Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Embattled Clackamas County commissioner Mark Shull makes bid for reelection after controversial term

News Feed
Tuesday, April 30, 2024

A Clackamas County commissioner whose first term has been marked by controversy and a failed recall is running for reelection — but declining to raise any money for his campaign.U.S. Army veteran Mark Shull, who was condemned by his fellow commissioners in 2021 for Islamophobic social media posts and comparing vaccine restrictions to Jim Crow laws, among other things, is being challenged by three local business leaders in the May primary.Commission Chair Tootie Smith, a fellow Republican to Shull on the commission, is also up for reelection. Clackamas County commissioners are elected countywide, as opposed to being elected in separate districts, like in Multnomah County.Shull faces challenges from business professionals Melissa Fireside and Tina Irvine, as well as former county employee Rae Gordon, who worked in tourism for 10 years. Fireside has taken the lead in campaign financing and lists endorsements from U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley and former Clackamas County Chair Charlotte Lehan. Irvine carries the endorsements of Clackamas County District Attorney John Wentworth, the Portland Metro Chamber and the Clackamas County Peace Officer Association.Irvine, former managing partner of Express Employment Professionals’ Oregon City branch, wants to improve public safety, lower the cost of living and expand affordable housing to address homelessness. A daughter of a police officer, Irvine said she is a strong supporter of local law enforcement.Irvine does not have previous government experience, but she has served on the board of Oregon City-based Children’s Center, a nonprofit that offers child abuse and neglect evaluations, and as chair, secretary and treasurer of nonprofit Clackamas Workforce Partnership, which aims to create equitable and inclusive work environments.Tina Irvine, former managing partner at Express Employment Professionals, poses at work site in Clackamas County.Courtesy of campaignShe’s raised $49,700 for her campaign.“I am a well-respected and a trusted leader within the county,” Irvine wrote in response to a questionnaire from The Oregonian/OregonLive. “Over the past 20 years, I haven’t just talked about the issues; I have rolled up my sleeves and done the work to help make families, businesses and nonprofit organizations thrive.”Fireside, endorsed by the Democratic Party of Oregon’s gun owners caucus in the nonpartisan race for Position 4, is the owner of a construction management consulting company and a former member of Clackamas County’s advisory Mental Health & Addictions Council. She also chaired the county’s board that recommends pay levels for elected officials. In 2020, Fireside ran unsuccessfully for the Lake Oswego City Council.“As a small business owner, educator, and working mom, I believe we need leaders that value and champion our workers, families and communities so everyone has an equal opportunity to thrive,” Fireside wrote in a response to an Oregonian/OregonLive questionnaire.Melissa Fireside, owner of a construction consulting business, speaks about her goals if elected.Courtesy of campaignHer campaign focuses on economic development, community health and increasing housing availability. Fireside has raised $67,600 for her campaign and is endorsed by Democratic state Rep. Jules Walters of West Linn as well as the Democratic Party of Clackamas County.Gordon, the third challenger, worked for the county’s tourism and cultural affairs department for a decade. She left that role in 2015, but returned on a one-year contract in 2021 to help manage the county’s COVID-19 response, which included overseeing supplies and working as an analyst for vaccine clinics. She previously owned a marketing company in Oregon City and serves as president of two nonprofits, including the Cascade Blues Association, a low-budget nonprofit that promotes blues music.Gordon’s bid focuses on developing wrap-around mental health and substance use treatment and family mediation services. She also highlighted a need for effective public safety responses and accountability. Her campaign has raised $15,400.“What we need now in Clackamas County and frankly throughout our nation are community-driven leaders who are approachable, bring people together and are advocates for every voice,” Gordon wrote. “I have honed these skills.”Rae Gordon, a blues singer and former Clackamas County employee, hands a flier to a voter.Courtesy of campaignShull, who declined an opportunity to respond to questions from The Oregonian/OregonLive, ran into controversy soon after winning office for the first time in 2020. He defeated incumbent Ken Humberston in a runoff, 50.6% to 48.7%. In January 2021, backlash erupted in the county after residents discovered Shull had posted derogatory comments about Islam and Muslims as well as transgender people and the Black Lives Matter movement on social media.Less than two weeks after he took office, he faced calls to resign.In a commission meeting, Smith, the chair, read aloud a resolution that condemned Shull for “bigoted statements” and called for his resignation.He apologized and voted for the resolution but remained on the board. Legally, the board could not force a resignation.Outrage resurfaced again six months later, when Shull compared COVID-19 vaccine passports to Jim Crow laws that enforced racial segregation. Smith and the other three commissioners at the time voted to strip Shull of all liaison duties and committee assignments.In September 2021, Shull shared a meme on Facebook that appeared to compare COVID-19 health restrictions to the Holocaust. The post, which was quickly taken down, once again drew disapproval from members of the Clackamas County board. Shull defended his actions, saying the post was sent to him by community members who were concerned about potentially losing their jobs if they did not get vaccinated.Although his actions caused rifts with fellow commissioners, his policy stances have not always been so divisive. Like most Clackamas County officials, he was a strong opponent of plans to toll improved Oregon interstates. Gov. Tina Kotek paused those plans last month but tolling is sure to resurface in 2025 as state lawmakers debate how to finance needed transportation improvements.Shull is calling for an audit of the Oregon Department of Transportation to find solutions that don’t involve tolling. He has also vowed to fight any new taxes on Clackamas voters.Shull was a leading force in dismantling the county’s Equity and Inclusion Office last year. He voted to strike the office’s nearly $830,000 budget. Shull did not respond to calls, messages or emails for comment.Due to Shull’s controversial term and his opponents’ inexperience in elected office, the race could go into a run-off. If one candidate does not secure at least 50% of the vote, the top two vote-getters will move on to the November ballot.Below are answers from Fireside, Irvine and Gordon to five key questions posed by The Oregonian/OregonLive. Some responses have been lightly edited for style or to comply with word limits.Tell us three concrete goals you have for Clackamas County in the next two years if elected or reelected.Irvine: Permanently stop tolling: We simply cannot put more financial burden on the backs of our constituents. Even with the governor’s pause to a regional tolling plan, we need to stay diligent on this issue. I do not support tolling now and I will not support tolling in the future. Drive economic development: We must be strategic to attract, retain and grow our employer base. Build stronger community: Working families need quality child care. Developing an early child care business accelerator program will do just that. This program assists aspiring child care providers to build business plans to open neighborhood centers.Fireside: Enhance labor and economic development: Create union (jobs) and living wages across Clackamas County through partnerships with the trades, community colleges and business while enhancing opportunities for career bound youth. Diversify housing options: Get our (Metro homelessness tax) dollars out the door and build to scale supportive and workforce housing. Everyone deserves to have access to the generational wealth, mobility and security homeownership provides. Protect our natural resources: Our workforce must be empowered to get our Climate Action plan off the shelf so our communities see an immediate investment in natural disaster preparedness, infrastructure, and services through a climate change lens.Gordon: Family-homeless relative mediation: We need to be more creative in our approach and utilize existing county mediation services to (help homeless individuals) build bridges to family members. Mental health/illness: More than 50% will be diagnosed with a mental illness or disorder. County leaders need to model open and honest communications regarding mental illness to take the stigma off of pursuing mental health services. I intend to increase access for all citizens and homeless individuals. Public Safety: Citizens deserve to feel safe in their community and to trust and respect their providers. I would hold those who disrespect the badge accountable.Clackamas County has reported significant results in decreasing homelessness — how would you build on that and what additional solutions will you bring to the table?Irvine: Our leadership within the region is unmatched: The board along with county agencies, a wealth of nonprofit partners, and community outreach teams make up our Coordinated Housing Access System. The success we have seen occurs when coordinated access points convene and act quickly using the supportive housing dollars efficiently. As commissioner, I will specifically focus on veterans, youth and those in imminent danger of domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking. Too often these highly vulnerable populations are forgotten but they deserve our full support.Fireside: Clackamas County saw a point in time decrease of 65% in homelessness. We still have, for example, over 300 students in one school district alone facing housing insecurity in Clackamas County. Our constituents must have access to services that bring stability to their lives. This includes opening up paths to homeownership, expanding our rent voucher program, stewarding the redevelopment of our HUD sites and empowering our cities to access the funding they need to meet their unique needs. Local control in this equation is paramount to success so we continue to see a decrease in homelessness.Gordon: It was recently announced that homelessness has decreased 65% since 2019 according to homeless counts. While I applaud that, I know when I was involved in helping conduct those counts, we weren’t able to interview everybody. Thus, we cannot be idle. The additional solutions need to address the individual and their unique circumstances that contributed to their current situation. More foundation needs to be laid to make it possible to step up into permanent housing that addresses family connections and counseling to give them a better chance at self-sufficiency, self-respect and success.What is your view of the closure of the Clackamas County equity office?Irvine: As a business leader and community advocate, I have built my career, family and social network in Clackamas County. The role of local government is not just to provide essential services like infrastructure, public health and safety, and economic development, but to also serve all people with dignity, respect and provide equal opportunity. I have dedicated my life to helping others and I hope that if I win, it is not because I’m a woman of color, but because people see my track record of success, leadership integrity, business acumen and believe I am the best person for the job.Fireside: I do not support the closure of the Equity and Inclusion Office. Good government requires a lens that considers all impacts and seeks to level the playing field. Opportunity must be available to all, which requires a realistic assessment of the roadblocks/barriers many of our fellow Oregonians face. It is incumbent on the county to provide services to all of us and to do so equitably. Many of the office’s services were designed to reach underserved folks in our county but without an equity and inclusion lens, those services will go to waste (or will not be delivered as intended).Gordon: Regardless of your opinion, one thing is clear — voices were heard but not respected. The amount of opposition should have changed the trajectory. It should be a goal to someday not need services, but that time is not now. Vulnerable citizens don’t feel safe by this action. While working for the county, I led a group that worked to build morale and make everyone feel welcome. We coordinated inclusive events and activities with an equity lens. The result was a better workforce and better customer service. When both employees and citizens aren’t seeing proactive steps to inclusivity, we all lose.What investments do you feel the county needs to make to address current and future climate issues, such as extreme weather events?Irvine: How we approach and mitigate extreme weather events such as wildfires is vital. Having more control over forest management at the county level is essential to reducing wildfires in the future. With our growing population and over 1.2 million acres to manage, we have learned that during emergencies our resources are stretched thin. Ensuring our residents know their part in an emergency is essential. I would like to see our county work with city leadership and private citizens to create more Community Emergency Response Teams with increased points of distribution that can be deployed in times of need.Fireside: Our county’s Climate Action Plan must be fully implemented. Our county procurement standards must align with our climate goals so the goods and services we procure and the contracts we enter into for development meet these standards whenever possible. Our cities, rural areas, homeowners associations and community planning organizations must have access to grants to prepare their communities. Our dedicated firefighters and first responders have programs to educate our communities on the plans they need to be safe in extreme weather and natural disasters. These programs must be fully funded to keep our communities safe and also our first responders.Gordon: Vehicles: Model environmental stewardship by increasing their fleet with eco-friendly vehicles. Disaster management: This dedicated department is proactive in developing programs and outreach. When I worked there I saw additional opportunities not taken due to resource development and access. This needs to be made a priority. Volunteer: A volunteer program was recently dissolved. As a community-driven volunteer and leader who has led others in large-scale projects, that was disheartening and a move that will only serve to disconnect citizens. Volunteers are crucial in times of extreme weather events and disasters and the county needs to lean into that source.How do you think Clackamas County should address fentanyl and substance use disorder?Irvine: Having lost a sibling to an overdose last year; I truly understand the vicious cycle of addiction. Fentanyl is a killer, highly addictive and extremely dangerous for medics and first responders to manage. The revision of Measure 110, which recriminalized drugs was a good start, but we must initiate help for those who can no longer help themselves. Law enforcement needs the tools and resources to ensure drug dealers are held accountable and prosecuted. Our criminal justice system is an entry point to supportive services that those in recovery tout as a reason they are alive today.Fireside: Education, prevention, rehabilitation and enforcement. Our populations must know how dangerous drug use is and that one pill can forever change or end their life. Our law enforcement must have a focus on cutting the head off the snake and make sure drugs are not being pumped into our communities. Our first responders need resources to respond effectively to drug overdoses and provide education to our community at large. We need to make sure the experts in the space of prevention, rehabilitation and medical response are empowered to lead and have every resource they need to keep our communities safe.Gordon: Priority is addressing the source and the addict. There should be severe penalties for those who sell and campaigns that share stories and encourage anonymous reporting. We need to continue to work and elevate existing groups and organizations that are currently doing the hard and difficult work to connect with addicts, homeless and people who are struggling with mental illness and susceptible to self-medicating. Easy access to free or low cost mental health services and counseling both on-site and off-site should be addressed.— Austin De Dios covers Multnomah County politics, programs and more. Reach him at 503-319-9744, adedios@oregonian.com or @AustinDeDios.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Shull, whose political career is marred by controversy, faces three challengers for his seat on the Clackamas County board.

A Clackamas County commissioner whose first term has been marked by controversy and a failed recall is running for reelection — but declining to raise any money for his campaign.

U.S. Army veteran Mark Shull, who was condemned by his fellow commissioners in 2021 for Islamophobic social media posts and comparing vaccine restrictions to Jim Crow laws, among other things, is being challenged by three local business leaders in the May primary.

Commission Chair Tootie Smith, a fellow Republican to Shull on the commission, is also up for reelection. Clackamas County commissioners are elected countywide, as opposed to being elected in separate districts, like in Multnomah County.

Shull faces challenges from business professionals Melissa Fireside and Tina Irvine, as well as former county employee Rae Gordon, who worked in tourism for 10 years. Fireside has taken the lead in campaign financing and lists endorsements from U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley and former Clackamas County Chair Charlotte Lehan. Irvine carries the endorsements of Clackamas County District Attorney John Wentworth, the Portland Metro Chamber and the Clackamas County Peace Officer Association.

Irvine, former managing partner of Express Employment Professionals’ Oregon City branch, wants to improve public safety, lower the cost of living and expand affordable housing to address homelessness. A daughter of a police officer, Irvine said she is a strong supporter of local law enforcement.

Irvine does not have previous government experience, but she has served on the board of Oregon City-based Children’s Center, a nonprofit that offers child abuse and neglect evaluations, and as chair, secretary and treasurer of nonprofit Clackamas Workforce Partnership, which aims to create equitable and inclusive work environments.

Tina Irvine

Tina Irvine, former managing partner at Express Employment Professionals, poses at work site in Clackamas County.Courtesy of campaign

She’s raised $49,700 for her campaign.

“I am a well-respected and a trusted leader within the county,” Irvine wrote in response to a questionnaire from The Oregonian/OregonLive. “Over the past 20 years, I haven’t just talked about the issues; I have rolled up my sleeves and done the work to help make families, businesses and nonprofit organizations thrive.”

Fireside, endorsed by the Democratic Party of Oregon’s gun owners caucus in the nonpartisan race for Position 4, is the owner of a construction management consulting company and a former member of Clackamas County’s advisory Mental Health & Addictions Council. She also chaired the county’s board that recommends pay levels for elected officials. In 2020, Fireside ran unsuccessfully for the Lake Oswego City Council.

“As a small business owner, educator, and working mom, I believe we need leaders that value and champion our workers, families and communities so everyone has an equal opportunity to thrive,” Fireside wrote in a response to an Oregonian/OregonLive questionnaire.

Melissa Fireside

Melissa Fireside, owner of a construction consulting business, speaks about her goals if elected.Courtesy of campaign

Her campaign focuses on economic development, community health and increasing housing availability. Fireside has raised $67,600 for her campaign and is endorsed by Democratic state Rep. Jules Walters of West Linn as well as the Democratic Party of Clackamas County.

Gordon, the third challenger, worked for the county’s tourism and cultural affairs department for a decade. She left that role in 2015, but returned on a one-year contract in 2021 to help manage the county’s COVID-19 response, which included overseeing supplies and working as an analyst for vaccine clinics. She previously owned a marketing company in Oregon City and serves as president of two nonprofits, including the Cascade Blues Association, a low-budget nonprofit that promotes blues music.

Gordon’s bid focuses on developing wrap-around mental health and substance use treatment and family mediation services. She also highlighted a need for effective public safety responses and accountability. Her campaign has raised $15,400.

“What we need now in Clackamas County and frankly throughout our nation are community-driven leaders who are approachable, bring people together and are advocates for every voice,” Gordon wrote. “I have honed these skills.”

Rae Gordon

Rae Gordon, a blues singer and former Clackamas County employee, hands a flier to a voter.Courtesy of campaign

Shull, who declined an opportunity to respond to questions from The Oregonian/OregonLive, ran into controversy soon after winning office for the first time in 2020. He defeated incumbent Ken Humberston in a runoff, 50.6% to 48.7%. In January 2021, backlash erupted in the county after residents discovered Shull had posted derogatory comments about Islam and Muslims as well as transgender people and the Black Lives Matter movement on social media.

Less than two weeks after he took office, he faced calls to resign.

In a commission meeting, Smith, the chair, read aloud a resolution that condemned Shull for “bigoted statements” and called for his resignation.

He apologized and voted for the resolution but remained on the board. Legally, the board could not force a resignation.

Outrage resurfaced again six months later, when Shull compared COVID-19 vaccine passports to Jim Crow laws that enforced racial segregation. Smith and the other three commissioners at the time voted to strip Shull of all liaison duties and committee assignments.

In September 2021, Shull shared a meme on Facebook that appeared to compare COVID-19 health restrictions to the Holocaust. The post, which was quickly taken down, once again drew disapproval from members of the Clackamas County board. Shull defended his actions, saying the post was sent to him by community members who were concerned about potentially losing their jobs if they did not get vaccinated.

Although his actions caused rifts with fellow commissioners, his policy stances have not always been so divisive. Like most Clackamas County officials, he was a strong opponent of plans to toll improved Oregon interstates. Gov. Tina Kotek paused those plans last month but tolling is sure to resurface in 2025 as state lawmakers debate how to finance needed transportation improvements.

Shull is calling for an audit of the Oregon Department of Transportation to find solutions that don’t involve tolling. He has also vowed to fight any new taxes on Clackamas voters.

Shull was a leading force in dismantling the county’s Equity and Inclusion Office last year. He voted to strike the office’s nearly $830,000 budget. Shull did not respond to calls, messages or emails for comment.

Due to Shull’s controversial term and his opponents’ inexperience in elected office, the race could go into a run-off. If one candidate does not secure at least 50% of the vote, the top two vote-getters will move on to the November ballot.

Below are answers from Fireside, Irvine and Gordon to five key questions posed by The Oregonian/OregonLive. Some responses have been lightly edited for style or to comply with word limits.

Tell us three concrete goals you have for Clackamas County in the next two years if elected or reelected.

Irvine: Permanently stop tolling: We simply cannot put more financial burden on the backs of our constituents. Even with the governor’s pause to a regional tolling plan, we need to stay diligent on this issue. I do not support tolling now and I will not support tolling in the future. Drive economic development: We must be strategic to attract, retain and grow our employer base. Build stronger community: Working families need quality child care. Developing an early child care business accelerator program will do just that. This program assists aspiring child care providers to build business plans to open neighborhood centers.

Fireside: Enhance labor and economic development: Create union (jobs) and living wages across Clackamas County through partnerships with the trades, community colleges and business while enhancing opportunities for career bound youth. Diversify housing options: Get our (Metro homelessness tax) dollars out the door and build to scale supportive and workforce housing. Everyone deserves to have access to the generational wealth, mobility and security homeownership provides. Protect our natural resources: Our workforce must be empowered to get our Climate Action plan off the shelf so our communities see an immediate investment in natural disaster preparedness, infrastructure, and services through a climate change lens.

Gordon: Family-homeless relative mediation: We need to be more creative in our approach and utilize existing county mediation services to (help homeless individuals) build bridges to family members. Mental health/illness: More than 50% will be diagnosed with a mental illness or disorder. County leaders need to model open and honest communications regarding mental illness to take the stigma off of pursuing mental health services. I intend to increase access for all citizens and homeless individuals. Public Safety: Citizens deserve to feel safe in their community and to trust and respect their providers. I would hold those who disrespect the badge accountable.

Clackamas County has reported significant results in decreasing homelessness — how would you build on that and what additional solutions will you bring to the table?

Irvine: Our leadership within the region is unmatched: The board along with county agencies, a wealth of nonprofit partners, and community outreach teams make up our Coordinated Housing Access System. The success we have seen occurs when coordinated access points convene and act quickly using the supportive housing dollars efficiently. As commissioner, I will specifically focus on veterans, youth and those in imminent danger of domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking. Too often these highly vulnerable populations are forgotten but they deserve our full support.

Fireside: Clackamas County saw a point in time decrease of 65% in homelessness. We still have, for example, over 300 students in one school district alone facing housing insecurity in Clackamas County. Our constituents must have access to services that bring stability to their lives. This includes opening up paths to homeownership, expanding our rent voucher program, stewarding the redevelopment of our HUD sites and empowering our cities to access the funding they need to meet their unique needs. Local control in this equation is paramount to success so we continue to see a decrease in homelessness.

Gordon: It was recently announced that homelessness has decreased 65% since 2019 according to homeless counts. While I applaud that, I know when I was involved in helping conduct those counts, we weren’t able to interview everybody. Thus, we cannot be idle. The additional solutions need to address the individual and their unique circumstances that contributed to their current situation. More foundation needs to be laid to make it possible to step up into permanent housing that addresses family connections and counseling to give them a better chance at self-sufficiency, self-respect and success.

What is your view of the closure of the Clackamas County equity office?

Irvine: As a business leader and community advocate, I have built my career, family and social network in Clackamas County. The role of local government is not just to provide essential services like infrastructure, public health and safety, and economic development, but to also serve all people with dignity, respect and provide equal opportunity. I have dedicated my life to helping others and I hope that if I win, it is not because I’m a woman of color, but because people see my track record of success, leadership integrity, business acumen and believe I am the best person for the job.

Fireside: I do not support the closure of the Equity and Inclusion Office. Good government requires a lens that considers all impacts and seeks to level the playing field. Opportunity must be available to all, which requires a realistic assessment of the roadblocks/barriers many of our fellow Oregonians face. It is incumbent on the county to provide services to all of us and to do so equitably. Many of the office’s services were designed to reach underserved folks in our county but without an equity and inclusion lens, those services will go to waste (or will not be delivered as intended).

Gordon: Regardless of your opinion, one thing is clear — voices were heard but not respected. The amount of opposition should have changed the trajectory. It should be a goal to someday not need services, but that time is not now. Vulnerable citizens don’t feel safe by this action. While working for the county, I led a group that worked to build morale and make everyone feel welcome. We coordinated inclusive events and activities with an equity lens. The result was a better workforce and better customer service. When both employees and citizens aren’t seeing proactive steps to inclusivity, we all lose.

What investments do you feel the county needs to make to address current and future climate issues, such as extreme weather events?

Irvine: How we approach and mitigate extreme weather events such as wildfires is vital. Having more control over forest management at the county level is essential to reducing wildfires in the future. With our growing population and over 1.2 million acres to manage, we have learned that during emergencies our resources are stretched thin. Ensuring our residents know their part in an emergency is essential. I would like to see our county work with city leadership and private citizens to create more Community Emergency Response Teams with increased points of distribution that can be deployed in times of need.

Fireside: Our county’s Climate Action Plan must be fully implemented. Our county procurement standards must align with our climate goals so the goods and services we procure and the contracts we enter into for development meet these standards whenever possible. Our cities, rural areas, homeowners associations and community planning organizations must have access to grants to prepare their communities. Our dedicated firefighters and first responders have programs to educate our communities on the plans they need to be safe in extreme weather and natural disasters. These programs must be fully funded to keep our communities safe and also our first responders.

Gordon: Vehicles: Model environmental stewardship by increasing their fleet with eco-friendly vehicles. Disaster management: This dedicated department is proactive in developing programs and outreach. When I worked there I saw additional opportunities not taken due to resource development and access. This needs to be made a priority. Volunteer: A volunteer program was recently dissolved. As a community-driven volunteer and leader who has led others in large-scale projects, that was disheartening and a move that will only serve to disconnect citizens. Volunteers are crucial in times of extreme weather events and disasters and the county needs to lean into that source.

How do you think Clackamas County should address fentanyl and substance use disorder?

Irvine: Having lost a sibling to an overdose last year; I truly understand the vicious cycle of addiction. Fentanyl is a killer, highly addictive and extremely dangerous for medics and first responders to manage. The revision of Measure 110, which recriminalized drugs was a good start, but we must initiate help for those who can no longer help themselves. Law enforcement needs the tools and resources to ensure drug dealers are held accountable and prosecuted. Our criminal justice system is an entry point to supportive services that those in recovery tout as a reason they are alive today.

Fireside: Education, prevention, rehabilitation and enforcement. Our populations must know how dangerous drug use is and that one pill can forever change or end their life. Our law enforcement must have a focus on cutting the head off the snake and make sure drugs are not being pumped into our communities. Our first responders need resources to respond effectively to drug overdoses and provide education to our community at large. We need to make sure the experts in the space of prevention, rehabilitation and medical response are empowered to lead and have every resource they need to keep our communities safe.

Gordon: Priority is addressing the source and the addict. There should be severe penalties for those who sell and campaigns that share stories and encourage anonymous reporting. We need to continue to work and elevate existing groups and organizations that are currently doing the hard and difficult work to connect with addicts, homeless and people who are struggling with mental illness and susceptible to self-medicating. Easy access to free or low cost mental health services and counseling both on-site and off-site should be addressed.

— Austin De Dios covers Multnomah County politics, programs and more. Reach him at 503-319-9744, adedios@oregonian.com or @AustinDeDios.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

When Susan Wojcicki Discovered She Had Lung Cancer, She Decided to Find Out Why

After her shocking lung cancer diagnosis, the late Susan Wojcicki dedicated herself to fighting the disease and looking for answers

In 2022 Susan Wojcicki was on top of the world—CEO of YouTube, parent to five kids and running a few miles a day—when she received a shocking diagnosis: metastatic lung cancer. She soon resigned from YouTube and dedicated herself to fighting the disease and looking for answers. Why does the leading cause of cancer deaths receive less funding than some less lethal cancers? How could her lung cancer have progressed so far undetected? And how did she get lung cancer even though she had never smoked? This episode is dedicated to Wojcick, who passed away last year.LISTEN TO THE PODCASTOn supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.TRANSCRIPTElah Feder: One day in late 2022, Susan Wojcicki had plans to meet up with her childhood friend, Joanna Strober. Here's Joanna.Joanna Strober: We were supposed to go for a walk on a Sunday, and she called me and she canceled because she had some hip pain. And you know, I just thought, okay, you probably exercised too much. Susan was a runner. Maybe she pulled something, but she went to her doctor and then she- I guess she got an MRI. And it was cancer, and that was her first indication—hip pain.Elah Feder: Lung cancer, and it had spread, which was shocking. Susan, she was 54 years old and in top shape, running a few miles a day at that point. And on top of everything, Susan had never smoked.Joanna Strober: Susan led the most healthy life. She didn't eat sugar. She was very careful about exercising every day. She was very careful about not eating pesticides. I mean, she was on the extreme of leading a healthy lifestyle. So yes, it's not just the not smoking, but she was doing everything she possibly could to stay healthy.Elah Feder: Susan's experience is not as unusual as you'd think. Lung cancer is the most common kind of cancer in the world. Third most common in the US. Smoking is still the leading cause, but a growing number of people who get lung cancer don't smoke, were never smokers. That's especially true of women who get lung cancer.To be clear, this is a terrible diagnosis to get for anyone, whether they smoked or not, but for those who haven't, there can be an extra layer on top of all the other feelings: confusion. So when Susan got this diagnosis, of course she wanted treatments, but she also wanted answers. Why did this happen to her?Elah Feder: This is Lost Women of Science, and I'm Elah FederKatie Hafner: And I'm Katie Hafner and today the story of Susan Wojcicki, who died last year of lung cancer.Elah, before we get to Susan's lung cancer, I want to acknowledge—some people out there might already be familiar with her name because Susan Wojcicki was one of the most successful and influential people in the world.Elah Feder: Yeah. Susan was the longtime CEO of YouTube, and she got involved in Google very early on, so that by 2022, her estimated net worth was about $800 million.Um, there's a story that gets quoted a lot about her early business acumen. When she was a kid, she and her friend, Joanna Strober—who you heard earlier—they sold what they called spice ropes. Here's Joanna again.Joanna Strober: It's really not that big of a deal. All we did was we made these yellow and orange yarn things and we put cinnamon in them and we called them spice ropes, and we sold them to the neighbors who of course had to buy them because they were neighbors.Elah Feder: The way the story gets told, it's like, look at this Susan kid born entrepreneur, but Joanna says, “no, no, no.” The point is they were just regular kids being kids.Katie Hafner: Right. It was their version of a lemonade stand. Right?Elah Feder: Exactly.Joanna Strober: We were not special. We were normal 10 year olds in a really beautiful environment that was supportive of our endeavors.The environment was the Stanford community. We grew up surrounded by smart people who were doing really interesting research and who, quite honestly, were changing the world in lots of ways. Lots of scientists, physicists, entrepreneurs. It was a wonderful way to grow up because everything felt very possible growing up on the Stanford campus in the seventies.Elah Feder: Susan grew up on the Stanford campus because her dad was a physics professor there, Stanley Wojcicki. Um, her mom—also very impressive—Esther Wojcicki, she's a journalist, educator, writer. She- she wrote a book called How to Raise Successful People, and I mean Esther Wojcicki has the cred to back this up. Uh, a couple of years ago, Mattel decided to honor women in STEM by making Barbies of some of the more notable figures. All three of her kids made the cut.Katie Hafner: Of course they did. Esther: mother of champions.Elah Feder: What you're hearing is a video of Susan, Janet and Anne Wojcicki all unboxing their Barbie likenesses.Janet Wojcicki: Let's do physics, mathematics. Let's show them what the childhood was really like!Elah Feder: You just heard Janet, she's the middle sister. Uh, she's a professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at UCSF.Then there's the youngest kid. Anne.Katie Hafner: Yes, Anne Wojcicki: the co-founder of 23andMe. Listeners might recognize her name from all the times we thank the Anne Wojcicki Foundation in the credits—and her foundation funded this episode as well, right?Elah Feder: And then there was Susan, the eldest. I talked to Anne and Janet a few weeks ago. All all three sisters were very close in age, all born in a span of, of just five years. But talking to them, it sounds like Susan had classic first child syndrome. You're gonna hear Anne first.Anne Wojcicki: She was always the responsible one. Janet was not. And- and but-Janet Wojckick: And you were halfway in between.Anne Wojcicki: I was halfway in between, yeah. My friends always liked hanging out with Susan, but they didn't like hanging out with Janet. And then part is that Susan was so kind. Susan was kind. She was responsible, like she would take us out to ice cream. She would pick me up from ice skating. She was like, always on time.Elah Feder: If Susan Wojcicki promised you ice cream, you were gonna get ice cream. This is a quality that surely you'd want in a leader. But Anne says Susan wasn't born to be a mogul or anything.Anne Wojcicki: I'd say Susan was very much almost like the accidental CEO. I never would've looked at her when we were younger and said like, “oh, my sister is going to be a CEO.” You know, like there's definitely other people I look at in high school who have focused on finance and thinking about their careers and stuff.Elah Feder: Susan, on the other hand, was a history and literature major, but in 1998 she got involved in the creation of a new tech company when she rented out her garage to two Guys: Larry Page and Sergey Brin. They were starting a new company, and I think you know the name. Um…Katie Hafner: Google, if I'm not mistaken!Elah Feder: Google!Newscaster: a little engine that could, we're talking about this morning, has nothing to do with the children's story about a brave little locomotive. That's because this engine is a search engine. Google by name, an internet website, partnered with our own CBS news.com.Elah Feder: Susan soon became the company's first marketing manager, and a few years after that she led them in buying another tech company: a company called YouTube. And in 2014 she was appointed YouTube CEO.Newscaster 2: Well, her name is Susan Wojcicki and she's one of the most powerful women in tech. She's also mother of four and more than eight months pregnant with her fifth child. So how did she do it all?Elah Feder: So, in 2022, Susan has been CEO of YouTube for eight years. Somehow she still had time to raise five children and run a few miles a day, which is completely alien to me.You know that Beyonce meme, like Beyonce has as many hours in the day as you do, and it's, like, meant to shame you for being inadequate. Um, that is how I feel hearing about Susan Wojcicki. Point is she's doing really well when she gets this news. And it's a complete shock. Here's Anne again.Anne Wojcicki: I think when you suddenly- like Susan was kind of on top of the world, like she loved her job, YouTube is taking off and she had her five kids and they're all amazing and um, and then suddenly it was like, your life is gonna be over soon. Right away the first priority was treatment.Elah Feder: Very quickly, Susan resigned from YouTube and really gave herself over to fighting this.Joanna Strober: What she really did was started working with scientists…Elah Feder: Joanna, again.Joanna Strober: …doing the in-depth work to understand the science and what treatments were available and what she could do, but it was very scientifically focused.Elah Feder: Susan would go on to learn a lot about lung cancer, and one of the things that she learned that really disturbed her is that doctors were not great at detecting her kind of cancer: lung cancer in non-smokers. Often there are no early signs, or in Susan's case, very few signs even when the cancer has progressed. Here's her sister, Janet.Janet Wojcicki: We went to see her, you know, thoracic oncologist, right? Her lung oncologist. She's sitting on the table and the oncologist is actually examining her and she's listening to her lungs and Susan's basically saying like, you don't hear anything, right? You, you hear nothing like it sounds totally normal, right? And the oncologist is like, yeah. So just from a clinical exam, she was perfect. There was nothing. So she was like, how is it that I have stage four lung cancer? You're an oncologist, you're listening to me, you're looking at me, and like, nothing's awry. So it's- it was that kind of disconnect that was also kind of a call to action.Elah Feder: How could Susan's lung cancer have gone undetected so long that it had spread? And why is it that when lung cancer is detected, survival rates aren't higher? Well, part of the reason might be that we need more funding despite some very effective anti-smoking campaigns, lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S., but it only gets about half the federal research funds that breast cancer does- or it did. The NIH has been slashing research funding, including cancer research. We'll see how this all shakes out in the coming months and years. In any case, lung cancer might not be the only cancer that's in trouble going forward. But historically, part of the reason that lung cancer got proportionately less funding might have to do with attitudes toward lung cancer. It just isn't viewed the same way that breast or prostate or pancreatic cancers are. It's often seen as something you bring on yourself. Here's Anne again.Anne Wojcicki: I think that the stigma has really hurt research- is that people look at it and they say like, oh, well you smoked. And um, and I think that's one of the things that Susan really wanted to change.Elah Feder: It took a long time to get this broad consensus that smoking causes lung cancer. If we go back to the forties and fifties, that's when you first see a bunch of studies coming out that demonstrate this link. And even so, if you asked a doctor in 1960, if the link had been proven, a fifth said they didn't think so. About half of them still smoked, but eventually the other side prevailed. We now have a consensus that smoking does cause lung cancer, but the downside is stigma.Katie Hafner: You know? And the stigma is really, really deeply embedded in our society. The minute you hear that somebody has been diagnosed with lung cancer, the very first thing you ask is, do they smoke? Have they smoked? Have you smoked? Has she smoked? And, so you immediately assign that stigma to the lung cancer even when it quickly gets established that there was no smoking. And that could also have an indirect effect on this lack of funding.Elah Feder: Yeah, that's the suspicion, and of course the stigma and the victim blaming is terrible for people who did smoke too. So, that really bothered Susan and she gave a lot of money for research, but she was also at the same time just investigating her own cancer. You know how, how did she get it?Anne Wojcicki: I think one of the first things we did was we got the houses tested for radon exposure.Elah Feder: Katie, do you know about radon? Are you familiar with radon?Katie Hafner: I mean, I'm familiar, but I have no idea what that has to do with it. Tell me.Elah Feder: I only recently learned about this, so, so radon is a radioactive gas. It- it sounds like one of these scary things you read on the internet, but this is real. It's a radioactive gas that naturally occurs in the ground, but it leaks into basements where it can accumulate to dangerous levels. It has no smell, no- no color. So you really would not know if it's in your home unless you test for it. Um, but it's the leading cause of lung cancer in non-smokers.Katie Hafner: You mean before secondhand smoke?Elah Feder: Apparently. In the U.S. radon is the number one cause of lung cancer among non-smokers according to the EPA.Other causes, of course, do include air pollution, asbestos exposure, and secondhand smoke.Katie Hafner: Wow. So, I've always thought secondhand smoke was it? But it sounds like it was, it sounds like it's radon.Elah Feder: Me too. Maybe it used to be when people were smoking more.Katie Hafner: Yeah.Elah Feder: But yeah, radon is unfortunately in the lead. Um, Susan's basement: clear of radon.Katie Hafner: And what about genetics? Last week, you know, we talked about a researcher named Maud Slye who worked to show that heredity explained all cancer.Elah Feder: Wrongly, but yes.Katie Hafner: Turns out not to be true, but that's okay. You go Maud. Um, are there genes linked to lung cancer? I guess that's my question.Elah Feder: There are, um, but lung cancer is still, for the most part, a disease caused by- by either your environment or your lifestyle. Some genes have been linked to increased cancer risk. For example, a certain mutation in the EGFR gene. More genes might be found. It's also possible that it's not just about finding a single gene, but about how mutations in a bunch of genes interact. But yeah, for the most part, lung cancer tends to be about environment and lifestyle more than genetics.Here's a part where there's sometimes confusion. Cancer usually happens when there's a genetic mutation in a cell, actually a series of mutations. And these cause that cell to start acting weird and replicating out of control. So in a sense, genetics is always involved in cancer, but in this case, we're not talking about inherited genetics, we're talking about mutations that you get in some of your cells later in life. They can pop up when you're 10 or 30 or 80 or hopefully never. But then, some people do have preexisting germline mutations. Some mutations that you have had since you were a little zygote that exist in every cell of your body. And, these don't usually directly cause cancer on their own. Um, I think an analogy might be helpful here. So, imagine a mutation as a switch. You usually need a few switches to turn on before a cell becomes cancerous. But some people are born with one of their switches already in the on position. And that makes them more vulnerable. Does that make sense?Katie Hafner: It makes sense. It, I mean, it makes me think about the BRCA gene.Elah Feder: Mm-hmm. Exactly.Katie Hafner: So you might be born with this mutation that puts you at high risk of getting breast cancer, but you might still not get it, but it still seems like a good idea to find out if you're at risk so that you can take some precautions and plan ahead.Elah Feder: Right. Although with lung cancer, genetic screening is tricky. Like I mentioned, heredity is not the driving factor usually for this kind of cancer. Um, but say- say you do find you have a heritable mutation that puts you at risk. You're limited in what you can do. It's not like BRCA where you might consider a double mastectomy. You're- you're gonna keep your lungs. You could take extra care to avoid environmental exposures—something we really should all do. You might even get regular low-dose CT scans—that’s actually something that is recommended for people who have smoked after a certain age to detect any lung cancer early, but those come with risks too: you’re getting a little bit of radiation each time. I’m not saying it's not worth it, it might be if you are very high risk, but it's a consideration. Anyway, that's for people who do not have lung cancer already, but are concerned about a genetic predisposition. For someone who does have lung cancer, yeah, you probably want to know what's going on in your tumor genetically.Katie Hafner: So what about Susan's case? Did she find a genetic cause for her lung cancer that could be really useful for her family to know?Elah Feder: No. Um, Susan did not actually test positive for any hereditary mutation linked to cancer, but there are still genes that may not have been identified. Even before her diagnosis, she and her husband were donating money for cancer research through their foundation. After her diagnosis, they ramped this up. Donating to research about immunotherapies, early detection. But, also funding a new project at her sister's Company 23andMe. It's called the Lung Cancer Genetic Study. So, they are trying to build a massive database of genetic information from people with lung cancer.One of the project's goals is to find heritable genetic risk factors, but they explain it's actually bigger than that. They want to know how heritable mutations, tumor mutations, and lifestyle all interact so that they might figure out, for example, why one person who smokes develops cancer, but another doesn't. It might also help them to develop new therapies. So-Katie Hafner: I just wanna interject with something that strikes me just as we're having this conversation, which is that, um, people who are listening to this probably know that 23andMe had a lot of problems, ended up filing for bankruptcy protection and Anne resigned earlier this year. Um, I'm sure that it's been very challenging for Anne, but it sounds like she is in her very best, um, Wojcicki family-like way: making lemonade out of lemons in this regard. That's my initial reaction to everything you're saying.Elah Feder: Yeah. And as you know, 23andMe—while it filed for bankruptcy—it lives on and created a nonprofit called the TTAM Research Institute. It bought 23andMe in July this year. And so, 23andMe is still going and so is this project. So far about 1200 patients have signed up and the goal is to reach 10,000.Anne Wojcicki: If you think about any one medical center, if it's UCSF or at Stanford or Harvard, getting a thousand patients coming in is- is a lot. And so, that's kind of the beauty of being able to go and find people around the entire country, is to be able to pull all that data together and then make that accessible to the research community.Elah Feder: 23andMe's Lung Cancer Genetics Study was officially announced in July last year. Susan Wojcicki died a few weeks later on August 9th, 2024. She was 56.Katie Hafner: So, Susan never did get an answer. She never found out why she had lung cancer.Elah Feder: No, she did not. And we're still trying to understand a lot about lung cancer in general. Here's Anne.Anne Wojcicki: There's still just like a lot you don't know. Understanding environmental science I think is really important. We live in a very complicated world with a lot of, you know, there's fires and there's pollution and there's what you eat and we just don't know. You don't know what the impact of all of that is, and so, you can't- I mean you can't live your life trying to measure everything and worry about everything. Like in some ways you have to come to terms with that, that you can't- you can't worry about it all the time.Elah Feder: This is a big part of life. It's understanding that so much of it is beyond our control, and we often don't even get answers. We don't find out why bad things happen to us. At the same time, when it comes to lung cancer, there is more that we can do. Here's Janet.Janet Wojcicki: I mean, if there are modifiable risk factors that we can identify—I mean the key word being modifiable, right? Then, ideally we could act on them.Elah Feder: We can fight air pollution, we can stop kids from getting their hands on cigarettes. We can look for more heritable risk factors and invest more money in treatments. As for Susan Wojcicki, despite all of her resources and all of her drive, ultimately she couldn't stop the cancer in her own body, but she left her mark in business in cancer research. She left a bigger mark than most of us ever will, but her sisters and her friend, Joanna- the thing that they really remember is how she never let any of that success go to her head.Anne Wojcicki: It didn't matter if we were like some fancy party or if Oprah wanted to talk to her. She was kind of the same. She was always very unaffected. And, it was, like, really fun going to the Oscars with her because she'd be like, “ah, I'm just gonna buy this dress on clearance at Macy's, and like no one cares what I wear.” And that was kind of the thing that was fun. She'd be like, “it would just be fun with you and like only going so that we can hang out.”Anne Wojcicki I always ride in my flats and my skirts. You're going to- are gonna YouTube? I’m actually really curious. Are you gonna meet YouTube- are you gonna meet Mr. Beast?Elah Feder: This episode of Lost Women of Science was produced by me, Elah Feder, and hosted by our co-executive producer Katie Hafner.Our senior managing producer is Deborah Unger. We had fact-checking help from Danya AbdelHameid. Lily Whear made the episode art. Thanks as always. To our co-executive producer, Amy Scharf, Eowyn Burtner, our program manager, and Jeff DelViscio at our publishing partner, Scientific American. This episode was made with funding from the Anne Wojcicki Foundation.You can find a transcript and a link to the Lung Cancer Genetics Study at www.lostwomenofscience.org.HostKatie HafnerHost and Senior ProducerElah FederGuestsAnne Wojcicki Anne is Susan Wojcicki’s youngest sister and the co-founder of 23andMe.Janet WojcickiJanet is the middle Wojcicki sister. She’s a professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).Joanna StroberJoanna is the co-founder of Midi Health and a long-time friend of Susan Wojcicki.Further Reading“From Susan” — Susan Wojcicki’s final post, written a few weeks before she died and published on YouTube’s blog on Nov. 25, 2024.How to Raise Successful People. Esther Wojcicki, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2019The Lung Cancer Genetics Study“Does Lung Cancer Attract Greater Stigma Than Other Cancer Types?” by Laura A. V. Marlow et al., in Lung Cancer, Vol. 88, No. 1; April 2015

The conservative parties can change their leaders – but it won’t stop the NSW Coalition’s death spiral | Anne Davies

The Nationals have a new leader in Gurmesh Singh and Kellie Sloane could soon replace Liberal leader Mark Speakman. But the Coalition is fractured on net zeroThe NSW Nationals have a new leader, Gurmesh Singh, and the Liberals will almost certainly follow suit by early next week.It’s desperation politics. Changing leaders will likely do nothing to stop the apparent death spiral the conservative side of politics has inflicted upon itself – in Canberra and now the states. Continue reading...

The NSW Nationals have a new leader, Gurmesh Singh, and the Liberals will almost certainly follow suit by early next week.It’s desperation politics. Changing leaders will likely do nothing to stop the apparent death spiral the conservative side of politics has inflicted upon itself – in Canberra and now the states.If they needed evidence of what the electorate was thinking, it was shouting at them from internal YouGov research presented to the NSW Liberal party room on Tuesday. The party’s MPs and MLCs were considering whether to dump net zero as their federal counterparts did on the weekend.YouGov found only one-third of Australians would now seriously consider voting for the Coalition, the party room was told.It found 26% of Australians who are former Coalition voters won’t seriously consider the Coalition in the future. That’s approximately 5 million voters the Coalition needs to persuade to consider them again, the pollsters said.“Only one in five (21%) of former Coalition voters see the Coalition as being in touch with modern Australia. Only one in four (25%) see them as aligned with their values,” the YouGov report stated.One in two (52%) of former Coalition voters said they would only consider a party ready to govern if it had credible policies to address climate change and its impacts.Without a coherent position on the most pressing problem of our generation – how to slow climate change – voters, in particular younger cohorts, have fled in droves. They are unable to take seriously a political party that ignores the overwhelming scientific consensus and the economics of renewables.The federal Liberals have chosen to dump any semblance of a coherent plan.The NSW Liberals, however, voted on Tuesday to retain a net zero emissions by 2050 target. They are sticking with the bipartisan energy transition roadmap devised by the state Coalition when in government.But how does that work when their federal counterparts are talking up new coal-fired power stations and their junior state partner has abandoned the net zero target?Singh, the NSW National’s newly minted leader, hopes a compromise might be reached – though it takes a vivid imagination to see it working.As the first Indian-Australian to leader a major party, he’s a break from the white male graziers that the NSW National party usually chooses.Singh has a degree in industrial design, has worked in advertising and was previously a big wheel in the blueberry and macadamia industries. He formerly chaired Oz Group Co-op – the major marketing co-operative in the Coffs region.His family is still a major player in the Coffs Harbour blueberry industry, an industry that has divided the local community over rapid rapid expansion, use of pesticides, environmental standards and use of contract labour.Singh is acutely aware that on the north coast, his own and other seats face an existential political threat from the progressive side of politics, in the form of the Greens and teals, who have made action on climate change central to their platforms.The Greens already hold the state seat of Ballina, just north of Singh’s seat. In the 2025 federal election, teal candidate Caz Heize slashed the National’s margin in the seat of Cowper (which includes Coffs Harbour) to 0.14% on a two-party preferred basis.Singh is no Barnaby Joyce or Matt Canavan, dinosaurs of the National party whose mission includes returning Australia to a coal-fired past. But he is of the same party.Asked at his first press conference how he would reconcile the Nationals’ position with that of the Liberals in NSW, Singh highlighted the cost of power, the plight of pensioners in the regions who can’t afford hot showers, and suggested a better-managed rollout was required. He didn’t diss renewables per se.Meanwhile, the Liberals’ leadership drama is still to unfold, probably on Thursday, or possibly early next week.Moderate Kellie Sloane, a former journalist who has been an MP for less than three years, appears to be the frontrunner to replace Mark Speakman.However, Alister Heskens, from the right faction and the manager of opposition business, is also canvassing the numbers.The difficulty for Sloane will be her lack of history in the party and her inexperience in government. Heskens’ challenge is his low profile and convincing colleagues he offers an improvement on Speakman. He is likely to relish attacking Labor more than Speakman does.The NSW Liberals have, at least, heeded the YouGov polling on attitudes to climate change and have not been infected by the nonsense pedalled by Advance and other climate-denying figures on the right.The party issued a statement on Tuesday that it remained “committed to a target of net zero by 2050”.“It’s been our target since 2016. It’s a target to be achieved alongside a focus on energy reliability, affordability, and industrial competitiveness.”

Federal Cash for Lead Pipe Replacement Isn’t Making It to Illinois Communities

This story, a partnership between Grist, Inside Climate News, and Chicago-area public radio station WBEZ, is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Lead pipes are ubiquitous. At this point, no state has gotten rid of all of its toxic lead service lines, which pipe drinking water to homes and businesses. But some cities like Chicago, New York […]

This story, a partnership between Grist, Inside Climate News, and Chicago-area public radio station WBEZ, is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Lead pipes are ubiquitous. At this point, no state has gotten rid of all of its toxic lead service lines, which pipe drinking water to homes and businesses. But some cities like Chicago, New York City, and Detroit have more lead plumbing than others, and replacing it can cost tens of thousands of dollars. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Biden-era infrastructure law, promised $15 billion for lead pipe replacements across the country to be disbursed over five years.  But in a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency sent earlier this week, a group of Illinois congressional delegates allege that $3 billion appropriated for lead pipe replacements nationwide for the fiscal year that ended in September has not reached communities yet. They warn that the delay is a “dangerous politicization” that puts children and families at risk. “It feels like it’s targeting blue states or blue cities that might require more of this mitigation.” “Federal resources are not partisan tools—they are vital lifelines intended to serve all Americans,” the letter notes. “Using federal funds as leverage against communities based on political considerations represents a dangerous abuse of power that undermines public trust and puts lives at risk.”  The move comes as communities in Illinois, which is among the top five states with the most lead service lines, and across the country are grappling with the overwhelming cost of removing the hazardous metal piping from water systems. The Trump administration has already withheld congressionally appropriated funding for infrastructure and energy projects from Democrat-led states like New York, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, and Massachusetts. Now, lawmakers fear money for lead pipes is stuck in Washington too.  “I think that they’re playing games,” said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, one of the lawmakers who led the effort to send the letter. “It feels like it’s targeting blue states or blue cities that might require more of this mitigation than other parts of the country.”  Lead is toxic and dangerous to human health. Lead plumbing can flake and dissolve into drinking water, which can lead to brain damage, cardiovascular problems, and reproductive issues. The EPA advises that there is no safe level of lead exposure. A spokesperson for the federal agency said it is “actively working” on allotments for lead service line replacements. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for disbursing the federal funds to local governments, did not respond to a request for comment. The Chicago Department of Water Management said it received $14 million from the Illinois EPA for the 2025 financial year and was approved for $28 million for the next fiscal year.   “The estimated replacement cost for the Chicago region alone is $12 billion or more, and statewide, it could be $14 billion,” Krishnamoorthi said. “Whatever amounts would come to Chicago would not be enough to do the entire job, but the federal component is vital to get the ball rolling.” Chicago has more than 412,000 lead service lines, the most of any city in the country. So far, the city has replaced roughly 14,000 lead pipes at a cost of $400 million over the past five years. That’s due in part to the high cost of replacing lead pipes. In Chicago, a single lead pipe replacement can cost on average $35,000. Federal rules require that Chicago replace all its pipes by 2047, but city officials have cited concerns over the unfunded federal mandate.  “This is impacting people’s health,” said Chakena Sims, a senior policy advocate with Natural Resources Defense Council. “The federal government politicizing access to safe drinking water is an all-time low,” she added. “It’s encouraging to see our Illinois congressional leaders stand up for communities.”  

Best Leaders 2025: John Palfrey

From finding MacArthur ‘geniuses’ to funding transformative change

John Palfrey is used to thinking about the biggest issues confronting society and what we should all do about them. And in these turbulent times, Palfrey, the president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, has reaffirmed his and the foundation's commitment to supporting democracy, creativity, learning and diversity.“I have a relentlessly positive nature, and I do, for better and for worse, often see what is possible and then have the temerity to think we can go get it,” Palfrey said in an interview with U.S. News & World Report. “I think that form of optimism is very helpful, particularly on the darkest of days.”With $9.2 billion in assets, the MacArthur Foundation is one of the nation’s largest philanthropic organizations. In 2024 alone, the foundation paid out more than $350 million in grants. This year, the foundation announced it would increase its grants for 2025 and 2026 because of the federal government’s cuts to funding – which could be devastating for the arts, environmental protection, public safety and more.Meet America's Best LeadersU.S. News & World Report selected its 2025 Best Leaders in public service, business, healthcare and education.See the Top 25 of '25The foundation makes “Big Bets,” investing in initiatives intended to bring about transformative change. For example, in October, the foundation announced it would participate in Humanity AI, an initiative to help ensure that artificial intelligence is a positive tool for society, funding efforts to safeguard democracy from negative effects of the new technology and to protect artists and other creators from theft of their intellectual property.MacArthur also makes “enduring commitments” to invest in journalism that promotes inclusive news narratives and supports a healthy democracy, and it funds initiatives in Chicago, where it is headquartered, to support racial equity and a more inclusive community.It’s perhaps most famous for the MacArthur Fellowships – referred to as “genius grants” – which award 20 to 30 extraordinary creative people in various fields with $800,000 each over a five-year period.Palfrey, 53, likens the foundation to “sort of a nonprofit venture capital” fund.“We prize creativity and effectiveness. And so we are constantly looking for people and institutions and networks that are creative and have new ideas and different ways of approaching topics,” he says.As an educator and acclaimed legal scholar who previously worked at Harvard University and Phillips Academy, Andover, Palfrey has studied some of the most complex challenges facing a democratic society – such as education’s need to respect both free speech and diversity and the influence of technology on society. He understands the fraught nature of these issues and has written seven books, such as “Safe Spaces, Brave Spaces,” to address them head-on.But Palfrey did not anticipate the recent need to advocate for American democracy itself.“The First Amendment, our freedom of expression, the freedom of the press, the freedom to give, the freedom to invest,” he says. “These are 250-year-old American traditions that are unbroken.” And all of a sudden, he says, “they need advocates in a way that they haven’t before.”In addition to the foundation’s ongoing support of the independent press, Palfrey has spearheaded the creation of Press Forward, a new initiative supported by several foundations to rebuild local news.He’s also been touring the country to speak on the importance of democracy and the First Amendment as well as continuing that dialogue in essays and social media.Watching other institutions, such as universities, agree to substantial changes in policy in light of federal government demands, Palfrey thought of historian Timothy Snyder’s first rule for resisting tyranny: “Do not obey in advance.” So, in April 2025, Palfrey and colleagues at other foundations decided to “unite in advance,” issuing a statement that they must have the freedom to give to the causes they believe in. More than 700 foundations from across the ideological spectrum have since signed on.

‘They’re playing games’: Illinois lawmakers press Trump administration over stalled lead-pipe funding

Congress appropriated $15 billion to replace lead pipes across the country. Is the Trump administration withholding it?

Lead pipes are ubiquitous. At this point, no state has gotten rid of all of its toxic lead service lines, which pipe drinking water to homes and businesses. But some cities like Chicago, New York City, and Detroit, have more lead plumbing than others, and replacing it can cost tens of thousands of dollars. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Biden-era infrastructure law, promised $15 billion for lead pipe replacements across the country to be disbursed over five years.  But in a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency sent earlier this week, a group of Illinois congressional delegates allege that $3 billion appropriated for lead pipe replacements nationwide for the fiscal year that ended in September has not reached communities yet. They warn that the delay is a “dangerous politicization” that puts children and families at risk. “Federal resources are not partisan tools — they are vital lifelines intended to serve all Americans,” the letter notes. “Using federal funds as leverage against communities based on political considerations represents a dangerous abuse of power that undermines public trust and puts lives at risk.”  The move comes as communities in Illinois, which is among the top five states with the most lead service lines, and across the country are grappling with the overwhelming cost of removing the hazardous metal piping from water systems. The Trump administration has already withheld congressionally appropriated funding for infrastructure and energy projects from Democrat-led states like New York, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, and Massachusetts. Now, lawmakers fear money for lead pipes is stuck in Washington too.  “I think that they’re playing games,” said Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, one of the lawmakers who led the effort to send the letter. “It feels like it’s targeting blue states or blue cities that might require more of this mitigation than other parts of the country.”  Lead is toxic and dangerous to human health. Lead plumbing can flake and dissolve into drinking water, which can lead to brain damage, cardiovascular problems, and reproductive issues. The EPA advises that there is no safe level of lead exposure. A spokesperson for the federal agency said it is “actively working” on allotments for lead service line replacements. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for disbursing the federal funds to local governments, did not respond to a request for comment. The Chicago Department of Water Management said it received $14 million from the Illinois EPA for the 2025 financial year and was approved for $28 million for the next fiscal year.   “The estimated replacement cost for the Chicago region alone is $12 billion or more, and statewide, it could be $14 billion,” Krishnamoorthi said. “Whatever amounts would come to Chicago would not be enough to do the entire job, but the federal component is vital to get the ball rolling.” Chicago has more than 412,000 lead service lines, the most of any city in the country. So far, the city has replaced roughly 14,000 lead pipes at a cost of $400 million over the past five years. That’s due in part to the high cost of replacing lead pipes. In Chicago, a single lead pipe replacement can cost on average $35,000. Federal rules require that Chicago replace all its pipes by 2047, but city officials have cited concerns over the unfunded federal mandate.  “This is impacting people’s health,” said Chakena Sims, a senior policy advocate with Natural Resources Defense Council. “The federal government politicizing access to safe drinking water is an all-time low,” she added. “It’s encouraging to see our Illinois congressional leaders stand up for communities.”   This story was originally published by Grist with the headline ‘They’re playing games’: Illinois lawmakers press Trump administration over stalled lead-pipe funding on Nov 13, 2025.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.