Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

In Rural Pennsylvania, Crypto Mining Offers a Lifeline for Dying Gas Wells

News Feed
Monday, June 3, 2024

Holly May first heard the roaring noise during a youth hunting event on state game lands in the fall of 2022.  “It’s back a ways,” May said of the noise. “It was an area that I previously had liked to hunt in.” The plot of land, State Game Lands 44 in Pennsylvania’s northwest, was once home to a coal mine — since revegetated with native and pollinator-friendly plants and stocked with pheasants by the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Today, traces of its mining past are covered by tall, waving grasses and clusters of goldenrod flowers. Getting to the site requires maneuvering up a treacherous gravel hill road and past a gate with a sign identifying the lessee of its mineral rights: Diversified Production LLC. Where the trees clear, grassland opens up, offering cover to the critters that May and others both hunt and protect. But that fall day, finding pheasants was harder than usual. “It literally sound[ed] like you’re standing beside an airplane taking off,” she said. May, a natural resources professional, wouldn’t find out until months later that the sound was coming from a different kind of mining operation than this land has grown accustomed to — one that searches for bitcoin.  The bitcoin mine sits atop a set of wells producing natural gas that — rather than being transported and sold — can be used to power banks of supercomputers that work around the clock to unlock cryptocurrency, a lucrative process. Today, one bitcoin is worth around $67,000. Diversified Production’s crypto mining operation at Longhorn Pad A in Elk County, PA. When May heard it roaring that day, the mine was up and running but without authorization from state regulators. The oil and gas producer Diversified had yet to secure the required permits to hook up the engines that power cryptocurrency mining on the low-producing fracking well pad, called Longhorn Pad A. Nonetheless, it ran for several weeks, one resident estimated.  Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) later slapped the company with a notice of violation for breaking state air pollution and noise laws.  Then, without handing down any punishment, the regulators approved the mining operation in December. The mine was the second Diversified site to be hit with a violation for operating without a permit. The agency did so as well at a neighboring site, Longhorn Pad C, which regulators discovered in March 2023. It also received the necessary permits for bitcoin mining two months later. Diversified, which has acquired some 70,000 wells in less than a decade, has surpassed Exxon Mobil Corp. to become the largest well owner in the nation. Many of these wells are low-producing and represent a risk if the company can’t afford to plug them at the end of their lives. The situation adds to the growing concern about a potential surge in bitcoin mining — and its potential to increase air pollution — throughout Pennsylvania. Across the country, crypto mining is blamed for producing millions of tons of carbon dioxide and consuming vast amounts of electricity — more than some entire countries. “We have invested tens of thousands of dollars in habitat work on that game lands,” May said. “Now, it’s really disturbing to use that whole back section … not to mention the greenhouse gas emissions.”  In issuing permits for the site, the DEP opted not to put a cap on its greenhouse gas emissions, noting that the site is not a “major” source of emissions relative to other polluters in the state, such as power plants. But the department did place a noise limit on the mine, even though Horton Township, where the mine is located, had already adopted a bitcoin mining ordinance that limited noise. PJ Piccirillo, a supervisor in Horton Township, said he was never contacted by Diversified Energy about the site throughout the entire permitting process. The agency also forgave the company’s infractions in granting the permit, saying that Diversified had “satisfactorily addressed violations.” In an email to Capital & Main, the DEP said Diversified has not yet started full-time operation of the bitcoin mine at Longhorn A because it has yet to install the “sound mitigation devices” its permit requires. The bitcoin operations point to a gap in regulatory oversight that has allowed operators such as Diversified to start their mining operations without being fully transparent about their full plans or communicating with local communities about the potential impact of their operations, interviews and government emails obtained through Right-to-Know requests show. Regulators often lack the bandwidth to properly monitor all infractions, especially in rural areas, and oversight can be fractured — in the case of Longhorn Pad A, requiring input from three different agencies that don’t often communicate with one another. “The permit applicant here has a bad track record in Pennsylvania,” said Robert Routh, Pennsylvania’s senior policy advocate for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which filed a complaint opposing the mine last July alongside Earthjustice and the Clean Air Council.  “It appears they lack both the intent or the ability to comply with Pennsylvania law.” From Bituminous to Bitcoin In a process known as “wellhead mining,” Diversified’s Longhorn Pad A funnels natural gas from two fracking wells directly into engines that power banks of supercomputers. Disconnected from the grid, the mine can churn away on its own around the clock. Diversified hadn’t owned the pad for very long before it took steps to turn it into a bitcoin mine. The company acquired the wells in November 2020 and formally applied to mine bitcoin there in June 2022. It powered up the mines the following October and operated for several weeks, according to resident complaints and emails reviewed by Capital & Main.  As the DEP’s permitting process was underway, staff at the Pennsylvania Game Commission expressed frustration that Diversified was not fully answering inquiries about their activities at the well site. Though the company’s permit applications on Longhorn Pads A and C clearly expressed its intent to mine bitcoin, early emails obtained by Capital & Main show company representatives were vague in communicating their plans to both agencies, referring to the mine as “containers” housing “computer equipment.” After finally meeting with the Game Commission, a Diversified executive offered to “partner” on projects for the agency, such as tree planting efforts and winter coat drives.  Both well pads house marginal, or low-producing, wells, which Diversified acquired from Pittsburgh-based fracking giant EQT in 2020. The wells had been inactive for around a decade before Diversified brought them back to life.  A highly energy-intensive process, bitcoin mining runs the risk of producing a surge in the state’s greenhouse gas emissions. Using what’s called the proof-of-work algorithm, bitcoin miners mint new coins by chipping away at complex mathematical equations. A September 2022 report from the Biden administration estimates that crypto operations are now responsible for 0.4% to 0.8% of the nation’s total greenhouse gas emissions. Bitcoin mining also generates localized air and water pollution as well as electronic waste, the report notes. Cooling the computers, which must remain at a set temperature, also requires vast water usage, which could strain drought-prone areas. Emissions projections for Longhorn Pad A from Diversified’s permit application. In its application for permits to add crypto-related generators to Longhorn A, Diversified predicted the site’s emissions of air pollutants, such as particulate matter and volatile organic compounds, would multiply by as much as 67 times once it began mining bitcoin.  Wells such as Longhorn A — which for most operators would be economically worthless since they lack pipeline capacity to transmit any gas they produce — are a model for giving new life to aging wells. Bitcoin mining offers them a new revenue stream and, as one bitcoin mine operator wrote in a 2023 blog post, going off-grid comes with a suite of “superpowers,” including the ability to relocate quickly and to “operate permissionlessly.”  The specter of a bitcoin gold rush in Pennsylvania seems to have caught regulators by surprise, interviews and documents obtained via Right-to-Know requests show. Thousands of low-producing wells are estimated to be scattered across the commonwealth, and environmentalists fear they could become targets for an emerging, hard-to-control industry.  ‘Big Picture, We Don’t Ever Want to See Another One of These’ In Horton Township, Piccirillo said he first heard complaints from residents in the fall of 2022. At first he couldn’t explain the noise or the sudden increase in truck traffic on the road leading to the well. That is, until he and his fellow supervisors went to the site to see for themselves. The bitcoin mine was up and running on his first visit, shut off on his second, he said.  Minutes from Horton Township Board of Supervisors meetings show the mine came up repeatedly between August and October of 2022. Around a year later, the township passed an ordinance requiring that, before operating, bitcoin mines be housed in a “fully enclosed” building that would keep noise emissions below 50 decibels (roughly the noise level of a refrigerator) from the closest property line; and receive approval through a local permitting process. After visiting the site this past March, Piccirillo said the company still had not enclosed the mine in a soundproof building. The road in Weedville, PA, just a few miles from Longhorn Pad C. Around the same time that Piccirillo began fielding resident complaints, Dave Gustafson, director for the Bureau of Wildlife Habitat Management at the Pennsylvania Game Commission, started looking for answers as well. At first, none came. “We went back and forth, and over the next several months throughout the summer [of 2022], tried to reach out and find out, ‘Well, what are they exactly doing?’” he said. “They really didn’t tell us.” Gustafson recalled that early correspondence from company representatives was vague. “They were very careful to say that what they were doing had to do with production and post-production of gas,” he said. “That’s careful language.”  The company took a similar tack in corresponding with the DEP. In April 2023, after the DEP hit Diversified with a violation for firing up its bitcoin mine on Longhorn C without permission, a company vice president pushed back. “We do not agree with this determination,” the executive wrote in an email, arguing that the engines at the site actually “provide power for oil and gas operations.” (The engines Diversified were cited for using are the same models the company noted in its permit application would be “associated with mining of crypto currency operations.”)  Meanwhile, emails show Diversified was slow to reply to agency queries, sometimes delaying answers to questions and plans to meet by weeks. An internal Game Commission memo noted that Gustafson emailed Diversified “requesting details of what was being developed on the Longhorn A pad” on Sept. 1, 2022. More than four months later, the memo said, “We had still not received a written response and only managed to get 1 phone conversation.”  Diversified’s notice of violation from the state’s Department of Environmental Protection. As the bitcoin mines began operating, the Game Commission fielded its first complaints. The situation presented a quandary for the state’s regulatory bodies, which appeared not to have communicated with each other about their shared experience with Diversified until July of 2023, records show. When a third agency — the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources — weighed in, another point of view emerged. “Our position is that [bitcoin mining] is certainly not permissible under our lease,” the department wrote in emails obtained by Capital & Main. It took months for Gustafson to get the chance to arrange a visit to Longhorn A with Diversified representatives, because the company didn’t offer “a lot of good-natured or good partnerly communication,” he recalled last October. “We disagree, still to this day, about certain rights that they assert that they have, that we don’t believe that they have.”  “Big picture,” he continued, “we don’t ever want to see another one of these. We don’t even want this one there.”  Gustafson concedes that since getting in touch with Diversified’s staff, the company has agreed to several key compromises — including shutting down the bitcoin mine on peak hunting days. Emails also show that, after meeting with Gustafson, in the wake of months of delay, Diversified Chief Financial Officer Brad Gray offered to “partner with your organization to get some great projects completed,” highlighting that the company had previously sponsored tree-planting initiatives, fishing explorations, playground construction projects and winter coat drives for other entities.  The violations at the two Longhorn pads tops a list of 19 others the company admitted to in its permit applications for the Longhorn sites. Those violations should have been enough to derail Diversified’s application to mine bitcoin, Routh, the NRDC policy advocate, and the nonprofit environmental groups Clean Air Council and Earthjustice said in a public comment filed in opposition to the mine. In response, the DEP said that “Diversified had worked with DEP to satisfactorily address violations occurring at other facilities the company operates.” They did not specify what steps the company had taken.  “The department offers a get-out-of-jail free card to Diversified and to any other polluters who don’t bother to apply for a permit,” Charley McPhedran, senior attorney in Earthjustice’s clean energy program, told Capital & Main. “The incentive for industry is to do whatever it wants.”  Capital & Main reached out to Diversified Energy PLC, the parent company to Diversified Production, with a list of questions. While it did not respond to specific questions, it offered a statement in response.  Fog hangs on the hillsides above the road to Longhorn Pad C. “As part of our well optimization efforts, we undertook a pilot research program to study on-site cryptocurrency mining activities as a solution for stranded assets. Throughout the process, we have sought guidance and worked closely with the Department of Environmental Protection and Game Commission,” the statement reads. “Across our operations, we strive to be good stewards of our assets, focused on innovative solutions to best use resources while minimizing environmental impact and improving performance.”  The Department of Environmental Protection did not respond to a list of questions from Capital & Main.  For May, the hunter who has now stopped frequenting State Game Lands 44 in favor of quieter grounds, this type of operation has real-life consequences.  “​​It’s super frustrating to watch a private company come in and be a repeat offender,” said May.  Copyright Capital & Main

Emails show Diversified largely kept the state in the dark as it fired up its bitcoin mining operation. The post In Rural Pennsylvania, Crypto Mining Offers a Lifeline for Dying Gas Wells appeared first on .

Holly May first heard the roaring noise during a youth hunting event on state game lands in the fall of 2022. 

“It’s back a ways,” May said of the noise. “It was an area that I previously had liked to hunt in.” The plot of land, State Game Lands 44 in Pennsylvania’s northwest, was once home to a coal mine — since revegetated with native and pollinator-friendly plants and stocked with pheasants by the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Today, traces of its mining past are covered by tall, waving grasses and clusters of goldenrod flowers.

Getting to the site requires maneuvering up a treacherous gravel hill road and past a gate with a sign identifying the lessee of its mineral rights: Diversified Production LLC. Where the trees clear, grassland opens up, offering cover to the critters that May and others both hunt and protect.

But that fall day, finding pheasants was harder than usual. “It literally sound[ed] like you’re standing beside an airplane taking off,” she said.

May, a natural resources professional, wouldn’t find out until months later that the sound was coming from a different kind of mining operation than this land has grown accustomed to — one that searches for bitcoin. 

The bitcoin mine sits atop a set of wells producing natural gas that — rather than being transported and sold — can be used to power banks of supercomputers that work around the clock to unlock cryptocurrency, a lucrative process. Today, one bitcoin is worth around $67,000.

Diversified Production’s crypto mining operation at Longhorn Pad A in Elk County, PA.

When May heard it roaring that day, the mine was up and running but without authorization from state regulators. The oil and gas producer Diversified had yet to secure the required permits to hook up the engines that power cryptocurrency mining on the low-producing fracking well pad, called Longhorn Pad A. Nonetheless, it ran for several weeks, one resident estimated. 

Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) later slapped the company with a notice of violation for breaking state air pollution and noise laws. 

Then, without handing down any punishment, the regulators approved the mining operation in December.

The mine was the second Diversified site to be hit with a violation for operating without a permit. The agency did so as well at a neighboring site, Longhorn Pad C, which regulators discovered in March 2023. It also received the necessary permits for bitcoin mining two months later. Diversified, which has acquired some 70,000 wells in less than a decade, has surpassed Exxon Mobil Corp. to become the largest well owner in the nation. Many of these wells are low-producing and represent a risk if the company can’t afford to plug them at the end of their lives.

The situation adds to the growing concern about a potential surge in bitcoin mining — and its potential to increase air pollution — throughout Pennsylvania. Across the country, crypto mining is blamed for producing millions of tons of carbon dioxide and consuming vast amounts of electricity — more than some entire countries.

“We have invested tens of thousands of dollars in habitat work on that game lands,” May said. “Now, it’s really disturbing to use that whole back section … not to mention the greenhouse gas emissions.” 

In issuing permits for the site, the DEP opted not to put a cap on its greenhouse gas emissions, noting that the site is not a “major” source of emissions relative to other polluters in the state, such as power plants. But the department did place a noise limit on the mine, even though Horton Township, where the mine is located, had already adopted a bitcoin mining ordinance that limited noise. PJ Piccirillo, a supervisor in Horton Township, said he was never contacted by Diversified Energy about the site throughout the entire permitting process.

The agency also forgave the company’s infractions in granting the permit, saying that Diversified had “satisfactorily addressed violations.”

In an email to Capital & Main, the DEP said Diversified has not yet started full-time operation of the bitcoin mine at Longhorn A because it has yet to install the “sound mitigation devices” its permit requires.

The bitcoin operations point to a gap in regulatory oversight that has allowed operators such as Diversified to start their mining operations without being fully transparent about their full plans or communicating with local communities about the potential impact of their operations, interviews and government emails obtained through Right-to-Know requests show. Regulators often lack the bandwidth to properly monitor all infractions, especially in rural areas, and oversight can be fractured — in the case of Longhorn Pad A, requiring input from three different agencies that don’t often communicate with one another.

“The permit applicant here has a bad track record in Pennsylvania,” said Robert Routh, Pennsylvania’s senior policy advocate for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which filed a complaint opposing the mine last July alongside Earthjustice and the Clean Air Council. 

“It appears they lack both the intent or the ability to comply with Pennsylvania law.”

From Bituminous to Bitcoin

In a process known as “wellhead mining,” Diversified’s Longhorn Pad A funnels natural gas from two fracking wells directly into engines that power banks of supercomputers. Disconnected from the grid, the mine can churn away on its own around the clock.

Diversified hadn’t owned the pad for very long before it took steps to turn it into a bitcoin mine. The company acquired the wells in November 2020 and formally applied to mine bitcoin there in June 2022. It powered up the mines the following October and operated for several weeks, according to resident complaints and emails reviewed by Capital & Main. 

As the DEP’s permitting process was underway, staff at the Pennsylvania Game Commission expressed frustration that Diversified was not fully answering inquiries about their activities at the well site. Though the company’s permit applications on Longhorn Pads A and C clearly expressed its intent to mine bitcoin, early emails obtained by Capital & Main show company representatives were vague in communicating their plans to both agencies, referring to the mine as “containers” housing “computer equipment.” After finally meeting with the Game Commission, a Diversified executive offered to “partner” on projects for the agency, such as tree planting efforts and winter coat drives. 

Both well pads house marginal, or low-producing, wells, which Diversified acquired from Pittsburgh-based fracking giant EQT in 2020. The wells had been inactive for around a decade before Diversified brought them back to life. 

A highly energy-intensive process, bitcoin mining runs the risk of producing a surge in the state’s greenhouse gas emissions. Using what’s called the proof-of-work algorithm, bitcoin miners mint new coins by chipping away at complex mathematical equations. A September 2022 report from the Biden administration estimates that crypto operations are now responsible for 0.4% to 0.8% of the nation’s total greenhouse gas emissions. Bitcoin mining also generates localized air and water pollution as well as electronic waste, the report notes. Cooling the computers, which must remain at a set temperature, also requires vast water usage, which could strain drought-prone areas.

Emissions projections for Longhorn Pad A from Diversified’s permit application.


In its
application for permits to add crypto-related generators to Longhorn A, Diversified predicted the site’s emissions of air pollutants, such as particulate matter and volatile organic compounds, would multiply by as much as 67 times once it began mining bitcoin. 

Wells such as Longhorn A — which for most operators would be economically worthless since they lack pipeline capacity to transmit any gas they produce — are a model for giving new life to aging wells. Bitcoin mining offers them a new revenue stream and, as one bitcoin mine operator wrote in a 2023 blog post, going off-grid comes with a suite of “superpowers,” including the ability to relocate quickly and to “operate permissionlessly.” 

The specter of a bitcoin gold rush in Pennsylvania seems to have caught regulators by surprise, interviews and documents obtained via Right-to-Know requests show. Thousands of low-producing wells are estimated to be scattered across the commonwealth, and environmentalists fear they could become targets for an emerging, hard-to-control industry. 

‘Big Picture, We Don’t Ever Want to See Another One of These’

In Horton Township, Piccirillo said he first heard complaints from residents in the fall of 2022. At first he couldn’t explain the noise or the sudden increase in truck traffic on the road leading to the well. That is, until he and his fellow supervisors went to the site to see for themselves. The bitcoin mine was up and running on his first visit, shut off on his second, he said. 

Minutes from Horton Township Board of Supervisors meetings show the mine came up repeatedly between August and October of 2022. Around a year later, the township passed an ordinance requiring that, before operating, bitcoin mines be housed in a “fully enclosed” building that would keep noise emissions below 50 decibels (roughly the noise level of a refrigerator) from the closest property line; and receive approval through a local permitting process. After visiting the site this past March, Piccirillo said the company still had not enclosed the mine in a soundproof building.

The road in Weedville, PA, just a few miles from Longhorn Pad C.

Around the same time that Piccirillo began fielding resident complaints, Dave Gustafson, director for the Bureau of Wildlife Habitat Management at the Pennsylvania Game Commission, started looking for answers as well. At first, none came. “We went back and forth, and over the next several months throughout the summer [of 2022], tried to reach out and find out, ‘Well, what are they exactly doing?’” he said. “They really didn’t tell us.”

Gustafson recalled that early correspondence from company representatives was vague. “They were very careful to say that what they were doing had to do with production and post-production of gas,” he said. “That’s careful language.” 

The company took a similar tack in corresponding with the DEP. In April 2023, after the DEP hit Diversified with a violation for firing up its bitcoin mine on Longhorn C without permission, a company vice president pushed back. “We do not agree with this determination,” the executive wrote in an email, arguing that the engines at the site actually “provide power for oil and gas operations.” (The engines Diversified were cited for using are the same models the company noted in its permit application would be “associated with mining of crypto currency operations.”) 

Meanwhile, emails show Diversified was slow to reply to agency queries, sometimes delaying answers to questions and plans to meet by weeks. An internal Game Commission memo noted that Gustafson emailed Diversified “requesting details of what was being developed on the Longhorn A pad” on Sept. 1, 2022. More than four months later, the memo said, “We had still not received a written response and only managed to get 1 phone conversation.” 

Diversified’s notice of violation from the state’s Department of Environmental Protection.

As the bitcoin mines began operating, the Game Commission fielded its first complaints.

The situation presented a quandary for the state’s regulatory bodies, which appeared not to have communicated with each other about their shared experience with Diversified until July of 2023, records show. When a third agency — the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources — weighed in, another point of view emerged. “Our position is that [bitcoin mining] is certainly not permissible under our lease,” the department wrote in emails obtained by Capital & Main.

It took months for Gustafson to get the chance to arrange a visit to Longhorn A with Diversified representatives, because the company didn’t offer “a lot of good-natured or good partnerly communication,” he recalled last October. “We disagree, still to this day, about certain rights that they assert that they have, that we don’t believe that they have.” 

“Big picture,” he continued, “we don’t ever want to see another one of these. We don’t even want this one there.” 

Gustafson concedes that since getting in touch with Diversified’s staff, the company has agreed to several key compromises — including shutting down the bitcoin mine on peak hunting days. Emails also show that, after meeting with Gustafson, in the wake of months of delay, Diversified Chief Financial Officer Brad Gray offered to “partner with your organization to get some great projects completed,” highlighting that the company had previously sponsored tree-planting initiatives, fishing explorations, playground construction projects and winter coat drives for other entities. 

The violations at the two Longhorn pads tops a list of 19 others the company admitted to in its permit applications for the Longhorn sites. Those violations should have been enough to derail Diversified’s application to mine bitcoin, Routh, the NRDC policy advocate, and the nonprofit environmental groups Clean Air Council and Earthjustice said in a public comment filed in opposition to the mine.

In response, the DEP said that “Diversified had worked with DEP to satisfactorily address violations occurring at other facilities the company operates.” They did not specify what steps the company had taken. 

“The department offers a get-out-of-jail free card to Diversified and to any other polluters who don’t bother to apply for a permit,” Charley McPhedran, senior attorney in Earthjustice’s clean energy program, told Capital & Main. “The incentive for industry is to do whatever it wants.” 

Capital & Main reached out to Diversified Energy PLC, the parent company to Diversified Production, with a list of questions. While it did not respond to specific questions, it offered a statement in response. 

Fog hangs on the hillsides above the road to Longhorn Pad C.

“As part of our well optimization efforts, we undertook a pilot research program to study on-site cryptocurrency mining activities as a solution for stranded assets. Throughout the process, we have sought guidance and worked closely with the Department of Environmental Protection and Game Commission,” the statement reads. “Across our operations, we strive to be good stewards of our assets, focused on innovative solutions to best use resources while minimizing environmental impact and improving performance.” 

The Department of Environmental Protection did not respond to a list of questions from Capital & Main. 

For May, the hunter who has now stopped frequenting State Game Lands 44 in favor of quieter grounds, this type of operation has real-life consequences. 

“​​It’s super frustrating to watch a private company come in and be a repeat offender,” said May. 


Copyright Capital & Main

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Ohio bills aim to sideline local critics of carbon capture projects

Ohio legislators are considering bills that would bar local governments from having a say in permitting projects that capture carbon dioxide emissions and inject them underground. The legislation could even force some landowners to let their property be used for carbon dioxide storage. The framework proposed in the…

Ohio legislators are considering bills that would bar local governments from having a say in permitting projects that capture carbon dioxide emissions and inject them underground. The legislation could even force some landowners to let their property be used for carbon dioxide storage. The framework proposed in the twin bills being considered by the state House and Senate starkly contrasts with Ohio’s approach to wind and solar farms, most of which can be blocked by counties. Instead, carbon capture and storage projects would follow a process similar to what’s used for oil and gas drilling, in which property owners must allow development on or below their land if enough neighbors support it. At least one large energy company, Tenaska, is already talking to Ohio landowners about obtaining rights to drill wells and store carbon dioxide from industrial and energy operations deep underground. An executive with the firm said the legislation would provide ​“clarity” for its planned carbon storage hub serving Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. “This project will provide manufacturers, industrial facilities, and other businesses in this region with a solution to address growing environmental regulations and climate goals,” said Ali Kairys, senior director of project development for Tenaska. The company is in discussions with various carbon-emitting businesses, including steel refineries, ethanol plants, and power plants. The Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub could also be a potential customer, Kairys said. In Ohio, Tenaska is eyeing Harrison, Jefferson, and Carroll counties as prime places to store CO2 underground. The three counties are among the state’s top oil and gas producers and have a history of coal mining. Tenaska initially hopes to store captured carbon dioxide in the Knox formation, which ranges from 8,500 feet to 12,000 feet below the Earth’s surface, Kairys said. Second-stage storage would use another formation roughly 5,500 to 8,000 feet underground. Other carbon sequestration projects could be on the horizon. The Great Plains Institute has identified roughly three dozen industrial facilities across the state as candidates for carbon capture projects. And even though the Trump administration is relaxing the environmental regulations that may motivate such efforts, 45Q tax credits expanded by the Inflation Reduction Act incentivize companies nationwide to develop storage projects. Ohio’s House Bill 170 and Senate Bill 136 would give the state Department of Natural Resources ​“sole and exclusive authority to regulate carbon sequestration,” a power the agency also has over oil and gas production via existing law. The Ohio Supreme Court has interpreted the oil and gas law’s language to block local government regulation of drilling, even through general zoning rules that apply to other businesses. If passed, the bills would similarly deprive counties and townships of any say over sequestration, said Bev Reed, an organizer for the Buckeye Environmental Network. ​“It’s … another really tragic thing that the Legislature is forcing on us.” The bills would also authorize a ​“consolidation” process that operators can undertake to force landowners to allow carbon dioxide storage in their property’s subsurface ​“pore space” if owners of 70% of the remaining area for an injection project have signed on. The process is similar to that for unitization, which lets oil and gas companies drill through dissenting landowners’ properties. The chief of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources’ oil and gas management division would be required to grant consolidation if it was ​“reasonably necessary to facilitate the underground storage of carbon dioxide.” A landowner could only object on the grounds that the facility’s design threatens ​“a commercially valuable mineral,” such as oil, gas, or coal. “You don’t get to object and say this is dangerous, this is ill-conceived or for any other reason,” said Heidi Gorovitz Robertson, a professor at Cleveland State University College of Law. ​“Reasonably necessary is a very low standard” for forcing property owners to give up the use of their pore space, she added. Asked to respond to advocacy groups’ complaints that the process is unfair, Tenaska’s Kairys focused instead on landowners’ potential for income.

US Exits Carbon Talks on Shipping, Urges Others to Follow - Document

By Jonathan Saul and Michelle NicholsLONDON (Reuters) -The United States has withdrawn from talks in London looking at advancing decarbonisation in...

By Jonathan Saul and Michelle NicholsLONDON (Reuters) -The United States has withdrawn from talks in London looking at advancing decarbonisation in the shipping sector and Washington will consider "reciprocal measures" to offset any fees charged to U.S. ships, a diplomatic note said.Delegates are at the UN shipping agency's headquarters this week for negotiations over decarbonisation measures aimed at enabling the global shipping industry to reach net zero by "around 2050".An initial proposal by a bloc of countries including the European Union, that was submitted to the UN's International Maritime Organization (IMO), had sought to reach agreement for the world’s first carbon levy for shipping on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions."The U.S. rejects any and all efforts to impose economic measures against its ships based on GHG emissions or fuel choice," according to a diplomatic demarche sent to ambassadors by the United States."For these reasons the U.S. is not engaging in negotiations at the IMO 3rd Marine Environment Protection Committee from 7-11 April and urges your government to reconsider its support for the GHG emissions measures under consideration."It was not clear how many of the IMO's 176-member countries received the note."Should such a blatantly unfair measure go forward, our government will consider reciprocal measures so as to offset any fees charged to U.S. ships and compensate the American people for any other economic harm from any adopted GHG emissions measures," the note from Washington said.Washington also opposed "any proposed measure that would fund any unrelated environmental or other projects outside the shipping sector", the note added.U.S. officials in Washington did not immediately comment when contacted late on Tuesday.The IMO had not yet received any communication, an IMO spokesperson said on Wednesday.Shipping, which transports around 90% of world trade and accounts for nearly 3% of the world's carbon dioxide emissions, has faced calls from environmentalists and investors to deliver more concrete action, including a carbon levy.(Reporting by Jonathan Saul, Michelle Nichols, Gram Slattery and Kate Abnett; Editing by Sharon Singleton)Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.

Poor air quality increases depression risk

A new study finds poor air quality is linked to a heightened risk for depression. Depression is a classified as a mood disorder.

A new study indicates that long-term exposure to air pollutants could directly correlate to an increased risk for depression. The study published in Environmental Science and Ecotechnology and conducted by Harbin Medical University and Cranfield University examined the link to depressive symptoms in a Chinese adult population and six common air pollutants over 7 years. Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) was the primary pollutant linked to an increased risk of depression, and carbon monoxide (CO) and fine particular matter The findings point to sulfur dioxide as the most influential pollutant associated with increased depression risk. Particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide also contributed to a heightened risk for mental health illness, according to the research. When an individual is exposed to a combination of pollutants, the possibility for depression is heightened. According to the authors of the study, "Essentially, air pollutants could affect the central nervous system through oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, potentially via systemic circulation, the trigeminal nerve, or olfactory receptor neurons." "Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the precise processes that link air pollution exposure to mental health outcomes," the study reads. Depression is a mood disorder that causes consistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest. It is also referred to as clinical depression. Symptoms of depression could be anxiety, sleeplessness, fatigue, irritability, loss of pleasure in activities, among others, according to the Mayo Clinic. If an individual should experience any symptoms of depression that should consult a medical professional.

Flooding in the Sahara, Amazon tributaries drying and warming tipping over 1.5°C – 2024 broke all the wrong records

The atmosphere now has the highest carbon dioxide levels in the last 800,000 years – and global heat records have toppled yet again. Coincidence? Of course not

Climate change is the most pressing problem humanity will face this century. Tracking how the climate is actually changing has never been more critical. Today, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) published its annual State of the Climate report, which found heat records kept being broken in 2024. It’s likely 2024 was the first year to be more than 1.5°C above the Earth’s pre-industrial average temperature. In 2024, levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere hit the highest point in the last 800,000 years. The combination of heat and unchecked emissions, the organisation points out, had serious consequences. Attribution studies found a link between climate change and disasters such as Hurricane Helene, which left a trail of destruction in the southeastern United States, and the unprecedented flooding in Africa’s arid Sahel region. Slowing these increasingly dangerous changes to Earth’s climate will require a rapid shift from fossil fuels to clean energy. The record heat of 2024 From the North Pole to the South Pole, the oceans and our land masses, the report catalogues alarm bells ringing ever louder for Earth’s vital signs. Steadily rising global average temperatures show us the influence of the extra heat we are trapping by emitting greenhouse gases. The ten warmest years on record have all happened in the past ten years. The report shows 2024 was the warmest year since comprehensive global records began 175 years ago. The planet was an estimated 1.55°C (plus or minus 0.13°C) warmer than it was between 1850 and 1900. Together, 2023 and 2024 marked a jump in global mean temperature from previous years. There was a jump of about 0.15°C between the previous record year (2016 or 2020 depending on the dataset) and 2023. Last year was even warmer – about 0.1°C above 2023. Last year was the first year the planet was likely more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This doesn’t mean we have broken the 2015 Paris Agreement goal of holding warming under 1.5°C – temperatures would need to be sustained over a number of years to formally lose that fight. But it’s not good news. There are a few extra factors at play in this record-breaking global temperature, including an El Niño event boosting eastern Pacific Ocean temperatures in the first part of 2024, falling pollution from shipping leading to less cloud over the ocean, and a more active sun as well. Researchers are hard at work unpicking why the Earth’s average temperature jumped in 2023 and 2024. But it is clear the 2024 record-breaking warmth and most other damning statistics in the report would not have occurred if it wasn’t for human-induced climate change. Much of the Northern Hemisphere was more than 2°C warmer in 2024 than 1951-1980 levels and many equatorial areas saw new annual temperature records. NASA GISS, CC BY-NC-ND Carbon dioxide up, glacial melt up, sea ice down It’s not just global temperatures breaking records. Carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere reached 427 parts per million last year. Sea level rise has accelerated and is now about 11 centimetres above early 1990s levels, and the oceans are at their highest temperatures on record. Seasonal sea-ice in the Arctic and around Antarctica shrank to low levels (albeit short of record lows) in 2024, while preliminary data shows glacial melt and ocean acidification continued at a rapid pace. Almost all parts of the world were much warmer in 2024 than even recent averages (1991–2020) and much of the tropics experienced record heat. From cyclones to heatwaves, another year of extreme events In the English-speaking media, extreme events affecting North America, Europe and Australia are well covered, such as the devastating Hurricane Helene in the US and the lethal flash flooding in Spain. By contrast, extreme weather and its fallout in Africa, South America and Southeast Asia get less coverage. In September 2024, Super Typhoon Yagi killed hundreds and caused widespread damage through the Philippines, China and Vietnam. Later in the year, Cyclone Chido struck Mayotte and Mozambique causing more than 100,000 people to be displaced. Hundreds died in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan due to spring floods following an unusual cold wave. Unusual flooding hit parts of the arid Sahel and even the Sahara Desert. Meanwhile the worst drought in a century hit southern Africa, devastating small farmers and leading to rising hunger. Much of South and Central America was hit by significant drought. Huge tributaries to the Amazon River all but dried up for the first time on record. Severe summer heat hit much of the Northern Hemisphere, while more than 1,300 pilgrims died during the Hajj pilgrimage in Mecca as heat and humidity pushed past survivable limits. Globally, extreme weather forced more people from their homes than any other year since 2008, which had widespread floods and fires. Did climate change play a role in these extreme events? The answer ranges from a resounding yes in some cases to a likely small role in others. Scientists at World Weather Attribution found the fingerprints of climate change in Hurricane Helene’s large-scale rain and winds as well as the flooding rains in the eastern Sahel. Paying the price for decades of inaction This report is a dire score card. The numbers are sobering, scary but sadly, not surprising. We have known the basic mechanism by which greenhouse gases warm the planet for over 100 years. The science behind climate change has been around a long time. But our response is still not up to the task. Currently, our activities are producing ever more greenhouse gas emissions, trapping more heat and causing more and more problems for people and the planet. Every fraction of a degree of global warming matters. The damage done will keep worsening until we end our reliance on fossil fuels and reach net zero. Andrew King receives funding from the ARC Centre of Excellence for 21st Century Weather and the National Environmental Science Program. Linden Ashcroft has received funding from the Australian Research Council and is affiliated with the ARC Centre of Excellence for 21st Century Weather

Why build nuclear power in place of old coal, when you could have pumped hydropower instead?

Research reveals most of the sites the Coalition has earmarked for nuclear power plants would be suitable for pumped hydropower plants.

Phillip Wittke, ShutterstockAustralia’s energy policy would take a sharp turn if the Coalition wins the upcoming federal election. A Dutton government would seek to build seven nuclear power plants at the sites of old coal-fired power stations. The Coalition says its plan makes smart use of the existing transmission network and other infrastructure. But solar and wind power would need to be curtailed to make room in the grid for nuclear energy. This means polluting coal and gas power stations would remain active for longer, releasing an extra 1 billion to 2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide. So is there another option? Yes: pumped hydro storage plants. This technology is quicker and cheaper to develop than nuclear power, and can store solar and wind rather than curtail it. It’s better suited to Australia’s electricity grid and would ultimately lead to fewer emissions. Drawing on our recent global analysis, we found the technology could be deployed near all but one of the seven sites the Coalition has earmarked for nuclear power. The Coalition is likely to spend anywhere from A$116 billion to $600 billion of taxpayers’ money to deliver up to 14 gigawatts of nuclear energy. Experts say the plan will not lower power prices and will take too long to build. Our findings suggest cheap storage of solar and wind, in the form of pumped hydro, is a better way forward. This way, we can continue to build renewable energy capacity while stabilising the grid. More than 45GW of solar and wind is already up and running, with a further 23GW being supported by the Capacity Investment Scheme until 2027. Only a handful of the pumped hydro sites we found would be needed to decarbonise the energy system, reaching the 1,046 gigawatt-hours of storage CSIRO estimates Australia needs. Building pumped hydro storage systems near old coal-fired power generators has some advantages, such as access to transmission lines – although more will be needed as electricity demand increases. But plenty of other suitable sites exist, too. Filling the gaps Pumped hydro is a cheap, mature technology that currently provides more than 90% of the world’s electrical energy storage. It involves pumping water uphill from one reservoir to another at a higher elevation for storage. Then, when power is needed, water is released to flow downhill through turbines, generating electricity on its way to the lower reservoir. Together with battery storage, pumped hydro solves the very real problem of keeping the grid stable and reliable when it is dominated by solar and wind power. By 2030, 82% of Australia’s electricity supply is expected to come from renewables, up from about 40% today. But solar panels only work during the day and don’t produce as much power when it’s cloudy. And wind turbines don’t generate power when it’s calm. That’s where storage systems come in. They can charge up when electricity is plentiful and then release electricity when it’s needed. Grid-connected batteries can fill short-term gaps (from seconds to a few hours). Pumped hydro can store electricity overnight, and longer still. These two technologies can be used together to supply electricity through winter, and other periods of calm or cloudy weather. Two types of pumped-storage hydropower, one doesn’t require dams on rivers. NREL Finding pumped hydro near the Coalitions’s proposed nuclear sites Australia has three operating pumped hydro systems: Tumut 3 in the Snowy Mountains, Wivenhoe in Queensland, and Shoalhaven in the Kangaroo Valley of New South Wales. Two more are under construction, including Snowy 2.0. Even after all the cost blowouts, Snowy 2.0 comes at a modest construction cost of A$34 per kilowatt-hour of energy storage, which is ten times cheaper than the cost CSIRO estimates for large, new batteries. We previously developed a “global atlas” to identify potential locations for pumped hydro facilities around the world. More recently, we created a publicly available tool to filter results based on construction cost, system size, distance from transmission lines or roads, and away from environmentally sensitive locations. In this new analysis, we used the tool to find pumped hydro options near the sites the Coalition has chosen for nuclear power plants. Mapping 300 potential pumped hydro sites The proposed nuclear sites are: Liddell Power Station, New South Wales Mount Piper Power Station, New South Wales Loy Yang Power Stations, Victoria Tarong Power Station, Queensland Callide Power Station, Queensland Northern Power Station, South Australia (small modular reactor only) Muja Power Station, Western Australia (small modular reactor only). We used our tool to identify which of these seven sites would instead be suitable for a pumped hydro project, using the following criteria: low construction cost (for a pumped hydro project) located within 85km of the proposed nuclear sites. We included various reservoir types in our search: new reservoirs on undeveloped land (“greenfield” sites) repurposing existing reservoirs (“bluefield” sites) repurposing existing mining pits (“brownfield” sites). Exactly 300 sites matched our search criteria. No options emerged near the proposed nuclear site in Western Australia, but suitable sites lie further north in the mining region of the Pilbara. One option east of Melbourne, depicted in the image below, has a storage capacity of 500 gigawatt-hours. Compared with Snowy 2.0, this option has a much shorter tunnel, larger energy capacity, and larger height difference between the two reservoirs (increasing the potential energy stored in the water). And unlike Snowy 2.0, it is not located in a national park. Of course, shortlisted sites would require detailed assessment to confirm the local geology is suitable for pumped hydro, and to evaluate potential environmental and social impacts. More where that came from We restricted our search to sites near the Coalition’s proposed nuclear plants. But there are hundreds of potential pumped hydro sites along Australia’s east coast. Developers can use our free tool to identify the best sites. So far, the Australian electricity transition has mainly been driven by private investment in solar and wind power. With all this renewable energy entering the grid, there’s money to be made in storage, too. Large, centralised, baseload electricity generators, such as coal and nuclear plants, are becoming a thing of the past. A smarter energy policy would balance solar and wind with technologies such as pumped hydro, to secure a reliable electricity supply. Timothy Weber receives funding from the Australian government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and the Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics.Andrew Blakers receives funding from the Australian government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and other organisations.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.