Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Federal government has resumed talks with Ontario about the Ring of Fire: document

News Feed
Monday, February 27, 2023

By Emma McIntosh After a years-long stalemate over the far northern Ring of Fire, the federal government appears to have extended an olive branch to Ontario, resuming talks over the region’s future. The province has asked with increasing impatience for the federal government to chip in about $1 billion for a road to the remote and environmentally-sensitive Ring of Fire region, 540 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay, Ont. — a move that could enable mining there.  “My team and I have been thinking about next steps for the Ring of Fire and potential options for collaboration with the Government of Ontario and local First Nations in our approach to supporting critical mineral development in the region,” wrote Jeff Labonté, assistant deputy minister for lands and minerals at Natural Resources Canada, in an Oct. 3, 2022 email to request a meeting with his counterpart at the Ontario Ministry of Mines, Afsana Quereshi. “Thanks for reaching out, I look forward to the discussion,” Quereshi wrote back. The correspondence, obtained by The Narwhal through an access to information request, appeared to signal a shift in relations between the two governments on the file. We’re investigating Ontario’s environmental cuts The Narwhal’s Ontario bureau is telling stories you won’t find anywhere else. Keep up with the latest scoops by signing up for a weekly dose of our independent journalism. We’re investigating Ontario’s environmental cuts The Narwhal’s Ontario bureau is telling stories you won’t find anywhere else. Keep up with the latest scoops by signing up for a weekly dose of our independent journalism. Between 2019 and 2021, officials at the federal and Ontario governments were unable to schedule any formal meetings to discuss the Ring of Fire. The issue “fell through the cracks,” and senior officials had “no substantive discussions” about it, according to documents previously reported by The Narwhal.  The emails contained in this latest access to information request indicate Labonté and Quereshi had a meeting on Oct. 18., a couple of weeks after exchanging messages, with Natural Resources staff discussing a potential follow-up in the days soon after.  Two days later, Natural Resources Canada told The Narwhal on Oct. 20 that “no formal discussions have taken place regarding funding for roads to the Ring of Fire.” Natural Resources Canada declined to make Labonté available for an interview.  Anthony Ertl, a spokesperson for Natural Resources Canada, said there is “currently no formal framework” for talks between Ontario and Natural Resources Canada on the Ring of Fire, though they do discuss it “on an ad hoc basis.” Natural Resources Canada officials also met with several First Nations to discuss it in late 2022. The federal government hasn’t made any decisions about funding construction of access roads to the Ring of Fire, he added. The Ring of Fire is on Treaty 9 land, home to over a dozen First Nations. Many, like Neskantaga, have not consented to development affecting their territories. Photos: Sara Hylton / The Narwhal “This would be premature,” Ertl said.  “Regulatory processes related to mineral development need to be completed by respective Government of Ontario and Government of Canada regulators, as required by law, to determine whether projects could go ahead.” Ontario’s Ministry of Mines was not able to answer questions from The Narwhal by deadline.  The Ring of Fire — named after a Johnny Cash song and the shape of its mineral deposits on a map — is a pet project for Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has long promised to build an all-season road to the region to enable mining. Ford isn’t the first politician to try, but there are a few big reasons no one has succeeded so far. Right now it’s only possible to reach the Ring of Fire by plane, or ice road in the winter. Located in the boggy James Bay Lowlands, the peatlands there are difficult to build on. The area is also ecologically sensitive, a major carbon sink that naturally helps regulate the climate. It’s Treaty 9 land, home to more than a dozen Matawa and Mushkegowuk First Nations, most of which have not consented to development affecting their territories.  Federal Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson recently poured some cold water on enthusiasm around the Ring of Fire, saying there are outstanding “questions about development in that space.” Photo: Province of British Columbia / Flickr The Ontario government has committed $1 billion to build permanent roads to the Ring of Fire, but needs Ottawa to chip in the same amount to cover construction costs that have climbed to over $2 billion. And right now, there’s no clear evidence the minerals in the region will be worth the money it would take to get them out of the ground.  The federal government has signalled interest in the deposits in the Ring of Fire, some of which include items on its priority list of “critical minerals” needed to build lower-carbon technology like electric vehicles. But it has also said it would only invest in development in the region that is done “in an environmentally sustainable manner and in collaboration with local First Nations.”  The Narwhal reported in October that the federal government had quietly marked the Ring of Fire as a potential “priority” mineral deposit, which would make it eligible for some or all of a $1.5-billion sum set aside for mining infrastructure.  Though the two governments have now resumed negotiations, it’s not clear if that means the federal government is any closer to deciding whether or not it will fund roads to the Ring of Fire. Weeks after the Oct. 18 meeting, both Labonté and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson appeared to pour cold water on some of the hype around the Ring of Fire.  Labonté told The Globe and Mail in November that the federal government doesn’t see development in the Ring of Fire as an inevitability, and that “it may be that projects go forward; it may be that they won’t.” Days later, Wilkinson said there are outstanding “questions about development in that space” that would need to be addressed before anything major in the Ring of Fire can move forward. Ontario Premier Doug Ford isn’t the first politician to try and get access roads to the Ring of Fire built, but there are a few big reasons no one has succeeded so far. Construction in the remote, boggy region is difficult and expensive, it’s environmentally sensitive and not all First Nations are on board. Illustration: Shawn Parkinson / The Narwhal Neskantaga First Nation Chief Wayne Moonias, whose community is located near the Ring of Fire, said he’s frustrated the two levels of government are having discussions about the issue without including his nation. When representatives of Neskantaga met with Labonté in November, the senior bureaucrat told them Neskantaga would be involved in decision-making. Instead, Moonias said, it seems Natural Resources Canada and the Ontario government were already having “backroom discussions” without them. “This should send a red flag to other nations that are trying to ensure that they are also involved when their rights and interests are going to be impacted,” Moonias said. “That’s clearly a demonstration that Canada does not respect the rights of our people.” Ertl said Natural Resources Canada is committed to a “scientific, fact-based approach” to mineral development. Any federal decisions on the Ring of Fire will factor in consultation with First Nations and the Ontario government, along with economic, social and environmental data, Ertl said, noting that there are currently no proposed mining projects in the Ring of Fire under federal review.  “Before any decisions on mining development in the Ring of Fire are made, its potential impacts must be thoroughly studied, and meaningful consultation with impacted First Nations must be undertaken,” Ertl said.  Right now, there are no permanent roads to the Ring of Fire. It’s only accessible by plane, or ice roads in the winter. Photos: Sara Hylton / The Narwhal New interest in the Ring of Fire comes at the same time as a global rush for minerals Natural Resources Canada’s renewed interest in the Ring of Fire comes amid a flurry of activity around the possibility of mining there — and a push to secure supplies of certain minerals, part of broader efforts to deepen trade ties with allied democracies and cut off hostile countries like Russia and China. Canada must “fast-track” energy and mining projects important to its allies, including those that produce materials needed to make electric vehicles, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said in a speech in October. The mineral deposits in the Ring of Fire include nickel, a key component of electric vehicle batteries. The metal falls on Canada’s “critical mineral” list. Over the years, miners have also been interested in nearby deposits of chromium, which is used to make stainless steel.Across the border, a parallel rush for critical minerals is underway in the United States, where the Department of Defence is considering funding work in the Ring of Fire as well, The Globe and Mail reported last year. The U.S. government held meetings with several mining companies involved in critical mineral projects, including Ring of Fire Metals (formerly known as Noront Resources), a junior exploration company that’s leading efforts to mine the area. Ring of Fire Metals is owned by Australian firm Wyloo Metals. Backed by billionaire Andrew Forrest, the company bought Ring of Fire Metals last year. It has since registered to lobby the federal and provincial governments as it pushes to advance its Eagle’s Nest project in the Ring of Fire.  Andrew Forrest, one of the richest people in Australia, is backing Wyloo Metals, which bought Ring of Fire Metals last year. Formerly known as Noront Resources, the company has said it holds 85 per cent of mining rights in the Ring of Fire. Photo: Global Maritime Forum / Flickr Wyloo Metals spokesperson Leanne Franco said the company is “pleased” that the federal and provincial governments have resumed talks about the Ring of Fire, and that Ring of Fire Metals is prioritizing engagement with First Nations. “It is important that we listen to the views and aspirations of all the communities and make balanced decisions about future development in the region,” Franco said. At the same time, another important process that will shape the region’s future is still playing out: the federal government is conducting a regional assessment in the Ring of Fire, which is meant to look at the cumulative effects of development there. The assessment would inform any future projects, which would likely be subject to their own individual reviews.  So far, it’s been a bumpy process. The chiefs of five Treaty 9 communities — Attawapiskat, Eabametoong, Fort Albany, Kashechewan and Neskantaga First Nations — wrote to federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault in January to express concerns about the framework of the review, which they said was too narrow.  Neskantaga First Nation Chief Wayne Moonias said his community wants to know how its way of life and cultural practices would be protected if the Ring of Fire region were ever to be developed. Photos: Sara Hylton / The Narwhal Things had begun to look up since then, said Kate Kempton, a lawyer representing Attawapiskat. The five nations met with Guilbeault after sending the letter, and Kempton felt cautiously optimistic that the regional assessment is moving in the right direction. What happens next will depend on whether decision-makers focus on fact-finding in the best interests of the environment and the First Nations who live in the James Bay Lowlands.  “The problem with Canadian law on environmental protection is it’s far too politicized,” Kempton said. “Whatever anybody’s self interests are in making money out of this, money won’t matter at the end of the day. If we destroy the second most important carbon sink in the world, then we’re pooched … The facts will tell us, not the politics.”  The facts are important because road access to the Ring of Fire could have much larger impacts than just enabling mining. Many First Nations in the James Bay Lowlands are coping with several crises at the same time — youth suicides, long-term boil-water advisories, high food prices and more — caused by the ongoing impacts of colonization.  Elected chiefs and band councils at different First Nations have varying opinions on development in their homelands and how it could change their way of life. Individuals within communities have their own views, as well.  Ontario Minister of Mines George Pirie is leading the province’s efforts to secure funding for access roads to the Ring of Fire. Photo: Government of Ontario / Flickr “Our people need to be involved in these developments [that are] going to impact our way of life,” Moonias told The Narwhal. Neskantaga, for example, has started a sturgeon stewardship program on its river system, which is healthy — Moonias said the community would want to know how those types of practices would be protected if the area were to be developed. “We will stand our ground,” Moonias said. “We will defend our rights, our lands, our interests.” Other chiefs see access roads as a way to connect their communities to economic opportunities and better services. Webequie and Marten Falls First Nations are leading proposals for three road projects, all of which would be needed to fully link their communities with the Ring of Fire and the existing road network to the south.  Marten Falls Chief Bruce Achneepineskum and Webequie Chief Cornelius Wabasse didn’t answer interview requests by publication time.  The Ontario government is currently pursuing plans for three roads leading to the Ring of Fire. The proposals are being led by Webequie and Marten Falls First Nations. Map: Shawn Parkinson / The Narwhal The Ring of Fire has nickel — but it’s not the only place to get it Though the Ontario government is pushing to get roads to the Ring of Fire built quickly, the prospect is still far away — if it even happens. The possibility of mining is also uncertain. The regional assessment started three years ago and will likely take several more years. Any specific mining projects would have to undergo their own review processes, too. In the meantime, some question whether the minerals in the Ring of Fire will still be needed by the time all these reviews are done, and whether it should be the focus of so much effort. For example, electric vehicle batteries mostly require nickel right now, but some automakers are also looking at technology that doesn’t include the metal.  There are also other ways to get nickel. Recycled nickel accounted for about half of the consumption of the metal in the United States in 2021, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. One project in Sudbury, Ont., is aimed at recovering nickel from mine tailings. Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson has also said there are other projects in Canada that are further along than the Ring of Fire. Franco, of Wyloo Metals, pointed to some of the company’s reasons for pursuing its Eagle’s Nest project in the Ring of Fire — including that the nickel there is high grade, or highly concentrated, making mining more cost-effective and less emissions-intensive than lower-grade deposits. Anna Baggio, conservation director at the charity Wildlands League, said it’s not clear efforts to mine the Ring of Fire will be worth it, for people or the environment. “The costs are just way too high,” she said. Photo: Christopher Katsarov Luna / The Narwhal “Canada’s nickel mines produce the lowest carbon-footprint nickel in the world and Eagle’s Nest is the highest-grade undeveloped nickel ore body in Canada,” Franco said.  “The nickel from Eagle’s Nest will be processed for use in electric vehicle batteries that are fundamental to the energy transition and to achieving Canada’s climate goals.” Anna Baggio, conservation director at the charity Wildlands League, said it’s not clear to her that the Ring of Fire will actually be worth it, especially given the consequences for the environment.  “The more we learn about it, the more we’re like, wow, this is just not a place where we make sense for mining to happen,” Baggio said.  “The costs are just way too high. And with the rich carbon stores there … even a small portion of that area being developed will have massive carbon debt.” 

By Emma McIntosh Internal emails obtained by The Narwhal appear to show a shift in relations between the two governments on the Ring of Fire. But some First Nations leaders say they're still being left out

Ontario Ring of Fire: An aerial view of a camp with rows of tents in a clearing in the boreal forest

After a years-long stalemate over the far northern Ring of Fire, the federal government appears to have extended an olive branch to Ontario, resuming talks over the region’s future.

The province has asked with increasing impatience for the federal government to chip in about $1 billion for a road to the remote and environmentally-sensitive Ring of Fire region, 540 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay, Ont. — a move that could enable mining there. 

“My team and I have been thinking about next steps for the Ring of Fire and potential options for collaboration with the Government of Ontario and local First Nations in our approach to supporting critical mineral development in the region,” wrote Jeff Labonté, assistant deputy minister for lands and minerals at Natural Resources Canada, in an Oct. 3, 2022 email to request a meeting with his counterpart at the Ontario Ministry of Mines, Afsana Quereshi.

“Thanks for reaching out, I look forward to the discussion,” Quereshi wrote back.

The correspondence, obtained by The Narwhal through an access to information request, appeared to signal a shift in relations between the two governments on the file.

We’re investigating Ontario’s environmental cuts
The Narwhal’s Ontario bureau is telling stories you won’t find anywhere else. Keep up with the latest scoops by signing up for a weekly dose of our independent journalism.
We’re investigating Ontario’s environmental cuts
The Narwhal’s Ontario bureau is telling stories you won’t find anywhere else. Keep up with the latest scoops by signing up for a weekly dose of our independent journalism.

Between 2019 and 2021, officials at the federal and Ontario governments were unable to schedule any formal meetings to discuss the Ring of Fire. The issue “fell through the cracks,” and senior officials had “no substantive discussions” about it, according to documents previously reported by The Narwhal. 

The emails contained in this latest access to information request indicate Labonté and Quereshi had a meeting on Oct. 18., a couple of weeks after exchanging messages, with Natural Resources staff discussing a potential follow-up in the days soon after. 

Two days later, Natural Resources Canada told The Narwhal on Oct. 20 that “no formal discussions have taken place regarding funding for roads to the Ring of Fire.”

Natural Resources Canada declined to make Labonté available for an interview. 

Anthony Ertl, a spokesperson for Natural Resources Canada, said there is “currently no formal framework” for talks between Ontario and Natural Resources Canada on the Ring of Fire, though they do discuss it “on an ad hoc basis.” Natural Resources Canada officials also met with several First Nations to discuss it in late 2022. The federal government hasn’t made any decisions about funding construction of access roads to the Ring of Fire, he added.

“This would be premature,” Ertl said. 

“Regulatory processes related to mineral development need to be completed by respective Government of Ontario and Government of Canada regulators, as required by law, to determine whether projects could go ahead.”

Ontario’s Ministry of Mines was not able to answer questions from The Narwhal by deadline. 

The Ring of Fire — named after a Johnny Cash song and the shape of its mineral deposits on a map — is a pet project for Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has long promised to build an all-season road to the region to enable mining.

Ford isn’t the first politician to try, but there are a few big reasons no one has succeeded so far. Right now it’s only possible to reach the Ring of Fire by plane, or ice road in the winter. Located in the boggy James Bay Lowlands, the peatlands there are difficult to build on. The area is also ecologically sensitive, a major carbon sink that naturally helps regulate the climate. It’s Treaty 9 land, home to more than a dozen Matawa and Mushkegowuk First Nations, most of which have not consented to development affecting their territories. 

Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson
Federal Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson recently poured some cold water on enthusiasm around the Ring of Fire, saying there are outstanding “questions about development in that space.” Photo: Province of British Columbia / Flickr

The Ontario government has committed $1 billion to build permanent roads to the Ring of Fire, but needs Ottawa to chip in the same amount to cover construction costs that have climbed to over $2 billion. And right now, there’s no clear evidence the minerals in the region will be worth the money it would take to get them out of the ground. 

The federal government has signalled interest in the deposits in the Ring of Fire, some of which include items on its priority list of “critical minerals” needed to build lower-carbon technology like electric vehicles. But it has also said it would only invest in development in the region that is done “in an environmentally sustainable manner and in collaboration with local First Nations.” 

The Narwhal reported in October that the federal government had quietly marked the Ring of Fire as a potential “priority” mineral deposit, which would make it eligible for some or all of a $1.5-billion sum set aside for mining infrastructure. 

Though the two governments have now resumed negotiations, it’s not clear if that means the federal government is any closer to deciding whether or not it will fund roads to the Ring of Fire. Weeks after the Oct. 18 meeting, both Labonté and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson appeared to pour cold water on some of the hype around the Ring of Fire. 

Labonté told The Globe and Mail in November that the federal government doesn’t see development in the Ring of Fire as an inevitability, and that “it may be that projects go forward; it may be that they won’t.” Days later, Wilkinson said there are outstanding “questions about development in that space” that would need to be addressed before anything major in the Ring of Fire can move forward.

A road into the woods superimposed with an illustration of a ring of fire.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford isn’t the first politician to try and get access roads to the Ring of Fire built, but there are a few big reasons no one has succeeded so far. Construction in the remote, boggy region is difficult and expensive, it’s environmentally sensitive and not all First Nations are on board. Illustration: Shawn Parkinson / The Narwhal

Neskantaga First Nation Chief Wayne Moonias, whose community is located near the Ring of Fire, said he’s frustrated the two levels of government are having discussions about the issue without including his nation. When representatives of Neskantaga met with Labonté in November, the senior bureaucrat told them Neskantaga would be involved in decision-making. Instead, Moonias said, it seems Natural Resources Canada and the Ontario government were already having “backroom discussions” without them.

“This should send a red flag to other nations that are trying to ensure that they are also involved when their rights and interests are going to be impacted,” Moonias said.

“That’s clearly a demonstration that Canada does not respect the rights of our people.”

Ertl said Natural Resources Canada is committed to a “scientific, fact-based approach” to mineral development. Any federal decisions on the Ring of Fire will factor in consultation with First Nations and the Ontario government, along with economic, social and environmental data, Ertl said, noting that there are currently no proposed mining projects in the Ring of Fire under federal review. 

“Before any decisions on mining development in the Ring of Fire are made, its potential impacts must be thoroughly studied, and meaningful consultation with impacted First Nations must be undertaken,” Ertl said. 

New interest in the Ring of Fire comes at the same time as a global rush for minerals

Natural Resources Canada’s renewed interest in the Ring of Fire comes amid a flurry of activity around the possibility of mining there — and a push to secure supplies of certain minerals, part of broader efforts to deepen trade ties with allied democracies and cut off hostile countries like Russia and China. Canada must “fast-track” energy and mining projects important to its allies, including those that produce materials needed to make electric vehicles, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said in a speech in October.

The mineral deposits in the Ring of Fire include nickel, a key component of electric vehicle batteries. The metal falls on Canada’s “critical mineral” list. Over the years, miners have also been interested in nearby deposits of chromium, which is used to make stainless steel.

Across the border, a parallel rush for critical minerals is underway in the United States, where the Department of Defence is considering funding work in the Ring of Fire as well, The Globe and Mail reported last year. The U.S. government held meetings with several mining companies involved in critical mineral projects, including Ring of Fire Metals (formerly known as Noront Resources), a junior exploration company that’s leading efforts to mine the area.

Ring of Fire Metals is owned by Australian firm Wyloo Metals. Backed by billionaire Andrew Forrest, the company bought Ring of Fire Metals last year. It has since registered to lobby the federal and provincial governments as it pushes to advance its Eagle’s Nest project in the Ring of Fire. 

A man in a suit sits in front of a backdrop for an event as a woman with a clipboard sits in the foreground, out of focus
Andrew Forrest, one of the richest people in Australia, is backing Wyloo Metals, which bought Ring of Fire Metals last year. Formerly known as Noront Resources, the company has said it holds 85 per cent of mining rights in the Ring of Fire. Photo: Global Maritime Forum / Flickr

Wyloo Metals spokesperson Leanne Franco said the company is “pleased” that the federal and provincial governments have resumed talks about the Ring of Fire, and that Ring of Fire Metals is prioritizing engagement with First Nations.

“It is important that we listen to the views and aspirations of all the communities and make balanced decisions about future development in the region,” Franco said.

At the same time, another important process that will shape the region’s future is still playing out: the federal government is conducting a regional assessment in the Ring of Fire, which is meant to look at the cumulative effects of development there. The assessment would inform any future projects, which would likely be subject to their own individual reviews. 

So far, it’s been a bumpy process. The chiefs of five Treaty 9 communities — Attawapiskat, Eabametoong, Fort Albany, Kashechewan and Neskantaga First Nations — wrote to federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault in January to express concerns about the framework of the review, which they said was too narrow. 

Things had begun to look up since then, said Kate Kempton, a lawyer representing Attawapiskat. The five nations met with Guilbeault after sending the letter, and Kempton felt cautiously optimistic that the regional assessment is moving in the right direction. What happens next will depend on whether decision-makers focus on fact-finding in the best interests of the environment and the First Nations who live in the James Bay Lowlands. 

“The problem with Canadian law on environmental protection is it’s far too politicized,” Kempton said.

“Whatever anybody’s self interests are in making money out of this, money won’t matter at the end of the day. If we destroy the second most important carbon sink in the world, then we’re pooched … The facts will tell us, not the politics.” 

The facts are important because road access to the Ring of Fire could have much larger impacts than just enabling mining. Many First Nations in the James Bay Lowlands are coping with several crises at the same time — youth suicides, long-term boil-water advisories, high food prices and more — caused by the ongoing impacts of colonization. 

Elected chiefs and band councils at different First Nations have varying opinions on development in their homelands and how it could change their way of life. Individuals within communities have their own views, as well. 

Ontario Minister of Mines George Pirie speaks at a podium
Ontario Minister of Mines George Pirie is leading the province’s efforts to secure funding for access roads to the Ring of Fire. Photo: Government of Ontario / Flickr

“Our people need to be involved in these developments [that are] going to impact our way of life,” Moonias told The Narwhal. Neskantaga, for example, has started a sturgeon stewardship program on its river system, which is healthy — Moonias said the community would want to know how those types of practices would be protected if the area were to be developed.

“We will stand our ground,” Moonias said. “We will defend our rights, our lands, our interests.”

Other chiefs see access roads as a way to connect their communities to economic opportunities and better services. Webequie and Marten Falls First Nations are leading proposals for three road projects, all of which would be needed to fully link their communities with the Ring of Fire and the existing road network to the south. 

Marten Falls Chief Bruce Achneepineskum and Webequie Chief Cornelius Wabasse didn’t answer interview requests by publication time. 

A map of three road proposals to the Ring of Fire region in Ontario's Far North.
The Ontario government is currently pursuing plans for three roads leading to the Ring of Fire. The proposals are being led by Webequie and Marten Falls First Nations. Map: Shawn Parkinson / The Narwhal

The Ring of Fire has nickel — but it’s not the only place to get it

Though the Ontario government is pushing to get roads to the Ring of Fire built quickly, the prospect is still far away — if it even happens. The possibility of mining is also uncertain. The regional assessment started three years ago and will likely take several more years. Any specific mining projects would have to undergo their own review processes, too.

In the meantime, some question whether the minerals in the Ring of Fire will still be needed by the time all these reviews are done, and whether it should be the focus of so much effort. For example, electric vehicle batteries mostly require nickel right now, but some automakers are also looking at technology that doesn’t include the metal

There are also other ways to get nickel. Recycled nickel accounted for about half of the consumption of the metal in the United States in 2021, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. One project in Sudbury, Ont., is aimed at recovering nickel from mine tailings. Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson has also said there are other projects in Canada that are further along than the Ring of Fire.

Franco, of Wyloo Metals, pointed to some of the company’s reasons for pursuing its Eagle’s Nest project in the Ring of Fire — including that the nickel there is high grade, or highly concentrated, making mining more cost-effective and less emissions-intensive than lower-grade deposits.

Anna Baggio Wildlands League The Narwhal
Anna Baggio, conservation director at the charity Wildlands League, said it’s not clear efforts to mine the Ring of Fire will be worth it, for people or the environment. “The costs are just way too high,” she said. Photo: Christopher Katsarov Luna / The Narwhal

“Canada’s nickel mines produce the lowest carbon-footprint nickel in the world and Eagle’s Nest is the highest-grade undeveloped nickel ore body in Canada,” Franco said. 

“The nickel from Eagle’s Nest will be processed for use in electric vehicle batteries that are fundamental to the energy transition and to achieving Canada’s climate goals.”

Anna Baggio, conservation director at the charity Wildlands League, said it’s not clear to her that the Ring of Fire will actually be worth it, especially given the consequences for the environment. 

“The more we learn about it, the more we’re like, wow, this is just not a place where we make sense for mining to happen,” Baggio said. 

“The costs are just way too high. And with the rich carbon stores there … even a small portion of that area being developed will have massive carbon debt.” 

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

How California lawmakers greenlit ‘any flavor of affordable housing you could possibly want’

A patchwork of bills are giving housing developers and local governments more options to reduce red tape for housing projects.

In summary A patchwork of bills are giving housing developers and local governments more options to reduce red tape for housing projects. You may not have seen the headlines (there weren’t any). You may have missed the raucous debate (there wasn’t much of one). But with the end of the legislative session last week, California is now on the verge of laying down a welcome mat for most major affordable housing projects across the state. That’s not because of a single bill, but a patchwork of current and former legislation that, taken together, “basically covers any flavor of affordable housing you could possibly want to build,” said Linda Mandolini, president of Eden Housing, an affordable housing development nonprofit. Homes designated for low-income occupants, like all housing projects, face a gauntlet of potential challenges and hold-ups that add to the already exorbitant cost of affordable housing in California. Those hurdles include lawsuits filed under the wide-ranging California Environmental Quality Act, extensive public hearings and other forms of opposition from local government. Now, affordable housing projects — in most places and most of the time — may soon be exempt from all that, fitted out in a suit of procedural armor made up of some half a dozen bills and laws. A bill now sitting on the governor’s desk would cover up one of the last chinks in that armor. Assembly Bill 1449, authored by two Democratic Assemblymembers, David Alvarez of San Diego and Buffy Wicks of Oakland, would exempt certain affordable apartment developments from review under CEQA. To qualify, projects would have to be located in dense urban areas, set aside each unit for someone earning less than 80% the area median income and abide by stricter labor standards, among other requirements.  Though modest and technical-sounding, that’s unusually broad for new construction in California.  “I do think it’s gonna be very consequential but it’s kind of flown under the radar,” Alvarez said. His explanation why: “The politics of where Californians are and certainly where the Legislature is — we want to see results. We want to see housing being produced.” Learn more about legislators mentioned in this story D David Alvarez State Assembly, District 80 (Chula Vista) Expand for more about this legislator D David Alvarez State Assembly, District 80 (Chula Vista) Time in office 2022—present Background Small Business Owner Contact Email Legislator How he voted 2021-2022 Liberal Conservative District 80 Demographics Voter Registration Dem 47% GOP 20% No party 26% Campaign Contributions Asm. David Alvarez has taken at least $192,000 from the Finance, Insurance & Real Estate sector since he was elected to the legislature. That represents 9% of his total campaign contributions. Taken together with a handful of other bills and current laws, said Mark Stivers, a lobbyist with the California Housing Partnership, which co-sponsored AB 1449, the new legislation “effectively make it possible for affordable housing providers to develop nearly all viable sites in California by-right and exempt from CEQA review.” Speeding up approval for these projects comes with a trade-off. Environmental justice organizations, labor unions and various opponents of new development see CEQA as a vital tool to weigh in and on what gets built, where and and under what terms.  “Our communities rely heavily on CEQA to be able to get more information about proposed developments that might be contributing to further pollution,” said Grecia Orozco, a staff attorney with the nonprofit Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment.  Local activists also often flood the public meetings of city councils and planning boards to pressure elected officials to block unpopular projects or extract concessions from developers.  Whether AB 1449 and a handful of similar bills become law is now up to Gov. Gavin Newsom. Supporters have reason to be optimistic. The Newsom administration is pushing local governments to approve an unprecedented 2.5 million additional homes by 2030, he called the CEQA process “broken” and in the spring he rolled out a package of bills aimed at speeding up environmental challenges to projects — though housing was not included.  He has until Oct. 14 to sign or veto the bills now sitting on his desk. A patchwork of carve-outs  The Alvarez-Wicks bill isn’t the first legislative effort to grease the skids for new affordable housing.  Two others, both authored by San Francisco Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener, would force local governments to automatically approve apartment buildings in housing-strapped parts of the state and most affordable housing projects on the properties of houses of worship and nonprofit colleges, so long as they comply with a list zoning, affordability and labor requirements.  A third piece of legislation by San Jose Democratic Sen. Dave Cortese exempts the decision by local governments to fund affordable housing projects from environmental challenges, too. Newsom already signed it. “We want to see housing being produced.”Assemblymember David alvarez, democrat, chula vista Still awaiting the governor’s pen are a handful of bills that make it more difficult to stall housing projects though environmental lawsuits in general. That includes a bill by Sen. Nancy Skinner, a Berkeley Democrat, that would make it easier for courts to toss out environmental challenges they deem “frivolous” or “solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.” Another by Assemblymember Phil Ting, a San Francisco Democrat, would give local officials a deadline by which to approve or deny a project’s environmental review. The Ting proposal was fiercely opposed by many environmental activists and the State Building and Construction Trades Council, an umbrella group that represents many unionized construction workers. The bill would also make it more difficult for courts to award legal fees to groups that sue to block projects through CEQA. J.P. Rose, a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, which regularly brings such suits, called that provision “the largest weakening of CEQA in recent history.” The fact that this long list of bills passed the Legislature — some by healthy margins — amounts to a notable political shift, said Christopher Elmendorf, a law professor at UC Davis who advised Ting on the bill. “I think it illustrates that a sea change is underfoot in how people are starting to think about these environmental review laws,” he said, though he noted that the shift in California is still modest compared to those underway in other states.  Earlier this year, the Washington legislature nearly unanimously passed a law to exempt virtually all new urban housing from that state’s environmental protection law. The grand bargain continued Many of the California bills build on a law passed last year that streamlines affordable housing construction along commercial corridors.  In cobbling together the law, its author, Wicks, struck a compromise: In exempting certain housing projects from environmental challenge and other local hurdles, developers would pay workers a higher minimum wage, provide them with health care benefits and abide by other stricter labor standards. That trade was the key to winning the support of the state carpenters’ union and breaking up a legislative logjam that had stymied housing production bills for years.  It also provided a template for Wiener’s two streamlining bills this year, along with the Alvarez-Wicks CEQA exemption proposal.  “That really laid the foundation for those of us who did work in the housing space this year,” said Alvarez. “Our communities rely heavily on CEQA to be able to get more information about proposed developments that might be contributing to further pollution.”Grecia Orozco, staff attorney, the nonprofit Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment Not every pro-housing advocate or CEQA critic is so content with the bargain. “A lot of these bills help a little,” said Jennifer Hernandez, a land use attorney at the law firm Holland & Knight, who has catalogued CEQA challenges to housing projects for years. But she notes that swapping out the threat of environmental litigation with higher payroll expenses just replaces one cost with another.  In practice, she said, these exemptions are only likely to clear the way for substantial new housing construction in higher cost areas where developers can make up the difference by charging higher rents to non-subsidized residents. “You really need premium rentals to pay for those higher labor standards,” she said. But for many affordable housing developers, it’s still a trade worth making. “You’ve got really strong laws, clear exemptions, and an attorney general who’s willing to step up and say you got to build it,” said Mandolini with Eden Housing, who has been working on housing in the state for more than two decades. “This is the best it has been in California…If this had all existed 20 years ago, we might have built a lot more housing a lot faster.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.