Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Durrell Kinsey Bey: Portland mayor’s race

News Feed
Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Name: Durrell Kinsey BeyNeighborhood: CentennialRenter/homeowner: HomeownerEducation: Peer support specialist, ASIST training & adept degree of The Moorish Science Temple of AmericaOccupation: Youth advocate & youth essentials coordinator at REAP Inc., director of development of KwaSha Enterprise LLC, co-founder of The BIPOC Rise Moor Healing Center, national prison outreach ambassador of The Moorish Science Temple of AmericaHow long you’ve lived in the city of Portland: Since Jan. 1, 2021Age: 30Pronouns: He/HimPortland is facing an historic election involving a new voting system and an unusually high number of candidates. Journalists at The Oregonian/OregonLive and Oregon PublicBroadcasting share a goal of ensuring that Portland voters have the information they need to make informed choices, and we also know candidates’ time is valuable and limited.That’s why the two news organizations teamed up this cycle to solicit Portland mayoral candidates’ perspectives on the big issues in this election. Here’s what they had to say:For each of the following questions, we asked candidates to limit their answers to 150 words.Why are you the best candidate to serve as mayor at this time? Please point to specific accomplishments as part of your answer.I’m actively leading four exciting initiatives in our city, focusing on youth advocacy from third graders to college-bound seniors. As a Moorish American Agrarian Moslem, I’m deeply committed to food sovereignty and have been involved in Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) programs since arriving in the City of Roses. In response to the COVID-19 impact, housing crisis and business closures, my campaign team now offers growth capital and various forms of funding to qualifying restaurant owners and other businesses.What are one or two issues that you’d like to draw attention to or champion as mayor that are overlooked or receiving less attention than they deserve?While many issues need attention, tackling homelessness through urban farming is a promising approach to lowering citywide food costs. By integrating urban farming, we can provide fresh, affordable produce and create jobs, which can help alleviate homelessness. Additionally, with anticipated increases in energy rates, expanding the Poop-to-Power Project and improving the (Critical Energy Infrastructure) hub will offer clean, renewable energy. This initiative will enhance environmental safety and sustainability, addressing both energy and waste management challenges.What specific examples do you have that demonstrate your competence to oversee a city with an $8.2 billion budget?At the Department of Energy’s nuclear vitrification plant, working alongside laborers, iron workers, pipefitters, steamfitters, painters, teamsters, electricians, and engineers, I learned the importance of building rapport and trust to ensure safety and adhere to OSHA and federal standards. Currently, in the David Douglas School District, I am dedicated to fostering strong relationships with colleagues at REAP Inc., students, parents, school administrators and district board members. This role enhances my ability to build a sincere, expert team and promote effective collaboration and camaraderie.What are your biggest concerns, if any, about the new form of government? What role do you think the mayor should play in it?While skepticism is natural, we have a unique opportunity to demonstrate that Portland’s challenges are temporary. We need a mayor who is a true leader and visionary, committed to the well-being of all Portlanders — from the homeless and students to veterans, the elderly and marginalized communities. The mayor should not display any form of performative activism but act with strong principles, high moral standards, and innovative thinking.How would you work to promote and boost Portland nationally as mayor and reinvigorate people’s sense of civic pride?My campaign aims to make Portland internationally relevant by leveraging my strong national relationships to bring economic and cultural empowerment to the city. Partnering with Bey Group of Companies, InKind Capital and National Business Capital, we will secure significant funding for small businesses. I will advocate for reintroducing civic-based curriculum in schools and work with all 95 neighborhood associations to strengthen community involvement. By uplifting neighborhood association administrations, we can enhance collaboration with the Office of Civic Life and Portland Street Response, giving the community a greater voice in public safety.Mayor Ted Wheeler has already warned that next year’s budget will be a difficult one as costs rise and forecasts call for lower revenue. What would guide your decisions in developing a budget, what specific ideas would you explore to minimize service reductions and are there specific areas where you would look to make cuts?I believe that “it’s not the possession of things but knowing how to use them” — emphasizing intent versus impact. As mayor, my goal is to lower costs for Portlanders by leveraging our resources effectively. Within the first week in office, I will assess our strengths and weaknesses to create strategic pathways for economic relief. Collaboration with nonprofits that share our vision is crucial to this process. By aligning efforts with these organizations, we can enhance our impact and address community needs more effectively.How can the city of Portland and Multnomah County improve their existing partnership to more effectively address the homelessness, addiction and behavioral health crises?As a community member collaborator with Multnomah County’s community justice department, I demonstrate the power of building effective relationships through humility and collaboration. To improve our partnership and address homelessness, addiction, and behavioral health crises, we must prioritize collective action over personal agendas. By setting aside egos and focusing on shared goals, we can tackle these pressing issues more effectively. With thousands of lives at stake, it’s crucial that we move beyond superficial efforts and implement comprehensive, coordinated strategies to address the dire conditions faced by many Portlanders.If elected, you will oversee the police chief. What is your opinion of police bureau priorities and operations and what changes, if any, would you make? Would you push for the city to fund hundreds more police officers than the City Council has already authorized? If yes, where would you find the money?As one of the youngest mayors since 1973, I will prioritize open communication with the Police Bureau and all community members, from District 1 to District 4, and work closely with neighborhood associations to enhance public safety. My approach will focus on fostering collaboration between Portland Street Response and the Portland Police Bureau without increasing police presence. Instead, I will strengthen efforts against bank fraud, identity theft, drug trafficking and human trafficking by coordinating with the National Guard, state police, sheriff’s department and FBI. Additionally, I will support and expand Neighborhood Emergency Teams (NET) to boost community resilience and safety.For the five remaining questions, we asked candidates to answer in 50 words or fewer:Do you favor arresting and jailing people who camp on public property in Portland who have refused repeated offers of shelter, such as the option to sleep in a city-designated tiny home cluster?Emphatically, no. My ancestors endured too much for me to replicate the injustices from chattel slavery to the war on drugs initiated by the Reagan Administration. Such measures have proven ineffective and unjust.Have the problems impacting downtown Portland received too much or too little attention among current city leaders? Are there other specific neighborhoods in the city that have not received enough attention?Of course, the issue has become conflated. East Portland has been neglected for over 30 years, and now, with increased attention due to the presence of more businesses downtown, the disparity is more apparent.Do you support the decision to use millions from the Portland Clean Energy Fund to backfill budget holes in various city bureaus? Would you seek to continue, expand or halt that practice?The Portland Clean Energy Fund is poised to be a national top-tier program. In my opinion, its funds should be dedicated exclusively to program operations and community leadership development.Do you support a potential change to the region’s homeless services tax that would direct some of the program’s unanticipated revenue to construct more affordable housing? Why or why not?Yes, I support this. To address housing affordability, we need to revise zoning laws and incorporate infill development with sustainable practices to enhance our approach to affordable housing.Describe the qualities and experience you will seek in a city administrator. Describe the working relationship you plan to build with the top administrator and their half dozen deputies.The city administrator must avoid performative activism and uphold high moral standards, remaining uncompromised. A strong, trustworthy relationship is crucial for the success of our term in office.

Read the candidate’s responses to questions about homelessness, police accountability, Portland’s budget and taxes.

Name: Durrell Kinsey Bey

Neighborhood: Centennial

Renter/homeowner: Homeowner

Education: Peer support specialist, ASIST training & adept degree of The Moorish Science Temple of America

Occupation: Youth advocate & youth essentials coordinator at REAP Inc., director of development of KwaSha Enterprise LLC, co-founder of The BIPOC Rise Moor Healing Center, national prison outreach ambassador of The Moorish Science Temple of America

How long you’ve lived in the city of Portland: Since Jan. 1, 2021

Age: 30

Pronouns: He/Him

Portland is facing an historic election involving a new voting system and an unusually high number of candidates. Journalists at The Oregonian/OregonLive and Oregon PublicBroadcasting share a goal of ensuring that Portland voters have the information they need to make informed choices, and we also know candidates’ time is valuable and limited.

That’s why the two news organizations teamed up this cycle to solicit Portland mayoral candidates’ perspectives on the big issues in this election. Here’s what they had to say:

For each of the following questions, we asked candidates to limit their answers to 150 words.

Why are you the best candidate to serve as mayor at this time? Please point to specific accomplishments as part of your answer.

I’m actively leading four exciting initiatives in our city, focusing on youth advocacy from third graders to college-bound seniors. As a Moorish American Agrarian Moslem, I’m deeply committed to food sovereignty and have been involved in Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) programs since arriving in the City of Roses. In response to the COVID-19 impact, housing crisis and business closures, my campaign team now offers growth capital and various forms of funding to qualifying restaurant owners and other businesses.

What are one or two issues that you’d like to draw attention to or champion as mayor that are overlooked or receiving less attention than they deserve?

While many issues need attention, tackling homelessness through urban farming is a promising approach to lowering citywide food costs. By integrating urban farming, we can provide fresh, affordable produce and create jobs, which can help alleviate homelessness. Additionally, with anticipated increases in energy rates, expanding the Poop-to-Power Project and improving the (Critical Energy Infrastructure) hub will offer clean, renewable energy. This initiative will enhance environmental safety and sustainability, addressing both energy and waste management challenges.

What specific examples do you have that demonstrate your competence to oversee a city with an $8.2 billion budget?

At the Department of Energy’s nuclear vitrification plant, working alongside laborers, iron workers, pipefitters, steamfitters, painters, teamsters, electricians, and engineers, I learned the importance of building rapport and trust to ensure safety and adhere to OSHA and federal standards. Currently, in the David Douglas School District, I am dedicated to fostering strong relationships with colleagues at REAP Inc., students, parents, school administrators and district board members. This role enhances my ability to build a sincere, expert team and promote effective collaboration and camaraderie.

What are your biggest concerns, if any, about the new form of government? What role do you think the mayor should play in it?

While skepticism is natural, we have a unique opportunity to demonstrate that Portland’s challenges are temporary. We need a mayor who is a true leader and visionary, committed to the well-being of all Portlanders — from the homeless and students to veterans, the elderly and marginalized communities. The mayor should not display any form of performative activism but act with strong principles, high moral standards, and innovative thinking.

How would you work to promote and boost Portland nationally as mayor and reinvigorate people’s sense of civic pride?

My campaign aims to make Portland internationally relevant by leveraging my strong national relationships to bring economic and cultural empowerment to the city. Partnering with Bey Group of Companies, InKind Capital and National Business Capital, we will secure significant funding for small businesses. I will advocate for reintroducing civic-based curriculum in schools and work with all 95 neighborhood associations to strengthen community involvement. By uplifting neighborhood association administrations, we can enhance collaboration with the Office of Civic Life and Portland Street Response, giving the community a greater voice in public safety.

Mayor Ted Wheeler has already warned that next year’s budget will be a difficult one as costs rise and forecasts call for lower revenue. What would guide your decisions in developing a budget, what specific ideas would you explore to minimize service reductions and are there specific areas where you would look to make cuts?

I believe that “it’s not the possession of things but knowing how to use them” — emphasizing intent versus impact. As mayor, my goal is to lower costs for Portlanders by leveraging our resources effectively. Within the first week in office, I will assess our strengths and weaknesses to create strategic pathways for economic relief. Collaboration with nonprofits that share our vision is crucial to this process. By aligning efforts with these organizations, we can enhance our impact and address community needs more effectively.

How can the city of Portland and Multnomah County improve their existing partnership to more effectively address the homelessness, addiction and behavioral health crises?

As a community member collaborator with Multnomah County’s community justice department, I demonstrate the power of building effective relationships through humility and collaboration. To improve our partnership and address homelessness, addiction, and behavioral health crises, we must prioritize collective action over personal agendas. By setting aside egos and focusing on shared goals, we can tackle these pressing issues more effectively. With thousands of lives at stake, it’s crucial that we move beyond superficial efforts and implement comprehensive, coordinated strategies to address the dire conditions faced by many Portlanders.

If elected, you will oversee the police chief. What is your opinion of police bureau priorities and operations and what changes, if any, would you make? Would you push for the city to fund hundreds more police officers than the City Council has already authorized? If yes, where would you find the money?

As one of the youngest mayors since 1973, I will prioritize open communication with the Police Bureau and all community members, from District 1 to District 4, and work closely with neighborhood associations to enhance public safety. My approach will focus on fostering collaboration between Portland Street Response and the Portland Police Bureau without increasing police presence. Instead, I will strengthen efforts against bank fraud, identity theft, drug trafficking and human trafficking by coordinating with the National Guard, state police, sheriff’s department and FBI. Additionally, I will support and expand Neighborhood Emergency Teams (NET) to boost community resilience and safety.

For the five remaining questions, we asked candidates to answer in 50 words or fewer:

Do you favor arresting and jailing people who camp on public property in Portland who have refused repeated offers of shelter, such as the option to sleep in a city-designated tiny home cluster?

Emphatically, no. My ancestors endured too much for me to replicate the injustices from chattel slavery to the war on drugs initiated by the Reagan Administration. Such measures have proven ineffective and unjust.

Have the problems impacting downtown Portland received too much or too little attention among current city leaders? Are there other specific neighborhoods in the city that have not received enough attention?

Of course, the issue has become conflated. East Portland has been neglected for over 30 years, and now, with increased attention due to the presence of more businesses downtown, the disparity is more apparent.

Do you support the decision to use millions from the Portland Clean Energy Fund to backfill budget holes in various city bureaus? Would you seek to continue, expand or halt that practice?

The Portland Clean Energy Fund is poised to be a national top-tier program. In my opinion, its funds should be dedicated exclusively to program operations and community leadership development.

Do you support a potential change to the region’s homeless services tax that would direct some of the program’s unanticipated revenue to construct more affordable housing? Why or why not?

Yes, I support this. To address housing affordability, we need to revise zoning laws and incorporate infill development with sustainable practices to enhance our approach to affordable housing.

Describe the qualities and experience you will seek in a city administrator. Describe the working relationship you plan to build with the top administrator and their half dozen deputies.

The city administrator must avoid performative activism and uphold high moral standards, remaining uncompromised. A strong, trustworthy relationship is crucial for the success of our term in office.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Measles Misinformation Is on the Rise – and Americans Are Hearing It, Survey Finds

Republicans are far more skeptical of vaccines and twice as likely as Democrats to believe the measles shot is worse than the disease.

By Arthur Allen | KFF Health NewsWhile the most serious measles epidemic in a decade has led to the deaths of two children and spread to nearly 30 states with no signs of letting up, beliefs about the safety of the measles vaccine and the threat of the disease are sharply polarized, fed by the anti-vaccine views of the country’s seniormost health official.About two-thirds of Republican-leaning parents are unaware of an uptick in measles cases this year while about two-thirds of Democratic ones knew about it, according to a KFF survey released Wednesday.Republicans are far more skeptical of vaccines and twice as likely (1 in 5) as Democrats (1 in 10) to believe the measles shot is worse than the disease, according to the survey of 1,380 U.S. adults.Some 35% of Republicans answering the survey, which was conducted April 8-15 online and by telephone, said the discredited theory linking the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism was definitely or probably true – compared with just 10% of Democrats.Get Midday Must-Reads in Your InboxFive essential stories, expertly curated, to keep you informed on your lunch break.Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.The trends are roughly the same as KFF reported in a June 2023 survey. But in the new poll, 3 in 10 parents erroneously believed that vitamin A can prevent measles infections, a theory Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has brought into play since taking office during the measles outbreak.“The most alarming thing about the survey is that we’re seeing an uptick in the share of people who have heard these claims,” said co-author Ashley Kirzinger, associate director of KFF’s Public Opinion and Survey Research Program. KFF is a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.“It’s not that more people are believing the autism theory, but more and more people are hearing about it,” Kirzinger said. Since doubts about vaccine safety directly reduce parents’ vaccination of their children, “that shows how important it is for actual information to be part of the media landscape,” she said.“This is what one would expect when people are confused by conflicting messages coming from people in positions of authority,” said Kelly Moore, president and CEO of Immunize.org, a vaccination advocacy group.Numerous scientific studies have established no link between any vaccine and autism. But Kennedy has ordered HHS to undertake an investigation of possible environmental contributors to autism, promising to have “some of the answers” behind an increase in the incidence of the condition by September.The deepening Republican skepticism toward vaccines makes it hard for accurate information to break through in many parts of the nation, said Rekha Lakshmanan, chief strategy officer at The Immunization Partnership, in Houston.Lakshmanan on April 23 was to present a paper on countering anti-vaccine activism to the World Vaccine Congress in Washington. It was based on a survey that found that in the Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma state assemblies, lawmakers with medical professions were among those least likely to support public health measures.“There is a political layer that influences these lawmakers,” she said. When lawmakers invite vaccine opponents to testify at legislative hearings, for example, it feeds a deluge of misinformation that is difficult to counter, she said.Eric Ball, a pediatrician in Ladera Ranch, California, which was hit by a 2014-15 measles outbreak that started in Disneyland, said fear of measles and tighter California state restrictions on vaccine exemptions had staved off new infections in his Orange County community.“The biggest downside of measles vaccines is that they work really well. Everyone gets vaccinated, no one gets measles, everyone forgets about measles,” he said. “But when it comes back, they realize there are kids getting really sick and potentially dying in my community, and everyone says, ‘Holy crap; we better vaccinate!’”Ball treated three very sick children with measles in 2015. Afterward his practice stopped seeing unvaccinated patients. “We had had babies exposed in our waiting room,” he said. “We had disease spreading in our office, which was not cool.”Although two otherwise healthy young girls died of measles during the Texas outbreak, “people still aren’t scared of the disease,” said Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, which has seen a few cases.But the deaths “have created more angst, based on the number of calls I’m getting from parents trying to vaccinate their 4-month-old and 6-month-old babies,” Offit said. Children generally get their first measles shot at age 1, because it tends not to produce full immunity if given at a younger age.KFF Health News’ Jackie Fortiér contributed to this report.This article was produced by KFF Health News, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF. It was originally published on April 23, 2025, and has been republished with permission.

Evangelical churches in Indiana turn to solar and sustainability as an expression of faith

A growing number of evangelical churches and universities in Indiana are embracing renewable energy and environmental stewardship as a religious duty, reframing climate action through a spiritual lens.Catrin Einhorn reports for The New York TimesIn short:Churches across Indiana, including Christ’s Community Church and Grace Church, are installing solar panels, planting native gardens, and hosting events like Indy Creation Fest to promote environmental stewardship.Evangelical leaders say their work aligns with a biblical call to care for creation, distancing it from politicized language around climate change to appeal to more conservative congregations.Christian universities such as Indiana Wesleyan and Taylor are integrating environmental science into academics and campus life, fostering student-led sustainability efforts rooted in faith.Key quote:“It’s a quiet movement.”— Rev. Jeremy Summers, director of church and community engagement for the Evangelical Environmental NetworkWhy this matters:The intersection of faith and environmental action challenges longstanding cultural divides in the climate conversation. Evangelical communities — historically less engaged on climate issues — hold substantial political and social influence, particularly across the Midwest and South. Framing sustainability as a religious obligation sidesteps partisan divides and invites wider participation. These faith-led movements can help shift attitudes in rural and suburban America, where skepticism of climate science and federal intervention runs high. And as the environmental impacts of fossil fuel dependence grow — heatwaves, water scarcity, air pollution— the health and well-being of families in these communities are increasingly at stake. Read more: Christian climate activists aim to bridge faith and environmental actionPope Francis, who used faith and science to call out the climate crisis, dies at 88

A growing number of evangelical churches and universities in Indiana are embracing renewable energy and environmental stewardship as a religious duty, reframing climate action through a spiritual lens.Catrin Einhorn reports for The New York TimesIn short:Churches across Indiana, including Christ’s Community Church and Grace Church, are installing solar panels, planting native gardens, and hosting events like Indy Creation Fest to promote environmental stewardship.Evangelical leaders say their work aligns with a biblical call to care for creation, distancing it from politicized language around climate change to appeal to more conservative congregations.Christian universities such as Indiana Wesleyan and Taylor are integrating environmental science into academics and campus life, fostering student-led sustainability efforts rooted in faith.Key quote:“It’s a quiet movement.”— Rev. Jeremy Summers, director of church and community engagement for the Evangelical Environmental NetworkWhy this matters:The intersection of faith and environmental action challenges longstanding cultural divides in the climate conversation. Evangelical communities — historically less engaged on climate issues — hold substantial political and social influence, particularly across the Midwest and South. Framing sustainability as a religious obligation sidesteps partisan divides and invites wider participation. These faith-led movements can help shift attitudes in rural and suburban America, where skepticism of climate science and federal intervention runs high. And as the environmental impacts of fossil fuel dependence grow — heatwaves, water scarcity, air pollution— the health and well-being of families in these communities are increasingly at stake. Read more: Christian climate activists aim to bridge faith and environmental actionPope Francis, who used faith and science to call out the climate crisis, dies at 88

Will the next pope be liberal or conservative? Neither.

If there’s one succinct way to describe Pope Francis’s stewardship of the Catholic Church over the last 12 years, it might best be  done with three of his own words: “todos, todos, todos” — “everyone, everyone, everyone.” Francis, who died Monday morning in Vatican City, was both a reformer and a traditionalist. He didn’t change […]

Pope Francis meets students at Portugal’s Catholic University on August 3, 2023, in Lisbon for World Youth Day, an international Catholic rally inaugurated by St. John Paul II to invigorate young people in their faith. | Vatican Media via Vatican Pool/Getty Images If there’s one succinct way to describe Pope Francis’s stewardship of the Catholic Church over the last 12 years, it might best be  done with three of his own words: “todos, todos, todos” — “everyone, everyone, everyone.” Francis, who died Monday morning in Vatican City, was both a reformer and a traditionalist. He didn’t change church doctrine, didn’t dramatically alter the Church’s teachings, and didn’t fundamentally disrupt the bedrock of Catholic belief. Catholics still believe there is one God who exists as three divine persons, that Jesus died and was resurrected, and that sin is still a thing. Only men can serve in the priesthood, life still begins at conception, and faith is lived through both prayer and good works. And yet it still feels like Pope Francis transformed the Church — breathing life into a 2,000-year-old institution by making it a player in current events, updating some of its bureaucracy to better respond to earthly affairs, and recentering the Church’s focus on the principle that it is open to all, but especially concerned with the least well off and marginalized in society. With Francis gone, how should we think of his legacy? Was he really the radical progressive revolutionary some on the American political right cast him as? And will his successor follow in his footsteps?   To try to neatly place Francis on the US political spectrum is a bit of a fool’s errand. It’s precisely because Francis and his potential successors defy our ability to categorize their legacies within our worldly, partisan, and tribalistic categories that it’s not very useful to use labels like “liberal” and “conservative.” Those things mean very different things within the Church versus outside of it. Instead, it’s more helpful to realize just how much Francis changed the Church’s tone and posturing toward openness and care for the least well off — and how he set up to Church to continue in that direction after he’s gone. He was neither liberal nor conservative: He was a bridge to the future who made the Church more relevant, without betraying its core teachings. That starting point will be critical for reading and understanding the next few weeks of papal news and speculation — especially as poorly sourced viral charts and infographics that lack context spread on social media in an attempt to explain what comes next. Revisiting Francis’s papacy Francis’s papacy is a prime example of how unhelpful it is to try to think of popes, and the Church, along the right-left political spectrum we’re used to thinking of in Western democracies.  When he was elected in 2013, Francis was a bit of an enigma. Progressives cautioned each other not to get too hopeful, while conservatives were wary about how open he would be to changing the Church’s public presence and social teachings. Before being elected pope, he was described as more traditional — not as activist as some of his Latin American peers who embraced progressive, socialist-adjacent liberation theology and intervened in political developments in Argentina, for example. He was orthodox and “uncompromising” on issues related to the right to life (euthanasia, the death penalty, and abortion) and on the role of women in the church, and advocated for clergy to embrace austerity and humility. And yet he was known to take unorthodox approaches to his ministry: advocating for the poor and the oppressed, and expressing openness to other religions in Argentina. He would bring that mix of views to his papacy. The following decade would see the Church undergo few changes in theological or doctrinal teachings, and yet it still appeared as though it was dramatically breaking with the past. That duality was in part because Francis was essentially both a conservative and a liberal, by American standards, at the same time, as Catholic writer James T. Keane argued in 2021. Francis was anti-abortion, critical of gender theory, opposed to ordaining women, and opposed to marriage for same-sex couples, while also welcoming the LGBTQ community, fiercely criticizing capitalism, unabashedly defending immigrants, opposing the death penalty, and advocating for environmentalism and care for the planet. That was how Francis functioned as a bridge between the traditionalism of his predecessors and a Church able to embrace modernity. And that’s also why he had so many critics: He was both too liberal and radical, and not progressive or bold enough. Francis used the Church’s unchanging foundational teachings and beliefs to respond to the crises of the 21st century and to consistently push for a “both-and” approach to social issues, endorsing “conservative”-coded teachings while adding on more focus to social justice issues that hadn’t been the traditionally associated with the church. That’s the approach he took when critiquing consumerism, modern capitalism, and “throwaway culture,” for example, employing the Church’s teachings on the sanctity of life to attack abortion rights, promote environmentalism, and criticize neo-liberal economics. None of those issues required dramatic changes to the Church’s religious or theological teachings. But they did involve moving the church beyond older debates — such as abortion, contraception, and marriage — and into other moral quandaries: economics, immigration, war, and climate change. And he spoke plainly about these debates in public, as when he responded, “Who am I to judge?” when asked about LGBTQ Catholics or said he wishes that hell is “empty.” Still, he reinforced that softer, more inquisitive and humble church tone with restructuring and reforms within the church bureaucracy — essentially setting the church up for a continued march along this path. Nearly 80 percent of the cardinals who are eligible to vote in a papal conclave were appointed by Francis — some 108 of 135 members of the College of Cardinals who can vote, per the Vatican itself. Most don’t align on any consistent ideological spectrum, having vastly different beliefs about the role of the Church, how the Church’s internal workings should operate, and what the Church’s social stances should be — that’s partially why it’s risky to read into and interpret projections about “wings” or ideological “factions” among the cardinal-electors as if they are a parliament or house of Congress. There will naturally be speculation, given who Francis appointed as cardinals, that his successor will be non-European and less traditional. But as Francis himself showed through his papacy, the church has the benefit of time and taking the long view on social issues. He reminded Catholics that concern for the poor and oppressed must be just as central to the Church’s presence in the world as any age-old culture war issue. And to try to apply to popes and the Church the political labels and sets of beliefs we use in America is pointless.

Grassroots activists who took on corruption and corporate power share 2025 Goldman prize

Seven winners of environmental prize include Amazonian river campaigner and Tunisian who fought against organised waste traffickingIndigenous river campaigner from Peru honouredGrassroots activists who helped jail corrupt officials and obtain personhood rights for a sacred Amazonian river are among this year’s winners of the world’s most prestigious environmental prize.The community campaigns led by the seven 2025 Goldman prize winners underscore the courage and tenacity of local activists willing to confront the toxic mix of corporate power, regulatory failures and political corruption that is fuelling biodiversity collapse, water shortages, deadly air pollution and the climate emergency. Continue reading...

Grassroots activists who helped jail corrupt officials and obtain personhood rights for a sacred Amazonian river are among this year’s winners of the world’s most prestigious environmental prize.The community campaigns led by the seven 2025 Goldman prize winners underscore the courage and tenacity of local activists willing to confront the toxic mix of corporate power, regulatory failures and political corruption that is fuelling biodiversity collapse, water shortages, deadly air pollution and the climate emergency.This year’s recipients include Semia Gharbi, a scientist and environmental educator from Tunisia, who took on an organised waste trafficking network that led to more than 40 arrests, including 26 Tunisian officials and 16 Italians with ties to the illegal trade.Semia Gharbi campaigning in Tunisia. Photograph: Goldman environmental prizeGharbi, 57, headed a public campaign demanding accountability after an Italian company was found to have shipped hundreds of containers of household garbage to Tunisia to dump in its overfilled landfill sites, rather than the recyclable plastic it had declared it was shipping.Gharbi lobbied lawmakers, compiled dossiers for UN experts and helped organise media coverage in both countries. Eventually, 6,000 tonnes of illegally exported household waste was shipped back to Italy in February 2022, and the scandal spurred the EU to close some loopholes governing international waste shipping.Not far away in the Canary Islands, Carlos Mallo Molina helped lead another sophisticated effort to prevent the construction of a large recreational boat and ferry terminal on the island of Tenerife that threatened to damage Spain’s most important marine reserve.Carlos Mallo Molina. Photograph: Goldman environmental prizeThe tourism gravy train can seem impossible to derail, but in 2018 Mallo swapped his career as a civil engineer to stop the sprawling Fonsalía port, which threatened the 170,000-acre biodiverse protected area that provides vital habitat for endangered sea turtles, whales, giant squid and blue sharks.As with Gharbi in Tunisia, education played a big role in the campaign’s success and included developing a virtual scuba dive into the threatened marine areas and a children’s book about a sea turtle searching for seagrass in the Canary Islands. After three years of pressure backed by international environmental groups, divers and residents, the government cancelled construction of the port, safeguarding the only whale heritage site in European territorial waters.“It’s been a tough year for both people and the planet,” said Jennifer Goldman Wallis, vice-president of the Goldman Environmental Foundation. “There’s so much that worries us, stresses us, outrages us, and keeps us divided … these environmental leaders and teachers – and the global environmental community that supports them – are the antidote.”For the past 36 years, the Goldman prize has honoured environmental defenders from each of the world’s six inhabited continental regions, recognising their commitment and achievements in the face of seemingly insurmountable hurdles. To date, 233 winners from 98 nations have been awarded the prize. Many have gone on to hold positions in governments, as heads of state, nonprofit leaders, and as Nobel prize laureates.Three Goldman recipients have been killed, including the 2015 winner from Honduras, the Indigenous Lenca leader Berta Cáceres, whose death in 2016 was orchestrated by executives of an internationally financed dam company whose project she helped stall.Environmental and land rights defenders often persist in drawn-out efforts to secure clean water and air for their communities and future generations – despite facing threats including online harassment, bogus criminal charges, and sometimes physical violence. More than 2,100 land and environmental defenders were killed globally between 2012 and 2023, according to an observatory run by the charity Global Witness.Latin America remains the most dangerous place to defend the environment but a range of repressive tactics are increasingly being used to silence activists across Asia, the US, the UK and the EU.In the US, Laurene Allen was recognised for her extraordinary leadership, which culminated in a plastics plant being closed in 2024 after two decades of leaking toxic forever chemicals into the air, soil and water supplies in the small town of Merrimack, New Hampshire. The 62-year-old social worker turned water protector developed the town’s local campaign into a statewide and national network to address Pfas contamination, helping persuade the Biden administration to establish the first federal drinking water standard for forever chemicals.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionLaurene Allen. Photograph: Goldman environmental prizeThree of this year’s Goldman recipients were involved in battles to save two rivers thousands of miles apart – in Peru and Albania – which both led to landmark victories.Besjana Guri and Olsi Nika not only helped stop construction of a hydroelectric dam on the 167-mile Vjosa River, but their decade-long campaign led to the Albanian government declaring it a wild river national park.Guri, 37, a social worker, and Nika, 39, a biologist and ecologist, garnered support from scientists, lawyers, EU parliamentarians and celebrities, including Leonardo DiCaprio, for the new national park – the first in Europe to protect a wild river. This historic designation protects the Vjosa and its three tributaries, which are among the last remaining free-flowing undammed rivers in Europe.In Peru, Mari Luz Canaquiri Murayari, 56, led the Indigenous Kukama women’s association to a landmark court victory that granted the 1,000-mile Marañón River legal personhood, with the right to be free-flowing and free of contamination.Mari Luz Canaquiri Murayari. Photograph: Goldman environmental prizeThe Marañón River and its tributaries are the life veins of Peru’s tropical rainforests and support 75% of its tropical wetlands – but also flow through lands containing some of the South American country’s biggest oil and gas fields. The court ordered the Peruvian government to stop violating the rivers’ rights, and take immediate action to prevent future oil spills.The Kukama people, who believe their ancestors reside on the riverbed, were recognised by the court as stewards of the great Marañón.This year’s oldest winner was Batmunkh Luvsandash from Mongolia, an 81-year-old former electrical engineer whose anti-mining activism has led to 200,000 acres of the East Gobi desert being protected from the world’s insatiable appetite for metal minerals.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.