Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

GoGreenNation News

Learn more about the issues presented in our films
Show Filters

Whooping Cranes Came Back From the Brink of Extinction. Now, New Threats Are Converging on Their Texas Wintering Grounds

Some residents along the Gulf Coast are creating habitat for the endangered birds on their properties, but development, saltwater intrusion and bird flu are putting pressure on the species' recovery

Whooping Cranes Came Back From the Brink of Extinction. Now, New Threats Are Converging on Their Texas Wintering Grounds Some residents along the Gulf Coast are creating habitat for the endangered birds on their properties, but development, saltwater intrusion and bird flu are putting pressure on the species’ recovery Rene Ebersole, Undark January 8, 2026 7:30 a.m. A whooping crane in flight in Texas John Noll / USDA Each fall—always before Thanksgiving—Diane Johnson looks to the sky above her home, waiting for the moment when her birds return. “You look up, and they’re here,” she says. “And you remember how magnificent they really are.” Twenty-six years ago, though, those same magnificent birds had Johnson and her husband, Al, worried their dream of building their forever home on the Texas Gulf Coast’s Lamar Peninsula—a weather-worn stretch of marsh, coastal plain and live oak woodlands—might be slipping away. It was the winter of 1999, and Al, a home builder, and Diane, a stay-at-home mom, had just scraped together practically every last dollar to buy 828 acres about 20 minutes northeast of downtown Rockport. There was one thing they hadn’t bargained for, however: a resident pair of whooping cranes strutting across their newly acquired lawn. One of just 15 crane species on Earth—ten of them threatened with extinction—North America’s whooping cranes were so imperiled that the entire population then hovered around 180 birds. The couple was awestruck by the roughly five-foot-tall birds, with their ivory plumage and crimson crowns, but they couldn’t help worrying that the federal government might stop them from building a house in the middle of an endangered species’ turf. In those first uneasy days, as they watched the cranes forage through the marsh grass, the Johnsons realized that their dream home sat squarely inside a much larger story—one that stretched far beyond their property line, into the vast migration corridors and fragile ecosystems the birds depended on. The whooping crane, North America’s tallest bird, almost went extinct in the 20th century. While its population has now rebounded, the endangered species still faces threats. Klaus Nigge / USFWS The whooping crane’s comeback is often hailed as one of the greatest wildlife conservation success stories in North America—but the forces that nearly wiped the species out are surging again in new and more complex forms. Once driven to the brink by rampant habitat loss and hunting, the cranes survived only through an extraordinary, decades-long rescue effort. Now, development pressure, shrinking freshwater flows, sea-level rise and the threat of avian flu are converging on the wintering habitat along the Texas coast just as the flock reaches its highest numbers in about a century. The stakes remain perilously high for the birds—and for the people who share their land. This spot in Texas is the primary wintering destination for the only purely wild whooping crane flock in the world. The life of every one of these cranes begins in a nest of trampled bulrushes, sedges and cattails in Canada’s Northwest Territories and Alberta, predominantly in Wood Buffalo National Park. The chicks hatch in late spring and into summer, cinnamon and white with blue eyes, and by late August they’ve grown nearly as large as their parents. By September or October, they are robust enough to join them on their maiden flight of about 2,500 miles south. As cool autumn winds rise, families of cranes take to the sky, traveling a flyway tracing straight through the American heartland and navigating a gauntlet of industrial agriculture, energy development, pollution and even poachers. After surviving this arduous journey, most cranes arrive on the Texas coast by late November. Here, within a mosaic of marshes and tidal flats stretching across the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge and into nearby private lands—including the Johnsons’ property—they stalk blue crabs in brackish shallows and nibble on scarlet wolfberries. Key concept: Wild whooping cranes Only one natural and self-sustaining population of whooping cranes exists in the world: the Aransas-Wood Buffalo group, which flies between Texas’ Aransas National Wildlife Refuge and Canada’s Wood Buffalo National Park each year. Experimental, non-migratory populations live in Central Florida and Louisiana, and another experimental group migrates between Wisconsin and Florida. The Johnsons, overwhelmed but determined, sought guidance on what it meant to share their land with two of some of the rarest birds on Earth. They reached out to their acquaintance Tom Stehn, a biologist at the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge—which was established in 1937 to protect whooping cranes and other migratory birds and wildlife—and co-leader of the International Crane Recovery Team. Stehn conducted weekly aerial surveys throughout the winter months. “We called him and said, ‘Oh my gosh, we have whooping cranes on our land that we just bought,’” Diane, now 74, remembers with a warm smile and a raspy Texas drawl. “He goes, ‘Of course, I know.’ … So, we asked him, ‘Well, what do we do? We want to preserve this property for the whooping cranes.’” Stehn introduced the Johnsons to representatives with the Nature Conservancy. The group offered a plan to purchase 244 acres from the Johnsons and donate it to the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge on the other side of Saint Charles Bay. They also offered the couple a payment to place 573 acres under a conservation easement—providing a tax benefit in exchange for a perpetual commitment that the land would never be developed. The Johnsons reserved ten acres where they would build their home and other structures. “It was a win-win,” Diane says. “We wanted to do everything they wanted us to do.” A whooping crane catches a crab in the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Texas. Jon G. Fuller / VWPics / Universal Images Group via Getty Images Such habitat protections to safeguard Texas coastal marsh, tidal flats and upland prairies—combined with landmark environmental legislation in the 1970s, captive breeding programs and the efforts of an army of conservationists—have played an important role preventing North America’s tallest bird from joining the passenger pigeon and Carolina parakeet in oblivion. About eight decades ago, only about 16 whooping cranes were left in the wild. Preserving their wintering grounds helped the remnant flock begin to rebound. Today, the Aransas-Wood Buffalo flock consists of more than 550 cranes, according to the latest population survey, and more than 270 additional whoopers live in zoos or experimental release programs in Wisconsin and Louisiana. A few also live in Florida following the end of a release program there. Yet despite their growing numbers, whooping cranes remain endangered. The Lamar Peninsula presents a microcosm of the challenges wild cranes now face—and what can be done to help them continue to grow and expand their range. The Johnsons’ dream home, Diane’s silo-like silversmith studio and a former rental cabin sit on one of the last large pieces of open wetland and live oak savanna on the peninsula, shielding their resident cranes from much of the surrounding development. Outside their gate, though, houses dot much of the peninsula. Cranes often wander through residents’ yards, where automated feeders drop corn to attract deer—visibility that helps people appreciate the birds, but density that can spell danger. For cranes, living in close quarters with people comes at a cost, wildlife managers say, because it increases the chances that these birds with more than seven-foot wingspans will collide with power lines or that an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza—easily spread when the birds are crowded together in a confined area—will kill some of the animals. In September 2025, the International Crane Foundation reported that the first whooping crane—a captive-bred bird named “Ducky” that was set to be released into the wild in Wisconsin—had died from bird flu. By late October, there were reports of at least two more whooping cranes killed by bird flu while migrating south from their Canadian breeding grounds. Meanwhile, saltwater intrusion associated with sea-level rise is converting freshwater wetlands to open water. Freshwater diversions for upstream urbanizing areas are altering the salinity of coastal estuaries where cranes feed, and drought, intensified by climate change, is drying the freshwater ponds where cranes drink. No one threat alone will likely reverse the whooping cranes’ recovery, says Liz Smith, a local conservation scientist who worked for the International Crane Foundation until her recent retirement, but there’s a common source. “When you put all those together,” she says. “They’re all human-driven.” “It’s us.” When I visit the Lamar Peninsula hoping to see wintering whooping cranes, I find a billboard along State Highway 35: “Lots for Sale.” Driving through a neighborhood of one-story houses with big garages and campers and boats in the driveways, I finally come to the gravel road leading to a popular whooper hangout: the home of Kevin and Lori Sims. Though the peninsula’s density is a challenge for cranes, the Sims, like the Johnsons, represent one of its paradoxes—local residents who are deeply invested in helping the birds and engaging others in their protection, even as development continues around them. An adult whooping crane and a juvenile at Aransas National Wildlife Refuge Jon G. Fuller / VWPics / Universal Images Group via Getty Images Wearing an old T-shirt, a royal blue sweatshirt, jeans and sneakers, Kevin is tending to a steaming shrimp boil near the garage in preparation for an evening family gathering. “Look up!” he yells, as I exit the car. Four whooping cranes cruise about 40 feet over my head and land in the grass, not far from his automated deer feeder. “You go get in the blind, and I’ll press the remote control for the feeder,” he says. “Maybe that will bring them in.” Following his instructions, I tiptoe across a soggy span of grass and mud to a primitive bird blind built from plywood and 2-by-4s, complete with a metal roof and pink fishnet curtains. As I take a seat in a plastic chair, the cranes do another flyby. Kevin hits the button on his remote, and as the corn drops from the feeder, two deer come running. Soon, three cranes land: two parents and their colt, hatched in northern Canada roughly six months earlier. A fourth crane, a young adult female known locally as Husker Red and identifiable by her white-red-white leg bands, tries to move in for some corn too. The crane family chases her away, loudly bugling and flapping their giant, black-tipped wings, delivering an obvious message: Scram—we were here first. Husker bugles back. When a car engine revs, the cranes startle. Momentarily, they retreat to the marsh. “There was quite a little drama down there,” I say, joining Kevin at the garage. “They put on a show for you,” he says. The Sims have a boat business, and each year they take about 800 tourists and photographers along the coast to see cranes. After their cruise, some customers enjoy close-up photo opportunities with cranes that come to the couple’s corn feeder. Some Texans use automated feeders to bait deer so they can shoot them. The Sims and the Johnsons have them purely to enjoy the nature they attract. “I grew up with deer in the yard,” Kevin explains. He wanted the same for his kids, so he put up a corn feeder. It was during a drought, and the family soon got more than they’d bargained for. “Here came the cranes,” he says. “I never expected it.” But there’s a downside to this seemingly harmless practice, says Dave Brandt, a recently retired USGS biologist who spent more than a decade catching whooping cranes on their Texas wintering grounds and in Canada, fitting them with leg bands and transmitters that help biologists track their migrations and identify the birds when they’re spotted. The problem is the feeders bring cranes in close contact with people and encourage the birds to concentrate in a tiny area, where they feed with other animals—deer, feral hogs, ducks—increasing the potential for them to encounter bird flu and other pathogens. Because whooping cranes are territorial, they often squabble over who has dibs. “Typically, at these feeders, you’ll get a dominant pair or a dominant family group that kind of guards them,” Brandt says. These territorial interactions can end in tragedy. On February 14, 2023, a crane that Brandt thinks was likely being chased by another at the Sims’ feeder struck a power line and died. Lori Sims, who doesn’t believe the crane was being chased, was one of the first people on the scene. “I went right over, and I stood with the crane,” she remembers. “It hit the top and the bottom lines at the same time, and it instantly killed it.” A woman who had been taking photographs of the cranes caught the whole incident on her phone and called Smith, the conservation scientist, who remembers feeling intense loss and sadness when she saw the dead crane. “His two winter companions landed in a field nearby and did not move for hours,” she says. “I could not shake the feeling that this shouldn’t have happened.” In response to the incident, the power company removed some inactive lines and marked others with diverters, small devices placed on the lines, so the cranes are better able to see them. “That helped, but there’s always a potential of lines all around the peninsula that could be dangerous,” Smith says. “We’re worried that that is going to continue to increase. And with so many birds chasing each other around,” she says, that’s a danger. There are also many nearby power lines connecting towns and cities to wind farms. “One would think that there would not be permits allowed for, let’s say, wind farms, as the birds narrow their scope down to that small area in and around the Aransas Wildlife Refuge,” Smith says, but there are large farms just dozens of miles away, with more on the way. A whooping crane (center) stands among sandhill cranes in Grantsburg, Wisconsin. Lorie Shaull via Flickr under CC BY 2.0 Smith says the main factor ensuring that the cranes have enough food during their winter months in Texas is the health of the Guadalupe Estuary, which varies with the freshwater flowing from the San Antonio and Guadalupe Rivers. Under Texas law, the state owns those waters; the use is regulated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, a state agency. When the flow is disrupted—whether by extreme drought or by ongoing freshwater diversions—San Antonio Bay can become too saline for healthy crab populations and wolfberry plants. And that can kill cranes. During a drought spanning 2008 and 2009, 23 whooping cranes died from likely starvation, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The population dropped to 247 wild birds. (Historical estimates put the population at about 10,000 before European settlement.) Environmentalists and birders were outraged that the state did not take additional steps to mitigate the effects of the diminished flows. The agency “did not change anything during that severe drought,” Smith says. “Water continued to be diverted as usual.” Some concerned citizens got together and formed a nonprofit organization, the Aransas Project, to protect whooping crane habitat. The group sued the commission, alleging that the agency had violated the Endangered Species Act because their actions and failures in regard to public water management during the drought had resulted in the cranes’ deaths. “The basis of the lawsuit was that they acted irresponsibly,” Smith says. The group won the suit in federal court, but the agency appealed the ruling, which an appeals court overturned on grounds that the impacts of the water withdrawals on the endangered birds had been too indirect and unforeseeable to meet the legal standard. Since then, the Aransas Project and the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, which manages water resources in the area, have worked out an agreement to support conservation in the Guadalupe River Basin. A whooping crane chick. The birds hatch in late spring and into summer in Canada’s Northwest Territories and Alberta. By September or October, the young birds have grown enough to migrate some 2,500 miles south to the Texas coast. International Crane Foundation / USFWS via Flickr under CC BY 2.0 The cranes are as vulnerable as ever to freshwater shortages. At the same time, rising seas are causing saltwater intrusion, which some conservation groups predict will convert more than half of the coast’s freshwater wetlands to open water by the end of the century. Smith says protecting more habitat is the key if the cranes are to have somewhere to go. “If we wanted to really do something meaningful on the coast, we would have to do another 50,000-acre, 100,000-acre kind of a deal,” she says. “We just don’t know where that land would be. It’s getting very fragmented.” While that long-term goal is daunting, in mid-December, the International Crane Foundation, the Conservation Fund and the Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program announced the acquisition of more than 3,300 acres of critical whooping crane winter habitat along the Texas coast. The new sanctuary—purchased for just over $8.4 million, according to the Associated Press—includes two properties, one of which will be owned and managed by the International Crane Foundation as the Wolfberry Whooping Crane Sanctuary, with the other held by the Conservation Fund until it is transferred to the Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program. The whooping cranes’ future depends on land purchases, says Diane Johnson, “because as their numbers grow, the more land they’re going to need.” But it can be hard to convince landowners to put their properties in easements, she says, recounting a time years ago when a man was trying to sell his property near the roughly 300-acre Goose Island State Park on the southern end of the Lamar Peninsula, surrounded by the Saint Charles and Aransas Bays. She and her husband introduced him to the Nature Conservancy in hopes that he might put the property in an easement as they had so many years ago. “The family would not go for it,” she says. “They wanted cash from a developer.” Instead of remaining a haven for cranes, the property was transformed to “The Reserve at St. Charles Bay,” marketing luxury waterfront homes for families wanting to be surrounded by nature. Johnson was so angry, she threatened her builder husband Al that if he ever put up a house in that development, she and their daughters would picket his job site. “That’s how strongly I felt about building over there,” she says. Fortunately, Al felt just as passionately about protecting crane habitat. The Johnsons are widely celebrated by the conservation community for their efforts to protect whooping cranes. A 2019 “Good Egg Award”—given by the International Crane Foundation for their voluntary actions to save whooping crane wintering habitat—is proudly displayed on a shelf in their dining area next to a framed print of Our Lady of Guadalupe. When legendary ornithologist and conservationist George Archibald, co-founder of the International Crane Foundation, headquartered in Baraboo, Wisconsin, comes to town each winter for an annual crane conference, he beats a path to the Johnsons to hang out with them and their resident pair of whoopers, Yay and Nay. Yay is named for the identification bands biologists put on her leg: yellow, aluminum, yellow. And if she’s Yay, then someone said his name must be Nay, Diane says, laughing. Over the years, Archibald has given the Johnsons advice on everything from how to mow the grass so a bobcat hiding in the weeds won’t sneak up and grab a crane, to the perfect slope for Yay and Nay to easily wade into the artificial ponds on the property. Diane says they’d really like to see others buy land and protect it. In fact, there’s a 52-acre pasture on the Lamar Peninsula now for sale. “It’s full of whooping cranes. One day, there were 24 whooping cranes in one spot,” she says. At the end of December, the owner was asking $6.45 million. “Every time you ask about it, it goes up another million.” If the land gets developed, there’s little chance that cranes will relocate to their place, she says: Yay and Nay wouldn’t allow it. “Let’s say two whooping cranes from over there at the pasture fly over. Ours start cussing and yelling at ’em—‘Don’t you even think about landing here.’ It’s hilarious. And so if they do land, then ours will start walking over in a posture that’s like, you know, ‘I’m gonna whip your butt.’” She respects them for their determination to keep hundreds of acres of wetlands, uplands and corn feeders all to themselves, and their territoriality illustrates why more land needs to be protected. “They’re pretty badass, when you think about it.” In a few months it will be time for the cranes to head back to northern Canada, where they will rebuild nests and raise a new generation of chicks. “Sometimes I get to see them go,” Diane tells me. “The wind has to be just right.” “They’ll kettle up and then they’ll take off, and when that happens—I can almost cry right now—I hate to see them go, but it’s beautiful,” she added. “Bon voyage.” This article was originally published on Undark. Read the original article. Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Contributor: 'Save the whales' worked for decades, but now gray whales are starving

The once-booming population that passed California twice a year has cratered because of retreating sea ice. A new kind of intervention is needed.

Recently, while sailing with friends on San Francisco Bay, I enjoyed the sight of harbor porpoises, cormorants, pelicans, seals and sea lions — and then the spouting plume and glistening back of a gray whale that gave me pause. Too many have been seen inside the bay recently.California’s gray whales have been considered an environmental success story since the passage of the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act and 1986’s global ban on commercial whaling. They’re also a major tourist attraction during their annual 12,000-mile round-trip migration between the Arctic and their breeding lagoons in Baja California. In late winter and early spring — when they head back north and are closest to the shoreline, with the moms protecting the calves — they can be viewed not only from whale-watching boats but also from promontories along the California coast including Point Loma in San Diego, Point Lobos in Monterey and Bodega Head and Shelter Cove in Northern California.In 1972, there were some 10,000 gray whales in the population on the eastern side of the Pacific. Generations of whaling all but eliminated the western population — leaving only about 150 alive today off of East Asia and Russia. Over the four decades following passage of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the eastern whale numbers grew steadily to 27,000 by 2016, a hopeful story of protection leading to restoration. Then, unexpectedly over the last nine years, the eastern gray whale population has crashed, plummeting by more than half to 12,950, according to a recent report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the lowest numbers since the 1970s.Today’s changing ocean and Arctic ice conditions linked to fossil-fuel-fired climate change are putting this species again at risk of extinction.While there has been some historical variation in their population, gray whales — magnificent animals that can grow up to 50 feet long and weigh as much as 80,000 pounds — are now regularly starving to death as their main food sources disappear. This includes tiny shrimp-like amphipods in the whales’ summer feeding grounds in the Arctic. It’s there that the baleen filter feeders spend the summer gorging on tiny crustaceans from the muddy bottom of the Bering, Chuckchi and Beaufort seas, creating shallow pits or potholes in the process. But, with retreating sea ice, there is less under-ice algae to feed the amphipods that in turn feed the whales. Malnourished and starving whales are also producing fewer offspring.As a result of more whales washing up dead, NOAA declared an “unusual mortality event” in California in 2019. Between 2019 and 2025, at least 1,235 gray whales were stranded dead along the West Coast. That’s eight times greater than any previous 10-year average.While there seemed to be some recovery in 2024, 2025 brought back the high casualty rates. The hungry whales now come into crowded estuaries like San Francisco Bay to feed, making them vulnerable to ship traffic. Nine in the bay were killed by ship strikes last year while another 12 appear to have died of starvation.Michael Stocker, executive director of the acoustics group Ocean Conservation Research, has been leading whale-viewing trips to the gray whales’ breeding ground at San Ignacio Lagoon in Baja California since 2006. “When we started going, there would be 400 adult whales in the lagoon, including 100 moms and their babies,” he told me. “This year we saw about 100 adult whales, only five of which were in momma-baby pairs.” Where once the predators would not have dared to hunt, he said that more recently, “orcas came into the lagoon and ate a couple of the babies because there were not enough adult whales to fend them off.”Southern California’s Gray Whale Census & Behavior Project reported record-low calf counts last year.The loss of Arctic sea ice and refusal of the world’s nations recently gathered at the COP30 Climate Summit in Brazil to meet previous commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions suggest that the prospects for gray whales and other wildlife in our warming seas, including key food species for humans such as salmon, cod and herring, look grim.California shut down the nation’s last whaling station in 1971. And yet now whales that were once hunted for their oil are falling victim to the effects of the petroleum or “rock oil” that replaced their melted blubber as a source of light and lubrication. That’s because the burning of oil, coal and gas are now overheating our blue planet. While humans have gone from hunting to admiring whales as sentient beings in recent decades, our own intelligence comes into question when we fail to meet commitments to a clean carbon-free energy future. That could be the gray whales’ last best hope, if there is any.David Helvarg is the executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean policy group, and co-host of “Rising Tide: The Ocean Podcast.” He is the author of the forthcoming “Forest of the Sea: The Remarkable Life and Imperiled Future of Kelp.”

Forever Chemicals' Might Triple Teens' Risk Of Fatty Liver Disease

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk...

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay ReporterTHURSDAY, Jan. 8, 2026 (HealthDay News) — PFAS “forever chemicals” might nearly triple a young person’s risk of developing fatty liver disease, a new study says.Each doubling in blood levels of the PFAS chemical perfluorooctanoic acid is linked to 2.7 times the odds of fatty liver disease among teenagers, according to findings published in the January issue of the journal Environmental Research.Fatty liver disease — also known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) — occurs when fat builds up in the organ, leading to inflammation, scarring and increased risk of cancer.About 10% of all children, and up to 40% of children with obesity, have fatty liver disease, researchers said in background notes.“MASLD can progress silently for years before causing serious health problems,” said senior researcher Dr. Lida Chatzi, a professor of population and public health sciences and pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of USC in Los Angeles.“When liver fat starts accumulating in adolescence, it may set the stage for a lifetime of metabolic and liver health challenges,” Chatzi added in a news release. “If we reduce PFAS exposure early, we may help prevent liver disease later. That’s a powerful public health opportunity.”Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are called “forever chemicals” because they combine carbon and fluorine molecules, one of the strongest chemical bonds possible. This makes PFAS removal and breakdown very difficult.PFAS compounds have been used in consumer products since the 1940s, including fire extinguishing foam, nonstick cookware, food wrappers, stain-resistant furniture and waterproof clothing.More than 99% of Americans have measurable PFAS in their blood, and at least one PFAS chemical is present in roughly half of U.S. drinking water supplies, researchers said.“Adolescents are particularly more vulnerable to the health effects of PFAS as it is a critical period of development and growth,” lead researcher Shiwen “Sherlock” Li, an assistant professor of public health sciences at the University of Hawaii, said in a news release.“In addition to liver disease, PFAS exposure has been associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, including several types of cancer,” Li said.For the new study, researchers examined data on 284 Southern California adolescents and young adults gathered as part of two prior USC studies.All of the participants already had a high risk of metabolic disease because their parents had type 2 diabetes or were overweight, researchers said.Their PFAS levels were measured through blood tests, and liver fat was assessed using MRI scans.Higher blood levels of two common PFAS — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) — were linked to an increased risk of fatty liver disease.Results showed a young person’s risk was even higher if they smoked or carried a genetic variant known to influence liver fat.“These findings suggest that PFAS exposures, genetics and lifestyle factors work together to influence who has greater risk of developing MASLD as a function of your life stage,” researcher Max Aung, assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine, said in a news release.“Understanding gene and environment interactions can help advance precision environmental health for MASLD,” he added.The study also showed that fatty liver disease became more common as teens grew older, adding to evidence that younger people might be more vulnerable to PFAS exposure, Chatzi said.“PFAS exposures not only disrupt liver biology but also translate into real liver disease risk in youth,” Chatzi said. “Adolescence seems to be a critical window of susceptibility, suggesting PFAS exposure may matter most when the liver is still developing.”The Environmental Working Group has more on PFAS.SOURCES: Keck School of Medicine of USC, news release, Jan. 6, 2026; Environmental Research, Jan. 1, 2026Copyright © 2026 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Household burning of plastic waste in developing world is hidden health threat, study shows

The practice is ‘much more widespread’ than previously realised, researchers say, with serious environmental impactThe household burning of plastic for heating and cooking is widespread in developing countries, suggests a global study that raises concerns about its health and environmental impacts.The research, published in the journal Nature Communications, surveyed more than 1,000 respondents across 26 countries. Continue reading...

The household burning of plastic for heating and cooking is widespread in developing countries, suggests a global study that raises concerns about its health and environmental impacts.The research, published in the journal Nature Communications, surveyed more than 1,000 respondents across 26 countries.One in three people reported being aware of households burning plastic, while 16% said they had burned plastic themselves.Respondents worked closely with low-income urban neighbourhoods and included researchers, government workers and community leaders.Dr Bishal Bharadwaj, the lead author of the study and a research associate at the University of Calgary, said the work provided broad global evidence on households burning plastic, a practice that had been “difficult to get accurate data on”.“When families can’t afford cleaner fuels and have no reliable waste collection, plastic becomes both a nuisance and a last-resort energy source. We found evidence of people burning everything from plastic bags and wrappers to bottles and packaging, just to meet basic household needs,” Bharadwaj said in a statement.“The practice is far more widespread than anyone realised, but because it happens in marginalised communities and is often hidden, it has escaped meaningful global attention despite the severe risks to health and the environment.”The researchers surveyed people in low- and middle-income countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, and suggest that plastic burning “does not result solely from energy poverty, but also represents a vital informal solution in many settings to cope with … a high rate of mismanaged plastic”.The study’s authors highlighted health risks such as inhalation of toxic emissions in confined spaces as well as contamination of food. Burning plastic releases noxious compounds such as dioxins, furans and heavy metals, while previous research has identified toxic compounds in egg samples near plastic burn sites.The researchers described the work as “an initial step toward filling critical knowledge gaps in this domain”, but noted that more work was needed to give a true sense of the “scale and distribution of plastic waste burning”.Prof Peta Ashworth, the director of the Curtin Institute for Energy Transition in Perth and a study co-author, described the burning as resulting from a “confluence of issues”.“Part of the reason is because these people are more vulnerable and they just don’t have the funds to be able to purchase any form of clean cooking [fuel],” she said, adding that growing plastic pollution and inadequate waste disposal were also contributing factors.Global plastic waste is projected to almost triple by 2060, according to the OECD. Ashworth said governments needed to improve waste management programs as well as “access to other clean cooking, through subsidies and other interventions”.Educational campaigns highlighting the hazards of burning plastic and introducing new technologies for cleaner plastic burning are also solutions, the researchers suggest.“As rapid urbanisation continues to outpace the expansion of essential services in many regions, the urgency of implementing these measures will only intensify.”

Pills that communicate from the stomach could improve medication adherence

MIT engineers designed capsules with biodegradable radio frequency antennas that can reveal when the pill has been swallowed.

In an advance that could help ensure people are taking their medication on schedule, MIT engineers have designed a pill that can report when it has been swallowed.The new reporting system, which can be incorporated into existing pill capsules, contains a biodegradable radio frequency antenna. After it sends out the signal that the pill has been consumed, most components break down in the stomach while a tiny RF chip passes out of the body through the digestive tract.This type of system could be useful for monitoring transplant patients who need to take immunosuppressive drugs, or people with infections such as HIV or TB, who need treatment for an extended period of time, the researchers say.“The goal is to make sure that this helps people receive the therapy they need to help maximize their health,” says Giovanni Traverso, an associate professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, a gastroenterologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and an associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.Traverso is the senior author of the new study, which appears today in Nature Communications. Mehmet Girayhan Say, an MIT research scientist, and Sean You, a former MIT postdoc, are the lead authors of the paper.A pill that communicatesPatients’ failure to take their medicine as prescribed is a major challenge that contributes to hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths and billions of dollars in health care costs annually.To make it easier for people to take their medication, Traverso’s lab has worked on delivery capsules that can remain in the digestive tract for days or weeks, releasing doses at predetermined times. However, this approach may not be compatible with all drugs.“We’ve developed systems that can stay in the body for a long time, and we know that those systems can improve adherence, but we also recognize that for certain medications, we can’t change the pill,” Traverso says. “The question becomes: What else can we do to help the person and help their health care providers ensure that they’re receiving the medication?”In their new study, the researchers focused on a strategy that would allow doctors to more closely monitor whether patients are taking their medication. Using radio frequency — a type of signal that can be easily detected from outside the body and is safe for humans — they designed a capsule that can communicate after the patient has swallowed it.There have been previous efforts to develop RF-based signaling devices for medication capsules, but those were all made from components that don’t break down easily in the body and would need to travel through the digestive system.To minimize the potential risk of any blockage of the GI tract, the MIT team decided to create an RF-based system that would be bioresorbable, meaning that it can be broken down and absorbed by the body. The antenna that sends out the RF signal is made from zinc, and it is embedded into a cellulose particle.“We chose these materials recognizing their very favorable safety profiles and also environmental compatibility,” Traverso says.The zinc-cellulose antenna is rolled up and placed inside a capsule along with the drug to be delivered. The outer layer of the capsule is made from gelatin coated with a layer of cellulose and either molybdenum or tungsten, which blocks any RF signal from being emitted.Once the capsule is swallowed, the coating breaks down, releasing the drug along with the RF antenna. The antenna can then pick up an RF signal sent from an external receiver and, working with a small RF chip, sends back a signal to confirm that the capsule was swallowed. This communication happens within 10 minutes of the pill being swallowed.The RF chip, which is about 400 by 400 micrometers, is an off-the-shelf chip that is not biodegradable and would need to be excreted through the digestive tract. All of the other components would break down in the stomach within a week.“The components are designed to break down over days using materials with well-established safety profiles, such as zinc and cellulose, which are already widely used in medicine,” Say says. “Our goal is to avoid long-term accumulation while enabling reliable confirmation that a pill was taken, and longer-term safety will continue to be evaluated as the technology moves toward clinical use.”Promoting adherenceTests in an animal model showed that the RF signal was successfully transmitted from inside the stomach and could be read by an external receiver at a distance up to 2 feet away. If developed for use in humans, the researchers envision designing a wearable device that could receive the signal and then transmit it to the patient’s health care team.The researchers now plan to do further preclinical studies and hope to soon test the system in humans. One patient population that could benefit greatly from this type of monitoring is people who have recently had organ transplants and need to take immunosuppressant drugs to make sure their body doesn’t reject the new organ.“We want to prioritize medications that, when non-adherence is present, could have a really detrimental effect for the individual,” Traverso says.Other populations that could benefit include people who have recently had a stent inserted and need to take medication to help prevent blockage of the stent, people with chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, and people with neuropsychiatric disorders whose conditions may impair their ability to take their medication.The research was funded by Novo Nordisk, MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Division of Gastroenterology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the U.S. Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), which notes that the views and conclusions contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the United States Government.

A Familiar Refrain as China and Japan, Uneasy Neighbors in East Asia, Begin 2026 at Odds Again

They’re at it again

BEIJING (AP) — They’re at it again. China and Japan — frenemies, trading partners and uneasy neighbors with a tortured, bloody history they still struggle to navigate — are freshly at each other’s rhetorical throats as 2026 begins. And it’s over the same sticking points that have kept them resentful and suspicious for many decades: Japan’s occupation of parts of China in the 20th century, the use of military power in East Asia, economics and politics — and, of course, pride.From insinuations that Chinese citizens face dangers in Japan to outright accusations of resurgent Japanese imperialism, this first week of the year in China has been marked by the communist government scorning Tokyo on multiple fronts and noticeably embracing the visiting leader of another crucial strategic neighbor: South Korea.The latest chapter in Japan-China enmity surged In November when Japan's new leader waded into choppy bilateral waters. She said, in effect, that if China moved militarily against Taiwan, she wouldn't rule out involving Japan's constitutionally defense-only military. That didn't go over well in Beijing, which has teed off on Tokyo over the years for far less.“Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s erroneous remarks concerning Taiwan infringe upon China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, blatantly interfere in China’s internal affairs, and send a military threat against China,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Wednesday, a week after military exercises around the island ended. “We urge Japan to face up to the root causes of the issue, reflect and correct its mistakes.”That’s hardly uncommon language. China frequently demands Japan ponder the path it has taken and correct its “erroneous” course. It's rhetoric, sure, but it goes far deeper. And sometimes it's hard to tell what's real umbrage and what's ginned up for domestic political consumption.Because when it comes to the China-Japan relationship, anger remains a powerful and enduring tool on both sides. And there's no indication that's going away anytime soon. A long history of antagonism From the time Japan colonized Taiwan in 1895 after a war with Qing Dynasty China, a deep suspicion and at times outright enmity has existed between the two countries.It worsened in the 1920s and 1930s after Japan’s brutal occupation of parts of China resulted in torture and deaths that Chinese resent to this day. At the same time, Japanese leaders have sometimes thrown incendiary political footballs like visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, a memorial to Japanese who gave their lives in the nation’s wars — including some war criminals from the Sino-Japanese wars. China, like clockwork, responds with indignation.Japan lost World War II to the Allied powers and relinquished offensive military powers under a U.S.-drafted constitution, even as the current communist Chinese government was establishing the People’s Republic in 1949. Since then, any hint of Japanese military assertiveness has drawn great umbrage here. Disputes over territory, such as an island chain called Diaoyu by China and Senkaku by Japan, spike occasionallyThe enmity, pulled out when something is perceived as aggressive or anger is required for a domestic audience, lurks barely beneath the surface, ready to pop. Even today, cartoons circulate online in China depicting Japanese as demonic, aggressive and anti-China. This week has been an illuminating case study.On Tuesday, China slapped restrictions on “dual-use exports” to Japan — anything, it said, that Japan could adapt for military use. Though it didn't specify what the ban includes, anything from drones to rare earths could be considered dual-use. The lack of specificity allows China to adjust its approach as it goes — making it more or less strict depending on where the political winds are blowing. Japan demanded the move be rescinded. “These measures, which only target Japan, deviate significantly from international practice,” its Foreign Ministry said, calling China's actions “absolutely unacceptable and deeply regrettable.” This came days after it protested Chinese mobile drilling rigs in the East China Sea.While the Chinese Commerce Ministry did not mention rare earths curbs, the official newspaper China Daily, seen as a government mouthpiece, quoted anonymous sources saying Beijing was considering tightening exports of certain rare earths to Japan. On Wednesday, the focus turned to a gas called dichlorosilane, used in computer chip manufacturing. The Commerce Ministry said it had launched an investigation into why the price of dichlorosilane imported from Japan had decreased 31% between 2022 and 2024. “The dumping of imported products from Japan has damaged the production and operation of our domestic industry,” it said.Finally, on Thursday, China's Arms Control and Disarmament Association, a nongovernment agency (inasmuch as any agency in China is nongovernmental) released with some fanfare a report provocatively titled “Nuclear Ambitions of Japan's Right-Wing Forces: A Serious Threat to World Peace.” It spent 29 pages outlining worries and accusations that Tokyo harbors dangerous nuclear ambitions. But it also went broader, invoking once again its stance that the nation's right-wing leaders — and, by extension, the whole country itself — have “failed to reflect on Japan's history of aggression.”“Japan has never been able to fully eliminate the scourge of militarism in the country,” the report said. “If Japan's right-wing forces are left free to develop powerful offensive weapons, or even possess nuclear weapons, it will again bring disaster to the world.”Also part of the equation this week: China's visible pivot to another regional neighbor, South Korea, whose president spent four days in Beijing. Seoul has a bumpy history of its own with Japanese aggression and also sporadic — though generally less intense — friction with Beijing, a longtime supporter and ally of its rival North Korea.Chinese media gave splashy coverage to Lee Jae Myung's visit, touting new Beijing-Seoul agreements on trade, environmental protection and transportation — and notably technology, given the dual-export ban. Also visible: Lee at two business events watching major companies pledge increased collaboration. The sides signed 24 export contracts worth a combined $44 million, according to South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources.The burst of official affection toward South Korea didn't stop with Lee. While he was here, Chinese media reported that South Korea overtook Japan as the leading destination for outbound flights from the mainland over New Year’s. That's on top of Beijing's recent efforts to discourage Chinese from traveling to Japan, citing “significant risks to the personal safety and lives of Chinese citizens” there.For now, Japan-China tension remains a matter of rhetoric and policy. But no one is predicting a quick resolution. With Japan's staunch ally, the United States, planning to furnish more arms to Taiwan in a single sale than ever before, there's too much at stake for both East Asian nations at this moment — and too much contentious history — for an easy and quick solution."This time ... de-escalation and a return to the status quo may not be as easily achieved," Sebastian Maslow, an East Asia specialist and associate professor of international relations at the University of Tokyo, wrote in The Conversation last month. “With diplomatic channels in short supply and domestic political agendas paramount, an off-ramp for the current dispute is not in sight.”Ted Anthony has written about China for The Associated Press since 1994. Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Dog food accounts for 1% of UK greenhouse gas emissions, study finds

Study of 1,000 products finds wet, raw and meat-free foods have substantially higher climate impact than dry kibbleDog food accounts for 1% of the UK’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to research that finds wet, raw and meat-rich products are associated with substantially higher emissions than dry kibble.The analysis revealed striking differences in the environmental impact of commercial dog foods, with the highest-impact foods being responsible for up to 65 times more emissions than the lowest-rated options. Continue reading...

Dog food accounts for 1% of the UK’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to research that finds wet, raw and meat-rich products are associated with substantially higher emissions than dry kibble.The analysis revealed striking differences in the environmental impact of commercial dog foods, with the highest-impact foods being responsible for up to 65 times more emissions than the lowest-rated options.The findings will leave environmentally conscious pet owners torn between giving their dogs the most delicious food and minimising their impact on the climate.“As a veterinary surgeon working on environmental sustainability, I regularly see owners torn between ideals of dogs as meat‑eating ‘wolves’ and their wish to reduce environmental harm,” said the study’s principal investigator, John Harvey, from the University of Edinburgh’s Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies.“Our research shows just how large and variable the climate impact of dog food really is. It’s important for owners to know that choosing grain-free, wet or raw foods can result in higher impacts compared to standard dry kibble foods,” he added.Scientists from the universities of Edinburgh and Exeter used ingredient and nutrient labelling information to calculate the carbon footprint of almost 1,000 commercially available dog foods.Overall, they found producing the ingredients for the UK’s commercial dog foods contributes 2.3–3.7% of UK food system greenhouse gas emissions, or 0.9–1.3% of total UK emissions.If the rest of the world fed their dogs the way Britons do, it would generate greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to more than half of those from burning jet fuel in commercial flights each year.But the impact varied widely between different varieties. Using large amounts of prime meat – which could otherwise be eaten by humans – pushes up emissions, while the use of nutritious carcass parts that are in low demand helps limit environmental impact. Dry food, not marketed as grain-free, tended to have a lower impact than wet, raw or grain-free options.Dog owners who want to reduce environmental impacts but not change food type should check the label description of meat cuts used in the food, aiming for a lower content of prime meat, the researchers said.An increase in the use of plant-based dog foods could also reduce emissions – but the research team cautioned that only a small number of plant-based foods were available to test for this study.Harvey added: “The pet food industry should make sure meat cuts used are of the types not typically eaten by humans, and that labelling is clear. These steps can help us have healthy, well-fed dogs with a smaller pawprint on the planet.”

Roads can become more dangerous on hot days – especially for pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists

We tend to adapt quickly to rain. But a growing body of research shows we also need to be more careful when it comes to travel and commuting during extreme heat.

Munbaik Cycling Clothing/UnsplashDuring heatwaves, everyday life tends to feel more difficult than on an average day. Travel and daily movement are no exception. But while most of us know rain, fog and storms can make driving conditions challenging, not many people realise heat also changes transport risk. In particular, research evidence consistently suggests roads, trips and daily commutes can become more dangerous on very hot days compared with an average day. The key questions are how much more dangerous, who is most affected, whether the risk is short-lived or lingers and how this information can be used to better manage road safety during extreme heat. Who is most at risk? The clearest picture comes from a recent multi-city study in tropical and subtropical Taiwan. Using injury data across six large cities, researchers examined how road injury risk changes as temperatures rise, and how this differs by mode of travel. The results show what researchers call a sharp, non-linear increase in risk on very hot days. It’s non-linear because road injury risk rises much more steeply once temperatures move into the 30–40°C range. It is also within this range that different travel modes begin to clearly separate in terms of their susceptibility to heat-related risk. This Taiwan study found injury risk for pedestrians more than doubled during extreme heat. Cyclist injuries soared by around 80%, and motorcyclist injuries by about 50%. In contrast, the increase for car drivers is much smaller. The pattern is clear: the more exposed the road user, the bigger the heat-related risk. The pattern is also not exclusive to a single geographical region and has been observed in other countries too. A long-running national study from Spain drew on two decades of crash data covering nearly 2 million incidents and showed crash risk increases steadily as temperatures rise. At very high temperatures, overall crash risk is about 15% higher than on cool days. Importantly, the increase is even larger for crashes linked to driver fatigue, distraction or illness. A nationwide study in the United States found a 3.4% increase in fatal traffic crashes on heatwave days versus non-heatwave days. The increase is not evenly distributed. Fatal crash risk rises more strongly: on rural roads among middle-aged and older drivers, and on hot, dry days with high UV radiation. This shows extreme heat does not just increase crash likelihood, but also the chance that crashes result in death. That’s particularly true in settings with higher speeds and less forgiving road environments. Taken together, the international evidence base is consistent: the likelihood of crashes, injury risk and fatal outcomes all increase during hot days. Why heat increases road risk, and why the effects can linger Across the three studies, the evidence points to a combination of exposure and human performance effects. The Taiwan study shows that risk increases most sharply for pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists. These are groups that are physically exposed to ambient heat and, in some cases, exertion. In contrast, occupants of enclosed vehicles show smaller increases in risk. This suggests that direct exposure to heat plays a role in shaping who is most affected. The Spanish study suggests that the largest heat-related increases occur in crashes involving driver fatigue, distraction, sleepiness or illness. This indicates that heat affects road safety not only through environmental conditions, but through changes in human performance that make errors more likely. Importantly, the Spanish data also show that these effects are not always confined to the hottest day itself. They can persist for several days following extreme heat, consistent with cumulative impacts such as sleep disruption and prolonged fatigue. High solar radiation refers to days with intense, direct sunlight and little cloud cover. In the US study, heat-related increases in fatal crashes were strongest under these conditions. Although visibility was not directly examined, these are also conditions associated with greater glare, which may make things even less safe. How can the extra risk be managed? The empirical evidence does not point to a single solution, but it does indicate where risk is elevated and where things become less safe. That knowledge alone can be used to manage risk. First, reducing exposure matters. Fewer trips mean less risk, and flexible work arrangements during heatwaves can indirectly reduce road exposure altogether. Second, risk awareness matters. Simply recognising that heatwaves are higher-risk travel days can help us be more cautious, especially for those travelling without the protection of an enclosed vehicle. We tend to adapt quickly to rain. As soon as the first drops hit the windscreen, we reduce speed almost subconsciously and increase distance to other vehicles. This, in fact, is a key reason traffic jams often start to develop shortly after roads become wet. But a growing body of research shows we also need to be more careful when it comes to travel and commuting during extreme heat. Milad Haghani receives funding from the Australian government (the Office of Road Safety).Zahra Shahhoseini does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

These Are the 66 Global Organizations the Trump Administration Is Leaving

The Trump administration says it’s going to depart 66 international organizations, nearly half them affiliated with the United Nations

Many focus on climate, labor, migration and other issues the Trump administration has categorized as catering to diversity and “woke” initiatives.Here is a list of all the agencies that the U.S. is exiting, according to the White House:— 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Compact— Commission for Environmental Cooperation— European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats— Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories— Freedom Online Coalition— Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund— Global Counterterrorism Forum— Global Forum on Cyber Expertise— Global Forum on Migration and Development— Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research— Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals, and Sustainable Development— Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change— Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services— International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property— International Cotton Advisory Committee— International Development Law Organization— International Energy Forum— International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies— International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance— International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law— International Lead and Zinc Study Group— International Renewable Energy Agency— International Solar Alliance— International Tropical Timber Organization— International Union for Conservation of Nature— Pan American Institute of Geography and History— Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation— Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia— Regional Cooperation Council— Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century— Science and Technology Center in Ukraine— Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme— Venice Commission of the Council of Europe United Nations organizations — Department of Economic and Social Affairs— U.N. Economic and Social Council, or ECOSOC — Economic Commission for Africa— ECOSOC — Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean— ECOSOC — Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific— ECOSOC — Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia— International Law Commission— International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals— International Trade Centre— Office of the Special Adviser on Africa— Office of the Special Representative of the secretary-general for Children in Armed Conflict— Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict— Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence Against Children— Peacebuilding Commission— Permanent Forum on People of African Descent— U.N. Alliance of Civilizations— U.N. Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries— U.N. Conference on Trade and Development— U.N. Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women— U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change— U.N. Human Settlements Programme— U.N. Institute for Training and Research— U.N. Register of Conventional Arms— U.N. System Chief Executives Board for Coordination— U.N. System Staff CollegeCopyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Costa Rica Rescues Orphaned Manatee Calf in Tortuguero

A young female manatee washed up alone on a beach in Tortuguero National Park early on January 5, sparking a coordinated effort by local authorities to save the animal. The calf, identified as a Caribbean manatee, appeared separated from its mother, with no immediate signs of her in the area. Park rangers received the first […] The post Costa Rica Rescues Orphaned Manatee Calf in Tortuguero appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

A young female manatee washed up alone on a beach in Tortuguero National Park early on January 5, sparking a coordinated effort by local authorities to save the animal. The calf, identified as a Caribbean manatee, appeared separated from its mother, with no immediate signs of her in the area. Park rangers received the first alert around 8 a.m. from visitors who spotted the stranded calf. Staff from the National System of Conservation Areas (SINAC) quickly arrived on site. They secured the animal to prevent further harm and began searching nearby waters and canals for the mother. Despite hours of monitoring, officials found no evidence of her presence. “The calf showed no visible injuries but needed prompt attention due to its age and vulnerability,” said a SINAC official involved in the operation. Without a parent nearby, the young manatee faced risks from dehydration and predators in the open beach environment. As the day progressed, the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE) joined the response. They decided to relocate the calf for specialized care. In a first for such rescues in the region, teams arranged an aerial transport to move the animal safely to a rehabilitation facility. This step aimed to give the manatee the best chance at survival while experts assess its health. Once at the center, the calf received immediate feeding and medical checks. During one session, it dozed off mid-meal, a sign that it felt secure in the hands of caretakers. Biologists now monitor the animal closely, hoping to release it back into the wild if conditions allow. Manatees, known locally as manatíes, inhabit the coastal waters and rivers of Costa Rica’s Caribbean side. They often face threats from boat strikes, habitat loss, and pollution. Tortuguero, with its network of canals and protected areas, serves as a key habitat for the species. Recent laws have strengthened protections, naming the manatee a national marine symbol to raise awareness. This incident highlights the ongoing challenges for wildlife in the area. Local communities and tourists play a key role in reporting sightings, which can lead to timely interventions. Authorities encourage anyone spotting distressed animals to contact SINAC without delay. The rescue team expressed gratitude to those who reported the stranding. Their quick action likely saved the calf’s life. As investigations continue, officials will determine if environmental factors contributed to the separation. For now, the young manatee rests under professional care, a small win for conservation efforts in Limón. The post Costa Rica Rescues Orphaned Manatee Calf in Tortuguero appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

No Results today.

Our news is updated constantly with the latest environmental stories from around the world. Reset or change your filters to find the most active current topics.

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.