Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

The State of the Planet in 10 Numbers

News Feed
Monday, November 20, 2023

CLIMATEWIRE | This story is part of POLITICO's COP28 Special Report.The COP28 climate summit comes at a critical moment for the planet.A summer that toppled heat records left a trail of disasters around the globe. The world may be just six years away from breaching the Paris Agreement’s temperature target of 1.5 degrees Celsius, setting the stage for much worse calamities to come. And governments are cutting their greenhouse gas pollution far too slowly to head off the problem — and haven’t coughed up the billions of dollars they promised to help poorer countries cope with the damage.This year’s summit, which starts on Nov. 30 in Dubai, will conclude the first assessment of what countries have achieved since signing the Paris accord in 2015.The forgone conclusion: They’ve made some progress. But not enough. The real question is what they do in response.To help understand the stakes, here’s a snapshot of the state of the planet — and global climate efforts — in 10 numbers.1.3 degrees CelsiusGlobal warming since the preindustrial eraHuman-caused greenhouse gas emissions have been driving global temperatures skyward since the 19th century, when the industrial revolution and the mass burning of fossil fuels began to affect the Earth’s climate. The world has already warmed by about 1.3 degrees Celsius, or 2.3 degrees Fahrenheit, and most of that warming has occurred since the 1970s. In the last 50 years, research suggests, global temperatures have risen at their fastest rate in at least 2,000 years.This past October concluded the Earth’s hottest 12-month span on record, a recent analysis found. And 2023 is virtually certain to be the hottest calendar year ever observed. It’s continuing a string of recent record-breakers — the world’s five hottest years on record have all occurred since 2015.Allowing warming to pass 2 degrees Celsius would tip the world into catastrophic changes, scientists have warned, including life-threatening heat extremes, worsening storms and wildfires, crop failures, accelerating sea-level rise and existential threats to some coastal communities and small island nations. Eight years ago in Paris, nearly every nation on Earth agreed to strive to keep temperatures well below that threshold, and under a more ambitious 1.5-degree threshold if at all possible.But with just fractions of a degree to go, that target is swiftly approaching — and many experts say it’s already all but out of reach.$4.3 trillionGlobal economic losses from climate disasters since 1970Climate-related disasters are worsening as temperatures rise. Heat waves are intensifying, tropical cyclones are strengthening, floods and droughts are growing more severe and wildfires are blazing bigger. Record-setting events struck all over the planet this year, a harbinger of new extremes to come. Scientists say such events will only accelerate as the world warms.Nearly 12,000 weather, climate and water-related disasters struck worldwide over the last five decades, the World Meteorological Organization reports. They’ve caused trillions of dollars in damage, and they’ve killed more than 2 million people.Ninety percent of these deaths have occurred in developing countries. Compared with wealthier nations, these countries have historically contributed little to the greenhouse gas emissions driving global warming — yet they disproportionately suffer the impacts of climate change.4.4 millimetersAnnual rate of sea-level riseGlobal sea levels are rapidly rising as the ice sheets melt and the oceans warm and expand. Scientists estimate that they’re now rising by about 4.4 millimeters, or about 0.17 inches, each year — and that rate is accelerating, increasing by about 1 millimeter every decade.Those sound like small numbers. They’re not.The world’s ice sheets and glaciers are losing a whopping 1.2 trillion tons of ice each year. Those losses are also speeding up, accelerating by at least 57 percent since the 1990s. Future sea-level rise mainly depends on future ice melt, which depends on future greenhouse gas emissions. With extreme warming, global sea levels will likely rise as much as 3 feet by the end of this century, enough to swamp many coastal communities, threaten freshwater supplies and submerge some small island nations.Some places are more vulnerable than others.“Low-lying islands in the Pacific are on the frontlines of the fight against sea-level rise,” said NASA sea-level expert Benjamin Hamlington. “In the U.S., the Southeast and Gulf Coasts are experiencing some of the highest rates of sea-level rise in the world and have very high future projections of sea level.”But in the long run, he added, “almost every coastline around the world is going to experience sea-level rise and will feel impacts.”Less than six yearsWhen the world could breach the 1.5-degree thresholdThe world is swiftly running out of time to meet its most ambitious international climate target: keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius. Humans can emit only another 250 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide and maintain at least even odds of meeting that goal, scientists say.That pollution threshold could arrive in as little as six years.That’s the bottom line from at least two recent studies, one published in June and one in October. Humans are pouring about 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, with each ton eating into the margin of error.The size of that carbon buffer is smaller than previous estimates have suggested, indicating that time is running out even faster than expected.“While our research shows it is still physically possible for the world to remain below 1.5C, it's difficult to see how that will stay the case for long,” said Robin Lamboll, a scientist at Imperial College London and lead author of the most recent study. “Unfortunately, net-zero dates for this target are rapidly approaching, without any sign that we are meeting them.”43 percentHow much greenhouse gas emissions must fall by 2030 to hit the temperature targetThe world would have to undergo a stark transformation during this decade to have any hope of meeting the Paris Agreement’s ambitious 1.5-degree cap.In a nutshell, global greenhouse gas emissions have to fall 43 percent by 2030, and 60 percent by 2035, before reaching net-zero by mid-century, according to a U.N. report published in September on the progress the world has made since signing the Paris Agreement. That would give the world a 50 percent chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.But based on the climate pledges that countries have made to date, greenhouse gas emissions are likely to fall by just 2 percent this decade, according to a U.N. assessment published this month.Governments are “taking baby steps to avert the climate crisis,” U.N. climate chief Simon Stiell said in a statement this month. “This means COP28 must be a clear turning point.”$1 trillion a yearClimate funding needs of developing countriesIn many ways, U.N. climate summits are all about finance. Cutting industries’ carbon pollution, protecting communities from extreme weather, rebuilding after climate disasters — it all costs money. And developing countries, in particular, don’t have enough of it.As financing needs grow, pressure is mounting on richer nations such as the U.S. that have produced the bulk of planet-warming emissions to help developing countries cut their own pollution and adapt to a warmer world. They also face growing calls to pay for the destruction wrought by climate change, known as loss and damage in U.N.-speak.But the flow of money from rich to poor countries has slowed. In October, a pledging conference to replenish the U.N.’s Green Climate Fund raised only $9.3 billion, even less than the $10 billion that countries had promised last time. An overdue promise by developed countries to deliver $100 billion a year by 2020 to help developing countries reduce emissions and adapt to rising temperatures was “likely” met last year, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said this month, while warning that adaptation finance had fallen by 14 percent in 2021.As a result, the gap between what developing countries need and how much money is flowing in their direction is growing. The OECD report said developing countries will need around $1 trillion a year for climate investments by 2025, “rising to roughly $2.4 trillion each year between 2026 and 2030.”$7 trillionWorldwide fossil fuel subsidies in 2022In stark contrast to the trickle of climate finance, fossil fuel subsidies have surged in recent years. In 2022, total spending on subsidies for oil, natural gas and coal reached a record $7 trillion, the International Monetary Fund said in August. That’s $2 trillion more than in 2020.Explicit subsidies — direct government support to reduce energy prices — more than doubled since 2020, to $1.3 trillion. But the majority of subsidies are implicit, representing the fact that governments don’t require fossil fuel companies to pay for the health and environmental damage that their products inflict on society.At the same time, countries continue pumping public and private money into fossil fuel production. This month, a U.N. report found that governments plan to produce more than twice the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with the 1.5-degree target.66,000 square kilometersGross deforestation worldwide in 2022At the COP26 climate summit two years ago in Glasgow, Scotland, nations committed to halting global deforestation by 2030. A total of 145 countries have signed the Glasgow Forest Declaration, representing more than 90 percent of global forest cover. Yet global action is still falling short of that target. The annual Forest Declaration Assessment, produced by a collection of research and civil society organizations, estimated that the world lost 66,000 square kilometers of forest last year, or about 25,000 square miles — a swath of territory slightly larger than West Virginia or Lithuania. Most of that loss came from tropical forests.Halting deforestation is a critical component of global climate action. The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warns that collective contributions from agriculture, forestry and land use compose as much as 21 percent of global human-caused carbon emissions. Deforestation releases large volumes of carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, and recent research suggests that carbon losses from tropical forests may have doubled since the early 2000s.Almost 1 billion tonsThe annual carbon dioxide removal gapGiven the world’s slow pace in reducing greenhouse gas pollution, scientists say a second approach is essential for slowing the Earth’s warming — removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.The technology for doing this is largely untested at scale, and won’t be cheap.A landmark report on carbon dioxide removals led by the University of Oxford earlier this year found that keeping warming to 2 degrees Celsius or less would require countries to collectively remove an additional 0.96 billion tons of CO2-equivalent a year by 2030.About 2 billion tons are now removed every year, but that is largely achieved through the natural absorption capacity of forests.Removing even more carbon will require countries to massively scale up carbon removal technologies, given the limited capacity of forests to absorb more carbon dioxide.Carbon removal technologies are in the spotlight at COP28, though some countries and companies want to use them to meet net-zero while continuing to burn fossil fuels. Scientists have been clear that carbon removal cannot be a substitute for steep emissions cuts.1,000 gigawattsAnnual growth in renewable power capacity needed to keep 1.5 degrees in reachThe shift from fossil fuels to renewables is underway, but the transition is still far too slow to meet the Paris Agreement targets.To keep 1.5 degrees within reach, the International Renewable Energy Agency estimates that the world needs to add 1,000 gigawatts in renewable energy capacity every year through 2030. By comparison, the United States’ entire utility-scale electricity-generation capacity was about 1,160 gigawatts last year, according to the Department of Energy.Last year, countries added about 300 gigawatts, according to the agency’s latest World Energy Transitions Outlook published in June.That shortfall has prompted the EU and the climate summit’s host nation, the United Arab Emirates, to campaign for nations to sign up to a target to triple the world’s renewable capacity by 2030 at COP28, a goal also supported by the U.S. and China.“The transition to clean energy is happening worldwide and it’s unstoppable,” International Energy Agency boss Fatih Birol said last month. “It’s not a question of ‘if’, it’s just a matter of ‘how soon’ — and the sooner the better for all of us.”This story is part of POLITICO's COP28 Special Report.Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Here is a snapshot of the warming world, from sea-level rise to fossil fuel subsidies to renewable energy growth

CLIMATEWIRE | This story is part of POLITICO's COP28 Special Report.

The COP28 climate summit comes at a critical moment for the planet.

A summer that toppled heat records left a trail of disasters around the globe. The world may be just six years away from breaching the Paris Agreement’s temperature target of 1.5 degrees Celsius, setting the stage for much worse calamities to come. And governments are cutting their greenhouse gas pollution far too slowly to head off the problem — and haven’t coughed up the billions of dollars they promised to help poorer countries cope with the damage.

This year’s summit, which starts on Nov. 30 in Dubai, will conclude the first assessment of what countries have achieved since signing the Paris accord in 2015.

The forgone conclusion: They’ve made some progress. But not enough. The real question is what they do in response.

To help understand the stakes, here’s a snapshot of the state of the planet — and global climate efforts — in 10 numbers.

1.3 degrees Celsius

Global warming since the preindustrial era

Human-caused greenhouse gas emissions have been driving global temperatures skyward since the 19th century, when the industrial revolution and the mass burning of fossil fuels began to affect the Earth’s climate. The world has already warmed by about 1.3 degrees Celsius, or 2.3 degrees Fahrenheit, and most of that warming has occurred since the 1970s. In the last 50 years, research suggests, global temperatures have risen at their fastest rate in at least 2,000 years.

This past October concluded the Earth’s hottest 12-month span on record, a recent analysis found. And 2023 is virtually certain to be the hottest calendar year ever observed. It’s continuing a string of recent record-breakers — the world’s five hottest years on record have all occurred since 2015.

Allowing warming to pass 2 degrees Celsius would tip the world into catastrophic changes, scientists have warned, including life-threatening heat extremes, worsening storms and wildfires, crop failures, accelerating sea-level rise and existential threats to some coastal communities and small island nations. Eight years ago in Paris, nearly every nation on Earth agreed to strive to keep temperatures well below that threshold, and under a more ambitious 1.5-degree threshold if at all possible.

But with just fractions of a degree to go, that target is swiftly approaching — and many experts say it’s already all but out of reach.

$4.3 trillion

Global economic losses from climate disasters since 1970

Climate-related disasters are worsening as temperatures rise. Heat waves are intensifying, tropical cyclones are strengthening, floods and droughts are growing more severe and wildfires are blazing bigger. Record-setting events struck all over the planet this year, a harbinger of new extremes to come. Scientists say such events will only accelerate as the world warms.

Nearly 12,000 weather, climate and water-related disasters struck worldwide over the last five decades, the World Meteorological Organization reports. They’ve caused trillions of dollars in damage, and they’ve killed more than 2 million people.

Ninety percent of these deaths have occurred in developing countries. Compared with wealthier nations, these countries have historically contributed little to the greenhouse gas emissions driving global warming — yet they disproportionately suffer the impacts of climate change.

4.4 millimeters

Annual rate of sea-level rise

Global sea levels are rapidly rising as the ice sheets melt and the oceans warm and expand. Scientists estimate that they’re now rising by about 4.4 millimeters, or about 0.17 inches, each year — and that rate is accelerating, increasing by about 1 millimeter every decade.

Those sound like small numbers. They’re not.

The world’s ice sheets and glaciers are losing a whopping 1.2 trillion tons of ice each year. Those losses are also speeding up, accelerating by at least 57 percent since the 1990s. Future sea-level rise mainly depends on future ice melt, which depends on future greenhouse gas emissions. With extreme warming, global sea levels will likely rise as much as 3 feet by the end of this century, enough to swamp many coastal communities, threaten freshwater supplies and submerge some small island nations.

Some places are more vulnerable than others.

“Low-lying islands in the Pacific are on the frontlines of the fight against sea-level rise,” said NASA sea-level expert Benjamin Hamlington. “In the U.S., the Southeast and Gulf Coasts are experiencing some of the highest rates of sea-level rise in the world and have very high future projections of sea level.”

But in the long run, he added, “almost every coastline around the world is going to experience sea-level rise and will feel impacts.”

Less than six years

When the world could breach the 1.5-degree threshold

The world is swiftly running out of time to meet its most ambitious international climate target: keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius. Humans can emit only another 250 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide and maintain at least even odds of meeting that goal, scientists say.

That pollution threshold could arrive in as little as six years.

That’s the bottom line from at least two recent studies, one published in June and one in October. Humans are pouring about 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, with each ton eating into the margin of error.

The size of that carbon buffer is smaller than previous estimates have suggested, indicating that time is running out even faster than expected.

“While our research shows it is still physically possible for the world to remain below 1.5C, it's difficult to see how that will stay the case for long,” said Robin Lamboll, a scientist at Imperial College London and lead author of the most recent study. “Unfortunately, net-zero dates for this target are rapidly approaching, without any sign that we are meeting them.”

43 percent

How much greenhouse gas emissions must fall by 2030 to hit the temperature target

The world would have to undergo a stark transformation during this decade to have any hope of meeting the Paris Agreement’s ambitious 1.5-degree cap.

In a nutshell, global greenhouse gas emissions have to fall 43 percent by 2030, and 60 percent by 2035, before reaching net-zero by mid-century, according to a U.N. report published in September on the progress the world has made since signing the Paris Agreement. That would give the world a 50 percent chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.

But based on the climate pledges that countries have made to date, greenhouse gas emissions are likely to fall by just 2 percent this decade, according to a U.N. assessment published this month.

Governments are “taking baby steps to avert the climate crisis,” U.N. climate chief Simon Stiell said in a statement this month. “This means COP28 must be a clear turning point.”

$1 trillion a year

Climate funding needs of developing countries

In many ways, U.N. climate summits are all about finance. Cutting industries’ carbon pollution, protecting communities from extreme weather, rebuilding after climate disasters — it all costs money. And developing countries, in particular, don’t have enough of it.

As financing needs grow, pressure is mounting on richer nations such as the U.S. that have produced the bulk of planet-warming emissions to help developing countries cut their own pollution and adapt to a warmer world. They also face growing calls to pay for the destruction wrought by climate change, known as loss and damage in U.N.-speak.

But the flow of money from rich to poor countries has slowed. In October, a pledging conference to replenish the U.N.’s Green Climate Fund raised only $9.3 billion, even less than the $10 billion that countries had promised last time. An overdue promise by developed countries to deliver $100 billion a year by 2020 to help developing countries reduce emissions and adapt to rising temperatures was “likely” met last year, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said this month, while warning that adaptation finance had fallen by 14 percent in 2021.

As a result, the gap between what developing countries need and how much money is flowing in their direction is growing. The OECD report said developing countries will need around $1 trillion a year for climate investments by 2025, “rising to roughly $2.4 trillion each year between 2026 and 2030.”

$7 trillion

Worldwide fossil fuel subsidies in 2022

In stark contrast to the trickle of climate finance, fossil fuel subsidies have surged in recent years. In 2022, total spending on subsidies for oil, natural gas and coal reached a record $7 trillion, the International Monetary Fund said in August. That’s $2 trillion more than in 2020.

Explicit subsidies — direct government support to reduce energy prices — more than doubled since 2020, to $1.3 trillion. But the majority of subsidies are implicit, representing the fact that governments don’t require fossil fuel companies to pay for the health and environmental damage that their products inflict on society.

At the same time, countries continue pumping public and private money into fossil fuel production. This month, a U.N. report found that governments plan to produce more than twice the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with the 1.5-degree target.

66,000 square kilometers

Gross deforestation worldwide in 2022

At the COP26 climate summit two years ago in Glasgow, Scotland, nations committed to halting global deforestation by 2030. A total of 145 countries have signed the Glasgow Forest Declaration, representing more than 90 percent of global forest cover. Yet global action is still falling short of that target. The annual Forest Declaration Assessment, produced by a collection of research and civil society organizations, estimated that the world lost 66,000 square kilometers of forest last year, or about 25,000 square miles — a swath of territory slightly larger than West Virginia or Lithuania. Most of that loss came from tropical forests.

Halting deforestation is a critical component of global climate action. The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warns that collective contributions from agriculture, forestry and land use compose as much as 21 percent of global human-caused carbon emissions. Deforestation releases large volumes of carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, and recent research suggests that carbon losses from tropical forests may have doubled since the early 2000s.

Almost 1 billion tons

The annual carbon dioxide removal gap

Given the world’s slow pace in reducing greenhouse gas pollution, scientists say a second approach is essential for slowing the Earth’s warming — removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

The technology for doing this is largely untested at scale, and won’t be cheap.

landmark report on carbon dioxide removals led by the University of Oxford earlier this year found that keeping warming to 2 degrees Celsius or less would require countries to collectively remove an additional 0.96 billion tons of CO2-equivalent a year by 2030.

About 2 billion tons are now removed every year, but that is largely achieved through the natural absorption capacity of forests.

Removing even more carbon will require countries to massively scale up carbon removal technologies, given the limited capacity of forests to absorb more carbon dioxide.

Carbon removal technologies are in the spotlight at COP28, though some countries and companies want to use them to meet net-zero while continuing to burn fossil fuels. Scientists have been clear that carbon removal cannot be a substitute for steep emissions cuts.

1,000 gigawatts

Annual growth in renewable power capacity needed to keep 1.5 degrees in reach

The shift from fossil fuels to renewables is underway, but the transition is still far too slow to meet the Paris Agreement targets.

To keep 1.5 degrees within reach, the International Renewable Energy Agency estimates that the world needs to add 1,000 gigawatts in renewable energy capacity every year through 2030. By comparison, the United States’ entire utility-scale electricity-generation capacity was about 1,160 gigawatts last year, according to the Department of Energy.

Last year, countries added about 300 gigawatts, according to the agency’s latest World Energy Transitions Outlook published in June.

That shortfall has prompted the EU and the climate summit’s host nation, the United Arab Emirates, to campaign for nations to sign up to a target to triple the world’s renewable capacity by 2030 at COP28, a goal also supported by the U.S. and China.

“The transition to clean energy is happening worldwide and it’s unstoppable,” International Energy Agency boss Fatih Birol said last month. “It’s not a question of ‘if’, it’s just a matter of ‘how soon’ — and the sooner the better for all of us.”

This story is part of POLITICO's COP28 Special Report.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

House votes to block Biden EV rule

The House on Wednesday voted in favor of blocking a Biden administration rule that’s expected to shift car sales in the U.S. significantly toward electric vehicles. The vote was 221-197. The rule in question could move car sales as far as to reach two-thirds electric by 2032. The bill approved by House Republicans on Wednesday...

The House on Wednesday voted in favor of blocking a Biden administration rule that’s expected to shift car sales in the U.S. significantly toward electric vehicles.  The vote was 221-197. The rule in question could move car sales as far as to reach two-thirds electric by 2032. The bill approved by House Republicans on Wednesday would also bar the Environmental Protection Agency from pursuing any rules that result in limited availability of gas-powered cars.  Despite its House passage, the legislation is not expected to gain traction in the Democratically-controlled Senate. The White House has already threatened to veto it. In its veto threat statement, The White House defended the rule as being “projected to save Americans $12,000 over the lifetime of a new light-duty vehicle by accelerating adoption of technologies that reduce fuel and maintenance costs alongside pollution.” It also lamented other provisions of the GOP bill that it said would “catastrophically impair EPA’s ability to issue automotive regulations that protect public health, save consumers money, strengthen American energy security, and protect American investments in the vehicle technologies of the future.” Republicans have criticized the EPA’s rule, saying that it is forcing a shift to electric vehicles that consumers do not want.  Bill sponsor Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) said during a Wednesday press conference that “this standard…is unattainable, it’s unaffordable and in fact it’s unrealistic.” “It takes away what we've always thought of as one of the most important principles of Americanism, and that's choice," he said. Members of the GOP are also trying to push for language to block the rule in an upcoming appropriations bill, with at least one member saying they would consider voting against a funding bill if it does not contain such a provision. 

Hampton Hills brings solar-equipped houses to Ellicott City, Md.

Buying New | Houses are certified as energy efficient

Hampton Hills brings solar-equipped houses to Ellicott City, Md.Fourteen single-family dwellings have been certified by federal program designed to offset energy consumption.December 6, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. ESTThe great room of the decorated model home at Hampton Hills in Ellicott City, Md. (Benjamin C Tankersley/For The Washington Post)● Address: 7000 Genevieve Way, Ellicott City, Md.● Type of House: Single-family● Prices: Starting at $1.1 million● Number of Units: 14 (two sold, 12 available)● Designs: Sycamore, Cypress, Mulberry, Willow● Square-footage: 2,916 to 4,690Hampton Hills is a community of solar-powered single-family houses next to a Howard County forest-conservation area in Ellicott City. The houses are certified by the U.S. Department of Energy as a Zero Energy Ready Home, indicating that most of their power consumption could be offset by a renewable energy system.Certified houses “are 40-50% more energy efficient than a typical new home,” Chance Hall, Maryland division president for Beazer Homes, said in an email. “This is important for homebuyers considering solar, amongst other factors such as home features and orientation.”The houses have Tesla solar roof tiles that resemble regular shingles. The tiles provide electricity to the house and charge a storage battery in the garage that powers the house at night and during outages. The houses also have car-charging stations, as well as Whirlpool appliances, Moen fixtures and Timberlake maple cabinets. Laminate floors are standard on the first floor, with carpet elsewhere. Oak stair treads are an upgrade.The houses also have the Environmental Protection Agency’s Indoor airPLUS designation, which indicates that the insulation, the windows and the heating and cooling system are sufficient to “stop air pollutants at the source and properly seal and ventilate the home,” Hall said.For the exterior, buyers have brick, stone and vinyl siding options.Hampton Hills houses have four basic designs. The floor plans vary, but they all have a first-floor great room and breakfast area with an electric fireplace and a covered rear deck as optional upgrades. The Sycamore, for instance, has a study; the Cypress has a study that can be converted to a dining room with access to the kitchen. The Mulberry and Willow have a study and a dining room. The Cypress, the Mulberry and the Willow have a bedroom with an en suite bathroom on the first floor.The Cypress, the Mulberry and the Willow have four bedrooms and a loft on the second floor. The Sycamore has three bedrooms with either a loft or a fourth bedroom. All units have a second-floor laundry room.All houses have a recreation room, a full bathroom and bedroom on the finished lower level. The Cypress has a three-car garage. Other models have two-car garages.Kitchens have stainless-steel electric appliances, including range, microwave, double wall oven, dishwasher and side-by-side refrigerator. They have quartz counters and tile backsplash. A beverage cooler is in the island cabinet. Sinks are in the island or on a counter in front of a window. A walk-in pantry can be upgraded to a butler’s pantry in the Cypress and Mulberry by connecting the kitchen to the dining room.The furnished Willow model home has dark-wood-stained cabinets on the wall and white cabinets in the island. Counters along the walls are white quartz; the island counter is dark quartz. The backsplash is gray, stone-look, subway tile. The sink is in front of a window and has a black faucet that matches the cabinet hardware.All units have at least three full bathrooms, including one on the lower level.The Cypress and Mulberry have full bathrooms on the first floor. The Willow has a full bathroom and a powder room. The Sycamore has a powder room.On the second floor, all designs have a primary bedroom with an en suite bathroom. The Cypress has two more bathrooms, one connected to a bedroom and one accessible from a bedroom and the hall. The Willow has a hall bathroom and a bathroom shared by two bedrooms. The Mulberry and the Sycamore have another hall bathroom each.Bathrooms have either a shower or a tub-shower combination. All units have quartz counters and tile shower surround and floor, Powder rooms have pedestal sinks. Primary bathrooms and one secondary bath on the second floor have two-sink vanities. Other full bathrooms have a one-sink vanity.In the decorated Willow model, there are five full bathrooms and one powder room. The primary bathroom, on the second floor, has upgraded marble-look tile on the floor, the shower surround and the ledge around the tub. The vanity has a white counter, black fixtures and a dark-wood-stained cabinet.The bathroom between two bedrooms in the model home has a double-sink vanity, a shower-tub combination, a white counter, a dark-wood cabinet and nickel hardware. Another bathroom has a single vanity, a shower and a white cabinet with nickel hardware.The first floor has a bedroom with an en suite bathroom, and that bathroom has a single-sink vanity, a shower, a white cabinet and black hardware. The full bathroom in the basement has a single-sink vanity, a shower, a white cabinet and nickel hardware.Nearby shops and restaurantsThe Ellicott City historic district is three miles away and has restaurants and stores. Long Gate Shopping Center is also about three miles away.Patapsco Valley State Park is about three miles away and has popular hiking spots such as Grist Mill Trail, Cascade Falls Trail and Swinging Bridge at Orange Grove.Illchester Elementary, Bonnie Branch Middle, Howard HighHampton Hills is about 30 miles northeast of Washington and about 12 miles southwest of Baltimore. The community has easy access to Routes 100 and 29.Hampton Hills is one of a few Zero Energy Ready Home communities in the nation, Hall said. The solar energy system “allows homeowners to power their home anytime and give back to the energy grid,” he said.

North Carolina Farms Were Properly Approved to Collect Energy From Hog Waste, Court Says

A North Carolina appeals court says several hog farms were properly allowed to collect energy from the animals’ waste

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Several hog farms in North Carolina were properly allowed to collect energy from the animals' waste, a state appeals court said Tuesday, ruling that their permit applications were scrutinized appropriately before their approval.A three-judge panel on the Court of Appeals ruled unanimously in favor of the state Department of Environmental Quality and for Murphy-Brown LLC, which sought the permits for four farms they own and operate in Duplin and Sampson counties. Murphy-Brown wanted to construct anaerobic waste digestion systems that would cover portions of open-air lagoons containing waste, which would let them capture methane and other biogas.Two environmental groups had challenged the approved permits, arguing that state law requires stricter pollution limits.The groups, Environmental Justice Community Action Network and Cape Fear River Watch, said the permits would lead to more pollution and harm water that their members rely on. They told the appeals judges that DEQ failed to consider some environmental standards set in state law. One that they cited declares “all permit decisions shall require that the practicable waste treatment and disposal alternative with the least adverse impact on the environment be utilized.”The groups unsuccessfully appealed DEQ’s authorizations in 2021 for the waste management systems to both an administrative law judge and a Superior Court judge.Writing for the panel, Judge Jefferson Griffin said that DEQ wasn't required to consider the standards described by the permit opponents to the proposed animal waste management systems. State law provides a less burdensome regulatory process, combined with its own requirements for best management practices and performance standards, for these operations, he wrote.The ruling is tempered because DEQ later granted general permits for three of the four farms that supersede the previous permits and that still allowed anaerobic digesters to be constructed. The environmental groups have filed separate, pending challenges to those new permits, the opinion said. A state law that took effect in October also attempts to clarify that animal waste management systems must obtain a permit process that is distinct from the process for permits for other sources of water pollution, according to the opinion.Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Federal Trade Commission Is Investigating ExxonMobil's $60B Deal to Acquire a Texas Oil Company

Security filings show the Federal Trade Commission is investigating ExxonMobil’s $60 billion deal to acquire a Texas oil company, potentially one the largest energy industry mergers in two decades

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal regulators are investigating ExxonMobil's $60 billion deal to acquire a Texas oil company in what would be one the largest mergers in the energy industry in two decades, according to securities filings.The Federal Trade Commission, which enforces federal antitrust law, has asked for additional information from the companies about Exxon’s proposed acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources. The request is a step the agency takes when reviewing whether a merger could be anticompetitive under U.S. law. Pioneer disclosed the request in a filing Tuesday. The investigation comes after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and 22 other Democratic senators urged the FTC to investigate the Exxon-Pioneer deal and a separate acquisition by oil giant Chevron, a proposed $53 billion purchase of Hess Corporation. Both deals are among the largest petroleum deals in U.S. history and could violate antitrust law, the Democrats said. There’s no public indication of a federal inquiry into the Chevron merger.Schumer said Tuesday he asked the FTC to "take a hard look at Exxon’s blockbuster merger and block it if it would lead to higher prices, hurt competition or force families to pay more at the pump. I’m glad the FTC is taking this step.''The FTC, which shares antitrust authority with the Justice Department, can sue in court to block a merger or decline to take action, effectively clearing the deal. A spokesman for the commission declined to comment Tuesday.Exxon has said the proposed deal with Texas-based Pioneer Resources would enhance U.S. energy security and benefit the American economy and consumers.Chevron said its proposed deal with New York-based Hess would strengthen long-term performance while “delivering higher returns and lower carbon” dioxide emissions that contribute to global warming.Both deals must be approved by federal regulators.Environmental groups have denounced what some called “merger mania” in the oil industry that threatens competition.“Exxon publicly promised to reduce emissions, yet subsequently spent $60 billion acquiring another fossil fuel company – doubling down on their commitment to oil and gas and putting profits over people,'' said Alex Witt of Climate Power, a left-leaning advocacy group founded by the Center for American Progress Action Fund, League of Conservation Voters and Sierra Club.“The FTC is right to investigate Exxon’s acquisition of Pioneer, which could raise prices at the pump and is aimed at keeping the U.S. reliant on fossil fuels,'' Witt said.Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Laser Leap: Organic Breakthrough Lights Up the Tech World

Scientists have achieved a breakthrough in creating an electrically driven organic semiconductor laser, paving the way for advanced and versatile laser applications. Researchers at the...

Scientists have made a pivotal advancement in creating compact laser technology using organic semiconductors. This development promises diverse applications, from enhancing OLED displays to aiding in disease detection and environmental monitoring. The new laser, which emits green light in short pulses, overcomes the traditional need for an external laser in organic semiconductor lasers. Scientists have achieved a breakthrough in creating an electrically driven organic semiconductor laser, paving the way for advanced and versatile laser applications. Researchers at the University of St. Andrews are leading a significant breakthrough in a decades-long challenge to develop compact laser technology. Lasers are used across the world for a huge range of applications in communications, medicine, surveying, manufacturing, and measurement. They are used to transmit information across the internet, for medical treatments, and even in the face scanner on phones. Most of these lasers are made from rigid, brittle, semiconductor crystals such as gallium arsenide. Organic semiconductors are a newer class of electronic material. Flexible, based on carbon and emitting visible light, they enable the simple fabrication of electronic devices. They are now widely used for the OLED (organic light-emitting diode) screens found in most mobile phones. A limitation of organic semiconductor lasers is that they typically need another laser to power them. Researchers have been working to overcome this limitation for 30 years, so it is particularly significant that scientists at the University of St Andrews have recently developed an electrically driven organic semiconductor laser. The team made this breakthrough, reported in the journal Nature, by first making an OLED with world-record light output and then carefully combining it with a polymer laser structure. This new type of laser emits a green laser beam consisting of short light pulses. For now, this is mainly a scientific breakthrough, but with future development, the laser could potentially be integrated with OLED displays and allow communication between them, or be used for spectroscopy for the detection of disease and environmental pollutants. Prof Ifor Samuel commented “Making an electrically driven laser from organic materials has been a huge challenge for researchers across the world. Now, after many years of hard work, we are delighted to have made this new type of laser.” Prof Graham Turnbull added, “We expect this new laser to use less energy in its manufacture, and in the future will generate laser light across the visible spectrum.” Reference: “Electrically driven organic laser using integrated OLED pumping” by Kou Yoshida, Junyi Gong, Alexander L. Kanibolotsky, Peter J. Skabara, Graham A. Turnbull and Ifor D. W. Samuel, 27 September 2023, Nature.DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06488-5

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.