Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

How to Stay Hydrated During a Summer Heatwave, According to Experts

News Feed
Thursday, August 1, 2024

Extreme heat is sending unprecedented numbers of Americans to emergency departments—and to untimely deaths. Scientists, clinicians and public health officials know that people need to stay hydrated to prevent heat-related illnesses. But it can be hard for an individual to figure out how much liquid is enough; needs can vary a lot depending on circumstances and body type.In search of some actionable guidance, Scientific American spoke with physicians and researchers about how to hydrate during a heat wave (or any other weather condition).Why is it especially important to hydrate in extreme heat?On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Heat-related illness can occur whenever people are exposed to hot outside temperatures, particularly those above 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius). Humid climates make sweating less effective and increase the threat, says Stavros Kavouras, director of the Hydration Science Lab at Arizona State University.High temperatures leach water from a person’s body, which reduces blood volume and forces the heart to work harder to support other essential organs. Dehydration, or severe water loss, in turn limits sweating, feeding a cycle of overheating. At its most innocuous, a spike in core body temperature can cause painful muscle cramps in people exercising outdoors. But heat-related illness can take the form of a more serious condition known as heat exhaustion, which can progress to a potentially lethal one called heat stroke.Knowing the various signs of heat-related illness can save lives. “When I’ve seen people who progressed into heat stroke, it was because they weren’t aware what was happening to them, and the people around them didn’t know they were unwell,” says Sheri Belafsky, an occupational and environmental medicine physician at UC Davis Health.Common symptoms of heat exhaustion are profuse sweating, fatigue and nausea. The condition itself isn’t fatal, but repeated cases can cause long-term health effects such as chronic kidney disease. Heat stroke occurs at body temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C) and above, can cause confusion, loss of consciousness and seizures. People who don’t receive emergency medical attention will undergo major organ failure.What heightens the risk of dehydration?People who spend long periods of time outside or are physically active, such as outdoor laborers and athletes, are most at risk. Age and medical status can also make dehydration more likely. Older adults sweat less efficiently, and the bodies of pregnant people and children have greater difficulty regulating body temperature. A broad swath of medications, including beta-blockers, stimulants, antipsychotics and antidepressants, make it harder for the body to detect or defend against dehydration. People with heart or kidney issues also risk their conditions worsening.How can if you tell if you’re properly hydrated?Thirst is a delayed and often shaky indicator of dehydration, Kavouras says. Our ability to detect thirst decreases as we age, and certain medications such as antidepressants and weight-loss drugs can dampen the signal. Experts suggest that people keep water bottles nearby and track how much they drink. Major health organizations advise women to take in 1.6 to 2.1 liters of water per day and men to take in two to three liters—but those recommendations increase in the heat. A well-hydrated person should urinate every two to three hours, and their urine should generally be pale yellow (though an individual’s diet and medication can sometimes alter the baseline color).For people who are outdoors in extreme heat, it helps to drink a glass of water every half hour, says Brandee Waite, a sports medicine doctor at UC Davis Health. Overhydration is rare and usually only occurs if someone drinks more than a liter of fluid per hour.Does only water count for hydration?Nope! Many foods, particularly fruits and vegetables, contain water. But people do need to consume liquids of some kind, in addition to their meals, to meet health guidelines. Beverages such as milk and some fruit juices are mostly water. People who dislike the taste of plain water can try flavoring their drinks—or even making at-home popsicles, says Sarah Eby, a sports medicine specialist at Mass General Brigham and Spaulding Rehabilitation. Drinks that contain caffeine or alcohol, however, cause people’s body to lose more water and should be consumed in moderation when the weather is extremely hot. Waite recommends, for instance, that people at picnics or outdoor parties alternate a glass of water with each alcoholic drink.When should a person replenish their electrolytes?As we sweat, we lose small amounts of important minerals such as sodium, potassium and magnesium. Such electrolytes help our muscles and nerve cells function. Most people’s diet contains enough electrolytes to make up for what they lose by perspiring. But those who sweat a lot—either from prolonged heat exposure or intense physical activity that lasts more than an hour—should consider consuming electrolyte products, such as sports drinks or gummies.The method of delivery, be it powder, tablet or gel, doesn’t affect the body’s absorption of electrolytes. The ingredient list is more important; effective products are rich in salt and contain small amounts of sugar. For a sports drink, that might look like 450 milligrams of sodium and less than 30 grams of sugar per 24 ounces (0.7 liter) of liquid, Eby says. Small amounts of sugar speed up fluid absorption, but larger amounts have the opposite effect: too much sugar can cause diarrhea and thereby dehydrate the body.People who decide to make their own electrolyte drinks at home should follow recipes that are simple and cheap, Waite suggests. A mixture of apple juice, water and salt can suffice—though “you don’t want to make it so [salty] that your face puckers as you drink it,” she adds.The kidneys often filter out extra electrolytes, but drinking too many can cause muscle cramps, nausea, diarrhea and a fast heart rate. It’s safest to stick to existing products that offer serving size recommendations and to reach out to physicians for more precise guidance when necessary.How much does hydration matter outside of a heat wave?Water plays a vital role in “every single physiological function of the body,” Kavouras says. Despite this, more than half the world’s population fails to meet normal daily hydration guidelines. The kidneys can stave off dehydration by secreting less liquid, which keeps symptoms minor for most people. But the consequences of even mild water deficits, or “underhydration,” accumulate over time. Inadequate hydration can worsen day-to-day cognitive and physical functions—and some research has linked chronically high sodium levels to faster aging and a higher risk of chronic diseases, such as diabetes, dementia and heart failure.

The amount of water and electrolytes needed for proper hydration vary from person to person

Extreme heat is sending unprecedented numbers of Americans to emergency departments—and to untimely deaths. Scientists, clinicians and public health officials know that people need to stay hydrated to prevent heat-related illnesses. But it can be hard for an individual to figure out how much liquid is enough; needs can vary a lot depending on circumstances and body type.

In search of some actionable guidance, Scientific American spoke with physicians and researchers about how to hydrate during a heat wave (or any other weather condition).

Why is it especially important to hydrate in extreme heat?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Heat-related illness can occur whenever people are exposed to hot outside temperatures, particularly those above 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius). Humid climates make sweating less effective and increase the threat, says Stavros Kavouras, director of the Hydration Science Lab at Arizona State University.

High temperatures leach water from a person’s body, which reduces blood volume and forces the heart to work harder to support other essential organs. Dehydration, or severe water loss, in turn limits sweating, feeding a cycle of overheating. At its most innocuous, a spike in core body temperature can cause painful muscle cramps in people exercising outdoors. But heat-related illness can take the form of a more serious condition known as heat exhaustion, which can progress to a potentially lethal one called heat stroke.

Knowing the various signs of heat-related illness can save lives. “When I’ve seen people who progressed into heat stroke, it was because they weren’t aware what was happening to them, and the people around them didn’t know they were unwell,” says Sheri Belafsky, an occupational and environmental medicine physician at UC Davis Health.

Common symptoms of heat exhaustion are profuse sweating, fatigue and nausea. The condition itself isn’t fatal, but repeated cases can cause long-term health effects such as chronic kidney disease. Heat stroke occurs at body temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C) and above, can cause confusion, loss of consciousness and seizures. People who don’t receive emergency medical attention will undergo major organ failure.

What heightens the risk of dehydration?

People who spend long periods of time outside or are physically active, such as outdoor laborers and athletes, are most at risk. Age and medical status can also make dehydration more likely. Older adults sweat less efficiently, and the bodies of pregnant people and children have greater difficulty regulating body temperature. A broad swath of medications, including beta-blockers, stimulants, antipsychotics and antidepressants, make it harder for the body to detect or defend against dehydration. People with heart or kidney issues also risk their conditions worsening.

How can if you tell if you’re properly hydrated?

Thirst is a delayed and often shaky indicator of dehydration, Kavouras says. Our ability to detect thirst decreases as we age, and certain medications such as antidepressants and weight-loss drugs can dampen the signal. Experts suggest that people keep water bottles nearby and track how much they drink. Major health organizations advise women to take in 1.6 to 2.1 liters of water per day and men to take in two to three liters—but those recommendations increase in the heat. A well-hydrated person should urinate every two to three hours, and their urine should generally be pale yellow (though an individual’s diet and medication can sometimes alter the baseline color).

For people who are outdoors in extreme heat, it helps to drink a glass of water every half hour, says Brandee Waite, a sports medicine doctor at UC Davis Health. Overhydration is rare and usually only occurs if someone drinks more than a liter of fluid per hour.

Does only water count for hydration?

Nope! Many foods, particularly fruits and vegetables, contain water. But people do need to consume liquids of some kind, in addition to their meals, to meet health guidelines. Beverages such as milk and some fruit juices are mostly water. People who dislike the taste of plain water can try flavoring their drinks—or even making at-home popsicles, says Sarah Eby, a sports medicine specialist at Mass General Brigham and Spaulding Rehabilitation. Drinks that contain caffeine or alcohol, however, cause people’s body to lose more water and should be consumed in moderation when the weather is extremely hot. Waite recommends, for instance, that people at picnics or outdoor parties alternate a glass of water with each alcoholic drink.

When should a person replenish their electrolytes?

As we sweat, we lose small amounts of important minerals such as sodium, potassium and magnesium. Such electrolytes help our muscles and nerve cells function. Most people’s diet contains enough electrolytes to make up for what they lose by perspiring. But those who sweat a lot—either from prolonged heat exposure or intense physical activity that lasts more than an hour—should consider consuming electrolyte products, such as sports drinks or gummies.

The method of delivery, be it powder, tablet or gel, doesn’t affect the body’s absorption of electrolytes. The ingredient list is more important; effective products are rich in salt and contain small amounts of sugar. For a sports drink, that might look like 450 milligrams of sodium and less than 30 grams of sugar per 24 ounces (0.7 liter) of liquid, Eby says. Small amounts of sugar speed up fluid absorption, but larger amounts have the opposite effect: too much sugar can cause diarrhea and thereby dehydrate the body.

People who decide to make their own electrolyte drinks at home should follow recipes that are simple and cheap, Waite suggests. A mixture of apple juice, water and salt can suffice—though “you don’t want to make it so [salty] that your face puckers as you drink it,” she adds.

The kidneys often filter out extra electrolytes, but drinking too many can cause muscle cramps, nausea, diarrhea and a fast heart rate. It’s safest to stick to existing products that offer serving size recommendations and to reach out to physicians for more precise guidance when necessary.

How much does hydration matter outside of a heat wave?

Water plays a vital role in “every single physiological function of the body,” Kavouras says. Despite this, more than half the world’s population fails to meet normal daily hydration guidelines. The kidneys can stave off dehydration by secreting less liquid, which keeps symptoms minor for most people. But the consequences of even mild water deficits, or “underhydration,” accumulate over time. Inadequate hydration can worsen day-to-day cognitive and physical functions—and some research has linked chronically high sodium levels to faster aging and a higher risk of chronic diseases, such as diabetes, dementia and heart failure.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

UK’s largest proposed datacentre ‘understating planned water use’

Analysis suggests consumption at Northumberland site could be 50 times higher than US operator QTS estimatesThe UK’s largest proposed datacentre is understating the scale of its planned water use, according to an analysis.The first phase of construction for the hyperscale campus in Cambois in Northumberland has been given the go-ahead by the local council. The US operator QTS, which is developing the site, has promoted its “water-free” cooling system as proof of its sustainability. Continue reading...

The UK’s largest proposed datacentre is understating the scale of its planned water use, according to an analysis.The first phase of construction for the hyperscale campus in Cambois in Northumberland has been given the go-ahead by the local council. The US operator QTS, which is developing the site, has promoted its “water-free” cooling system as proof of its sustainability.But research published this week calls that claim into question. A study of the power and water footprints of AI production by the data scientist Alex de Vries-Gao highlights the underestimated scale of indirect, or embedded, water consumption caused by datacentre operations.QTS estimates the two initial data halls will consume 2.3m litres of water annually, according to documents it submitted to Northumberland county council. Yet applying De Vries-Gao’s methodology to the electricity generation required for the site’s AI servers produces a figure more than 50 times higher, at 124m litres a year, according to analysis by Watershed Investigations and the Guardian.When all the 10 planned halls are operational, the Cambois campus could indirectly consume about 621m litres annually – equivalent to the average yearly use of more than 11,000 people.The company uses a closed-loop system, which typically reuses the same water repeatedly for cooling, but uses more energy to chill the machines. QTS says there will be no pressure on water supply for people in the north-east fromits direct datacentre operations.In a statement, QTS said: “Our power is typically carbon neutral and comes from a range of sources including wind, hydro, nuclear, tidal, etc. QTS does not control the quantity of any water utilised in the power generation process.”But according to De Vries-Gao, datacentre operators must acknowledge the water footprint linked to their massive energy demands, in the same way that power-intensive industries are held accountable for the carbon emissions generated by their electricity consumption.De Vries-Gao said: “The datacentre operator will be responsible for creating the power demand which leads to the consumption of this water. For the same reason, the greenhouse gas protocol already mandates disclosure of indirect emissions related to electricity consumption.”Another potentially understated problem is the air pollution from the datacentre from increased power generation and potential greater use of diesel generators than stated.In the US, researchers and environmental groups have sounded the alarm about worsening air quality as a result of growing emissions of fine particulate matter and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from the power plants and backup generators datacentres rely on. Increased emissions are a result of surging power demand to produce AI systems, according to a recent study. According to Shaolei Ren of the University of California, one of the study’s authors, the evidence connecting datacentre growth to harmful health outcomes from air pollution is already “very strong”.“What is missing is awareness and precise quantitative accounting. The critical gap is that we still do not know, in a transparent and systematic way, how much criteria air pollution data centres actually contribute at the local and regional levels,” Ren said.Common pollutants include ozone, fine particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and lead, which damage human health and the wider environment.This pollution is not only the result of electricity generation from the grid. A proportion often comes from highly-polluting diesel generators, installed to ensure the nearly constant “uptime” demanded by the datacentre and AI industry.Once complete, the Cambois campus will rely on nearly 600 diesel generators for “backup” power – up to 58 per data hall. QTS estimates that regular testing of the system would mean running each generator for five hours a year.The generators have been designated as a backup power system to be used in emergencies if the grid fails. But in Virginia’s “datacentre alley”, a hub where QTS has a datacentre, regulators are considering expanding diesel generator use for planned outages, while environmentalists have warned of pressure to permit generators during grid stress.Julie Bolthouse from the Piedmont Environmental Council, a conservation organisation, said: “They are incrementally increasing under what circumstances they can run and de facto how frequently and how long they can run the thousands of generators we have permitted here in Virginia. Once the generators are in place it is only a matter of time before they use them.”The potential impact of this scenario playing out in Cambois could have negative effects on the local community’s health. Cambois primary school’s playground has been identified by QTS as directly affected by emissions from the generators.In a statement, QTS said: “Generators can occasionally be utilised on a temporary basis to bridge power needs while permanent connections are finalised, but the primary use of generators is for emergency backup purposes.“Diesel generators are not the main source of power for our datacentres. Generators are tested once a month for a short period of time for routine maintenance. Each data centre has a publicly available emissions limit and our normal operations are designed to stay well within those requirements. In the highly unlikely event of a complete grid outage in the UK, backup generators would run only for the duration of such grid outage and at reduced power. Regarding Virginia, QTS has zero control over our competitors.”

These giant sea reptiles lived in freshwater rivers, too

Scientists thought mosasaurs - giant sea reptiles - lived in oceans. But the discovery of fossils in North Dakota shows they may also have lived in freshwater. The post These giant sea reptiles lived in freshwater rivers, too first appeared on EarthSky.

Watch Melanie During of Vrije University in the Netherlands talk about mosasaurs in the late Cretaceous. Researchers found a tooth from a mosasaur in North Dakota that dates back 66 million years. The find suggests these giant sea reptiles lived in freshwater as well as oceans. Video via Genuine Rockstars (Dennis Voeten and Melanie During). EarthSky’s 2026 lunar calendar is available now. Get yours today! Makes a great gift. Mosasaurs were the apex predators of the sea during the late Cretaceous, 94 to 66 million years ago. But they also lived in freshwater habitats, such as rivers, according to a new study. Environmental changes during the late Cretaceous may have driven mosasaurs to adapt to freshwater areas in North America’s inland sea. Chemical analysis of a mosasaur tooth reveals a surprise Mosasaurs were giant aquatic reptiles that lived 94 to 66 million years ago. While T. rex was the dominant predator on land, mosasaurs were the apex predators of the sea. But scientists from Uppsala University in the Netherlands said on December 12, 2025, that they have new evidence showing mosasaurs also lived in freshwater, in inland rivers. Their diverse habitats suggest they were adapting to a changing environment. In 2022, researchers found a mosasaur tooth at an unexpected location in North Dakota. They recovered it from ancient river deposits alongside a T. rex tooth and the jawbone of a freshwater crocodile-like (or crocodilian) reptile. Plus, the area was known for its fossilized Edmontosaurus duck-billed dinosaurs. How did a seagoing mosasaur’s tooth end up in a freshwater river? In this new study, scientists found answers in the mosasaur’s tooth enamel. A chemical analysis of certain elements revealed that this mosasaur had, in fact, lived in freshwater, not salt water. The researchers published their study in the peer-reviewed journal BMC Zoology on December 12, 2025. Artist’s concept of a mosasaur in a river, having just caught a crocodilian. In this new study, scientists suggest that late Cretaceous mosasaurs could have lived in freshwater. Image via Christopher DiPiazza/ Uppsala University. These giant sea reptiles were apex water predators Mosasaurs were large swimming reptiles of the late Cretaceous, 94 to 66 million years ago. Scientists have found most of their fossils in marine deposits, therefore associating mosasaurs as sea creatures. Along with most dinosaurs, mosasaurs perished 66 million years ago, during the K-Pg extinction event. That’s when a massive asteroid crashed into our planet, causing the extinction of many species. Scientists think the tooth they studied came from a mosasaur of the genus Prognathodon. These creatures had bulky heads with sturdy jaws and teeth. The tooth was about 1.2 inches (30 mm) long. Therefore, based on what they knew about other, more complete mosasaur fossils, the researchers extrapolated the size of this individual to 36 feet (11 meters) in length. That’s about the size of a bus. Per Ahlberg, of Uppsala University in Sweden, is a paper co-author. He said: The size means that the animal would rival the largest killer whales, making it an extraordinary predator to encounter in riverine environments not previously associated with such giant marine reptiles. On the left, different views of the mosasaur tooth. On the right, an image of the T. rex tooth in the ground. The red rectangle shows the location where the mosasaur tooth was recovered. Image via During, M. A. D., et al./ BMC Zoology (CC BY 4.0). Probing the tooth enamel with isotope analysis For some elements, an atom has the same number of protons but a different number of neutrons. These different forms of an element are called isotopes. For example, carbon-12, carbon-13 and carbon-14 are three carbon isotopes. They all have six protons. But they also have six, seven and eight neutrons, respectively. The ratio of isotopes for an element can vary depending on the type of environment. In this study, the scientists looked at three elements: oxygen, strontium and carbon. They found there was more oxygen-16 in their mosasaur’s tooth enamel compared to mosasaurs found in marine environments. Therefore, they concluded, this animal lived in freshwater. Strontium isotope ratios also suggested the same. Melanie During of Vrije University in The Netherlands is the paper’s lead author. She said this about carbon isotope ratios they found: Carbon isotopes in teeth generally reflect what the animal ate. Many mosasaurs have low carbon-13 values because they dive deep. The mosasaur tooth found with the T. rex tooth, on the other hand, has a higher carbon-13 value than all known mosasaurs, dinosaurs and crocodiles, suggesting that it did not dive deep and may sometimes have fed on drowned dinosaurs. The isotope signatures indicated that this mosasaur had inhabited this freshwater riverine environment. When we looked at two additional mosasaur teeth found at nearby, slightly older, sites in North Dakota, we saw similar freshwater signatures. These analyses shows that mosasaurs lived in riverine environments in the final million years before going extinct. Melanie During prepares a sample of the mosasaur tooth for strontium isotope analysis. Via Melanie During/ Uppsala University. An ancient sea in North America During the late Cretaceous, an inland sea divided North America, separating the east and west sides of the continent. This sea is known as the Western Interior Seaway. The amount of freshwater entering this sea increased over time. As a result, the seawater gradually transformed from salt water to brackish water, and then to mostly fresh water. The scientists think that this created a halocline. In other words, salt water – which is heavier because of dissolved salts – formed a layer at the bottom of the sea. Meanwhile, the lighter freshwater sat on top of it. These giant sea reptiles might have lived in freshwater Ahlberg commented that their isotope analysis confirms the theory about halocline conditions in the Western Interior Seaway: For comparison with the mosasaur teeth, we also measured fossils from other marine animals and found a clear difference. All gill-breathing animals had isotope signatures linking them to brackish or salty water, while all lung-breathing animals lacked such signatures. This shows that mosasaurs, which needed to come to the surface to breathe, inhabited the upper freshwater layer and not the lower layer where the water was more saline. Late Cretaceous mosasaurs may have adapted to the changing salinity of the inland sea. During said: Unlike the complex adaptation required to move from freshwater to marine habitats, the reverse adaptation is generally simpler. The scientists cited modern examples of these adaptations. For instance, river dolphins live in freshwater but they’re descended from marine ancestors. The saltwater crocodile in Australia is able to move between freshwater rivers and the sea. Bottom line: Scientists used to think that mosasaurs were exclusively sea-dwellers. But new research suggests that North American late Cretaceous mosasaurs might have lived in freshwater. Source: “King of the Riverside”, a multi-proxy approach offers a new perspective on mosasaurs before their extinction Via Uppsala University Read more: Nanotyrannus, a T. rex mini-me, coexisted with the big guysThe post These giant sea reptiles lived in freshwater rivers, too first appeared on EarthSky.

2025’s AI boom caused huge CO2 emissions and use of water, research finds

Study’s author says society not tech companies paying for environmental impact of AI and asks if this is fairThe AI boom has caused as much carbon dioxide to be released into the atmosphere in 2025 as emitted by the whole of New York City, it has been claimed.The global environmental impact of the rapidly spreading technology has been estimated in research published on Wednesdaywhich also found that AI-related water use now exceeds the entirety of global bottled-water demand. Continue reading...

The AI boom has caused as much carbon dioxide to be released into the atmosphere in 2025 as emitted by the whole of New York City, it has been claimed.The global environmental impact of the rapidly spreading technology has been estimated in research published on Wednesdaywhich also found that AI-related water use now exceeds the entirety of global bottled-water demand.The figures have been compiled by the Dutch academic Alex de Vries-Gao, the founder of Digiconomist, a company that researches the unintended consequences of digital trends. He claimed they are the first attempt to measure the specific effect of artificial intelligence rather than datacentres in general as the use of chatbots such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini soared in 2025.The figures show the estimated greenhouse gas emissions from AI use are also now equivalent to more than 8% of global aviation emissions. His study used technology companies’ own reporting and he called for stricter requirements for them to be more transparent about their climate impact.“The environmental cost of this is pretty huge in absolute terms,” he said. “At the moment society is paying for these costs, not the tech companies. The question is: is that fair? If they are reaping the benefits of this technology, why should they not be paying some of the costs?”De Vries-Gao found that the 2025 carbon footprint of AI systems could be as high as 80m tonnes, while the water used could reach 765bn litres. He said it was the first time AI’s water impact had been estimated and showed that AI water use alone was more than a third higher than previous estimates of all datacentre water use.The figures are published in the academic journal Patterns. The International Energy Agency (IEA) said earlier this year that AI-focused datacentres draw as much electricity as power-thirsty aluminium smelters and datacentre electricity consumption is expected to more than double by 2030.“This is yet more evidence that the public is footing the environmental bill for some of the richest companies on Earth,” said Donald Campbell, the director of advocacy at Foxglove, a UK non-profit that campaigns for fairness in tech. “Worse, it is likely just the tip of the iceberg. The datacentre construction frenzy, driven by generative AI, is only getting started.“Just one of these new ‘hyperscale’ facilities can generate climate emissions equivalent to several international airports. And in the UK alone, there are an estimated 100-200 of them in the planning system,” said Campbell.The IEA has reported that the largest AI-focused datacentres being built today will each consume as much electricity as 2m households with the US accounting for the largest share of datacentre electricity consumption (45%) followed by China (25%) and Europe (15%).The largest datacentre being planned in the UK, at a former coal power station site in Blyth, Northumberland, is expected to emit more than 180,000 tonnes of CO2 a year when at full operation – the equivalent to the amount produced by more than 24,000 homes.In India, where $30bn (£22.5bn) is being invested in datacentres, there are growing concerns that a lack of reliability from the National Grid will mean the construction of huge diesel generator farms for backup power, which the consultancy KPMG this week called “a massive … carbon liability”.Technology companies’ environmental disclosures are often insufficient to assess even the total datacentre impact, never mind isolating AI use, said De Vries-Gao. He noted that when Google recently reported on the impact of its Gemini AI, it did not account for the water used in generating the electricity needed to power it.Google reported that in 2024 it managed to reduce energy emissions from its datacentres by 12% due to new clean energy sources, but it said this summer that achieving its climate goals was “now more complex and challenging across every level – from local to global” and “a key challenge is the slower-than-needed deployment of carbon-free energy technologies at scale”.Google was approached for comment.

EU waters down plans to end new petrol and diesel car sales by 2035

Carmakers, particularly in Germany, have lobbied heavily for concessions to the planned rules.

The European Commission has watered down its plans to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2035.Current rules state that new vehicles sold from that date should be "zero emission", but carmakers, particularly in Germany, have lobbied heavily for concessions.Under the European Commission's new plan, 90% of new cars sold from 2035 would have to be zero-emission, rather than 100%.According to the European carmakers association, ACEA, market demand for electric cars is currently too low, and without a change to the rules, manufacturers would risk "multi-billion euro" penalties.The remaining 10% could be made up of conventional petrol or diesel cars, along with hybrids.Carmakers will be expected to use low-carbon steel made in the EU in the vehicles they produce.The Commission also expects an increase in the use of biofuels and so-called e-fuels, which are synthesised from captured carbon dioxide, to compensate for the extra emissions created by petrol and diesel vehicles. Opponents of the move have warned that it risks undermining the transition towards electric vehicles and leaving the EU exposed in the face of foreign competition.The green transport group T&E has warned that the UK should not follow the EU's lead by weakening its own plans to phase out the sale of conventional cars under the Zero Emission Vehicles Mandate."The UK must stand firm. Our ZEV mandate is already driving jobs, investment and innovation into the UK. As major exporters we cannot compete unless we innovate, and global markets are going electric fast," said T&E UK's director Anna Krajinska.Ahead of the announcement, Sigrid de Vries, director general at ACEA, said that "flexibility" for manufacturers was "urgent"."2030 is around the corner, and market demand is too low to avoid the risk of multi-billion-euro penalties for manufacturers," she said."It will take time to build the charging points and introduce fiscal and purchase incentives to get the market on track. Policy makers must provide breathing space to manufacturers to sustain jobs, innovation and investments."Carmakers in the UK have previously called for better incentives to encourage drivers to buy electric ahead of the government's planned ban on sales of new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2030.Firms across the world have been changing their production lines and investing billions as governments try to persuade people to drive greener cars to meet environmental targets.Volvo said it had "built a complete EV portfolio in less than 10 years" and was prepared to go fully electric, using hybrids as a transition. It argued if it can move away from petrol and diesel vehicles, other companies should be able to as well.The carmaker said: "Weakening long-term commitments for short-term gain risks undermining Europe's competitiveness for years to come. "A consistent and ambitious policy framework, as well as investments in public infrastructure, is what will deliver real benefits for customers, for the climate, and for Europe's industrial strength."However, German carmaker Volkswagen welcomed the European Commission's draft proposal on new CO₂ targets, calling it "economically sound overall".It said: "The fact that small electric vehicles are to receive special support in future is very positive. It is extremely important that the CO₂ targets for 2030 are made more flexible for passenger cars and adjusted for light commercial vehicles."Opening up the market to vehicles with combustion engines while compensating for emissions is pragmatic and in line with market conditions."Colin Walker, head of transport at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) think tank, said the UK having "stable policy" would give companies the confidence to invest in charging infrastructure and avoid "jeopardising investments"."It was government policy that saw Sunderland chosen to build Nissan's original electric Leaf, and today the latest Nissan EV has started rolling off the production lines in the North East, securing jobs for years to come," he said.Octopus Electric Vehicles chief executive Fiona Howarth warned that if the UK reduced its goals because of changes in Brussels, it would send a "damaging signal to investors, manufacturers and supply-chain partners".Many of these groups have already invested heavily in the transition "on the assumption the UK would stay the course," she said.

How the myth of ‘aqua nullius’ still guides Australia’s approach to groundwater

For too long, Indigenous perspectives have not been heard in groundwater science. We must work together to protect Australia’s precious groundwater.

Clint Hansen, CC BY-NDIndigenous people have coexisted with Australia’s vast and ancient groundwater systems for thousands of generations. Their knowledge extends back through deep time, before our current climate and waterways. It offers insights that Western science is only beginning to quantify. When rain falls, some can seep into the ground, becoming groundwater. This water can remain underground for as little as a few months, or for millions of years. Eventually it is taken up by plants, or flows into springs, rivers and the ocean. Australia’s groundwater resources underpin the economic growth and prosperity of the country. But they are under greater pressure than ever before. Legal battles over water in the NT, including extraction licences, highlights the rapid pace at which decisions over the future of water are being made. Our new paper shows the “business as usual” approach to groundwater science and management risks perpetuating colonial injustices. And it compromises our ability to manage water sustainably as the climate grows warmer and population increases. Most Australians are aware of terra nullius, the legal fiction that Australia belonged to no-one before European settlement. But very few know about aqua nullius, – “water belonging to no-one”. This is a similar fiction suggesting Traditional Owners had no rights to the water they had used for millennia. We show how the legacy of aqua nullius remains embedded within contemporary groundwater science. And urge Australia to take a different approach. Indigenous care of groundwater Indigenous knowledge systems embody many thousands of years of groundwater monitoring. This includes tracking spring behaviour and soil moisture, animal movement and vegetation cues. Australia’s colonial expansion used the water knowledge of Indigenous peoples to support economic and agricultural development. This came at the expense of Indigenous peoples’ water, food, and culture. Bitter Springs in Mataranka, in the Northern Territory. The Traditional Owners are the Mangarayi and Yangman people. Felix Dance/Wikimedia, CC BY Indigenous voices ignored For too long, and too often, Indigenous perspectives on groundwater have not been heard or acted upon. In many instances, Indigenous people bear the impacts of groundwater decline or contamination. And yet, they have limited power to influence the development approvals that create these pressures. For Indigenous communities who have cared for these waters for tens of thousands of years, rapid decision-making over the future of groundwater represents a profound risk to cultural obligations and the living systems that hold songlines, identity, and law. Western scientific approaches are prioritised, while Indigenous groundwater expertise is dismissed and neglected in decision-making. When Indigenous perspectives are considered, there can be backlash from industry. There is often an expectation the government will prioritise economic development. Accelerating pressures from industry and agriculture are superimposed onto the existing inequalities in water access. Many Aboriginal homelands communities still facing water insecurity. Australia’s recent critical minerals agreement with the United States will lead to more water-intensive production and processing and substantial long-term environmental impacts. Mine closure is rare in Australia. Mine rehabilitation often falls short of societal expectations. The legacy of decisions made now is likely to last for thousands of years. And they will disproportionately affect Indigenous communities. Rights vs legal obligations In 2009, Australia endorsed the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. But these rights are not reinforced by current approaches to groundwater science and management. Article 25 states Indigenous Peoples have the right to maintain their relationships with traditional lands and waters. Yet over-extraction is leading springs in Australia to dry out. Springs are places of ceremony, law, healing and identity. A dry spring not only has an environmental impact but causes cultural harm, with intergenerational consequences. The UN declaration also says states should obtain consent before any project, including the exploitation of water. Yet in most states and territories there is only a legal obligation to “consult” with Indigenous peoples. Country as a living relative Better outcomes require the colonial settler community to make genuine efforts to understand and incorporate Indigenous perspectives and knowledge in groundwater science and management. The deconstruction of colonial legacies must be facilitated by people working within government agencies and regulatory authorities, and water scientists, in partnership with Aboriginal communities. Genuine relationship building is not just an “engagement activity”. It should be grounded in respect, reciprocity and an understanding of the obligation to care for Country as a living relative. This process takes time and will not necessarily progress according to a particular schedule. This creates a tension between existing approvals mechanisms and best-practice engagement with Indigenous communities. Some governments and companies are working towards improving relationships with Indigenous communities. But this is not a requirement of existing systems for groundwater management. Our cultural heritage continues to be lost. We must work together for a better future so our precious water is protected, not just for the next 50 years but for the next 5,000. This requires a holistic understanding that weaves together Western and Indigenous perspectives to ensure that both people and Country can thrive. A future where Indigenous laws, sciences and decision-making authority are embedded in, not appended to, water science and governance. Sarah Bourke receives funding from the National Water Grid Authority of the Australian Government. She is affiliated with the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Margaret Shanafield receives funding from the National Water Grid Authority of the Australian Government.Bradley J. Moggridge and Clint Hansen do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.