Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

GoGreenNation News

Learn more about the issues presented in our films
Show Filters

Insurers calling for trees to be felled as cheap fix for subsidence, say critics

Campaigners say problem so common that some of the UK’s most irreplaceable ancient trees in danger of being lostWhen Linda Taylor Cantrill finally found her dream family home in Exmouth, Devon, it wasn’t the location, the square footage or the local amenities that finally made up her mind – it was the 200-year-old oak tree in the garden.“The way we felt about just standing in the shade of the tree was: ‘We need this house, because look how beautiful it is,’” she told the Guardian. Continue reading...

When Linda Taylor Cantrill finally found her dream family home in Exmouth, Devon, it wasn’t the location, the square footage or the local amenities that finally made up her mind – it was the 200-year-old oak tree in the garden.“The way we felt about just standing in the shade of the tree was: ‘We need this house, because look how beautiful it is,’” she told the Guardian.Little wonder then, that when an insurance company suggested chopping the tree down in an effort to arrest the subsidence affecting the house, Taylor Cantrill says she turned “into Boudicca”, to stop the chainsaws – launching a years-long battle that, this year, she finally won.Hers might seem like an isolated example of arboreal activism, but the issue of insurers recommending tree-felling as a cheap fix to building issues is one played out daily in Britain.The problem, according to some campaigners, is so common that they fear it could bring about the loss of irreplaceable ancient trees.Data on insurance-related tree-felling is difficult to pin down, but underwriters are braced for a increase in subsidence claims this year. The Association of British Insurers (ABI) said there had been “unusually high spring temperatures” – often a cause of such claims.The tree that the Taylor Cantrills’ insurers blame for subsidence. Photograph: Jim Wileman/The GuardianAs part of the Haringey Tree Protectors group, Gio Iozzi has been heavily involved in efforts to save a 120-year-old plane tree in north London. “I see it as big a problem, on a par with the water pollution scandal,” she said.Like Taylor Cantrill, she chose her home because of the trees nearby and believes insurers prefer to fell trees suspected of causing subsidence rather than pursuing engineering solutions such as underpinning houses.It is a view shared by the Woodland Trust, which said it was a “significant concern”. Caroline Campbell, who leads the trust’s work on bringing the benefits of trees to the urban areas that need them the most, said: “Mature and veteran trees are often removed before causation is proven, and in many cases where alternative engineering or root management solutions could resolve the problem while retaining the tree.“The general approach from many insurers remains risk-averse, defaulting to removal as the quickest or cheapest option.”The ABI said: “It is not the case that insurers default to tree removal as a matter of convenience or cost-cutting. Insurers will assess each claim on a case-by-case basis, and will consult with experts to determine the most appropriate course of action.”In Billingshurst, in West Sussex, another group is still fighting to save two oak trees villagers believe are at least 200 years old, and that insurers say are the cause of damage to nearby homes.After hiring a lawyer, and thousands of people signing a petition in support, the Save Billi Oaks campaigners have fought their local authority to a standstill. The authority had initially granted permission to fell the trees, despite tree preservation orders being in place.Last month, councillors voted unanimously to pause those plans while they took legal advice. It is understood the council will revisit the matter on 5 November.One of those fighting for the trees, Gabi Barrett, said: “If it weren’t for the community stepping up, both trees would have been felled.” .She added: “The trees are stunning, perfectly balanced and over 200 years-old. They are the only trees of that age and status that remain on the estate. They provide shade in summer and mitigate flood risk in the wetter months.”She said that “from the get-go, saving these trees has been a community effort”.But it has not yet secured the future of the trees. They remain vulnerable, partly because the council fears incurring liability if it does not agree to the insurer’s request to cut them down.Campbell said the effect of losing the trees could be devastating for the local environment: “Even a single insurance claim can lead to the felling of multiple street or garden trees, and subsidence is known to be one of the largest claim types facing the insurance sector.“The cumulative impact over time is substantial, contributing to canopy loss in exactly the urban areas where trees are most needed for cooling, air quality and flood mitigation.”And, while mature trees are effective at taking CO2 out of the atmosphere, newly planted ones – often cited as mitigation when an ancient tree is felled – are much less so. Chopping down mature trees can also release the CO2 back into the atmosphere.The ABI said firms “explore alternative solutions” to felling, but these were not always suitable. A spokesperson also said underpinning “itself has an environmental impact through the use of carbon-intensive concrete”. They added: “The insurance industry takes its climate responsibilities seriously.”Taylor Cantrill’s successful defence of her beloved tree will be an inspiration to others with a similar fight on their hands. For those, like Barrett, the battle to preserve their local greenery is personal. She said: “My children were born in Billingshurst – I have fond memories of stopping for a snack in the shade under those trees on the way back from toddler group. I would find their loss devastating.”

Black Vultures Attack and Kill Cattle. Climate Change Is One Reason They're Spreading North

Black vultures have killed and eaten several calves on Tom Karr’s cattle ranch in southeastern Ohio, a loss he says didn't happen two decades ago

EMINENCE, Ky. (AP) — Allan Bryant scans the sky as he watches over a minutes-old calf huddled under a tree line with its mother. After a few failed tries, the calf stands on wobbly legs for the first time, looking to nurse.Above, a pair of birds circle in the distance. Bryant, hoping they're not black vultures, is relieved to see they're only turkey vultures — red-headed and not aggressive.“Honestly, the black vulture is one of the ugliest things I’ve ever seen,” he said. “They’re easy to hate.”Black vultures, scavengers that sometimes attack and kill sick or newborn animals, didn't used to be a problem here. But now Bryant frequently sees the birds following a birth. He hasn't lost a calf in several years, but they've killed his animals before. So now he takes measures to stop them.In some of his fields, he erects a scarecrow of sorts — a dead black vulture — aimed at scaring off the birds. It's a requirement of his depredation permit through the Kentucky Farm Bureau, which allows him to shoot a few birds a year. The dead bird keeps the live birds away for about a week, but they eventually come back, he said.It’s a problem that may grow worse for cattle farmers as the scavenging birds’ range expands northward, in part due to climate change. Lobbying groups have been pushing for legislation that would allow landowners to kill more of these birds, which are protected but not endangered. But experts say more research is needed to better understand how the birds impact livestock and how their removal could affect ecosystems. Warmer winters and changing habitats expanding birds' range Black vultures used to mainly live in the southeastern U.S. and farther south in Latin and South America, but over the past century they've started to rapidly stretch northward and also west into the desert Southwest, said Andrew Farnsworth, a visiting scientist at Cornell Lab of Ornithology who studies bird migration.Warmer winters on average, fueled by climate change, are making it easier for the birds to stay in places that used to be too cold for them. What's more, the human footprint in suburban and rural areas is enriching their habitat: development means cars, and cars mean roadkill. Cattle farms can also offer a buffet of vulnerable animals for vultures that learn the seasonal calving schedule.“If there’s one thing we’ve learned from a lot of different studies of birds, it’s that they are very good at taking advantage of food resources and remembering where those things are,” Farnsworth said.Although black vultures are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, they aren't really a migratory species, he said. Instead, they breed, and some disperse to new areas and settle there. How farmers have been dealing with it After losing a calf to a black vulture a decade ago, Tom Karr, who raises cattle near Pomeroy, Ohio, tried to move his fall calving season later in the year in hopes the vultures would be gone by then. But that didn't help — the birds stay all year, he said. Until newborn calves are a few days old, “we try to keep them up closer to the barns,” said Joanie Grimes, the owner of a 350-head calf-cow operation in Hillsboro, Ohio. She said they've been dealing with the birds for 15 years, but keeping them out of remote fields has helped improve matters.Annette Ericksen has noticed the black vultures for several years on her property, Twin Maples Farm in Milton, West Virginia, but they haven't yet lost any animals to them. When they expect calves and lambs, they move the livestock into a barn, and they also use dogs — Great Pyrenees — trained to patrol the fields and the barnyard for raptors that might hurt the animals.The size of their operation makes it easier to account for every animal, but “any loss would be severely detrimental to our small business,” she wrote in an email.Local cattlemen's associations and state farm bureaus often work together to help producers get depredation permits, which allow them to shoot a few birds each year, as long as they keep track of it on paper.“The difficulty with that is, if the birds show up, by the time you can get your permit, get all that taken care of, the damage is done,” said Brian Shuter, executive vice president of the Indiana Beef Cattle Association. Farmers said calves can be worth hundreds of dollars or upward of $1,000 or $2,000, depending on the breed. A new bill would let farmers shoot the protected birds with less paperwork In March, lawmakers in Congress introduced a bill that would let farmers capture or kill any black vulture “in order to prevent death, injury, or destruction to livestock.” Many farmers and others in the cattle industry have supported the move, and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association in July commended the House Natural Resources Committee for advancing the bill.Farnsworth, of the Cornell lab, said it's not necessarily a good thing to make it easier to kill black vultures, which he said fill “a super important role" in cleaning up “dead stuff.”Simply killing the birds, Farnsworth said, may make room for more bothersome predators or scavengers. He said though black vultures can leave behind gory damage, current research doesn't show that they account for an outsize proportion of livestock deaths.But many farmers are unwilling to do nothing.“They just basically eat them alive,” Karr said. “It is so disgusting.”The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

Nigeria to Impose More Stringent Penalties on Wildlife Traffickers

By Isaac AnyaoguLAGOS (Reuters) -Nigeria will impose fines of up to 12 million naira ($8,200) and jail terms of up to 10 years on traffickers of...

LAGOS (Reuters) -Nigeria will impose fines of up to 12 million naira ($8,200) and jail terms of up to 10 years on traffickers of ivory, pangolin scales and other wildlife in a sweeping new bill passed by its Senate on Tuesday.Conservation groups say the law could help curb organised crime networks which have made Nigeria a major hub for illegal wildlife trade. The networks have been linked with more than 30 tonnes of ivory since 2015 and over half of global pangolin scale trafficking between 2016 and 2019.The Endangered Species Conservation and Protection Bill, passed by the lower parliament in May, updates decades-old laws that allow offenders to spend three months to five years in jail or pay fines as low as 100,000 naira ($68) for trafficking.The Bill grants the Nigerian Customs investigators powers to track financial flows, and search and detain aircraft and vessels transporting prohibited wildlife. Judges will be allowed to fast-track cases and seize assets.The law, which also prohibits pollution of wildlife habitat and the eating of endangered wildlife, aligns Nigeria with global treaties and enables extradition of offenders."This is a huge win for Nigeria and shows, without any doubt, that we remain committed to stamping out wildlife trafficking and protecting our unique fauna and flora," said Terseer Ugbor, the lawmaker who sponsored the bill.Environmental groups welcomed the move, saying it will help protect wildlife."For too long, traffickers have used Nigeria as a transit country for the illegal wildlife trade, bringing endangered wildlife from all over Africa through our porous borders, ports and airports to export them illegally to Europe and Asia," said Tunde Morakinyo, Executive Director, Africa Nature Investors Foundation (ANI).They urged swift presidential assent before the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, a UN-affiliated international agreement summit in Uzbekistan in November.(Reporting by Isaac Anyaogu, editing by Ed Osmond)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

Hiking with the wildlife author who studies Yosemite’s high peaks: ‘These animals are equal to us’

Inspired by childhood encyclopedias and Jane Goodall, Beth Pratt writes about the more than 150 species in the national park – and transports readers to a rarefied worldA shrill call was followed by a flash of movement through a pile of boulders on a high country slope in Yosemite national park. “Hello, Sophie!” Beth Pratt responded to the round, feisty pika who had briefly emerged to pose defiantly in the sun.Pratt, a conservation leader and wildlife advocate, has spent more than a decade observing the tiny mammals and the other inhabitants of these serene granite domes and the alpine meadows they overlook, which gleamed gold on a crisp afternoon in mid-October. Continue reading...

A shrill call was followed by a flash of movement through a pile of boulders on a high country slope in Yosemite national park. “Hello, Sophie!” Beth Pratt responded to the round, feisty pika who had briefly emerged to pose defiantly in the sun.Pratt, a conservation leader and wildlife advocate, has spent more than a decade observing the tiny mammals and the other inhabitants of these serene granite domes and the alpine meadows they overlook, which gleamed gold on a crisp afternoon in mid-October.Their stories are woven into Pratt’s new book, Yosemite Wildlife: The Wonder of Animal Life in California’s Sierra Nevada – the first in more than a century to focus solely on the more than 150 species who call the park home.Pratt’s book is designed to be more than a coffee-table tome. Each chapter features stories, facts and intimate insights about a different animal. The book isn’t necessarily meant to be read cover to cover. Rather, she was inspired by the encyclopedias she got lost in as a child.Paired with hundreds of photos from naturalist-photographer Robb Hirsch, as well as archival images, natural history and research, her storytelling transports readers into a world they don’t often have access to. Published by the Yosemite Conservancy, proceeds also directly benefit the park.Along with a glimpse into the lives of mammals, reptiles, amphibians and insects who dwell in one of the country’s most treasured parks, Pratt hopes to foster a deeper connection to the tenacious creatures who are surviving through the harshest conditions.“We think we as humans are so exceptional, but come up here and even the smallest of critters will put you in your place very quickly,” she said.Sophie the pika in Yosemite national park. Photograph: Gabrielle Canon/The GuardianThe world Pratt captures is fierce and fragile: Butterflies, weighing no more than a feather, fly over 12,000ft (3,650-meter) peaks. Freshwater crustaceans called fairy shrimp spring to life in small temporary ponds left after the mountain snow melts, their eggs able to last up to a century waiting in suspended animation for the right conditions. Pratt even saw a marmot chase off a coyote.But it also highlights how exceedingly vulnerable these animals have become. The climate crisis and the encroaching development into once-wild places have added challenges even for the most hardy.“People don’t understand that wildlife operate on the barest of margins,” Pratt said, pausing to ferry a caterpillar off the trail and onto the underbrush in the direction it was heading. “Something like trampling their nest or leaving trash out can result in dead animals or a loss of habitat or scaring an animal who doesn’t have a lot of energy reserves to begin with.”‘Stuff your eyes with wonder’For more than 30 years, Pratt has worked in environmental leadership roles, including heading the campaign behind the world’s largest wildlife crossing of its kind, stretching across 10 lanes of a bustling highway near Los Angeles.Her work helped the city fall in love with P-22, a celebrated urban mountain lion who lived in Griffith Park and died after being struck by a car in 2022, which inspired the P-22 Day festival – held in October this year – to honor and increase awareness around protecting wildlife. She is also the author of I Heart Wildlife and When Mountain Lions Are Neighbors.But from her first visit after she moved from Massachusetts to California in 1991 at the age of 22, “Yosemite claimed me”, she wrote in the book’s preface. Her adoration of national parks, first introduced in a book she dreamed over in middle school, was cemented during a first winter trip to the park that she now refers to as “her north star”.Beth Pratt and “pika hill,” in Yosemite National Park. Photograph: Gabrielle Canon/The GuardianFor 25 years, Pratt has made her home in the Sierra foothills just outside Yosemite, and she makes frequent trips through the park gates.With her new book, she’s invited the public deeper into a process 15 years in the making: Pratt said she’s about halfway through an attempt to record three decades of changes in Yosemite’s highest elevations.The hike up to an area Pratt affectionately refers to as “pika hill” is steep, but the rewards come quickly. “This is my happy place,” she said, gesturing toward a craggy ridgeline and the 13-mile (21km) route she’s looped countless times over the years to document how her friends are faring. The trail sweeps out from Yosemite’s eastern entrance on the Tioga Pass – a scenic thoroughfare that snakes through the Sierra at nearly 10,000ft – and offers access to the dramatic landscapes in a less-frequented part of the park.The high country is one of the places Pratt feels most at home and it inspired the intro to her book. “Stuff your eyes with wonder,” she quotes from the author Ray Bradbury, calling it a creed. Here, it is easy to do.In the distance, a lone coyote stalked through the amber plains in search of a snack. Overhead, a hawk, held fast by the wind, hovered in place. Sophie the pika retreated into tunnels burrowed deep under the rocks, as an azure lake on the horizon sparkled in the afternoon sun.Her process, though rooted in scientific observation, is simple: “I wander around and pay attention,” she said. Pratt’s patience has been rewarded again and again with rare encounters.She’s one of the few people who have seen burrowing owls here. She’s watched black bears sniff the air, and presided over the “commute of the newts”, an annual march of the small rust-colored amphibians as they descend down-canyon into their breeding-ground ponds near the Merced River.“When I was younger, it was such a push to see different places. Now I am really focused on one place,” she said. She knows the landscapes well – watching over them week to week through the seasons – and they have begun to know her in return. Sophie the pika wouldn’t have emerged for just anyone.“I treat them as people – because to me they are,” she said. “They are equal to us.”A gray fox captured by a camera trap on a rainy night with the moon rising. Photograph: Robb Hirsch/Yosemite ConservancyIt’s been her life mission to be a voice for those who have none, something she said was inspired by her love for wildlife and the late Jane Goodall. Goodall, who died earlier this year, was a primatologist and leader in her field who also named the animals she worked with – a practice once regarded as a coup against scientific convention.Goodall’s work inspired people around the world to take a greater interest in wildlife and in the negative impact humans have had, and Pratt’s work carries on that legacy.“Losing her couldn’t come at a worse time,” Pratt said. “All of us who do the work for the wildlife need to be louder now.”National parks facing threatsBefore heading back to the parking lot, Pratt called to Sophie one final time. They may not meet again. Soon, the pika would burrow deep beneath the snow, seeking protection from the cold by the drifts and the piles of vegetation she’d gathered to get her through.“You can see it’s the last hurrah – they can tell something is coming and they are out here preparing,” Pratt said, before turning back to the trail leading downhill. There was work left to do, both for Sophie and for Pratt.The effects of climate change have continued to unfold. Support for wildlife protections has eroded under the Trump administration, which has gutted budgets and pushed extractive policies. Yosemite and the national parks more broadly are facing greater threats; left without adequate staffing, there’s more pressure being put on landscapes and the animals who live within them.Beth Pratt. Photograph: Gabrielle Canon/The Guardian“Some days I am in despair,” she added. The setting sun offered a last brilliant glow as it slowly sank behind the purple horizon. “And then I think about the pika who have to gather enough hay for three months to live under the snow for the winter. Or these butterflies that are literally flowing over peaks with tattered wings. Or the Yosemite toad that has to walk sometimes up to a mile over snow to their breeding grounds.”With the first big snow foreshadowed in the darkening clouds gathering above, another winter was on its way. The hike was coming to an end, along with the season. But plans were already being made for the future. She’d soon be back.“If these animals can do this,” she said, “we got this.”

Rare white Iberian lynx captured on film in Spain by amateur photographer

Researchers to investigate whether environmental factors may have affected female animal’s pigmentationAn amateur photographer in southern Spain has captured unprecedented images of a white Iberian lynx, prompting researchers to investigate whether environmental factors could be at play as wildlife watchers revelled in the rare sighting.Ángel Hidalgo published the images on social media, describing the singular animal as the “white ghost of the Mediterranean forest”. Continue reading...

An amateur photographer in southern Spain has captured unprecedented images of a white Iberian lynx, prompting researchers to investigate whether environmental factors could be at play as wildlife watchers revelled in the rare sighting.Ángel Hidalgo published the images on social media, describing the singular animal as the “white ghost of the Mediterranean forest”.In a post, Hidalgo explained he had first caught a glimpse of the animal in a camera trap he had set up in a wooded area near the city of Jaén. The footage lasted just a few seconds, but it was enough to make out a lynx that appeared to have a white coat and dark spots, rather than the brown and black-spotted colouring usually associated with the species.“From then on, I started dedicating all of my free time to it,” Hidalgo wrote. “Time passed; hours, days, weeks and even months without success. Many times I was on the verge of giving up.”His lucky moment came as the sun rose after a rainy night. “When I saw a ‘white Iberian lynx’ for the first time, with its snow-white winter coat and piercing eyes, I was transfixed. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing,” he said.His images have made waves across Spain and beyond. Media described it as the first time a white lynx had been caught on camera.Those who work to protect the species, however, said the animal was known to researchers.Javier Salcedo, the coordinator of the EU-funded LIFE Lynx-Connect project, described her as a female named Satureja and said she had been born in 2021.The lynx had normal colouring at birth but her pigmentation had changed at some point. The change in colouring had seemingly not affected her behaviour, Salcedo said, as she continued to feed normally and had successfully raised several litters.“It’s neither albinism nor leucism,” he told the newspaper El País. Leucism refers to a partial loss of pigmentation in animals.“We’re investigating what might have happened,” Salcedo added. “We think it could be related to exposure to something environmental.”He said it was the second time researchers had come across a lynx with this characteristic; at one point scientists had tracked a female from the same area, possibly a relative of Satureja, watching as her colouring transformed to white and, later, back to brown.“That could imply the existence of some kind of hypersensitivity,” Salcedo said. “We detected this case because we conduct thorough monitoring of the lynx, but it can happen in other species without us noticing.”The regional government in Andalusía told the broadcaster TVE that the next step would be to briefly capture Satureja and take samples in the hope of gaining insight as to why her colour had changed.The rebounding presence of the Iberian lynx in Spain and Portugal has been hailed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as a “great success story”.Less than a quarter of a century after the animal was feared to be on the brink of extinction, the populations have recovered to a point that the Iberian lynx was moved last year from “endangered” to “vulnerable” on the global red list of threatened species.

Galápagos had no native amphibians. Then it was invaded by hundreds of thousands of frogs

Scientists are only beginning to grasp the scale of the issue and understand what impact the tree frogs may have on the islands’ rare wildlifeOn the way to her office at the Charles Darwin research station, biologist Miriam San José crouches down near a shallow pond shrouded by vegetation and reaches deep into the foliage, pulling out a small green plastic box recorder.She left it there overnight to capture the infamous croaks of a Fowler’s snouted treefrog (Scinax quinquefasciatus), known to Galápagos scientists as an invasive threat, with repercussions researchers are only beginning to grasp. Continue reading...

On the way to her office at the Charles Darwin research station, biologist Miriam San José crouches down near a shallow pond shrouded by vegetation and reaches deep into the foliage, pulling out a small green plastic box recorder.She left it there overnight to capture the infamous croaks of a Fowler’s snouted treefrog (Scinax quinquefasciatus), known to Galápagos scientists as an invasive threat, with repercussions researchers are only beginning to grasp.Despite abounding with wildlife – centuries-old giant tortoises, swimming iguanas, and the finches that sparked Darwin’s theory of evolution – the Galápagos archipelago off the coast of Ecuador has long been free from amphibians. Until recently, no frogs, toads, newts, or salamanders waddled or hopped on its volcanic islands.In the late 1990s, that changed. Some small tree frogs made their way from mainland Ecuador to the islands, likely as stowaways on cargo ships.Fowler’s snouted tree frogs arrived in the 90s and have become established on Isabela and Santa Cruz islands. Photograph: Rashid Cruz/Charles Darwin Research StationGenetic studies suggest that, over the years, there have been repeated accidental introductions to the archipelago, and the frogs now have a strong foothold on two islands: Isabela and Santa Cruz. The population is growing so fast that scientists have been struggling to keep track, estimating numbers in the hundreds of thousands on each island, across urban and agricultural areas, but also in the protected Galápagos national park.When San José marked frogs and tried to recapture them in the following 10 days – a technique commonly used to make estimates of animal populations – she could find just one marked frog every once in a while, suggesting their populations were huge. They estimated 6,000 frogs in a single pond. “Our estimates are still very conservative,” says San José. “I am pretty sure there are even more.”The frogs’ abundance is clear from the acoustic chaos they cause. “The amount of frogs and the noise – it’s really insane,” says San José.For the scientists, their nightly mating calls are helpful in estimating their presence in far-flung areas, using recorders like the one outside San José’s office. But local farmers say the calls are so raucous they keep them up at night.“During the wet season, I constantly hear their calls and they’re really loud,” says Jadira Larrea Saltos, a coffee farmer at Finca La Envidia on Santa Cruz.“At first it was a surprise, seeing the first frogs in the area,” says Larrea Saltos, who started noticing their abundance about three years ago when one jumped on her hand as she was walking out of her front door. Now she has more poultry on her property, which she thinks has helped keep the populations relatively at bay.The noise isn’t the fundamental problem, though. While the species has been in the Galápagos for almost 30 years, scientists still know very little about its impact on the archipelago’s delicately balanced land and water ecosystems.Scientists are finding out more about the frogs, including that they can remain as tadpoles for as long as six months. Photograph: Joshua Vela Fonseca/Charles Darwin Research StationOn islands, it is very common for invasive species to thrive, as they have none of their natural predators. The Galápagos counts 1,645 invasive species, many of which are seriously disrupting the safety of its endemic ones. Avian vampire flies are bleeding rare bird hatchlings dry, and the hardy blackberry plant is encroaching on the Scalesia forests.A 2020 study suggests the invasive frogs are voracious insect eaters, and might be disproportionately consuming rare insects found only on the archipelago, or depleting the food sources of the islands’ rare birds, disrupting the food chain. Since the frogs’ diet is dominated by moths, they could even be affecting pollination on the islands, according to ecologist María del Mar Moretta-Urdiales, who was involved in the study.The Galápagos frogs have exhibited some unusual traits, including living in brackish water, which is uncommon for amphibians. Their metamorphosis process is also extremely variable, with some tadpoles turning into frogs very quickly and others taking a long time: San José observed one which remained as a tadpole in her lab for six months.“We really don’t know this part,” she says, worried the tadpoles could be affecting the islands’ freshwater, a very scarce resource in Galápagos. And even though studies show that the Galápagos diving beetle now eats large numbers of tadpoles in its diet, it doesn’t seem to be making a dent in their populations.More research is needed to determine the best way to control the frogs without harming other species. Photograph: Rashid Cruz/Charles Darwin Research StationMethods to curb the frogs in the early 2000s were largely unsuccessful. Park rangers tried capturing large numbers by hand and gradually increasing the salinity of lagoons in vain. Research suggests spraying coffee – which is highly toxic to frogs – or using electrocution could help, but these methods aren’t necessarily safe for other rare Galápagos species.Without answers to more of the basic questions about their biology and impact, culling the frogs might not even be the right way to go, says San José.While she hopes the growing use of environmental DNA techniques and genetic analysis will help her team make sense of the invader, funding for the project has been hard to come by. “Everybody wants to give funding for preserving frogs,” says San José. “But it’s harder to find funding for an introduced frog that you might want to control for.”Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage

How El Jefe, the Lone Arizona Jaguar Who Captivated a Nation in 2016, Became a 'Rock Star'

Once called “America’s last jaguar,” the solitary male wandered across the southern border in 2011 and became the centerpiece of a campaign to protect habitat in the Santa Rita Mountains

How El Jefe, the Lone Arizona Jaguar Who Captivated a Nation in 2016, Became a ‘Rock Star’ Once called “America’s last jaguar,” the solitary male wandered across the southern border in 2011 and became the centerpiece of a campaign to protect habitat in the Santa Rita Mountains James Campbell - Author, Heart of the Jaguar November 4, 2025 8:00 a.m. A camera trap image of El Jefe, a male jaguar who made international news as the only known jaguar in the United States. USFWS When the jaguar who came to be known as El Jefe crossed the United States-Mexico border in 2011 and entered Arizona, he had no idea he was walking onto a stage where he would be the star performer.  He had been on the move for days, or possibly weeks, having left his home 125 miles south of the border, in the 90-square-mile Northern Jaguar Reserve in the Sierra Madres of northwestern Mexico, where teams of American and Mexican conservationists were struggling to protect a waning population of the world’s northernmost jaguars. El Jefe had likely fled to save his life. At 2 years of age, and weighing just 120 pounds, staying put had become dangerous. Larger, more territorial males, unwilling to tolerate an adolescent intruder, prowled the countryside. But unlike the others, who escaped with their lives by traveling south, El Jefe responded to the magnetic pull of his internal compass by fleeing north, becoming just the fourth documented male jaguar in two decades to make the border crossing into Arizona and what was once jaguar country. There, he was utterly alone—perhaps the loneliest jaguar in the history of the species—but content for a time.  In 1963, the last known female jaguar in the U.S. was killed by a hunter at 9,000 feet in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests of eastern Arizona. The hunter, who thought he was zeroing in on a big bobcat, shot her at 80 yards in the evening’s dwindling light. Two years later, the last legally killed jaguar, a male, was shot by a hunter in the Patagonia Mountains of southern Arizona. In 1969, Arizona finally outlawed most jaguar hunting, but with no known females roaming the state, the prospects for a rebounding population of indigenous big cats were exceedingly dim.  No one knows exactly when El Jefe entered the U.S., but it’s possible that a Border Patrol helicopter pilot who had reported seeing a jaguar in the Santa Rita Mountains in June 2011 was the first one to spot him. The first clearly documented sighting of El Jefe was in November 2011, east of the Santa Ritas in the Whetstone Mountains, 25 miles north of the Mexican border, by an Arizona man named Donnie Fenn. Fenn ran a part-time business, Chasin’ Tail Guide Service, that specialized in mountain lion hunts. He and his 10-year-old daughter, Alyson, already an accomplished horsewoman, left their home on a Saturday morning bound for the Whetstones.  Once they saddled their mules, they rode with a pack of eight dogs up ahead singing. They were about to call it a day when the strike hound cut a trail. The Fenns followed the dogs as they ran through the canyon in full cry. After a short chase, Fenn saw his hounds 200 yards ahead, bellowing frantically. Calming his mule, he approached slowly. Assuming his dogs had treed a mountain lion, he used his telephoto lens to zoom in on the tree. As he got closer, he saw it. He was astounded by its size. He guessed that it was twice as big as a mountain lion. Then he dismounted. His heart was pounding, but he was mesmerized. He could sense the jaguar’s power. He watched as the big cat slowly climbed down the tree. When its feet hit the ground, he thought for a moment it might turn to pounce on him. Instead, it took off at a high speed in the opposite direction, and his dogs gave chase.  About two miles down the trail, the hounds brought the jaguar to bay. It was growling in a raw and aggressive way, making sounds Fenn had never heard from an animal. His hounds, excited to the point of frenzy, had encircled the jaguar, and it was swiping at them. He worried that the big cat would tear his dogs apart. But the jaguar made its final escape, and Fenn shouted to his crazed hounds, commanding them to hold hard. “It’s the most amazing thing that’s ever happened to me,” Fenn later told the Arizona Daily Star. “I got to see it in real life, my daughter got to see it, but I hope never to encounter it again.”  James Campbell tells the story of the extraordinary undertaking to save the jaguar, as well as the impassioned conservationist Alan Rabinowitz, who dedicated his life to the species. Fenn alerted Arizona Game and Fish Department officials, who found hair samples left behind by the animal and obligingly told his tale to the media.  What El Jefe did after encountering Fenn and his hounds, no one really knows. Having learned from his experience in the Whetstones, he likely grew even more stealthy, moving largely at night. He wasn’t seen again until late 2012, when some of the hundreds of remote wireless infrared cameras operated by the University of Arizona’s Jaguar Survey and Monitoring Project captured photos of a male jaguar lurking in the Santa Rita Mountains—the perfect hiding place for a lone jaguar. A wildlife camera automatically snapped this photo of El Jefe on October 25, 2012. USFWS / UA / DHS The wild Santa Ritas, just 28 miles southeast of Tucson, had everything El Jefe needed: high country, with its narrow ridges and steep slopes, swathed in pine forests, where he could move unseen; mid-elevations scattered with live oaks, Gambel oaks and junipers; and fecund washes thick with walnuts, hackberry, willows and cottonwoods. And an impressive array of wild game was there for the taking—deer, javelinas, coatis, skunks, turkeys, jackrabbits and raccoons. He was able to find water in streams, ephemeral ponds and springs. Mountain lions inhabited the area, but they seemed to know, instinctively, who the boss was.  The primary danger for El Jefe was that he was fond of space and was partial to wandering. In his next encounter with people—or perhaps a busy highway—he might not be so lucky.  Among the handful who knew of El Jefe’s presence, no one was better acquainted with the jaguar than wildlife biologist Chris Bugbee. Along with his 65-pound Belgian Malinois Mayke—who had failed as a Border Patrol drugs and explosives dog and whom he had carefully trained to be a jaguar scent detection dog—the burly and rugged Bugbee had been steadily tracking El Jefe’s movements across the Santa Ritas for the University of Arizona.  It took a long time for Bugbee to turn the skittish canine into a dependable jaguar scat detection dog. But at some point, Mayke blossomed. She’d scent over puma scat and would drive off impudent black bears, but when she found jaguar scat, she would stand over it and bark repeatedly. The longer Bugbee and Mayke tracked El Jefe, the more curious the big cat became. Often, when they would return to a camera that they had checked days before, the time code would show that El Jefe had visited that same camera just minutes after they had. In other words, the big cat was tracking them. At first, it made Bugbee break out in an anxious sweat, but he told me that as they became more familiar with each other, it turned into a “special relationship,” one that Bugbee came to “cherish”—just him, his faithful dog and the United States’ only wild jaguar. Fun fact: A jaguar’s spots A jaguar’s tan-and-black spots are called “rosettes,” and each animal has its own unique pattern of these markings. That’s how scientists can recognize an individual jaguar in camera trap images, even years later. By 2015, El Jefe—though not yet enmeshed in a thicket of complicated and conflicting human ambitions—was becoming a local legend and something of a household name as media attention to the “Santa Rita jaguar” or “America’s last jaguar” intensified. But the charismatic big cat was still an anonymous jaguar who had taken up residence some 200 miles north of where he was born. For some biologists, his presence was a thrilling development, signifying the auspicious return of jaguars to an area where for millennia big cats had thrived. However, Alan Rabinowitz, an American zoologist and big cat expert, was not especially impressed and went on record saying that a lone big cat, especially a male, wandering the mountains of southern Arizona, was nothing more than a fortuitous exception and had little or no ecological significance. If anything, he argued, jaguars dispersing from a fragile population in Sonora, Mexico, were acting as desperate organisms might, searching for a way to survive.  The Center for Biological Diversity wasn’t buying Rabinowitz’s indifference. The gutsy and contentious Tucson-based nonprofit environmental organization, with a reputation for filing lawsuits based on the Endangered Species Act since its founding in 1989, began a campaign in May 2015, focusing on the big cat and on Arizona jaguars in general. Not long afterward, Mike Stark and Russ McSpadden, from the center’s communication department, and Randy Serraglio, a magnetic and outspoken conservation advocate for the center, began laying plans for a considerably more aggressive publicity campaign with the ambitious goal of branding jaguars as icons of wildness in southern Arizona. But perhaps their greatest dream, one they were reluctant even to whisper about outside the confines of the conference room, was to turn the Santa Ritas jaguar into a national cynosure and, dare they hope, even a rock star.  While brainstorming, Serraglio, McFadden and Stark hit on the notion of holding a naming contest for the big cat. An anonymous apex predator on the loose in Tucson’s remote outskirts was exciting, but a jaguar with a resonant moniker could be a powerful symbol. Further refining the idea, they decided to enlist the help of local schoolkids. They settled on Valencia Middle School in Tucson, composed largely of Indigenous and Mexican American students, which had a jaguar as its mascot. Serraglio took the lead, contacting Valencia’s principal, who embraced the idea. Together she and Serraglio established a jaguar curriculum. Following the study unit, their plan was to hold a schoolwide vote to determine the jaguar’s name. Simultaneously, the center ran an online vote for their members and supporters across the country, using the teaser: “Cast your vote: ProtectOurJaguars.org.”  The program was even more successful than Serraglio imagined. On the final day of the study unit, the school staged a huge pep rally, replete with a large, 12-by-14-­foot Chinese-dragon-style jaguar puppet, operated by five people; music and singing; and a relay race where kids, emulating jaguars, had to secure “resources” around the school grounds while avoiding “threats” (a mine, roads and the border wall). Serraglio described the celebration as a “jaguar frenzy.” McFadden filmed and did interviews with the students about what name they chose and why. Later he spliced together the video clips, which the center used on its website.  In early October 2015, Serraglio tallied all the votes from the school and the online campaign. The top five names were: O’oshad (the Tohono O’odham word for jaguar); Rito, in honor of the Santa Ritas; Scout; Spirit; and El Jefe. The winner was El Jefe, Spanish for “the Boss,” by a whisker. One month later, on November 2, Serraglio and the center staged a live press event at the school to announce El Jefe as the winner of the jaguar naming contest. Meanwhile, in the months leading up to November 2, Chris Bugbee had grown frustrated with the University of Arizona’s resistance to making public his stirring and unprecedented footage of El Jefe. From his perspective, the footage was “gold” for jaguar conservation in the U.S. that the directors of the project refused to use. He’d also become deeply upset with the Forest Service, which had issued a preliminary permit for a copper mine in the Santa Rita Mountains that would challenge the inviolability of the Endangered Species Act, which protected jaguars like El Jefe and their habitat. One of Bugbee’s videos showed El Jefe just a half-mile from the proposed mine site. “We wanted to show the world that we still have jaguars in Arizona,” Bugbee told the Arizona Daily Star. “We wanted to get the American public involved in this question: Do we want to recover jaguars, or do we want them to just become a piece of local history?” Bugbee later spoke of his frustration: “Nobody wanted to do any advocacy for jaguars or say a word against this mine … not the university, not the wildlife agencies. El Jefe was like a dirty little secret they wanted to keep quiet. It didn’t sit right with me. It kept me up at night.” El Jefe, caught on camera in 2013 United States Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikimedia Commons So Bugbee and his wife, Aletris Neils, a fellow biologist who had studied black bears in Florida, contemplated going public with the photos and the video footage of El Jefe that Bugbee had collected under the aegis of the University of Arizona’s Jaguar Survey and Monitoring Project. Though Bugbee hadn’t intended to mix science with advocacy, both he and Neils sensed that the big cat could be a galvanizing publicity tool in the fight against the copper mine. They also feared for him. Rural Arizona could be hostile territory for a jaguar. Someone filled with hate might try to track down El Jefe and shoot him.  Bugbee and Neils agonized over the decision, knowing, too, the kind of discord it could create in the academic and conservation community. Some would applaud it, but most would regard the move as roguish, and it would alienate colleagues who believed that the university had proprietary rights to the footage or that under no circumstances should a vulnerable jaguar’s movements ever be made public. The University of Arizona and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) would eventually employ a federal agent and a prosecutor to investigate Bugbee’s and Neils’ conduct for allegedly stealing intellectual property and cameras; five years later, it ended with no convictions.  At the same time, the University of Arizona’s money for Bugbee’s camera program ran out. Bugbee tried to convince the FWS, the Arizona Game and Fish Department and even the Forest Service to pick up the funding, but when they balked, he approached the Center for Biological Diversity. The center ponied up the money to keep Bugbee’s research going, but it negotiated a promise from him that he would provide footage it could use in its ongoing PR campaign for jaguars.  Bugbee and Mayke then resumed tracking El Jefe, using an expired university research permit. By the fall of 2015, Bugbee realized that after appearing regularly and reliably on cameras for several years, El Jefe was nowhere to be found. Mayke hadn’t barked in months.  In late January 2016, Serraglio alerted Bugbee that McSpadden had cut a 41-second video clip, which the center was planning to release on the Conservation CATalyst website, an organization Bugbee and Neils had established hoping to educate the public about big cats and promote their protection. The center had picked a day that would precede the local Barrio Brewing Company’s much-anticipated rollout of its El Jefe Hefeweizen, infused with catnip. Bugbee and Neils held their breath. On February 3, according to plan, the center released the video—actually a compilation of three separate videos—showing El Jefe, now a robust 150-pound male in his prime, moving like a ghost through the forest and up a creek bed. Midway through, El Jefe walks, broad-shouldered and muscular, right into the camera. El Jefe: Americas Only Known Wild Jaguar According to Bugbee, once the video hit and legend merged with reality, “all hell broke loose.” The following weeks were nothing but a “blur.” The press coverage was preponderantly positive, but the FWS field supervisor for the Southwest, unaware that El Jefe had likely decamped for new territory, accused Bugbee of blatantly violating the terms of the research permit and endangering the big cat’s life.  The video went viral. Twenty-one million television viewers in the U.S. saw it, and El Jefe, the incarnation of beauty and wildness, became an object of adoration and admiration, a national—and international—sensation. He was Arizona’s version of the iconic Yellowstone wolf, O-Six, or Los Angeles’ beloved puma, P-22, and as close to a natural cause célèbre as the state had ever seen. Within just 48 hours, the video had reportedly appeared on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” NBC’s “Today Show,” CBS “This Morning” and nearly 830 other TV segments in the U.S. Millions more saw the video on national newspaper websites. The center’s rough estimate was that 100 million people globally viewed the video. El Jefe was indeed a rock star. But by the time El Jefe became famous, he was already gone. He likely did what jaguars sometimes do—disappear. Some claimed he went east into the Patagonia Mountains. Others said he followed his sun compass hundreds of miles back into the foothills of the Sierra Madres. Bugbee, who in almost four years of tracking El Jefe never had the good fortune of laying his eyes on the big cat, recalls some of the last photos of El Jefe, in the fall of 2015, his testicles bulging. He thinks the big lusty cat, obeying a biological imperative, went south in search of a mate, knowing that his sojourn in Arizona was reproductively doomed. What exactly happened to El Jefe, no one knows. But for a few years he graced Arizona with his presence, and for a brief time, he captivated a nation. Excerpted from Heart of the Jaguar: The Extraordinary Conservation Effort to Save the Americas’ Legendary Cat. Copyright ©2025 by James Campbell. Used with permission of the publisher, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Massive crocodile taken to Steve Irwin’s Australia Zoo despite traditional owners’ anger over removal

Old Faithful, measuring more than 4 metres, rehomed to Sunshine Coast facility after removal from far north Queensland waterholeFollow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastAn “iconic” saltwater crocodile has been transported more than 1,600km to Australia Zoo – made famous by Steve Irwin – almost two months after its controversial removal from its far north Queensland habitat.But while the Sunshine Coast zoo said it was proud to become the “forever home” of Old Faithful, as the crocodile that measures longer than 4 metres is known, traditional owners said they were “very upset” by the outcome, which conservationists describe as a “cover-up”. Continue reading...

An “iconic” saltwater crocodile has been transported more than 1,600km to Australia Zoo – made famous by Steve Irwin – almost two months after its controversial removal from its far north Queensland habitat.But while the Sunshine Coast zoo said it was proud to become the “forever home” of Old Faithful, as the crocodile that measures longer than 4 metres is known, traditional owners said they were “very upset” by the outcome, which conservationists describe as a “cover-up”.Australia Zoo announced the crocodile had arrived at its facility, near the Glasshouse Mountains of south-east Queensland, via a social media video on Monday morning.The clip begins with footage of the late Steve Irwin capturing Old Faithful in the waterhole for which he is named in Rinyirru – or Lakefield national park – as portrayed in the mid-1990s television series The Crocodile Hunter.In that episode, Irwin “hazed” the apex predator, before returning him to his home on the Normanby River, in an effort to instil fear of humans into the big reptile and so avoid conflict with anglers – a pioneering experiment which appears to have been successful for almost two decades.Sign up: AU Breaking News emailBut that coexistence unravelled on 8 September when Old Faithful and a second – albeit smaller – crocodile were removed from the river by wildlife officers.It came after the Queensland environment department said it received reports of the crocodile’s repeated, concerning escalating behaviour “as a direct result of it being fed by people”.Old Faithful in a shallow pool at a government facility in Cairns after his removal from the wildIn the social media video, Australia Zoo’s Toby Millyard says the crocodile research team he leads had initially hoped Old Faithful would be released back into its natural habitat.“Once we heard that he was unreleasable, we jumped in to offer to give him a home because we know that we can give him the best of the best for the rest of his life,” Millyard said.But the Rinyirru (Lakefield) Aboriginal Corporation chair, Alwyn Lyall, said he was saddened and “pissed off” to learn on Monday morning that this “important and totemic” animal had been taken so far from his country and its traditional owners.“This crocodile comes from up here in Cape York,” Lyall said. “A zoo is the wrong place for that animal.“To remove him over the weekend without [any] notice or notification to us traditional owners, or anything – it’s like a thief in the night sort of rubbish?“We never gave the authority for that to happen.”Lyall said that if the croc had to be rehomed, he would rather Old Faithful go to a facility in Babinda, less than 400km south, and more accessible to traditional owners. Croc Country Australia also runs training courses with Indigenous rangers, and is home to another icon crocodile removed from Rinyirru.Its owner, Jesse Crampton, confirmed he had put in an expression of interest to the department to house Old Faithful.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Breaking News AustraliaGet the most important news as it breaksPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionCrampton said he established the facility specifically to meet a “housing crisis” for crocodiles deemed icons under Queensland law – which are longer than 4 metres – but also considered a problem by authorities.“We’ve got a purpose-built, newly established crocodile facility designed to house icon crocodiles for these kinds of scenarios,” he said.In September, the Environmental Defenders Office – acting for advocacy group Community Representation of Crocodiles (Croc) – lodged a request for a statement of reasons for Old Faithful’s removal.Croc’s co-founder Amanda French said the department requested an extension for the request until Wednesday, but had simultaneously “fast-tracked the paperwork and transport logistics” to move Old Faithful. She said this amounted to a “cover-up for mistakes” made in a removal from the wild that lacked “transparency” and “cultural authority”.She said Old Faithful would no doubt provide “a great commercial opportunity” for the zoo.“It’s incredibly sad that a crocodile that survived decades in the wild – swimming enormous distances, feeding on whatever he wants, mating with whomever he wants – is now sentenced to a lifetime in [captivity] … for tourists’ [amusement],” French said.A department spokesperson confirmed the smaller reptile captured along with Old Faithful had been relocated to a crocodile farm in far north Queensland.

Controversial UK oil field publishes full scale of climate impact

The impact from the Rosebank oil field is estimated at nearly 250 million tonnes of planet warming CO2.

The UK's largest undeveloped oil field has revealed the full scale of its environmental impact, should it gain approval by the government.Developers of the Rosebank oil field said nearly 250 million tonnes of planet warming gas would be released from using oil products from the field.The amount would vary each year, but by comparison the UK's annual emissions in 2024 were 371 million tonnes.The field's developer said its emissions were "not significant" considering the UK's international climate commitments.Rosebank is an oil and gas field which lies about 80 miles north-west of Shetland and is one of the largest undeveloped discoveries of fossil fuels in UK waters.It is said to contain up to 300 million barrels of oil and some gas, and is owned by Norwegian energy giant Equinor and British firm Ithaca Energy.The field was originally approved in 2023, but in July a court ruled that a more detailed assessment of the field's environmental impact was required, taking into account the effect on the climate of burning any fossil fuels extracted from it.A public consultation has now been opened, and will run until 20th November 2025.The final decision on whether to approve the field will be made by the Energy Secretary.Until recently such projects were only required to consider the impact on the environment from extracting the fossil fuels.But in June last year the Supreme Court ruled that authorities must take account of the impact from also using the products, after a woman in Surrey challenged the development of her local gas project.This ruling was then used in a further challenge to the Rosebank oil field by environmental campaigners Uplift and Greenpeace - which was subsequently successful in January. Equinor was required to recalculate the "full impact" of the field and it now estimates that it will contribute an additional 249 million tonnes of the planet warming gas CO2 over the next 25 years. This is more than 50 times greater than the original figure of 4.5 million tonnes it gave from extracting the oil and gas.The UK has a target to produce no additional emissions by 2050 and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has been vocal about the need to move away from fossil fuels. On Tuesday, he told an industry conference that the UK's dependence on fossil fuels was its "Achilles' heel" and argued clean power was the only way to reduce bills.The fossil fuels for the Rosebank field are not guaranteed to be used in the UK but would be sold on the international market.As such the project is unlikely to have an impact on lowering gas prices. The UK's independent climate advisors said in 2022 that any more domestic oil and gas extraction would have "at most, a marginal effect on prices".But Arne Gurtner, Equinor's senior vice president for the UK, has previously said that: "If the UK needs Rosebank oil, it will go to the UK through open market mechanisms."

No Results today.

Our news is updated constantly with the latest environmental stories from around the world. Reset or change your filters to find the most active current topics.

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.