Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Geomorphic Transformations: Landslide in British Columbia Ushers In Unexpected New Lake

News Feed
Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Satellite image of water pooling behind the landslide deposit on the Chilcotin River captured on August 1, 2024, by the Operational Land Imager-2 on Landsat 9. Debris from a landslide in British Columbia blocked the river’s flow for several days before water found a way through.On July 30, 2024, a significant landslide occurred in Farwell Canyon, British Columbia, resulting in a massive earth deposit that blocked the Chilcotin River and created a new lake. The debris prompted immediate flood warnings and evacuation orders for downstream areas. By August 5, water levels rose, challenging the stability of the dam formed by the landslide. This event has potential long-term impacts on the local environment and the culturally significant Tšilhqot‘in territory, particularly affecting endangered salmon populations. Catastrophic Landslide in Farwell Canyon Late on July 30, 2024, land along the south bank of the Chilcotin River in Farwell Canyon began to sink and flow into the valley below. When the landslide stopped moving, a large piece of earth had dropped more than 50 meters (160 feet), leaving a mound of debris 1,000 meters long, 600 meters wide, and 30 meters deep that blocked the river and completely halted its flow. When the OLI-2 (Operational Land Imager-2) on Landsat 9 captured this image (above) on August 1, 2024, water had begun to pool behind the landslide deposit, creating a long, narrow lake. The next image (below) shows the same area on July 16, about two weeks before the landslide. Satellite image of the same area of the Chilcotin River captured on July 16, 2024, which was before the landslide.Immediate Response and Risks Soon after the event was discovered, local authorities issued flood warnings for areas upstream of the landslide and evacuation orders for areas immediately downstream. “The major threat in situations like this is that large amounts of water build-up behind the landslide dam and eventually trigger destructive outburst floods,” said Robert Emberson, a member of NASA’s Landslides research team and one of the associate program managers for NASA’s Disasters program. On August 5, water began to overwhelm the natural dam, causing water levels downstream to increase rapidly and carry woody debris down the river. Preliminary modeling from British Columbia’s River Forecast Center indicated that water levels would surge above typical spring flooding levels on the Chilcotin upstream of the point where it flows into the Fraser River. Escalating Flood Threats and Precautions On the Fraser, estimated flows are likely to be similar to or below peak flows that occur during typical spring flooding. However, “the water will react differently, with greater momentum and force, than a gradual increase in water levels,” officials from the Ministry of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness (EMCR) warned. Aerial photo of debris-filled water pooling behind the landslide dam on August 1, 2024.As a trickle and then a gushing torrent of water chiseled through the landslide debris, authorities urged people to stay away from the riverbanks due to the risk of fast-moving water and debris. A gauge downstream at Big Bar showed Fraser River water levels peaking on August 6 at 3,640 cubic meters per second: a sharp increase, though not a historical record for that date. “Fortunately, the Chilcotin River is sparsely populated, and evacuation warnings have already been issued,” Emberson said. “But the impact of flooding on agriculture downstream is still a concern.” Environmental and Cultural Impacts The photograph above, provided by EMCR, shows debris-filled water pooling behind the landslide dam on August 1. The image below, also provided by EMCR, shows the leading edge of the floodwater after it broke through the dam and flowed south along the Chilcotin River into the Fraser River on August 5. The event occurred in a remote part of British Columbia, about 100 kilometers southwest of Williams Lake, in an area known as Nagwentled by the Tšilhqot’in, an Athabaskan-speaking indigenous group in the area. Nagwentled roughly translates to “landslides across the river.” Indeed, scars along the south side of the river and tongue-shaped debris fields visible in multiple areas indicate that landslides occur relatively frequently. Photo shows the leading edge of the floodwater after it broke through the dam and flowed south along the Chilcotin River into the Fraser River on August 5, 2024.Historical Significance and Ongoing Concerns “The scalloped edges in the terrain immediately south of the point of failure appear to be ancient landslide scarps, some of which were likely considerably larger than the event in July,” said Daniel Shugar, a geomorphologist at the University of Calgary. The river is also an important waterway for several types of salmon. In a statement issued after the landslide, the Tšilhqot‘in National Government expressed particular concern that the event had blocked the movement of Taseko sockeye, an endangered population that had been on track to return to spawning grounds at record low levels prior to the landslide. “[We are] calling on all levels of government, downstream First Nations, the Pacific Salmon Commission, and other Nations and States, especially Alaskan fisheries, to take all precautionary measures possible to conserve Tšilhqot‘in territory-bound salmon,” the group said. There are some ranches, farms, and mining operations along the river edges, and people regularly canoe and camp along the Chilcotin. A stretch of the canyon downstream with large sand dunes is a common destination for hikers, campers, and mountain bikers. According to the Canadian Broadcast Company, one person in the area was partially buried by the initial landslide and had to be rescued by a local resident. Government officials and university scientists will be monitoring the situation in the coming days and weeks from the ground and from the air with helicopters and uncrewed vehicles using a variety of technologies. They will also be using satellites and other forms of remote sensing. “Satellites are indispensable for near-real-time monitoring of evolving disaster situations like this,” Shugar said. “Having eyes in the sky to see the entire slide and impounded lake is tremendously useful.” NASA Earth Observatory images by Wanmei Liang, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. Photographs courtesy of the Ministry of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness.

On July 30, 2024, a significant landslide occurred in Farwell Canyon, British Columbia, resulting in a massive earth deposit that blocked the Chilcotin River and created a new lake. The debris prompted immediate flood warnings and evacuation orders for downstream areas. By August 5, water levels rose, challenging the stability of the dam formed by [...]

Chilcotin River August 2024 Annotated
Satellite image of water pooling behind the landslide deposit on the Chilcotin River captured on August 1, 2024, by the Operational Land Imager-2 on Landsat 9. Debris from a landslide in British Columbia blocked the river’s flow for several days before water found a way through.

On July 30, 2024, a significant landslide occurred in Farwell Canyon, British Columbia, resulting in a massive earth deposit that blocked the Chilcotin River and created a new lake.

The debris prompted immediate flood warnings and evacuation orders for downstream areas. By August 5, water levels rose, challenging the stability of the dam formed by the landslide. This event has potential long-term impacts on the local environment and the culturally significant Tšilhqot‘in territory, particularly affecting endangered salmon populations.

Catastrophic Landslide in Farwell Canyon

Late on July 30, 2024, land along the south bank of the Chilcotin River in Farwell Canyon began to sink and flow into the valley below. When the landslide stopped moving, a large piece of earth had dropped more than 50 meters (160 feet), leaving a mound of debris 1,000 meters long, 600 meters wide, and 30 meters deep that blocked the river and completely halted its flow.

When the OLI-2 (Operational Land Imager-2) on Landsat 9 captured this image (above) on August 1, 2024, water had begun to pool behind the landslide deposit, creating a long, narrow lake. The next image (below) shows the same area on July 16, about two weeks before the landslide.

Chilcotin River July 2024 Annotated
Satellite image of the same area of the Chilcotin River captured on July 16, 2024, which was before the landslide.

Immediate Response and Risks

Soon after the event was discovered, local authorities issued flood warnings for areas upstream of the landslide and evacuation orders for areas immediately downstream. “The major threat in situations like this is that large amounts of water build-up behind the landslide dam and eventually trigger destructive outburst floods,” said Robert Emberson, a member of NASA’s Landslides research team and one of the associate program managers for NASA’s Disasters program.

On August 5, water began to overwhelm the natural dam, causing water levels downstream to increase rapidly and carry woody debris down the river. Preliminary modeling from British Columbia’s River Forecast Center indicated that water levels would surge above typical spring flooding levels on the Chilcotin upstream of the point where it flows into the Fraser River.

Escalating Flood Threats and Precautions

On the Fraser, estimated flows are likely to be similar to or below peak flows that occur during typical spring flooding. However, “the water will react differently, with greater momentum and force, than a gradual increase in water levels,” officials from the Ministry of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness (EMCR) warned.

Landslide Dams Chilcotin River
Aerial photo of debris-filled water pooling behind the landslide dam on August 1, 2024.

As a trickle and then a gushing torrent of water chiseled through the landslide debris, authorities urged people to stay away from the riverbanks due to the risk of fast-moving water and debris. A gauge downstream at Big Bar showed Fraser River water levels peaking on August 6 at 3,640 cubic meters per second: a sharp increase, though not a historical record for that date.

“Fortunately, the Chilcotin River is sparsely populated, and evacuation warnings have already been issued,” Emberson said. “But the impact of flooding on agriculture downstream is still a concern.”

Environmental and Cultural Impacts

The photograph above, provided by EMCR, shows debris-filled water pooling behind the landslide dam on August 1. The image below, also provided by EMCR, shows the leading edge of the floodwater after it broke through the dam and flowed south along the Chilcotin River into the Fraser River on August 5.

The event occurred in a remote part of British Columbia, about 100 kilometers southwest of Williams Lake, in an area known as Nagwentled by the Tšilhqot’in, an Athabaskan-speaking indigenous group in the area. Nagwentled roughly translates to “landslides across the river.” Indeed, scars along the south side of the river and tongue-shaped debris fields visible in multiple areas indicate that landslides occur relatively frequently.

Debris Fraser River August 2024
Photo shows the leading edge of the floodwater after it broke through the dam and flowed south along the Chilcotin River into the Fraser River on August 5, 2024.

Historical Significance and Ongoing Concerns

“The scalloped edges in the terrain immediately south of the point of failure appear to be ancient landslide scarps, some of which were likely considerably larger than the event in July,” said Daniel Shugar, a geomorphologist at the University of Calgary.

The river is also an important waterway for several types of salmon. In a statement issued after the landslide, the Tšilhqot‘in National Government expressed particular concern that the event had blocked the movement of Taseko sockeye, an endangered population that had been on track to return to spawning grounds at record low levels prior to the landslide.

“[We are] calling on all levels of government, downstream First Nations, the Pacific Salmon Commission, and other Nations and States, especially Alaskan fisheries, to take all precautionary measures possible to conserve Tšilhqot‘in territory-bound salmon,” the group said.

There are some ranches, farms, and mining operations along the river edges, and people regularly canoe and camp along the Chilcotin. A stretch of the canyon downstream with large sand dunes is a common destination for hikers, campers, and mountain bikers. According to the Canadian Broadcast Company, one person in the area was partially buried by the initial landslide and had to be rescued by a local resident.

Government officials and university scientists will be monitoring the situation in the coming days and weeks from the ground and from the air with helicopters and uncrewed vehicles using a variety of technologies. They will also be using satellites and other forms of remote sensing. “Satellites are indispensable for near-real-time monitoring of evolving disaster situations like this,” Shugar said. “Having eyes in the sky to see the entire slide and impounded lake is tremendously useful.”

NASA Earth Observatory images by Wanmei Liang, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. Photographs courtesy of the Ministry of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Amid a data center boom, California lawmakers pass a bill to track water use

The AI-driven data center boom is adding strain on the West's water. New legislation in California would require data centers to report how much water they use.

Companies that run data centers are facing increasing scrutiny for guzzling water in the dry western U.S. as artificial intelligence fuels a boom in the industry. California legislators passed a bill this month that would require the facilities to report their projected water use before they begin operating and thereafter certify how much they use annually. The bill is now awaiting Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signature.“Data centers are popping up all over the place,” said Assemblymember Diane Papan (D-San Mateo), the bill’s author. “And they demand so much water.”The large buildings packed with equipment typically use water to cool their servers and interiors.The International Energy Agency said in a recent report that a 100-megawatt data center in the U.S. can consume approximately 500,000 gallons of water per day. But it said innovations in cooling systems can significantly reduce that.The California legislation requires companies to submit water information for both new and existing facilities.“It’s very important that localities be able to plan for what’s next, whether that’s building more housing or building data centers, and data centers happen to be incredibly thirsty,” said Papan, who chairs the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee.Much of the nation’s data center construction boom is taking place in arid states, including California, Arizona and Texas, where strains on water have been mounting amid dry conditions and rising temperatures. The ongoing water shortage on the Colorado River, where reservoirs are approaching critically low levels, is expected to force additional reductions in water use in the Southwest in the coming years.A key goal is to prevent problems, Papan said, “so that we don’t end up with a data center without sufficient water, and we don’t end up with a community that has a data center that takes too much water away from the community.”Assembly Bill 93 was opposed by business groups including the Data Center Coalition. Newsom has until Oct. 12 to sign or veto it.In a report released this week, researchers with the nonprofit group Ceres analyzed current and projected water use for data centers in the Phoenix area, where, as of May, there were 75 of the facilities and 49 more planned. It found that water for cooling, as well as water consumption linked to electricity generation, is expected to dramatically increase in the coming years as more facilities come online.The group projected that cooling water alone in the area could increase to more than 3.7 billion gallons per year, enough to supply a city of about 80,000 people for nearly two years — a change they said could increase water stress in a region that is already grappling with scarcity. “This needs to become a consideration in those areas,” said Kirsten James, senior director of Ceres’ water program. “If companies and their shareholders do not address these sustainability risks, then that could leave them open for financial loss, and so they really need to be proactive.” Experts say California has more than 300 data centers, with many more planned.Some major tech companies already disclose their data centers’ water use in other parts of the country, so it makes sense for the state to collect this information, especially since California is known for both leading on innovation and for having long droughts, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor at UC Riverside who studies data centers’ use of resources. “We ask California residents to switch to artificial turf and display ‘water conservation’ stickers in public places, yet data center water use remains hidden,” Ren said. “Disclosure doesn’t hurt the industry or add costs; it simply helps us track and manage a vital resource more responsibly as we build the next generation of data centers.”Inside data centers, servers generate heat as they run, and are typically cooled by systems that circulate either liquid or air through them. Many data center buildings have industrial-scale cooling towers where water evaporates and helps cool the interior environment.Some use much less water than others. Facilities with closed-loop dry coolers may use virtually no water on-site, while those that rely on evaporative cooling are more water-intensive, Ren said.Notably, the types of systems that require little water are generally more energy-intensive and costlier, Ren said.The rise of artificial intelligence as well as growing investments in cloud computing are driving the data center construction boom. While some companies don’t report their water use, others do.Google, for example, listed water data for three dozen data centers around the world in its latest annual environmental report, saying a single site can use anywhere from nearly zero water to more than 3 million gallons per day, depending on its cooling design and size.It said some of its more water-intensive centers, including two in Iowa and Oklahoma, require five to six times as much water as an average golf course, while various other facilities use less than a typical golf course. None of the data centers the company listed are in California.Google said it is focused on “advancing responsible water use,” and that last year, 72% of its water “came from sources at low risk of water depletion or scarcity.” Michael Kiparsky, director of the Wheeler Water Institute at the UC Berkeley School of Law, said requiring data on water use is a good first step, but local officials may not know what to do with that number alone.For example, he said, it won’t let them know if there is a more conserving option, or another location with more water available.

Dodging New York traffic: hundreds of humpback whaless on a collision course with ships

Humpbacks are thriving in the warm waters off the coast of Manhattan but maritime restrictions have not kept paceIt is the beginning of August and a crowd is gathered on the deck of the American Princess cruise boat waiting for one thing – and they are not disappointed. Suddenly, a juvenile humpback whale, known as NYC0318 in local records, bursts through the surface of the water, engulfing thousands of small, oily fish.For those onboard the 29-metre (95ft) vessel, the scene is a thrill to watch, in part because it is taking place not far out at sea but just off the coast of Manhattan, New York. Among the tourists watching is Chris St Lawrence, a naturalist and the communications director of Gotham Whale, a volunteer-run marine research organisation in the city. He is not just looking out for the whales, he is watching for danger around them. Continue reading...

It is the beginning of August and a crowd is gathered on the deck of the American Princess cruise boat waiting for one thing – and they are not disappointed. Suddenly, a juvenile humpback whale, known as NYC0318 in local records, bursts through the surface of the water, engulfing thousands of small, oily fish.For those onboard the 29-metre (95ft) vessel, the scene is a thrill to watch, in part because it is taking place not far out at sea but just off the coast of Manhattan, New York. Among the tourists watching is Chris St Lawrence, a naturalist and the communications director of Gotham Whale, a volunteer-run marine research organisation in the city. He is not just looking out for the whales, he is watching for danger around them.“When they’re feeding, they can get really distracted, and they don’t care about boats,” he says.Chris St Lawrence of Gotham Whale, which tracks whales and other marine mammals off New York and New Jersey. Photograph: Lauren Owens LambertWhen Gotham Whale began tracking humpbacks in 2012, its NYC humpback catalogue contained just five individuals. Today, it includes 470 whales – mostly transient juveniles such as NYC0318 drawn by the rich feeding opportunities of the New York Bight. But with the hunt for such bounty comes a growing problem.What was once a marine highway connecting southern breeding grounds to northern feeding areas has, since 2010, become a regular foraging destination, putting humpbacks on a collision course with maritime traffic.Cargo vessels, tankers, cruise ships, fishing boats and recreational craft all cross humpback feeding grounds in the New York Bight – an area roughly the size of Switzerland, stretching from southern New Jersey to eastern Long Island and offshore to the Hudson Canyon, a deep submarine valley.Danielle Brown, research director at Gotham Whale, says: “I don’t think people realise they are out there, and these shipping companies certainly don’t expect to see them.”Lesley Thorne, a marine scientist at Stony Brook University on Long Island, says several factors are converging dangerously: recovering humpback populations, potential climate-related shifts in their food, and whales venturing into shipping corridors to feed. “It is this perfect storm of events,” she says.Since the end of commercial whaling, humpbacks have become a conservation success story. In 2016, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) delisted the whales in New York waters (considered as part of the West Indies population) under the Endangered Species Act.But that same year, large whale strandings along the US east coast began to rise, prompting Noaa to declare an Unusual Mortality Event in 2017 that remains open today.Where whales once just passed through the waters off New York, they are increasingly venturing into the busy shipping lanes to feed. Photograph: Chris St Lawrence/gothamwhale.orgThorne’s 2024 research found vessel strikes to be the main cause, although fishing gear entanglements played a part.The New York Bight hosts an extraordinary array of endangered whales: blue, fin, sei, sperm and North Atlantic right whales. In 2024, researchers documented critically endangered North Atlantic right whales near Hudson Canyon, close to busy shipping lanes.In May that year, a cruise ship arrived at a New York port with a dead endangered sei whale draped on its bow. The common draw is food, but humpback feeding behaviour compounds the risk.The combination of surface feeding and shallow waters likely makes them more vulnerable to vessel strikesLesley Thorne, Stony Brook University“We see surface aggregations of menhaden [herring-like fish] that are really close to shore, and we have almost exclusively juvenile whales feeding in these really nearshore waters, as shallow as 15ft [5 metres] of water,” says Thorne. “The combination of surface feeding and shallow waters likely makes them more vulnerable to vessel strikes.”Gotham Whale’s research documents the toll, showing whales with vessel strike scars and deep propeller wounds. One case this year involved a healthy humpback observed one day bearing fresh strike injuries only days later in the same area.As one of the world’s fastest-warming ocean regions, changing conditions may be drawing more whales closer to shore to feed.The endangered sei whale that was found dead on the bow of a cruise ship arriving in New York last year. Photograph: Atlantic Marine Conservation SocietyJanet Coit, who was Noaa’s assistant administrator for fisheries under the Biden administration, says: “The scientists out of our Northeast Fisheries Science Center were clear that warming waters are affecting the productivity of the ocean and bringing more whales in closer to shore, which is causing greater interactions with vessels and more vessel strikes.”The remedy – to reroute vessels or slow them down – is clear but not easily achieved. “With three shipping lanes into New York, there is no opportunity to reroute vessels,” says Samantha Rosen, a spokesperson for the New York State environmental conservation department.Studies show that reducing ship speeds to 10 knots (12mph) decreases strike likelihood and lethality. Currently, vessels 20 metres or longer must travel no faster than 10 knots from January to May in seasonal management areas, including around major ports. However, in January 2025, the Noaa withdrew proposed vessel speed rule expansions that would have better protected large whales year-round by expanding protections to larger areas, longer time periods and smaller vessels.The revisions, aimed at reducing risks to right whales, would also have helped other large whales, says Thorne. But resistance from mariners and lawmakers has hindered Noaa’s proposal, says Coit. Meanwhile, voluntary slowdowns triggered when whales are detected have limited effectiveness.The regulatory setback coincides with significant cuts to Noaa’s funding, staffing and climate research programmes since January.When the US enacted wildlife protection laws in the 1970s, Coit says there was a moral ethic around saving whales and conservation. “I’m concerned that this ethic is not underpinning our values any more,” she says.“If people want to save the whales, they are going to have to change their behaviour.”

When lithium mining starts, who benefits, and who’s at risk? Inside this Salton Sea case.

Two non-profits filed arguments with the Fourth District Court of Appeal last week, asking the court to reconsider a claim they filed in 2024 that the environmental impact report for the Hell’s Kitchen lithium mine near the Salton Sea neglects potential problems with air quality, water use, hazardous materials and tribal cultural resources.

In summary Two non-profits filed arguments with the Fourth District Court of Appeal last week, asking the court to reconsider a claim they filed in 2024 that the environmental impact report for the Hell’s Kitchen lithium mine near the Salton Sea neglects potential problems with air quality, water use, hazardous materials and tribal cultural resources. Critics of a proposed lithium mine near the Salton Sea entered round two of their fight to force stricter environmental review of the project. It’s the latest stage in a legal impasse over the massive lithium project. Environmental groups are trying to make sure nearby residents get the benefits of lithium production, while guarding against harmful impacts. The company says critics are using court challenges to stall an important energy project. The nonprofits Comite Civico del Valle and Earthworks filed arguments with the Fourth District Court of Appeal last week, asking the court to reconsider a claim they filed in 2024, which a superior court judge dismissed earlier this year. READ MORE >>> Geologically rich but economically poor, Salton Sea communities want a say in their lithium future In their appeal filed Sept. 11, the groups argue that the environmental impact report for the Hell’s Kitchen lithium mine neglects potential problems with air quality, water use, hazardous materials and tribal cultural resources. “The project would create a high-water demand in an arid desert environment where the drying out of the Salton Sea worsens severe air pollution impacts,” the brief stated. Lauren Rose, a spokesperson for Controlled Thermal Resources, the parent company of Hell’s Kitchen, denounced what she called a “frivolous legal appeal.” “This group’s ongoing actions are a clear abuse of the original intentions of (the California Environmental Quality Act) and only serve to delay progress on clean energy projects that are essential to the community, California, and the nation,” she said in a statement to CalMatters. Hell’s Kitchen promises to unearth thousands of kilotons of lithium, a mineral essential to electric car batteries, cellphones and other electronics.  Officials with the nonprofits say they’re in favor of lithium production, but want to ensure it doesn’t compromise the health and environment of surrounding communities. “We make the case that the project must be corrected to meet the standards that protect our community and our environment,” Luis Olmedo, executive director of Comite Civico del Valle, told CalMatters. “The lawsuit isn’t about stopping clean energy. We are for clean energy.” The groups also released a report summarizing their call for heightened scrutiny of the project’s impacts. And they laid out demands that included creating a Lithium Valley joint powers authority with a local advisory commission, dedicating more of the state’s lithium extraction excise tax to areas closest to the project, and enacting an additional environmental mitigation fee on lithium produced there.  Under the existing formula, Bombay Beach, a small hamlet on the Salton Sea near the project, would get $8,631 to offset impacts of the project, while larger areas such as El Centro, Calexico and Imperial would get six-figure payments. READ MORE >>> The rotten egg smell at the Salton Sea isn’t just a nuisance. It can make people sick. Bari Bean, deputy CEO of natural resources for Imperial County, said in a statement to CalMatters that the lithium tax formula is “a practical and balanced framework that considers both population size and geographic proximity to the lithium resource.”  Bean said a joint powers authority would duplicate existing systems for community input. Imperial County wouldn’t support additional lithium fees, she said, since California already has stricter environmental protections than other states, “making development in California more challenging and often less cost competitive.” State and federal officials have predicted that the area around the Salton Sea that they call  “Lithium Valley” could become one of the world’s biggest sources of the “white gold,” freeing the U.S. from dependence on other countries for the critical mineral. Imperial County Supervisor Ryan E. Kelley said the project will advance both regional economic growth and U.S. energy goals. “This initiative will position Imperial County as a leader in clean energy, contribute to California’s sustainability goals, and strengthen the United States’ critical mineral supply chain,” Kelley said in a statement to CalMatters.  However, Rose said the ongoing court challenge has halted that momentum, and risks stalling lithium production in California. “Just a few short years ago, Imperial County was leading the charge for clean energy and sustainable critical minerals development in the United States,” she said. “Now, billions of investment dollars have flowed to other states, including Nevada, Utah, Texas, and Arkansas, leaving California in the dust.” Olmedo said his group has never called for injunctions against the project, but wants safeguards on its operations. Hell’s Kitchen would extract lithium and other critical minerals from super-heated brine in the Salton Sea aquifer and then reinject the brine into the earth, in what the company calls a closed loop system that’s cleaner than other lithium mining systems. Cal Poly Pomona Professor James Blair, an advisor to Comite Del Civico and member of Imperial County’s Lithium Valley Academic Taskforce, said the environmental review doesn’t prove that claim. Blair said direct lithium extraction is framed as a “cleaner, greener method of lithium extraction compared to open mine or brine ponds,” but research on similar systems show that they use lots of fresh water. If that’s the case at Hell’s Kitchen it could worsen the decline of the shrinking Salton Sea. “Novel technologies bring unknown results,” Blair said. “We don’t really know how much water is needed.”

Tens of Thousands Protest Dundee's Ecuador Mine Project Near Key Water Reserve

QUITO (Reuters) -Tens of thousands of residents and local leaders in Ecuador's central Azuay province took to the streets on Tuesday to demand the...

QUITO (Reuters) -Tens of thousands of residents and local leaders in Ecuador's central Azuay province took to the streets on Tuesday to demand the suspension of a mining project by Canada's Dundee Precious Metals, which they say will affect a vital water reserve.The government of President Daniel Noboa had granted Dundee an environmental license to start building the Loma Larga gold mine there, but as community pressure mounted, the country's energy minister in August suspended the start of construction work until Dundee provides an environmental management plan. Provincial authorities reject the project, saying it will affect the region's 3,200-hectare Quimsacocha reserve and its surrounding paramos - highland moors that act as giant sponges and supply the bulk of drinking water to major cities there.Authorities estimated that over 90,000 people marched in the provincial capital of Cuenca on Tuesday, chanting "Hands off Quimsacocha!" and "Water is worth more than anything!""We want the national government to revoke the environmental license," Cuenca Mayor Cristian Zamora said. "The streets of Cuenca are roaring ... and they will have to listen to us."Dundee declined to comment on the protesters' demands.Despite Ecuador's significant gold and copper reserves, just two mines are operating in the country - projects owned by Canada's Lundin Gold and EcuaCorriente, which is held by a Chinese mining consortium.Noboa, meanwhile, stepped back from the project, saying responsibility for what happens next lies with the local authorities."The municipality and prefecture must take responsibility," he said in a radio interview on Friday, saying if Dundee takes them to an arbitration court that would have to go. "There is a very high probability (the project will not go ahead), but there is also a probability that there will be problems in the future."Strong community opposition, environmental concerns and legal uncertainty in Ecuador have contributed to a relative lack of mining projects. In Azuay, residents have rejected mining projects at the ballot box and courts have ruled in their favor to block mining projects in the area.(Reporting by Alexandra Valencia; Writing by Sarah Morland; Editing by Richard Chang)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

Santa Monica's waves have turned a bright pink. How can the dye job improve water quality?

Monday's pink, fluorescent dye drop in Santa Monica Bay is part of a project to study how water circulation could be driving poor water quality.

Over the next two weeks, surfers and beachgoers in Santa Monica may spot waves that have a pink, fluorescent hue — but officials say not to worry.The luminous, pink color spreading across the Santa Monica Bay is from a temporary, nontoxic dye that researchers are using to study how ocean circulation might contribute to the bay’s poor water quality. The project kicked off Monday morning, as UCLA and Heal the Bay researchers discharged the first of four batches of the pink dye near the Santa Monica Pier. “By following where the dye goes, we will better understand how the breakwater changes the environment around it, providing insight into Santa Monica beach’s poor water quality,” Isabella Arzeno-Soltero, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at UCLA and a researcher on the project, said in a statement. Although the pink dye on Monday didn’t appear to create many “bright pink waves,” as researchers warned might be the case, additional bouts of the dye — or the fluorescent rhodamine water tracer dye — will be released later this month. But the fact that the dye seemed to dissipate quickly Monday didn’t mean the first phase won’t lead to important data, said Gabriela Carr, a researcher in the project and doctoral student at UCLA’s Samueli School of Engineering. “It was a big success today,” Carr said. “The dye is pink but it’s also fluorescent, so that’s kind of our main tracker.” A boat with “finely tuned fluorescent monitors” would remain in the bay for 24 hours, Carr said, and at least 10 additional trackers will remain attached to buoys through the end of the month, when additional dye drops will occur. The study is intended to help researchers understand how the man-made breakwater that was built in the 1930s in Santa Monica Bay, often visible during low tide, might hurt water circulation and, therefore, water quality. Santa Monica Pier routinely tops the yearly list of the state’s dirtiest beaches by environmental nonprofit Heal the Bay, which tests waters up and down the California coast for fecal bacteria, which can harm beachgoers. The break in the Santa Monica Bay was constructed to create a marina, but storms and time damaged it beyond effectiveness, though remnants of the rocky break still affect the water flow, researchers said.“It still substantially impacts the coastal hydrodynamics and surrounding environment,” Timu Gallien, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at UCLA and a lead researcher in the study, said in a statement. “For example, the breakwater protects the beach from large waves, keeping the beach wider than it would naturally be.”Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete watched the first deployment Monday morning and said she was hopeful this research could help her city finally get off the list of “beach bummers.” The city has partnered with the UCLA Samueli School of Engineering and the Bay Foundation on the project. “We’re trying to see if the circulation of the water is so poor that that’s creating the concentrated pollution 100 yards north and south of the pier,” Negrete said. “We don’t want to keep ending up on the beach bummer list — it’s a bummer!”She said this is one of many projects to help researchers understand and combat water quality issues, including a relatively new advanced water treatment facility and a sand dune restoration project. “This is all working in tandem,” Negrete said. “The whole ecosystem is important.”The researchers did not include in their announcement what remedies might be recommended if the breakwaters are determined to be responsible for, or a factor in, the poor water quality. That would probably be a multifaceted decision involving city and environmental leaders. Although this is the first time the dye has been used in the Santa Monica Bay, UCLA researchers said the coloring has been used for many years in other waterways, explaining that it disperses naturally and poses no risk to people, animals or vegetation.Carr said there may be more pink visible next week when the team performs another surface-level drop of the dye, but probably not as much when they do two deep-water drops later this month. Still, the pinkifying of the bay might not be much of a spectacle despite signs that were plastered all around the Santa Monica Pier area that scream: “Why is the water pink?” Carr said the team wanted to be sure the public did not become alarmed if the pink color was spotted. The next surface-level dye deployment will occur sometime Sept. 22–24, and the last underwater deployment will be Sept. 30, Carr said.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.