organized in the days ahead, including a performance by the musician Ed Kabotie in Tuba City and another protest in Grand Canyon Junction on 24 August. At the same time, Navajo leaders have taken steps to halt shipments across their lands in an effort that will test the limits of tribal sovereignty.Navajo Nation president Buu Nygren addresses a crowd Fort Defiance, Arizona, on 10 January 2023. Photograph: Felicia Fonseca/AP“They snuck through the Navajo Nation and they made it onto the Utah side, outside of the reservation,” said Nygren, the Navajo president, in a press release. Nygren views the mining company’s actions as a violation of a 2012 law banning the transport of uranium on Navajo Nation, although that law did include an exemption for the state and federal highways that Energy Fuels had designated as its hauling route.Nygren said Energy Fuels had promised to alert the nation before it began shipping uranium through its land, but that they did not receive any advance notice. “To me, they operated covertly to travel the Navajo Nation illegally. It’s very disappointing that they smuggled uranium across our Nation.”Nygren recently issued an executive order requiring Energy Fuels and the Navajo Nation to reach an agreement before transporting any radioactive material through the nation – effectively blocking uranium shipments across the nation’s territory for the next six months. Arizona’s governor, Katie Hobbs, also asked Energy Fuels to halt shipments for the foreseeable future – until the company and the Navajo Nation can hold discussions about safety concerns.“Anyone bringing those substances onto the Nation should undertake that activity with respect and sensitivity to the psychological impact to our people, as well as the trauma of uranium development that our community continues to live with every day,” said Ethel Branch, attorney general for the Navajo Nation, in a statement Wednesday.

Firm moves ore through land without telling tribal leaders as mine resurfaces painful legacy of nuclear developmentA coalition of hundreds of environmental activists, Navajo and Havasupai tribal members are protesting the transportation of uranium ore through the Navajo Nation, as a newly opened mine near the Grand Canyon resurfaces a painful legacy of nuclear development.Located just seven miles south of the famous national park, the controversial Pinyon Plain mine is one of the first uranium mines to open in years as the United States works to boost its nuclear arsenal and energy supply. Continue reading...

A coalition of hundreds of environmental activists, Navajo and Havasupai tribal members are protesting the transportation of uranium ore through the Navajo Nation, as a newly opened mine near the Grand Canyon resurfaces a painful legacy of nuclear development.

Located just seven miles south of the famous national park, the controversial Pinyon Plain mine is one of the first uranium mines to open in years as the United States works to boost its nuclear arsenal and energy supply.

Protests were rapidly organized over the weekend after news broke that Energy Fuels, the company that owns and operates the mine, had begun transporting dozens of tons of uranium across the Navajo Nation without alerting the nation’s leadership, a move that the tribe views as an illegal violation of laws that prohibit uranium shipping on its land.

Protesters gathered at several events along the 350-mile long fuel shipping route that trucks will take as they transport ore from Pinyon Plain for processing at White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah. On Friday, about 50 people marched in Cameron, Arizona, alongside the Navajo Nation’s president Buu Nygren and First Lady Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren.

On Saturday in Flagstaff, Arizona, protesters gathered outside city hall, holding aloft signs that read “Haul No!” and “Respect Tribal Sovereignty”. And on Sunday, more than 100 people – including members of the Havasupai tribe who live in the Grand Canyon – marched in Grand Canyon Junction, Arizona.

The renewal of uranium mining and shipping across the region has touched a nerve because of its troubled health and environmental legacy on the Navajo Nation, where more than 500 abandoned uranium mines remain. The US government extracted 30m tons of uranium ore on Navajo Nation land from 1944 to 1986, beginning as part of the Manhattan Project. Many Navajo men labored in the mines, where the health risks of doing so were not well communicated.

Pinyon Plain mine (formerly called Canyon mine), nine miles from the South Rim of Grand Canyon, seen from above. Photograph: Bruce Gordon/Bruce Gordon / ecoflight

Today, families continue to link health issues – particularly high rates of kidney disease, cancer and reproductive disorders – to the mines. In 1979, the nation was home to the largest radioactive spill on US soil – larger than the accident at Three Mile Island – when a dam burst at the Church Rock uranium mill, flooding the Puerco River with 94m gallons of radioactive waste.

“The Havasupai have been fighting the Pinyon Plain mine since the 80s, for decades,” said Leona Morgan, co-founder of Haul No!, a Navajo/Diné-led group focused on ending uranium extraction. “As Diné people, we’re dealing with all the past mining still.”

Shipping ore through these tribal lands “risks the waters of the Grand Canyon and puts at risk the people along the haul route”, said Sandy Bahr, director of the Sierra Club’s Grand Canyon Chapter and one of the organizer’s of Sunday’s march.

The transport of uranium ore across Navajo Nation comes as the US is reinvesting in nuclear energy and building up its nuclear arsenal. At Cop28, the US endorsed an agreement to triple nuclear energy production to combat climate change, boosting the demand for uranium.

Mark Chalmers, the president and CEO of Energy Fuels, argued that opposition to the mine is “rooted in outdated fears from the legacy of uranium mining from the 1940s through 1960s, which is not representative of the strict regulations and high environmental and safety standards of today’s industry”.

“With this transport, we can work together to combat climate change, while meeting the growing demand for clean energy and reducing reliance on Russia for uranium and critical minerals,” Chalmers said in a statement to the Guardian.

The reopening of Pinyon Plain has been steeped in controversy. Last August, Joe Biden signed a proclamation establishing a national monument around the Grand Canyon and banning future uranium mining there as well – but Pinyon Plain mine was exempted and began operating in January.

More actions have been organized in the days ahead, including a performance by the musician Ed Kabotie in Tuba City and another protest in Grand Canyon Junction on 24 August. At the same time, Navajo leaders have taken steps to halt shipments across their lands in an effort that will test the limits of tribal sovereignty.

Navajo Nation president Buu Nygren addresses a crowd Fort Defiance, Arizona, on 10 January 2023. Photograph: Felicia Fonseca/AP

“They snuck through the Navajo Nation and they made it onto the Utah side, outside of the reservation,” said Nygren, the Navajo president, in a press release. Nygren views the mining company’s actions as a violation of a 2012 law banning the transport of uranium on Navajo Nation, although that law did include an exemption for the state and federal highways that Energy Fuels had designated as its hauling route.

Nygren said Energy Fuels had promised to alert the nation before it began shipping uranium through its land, but that they did not receive any advance notice. “To me, they operated covertly to travel the Navajo Nation illegally. It’s very disappointing that they smuggled uranium across our Nation.”

Nygren recently issued an executive order requiring Energy Fuels and the Navajo Nation to reach an agreement before transporting any radioactive material through the nation – effectively blocking uranium shipments across the nation’s territory for the next six months. Arizona’s governor, Katie Hobbs, also asked Energy Fuels to halt shipments for the foreseeable future – until the company and the Navajo Nation can hold discussions about safety concerns.

“Anyone bringing those substances onto the Nation should undertake that activity with respect and sensitivity to the psychological impact to our people, as well as the trauma of uranium development that our community continues to live with every day,” said Ethel Branch, attorney general for the Navajo Nation, in a statement Wednesday.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Tunisians Escalate Protests Against Saied, Demanding Return of Democracy

By Tarek AmaraTUNIS (Reuters) -Thousands of Tunisians marched in the capital on Saturday in a protest against “injustice and repression”, accusing...

TUNIS (Reuters) -Thousands of Tunisians marched in the capital on Saturday in a protest against “injustice and repression”, accusing President Kais Saied of cementing one-man rule by using the judiciary and police.The protest was the latest in a wave that has swept Tunisia involving journalists, doctors, banks and public transport systems. Thousands have also demanded the closure of a chemical plant on environmental grounds.The protesters dressed in black to express anger and grief over what they called Tunisia’s transformation into an "open-air prison". They raised banners reading "Enough repression", "No fear, no terror, the streets belong to the people".The rally brought together activists, NGOs and fragmented parties from across the spectrum in a rare display of unity in opposition to Saied.It underscores Tunisia’s severe political and economic crisis and poses a major challenge to Saied, who seized power in 2021 and started ruling by decree.The protesters chanted slogans saying "We are suffocating!", "Enough of tyranny!" and "The people want the fall of the regime!"."Saied has turned the country into an open prison, we will never give up," Ezzedine Hazgui, father of jailed politician Jawhar Ben Mbark, told Reuters.Opposition parties, civil society groups and journalists all accuse Saied of using the judiciary and police to stifle criticism.Last month, three prominent civil rights groups announced that the authorities had suspended their activities over alleged foreign funding.Amnesty International has said the crackdown on rights groups has reached critical levels with arbitrary arrests, detentions, asset freezes, banking restrictions and suspensions targeting 14 NGOs.Opponents say Saied has destroyed the independence of the judiciary. In 2022 he dissolved the Supreme Judicial Council and sacked dozens of judges — moves that opposition groups and rights advocates condemned as a coup.Most opposition leaders and dozens of critics are in prison.Saied denies having become a dictator or using the judiciary against opponents, saying he is cleansing Tunisia of “traitors”.(Reporting by Tarek Amara; Editing by Kevin Liffey)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

At UN Climate Conference, Some Activists and Scientists Want More Talk on Reforming Agriculture

Many of the activists, scientists and government leaders at United Nations climate talks underway in Brazil have a beef: They want more to be done to transform the world’s food system

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — With a spotlight on the Brazilian Amazon, where agriculture drives a significant chunk of deforestation and planet-warming emissions, many of the activists, scientists and government leaders at United Nations climate talks have a beef. They want more to be done to transform the world's food system.Protesters gathered outside a new space at the talks, the industry-sponsored “Agrizone,” to call for a transition toward a more grassroots food system, even as hundreds of lobbyists for big agriculture companies are attending the talks.Though agriculture contributes about a third of Earth-warming emissions worldwide, most of the money dedicated to fighting climate change goes to causes other than agriculture, according to the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization.The FAO didn't offer any single answer as to how that spending should be shifted, or on what foods people should be eating.“All the countries are coming together. I don’t think we can impose on them one specific worldview,” said Kaveh Zahedi, director of the organization's Office of Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment."We have to be very, very aware and conscious of those nuances, those differences that exist,” Zahedi said. An alternative universe at COP for agriculture When world leaders gather every year to try to address climate change, they spend much of their time in a giant, artificial world that typically gets built up just for the conference.One corner of COP30, as this year's conference is known, featured the alternative universe of AgriZone, where visitors could step into a world of immersive videos and exhibits with live plants and food products. Those included a research farm that Brazilian national agricultural research corporation Embrapa built to showcase what they call low-carbon farming methods for raising cattle, and growing crops like corn and soy as well as ways to integrate cover crops like legumes or trees like teak and eucalyptus. Ana Euler, executive director of innovation, business and technology transfer at Embrapa, said her industry can offer solutions needed especially in the Global South where climate change is hitting hardest."We need to be part of the discussions in terms of climate funds," Euler said. "We researchers, we speak loud, but nobody listens.”AgriZone was averaging about 2,000 visitors a day during COP30's two-week run, said Gabriel Faria, an Embrapa spokesman. That included tours for Queen Mary of Denmark, COP President André Corrêa do Lago and other Brazilian state and local officials.But while the AgriZone seeks to spread a message of lower-carbon agriculture possibilities, industrial agriculture retains a big influence at the climate talks. The climate-focused news site DeSmog reported that more than 300 industrial agriculture lobbyists are attending COP30. In the face of big industry, some call for a voice for smallholder farmers On a humid evening at COP30's opening, a group of activists gathered on the grassy center of a busy roundabout in front of the AgriZone to call for food systems that prioritize good working conditions and sustainability and for industry lobbyists to not be allowed at the talks.Those with the most sway are "not the smallholder food producers, ... not the peasants, and ... definitely not all these people in the Global South that are experiencing the brunt of the crisis," said Pang Delgra, an activist with the Asian People’s Movement on Debt and Development who was among the protesters. “It’s this industrial agriculture and corporate lobbyists that are shifting the narrative inside COPs.”“We have to decolonize our thoughts. It’s not just about changing to a different food,” said Sara Omi, from the Embera people of Panama and president of the Coordination of Territorial Leaders of the Mesoamerican Alliance of Peoples and Forests.“The agro-industrial systems are not the solution," she added. "The solution is our own ancestral systems that we maintain as Indigenous peoples."The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

How U.S. Universities Used Counterterror Fusion Centers to Surveil Student Protests for Palestine

Internal university communications reveal how a network established for post-9/11 intelligence sharing was turned on students protesting genocide.  The post How U.S. Universities Used Counterterror Fusion Centers to Surveil Student Protests for Palestine appeared first on The Intercept.

From a statewide counterterrorism surveillance and intelligence-sharing hub in Ohio, a warning went out to administrators at the Ohio State University: “Currently, we are aware of a demonstration that is planned to take place at Ohio State University this evening (4/25/2024) at 1700 hours. Please see the attached flyers. It is possible that similar events will occur on campuses across Ohio in the coming days.” Founded in the wake of 9/11 to facilitate information sharing between federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, fusion centers like Ohio’s Statewide Terrorism Analysis and Crime Center, or STACC, have become yet another way for law enforcement agencies to surveil legally protected First Amendment activities. The 80 fusion centers across the U.S. work with the military, private sector, and other stakeholders to collect vast amounts of information on American citizens in a stated effort to prevent future terror attacks. In Ohio, it seemed that the counterterrorism surveillance hub was also keeping close tabs on campus events. It wasn’t just at Ohio State: An investigative series by The Intercept has found that fusion centers were actively involved in monitoring pro-Palestine demonstrations on at least five campuses across the country, as shown in more than 20,000 pages of documents obtained via public records requests exposing U.S. universities’ playbooks for cracking down on pro-Palestine student activism. Related How California Spent Natural Disaster Funds to Quell Student Protests for Palestine As the documents make clear, not only did universities view the peaceful, student-led demonstrations as a security issue — warranting the outside police and technological surveillance interventions detailed in the rest of this series — but the network of law enforcement bodies responsible for counterterror surveillance operations framed the demonstrations in the same way. After the Ohio fusion center’s tip-off to the upcoming demonstration, officials in the Ohio State University Police Department worked quickly to assemble an operations plan and shut down the demonstration. “The preferred course of action for disorderly conduct and criminal trespass and other building violations will be arrest and removal from the event space,” wrote then-campus chief of police Kimberly Spears-McNatt in an email to her officers just two hours after the initial warning from Ohio’s primary fusion center. OSUPD and the Ohio State Highway Patrol would go on to clear the encampment that same night, arresting 36 demonstrators. Fusion centers were designed to facilitate the sharing of already collected intelligence between local, state, and federal agencies, but they have been used to target communities of color and to ever-widen the gray area of allowable surveillance. The American Civil Liberties Union, for example, has long advocated against the country’s fusion center network, on the grounds that they conducted overreaching surveillance of activists from the Black Lives Matter movement to environmental activism in Oregon. “Ohio State has an unwavering commitment to freedom of speech and expression. We do not discuss our security protocols in detail,” a spokesperson for Ohio State said in a statement to The Intercept. Officials at STACC didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment. The proliferation of fusion centers has contributed to a scope creep that allows broader and more intricate mass surveillance, said Rory Mir, associate director of community organizing at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “Between AI assessments of online speech, the swirl of reckless data sharing from fusion centers, and often opaque campus policies, it’s a recipe for disaster,” Mir said. While the Trump administration has publicized its weaponization of federal law enforcement agencies against pro-Palestine protesters — with high-profile attacks including attempts to illegally deport student activists — the documents obtained by The Intercept display its precedent under the Biden administration, when surveillance and repression were coordinated behind the scenes. “ All of that was happening under Biden,” said Dylan Saba, a staff attorney at Palestine Legal, “and what we’ve seen with the Trump administration’s implementation of Project 2025 and Project Esther is really just an acceleration of all of these tools of repression that were in place from before.” Not only was the groundwork for the Trump administration’s descent into increasingly repressive and illegal tactics laid under Biden, but the investigation revealed that the framework for cracking down on student free speech was also in place before the pro-Palestine encampments. Among other documentation, The Intercept obtained a copy of Clemson University Police Department’s 2023 Risk Analysis Report, which states: “CUPD participates in regular information and intelligence sharing and assessment with both federal and state partners and receives briefings and updates throughout the year and for specific events/incidents form [sic] the South Carolina Information and Intelligence Center (SCIIC)” — another fusion center. The normalization of intelligence sharing between campus police departments and federal law enforcement agencies is widespread across U.S. universities, and as pro-Palestine demonstrations escalated across the country in 2024, U.S. universities would lean on their relationships with outside agencies and on intelligence sharing arrangements with not only other universities, but also the state and federal surveillance apparatus. Read our complete coverage Chilling Dissent OSU was not the only university where fusion centers facilitated briefings, intelligence sharing, and, in some cases, directly involved federal law enforcement agencies. At California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, where the state tapped funds set aside for natural disasters and major emergencies to pay outside law enforcement officers to clear an occupied building, the university president noted that the partnership would allow them “to gather support from the local Fusion Center to assist with investigative measures.” Cal Poly Humboldt had already made students’ devices a target for their surveillance, as then-President Tom Jackson confirmed in an email. The university’s IT department had “tracked the IP and account user information for all individuals connecting to WiFi in Siemens Hall,” a university building that students occupied for eight days, Jackson wrote. With the help of the FBI – and warrants for the search and seizure of devices – the university could go a step further in punishing the involved students. The university’s IT department had “tracked the IP and account user information for all individuals connecting to WiFi in Siemens Hall.” In one email exchange, Kyle Winn, a special agent at the FBI’s San Francisco Division, wrote to a sergeant at the university’s police department: “Per our conversation, attached are several different warrants sworn out containing language pertaining to electronic devices. Please utilize them as needed. See you guys next week.” Cal Poly Humboldt said in a statement to The Intercept that it “remains firmly committed to upholding the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment, ensuring that all members of our community can speak, assemble, and express their views.” “The pro-Palestine movement really does face a crisis of repression,” said Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka’s U.S. policy fellow. “We are up against repressive forces that have always been there, but have never been this advanced. So it’s really important that we don’t underestimate them — the repressive forces that are arrayed against us.” Related How Northern California’s Police Intelligence Center Tracked Protests In Mir’s view, university administrators should have been wary about unleashing federal surveillance at their schools due to fusion centers’ reputation for infringing on civil rights. “Fusion centers have also come under fire for sharing dubious intelligence and escalating local police responses to BLM,” Mir said, referring to the Black Lives Matter protests. “For universities to knowingly coordinate and feed more information into these systems to target students puts them in harm’s way and is a threat to their civil rights.” Research support provided by the nonprofit newsroom Type Investigations. The post How U.S. Universities Used Counterterror Fusion Centers to Surveil Student Protests for Palestine appeared first on The Intercept.

K-Pop Fans' Environmental Activism Comes to UN Climate Talks

K-pop is turning up in force at the United Nations climate talks in Brazil, with fans-turned-activists hosting protest and events to mobilize their millions-strong online community to back concrete climate actions

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — Fans of K-pop have an intensity that's turned the music into a global phenomenon. Some are determined to channel that energy into action on climate change.Meanwhile, panels attended by high-ranking South Korean officials during the talks, known as COP30, strategized on how to mobilize the K-pop fanbase.“It’s the first time K-pop fans have been introduced on a COP stage — not bands or artists — but fans,” said Cheulhong Kim, director of the Korean Cultural Center in Brazil, a branch of South Korea's Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. “K-pop fans are the real protagonists behind this culture that has the power to shape social and political issues."While attending a K-pop event at COP30, South Korea's Minister of Climate, Energy and Environment Kim Seong-hwan told The Associated Press that his ministry “will support K-pop fans and their artists so that K-pop can contribute to tackling the climate crisis.” K-pop on the climate front Banners reading “Export K-pop, not fossil fuels” filled part of the main hall at COP30 on Monday, as activists demanded South Korea cut its funding for foreign fossil fuel development.Seokhwan Jeong, who organized the protest with the Seoul-based advocacy group, Solutions for Our Climate, alluded to a storyline from the demon hunters movie with a character leading a double life, hiding a secret.“South Korea must overcome its dual stance — championing coal phase-out on the global stage while supporting fossil-fuel finance behind the scenes,” Jeong said. “It is time for the country to stop hiding and become a genuine climate champion.”When organized, the fan base is a force to be reckoned with because of its size and intense loyalty, said Gyu Tag Lee, a professor at George Mason University Korea who studies the cultural impact of K-pop.Dayeon Lee, a campaigner with KPOP4PLANET, believes “cultural power is driving real climate action.”“Our love extends beyond artists," Lee said. “We care for each other across fandoms and borders. We are young people facing the same future, fluent in social media, keen to respond to injustice.”The K-pop activism aligns with the Brazilian Portuguese concept of “mutirão” — a spirit of collective effort — that the COP30 Presidency is using as a rallying cry on the problem of climate change, according to Vinicius Gurtler, general coordinator for international affairs in Brazil’s Ministry of Culture.More than 80 countries have voiced support for the “mutirão” call in what environmentalists have said “could be the turning point of COP30.”“One of the best ways for us to do this is through music and through the youth," Gurtler said. "I don’t think that we will create a better planet if we cannot sing and if we cannot imagine a better world."The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.This story was produced as part of the 2025 Climate Change Media Partnership, a journalism fellowship organized by Internews’ Earth Journalism Network and the Stanley Center for Peace and Security.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

Costa Rica Environmentalists Face Rising Threats and Harassment

Environmental activists in Costa Rica continue to face escalating threats, harassment, and legal intimidation as they challenge projects that harm ecosystems. Groups report a systematic pattern of repression, including public stigmatization, digital attacks, and abusive lawsuits meant to exhaust resources and silence opposition. In Puntarenas, billboards have appeared labeling local defenders as “persona non grata,” […] The post Costa Rica Environmentalists Face Rising Threats and Harassment appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Environmental activists in Costa Rica continue to face escalating threats, harassment, and legal intimidation as they challenge projects that harm ecosystems. Groups report a systematic pattern of repression, including public stigmatization, digital attacks, and abusive lawsuits meant to exhaust resources and silence opposition. In Puntarenas, billboards have appeared labeling local defenders as “persona non grata,” a form of symbolic violence that isolates activists in their communities. Similar tactics include online campaigns spreading disinformation and gendered threats, particularly against women who speak out against coastal developments or illegal logging. Legal actions add another layer of pressure. Developers have sued content creators for posting videos that question the environmental impact of tourism projects, claiming defamation or false information. Organizations identify these as SLAPP suits—strategic lawsuits against public participation—designed to drain time and money through lengthy court processes rather than seek genuine redress. In recent cases, bank accounts have been frozen, forcing individuals to halt their work. The Federation for Environmental Conservation (FECON), Bloque Verde, and other groups link these incidents to broader institutional changes. The State of the Nation Report released this month documents sustained weakening of environmental bodies. Budget cuts and staff reductions at the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE) and the National System of Conservation Areas (SINAC) have left larger protected areas with fewer resources. Policy shifts concentrate decision-making power while reducing scientific and community input. Activists argue this dismantling exposes water sources, forests, and biodiversity to greater risks. They point to rapid coastal development in areas like Guanacaste, where unplanned tourism strains wetlands and mangroves. Indigenous communities and rural defenders face added vulnerabilities, with reports of death threats tied to land recovery efforts. These pressures coincide with debates over resource extraction and regulatory rollbacks. Environmental organizations stress that protecting nature supports public health, jobs in sustainable tourism, and democratic rights. They maintain that freedom of expression and participation remain essential for holding projects accountable. Without stronger safeguards for defenders and reversal of institutional decline, groups warn that Costa Rica risks undermining its conservation achievements. They call for protocols to address threats, anti-SLAPP measures, and renewed commitment to environmental governance. Defending ecosystems, they say, equals defending the country’s future stability and justice. The post Costa Rica Environmentalists Face Rising Threats and Harassment appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.